Bernhard Waldenfels

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bernhard Waldenfels Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics XIII, 2011, 1 www.units.it/etica ISSN 1825- 5167 Photo courtesy: Piero Corubolo 2 Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics XIII, 2011, 1 MONOGRAPHICA The Paths of the Alien: On the Philosophy of Bernhard Waldenfels Ferdinando G. Menga Guest Editor’s Preface p. 7 Andrea Altobrando Dalla fondazione della conoscenza alla comunità degli uomini liberi p. 16 Gabriella Baptist Nei sensi dell’arte: Bernhard Waldenfels ‘lettore’ di Pier Paolo Pasolini p. 38 Thomas Bedorf Die politische Differenz und die Kontingenz der Ordnung p. 46 Pascal Delhom Politique du contrat p. 57 Francesca Dell’Orto Il tempo dell’ordine e il gioco dello sdoppiamento p. 67 Xavier Escribano Fenomenología y antropología de la corporalidad en Bernhard Waldenfels p. 86 Matthias Flatscher Antwort als Verantwortung p. 99 Petra Gehring Wie Phänomenologie interveniert p. 134 Salvatore Giammusso Sitzen und Gehen. Zur Hermeneutik des Leibes in den fernöstlichen Künsten p. 136 Antje Kapust Ethics of Respect and Human Dignity. A Responsive Reading p. 151 Krassimira Kruschkova The ‘responsive event’ at steirischer herbst ’09 or Bernhard Waldenfels’ ‘kinetic epoché’ and performance today p. 164 3 Gustavo Leyva Identidad, Alteridad y Extrañeza p. 174 Käte Meyer-Drawe Staunen – ein “sehr philosophisches Gefühl” p. 196 María del Carmen La atención: una mirada desde la Paredes-Martín fenomenología responsiva p. 206 Mauro Ponzi Übergang, Übergangszeit, Übertragung: Eine Hommage an Bernhard Waldenfels p. 217 Philipp Stoellger Das Bild als Anderer und der Andere als Bild? p. 230 Michel Vanni A qui s’adressent les requêtes qui nous touchent? Appel des choses et urgence écologique p. 248 Niels Weidtmann Erfahrung des Zwischen: Anmerkungen zu Waldenfels’ Phänomenologie der Fremderfahrung p. 258 Ichiro Yamaguchi Die paradoxe Simultaneität inmitten des Widerfahrnisses p. 271 SYMPOSIUM Gillian Brock, Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account Janna Thompson On Brock’s Account of Global Justice p. 293 Jon Mandle Brock on Global Justice and Choosing p. 298 Principles Gillian Brock Global Justice and What We Owe One Another p. 308 SIMPOSIO Adriano Fabris, TeorEtica. Filosofia della 4 relazione Leonardo Messinese Primato della Teoria o primato della p. 319 TeorEtica? Graziano Lingua Sul primato della relazione in Adriano Fabris Attilio Franchi Sulla filosofia della relazione di Adriano p. 330 Fabris Mariano Ure TeorEtica: algunas reflexiones p. 338 Adriano Fabris Risposte ai miei critici p. 345 VARIA Elvio Baccarini Sergio Cremaschi su metaetica ed etica applicata p. 355 Pierpaolo Marrone Questioni di consenso p. 362 Luca Mori I limiti del consenso tra sfere valoriali p . 374 alternative Riccardo Fanciullacci La sovranità dell’Idea del Bene: Iris Murdoch p. 393 con Platone Informazioni sulla rivista p. 439 Information on the journal 5 MONOGRAPHICA The Paths of the Alien: On the Philosophy of Bernhard Waldenfels 6 Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, XIII, 2011, 1, pp. 7-15 Guest Editor’s Preface: The Experience of the Alien and the Philosophy of Response Ferdinando G. Menga Universität Tübingen Institut für Ethik Ev.-Theologische Fakultät ferdinandomenga@gmail.com 0. Introducing the Author This issue of “Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics” collects international and interdisciplinary contributions devoted to the thought of one of the most original and renowned contemporary masters in phenomenology: the German philosopher Bernhard Waldenfels.1 Waldenfels‟ philosophical orientation – characterized both by a close dialogue with the doctrine of his French master Maurice Merleau-Ponty and a thorough confrontation with thinkers such as Husserl, Foucault, Levinas, Ricoeur and Derrida2 – can be traced back to that constellation of thinking which, by putting at its center the phenomenon of intersubjectivity, attempts to show how every domain of human experience is faced by a constitutive intervention of alterity as an element calling for constant questioning and inevitable transformations. Within this paradigm, Waldenfels offers, however, an undoubtedly original contribution, since he does not remain at the level of a general doctrine of otherness, but rather: by exactly “bending” the category of alterity towards the notion of alienness (Fremdheit), he charges the other with a peculiar factical density, which frees it from the latent risk of a mere logical- ontological opposition to the category of the same. Hence, through this philosophical twist, Waldenfels proposes a genuine phenomenological discourse, which, by avoiding the abstract duality otherness/sameness, places the other on the very plural and unstable terrain of factical experience. 1 I would like to express here my gratitude to the editorial board of the journal for having accepted the publishing of this issue devoted to Bernhard Waldenfels‟ philosophy. Equal gratitude goes also to all contributors, without whose scientific effort this project would have never been realized. 2 Proof of this constant dialogue can be found in the whole work of Waldenfels. I limit myself to mention here the volumes in which such a confrontation acquires explicit traits: Cf. B. Waldenfels, Phänomenologie in Frankreich, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M. 1983; Id., Deutsch-Französische Gedankengänge, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M. 1995; Id., Idiome des Denkens. Deutsch-Französische Gedankengänge II, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M. 2005. FERDINANDO G. MENGA It is exactly this constitutive plural character of experience, in which alienness is constantly involved, what makes Waldenfels‟ phenomenology particularly open to confrontations with several discourse domains. We can recall here his dialogue with and responses from disciplines like psychology, psychoanalysis, psychiatry, pedagogy, ethnology, sociology, political theory, ethics, theology, legal studies, linguistics, as well as architecture and arts (in its several expressions). There is no need to spend here much more effort in order to assert the dialogical and open character of Waldenfels‟ phenomenology of alienness, as its evidence – I believe – is absolutely well disclosed by the very broad domain of contributions gathered in this issue. What I would like to provide, instead, is a general orientation map for the readers who approach Waldenfels‟ thought for the first time, and this with the hope to offer them, firstly, the indispensable tools in order to better appreciate the essays collected here and, secondly, a good reason for starting an independent research path within the work of this master in phenomenology. 1. The Role of Alienness Within Experience Waldenfels‟ whole phenomenological effort is centered on a very clear and strong point of departure: as long as we assume the phenomenon of the alien in terms of “something” or “someone”, i.e. as an unproblematic accessible object of research, which stays more or less in front of us, we will have missed it from the start. In this case, indeed, our attitude, despite its willingness to being open or its inclination to repulsion towards the alien, would keep following the traditional structure of thought, according to which “alienness” is certainly admitted, however, only under a clear premise: alien can only be thought of starting from the sphere of property, the sphere of the own, that is, a realm to which indubitable ontological priority and hierarchical superiority are to be ascribed. By following this perspective, what would be inevitably affirmed is that consolidated interpretation of experience, according to which the alien, for how much it might represent a destabilizing moment within the own, is nevertheless bound to undergo a process of final overcoming and re-appropriation, thanks to which, in the end, the presupposed and unquestioned priority of the own itself is reestablished. This kind of unquestioned certainty, which gives a clear priority to the own, is the attitude underlying all the traditional operations of thought which, while on the one hand foresee an indubitable participation or intervention of the alien, on the other hand return too easily to the own self, 8 Guest Editor’s Preface since nothing can really question the own, if the own is guaranteed a higher originarity (Ursprünglichkeit) since the beginning. Just to quote some examples of this traditional attitude, we may refer to Hegel‟s dialectic, in which alienness appears only as Entfremdung, i.e. as a transitory form in a process in which consciousness tends to “overcome the being alien” and “discover” the world and the present as its “own property”.3 This is also the case of Gadamer‟s hermeneutics, whose task, despite its weaker pretentions if compared to the Hegelian project, remains the overcoming of the alien, that is, the recovery of comprehension as a more originary condition, in which the ownness of sense is to be presupposed to every interruption produced by an alien incomprehension.4 The same strategy is also at work in the Habermas‟ communication discourse which, starting from the presupposition of a common logos, common sense and communicative reason, does not allow the intervention of any radical alien, but only the participation of a relative alien,5 who can therefore always be part of a successful strategy of inclusion.6 In this sense, Habermas‟ communicative strategy, by founding itself on the premise of a given symmetrical reciprocity of the participants, far from giving itself as an “inter-realm of dialogue”7 between own and alien, works as a monologue put into scene dialogically.8 Precisely here Waldenfels inserts his main critical warning:
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

435 pages remaining, click to load more.

Recommended publications
  • World Philosophies in Dialogue: a Shared Wisdom?
    Confluence Online Journal of World Philosophies Verlag Karl Alber Freiburg/Munich Vol. 2 · 2015 ISSN 2199-0360 · ISBN 978-3-495-46802-9 Confluence: Online Journal of World Philosophies Editors Confluence: Online Journal of World Philosophies is a bi-annual, Monika Kirloskar-Steinbach (University Konstanz, Germany) peer-reviewed, international journal dedicated to comparative Geeta Ramana (University Mumbai, India) thought. It seeks to explore common spaces and differences between James Maffie (University of Maryland, USA) philosophical traditions in a global context. Without postulating cul- tures as monolithic, homogenous, or segregated wholes, it aspires to address key philosophical issues which bear on specific methodologi- Manuscript Editor cal, epistemological, hermeneutic, ethical, social, and political ques- tions in comparative thought. Confluence aims to develop the con- James Garrison (University of Vienna, Austria) tours of a philosophical understanding not subservient to dominant paradigms and provide a platform for diverse philosophical voices, including those long silenced by dominant academic discourses and Advisory Board institutions. Confluence also endeavors to serve as a juncture where specific philosophical issues of global interest may be explored in an Robert Bernasconi (Pennsylvania State University, USA) imaginative, thought-provoking, and pioneering way. Claudia Bickmann (University of Cologne, Germany) We welcome innovative and persuasive ways of conceptualizing, Anat Biletzki (Quinnipiac University, USA) articulating, and representing intercultural encounters. Contribu- Jonardon Ganeri (New York University, Abu Dhabi, UAE) tions should be able to facilitate the development of new perspectives Raghunath Ghosh (University of North Bengal, India) on current global thought-processes and sketch the outlines of salient Peter S. Groff (Bucknell University, USA) future developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Confluence 2015 G 1..292
    Confluence Online Journal of World Philosophies Verlag Karl Alber Freiburg/Munich Vol. 2 · 2015 ISSN 2199-0360 · ISBN 978-3-495-46802-9 Confluence: Online Journal of World Philosophies Editors Confluence: Online Journal of World Philosophies is a bi-annual, Monika Kirloskar-Steinbach (University Konstanz, Germany) peer-reviewed, international journal dedicated to comparative Geeta Ramana (University Mumbai, India) thought. It seeks to explore common spaces and differences between James Maffie (University of Maryland, USA) philosophical traditions in a global context. Without postulating cul- tures as monolithic, homogenous, or segregated wholes, it aspires to address key philosophical issues which bear on specific methodologi- Manuscript Editor cal, epistemological, hermeneutic, ethical, social, and political ques- tions in comparative thought. Confluence aims to develop the con- James Garrison (University of Vienna, Austria) tours of a philosophical understanding not subservient to dominant paradigms and provide a platform for diverse philosophical voices, including those long silenced by dominant academic discourses and Advisory Board institutions. Confluence also endeavors to serve as a juncture where specific philosophical issues of global interest may be explored in an Robert Bernasconi (Pennsylvania State University, USA) imaginative, thought-provoking, and pioneering way. Claudia Bickmann (University of Cologne, Germany) We welcome innovative and persuasive ways of conceptualizing, Anat Biletzki (Quinnipiac University, USA) articulating, and representing intercultural encounters. Contribu- Jonardon Ganeri (New York University, Abu Dhabi, UAE) tions should be able to facilitate the development of new perspectives Raghunath Ghosh (University of North Bengal, India) on current global thought-processes and sketch the outlines of salient Peter S. Groff (Bucknell University, USA) future developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Heidegger and Theology Philosophy and Theology Series
    Heidegger and Theology PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY SERIES Other titles in the Philosophy and Theology series include: Adorno and Theology, Christopher Craig Brittain Badiou and Theology, Frederiek Depoortere Derrida and Theology, Steven Shakespeare Foucault and Theology, Jonathan Tran Girard and Theology, Michael Kirwan Habermas and Theology, Maureen Junker-Kenny Hegel and Theology, Martin J. De Nys Kant and Theology, Pamela Sue Anderson and Jordan Bell Kierkegaard and Theology, Murray Rae Levinas and Theology, Nigel Zimmerman Merleau-Ponty and Theology, Christopher Ben Simpson Nietzsche and Theology, Craig Hovey Simone Weil and Theology, A. Rebecca Rozelle-Stone Vattimo and Theology, Thomas G. Guarino Wittgenstein and Theology, Tim Labron Žižek and Theology, Adam Kotsko Heidegger and Theology Judith Wolfe LONDON • NEW DELHI • NEW YORK • SYDNEY Bloomsbury T&T Clark An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc 50 Bedford Square 1385 Broadway London New York WC1B 3DP NY 10018 UK USA www.bloomsbury.com Bloomsbury is a registered trade mark of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published 2014 © Judith Wolfe, 2014 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Judith Wolfe has asserted her right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as Author of this work. No responsibility for loss caused to any individual or organization acting on or refraining from action as a result of the material in this publication can be accepted by Bloomsbury or the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Welt Als Phänomen Anmerkungen Zu Husserl, Heidegger Und Rombach1
    Original paper UDC 165.62(045) doi: 10.21464/sp34210 Received: 24 July 2019 Niels Weidtmann Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Forum Scientiarum, Doblerstraße 33, DE–72074 Tübingen niels.weidtmann@fsci.uni-tuebingen.de Welt als Phänomen Anmerkungen zu Husserl, Heidegger und Rombach1 Zusammenfassung Einen Beitrag über Welt als Phänomen zu schreiben, impliziert die Annahme, dass die Welt überhaupt ein Phänomen im Sinne der philosophischen Phänomenologie ist. Das ist aber gerade in der Phänomenologie selbst nicht unstrittig. Dem husserlschen Verständnis nach kann die Welt nämlich tatsächlich nicht selbst Phänomen sein, weil jedes Phänomen in einem Verweisungszusammenhang, d.h. in einem Horizont erscheint, die Welt selbst aber gerade nicht. Die Welt ist der äußerste Horizont und kann daher nicht über sich hinaus auf einen weiteren Horizont verweisen. Daher ist es keineswegs selbstverständlich zu be- haupten, dass die Welt als Phänomen betrachtet werden kann. In meinem Beitrag werde ich nun allerdings noch über die Annahme, dass die Welt ein Phänomen ist, hinausgehen und zu zeigen versuchen, dass sie in Wirklichkeit das Phänomen par excellence ist. In gewisser Weise ist die Welt das einzige Phänomen überhaupt, weil sie nicht nur allem, was in ihr erscheint, seinen besonderen Sinn verleiht, sondern sich dabei zugleich selbst je anders, nämlich diesem besonderen Sinn entsprechend zeigt. Das will ich insbesondere mit Heideg- ger und Rombach zu zeigen versuchen. Auf diese Weise hoffe ich, zumindest einige Aspekte einer phänomenologischen Analyse von „Welt“ offenzulegen. Schlüsselwörter Welt, Sinn, Phänomenologie, Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger, Heinrich Rombach, Maurice Merleau-Ponty „Der Begriff der Welt bzw. das damit bezeichnete Phänomen ist das, was bis- her in der Philosophie überhaupt noch nicht erkannt ist“, so Martin Heideg- ger.2 Deshalb sei „die Aufklärung des Welt-Begriffs (…) eine der zentralsten Aufgaben der Philosophie“.
    [Show full text]
  • Eder Soares Santos Paths of Science of Man in Heidegger
    Eder Soares Santos Paths of Science of Man in Heidegger LIBRI NIGRI 80 Edited by Hans Rainer Sepp Editorial Board Suzi Adams · Adelaide │ Babette Babich · New York │ Kimberly Baltzer-Jaray · Wa- terloo, Ontario │ Damir Barbarić · Zagreb │ Marcus Brainard · London │ Martin Cajthaml · Olomouc │ Mauro Carbone · Lyon │ Chan Fai Cheung · Hong Kong │ Cristian Ciocan · Bucure şti │ Ion Copoeru · Cluj-Napoca │ Renato Cristin · Trieste │ Eddo Evink · Groningen │ Matthias Flatscher · Wien │ Dimitri Ginev · Sofia │ Jean-Christophe Goddard · Toulouse │ Andrzej Gniazdowski · Warszawa │ Ludger Hagedorn · Wien │ Seongha Hong · Jeollabukdo │ Edmundo Johnson · Santiago de Chile │ René Kaufmann · Dresden │ Vakhtang Kebuladze · Kyjiw │ Dean Komel · Ljubljana │ Pavlos Kontos · Patras │ Kwok-ying Lau · Hong Kong │ Mette Lebech · Maynooth │ Nam-In Lee · Seoul │ Monika Małek · Wrocław │ Balázs Mezei · Buda- pest │ Viktor Molchanov · Moskwa │ Liangkang Ni · Hangzhou │ Cathrin Nielsen · Frankfurt am Main │ Ashraf Noor · Jerusalem │ Karel Novotný · Praha │ Markus Ophälders · Verona | Luis Román Rabanaque · Buenos Aires │ Rosemary Rizo- Patrón de Lerner · Lima │ Kiyoshi Sakai · Tokyo │ Javier San Martín · Madrid │ Alexander Schnell · Paris │ Marcia Schuback · Stockholm │ Agustín Serrano de Haro · Madrid │ Tatiana Shchyttsova · Vilnius │ Olga Shparaga · Minsk │ Michael Staudigl · Wien │ Georg Stenger · Wien │ Silvia Stoller · Wien │ Ananta Sukla · Cuttack │ Toru Tani · Kyoto │ Detlef Thiel · Wiesbaden │ Lubica Ucnik · Perth │ Pol Vande- velde · Milwaukee │ Chung-chi
    [Show full text]
  • Kritik Zwischen Sorge Und Gelassenheit Grundformen
    Kritik zwischen Sorge und Gelassenheit Grundformen ethischer Praxis im Denken Martin Heideggers und Michel Foucaults Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Philosophie (Dr. phil.) am Fachbereich Philosophie und Geisteswissenschaften der Freien Universität Berlin vorgelegt von Marcel Mietzel (M.A.) 10318 Berlin 1. Gutachterin: Prof. Dr. Hilge Landweer 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Gunter Gebauer eingereicht im Juni 2018 Tag der Disputation: 20. Mai 2019 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einleitung........................................................................................................................................3 1.1 Zwischenbilanz zur Forschung.............................................................................................14 1.2 Methodische Vorbemerkungen.............................................................................................37 2. Zum ethos der Kritik bei Foucault und Heidegger...................................................................49 2.1 Zum Begriff ethos..................................................................................................................63 2.2 Ethos bei Heidegger .............................................................................................................69 2.3 Aufenthalt im Sein ................................................................................................................78 2.4 Ethos bei Foucault ................................................................................................................89
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation FINAL Submission
    Dissertation Titel der Dissertation „The Aesthetic Life of Power“ Verfasser James Millard Garrison IV angestrebter akademischer Grad Doktor der Philosophie (Dr.phil.) Wien, 2015 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienbuchblatt: A 792 296 Studienrichtung lt. Studienbuchblatt: Dr.-Studium der Philosophie/ Dissertationsgebiet: Philosophie Betreuer: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Georg Stenger Plagiarism Declaration (Plagiatserklärung) Hiermit erkläre ich, die vorgelegte Arbeit selbständig verfasst und ausschließlich die angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmittel benutzt zu haben. Alle wörtlich oder dem Sinn nach aus anderen Werken entnommenen Textpassagen und Gedankengänge sind durch genaue Angabe der Quelle in Form von Anmerkungen bzw. In-Text-Zitationen ausgewiesen. Dies gilt auch für Quellen aus dem Internet, bei denen zusätzlich URL und Zugriffsdatum angeführt sind. Mir ist bekannt, dass jeder Fall von Plagiat zur Nicht-Bewertung der gesamten Lehrveranstaltung führt und der Studienprogrammleitung gemeldet werden muss. Ferner versichere ich, diese Arbeit nicht bereits andernorts zur Beurteilung vorgelegt zu haben. James Garrison Wien, 1. Juli 2015 Table of Contents Introduction (I) Subjectivation (II) Autonomy (III) Ritual Propriety - Lǐ (IV) Subjectality (V) Technique in Appearance (VI) Somaesthetics Conclusion Intercultural and Interdisciplinary Work: A Statement on Method a. Rhizomes, Embryos, and Growth in Between b. Intercultural Philosophy c. Growing the Rhizome (I) Subjectivation a. Preliminary Remarks: Butler on Subjectivation b. Foucault’s Prison: Subjectivation in the Panopticon c. Hailed into Existence: Interpellation d. Misrecognition and Limited Freedom from Sign Chains e. Kantian Responses to Subjectivation f. Kant on Purposiveness and the Artwork’s Negative Freedom g. Hegel on the Artisan and Recognition h. Nietzsche on the Artistically Creating Subject i. Art as Another “Other” and Novelty in Self-Recognition Conclusion (II) Autonomy and Appearance in Artful Ritual Practice a.
    [Show full text]
  • Mimesis International
    MIMESIS INTERNATIONAL HASEKURA LEAGUE INTERCULTURAL STUDIES EDITIONS n. 1 Editorial Board Raffaele Milani (University of Bologna), Rolando Minuti (University of Florence), Ikuko Sagiyama (University of Florence), Andreas Niehaus (Ghent University), Judit Arokay (Heidelberg University), Harald Fuess (Heidelberg University), Ivo Smits (Leiden University), Franco Mazzei (University of Naples “L’Orientale”), Giangiorgio Pasqualotto (University of Padua), Matilde Mastrangelo (Sapienza University of Rome), Glenn Hook (University of Sheffield), Akihiro Ozaki 尾崎彰宏 (Tohoku University), Ryūsaku Nagaoka 長岡龍作 (Tohoku University), Hiroo Satō 佐藤弘夫 (Tohoku University), Yoshimichi Satō 佐藤嘉倫 (Tohoku University), Akinori Takahashi 高橋章則 (Tohoku University), Paul Ziche (Utrecht University), Bonaventura Ruperti (Ca’ Foscari University of Venice), Georg Stenger (University of Vienna) HOW TO LEARN? 学びの作法 NIPPON/JAPAN AS OBJECT, NIPPON/JAPAN AS METHOD 対象としてニッポン、方 法としてニッポン Acts of the 1st Symposium of the Hasekura League University of Florence Palazzo Marucelli-Fenzi, 29-30 October 2015 Edited by Christopher Craig, Enrico Fongaro, and Akihiro Ozaki MIMESIS INTERNATIONAL © 2016 – MIMESIS INTERNATIONAL www.mimesisinternational.com e-mail: info@mimesisinternational.com Isbn: 9788869770524 Book series: Hasekura League Intercultural Studies Editions, n. 1 © MIM Edizioni Srl P.I. C.F. 02419370305 TABLE OF CONTENTS GREETING ADDRESS by Luigi Dei 11 OPENING REMARKS by Toshiya Ueki 植木俊哉 15 Executive Vice President of Tohoku University KEYNOTE LECTURE THE BIRTH OF GHOSTS.
    [Show full text]