Transit Administration Under Contract #MA-80-0006 with the Executive Office of Transportation Planning

Home , Braintree Split, Broad Canal, Lowell Connector, Massachusetts Route 9, Mumford River, Scott Brown (politician)

CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (CMMPO)

CMMPO Endorsed 2013-2016 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)

Prepared by the transportation staff of the

June 13, 2012

The preparation of this document has been financed in part through a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, under Contract #69650 with the Massachusetts Department of Transportation and through a grant from the Federal Transit Administration under Contract #MA-80-0006 with the Executive Office of Transportation Planning. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation.

Central Massachusetts Metropolitan Planning Organization Endorsement Sheet

• Endorsement of the FFY 2013-2016 Transportation Improvement Program & Air Quality Conformity Determination

Whereas, the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) require Metropolitan Planning Organizations within non-attainment areas and/or attainment areas with maintenance plans to perform air quality conformity determinations prior to the approval of transportation plans and transportation improvement programs, and at such other times as required by regulation;

Whereas, the air quality conformity analysis prepared for the 2013-2016 Transportation Improvement Program also demonstrates air quality conformity of the Central Massachusetts 2012 Regional Transportation Plan, and that all regionally significant transportation projects in the 2013-2016 Transportation Improvement Program are contained in the 2012 Regional Transportation Plan, and that all regionally significant projects in the 2015 to 2035 timeframe of the Regional Transportation Plan are modeled in the 2013-2016 Transportation Improvement Program’s air quality conformity analyses;

Whereas, the CMMPO has completed its review accordance with Section 176(c) (4) of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 [42 U.S.C. 7251 (a)}, and hereby certifies that the FFY 2013-2016 TIP is financially constrained and that the implementation of the Central Massachusetts 2012 Regional Transportation Plan satisfies the conformity criteria specified in both 40 CFR Part 51 and 93 (8/15/1997) and 310 CMR 60.03 (12/30/1994). Based on the results of the conformity analyses, the Central Massachusetts 2012 Regional Transportation Plan and FFY 2013-2016 TIP are consistent with the air quality goals of, and in conformity with, the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan;

Therefore, in accordance with 23 CFR Part 450 Section 322 (Development and content of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan) of the March 16, 2007 Final Rules for Statewide and Metropolitan Planning, the MPO hereby endorses the FFY 2013-2016 Transportation Improvement Program.

1 2 Central Massachusetts Metropolitan Planning Organization

Listing of CMMPO Members:

1. David Delanski, West Subregion Representative 2. Maurice Depalo, Northeast Subregion Representative 3. Francis DePaola, Acting Administrator, MassDOT-Highway 4. John Hebert, Southeast Subregion Representative 5. Dennis Lemarche, Southwest Subregion Representative 6. Otto R. Lies, CMRPC Chairperson 7. Edith Morgan, North Subregion Representative 8. Richard A. Davey, Secretary of Transportation, MassDOT 9. Michael O’Brien, Worcester City Manager 10. Stephen O’Neil, WRTA Chairperson

Ex-Officio Members (Non-Voting):

1. William Gordon, P.E., FTA 2. Pamela S Stephenson, FHWA 3. Paul F. Maloney, P.E., FHWA Liaison 4. Steven J. Tyler, P.E., MPO Advisory Committee

Listing of MPO Advisory Committee Members and Organizations:

1. Marie Angelini, P&W Railroad 2. Silvio Baruzzi, Town of West Boylston 3. Dan Bigda, North Brookfield Railroad 4. Bradford G. Blodget, Private Citizen 5. Andrea Briggs, Massachusetts DEP 6. Adam Burney, Town of Auburn 7. Deborah D. Cary, Mass. Audubon 8. Dawn E. Clark, TPAG member 9. Laurie Connors, Town of Millbury 10. Heather Gould, City of Worcester 11. David F. Johnson, Quinsigamond Village Community Center 12. John Knipe, Town of Shrewsbury 13. Laurie Scarbrough, MassDOT-H District 2 14. Wendy Steinhilber, PTM Brokerage Services Inc. 15. Jessica Strunkin, 495/Metrowest Partnership 16. Ann Sullivan, MassDOT-H District 3 17. Steven J Tyler, P.E., Town of Spencer 18. Karin Valentine Goins, Private Citizen

3 Table of Contents

Central Massachusetts Metropolitan Planning Organization Endorsement Sheet 1

• CMMPO Endorsement 2 • CMMPO & MPO Advisory Committee Members 3

Part A: Introduction 7

1.) TIP Development Schedule 15

2.) Public Participation 17

• TIP Development Summary 27 • MassDOT Correspondence 28 • FHWA Correspondence 47

3.) Summary of Transportation Funding Programs 57

4.) Project Selection 58

5.) Amendment / Modification Procedures 66

Part B: Regional Transportation Projects, Consolidated Listing 69

1.) Federal-aid & NFA Highway-Related Listing 70

• Green House Gas (GHG) Tracking in the Central Massachusetts Planning Region 82 • FY 2013 Project Locus Maps 97 • Supplementary Project Listing 101

2.) Federal-aid & NFA Transit-Related Listing 105

Part C: Federal Requirements 114

1.) Certification of the “3C” Planning Process 115

2.) Federal Transportation Project Priorities 117

• FHWA Related Project Listing 117 • FTA Related Project Listing 127 • Demonstration of Federal-Aid Funding Target Financial Constraint: Highway & Transit 136 • Consultation Efforts 139 • Environmental Justice Review 142

4 • Congestion Management Process (CMP) Summary 148 • Highway Safety Improvement Program: Supporting Documentation 151

3.) Listing of Regionally Significant Projects 154

• Advanced Construction 161 • SAFETEA-LU High Priority Project (HPP) & Transportation Improvements (TI)Project Descriptions 164 • TEA-21 High Priority Project (HPP) Project Descriptions 167 • Projects Included in National OMNIBUS Legislation – 100% Federally Funded 168 • Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 174 • Transportation Demand Management Program 177

4.) Statewide Projects 180

A. Operating & Maintenance Expenditures 181 – Highway 181 – Transit 181 B. Statewide Infrastructure Program 185 C. Statewide Bridge Maintenance Program 186 D. Statewide Bridge Replace/Rehabilitate Program 187 E. Interstate Maintenance Program 192 F. National Highway System (NHS) Pavement Preservation Program 193 G. Statewide Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Program 194 H. Highway Safety Improvement Program 195 I. Summary of the Region’s Accelerated Bridge Program (ABP) 196 J. Intelligent Transportation Systems Program 197 K. Statewide Transportation Enhancement Program 199 L. Safe Routes to Schools Program 200 M. Statewide Storm Water Retrofits Program 201 N. Statewide ADA Implementation Program 202

5.) Status of Current FY 2012 Projects 203

• Highway Projects 203 • Transit Projects (“Attachment B”) 203

6.) Air Quality Conformity Determination 206

• Backround 206 • Timely Implementation of Transportation Control Measures 207 • Air Quality Conformity Analysis 208 • Regionally Significant Projects Included in the Regional Transportation Models for the Eastern Massachusetts Ozone Non-Attainment Area 209

5 Part D: Reference Materials 213

1.) Regional Maps 214

• CMRPC’s Designated Transportation Subregions 215 • CMRPC Regional Transportation Networks Map 216 • WRTA 2012 Member Municipalities 217 • MassDOT District Boundaries 218

2.) Listing of Transportation-Related Acronyms 219

Also, See Accompanying TIP’s Technical Appendix

• CMMPO Endorsed Public Outreach Program • Community Correspondence

Part A:

Introduction

The Transportation Improvement Program of the Central Massachusetts Metropolitan Planning Organization (CMMPO), commonly referred to as the “TIP”, is a federally required planning document that lists all highway, bridge, transit and intermodal projects in the Central Massachusetts planning region that are programmed to receive federal-aid funding. In this most current TIP, projects are listed for federal fiscal years 2013 through 2016. Projects of regional & statewide significance as well as projects that improve air quality are also listed in the TIP document. Non federal-aid (NFA), or state-funded, projects are included as well, an example being the state’s Accelerated Bridge Program (ABP). Cognizant of limited statewide transportation funding resources, the annual program of projects must demonstrate financial constraint within the federal-aid funding targets established for each of the state’s MPOs by the Office of Transportation Planning.

The transportation staff of the Central Massachusetts Regional Planning Commission (CMRPC), working on behalf of the entire CMMPO, revises the TIP project listing on an annual basis. Amendments and adjustments to the TIP also occur periodically. The CMMPO’s local members are the Commission, the Worcester Regional Transit Authority (WRTA) and six local elected officials, while the state members are MassDOT and MassDOT-Highway Division. Project priorities (among other policy matters) are also considered by the CMMPO Advisory Committee.

The prioritization process combines an exchange of project information and evaluation of project importance. An established set of Transportation Evaluation Criteria (TEC) factors is considered for each eligible project. The CMRPC transportation staff, working with the MassDOT-Highway District #2 & #3, accumulates engineering design, right-of- way and environmental status information for each TIP project. If necessary, appropriate community personnel and/or engineering consultants are also contacted to obtain design status updates. Throughout the development of the TIP, the CMMPO oversees an extensive outreach effort, following their endorsed Public Outreach Program (POP), that provides ample opportunity for public involvement and participation. Typically commencing in late winter, the TIP development process ends in June when the CMMPO acts to endorse the finalized project listing.

At that time, the CMMPO Endorsed TIP is forwarded to MassDOT where it is combined with the TIPs produced by all of the MPOs throughout the state. The resulting document, referred to as the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), is forwarded to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for approval. Only after obtaining these approvals can federal-aid transportation funds be made available to construct the projects included in the TIP.

Summarized below are some of the major techniques, procedures and approaches used in the region’s annual TIP development effort:

• Visualization Techniques: The use of in-house GIS capabilities to indicate project locations using aerial photography and Pictometry images as well as digital photographs taken in the field.

• Environmental Consultation: Through periodic meetings, engaging the environmental community in dialogue regarding key areas of environmental concern associated with both current and proposed TIP projects, along with potential mitigation strategies. Further, continuing to evolve a cooperative process that considers existing conservation, economic, historic and land use plans when projects are being considered for placement on the TIP. GIS based “Environmental Profiles” are also used to provide a visual reference to environmental constraints and challenges.

• Environmental Justice: Continuing staff participation in statewide efforts aimed at establishing a standard approach to assessing both the benefits and adverse impacts resulting from TIP projects proposed for implementation in identified “EJ” areas.

• Highway Safety Improvement Program: Projects analytically derived through an operational “HSIP” will be considered for TIP programming by the CMMPO.

• Congestion Mitigation Air Quality: The completion of required calculations and the compilation of other standard materials necessary to support projects programmed under the “CMAQ” funding category. Attending meetings of the CMAQ Consultation Committee in order to obtain project approval as necessary and to stay informed on other state activities and potential new requirements for the CMMPO region.

• Intelligent Transportation Systems: Fully considering the potential for “ITS” applications, both stand alone and project-specific, throughout the development of the TIP project listings for highway and transit. Staff provides ITS overviews to both the CMMPO and their standing Advisory Committee.

• Transportation Evaluation Criteria: Continuing to utilize the “TEC” established by EOT-OTP in the development of the 2013 to 2016 TIP project listing. Potential regional target-funded projects will be evaluated for each of the TIP’s four fiscal years. The results of the evaluation, along with other critical benchmark data concerning project status and readiness as requested by the CMMPO, are used to assist in the selection of TIP target projects for review and eventual approval by the CMMPO. It is envisioned that this will be a continuing, cooperative process among the RPAs, RTAs, MassDOT and the MassDOT-Highway district offices.

The following standard procedures are employed:

1. Select a set of projects to evaluate (or re-evaluate, as appropriate) 2. Gather and record data 3. Evaluate and score projects 4. Summarize results and report to CMMPO for review and approval 5. Develop Draft TIP project listings for CMMPO review and approval

• Public Outreach: Insuring early involvement of local legislators, chief local officials, stakeholders, citizens and other interested parties through the CMMPO’s formal Public Outreach Program (POP) with full consideration of the principles of Environmental Justice, including special meetings such as community-targeted TIP information sessions. The region’s communities will continue to be contacted periodically by staff, on behalf of the CMMPO, for project information and status updates.

• Implementing Agencies: As deemed necessary, meeting with the MassDOT District #2 and #3 Directors and staff as well as staff from OTP and the Capital Expenditure and Program Office (CEPO) as needed to develop project information. Similarly, as necessary, meeting with the WRTA Administrator concerning transit-related projects.

• Technical Assistance: Providing limited technical assistance to municipalities and public agencies as applicable in completing and submitting Project Need Forms (PNF) detailing potential highway and bridge projects for initial MassDOT review. When submitting PNFs for potential new projects, the communities are asked to prioritize their new requests and any other projects previously programmed for target funding.

701 CMR 7.00 Use of Road Flaggers and Police Details on Public Works Projects

701 CMR 7.00 (the Regulation) was promulgated and became law on October 3, 2008. Under this Regulation, the CMR is applicable to any Public works Project that is performed within the limits of, or that impact traffic on, any Public Road. The Municipal Limitation referenced in this Regulation is applicable only to projects where the Municipality is the Awarding Authority.

For all projects contained in the TIP, the Commonwealth is the Awarding Authority. Therefore, all projects must be considered and implemented in accordance with 701 CMR 7.00, and the Road Flagger and Police Detail Guidelines.

By placing a project on the TIP, the Municipality acknowledges that 701 CMR 7.00 is applicable to its project and design and construction will be fully compliant with this Regulation.

This information, and additional information relative to guidance and implementation of the Regulation can be found at the following link on the MassDOT Highway Division website: http://www.massdot.state.ma.us/Highway/flaggers/main.aspx

11 The Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EEA) is pleased to provide this Smart Growth/Smart Energy Toolkit on behalf of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This Toolkit provides easy access to information on planning, zoning, subdivision, site design, and building construction techniques that can make smart growth and smart energy a reality in your community. The materials are designed to increase understanding of smart growth/smart energy tools and policies, as well as how to customize and apply the techniques to suit local circumstances. The Commonwealth encourages communities to adopt and implement these smart growth/smart Click here to access energy measures in order to realize the many environmental, Governor Patrick's fiscal, and social benefits of smarter energy and smarter land Clean Energy & use. Smart Growth-Smart Energy webpage! Integration of Smart Growth / Smart Energy into Comprehensive Planning

Planning - the importance of context to successful implementation of smart growth/smart energy techniques

Successful implementation of these measures will require planning. Adoption of any of the techniques included here will require customization, and communities should not simply copy and use model bylaws, either those provided here or found elsewhere, without Interactive Case modifications to address circumstances within the community. Ideally, users of this Toolkit Study Map will take a comprehensive approach. At a minimum, once a decision has been made to pursue implementation of a particular technique, such as open space residential design, community meetings will be needed to answer basic questions about how the model provided will be customized to meet local needs and goals.

12 Municipalities have important choices to make when implementing any of these techniques including the areas within the community where a technique will be applied and the appropriate permitting authority and mechanism. To ensure that choices are made on the basis of a good understanding of citizen desires, communities are encouraged to plan in advance of, and involve the public prior to, implementing any of these techniques. Especially considering that a two-thirds vote at town meeting or by city council will be required for zoning approval, understanding or arriving at a consensus about community objectives and planning techniques is important early in the adoption process. Master, community development, open space, housing, transportation, capital facilities, climate action, and other types of plans all provide a foundation for reaching such consensus; the public process associated with planning greatly increases the odds of adoption.

Comprehensive Planning in the Urban Setting

Achieving Smart Growth / Smart Energy on the Community Scale

An important point that should be kept in mind when utilizing this Toolkit is that smart growth or smart energy objectives are unlikely to be accomplished via the passage and implementation of a single technique. While each technique in this Toolkit will achieve certain important goals, and move a community in the direction of smart growth and smart energy, a more comprehensive approach is likely to be necessary. Another reason to plan in advance of implementing the measures included in the Toolkit is to determine a mix of techniques necessary to achieve municipal goals. Included below are several typical scenarios illustrating how smart growth and clean energy initiatives often involve a long-term and multi-faceted campaign to realize a community's vision.

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts offers several incentives to implement smart growth/smart energy plans, regulations, and site and building designs. The Commonwealth Capital Policy provides financial incentive to communities to adopt clean energy practices and apply smart growth principles. MGL Chapter 40R provides incentive payments when "smart growth zoning districts" are adopted and, again, when building permits are issued. In addition, agencies of the Commonwealth, including the Department of Housing and Community Development and the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs, offer technical assistance.

13 Sustainable Development Principles The Commonwealth of Massachusetts shall care for the built and natural environment by promoting sustainable development through integrated energy and environment, housing and economic development, transportation and other policies, programs, investments, and regulations. The Commonwealth will encourage the coordination and cooperation of all agencies, invest public funds wisely in smart growth and equitable development, give priority to investments that will deliver good jobs and good wages, transit access, housing, and open space, in accordance with the following sustainable development principles. Furthermore, the Commonwealth shall seek to advance these principles in partnership with regional and municipal governments, non-profit organizations, business, and other stakeholders.

1. Concentrate Development and Mix Uses Support the revitalization of city and town centers and neighborhoods by promoting development that is compact, conserves land, protects historic resources, and integrates uses. Encourage remediation and reuse of existing sites, structures, and infrastructure rather than new construction in undeveloped areas. Create pedestrian friendly districts and neighborhoods that mix commercial, civic, cultural, educational, and recreational activities with open spaces and homes.

2. Advance Equity Promote equitable sharing of the benefits and burdens of development. Provide technical and strategic support for inclusive community planning and decision making to ensure social, economic, and environmental justice. Ensure that the interests of future generations are not compromised by today's decisions.

3. Make Efficient Decisions Make regulatory and permitting processes for development clear, predictable, coordinated, and timely in accordance with smart growth and environmental stewardship.

4. Protect Land and Ecosystems Protect and restore environmentally sensitive lands, natural resources, agricultural lands, critical habitats, wetlands and water resources, and cultural and historic landscapes. Increase the quantity, quality and accessibility of open spaces and recreational opportunities.

5. Use Natural Resources Wisely Construct and promote developments, buildings, and infrastructure that conserve natural resources by reducing waste and pollution through efficient use of land, energy, water, and materials.

6. Expand Housing Opportunities Support the construction and rehabilitation of homes to meet the needs of people of all abilities, income levels, and household types. Build homes near jobs, transit, and where services are available. Foster the development of housing, particularly multifamily and smaller single-family homes, in a way that is compatible with a community's character and vision and with providing new housing choices for people of all means. 7. Provide Transportation Choice Maintain and expand transportation options that maximize mobility, reduce congestion, conserve fuel and improve air quality. Prioritize rail, bus, boat, rapid and surface transit, shared-vehicle and shared-ride services, bicycling, and walking. Invest strategically in existing and new passenger and freight transportation infrastructure that supports sound economic development consistent with smart growth objectives.

8. Increase Job and Business Opportunities Attract businesses and jobs to locations near housing, infrastructure, and transportation options. Promote economic development in industry clusters. Expand access to education, training, and entrepreneurial opportunities. Support the growth of local businesses, including sustainable natural resource-based businesses, such as agriculture, forestry, clean energy technology, and fisheries.

9. Promote Clean Energy Maximize energy efficiency and renewable energy opportunities. Support energy conservation strategies, local clean power generation, distributed generation technologies, and innovative industries. Reduce greenhouse gas emissions and consumption of fossil fuels.

10. Plan Regionally Support the development and implementation of local and regional, state and interstate plans that have broad public support and are consistent with these principles. Foster development projects, land and water conservation, transportation and housing that have a regional or multi-community benefit. Consider the long-term costs and benefits to the Commonwealth.

1.) TIP Development Schedule

15 2013 to 2016 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP): REVISED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE

March 14, 2012: CMMPO Meeting. MassDOT provides 2013 to 2016 regional federal-aid funding targets for TIP development purposes.

March 28, 2012: Annual development of the TIP commences with regionwide distribution of community outreach letter requesting status updates for all previously submitted, active projects.

April 11, 2012: CMMPO meeting. Annual TIP development effort introduced.

April 12, 2012: “TIP Development Day” to be held at the MassDOT Highway Division District #3 office. The status of eligible TIP projects will be reviewed to inform the MPO’s programming efforts. (This is a MassDOT/CMRPC-only working session.)

April 25, 2012: CMMPO “TIP Development Workshop” 4:30 PM. Future year projects tentatively programmed for anticipated federal- aid funding using “worksheet” format.

May 8, 2012: Due date for the submittal of community project status updates, 4:30 PM.

May 9, 2012: CMMPO meeting 4:30 PM. Workshop results reviewed, projects selected for programming. Draft TIP project listings established after considering range of available options. Approved Draft TIP listings released for public review and comment; listings available on CMRPC website. 30-day public review & comment period begins, legal ad appears in the T&G and regionwide mailing invites all interested parties to attend public meeting.

May 23, 2012: CMMPO Advisory Committee Meeting, 3:00 PM.

May 23, 2012: 2013 to 2016 TIP Public Meeting, CMRPC conference room, Union Station, 5 PM.

June 12, 2012: Public comment period on Final Draft TIP closed, 4:30 PM

June 13, 2012: CMMPO meeting 4:30 PM. Endorsement of Final TIP document considered after review of all submitted comment. TIP documentation subsequently finalized for federal agency review with accompanying Technical Appendix materials.

June 20, 2012: “TIP Environmental Consultation Session” held at Union Station, 10 AM.

July/August/ September 2012: Federal agency review of CMMPO Endorsed TIP underway.

October 1, 2012: Federally approved CMMPO Endorsed TIP is in effect and available for distribution to interested parties.

2.) Public Participation

The CMMPO TIP document customarily includes a comprehensive overview of the proactive public outreach process used throughout the development of the TIP. As seen from the “TIP Development Schedule”, from March through June 2012 the CMMPO guided the CMRPC staff as the TIP project listings and supporting documentation were compiled. Further, the CMMPO Advisory Committee provided ongoing technical advice concerning the compilation of the TIP.

The TIP project listings for highway and transit evolved from the preliminary and draft project listings to that eventually endorsed by the CMMPO. During May, the Draft TIP document was released by the CMMPO for the federally-required 30-day public review and comment period. In addition, a public meeting was held on May 23, 2012 to discuss the compilation of the TIP and to allow for the submittal of public comment. (The minutes from the public meeting are included in this document.) Finally, on June 13, 2012 after considering all submitted comment from various decision makers, stakeholders and other interested parties, the CMMPO voted unanimously to endorse the 2013 to 2016 TIP.

30-DAY PUBLIC REVIEW & COMMENT PERIOD: SUBMITTED COMMENT SUMMARY

All substantive comment received on the Draft TIP during the 30-day public review and comment period, summarized on the following pages, was brought before the CMMPO for their full consideration prior to the commencement of document endorsement proceedings. In response to the comments, the TIP project listings and documentation were edited and refined by staff as needed and as approved by the CMMPO.

17 SUMMARY OF SUBMITTED PUBLIC COMMENT ON 2013‐16 TIP DOCUMENT

• State Sen. Stephen Brewer wrote in support of the Barre Town common project (604227). He wrote separately to support projects in West Brookfield, in the center of town at School and Church streets and for general Route 9 resurfacing needs.

• The Barre Common Oversight Committee wrote in support of the Barre Town common project (604227) and provided a status update on design work.

• The Town of Brookfield wrote to indicate that it was planning to pursue engineering design work for a resurfacing project with a safety aspect on Route 148 (603486).

• Nancy Runkle, Dudley town planner, wrote in support of the Center Road project (605390). She provided an extensive update and timeline depicting progress to date. The town hopes to host a 25% Design Public Hearing soon.

• Paul Guertin from consultants Coler & Colantonio wrote to indicate that the town of Leicester was proceeding with design of a potential project on Route 56 (606346). Additionally, the firm was working with New Braintree on a potential reconstruction project for Ravine and Hardwick roads (605035), and with West Brookfield for a reconstruction project for Route 9 (606517).

• Ted Kozak, Northbridge Town Manager, wrote in support of the Sutton Street reconstruction project, currently programmed for the 2013 fiscal year (606493). This project has been in various planning stages since the 1990s, and the town has spent more than $300,000 in efforts to complete the fairly complex design phase. The project has regional impacts, and the roadway is continuing to deteriorate under the weight of extensive trucking use.

• The Town of Paxton wrote to advise that it has taken steps to begin the programming process for two projects for sections of roadway on Routes 31 and 56.

• State Rep. Kimberly Ferguson wrote in support of a potential project for Princeton’s East Princeton Village area located on Route 140 (606440). This project is still in the conceptual stage.

• Jack Perrault, Shrewsbury town engineer, wrote to update the MPO on design progress for the Main Street project (602740). The town continues to review design plans and is seeking opportunities to maximize effectiveness of monies spent as well as to minimize requested funding levels.

• The Town of Spencer submitted a detailed overview of pending and potential projects, including a 2016 programmed project for the downtown area (606207), repair of the Route 31 bridges over the Seven Mile River and a section of Route 31 south of the town center, with extensive discussions of need, design and construction areas of concern and import. Regional impacts are associated with these projects.

18 • Blythe Robinson, Upton town manager, provided a status update on the Hartford Ave / High Street / Hopkinton Road corridor with associated intersection projects (606125). Design costs of over $600,000 have been funded by the town, and a 25% submission is to be made soon. The town indicates the ability to break the project into phases of manageable size, more conducive to programming. Safety and regional benefits can be realized by improvement work in this area.

• The Town of West Brookfield wrote to indicate that they were proceeding with design needs for a project at Routes 9 & 67 and School Street (604739).

• Comprehensive Environmental Inc, retained by West Brookfield, described their ongoing design activities for the downtown area (604739) and requested TIP programming for 2015.

• The City of Worcester provided written prioritization for potential future year projects along with design status updates. These included the Lincoln St Phase II (605055) and Grafton Street (601368) projects. The City also indicated that some other recognized projects could be dropped from consideration as they have been funded from other sources or have been accomplished in other manners.

• MassDOT‐Highway/District 3 provided clarification on project scope for three projects on Route 146: limited median barrier reconstruction, the Millbury West Main Street bridge and interchange reconstruction and the Boston Road intersection improvements planned in Sutton.

• The Conservation Law Foundation supplied written documentation and followup of their request to use unprogrammed 2015 Highway monies for select transit opportunities by using flex‐funding procedures. The CLF would like to see one additional new hybrid bus purchase and four new bus stop shelters funded in this manner.

• The Common Pathways organization wrote in direct support of the CLF’s recommendation.

MEMORANDUM

Date: March 28, 2012

To: Board of Selectmen Community Administrators & Managers

CC: Central Massachusetts Metropolitan Planning Organization CMMPO Advisory Committee Neighboring MPOs Central Massachusetts Transportation Planning Committee CMRPC Delegates & Alternates WRTA Advisory Board DPW/Highway Superintendents Community Engineers & Planners Area Legislators Regional Stakeholders All Interested Parties

From: CMRPC Transportation Staff

Re: Annual Development of the 2013 to 2016 “TIP” Project Listing ______

Overview

The Central Massachusetts Metropolitan Planning Organization (CMMPO) is the transportation policy and project selection body for the planning region. The Central Massachusetts Regional Planning Commission (CMRPC), as the agency that provides technical staff to the CMMPO, has been directed to commence the annual development of the Transportation Improvement Program (“TIP”) through a proactive public outreach process. The TIP development schedule established by the CMMPO for this year’s effort is attached for your reference.

20 Ultimately approved by the CMMPO, the federally required TIP lists all eligible highway, transit, intermodal and bicycle & pedestrian projects in the region that are programmed to receive federal-aid funding. Based on strict federal requirements, the TIP includes an emphasis on safety projects and projects that both reduce congestion and improve air quality. In addition, projects of regional and statewide significance, such as Interstate Maintenance and Bridge reconstruction, are also included in the TIP document.

The CMMPO has indicated that communities should fully realize that the TIP project listing is financially constrained within the federal-aid funding targets provided to each planning region in the Commonwealth by the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT). Copies of the current TIP’s highway and transit-related project listings can be viewed at cmrpc.org. As is evident from the listings, a backlog of projects exists at this time. A number of communities in the region already are moving ahead with projects that are fully accepted by MassDOT and programmed to receive a portion of the limited federal- aid funding anticipated to be available. Many of the listed communities have commenced the necessary design and lengthy right- of-way acquisition process.

Community Responsibilities

Each year, when the development of the TIP begins, communities in the planning region with federal-aid highway projects already underway are asked to provide a status update to the CMMPO in order to measure design readiness. The requested status updates should indicate 1) the current stage of project design, 2) current status of right-of-way & environmental requirements and 3) any other project information that the community feels would be useful to the CMMPO. Please note that the CMMPO has the ability to remove idle projects from the TIP listing if they are lacking necessary community support.

CMMPO member MassDOT Highway Division reminds the planning region’s communities that new federal-aid eligible project proposals may be submitted throughout the year. Due to ongoing budgetary constraints, low-cost projects in the range of $1M to $2M that address safety and congestion may be considered. Again, these project proposals can be submitted for consideration at any time. Further, it is highly recommended that communities preparing to submit a new project contact their MassDOT Highway Division district office for additional guidance on the project development process. The contact persons are as follows:

• MassDOT Highway Division District #2 office, Northampton: Laurie Scarbrough, 413-582-0591

• MassDOT Highway Division District #3 office, Worcester: Ann Sullivan, 508-929-3868

Additionally, any new, low-cost project submittals to the CMMPO must be accompanied by MassDOT’s required Project Need Form (“PNF”) that is available at the following web link:

• http://www.mhd.state.ma.us/default.asp?pgid=content/projectR eview&sid=about.

All requests for new highway or bridge projects must originate from the host community’s Board of Selectmen or, as appropriate, a town administrator/manager acting on its behalf. When submitting a project for consideration by the CMMPO, fully realize that local responsibilities often include funding project design, funding the acquisition of permanent right-of-way and any temporary easements and any identified environmental requirements.

Communities must fully realize that the number of projects seeking federal-aid funding far exceed the resources available to the CMMPO. Further, the CMMPO considers a wide range of factors when assessing project readiness for placement on the TIP, including the MassDOT Transportation Evaluation Criteria (TEC) for project scoring, the provision of regional equity and available funds.

Important CMMPO Deadline

The initial public outreach period for the development of the 2013 to 2016 TIP project listing is now underway. Status updates on existing federal-aid highway projects should be forwarded to Rich Rydant, Transportation Project Manager, by the close of business on Tuesday, May 8, 2012. The CMMPO will consider all submitted materials at their May 9th meeting. Earlier community correspondence previously forwarded to the CMRPC staff will also be recognized as part of the status update effort. Again, inactive projects lacking community support have the potential to be removed from the TIP listing by the CMMPO.

Summary materials for the annual TIP development effort are available online at cmrpc.org and at the CMRPC office. Any questions or requests for additional information can be directed to Rich Rydant at (508)-459-3312 or [email protected].

Este es un aviso importante. Sirvase mandarlo traducir.

MEMORANDUM

Date: April 11, 2012

To: Board of Selectmen Community Administrators & Managers

From: CMRPC Transportation Staff

Re: Development Schedule Revisions: 2013 to 2016 Transportation Improvement Program ______

In reference to recent correspondence from the Central Massachusetts Metropolitan Planning Organization (CMMPO) dated March 28th, the staff of the Central Massachusetts Regional Planning Commission (CMRPC), on behalf of the CMMPO, needs to indicate changes in the recently issued schedule for the development of the region’s Transportation Improvement Program (“TIP”). The TIP is the listing of all transportation related projects in the planning region anticipated to receive federal-aid funding from US DOT.

Based on guidance from MassDOT-Planning, the state’s planning regions have been asked to accelerate the annual TIP development process in order to address federal concerns regarding necessary review proceedings. It is preferred that the federal review period for the TIP begin by July 2012. All regional TIPs are combined into a Statewide “STIP” document which also undergoes a required federal review.

Please see the attached updated TIP Development Schedule. The underlined text indicates a date change from the original schedule.

Please note that the CMMPO’s “TIP Development Workshop” is now scheduled for April 25, 2012 at 4:30 PM in the CMRPC offices at Union Station, 2 Washington Square, Worcester. All are welcome to attend the Workshop and observe the CMMPO members consider a range of projects for TIP programming: highway, transit and intermodal. Those in attendance will have the opportunity to provide brief status updates on the projects they are supporting.

We appreciate your participation in the annual TIP development process. Summary materials pertaining to the TIP development effort are available online at cmrpc.org and at the CMRPC office. Any questions or requests for additional information can be directed to Rich Rydant at (508)-459-3312 or [email protected].

Este es un aviso importante. Sirvase mandarlo traducir.

25 2013 to 2016 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP): REVISED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE

March 14, 2012: CMMPO Meeting. MassDOT provides 2013 to 2016 regional federal-aid funding targets for TIP development purposes.

March 28, 2012: Annual development of the TIP commences with regionwide distribution of community outreach letter requesting status updates for all previously submitted, active projects.

April 11, 2012: CMMPO meeting. Annual TIP development effort introduced.

April 25, 2012: CMMPO “TIP Development Workshop” 4:30 PM. Future year projects tentatively programmed for anticipated federal- aid funding using “worksheet” format.

May 8, 2012: Due date for the submittal of community project status updates, 4:30 PM.

May 23, 2012: CMMPO Advisory Committee Meeting, 3:00 PM.

May 23, 2012: 2013 to 2016 TIP Public Meeting, CMRPC conference room, Union Station, 5 PM.

June 12, 2012: Public comment period on Final Draft TIP closed, 4:30 PM

June 20, 2012: “TIP Environmental Consultation Session” held at Union Station, 10 AM.

July/August/ September 2012: Federal agency review of CMMPO Endorsed TIP underway.

October 1, 2012: Federally approved CMMPO Endorsed TIP is in effect and available for distribution to interested parties.

• TIP Development Summary

- Public Meetings o May 23, 2012

- Central Massachusetts MPO o April 11, 2012 o May 9, 2012 o June 13, 2012

- CMMPO Advisory Committee o April 25, 2012 o May 23, 2012

• MassDOT Correspondence

28 29 30 DRAFT

Summary of Proposed FFY 2013 - 2016 MPO Targets March 14, 2012

Current Proposed Current Proposed Current Proposed Proposed 2013 2013 2014 2014 2015 2015 2016

Base Obligation Authority $560,000,000 $550,000,000 $560,000,000 $550,000,000 $560,000,000 $550,000,000 $550,000,000 Redistribution, as Estimated by FHWA $0 $50,000,000 $0 $50,000,000 $0 $50,000,000 $50,000,000

Total Estimated Obligation Authority Available: $560,000,000 $600,000,000 $560,000,000 $600,000,000 $560,000,000 $600,000,000 $600,000,000 Central Artery/Tunnel or ABP GANS Obligation Authority -$170,710,000 -$141,005,000 -$178,390,000 -$122,840,000 -$150,000,000 -$150,000,000 -$150,000,000

Total Non-Earmarked O/A Available Statewide $389,290,000 $458,995,000 $381,610,000 $477,160,000 $410,000,000 $450,000,000 $450,000,000

Total Non-Earmarked Available Statewide ( Including State Match ) $475,737,500 $561,443,750 $466,137,500 $584,993,750 $501,625,000 $551,450,000 $551,455,000

Statewide Infrastructure Items: Statewide Infrastructure Program $6,000,000 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 Statewide HSIP Program $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 Statewide Safe Routes to Schools Program $3,500,000 $4,200,000 $3,500,000 $5,200,000 $3,500,000 $5,200,000 $5,180,000 Statewide CMAQ $6,250,000 $37,000,000 $6,250,000 $33,000,000 $6,250,000 $24,000,000 $23,000,000 Statewide Transportation Enhancements $3,500,000 $7,500,000 $3,500,000 $12,500,000 $3,500,000 $12,500,000 $12,500,000 Statewide Recreational Trails $783,000 $783,000 $783,000 $1,000,000 $783,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Statewide ITS $6,250,000 $15,750,000 $6,250,000 $15,700,000 $6,250,000 $12,700,000 $12,700,000 Statewide Design and Right of Way $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 Statewide Interstate Maintenance Program $75,000,000 $75,000,000 $75,000,000 $65,250,000 $75,000,000 $63,000,000 $63,000,000 31 Statewide NHS Preservation Program $12,000,000 $12,000,000 $12,000,000 $29,218,750 $12,000,000 $25,500,000 $25,500,000 Statewide Railroad Grade Crossings $500,000 $10,000,000 $500,000 $10,000,000 $500,000 $500,000 $2,500,000 Statewide Stormwater Retrofits $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 Statewide ADA Implementation Plan $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 Subtotal Statewide Infrastructure Items: $130,783,000 $186,233,000 $130,783,000 $197,868,750 $130,783,000 $169,400,000 $170,380,000

Other Statewide Items: Award Adjustments, Change Orders, Project Value Changes, Etc. $43,750,000 $42,750,000 $43,750,000 $41,750,000 $43,750,000 $41,750,000 $41,750,000 Planning $23,000,000 $23,000,000 $23,000,000 $23,000,000 $23,000,000 $23,000,000 $23,000,000 DBEs, CEPO, Pavement Lab Retrofits, and Misc. Programs $0 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Subtotal Other Statewide Items: $66,750,000 $66,750,000 $66,750,000 $65,750,000 $66,750,000 $65,750,000 $65,750,000

Regional Major Infrastructure Projects: $21,875,000 $0 $15,625,000 $21,875,000 $40,000,000 $40,000,000 $40,000,000

Bridge Program: Statewide Bridge Maintenance Program $0 $10,000,000 $0 $10,000,000 $0 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 Statewide Bridge Repl. / Rehab Program $121,483,328 $139,175,000 $121,483,328 $99,175,000 $121,483,328 $122,000,000 $82,000,000

Statewide Bridge Inspection Program $6,250,000 $6,250,000 $6,250,000 $6,250,000 $6,250,000 $6,250,000 $6,250,000 Subtotal Federal Aid Bridge Program: $127,733,328 $155,425,000 $127,733,328 $115,425,000 $127,733,328 $138,250,000 $98,250,000

Regional Targets: Minimum Regional CMAQ Component: $20,000,000 $20,000,000 $20,000,000 $20,000,000 $20,000,000 $20,000,000 $20,000,000 Minimum Regional HSIP Component: $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 Maximum Regional Non-CMAQ / HSIP Component: $98,596,173 $123,035,750 $95,246,173 $154,075,000 $106,358,673 $108,050,000 $147,075,000 Total Regional Target $128,596,173 $153,035,750 $125,246,173 $184,075,000 $136,358,673 $138,050,000 $177,075,000

MassDOT - Federal Aid and Programming Office DRAFT Page 1 of 5 DRAFT

TITLE 23 - TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2013 FEDERAL REGIONAL TARGETS March 14, 2012

Obligation Obl. Auth. Total Funding Authority Matching Based On State Funds Obl. Auth.

Base Obligation Authority $550,000,000

Redistribution, as Estimated by FHWA $50,000,000

Total Estimated Obligation Authority Available: $600,000,000

Central Artery/Tunnel Obligation Authority (141,005,000)

Total Non-Earmarked Available Statewide - (Including State Match) 458,995,000 102,448,750 561,443,750

Statewide Infrastructure Items: Statewide Infrastructure Program $4,800,000 $1,200,000 $6,000,000 Statewide HSIP Program $4,500,000 $500,000 $5,000,000 Statewide Safe Routes to Schools Program $4,200,000 $0 $4,200,000 Statewide CMAQ $29,600,000 $7,400,000 $37,000,000 Statewide Transportation Enhancements $6,000,000 $1,500,000 $7,500,000 Statewide Recreational Trails $626,400 $156,600 $783,000 Statewide ITS $12,600,000 $3,150,000 $15,750,000 Statewide Design and Right of Way $0 $0 $0 Statewide Interstate Maintenance Program $67,500,000 $7,500,000 $75,000,000 Statewide NHS Preservation Program $9,600,000 $2,400,000 $12,000,000 Statewide Railroad Grade Crossings $8,000,000 $2,000,000 $10,000,000 Statewide Stormwater retrofits $8,000,000 $2,000,000 $10,000,000 Statewide ADA Implementation Plan $2,400,000 $600,000 $3,000,000 Subtotal Statewide Infrastructure Items: $157,826,400 $28,406,600 $186,233,000

Other Statewide Items: Award Adjustments, Change Orders, Project Value Changes, Etc. $34,200,000 $8,550,000 $42,750,000 Planning $18,400,000 $4,600,000 $23,000,000 DBEs, FAPO, Pavement Lab Retrofits, and Misc. Programs $800,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 Subtotal Other Statewide Items: $53,400,000 $13,350,000 $66,750,000

Regional Major Infrastructure Projects: $0 $0 $0

Bridge Program: Statewide Bridge Maintenance Program $8,000,000 $2,000,000 $10,000,000 Statewide Bridge Repl. / Rehab Program $111,340,000 $27,835,000 $139,175,000

Statewide Bridge Inspection Program $5,000,000 $1,250,000 $6,250,000 Subtotal Federal Aid Bridge Program: $124,340,000 $31,085,000 $155,425,000

Total Regional Targets: Minimum Regional CMAQ Component: $16,000,000 $4,000,000 $20,000,000 Minimum Regional HSIP Component: $9,000,000 $1,000,000 $10,000,000 Maximum Regional Non-CMAQ / HSIP Component: $98,428,600 $24,607,150 $123,035,750 Total Regional Target $123,428,600 $29,607,150 $153,035,750

Regional Minimum Regional Minimum Total Regional HSIP Component CMAQ Component Regional Target STP Region Share (%) With State Match With State Match With State Match with State Match

Berkshire Region 3.5596 $355,964 $711,929 $5,447,528 $4,379,635 Boston Region 42.9671 $4,296,710 $8,593,421 $65,755,029 $52,864,898 Cape Cod 4.5851 $458,514 $917,028 $7,016,906 $5,641,363 Central Mass 8.6901 $869,013 $1,738,026 $13,299,007 $10,691,968 Franklin Region 2.5397 $253,975 $507,949 $3,886,719 $3,124,796 Martha's Vineyard 0.3100 $30,997 $61,994 $474,363 $381,373 Merrimack Valley 4.4296 $442,956 $885,911 $6,778,806 $5,449,939 Montachusett 4.4596 $445,955 $891,911 $6,824,712 $5,486,846 Nantucket 0.2200 $21,998 $43,996 $336,645 $270,652 Northern Middlesex 3.9096 $390,961 $781,922 $5,983,099 $4,810,217 Old Colony 4.5595 $455,954 $911,909 $6,977,732 $5,609,869 Pioneer Valley 10.8099 $1,080,992 $2,161,984 $16,543,041 $13,300,065 Southeastern Mass 8.9601 $896,010 $1,792,021 $13,712,162 $11,024,131

Total: 100.00 $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $153,035,750 $123,035,750

Note 1: Base Obligation Authority includes Estimated Equity Bonus Exempt from Limitation

Federal Aid and Programming Office DRAFT Page 2 of 5 32 DRAFT

TITLE 23 - TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2014 FEDERAL REGIONAL TARGETS March 14, 2012

Obligation Obl. Auth. Total Funding Authority Matching Based On State Funds Obl. Auth.

Base Obligation Authority $550,000,000

Redistribution, as Estimated by FHWA $50,000,000

Total Estimated Obligation Authority Available: $600,000,000

Central Artery/Tunnel Obligation Authority (122,840,000) Final CAT/GANS

Total Non-Earmarked Available Statewide - (Including State Match) 477,160,000 107,833,750 584,993,750

Statewide Infrastructure Items: Statewide Infrastructure Program $4,800,000 $1,200,000 $6,000,000 Statewide HSIP Program $5,400,000 $600,000 $6,000,000 Statewide Safe Routes to Schools Program $5,200,000 $0 $5,200,000 Statewide CMAQ $26,400,000 $6,600,000 $33,000,000 Statewide Transportation Enhancements $10,000,000 $2,500,000 $12,500,000 Statewide Recreational Trails $800,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 Statewide ITS $12,560,000 $3,140,000 $15,700,000 Statewide Design and Right of Way $0 $0 $0 Statewide Interstate Maintenance Program $58,725,000 $6,525,000 $65,250,000 Statewide NHS Preservation Program $23,375,000 $5,843,750 $29,218,750 Statewide Railroad Grade Crossings $8,000,000 $2,000,000 $10,000,000 Statewide Stormwater retrofits $8,000,000 $2,000,000 $10,000,000 Statewide ADA Implementation Plan $3,200,000 $800,000 $4,000,000 Subtotal Statewide Infrastructure Items: $166,460,000 $31,408,750 $197,868,750

Other Statewide Items: Award Adjustments, Change Orders, Project Value Changes, Etc. $33,400,000 $8,350,000 $41,750,000 Planning $18,400,000 $4,600,000 $23,000,000 DBEs, FAPO, Pavement Lab Retrofits, and Misc. Programs $800,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 Subtotal Other Statewide Items: $52,600,000 $13,150,000 $65,750,000

Regional Major Infrastructure Projects: $17,500,000 $4,375,000 $21,875,000

Bridge Program: Statewide Bridge Maintenance Program $8,000,000 $2,000,000 $10,000,000 Statewide Bridge Repl. / Rehab Program $79,340,000 $19,835,000 $99,175,000

Statewide Bridge Inspection Program $5,000,000 $1,250,000 $6,250,000 Subtotal Federal Aid Bridge Program: $92,340,000 $23,085,000 $115,425,000

Total Regional Targets: Minimum Regional CMAQ Component: $16,000,000 $4,000,000 $20,000,000 Minimum Regional HSIP Component: $9,000,000 $1,000,000 $10,000,000 Maximum Regional Non-CMAQ / HSIP Component: $123,260,000 $30,815,000 $154,075,000 Total Regional Target $148,260,000 $35,815,000 $184,075,000

Regional Minimum Regional Minimum Total Regional HSIP Component CMAQ Component Regional Target STP Region Share (%) With State Match With State Match With State Match with State Match

Berkshire Region 3.5596 $355,964 $711,929 $6,552,415 $5,484,521 Boston Region 42.9671 $4,296,710 $8,593,421 $79,091,696 $66,201,565 Cape Cod 4.5851 $458,514 $917,028 $8,440,099 $7,064,557 Central Mass 8.6901 $869,013 $1,738,026 $15,996,359 $13,389,319 Franklin Region 2.5397 $253,975 $507,949 $4,675,037 $3,913,114 Martha's Vineyard 0.3100 $30,997 $61,994 $570,575 $477,585 Merrimack Valley 4.4296 $442,956 $885,911 $8,153,707 $6,824,840 Montachusett 4.4596 $445,955 $891,911 $8,208,924 $6,871,058 Nantucket 0.2200 $21,998 $43,996 $404,925 $338,931 Northern Middlesex 3.9096 $390,961 $781,922 $7,196,613 $6,023,730 Old Colony 4.5595 $455,954 $911,909 $8,392,981 $7,025,117 Pioneer Valley 10.8099 $1,080,992 $2,161,984 $19,898,358 $16,655,383 Southeastern Mass 8.9601 $896,010 $1,792,021 $16,493,311 $13,805,280

Total: 100.00 $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $184,075,000 $154,075,000

Note 1: Base Obligation Authority includes Estimated Equity Bonus Exempt from Limitation

Federal Aid and Programming Office DRAFT Page 3 of 5 33 DRAFT

TITLE 23 - TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2015 FEDERAL REGIONAL TARGETS March 14, 2012

Obligation Obl. Auth. Total Funding Authority Matching Based On State Funds Obl. Auth.

Base Obligation Authority $550,000,000

Redistribution, as Estimated by FHWA $50,000,000

Total Estimated Obligation Authority Available: $600,000,000

ABP GANS Repayment (150,000,000) First ABP Gans

Total Non-Earmarked Available Statewide - (Including State Match) 450,000,000 101,450,000 551,450,000

Statewide Infrastructure Items: Statewide Infrastructure Program $4,800,000 $1,200,000 $6,000,000 Statewide HSIP Program $4,500,000 $500,000 $5,000,000 Statewide Safe Routes to Schools Program $5,200,000 $0 $5,200,000 Statewide CMAQ $19,200,000 $4,800,000 $24,000,000 Statewide Transportation Enhancements $10,000,000 $2,500,000 $12,500,000 Statewide Recreational Trails $800,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 Statewide ITS $10,160,000 $2,540,000 $12,700,000 Statewide Design and Right of Way $0 $0 $0 Statewide Interstate Maintenance Program $56,700,000 $6,300,000 $63,000,000 Statewide NHS Preservation Program $20,400,000 $5,100,000 $25,500,000 Statewide Railroad Grade Crossings $400,000 $100,000 $500,000 Statewide Stormwater retrofits $8,000,000 $2,000,000 $10,000,000 Statewide ADA Implementation Plan $3,200,000 $800,000 $4,000,000 Subtotal Statewide Infrastructure Items: $143,360,000 $26,040,000 $169,400,000

Regional Major Infrastructure Projects: $32,000,000 $8,000,000 $40,000,000

Bridge Program: Statewide Bridge Maintenance Program $8,000,000 $2,000,000 $10,000,000 Statewide Bridge Repl. / Rehab Program $97,600,000 $24,400,000 $122,000,000

Statewide Bridge Inspection Program $5,000,000 $1,250,000 $6,250,000 Subtotal Federal Aid Bridge Program: $110,600,000 $27,650,000 $138,250,000

Total Regional Targets: Minimum Regional CMAQ Component: $16,000,000 $4,000,000 $20,000,000 Minimum Regional HSIP Component: $9,000,000 $1,000,000 $10,000,000 Maximum Regional Non-CMAQ / HSIP Component: $86,440,000 $21,610,000 $108,050,000 Total Regional Target $111,440,000 $26,610,000 $138,050,000

Regional Minimum Regional Minimum Total Regional HSIP Component CMAQ Component Regional Target STP Region Share (%) With State Match With State Match With State Match with State Match

Berkshire Region 3.5596 $355,964 $711,929 $4,914,089 $3,846,195 Boston Region 42.9671 $4,296,710 $8,593,421 $59,316,086 $46,425,955 Cape Cod 4.5851 $458,514 $917,028 $6,329,788 $4,954,245 Central Mass 8.6901 $869,013 $1,738,026 $11,996,726 $9,389,687 Franklin Region 2.5397 $253,975 $507,949 $3,506,119 $2,744,196 Martha's Vineyard 0.3100 $30,997 $61,994 $427,912 $334,922 Merrimack Valley 4.4296 $442,956 $885,911 $6,115,003 $4,786,136 Montachusett 4.4596 $445,955 $891,911 $6,156,414 $4,818,548 Nantucket 0.2200 $21,998 $43,996 $303,680 $237,686 Northern Middlesex 3.9096 $390,961 $781,922 $5,397,215 $4,224,333 Old Colony 4.5595 $455,954 $911,909 $6,294,450 $4,926,587 Pioneer Valley 10.8099 $1,080,992 $2,161,984 $14,923,093 $11,680,117 Southeastern Mass 8.9601 $896,010 $1,792,021 $12,369,424 $9,681,392

Total: 100.00 $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $138,050,000 $108,050,000

Note 1: Base Obligation Authority includes Estimated Equity Bonus Exempt from Limitation

Federal Aid and Programming Office DRAFT Page 4 of 5 34 DRAFT

TITLE 23 - TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2016 FEDERAL REGIONAL TARGETS March 14, 2012

Obligation Obl. Auth. Total Funding Authority Matching Based On State Funds Obl. Auth.

Base Obligation Authority $550,000,000

Redistribution, as Estimated by FHWA $50,000,000

Total Estimated Obligation Authority Available: $600,000,000

ABP GANS Repayment (150,000,000)

Total Non-Earmarked Available Statewide - (Including State Match) 450,000,000 101,455,000 551,455,000

Statewide Infrastructure Items: Statewide Infrastructure Program $4,800,000 $1,200,000 $6,000,000 Statewide HSIP Program $4,500,000 $500,000 $5,000,000 Statewide Safe Routes to Schools Program $5,180,000 $0 $5,180,000 Statewide CMAQ $18,400,000 $4,600,000 $23,000,000 Statewide Transportation Enhancements $10,000,000 $2,500,000 $12,500,000 Statewide Recreational Trails $800,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 Statewide ITS $10,160,000 $2,540,000 $12,700,000 Statewide Design and Right of Way $0 $0 $0 Statewide Interstate Maintenance Program $56,700,000 $6,300,000 $63,000,000 Statewide NHS Preservation Program $20,400,000 $5,100,000 $25,500,000 Statewide Railroad Grade Crossings $2,000,000 $500,000 $2,500,000 Statewide Stormwater retrofits $8,000,000 $2,000,000 $10,000,000 Statewide ADA Implementation Plan $3,200,000 $800,000 $4,000,000 Subtotal Statewide Infrastructure Items: $144,140,000 $26,240,000 $170,380,000

Regional Major Infrastructure Projects: $32,000,000 $8,000,000 $40,000,000

Bridge Program: Statewide Bridge Maintenance Program $8,000,000 $2,000,000 $10,000,000 Statewide Bridge Repl. / Rehab Program $65,600,000 $16,400,000 $82,000,000

Statewide Bridge Inspection Program $5,000,000 $1,250,000 $6,250,000 Subtotal Federal Aid Bridge Program: $78,600,000 $19,650,000 $98,250,000

Total Regional Targets: Minimum Regional CMAQ Component: $16,000,000 $4,000,000 $20,000,000 Minimum Regional HSIP Component: $9,000,000 $1,000,000 $10,000,000 Maximum Regional Non-CMAQ / HSIP Component: $117,660,000 $29,415,000 $147,075,000 Total Regional Target $142,660,000 $34,415,000 $177,075,000

Regional Minimum Regional Minimum Total Regional HSIP Component CMAQ Component Regional Target STP Region Share (%) With State Match With State Match With State Match with State Match

Berkshire Region 3.5596 $355,964 $711,929 $6,303,240 $5,235,346 Boston Region 42.9671 $4,296,710 $8,593,421 $76,083,999 $63,193,867 Cape Cod 4.5851 $458,514 $917,028 $8,119,139 $6,743,597 Central Mass 8.6901 $869,013 $1,738,026 $15,388,049 $12,781,010 Franklin Region 2.5397 $253,975 $507,949 $4,497,255 $3,735,331 Martha's Vineyard 0.3100 $30,997 $61,994 $548,878 $455,887 Merrimack Valley 4.4296 $442,956 $885,911 $7,843,638 $6,514,771 Montachusett 4.4596 $445,955 $891,911 $7,896,755 $6,558,889 Nantucket 0.2200 $21,998 $43,996 $389,526 $323,533 Northern Middlesex 3.9096 $390,961 $781,922 $6,922,940 $5,750,057 Old Colony 4.5595 $455,954 $911,909 $8,073,813 $6,705,949 Pioneer Valley 10.8099 $1,080,992 $2,161,984 $19,141,664 $15,898,688 Southeastern Mass 8.9601 $896,010 $1,792,021 $15,866,104 $13,178,073

Total: 100.00 $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $177,075,000 $147,075,000

Note 1: Base Obligation Authority includes Estimated Equity Bonus Exempt from Limitation

Federal Aid and Programming Office DRAFT Page 5 of 5 35 TIP Development Comparison of Regional Funding Targets 2011 VS 2012 Issued Funding Levels

STP Funds HSIP Funds CMAQ Funds Total Funds TIP Year Old New Old New Old New Old New Gain

2013 $8,568,137 $10,691,968 $869,013 $869,013 $1,738,026 $1,738,026 $11,175,176 $13,299,007 $2,123,831

2014 $8,277,017 $13,389,319 $869,013 $869,013 $1,738,026 $1,738,026 $10,884,056 $15,996,359 $5,112,303 2013 Dollars $12,874,345 $835,589 $1,671,179 $15,381,114 36

2015 $9,242,708 $9,389,687 $869,013 $869,013 $1,738,026 $1,738,026 $11,849,747 $11,996,726 $146,979 2013 Dollars $8,681,293 $803,451 $1,606,903 $11,091,648

2016 NA $12,781,010 NA $869,013 NA $1,738,026 NA $15,388,049 NA 2013 Dollars $11,362,271 $772,549 $1,545,099 $13,679,920

Use 2013 dollars to program everything using todays' costs, then ratio costs and targets back up after programming.

Totals not exact due to rounding process 37 38 39 40 41 MASSDOT – PLANNING COMMENT ON DRAFT TIP

42 43 44

From: Frost, Arthur (DOT) Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 4:10 PM To: Guenard, Mark (DOT) Cc: Sullivan, Ann (DOT); Masse, Richard (DOT) Subject: FW: Comment letters to Central MA and Montachusett for the draft FFY2013 -2016 TIPs

Additional comments for CMMPO FY‐2015 Add $420,000 to 606347 ‐ STURBRIDGE‐ RESURFACING AND RELATED WORK ON ROUTE 20, FROM ROUTE 49 TO I‐84 The additional funding will allow adding shoulders for safety and bike accommodation thru the Shopping Plaza signal on Route 20

FY‐2016 Add 606562 ‐ OAKHAM‐ RESURFACING AND RELATED WORK ON ROUTE 122 FROM ROUTE 148 TO THE BARRE TOWN LINE. Using the remaining $1,255,000 of unprogrammed target funds in FY‐2016

45 05/09/2012 Draft Released xx/xx/xxxx Endorsed Total Comments MassDOT MassDOT Funding Programmed Federal Non-Federal Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Additional Information ▼ ►Section 1C / Federal Aid Non-Target Projects ►Earmarks 604893 WORCESTER - STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS AT MAIN STREET & TI (2005) $ 2,000,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 400,000 Construction / TI#177 - MA213 / Design Status = Pre 25% / Total Project Partial Move to FY 2016 MAYWOOD STREET Cost = $2,000,000 604892 WORCESTER - BIKE PATH CONSTRUCTION, FROM TAINTER STREET HPP (2005) $ 1,862,544 $ 1,490,035 $ 372,509 Construction / HPP#918 - MA136 & HPP#4288 - MA207 / Design Status = Partial okay for 2014 TO KILBY STREET 25% / Total Project Cost = $1,862,544 605820 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE RIVER BIKEWAY (SEGMENT 7) HPP (2005) $ 2,400,000 $ 1,920,000 $ 480,000 Construction / HPP#4283 - MA202 & HPP#2218 - MA157 / Design Status = Partial okay for 2014 Pre 25% / Total Project Cost = $2,400,000 605820 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE RIVER BIKEWAY (SEGMENT 7) HPP (2005) $ 96,500 $ 77,200 $ 19,300 Design & Construction / HPP#2509 - MA165 / Design Status = Pre 25% / Partial okay for 2014 Total Project Cost = $2,400,000 605780 WORCESTER - QUINSIGAMOND VILLAGE BIKEWAY CONSTRUCTION, HPP (1998) $ 1,462,580 $ 1,170,064 $ 292,516 Construction / MA006 / Design Status = 100% / Total Project Cost = Partial okay for 2014 FROM BLACKSTONE RIVER BIKEWAY TO MCKEON ROAD, INCLUDES $1,462,580 WORK ON W 44 155 604998 WORCESTER - CITY COMMON PAVILION & MULTI-USE PATH HPP (2005) $ 1,800,000 $ 1,440,000 $ 360,000 Construction / HPP#4283 - MA202 & HPP#2218 - MA157 / Design Status = Partial Move to FY 2016 CONSTRUCTION (FRANKLIN STREET) 75% / Total Project Cost = $2,000,000 604998 WORCESTER - CITY COMMON PAVILION & MULTI-USE PATH HPP (2005) $ 200,000 $ 160,000 $ 40,000 Design & Construction / HPP#2509 - MA165 / Design Status = 75% / Total Partial Move to FY 2016 CONSTRUCTION (FRANKLIN STREET) Project Cost = $2,000,000 605649 WORCESTER - SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION ON MCKEON ROAD § 125 $ 1,095,000 $ 1,095,000 $ - Construction / MA241 & MA251 / Design Status = 25% / Total Project Cost Full okay for 2014 (2009) = $1,095,000 605649 WORCESTER - SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION ON MCKEON ROAD § 125 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ - Design / MA241 & MA251 / Design Status = 25% / Total Project Cost = Full Obligated in FY 2012, (2009) $1,095,000 remove from list. Pending WORCESTER -BLACKSTONE CANAL STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS § 129 $ 735,000 $ 735,000 $ - Construction / MA238 / Design Status = Pre 25% / Total Project Cost = Full okay for 2014 ON HARDING STREET (2008) $735,000 606434 WORCESTER - CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT STREETSCAPE HPP (2005) $ 5,625,000 $ 4,500,000 $ 1,125,000 Design & Construction / HPP#4266 - MA185 / Design Status = Pre 25% / Partial okay for 2014 IMPROVEMENTS Total Project Cost = $5,625,000 605674 STURBRIDGE - GRAND TRUNK TRAIL HPP (2005) $ 507,500 $ 406,000 $ 101,500 Construction / HPP#2439 - MA162 / Design Status = Pre 25% / Total Partial okay for 2014

46 Project Cost = $507,500 606629 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE VISITOR CENTER HPP (2005) $ 360,000 $ 288,000 $ 72,000 Design / HPP#2351 - MA158 / Design Status - For Final Design / Total PtilPartial okayk for f 2014 Project Cost = $7,890,000 606629 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE VISITOR CENTER HPP (2005) $ 5,300,000 $ 4,240,000 $ 1,060,000 Construction / HPP#2351 - MA158 / Design Status - Pre 25% / Total Project Partial okay for 2014 Cost = $7,890,000 606629 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE VISITOR CENTER, BIKEWAY & BRIDGE HPP (2005) $ 85,000 $ 68,000 $ 17,000 Design / HPP#4283 - MA202 & HPP#2218 - MA157 & MA006 / Design Partial okay for 2014 Status - For Final Design / Total Project Cost = $7,890,000 606629 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE VISITOR CENTER, BIKEWAY & BRIDGE HPP (2005) $ 1,700,000 $ 1,360,000 $ 340,000 Construction / HPP#4283 - MA202 & HPP#2218 - MA157 & MA006 / Partial okay for 2014 Design Status - Pre 25% / Total Project Cost = $7,890,000 606629 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE VISITOR CENTER HPP (2005) $ 360,000 $ 288,000 $ 72,000 Design / HPP#2351 - MA158 / Funding to be used for Env & 25% Design / Partial okay for 2014 Total Project Cost = $7,890,000 / Moved from 2012 606629 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE VISITOR CENTER, BIKEWAY & BRIDGE HPP (2005) $ 85,000 $ 68,000 $ 17,000 Design / HPP#4283 - MA202 & HPP#2218 - MA157 & MA006 / Funding to Partial okay for 2014 be used for Env & 25% Design / Total Project Cost = $7,890,000 / Moved from 2012 Pending QUINEBAUG RAIL TRAIL HPP (2005) $ 800,000 $ 640,000 $ 160,000 Construction / HPP#2173 - MA156 / Design Status - Pre 25% / Total Project Partial Move to FY 2016 Cost = $800,000 Earmarks Subtotal ►◄ $ 26,499,124 $ 21,570,299 $ 4,928,825 Funding Split Varies by Earmark

• FHWA Correspondence

47 48 49 50 51 FHWA COMMENT ON DRAFT TIP

52 From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 11:40 AM To: Richard Rydant Cc: [email protected] Subject: FHWA comments part 1

6‐11‐2012

1st email

Previously sent message: ‐11‐2012

Hi Rich. I am sending my comments on the TIP, attached here. This file may be too big, so I will follow up with 3 individual emails, each with 2 separate attachments; the section of the document, with sticky notes and the file called summary of comments. Please loot at my sticky notes for my comments. Any questions, please feel free to call me.

Paul F. Maloney, P.E. (Maryland) Statewide and Metropolitan Planner FHWA - Massachusetts Division 55 Broadway, 10th floor Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-494-3610 Email: [email protected]

53 Summary of FHWA Comments on Microsoft Word – Draft 2013 to 2016 TIP.doc

Sections A & B

Page: 3 Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/7/2012 3:21:31 PM Non-Voting

Page: 68 Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 9:29:52 AM A conversation with D-3 indicated that 100% plans are due any day now for the Auburn Route 12/20 project. The 25% status should be updated to give the reader a better understanding.

Page: 75 Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 9:57:39 AM 25% design status is not desirable on Year 1 of the TIP. Please coordinate with Mass DOT and the project sponsor to ensure that this project progresses appropriately.

Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 9:57:30 AM 25% design status is not desirable on Year 1 of the TIP. Please coordinate with Mass DOT and the project sponsor to ensure that this project progresses appropriately.

Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 9:57:27 AM Pre-25% design status is not desirable on Year 1 of the TIP. Please coordinate with Mass DOT and the project sponsor to ensure that this project progresses appropriately.

Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 9:57:24 AM 25% design status is not desirable on Year 1 of the TIP. Please coordinate with Mass DOT and the project sponsor to ensure that this project progresses appropriately.

Page: 76 Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 9:57:19 AM 25% design status is not desirable on Year 1 of the TIP. Please coordinate with Mass DOT and the project sponsor to ensure that this project progresses appropriately.

Page: 77 Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 10:01:22 AM FHWA recommends that the MPO continue to coordinate with the project sponsor and Mass DOT to advance this year 2 project.

Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 10:01:55 AM FHWA recommends that the MPO continue to coordinate with the project sponsor and Mass DOT to advance this year 2 project.

Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 10:02:02 AM FHWA recommends that the MPO continue to coordinate with the project sponsor and Mass DOT to advance this year 2 project.

Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 10:02:19 AM FHWA recommends that the MPO continue to coordinate with the project sponsor and Mass DOT to advance this year 2 project.

Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 10:03:10 AM FHWA recommends that the MPO continue to coordinate with the project sponsor and Mass DOT to advance this year 2 project.

Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 10:04:34 AM FHWA recommends that the MPO continue to coordinate with the project sponsor and Mass DOT to advance this year 2 project.

Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 10:03:52 AM FHWA notes that both the HSIP and CMAQ target minimums have been met.

Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 10:07:16 AM FHWA recommends that the MPO continue to coordinate with the project sponsor and Mass DOT to advance this year 2 project.

Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 10:36:20 AM FHWA recommends that the MPO continue to coordinate with the project sponsor and Mass DOT to advance this year 2 project.

Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 10:36:29 AM FHWA recommends that the MPO continue to coordinate with the project sponsor and Mass DOT to advance this year 2 project.

Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 10:36:38 AM FHWA recommends that the MPO continue to coordinate with the project sponsor and Mass DOT to advance this year 2 project.

Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 10:36:48 AM FHWA recommends that the MPO continue to coordinate with the project sponsor and Mass DOT to advance this year 2 project.

Page: 78 Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 10:44:59 AM Please ensure that earmarks that are being applied to more than one project are not being programmed beyond what was legislatively provided. As an example, projects 605820 and 604998 are shown to be utilizing the same HPP earmarks (# 4283 and 2218). Together, these earmarks total $3.6 Million. Please just ensure that no more that that total is programmed from those particular earmarks.

Page: 79 Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 10:45:47 AM FHWA recommends that the MPO continue to coordinate with the project sponsor and Mass DOT to advance this year 2 project.

Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 10:46:00 AM FHWA recommends that the MPO continue to coordinate with the project sponsor and Mass DOT to advance this year 2 project.

55 Page: 80 Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 10:49:50 AM FHWA notes that the HSIP and CMAQ minimums have been met.

Page: 82 Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 10:50:01 AM FHWA notes that the HSIP and CMAQ minimums have been met.

Page: 89 Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 10:54:27 AM Awesome use of graphics to help the reader picture the location of the improvement better. Addresses SAFETEA- LU's Visualization initiative very well.

Section C1

Page: 108 Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 10:59:44 AM Please see FHWA comments on the 4 annual elements in Part A&B of the document. This listing of each element appears to be listed twice.

Section C2 & D

Page: 183 Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 11:11:43 AM Thanks! This is excellent information.

Author: Paul.Maloney Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/11/2012 11:16:58 AM These three seem to total an amount greater than their initial earmarked amounts, unless additional funds were earmarked and are not shown here. Regardless, if $2,000,000 is earmarked, no more than $2,000,000 can be obligated from the earmark.

3.) Summary of Transportation Funding Programs

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Related Funding Categories

ABP Accelerated Bridge Program ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act BR OFF Bridges Off the Federal-Aid System BR ON Bridges On the Federal-Aid System BR-S Special Federal-Aid Bridges CMAQ Congestion Mitigation Air Quality HPP “High Priority Projects” authorized in TEA-21 & SAFETEA-LU HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program IM Interstate Maintenance MAJOR Major infrastructure projects of statewide significance NHS National Highway System PLH Public Lands Highway STP Surface Transportation Program in general for use in any area STP-W Surface Transportation Program in areas over 200,000 population (Worcester Urbanized Area) STP-S STP Safety projects STP-E STP Transportation Enhancement Program projects TCSP Transportation and Community and System Preservation TDM Transportation Demand Management

Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Related Funding Categories

FTA-07 Federal Transit 49 U.S.C. S 5307 FTA-09 Federal Transit 49 U.S.C. S 5309 FTA-10 Federal Transit 49 U.S.C. S 5310 FTA-11 Federal Transit 49 U.S.C. S 5311 FTA-16 Federal Transit 49 U.S.C. S 5316 FTA-17 Federal Transit 49 U.S.C. S 5317

Commonwealth of Massachusetts State Funding Categories

BOND Projects included in the current state Transportation Bond Bill MAP State Mobility Assistance Program NFA Non-Federal Aid (state highway funds) RTA State transit funds for Regional Transit Authorities

4.) Project Selection

The Central Massachusetts Metropolitan Planning Organization (CMMPO), by virtue of its endorsement of the FY 2013 to FY 2016 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), agrees that the inclusion of projects in FY 2013 (first year of the TIP) is sufficient for project selection purposes as allowed by the provisions of SAFETEA-LU. Any project listed within FY 2013 can proceed with programming during FY 2013 without additional action on the part of the MPO.

Furthermore, as emphasized in testimony at the February 2012 Federal Certification Review of the CMMPO’s planning process, let it be specifically known that the projects included in the TIP are selected through the region’s ongoing Comprehensive, Continuing, and Cooperative (3C) Transportation Planning Process with full consideration of the principles of Environmental Justice.

TIP project priorities, once established by the CMMPO, lead to the selection of projects that can most effectively and efficiently utilize the limited funding, both federal and state, that is available to the region while maintaining financial constraint. These priorities are derived from the extensive public outreach efforts conducted on behalf of the entire CMMPO (CMRPC, WRTA, MassDOT and its Highway Division), as overseen by the CMMPO Advisory Committee and the WRTA’s Advisory Board, as well as various planning studies listed below, completed either by staff or hired consultants, which provide both quantitative and qualitative data.

• Regional Transportation Plan (RTP): Transportation projects of all types must be reflected in the comprehensive RTP in order to be eligible for inclusion in the TIP project listing. The document provides an overview of both the existing and future projected condition of all major modes of transportation in the region, including intermodal activities. An extensive public outreach process accompanies the development of the document, prepared every four years.

• Management Systems (MS): Materials available through various management systems also lend support to projects included in the TIP:

Congestion Management Process (CMP) - The regional CMP monitors key roadway segments, critical intersections and MassDOT-maintained Park and Ride facilities. Staff produces a CMP Progress Report on an annual basis. Projects programmed on the TIP are often generated through this process.

Bridge MS - This information is maintained by MassDOT-Boston and supported by bridge inspection reports compiled by the five MassDOT District offices. Structurally Deficient (SD) and Functional Obsolete (FO) bridge listings are

58 provided to the regions that assist the CMMPO in prioritizing those structures in need of attention.

Pavement MS - MassDOT oversees the condition and repair needs of NHS and STP designated roadways. The regional staff offers PMS services and assistance to member communities for town-maintained state numbered routes and locally maintained roadways.

Safety MS - Data is maintained by MassDOT - Highway and supported by vehicle crash report information compiled from various sources statewide. Top 200 accident location listing compiled on state level is provided to the region. Recently, staff has participated in the development of the state’s Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP).

Other related activities include:

Transportation Evaluation Criteria - The “Transportation Evaluation Criteria” set forth by MassDOT predecessor organizations are utilized in the development of the TIP project listings. Potential regional target-funded projects are evaluated when considered for programming. The results of the evaluation, along with other critical benchmark data concerning project status and readiness, are used to assist in the selection of TIP target projects for review and eventual approval by the CMMPO. It is envisioned that this will be a continuing, cooperative process among the RPAs, RTAs, MassDOT and its Highway Division district offices.

Transit Planning - Staff works closely with the WRTA to identify capital and operations needs for both fixed route transit and complimentary paratransit services. The WRTA Advisory Board oversees this process. Statewide guidance concerning transit issues is often provided by EOT.

Freight Planning - MassDOT efforts on behalf of the (now dormant) Massachusetts Freight Advisory Council (FAC) have resulted in the identification of statewide freight issues and priorities. A state rail plan has been developed. Regional staff is often requested to assist in such efforts, being familiar with the various aspects of local intermodal facilities. Regional Freight Planning Progress Reports are available.

Traffic Monitoring - At times referred to as the “Seventh Management System”, an aggressive annual traffic count program is carried out by the regional planning staff. The regional count program is supplemented by traffic volume data collected by MassDOT on the Interstate System and other major NHS roadways.

• Corridor Planning Studies (CPS): Based upon the recommendation of the CMMPO either prepared by staff, or by hired consultants, these efforts often utilize regional travel demand modeling in order to develop future traffic volume projections and to determine associated air quality impacts. Recently, staff has completed a number of “Corridor Profile” efforts, streamlined studies that utilize

59 the results of the ongoing management systems. These studies inevitably result in the compilation of a comprehensive listing of improvement options to be considered by the host communities.

• Competitive Programs: The staff is often charged with the responsibility of conducting the regional solicitation and screening process for any of a number of specially funded programs, such as Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ), Transportation Enhancements, Transportation Demand Management (TDM)/Transportation Management Association (TMA) and, less frequently, National Scenic Byways, Public Lands Highway (PLH), Safe Communities and Transportation and Community and System Preservation (TCSP). Projects selected through a regional process, overseen by the CMMPO, which are subsequently approved by either MassDOT and/or EOT, will be reflected in the TIP listing.

• Congressional Earmarks: As required by SAFETEA-LU legislation, staff will include the High Priority Projects (HPP) identified by the U.S. Congress as recipients of earmarked funding as is feasible and appropriate. On the state level, projects approved by the Legislature, such as those included in a Transportation Bond Bill, are similarly reflected in the TIP listing.

CMMPO Transportation Evaluation Criteria (TEC) “Working Group”

Conducted from a region viewpoint, project scoring is completed by consensus, using both objective & subjective methods.

Scoring Group:

• MaryEllen Blunt, Central Massachusetts Regional Planning Commission (CMRPC)

• Mark Guenard, MassDOT Planning

• Arthur Frost, MassDOT District #3 Office, Worcester

• Paula Simmons, MassDOT District #2 Office, Northampton

• Rich Rydant, Central Massachusetts Regional Planning Commission (CMRPC)

• Laurie Scarbrough, MassDOT District #2 Office, Northampton

• Ann Sullivan, MassDOT District #3 Office, Worcester

Supporting Roles:

• Transportation Staff Field Surveys: Pavement Distress, Digital Photos

• CMRPC Land Use Expertise

• GIS Expertise: Aerials and Pictometry Images

– Environmental Consultation Maps – Environmental Justice Areas Map – Management Systems Integration Maps – WRTA Related Mapping Efforts

• Other MassDOT District Office Resources

61 DRAFT@For Discussion Only TRANSPORTATION PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA

Highway-funded Improvement/Expansion Projects

PROJECTTYPE TRANSPORTATIONCRITERIA

ConditionandService Mobility SafetyandSecurity CostEffectiveness Quality Arterials/lntersections Magnitudeofpavement Effectonmagnitudeand Effectoncrashrate CostperUnitChangein conditionimprovement durationofcongestion comparedtostateaverage Condition

Magnitudeofimprovement Effectontraveltimeand Effectonbicycleand CostperLinearMile ofotherinfrastructure connectivity/access sedestriansafety elements Effectonothermodesusing Effectontransportation CostperAADT facility securityandevacuation routes Effectonregionalandlocal traffic

MajorHighways Magnitudeofpavement Effectonmagnitudeand Effectoncrashrate CostperUnitChangein conditionimprovement durationofcongestion comparedtostateaverage Condition

Magnitudeofimprovement Effectontraveltimeand Effectonbicycleand CostperLinearMile ofotherinfrastructure connectivity/access pedestriansafety elements Effectonothermodesusing Effectontransportation CostperAADT facility securityandevacuation routes Effectonregionalandlocal traffic

Bridges Magnitudeofbridge Effectonmagnitudeand Effectoncrashrate CostperUnitChangein conditionimprovement durationofcongestion comparedtostateaverage Condition

Magnitudeofimprovement Effectontraveltimeand Effectonbicycleand Costperunitbridgearea ofotherinfrastructure connectivity/access pedestriansafety elements Effectonothermodesusing Effectontransportation CostperAADT facility securityandevacuation routes Bicycle/Pedestrian Magnitudeofsurface Numberofnewusers EffectonBicycleComfort CostperUser Facilities conditionimprovement Index

Magnitudeofimprovement Effectontravel Effectonpedestriansafety CostperLinearMile ofotherinfrastructure time/access/connectivityfor elements existingusers ConsistentwithState Effectontransportation Bicycleand/orPedestrian securityandevacuation Plans routes Park-and-RideFacilities/ Magnitudeofsurface Numberofnewriders/users Effectonuser Costforparkingspaceorunit Transp.Demand conditionimprovement safety/security area Management Magnitudeofimprovement Effectontravel Effectontransportation Costpernewrider ofotherinfrastructure time/access/connectivityfor securityandevacuation elements existingusers routes

OtherEnhancements(non- Theextenttowhichthe Numberofusers Effectonuser Costperuser bike/ped) projectimprovesthe safety/security transportationsystem Theextenttowhichthe Effectontransportation projectiscoordinatedwith securityandevacuation otherprojects routes Theextenttowhichthe projectprovidesother benefits

Executive Office of Transportation - Office of Transportation Planning 4/24/2006 62 TRANSPORTATION EVALUATION CRITERIA Community: Location: Highway-funded Roadway Improvement Projects Total Cost:

TRANSPORTATION CRITERIA OTHER IMPACT CRITERIA PROJECT TYPE Community Effects and Land Use and Economic Environmental Condition Mobility Safety Cost Effectiveness Support Development Effects

Roadways Magnitude of pavement Effect on magnitude and Effect on crash rate Cost per Unit Change in Residential effects: right-of- Business effects: right-of-way, Air Quality/Climate effects condition improvement duration of congestion compared to state average Condition way, noise, aesthetics, cut- access, noise, traffic, parking, through traffic, other freight access other Magnitude of improvement Effect on travel time and Effect on bicycle and Cost per Linear Mile Effect on service to minority Sustainable development Water quality/supply effects; of other infrastructure connectivity/access pedestrian safety or low-income neighborhoods effects wetlands effects elements Effect on other modes using Effect on transportation Cost per AADT Other impacts/benefits to Consistent with regional land- Historic and cultural resource facility security and evacuation minority or low-income use and economic effects routes neighborhoods development plans Effect on regional and local Public, local government, Effect on job creation Effect on wildlife habitat and traffic legislative, and regional endangered species

63 support Effect on development and redevelopment of housing stock

Avg. Score (-3 to +3) Avg. Score (-3 to +3) Avg. Score (-3 to +3) Avg. Score (-3 to +3) Avg. Score (-3 to +3) Avg. Score (-3 to +3)

Total Score (-18 to +18) CMMPO 2013-2016 TIP DEVELOPMENT EFFORT EVALUATION OF FEDERAL-AID TARGET PROJECTS

INCLUDING TRANSPORTATION EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORES

6/12 SUGGESTED PROGRAMMING PRC PRC SUB- DESIGN TEC COST W/ OF FED-AID PROJECTS TYPE* NO. DATE REGION STATUS POINTS CONTINGENCIES

CURRENT FY 2012 Auburn - Route 12/20 I 604234 6/04 SW 100% 6.35 1.000 CMAQ Auburn - Route 12/20 I 604234 6/04 SW 100% 6.35 4.210 HSIP Auburn - Route 12/20 I 604234 6/04 SW 100% 6.35 0.640 STP/TE Ebrook/Spencer/Sturb - Rte 49 P 606451 5/11 W 100% 3.03 2.732 STP Warren/Wbrook - Route 67 P 606487 5/11 W 100% 3.28 2.622 STP

PROPOSED FY 2013 Worcester - Northern E/W Imps I 602037 12/05 C 100% 8.13 1.700 CMAQ Millbury - Rte 146 at W Main St I 605964 2/10 SE 25% 6.90 2.015 CMAQ Worcester - Northern E/W Imps I 602037 12/05 C 100% 8.13 2.000 HSIP Northbridge - Sutton St P 606493 3/95 SE 75% 4.58 7.584 STP

PROPOSED FY 2014 Westborough - Rte 9/Lyman St I 604864 9/06 NE 25% 7.88 2.080 CMAQ

Westborough - Rte 9/Lyman St I 604864 9/06 NE 25% 7.88 2.652 HSIP Worcester - Northern E/W Imps I 607220 12/05 C 100% 8.13 0.884 HSIP Millbury/Sutton - Route 146 P 606485 5/11 SE Preliminary 2.28 3.224 STP Barre - Town Common P 604227 6/04 N Preliminary 6.00 2.339 STP Dudley - Center Road I 605390 11/08 SW 25% 6.23 2.912 STP Warren - Town Center I 605559 2/09 W 25% 4.57 1.768 STP

PROPOSED FY 2015 Worcester - Lincoln St I 605055 12/07 C 25% 6.83 2.163 CMAQ Worcester - Lincoln St I 605055 12/07 C 25% 6.83 4.867 HSIP Sturbridge - Route 20 P 606347 11/10 SW 25% 3.28 2.920 STP Warren - Route 67 P 606686 3/12 W Preliminary 1.68 1.622 STP

PROPOSED FY 2016 Spencer - Rte 9/Main St I 606207 8/10 W Preliminary 5.10 2.137 CMAQ Spencer - Rte 9/Main St I 606207 8/10 W Preliminary 5.10 2.250 HSIP Brookfield - Route 148 P 603486 6/01 W Preliminary 2.75 2.587 STP Oakham - Route 122 P 606562 8/11 N Preliminary 3.37 1.255 STP Shrewsbury - Main St P 602740 7/98 NE 25% 4.57 5.849 STP W Brookfield - Rte 9 / Rte 67 I 604739 3/06 W Preliminary 6.52 1.310 STP

*: I= Improvement, P= Preservation, E= Expansion

64 CMMPO 2013-2016 TIP DEVELOPMENT EFFORT TRANSPORTATION EVALUATION CRITERIA: EVALUATION OF FEDERAL-AID TARGET TIP PROJECTS

Community Land Use Potential SUB- Effects & & Econom Environ FY PROJECT REGION Condition Mobility Safety Support Develpmt Effects TOTALS

2012 Auburn - Route 12/20 SW 2.00 1.75 1.00 0.60 1.00 0.00 6.35 2012 Ebrook/Spencer/Stur - Rt 49 W 2.00 0.25 0.33 0.20 0.25 0.00 3.03 2012 Warren/Wbrook - Route 67 W 2.00 0.25 0.33 0.20 0.25 0.25 3.28

2013 Millbury - Rt 146 @ W Main SE 3.00 1.50 1.50 0.40 0.50 0.50 6.90 2013 Northbridge - Sutton St SE 2.00 0.75 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.33 4.58 2013 Worcester - North E/W Imps C 2.00 2.25 1.33 0.80 1.25 0.50 8.13

2014 Barre - Town Common N 2.50 1.50 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 2014 Dudley - Center Rd SW 3.00 0.50 1.33 0.40 0.50 0.50 6.23 2014 Millbury/Sutton - Rte 146 SE 1.50 0.00 0.33 0.20 0.00 0.25 2.28 2014 Warren - Town Center W 2.00 0.75 0.67 0.40 0.50 0.25 4.57 2014 Westborough - Rt9/Lyman NE 2.50 2.00 1.33 0.80 1.00 0.25 7.88 2014 Worcester - North E/W Imps C 2.00 2.25 1.33 0.80 1.25 0.50 8.13

2015 Sturbridge - Route 20 SW 1.50 0.50 0.33 0.20 0.25 0.50 3.28 2015 Warren - Route 67 W 0.50 0.00 0.33 0.60 0.00 0.25 1.68 2015 Worcester - Lincoln St C 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.75 1.25 0.33 6.83

2016 Brookfield - Route 148 W 1.50 0.25 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.75 2016 Oakham - Route 122 N 1.50 0.50 0.67 0.20 0.00 0.50 3.37 2016 Shrewsbury - Main St NE 2.00 1.00 0.67 0.40 0.25 0.25 4.57 2016 Spencer - Rte 9/Main St W 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.25 0.25 5.10 2016 W Brookfield - Rte 9 / Rte 67 W 2.50 0.75 1.67 0.60 0.75 0.25 6.52

5.) Amendment / Modification Procedures

Regional Summary

The Central Massachusetts Metropolitan Planning Organization (CMMPO) by virtue of its endorsement of the FY 2013 - FY 2016 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) agrees to the following definitions/examples regarding Amendments and Modifications to the TIP:

An Amendment is called for when there is a significant change to the TIP. It will require formal action by the CMMPO. Examples of significant changes would include additions or deletions of projects, movement of highway projects from Year 3 (FY ‘15 and beyond) to Year 1 (FY ‘13) and other actions (such as significant cost or scope changes) deemed to necessitate formal action.

A Modification is called for when lesser actions affecting the TIP may be accommodated through an administrative procedure of the CMMPO. A modification to the TIP may include movement of a project from Year 2 (FY ‘14) to Year 1 (FY ‘13), movement from one funding category to another and the movement of FTA-09 Year 3 (FY ‘15) projects to Year 1 (FY ‘13). The underlying purpose of this mechanism is to provide a degree of flexibility in programming projects in the CMMPO Endorsed TIP.

Further, a recommendation will be obtained as needed from the CMMPO Advisory Committee concerning whether an Amendment or Modification procedure is appropriate.

FHWA Guidance on TIP/STIP Amendment and Modification Procedures

The projects in the first year of an approved STIP shall constitute an “agreed to” list of projects for subsequent scheduling and implementation. For a project to receive federal funds, it must be programmed in the current fiscal year of the current FHWA/FTA approved STIP. FHWA will only authorize projects and FTA will only approve grants for projects that are programmed in the current fiscal year of the current FHWA/FTA approved STIP.

If an implementing agency wishes to proceed with a project not included in the current fiscal year of the current FHWA/FTA approved STIP, a STIP amendment or administrative modification must be made. Due to the fact that the Massachusetts STIP is an aggregation of 13 regional TIPs, a TIP(s) will have to be amended or administratively modified in order to amend or adjust the STIP. The minimum thresholds and corresponding required actions of a TIP amendment and modification are outlined below. The state and CMMPO may set stricter thresholds or require additional actions. A TIP/STIP may be amended or modified at any time (as long as air quality conformity is maintained).

TIP Amendments

The state and MPOs are required to make a formal amendment to the TIP if an implementing agency seeks federal-aid funding for:

• A project that is not programmed in the first three years of the current FHWA/FTA approved STIP.

• Project scope or cost changes that are significant in character or size.

• A FTA-administered project that is programmed in the current fiscal year of the current FHWA/FTA approved STIP where there is a change in scope of more than 20% of the total programmed amount. (Total programmed amount is the authorized amount for a Regional Transit Authority set by ISTEA and affirmed by subsequent transportation legislation, and can include carryover funds from previous fiscal years and funds deobligated from previous grants.)

A public participation process shall be conducted by the respective MPO according to an MPO endorsed Public Outreach Program and shall include adequate public notice of public involvement activities and a public comment period of at least 30 days.

After the MPO formally endorses the TIP amendment in a public meeting, the MPO shall provide a copy of the endorsed amendment and conformity determination action (see the air quality conformity considerations listed below) to FHWA/FTA to indicate that an amendment to the STIP is forthcoming from the State.

TIP Administrative Modifications

At the option of the state and MPOs, an administrative modification to the TIP can be made rather than a formal amendment for the following projects for which federal funds are sought by an implementing agency:

• A project that is programmed in the first three years of the current FHWA/FTA approved STIP but is not programmed in the current fiscal year.

For projects funded with FHWA administered funding categories:

• A project programmed in the current fiscal year of the current FHWA/FTA approved STIP where the total project cost has increased by 10% or more for projects costing $10 million or more.

• A project programmed in the current fiscal year of the current FHWA/FTA approved STIP where the total project cost has increased by $1 million or more for projects costing less than $10 million. For projects funded with FTA administered funding categories or FHWA flexed funds:

67 • A project programmed in the current fiscal year of the current FHWA/FTA approved STIP where the total project cost exceeds the TIP/STIP total FTA programmed amount by more than 10% but less than 20%. (Please note that for the programming of FTA Section 5309 Discretionary Funds, only funds that have a specific earmark, i.e. committed by Congress, may be programmed in fiscal year 1 or 2 of the TIP/STIP. Discretionary funds that are “reasonably expected to become available” may be programmed in fiscal year 3 and then administratively modified to fiscal years 1 or 2 when the project receives a specific earmark.)

Expeditious procedures for the TIP administrative modifications shall be developed by the state and MPOs and reflected in the respective MPO Public Outreach Program. If no such expeditious procedures are developed, formal amendment procedures must be followed.

When a TIP modification is agreed to by the state and MPO, the MPO shall provide a copy of the TIP modification and conformity determination action (see the air quality section below) to FHWA/FTA to indicate that a modification to the STIP is forthcoming from the State.

The TIP modification procedure can be used if an implementing agency seeks federal-aid funding of projects programmed using federal-aid in the previous fiscal year of the previous FHWA/FTA approved STIP. However, this situation should not happen if projects that have not been advertised are programmed in subsequent years of new TIPs/STIP as outlined in the TIPs/STIP development procedures.

Air Quality Conformity Considerations of TIP Amendments or Modifications

A conformity determination must be made when a TIP is amended or administratively modified unless the amendment or administrative modification consists entirely of projects that are not air quality sensitive. If this exception is the case, it shall be explicitly reflected in the TIP amendment/modification along with a statement that the original TIP conformity determination still applies. (Air quality sensitive projects include projects such as regionally significant projects, exempt projects that were included in the analysis of the RTP conformity determination, Transportation Control Measures from the SIP, etc.)

If there is reprogramming of air quality sensitive projects such that a new conformity analysis is needed, an amendment to the RTP shall be developed and endorsed along with a new conformity analysis and determination (consultation procedures still apply). The amended or administratively modified TIP conformity determination would then be based on the amended RTP conformity analysis. A less favorable option is to determine conformity of just the TIP amendment/modification. This option is only allowable if the programming of projects in the TIP is consistent with the RTP (consultation procedures still apply).

Part B:

Regional Transportation Projects, Consolidated Listing

1.) Federal-aid & NFA Highway-Related Listing

70 07/20/2011 Draft Released 11/2/2011 Administrative Modification #1 2012 Central Mass MPO Transportation Improvement Program 08/24/2011 Endorsed 5/9/2012 Amendment #1 Total MassDOT MassDOT MassDOT Funding Programmed Federal Non-Federal Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ District ▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Information ▼

►Section 1A / Federal Aid Target Projects

►STP - Surface Transportation Program 606451 EAST BROOKFIELD - SPENCER - 3 STP $ 2,732,000 $ 2,185,600 $ 546,400 Construction / Design Status = Pre 25% / TEC STURBRIDGE - RESURFACING & Score = 3.03 / Total Project Cost = $2,732,000 RELATED WORK ON ROUTE 49 604234 AUBURN - OXFORD - RECONSTRUCTION 3 TE $ 640,000 $ 512,000 $ 128,000 TE+HSIP+CMAQ Total Project Cost = & IMPROVEMENTS ON ROUTE 12/20 $5,850,000 / Construction / TEC Score = 6.4 / OVERLAP, FROM THE 12/20 Design Status = 25% (75% due in October) INTERSECTION IN OXFORD TO THE ROUTE 12/20 INTERSECTION IN AUBURN 606487 WARREN - WEST BROOKFIELD - 2 STP $ 2,622,000 $ 2,097,600 $ 524,400 Construction / Design Status = PS&E Received / RESURFACING & RELATED WORK ON TEC Score = 3.28 / Total Project Cost = ROUTE 67, FROM THE PALMER/WARREN $2,622,000 T.L. TO ROUTE 9 (APPROX 5.4 MILES) STP Subtotal ► $ 5,994,000 $ 4,795,200 $ 1,198,800 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►HSIP - Highway Safety Improvement Program 604234 AUBURN - OXFORD - RECONSTRUCTION 3 HSIP $ 4,210,000 $ 3,789,000 $ 421,000 TE+HSIP+CMAQ Total Project Cost = & IMPROVEMENTS ON ROUTE 12/20 $5,850,000 / Construction / TEC Score = 6.4 / OVERLAP, FROM THE 12/20 Design Status = 25% (75% due in October) INTERSECTION IN OXFORD TO THE ROUTE 12/20 INTERSECTION IN AUBURN

HSIP Subtotal ► $ 4,210,000 $ 3,789,000 $ 421,000 ◄ Funding Split Varies by Project Specifications

►CMAQ - Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program 604234 AUBURN - OXFORD - RECONSTRUCTION 3 CMAQ $ 1,000,000 $ 800,000 $ 200,000 TE+HSIP+CMAQ Total Project Cost = & IMPROVEMENTS ON ROUTE 12/20 $5,850,000 / Construction / TEC Score = 6.4 / OVERLAP, FROM THE 12/20 Design Status = 25% (75% due in October) INTERSECTION IN OXFORD TO THE ROUTE 12/20 INTERSECTION IN AUBURN

CMAQ Subtotal ► $ 1,000,000 $ 800,000 $ 200,000 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Section 1A / Fiscal Constraint Analysis TotalTotal FederalFederal AidAid TargetTarget FundsFunds ProgrammedProgrammed ► $ 11, 204 0, ,000000 $ 11,204,29511,204,295 ◄TTotalotal TargetTarget $ 295295 TargetTarget FundsFunds AvailableAvailable Total STP Programmed ► $ 5,994,000 $ 10,335,282 ◄ Max. STP $ 4,341,282 STP Available Total HSIP Programmed ► $ 4,210,000 $ 869,013 ◄ Min. HSIP $ (3,340,987) HSIP Minimum Met Total CMAQ Programmed ► $ 1,000,000 $ - ◄ Min. CMAQ $ (1,000,000)

►Section 1B / Federal Aid Bridge Projects

605561 AUBURN - BRIDGE DECK REPLACEMENT 3 BR $ 2,900,000 $ 2,320,000 $ 580,000 Construction / Design Status = 75% / Total & SUBSTRUCTURE REPAIRS, A-17-029, Project Cost = $2,900,000 SWANSON ROAD OVER I-290

BR Subtotal ► $ 2,900,000 $ 2,320,000 $ 580,000 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Section 1C / Federal Aid Non-Target Projects

►Earmarks 606629 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE VISITOR 3 HPP (2005) $ 360,000 $ 288,000 $ 72,000 Design / HPP#2351 - MA158 / Funding to be CENTER used for Env & 25% Design / Total Project Cost = $7,890,000

606629 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE VISITOR 3 HPP (2005) $ 85,000 $ 68,000 $ 17,000 Design / HPP#4283 - MA202 & HPP#2218 - CENTER, BIKEWAY & BRIDGE MA157 & MA006 / Funding to be used for Env & 25% Design / Total Project Cost = $7,890,000

Earmarks Subtotal ► $ 445,000 $ 356,000 $ 89,000 ◄ Funding Split Varies by Earmark

►Other 604234 AUBURN - OXFORD - RECONSTRUCTION 3 Statewide $ 260,073 $ 208,058 $ 52,015 The source is Statewide Transportation & IMPROVEMENTS ON ROUTE 12/20 TE Enhancements 2-for-1 funding / Total Project OVERLAP, FROM THE 12/20 Cost = $5,850,000 of TE+HSIP+CMAQ INTERSECTION IN OXFORD TO THE ROUTE 12/20 INTERSECTION IN AUBURN Other Subtotal ► $ 260,073 $ 208,058 $ 52,015 ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

Page 1 of 2

71 07/20/2011 Draft Released 11/2/2011 Administrative Modification #1 2012 Central Mass MPO Transportation Improvement Program 08/24/2011 Endorsed 5/9/2012 Amendment #1 Total MassDOT MassDOT MassDOT Funding Programmed Federal Non-Federal Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ District ▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Information ▼

►Section 1D / Federal Aid Major & State Category Projects

►IM - Interstate Maintenance No Projects Programmed $ - $ - $ - IM Subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 90% Federal + 10% Non-Federal

►NHS - National Highway System No Projects Programmed $ - - - NHS Subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Other No Projects Programmed $ - - - Other Subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

►Section 2A / Non-Federal Projects

No Projects Programmed $ - $ - Non-Federal Projects Subtotal► $ - $ - ◄100% Non-Federal

►Section 2B / Non-Federal Bridge Projects

604729 SHREWSBURY - WORCESTER BRIDGE 3 ABP-GANS $144,496,605 $ 144,496,605 Construction / Design Status = 25% / Total REHABILITATION, S-14-001 = W-44-018, Project Cost = $144,496,605 STATE ROUTE 9 (BELMONT STREET) OVER LAKE QUINSIGAMOND (AKA - KENNETH F. BURNS BRIDGE)

Non-Federal Bridge Projects Subtotal► $144,496,605 $ 144,496,605 ◄100% Non-Federal

TIP Section 1: TIP Section 2: Total of All 2012 Central Mass MPO TIP Summary ▼ ▼ Projects ▼ Total ► $ 14,809,073 $ 144,496,605 $ 159,305,678 ◄ Total Spending in Region Federal Funds ► $ 12,268,258 $ 12,268,258 ◄ Total Federal Spending in Region Non-Federal Funds ► $ 2,540,815 $ 144,496,605 $ 147,037,420 ◄ Total Non-Federal Spending in Region

701 CMR 7.00 Use of Road Flaggers and Police Details on Public Works Projects / 701 CMR 7.00 (the Regulation) was promulgated and became law on October 3, 2008. Under this Regulation, the CMR is applicable to any Public works Project that is performed within the limits of, or that impact traffic on, any Public Road. The Municipal Limitation referenced in this Regulation is applicable only to projects where the Municipality is the Awarding Authority. For all projects contained in the TIP, the Commonwealth is the Awarding Authority. Therefore, all projects must be considered and implemented in accordance with 701 CMR 7.00, and the Road Flagger and Police Detail Guidelines. By placing a project on the TIP, the Municipality acknowledges that 701 CMR 7.00 is applicable to its project and design and construction will be fully compliant with this Regulation. This information, and additional information relative to guidance and implementation of the Regulation can be found at the following link on the MassDOT Highway Division website: http://www.massdot.state.ma.us/Highway/flaggers/main.aspx

Page 2 of 2

72 05/09/2012 Draft Released 2013 Central Mass MPO Transportation Improvement Program 06/13/2012 CMMPO

Total MassDOT MassDOT MassDOT Funding Programmed Federal Non-Federal Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ District ▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Information ▼

►Section 1A / Federal Aid Target Projects

►STP - Surface Transportation Program 606493 NORTHBRIDGE - RECONSTRUCTION OF 3 STP $ 7,584,000 $ 6,067,200 $ 1,516,800 Construction / TEC Score = 2.8 / Design Status = SUTTON STREET, FROM SUTTON T.L. TO 75-100% / TE + STP Total Project Cost = ROUTE 122 (APPROX. - 2.2 MILES) $7,758,000 STP Subtotal ► $ 7,584,000 $ 6,067,200 $ 1,516,800 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►HSIP - Highway Safety Improvement Program 602037 WORCESTER - INTERSECTION & SIGNAL 3 HSIP $ 2,000,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 200,000 HSIP+CMAQ TOTAL COST = 3,700,000 / IMPROVEMENTS AT LINCOLN STREET, Construction / TEC Score = 8.1 / Design Status = HIGHLAND STREET, PLEASANT STREET 100% CORRIDOR HSIP Subtotal ► $ 2,000,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 200,000 ◄ Funding Split Varies by Project Specifications

►CMAQ - Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program 602037 WORCESTER - INTERSECTION & SIGNAL 3 CMAQ $ 1,700,000 $ 1,360,000 $ 340,000 HSIP+CMAQ TOTAL COST = 3,700,000 / IMPROVEMENTS AT LINCOLN STREET, Construction / TEC Score = 8.1 / Design Status = HIGHLAND STREET, PLEASANT STREET 100% CORRIDOR 605964 MILLBURY - BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, M-22- 3 CMAQ $ 2,015,000 $ 1,612,000 $ 403,000 Construction / Design Status = w/ABP funds 25% 020, ROUTE 146 (NB & SB) OVER WEST / TEC Score = 6.90 / Total Project Cost w/NFA MAIN STREET AND IMPROVEMENTS ON Funding = $8,515,000 / See also NFA Bridge ROUTE 146 @ ELM STREET, ELMWOOD Project under Section 2B STREET & WEST MAIN STREET (ROTARY)

CMAQ Subtotal ► $ 3,715,000 $ 2,972,000 $ 743,000 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Section 1A / Fiscal Constraint Analysis Total Federal Aid Target Funds Programmed ► $ 13,299,000 $ 13,299,007 ◄Total $ 7 Target Funds Available Total STP Programmed ► $ 7,584,000 $ 10,691,968 ◄ Max. STP $ 3,107,968 STP Available Total H SIP Pr ogr amm ed ► $ 2 ,000,000 $ 869,01 3 ◄ Min. HSIP $ ( 1, 130,98 7 ) HSSuetIP Minimum Met Total CMAQ Programmed ► $ 3,715,000 $ 1,738,026 ◄ Min. CMAQ $ (1,976,974)

►Section 1B / Federal Aid Bridge Projects

604507 OXFORD - CULVERT REPLACEMENT, O- 3 BR $ 1,303,038 $ 1,042,430 $ 260,608 Construction / Design Status = 25% / Total Project 06-001, COMINS ROAD OVER FRENCH Cost = $1,303,038 / Funding Source is BR-On RIVER 606638 SUTTON - BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, S-33- 3 BR $ 2,400,000 $ 1,920,000 $ 480,000 Construction / Design Status = Pre 25% / Total 005, BLACKSTONE STREET OVER Project Cost = $2,400,000 / Funding Source is BR- BLACKSTONE RIVER Off

604065 WORCESTER - BRIDGE 3 BR $ 7,572,261 $ 6,057,809 $ 1,514,452 Construction / Design Status = 25% / Total Project RECONSTRUCTION, W-44-094, (SR9) Cost = $7,272,261 / Funding Source is BR-On BELMONT STREET OVER I-290

BR Subtotal ► $ 11,275,299 $ 9,020,239 $ 2,255,060 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Section 1C / Federal Aid Non-Target Projects

►Earmarks No Projects Programmed $ - $ - Earmarks Subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Earmark

►Other 606493 NORTHBRIDGE - RECONSTRUCTION OF 3 Statewide $ 174,000 $ 139,200 $ 34,800 The source of the Statewide Transportation SUTTON STREET, FROM SUTTON T.L. TO TE Enhancements 2-for-1 funding / Total Project Cost ROUTE 122 (APPROX. - 2.2 MILES) = $7,758,000 of TE + STP

Other Subtotal ► $ 174,000 $ 139,200 $ 34,800 ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

Page 1 of 2

73 05/09/2012 Draft Released 2013 Central Mass MPO Transportation Improvement Program 06/13/2012 CMMPO

Total MassDOT MassDOT MassDOT Funding Programmed Federal Non-Federal Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ District ▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Information ▼

►Section 1D / Federal Aid Major & State Category Projects

►IM - Interstate Maintenance No Projects Programmed $ - $ - IM Subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 90% Federal + 10% Non-Federal

►NHS - National Highway System No Projects Programmed $ - - - NHS Subtotal ►◄$ - $ - $ - 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Other No Projects Programmed $ - - - Other Subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

►Section 2A / Non-Federal Projects

606110 SUTTON - INTERSECTION 3 Other $ 6,000,000 $ 6,000,000 Construction / TEC Score = 7.7 / Total Project IMPROVEMENTS @ ROUTE 146 & Cost = $6,000,000 / For Informational Purposes BOSTON ROAD Non-Federal Projects Subtotal► $ 6,000,000 $ 6,000,000 ◄100% Non-Federal

►Section 2B / Non-Federal Bridge Projects

605964 MILLBURY - BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, M-22- 3 Other $ 6,500,000 $ 6,500,000 Construction / Design Status = Pre 25% / Total 020, ROUTE 146 (NB & SB) OVER WEST Project Cost w/CMAQ Funding = $8,515,000 MAIN STREET Non-Federal Bridge Projects Subtotal► $ 6,500,000 $ 6,500,000 ◄100% Non-Federal

TIP Section TIP Section Total of All 2013 Central Mass MPO TIP Summary 1: ▼ 2: ▼ Projects ▼ Total ► $ 24,748,299 $ 12,500,000 $ 37,248,299 ◄ Total Spending in Region Federal Funds ► $ 19,998,639 $ 19,998,639 ◄ Total Federal Spending in Region Non-Federal Funds ► $ 4,749,660 $ 12,500,000 $ 17,249,660 ◄ Total Non-Federal Spending in Region

Page 2 of 2

74 05/09/2012 Draft Released 2014 Central Mass MPO Transportation Improvement Program 06/13/2012 CMMPO Total MassDOT MassDOT MassDOT Funding Programmed Federal Non-Federal Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ District ▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Information ▼

►Section 1A / Federal Aid Target Projects

►STP - Surface Transportation Program 606485 MILLBURY - SUTTON - MEDIAN BARRIER 3 STP $ 3,224,000 $ 2,579,200 $ 644,800 Construction / Design Status = Pre 25% / TEC REPLACEMENT ON ROUTE 146, FROM Score = 2.28 / Total Project Cost = $3,224,000 ROUTE 122A TO BOSTON ROAD

604227 BARRE - TOWN COMMON 2 STP $ 2,339,000 $ 1,871,200 $ 467,800 Construction / TEC Score = 6.0 / Design Status = IMPROVEMENTS Pre 25% / Total Project Cost = $2,339,000

605390 DUDLEY - RESURFACING & RELATED 3 STP $ 2,912,000 $ 2,329,600 $ 582,400 Construction / TEC Score = 6.23 / Design Status WORK ON CENTER ROAD, FROM = 25% / Total Project Cost = $2,912,000 DUDLEY HILL ROAD TO 1200' WEST OF HEALY ROAD 605559 WARREN - RESURFACING & 2 STP $ 1,768,000 $ 1,414,400 $ 353,600 Construction / Design Status = 25% / TEC Score INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT = 4.07 / Total Project Cost = $1,768,000 ROUTE 67 & ROUTE 19 (WARREN TOWN CENTER) STP Subtotal ► $ 10,243,000 $ 8,194,400 $ 2,048,600 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►HSIP - Highway Safety Improvement Program 604864 WESTBOROUGH - INTERSECTION & 3 HSIP $ 2,652,000 $ 2,386,800 $ 265,200 Construction / TEC Score = 7.9 / Design Status = SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AT ROUTE 9 & 25% / HSIP+CMAQ Total Project Cost = LYMAN STREET $4,732,000

607220 WORCESTER - EAST/WEST 3 HSIP $ 884,000 $ 795,600 $ 88,400 TOTAL Project Cost = $884,000 / Construction / IMPROVEMENTS AT PARK AVENUE & TEC Score = 8.1 / Design Status = 100% HIGHLAND STREET INTERSECTION

HSIP Subtotal ► $ 3,536,000 $ 3,182,400 $ 353,600 ◄ Funding Split Varies by Project Specifications

►CMAQ - Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program 604864 WESTBOROUGH - INTERSECTION & 3 CMAQ $ 2,080,000 $ 1,664,000 $ 416,000 Construction / TEC Score = 7.9 / Design Status = SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AT ROUTE 9 & 25% / HSIP+CMAQ Total Project Cost = LYMAN STREET $4,732,000

CMAQ Subtotal ►◄ $ 2,080,000 $ 1,664,000 $ 416,000 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Section 1A / Fiscal Constraint Analysis Total Federal Aid Target Funds Programmed ► $ 15,859,000 $ 15,996,359 ◄Total $ 137,359 Target Funds Available Total STP Programmed ► $ 10,243,000 $ 13,389,320 ◄ Max. STP $ 3,146,320 STP Available Total HSIP Programmed ► $ 3,536,000 $ 869,013 ◄ Min. HSIP $ (2,666,987) HSIP Minimum Met Total CMAQ Programmed ► $ 2,080,000 $ 1,738,026 ◄ Min. CMAQ $ (341,974) CMAQ Minimum Met

►Section 1B / Federal Aid Bridge Projects

607113 DUDLEY - BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, D-12- 3 BR $ 417,300 $ 333,840 $ 83,460 Construction / Design Status = Pre 25% / Total 009, CARPENTER ROAD OVER Project Cost = $417,300 / Funding Source is BR- ABANDONED RR Off BR Subtotal ► $ 417,300 $ 333,840 $ 83,460 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Section 1C / Federal Aid Non-Target Projects

►Earmarks 604893 WORCESTER - STREETSCAPE 3 TI (2005) $ 2,000,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 400,000 Construction / TI#177 - MA213 / Design Status = IMPROVEMENTS AT MAIN STREET & Pre 25% / Total Project Cost = $2,000,000 MAYWOOD STREET

604892 WORCESTER - BIKE PATH 3 HPP (2005) $ 1,862,544 $ 1,490,035 $ 372,509 Construction / HPP#918 - MA136 & HPP#4288 - CONSTRUCTION, FROM TAINTER MA207 / Design Status = 25% / Total Project STREET TO KILBY STREET Cost = $1,862,544

605820 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE RIVER 3 HPP (2005) $ 2,400,000 $ 1,920,000 $ 480,000 Construction / HPP#4283 - MA202 & HPP#2218 - BIKEWAY (SEGMENT 7) MA157 / Design Status = Pre 25% / Total Project Cost = $2,496,500

605820 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE RIVER 3 HPP (2005) $ 96,500 $ 77,200 $ 19,300 Design & Construction / HPP#2509 - MA165 / BIKEWAY (SEGMENT 7) Design Status = Pre 25% / Total Project Cost = $2,496,500

Page 1 of 3

75 05/09/2012 Draft Released 2014 Central Mass MPO Transportation Improvement Program 06/13/2012 CMMPO Total MassDOT MassDOT MassDOT Funding Programmed Federal Non-Federal Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ District ▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Information ▼

605780 WORCESTER - QUINSIGAMOND VILLAGE 3 HPP (1998) $ 1,462,580 $ 1,170,064 $ 292,516 Construction / MA006 / Design Status = 100% / BIKEWAY CONSTRUCTION, FROM Total Project Cost = $1,462,580 BLACKSTONE RIVER BIKEWAY TO MCKEON ROAD, INCLUDES WORK ON W- 44-155 604998 WORCESTER - CITY COMMON PAVILION 3 HPP (2005) $ 1,000,000 $ 800,000 $ 200,000 Construction / HPP#4283 - MA202 & HPP#2218 - & MULTI-USE PATH CONSTRUCTION MA157 / Design Status = 75% / Total Project (FRANKLIN STREET) Cost = $1,200,000

604998 WORCESTER - CITY COMMON PAVILION 3 HPP (2005) $ 200,000 $ 160,000 $ 40,000 Design & Construction / HPP#2509 - MA165 / & MULTI-USE PATH CONSTRUCTION Design Status = 75% / Total Project Cost = (FRANKLIN STREET) $1,200,000

605649 WORCESTER - SIDEWALK 3 § 125 $ 1,095,000 $ 1,095,000 $ - Construction / MA241 & MA251 / Design Status = CONSTRUCTION ON MCKEON ROAD (2009) 25% / Total Project Cost = $1,095,000

Pending WORCESTER -BLACKSTONE CANAL 3 § 129 $ 735,000 $ 735,000 $ - Construction / MA238 / Design Status = Pre 25% STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS ON (2008) / Total Project Cost = $735,000 HARDING STREET

606434 WORCESTER - CENTRAL BUSINESS 3 HPP (2005) $ 5,625,000 $ 4,500,000 $ 1,125,000 Design & Construction / HPP#4266 - MA185 / DISTRICT STREETSCAPE Design Status = Pre 25% / Total Project Cost = IMPROVEMENTS $5,625,000

605674 STURBRIDGE - GRAND TRUNK TRAIL 3 HPP (2005) $ 507,500 $ 406,000 $ 101,500 Construction / HPP#2439 - MA162 / Design Status = Pre 25% / Total Project Cost = $507,500

606629 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE VISITOR 3 HPP (2005) $ 360,000 $ 288,000 $ 72,000 Design / HPP#2351 - MA158 / Design Status - CENTER For Final Design / Total Project Cost = $7,890,000

606629 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE VISITOR 3 HPP (2005) $ 5,300,000 $ 4,240,000 $ 1,060,000 Construction / HPP#2351 - MA158 / Design CENTER Status - Pre 25% / Total Project Cost = $7,890,000

606629 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE VISITOR 3 HPP (2005) $ 360,000 $ 288,000 $ 72,000 Design / HPP#2351 - MA158 / Funding to be CENTER used for Env & 25% Design / Total Project Cost = $7,890,000

606629 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE VISITOR 3 HPP (2005) $ 85,000 $ 68,000 $ 17,000 Design / HPP#4283 - MA202 & HPP#2218 - CENTER, BIKEWAY & BRIDGE MA157 & MA006 / Design Status - For Final Design / Total Project Cost = $7,890,000

606629 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE VISITOR 3 HPP (2005) $ 1,700,000 $ 1,360,000 $ 340,000 Construction / HPP#4283 - MA202 & HPP#2218 - CENTER, BIKEWAY & BRIDGE MA157 & MA006 / Design Status - Pre 25% / Total Project Cost = $7,890,000

Pending QUINEBAUG RAIL TRAIL 3 HPP (2005) $ 800,000 $ 640,000 $ 160,000 Construction / HPP#2173 - MA156 / Design Status - Pre 25% / Total Project Cost = $800,000

Earmarks Subtotal ► $ 25,674,124 $ 20,905,299 $ 4,768,825 ◄ Funding Split Varies by Earmark

►Other TBD WORCESTER - SAFE ROUTES TO 3 SRTS $ 583,000 $ 583,000 Construction / Design Status = Pre 25% / Total SCHOOL (ELM PARK SCHOOL) Project Cost = $583,000 / 100% Federally Funded Other Subtotal ► $ 583,000 $ 583,000 $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

Page 2 of 3

76 05/09/2012 Draft Released 2014 Central Mass MPO Transportation Improvement Program 06/13/2012 CMMPO Total MassDOT MassDOT MassDOT Funding Programmed Federal Non-Federal Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ District ▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Information ▼

►Section 1D / Federal Aid Major & State Category Projects

►IM - Interstate Maintenance 605588 WORCESTER - INTERSTATE 3 IM $ 11,486,592 $ 10,337,933 $ 1,148,659 Construction / Design Status = Pre 25% / Total MAINTENANCE & RELATED WORK ON I- Project Cost = $11,486,592 190 (NB) IM Subtotal ► $ 11,486,592 $ 10,337,933 $ 1,148,659 ◄ 90% Federal + 10% Non-Federal

►NHS - National Highway System 605610 NORTHBOROUGH - RESURFACING & 3 NHS $ 3,534,336 2,827,468.8 706,867.2 Construction / Design Status = Pre 25% / Total RELATED WORK ON ROUTE 20 Project Cost = $3,534,336

NHS Subtotal ► $ 3,534,336 $ 2,827,469 $ 706,867 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Other No Projects Programmed $ - - - Other Subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

►Section 2A / Non-Federal Projects

No Projects Programmed $ - $ - Non-Federal Projects Subtotal► $ - $ - ◄100% Non-Federal

►Section 2B / Non-Federal Bridge Projects

No Projects Programmed $ - $ - Non-Federal Bridge Projects Subtotal► $ - $ - ◄100% Non-Federal

TIP Section TIP Section Total of All 2014 Central Mass MPO TIP Summary 1: ▼ 2: ▼ Projects ▼ Total ► $ 57,554,352 $ - $ 57,554,352 ◄ Total Spending in Region Federal Funds ► $ 48,028,341 $ 48,028,341 ◄ Total Federal Spending in Region Non-Federal Funds ► $ 9,526,011 $ - $ 9,526,011 ◄ Total Non-Federal Spending in Region

Project costs have been increased by 4% a year to account for inflation. 701 CMR 7.00 Use of Road Flaggers and Police Details on Public Works Projects / 701 CMR 7.00 (the Regulation) was promulgated and became law on October 3, 2008. Under this Regulation, the CMR is applicable to any Public works Project that is performed within the limits of, or that impact traffic on, any Public Road. The Municipal Limitation referenced in this Regulation is applicable only to projects where the Municipality is the Awarding Authority. For all projects contained in the TIP, the Commonwealth is the Awarding Authority. Therefore, all projects must be considered and implemented in accordance with 701 CMR 7.00, and the Road Flagger and Police Detail Guidelines. By placing a project on the TIP, the Municipality acknowledges that 701 CMR 7.00 is applicable to its project and design and construction will be fully compliant with this Regulation. This information, and additional information relative to guidance and implementation of the Regulation can be found at the following link on the MassDOT Highway Division website: http://www.massdot.state.ma.us/Highway/flaggers/main.aspx

Page 3 of 3

77 05/09/2012 Draft Released 2015 Central Mass MPO Transportation Improvement Program 06/13/2012 CMMPO Total MassDOT MassDOT MassDOT Funding Programmed Federal Non-Federal Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ District ▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Information ▼

►Section 1A / Federal Aid Target Projects

►STP - Surface Transportation Program 606347 STURBRIDGE - RESURFACING AND 3 STP $ 3,340,000 $ 2,672,000 $ 668,000 Construction / Design Status = Book Job / TEC RELATED WORK ON ROUTE 20, FROM Score = 3.3 / Total Project Cost = $3,340,000 ROUTE 49 TO I-84 606686 WARREN - RESURFACING AND RELATED 2 STP $ 1,622,000 $ 1,297,600 $ 324,400 Construction / Design Status = Pre 25% / TEC WORK ON ROUTE 67 @ WEST WARREN Score = 1.7 / Total Project Cost = $1,622,000 AND WARREN TOWN CENTERS STP Subtotal ► $ 4,962,000 $ 3,969,600 $ 992,400 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►HSIP - Highway Safety Improvement Program 605055 WORCESTER - RECONSTRUCTION OF 3 HSIP $ 4,867,000 $ 4,380,300 $ 486,700 Construction / Design Status = 25% / TEC Score LINCOLN STREET (ROUTE 70), FROM = 6.8 / HSIP + CMAQ Total Project Cost = MARSH AVENUE TO AMESBURY STREET $7,030,000 (PHASE II) HSIP Subtotal ► $ 4,867,000 $ 4,380,300 $ 486,700 ◄ Funding Split Varies by Project Specifications

►CMAQ - Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program 605055 WORCESTER - RECONSTRUCTION OF 3 CMAQ $ 2,163,000 $ 1,730,400 $ 432,600 Construction / Design Status = 25% / TEC Score LINCOLN STREET (ROUTE 70), FROM = 6.8 / HSIP + CMAQ Total Project Cost = MARSH AVENUE TO AMESBURY STREET $7,030,000 (PHASE II) CMAQ Subtotal ► $ 2,163,000 $ 1,730,400 $ 432,600 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Section 1A / Fiscal Constraint Analysis Total Federal Aid Target Funds Programmed ► $ 11,992,000 $ 11,996,726 ◄Total $ 4,726 Target Funds Available Total STP Programmed ► $ 4,962,000 $ 9,389,687 ◄ Max. STP $ 4,427,687 STP Available Total HSIP Programmed ► $ 4,867,000 $ 869,013 ◄ Min. HSIP $ (3,997,987) HSIP Minimum Met Total CMAQ Programmed ► $ 2,163,000 $ 1,738,026 ◄ Min. CMAQ $ (424,974) CMAQ Minimum Met

►Section 1B / Federal Aid Bridge Projects

604675 HOLDEN - BRIDGE REHABILITATION, H- 3 BR $ 2 , 589, 192 $ 2 , 071, 354 $ 517, 838 Construction / Design Status = 25% / Total 18-020, RIVER STREET OVER Project Cost = $2,589,192 / Funding Source is QUINAPOXET RIVER BR-Off BR Subtotal ► $ 2,589,192 $ 2,071,354 $ 517,838 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Section 1C / Federal Aid Non-Target Projects

►Earmarks No Projects Programmed $ - $ - $ - Earmarks Subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Earmark

►Other No Projects Programmed $ - $ - $ - Other Subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

Page 1 of 2

78 05/09/2012 Draft Released 2015 Central Mass MPO Transportation Improvement Program 06/13/2012 CMMPO Total MassDOT MassDOT MassDOT Funding Programmed Federal Non-Federal Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ District ▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Information ▼

►Section 1D / Federal Aid Major & State Category Projects

►IM - Interstate Maintenance 605592 STURBRIDGE - HOLLAND - INTERSTATE 3 IM $ 14,337,000 $ 12,903,300 $ 1,433,700 Construction / Design Status = Pre 25% / Total MAINTENANCE & RELATED WORK ON I- Project Cost = $14,337,000 84 IM Subtotal ► $ 14,337,000 $ 12,903,300 $ 1,433,700 ◄ 90% Federal + 10% Non-Federal

►NHS - National Highway System No Projects Programmed $ - - - NHS Subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Other 605215 UXBRIDGE - SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND 3 Other $ 1,252,016 1,001,612.8 250,403.2 Construction / Total Project Cost = $1,252,016 / TRUNK TRAIL CONSTRUCTION Funding is provided through the Statewide Enhancements Program

Other Subtotal ► $ 1,252,016 $ 1,001,613 $ 250,403 ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

►Section 2A / Non-Federal Projects

No Projects Programmed $ - $ - Non-Federal Projects Subtotal► $ - $ - ◄100% Non-Federal

►Section 2B / Non-Federal Bridge Projects

No Projects Programmed $ - $ - Non-Federal Bridge Projects Subtotal► $ - $ - ◄100% Non-Federal

TIP Section TIP Section Total of All 2015 Central Mass MPO TIP Summary 1: ▼ 2: ▼ Projects ▼ Total ► $ 30,170,208 $ - $ 30,170,208 ◄ Total Spending in Region Federal Funds ► $ 26,056,566 $ 26,056,566 ◄ Total Federal Spending in Region Non-Federal Funds ► $ 4,113,642 $ - $ 4,113,642 ◄ Total Non-Federal Spending in Region

Page 2 of 2

79 05/09/2012 Draft Released 2016 Central Mass MPO Transportation Improvement Program 06/13/2012 CMMPO Total MassDOT MassDOT MassDOT Funding Programmed Federal Non-Federal Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ District ▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Information ▼

►Section 1A / Federal Aid Target Projects

►STP - Surface Transportation Program 603486 BROOKFIELD - RECONSTRUCTION OF 3 STP $ 2,587,000 $ 2,069,600 $ 517,400 Construction / Design Status = Pre 25% / TEC ROUTE 148 (FISKDALE ROAD) FROM Score = 2.8 / Total Project Cost = $2,587,000 MOLASSES HILL ROAD TO STURBRIDGE T.L. INCL. WEBBER ROAD

602740 SHREWSBURY - RESURFACING AND 3 STP $ 5,849,000 $ 4,679,200 $ 1,169,800 Construction / Design Status = 25% / TEC Score RELATED WORK ON MAIN STREET, = 4.6 / Total Project Cost = $5,849,000 FROM I-290 RAMPS EASTERLY TO MAPLE AVENUE 606562 OAKHAM - RESURFACING AND RELATED 3 STP $ 1,255,000 $ 1,004,000 $ 251,000 Construction / Design Status = Pre 25% / TEC WORK ON ROUTE 122 FROM ROUTE 148 Score = 3.4 / Total Project Cost = $1,255,000 TO THE BARRE TOWN LINE

604739 WEST BROOKFIELD - 2 STP $ 1,310,000 $ 1,048,000 $ 262,000 Construction / Design Status = Earlier 25% / TEC RECONSTRUCTION ON ROUTE 9, ROUTE Score = 6.5 / Total Project Cost = $1,310,000 67 & INTERSECTIONS AT SCHOOL STREET STP Subtotal ► $ 11,001,000 $ 8,800,800 $ 2,200,200 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►HSIP - Highway Safety Improvement Program 606207 SPENCER - REHABILITATION ON ROUTE 3 HSIP $ 2,250,000 $ 2,025,000 $ 225,000 Construction / Design Status = Pre 25% / TEC 9 (MAIN STREET), FROM HIGH STREET Score = 5.1 / HSIP + CMAQ Total Project Cost = TO GROVE STREET $4,387,000 HSIP Subtotal ► $ 2,250,000 $ 2,025,000 $ 225,000 ◄ Funding Split Varies by Project Specifications

►CMAQ - Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program 606207 SPENCER - REHABILITATION ON ROUTE 3 CMAQ $ 2,137,000 $ 1,709,600 $ 427,400 Construction / Design Status = Pre 25% / TEC 9 (MAIN STREET), FROM HIGH STREET Score = 5.1 / HSIP + CMAQ Total Project Cost = TO GROVE STREET $4,387,000 CMAQ Subtotal ► $ 2,137,000 $ 1,709,600 $ 427,400 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Section 1A / Fiscal Constraint Analysis Total Federal Aid Target Funds Programmed ► $ 15,388,000 $ 15,388,049 ◄Total $ 49 Target Funds Available Total STP Programmed ► $ 11,001,000 $ 12,781,010 ◄ Max. STP $ 1,780,010 STP Available Total HSIP Programmed ► $ 2,250,000 $ 869,013 ◄ Min. HSIP $ (1,380,987) HSIP Minimum Met Total CMAQ Programmed ► $ 2,137,000 $ 1,738,026 ◄ Min. CMAQ $ (398,974) CMAQ Minimum Met

►Section 1B / Federal Aid Bridge Projects

603516 WORCESTER - BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, 3 BR $ 5,046,720 $ 4,037,376 $ 1,009,344 Construction / Design Status = 75% / Total W-44-063, ROUTE 122 (GRAFTON Project Cost = $5,046,720 / Funding Source is STREET) OVER ROUTE 20 BR-On

604468 WEST BROOKFIELD - BRIDGE 3 BR $ 2,260,608 $ 1,808,486 $ 452,122 Construction / Design Status = Pre 25% / Total REPLACEMENT, W-19-008, WICKABOAG Project Cost = $2,260,608 / Funding Source is VALLEY ROAD OVER SUCKER BROOK BR-Off 606303 RUTLAND - BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURE 3 BR $ 1,344,000 $ 1,075,200 $ 268,800 Construction / Total Project Cost = $1,344,000 / REPLACEMENT, R-14-004, INTERVALE Funding Source is BR-Off ROAD OVER EAST BRANCH OF WARE RIVER 607135 WORCESTER - DECK REPLACEMENT 3 BR $ 4,480,896 $ 3,584,717 $ 896,179 Construction / Total Project Cost = $4,480,896 / AND PAINTING, W-44-083, HARRISON Funding Source is BR-Off STREET OVER I-290

BR Subtotal ► $ 13,132,224 $ 10,505,779 $ 2,626,445 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Section 1C / Federal Aid Non-Target Projects

►Earmarks No Projects Programmed $ - $ - $ - Earmarks Subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Earmark

►Other No Projects Programmed $ - $ - $ - Other Subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

Page 1 of 2

80 05/09/2012 Draft Released 2016 Central Mass MPO Transportation Improvement Program 06/13/2012 CMMPO Total MassDOT MassDOT MassDOT Funding Programmed Federal Non-Federal Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ District ▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Information ▼

►Section 1D / Federal Aid Major & State Category Projects

►IM - Interstate Maintenance No Projects Programmed $ - $ - $ - IM Subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 90% Federal + 10% Non-Federal

►NHS - National Highway System 607176 SHREWSBURY - WESTBOROUGH 3 NHS $ 13,888,090 11,110,472.0 2,777,618.0 Construction / Total Project Cost = $13,888,090 RESURFACING AND RELATED WORK ON ROUTE 9 NHS Subtotal ► $ 13,888,090 $ 11,110,472 $ 2,777,618 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Other 603251 WORCESTER - SIGNAL & INTERSECTION 3 Other $ 485,100 388,080.0 97,020.0 Construction / Design Stage = Approved / Total IMPROVEMENTS @ HOLDEN STREET, Project Cost = $485,100 / Funding is provided by DRUMMOND AVENUE & SHORE DRIVE the Statewide CMAQ Program

Other Subtotal ► $ 485,100 $ 388,080 $ 97,020 ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

►Section 2A / Non-Federal Projects

No Projects Programmed $ - $ - Non-Federal Projects Subtotal► $ - $ - ◄100% Non-Federal

►Section 2B / Non-Federal Bridge Projects

No Projects Programmed $ - $ - Non-Federal Bridge Projects Subtotal► $ - $ - ◄100% Non-Federal

TIP Section TIP Section Total of All 2016 Central Mass MPO TIP Summary 1: ▼ 2: ▼ Projects ▼ Total ► $ 42,893,414 $ - $ 42,893,414 ◄ Total Spending in Region Federal Funds ► $ 34,539,731 $ 34,539,731 ◄ Total Federal Spending in Region Non-Federal Funds ► $ 8,353,683 $ - $ 8,353,683 ◄ Total Non-Federal Spending in Region

Page 2 of 2

• Green House Gas (GHG) Tracking in the Central Massachusetts Planning Region

2013-2016 Transportation Improvement Program Greenhouse Gas Monitoring and Evaluation

Introduction

This section summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts that are anticipated to result from the projects that are included in this FFY 2013 – 2016 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). It includes a summary of the state laws and policies that call for reducing greenhouse gas in order to mitigate global climate change, actions that are being to respond to these state laws and policies, the role of regional planning and TIP development in reducing GHG emission and tracking these reductions, and the projected GHG emission impacts from the projects programmed in the TIP.

State Policy Context

The Global Warming Solutions Act (GWSA), which Governor Deval Patrick signed into law in August 2008, makes Massachusetts a leader in setting aggressive and enforceable GHG reduction targets, and implementing policies and initiatives to achieve these targets. In keeping with the law, on December 29, 2010 the Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EOEEA), in consultation with other state agencies and the public, released the Massachusetts Clean Energy and Climate Plan for 2020. This implementation plan establishes targets for overall, statewide GHG emissions:

By By 2020 25 2050 80 percent reductio percent reduction n below statewide below statewide 1990 GHG 1990 GHG emission levels emission levels

GreenDOT Policy

The transportation sector is the single largest emitter of greenhouse gases, accounting for over a third of GHG emissions, and therefore the transportation sector is a key focus of the Clean Energy and Climate Plan. MassDOT’s approach to supporting the implementation of the plan is set forth in its GreenDOT Policy Directive, a comprehensive sustainability initiative that sets three principal objectives:

Draft Example Text

Reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. MassDOT will achieve this by taking GHG emissions into account in all of its responsibilities, from strategic planning to project design and construction and system operations.

Promote the healthy transportation modes of walking, bicycling, and public transit. MassDOT will achieve this by pursuing multi-modal, “complete streets” design standards; providing choice in transportation services; and by working with MPOs and other partners to prioritize and program a balance of projects that serve drivers, pedestrians, bicyclists, and public transit riders.

To support smart growth development. MassDOT will achieve this by working with MPOs and other partners to make transportation investments that enable denser, smart growth development patterns that support reduced GHG emissions.

GreenDOT Policy and Metropolitan Planning Organizations

The Commonwealth’s thirteen metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) are integrally involved in helping to achieve the GreenDOT goals and supporting the GHG reductions mandated under the GWSA. The MPOs are most directly involved in helping to achieve the GHG emissions reductions under the second goal – to promote healthy transportation modes through prioritizing and programming an appropriate balance of roadway, transit, bicycle and pedestrian investments – and assist in the third goal by supporting smart growth development patterns through the creation of a balanced multi-modal transportation system. This will be realized through the transportation goals and policies espoused in the Regional Transportation Plans (RTPs), the major projects planned in the RTPs, and the mix of new transportation projects that are programmed and implemented through the TIPs. The GHG tracking and evaluation processes enable the MPOs to identify the anticipated GHG impacts of the planned and programmed projects, and also to use GHG impacts as a criterion in prioritizing transportation projects.

Regional GHG Tracking and Evaluation in RTPs

MassDOT coordinated with MPOs and regional planning agency (RPA) staffs on the implementation of GHG tracking and evaluation in development of each MPO’s 2035 RTPs, which were adopted in September 2011.

Working together, MassDOT and the MPOs have attained the following milestones:

• Modeling and long-range statewide projections for GHG emissions resulting from the transportation sector. Using the Boston MPO’s regional model and the statewide travel demand model for the remainder of the state, GHG emissions were projected for 2020 no-build and build conditions, and for 2035 no-build and build conditions. • All of the MPOs included these GHG emission projections in their RTPs, along with a discussion of climate change and a statement of MPO support for reducing GHG emissions as a regional goal.

Draft Example Text

Project-Level GHG Tracking and Evaluation in the Transportation Improvement Program

It is also important to monitor and evaluate the GHG impacts of the transportation projects that are programmed in the MPO Transportation Improvement Programs (TIP). The TIP includes both the larger, regionally-significant projects from the RTPs, which have already had their aggregate GHG impacts calculated and reported in the RTP, as well as smaller projects that are not included in the RTP but that may nevertheless have impacts on GHG emissions. The principal objective of this tracking is to enable the MPOs to evaluate expected GHG impacts of different projects and to use this information as a criterion for prioritizing and programming projects in future TIPs.

In order to monitor and evaluate the GHG impacts of TIP projects, MassDOT and the MPOs have developed the following approach for identifying anticipated GHG impacts and quantifying GHG impacts of projects, when appropriate, through the TIP. Different types of projects will have different anticipated GHG emissions impacts. The different project categories are outlined on the next two pages with this region’s project tracking sheet on the third page.

Draft Example Text

Projects with Quantified RTP Projects - Major capacity expansion projects (e.g. Green Line Impacts Extension, I-95 Whittier Bridge Replacement) would be expected to have a significant impact on GHG emissions. However, these projects are included in the RTPs and analyzed using the statewide model or Boston regional model, which would reflect their GHG impacts. Therefore, no independent TIP calculations are required.

Quantified Decrease in Emissions - Projects that would be expected to produce a measurable decrease in emissions. The approach for calculating these impacts is described below. These projects should be categorized in the following manner: • Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Traffic Operational Improvement - An intersection reconstruction or signalization project that is projected to reduce delay and congestion. • Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure - A shared-use path that would enable increased walking and biking and decreased vehicle-miles traveled (VMT). • Quantified Decrease in Emissions from New/Additional Transit Service - A bus or shuttle service that would enable increased transit ridership and decreased VMT • Quantified Decrease in Emissions from a Park and Ride Lot A park-and-ride lot that would enable increased transit ridership/ increased ridesharing and decreased VMT • Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Bus Replacement A bus replacement that would directly reduce GHG emissions generated by that bus service. • Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Other Improvement

Quantified Increase in Emissions – Projects that would be expected to produce a measurable increase in emissions. Calculation of GHG Impacts for TIP Projects

The Office of Transportation Planning at MassDOT provided the spreadsheets that are used for determining Congestion Management and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) eligibility. These spreadsheets require the same inputs as the CMAQ calculations, and have been adapted to provide CO2 impacts. The data and analysis required for these calculations is available from functional design reports that should be submitted for projects that would produce a measurable GHG impact.

Draft Example Text

Projects with Assumed No Assumed Impact/Negligible Impact on Emission - Projects that Impacts do not change the capacity or use of a facility (e.g. a resurfacing project that restores a roadway to its previous condition, or a bridge rehabilitation/replacement that restores the bridge to its previous condition) would be assumed to have no GHG impact.

Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions - Projects that would be

expected to produce a minor decrease in emissions that cannot be calculated with any precision. Examples of such projects include

roadway repaving or reconstruction projects that add a new sidewalk or new bike lanes. Such a project would enable increased travel by walking or bicycling, but there may be not data or analysis to support any projections of GHG impacts. These projects should be categorized in the following manner: • Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from Sidewalk Infrastructure • Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from Bicycle Infrastructure • Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from Sidewalk and Bicycle Infrastructure • Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) and/or Traffic Operational Improvements • Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from Other Improvements

Assumed Nominal Increase in Emissions - Projects that would be expected to produce a minor increase in emissions that cannot be calculated with any precision.

Regional Greenhouse Gas Impact Summary Tables for FFY 2013 – 2016 TIP

The following tables summarize the calculated quantitative and assumed qualitative impacts of the projects included in the CMMPO Endorsed FFY 2013 – 2016 TIP.

Draft Example Text

87 2013 Central Mass TIP GHG Tracking Total Programme GHG GHG Impact MassDOT MassDOT Funding d Analysis by the GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼ Numbers▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼

►Section 1A / Federal Aid Target Projects

►STP - Surface Transportation Program 606493 NORTHBRIDGE - RECONSTRUCTION OF STP $ 7,584,000 Qualitative 0 No Assumed Impact/Negligible Impact SUTTON STREET, FROM SUTTON T.L. TO on Emissions ROUTE 122 (APPROX. - 2.2 MILES)

Quantified Impact ► 0

►HSIP - Highway Safety Improvement Program 602037 WORCESTER - INTERSECTION & SIGNAL HSIP $ 2,000,000 Quantified 357,161 Quantified Decrease in Emissions (See From Traffic Operational IMPROVEMENTS AT LINCOLN STREET, Emissions Analysis Appendix) Improvement HIGHLAND STREET, PLEASANT STREET CORRIDOR

Quantified Impact ► 357161

►CMAQ - Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement 602037 WORCESTER - INTERSECTION & SIGNAL CMAQ $ 1,700,000 Quantified 357,161 Quantified Decrease in Emissions (See From Traffic Operational IMPROVEMENTS AT LINCOLN STREET, Emissions Analysis Appendix) Improvement HIGHLAND STREET, PLEASANT STREET CORRIDOR

605964 MILLBURY - BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, M-22- CMAQ $ 2,015,000 Quantified 34,117 Quantified Decrease in Emissions (See From Traffic Operational 020, ROUTE 146 (NB & SB) OVER WEST MAIN Emissions Analysis Appendix) Improvement STREET AND IMPROVEMENTS ON ROUTE 146 @ ELM STREET, ELMWOOD STREET & WEST MAIN STREET (ROTARY)

Quantified Impact ► 391278

►Section 1B / Federal Aid Bridge Projects

604507 OXFORD - CULVERT REPLACEMENT, O-06- BR $ 1,303,038 Qualitative 0 No Assumed Impact/Negligible Impact 001, COMINS ROAD OVER FRENCH RIVER on Emissions

606638 SUTTON - BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, S-33-005, BR $ 2,400,000 Qualitative 0 No Assumed Impact/Negligible Impact BLACKSTONE STREET OVER BLACKSTONE on Emissions RIVER

604065 WORCESTER - BRIDGE RECONSTRUCTION, BR $ 7,572,261 Qualitative 0 No Assumed Impact/Negligible Impact W-44-094, (SR9) BELMONT STREET OVER I- on Emissions 290

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Section 1C / Federal Aid Non-Target Projects

►Earmarks 0 No Projects Programmed 0 $ - 0 Quantified Impact ► 0

►Other 606493 NORTHBRIDGE - RECONSTRUCTION OF Statewide TE $ 174,000 Qualitative 0 No Assumed Impact/Negligible Impact Statewide TE used for Bike & SUTTON STREET, FROM SUTTON T.L. TO on Emissions Ped Accommodation including ROUTE 122 (APPROX. - 2.2 MILES) Sidewalk.

Quantified Impact ► 0

Page 1 of 2

88 2013 Central Mass TIP GHG Tracking Total Programme GHG GHG Impact MassDOT MassDOT Funding d Analysis by the GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼ Numbers▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼

►Section 1D / Federal Aid Major & State Category Projects

►IM - Interstate Maintenance 0 No Projects Programmed 0 $ - N/A 0 Quantified Impact ► 0

►NHS - National Highway System 0 No Projects Programmed 0 $ - N/A 0 N/A Quantified Impact ► 0

►Other 0 No Projects Programmed 0 $ - N/A 0 N/A Quantified Impact ► 0

►Section 2A / Non-Federal Projects

606110 SUTTON - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS @ Other $ 6,000,000 Qualitative 0 No Assumed Impact/Negligible Impact ROUTE 146 & BOSTON ROAD on Emissions

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Section 2B / Non-Federal Bridge Projects

605964 MILLBURY - BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, M-22- Other $ 6,500,000 Qualitative 0 Assumed Nominal Decrease in 020, ROUTE 146 (NB & SB) OVER WEST MAIN Emissions from Other Improvements STREET

Quantified Impact ► 0

Total 2013 Central Mass TIP GHG Tracking Summary Quantified Impact ▼ Quantified Impact ► 748439

Page 2 of 2

89 2014 Central Mass TIP GHG Tracking Total GHG GHG Impact MassDOT MassDOT Funding Programmed Analysis by the GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼ Numbers▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼

►Section 1A / Federal Aid Target Projects

►STP - Surface Transportation Program 606485 MILLBURY - SUTTON - MEDIAN BARRIER STP $ 3,224,000 Qualitative 0 No Assumed Impact/Negligible Impact on REPLACEMENT ON ROUTE 146, FROM Emissions ROUTE 122A TO BOSTON ROAD

604227 BARRE - TOWN COMMON IMPROVEMENTS STP $ 2,339,000 Qualitative 0 Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from Other Improvements

605390 DUDLEY - RESURFACING & RELATED WORK STP $ 2,912,000 Qualitative 0 Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions ON CENTER ROAD, FROM DUDLEY HILL from Bicycle and Sidewalk Improvements ROAD TO 1200' WEST OF HEALY ROAD

605559 WARREN - RESURFACING & INTERSECTION STP $ 1,768,000 Qualitative 0 Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions From Traffic Operational IMPROVEMENTS AT ROUTE 67 & ROUTE 19 from Other Improvements Improvement (WARREN TOWN CENTER)

Quantified Impact ► 0

►HSIP - Highway Safety Improvement Program 604864 WESTBOROUGH - INTERSECTION & SIGNAL HSIP $ 2,652,000 Quantified 165,649 Quantified Decrease in Emissions (See From Traffic Operational IMPROVEMENTS AT ROUTE 9 & LYMAN Emissions Analysis Appendix) Improvement STREET

607220 WORCESTER - EAST/WEST IMPROVEMENTS HSIP $ 884,000 Quantified 468,593 Quantified Decrease in Emissions (See From Traffic Operational AT PARK AVENUE & HIGHLAND STREET Emissions Analysis Appendix) Improvement INTERSECTION

Quantified Impact ► 634242

►CMAQ - Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement 604864 WESTBOROUGH - INTERSECTION & SIGNAL CMAQ $ 2,080,000 Quantified 165,649 Quantified Decrease in Emissions (See From Traffic Operational IMPROVEMENTS AT ROUTE 9 & LYMAN Emissions Analysis Appendix) Improvement STREET

Quantified Impact ► 165649

►Section 1B / Federal Aid Bridge Projects

607113 DUDLEY - BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, D-12-009, BR $ 417,300 Qualitative No Assumed Impact/Negligible Impact on CARPENTER ROAD OVER ABANDONED RR Emissions

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Section 1C / Federal Aid Non-Target Projects

►Earmarks 604893 WORCESTER - STREETSCAPE TI (2005) $ 2,000,000 Qualitative 0 Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions IMPROVEMENTS AT MAIN STREET & from Sidewalk Infrastructure MAYWOOD STREET

604892 WORCESTER - BIKE PATH CONSTRUCTION, HPP (2005) $ 1,862,544 Quantified 2,378 Quantified Decrease in Emissions (See FROM TAINTER STREET TO KILBY STREET Emissions Analysis Appendix)

605820 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE RIVER HPP (2005) $ 2,400,000 Quantified 401,949 Quantified Decrease in Emissions (See BIKEWAY (SEGMENT 7) Emissions Analysis Appendix)

605820 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE RIVER HPP (2005) $ 96,500 Quantified 401,949 Quantified Decrease in Emissions (See BIKEWAY (SEGMENT 7) Emissions Analysis Appendix)

Page 1 of 3

90 2014 Central Mass TIP GHG Tracking Total GHG GHG Impact MassDOT MassDOT Funding Programmed Analysis by the GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼ Numbers▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼

605780 WORCESTER - QUINSIGAMOND VILLAGE HPP (1998) $ 1,462,580 Quantified 29,135 Quantified Decrease in Emissions (See BIKEWAY CONSTRUCTION, FROM Emissions Analysis Appendix) BLACKSTONE RIVER BIKEWAY TO MCKEON ROAD, INCLUDES WORK ON W-44-155

604998 WORCESTER - CITY COMMON PAVILION & HPP (2005) $ 1,000,000 Quantified 595 Quantified Decrease in Emissions (See MULTI-USE PATH CONSTRUCTION Emissions Analysis Appendix) (FRANKLIN STREET)

604998 WORCESTER - CITY COMMON PAVILION & HPP (2005) $ 200,000 Quantified 595 Quantified Decrease in Emissions (See MULTI-USE PATH CONSTRUCTION Emissions Analysis Appendix) (FRANKLIN STREET)

605649 WORCESTER - SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION § 125 (2009) $ 1,095,000 Qualitative 0 Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions ON MCKEON ROAD from Sidewalk Infrastructure

Pending WORCESTER -BLACKSTONE CANAL § 129 (2008) $ 735,000 Qualitative 0 Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS ON from Bicycle and Sidewalk Improvements HARDING STREET

606434 WORCESTER - CENTRAL BUSINESS HPP (2005) $ 5,625,000 Qualitative 0 Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions DISTRICT STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS from Sidewalk Infrastructure

605674 STURBRIDGE - GRAND TRUNK TRAIL HPP (2005) $ 507,500 Qualitative 0 Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from Other Improvements

606629 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE VISITOR HPP (2005) $ 360,000 Qualitative 0 Assumed Nominal Increase in Emissions CENTER

606629 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE VISITOR HPP (2005) $ 5,300,000 Qualitative 0 Assumed Nominal Increase in Emissions CENTER

606629 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE VISITOR HPP (2005) $ 360,000 Qualitative 0 Assumed Nominal Increase in Emissions CENTER

606629 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE VISITOR HPP (2005) $ 85,000 Qualitative 0 Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions CENTER, BIKEWAY & BRIDGE from Bicycle Infrastructure

606629 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE VISITOR HPP (2005) $ 1,700,000 Qualitative 0 Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions CENTER, BIKEWAY & BRIDGE from Bicycle Infrastructure

606629 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE VISITOR HPP (2005) $ 85,000 Qualitative 0 Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions CENTER, BIKEWAY & BRIDGE from Bicycle Infrastructure

Pending QUINEBAUG RAIL TRAIL HPP (2005) $ 800,000 Qualitative 0 Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from Bicycle Infrastructure

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Other TBD WORCESTER - SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL SRTS $ 583,000 Qualitative 0 Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions (ELM PARK SCHOOL) from Sidewalk Infrastructure

Quantified Impact ► 0

Page 2 of 3

91 2014 Central Mass TIP GHG Tracking Total GHG GHG Impact MassDOT MassDOT Funding Programmed Analysis by the GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼ Numbers▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼

►Section 1D / Federal Aid Major & State Category Projects

►IM - Interstate Maintenance 605588 WORCESTER - INTERSTATE MAINTENANCE IM $ 11,486,592 Qualitative 0 No Assumed Impact/Negligible Impact on & RELATED WORK ON I-190 (NB) Emissions

Quantified Impact ► 0

►NHS - National Highway System 605610 NORTHBOROUGH - RESURFACING & NHS $ 3,534,336 Qualitative 0 No Assumed Impact/Negligible Impact on RELATED WORK ON ROUTE 20 Emissions

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Other 0 No Projects Programmed 0 $ - N/A 0 N/A Quantified Impact ► 0

►Section 2A / Non-Federal Projects

0 No Projects Programmed 0 $ - N/A 0 N/A Quantified Impact ► 0

►Section 2B / Non-Federal Bridge Projects

0 No Projects Programmed 0 $ - N/A 0 N/A Quantified Impact ► 0

Total 2014 Central Mass TIP GHG Tracking Summary Quantified Impact ▼ Quantified Impact ► 799891

Page 3 of 3

92 2015 Central Mass TIP GHG Tracking Total GHG GHG Impact MassDOT MassDOT Funding Programmed Analysis by the GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼ Numbers▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼

►Section 1A / Federal Aid Target Projects

►STP - Surface Transportation Program 606347 STURBRIDGE - RESURFACING AND RELATED STP $ 3,340,000 Qualitative 0 Assumed Nominal Decrease in WORK ON ROUTE 20, FROM ROUTE 49 TO I- Emissions from Bicycle and Sidewalk 84 Improvements

606686 WARREN - RESURFACING AND RELATED STP $ 1,622,000 Qualitative 0 Assumed Nominal Decrease in WORK ON ROUTE 67 @ WEST WARREN AND Emissions from Sidewalk Infrastructure WARREN TOWN CENTERS Quantified Impact ► 0

►HSIP - Highway Safety Improvement Program 605055 WORCESTER - RECONSTRUCTION OF HSIP $ 4,867,000 Quantified Pending GHG results are pending due to data LINCOLN STREET (ROUTE 70), FROM MARSH not being available at this time. AVENUE TO AMESBURY STREET (PHASE II)

Quantified Impact ► 0

►CMAQ - Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement 605055 WORCESTER - RECONSTRUCTION OF CMAQ $ 2,163,000 Quantified Pending GHG results are pending due to data LINCOLN STREET (ROUTE 70), FROM MARSH not being available at this time. AVENUE TO AMESBURY STREET (PHASE II)

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Section 1B / Federal Aid Bridge Projects

604675 HOLDEN - BRIDGE REHABILITATION, H -18 - BR $ 2, 589, 192 Qualitative 0 No Assumed Impact/Negligible Impact 020, RIVER STREET OVER QUINAPOXET on Emissions RIVER

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Section 1C / Federal Aid Non-Target Projects

►Earmarks 0 No Projects Programmed 0 $ - N/A 0 N/A Quantified Impact ► 0

►Other 0 No Projects Programmed 0 $ - N/A 0 N/A Quantified Impact ► 0

Page 1 of 2

93 2015 Central Mass TIP GHG Tracking Total GHG GHG Impact MassDOT MassDOT Funding Programmed Analysis by the GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼ Numbers▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼

►Section 1D / Federal Aid Major & State Category Projects

►IM - Interstate Maintenance 605592 STURBRIDGE - HOLLAND - INTERSTATE IM $ 14,337,000 Qualitative 0 No Assumed Impact/Negligible Impact MAINTENANCE & RELATED WORK ON I-84 on Emissions

Quantified Impact ► 0

►NHS - National Highway System 0 No Projects Programmed 0 $ - N/A 0 N/A Quantified Impact ► 0

►Other 605215 UXBRIDGE - SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND Other $ 1,252,016 Quantified 432 Quantified Decrease in Emissions (See TRUNK TRAIL CONSTRUCTION Emissions Analysis Appendix)

Quantified Impact ► 432

►Section 2A / Non-Federal Projects

0 No Projects Programmed 0 $ - N/A 0 N/A Quantified Impact ► 0

►Section 2B / Non-Federal Bridge Projects

0 No Projects Programmed 0 $ - N/A 0 N/A Quantified Impact ► 0

Total 2015 Central Mass TIP GHG Tracking Summary Quantified ItImpact ▼ Quantified Impact ► 432

Page 2 of 2

94 2016 Central Mass TIP GHG Tracking Total GHG GHG Impact MassDOT MassDOT Funding Programmed Analysis by the GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼ Numbers▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼

►Section 1A / Federal Aid Target Projects

►STP - Surface Transportation Program 603486 BROOKFIELD - RECONSTRUCTION OF STP $ 2,587,000 Qualitative 0 No Assumed Impact/Negligible Impact ROUTE 148 (FISKDALE ROAD) FROM on Emissions MOLASSES HILL ROAD TO STURBRIDGE T.L. INCL. WEBBER ROAD

602740 SHREWSBURY - RESURFACING AND STP $ 5,849,000 Qualitative 0 Assumed Nominal Decrease in RELATED WORK ON MAIN STREET, FROM I- Emissions from Bicycle and Sidewalk 290 RAMPS EASTERLY TO MAPLE AVENUE Improvements

606562 OAKHAM - RESURFACING AND RELATED STP $ 1,255,000 Qualitative 0 No Assumed Impact/Negligible Impact WORK ON ROUTE 122 FROM ROUTE 148 TO on Emissions THE BARRE TOWN LINE

604739 WEST BROOKFIELD - RECONSTRUCTION ON STP $ 1,310,000 Qualitative 0 Assumed Nominal Decrease in ROUTE 9, ROUTE 67 & INTERSECTIONS AT Emissions from Other Improvements SCHOOL STREET

Quantified Impact ► 0

►HSIP - Highway Safety Improvement Program 606207 SPENCER - REHABILITATION ON ROUTE 9 HSIP $ 2,250,000 Quantified 16,053 Quantified Decrease in Emissions (See (MAIN STREET), FROM HIGH STREET TO Emissions Analysis Appendix) GROVE STREET Quantified Impact ► 16053

►CMAQ - Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement 606207 SPENCER - REHABILITATION ON ROUTE 9 CMAQ $ 2,137,000 Quantified 16,053 Quantified Decrease in Emissions (See (MAIN STREET), FROM HIGH STREET TO Emissions Analysis Appendix) GROVE STREET

Quantified Impact ► 16053

►Section 1B / Federal Aid Bridge Projects

603516 WORCESTER - BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, W-44-BR $ 5,046,720 Qualitative 0 No Assumed Impact/Negligible Impact 063, ROUTE 122 (GRAFTON STREET) OVER on Emissions ROUTE 20

604468 WEST BROOKFIELD - BRIDGE BR $ 2,260,608 Qualitative 0 No Assumed Impact/Negligible Impact REPLACEMENT, W-19-008, WICKABOAG on Emissions VALLEY ROAD OVER SUCKER BROOK

606303 RUTLAND - BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURE BR $ 1,344,000 Qualitative 0 No Assumed Impact/Negligible Impact REPLACEMENT, R-14-004, INTERVALE ROAD on Emissions OVER EAST BRANCH OF WARE RIVER

607135 WORCESTER - DECK REPLACEMENT AND BR $ 4,480,896 Qualitative 0 No Assumed Impact/Negligible Impact PAINTING, W-44-083, HARRISON STREET on Emissions OVER I-290

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Section 1C / Federal Aid Non-Target Projects

►Earmarks 0 No Projects Programmed 0 $ - N/A 0 N/A Quantified Impact ► 0

►Other 0 No Projects Programmed 0 $ - N/A 0 N/A Quantified Impact ► 0

Page 1 of 2

95 2016 Central Mass TIP GHG Tracking Total GHG GHG Impact MassDOT MassDOT Funding Programmed Analysis by the GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼ Numbers▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼

►Section 1D / Federal Aid Major & State Category Projects

►IM - Interstate Maintenance 0 No Projects Programmed 0 $ - N/A 0 N/A Quantified Impact ► 0

►NHS - National Highway System 607176 SHREWSBURY - WESTBOROUGH NHS $ 13,888,090 Qualitative 0 No Assumed Impact/Negligible Impact RESURFACING AND RELATED WORK ON on Emissions ROUTE 9 Quantified Impact ► 0

►Other 603251 WORCESTER - SIGNAL & INTERSECTION Other $ 485,100 Quantified 82,536 Quantified Decrease in Emissions (See IMPROVEMENTS @ HOLDEN STREET, Emissions Analysis Appendix) DRUMMOND AVENUE & SHORE DRIVE

Quantified Impact ► 82536

►Section 2A / Non-Federal Projects

0 No Projects Programmed 0 $ - N/A 0 N/A Quantified Impact ► 0

►Section 2B / Non-Federal Bridge Projects

0 No Projects Programmed 0 $ - N/A 0 N/A Quantified Impact ► 0

Total 2016 Central Mass TIP GHG Tracking Summary Quantified Impact ▼ Quantified Impact ► 114642

Page 2 of 2

• FY 2013 Project Locus Maps

97 GRAFTON

)"140

)"122

Sutton Street

SUTTON

NORTHBRIDGE )"146

Legend I Planned Sutton St Project NHS System Major Roads Local Roads Town Boundary

0 0.125 0.25 0.5 Miles

The information depicted on this map is for planning purposes only. This information is not adequate for legal boundary definition, regulatory 2013-2016 TIP interpretation, or parcel-level analysis. Use caution intrepreting positional accuracy. NORTHBRIDGE

Produced by the Transportation Staff at Central Massachusetts Regional Planning Commission. SUTTON STREET: SUTTON TOWN LINE TO ROUTE 122 2 Washington Square, 2nd Floor, Worcester, MA 01604-4016 LOCUS MAP Data provided by MassHighway/Mass EOT and MassGIS. H:\Projects\DR2011\ForRich\TIP 2021-2015\Route67LocusMap.mxd 98 LINCOLN AVENUE EXTENSION MILES STREET 2013-2016 TIP MAYFAIR DRIVE Route 146 / West Main St: Interchange Reconstruction West Main St/Elm St/Elmwood St Roundabout

HOWE AVENUE

WEST STREET CANAL STREET SUMMER STREETMAIN STREET NORTH PROVIDENCE ROADRIVERLIN STREET

BORIA LANE WATER STREET

CORAL STREET

GROVE STREET )"146 RIVER STREET CURVE STREET 122A SCHOOL STREET MAPLE STREET JACKIE ROAD Route 146 @ West Main St. SOUTH MAIN STREET )"

PURPLE HEART HIGHWAY

ELM STREET ELM COURT

RICE ROAD

GOULD STREET SULLIVAN PLACE

ELMWOOD TERRACE

ELMWOOD STREET LESLIE LANE

WOODLAND STREET FOREST DRIVE MITCHELL ROAD

ALPINE STREET

SYCAMORE STREET

WEST MAIN STREET

FINK ROAD

HIGH STREET

BEACH STREET PURPLE HEART HIGHWAY HERRICK LANE

Elm Street Route 146

BURBANK STREET

DEBORAH DRIVE WORCESTER PROVIDENCE TURNPIKE

JUNIPER DRIVE Elmwood Street

COLONIAL ROAD

LAUREL DRIVE

SUTTON ROAD

BRENDA DRIVE

HARRIS AVENUE BURBANK ROAD West Main Street

OAKVIEW DRIVE

Source: Data provided by the Central Massachusetts Regional Planning Commission (CMRPC), Legend EOT/MHD and the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs/MassGIS (EOEA/MassGIS)/Pictometry International Corp. Water Bodies Roads Information depicted on this map is for planning purposes Streams Interstate only. This information is not adequate for legal boundary definition, regulatory interpretation, or parcel-level analysis. Railroads US Route Use caution intrepreting positional accuracy. Pictometry State Route Produced by the Central Massachusetts Regional Planning Commission (CMRPC) 00.075 0.15 0.3 Miles Viewshed Local 2 Washington Square, Union Station Worcester, MA 01604 99 h E T U Y STREE N ARADA E F V LA S A N AL CA IS T S G B D T U E R R L R Y O T P S O E T R T R V RE B R E A E E ET M C E E S U S

C R H T

T O R

E T

T E K

T S R

T A

R P èéë E Y T

E A

T W T E

E 7E0 R

èéë T T )"E

A R S T T G E S Y

E N R L R O R T T C E E S ET E B èéë STR IN E RD CO L S N CON R

D A T T

L E S E

D O E

èéë G R èéë E T T

A N T E C A T E N E M R E A R T

L R E S

T K N

S C L

T U O

T T C

T E N I S E L

E U D INS R H èéë TITUTE L ROA T C èéë D O S

N W

ET STRE 9 MONT )" TREET èéë BEL IGHLAND S èéë H )"9 èéë èéë

E T

R E

T E

S R

G S

N S

I A Y

D WORCESTER P R

R R

E E

O D B

G T N S

E U D M

E L

N A R O

J T O

G S O S

N R D H T R S TAT O A U A E ST J R Y E N V ET . L I R S O O A T N R H S D S IX B S E TR T E O ET N R

U R E

A L E GER E E T T V RUDE AV A ENUE R H D OME S TREET èéë SCHOOL STREET T èéë E M E

A R

J T

O S

R N I JO T H A A N STRE G ET EO M Y 0 0.05 0.1 RGE JOH STCR ity of Worcester L N S Miles EE T T O REET Northern E/W Arterial ImproveTmHOeMnAtSs: R T STRE The information depicted on this map is for planning purposes only. ET B E This information is not adequate for legal boundary definition, O H E Lincoln Square Area regulatory interpretation, or parcel-level analysis. Use caution AR U Source: VAR R intrepreting positional accuracy. D L PLA T Data provided by MassDOT C E B E S and Office of Geographic Information OW DO V Produced by the Transportation Staff at IN STR (MassGIS), Commonwealth of Massachusetts, E N ET CMAQ-Eligible A Central Massachusetts Regional Planning Commission. E Information Technology Division. MassGIS. Union Station, 2 Washington Sq, Worcester, MA 01604 R D Intersection O D E H:\Projects\DR2011\For Rich\CMAQ 2011

100

• Supplementary Project Listing

101 RAR JUNE 20, 2012 2013-2016 ENDORSED TIP HIGHWAY REGIONAL FORMAT JUNE 2012 THE CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (CMMPO) CMMPO ENDORSED 2013-2016 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) PROJECT LISTING * HIGHWAY-RELATED PROJECTS DEMONSTRATE FEDERAL-AID FUNDING TARGET FINANCIAL CONSTRAINT * LISTED COSTS INCLUDE ALL NECESSARY CONTINGENCIES AS PER FHWA COST IN MILLIONS $ MHD TEC TOTAL FEDERAL STATE LOCAL FFY PRC# MUNICIPALITY FACILITY DESCRIPTION SCORE COST COST COST COST FUND

PART B: SUPPLEMENTARY PROJECT LISTING PAGE 1 UNPROGRAMMED PROJECTS RECOGNIZED BY THE CMMPO (INFORMATION ONLY, SUBJECT TO FUNDING AVAILABILITY) POTENTIAL POTENTIAL PROJECT PROPOSALS FOR FURTHER EVALUATION SOURCE TBD 603192 AUBURN ROUTE 12, DRURY SQUARE TO WORC C/L REHABILITATION & RELATED 2.160 1.728 0.432 STP TBD 602623 BLACKSTONE ROUTE 122 (MAIN STREET) RESURFACING 2.1 MILES (& LIGHTING, LANDSCAPE) 0.688 0.550 0.138 TE DOT 602659 CHARLTON-OXFORD ROUTE 20 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 3.2 MILES 7.4 20.100 16.080 4.020 MAJOR TBD 602277 DOUGLAS ROUTE 16 (MAIN STREET-TOWN CENTER) RECLAMATION, BOX WIDENING 0.75 MILES 0.960 0.768 0.192 STP TBD 606220 HARDWICK ROUTE 32 (GILBERTVILLE SECTION) RESURFACING & RELATED 3.9 3.456 2.765 0.691 STP 102 TBD 606346 LEICESTER ROUTE 56 (PAXTON STREET) RESURFACING & RELATED, MAIN TO HYLAND 3.4 1.923 1.538 0.385 STP/SRTS TBD 602275 LEICESTER ROUTE 56 RESURFACING & RELATED, RTE 9 TO PAXTON TL 1.600 1.280 0.320 HSIP/STP TBD 605675 MENDON HARTFORD AVENUE EAST REHABILITATION & RELATED 5.000 4.000 1.000 HSIP/STP TBD 602251 MENDON PROVIDENCE STREET & MAIN STREET RECONSTRUCTION 3.500 2.800 0.700 STP TBD 605377 MILLBURY McCRACKEN RD & GREENWOOD ST RECONSTRUCTION & SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 5.4 7.300 5.840 1.460 NFA/CMAQ TBD 605035 NEW BRAINTREE RAVINE ROAD & HARDWICK ROAD RESURFACING & RELATED 3.1 2.150 1.720 0.430 STP TBD 603483 NORTHBRIDGE QUAKER STREET SIGNAL, RESURFACING, BOX WIDENING 1.7 MILES 2.160 1.728 0.432 STP TBD 604116 NORTHBRIDGE RTE 122/CHURCH ST (PLUMMERS CORNER) INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 5.8 1.300 1.170 0.130 HSIP TBD 606206 OXFORD CHARLTON STREET RECONSTRUCTION, MAIN TO DUDLEY RD 4.3 3.800 3.040 0.760 STP

TBD 606440 PRINCETON ROUTE 140 RECLAMATION, STERLING TL TO RTE 31 4.3 3.440 2.752 0.688 STP TBD 602102 SHREWSBURY ROUTE 20 RESURFACING, LTD BOX WIDENING 4.5 5.000 4.000 1.000 STP TBD 602991 SPENCER ROUTE 31 (CHARLTON ROAD) REHABILITATION & RELATED 3.3 4.500 3.600 0.900 STP TBD 606125 UPTON HARTFORD AVE/HIGH ST/HOPKINTON RD RECONSTRUCTION 4.8 8.165 6.532 1.633 STP/HSIP TBD 604948 UXBRIDGE ROUTE 122 RESURFACING & RELATED 4.3 9.174 7.339 1.835 STP/HSIP TBD 603115 UXBRIDGE-MILLVILLE BLACKSTONE RIVER BIKEWAY CONSTRUCT NEW BIKEWAY 9.000 7.200 1.800 CMAQ TBD 606517 WEST BROOKFIELD ROUTE 9 RESURFACING 3.0 4.954 3.963 0.991 STP/HSIP TBD DOT WESTBOROUGH LIMITED ROUTE 9 WIDENING (EMC RELATED) BETWEEN I-495 AND SOUTHBORO T/L 1.000 0.800 0.200 STP TBD 602167 WESTBOROUGH ROUTE 30 & ROUTE 135 RESURFACING & RELATED 0.700 0.560 0.140 HSIP/STP TBD DOT WESTBOROUGH-HOPKINTON MASSPIKE/I-495 INTERCHANGE INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS 33.300 26.640 6.660 MAJOR TBD DOT WESTBOROUGH-SOUTHBOROUGHI-495/ROUTE 9 INTERCHANGE INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS 30.390 24.312 6.078 MAJOR RAR JUNE 20, 2012 2013-2016 ENDORSED TIP HIGHWAY REGIONAL FORMAT JUNE 2012 THE CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (CMMPO) CMMPO ENDORSED 2013-2016 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) PROJECT LISTING * HIGHWAY-RELATED PROJECTS DEMONSTRATE FEDERAL-AID FUNDING TARGET FINANCIAL CONSTRAINT * LISTED COSTS INCLUDE ALL NECESSARY CONTINGENCIES AS PER FHWA COST IN MILLIONS $ MHD TEC TOTAL FEDERAL STATE LOCAL FFY PRC# MUNICIPALITY FACILITY DESCRIPTION SCORE COST COST COST COST FUND

PART B: SUPPLEMENTARY PROJECT LISTING (continued) PAGE 2 103 UNPROGRAMMED PROJECTS RECOGNIZED BY THE CMMPO (INFORMATION ONLY, SUBJECT TO FUNDING AVAILABILITY) POTENTIAL POTENTIAL PROJECT PROPOSALS FOR FURTHER EVALUATION SOURCE

TBD 27260 WORCESTER GATEWAY I, QUINSIGAMOND AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION, BROSNIHAN SQ TO SBRIDGE ST 5.9 8.600 6.880 1.720 STP/CMAQ TBD 601966 WORCESTER ROUTE 20 (SOUTHWEST CUTOFF) RESURFACING, LTD BOX WIDENING 4.5 5.000 4.000 1.000 HSIP/STP TBD 605609 WORCESTER ROUTE 122 RESURFACING & RELATED 0.915 0.732 0.183 STP TBD 601368 WORCESTER ROUTE 122 (GRAFTON STREET) RESURFACING & INTERSECTION IMPROVE 5.1 7.100 5.680 1.420 HSIP/STP/CMA TBD 605740 WORCESTER VERNON HILL INTERSECTIONS SIGNALS & CAPACITY IMPROVE 3 LOCATIONS 2.500 2.000 0.500 HSIP/STP TBD 603539 WORCESTER I-290/ROUTE 122A INTERCHANGE #13, KELLY SQ RECONSTRUCTION, W-44-085 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 20.530 16.424 4.106 CMAQ/HSIP MassDOT D-2 and D-3 Supplemental Bridge Listing For Information Only Projected Project Project Funding Project # Description Type Status Year TFPCC District

AUBURN- BRIDGE BETTERMENT, A-17-036, I-290 Structures 605086 (EB & WB) OVER SR 12 (SOUTHBRIDGE STREET) Maintenance Initial $4,469,000.00 District 3 BARRE- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, B-02-008, STATE ROUTE 32 (MAIN STREET) OVER THE WARE Bridge 604803 CANAL Replacement 75% Design $2,118,945.60 District 2

BARRE- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, B-02-009, Bridge 603719 ROUTE 32 (MAIN STREET) OVER WARE CANAL Replacement 25% Design $1,559,863.20 District 2

BELCHERTOWN- WARREN- WEST SPRINGFIELD- BRIDGE DEMOLITION, B-05-023, W-07-012, W- 21-011, OLD BOSTON POST ROAD (EAST MAIN 604626 STREET/NAULTAUG BROOK) Demolition Initial $800,000.00 District 2

BLACKSTONE - B-13-001, HWY BRIDGE ST OVER Bridge 605277 WATER BLACKSTONE RIVER Replacement Initial $3,575,092.00 District 3

BLACKSTONE - B-13-020, HWY ELM ST OVER 605278 WATER MILL RIVER Unsure Initial $2,573,420.00 District 3

BLACKSTONE- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, B-13-025, Bridge 602849 LINCOLN STREET OVER FOX BROOK Replacement Initial $2,800,000.00 District 3 BROOKFIELD- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, B-26-002, SR 148 (FISKDALE ROAD) OVER THE QUABOAG Bridge 605283 RIVER Replacement Initial $1,406,264.00 District 3

DOUGLAS- BRIDGE PRESERVATION, D-09-003, Structures 605087 MECHANIC STREET OVER MUMFORD RIVER Maintenance Initial $1,217,160.00 District 3

NORTHBOROUGH- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, N-20- Bridge 605318 001, RIVER STREET OVER ASSABET RIVER Replacement Initial $3,111,184.00 District 3 NORTHBRIDGE- N-21-001, HWY CHURCH ST 605319 OVER WATER BLACKSTONE RIVER Unsure Initial $805,492.00 District 3 Bridge OXFORD- BRIDGE BETTERMENT, O-06-002, Reconstruction 605889 ROUTE 20 OVER FRENCH RIVER /Rehab Initial $1,600,000.00 District 3

OXFORD- O-06-030, ST 56 LEICESTER RD OVER Painting - 605323 WATER FRENCH RIVER Structural Initial $1,569,440.00 District 3

SHREWSBURY- BRIDGE DECK REPLACEMENT, S- 14-018, BOYLSTON STREET (ROUTE 140) OVER I- Structures 606380 290 Maintenance Initial $4,200,000.00 District 3 SOUTHBRIDGE- BRIDGE PRESERVATION, S-21- Bridge 002, SR 131 (MAIN STREET) OVER QUINEBAUG Reconstruction 605972 RIVER /Rehab Initial $2,566,000.00 District 3 Bridge UXBRIDGE - U-02-041, ST146 NB OVER WATER Reconstruction 605347 MUMFORD RIVER /Rehab Initial $575,000.00 District 3 UXBRIDGE- U-02-020, HARTFORD AVENUE OVER 605346 THE MUMFORD RIVER Unsure Initial $1,096,300.00 District 3

WORCESTER- BRIDGE PRESERVATION, W-44- Bridge 120, WEST MOUNTAIN STREET OVER I-190 (NB & Reconstruction 605093 SB) /Rehab Initial $3,093,000.00 District 3 WORCESTER- BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURE Bridge REPLACEMENT, W-44-030, PLANTATION STREET Reconstruction 606317 OVER CSX RAILROAD /Rehab Initial $2,875,000.00 District 3

104

2.) Federal-aid & NFA Transit-Related Listing

105 Regional Transit Outlook Project List (FY13) State Match Sources Regional FTA Scope & FTA Transit Project Activity Line Carryover or Federal RTA Total Program ▼ Authority ▼ Description ▼ Item Codes Earmark Details▼ Funds ▼ RTACAP ▼ MAP ▼ ITCCAP ▼ TDC ▼ SCA ▼ Funds ▼ Cost ▼

Associated Capital 11.12.40 WRTA 5307 ► MaintenanceTires $80,000 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Maintenance / Admin Facility 11.44.02 WRTA Rehab $80,000 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 WRTA Support Vehicle 11.42.11 $28,000 $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 WRTA Shop Equipment 11.42.06 $120,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 Computer Related 11.42.07 / WRTA 11.42.08 $110,160 $27,540 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $137,700 Signage & Bus Shelters 11.92.02 / WRTA 11.94.02 / 11.92.08 $160,000 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Replacement - Options only MAP 11.12.15 WRTA vans (10) $56,000 $14,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 Support Equipment - Furniture 11.42.20 WRTA New Hub $128,000 $32,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 Bus Rolling Stock 11.12.01 / WRTA 11.12.02 RTACap14 $1,849,840 $462,460 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,312,300 Bus Rolling Stock 11.12.01 / WRTA 11.12.02 $1,387,700 $0 $0 $0 $277,540 $0 $0 $1,387,700 WRTA Preventive Maintenance 11.7A.00 $1,515,074 $0 $0 $0 $0 $378,769 $0 $1,893,843 WRTA Project Administration 11.79.00 $51,861 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,965 $0 $64,826 WRTA Transportation Planning 11.24.00 $247,254 $0 $0 $0 $0 $61,814 $0 $309,068 ADA Paratransit Services 11.7C.00

106 WRTA $898,100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $224,525 $0 $1,122,625 5307 Subtotal ► $6,711,989 $653,000 $0 $0 $277,540 $678,072 $0 $8,043,061

Intermodal Center - Union Station 11.34.01 / WRTA 5309 ► / WRTA Hub 12.34.02 $1,551,000 $387,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,938,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 5309 Subtotal ► $1,551,000 $387,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,938,750

5310 ► (Do Not Enter Request - Part of Competitive Application) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 (application to be submitted from statewide allocation) 5310 Subtotal ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

5311 ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 WRTA Rural Funding $43,597 $0 $0 $0 $0 $43,597 $0 $87,194

5311 Subtotal ► $43,597 $0 $0 $0 $0 $43,597 $0 $87,194

5316 ► (Do Not Enter Request - Part of Competitive Application) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Regional Transit Outlook Project List (FY13) State Match Sources Regional FTA Scope & FTA Transit Project Activity Line Carryover or Federal RTA Total Program ▼ Authority ▼ Description ▼ Item Codes Earmark Details▼ Funds ▼ RTACAP ▼ MAP ▼ ITCCAP ▼ TDC ▼ SCA ▼ Funds ▼ Cost ▼

(application to be submitted from regional allocation) 5316 Subtotal ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

5317 ► (Do Not Enter Request - Part of Competitive Application) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 (application to be submitted from regional allocation) 5317 Subtotal ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

SoGR ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Livability ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TIGER ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 (for previously awarded competitive grants) Grants Subtotal ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Other ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

107 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Non-Federal (RTACAP)► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Non-Federal (Other State & Locally Funded Projects)► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Subtotal ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL PROGRAMMED $8,306,586 $1,040,750 $0 $0 $277,540 $721,669 $0 $10,069,005

Fiscal Constraint Analysis State Federal Funding Funding Source ▼ Programmed ▼ Available ▼ (+/-) ▼ Source ▼ Programmed ▼ Available ▼ (+/-) ▼ FFY 13 / 5307 $ 6,711,989 $ 8,965,263 $ 2,253,274 RTACAP $ 1,040,750 $ 592,309 $ (448,441) FFY 13 / 5309 $ 1,551,000 $ 1,551,000 $ - ITCCAP $ - $ - n/a n/a SCA $ 721,669 $ 8,698,546 n/a n/a ($462,460 of RTACap will be for FY14 when buses are delivered so there is still $14,019 of RTACap available) TDC $ 277,540 n/a n/a n/a Regional Transit Outlook Project List (FY14) Regional FTA Scope & State Match Sources FTA Transit Project Activity Line Carryover or Federal RTA Total Program ▼ Authority ▼ Description ▼ Item Codes Earmark Details▼ Funds ▼ RTACAP ▼ MAP ▼ ITCCAP ▼ TDC ▼ SCA ▼ Funds ▼ Cost ▼

Associated Capital Maintenance 11.12.40 WRTA 5307 ► $155,585 $38,896 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $194,481 Maintenance / Admin Facility 11.44.02 WRTA Rehab $59,410 $14,853 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $74,263 WRTA Acquire Support Vehicle 11.42.11 $24,000 $6,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 11.42.07 / WRTA Computer Related 11.42.08 $125,200 $31,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $156,500 Signage / Bus Shelters 11.92.02 / WRTA 11.94.02 / 11.92.08 $60,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 Replacement - Options only MAP 11.12.15 WRTA vans (17) $95,200 $23,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $119,000 WRTA Preventive Maintenance 11.7A.00 $951,859 $0 $0 $0 $0 $237,965 $0 $1,189,824 WRTA Preventive Maintenance 11.7A.00 Carryover FY13 $2,253,274 $0 $0 $0 $0 $563,319 $0 $2,816,593 WRTA Project Administration 11.79.00 $52,380 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,095 $0 $65,475 WRTA Transportation Planning 11.24.00 $253,435 $0 $0 $0 $0 $63,359 $0 $316,794 WRTA ADA Paratransit Services 11.7C.00 $889,119 $0 $0 $0 $0 $222,280 $0 $1,111,399 5307 Subtotal ► $4,919,462 $129,849 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,017 $0 $6,149,328

Intermodal Center - Union Station 11.34.01 / WRTA

108 5309 ► / WRTA Hub 12.34.02 $1,551,000 $0 $0 $0 $310,200 $0 $0 $1,551,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 5309 Subtotal ► $1,551,000 $0 $0 $0 $310,200 $0 $0 $1,551,000

5311 ► (Do Not Enter Request - Part of Competitive Application) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 (application to be submitted from statewide allocation) 5311 Subtotal ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

5316 ► (Part of Competitive Application-to be determined) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 (application to be submitted from regional allocation) 5316 Subtotal ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

5317 ► (Do Not Enter Request - Part of Competitive Application) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Regional Transit Outlook Project List (FY14) Regional FTA Scope & State Match Sources FTA Transit Project Activity Line Carryover or Federal RTA Total Program ▼ Authority ▼ Description ▼ Item Codes Earmark Details▼ Funds ▼ RTACAP ▼ MAP ▼ ITCCAP ▼ TDC ▼ SCA ▼ Funds ▼ Cost ▼

(application to be submitted from regional allocation) 5317 Subtotal ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Other ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 109 Non-Federal (RTACAP)► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Non-Federal (Other State & Locally Funded Projects)► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Subtotal ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL PROGRAMMED $6,470,462 $129,849 $0 $0 $310,200 $1,100,017 $0 $7,700,328

Fiscal Constraint Analysis State Federal Funding Funding Source ▼ Programmed ▼ Available ▼ (+/-) ▼ Source ▼ Programmed ▼ Available ▼ (+/-) ▼ FFY 14 / 5307 $ 4,919,462 $ 8,965,263 $ 4,045,801 RTACAP $ 129,849 $ 592,309 $ 462,460 FFY 14 / 5309 $ 1,551,000 $ 1,551,000 $ - ITCCAP $ - $ - n/a n/a ($462,460 of RTACap was used for FY13 TIP line item for buses, leaving a balance of $0 in FY14) SCA $ 1,100,017 $ 8,698,546 n/a n/a TDC $ 310,200 n/a n/a n/a Regional Transit Outlook Project List (FY15) Regional FTA Scope & State Match Sources FTA Transit Project Activity Line Carryover or Federal RTA Total Program ▼ Authority ▼ Description ▼ Item Codes Earmark Details▼ Funds ▼ RTACAP ▼ MAP ▼ ITCCAP ▼ TDC ▼ SCA ▼ Funds ▼ Cost ▼

11.12.40 WRTA 5307 ► Associated Capital Maintenance Carryover FY14 $218,676 $54,669 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $273,345 Maintenance / Admin Facility 11.44.02 WRTA Rehab Carryover FY14 $61,193 $15,298 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $76,491 WRTA Acquire Support Vehicle (2) 11.42.11 Carryover FY14 $52,000 $13,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000 WRTA Support Equipment 11.42.20 Carryover FY14 $64,000 $16,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 11.42.07 / WRTA Computer Related 11.42.08 Carryover FY14 $76,000 $19,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 Signage / Bus Shelters 11.92.02 / WRTA 11.94.02 / 11.92.08 Carryover FY14 $60,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 Replacement - Options only MAP 11.12.15 WRTA vans (17) Carryover FY14 $95,200 $23,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $119,000 WRTA Preventive Maintenance 11.7A.00 Carryover FY14 $3,500,299 $0 $0 $0 $0 $875,075 $0 $4,375,374 WRTA Project Administration 11.79.00 Carryover FY14 $52,903 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,226 $0 $66,129 WRTA Transportation Planning 11.24.00 Carryover FY14 $259,771 $0 $0 $0 $0 $64,943 $0 $324,714 WRTA ADA Paratransit Services 11.7C.00 $880,228 $0 $0 $0 $0 $220,057 $0 $1,100,285 5307 Subtotal ► $5,320,270 $156,767 $0 $0 $0 $1,173,300 $0 $6,650,337

Intermodal Center - Union Station 11.34.01 / WRTA

110 5309 ► / WRTA Hub 12.34.02 $1,551,000 $387,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,938,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 5309 Subtotal ► $1,551,000 $387,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,938,750

5316 ► (Do Not Enter Request - Part of Competitive Application) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 (application to be submitted from statewide allocation) 5316 Subtotal ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

5317 ► (Do Not Enter Request - Part of Competitive Application) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Regional Transit Outlook Project List (FY15) Regional FTA Scope & State Match Sources FTA Transit Project Activity Line Carryover or Federal RTA Total Program ▼ Authority ▼ Description ▼ Item Codes Earmark Details▼ Funds ▼ RTACAP ▼ MAP ▼ ITCCAP ▼ TDC ▼ SCA ▼ Funds ▼ Cost ▼

(application to be submitted from statewide allocation) 5317 Subtotal ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

SoGR ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Livability ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TIGER ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Grants Subtotal ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Other ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Non-Federal 111 (RTACAP)► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Non-Federal (Other State & Locally Funded Projects)► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Subtotal ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL PROGRAMMED $6,871,270 $544,517 $0 $0 $0 $1,173,300 $0 $8,589,087

Fiscal Constraint Analysis State Federal Funding Funding Source ▼ Programmed ▼ Available ▼ (+/-) ▼ Source ▼ Programmed ▼ Available ▼ (+/-) ▼ FFY 15 / 5307 $ 5,320,270 $ 8,965,263 $ 3,644,993 RTACAP $ 544,517 $ 592,309 $ 47,792 FFY 15 / 5309 $ 1,551,000 $ 1,551,000 $ - ITCCAP $ - $ - n/a n/a SCA $ 1,173,300 $ 8,698,546 n/a n/a TDC $ - n/a n/a n/a Regional Transit Outlook Project List (FY16) Regional FTA Scope & State Match Sources FTA Transit Project Activity Line Carryover or Federal RTA Total Program ▼ Authority ▼ Description ▼ Item Codes Earmark Details▼ Funds ▼ RTACAP ▼ MAP ▼ ITCCAP ▼ TDC ▼ SCA ▼ Funds ▼ Cost ▼

11.12.40 WRTA 5307 ► Associated Capital Maintenance Carryover FY15 $180,237 $45,059 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,296 Maintenance / Admin Facility 11.44.02 WRTA Rehab Carryover FY15 $63,029 $15,757 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $78,786 WRTA Acquire Support Vehicle 11.42.11 Carryover FY15 $60,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 WRTA Shop Equipment 11.42.06 Carryover FY15 $160,000 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 11.42.07 / WRTA Computer Related 11.42.08 Carryover FY15 $64,000 $16,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 Signage / Bus Shelters 11.92.02 / WRTA 11.94.02 / 11.92.08 Carryover FY15 $60,000 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 Replacement - Options only MAP 11.12.15 WRTA vans (4) Carryover FY15 $22,400 $5,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $28,000 WRTA Preventive Maintenance 11.7A.00 Carryover FY15 $1,744,585 $0 $0 $0 $0 $436,146 $0 $2,180,731 WRTA Preventive Maintenance 11.7A.00 Carryover FY14 $1,859,033 $0 $0 $0 $0 $464,758 $0 $2,323,791 WRTA Project Administration 11.79.00 Carryover FY15 $53,432 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,358 $0 $66,790 WRTA Transportation Planning 11.24.00 Carryover FY15 $266,266 $0 $0 $0 $0 $66,567 $0 $332,833 WRTA ADA Paratransit Services 11.7C.00 $871,426 $0 $0 $0 $0 $217,857 $0 $1,089,283 5307 Subtotal ► $5,404,408 $197,416 $0 $0 $0 $1,198,686 $0 $6,800,510

112 Intermodal Center - Union Station 11.34.01 / WRTA 5309 ► / WRTA Hub 12.34.02 $1,551,000 $387,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,938,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 5309 Subtotal ► $1,551,000 $387,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,938,750

5317 ► (Do Not Enter Request - Part of Competitive Application) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Regional Transit Outlook Project List (FY16) Regional FTA Scope & State Match Sources FTA Transit Project Activity Line Carryover or Federal RTA Total Program ▼ Authority ▼ Description ▼ Item Codes Earmark Details▼ Funds ▼ RTACAP ▼ MAP ▼ ITCCAP ▼ TDC ▼ SCA ▼ Funds ▼ Cost ▼

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 (application to be submitted from statewide allocation) 5317 Subtotal ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Other ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 113 Non-Federal (RTACAP)► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Non-Federal (Other State & Locally Funded Projects)► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Subtotal ► $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL PROGRAMMED $6,955,408 $585,166 $0 $0 $0 $1,198,686 $0 $8,739,260

Fiscal Constraint Analysis State Federal Funding Funding Source ▼ Programmed ▼ Available ▼ (+/-) ▼ Source ▼ Programmed ▼ Available ▼ (+/-) ▼ FFY 16 / 5307 $ 5,404,408 $ 8,965,263 $ 3,560,855 RTACAP $ 585,166 $ 592,309 $ 7,143 FFY 16 / 5309 $ 1,551,000 $ 1,551,000 $ - ITCCAP $ - $ - n/a n/a SCA $ 1,198,686 $ 8,698,546 n/a n/a TDC $ - n/a n/a n/a

Part C:

Federal Requirements

114

1.) Certification of the “3C” Planning Process

This will certify that the Comprehensive, Continuing, and Cooperative (3C) Transportation Planning Process for Fiscal Year 2012 in the Central Massachusetts Metropolitan Planning Organization (CMMPO) is addressing major issues facing the region and is being conducted in accordance with the requirements of:

1. 23 U.S.C. 134, 49 U.S.C. 5303, and this subpart;

2. In nonattainment and maintenance areas, sections 174 and 176 (c) and (d) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7504, 7506 (c) and (d)) and 40 CFR part 93;

3. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000d-1) and 49 CFR part 21;

4. 49 U.S.C. 5332, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed, national origin, sex, or age in employment or business opportunity;

5. Section 1101(b) of the SAFETEA-LU (Pub. L. 109-59) and 49 CFR part 26 regarding the involvement of disadvantaged business enterprises in USDOT funded projects;

6. 23 CFR 230, regarding the implementation of an Equal Employment Opportunity Program on Federal and Federal-Aid construction contracts.

7. The provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) and 49 CFR parts 27, 37, and 38;

8. The Older Americans Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6101), prohibiting discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance;

9. Section 324 of title 23 U.S.C. regarding the prohibition of discrimination based on gender; and

10. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and 49 CFR part 27 regarding discrimination against individuals with disabilities.

11. Anti-lobbying restrictions found in 49 USC Part 20. No appropriated funds may be expended by a recipient to influence or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract.

115 116

2.) Federal Transportation Project Priorities

• FHWA Related Project Listing

117 05/09/2012 Draft Released 2013 Central Mass MPO Transportation Improvement Program 06/13/2012 CMMPO

Total MassDOT MassDOT MassDOT Funding Programmed Federal Non-Federal Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ District ▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Information ▼

►Section 1A / Federal Aid Target Projects

CMAQ Subtotal ► $ 3,715,000 $ 2,972,000 $ 743,000 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Section 1B / Federal Aid Bridge Projects

BR Subtotal ► $ 11,275,299 $ 9,020,239 $ 2,255,060 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Section 1C / Federal Aid Non-Target Projects

►Earmarks No Projects Programmed $ - $ - Earmarks Subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Earmark

Other Subtotal ► $ 174,000 $ 139,200 $ 34,800 ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

Page 1 of 2

118 05/09/2012 Draft Released 2013 Central Mass MPO Transportation Improvement Program 06/13/2012 CMMPO

Total MassDOT MassDOT MassDOT Funding Programmed Federal Non-Federal Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ District ▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Information ▼

►Section 1D / Federal Aid Major & State Category Projects

►IM - Interstate Maintenance No Projects Programmed $ - $ - IM Subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 90% Federal + 10% Non-Federal

►NHS - National Highway System No Projects Programmed $ - - - NHS Subtotal ►◄$ - $ - $ - 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Other No Projects Programmed $ - - - Other Subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

►Section 2A / Non-Federal Projects

►Section 2B / Non-Federal Bridge Projects

Page 2 of 2

119 05/09/2012 Draft Released 2014 Central Mass MPO Transportation Improvement Program 06/13/2012 CMMPO Total MassDOT MassDOT MassDOT Funding Programmed Federal Non-Federal Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ District ▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Information ▼

►Section 1A / Federal Aid Target Projects

604227 BARRE - TOWN COMMON 2 STP $ 2,339,000 $ 1,871,200 $ 467,800 Construction / TEC Score = 6.0 / Design Status = IMPROVEMENTS Pre 25% / Total Project Cost = $2,339,000

HSIP Subtotal ► $ 3,536,000 $ 3,182,400 $ 353,600 ◄ Funding Split Varies by Project Specifications

CMAQ Subtotal ►◄ $ 2,080,000 $ 1,664,000 $ 416,000 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Section 1B / Federal Aid Bridge Projects

►Section 1C / Federal Aid Non-Target Projects

605820 WORCESTER - BLACKSTONE RIVER 3 HPP (2005) $ 96,500 $ 77,200 $ 19,300 Design & Construction / HPP#2509 - MA165 / BIKEWAY (SEGMENT 7) Design Status = Pre 25% / Total Project Cost = $2,496,500

Page 1 of 3

120 05/09/2012 Draft Released 2014 Central Mass MPO Transportation Improvement Program 06/13/2012 CMMPO Total MassDOT MassDOT MassDOT Funding Programmed Federal Non-Federal Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ District ▼ Source ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Information ▼