Violence Against Journalists and Media Workers in Mexico and U.S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Violence Against Journalists and Media Workers in Mexico and U.S MEMORANDUM May 3, 2018 Subject: Violence Against Journalists and Media workers in Mexico and U.S. Policy From: Clare Ribando Seelke, Specialist in Latin American Affairs, [email protected], 7-5229 This memorandum was prepared to enable distribution to more than one congressional office. The following memorandum provides background information on threats to journalists in Mexico, Mexican government efforts to prevent and punish violence against journalists, and U.S. programs to support journalists and strengthen Mexico’s ability to protect them. For the purposes of this memorandum, the term “journalists” includes all media workers. Press Freedom in Mexico as Compared to Other Countries in Latin America In recent years, international press freedom organizations have expressed concerns about the deterioration of press freedom in many countries in Latin America, precipitated by an increase in violence and other attacks on journalists, as well as politically-driven attempts to curb or repress independent media. In 2017, 12 of the 22 journalist killings in the region documented in the annual report of the Special Rapporteur of Freedom of Expression of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) occurred in Mexico.1 Mexico, along with Brazil, ranks among the top ten countries globally with the highest rates of unsolved journalist murders as a percentage of their population in the Global Impunity Index published by the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ).2 Increasing violent crimes against journalists and the impunity enjoyed by those who perpetrate those crimes have led to journalistic self-censorship in Mexico, inhibiting people’s access to information, government accountability, and freedom of expression. As an example, 68% of journalists in Mexico surveyed by Article 19, a press freedom group that has received U.S. funding for its programs, reported self-censoring.3 While the Mexican government does not use state-owned media to promote itself or to shut down independent media (as Cuba and Venezuela have done), it reportedly has rewarded outlets that provide favorable coverage with lucrative advertising contracts and used various means to punish and intimidate its critics.4 According to Freedom House, officials at all levels of government in Mexico have punished 1 Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR), Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression, Annual Report of the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression, December 31, 2017, available at: http://www.oas.org/en/iachr/docs/annual/2017/docs/AnnexRELE.pdf. Hereinafter: IACHR, December 2017. 2 Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), Getting Away with Murder: 2017 Global Impunity Index, October 31, 2017, available at: https://cpj.org/reports/2017/10/impunity-index-getting-away-with-murder-killed-justice.php. 3 Articúlo 19, Democracia Simulada: Nada que Aplaudir: Informe Anual 2017, March 2018, available in Spanish at: https://articulo19.org/nadaqueaplaudir/. Hereinafter: Article 19, March 2018. 4 IACHR, December 2017. Congressional Research Service 2 journalists critical of their actions by publicly denouncing their work, pushing media owners (who rely on government ad buys for revenue) to dismiss them, suing them for libel, or using other tactics to intimidate, and/or threaten them.5 Evidence reportedly emerged in 2017 that the Mexican federal government had conducted illegal digital surveillance on journalists and their families, a practice common in Cuba and Venezuela.6 According to Article 19, public officials committed 52% of the 507 “aggressions” that journalists experienced in 2017 (see Figure 2).7 This compares to a regional average of roughly 40% of aggressions committed against journalists being carried out by public officials cited by IACHR in the executive summary of its 2017 annual report. Both Freedom House and Reporters Without Borders (RWB) produce annual indices rating and ranking countries worldwide in terms of press freedom (See Table 1). In 2018, Freedom House placed Mexico in the lowest, “not free” category of countries, along with the authoritarian governments of Venezuela and Cuba, as well as Honduras and Ecuador. With the exception of Ecuador, press freedom has continued to deteriorate in Mexico and the other countries in that group. Thirteen of the 35 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean ranked in the bottom half of the RWB rankings. Mexico ranked 147 out of 180 countries evaluated worldwide, just above Cuba (173) and below Honduras (141) and Venezuela (143).8 According to RWB, the Mexican government failed to protect its journalists in 2017, becoming the second most violent country for journalists (after Syria). Table 1. Press Freedom Ratings of Select Latin American Countries by Freedom House and Reporters Without Borders Freedom House Reporters Without Borders Rank (out of Country Category Country 180) Category Argentina Partly Free Peru 90 Problematic Peru Partly Free Nicaragua 92 Problematic Brazil Partly Free Panama 96 Problematic Colombia Partly Free Brazil 103 Problematic Panama Partly Free Ecuador 105 Problematic Nicaragua Partly Free Bolivia 107 Bad Guatemala Partly free Paraguay 110 Bad Paraguay Partly Free Guatemala 118 Bad Mexico Not Free Colombia 129 Bad Honduras Not Free Honduras 137 Bad Ecuador Not Free Venezuela 143 Bad 5 Freedom House, Freedom in the World, 2017, available at: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2017/mexico. 6 The government also reportedly used spyware against human rights and anti-corruption activists. Freedom House, Freedom in the World, 2018, available at: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2018/mexico; Azam Ahmed, “Using Texts as Lures, Government Spyware Targets Mexican Journalists and Their Families,” New York Times, June 19, 2017. 7 Article 19, March 2018. 8 Reporters Without Borders, World Press Freedom Index, 2018, April 25, 2018, available at: https://rsf.org/en/ranking. Congressional Research Service 3 Freedom House Reporters Without Borders Venezuela Not Free Mexico 147 Bad Cuba Not Free Cuba 173 Very Bad Source: Freedom House, Freedom in the World, 2018; Reporters Without Borders, 2018 World Press Freedom Index. Notes: Freedom House rates countries by providing a press freedom score and then based on that score, classifies the countries as free, partly free, and not free. The countries listed in this chart appear from “most free” to “least free.” Mexico: Crimes Against Journalists and Media Workers For more than a decade, violent crime perpetrated by warring criminal organizations has threatened citizen security and governance in parts of Mexico. Although Mexico’s homicide rate (murders per 100,000 people) remains within the “average” range for the Western Hemisphere (albeit high by global standards), it has experienced a much faster rise in homicides over the past decade than other countries in the region. Experts estimate that between 30% and 50% of those homicides have been organized crime- related.9 Although the illicit drug trade has long been prevalent in Mexico, violence has escalated as an increasing number of criminal organizations have fought for control of lucrative routes to transport drugs, including heroin, into the United States.10 In addition to rising insecurity, corruption and impunity have become top issues of concern in Mexico. Since 2014, corruption scandals have implicated President Enrique Peña Nieto’s family and top advisers, as well as many former governors. Javier Duarte, the former governor of Veracruz once close to Peña Nieto, is now on trial for stealing billions of dollars while in office.11 Corruption in the police and judicial systems is thought to be a reason behind the country’s high rates of impunity for all crimes, including homicides. Many journalists reporting on critical issues such as crime and corruption have become targets for organized crime groups and corrupt officials. While some crime groups or public officials pay bribes to journalists in order to receive favorable coverage, others use threats or other aggressive actions to pressure journalists not to expose their crimes or to retaliate against journalists who do report on their misdeeds. A recent study found that journalists are three times as likely as other Mexicans to be victims of organized crime or drug trafficking-related violence.12 The IACHR and the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights have expressed ongoing concern about the safety of journalists in Mexico.13 While killings of local journalists have occurred at high levels in Mexico over the past decade, 2017 marked the first year in which multiple well-known journalists were killed (See Figure 1 below). The killings of investigative journalists Miroslava Breach, a correspondent for La Jornada based in Chihuahua, and Javier Valdéz, the editor of Riodoce in Sinaloa, have fostered international concern and been condemned by CPJ and others. Both journalists spent much of their decades-long careers writing on 9 Laura Calderón, Octavio Rodríguez Ferreira, and David A. Shirk, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2017, Justice in Mexico, University of San Diego, April 2018, available at: https://justiceinmexico.org/2018-drug-violence-mexico- report/. Hereinafter: Justice in Mexico, April 2018. 10 CRS In Focus IF10400, Transnational Crime Issues: Heroin Production, Fentanyl Trafficking, and U.S.-Mexico Security Cooperation, by Clare Ribando Seelke and Liana W. Rosen; CRS Report R41576, Mexico: Organized Crime and Drug Trafficking Organizations, by June S. Beittel. 11 Duarte fled
Recommended publications
  • Violence Against Journalists in Mexico: in Brief Name Redacted Specialist in Latin American Affairs
    Violence Against Journalists in Mexico: In Brief name redacted Specialist in Latin American Affairs Updated May 17, 2018 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov R45199 Violence Against Journalists in Mexico: In Brief Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Press Freedom in Mexico Compared to Other Latin American Countries ...................................... 1 Crimes Against Journalists and Media Workers .............................................................................. 3 Estimated Killings of Journalists and Media Workers .............................................................. 4 Other Crimes Committed Against Journalists ........................................................................... 5 Selected Emblematic Cases ....................................................................................................... 6 Mexican Government Efforts to Address Crimes Against Journalists ............................................ 8 The Federal Protection Mechanism........................................................................................... 8 Office of the Special Prosecutor for Crimes Against Freedom of Expression .......................... 9 Executive Commission of Attention to Victims ...................................................................... 10 U.S. Policy .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IMPACT REPORT a Word from the Founder and Director|
    2017 - 2020 IMPACT REPORT A word from the founder and director| In October 2017 as we were preparing to launch a collaborative " network of journalists dedicated to pursuing and publishing the work of other reporters facing threats, prison or murder, prominent Maltese investigative journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia was horrifically silenced with a car bomb. Her murder was a cruel and stark reminder of how tenuous the free flow of information can be when democratic systems falter. We added Daphne to the sad and long list of journalists whose work Forbidden Stories is committed to continuing. For five months, we coordinated a historic collaboration of 45 journalists from 18 news organizations, aimed at keeping Daphne Caruana Galizia’s stories alive. Her investigations, as a result of this, ended up on the front pages of the world’s most widely-read newspapers. Seventy-four million people heard about the Daphne Project worldwide. Although her killers had hoped to silence her stories, the stories ended up having an echo way further than Malta. LAURENT RICHARD Forbidden Stories' founder Three years later, the journalists of the Daphne Project continue and executive director. to publish new revelations about her murder and pursue the investigations she started. Their explosive role in taking down former Maltese high-ranking government officials confirms that collaboration is the best protection against impunity. 2 2017-2020 Forbidden Stories Impact Report A word from the founder and director| That’s why other broad collaborative On a smaller scale, we have investigations followed. developed rapid response projects. We investigated the circumstances The Green Blood Project, in 2019, pursued behind the murders of Ecuadorian, the stories of reporters in danger for Mexican and Ghanaian journalists; investigating environmental scandals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civil Society-Driven Anti-Corruption Push in Mexico During the Enrique
    MEXICO CASE STUDY Rise and Fall: Mexican Civil Society’s Anti-Corruption Push in the Peña Nieto Years Roberto Simon AS/COA Anti Corruption Working Group Mexican Civil Society’s Anti-Corruption Push in the Peña Nieto Years Rise and Fall: Mexican Civil Society’s Anti-Corruption Push in the Peña Nieto Years Mexico City — “Saving Mexico” declared the cover of Time magazine, alongside a portrait of President Enrique Peña Nieto gazing confidently toward the future.1 Elected in 2012, Peña Nieto had been in power for only 15 months, yet already his bold reform agenda — dubbed the “Pacto por Mexico” (Pact for Mexico) — had made him a darling of global investors. Time noted that the president — “assisted by a group of young technocrats (including) Finance Minister Luis Videgaray and Pemex chief Emilio Lozoya” — was making history by breaking Mexico’s eight-decade state monopoly over the energy industry. “And the oil reform might not even be Peña Nieto’s most important victory,” the magazine said. There was “evidence” that Peña Nieto was about to “challenge Mexico’s entrenched powers.” While most investors focused on the deep regulatory changes under way, leading Mexican civil society organizations were looking at another critical promise in the Pacto por Mexico: fighting endemic corruption. “For centuries, corruption has been one of the central elements of the Mexican state (and) a constant in shaping the political system,” said Jorge Buendía, a prominent pollster and political analyst. A powerful governor from the 1960s to the 1980s allegedly once said that in Mexico “a poor politician is a poor politician.”2 And by the time Peña Nieto came to power, most in the country believed that things hadn’t really changed.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico Report Wolfgang Muno, Jörg Faust, Martin Thunert (Coordinator)
    Mexico Report Wolfgang Muno, Jörg Faust, Martin Thunert (Coordinator) Sustainable Governance Indicators 2019 © vege - stock.adobe.com Sustainable Governance SGI Indicators SGI 2019 | 2 Mexico Report Executive Summary Considering Mexico’s experience with military and corporatist autocratic rule, the country has made significant progress over the last two decades with regard to electoral competition and its overall regulatory environment, including market-oriented reforms. Economic and political elites, as well as an increasing share of the middle-class, are technically well qualified, and have gained knowledge on how best to organize the country’s political, economic and social frameworks. Mexican policymakers at both the national and regional levels are well trained, internationally experienced and often equipped with high-level qualifications from Western universities. Mexico’s tertiary education system is increasingly competitive internationally as are several major firms, including an increasing number in the manufacturing sector. At the same time, Mexico suffers from structural problems that are uncommon among other OECD countries. These challenges mainly relate to the extremely unequal distribution of social benefits and services among the population, such as security and social opportunities. The resulting cleavages between geographic regions, rural and urban areas, and social classes are among the most pressing barriers to further socioeconomic progress. In addition, uneven state capacity, both geographically and across policy sectors, often undermines the effective and coherent implementation of policies. In comparison to most other OECD countries, Mexico’s GDP growth over the last decade was rather slow, the socioeconomic situation was marked by considerable inflation, the lowest tax-to-GDP ratio of any OECD country, and persistently high levels of poverty and inequality.
    [Show full text]
  • Condena La Cndh El Homicidio De La Periodista Miroslava Breach Y Se Solidariza De La Manera Más Amplia Con Sus Familiares, Colegas Y Amigos
    Dirección General de Comunicación “2017, Año del Centenario de la Promulgación de la Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos” Ciudad de México, a 23 de marzo de 2017 Comunicado de Prensa DGC/084/17 CONDENA LA CNDH EL HOMICIDIO DE LA PERIODISTA MIROSLAVA BREACH Y SE SOLIDARIZA DE LA MANERA MÁS AMPLIA CON SUS FAMILIARES, COLEGAS Y AMIGOS Demanda a los distintos órdenes de autoridad investigar y evitar impunidad en el caso El Organismo Nacional solicitó al gobierno de aquella entidad, implementar medidas cautelares para proteger a su familia El Estado de Chihuahua se ubica, junto con Guerrero y Tamaulipas, en el tercer lugar de homicidios de periodistas, con 14 cada uno La Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos (CNDH) condena el asesinato de la periodista Miroslava Breach, corresponsal del diario La Jornada en el estado de Chihuahua, acontecida en la capital de esa entidad esta mañana. La CNDH expresa su más amplia solidaridad con sus familiares y colegas, al tiempo que solicita al gobierno de esa entidad la implementación de medidas cautelares para protegerlos, así como la realización de una investigación que permita dar con los responsables y llevarlos ante la justicia, para que en este lamentable hecho no haya impunidad. De igual manera, pide a la Fiscalía General del Estado información sobre el avance de las investigaciones, en tanto que el titular y personal del Programa de Agravios a Periodistas y Defensores Civiles de Derechos Humanos de la CNDH se trasladaron al Estado de Chihuahua con el objeto de allegarse de la información correspondiente y realizar las primeras diligencias.
    [Show full text]
  • The Missing Reform: Strengthening Rule of Law in Mexico
    The Missing Reform: Strengthening the Rule of Law in Mexico EDITED BY VIRIDIANA RÍOS AND DUNCAN WOOD The Missing Reform: Strengthening the Rule of Law in Mexico EDITED BY VIRIDIANA RÍOS AND DUNCAN WOOD Producing a book like this is always a team effort and, in addition to the individual chapter authors, we would especially like to thank the Mexico Institute and Wilson Center team who gave so many hours to edit, design, and produce this book. In particular, we would like to mention Angela Robertson, Kathy Butterfield, and Lucy Conger for their dedication as well as their professional skill. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004-3027 www.wilsoncenter.org Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars ISBN 978-1-938027-76-5 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS INTRODUCTION / 1 SECTION 1 / 18 Corruption / 18 The Justice System / 44 Democracy and Rule of Law / 78 Business Community / 102 Public Opinion / 124 Media and the Press / 152 SECTION 2 / 182 Education / 182 Transparency / 188 Competition / 196 Crime Prevention / 202 Civil Society / 208 Congress and Political Parties / 214 Energy / 224 Land Tenure / 232 Anticorruption Legislation / 240 Police Forces / 246 Acknowledgements This book collects the intelligence, commitment, and support of many. It comprises the research, ideas and hopes of one of the most talented pools of Mexican professionals who day-to-day, in different spheres, work to strengthen rule of law in their own country. Collaborating with them has been among the highest honors of my career. I cannot thank them enough for believing in this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of the Press 2009
    Freedom of the Press 2009 FURTHER DECLINES IN GLOBAL MEDIA INDEPENDENCE Selected data from Freedom House’s annual survey of press freedom Acknowledgments Freedom of the Press 2009 could not have been completed without the contributions of numerous Freedom House staff and consultants. The following section, entitled “The Survey Team,” contains a detailed list of writers without whose efforts this project would not have been possible. Karin Deutsch Karlekar, a senior researcher at Freedom House, served as managing editor of this year’s survey. Extensive research, editorial, and administrative assistance was provided by Denelle Burns, as well as by Sarah Cook, Tyler Roylance, Elizabeth Floyd, Joanna Perry, Joshua Siegel, Charles Liebling, and Aidan Gould. Overall guidance for the project was provided by Arch Puddington, director of research, and by Christopher Walker, director of studies. We are grateful for the insights provided by those who served on this year’s review team, including Freedom House staff members Arch Puddington, Christopher Walker, Karin Deutsch Karlekar, Sarah Cook, and Tyler Roylance. In addition, the ratings and narratives were reviewed by a number of Freedom House staff based in our overseas offices. This report also reflects the findings of the Freedom House study Freedom in the World 2009: The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties. Statistics on internet usage were taken from www.internetworldstats.com. This project was made possible by the contributions of the Asia Vision Foundation, F. M. Kirby, Free Voice, Freedom Forum, The Hurford Foundation, John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, Lilly Endowment Inc., The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, the National Endowment for Democracy, The Nicholas B.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico 2020 Human Rights Report
    MEXICO 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Mexico is a multiparty federal republic with an elected president and bicameral legislature. Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador of the National Regeneration Movement party coalition won the presidential election in July 2018 in generally free and fair multiparty elections and took office in December 2018. Citizens also elected members of the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies, governors, state legislators, and mayors. The National Guard, state, and municipal police are responsible for enforcing the law and maintaining order. The National Guard, which began operations in June 2019, is a civilian institution reporting to the Secretariat of Public Security and Civil Protection. On December 31, 2019, the Federal Police was disbanded, and on May 4, all remaining assets and personnel were transferred to the National Guard. The bulk of National Guard personnel are seconded from the army and navy and have the option to return to their services after five years. State preventive police report to state governors, while municipal police report to mayors. The Secretariat of National Defense and Secretariat of the Navy also play a role in domestic security, particularly in combating organized criminal groups. The constitution was amended in 2019 to grant the president the authority to use the armed forces to protect internal and national security, and courts have upheld the legality of the armed forces’ role in law enforcement activities in support of civilian authorities through 2024. The National Migration Institute, under the authority of the Interior Secretariat, is responsible for enforcing migration law and protecting migrants. Although authorities generally maintained effective control over the security forces, there were instances in which security force elements acted independently of civilian control.
    [Show full text]
  • The Duty of the Mexican Government Comprehensive Protection for Human Rights Defenders and Journalists: the Duty of the Mexican Government Third Diagnosis
    Comprehensive Protection for Human Rights Defenders and Journalists: _ The Duty of the Mexican Government Comprehensive Protection for Human Rights Defenders and Journalists: The Duty of the Mexican Government Third Diagnosis Espacio osc organizations signing this report are: article 19; Asociación Mundial de Radios Comunitarias, México (amarc mx); Casa de los Derechos de Periodistas a.c.; Casa del Migrante Saltillo; Centro Mexicano de Derecho Ambiental (cemda); Centro de Derechos Humanos de la Montaña Tlachinollan; Centro de Derechos Humanos Mi- guel Agustín Pro Juárez (Centro Prodh); Centro de Derechos humanos Zeferino Ladril- lero (cdhzl); Centro de Investigación y Capacitación Propuesta Cívica a.c. (cic-pc); Centro Nacional de Comunicación Social (cencos); Comisión Mexicana de Defensa y Promoción de los Derechos Humanos (cmdpdh); Comunicación e Información de la Mujer a.c. (cimac); jass Just Associates; Red Nacional de Organismos Civiles de Dere- chos Humanos Todos los Derechos para Todas y Todos (Redtdt); Journalists without Borders; smr: Scalabrinianas, Misión con Migrantes y Refugiados; Servicios y Asesoría para la Paz a.c. (serapaz). Peace Brigades International (pbi) - Mexico Project accom- panies the Espacio osc. E-mail: [email protected] © Espacio osc © By the organizations and the authors Cover picture: Mario Marlo The editorial supervision and publishing of this report was possible thanks to article 19’s contribution. This report may be reproduced with proper clearance from the authors. Made in Mexico. Acknowledgements Coordination: Katharina Masoud, Servicios y Asesoría para la Paz a.c. (serapaz) Coordinating Team: Olga Guzmán Vergara, Comisión Mexicana de Defensa y Promoción de los Derechos Humanos (cmdpdh) María Martín Quintana, Just Associates.
    [Show full text]
  • México En Sus Revoluciones: Historia, Crítica Y Poéticas De La Emancipación Y La Resistencia En México
    México en sus revoluciones: historia, crítica y poéticas de la emancipación y la resistencia en México Berenice Villagómez Alejandro Zamora Esther Raventós-Pons (coordinadores) México en sus revoluciones: historia, crítica y poéticas de la emancipación y la resistencia en México Berenice Villagómez Alejandro Zamora Esther Raventós-Pons (coordinadores) México en sus revoluciones : historia, crítica y poéticas de la emancipación y la resis- tencia en México / Berenice Villagómez, Alejandro Zamora, Esther Reventós-Pons (coordinadores). - - Canadá : Glendon College : Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, 2013. 266 p. ISBN 978-607-7771-98-2 1. México – Historia 2. México – Arte y literatura 3. Movimientos sociales – México I. Villagoméz, Berenice, coord. II. Zamora, Alejandro, coord. III. Reventós-Pons, Esther, coord. LCC F1226 DC 972 México en sus revoluciones: historia, crítica y poéticas de la emancipación y la resistencia en México Berenice Villagómez, Alejandro Zamora y Esther Raventós-Pons. (Coordinadores) D.R. ©2013, Berenice Villagómez, Alejandro Zamora, Esther Raventós-Pons Primera edición, 2013. D.R. ©2013, Glendon College D.R. ©2013, Universidad Autónoma 2275 Bayview Avenue de Estado de Morelos Toronto, ON Av. Universidad 1001 M4N3M6 Canada Chamilpa C.P. 62209 Cuernavaca, Morelos, México “Rebozo [Man]” first appeared in El Mundo Zurdo Copyright © 2010 by The Society for the Study of Gloria Anzaldúa Reprinted by permission of Aunt Lute Books. www.auntlute.com Coordinación editorial: Ana Silvia Canto Reyes Diseño gráfico y formación: Roberto González Peralta Diseño de portada: Vicente Encarnación ISBN: 978-607-7771-98-2 Se prohíbe la reproducción parcial o total, por cualquier medio conocido o por conocerse, sin el consentimiento por escrito del titular de los derechos.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambition, Electoral Competition, and Legislative Representation in Mexico, 1997-2009 Yann P
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Political Science ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 1-31-2013 Ambition, Electoral Competition, and Legislative Representation in Mexico, 1997-2009 Yann P. Kerevel Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/pols_etds Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Kerevel, Yann P.. "Ambition, Electoral Competition, and Legislative Representation in Mexico, 1997-2009." (2013). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/pols_etds/8 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Yann P. Kerevel Candidate Political Science Department This dissertation is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Dissertation Committee: Lonna Rae Atkeson , Chairperson Juan Pablo Micozzi Michael S. Rocca Kathryn Hochstetler James McCann AMBITION, ELECTORAL COMPETITION, AND LEGISLATIVE REPRESENTATION IN MEXICO, 1997-2009 by YANN P. KEREVEL B.A. Criminal Justice, Grand Valley State University, 2003 M.A. Latin American Studies, University of New Mexico, 2006 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Political Science The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico December 2012 ii DEDICATION To Ruth Lucile Hollinger iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation could not have been written without the advice and support of a large number of wonderful people who have graciously dedicated their time and energy. First, I would like to acknowledge the invaluable feedback and support from Lonna Atkeson over the last four years.
    [Show full text]
  • Publicaciones - División De Historia
    PUBLICACIONES - DIVISIÓN DE HISTORIA 2014 Nombre de la publicación Investigador(es) Producción científica publicada dictaminada Artículos dictaminados en revistas extranjeras Constitutional Projects for the Division of Powers in Mexico during Iturbide´s Empire, 1821-1823, Journal Latin American Studies, Volume Andrews Catherine 46, Issue 40, November 2014. DOI: 10.1017/s0022216x14001059 La prole de Virgilio: Vaivenes de la recepción de Virgilio Piñera en Cuba, Revista Iberoamericana, Vol. LXXIX, Núm. 243, Abril-Junio Rojas Rafael 2013: Trazos de islas: (dislocaciones narrativas y territorios culturales en la República de Dominicana y Cuba De la diversité des acteurs et des intérêts concernés para la gestion bilatérale de la migration. Observations sur le maintien du Vézina Catherine programme bracero, 1947-1948, Histoire sociale / Social History, vol. XLVII, no° 93 (Mai / May 2014) Construction du discours alarmistre sur l'invasion latina aux États-Unis. L'instrumentalisation de la situation québécoise, Canadian Review Vézina Catherine of American Studies/Revue canadienne d'études américaines 44, no. 3, 2014 doi: 10.3138/cras.2014-007 Arabic Singing Girls, The Pope, and the Astrolabe: Arabic Science in Tenth-Century Latin Europe, Viator 45 No. 1 (2014) 10- Zuccato Marco 1484/J.VIATOR.1.103784 Artículos dictaminados en revistas nacionales Mujeres y revueltas en el mundo árabe: historia y orientalismos, Foro Internacional, vol. LIV, núm. 3, julio-septiembre 2014 Pastor Camila El aparato cultural del imperio. C. Wright Mills, la Revolución Cubana y la Nueva Izquierda, Perfiles Latinoamericanos. Revista de la Rojas Rafael Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Sede México, No. 44, Julio-diciembre 2014 O Campus, My Campus!, Istor.
    [Show full text]