Review of the Bennettitalean Genus Weltrichia Mihai Emilian Popa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Review of the Bennettitalean Genus Weltrichia Mihai Emilian Popa Popa Journal of Palaeogeography (2019) 8:12 https://doi.org/10.1186/s42501-019-0023-9 Journal of Palaeogeography REVIEW Open Access Review of the bennettitalean genus Weltrichia Mihai Emilian Popa Abstract The bennettitalean male reproductive structure Weltrichia Braun 1849 emend. Harris 1969 (Family Williamsoniaceae) is discussed from several points of view, including anatomy and morphology, species diversity and validity, phytogeographical and stratigraphical distribution, and reproduction strategy. A very rare fossil, genus Weltrichia includes 25 valid species distributed in both hemispheres during Triassic and Jurassic times. This contribution critically reviews the systematics of the entire genus, together with its stratigraphical and palaeophytogeographical significance. Keywords: Bennettitales, Weltrichia, Male reproductive structure, Triassic, Jurassic 1 Introduction Cretaceous representatives. The Williamsoniaceae in- The Order Bennettitales Engler 1892 represents a highly cludes plants with a slender stem and unisexual and interesting group of extinct gymnosperms in terms of bisexual reproductive structures, such as the unisex- anatomy, high biodiversity and widespread phytogeograph- ual, male Weltrichia Braun 1849 emend Harris 1969, ical distribution during the whole Mesozoic (Stewart 1983; the female Williamsonia Carruthers 1870 or the bi- Taylor et al. 2009; Friis et al. 2011). In the same time, their sexual Williamsoniella Thomas 1915. evolutionary significance is related to the origin of angio- Weltrichia consists basically of a central cup to which sperms, as the Bennettitales innovated radial, complex, radially equal, centrifugal rays are attached, bearing bi- unisexual or bisexual reproductive structures resembling valve pollen sacs (also called synangia) with elliptical, the angiosperm flowers. Such reproductive structures are monocolpate pollen, the whole structure having a radial true gymnospermous cones and they represent a conver- symmetry. The substance of the cup and rays is usually gent evolutionary trend with true flowers, an experiment thick, and the rays occur in a single whorl. Variations to which the Bennettitales undertook before the first flower- this basic morphology include equal centripetal rays over ing plants originated (Friis et al. 2011; Pott 2014). The the central cup, attractants or resin (resinous) bodies reproductive structures resembling flowers were not the within the cup, unipinnate (pedicellate) pollen sacs, only peculiar characters of Bennettitales, they also pos- trichomes, appendages, striae and ridges over the centri- sessed syndetocheilic stomata in their epidermal tissues. fugal rays. Weltrichia is associated with Williamsonia These types of stomata separate them from morphologic- female reproductive structures, with foliage belonging to ally similar vegetative organs of plants belonging to the the genera Zamites, Otozamites and Ptilophyllum and Order Cycadales, among other characters. Bennettitales with other vegetative parts such as Bucklandia cortical are related to Gnetales and angiosperms in cladistic stud- fragments (Harris 1969). ies (Doyle 2006; Hilton and Bateman 2006). They are Genus Weltrichia was defined by Braun (1849), with divided into two separate families, based on vegetative and the type species Weltrichia mirabilis from Lower reproductive anatomy: Family Williamsoniaceae, domin- Jurassic sediments of Franconia, Germany. He also antly with Late Triassic and Jurassic representatives, and defined two more species of Weltrichia in the same Family Cycadeoidaceae (Bennettitaceae), with mainly paper, synonyms of W. mirabilis.Thenewtaxonwas dedicated to Johann P. A. Weltrich, who collected the material,anditwasconsideredasbelongingtothe Correspondence: [email protected] Faculty of Geology and Geophysics, Department of Geology and Doctoral Family Rafflesiaceae (Braun 1849). Initially, the Weltri- School of Geology, Laboratory of Palaeontology, University of Bucharest, 1, N. chia denomination did not reach a wide use, as such Bălcescu Ave, 010041 Bucharest, Romania © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Popa Journal of Palaeogeography (2019) 8:12 Page 2 of 21 structures were often referred as “male Williamsonias”, Since Braun (1849), Weltrichia species were described in relation with and resembling the female bennettita- from Franconia, Germany (Schuster 1911), Banat, lean reproductive structures Williamsonia Carruthers Romania (Krasser 1915, 1922; Humml 1969; Givulescu 1870. Krasser (1912, 1913, 1915, 1919, 1922), Nathorst 1990, 2001, 2014), Yorkshire, United Kingdom (Nathorst (1909, 1911a, 1912)andSharma(1969)usedtheterm 1909, 1911a, 1911b, 1912, 1913; Florin 1933; Harris “male Williamsonia” for various Weltrichia species, 1969), Tirol, Germany (Krasser 1919), Veneto and while Schuster (1911) and Nathorst (1911b)used Sardinia, Italy (Saporta 1891; Krasser 1912), France Weltrichia.Saporta(1891)usedWeltrichia in his contri- (Saporta 1891), Alborz Mountains, Iran (Schweitzer and bution on Jurassic plants of France, erecting two new spe- Kirchner 2003), Rajmahal, Malda and Katchchh, India cies, W. fabrei from France and W. oolithica from Italy. (Sharma 1969, 1971, 1977; Sitholey and Bose 1971; Bose Discussion over the relationship between Weltrichia and and Banerji 1984; Pal and Ghosh 1985; Banerji 1992), Williamsonia and on their nomenclature was continued Malaysia (Asama 1974), Nepal (Kimura et al. 1985), by Harris (1969), Sitholey and Bose (1971), Schweitzer China (Sun et al. 2001; Li et al. 2004), Japan (Kimura and Kirchner (2003) and Popa (2014), next to emenda- and Ohana 1989) and Oaxaca, Mexico (Delevoryas tions of previous species or with definitions of new and Gould 1973; Delevoryas 1991;SilvaPinedaetal. species. As Weltrichia has priority over Williamsonia,it 2011; Velasco de Leon et al. 2012). The distribution was kept by Harris (1969) as a legitimate denomination of Weltrichia species in the world is illustrated in for male, unisexual structures, keeping Williamsonia only Fig. 1. for female, unisexual structures. Harris (1969)emended The stratigraphic ranges of Weltrichia species vary the diagnosis of the genus, supplementing it with micro- from Late Triassic to Late Jurassic, from the earliest rep- scopical characters, noting the high variation in attaching resentative Weltrichia alpina, Late Triassic in age, to its the pollen sacs to the centrifugal rays, directly or on sup- latest representatives, W. maldaensis and W. huangban- plementary, sterile appendages. Harris refrained from jigouensis, Late Jurassic in age. splitting the genus and erecting new genera based on this variation of characters, for practical reasons. Popa (2014) briefly reviewed the valid species of Weltrichia and their 2 Material and methods ranges when introducing new species of this genus, The Romanian material belonging to genus Weltrichia stressing the most important characters in Weltrichia: has been surveyed and described in a previous work shape and number of centrifugal rays, ornamentation and (Popa 2014), curated at the University of Bucharest and at shape of centripetal rays, distribution and types of pollen University of Petroșani. Previous palaeobotanical literature sacs, ornamentation of the central cup, and occurrence of was carefully surveyed and large sized differential tables resin bodies. were synthesized. I have produced the reconstructions Fig. 1 Geographical distribution of genus Weltrichia. 1. Oaxaca State (Mexico); 2. Yorkshire (United Kingdom); 3. Tirol, Franconia (Germany), Veneto (Italy), Lozére (France); 4. Sardinia (Italy); 5. Anina (Romania); 6. Alborz (Iran); 7. Kachchh (India); 8. Rajmahal and Malda (India); 9. Palpa (Nepal); 10. Ulu Endau (Malaysia); 11. Liaoning (China); 12. Chifeng (Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China); 13. Samenoura (Japan) Popa Journal of Palaeogeography (2019) 8:12 Page 3 of 21 manually, using a protractor, a ruler, a pair of com- 3 Terminology passes and soft lead 0.5 mm mechanical pencils (2B), The terminology used in Weltrichia parts is very variable as well as normal and semi-transparent paper for and sometimes confusing. Harris (1969) used the terms continuously refining the drawings. The numbers of central cup, rays or microsporophylls and pollen sacs for centrifugal and centripetal rays were considered, in the main parts of Weltrichia, as well as resin or resinous order to divide angles and circles accordingly, while bodies (sometimes also called resinous sacs), sterile scales, ray lengths, widths and diameters of central cups and fertile appendages (Fig. 2). The preference for pollen were reflected in reconstructions, for correct dimen- sacs instead of synangia was explained for the gymno- sional ratios in drawings. All dimensions and pre- spermous nature of Weltrichia (Harris 1969,p.159),in served anatomical and morphological characters were contrast with the more pteridophytic synangia. Although considered in order to produce accurate reconstruc- the term synangia is also correctly used for these tions. Drawings with adaxial and abaxial perspectives structures (Pott et al. 2017), pollen sacs being basically were produced, depending
Recommended publications
  • Gymnosperm Foliage from the Upper Triassic of Lunz, Lower Austria: an Annotated Check List and Identification Key
    Geo.Alp, Vol. 7, S. 19–38, 2010 GYMNOSPERM FOLIAGE FROM THE UPPER TRIASSIC OF LUNZ, LOWER AUSTRIA: AN ANNOTATED CHECK LIST AND IDENTIFICATION KEY Christian Pott1 & Michael Krings2 With 7 figures and 1 table 1 Naturhistoriska riksmuseet, Sektionen för paleobotanik, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden; [email protected] 2 Department für Geo- und Umweltwissenschaften, Paläontologie und Geobiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, and Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie, Richard-Wagner-Straße 10, 80333 München, Germany; [email protected] Abstract The famous Lunz flora from Lower Austria is one of the richest and most diverse Late Triassic floras of the Northern He- misphere. The historical outcrops (mainly coal mines) are no longer accessible, but showy fossils can still be collected from natural exposures around the town of Lunz-am-See and from several of the old spoil tips. This paper presents an annotated check list with characterisations of all currently recognised gymnosperm foliage taxa in the Lunz flora. The descriptions are exemplified by illustrations of typical specimens and diagnostic features of the leaf morphology and epidermal anatomy. Moreover, a simple identification key for the taxa based on macromorphological features is provided that facilitates identification of newly collected specimens. 1. Introduction The Carnian (Late Triassic) flora from Lunz in Lo- ments (i.e. reproductive structures) among the fossils wer Austria is one of only a few well-preserved flo- (see e.g., Krasser, 1917, 1919; Kräusel, 1948, 1949, ras from the Alpine Triassic (Cleal, 1993; Dobruskina, 1953; Pott et al., 2010), the most striking feature of 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Botany (Effective from 2018 Admissions)
    C. M. S. COLLEGE KOTTAYAM KERALA SYLLABUS FOR UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMME IN BOTANY (EFFECTIVE FROM 2018 ADMISSIONS) RECOMMENDED BY: BOARD OF STUDIES, BOTANY C. M. S. COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM B Sc BotanySyllabus 2018 Admissiononwards B. Sc. BOTANY PROGRAMME PROGRAMME DESIGN The UG programme in Botany must include (a) Common Courses*, (b) Core Courses (c) Complementary Courses (d) Open Course (e) Choice based Course and (f) Projectwork. No course shall carry more than 5 credits. The student shall select one Open course in Semester V offered by different departments in the same institution. The number of courses for the programme should contain 12 compulsory core courses,1 open course,1 elective course from the frontier area of the core courses, 6 core practical courses, 1project work, 8 complementary courses and 2 complementary practical courses. There should be 10 common courses,or otherwise specified, which includes the first and second language of study. PROGRAMME STRUCTURE: SUMMARY OF COURSES AND CREDITS No.of Total Sl. No. Coursetype courses credits 1 Common course I-English 6 22 2 Common course II– Additionallanguage 4 16 3 Core + Practical 12 + 6 46 4 ComplementaryI+ Practical 4 + 2 14 5 ComplementaryII+ Practical 4 + 2 14 6 Opencourse 1 3 7 Programme elective 1 3 8 Project work 1 2 Total 43 120 Totalcredits 120 Programme duration 6 Semesters Minimum attendance required 75% *Course: a segment of subject matter to be covered in a semester. Each course is designed variously under lectures /tutorials /laboratory or fieldwork /seminar /project /practical training /assignments /evalution etc., to meet effective teaching and learning needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Life and Time of Indian Williamsonia
    Life and time of Indian Williamsonia )ayasri Banerji Banerji, J 1992. Life and time of Indian Williamsonia. Palaeobotanist 40 : 245-259. The Williamsonia plant, belonging to the order Bennettitales, consists of stem-Bucklandia Presl, leaf­ Ptilophyllum Morris, male flower- Weltrichia Braun and female flower- Williamsonia Carruthers. This plant was perhaps a small, much branched woody tree of xerophytic environment. It co-existed alongwith extremely variable and rich flora including highly diversified plant groups from algae to gymnosperms. In India, it appeared during the marine Jurassic, proliferated and widely distributed in the Lower Cretaceous and disappeared from the vegetational scenario of Upper Cretaceous Period with the advent of angiosperms. Key-words-Bennettitales, Williamsonia, Jurassic-Cretaceous (India). jayasri Baner}i, Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeobotany, 53 University Road, Lucknow 226007, India. ri~T ~ 'lfmftq- fili'<1QQ«lf.:lQi "" om~~ "l?li'O'$i'OI<1fl \f>'f it ~ filf<1QQ«lf.:lQi qtfr if ~ ~ 3!<'flT-3!<'flT 'lTIif it ~ "lTif t W'I'T CAT-~ m, ~ ~ ~it ~fu;m;;mrr~1 ~qtm~~ <ffir ll~<'ilf4>~<'1'i"li'tfGr, "''!'''l ~~?l~Ti:t>Qi <ilf.1 'I"lT filf<1QQ«lf.:lQi ~ ~ ~ f;;ru-if.~ ~ 61'1'~dOl'h\'i if m <'IT<'1T ~ Wc:r, 3!fuq,iffiliOlT3if it ~ ¥i "IT' ~ it il'1f4ff1"1ld, it if qtfr ~ 'it, q;r tt ~ ~tl W'I'T~~'-I'<"1if~~3lT, 3Tahmm'-l'<"1if~~~-~'d"f~<f"lT'3'1f'<mm~ ~ ~ ~ ~ if qtm if if t1T"f -flT"f lIT lfllT' LIFE OF WILLIAMSONIA PLANT B. dichotoma Sharma. In B. indica Seward, the secondary wood is more compact than recent cycads In the Upper Mesozoic Era, a new group of and cycadeoids.
    [Show full text]
  • JUDD W.S. Et. Al. (2002) Plant Systematics: a Phylogenetic Approach. Chapter 7. an Overview of Green
    UNCORRECTED PAGE PROOFS An Overview of Green Plant Phylogeny he word plant is commonly used to refer to any auto- trophic eukaryotic organism capable of converting light energy into chemical energy via the process of photosynthe- sis. More specifically, these organisms produce carbohydrates from carbon dioxide and water in the presence of chlorophyll inside of organelles called chloroplasts. Sometimes the term plant is extended to include autotrophic prokaryotic forms, especially the (eu)bacterial lineage known as the cyanobacteria (or blue- green algae). Many traditional botany textbooks even include the fungi, which differ dramatically in being heterotrophic eukaryotic organisms that enzymatically break down living or dead organic material and then absorb the simpler products. Fungi appear to be more closely related to animals, another lineage of heterotrophs characterized by eating other organisms and digesting them inter- nally. In this chapter we first briefly discuss the origin and evolution of several separately evolved plant lineages, both to acquaint you with these important branches of the tree of life and to help put the green plant lineage in broad phylogenetic perspective. We then focus attention on the evolution of green plants, emphasizing sev- eral critical transitions. Specifically, we concentrate on the origins of land plants (embryophytes), of vascular plants (tracheophytes), of 1 UNCORRECTED PAGE PROOFS 2 CHAPTER SEVEN seed plants (spermatophytes), and of flowering plants dons.” In some cases it is possible to abandon such (angiosperms). names entirely, but in others it is tempting to retain Although knowledge of fossil plants is critical to a them, either as common names for certain forms of orga- deep understanding of each of these shifts and some key nization (e.g., the “bryophytic” life cycle), or to refer to a fossils are mentioned, much of our discussion focuses on clade (e.g., applying “gymnosperms” to a hypothesized extant groups.
    [Show full text]
  • A Stable Isotopic Investigation of Resource Partitioning Among Neosauropod Dinosaurs of the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation
    A stable isotopic investigation of resource partitioning among neosauropod dinosaurs of the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation Benjamin T. Breeden, III SID: 110305422 [email protected] GEOL394H University of Maryland, College Park, Department of Geology 29 April 2011 Advisors: Dr. Thomas R. Holtz1, Jr., Dr. Alan Jay Kaufman1, and Dr. Matthew T. Carrano2 1: University of Maryland, College Park, Department of Geology 2: National Museum of Natural History, Department of Paleobiology ABSTRACT For more than a century, morphological studies have been used to attempt to understand the partitioning of resources in the Morrison Fauna, particularly between members of the two major clades of neosauropod (long-necked, megaherbivorous) dinosaurs: Diplodocidae and Macronaria. While it is generally accepted that most macronarians fed 3-5m above the ground, the feeding habits of diplodocids are somewhat more enigmatic; it is not clear whether diplodocids fed higher or lower than macronarians. While many studies exploring sauropod resource portioning have focused on differences in the morphologies of the two groups, few have utilized geochemical evidence. Stable isotope geochemistry has become an increasingly common and reliable means of investigating paleoecological questions, and due to the resistance of tooth enamel to diagenetic alteration, fossil teeth can provide invaluable paleoecological and behavioral data that would be otherwise unobtainable. Studies in the Ituri Rainforest in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, have shown that stable isotope ratios measured in the teeth of herbivores reflect the heights at which these animals fed in the forest due to isotopic variation in plants with height caused by differences in humidity at the forest floor and the top of the forest exposed to the atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Evolutionary Trends in the Angiosperm Fossil Record
    Colloquium Toward a new synthesis: Major evolutionary trends in the angiosperm fossil record David Dilcher* Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-7800 Angiosperm paleobotany has widened its horizons, incorporated Nature and Origin of Primitive Angiosperms,’’ there is no new techniques, developed new databases, and accepted new substantive use of the fossil record to address this question. questions that can now focus on the evolution of the group. The The theories and hypothesis presented by Stebbins are based fossil record of early flowering plants is now playing an active role on the comparative morphology and anatomy of living angio- in addressing questions of angiosperm phylogeny, angiosperm sperms considered primitive at that time rather than the fossil origins, and angiosperm radiations. Three basic nodes of angio- record of early angiosperms. sperm radiations are identified: (i) the closed carpel and showy However, at the same time, the early 1970s, special attention radially symmetrical flower, (ii) the bilateral flower, and (iii) fleshy was being focused on the fine features of the morphology of fruits and nutritious nuts and seeds. These are all coevolutionary angiosperm leaf venation and the cuticular anatomy of living and events and spread out through time during angiosperm evolution. fossil angiosperms (2, 6–8). Most of the early angiosperms from The proposal is made that the genetics of the angiosperms pres- the Cretaceous and early Tertiary were being found to be extinct sured the evolution of the group toward reproductive systems that or only distantly related to living genera (Fig. 3). Grades and favored outcrossing. This resulted in the strongest selection in the clades of relationships were being founded on the basis of careful angiosperms being directed toward the flower, fruits, and seeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE ORCID ID: 0000-0003-0186-6546 Gar W. Rothwell Edwin and Ruth Kennedy Distinguished Professor Emeritus Department of Environmental and Plant Biology Porter Hall 401E T: 740 593 1129 Ohio University F: 740 593 1130 Athens, OH 45701 E: [email protected] also Courtesy Professor Department of Botany and PlantPathology Oregon State University T: 541 737- 5252 Corvallis, OR 97331 E: [email protected] Education Ph.D.,1973 University of Alberta (Botany) M.S., 1969 University of Illinois, Chicago (Biology) B.A., 1966 Central Washington University (Biology) Academic Awards and Honors 2018 International Organisation of Palaeobotany lifetime Honorary Membership 2014 Fellow of the Paleontological Society 2009 Distinguished Fellow of the Botanical Society of America 2004 Ohio University Distinguished Professor 2002 Michael A. Cichan Award, Botanical Society of America 1999-2004 Ohio University Presidential Research Scholar in Biomedical and Life Sciences 1993 Edgar T. Wherry Award, Botanical Society of America 1991-1992 Outstanding Graduate Faculty Award, Ohio University 1982-1983 Chairman, Paleobotanical Section, Botanical Society of America 1972-1973 University of Alberta Dissertation Fellow 1971 Paleobotanical (Isabel Cookson) Award, Botanical Society of America Positions Held 2011-present Courtesy Professor of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University 2008-2009 Visiting Senior Researcher, University of Alberta 2004-present Edwin and Ruth Kennedy Distinguished Professor of Environmental and Plant Biology, Ohio
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Duplications and Genomic Conflict Underlie Major Pulses of Phenotypic 2 Evolution in Gymnosperms 3 4 Gregory W
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.13.435279; this version posted March 15, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 1 Gene duplications and genomic conflict underlie major pulses of phenotypic 2 evolution in gymnosperms 3 4 Gregory W. Stull1,2,†, Xiao-Jian Qu3,†, Caroline Parins-Fukuchi4, Ying-Ying Yang1, Jun-Bo 5 Yang2, Zhi-Yun Yang2, Yi Hu5, Hong Ma5, Pamela S. Soltis6, Douglas E. Soltis6,7, De-Zhu Li1,2,*, 6 Stephen A. Smith8,*, Ting-Shuang Yi1,2,*. 7 8 1Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 9 Kunming, Yunnan, China. 10 2CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of 11 Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China. 12 3Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Research, College of Life Sciences, 13 Shandong Normal University, Jinan, Shandong, China. 14 4Department of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 15 5Department of Biology, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, 16 University Park, PA, USA. 17 6Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 18 7Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 19 8Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 20 MI, USA. 21 †Co-first author. 22 *Correspondence to: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Yellowstone Paleontological Survey
    E PALEONT ON O T LO S G W I O C L A L L E National Y Park The Yellowstone Service Department of the Interior Paleontological Survey SURVEY Vincent L. Santucci Yellowstone Center for Resources National Park Service Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming YCR-NR-98-1 1998 How to cite this document: Santucci, V. L. 1998. The Yellowstone Paleontological Survey. Yellowstone Center for Resources, National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming,YCR-NR-98-1. Current address for Vincent L. Santucci is National Park Service, P.O. Box 592, Kemmerer, WY 83101. The Yellowstone Paleontological Survey To Lt. Col. Luke J. Barnett, III “Uncle by blood, brother in spirit!” Vincent L. Santucci Yellowstone Center for Resources National Park Service Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming YCR-NR-98-1 1998 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 Stratigraphy .................................................................................................... 4 Fossil Chronology........................................................................................... 6 Taxonomy ..................................................................................................... 12 Localities ...................................................................................................... 15 Interpretation ................................................................................................ 19 Paleontological Resource Management.......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Williamsonia Stewardiana, (Open Canopy Growth Form) E.G
    Were Mesozoic Ginkgophytes Shrubby? Data on leaf morphology in the Mesozoic of North America shows a proportional increase of bifurcated, ginkgo-like leaves during the middle of the Jurassic. This ginkophyte acme is correlated with W. A. Green—Department of Geology—Yale University—P. O. Box 208109, Yale Station—New Haven, Connecticut 06520—[email protected] a decreased proportion of the leaf forms associated with herbaceous or shrubby pteridophytes, and with no substantial change in the proportion of leaf forms associated with canopy gymnosperms. The increase in ginkgo-like foliage at the same time as fern-like forms decreased in relative abundance suggests replacement of The conventional view sees all ginkgophytes as some part of the forest understory or early-successional habitats by early ginkgophytes. That is, early ginkgophytes may not have arborescent, by analogy with modern Ginkgo biloba: been competing for light or water in an established gymnosperm canopy. This suggests that most Mesozoic ginkgophytes were shrubs rather than being large trees like the surviving Ginkgo biloba. Such a result explains the absence of Mesozoid ginkgophyte wood and supports the argument that has already been made from sedimentological data, that to a much greater extent than do individuals of Ginkgo biloba now cultivated around the world, many ancestral ginkgophytes pursued early-successional strategies. 1: Competitive displacement alues) 2 v Records of Jurassic fossil occurrences in the Compendium Index of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Jurassic Records
    [Show full text]
  • A Number of Additional and Revised Taxa from the Ladinian Flora of the Dolomites, Northern Italy
    Geo.Alp, Vol. 1, S. 57–69, 2004 A NUMBER OF ADDITIONAL AND REVISED TAXA FROM THE LADINIAN FLORA OF THE DOLOMITES, NORTHERN ITALY Evelyn Kustatscher 1, Michael Wachtler2 & Johanna H.A. van Konijnenburg-van Cittert 3 With 1 figure, 2 plates and 1 table 1 Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Ferrara, C.so Ercole I d’Este 32, 44100 Ferrara, Italy, e-mail: [email protected] 2 Rainerstrasse 11, 39038 Innichen, Italy; e-mail: [email protected] 3 Laboratory of Palaeobotany and Palynology, Budapestlaan 4, 3584CD Utrecht, Netherlands, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract After the description of the flora from the La Valle (Wengen) Formation (Ladinian) in the Dolomites (Wachtler & van Konijnenburg – van Cittert, 2000a, b), some new material was found and an extensive search of the old collections in various museums and universities in Europe also unearthed many additional specimens. Moreover, there appeared to be nomenclatorial problems with some taxa as well. For these reasons we are describing a few taxa that have not been described from the La Valle Formation before, and are revising some of the taxa that were described previously, resulting in a description and discussion of the following taxa: the lycopsid Annalepis zeilleri Fliche, the fern Neuropteridium elegans (Brongniart) Schimper together with a frag- ment of its fertile frond Scolopendrites sp., a fern indet. (formerly Anomopteris mougeotii), the cycadophyte taxa Dioonitocarpidium moroderi (Leonardi) nov. comb. and Sphenozamites sp. cf. S. bronnii, and the conifer Pelourdea vogesiaca (Schimper et Mougeot) Seward. A short general discussion of the flora is presented as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Botany Syllabus Semester Pattern with Choice Based Credits System
    Shiksha Mandal’s Jankidevi Bajaj College of Science, Wardha. (Autonomous) NAAC (UGC) Reaccredited ‘A’ Institution (A Linguistic Minority College) COLLEGE WITH POTENTIAL FOR EXCELLENCE Star College Status by DBT Govt. of India M.Sc. Botany Syllabus Semester pattern with Choice Based Credits System (2017-2018) Department of Botany Jankidevi Bajaj College of Science, Wardha. JANKIDEVI BAJAJ COLLEGE OF SCIENCE, WARDHA Two Year Post Graduate Course (M. Sc.) SEMESTER PATTERN SYLLABUS (Proposed Under Autonomy) SUBJECT – BOTANY (Distribution of Units) Seme Paper Existing Syllabus Proposed Syllabus ster Uni Content of Unit Alloted Uni Content of Unit Alloted t Hours t Hours No No Seme Paper I I-IV Prokaryotes & 60 I-III Prokaryotes & Viruses, 48 ster I Viruses, Phycology, Mycology Phycology, and Plant Pathology Mycology and IV Microscopy & 12 Plant Pathology Centrifugation Paper II I-IV Bryophytes, 60 I-III Bryophytes, 48 Pteridophytes Pteridophytes IV Plant Microtechniques 12 Paper III I-IV Paleobotany, 60 I-III Paleobotany, 48 Gymnosperms Gymnosperms IV Instrumentation 12 (Spectrophotometery & Chromatography) Paper IV I-IV Cytology, 60 I-III Cytology, Genetics 48 Genetics IV Methods To Study Cell 12 / Tissue Structure Seme Paper V I-IV Plant Physiology, 60 I-III Plant Physiology, 48 ster II Biochemistry Biochemistry IV Analytical 12 Pharmacognosy Paper VI I-IV Plant 60 I-III Plant Development, 48 Development, Reproduction Reproduction IV Phytochemistry 12 Paper VII I-IV Cell, Molecular 60 I-III Cell, Molecular 48 Biology- I Biology- I IV Data
    [Show full text]