DOCSLIB.ORG

Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) Habitats Regulations Assessment for Hartlepool Local Plan 2016 to 2031 Prepared by Graham Megson MSc, Hartlepool Borough Council Revision history Revision Date Details Prepared by Approved by 1 20/05/2016 First draft Graham Megson Sarah Scarr 2 10/11/2016 First revision Graham Megson Matthew King 3 27/07/2017 Second revision Graham Megson Matthew King 4 01/11/2017 Final revision Graham Megson Matthew King Rev 4 Amendments are shown in red. 1. Summary ....................................................................................................................... 7 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 9 3. Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) .......................................................................... 10 3.1 Legislation ............................................................................................................. 10 3.2 HRA - the four stages ............................................................................................ 11 4. The Hartlepool Local Plan - HRA Stage 1 Screening ...................................................... 12 4.1 European Sites considered .................................................................................... 12 Table 1. European Sites considered in the screening process.................................... 12 4.2 Useful supplementary information - underlying SSSIs and condition status of units .................................................................................................................................... 13 4.3 HRA – Stage 1 European Sites – interest features, vulnerabilities & potential for adverse effects from Hartlepool Local Plan policies ..................................................... 14 Table 2. ....................................................................................................................... 14 Table 2a ...................................................................................................................... 16 Table 3. ....................................................................................................................... 16 Table 4. ....................................................................................................................... 17 Table 5. ....................................................................................................................... 18 Table 6. ....................................................................................................................... 19 Table 7. ....................................................................................................................... 21 Table 8. ....................................................................................................................... 22 Table 9. ....................................................................................................................... 22 Table 10. ..................................................................................................................... 23 Table 11. ..................................................................................................................... 25 Table 12. ..................................................................................................................... 25 5. HRA stage 1 screening ............................................................................................... 27 5.1 HRA stage 1 screening – Part A: initial analysis of the Hartlepool Local Plan policies for Likely Significant Effects (LSE) on European Sites. ................................................ 27 Table 13. Screening Analysis of Local Plan policies for potential adverse effects on the integrity of internationally designated sites. See also Appendix 2. .............................. 28 5.2 HRA stage 1 screening – Part B: Further analysis of the Hartlepool Local Plan policies for LSE on European Sites. ............................................................................ 42 4.3 HRA Stage 1 - findings .......................................................................................... 54 6. HRA Stage 2 - Appropriate Assessment of Policies HSG1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, EMP4 and LT1, LT3 ...................................................................................................................... 55 6.1 Bird and recreation studies ........................................................................................ 55 Table 14. Studies used to inform the HRA. ................................................................. 55 6.2 Bird populations – at designation (1995) ................................................................... 56 Table 15. T&CC SPA/ Ramsar Conservation Objectives ............................................. 56 Table 15A. Total number of waterbirds in Tees Estuary during five-year period 2011/2012 to 2015/16. ................................................................................................ 56 Figure 1. Tees Estuary species with BTO alerts and site issues. ................................. 57 6.3 Direct AEOI ............................................................................................................... 58 6.3.1 Direct AEOI on European Sites – habitat loss ..................................................... 58 6.4 Indirect AEOI ............................................................................................................. 59 6.4.1 Indirect AEOI on European Sites - Issue - Atmospheric pollution ........................ 59 6.4.2 Indirect AEOI on European Sites – Issue – nutrient enrichment via dog faeces. 60 6.4.3 Indirect AEOI on European Sites - Issue – Recreational disturbance ................. 60 Table 17. Beach visiting behaviour .............................................................................. 64 Table 18. Popular beaches .......................................................................................... 64 Table 19. Frequency of greenspace visits. .................................................................. 65 Table 20. Preference for types of greenspace. ............................................................ 65 Table 21. Preference of sites visited. ........................................................................... 66 Table 22. Means of travel to the beach. ....................................................................... 66 Table 23. Table of reports available which cover bird and/or recreational surveys in NE England. ...................................................................................................................... 68 Table 24. Percentage of recreation made up by dog walking and percentage of disturbance caused by dogs. ....................................................................................... 69 6.4.4 Indirect AEOI on European Sites - Issue – Loss of functional land ......................... 73 6.5 Indirect AEOI Conclusion .......................................................................................... 76 7. Mitigation ..................................................................................................................... 77 7.1 Actions to avoid and mitigate adverse impacts of Local Plan policies ........................ 77 7.2 Strategic guidance..................................................................................................... 77 7.3 Developer contributions ............................................................................................. 78 Table 25. Hartlepool Local Plan HRA funding formula - £/house. ............................... 79 7.3.1 Example of how mitigation has been secured to date (in the absence of appropriate policy wording). ........................................................................................ 79 Table 26. Recent Hartlepool housing applications. ...................................................... 80 7.3.2 Existing action plans ........................................................................................... 80 7.3.3 Suitable Alternative Natural Green Space .......................................................... 80 7.4 Local Plan Strategic Mitigation and Delivery Plan + monitoring programme .............. 81 7.4.1 Example 1 – access measures ........................................................................... 81 7.4.2 Example 1 - Little tern wardening ....................................................................... 81 7.4.3 Example 2 - Wider SPA wardening ..................................................................... 82 7.5 Hartlepool BC day to day service provision ............................................................... 82 7.5.1 Foreshore Management ..................................................................................... 82 7.5.2 Controlling dogs ................................................................................................. 82 Table 27. Key breeding and roosting sites ................................................................... 83 7.5.3 Public awareness ............................................................................................... 83 7.5.4 Monitoring: bird disturbance study ...................................................................... 84 7.5.5 Additional conservation measures ...................................................................... 84 7.6 Adequacy of mitigation proposals .............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Former Colliery Spoil Heap, Hesleden, Durham
    Planning Services COMMITTEE REPORT APPLICATION DETAILS APPLICATION NO: DM/14/00519/MIN Reclamation of former colliery spoil mound to extract coal FULL APPLICATION DESCRIPTION: spoil, reprofiling of mound on completion of works and landscaping works. NAME OF APPLICANT: Hargreaves Surface Mining Ltd ADDRESS: Former Colliery Spoil Heap, Hesleden, Durham ELECTORAL DIVISION: Blackhalls Chris Shields, Senior Planning Officer CASE OFFICER: 03000 261394, [email protected] DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE AND PROPOSALS The Site 1. The village of Hesleden is located south of the B1281 Road between the A19 to the west and the A1086 Road to the east. The former Castle Eden Colliery and associated spoil heap lie adjacent to the village, immediately south of the Haswell to Hart Railway Path, now part of the Sustrans National Cycle Network. This was once a mineral railway line serving various collieries in East Durham and finally closed in 1980. The site is on the northern edge of Hesleden Dene, which links with Nesbitt Dene to become Crimdon Dene, on the northern outskirts of Hartlepool. 2. The village of Castle Eden lies approximately 1 kilometre to the west; the A19 is approximately 1 kilometre further west again and the settlement of Blackhall Rocks lies three kilometres to the north east. 3. The application site is accessed via Gray Avenue, which in turn, leads to the B1281 Road. At the corner of Gray Avenue, where it becomes Front Street, an unmetalled track leads to the site. This track, which forms part of Footpath No.24 (Monk Hesleden Parish), also serves a number of smallholdings, allotments and associated buildings in different ownerships in close proximity to the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Footpath Booklet
    The Durham Heritage Coastal footpath The Countryside Code Respect, protect, enjoy! Respect other people l Consider the local community and other people enjoying the outdoors. l Leave gates and property as you find them and follow paths unless wider access is available. Protect the natural environment l Leave no trace of your visit and take your litter home. l Keep dogs under effective control Enjoy the outdoors l Plan ahead and be prepared. l Follow advice and local signs. Scan the code to find out more about Durham Heritage Coast. Public Transport Information For information on getting to the coast using public transport, www.traveline.info please go to , or telephone 0871 200 22 33. Introduction Welcome to Durham’s Heritage Coastal Footpath, an 11 mile walking route following the England Coast Path National Trail. Discover and explore spectacular grasslands, superb coastal denes and uncover the rich heritage that has shaped this coastline into a unique and fascinating place to be. Why is it so special? Durham’s Coastline is unique. Nowhere else in Britain has such a wonderful display of Magnesian Limestone Coastal Grasslands supporting a vast array of wildflowers and insects. The Northern Brown Argus butterfly can be found amongst these grasslands in the summer months and flowers such as orchids, Bloody Cranesbill, Thrift, Birds’ Eye Primrose and Common Rock Rose are a characteristic sight on the grassy cliff tops. The sound of Skylarks and Lapwings in the summer are a musical treat not to be missed. The coastal denes created at the end of the last ice age support some of the most natural woodland in North East England and provide a valuable habitat for mammals such as deer, foxes, badgers and bats.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Breccia Gashes of the Durham Coast. Lebour.G.A
    Durham E-Theses Some aspects of the geomorphology of the Durham coast Westgate, W. A. How to cite: Westgate, W. A. (1957) Some aspects of the geomorphology of the Durham coast, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/8519/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. SOME ASPECTS OF THE G-EOMQRPHOLO GY OP THE DUHHAM COAST W.A. Westgate, B.Sc. Submitted for the Degree of Ph.D. in the University of Durham. February, 1957. Itmm?, not ** > \ i3i (i) This research was carried out whilst I was in receipt of a Nature Conservancy Research Studentship "between July 1953 and July 1955.
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals and Waste Core Strategy
    Tees Valley Joint Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents In association with Core Strategy DPD Adopted September 2011 27333-r22.indd 1 08/11/2010 14:55:36 i ii Foreword The Tees Valley Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents (DPDs) - prepared jointly by the boroughs of Darlington, Hartlepool, Middlesbrough, Redcar and Cleveland and Stockton-on-Tees - bring together the planning issues which arise from these two subjects within the sub-region. Two DPDs have been prepared. This Minerals and Waste Core Strategy contains the long-term spatial vision and the strategic policies needed to achieve the key objectives for minerals and waste developments in the Tees Valley. The separate Policies and Sites DPD, which conforms with it, identifies specific sites for minerals and waste development and sets out policies which will be used to assess minerals and waste planning applications. The DPDs form part of the local development framework and development plan for each Borough. They cover all of the five Boroughs except for the part within Redcar and Cleveland that lies within the North York Moors National Park. (Minerals and waste policies for that area are included in the national park’s own local development framework.) The DPDs were prepared during a lengthy process of consultation. This allowed anyone with an interest in minerals and waste in the Tees Valley the opportunity to be involved. An Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State carried out an Examination into the DPDs in early 2011. He concluded that they had been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and were sound.
    [Show full text]
  • LTP3 Appendices Document
    LTP3 Appendices Document 1 The Weardale Line Concept 3 2 Outline Case for a New Station on the Durham Coast Line 9 3 The Leamside Line 11 4 LTP3 Policies & Daughter Strategies 13 5 Minor Schemes Review 43 6 Durham City 50 7 Outline Case for East Durham Link Road - Remaining Stage 59 8 Rights Of Way Improvement Plan Summary 62 9 Regeneration Statement Summary 64 10 Sustainable Community Strategy (SCS) Summary 67 11 Performance Indicators 71 12 Main Towns Profiles 73 13 Settlements 75 14 Area Action Partnerships 87 LTP3 Appendices Document 1 .0 The Weardale Line Concept Durham County Council 2 LTP3 Appendices Document The Weardale Line Concept 1.0.1 Any reference to the Weardale Line in this document means the branch railway line between Darlington and Eastgate that provides an increasingly important sustainable transport link for the connectivity of settlements in the south west of the county with Darlington and Tees Valley. Background 1.0.2 The Weardale Line was originally part of the Stockton and Darlington Railway, which was the first public passenger steam railway in the world. The extent of the line which remains today was once part of a much wider network in the Bishop Auckland area. 1.0.3 It had played an important role for many years, especially for people commuting to and from work in the Darlington and Tees Valley areas as well as transporting bulk materials from the cement works at Eastgate until its closure in the early 1990's. 1.0.4 Two railway museums have since been located adjacent to the line.....one at the North Road station in Darlington and more recently, the National Railway Museum Annex, Locomotion, at Shildon.
    [Show full text]
  • Other Reports Template
    Habitats Regulations Assessment Redcar and Cleveland Draft Local Plan On behalf of Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council Project Ref: 29032/HRA/01 | Rev: AA | Date: May 2016 Office Address: 10 Queen Square, Bristol, BS1 4NT T: +44 (0)117 928 1560 E: [email protected] HRA Screening Report Redcar and Cleveland draft Local Plan Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Statutory Requirements ................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Aims of the Screening Report ....................................................................................... 2 1.4 Report Structure ............................................................................................................ 2 2 Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Overview to the HRA process ....................................................................................... 4 2.2 Identifying potentially relevant Natura 2000 Sites ......................................................... 5 2.3 Screening for Likely Significant Effects ......................................................................... 5 3 Natura 2000 Sites Considered ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tees Valley Joint Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents
    Draft Only i APPENDIX 2(i) Tees Valley Joint Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents Core Strategy Publication Document August 2009 Draft Only ii Draft Only iii Foreword The preparation of Joint Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents (DPDs) for Darlington, Hartlepool, Middlesbrough, Redcar and Cleveland and Stockton-on-Tees Boroughs presents an important opportunity to understand and deal with the cross boundary issues which arise from these two subjects in the Tees Valley. Two DPDs are being prepared. This Core Strategy contains the long-term spatial vision and the strategic policies needed to achieve the key objectives for minerals and waste developments in the Tees Valley. The Policies and Sites document will, in conformity with this Core Strategy, identify specific sites for future minerals and waste development and provide a limited range of policies which will be used to assess minerals and waste planning applications. The DPDs will form part of the Local Development Framework for each Borough, which together with the Regional Spatial Strategy for North East England will form the Development Plan for the area. The DPDs cover all of the land within the five Boroughs except for the part within Redcar & Cleveland Borough that also falls within the North York Moors National Park. The Publication Document represents the third stage of the preparation process. The first stage, in May 2007, was the production of an Issues and Options Report, where the issues affecting minerals and waste development in the Tees Valley were identified and consultees and the general public were asked to identify which of the options presented were the most appropriate for dealing with the issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Normal Template
    Document Ref: 8.61 PINS Ref: EN010082 Tees CCPP Project The Tees Combined Cycle Power Plant Project Land at the Wilton International Site, Teesside Stack Diameter Sensitivity Study Applicant: Sembcorp Utilities UK Date: September 2018 Version: 1 CONTENTS 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.2 BACKGROUND 1 1.3 MODELLING APPROACH 2 1.4 RESULTS 2 1 STACK DIAMETER SENSITIVITY STUDY 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Within the Development Consent Order (‘DCO’) there is a desire to maintain flexibility in the final power plant design, as this has not yet been confirmed. One item which requires this flexibility is the final internal stack diameter. Flexibility is required as the diameter may change from the current 8.0 metres (‘m’), depending upon the final specification of the plant and turbines that would be used. During the examination process, the question has been raised as to what difference would arise in environmental impacts if the stack diameter is varied. Small changes in environmental impacts can be potentially significant. This is because nearby sensitive ecological receptors are subject to baseline conditions that are in excess of the Critical Load, and therefore there is only a small degree of ‘headroom’ for additional impacts. 1.2 The current impact assessment for the Project uses an 8.0m internal diameter stack and identifies that impacts at all relevant ecological receptors are below the threshold of potentially significant impacts (Refer to the No Significant Effects Report REP1-001). Notwithstanding this, care needs to be taken around any design commitments that could potentially increase these impacts. 1.2 BACKGROUND 1.3 Dispersion modelling has been undertaken for the Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) for the Proposed Power Plant, consisting of two 850MWthermal gas turbines.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices to the Appraisal of Sustainability Site Report for Hartlepool
    Appendices to the Appraisal of Sustainability Site Report for Hartlepool EN-6: Revised Draft National Policy Statement for Nuclear Power Generation Planning for new energy infrastructure October 2010 Appendices to the Appraisal of Sustainability Site Report for Hartlepool Appraisal of Sustainability of the revised draft Nuclear National Policy Statement The Appraisal of Sustainability (AoS), incorporating Strategic Environmental Assessment, of the revised draft Nuclear National Policy Statement (Nuclear NPS) has been undertaken at a strategic level. It considers the effects of the proposed policy at a national level and the sites to be assessed for their suitability for the deployment of new nuclear power stations by 2025. These strategic appraisals are part of an ongoing assessment process that started in March 2008 and, following completion of this AoS, will continue with project level assessments when developers make applications for development consent in relation to specific projects. Applications for development consents to the Infrastructure Planning Commission will need to be accompanied by an Environmental Statement having been the subject of a detailed Environmental Impact Assessment. The AoS/SEA Reports are presented in the following documents: AoS Non-Technical Summary Main AoS Report of draft Nuclear NPS Introduction Approach and Methods Alternatives Radioactive Waste Findings Summary of Sites Technical Appendices Annexes to Main AoS Report: Reports on Sites Site AoS Reports Technical Appendices All documents are available on the website of the Department of Energy and Climate Change at http://www.energynpsconsultation.decc.gov.uk This document is the Appendices to the Appraisal of Sustainability Site Report for Hartlepool. These appendices have been prepared by the Department of Energy and Climate Change with expert input from a team of specialist planning and environmental consultancies led by MWH UK Ltd with Enfusion Ltd, Nicholas Pearsons Associates Ltd, Studsvik UK Ltd and Metoc plc.
    [Show full text]
  • Tees Valley Statement of Transport Ambition Strategic Environmental Assessment
    Tees Valley Statement of Transport Ambition Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report Tees Valley Statement of Transport Ambition Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report JMP Consultants Limited Minerva House East Parade Leeds LS1 5PS T 0113 244 4347 F 0113 242 3753 E [email protected] www.jmp.co.uk Job No. NEA6082 Report No. 2 Prepared by AD/JJ Verified MR Approved by MR Status Final Issue No. 1 Date 28 February 2011 Tees Valley Statement of Transport Ambition Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report Contents Amendments Record This document has been issued and amended as follows: Status/Revision Revision description Issue Number Approved By Date Draft For TVU approval 1 MR 18/02/2011 Final For consultation 2 MR 28/02/2011 Contents 1 NON – TECHNICAL SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 The SEA Process ....................................................................................................................... 1 Consultation ................................................................................................................................ 4 2 CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................... 5 Strategic Environmental Assessment ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hartlepool Walking and Cycling Map Here
    O S N A QUEEN'SQU R R D O O A A D D RO B AD 1 D 2 ROAOA UEEN'S'S 8 FILLPOKE LANE Q 0 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R WingW ate MOOR LANE To Sunderland MonkMonk and Peterlee For more information on cycling and walking in the area go to COAST ROADROA F R HesledenHe O N www.letsgoteesvalley.co.uk Places of interestT Tees Valley S To Crimdon & T R E Blackhall Rocks ET Crimdonimdoono Beck Nor Crimd NesbitNesNe t md th Ward Jackson Park K5 Sa A B1B DeneDene Ha on Beck Scale 1:20,000 128 r nds 0 t to K S T H A a Burn Valley Gardens L6 T s B IO Hartlepool w N el 0 Miles 12 R l W 1 O al 1 ADA D kwa Rossmere Park L8 2 HARTLEPOOL A C y 1 0 B1280 SSeeatoneaeaatontononn CarewCCareCaCara ew 8 DURHAMM 6 0 Kilometres 123 Seaton Park O8 D Thee C O MIM CommonCommmmommon A I S L F W E B T IN B EL R L GA OWSW R © Crown Copyright and database right 2018. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100015871. TETE R A N S BU D O Summerhill Country Park K6 StationStation D R O AD N N L A E A Redcar Central AN A L L E K BILLINGHAM D E E Bellows Burn T Redcar East C ToTowwnn C E Golf Course L R L CemeteryCemetery Billingham D E R OA A ET HutHutton E R O Art Gallery / Tourist Information Centre M5 RE ILL C F C T V E S T E T Longbeck AR V A N H E N HenryHenry R O R BEB N R F Marske ELLLLOWSW O S BURURN E Saltburn LANE R A D W South Bank R IN A D G A St.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Infrastructure Implementation Plans Introduction 1
    Contents Region 1 Introduction 3 2 Durham Magnesian Limestone Plateau 10 2.1 General comments about the area 10 2.2 Landscape 11 2.3 open spaces 12 2.4 Flood risk and water quality 14 2.5 Ecology 16 3 Seaham 20 4 Peterlee 28 5 Secondary and tertiary settlements 36 5.1 Blackhall 36 5.2 Chilton 38 5.3 Easington 40 5.4 Ferryhill 44 5.5 Fishburn 47 5.6 Murton 49 5.7 Shotton 51 5.8 Thornley and Wheatley Hill 53 5.9 Wingate 57 Green Infrastructure Implementation Plans Introduction 1 Green Infrastructure Implementation Plans 2 Introduction 1 Green Infrastructure Implementation Plans 1.1 The GI Implementation Plans are intended to translate the recommendations of the Durham County Council Green Infrastructure Strategy (2012) into actions. They will achieve this by: Detailed analysis of environmental qualities and issues, taking into consideration studies carried out by the Council and its partners, such as the Environment Agency, Natural England and neighbouring authorities Identification of priorities and mitigation/ amelioration measures, either as general objectives or, where appropriate, as specific projects Discussion of planned development in the County in the period covered by the forthcoming County Durham Plan (until 2030); suggesting, for each allocated development site, how green infrastructure might be incorporated within the site, and what improvements should be made to the quantity, quality and management of green infrastructure in the area. Structure of the Implementation Plans 1.2 Because the County is large and diverse, some form of breakdown is required in order to make meaningful locationally-specific recommendations.
    [Show full text]