College Student Vulnerability to Harmful Religious Groups Based on Perceptions
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 8-2008 College Student Vulnerability to Harmful Religious Groups Based on Perceptions. Kevin Clark Dreher East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Personality and Social Contexts Commons Recommended Citation Dreher, Kevin Clark, "College Student Vulnerability to Harmful Religious Groups Based on Perceptions." (2008). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1957. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1957 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. College Student Vulnerability to Harmful Religious Groups Based on Perceptions ____________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Criminal Justice and Criminology ____________________ by Kevin Clark Dreher August 2008 ____________________ Wayne Gillespie, PhD., Chair Dennis Hamm, PhD. Michael Braswell, PhD Keywords: Cults, College Students, Religion, Vulnerability, Perceptions ABSRACT College Student Vulnerability to Harmful Religious Groups Based on Perceptions by Kevin Clark Dreher This study was conducted in an attempt to understand which, if any, groups of college students are susceptible to cult influence based on false perceptions. Religion is a powerful practice that, if used for the wrong reasons, can influence a person to dissolve social and financial relationships with family, friends, and the surrounding community. Surveys were given to randomly selected cluster samples of students currently enrolled at the university. These surveys consisted of demographic questions and a scale designed to measure perceptions. Also devised was a scale to measure traits of depression. Both bivariate and multivariate analysis showed that the depression scale was more significant than the perceptions scale in measuring vulnerability. 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my family for their constant support throughout my long educational career. They have always been there for me with unfaltering support. Without them, I do not think that I would have made it this far and achieved so much. Thank you, Dr Gillespie in not only being my committee chair but also allowing me to be your Graduate Assistant. I learned more about research and the educational process in the time I worked for you than in any time during my academic career. The experience I gained from this will help me far into life. I would also like to thank the members of my committee. I thank them for having patience with me and allowing me to complete my academic odyssey. I have learned much from their teachings in both classes and the pursuit of this thesis. I will take everything I have learned from them and apply it to my future. I would like to acknowledge a select group of individuals who helped fuel my desire to continue educating myself, all those who said I couldn‟t do it. There are a few in my mind who in various points of my academic career suggested I quit or seek an alternate path. I did not. 3 CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT ……………………………………………………………………………... 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ….…………………………………………………....……..... 3 LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………………….. 8 Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………..…....... 9 Extent of Cults in the U.S. (and Abroad)………………………………… 10 Academic Definition of Cult and Susceptibility…………………………… 11 Theoretical Explanations…………………………………………………. 15 Characteristics of Individuals Who Join Cults............................................ 18 Overview of Study....................................................................................... 20 Hypotheses……………………………………………………...... 20 2. LITERATURE REVIEW……….………………………………….………. .. 21 Expanded Terminology…………………………………........................... 21 Differentiating Cult and Cult-Like……………………………………...... 25 Cult-Like Group Characteristics…………………..…………….... 25 Cult Charictaristics……………………………………………...... 27 Characteristics of Cult Leaders……………………………………….... 29 Psychopathological Explanation………………………………...... 29 Entrepreneurship Explanation…………………………………..... 29 Overview of Cult Influence on the Individual………………………........ 31 4 Invulnerability…………………………………………………..... 32 Morality…………………………………………………………... 33 Rationalization………………………………….………...…….... 33 Out-Groups……………………………………………………..... 33 Self-Censorship………………………………………………....... 34 Dissenters……………………………………………………….... 34 Mindguards……………………………………………………. ... 35 Unanimity……………………………………………………........ 35 Perceptions………………………………………………………..…........ 35 Media Misrepresentation………………………………………..... 36 Fear of Crime……………………………………………………... 36 The Anti-Cult Movement……………………………………….... 38 Cults on College Campuses…………………………………………......... 39 Risk Factors for Susceptibility……………………….................... 39 Recruitment Methods…………………………………………….. 40 3. METHODOLOGY…………………………………………………................ 43 Data……………………………………………………………................. 43 Participants…………………………………………………….................. 43 Data Collection Instrument……………………………………................. 44 Measures……………………………………………………….................. 45 Demographics………………………………………….................. 45 Cult Susceptibility Inventory…………………………................... 45 Variables……………………………………………………...................... 45 5 Dependent……………………………………………................... 45 Independent.................................................................................... 46 Analysis………………………………………………………….............. 48 Hypothesis....................................................................................... 48 Univariate…………………………………………….................... 49 Bivariate……………………………………………….................. 49 Multivariate……………………………………………................. 49 Summary…………………………………………………………............. 49 4. RESULTS………………………………………………………….................. 51 Univariate………………………………………………………................ 51 Bivariate………………………………………………………….............. 56 Correlation……………………………………………................... 56 Independent Sample t-Test……………………………................. 58 Analysis of Variance…………………………………................... 63 Multivariate……………………………………………………................. 65 Perceptions…………………………………………….................. 65 Depression……………………………………………................... 66 Summary……………………………………………………….................. 68 5. DISSCUSSION……………………………………………………................. 70 Methodology……………………………………………........................... 70 Findings…………………………………………………........................... 70 Perceptions…………………………………………......................... 70 Depression………………………………………….......................... 72 6 Limitations……………………………………….............................. 73 Implications……………………………………................................ 75 Future Research………………………………….............................. 76 REFERENCES……………………………………………………. …................. 77 APPENDIX: Data Collection Instrument………………………………............... 83 VITA……………………………………………………………………............... 90 7 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Frequencies ………………………………………………………….............. 53 2. Descriptive Statistics .……………………………………………….............. 55 3. Pearson Correlation Matrix…………………………………………............... 57 4. Perceptions of Cults t-Tests ………………………………………….............. 60 5. Depression t-Tests …………………………………………………................ 62 6. Analysis of Variance for Perceptions Scale ………………………................. 64 7. Analysis of Variance for Depression Scale ………………………….............. 64 8. Summary of Regression Analysis for Variables Predicting Perceptions of HRMs …………………………………….………….............. 66 9. Summary of Regression Analysis for Variables Predicting Depression …………………………………………………………................ 67 8 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION College is a time when young adults move away from their parents for the first time and are really trying to discover who they are and where they belong in the world. This need for belonging can help influence people to do things or believe things they otherwise might not. You can see this in cases where a young adult comes to a college campus and gets involved with fraternities, drugs, or other activities. Also, seniors who are ready to graduate might not be ready for the “real world” after college. This lack of experience at both ends of the undergraduate career can render the student open to influence. One less discussed influential force on college students are harmful religious groups, better known as cults. A “harmful” religious group is one that controls a person‟s social life, family relations, mind, and finances for the group leaders own benefit (Gesy, 1993). For years college students have been studied and used as subjects in research projects. This is in part due to the availability and the overall captivity of the student body. While this has been used for responsible social research, it also has its down sides. A student who lives on campus will usually follow a precise schedule in order to attend classes. This routine gives recruiters a sufficient time frame when to approach prospects and maximize their efforts. On- campus students are not the only ones “at risk.” Those who live off campus can still be persuaded by their professors,