DOCSLIB.ORG

Violations of Human Rights in Belarus in 2006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Violations of Human Rights in Belarus in 2006 Violations of Human Rights in Belarus in 2006. Analytical Review. Violations of Human Rights in Belarus in 2006 Analytical Review Minsk 2007 1 Violations of Human Rights in Belarus in 2006. Analytical Review. Violations of Human Rights in Belarus in 2006. Analytical Review. Authors: Ales Bialiatski Uladzimir Labkovich Tatsiana Reviaka Valiantsin Stefanovich Editors: Yury Chavusau Tatsiana Reviaka The Review presents the analysis of the situation of human rights in Belarus in 2006. It contains the most eloquent and typical facts of violations of Belarusian citizens’ rights and liberties during this period. The Review was prepared on the basis of personal applications of victims of human rights violations, the facts that were registered by human rights activists and the information that was taken from open sources (mass media, web-sites spring96.org, baj.ru, charter97.org, etc.). The book is illustrated with photos by Yury Dziadzinkin, Siarhei Serabro, photo.bymedia.net, svaboda.org, etc. 2 Violations of Human Rights in Belarus in 2006. Analytical Review. INTRODUCTION The previous Chronicle Review of Human Rights Violations in 2005 was about 500 pages. In conjunction with the volume of facts and events which had to be processed, its publishing was delayed. The book came out only in the second half of 2006. We realized that the number of facts, concrete stories and incidents of human rights violation in Belarus in 2006 is so high, that it may become an impossible mission to publish WKHERRN7KDWLVZK\ZLWKWKHJRDOWRNHHSWKHHI¿FLHQF\DQGUHOHYDQFH of the Review, we made a decision to change its format, and to refuse from scrupulous factual account of human rights violations and make it more analytical. In this edition of the Review we set a goal to track down the tendencies and changes in the human rights situation in 2006, giving only the most obvious and typical examples. We leave a detailed fact account for the future researchers of this period of history. Moreover, the overwhelming majority of cases of human rights violations is described on informational web-sites. Its most complete package lies in court archives, KGB folders, DQGSUHVLGHQW¶VRI¿FH¿OHV:HKRSHWKDWWKH\ZLOOQRWGLVDSSHDUIRUHYHU and will see the light of day some time in the future. The year of 2006 became a breaking point in maturing of our people. Working on the Review, we pointed out a great rise in the civic activity connected with the presidential election in Spring. We encountered so many facts of civic courage, youth activity, and unwillingness to bear injustice, which mostly comes from the authorities in present Belarus. These facts could really make a real chronicle of Belarusian people ¿JKWLQJIRULQGHSHQGHQFHGHPRFUDF\DQGKXPDQULJKWV7KDWLVZK\WKH authorities increased the level of repression used against their political opponents. The system created by Aliaksandr Lukashenka and his mates is absolutely totalitarian. Aggressiveness to political and ideological opponents, suspicion and self-distrust, penetrating in all state structures, attempts to control any displays of civic activity, and inability to transform are the typical feature of the regime. More and more weight in the 3 Violations of Human Rights in Belarus in 2006. Analytical Review. state management is given to repressive structures – the police and LWVVSHFLDOGHSDUWPHQWVSURVHFXWLRQRI¿FHVWD[LQVSHFWRUDWH DQG especially, KGB. Courts, as an independent branch of power, are less and less VLJQL¿FDQW6SULQJRIVKRZHGWKHDEVROXWHLQDELOLW\RI%HODUXVLDQ courts to have an unbiased opinion and demonstrated total dependence of judges on the executive authorities. Courts were used as a repressive tool, aimed against political opponents of the regime. The Lukashenka-created network of ideological workers – a huge number of full-time ideologists at higher educational institutions, executive committees, and state-owned companies — had more and more of an LQÀXHQFHRQWKHOLIHRIWKHVRFLHW\7KHLGHRORJLVWVFORVHO\REVHUYHGWKH “appropriateness” of opinions of Belarusian citizens; they “organized” the needed election results, and participated in expulsion of students IURPFROOHJHVDQG¿ULQJRIHPSOR\HHVIRUSROLWLFDOUHDVRQVEHFRPLQJ an element of the repressive machinery. State-owned mass media became even more ideologized. While what remains of the independent press are under the strong economic, administrative, and political pressure, and make wonders to survive in unfavorable conditions, state-owned mass media deal with open propaganda, organize campaigns of slander against opponents of the regime, and demonstrate complete absence of human morals and journalists’ ethics. Once ordinary journalistic editions, they have become a real ideological weapon serving the totalitarian state system. 7KHRI¿FLDOWUDGHXQLRQRI%HODUXVKDVLQIDFWWXUQHGLQWRDQRWKHU state ministry and does not defend the workers’ rights at all. The working contract system for all workers has become a repressive tool in the hands of executive authorities, which is used against citizens who do not agree with this or that element of organization of our public system. Such entities of political and public system as political parties and QRQJRYHUQPHQWDORUJDQL]DWLRQVKDYHOHVVDQGOHVVVLJQL¿FDQFHLQWKH life of our society. They are subject to endless repression and restrictions from the created system of state management. The problem of keeping power by any means is the main and fundamental one in all actions of the incumbent president and his circle. Only that can explain the anti-constitutional amendments to the Constitution in 2004, which gave Lukashenka an opportunity to run for presidential post for an unlimited number of times. This is also the basis of the changes in the legislation, which allow the authorities to persecute 4 their political and civic opponents “legally”, on the ground of laws. Often Violations of Human Rights in Belarus in 2006. Analytical Review. they violate in these laws and act out of accordance with the human rights standards and current Belarusian legislation. That is why the extremely high level of repression encountered by the Belarusian society in 2006 was not accidental. The authorities perceived any civic activity as a threat. They used all possible means to prevent the displays of real moods and opinions in the Belarusian society from going to the surface of public life. The regime did everything possible to disorganize and intimidate the Belarusian citizens, to keep them in a passive zombie state. The repression affected the wide layers of the Belarusian society. We have never seen so many criminal charges against the opponents of the regime, and administrative trials for participation in rallies, pickets and demonstrations and distribution of printed materials. KGB has never been so zealous in putting its efforts to neutralize the activity of Belarusian citizens. Never have so many students and workers been H[SHOOHGDQG¿UHGIRUWKHLUFLYLFDQGSROLWLFDOFRQYLFWLRQV&LYLFDQG political activists were groundlessly accused of such serious crimes as SUHSDUDWLRQRIWHUURULVWDFWVUDSHVLOOHJDOSRVVHVVLRQRI¿UHDUPVDQG GUXJWUDQVSRUWDWLRQ7RSVWDWHRI¿FLDOVVSRNHRQ79FDOOLQJDOOSRVVLEOH participants of post-election protests potential terrorists. At the same time, a huge billow of repression created by the authorities UHÀHFWVWKHUHDOOHYHORIUHVLVWDQFHWRXQODZIXOQHVVDQGLQMXVWLFHLQWKH %HODUXVLDQVRFLHW\7KH\HDURISURYHGWKDWDVLJQL¿FDQWSDUWRI Belarusian citizens want to live in a democratic lawful state, which would respect their rights. That is why quite an abstract slogan “For Freedom”, initiated by the non-governmental organizations and picked up by the United Democratic Forces, has become so important in the Belarusian society. This short phrase accumulates all hopes and desires of the oppressed and non-free society. New countdown of time began in 2006 in Belarus. People are less and less intimidated by pressure and restrictions. They demonstrate more and more open and hidden resistance to implementation of the political orders and participation in various campaigns organized by the authorities. 3RWHQWLDOUHSUHVVLRQKDVOHVVLQÀXHQFHRQWKHSROLWLFDODQGFLYLF DFWLYLVWVZKRDUHUHDG\WRVDFUL¿FHWKHLUIUHHGRPLQWKH¿JKWIRUGHPRFUDWLF ideals and principles. The repressed activists have serious support and sympathy in the society. Psychologically they do not believe themselves to be renegades and dissidents, because many people in Belarus are on their side. Gradually the Belarusian society is coming out of the moral and political crisis where they were placed by the regime. 5 Violations of Human Rights in Belarus in 2006. Analytical Review. We hope that when changes come this research will help to quickly DQGHI¿FLHQWO\JHWULGRIWKHSRVW6RYLHWWRWDOLWDULDQV\VWHPFUHDWHGE\ the current Belarusian authorities which literally entangles our public and social life. For our society to have good chances for moral recovery, for irrevocability of democratic processes, when changes come, we have to know the names of all people who organized and implemented repression against the citizens of Belarus, so that in the future they would not have anything to do with state management and power. People should know their “heroes”, and the “heroes” should also know that the time will come and they will be accountable for the crimes against their people. We are convinced that awareness of the Belarusian society, moral guidelines based on European values, understanding of importance of the human rights, and personal dignity of our people will give totalitarian authorities in Belarus no chance to exist. Ales Bialiatski. 6 Violations of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Book
    84 823 65 Special thanks to the Independent Institute of Socio-Economic and Political Studies for assistance in getting access to archival data. The author also expresses sincere thanks to the International Consortium "EuroBelarus" and the Belarusian Association of Journalists for information support in preparing this book. Photos by ByMedia.Net and from family albums. Aliaksandr Tamkovich Contemporary History in Faces / Aliaksandr Tamkovich. — 2014. — ... pages. The book contains political essays about people who are well known in Belarus and abroad and who had the most direct relevance to the contemporary history of Belarus over the last 15 to 20 years. The author not only recalls some biographical data but also analyses the role of each of them in the development of Belarus. And there is another very important point. The articles collected in this book were written at different times, so today some changes can be introduced to dates, facts and opinions but the author did not do this INTENTIONALLY. People are not less interested in what we thought yesterday than in what we think today. Information and Op-Ed Publication 84 823 © Aliaksandr Tamkovich, 2014 AUTHOR’S PROLOGUE Probably, it is already known to many of those who talked to the author "on tape" but I will reiterate this idea. I have two encyclopedias on my bookshelves. One was published before 1995 when many people were not in the position yet to take their place in the contemporary history of Belarus. The other one was made recently. The fi rst book was very modest and the second book was printed on classy coated paper and richly decorated with photos.
    [Show full text]
  • Review-Chronicle
    REVIEW-CHRONICLE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BELARUS IN 1999 2 REVIEW-CHRONICLE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BELARUS IN 1999 INTRODUCTION: GENERAL CONCLUSIONS The year of 1999 was the last year of Alexander Lukashenka’s original mandate. In 1994 having used the machinery of democratic procedure he was elected president of the Republic of Belarus for five years term. But in 1996 A.Lukashenka conducted illegal, non-free and unfair referendum and by it prolonged his mandate to seven years. Constitutional Court’s judges and deputies of the Supreme Soviet that resisted to A.Lukashenka’s dictatorial intentions were dismissed. Thus provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus were broken. Attempt to conduct presidential elections done by the legitimate Supreme Soviet of the 13th convocation was supported by the most influential opposition parties and movements. But Belarusan authorities did their best to prevent opposition from succeeding in presidential elections and subjected people involved in election campaign to different kinds of repressions. Regime didn’t balk at anything in the struggle with its opponents. Detentions and arrests, persecutions of its organisers and participants, warnings, penalties and imprisonment followed every opposition-organised action… Yet the year of 1999 became a year of mass actions of protest of Belarusan people against a union with Russia imposed by the authorities to the people. In 1999 the OSCE Advisory and Monitoring Group in Belarus made an attempt to arrange talks between Belarusan authorities and opposition. This year will go down to history as a year when some of prominent politicians and fighters against the regime disappeared, when unprecedented number of criminal proceedings against opposition leaders and participants of mass actions of protest was instituted..
    [Show full text]
  • Review–Chronicle
    REVIEWCHRONICLE of the human rights violations in Belarus in 2005 Human Rights Center Viasna ReviewChronicle » of the Human Rights Violations in Belarus in 2005 VIASNA « Human Rights Center Minsk 2006 1 REVIEWCHRONICLE of the human rights violations in Belarus in 2005 » VIASNA « Human Rights Center 2 Human Rights Center Viasna, 2006 REVIEWCHRONICLE of the human rights violations in Belarus in 2005 INTRODUCTION: main trends and generalizations The year of 2005 was marked by a considerable aggravation of the general situation in the field of human rights in Belarus. It was not only political rights » that were violated but social, economic and cultural rights as well. These viola- tions are constant and conditioned by the authoritys voluntary policy, with Lu- kashenka at its head. At the same time, human rights violations are not merely VIASNA a side-effect of the authoritarian state control; they are deliberately used as a « means of eradicating political opponents and creating an atmosphere of intimi- dation in the society. The negative dynamics is characterized by the growth of the number of victims of human rights violations and discrimination. Under these circums- tances, with a high level of latent violations and concealed facts, with great obstacles to human rights activity and overall fear in the society, the growth points to drastic stiffening of the regimes methods. Apart from the growing number of registered violations, one should men- Human Rights Center tion the increase of their new forms, caused in most cases by the development of the state oppressive machine, the expansion of legal restrictions and ad- ministrative control over social life and individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation of Human Rights in Belarus in 2012
    Human Rights Center «Viasna» Situation of Human Rights in Belarus in 2012 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Мinsk, 2013 SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN BELARUS IN 2012 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Compiled by Tatsiana Reviaka Editing and introduction by Valiantsin Stefanovich The book was prepared on the basis of the monthly reviews of the situation of human rights in Belarus in 2012. Each of the monthly reviews includes the analysis of the most important events which influenced the observation of human rights for the given period, as well as the most evident and characteristic features of the abuses registered at that time. The review was prepared on the basis of personal applications of victims of human rights violations, the facts that were registered by human rigths defenders or voiced in open information sources. The book makes use of photos by Yuliya Darashkevich Dzmitry Bushko, Siarhei Hudzilin, Nastassia Loika, the web-sites http://photo.bymedia. net, http://nn.by, http://euroradio.fm, http://www.svaboda.org, http://volkovysk.by, http://gazetaby.com, http://mfront.net, http://www.reuters.com, http://belsat.eu/be, belhouse.org and the archive of the Human Rights Center «Viasna». TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 9 Review-Chronicle of Human Rights Violations in Belarus in January 2012 19 Politically motivated criminal prosecution 19 Harassment and pressurization of human rights activists and organizations 21 Torture and cruel treatment, poor conditions of detention 23 Death penalty 25 Administrative prosecution of social and political activists 25 Restrictions on freedom of speech 27 Restrictions on freedom of assembly 28 Situation of freedom of association 30 Review-Chronicle of Human Rights Violations in Belarus in February 2012 31 Political prisoners.
    [Show full text]
  • SITUATION of HUMAN RIGHTS in BELARUS in 2014
    Human Rights Centre “Viasna” SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS in BELARUS in 2014 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Minsk, 2015 SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN BELARUS in 2014 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Author and compiler: Tatsiana Reviaka Editor and author of the foreword: Valiantsin Stefanovich The edition was prepared on the basis of reviews of human rights violations in Belarus published every month in 2014. Each of the monthly reviews includes an analysis of the most important events infl uencing the observance of human rights and outlines the most eloquent and characteristic facts of human rights abuses registered over the described period. The review was prepared on the basis of personal appeals of victims of human rights abuses and the facts which were either registered by human rights activists or reported by open informational sources. The book features photos from the archive of the Human Rights Center “Viasna”, as well as from publications on the websites of Radio Free Europe/ Radio Liberty Belarus service, the Nasha Niva newspaper, tv.lrytas.lt, baj.by, gazetaby.com, and taken by Franak Viachorka and Siarhei Hudzilin. Human Rights Situation in 2014: Trends and Evaluation The situation of human rights during 2014 remained consistently poor with a tendency to deterioration at the end of the year. Human rights violations were of both systemic and systematic nature: basic civil and political rights were extremely restricted, there were no systemic changes in the fi eld of human rights (at the legislative level and (or) at the level of practices). The only positive development during the year was the early release of Ales Bialiatski, Chairman of the Human Rights Centre “Viasna” and Vice-President of the International Federation for Human Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf 12.39 MB За Права На Выбар. Партрэты Асуджаных
    ЗА ПРАВА НА ВЫБАР 1 Human Rights Center «Viasna» FOR RIGHT TO ELECT Portraits of Convicts Square-2010 Vilnius Publishing House «GUDAS» 2011 2 Праваабарончы цэнтр «Вясна» ЗА ПРАВА НА ВЫБАР Партрэты асуджаных Плошча-2010 Вільнюс Выдавецтва «GUDAS» 2011 3 За права на выбар: Партрэты асуджаных. Плошча-2010 / For Right to Elect: Portraits of Convicts. Square-2010/ Photo album. — Фотаальбом. — Вільнюс: «Gudas», 2011 — 142 с., 89 іл. Vilnius: “Gudas”, 2011 — 142 p., 89 il. Вынікам 2010-га года і чарговых выбараў Прэзідэнтам Рэспублікі Year 2010 and the election of Aliaksandr Lukashenka for the fourth Беларусь Аляксандра Лукашэнкі на чацвёрты тэрмін стала consecutive presidential term resulted in an incredible number of неверагодная дагэтуль наяўнасць у краіне палітвязняў — агулам political prisoners in the country — about 60 people. Why is this number каля 60-ці чалавек. Чаму гэтая лічба недакладная? Таму што imprecise? Because most of them were released, some even managed большасць з іх усё ж выйшлі на волю, некаторым нават удалося to avoid the criminal “mock trials”, while some others were still kept пазбегнуць крымінальнага «судзілішча», і за кратамі засталіся толькі in custody. The trials lasted for the whole of 2011 and concerned not самыя-самыя. Судовыя працэсы ішлі на працягу ўсяго 2011-га года only the Square. Among those punished there is Andrei Pachobut, і не толькі за Плошчу. Сярод пакараных — незалежны журналіст і актывіст апазіцыйнага Саюза палякаў на Беларусі Андрэй Пачобут, independent journalist and activist of opposition Union of Poles in прадстаўнікі анархісцкага моладзевага руху, праваабаронца Belarus, representatives of anarchist youth movement and human rights Алесь Бяляцкі. Да таго ж за кратамі працягвае знаходзіцца activist Ales Bialiatski.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Media in Belarus
    Belarusian Association of Journalists (BAJ) MASS MEDIA IN BELARUS 2016 ANNUAL REPORT Minsk 2017 CONTENTS SITUATION IN THE SPHERE OF MASS MEDIA IN 2016 (OVERVIEW) ……………….…………………………………………….....…. 3 CHANGES IN LEGISLATION …………………………………………… 5 VIOLATIONS OF RIGHTS OF MASS MEDIA AND JOURNALISTS, CONFLICTS IN THE SPHERE OF MASS MEDIA ……………………………….................……...……....………………….. 8 Criminal cases ………………..…………………………………………………... 8 Other court cases (except for administrative prosecution) …….. 9 Detention of journalists, judicial administrative prosecution ….. 11 Physical attacks against journalists ……………………........................ 17 Seizure of equipment, damages, confiscation ………….……………. 19 Warnings of the Ministry of Information ………..……………………… 19 Restrictions on the free use of the Web ……………………………….. 20 Violations related to access to information ………….………………. 21 Violations during the elections to the House of Representatives of the National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus …................... 24 Economic policy in mass media field ………….…………………………. 25 Other forms of pressure and violation of rights of journalists and mass media ……………………………………………… 27 Mass-media in Belarus: 2016 SITUATION IN THE SPHERE OF MASS MEDIA IN 2016 (OVERVIEW) The main factor that influenced the media situation in Belarus in 2016 was the elections to the House of Representatives of the National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus. They took place in September 2016 against the backdrop of a worsening economic situation and a complex foreign policy environment. The Belarusian authorities sought to receive a positive assessment of the elections by international bodies, and as the election campaign approached and during its course, direct repression of journalists decreased. However, at the system level, the situation has not changed for the better, and the legislation in the field of media regulation has only become tougher. This shows the situational nature and volatility of some positive changes in the media sector in 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • SITUATION of HUMANRIGHTS in BELARUS in 2013
    Human Rights Center “Viasna” SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS in BELARUS in 2013 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Minsk, 2014 SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN BELARUS IN 2013 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Compiled by: Tatsiana Reviaka Editor and author of the foreword: Valiantsin Stefanovich The book was prepared on the basis of monthly reviews of the situation of human rights in Belarus in 2013. Each of the monthly reviews includes the analysis of the most important events infl uencing the observance of human rights for the reported period, as well as the most eloquent and signifi cant facts of violations registered at the time. The review was prepared on the basis of personal appeals of victims of human rights violations, registered by human rights defenders and/or voiced in open sources of information. The book makes use of photos from the websites nn.bу, euroradio.fm, sva- boda.org, gazetaby.com, charter97.org and the archive of the Human Rights Center “Viasna”. FOREWORD In 2013, the situation with human rights in the country remained stably bad: the basic political and civil rights were extremely limited, rigid and authoritar- ian practices persisted, bringing an aggravation of systematic and systemic issues: - Eleven political prisoners — Ihar Alinevich, Mikalai Autukhovich, Ales Bi- aliatski, Mikalai Dziadok, Andrei Haidukou, Eduard Lobau, Vasil Parfi ankou, Artsiom Prakapenka, Mikalai Statkevich, Yauhen Vaskovich and Uladzimir Yaromenak — continued to be held in jail; - the release of political prisoners Dzmitry Dashkevich, Aliaksandr Frant- skevich and Pavel Seviarynets
    [Show full text]
  • Belarus After Election. Report
    BELARUS AFTER ELECTION Report on the human rights situation in Belarus in the post-election period1 Summary This report has been prepared to assist the expert mission established under the OSCE Moscow Mechanism in establishing facts of human rights violations in Belarus during the post-election period. This report contains information on the human rights situation in the post-election period, covering the period from August 9 to the present. It provides information about violations of individual human rights, such as the right to life, freedom from torture, the right to personal liberty, and the right to be free from inhumane treatment. This report also contains facts of violations of the rights of journalists covering protests and the situation in the country. The report separately addresses children's rights violations in connection with the post-election events. The report contains victims’ testimony collected by the Human Rights Centre “Viasna”2 and the Belarusian Helsinki Committee3, information from monitoring reports by Belarusian human rights organizations, as well as information received from other reliable sources (for example, information from the Minsk City Emergency Medical Service on the nature and severity of bodily injuries received by protesters on August 9-21). Each section of the report contains brief conclusions and recommendations. The report includes direct quotations of the victims of the law-enforcement agencies’ actions, which significantly increased its volume. For security reasons, we do not share the names or personal information of the people who provided us with the information in this report, although we do possess them. 1 The report was prepared by the following human rights organizations: Human Rights Centre "Viasna" (http://spring96.org/en, [email protected]), the Belarusian Helsinki Committee (http://belhelcom.org/en, [email protected]), and the Belarusian Association of Journalists (https://baj.by/en) in cooperation with the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) and World Organization Against Torture (OMCT).
    [Show full text]
  • MASS MEDIA in BELARUS 2019 Baj.By
    MASS MEDIA IN BELARUS 2019 baj.by CONTENTS SITUATION IN THE SPHERE OF MASS MEDIA IN 2019 (OVERVIEW) ……………..…….…… 3 VIOLATIONS OF RIGHTS OF MASS MEDIA AND JOURNALISTS, CONFLICTS IN THE SPHERE OF MASS MEDIA ……………………………….........................………………………………….. 7 Criminal cases ………………..………………………………………………………………….……………………………... 7 Other court cases (except for administrative prosecution) …………………………..….. 9 Detention of journalists, judicial administrative prosecution …………………………….. 11 Physical assault against journalists ………………………………………………………………………….. 18 Searches, seizure, and confiscation of and damage to equipment and storage devices …..………………….......................................................... 19 Threat ………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 19 Restrictions on online freedom ………………………………………………………………………………….. 20 Violations related to access to information ………….…………………………………………………. 21 Other forms of pressure and violation of journalists' rights …………………………… 25 Infringements during the elections to the House of Representatives of the Republic of Belarus …………………………………………………………………………………………. 27 ECONOMIC POLICY IN THE MEDIA SPHERE ……………….……………………………………………………… 30 Mass-media in Belarus: 2019 SITUATION IN THE SPHERE OF MASS MEDIA IN 2018 (OVERVIEW) The general situation in the Belarusian mass media field was controversial in 2019. On the one hand, it was influenced by the overwhelming trend of reinforcing governmental control over the media space. On the other hand, due to hosting the 2nd European Games, the official authorities were pushed towards greater openness of the country. The complicated foreign policy and economic situation in Belarus, including negotiation processes with the European Union and the United States, the increasing size of external debt and pressure on the part of Russia as well as the elections to the Belarusian parliament, held on November 17, 2019, had their impact on the situation in the media field, too. The 2nd European Games were held in the capital city of Minsk on June 21-30, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • OSCE Rapporteur‟S Report on Belarus
    28 May 2011 OSCE Rapporteur‟s Report on Belarus By prof. Emmanuel Decaux CONTENTS SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS I – INTRODUCTION : THE OSCE RAPPORTEUR‟S MISSION. A – The nature and scope of the Moscow Mechanism. B – The implementation of the mandate of OSCE rapporteur. II – THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF BELARUS. A – The international framework. B – The domestic framework. III – THE FACT-FINDING MISSION. A – Political rights. B – Freedom of association. C – Freedom of expression, free media and information. D – Freedom of movement. E – Freedom of peaceful assembly. F – Freedom from arbitrary arrest or detention. G – Right to a fair trial and independence of lawyers. ANNEXES : List of individual cases. 1 SUMMARY At the request of fourteen Participating States the Human Dimension Mechanism of the OSCE was triggered according to §.12 of the 1991 Document of Moscow in order to establish a fact-finding mission to examine the fulfillment of the provisions of the OSCE human dimension in Belarus and to produce an independent and impartial report containing facts, proposals and advice. The OSCE rapporteur has “to examine concerns regarding the demonstration that took place there on 19 December [2010] as well as developments since then” and “to investigate all matters relating to : the arrest, detention, conviction and sentencing of several hundred of protestors and many journalists; allegations of torture, other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, physical coercion and intimidation; and the apparent harassment of human rights activists, lawyers, opposition political parties, independent media and civil society organizations. Belarus‟s actions with regard to the demonstrations may constitute a particularly serious threat to the fulfillment of its OSCE commitments in the human dimension”.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BELARUSIAN ASSOCIATION of JOURNALISTS Mass Media Week
    THE BELARUSIAN ASSOCIATION OF JOURNALISTS Mass Media Week in Belarus Info‐posting July 8 – 21, 2013 Within the reporting period Iryna Khalip, a member of BAJ, had her criminal sentence terminated. The OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media Dunja Mijatović welcomed the decision of the Minsk court and expressed her hope that a similar sentence, given to another Belarusian journalist Andrei Poczobut in 2011, would be terminated, too, and journalists would not be prosecuted any longer in future. A similar reaction came from the Reporters without Borders and some other human rights organizations. On July 8 the judge of the Soviet district court in Minsk Tatsiana Palulekh fined the activist Pavel Prakapovich for an unsanctioned one‐man picket which he held to remind about the abduction of the journalist Dzmitry Zavadski 13 years ago. On the evening of July 7 Pavel Prakapovich, from the organizational committee of the Belarusian Christian Democracy Party, went out to the Yakuba Kolasa square with a portrait of the journalist and was detained and brought to a detention center. He was found guilty of holding an unsanctioned mass event (art. 23.34 of the Administrative Code) and fined to 25 basic amounts (2.5 million BR, or around 230 euro). On July 9 the Vitebsk‐based journalist Alena Stsiapanava was summoned to a police department of the Kastrychnitski district of Vitebsk, together with her lawyer, where she was handed in an administrative protocol against her, complied by the senior inspector of protecting law and order and crime prevention Siarhei Viaraksa. The police accused the journalist of contributing to the foreign mass media Radio Svaboda without accreditation, which is a violation according to article 22.9 of the Administrative Code.
    [Show full text]