2007 Session Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2007 Session Review Nebraska Legislature Research Office Session Review: Review: Session One-Hundredth Legislature, First Session July July 2007 Published by Legislative Research Office Cynthia G. Johnson, Director Nebraska Legislature State Capitol P.O. Box 94945 Lincoln, NE 68509-4945 402.471.2221 Session Review: One-Hundredth Legislature, First Session July 2007 Prepared by Legislative Research Office Staff Nancy Cyr, Legal Counsel Kate Gaul, Research Analyst Stephen Moore, Research Analyst Bernard Scherr, Research Analyst Deb Emmons, Deputy Director Research Report 2007-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...............................................................i AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE .......................................... 1 APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE..................................... 5 BANKING, COMMERCE, AND INSURANCE COMMITTEE ...................................................................9 BUSINESS AND LABOR COMMITTEE ........................... 19 EDUCATION COMMITTEE............................................. 27 EXECUTIVE BOARD ...................................................... 41 GENERAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE ................................. 45 GOVERNMENT, MILITARY AND VETERANS AFFAIRS COMMITTEE................................49 HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE ................................................................. 53 JUDICIARY COMMITTEE .............................................. 63 NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE ........................... 75 NEBRASKA RETIREMENT SYSTEMS COMMITTEE .................................................................83 REVENUE COMMITTEE ................................................ 85 TRANSPORTATION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE ........................99 URBAN AFFAIRS COMMITTEE ................................... 107 BILL INDEX.................................................................. 113 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION INDEX ............................119 INTRODUCTION The following review provides a summary of significant legislative issues addressed during the first session of the One Hundredth Legislature of Nebraska. The review briefly describes many, but by no means all, of the issues discussed by the Legislature during the 2007 session. Information gathered from committee chairpersons and staff members, staff of the Legislative Fiscal Office, legislative records, and the Unicameral Update is used to produce the re- view. Bill summaries and summaries of legislative resolutions proposing constitutional amendments are found under the heading of the legislative committee to which each bill or resolution was referred. Because the subject matter of some legislation relates to more than one committee, cross-referencing notes are included as needed. A bill-number index and a legislative-resolution index are included for ease of reference. The authors acknowledge and thank the legislative staff who as- sisted in the preparation of this review. A word about effective and operative dates— Article III, section 27, of the Nebraska Constitution provides in part that, unless an emergency is declared, any bill passed by the Legislature takes effect three calendar months after the Legislature adjourns sine die. This year, the effective date for all enacted leg- islation that does not have (1) a specific operative date or (2) the emergency clause is September 1, 2007. Enacted legislation with a specific operative date takes effect on that date. If enacted legislation has no specific operative date but passes with the emergency clause, the measure takes effect the day after the Governor signs the measure. For example, if a bill passes with the emergency clause and the Governor signs the measure into law on May 31, the bill becomes effective June 1. i AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE Senator Philip Erdman, Chairperson ENACTED LEGISLATIVE BILLS LB 12—Change the Commercial Dog and Cat Operator Inspection Act (Mines, Cornett, Pahls, and Schimek) LB 12 amends the Commercial Dog and Cat Operator Act with the goal of eliminating “puppy mills.” “Puppy mill” is a negative term used to describe breeding operations that mistreat dogs and cats. Puppy mill owners often keep animals in overcrowded and un- clean conditions and breed females repeatedly. Under the bill, the Department of Agriculture can require an in- spection of commercial kennels, including breeding and boarding kennels, shelters, and pet stores, at the time of the initial applica- tion for a license. In addition, the new law requires kennel inspec- tions be done every two years. (Under prior law, inspections were done only in response to complaints about a particular kennel.) LB 12 also establishes a new fee schedule for kennel licenses. The fee for an initial kennel license is $125. Subsequent license fees will vary according to the number of animals housed by the ken- nel: (1) 10 or fewer cats or dogs, $150; (2) 11 to 50 cats or dogs, $200; and (3) more than 50 cats or dogs, $250. If a licensee does not house cats or dogs, the license fee is $150. The Director of Ag- riculture can increase or decrease any license fees after holding a public hearing for purposes of outlining the rationale behind the fee change; however, the maximum fee authorized by the act is $350. A violation of the act can result in a fine of up to $5,000. The bill is a response to the growth of puppy mills in the state. Proponents acknowledged that most breeders run good opera- tions, and are responding to the market demand for pets through- out the country. However, backers of the bill want to crack down on unethical breeders, protecting consumers from buying animals with genetic defects and from the trauma and expense of owning a damaged pet. LB 12 passed 44-1 and was approved by the Governor on May 30, 2007. LB 25—Change Rabies Control Provisions to Include Hybrid Animals (Langemeier) Controlling the spread of rabies among hybrid dogs by requiring they be vaccinated is the intent of LB 25. The bill defines a hybrid animal to be the product of breeding between a domestic dog and a nondomestic canine species, such as a wolf or a coyote. Cur- 1 rently, no federally approved vaccine for hybrid dogs exists; there- fore, the bill delays implementation of the inoculation requirement until a scientifically reliable vaccine is developed. Once developed, hybrid dog owners will have one year to vaccinate their animals. Wolf-dogs are one of the most common hybrid dogs. Wolves and dogs can breed because they are genetically similar. Wolf-dogs are also controversial. Some think the animals are vicious and un- trainable. They point to the fact that attacks on people, mostly children, have resulted in severe injury, even death. Others say that wolf-dogs are merely an alternative exotic pet. They contend that the animals are generally docile and have dispositions that vary, just like dispositions of domestic dogs. LB 25 passed 41-1 and was approved by the Governor on April 4, 2007. LB 108—Change Provisions Relating to Fence Disputes (Agriculture Committee) LB 108 amends Nebraska’s fence law. Generally, fence law regu- lates boundary and fence disputes by providing procedures to be used when disputes between rural landowners cannot be resolved. Nebraska’s early fence law was considered to be “fence-out,” re- flecting the open range of settlement days. The law required land- owners to fence agricultural land to keep out neighboring live- stock. Current fence law is considered to be “fence-in,” and re- quires a landowner to fence his or her property to contain live- stock, with the provision that landowners are obligated to share the cost and responsibility of building and maintaining fence that separates adjoining properties (division fence). However, rural-land use in Nebraska and throughout the country is no longer so exclusively agricultural. Rural land is increasingly used for residential purposes, such as acreages and ranchettes. Despite this fact, the state’s fence law has continued to obligate all rural residents to build and maintain fence, even if they do not benefit from it. The changes to the fence law included within LB 12 reflect the new uses of rural land. Neighboring landowners will continue to share the cost and maintenance of division fence, determining the exact arrangement themselves. However, if a dispute arises, the bill pre- scribes an equal (50-50) responsibility only if both landowners use division fence to contain livestock. LB 108 also ends the “fence viewer” system, by which county offi- cials or persons appointed to be “fence viewers” arbitrate fence disputes. System administrators have had difficulty attracting fence viewers, in part, because of fear of being drawn into a bitter fence dispute between neighbors. 2 Alternatively, LB 108 provides that a party in a fence dispute can bring an action in the county court where the land is located. The bill establishes a process by which a disputant may choose media- tion under programs offered by the Department of Agriculture or the Office of Dispute Resolution. If an agreement is reached, the court will enter it as the judgment. If mediation is not chosen or is not successful, a civil action can proceed. LB 108 passed with the emergency clause 34-0 and was approved by the Governor on March 7, 2007. LB 435—Study Issues Relating to the Nebraska State Fairgrounds (Raikes, Avery, Dierks, Dubas, Fulton, Hudkins, Karpisek, McDonald, McGill, Nantkes, Schimek, and Wallman) The future of the Nebraska State Fair is the topic of LB 435. The debate is whether the fair should remain at its current, historically significant
Recommended publications
  • The Nebraska Unicameral and Its Lasting Benefits, 76 Neb
    Nebraska Law Review Volume 76 | Issue 4 Article 6 1997 The eN braska Unicameral and Its Lasting Benefits Kim Robak Nebraska Lieutenant Governor Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr Recommended Citation Kim Robak, The Nebraska Unicameral and Its Lasting Benefits, 76 Neb. L. Rev. (1997) Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol76/iss4/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law, College of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Kim Robak* The Nebraska Unicameral and Its Lasting Benefits TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .......................................... 791 II. Background ........................................... 793 III. Why and How the Unicameral Works ................. 799 A. Organization ...................................... 800 B. Process ........................................... 802 C. Partisanship ...................................... 804 D. The Lobby ........................................ 804 IV. Why a Nonpartisan Unicameral Is Superior to a Bicameral System ..................................... 805 A. Duplication ....................................... 805 B. Representative and Open Process .................. 809 C. Nonpartisanship .................................. 810 D. Leadership ........................................ 812 E. Lobby ............................................. 814 F. Balance
    [Show full text]
  • Section II LEGISLATURES and LEGISLATION 1. Legislative
    I . s . ^ • -• -y- ;•,.-. • ; ,. ; -, /,. •,;.-.^ •• .. ^ "'• " '-"t- Section II LEGISLATURES AND LEGISLATION 1. Legislative Organization and Services 2. Legislation • .••••.4- J • •••••fe^^r^. • "^VV"/. „._'*; T- Qi A-.. ^!^ 0 1 Legislative Organization and Services -T-^ STRUCTURE AND PROCEDURES HE citizens of the states through their widely from state to state:—in Idaho there Tconstitutions have vested the su- are forty-four Senators to fifty-nine Rep- preme latv-making power in their resentatives; in New Hampshire there are legislatures. They have provided for the twenty-four Senators to 400 RepresenP**' popular election at frequent intervals of atives. *'. those whoxomprise th^ legislative bodies. With two noteworthy exceptions, only Except in Nebraska they have established minor changes have been made by sta|jes two-house legislatures. during the past biennium in the size of. Beyond these common elements, a wide their legislatures. The exceptions ar$ variety of constitutional provisions, stat- Alaska and Hawaii, which became istate^ utory requirements, rules and preceden^ts during the period under review. In the. govern the workings of the state legisla- former the legislature was increased from tures. Together they determine the many forty to sixty members;" in Hawaii, the details of legislative structure, organiza- total went from forty-five to seventy-six. In tion and procedure, the purpose of which both states, the lower house noyf is ahnost is to enable the legislatures to carry out exactly twice as large as the Senate, their responsibilities in an orderly and "In all states legislative terms are either effective manner. two years or four. State Senators in thirty- „ five states—an increatse of three in the past biZE AND lERMs biennium—serve for four ycarsHn fifteen In Nsize American state legislatures (including Nebraska) they serve for two.
    [Show full text]
  • Unicam Kids!: a Visit to Your Nebraska Legislature
    UNICAM KIDS! A Visit to Your Nebraska Legislature guided by George W. Norris, “the father of the Unicameral” Unicam Kids i! I’m George Norris. I represented Nebraska in Congress from 1913 to 1943. Many people call me Hthe father of Nebraska’s Unicameral Legislature. A unicameral is a legislature with just one group of people to make laws. Nebraska has the nation’s only unicameral, which meets here at the Capitol in Lincoln to make laws for the state. I believed this one-house system would serve Nebraskans better than a bicameral, or two-house system, found in every other state. Nebraskans voted to change to a unicameral in 1934, and the first unicameral met in 1937. Let’s go inside. I’ll show you around! Nebraska is unique for its unicameral and also its unusual Capitol building. Architect Bertram Goodhue wanted the Capitol’s design to reflect the spirit of Nebraska’s people. The words and pictures on the outside of the building show Nebraska’s place in the history of law and democracy. The Capitol took 10 years to build and was finished in 1932. The tower rises almost 400 feet and is topped by a 19-foot bronze statue of a man tossing seeds, called “The Sower.” — 1 — A Visit to Your Nebraska Legislature y experience as a lawmaker made me wish for a smoother processM to make laws. I encour- aged Nebraskans to vote for a new, smaller legislature so the process would be simpler and allow for more public input. Some Nebraskans worried about becoming the only unicameral.
    [Show full text]
  • Floor Debate April 19, 2017
    Transcript Prepared By the Clerk of the Legislature Transcriber's Office Floor Debate April 19, 2017 [LB68 LB97 LB145 LB152 LB159 LB167 LB172 LB203 LB223 LB244 LB255A LB257 LB259 LB268 LB323 LB346 LB395 LB409 LB441 LB461 LB478 LB481 LB487 LB509A LB509 LB526 LB578 LB605 LB622 LB661 LR99 LR100 LR101] SPEAKER SCHEER PRESIDING SPEAKER SCHEER: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the George W. Norris Legislative Chamber for the sixty-seventh day of the One Hundred Fifth Legislature, First Session. Our chaplain for today is Father Gary Coulter from Our Lady of Good Counsel Retreat House in Waverly, Nebraska, Senator Geist's district. Would you please rise. FATHER COULTER: (Prayer offered.) SPEAKER SCHEER: Thank you, Father Coulter. I call to order the sixty-seventh day of the One Hundred Fifth Legislature, First Session, Senators please record your presence. Roll call. PRESIDENT FOLEY PRESIDING PRESIDENT FOLEY: Mr. Clerk, please record. ASSISTANT CLERK: There is a quorum present, Mr. President. PRESIDENT FOLEY: Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Are there any corrections for the Journal? ASSISTANT CLERK: No corrections this morning. PRESIDENT FOLEY: Thank you, sir. Are there any messages, reports, or announcements? ASSISTANT CLERK: I have no messages, reports, or announcements. PRESIDENT FOLEY: While the Legislature is in session and capable of transacting business, I propose to sign and do hereby sign LR99, LR100, and LR101. We'll now proceed to the first item on the agenda, General File, 2017, committee priority bill. Mr. Clerk. [LR99 LR100 LR101] 1 Transcript Prepared By the Clerk of the Legislature Transcriber's Office Floor Debate April 19, 2017 ASSISTANT CLERK: Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Resolution 118
    LR118 LR118 2021 2021 ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH LEGISLATURE FIRST SESSION LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION 118 Introduced by Hunt, 8. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH LEGISLATURE OF NEBRASKA, FIRST SESSION: 1. That we hereby reaffirm our solemn oaths of office by expressing a firm resolution to defend the United States Capitol, the sacred symbol of our democracy, against every act of sedition and insurrection, whether from citizens of the United States or their elected officials. 2. That we are greatly alarmed that a factious and treasonous spirit manifested on January 6, 2021, in a violent attack on the United States Capitol in Washington, D.C., and that such insurrection was spurred by influences emanating from some members of the United States Congress and former President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, with a desire to sow discord among the citizenry and to destroy the outcome of the free and fair election that resulted in the election of President Joseph R. Biden. 3. That we further protest against the actions of the mob of citizens who committed countless criminal acts resulting in incalculable property damage; caused physical injuries to many, including brave first responders; and brought about tragic loss of life, including an officer of the United States Capitol Police. We also protest the words of elected officials in the state legislatures and the United States Congress which sought to incite such mob. 4. That we express distress at the knowledge that this insurrection was fueled by lies and misinformation and an official abuse of power by some local, state, and federal leaders, including Nebraska's Attorney General, Nebraska's Secretary of State, and Nebraska's Governor, who used the powers and privileges of their offices, granted by the people themselves, as well as state resources, to file frivolous partisan lawsuits designed to usurp the democratic process.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Bill 406
    LB406 LB406 2021 2021 LEGISLATIVE BILL 406 Approved by the Governor May 25, 2021 Introduced by McDonnell, 5; Gragert, 40; Flood, 19; Lindstrom, 18; Sanders, 45. A BILL FOR AN ACT relating to natural resources; to state legislative findings; to create the Statewide Tourism And Recreational Water Access and Resource Sustainability Special Committee of the Legislature; to provide powers and duties; to provide a termination date for the committee; and to declare an emergency. Be it enacted by the people of the State of Nebraska, Section 1. The Legislature finds and declares as follows: (1) The future vibrancy of the people, communities, and businesses of Nebraska depends on reliable sources of water; (2) While it is in the state's best interest to retain control over its water supplies, much of the state's water resources are currently underutilized; (3) Well-planned flood control is critical to the future of the people, communities, and businesses of Nebraska; (4) The state's water resources provide economic benefit to the people, communities, and businesses of Nebraska by helping to attract visitors from other states and boost local economies; (5) Nebraska has tremendous water resources across the state, including, but not limited to, the Ogallala Aquifer, Lake McConaughy, the Platte River, the Republican River, and the Missouri River. The state's lakes and rivers help Nebraskans enjoy the water resources in our state and make Nebraska an even more attractive place to live and raise a family; (6) In light of the disruption from the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic and the trend toward a remote workforce around the country, people around the country are rethinking where they want to work, live, and raise a family.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Hearing January 28, 2021
    Transcript Prepared by Clerk of the Legislature Transcribers Office Natural Resources Committee January 28, 2021 Rough Draft Does not include written testimony submitted prior to the public hearing per our COVID-19 Response protocol BOSTELMAN: M ay I have your attention? We'll get started here this morning on our first bill, LB406. I have a few things I need to read in for your information. I'll start off with the COVID-19 hearing procedures. For the safety of our committee members, staff, pages, and the public, we ask those attending our hearings to abide by the following procedures. Due to social distancing requirements, seating in the hearing room is limited. We ask that you only enter the hearing room when it is necessary for you to, to attend the bill hearing in progress. The bills will be taken up in the order posted outside of the hearing room. The list will be updated after each hearing to identify which bill is currently being heard. The committee will pause between each bill to allow time for the public to move in and out of the hearing room. We request that everyone utilize the identified entrance and identified exit for the hearing room. We request that you wear a face covering while in the hearing room. Testifiers may remove their face covering during the testimony to assist committee members and transcribers in clearly hearing and understanding the testimony. Pages will sanitize the front table and chair between each testifier. Public hearings for which attendance reach a seating capacity or near capacity, the entrance door will be monitored by a Sergeant at Arms who will allow people to enter the hearing room based upon seating availability.
    [Show full text]
  • Roster Executive Committee 2019-20
    ROSTER EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 2019-20 NCSL OFFICERS President Staff Chair Speaker Robin Vos Martha R. Wigton Assembly Speaker Director – House Budget & Research Wisconsin Legislature Office State Capitol, Room 217 West Georgia General Assembly PO Box 8953 412 Coverdell Legislative Office Building Madison, WI 53708-8953 18 Capitol Square (608) 266-9171 Atlanta, GA 30334 [email protected] (404) 656-5050 [email protected] President-Elect Staff Vice Chair Speaker Scott Saiki Joseph James “J.J.” Gentry, Esq. Speaker of the House Counsel, Ethics Committee – Senate Hawaii State Legislature South Carolina General Assembly State Capitol PO Box 142 415 South Beretania Street, Room 431 205 Gressette Building Honolulu, HI 96813 Columbia, SC 29202 (808) 586-6100 (803) 212-6306 [email protected] [email protected] Vice President Immediate Past Staff Chair Speaker Scott Bedke Jon Heining Speaker of the House General Counsel – Legislative Council Idaho Legislature Texas Legislature State Capitol Building PO Box 12128 PO Box 83720 Robert E. Johnson Building 700 West Jefferson Street 1501 North Congress Avenue Boise, ID 83720-0038 Austin, TX 78711-2128 (208) 332-1123 (512) 463-1151 [email protected] [email protected] Executive Committee Roster 2019-20 ROSTER EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Immediate Past President Speaker Mitzi Johnson Speaker of the House Vermont General Assembly State House 115 State Street Montpelier, VT 05633-5501 (802) 828-2228 [email protected] AT LARGE MEMBERS Representative
    [Show full text]
  • Term Limits for Nebraska State Senators: a Challenge to the Future Effectiveness of the Nebraska State Legislature
    TERM LIMITS FOR NEBRASKA STATE SENATORS: A CHALLENGE TO THE FUTURE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NEBRASKA STATE LEGISLATURE DOUG BENDt INTRODUCTION In 2000, Nebraska voters approved a constitutional amendment limiting Nebraska state senators to two consecutive four-year terms.' Of the forty-nine state senators, twenty, 2 including the speaker 3 and nine committee chairmen, 4 were not permitted to seek re-election in 2006.5 Another sixteen will be forced from office in 2008.6 The re- maining state senators will be term limited by 2012. 7 This Article ex- amines the possible consequences of the term limits and argues that while they were well-intentioned, they will likely harm the effective- ness of the Nebraska State Legislature. Part I provides an overview of the structure of the Nebraska State Legislature, the responsibilities of state senators, and the term limits t J.D., Georgetown University Law Center (May 2006); M.A. in Political Science, University of Nebraska (2001); B.A. in Political Science and History, Drake University (1999). Prior to attending law school, the author served as a Legislative Assistant in the U.S. House of Representatives. 1. Kevin O'Hanlon, Clock Ticking on Term Limits, LINCOLN J. STAR, Feb. 9, 2005, http://www.journalstar.com/articles/2005/02/09/local/doc420a90c88b940489646224.txt; see also Respondent's Initial Brief at 2, State v. Chambers, No. C105-5297 (District Court of Lancaster County, Neb. Feb. 3, 2006) (noting "[t]he vote was 355,030 (56%) in favor of the measure and 280,985 (44%) against"). 2. Staff, Stage Set for Term-Limits Fight, LINCOLN J.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside Our Nation's Only Unicameral: The
    Inside Our Nation’s Only Unicameral The Nebraska Legislature 2021 Origin of the Unicameral ebraska’s Legislature is unique among state Nlegislatures in the country because it consists of a single body of lawmakers—a one-house legislature, or unicameral. This was not always the case. Nebraska had a senate and a house of representatives for the first 68 years of the state’s existence. It took decades of work to convice Nebraskans to do away with “Every act of the legislature and every act of each individual the two-house system (see Norton excerpt, right). must be transacted in the spotlight of publicity,” Norris said. The potential cost-saving aspects of a unicameral In a one-house legislature, Norris said, no actions could be system helped the idea gain popularity during the Great concealed as too often happened in conference committees. Depression. A petition campaign led by the prestigious A conference committee reconciles differences in legislation U.S. Sen. George W. Norris benefited from two other when the two chambers of a bicameral legislature pass different popular proposals that also were on the ballot that year: versions of a bill. In Nebraska, the appointed six-member a local option on prohibition and legalized pari-mutuel betting. In 1934, Nebraska voters finally decided to reform committee met in secret, and members’ votes were not the state legislature on a 286,086 to 193,152 vote. public record. Norris said these committees had too Norris was a “New Deal Republican” from McCook. much power and easily could be influenced by lobbyists.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Bill 615
    LB615 LB615 2021 2021 LEGISLATURE OF NEBRASKA ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH LEGISLATURE FIRST SESSION LEGISLATIVE BILL 615 Introduced by Erdman, 47. Read first time January 20, 2021 Committee: Natural Resources 1 A BILL FOR AN ACT relating to the Game and Parks Commission; to amend 2 sections 37-101 and 37-102, Reissue Revised Statutes of Nebraska, 3 and section 32-101, Revised Statutes Cumulative Supplement, 2020; to 4 provide for election of commission members as prescribed; to 5 eliminate obsolete provisions; to harmonize provisions; and to repeal the original sections.6 7 Be it enacted by the people of the State of Nebraska, -1- LB615 LB615 2021 2021 1 Section 1. Section 32-101, Revised Statutes Cumulative Supplement, 2 2020, is amended to read: 3 32-101 Sections 32-101 to 32-1551 and section 4 of this act shall be 4 known and may be cited as the Election Act. 5 Sec. 2. Section 37-101, Reissue Revised Statutes of Nebraska, is 6 amended to read: 7 37-101 (1) (1)(a) The Game and Parks Commission shall consist of 8 nine members, one from each of the eight districts provided for by 9 section 37-102 and one at-large member, and shall be appointed by the 10 Governor with the consent of a majority of all members of the 11 Legislature. (b) Members of the commission shall be legal residents and 12 citizens of Nebraska and shall be well informed and interested in matters 13 under the jurisdiction of the commission. A member shall be a bona fide 14 resident of the district which such member represents.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules of the Nebraska Unicameral Legislature
    RULES of the NEBRASKA UNICAMERAL LEGISLATURE One Hundred Seventh Legislature 2021-2022 RULES of the NEBRASKA UNICAMERAL LEGISLATURE Published by Patrick J. O'Donnell Clerk of the Legislature Lincoln, Nebraska 68509 Adopted January 21, 2021 03-01-12-2021 RULES OF THE NEBRASKA UNICAMERAL TABLE OF CONTENTS RULE 1 – OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES ............................................. 1 RULE 2 – RULES OF PROCEDURE ....................................................... 9 RULE 3 – COMMITTEES ....................................................................... 13 RULE 4 – RESOLUTIONS ...................................................................... 27 RULE 5 – BILLS–GENERAL PROVISIONS ........................................ 31 RULE 6 – BILLS–STAGES OF CONSIDERATION ............................ 39 RULE 7 – PROCEEDINGS AND MOTIONS ........................................ 47 RULE 8 – APPROPRIATIONS PROCESS............................................ 55 RULE 9 – SPECIAL SESSIONS ............................................................. 59 RULE 10 – ELECTION CONTESTS AND QUALIFICATIONS CHALLENGES ................................................ 61 MOTIONS ................................................................................................. 65 INDEX TOPICS ........................................................................................ 66 INDEX ........................................................................................................ 67 RULE 1 – OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES A. Election of Officers Section 1.
    [Show full text]