The White Dwarf Cooling Sequence of the Globular Cluster Messier 41

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The White Dwarf Cooling Sequence of the Globular Cluster Messier 41 SubmittedtoTheAstrophysical Journal Letters March 5, 2002. If both papers areaccepted for publication, this paper should immediately fol low the paper authoredbyRicher et al. 2002. THE WHITE DWARF COOLING SEQUENCE OF THE 1 GLOBULAR CLUSTER MESSIER 4 2;3 4 4;5 6 Brad M. S. Hansen , James Brewer , Greg G. Fahlman , Brad K. Gibson , Ro drigo 7 8 2 4 9 Ibata , Marco Limongi ,R.Michael Rich ,Harvey B. Richer ,Michael M. Shara ,Peter B. 10 Stetson ABSTRACT We present the white dwarf sequence of the globular cluster M4, based on a 123 orbit Hubble Space Telescop e exp osure, with limiting magnitude V 30, I 1 Based on observations with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescop e, obtained at the Space Telescop e Science Institute, whichisoperatedby the Asso ciation of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26555. These observations are asso ciated with prop osal GO-8679 2 Hubble Fellow, Department of Astronomy,University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, [email protected], [email protected] 3 DepartmentofAstrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 4 DepartmentofPhysics & Astronomy, 6224 Agricultural Road, University of British Columbia, Vancou- ver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada, [email protected] c.ca 5 Canada-France-Hawaii Telescop e Corp oration, P.O. Box 1597, Kamuela, HA, 96743, [email protected] 6 Centre for Astrophysics Sup ercomputing, Mail No. 31, Swinburne University,P.O.Box 218, Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia, [email protected] 7 Observatoire de Strasb ourg, 11, rue de l'Universite, F-67000 Strasb ourg, France, [email protected] strasbg.fr 8 Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, Montep orzio Catone I-00040, Italy, [email protected] orzio.astro.it 9 DepartmentofAstrophysics, Division of Physical Sciences, American Museum of Natural History,Cen- tral Park West at 79th St, New York, NY, 10024-5192, [email protected] 10 National Research Council, Hertzb erg Institute of Astrophysics, 5071 West Saanich Road, RR5, Victoria, BC, V9E 2E7, Canada, p [email protected] {2{ 28. The white dwarf luminosity function rises sharply for I> 25:5, consistent with the b ehaviour exp ected for a burst p opulation. The white dwarfs of M4 extend to approximately 2.5 magnitudes fainter than the p eak of the lo cal Galactic disk white dwarf luminosity function. This demonstrates a clear and signi cant age di erence b etween the Galactic disk and the halo globular cluster M4. Using the same standard white dwarf mo dels (Hansen 1999) to t each luminosity function yields ages of 7:3 1:5 Gyr for the disk and 12:7 0:7 Gyr for M4 (2 statistical errors). Subject headings: globular clusters: individual (Messier 4), age { stars: white dwarfs, luminosity function, Population I I { Galaxy: halo 1. Intro duction Globular clusters have b een the fundamental lab oratories for tests of stellar structure theories ever since the work of Sandage (1953). Aby-pro duct of such studies is an age determination for the cluster which is of cosmogonical interest by virtue of the large value. The study of the main sequence and giant branches has b ecome a detailed and quantitative eld (Stetson, Vandenb erg & Bolte 1996; Sara jedini, Chab oyer & Demarque 1997) and the ages thus determined o er a lower limit to the age of the Universe. In contrast, the study of the white dwarfs in globular clusters has progressed much more slowly. Their low luminosities hamp ered early searches (Richer 1978; Ortolani & Rosino 1986; Richer & Fahlman 1988; Paresce, De Marschi & Ramoniello 1995; Elson et al. 1995). Richer et al. (1995; 1997) rep orted the rst detection of a signi cant globular cluster white dwarf p opulation in the cluster M4. Here we rep ort the rst results of a very deep exp osure of the outer eld of that study, allowing b oth the detection of very faint white dwarfs and the removal of background stars and galaxies by virtue of the cluster prop er motion. The motivation for this work is severalfold. The contemp oraneous and chemically ho- mogeneous nature of the cluster sample makes it an excellent lab oratory to study the physics of white dwarf co oling, just as it has b een for main sequence and giant stars. The determi- nation of an age from the white dwarf luminosity function is particularly attractive b ecause it allows a direct comparison, using the same metho d, b etween the cluster and the Galactic disk. Furthermore, the internal physics of white dwarfs is considerably di erent from that of main sequence stars. In particular, the sensitivity of the atmospheric mo dels to metallicity is exp ected to b e unimp ortant as all elements heavier than helium sink under the in uence of the high white dwarf gravity.Thus, a comparison of ages determined from white dwarf and main sequence mo dels o ers an excellent test of systematic mo del uncertainties. {3{ Finally, the continuing interest in the existence of a halo white dwarf p opulation makes the cluster white dwarfs useful as templates to guide searches for similarly old white dwarfs which could p otentially contribute to the Galactic dark matter. 2. The Cluster White Dwarf Sequence The data are drawn from Hubble Space Telescop e exp osures of M4 in programs GO 5461 (cycle 4) and GO 8679 (cycle 9) and are describ ed in detail in the preceding pap er, Richer et al. (2002). The photometric solutions are p erformed by the metho d of pro le tting. The deep second ep o ch is used to x the p osition centroid for cluster memb ers. The p osition (in the cluster frame of reference) is then held xed when determining the magnitude in the (shallower) rst ep o ch data. This allows the detection and measurementofmuchfainter ob jects than in Richer et al. (1997). The nal sample consists of ob jects that havebeen detected in at least three data sets (where the four p ossible sets are the V and I data at each of the two epochs). Completeness corrections were determined using arti cial star tests and require that the added stars b e recovered within 0.5 pixels of their original p ositions and within 0.5 magnitudes of their original input magnitude. The entire cluster white dwarf co oling sequence is shown in Figure 1. The resulting V- band luminosity function is shown in Figure 2. Also shown is the disk white dwarf luminosity function from Lieb ert, Dahn & Monet (1988), using the improved photometry of Leggett, Ruiz & Bergeron (1998) and a V-band distance mo dulus of 12.51. This diagram provides the clearest and most direct evidence of a signi cant age di erence b etween the Galactic disk and the Galactic halo cluster M4, predicated only on the assumption that white dwarfs co ol as they age. While this may not surprise many astronomers, until nowsuch evidence has b een remarkably unconvincing (e.g. Carraro, Girardi & Chiosi 1999). While (halo) globular cluster ages have b een estimated at > 10 Gyr (Chab oyer et al. 1998; Cassisi et al. 1999; Caretta et al. 2000; Thompson et al. 2001) for some time, age estimates (ignoring, for the moment, white dwarf-based estimates, to whichwe shall return) for the lo cal Galactic thin disk range from 8-15 Gyr (Ng & Bertelli 1998; Jimenez, Flynn & Kotonova 1998; Liu & Chab oyer 2000; Binney, Dehnen & Bertelli 2000). Another striking asp ect of the M4 luminosity function is the sharp rise in the number counts from V 26:5toV 27:5. This is the exp ected characteristic b ehaviour of the white dwarf p opulation resulting from a single burst of star formation (e.g. Hansen 2001) and is to b e contrasted with the more gradual rise and turnover at the faint end exp ected from a more extended p erio d of star formation. {4{ 3. Comparison with the mo dels To obtain a quantitative measure of this age di erence, wemust turn to theoretical mo dels of white dwarf co oling. A complete parameter study is b eyond the scop e of a Letter, but wemay obtain a rst estimate by using the current default set of mo dels. It is also imp ortantthatwe redo the age estimate for the lo cal white dwarfs with the same mo dels and in the same way in order to b e consistent. We shall assume mo dels with carb on/oxygen cores, using the mixtures of Segretain & Chabrier (1993). We shall assume a chemical comp osition uniform in layers (`onion- skin mo del') due to gravitational sedimentation, with helium surface layers of mass M He 2 10 M .We will consider mo dels b oth with no surface hydrogen layers and with a hydrogen wd 4 mass fraction of 10 on the surface. The main sequence ages are taken from the mo dels of Hurley,Pols & Tout (2000) and the white dwarf mo dels from Hansen (1999). The main sequence-white dwarf mass relation is that of Wo o d (1992). The signi cant di erence in the calculation of the cluster and disk luminosity functions is the choice of initial mass function and star formation history. The star formation rate in the Galactic disk is assumed to b e constant and the IMF is assumed to b e Salp eter (slop e =2.35). For M4, wehave assumed the star formation is a single burst and the mass function (in the white dwarf progenitor range) slop e is =1.05, based on comparing the white dwarf number count with the main sequence counts in our eld (see Richer et al.
Recommended publications
  • Messier Objects
    Messier Objects From the Stocker Astroscience Center at Florida International University Miami Florida The Messier Project Main contributors: • Daniel Puentes • Steven Revesz • Bobby Martinez Charles Messier • Gabriel Salazar • Riya Gandhi • Dr. James Webb – Director, Stocker Astroscience center • All images reduced and combined using MIRA image processing software. (Mirametrics) What are Messier Objects? • Messier objects are a list of astronomical sources compiled by Charles Messier, an 18th and early 19th century astronomer. He created a list of distracting objects to avoid while comet hunting. This list now contains over 110 objects, many of which are the most famous astronomical bodies known. The list contains planetary nebula, star clusters, and other galaxies. - Bobby Martinez The Telescope The telescope used to take these images is an Astronomical Consultants and Equipment (ACE) 24- inch (0.61-meter) Ritchey-Chretien reflecting telescope. It has a focal ratio of F6.2 and is supported on a structure independent of the building that houses it. It is equipped with a Finger Lakes 1kx1k CCD camera cooled to -30o C at the Cassegrain focus. It is equipped with dual filter wheels, the first containing UBVRI scientific filters and the second RGBL color filters. Messier 1 Found 6,500 light years away in the constellation of Taurus, the Crab Nebula (known as M1) is a supernova remnant. The original supernova that formed the crab nebula was observed by Chinese, Japanese and Arab astronomers in 1054 AD as an incredibly bright “Guest star” which was visible for over twenty-two months. The supernova that produced the Crab Nebula is thought to have been an evolved star roughly ten times more massive than the Sun.
    [Show full text]
  • The Midnight Sky: Familiar Notes on the Stars and Planets, Edward Durkin, July 15, 1869 a Good Way to Start – Find North
    The expression "dog days" refers to the period from July 3 through Aug. 11 when our brightest night star, SIRIUS (aka the dog star), rises in conjunction* with the sun. Conjunction, in astronomy, is defined as the apparent meeting or passing of two celestial bodies. TAAS Fabulous Fifty A program for those new to astronomy Friday Evening, July 20, 2018, 8:00 pm All TAAS and other new and not so new astronomers are welcome. What is the TAAS Fabulous 50 Program? It is a set of 4 meetings spread across a calendar year in which a beginner to astronomy learns to locate 50 of the most prominent night sky objects visible to the naked eye. These include stars, constellations, asterisms, and Messier objects. Methodology 1. Meeting dates for each season in year 2018 Winter Jan 19 Spring Apr 20 Summer Jul 20 Fall Oct 19 2. Locate the brightest and easiest to observe stars and associated constellations 3. Add new prominent constellations for each season Tonight’s Schedule 8:00 pm – We meet inside for a slide presentation overview of the Summer sky. 8:40 pm – View night sky outside The Midnight Sky: Familiar Notes on the Stars and Planets, Edward Durkin, July 15, 1869 A Good Way to Start – Find North Polaris North Star Polaris is about the 50th brightest star. It appears isolated making it easy to identify. Circumpolar Stars Polaris Horizon Line Albuquerque -- 35° N Circumpolar Stars Capella the Goat Star AS THE WORLD TURNS The Circle of Perpetual Apparition for Albuquerque Deneb 1 URSA MINOR 2 3 2 URSA MAJOR & Vega BIG DIPPER 1 3 Draco 4 Camelopardalis 6 4 Deneb 5 CASSIOPEIA 5 6 Cepheus Capella the Goat Star 2 3 1 Draco Ursa Minor Ursa Major 6 Camelopardalis 4 Cassiopeia 5 Cepheus Clock and Calendar A single map of the stars can show the places of the stars at different hours and months of the year in consequence of the earth’s two primary movements: Daily Clock The rotation of the earth on it's own axis amounts to 360 degrees in 24 hours, or 15 degrees per hour (360/24).
    [Show full text]
  • A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In
    Abasic requirement for studying the heavens is determining where in the sky things are. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each uses a coordinate grid projected on to the celestial sphere, in analogy to the geographic coordinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth's equator) . Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the one most closely related to the geographic coordinate system, because they use the same fun­ damental plane and the same poles. The projection of the Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles on to the celest ial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate systems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth; it rotates as the Earth does . The equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but of course it's really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec for short) . It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator. The longitud inal angle is called the right ascension (RA for short).
    [Show full text]
  • OBSERVING BASICS by GUY MACKIE
    OBSERVING BASICS by GUY MACKIE Observing Reports The colorful and detailed photographs we see of celestial objects are not at all like the ubiquitous "fuzzy blobs" we see at the eyepiece. Nevertheless, you are freezing your buns off and loosing much needed sleep for work, the next day so why not make a description of your observations that will make the hunt worthwhile. Here are some suggestions to fill the empty spaces in your logbook and to imprint the observing experience more deeply in your memory. The Basics Your website www.m51.ca has a downloadable log sheet template that is just super, but you can also make up one for yourself or customize the website version to your own needs. The main things to start your report should be the circumstances under which you observed: Observing Location Time (of observing session and of the observation of each object) Optics (type of instrument, eyepiece, filters, power of magnification) Transparency (page 56 of the Observers Handbook) Seeing (for me this is a subjective rating of the atmospheric stability based on Planet features and double star observations) It is good to know the field of view (FOV) of each of your eyepieces in minutes of degree, then you can estimate the approximate size of the object. The sketchpad I use has the FOV for every eyepiece I use taped to the back, a handy reference. To calculate your field of view there are websites that will punch out the both the magnification and the FOV for most eyepieces. You can do it yourself: With any motor drives turned off, place a star near the celestial equator just outside the field of view in the eyepiece so that it will drift across the middle of the field of view.
    [Show full text]
  • The Messier Catalog
    The Messier Catalog Messier 1 Messier 2 Messier 3 Messier 4 Messier 5 Crab Nebula globular cluster globular cluster globular cluster globular cluster Messier 6 Messier 7 Messier 8 Messier 9 Messier 10 open cluster open cluster Lagoon Nebula globular cluster globular cluster Butterfly Cluster Ptolemy's Cluster Messier 11 Messier 12 Messier 13 Messier 14 Messier 15 Wild Duck Cluster globular cluster Hercules glob luster globular cluster globular cluster Messier 16 Messier 17 Messier 18 Messier 19 Messier 20 Eagle Nebula The Omega, Swan, open cluster globular cluster Trifid Nebula or Horseshoe Nebula Messier 21 Messier 22 Messier 23 Messier 24 Messier 25 open cluster globular cluster open cluster Milky Way Patch open cluster Messier 26 Messier 27 Messier 28 Messier 29 Messier 30 open cluster Dumbbell Nebula globular cluster open cluster globular cluster Messier 31 Messier 32 Messier 33 Messier 34 Messier 35 Andromeda dwarf Andromeda Galaxy Triangulum Galaxy open cluster open cluster elliptical galaxy Messier 36 Messier 37 Messier 38 Messier 39 Messier 40 open cluster open cluster open cluster open cluster double star Winecke 4 Messier 41 Messier 42/43 Messier 44 Messier 45 Messier 46 open cluster Orion Nebula Praesepe Pleiades open cluster Beehive Cluster Suburu Messier 47 Messier 48 Messier 49 Messier 50 Messier 51 open cluster open cluster elliptical galaxy open cluster Whirlpool Galaxy Messier 52 Messier 53 Messier 54 Messier 55 Messier 56 open cluster globular cluster globular cluster globular cluster globular cluster Messier 57 Messier
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Sp Target Information
    SUMMER SP TARGET INFORMATION ALGIEBA (g LEO) BASIC INFORMATION OBJECT TYPE: Binary Star CONSTELLATION: Leo BEST VIEW: Late April DISCOVERY: Known to Ancients DISTANCE: 131 ly BINARY SEPARATION: 4” (170 AU) ORBITAL PERIOD: ~500 yr. APPARENT MAGNITUDE: 1.98 DISTANCE DETERMINATION After measuring the shift in position of the star relative to background stars as Earth orbits the Sun, simple trigonometry can yield the distance. The Hipparcos satellite was launched in 1989 to create a comprehensive catalog of trigonometric parallax measurements from space. The distance quoted above is from this catalog. NOTABLE FEATURES/FACTS • William Herschel discovered Algieba’s binary nature in 1782. • Both components of Algieba have evolved beyond the main sequence. They began their lives as B-type stars, and they will end their lives as white dwarfs. • In 2010, a team including former UT astronomer Arte Hatzes discovered a planet orbiting Algieba A. The planet is nine times the mass of Jupiter and orbits the star in 1.2 years at an average distance of 1.2 AU. SUMMER SP TARGET INFORMATION MESSIER 97 (THE OWL NEBULA) BASIC INFORMATION OBJECT TYPE: Planetary Nebula CONSTELLATION: Ursa Major BEST VIEW: Early May DISCOVERY: Pierre Mechain, 1781 DISTANCE: ~2000 ly DIAMETER: 1.8 ly APPARENT MAGNITUDE: +9.9 APPARENT DIMENSIONS: 3.3’ DISTANCE DETERMINATION The distances to most planetary nebulae are very poorly known. A variety of methods can be used, providing mixed results. In many cases, astronomers resort to statistical methods to estimate the distances to planetary nebulae. Although we don’t have accurate distances for most of the planetary nebulae in the Milky Way, we do know exactly how far away the Large Magellanic Cloud is.
    [Show full text]
  • Galactic and Extragalactic Studies, Xxiii. Opacity of the Southern Milky Way Dust Clouds by Harlow Shapley and Jacqueline Sweeney
    GALACTIC AND EXTRAGALACTIC STUDIES, XXIII. OPACITY OF THE SOUTHERN MILKY WAY DUST CLOUDS BY HARLOW SHAPLEY AND JACQUELINE SWEENEY HARVARD COLLEGE OBSERVATORY Communicated June 3, 1955 The greater richness of the southern celestial hemisphere when compared with the northern is illustrated by its brightest constellations, Scorpius, Sagittarius, Centaurus, and Crux, and in such stellar giants of brightness and size as Sirius, Antares, Canopus, and Achernar. It is the hemisphere of the nearest external galaxies (the Magellanic Clouds) and of the central nucleus of our Milky Way. A consequence of the latter is that more than four-fifths of the known globular star clusters, including the two brightest, Omega Centauri and 47 Tucanae, are also southern, as is the heavily obscured Messier 4, probably the nearest of all globular clusters. But perhaps the most outstanding features of the southern sky are the brilliance of the gaseous nebulosities in Orion, Carina, and Sagittarius and the darkness of the large obscurations among the Milky Way star clouds, especially the darkness of the Coalsack and of the complex of obscurities around Rho Ophi- uchi. An examination of the opacity of these discrete dark nebulosities, and of the general cosmic dust that obscures the distant parts of the southern Milky Way, is reported in this communication. 1. On the basis of galaxy counts on photographs made with the Mount Wilson reflectors, E. P. Hubble published in 1934 his well-known picture of the distribution of faint galaxies. He was able to take his sampling survey southward only to dec- lination -30°. Hubble's work on northern galaxies is now being reinforced, or actually supplanted, by the full-coverage atlas of the northern sky by C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Age of Aquarius Is an Astrological Term Denoting Either the Current Or Upcoming Astrological Age, Depending on the Method of Calculation
    The Age of Aquarius is an astrological term denoting either the current or upcoming astrological age, depending on the method of calculation. Astrologers maintain that an astrological age is a product of the earth's slow precessional rotation and lasts for 2,150 years, on average. In popular culture in the United States, the Age of Aquarius refers to the advent of the New Age movement in the 1960s and 1970s. There are various methods of calculating the length of an astrological age. In sun- sign astrology, the first sign is Aries, followed by Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo, Libra, Scorpio, Sagittarius, Capricorn, Aquarius, and Pisces, whereupon the cycle returns to Aries and through the zodiacal signs again. Astrological ages, however, proceed in the opposite direction ("retrograde" in astronomy). Therefore, the Age of Aquarius follows the Age of Pisces. Mythology of the constellation Aquarius This is the eleventh zodiacal sign and one which has always been connected with water. To the Babylonians it represented an overflowing urn, and they associated this with the heavy rains which fell in their eleventh month, whilst the Egyptians saw the constellation as Hapi, the god of the Nile. Greek legend, however, tells of Ganymede, an exceptionally handsome, young prince of Troy. He was spotted by Zeus, who immediately decided that he would make a perfect cup-bearer. The story then differs - one version telling how Zeus sent his pet eagle, Aquila, to carry Ganymede to Olympus, another that it was Zeus, himself, disguised as an eagle, who swept up the youth and carried him to the home of the gods.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Messier (1730-1817) Was an Observational Astronomer Working
    Charles Messier (1730-1817) was an observational Catalogue (NGC) which was being compiled at the same astronomer working from Paris in the eighteenth century. time as Messier's observations but using much larger tele­ He discovered between 15 and 21 comets and observed scopes, probably explains its modern popularity. It is a many more. During his observations he encountered neb­ challenging but achievable task for most amateur astron­ ulous objects that were not comets. Some of these objects omers to observe all the Messier objects. At «star parties" were his own discoveries, while others had been known and within astronomy clubs, going for the maximum before. In 1774 he published a list of 45 of these nebulous number of Messier objects observed is a popular competi­ objects. His purpose in publishing the list was so that tion. Indeed at some times of the year it is just about poss­ other comet-hunters should not confuse the nebulae with ible to observe most of them in a single night. comets. Over the following decades he published supple­ Messier observed from Paris and therefore the most ments which increased the number of objects in his cata­ southerly object in his list is M7 in Scorpius with a decli­ logue to 103 though objects M101 and M102 were in fact nation of -35°. He also missed several objects from his list the same. Later other astronomers added a replacement such as h and X Per and the Hyades which most observers for M102 and objects 104 to 110. It is now thought proba­ would feel should have been included.
    [Show full text]
  • MESSIER 4, a GLOBULAR CLUSTER Messier 4 Or M4 (Also Designated NGC 6121) Is a Globular Cluster in the Constellation of Scorpius
    MESSIER 4, A GLOBULAR CLUSTER Messier 4 or M4 (also designated NGC 6121) is a globular cluster in the constellation of Scorpius. It was discovered by Philippe Loys de Chéseaux in 1746 and catalogued by Charles Messier in 1764. It was the first globular cluster in which individual stars were resolved. Unlike open star clusters – such as the Pleiades and the Hyades – the Milky Way’s 200 or so globular star clusters are not part of the galactic disk. M4 is conspicuous in even the smallest of telescopes as a fuzzy ball of light. It appears about the same size as the Moon in the sky. It is one of the easiest globular clusters to find, being located only 1.3 degrees west of the bright star Antares, with both objects being visible in a wide field telescope. Modestly sized telescopes will begin to resolve individual stars of which the brightest in M4 are of apparent magnitude 10.8. CHARACTERISTICS M4 is a rather loosely concentrated cluster of class IX (see below) and measures 75 light years across. It features a characteristic "bar" structure across its core, visible to moderate sized telescopes. The structure consists of 11th magnitude stars and is approximately 2.5' long and was first noted by William Herschel in 1783. At least 43 variable stars have been observed within M4. M4 is approximately 7,200 light years away, the same distance as NGC 6397 in the constellation Ara, making these two the closest globular clusters to the Solar System. It has an estimated age of 12.2 billion years.
    [Show full text]
  • Stellar Dynamics and Structure of Galaxies Introduction
    Galaxies Part II Introduction Clusters Stellar Dynamics and Structure of Galaxies Introduction. Spherically symmetric objects Vasily Belokurov [email protected] Institute of Astronomy Lent Term 2016 1 / 21 Galaxies Part II OutlineI Introduction Clusters 1 Introduction 2 Clusters Globular Clusters Open clusters Clusters of galaxies Comparison of hot stellar systems 2 / 21 Galaxies Part II Why study galaxies? Introduction Clusters Cosmic Timeline 3 / 21 Galaxies Part II Stellar Dynamics = Structure of Galaxies Introduction Clusters NGC 634 4 / 21 Galaxies Part II Stellar Dynamics = Structure of Galaxies Introduction Clusters NGC 4565 5 / 21 Galaxies Part II Stellar Dynamics = Structure of Galaxies Introduction Clusters M 87 6 / 21 Galaxies Part II Stellar Dynamics = Structure of Galaxies Introduction Clusters Orbits in axisymmetric potential. From Cappellari et al 2004 7 / 21 Galaxies Part II Stellar Dynamics = Structure of Galaxies Introduction Clusters Observed light and velocity distribution is nothing but the superposition of stellar orbits 8 / 21 Galaxies Part II Why Study Galaxies? Introduction Because they are beautiful! Clusters • What is the mass distribution? • On what orbits do stars, gas, dark matter, globular clusters move? • How much mass contributed by each component? • What can we learn about the formation and evolution? With the hope to solve the following conundrums: • Nature of the dark matter particle, interaction between dark matter and ordinary matter, fomatiom of the first stars and galaxies, formation of the first black holes, black hole growth, jets, element abundance evolution 9 / 21 Galaxies Part II Collisional and collisionless Introduction Stars and gas Clusters • Around solar radius, the typical distance between two stars is 1019 cm.
    [Show full text]
  • Messier Objects: Images on the Web a Catalog by Andrew Fraknoi [Dec
    Messier Objects: Images on the Web A Catalog by Andrew Fraknoi [Dec. 2017] NOTE: The images listed are in the public domain, and can thus be used for educational purposes. Under Type: SNR = Supernova Remnant; GSC = Globular Star Cluster; OSC = Open Star Cluster NEB = Nebula; GAL = Galaxy M# Typ Name Picture Address e 1 SNR Crab https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/messier-1-the-crab-nebula Nebula https://www.eso.org/public/images/potw1523a/ 2 GSC https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/messier-2 https://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/html/im0523.html 3 GSC https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/messier-3 https://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/html/im1273.html 4 GSC https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/messier-4 https://www.eso.org/public/images/eso1235a/ 5 GSC https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/messier-5 https://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/html/im0731.html 6 OSC Butterfly https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:M6a.jpg Cluster https://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/html/im0379.html 7 OSC Ptolemy’s http://www.eso.org/public/images/eso1406a/ Cluster https://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/html/im0584.html 8 NEB Lagoon https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/messier-8-the-lagoon-nebula Nebula https://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/html/im1105.html 9 GSC https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/messier-9 https://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/html/im0573.html 10 GSC https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/messier-10 1 https://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/html/im0648.html 11 OSC Wild Duck https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/messier-11-the-wild-duck-cluster
    [Show full text]