Volume 29 Issue 1 Wilderness: Past, Present, and Future Winter 1989 The Dispute over the Frankling River and South West Wilderness Area in Tasmania, Australia Aynsley Kellow Recommended Citation Aynsley Kellow, The Dispute over the Frankling River and South West Wilderness Area in Tasmania, Australia, 29 Nat. Resources J. 129 (1989). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol29/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected]. AYNSLEY KELLOW* The Dispute over the Franklin River and South West Wilderness Area in Tasmania, Australia INTRODUCTION On July 1, 1983 the High Court of Australia upheld the constitutional validity of the 1983 World Heritage Properties Act [19831,' a statute which halted construction of a hydro-electric power scheme in the area of wilderness in the southwest of Tasmania. The decision was notable both because it represented an extension of Commonwealth power within the Australian federation and because of the fact that it preserved an important area of temperate wilderness. The focus of this paper is on the latter aspect. The High Court ruling was the final stage in a long and bitter struggle between those who wished to see development in the South West and those who wished to preserve the area further from such encroachments. While the focus of the dispute was the dam proposal, also at stake were the forest and potential mineral resources of the area.