DOCSLIB.ORG

Terrestrial Wildlife Species Habitat Descriptions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Terrestrial Wildlife Species Habitat Descriptions TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE SPECIES HABITAT DESCRIPTIONS Fremont-Winema National Forest Fremont Land and Resource Management Plan Eastside of the Forest - Bly, Lakeview, Paisley, and Silver Lake Districts JULY 17, 2017 PREPARED BY Cheran Cavanaugh – Eastside Wildlife Biologist and Isaac Gansberg – Eastside Assistant Wildlife Biologist Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 Mammals ........................................................................................................................................ 5 American marten ........................................................................................................................ 5 Canada lynx ................................................................................................................................. 8 Gray Wolf .................................................................................................................................... 9 Fringed myotis .......................................................................................................................... 11 Mule Deer ................................................................................................................................. 12 Pacific Fisher – West Coast Distinct Population Segment (DPS) .............................................. 15 Pallid bat ................................................................................................................................... 16 Pygmy rabbit ............................................................................................................................. 17 Townsend’s big-eared bat......................................................................................................... 19 Wolverine .................................................................................................................................. 20 Birds .............................................................................................................................................. 23 American peregrine falcon ....................................................................................................... 23 American white pelican ............................................................................................................ 24 Bald Eagle .................................................................................................................................. 25 Black-backed woodpecker ........................................................................................................ 26 Bufflehead ................................................................................................................................. 30 Goshawk .................................................................................................................................... 31 Greater sage-grouse ................................................................................................................. 34 Landbirds ................................................................................................................................... 36 Lewis’s woodpecker .................................................................................................................. 42 Northern spotted owl ............................................................................................................... 43 Pileated Woodpecker................................................................................................................ 45 Purple martin ............................................................................................................................ 47 Red-naped Sapsucker ............................................................................................................... 48 Red-necked grebe ..................................................................................................................... 50 Tricolored blackbird .................................................................................................................. 51 Upland sandpiper ...................................................................................................................... 52 White-headed woodpecker ...................................................................................................... 54 Yellow-billed cuckoo (Western DPS) ......................................................................................... 56 Yellow rail .................................................................................................................................. 54 1 Amphibians and Reptiles .............................................................................................................. 56 Columbia spotted frog .............................................................................................................. 56 Northern Leopard Frog ............................................................................................................. 58 Oregon spotted frog ................................................................................................................. 59 Western Pond Turtle ................................................................................................................. 60 Invertebrates ................................................................................................................................. 62 Crater Lake tightcoil .................................................................................................................. 62 Gray-blue butterfly ................................................................................................................... 62 Johnson’s Hairstreak ................................................................................................................. 64 Leona’s little blue butterfly ....................................................................................................... 65 Mardon skipper ......................................................................................................................... 68 Modoc Rim sideband ................................................................................................................ 70 Siskiyou Hesperian .................................................................................................................... 71 Traveling sideband .................................................................................................................... 71 Western Bumble bee ................................................................................................................ 73 Primary Excavators and Dead Wood Dependent Species ............................................................ 75 References .................................................................................................................................... 76 2 Introduction This document describes habitat for terrestrial wildlife species considered during environmental analysis. Species and habitat descriptions for all species listed in Table 1 are included in this document. Species that could potentially be affected by the project (“yes” in Table 1) will be addressed in full detail in the Terrestrial Wildlife report or in the project Environmental Analysis. For those species that will not be addressed in full detail (“no” in Table 1), habitat descriptions and assessment of habitat within the project area are also included in this document. Species descriptions are listed by Class, then in alphabetical order by common name. Though the Fremont-Winema National Forest is one forest, it is still managed under two Land Resource Management Plans. The Bly, Lakeview, Paisley, and Silver Lake Districts make up the portions of the Forest managed under the Fremont Land and Resource Management Plan (USDA 1989). Species and habitats will therefore be analyzed based on their occurrence or proximity only to the Fremont National Forest, and follow the Standards and Guidelines of the Fremont LRMP. The Fremont National Forest falls within the East Cascades (EC) and Northern Basin and Range (NBR) ecoregions of the Oregon Conservation Strategy. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service 12/14/2017 list of threatened, endangered, proposed, and candidate species was reviewed for species that may be present on the Fremont- Winema National Forest and found within or immediately adjacent to the Fremont National Forest. After a review of habitat requirements and existing habitat components, it was determined that there is no habitat within the Fremont National Forest for northern spotted owl, Oregon spotted frog, or wolverine. Habitat for yellow-billed cuckoo and Canada lynx is not present on the Fremont-Winema National Forest, and therefore not evaluated as part of the R6 Sensitive Species List. The Forest Service’s Special Status/Sensitive Species Program (ISSSSP) and the Regional Forester’s Sensitive Species List are proactive approaches for meeting the Agency’s obligations under the Endangered Species Act, the National Forest Management Act (NFMA), and National Policy direction as stated in the 2670 section of the Forest Service Manual. The primary objectives of the Sensitive Species program are to ensure species viability and to preclude trends toward endangerment that would result in a need
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Botany Biological Evaluation
    APPENDIX I Botany Biological Evaluation Biological Evaluation for Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Plants and Fungi Page 1 of 35 for the Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project November 2009 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE – FOREST SERVICE LAKE TAHOE BASIN MANAGEMENT UNIT Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project El Dorado County, CA Biological Evaluation for Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Plants and Fungi PREPARED BY: ENTRIX, Inc. DATE: November 2009 APPROVED BY: DATE: _____________ Name, Forest Botanist, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit SUMMARY OF EFFECTS DETERMINATION AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND/OR REQUIREMENTS One population of a special-status bryophyte, three-ranked hump-moss (Meesia triquetra), was observed in the survey area during surveys on June 30, 2008 and August 28, 2008. The proposed action will not affect the moss because the population is located outside the project area where no action is planned. The following species of invasive or noxious weeds were identified during surveys of the Project area: cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum); bullthistle (Cirsium vulgare); Klamathweed (Hypericum perforatum); oxe-eye daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare); and common mullein (Verbascum Thapsus). The threat posed by these weed populations would not increase if the proposed action is implemented. An inventory and assessment of invasive and noxious weeds in the survey area is presented in the Noxious Weed Risk Assessment for the Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project (ENTRIX 2009). Based on the description of the proposed action and the evaluation contained herein, we have determined the following: There would be no significant effect to plant species listed as threatened, endangered, proposed for listing, or candidates under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA), administered by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Outreach Notice FREMONT-WINEMA NATIONAL
    Outreach Notice FREMONT-WINEMA NATIONAL FOREST District Ranger GS-0340-13 Winter Rim Zone Silver Lake and Paisley Ranger Districts The Position This position is responsible for the development, production, conservation, and utilization of natural resources on forest lands across the Winter Rim Zone of the Fremont-Winema National Forest. Duties include overseeing the inventorying, planning, evaluation, and management of the unit’s timber, soil, land, water, wildlife, fish, mineral, forage, wilderness, visual, and outdoor recreation resources in accordance with Forest Plan goals and requirements. Major project work is associated with the Sustained Yield Unit, Lakeview Collaborative Group, and Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration. Direction is provided to subordinate programs engaged in work associated with the preparation of National Environmental Policy Act documentation, development of land-use strategies, management of multiple uses, and coordination of resource management planning activities. The incumbent serves as a key member of the Forest Leadership Team and contributes to the group’s formulation of Forest plans, polices, and objectives. Extensive effort is invested in establishing and maintaining cooperative relations with local, county, and state representatives; special interest and civic groups; private industry representatives; Tribal governments; permittees; and members of the general public. PLEASE NOTE: The purpose of this Outreach Notice is to determine the potential applicant pool for this position and to establish the appropriate recruitment method and area of consideration for the advertisement. (e.g., target grade or multi-grade and forest- wide, service-wide, region-wide, government-wide, or DEMO). Responses received from this outreach notice will be relied upon to make this determination.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Abert Rim Wilderness Study Area, Lake County, Oregon
    Mineral Resources of the Abert Rim Wilderness Study Area, Lake County, Oregon U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1738-C AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the cur­ rent-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Sur­ vey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. Prices of reports released to the open files are given in the listing "U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports," updated month­ ly, which is for sale in microfiche from the U.S. Geological Survey, Books and Open-File Reports Section, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications of general in­ Books of the U.S. Geological Survey are available over the terest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single copies of Earthquakes counter at the following Geological Survey Public Inquiries Offices, all & Volcanoes, Preliminary Determination of Epicenters, and some mis­ of which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of Documents: cellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are obtainable by mail from WASHINGTON, D.C.-Main Interior Bldg.
    [Show full text]
  • First Presbyterian Church of Klamath Falls, Oregon
    First Presbyterian Church of Klamath Falls, Oregon First Presbyterian Church of Klamath Falls (FPC) seeks a vibrant, outgoing, and loving Pastor who will be a joyful leader of our Church and an active member of our wonderful community. The Pastor will collaborate with the Elders and covenant part- ners of FPC to grow our congregation and to bring the good news of God’s Word to the people of the Klamath Basin FPC’s History and Programs First Presbyterian Church was founded on February 27, 1884, the first organized church in Klamath Falls and for 15 years the only house of worship in this southeastern Oregon pioneer town. From the beginning, FPC attracted pastors and people whose life’s goals were to teach, preach, uplift, and serve the community. At FPC’s 130-Year celebration in 2014, the mayor’s proclamation recognized our church’s critical role in providing rough-and-tumble pioneers who worked in the forests and fields with the “education, infrastructure and medical facilities and all the other elements that make a vibrant, caring community with strong values.” Our historic com- mitment to service remains in our church body’s culture and guides us to this day. FPC attracts regular weekly attendance of 210 between its contemporary and traditional Sunday service. FPC has 266 covenant partners as well as many regular attendees not yet formally affiliated with the church. Our Children’s Ministry helps children discover Christ as the adults in our congregation model our faith and invest in our children’s lives. We rejoice in the “joyful noises” as our children participate with us during our praise and worship time in the sanctuary on Sundays.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Notes from Southeastern Oregon and Northeastern California
    194 Vol. XXI BIRD NOTES FROM SOUTHEASTERN OREGON AND NORTHEASTERN CALIFORNIA By GEORGE WILLETT WITH FIVE PHOTOS HE WRITER spent the greater part of the summer of 1918 at Malheur T Lake, Harney County, Oregon, in the interests of the United States Bio- logical Survey, and, while there, accumulated the bulk of the bird notes that make up this article. There will be found, however, a few additional items from other localities, principally from Clear Lake, Modoc County, California, and from the territory between Malheur Lake and Klamath Falls, the latter having been covered by auto in company with Dr. 0. W. Field and Mr. Stanley 11. Jewett, both of the Biological Survey. More than four months, from April 23 to August 27, were spentat’ Mal- heur Lake, so that the notes from that immediate section may be considered fairly complete for this season of the year, but those from other localities are more or less fragmentary. From April 4 to April 16 was spent at Clear Lake and, though quite a number of species of birds were observed at this time, some of the regular summer visitants had either not appeared at all or were present in small numbers at the date of my departure. The auto trip from Malheur Lake to Klamath Falls occupied nine days, from August 27 to September 4, inclusive. While on this trip we travelled almost continuously during daylighl hours and undoubtedly missed seeing many species of birds that were common in the country traversed.. The principal points touched at this time were Dia.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F.7
    APPENDIX F.7 Biological Evaluation Appendix F.7 Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline Project Biological Evaluation March 2019 Prepared by: Tetra Tech, Inc. Reviewed and Approved by: USDA Forest Service BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION This page intentionally left blank BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 PROPOSED ACTION AND ACTION ALTERNATIVES .................................................... 1 PRE-FIELD REVIEW ........................................................................................................ 4 RESULTS OF FIELD SURVEYS ...................................................................................... 4 SPECIES IMPACT DETERMINATION SUMMARY .......................................................... 5 DETAILED EFFECTS OF PROPOSED ACTION ON SPECIES CONSIDERED ............ 25 6.1 Global Discussion ........................................................................................................ 25 6.1.1 Analysis Areas and Current Environment ............................................................. 25 6.1.2 Impacts .................................................................................................................. 33 6.1.3 Conservation Measures and Mitigation ................................................................. 62 6.2 Species Accounts and Analysis of Impacts ................................................................. 63 6.2.1 Mammals ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • List of Plants for Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve
    Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve Plant Checklist DRAFT as of 29 November 2005 FERNS AND FERN ALLIES Equisetaceae (Horsetail Family) Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum arvense Present in Park Rare Native Field horsetail Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum laevigatum Present in Park Unknown Native Scouring-rush Polypodiaceae (Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Cystopteris fragilis Present in Park Uncommon Native Brittle bladderfern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Woodsia oregana Present in Park Uncommon Native Oregon woodsia Pteridaceae (Maidenhair Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Argyrochosma fendleri Present in Park Unknown Native Zigzag fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cheilanthes feei Present in Park Uncommon Native Slender lip fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cryptogramma acrostichoides Present in Park Unknown Native American rockbrake Selaginellaceae (Spikemoss Family) Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella densa Present in Park Rare Native Lesser spikemoss Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella weatherbiana Present in Park Unknown Native Weatherby's clubmoss CONIFERS Cupressaceae (Cypress family) Vascular Plant Pinales Cupressaceae Juniperus scopulorum Present in Park Unknown Native Rocky Mountain juniper Pinaceae (Pine Family) Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies concolor var. concolor Present in Park Rare Native White fir Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies lasiocarpa Present
    [Show full text]
  • A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks Appendix 14 – Plants of Conservation Concern
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks Appendix 14 – Plants of Conservation Concern Natural Resource Report NPS/SEKI/ NRR—2013/665.14 In Memory of Rebecca Ciresa Wenk, Botaness ON THE COVER Giant Forest, Sequoia National Park Photography by: Brent Paull A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks Appendix 14 – Plants of Conservation Concern Natural Resource Report NPS/SEKI/ NRR—2013/665.14 Ann Huber University of California Berkeley 41043 Grouse Drive Three Rivers, CA 93271 Adrian Das U.S. Geological Survey Western Ecological Research Center, Sequoia-Kings Canyon Field Station 47050 Generals Highway #4 Three Rivers, CA 93271 Rebecca Wenk University of California Berkeley 137 Mulford Hall Berkeley, CA 94720-3114 Sylvia Haultain Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks 47050 Generals Highway Three Rivers, CA 93271 June 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Contact Us: Spotter Field Guide
    Joel Tannenholz Winter 2018-19 was wetter or much wetter than normal across most of southeast Oregon and southwest Idaho. Temperatures averaged over the three-month period were near normal, except in the Treasure Valley, which was a few degrees warmer than normal. Comparisons of average temperatures for December, January, and February showed a somewhat unusual pattern. January was warmer than December, which is normal. But February was slightly colder than January at most locations, which, on average, happens in only one year in ten. When should you call us? shifted into the west. Along with warmer air, westerly winds carried a series of Pacific weather systems inland. Most HAIL: pea size or larger. Several locations also observed their seasonal lows in February, which also happens in about one year in ten. Seasonal lows provided only light precipitation and breezy southeast to SNOW: 1” per hour or greater normally occur in December or January, but have been southwest winds. observed as early as October and as late as March. OR storm total 4”+ OR snow A record high temperature of 48 degrees was set at Baker City causing road closures. on the 18th , breaking the old record of 46 set in 1979. REDUCED VISIBILITY: for any A record snowfall of 3.4 inches was set at Boise on the 2nd , reason. breaking the old record of 2.8 inches set in 1948. Snowfall Reports (5 inches or more) WIND: Greater than 40 mph or damage. Date Amount Location HEAVY RAIN: ½”+ in 1 hour Dec 2 6” Boise 8-9“ Cascade FREEZING RAIN: Any 12” Idaho City 8” Table Rock amount.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Evaluation for Pacific Southwest Region (R5) Sensitive Botanical Species For
    BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION FOR PACIFIC SOUTHWEST REGION (R5) SENSITIVE BOTANICAL SPECIES FOR JOSEPH CREEK FOREST HEALTH PROJECT MODOC NATIONAL FOREST WARNER MOUNTAIN RANGER DISTRICT September 14, 2017 Prepared by: Heidi Guenther 9.14.2017 Heidi Guenther, Forest Botanist Date Modoc National Forest BOTANY BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION JOSEPH CREEK FOREST HEALTH PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 1 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 2 3 Proposed Project and Description ....................................................................................... 2 3.1 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Proposed Action.............................................................................................................. 2 3.3 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................... 2 4 Species Considered and Species Evaluated ........................................................................ 4 5 Analysis Process and Affected Environment ...................................................................... 4 5.1 Analysis Process.............................................................................................................. 4 6 Consultation..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant Species Checklist
    Vascular Species List Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska Family Scientific Name Growth Form Biogeography Adoxaceae Adoxa moschatellina Herb / Forb Incompletely circumpolar Apiaceae Angelica genuflexa Herb / Forb Amphi-Beringian Angelica lucida Herb / Forb Amphi-Beringian Bupleurum americanum Herb / Forb Amphi-Beringian Cicuta bulbifera Herb / Forb North American Cicuta douglasii Herb / Forb North American Cicuta virosa Herb / Forb Circumpolar Cnidium cnidiifolium Herb / Forb Amphi-Beringian Heracleum lanatum Herb / Forb Amphi-Beringian Osmorhiza depauperata Herb / Forb North American Podistera macounii Herb / Forb Amphi-Beringian Araceae Calla palustris Herb / Forb Circumpolar Araliaceae Oplopanax horridus Herb / Forb North American Asteraceae Achillea millefolium ssp. borealis Herb / Forb North American Achillea millefolium ssp. lanulosa Herb / Forb North American Achillea millefolium ssp. millefolium Herb / Forb Circumpolar Achillea sibirica Herb / Forb Amphi-Beringian Anaphalis margaritacea Herb / Forb Amphi-Beringian Antennaria alpina Herb / Forb Circumpolar Antennaria friesiana Herb / Forb Incompletely circumpolar Antennaria monocephala Herb / Forb Amphi-Beringian Antennaria pulcherrima Herb / Forb North American Antennaria rosea Herb / Forb North American Arnica amplexicaulis Herb / Forb North American Arnica angustifolia Herb / Forb North American Arnica ovata Herb / Forb North American Arnica frigida ssp. griscomii Herb / Forb Amphi-Beringian Arnica latifolia Herb / Forb North American Arnica lessingii Herb / Forb Amphi-Beringian
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Cedar Breaks National
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/173 ON THE COVER Peterson’s campion (Silene petersonii), Cedar Breaks National Monument, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/173 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 February 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. Current examples of such reports include the results of research that addresses natural resource management issues; natural resource inventory and monitoring activities; resource assessment reports; scientifi c literature reviews; and peer- reviewed proceedings of technical workshops, conferences, or symposia.
    [Show full text]