DOCSLIB.ORG

Armed Reprisals from Medieval Times to 1945

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Studien zur Geschichte des Völkerrechts 40 Christophe Wampach Armed Reprisals from Medieval Times to 1945 Nomos https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748921110, am 01.10.2021, 09:23:53 Open Access - http://www.nomos-elibrary.de/agb Studien zur Geschichte des Völkerrechts Begründet von Michael Stolleis Herausgegeben von Jochen von Bernstorff Universität Tübingen, Professur für Staatsrecht, Völkerrecht und Menschenrechte Bardo Fassbender Universität St. Gallen, Lehrstuhl für Völkerrecht, Europarecht und Öffentliches Recht Anne Peters Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Heidelberg Miloš Vec Universität Wien, Institut für Rechts- und Verfassungsgeschichte Band 40 https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748921110, am 01.10.2021, 09:23:53 Open Access - http://www.nomos-elibrary.de/agb BUT_Wampach_7718-1_OA-Online.indd 2 04.11.20 09:14 Christophe Wampach Armed Reprisals from Medieval Times to 1945 Nomos https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748921110, am 01.10.2021, 09:23:53 Open Access - http://www.nomos-elibrary.de/agb BUT_Wampach_7718-1_OA-Online.indd 3 04.11.20 09:14 The Open Access-publication of the electronic version of this work was supported by the Max Planck Digital Library. The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de a.t.: Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Univ., Diss., 2020 ISBN 978-3-8487-7718-1 (Print) 978-3-7489-2111-0 (ePDF) British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 978-3-8487-7718-1 (Print) 978-3-7489-2111-0 (ePDF) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Wampach, Christophe Armed Reprisals from Medieval Times to 1945 Christophe Wampach 336 pp. Includes bibliographic references. ISBN 978-3-8487-7718-1 (Print) 978-3-7489-2111-0 (ePDF) 1st Edition 2020 © Christophe Wampach Published by Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG Waldseestraße 3-5 | 76530 Baden-Baden www.nomos.de Production of the printed version: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG Waldseestraße 3-5 | 76530 Baden-Baden ISBN (Print): 978-3-8487-7718-1 ISBN (ePDF): 978-3-7489-2111-0 Onlineversion DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748921110 Nomos eLibrary This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748921110, am 01.10.2021, 09:23:53 Open Access - http://www.nomos-elibrary.de/agb BUT_Wampach_7718-1_OA-Online.indd 4 04.11.20 09:14 To my grandfathers René and Emil https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748921110, am 01.10.2021, 09:23:53 Open Access - http://www.nomos-elibrary.de/agb https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748921110, am 01.10.2021, 09:23:53 Open Access - http://www.nomos-elibrary.de/agb Acknowledgements The present work is the result of a Ph.D. dissertation at the Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn defended in Summer Semester 2020. This book would not exist without the help and support of many persons. I would like to first thank my supervisor, Prof. Dr. Mathias Schmoeckel from the University of Bonn, who encouraged me to embark on the doc- toral journey, drew my attention to the topic of reprisals and showed great enthusiasm for my research. He also gave me an excellent environment at the Institut für Deutsche und Rheinische Rechtsgeschichte to broaden my knowledge on legal history and more particularly on the history of interna- tional law by making me one of his assistants. My second acknowledgement goes to Prof. Dr. Dirk Heirbaut from the Universiteit Gent, who kindly agreed to become the second assessor. I am really thankful for his interest in my work, his pertinent remarks, and for exhorting me to pursue the path of academic investigation. Thanks as well to Prof. Dr. Martin Schermaier from the University of Bonn, who organised and presided the defence under the particular cir- cumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic that shook the world. I am also very much obliged to the Gerda Henkel Stiftung which grant- ed me a two-year scholarship that made the writing of my thesis financially possible. I also want to thank my colleagues, fellow Ph.D. candidates and friends at the Institut für Deutsche und Rheinische Rechtsgeschichte for their un- failing support, our long talks about methodological issues and all the good time we spent together: PD Dr. Matthias Maetschke, Dr. Pierre Friedrich, Dr. Vincent Nossek, Dr. Gero Fuchs, Dr. Malte Becker, Dr. Alexander Kustermann, Prof. Dr. Joaquín Sedano Rueda and Frau Silvia Schmidt. I am greatly indebted to the Milla Altabás family in Lima who wel- comed me into their home and provided me with a place to serenely work, while helping me to sometimes take my mind off the naval battles, the stormy sessions in the British parliament and the fluctuating attitude of lawyers which all teemed in my head. 7 https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748921110, am 01.10.2021, 09:23:53 Open Access - http://www.nomos-elibrary.de/agb Acknowledgements I would like also to express my deep gratitude to my good friends Hugo W. Smart, for helping with my punctual linguistic enquiries, and Connor A. Carey, for having endorsed the burdensome task of proofreading my work. My eternal gratitude goes to my family who has always believed in me and provided me with emotional support in times of doubt and motiva- tion drop. Thank you, Papa, Maman, Florent, Corinne, and my grandpar- ents. Finally, thank you, María Belén, for all your love giving me strength to keep going. You make me feel lucky everyday to have met you. Brussels, July 2020 8 https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748921110, am 01.10.2021, 09:23:53 Open Access - http://www.nomos-elibrary.de/agb Table of Contents Abbreviations 15 Introduction 19 I. Outline of a Burning Issue 19 1. Contextualisation of a Remark by Karl Strupp 19 2. Blurry Line between Armed Reprisals and War 25 3. Pre-1919 Practice 30 II. Leading Question 35 III. State of Research 37 IV. Research Hypotheses 43 V. Sources 44 VI. Structure 46 Chapter One. From Regulation to Deregulation up to the End of the Eighteenth Century 49 I. Introduction 49 II. Elaboration of the Medieval Law of Reprisals 49 1. Emergence and Development of Reprisals in the Early and High Middle Ages 49 2. Theory: Bartolus de Saxoferrato’s Tractatus Represaliarum 59 (a) Significance for the Law of Reprisals 59 (b) Justification of Reprisals 63 (c) Conditions 65 i) Superior’s Consent 65 ii) Just Cause 66 (d) Execution 68 3. Risks of Abuse 69 III. Politicisation of Reprisals (XVIth–XVIIIth c.) 71 1. Transition from Private to Public Reprisals 71 (a) Diplomatic Interposition of the Sovereign 71 (b) Progressive Exclusion of Private Individuals from the Execution 77 9 https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748921110, am 01.10.2021, 09:23:53 Open Access - http://www.nomos-elibrary.de/agb Table of Contents 2. Public Character of Reprisals 84 (a) General Aspects 84 (b) Blurring of the Line between War and Peace 90 (c) Vattel’s Pertinent Remark 94 IV. Interim Conclusion 97 Chapter Two. Shaping of a Prerogative, 1831–1863 99 I. Introduction 99 II. Asymmetric Power Relation 100 1. Portrait of Target Countries 100 (a) Preliminary Observation: ‘Reprisal Clause’ in Bilateral Treaties 100 (b) Characteristics of Inferiority 104 2. Informal Imperialism through Reprisals 107 (a) Issues of Commercial Nature 107 (b) Assertion of National Dignity: ‘Civis Romanus Sum’, 1850 112 III. Unrestricted Resort to Reprisals 119 1. A Question of Political Opportunism: Palmerston’s Policy, 1847 119 2. Eluding Legal Requirements 121 (a) Denial of Justice debated in the British Parliament, 1850 121 (b) Preventive Recourse to Amicable Means of Settlement 124 i) The Principle laid down in the 23rd Paris Protocol of 1856 124 ii) The Cagliari affair, 1857–1858 125 iii) The Prince of Wales case: British Reprisals against Brazil, 1862–1863 127 IV. On the Questionable Edge of Peace 132 1. Disproportionate Use of Force 132 (a) Standard of Proportionality versus Efficacy 132 (b) Widening of the Category of Reprisals 135 2. Confusion between War and Peace 140 3. A Right in Vertical Power Relations 147 V. Interim Conclusion 151 10 https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748921110, am 01.10.2021, 09:23:53 Open Access - http://www.nomos-elibrary.de/agb Table of Contents Chapter Three. Legal Doctrine confronting State Practice, 1848–1912 153 I. Introduction 153 II. Precursors of the Doctrinal Debate on Armed Reprisals: Wurm and Hautefeuille 153 III.Building the Legal Theory of Pacific Blockade 158 1. Rising Interest and Controversy, 1849–1887 158 2. Examination by the Institute of International Law 164 (a) First Contact at The Hague, 1875 164 (b) The Heidelberg Declaration of 1887 165 i) Triggering Event: The French Blockade of Formosa, 1884 165 ii) The Work of the Institute 169 (c) Reception of the Institute’s Declaration 174 3. Departing State Practice: The Blockades of Siam (1893) and Crete (1897–1898) 177 4. A Custom of International Law? 182 (a) “Mais si la doctrine proteste, la politique agit” 182 (b) Dialogue of the Deaf 183 (c) Opinio Juris 187 IV. The Larger Issue of Armed Reprisals 190 1. Twilight Zone 190 (a) Variety of Armed Reprisals 190 (b) The Uncertain Dividing Line between Peace and War 193 (c) State of Reprisals 196 2. The Blockade of Venezuela (1902–1903) as Breaking Point 199 (a) Background 199 (b) The Venezuelan Preferential Claims 205 (c) The Drago-Porter Convention of 1907 208 i) Previous Efforts of Prevention of Armed Reprisals in International Law 208 ii) The Drago Doctrine as Corollary of the Monroe Doctrine 210 iii) From Political Policy to Norm of International Law 212 iv) Second Hague Peace Conference, 1907 215 v) Mixed Impact of the Second Hague Conference on Armed Reprisals 220 V.
Recommended publications
  • Obligation and Self-Interest in the Defence of Belgian Neutrality, 1830-1870

    Obligation and Self-Interest in the Defence of Belgian Neutrality, 1830-1870

    CONTEXTUAL RESEARCH IN LAW CORE VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL Working Papers No. 2017-2 (August) Permanent Neutrality or Permanent Insecurity? Obligation and Self-Interest in the Defence of Belgian Neutrality, 1830-1870 Frederik Dhondt Please do not cite without prior permission from the author The complete working paper series is available online at http://www.vub.ac.be/CORE/wp Permanent Neutrality or Permanent Insecurity? Obligation and Self-Interest in the Defence of Belgian Neutrality, 1830-1870 Frederik Dhondt1 Introduction ‘we are less complacent than the Swiss, and would not take treaty violations so lightly.’ Baron de Vrière to Sylvain Van de Weyer, Brussels, 28 June 18592 Neutrality is one of the most controversial issues in public international law3 and international relations history.4 Its remoteness from the United Nations system of collective security has rendered its discussion less topical.5 The significance of contemporary self-proclaimed ‘permanent neutrality’ is limited. 6 Recent scholarship has taken up the theme as a general narrative of nineteenth century international relations: between the Congress of Vienna and the Great War, neutrality was the rule, rather than the exception.7 In intellectual history, Belgium’s neutral status is seen as linked to the rise of the ‘Gentle Civilizer of Nations’ at the end of the nineteenth century.8 International lawyers’ and politicians’ activism brought three Noble Peace Prizes (August Beernaert, International Law Institute, Henri La Fontaine). The present contribution focuses on the permanent or compulsory nature of Belgian neutrality in nineteenth century diplomacy, from the country’s inception (1830-1839)9 to the Franco- 1 Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), University of Antwerp, Ghent University/Research Foundation Flanders.
  • On the Nationalisation of the Old English Universities

    On the Nationalisation of the Old English Universities

    TH E NATIONALIZATION OF THE OLD ENGLISH UNIVERSITIES LEWIS CAMPBELL, MA.LLD. /.» l.ibris K . DGDEN THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES J HALL & SON, Be> • ON THE NATIONALISATION OF THE OLD ENGLISH UNIVERSITIES ON THE NATIONALISATION OF THE OLD ENGLISH UNIVERSITIES BY LEWIS CAMPBELL, M.A., LL.D. EMERITUS PKOFESSOK OF GREEK IN THE UNIVERSITY OF ST. ANDREWS HONORARY FELLOW OF BALLIOL COLLEGE, OXFORD LONDON: CHAPMAN AND HALL 1901 LK TO CHARLES SAVILE ROUNDELL My dear Roundell, You have truly spoken of the Act, which forms the central subject of this book, as " a little measure that may boast great things." To you, more than to anyone now living, the success of that measure was due ; and without your help its progress could not here have been set forth. To you, therefore, as of right, the following pages are in- scribed. Yours very sincerely, LEWIS CAMPBELL PREFACE IN preparing the first volume of the Life of Benjamin fowett, I had access to documents which threw unexpected light on certain movements, especially in connexion with Oxford University- Reform. I was thus enabled to meet the desire of friends, by writing an article on " Some Liberal Move- ments of the Last Half-century," which appeared in the Fortnightly Review for March, 1900. And I was encouraged by the reception which that article met with, to expand the substance of it into a small book. Hence the present work. I have extended my reading on the subject, and have had recourse to all sources of information which I found available.
  • Biographie Nationale

    Biographie Nationale

    BIOGRAPHIE NATIONALE PUBLIÉE PAR L'ACADÉMIE ROYALE DES SCIENCES, DES LETTRES ET DES BEAUX-ARTS^ DE BELGIQUE TOME QUARANTE-ET-UNIÈME SUPPLÉMENT TOME XIII (FASCICULE 1") ABBELOOS — JOASSART BRUXELLES ÉTABLISSEMENTS EMILE BRUYLANT Société anonyme d'éditions juridiques et scientifiques RUE DE LA RÉGENCE, 67 I 1979 ι BIOGRAPHIE NATIONALE BIOGRAPHIE NATIONALE PUBLIÉE PAR L'ACADÉMIE ROYALE DES SCIENCES, DES LETTRES ET DES BEAUX-ARTS DE BELGIQUE TOME QUARANTE-ET-UNIÈME SUPPLÉMENT er TOME XIII (FASCICULE 1 ) ABBELOOS — JOASSART BRUXELLES ÉTABLISSEMENTS EMILE BRUYLANT Société anonyme d'éditions juridiques et scientifiques RUE DE LA RÉGENCE, 67 1979 Les opinions exprimées dans les notices n'engagent que leurs auteurs. A ABBELOOS (Jean-Baptiste), prê- dans la lutte scolaire qui a marqué tre du diocèse de Malines et orienta- l'histoire de notre pays à cette épo- liste, recteur de l'Université Catholi- que et devint, en 1883, vicaire géné- que de Louvain, né à Gooik le 15 jan- ral de l'archevêché de Malines. Nommé vier 1836, décédé à Louvain, le 25 fé- recteur de l'Université Catholique de vrier 1906. Louvain le 10 février 1887, il s'acquitta Issu de la bourgeoisie rurale du de cette tâche jusqu'à son éméritat Brabant flamand, il fut l'élève du c'est-à-dire jusqu'au 1er octobre 1898. Petit Séminaire, puis du Grand Sémi- Il faisait partie de la Société asiatique naire de Malines avant d'aller étudier de Paris. Il était prélat, avec le titre la théologie à Louvain puis à Rome. de protonotaire apostolique ad instar A l'Université de Louvain, il avait parlicipantium, et chanoine honoraire appris le syriaque avec J.-B.
  • Pasquale Stanislao Mancini, Augusto Pierantoni and the International Legal Discourse of 19Th Century Italy

    Pasquale Stanislao Mancini, Augusto Pierantoni and the International Legal Discourse of 19Th Century Italy

    1 Elisabetta FIOCCHI MALASPINA « Toil of the noble world » : Pasquale Stanislao Mancini, Augusto Pierantoni and the international legal discourse of 19th century Italy Abstract : The aim of this article is to reconstruct, from a legal historical point of view, the complexity and the meaning of international law in the Italian peninsula during the 19th century. The paper will analyse different entanglements that constituted the core of nineteenth-century Italian international legal discourse. It is structured in four sections, dealing respectively with : 1) the principle of nationality elaborated by Pasquale Stanislao Mancini and its repercussion both on private and public international law ; 2) the return to the historical origins of Italian international law and the role played by comparative constitutional law ; 3) the implementation and translation of particular legal genres, such as the attempts to codify international law ; 4) colonial education, including legal education, through the creation of the Scuola diplomatico- coloniale (colonial and diplomatic school). Keywords : International law, constitutional law, colonial law, Italy, 19th century Résumé : L’objectif de cet article est de reconstruire, d’un point de vue historico- juridique, la complexité et la signification du droit international dans la péninsule italienne au cours du XIXe siècle. L’article analysera les différents enchevêtrements qui constituaient le cœur du discours juridique international italien du XIXe siècle et il est structuré en quatre sections, traitant respectivement
  • The Functions and Limits of Arbitration and Judicial Settlement Under Private and Public International Law

    The Functions and Limits of Arbitration and Judicial Settlement Under Private and Public International Law

    BROWER_FMT2.DOC 10/15/2008 2:14:21 PM THE FUNCTIONS AND LIMITS OF ARBITRATION AND JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT UNDER PRIVATE AND PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW CHARLES H. BROWER, II* INTRODUCTION When drafting international agreements, be they contracts or treaties, lawyers often provide for resolution of future disputes, usu- ally by selecting arbitration or judicial settlement.1 For contracts likely to produce international commercial disputes among private parties, the modern shift from litigation to arbitration has assumed legendary proportions. Unfortunately, that development has become so engrained in the public consciousness that many have ignored an important countertrend. For controversies among states involving their exercise of sovereign powers and the application of public inter- national law, dispute settlement has taken the opposite course: away from arbitration towards judicial settlement. Partially documenting the trajectory of dispute settlement involv- ing states under public international law, one study has reviewed the decline of arbitration from 1945 through 1990.2 By contrast, no one * Tillar House Sabbatical Fellow, American Society of International Law; Visiting Fellow, Lau- terpacht Research Centre for International Law, Cambridge University; Scholar-in-Residence, American University, Washington College of Law; Croft Associate Professor of International Law and Jessie D. Puckett, Jr. Lecturer-in-Law, University of Mississippi School of Law. 1. See Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co., 417 U.S. 506, 516 (1974) (indicating that a “contrac-
  • Public Law Sources and Analogies of International Law

    Public Law Sources and Analogies of International Law

    533 PUBLIC LAW SOURCES AND ANALOGIES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW Eirik Bjorge* Are the "general principles of law recognised by civilized nations" capable of adjusting to the progress and needs of the international community? This article argues that they are, and that international law needs, to a larger degree than what has been the case, to draw on principles of public law. Those principles of public law are not to supplant, but to supplement, those of private law. The article analyses four principles: the principle of legality; the principle requiring positive legal basis for state action; the principle that even the highest emanation of the executive power cannot escape judicial review; and the principle of protection of legitimate expectations. If one takes account of the needs of international law, there is no reason whatever why today we should accede to the orthodoxy that the intention behind the concept of general principles is only to authorise a court to apply the general principles of municipal jurisprudence, in particular of private law, in so far as they are applicable to relations of states – if for no other reason than the fact that international law no longer governs only relations of states. I INTRODUCTION The focus of this article is the extent to which "general principles of law recognised by civilized nations"1 are capable of adjusting to the progress and needs of the international community. The * Professor of Law, University of Bristol. 1 Statute of the International Court of Justice 892 UNTS 119 (26 June 1945), art 38(1)(c).
  • Philip C. Jessup Papers a Finding Aid to the Collection in the Library of Congress

    Philip C. Jessup Papers a Finding Aid to the Collection in the Library of Congress

    Philip C. Jessup Papers A Finding Aid to the Collection in the Library of Congress Manuscript Division, Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 2003 Contact information: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/mss.contact Catalog Record: https://lccn.loc.gov/mm78027771 Additional search options available at: https://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/eadmss.ms004004 Prepared by Allen H. Kitchens and Audrey Walker Revised and expanded by Connie L. Cartledge with the assistance of Michael W. Giese and Susie H. Moody Finding aid encoded by Library of Congress Manuscript Division, 2004 Revised 2010 April Collection Summary Title: Philip C. Jessup Papers Span Dates: 1574-1983 Bulk Dates: (bulk 1925-1983) ID No.: MSS27771 Creator: Jessup, Philip C. (Philip Caryl), 1897-1986 Extent: 120,000 items Extent: 394 containers plus 2 oversize and 1 classified Extent: 157.6 linear feet Language: Collection material in English Location: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. LC Catalog record: https://lccn.loc.gov/mm78027771 Summary: Jurist, diplomat, and educator. Family and general correspondence, reports and memoranda, speeches and writings, subject files, legal papers, newspaper clippings and other papers pertaining chiefly to Jessup's work with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Institute of Pacific Relations, United States Department of State, United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration, and International Court of Justice. Includes material relating to his World War I service in Spartanburg, S.C., and in France; and to charges made against him by Senator Joseph McCarthy and postwar loyalty and security investigations. Also includes papers of his wife, Lois Walcott Kellogg Jessup, relating to her work for the American Friends Service Committee, United States Children's Bureau, and United Nations, her travels to Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East, and to her writings.
  • Seasons in Hell: Charles S. Johnson and the 1930 Liberian Labor Crisis Phillip James Johnson Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College

    Seasons in Hell: Charles S. Johnson and the 1930 Liberian Labor Crisis Phillip James Johnson Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College

    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2004 Seasons in hell: Charles S. Johnson and the 1930 Liberian Labor Crisis Phillip James Johnson Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Johnson, Phillip James, "Seasons in hell: Charles S. Johnson and the 1930 Liberian Labor Crisis" (2004). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3905. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3905 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. SEASONS IN HELL: CHARLES S. JOHNSON AND THE 1930 LIBERIAN LABOR CRISIS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Phillip James Johnson B. A., University of New Orleans, 1993 M. A., University of New Orleans, 1995 May 2004 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My first debt of gratitude goes to my wife, Ava Daniel-Johnson, who gave me encouragement through the most difficult of times. The same can be said of my mother, Donna M. Johnson, whose support and understanding over the years no amount of thanks could compensate. The patience, wisdom, and good humor of David H. Culbert, my dissertation adviser, helped enormously during the completion of this project; any student would be wise to follow his example of professionalism.
  • Friendship, Crisis and Estrangement: U.S.-Italian Relations, 1871-1920

    Friendship, Crisis and Estrangement: U.S.-Italian Relations, 1871-1920

    FRIENDSHIP, CRISIS AND ESTRANGEMENT: U.S.-ITALIAN RELATIONS, 1871-1920 A Ph.D. Dissertation by Bahar Gürsel Department of History Bilkent University Ankara March 2007 To Mine & Sinan FRIENDSHIP, CRISIS AND ESTRANGEMENT: U.S.-ITALIAN RELATIONS, 1871-1920 The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by BAHAR GÜRSEL In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA March 2007 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Asst. Prof. Dr. Timothy M. Roberts Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Asst. Prof. Dr. Nur Bilge Criss Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Asst. Prof. Dr. Edward P. Kohn Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Asst. Prof. Dr. Oktay Özel Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History.
  • Some Reflections on the Nationality of Judges of the International Court of Justice

    Some Reflections on the Nationality of Judges of the International Court of Justice

    Pace International Law Review Volume 4 Issue 1 Article 2 January 1992 Some Reflections on the Nationality of Judges of the International Court of Justice Manfred Lachs Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pilr Recommended Citation Manfred Lachs, Some Reflections on the Nationality of Judges of the International Court of Justice, 4 Pace Y.B. Int'l L. 49 (1992) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pilr/vol4/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace International Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE NATIONALITY OF JUDGES OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE Manfred Lachst It is a truism to repeat that courts constitute a very impor- tant institution in all societies. They have been part and parcel of them from time immemorial, from the individual judge to the bench. Hence, whatever stage of history we look at, we find that courts were under the protection of the rulers and, with the pas- sage of time, acquired the confidence, approval and support of t Manfred Lachs was a member of the International Court of Justice from 1967 until his death earlier this year. He was born in Poland in 1914 and received Juris Doc- tor and Master of Laws degrees from the University of Cracow, a Docteur en Droit de- gree from the University of Nancy, France, and a DSC (Law) from the University of Moscow.
  • SEANCES PUBLIQUES ET PLAIDOIRIES Publlc SITTINGS and PLEADINGS

    SEANCES PUBLIQUES ET PLAIDOIRIES Publlc SITTINGS and PLEADINGS

    DEUXIEME PARTIE SEANCES PUBLIQUES ET PLAIDOIRIES PART *II. -- PUBLlC SITTINGS AND PLEADINGS. COU12 PERMANENTE DE JUSTICE INTERNRTIONAT-E VINGT-TROISIEME SESS [ON (EXTRAOIIDINAIRE) PREMIÈRESEANCE PUBLIQUE tenue au Pnktis de lu Paix, La Huye, le lundi 9 novembre 1931, à IO h. 30, sous la présidence de M. Adntci, Président :. Pre'seîzls : MM. ADATC~,Président ; GUEKKEKO, Vice-Prési- dent ; le baroii KOLIX-JAEQUE:~~YNS,le comte ROSTWOKOWSKI, IvTRI. I~KOMAGEOT,ALTAMIRA, ASZILOTTI, UKKUTIA,sir CECIr. Huusr, 8131. SCH~CKIXG,NEGULESCO, Jhr. VA;^ EYSIXGA, M. \YANG, juges; M. BRUXS,juge ad hoc; M. HA~IMARSKJOLU, Grefier de lu Cour. Le PK~SSIDENTdéclare I'aiidieiice ouverte et ;innonce qiie la vingt-troisihiiie session extraordinaire de la Coiir, convoquée conforméiiient à l'article 23 du Statut, dans les conditions indiqukcs lors de la derniere audience de la session précédente, a comrncncti: le j novembre. Lü Cour tient atijoiird'hui la pre- rnière aiidience de la sessioi; La Cour se trouve rictuclleiiierit saisie de cinq affaires, savoir: I) l'affaire des zones franches de la Haute-Savoie et dit Pays de Gex, affaire clont la Coiir ne sera pas cn rnesure de s'occuper avant le mois clfavriI 1932 ; 2) l'affaire relative au traitement des riatioiiaiis polonais et des autres personnes d'origine ou de langtie polonaise dans le territoire de Dantzig ; cette affaire est en ktat depuis le 29 octobre dernier ; 3) l'affaire du statut juridique de certaines parties du Groë~llancl oriental; cette affaire ne sera en état que le ~~r septembre 1932 ; 4) I'affaire reIative à I'üccès et au stntionneinent des navires de guerre polonais dans le port de Dantzig, eii Ctat depuis le j novembre, et enfin 5) l'affaire relative à l'interpretation de l'Accord Caphanda- ris-Slolloff du g décembre 1927 ; cette affaire sera en état le rer février 1932.
  • PUT on NOTICE: the ROLE of the DISPUTE REQUIREMENT in ASSESSING JURISDICTION and ADMISSIBILITY BEFORE the INTERNATIONAL COURT Put Notice JULIETTE MCINTYRE*

    PUT on NOTICE: the ROLE of the DISPUTE REQUIREMENT in ASSESSING JURISDICTION and ADMISSIBILITY BEFORE the INTERNATIONAL COURT Put Notice JULIETTE MCINTYRE*

    PUT ON NOTICE: THE ROLE OF THE DISPUTE REQUIREMENT IN ASSESSING JURISDICTION AND ADMISSIBILITY BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL COURT Put Notice JULIETTE MCINTYRE* Since the International Court of Justice handed down its 2016 judgments in the Marshall Islands cases, much has been written about the cases and their consequences. This article takes a step back, to view the Court’s most recent treatment of the dispute requirement in the context of the principles developed in the Court’s previous case law. It will be argued that the ‘new’ awareness requirement is potentially no more than a manifestation of the requirement for positive opposition, but that it has been driven by the Court’s conceiving of the dispute requirement as a jurisdictional precondition and serves to impose a de facto pre-action notice requirement on parties seeking access to the Court. CONTENTS I Introduction ............................................................................................................... 2 II ‘Disputes’ before the International Court of Justice and the Principles that Determine the Existence of a Dispute ....................................................................... 4 A Irrelevance of Political Motive ..................................................................... 7 B Legal Rights .................................................................................................. 9 C Positive Opposition .................................................................................... 10 D Awareness ..................................................................................................