Correcting the CONSTITUTION Was the Bill of Rights Necessary?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Correcting the CONSTITUTION Was the Bill of Rights Necessary? S v . pulM^n!ptU«»on™tiog»fO»,BtriIbM^p«l|^rMttomilti»iy l*«tiog»rn», fa-ritt l* W C i.t iu S ! : T H. ■?, "v* I -5J Xo IbUicnKall, m tune of. , , nohow ibe omlm of ihc pwscf, our in » of *ar. but In xf to bo pfefcribcrf by bur- ARTICLE ENT H. 's 5 r___ ' ulitttl, ami_fii no n itM (hall__ tfttf, botsasai_ upon probable caufc *5 k hippoereil by oatb or aHtnoerirri, ecd panieulariv ^(bribing the ^ v O place u> be Sbareberi. and ibe petKJGi or tbingi to [>r (eried. ^ y U' ," M U7 .w xoperfa.* * % VfA& nUliSJft#- ■ M111 < -7 fhirll be compelled In aafei*a«wl cafe, to be a nitnef* agaitdl bun- ulafi,. Or. „ it.* Or., V Out »;airafflpwiBEK,'3ffas (ltd - . .TlJK'nC.in XI. f* ^ In all i riminri ptotrcutwii", die xculed Oyll enjoy- tlte right to ...— p IjJCetlr and public triai. In be infolioal of the nature and canlc of if. eolation, to be. conboctCduilJi ihc taitnelln agajtldbim, to baaceonifiolfufy [reocelafor obtaining Yfitnttia art [lit favor, and to bdnethe-alhfianeeofoonoM&nhuddbiee. A R T I C L E fit* T E N T H . cimKiiOa. thertflfclw^Benge, and other aecottotrrd irattfliftti «Lnnf^th, .'. -H>~- t-”j lo anfuer (dr a cipnsl, nr .Hhrtwuyi or indximrrt! by a Grand flWl in thepodelboa of Correcting the CONSTITUTION Was the Bill of Rights necessary? by Richard Brookhiser On September 12,1787, in the home stretch of the Constitutional Convention— the delegates would finish their work five days later—George Mason, a self-educat ed Virginia planter, brilliant and gruff, raised an important point: The document they had been working on since May had no bill of rights. By the late 18th century such bills had The king’s subjects were to be the judges of become a fixture of Anglo-American politi each other’s guilt or innocence, and the king cal thought. The first example was said to be had to listen to their grievances (at least the Magna Carta, the list of pledges that rebel grievances of the powerful). lious barons extorted from an unpopular King The Glorious Revolution of 1688 drove John in 1215. But claiming Magna Carta as another unpopular king, James II, from his a bill of rights was a stretch. Most of it con throne. The following year Parliament passed a cerned strictly medieval matters—forestry law, true English Bill of Rights. It extended the right how to treat England’s Welsh neighbors—and the entire document was meant to secure the privileges of the upper nobility, not rights for everybody. Above: The proposed Yet some of its provisions anticipated ele amendments, marked up by the Senate, 1789. Opposite: ments of the United States’ Bill of Rights—trial Benjamin Franklin (center) and by jury (“no freemen shall be taken or impris George Washington (right) oned.. .except by the lawful judgment of his are warmly greeted at the peers”) and the right to petition (barons could Constitutional Convention. “petition to have.. ,transgression[s] redressed”). TOP: RECORDS OF THE U.S. SENATE/NATIONAL ARCHIVES: OPPOSITE: 36 AMERICAN HISTORY JEAN LEON GEROME FERRIS/PRIVATE COLLECTION/BRIDGEMAN IMAGES wit m r^9MP 3 3 . r m «i3Sfe*C' - . Hy ^ jr •>• wT' i.ru Jll Kfl ili 1 § § 1 .. 1 IP- - i~, ■ of petition beyond barons and reaffirmed trial b O 8 T O N, IVednejday, January 30. by jury, especially in trials for high treason. It Extra ft of a 'ester fror. a gentleman of eminence, in also guaranteed “freedom of speech” in Parlia the city of Philadelphia, to a gentleman in this ment and the right of Protestants to have “arms town, dated Jan 14, rj88. for their defence.” (England’s Protestants, the “ You will, no donbr, fee by the paper?, that oar majority in the country, believed that James II, a Catholic convert, had staffed the army with antUederaliib—from th? defpair which their Catholic officers in preparation for a religious weakaefi has thrown them into, like an expiring coup.) One provision would reappear almost taper, are tnaking another ftruggle in order 10 dil- word for word in the U.S. Bill of Rights: “Exces aOfeA the people of theUnitedStates againft the new sive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive ConOitution. Under the mock appearance of ex- fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punish tra£b from a Carlifle paper, Judge B, has given ments inflicted.” The justice system should not the publiek a long account of the dtjlraftion which torture Englishmen or crush them financially. prevails in that phica : But on the authority of a Similar bills of rights were passed by .Rev, Clergyman src m that country, I alfuie you, American states as soon as they declared their that it was a tifere fracas, fimilar to which have independence, as George Mason knew from happened there, ever fmce the Conrtituticn of this personal experience. In May 1776 the Virginia State was adopted—between the Republicans and Convention, the colony’s revolutionary legis lature, appointed him to a committee charged Con(litutiona!ifts-~I no not know what to compare with producing a declaration of rights. Mason them to bet er than your Pope-mohs before the did most of the work, copying the English Bill revolution.” of Rights’ language on bail, fines and punish I ED ERA L S UPERS TR UCTURE. ments. He called for “speedy” trials by juries in criminal cases and for juries in civil suits. He condemned “general warrants” allowing searches "without evidence” of particular of fenses. He praised “freedom of the press,” mi litias “composed of the body of the people, trained to arms” and "the fullest toleration” of religion. One of Mason's colleagues on the committee, young James Madison, amended this last clause to state that "all men are equally entitled to the free exercise” of religion. “Tol __ ■ — ■ —- - - - — • •• - From obfervation, and good information, wc eration" implied that religious liberty was a venture to allure the world, that the m assac hu gift. Instead Madison made it an inherent right. 5et^ nsian PILLAR of the great FEDERAL Virginia’s declaration, with Madison’s change, EDIFICE riles daily-*Thanks to the candour of was approved June 12,1776, three weeks before thole gentlemen who at lirlf were oppofed to its e the Declaration of Independence. region — and thanks to the unremitted exertions of In Philadelphia in 1787 Mason said that the thofe who have affilled in raifin? it. Constitutional Convention could add a bill of rights to its handiwork “in a few hours,” using The General Afiembiy of New-York, now in state bills as guides. But he found almost no feffion at i oughkeepfie, we are affured by good an- takers. Elbridge Gerry, a quirky delegate from thorny, have refolved that a Convention be call ed, for tne purpole of ailenting to, and ratifying the Federal Coniiitution—■-to meet at a fhort day— and that the Coniiitution will be adopted by chat Sta-e by two again!! one—which God grant. O---- \\ e are tola—-and feriouily too—that Mr. Bacon, has On January 30, 1788, changed his political fentiments once more, and that he the Massachusetts now believes the Oonllitution muff go down. Centinel expressed MARRIED] At Dedham 'Monf. NICHOLAS DU. uncertainty over R 1VAGR; to Mils NANCY Ba KER. whether the state DIED, la(l Sunday morning, Capt. RICHARD CHAP- would ratify the MAN, aged 27. His funeral wfJl be thi; afternoon, at half paa three Constitution. ~-*-3 ’* ir. Charleftown. 38 AMERICAN HISTORY Patrick Henry feared Alexander Hamilton George Mason refused James Madison came that a strong central argued against a bill of to sign the C onstitution to accept that a bill o f government would rights, claim ing it w ould because it did not rights was necessary to usurp individual and tempt government to include a bill of rights or assure ratification o f the states' rights. test its limits. restrict the slave trade. Constitution. Massachusetts, moved for a committee to do as Mason had suggested. ferson, who was in Paris at the time, serving There was a quick vote, with every state delegation rejecting the idea. as minister to France. Despite being an ocean The Constitution makers were tired. They had spent an entire Phila away, he helped change Madison’s mind: “A delphia summer cooped up in Independence Hall, orating, nitpicking bill of rights,” wrote Jefferson, “is what the peo and forging an elaborate web of compromises. They wanted to go home. ple are entitled to against every government But why had they not thought of drafting a bill of rights in all the on earth.” months they had been together? Once the Constitution went before the Madison was hearing the same thing from American people for ratification, its authors offered various excuses for the people of Virginia. The state’s Baptists, a min their omission. During the ratification debate in Pennsylvania, James ority sect, feared the lack of a guarantee of reli Wilson, a learned, Scottish-born lawyer, argued that the rights en gious liberty. And Patrick Henry, whom Madison shrined in Magna Carta and England’s Bill of Rights had been carved disdained as a demagogue but could not ignore from a background of royal power. In the United States, he said, power as an effective one, harped on the issue. A “bill of should remain “in the people at large, and by this Constitution they do rights maybe summed up in a few words," Henry not part with it." There was no reason to guard against the abuse of pow said.
Recommended publications
  • Are Texans Being Denied Access to a Vital Medicine? a Scientific Assessment of Marijuana
    Are Texans Being DENIED ACCESS to a VITAL MEDICINE? A Scientific Assessment of Marijuana This booklet may be reproduced in total for free distribution. PDF files are available at http://www.DPFT.org Introduction The goal of the Drug Policy Forum of Texas (DPFT) is to minimize the damage done to society by both drug abuse and poorly conceived drug laws. To that end we provide scientific information and expert opinion while promoting discussion of what might be more effective alternatives to our current drug policies. Members may differ on the best answers. We hold the traditional view that unrestricted debate and a well informed public are essential elements of democracy. DPFT does not advocate or encourage the recreational use of illegal or legal drugs. Our members are simply concerned citizens from no particular political or social group, but we’re fortunate to include many experts among our leaders and advisors. Executive Director, Dr. G. Alan Robison, is a National Academy of Sciences award winning pharmacologist, Dr. Fred Murad recently won the Nobel prize for medicine and Dr. Susan Robbins teaches a national award-winning TV course on “Drugs and Society.” We work closely with many other experts here and around the world. We welcome you to join us. This booklet addresses one element of drug policy, the use of marijuana as medicine. Federal policy seems oddly schizophrenic in that since 1978 the federal government has grown, and mailed some 300 marijuana cigarettes a month to a handful of patients who had to prove to the satisfaction of three government agencies (DEA, FDA and NIDA) that marijuana was an essential element in their treatment, yet has closed the program to new entrants since 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • America the Beautiful Part 1
    America the Beautiful Part 1 Charlene Notgrass 1 America the Beautiful Part 1 by Charlene Notgrass ISBN 978-1-60999-141-8 Copyright © 2020 Notgrass Company. All rights reserved. All product names, brands, and other trademarks mentioned or pictured in this book are used for educational purposes only. No association with or endorsement by the owners of the trademarks is intended. Each trademark remains the property of its respective owner. Unless otherwise noted, scripture quotations are taken from the New American Standard Bible®, Copyright © 1960, 1962, 1963, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995 by the Lockman Foundation. All rights reserved. Used by permission. Cover Images: Jordan Pond, Maine, background by Dave Ashworth / Shutterstock.com; Deer’s Hair by George Catlin / Smithsonian American Art Museum; Young Girl and Dog by Percy Moran / Smithsonian American Art Museum; William Lee from George Washington and William Lee by John Trumbull / Metropolitan Museum of Art. Back Cover Author Photo: Professional Portraits by Kevin Wimpy The image on the preceding page is of Denali in Denali National Park. No part of this material may be reproduced without permission from the publisher. You may not photocopy this book. If you need additional copies for children in your family or for students in your group or classroom, contact Notgrass History to order them. Printed in the United States of America. Notgrass History 975 Roaring River Rd. Gainesboro, TN 38562 1-800-211-8793 notgrass.com Thunder Rocks, Allegany State Park, New York Dear Student When God created the land we call America, He sculpted and painted a masterpiece.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: Federalists and Republicans, 1789-1816
    Unit The Young Republic 1789–1850 CHAPTER 4 Federalists and Republicans 1789–1816 CHAPTER 5 Growth and Division 1816–1832 CHAPTER 6 The Spirit of Reform 1828–1845 CHAPTER 7 Manifest Destiny 1840–1848 Why It Matters Internal improvements and industrial development began to transform the United States in the early 1800s, but these changes also highlighted the growing differences between the North and South and set the stage for civil war. At the same time, Americans fought a war with Mexico and continued to expand west, building a nation that stretched from the Atlantic to the Pacific. 150 Winterthur Museum The bustle and excitement of an Election Day in Philadelphia in the early 1800s 151 Chapter FFederalistsederalists andand Republicans 1789–1816 SECTION 1 Washington and Congress SECTION 2 Partisan Politics SECTION 3 Jefferson in Office SECTION 4 The War of 1812 This detail from Jean Leon Gerome Ferris’s painting Washington’s Inauguration at Independence Hall, 1793 shows Washington being greeted by John Adams and Thomas Jefferson. 1804 • Lewis and Clark begin to explore the 1789 Louisiana Purchase • Washington Washington J. Adams Jefferson 1797–1801 1801–1809 becomes 1789–1797 1794 1803 president • Jay’s Treaty • Louisiana Purchase is signed doubles size of the nation U.S. PRESIDENTS U.S. EVENTS 1790 1795 1800 WORLD EVENTS 1789 1793 1798 • French • Louis XVI is • Quasi-War between Revolution guillotined during France and the US begins French Revolution begins 152 Chapter 4 Federalists and Republicans MAKING CONNECTIONS Why Do People Form Political Parties? The Constitution does not mention political parties, and the Founders thought they were a bad idea in a democ- racy, yet almost immediately after the federal govern- ment was created, political parties began to take shape.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gilder Lehrman Collection
    the Gilder Lehrman institute of american history the Gilder Lehrman institute of american history 19 west 44th street, suite 500 new york, ny 10036 646-366-9666 www.gilderlehrman.org Annual Report 2001 Board of Advisors Co-Chairmen Richard Gilder Lewis E. Lehrman President James G. Basker Executive Director Lesley S. Herrmann Advisory Board Dear Board Members and Friends, Joyce O. Appleby, Professor of History Emerita, James O. Horton, Benjamin Banneker Professor University of California Los Angeles of American Studies and History, George We present the Institute’s annual report for 2001, a year in which William F. Baker, President, Channel Thirteen/WNET Washington University Thomas H. Bender, University Professor of the Kenneth T. Jackson, Jacques Barzun Professor the study of American history took on a new importance. Our Humanities, New York University of History, Columbia University and President, activities continue to expand, and we look forward to significant Lewis W. Bernard, Chairman, Classroom Inc. New-York Historical Society David W. Blight, Class of 1959 Professor of History Daniel P. Jordan, President, Thomas Jefferson growth in 2002. and Black Studies, Amherst College Memorial Foundation Gabor S. Boritt, Robert C. Fluhrer Professor of David M. Kennedy, Donald J. McLachlan Professor Civil War Studies, Gettysburg College of History, Stanford University (co-chair, Advisory Board) Roger G. Kennedy, Director Emeritus, Richard Brookhiser, Senior Editor, National Review National Park Service James G. Basker Lesley S. Herrmann Kenneth L. Burns, Filmmaker Roger Kimball, Managing Editor, The New Criterion President Executive Director David B. Davis, Sterling Professor of History Emeritus, Richard C. Levin, President, Yale University Yale University (co-chair, Advisory Board) James M.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Jefferson
    WRITING the DECLARATION 0. WRITING the DECLARATION - Story Preface 1. A BOY'S LIFE 2. TREASURES ... LOST and FOUND 3. EARLY INFLUENCES 4. TOM'S MOUNTAIN 5. A WRITER not a SPEAKER 6. WE ARE ALL BORN FREE 7. THE DECLARATION HOUSE 8. SLAVERY and the DECLARATION 9. WRITING the DECLARATION 10. DECLARATION of INDEPENDENCE 11. IMMEDIATE IMPACT 12. TIME WASTES TOO FAST 13. A MAN of CONTRADICTIONS 14. JEFFERSONIAN QUOTES 15. A SPECIAL 4TH OF JULY This image - from a postcard based on the oil-on-canvas painting by Jean Leon Gerome Ferris (1863-1930) - depicts what it may have been like to watch Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson assessing, and editing, Jefferson's draft of the Declaration of Independence. Online, courtesy Library of Congress. As Jefferson created the document which became America's creed, how much time did he spend on his project? Where did he find words like "the pursuit of happiness?" He greatly respected John Locke, whose Second Treatise of Civil Government (see, for example, chapter 2, section 5) addresses mankind's natural rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of property. He thought Discourses Concerning Government (by Algernon Sidney) - which disputes the "natural power" of kings - "is probably the best elementary book of the principles of government." (See Jefferson's December 13, 1804 letter to Mason Weems.) And ... he admired the philosophy of Scotsman Henry Home (Lord Kames) whose book of essays on morality is one of the few which Jefferson personally annotated. Widely read, Jefferson absorbed the concepts of such writers and merged what he found useful with his own thinking.
    [Show full text]
  • The Citizen's Almanac
    M-76 (rev. 09/14) n 1876, to commemorate 100 years of independence from Great Britain, Archibald M. Willard presented his painting, Spirit of ‘76, Iat the U.S. Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia, PA. The painting depicts three generations of Americans fighting for their new nation’s freedom, one of whom is marching along though slightly wounded in battle. Willard’s powerful portrayal of the strength and determination of the American people in the face of overwhelming odds inspired millions. The painting quickly became one of the most popular patriotic images in American history. This depiction of courage and character still resonates today as the Spirit of ‘76 lives on in our newest Americans. “Spirit of ‘76” (1876) by Archibald M. Willard. Courtesy of the National Archives, NARA File # 148-GW-1209 The Citizen’s Almanac FUNDAMENTAL DOCUMENTS, SYMBOLS, AND ANTHEMS OF THE UNITED STATES U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL EDITION NOTICE Use of ISBN This is the Official U.S. Government edition of this publication and is herein identified to certify its authenticity. Use of the ISBN 978-0-16-078003-5 is for U.S. Government Printing Office Official Editions only. The Superintendent of Documents of the U.S. Government Printing Office requests that any reprinted edition clearly be labeled as a copy of the authentic work with a new ISBN. The information presented in The Citizen’s Almanac is considered public information and may be distributed or copied without alteration unless otherwise specified. The citation should be: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Office of Citizenship, The Citizen’s Almanac, Washington, DC, 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • George Washington: a New Man for a New Century
    GEORGE WASHINGTON: A NEW MAN FOR A NEW CENTURY By Barry Schwartz George Washington never tolerated the notion, flaunted by some of his successors in the Presidential chair that the voice of the people, whatever its tone or its message, is the voice of God; nor was his political philosophy summed up in “keeping his ear to the ground, ” in order to catch from afar the ramblings of popular approval or dissent.... Will any one say that there is no need of such men now, or that the common people would not hear them gladly if once it were known that they dwelt among us? —The Nation, 18891 Every conception of the past is construed from the standpoint of the concerns and needs of the present.”2 Could the sociologist George Herbert Mead’s statement be applied to George Washington at the 1899 centennial of his death? Was Washington the same man at the turn of the twentieth century, when America was becoming an industrial democracy, as he was at the turn of the nineteenth, when the nation was still a rural republic? The title of the present essay suggests that the question has already been answered, but the matter is more complex than that. Because any historical object appears differently against a new background, Washington’s character and achievements necessarily assumed new meaning from the Jacksonian era and Civil War through the Industrial Revolution. Washington’s changing image, however, is only one part of this story. Focusing on the first two decades of the twentieth century, the other part of the story—“Washington’s unchanging image”—must also be considered.
    [Show full text]
  • National Review Commentary What Is
    National Review Commentary What Is Conservatism? By Lee Edwards The National Review Institute, led by the redoubtable Lindsay Craig, has been engaged in a praiseworthy project these past five years, sponsoring a “rigorous examination” of conservative principles for mid-career professionals who want a deeper understanding of conservatism. Leading the discussions over the course of eight dinner seminars are such knowledgeable conservatives as Victor Davis Hanson, Jonah Goldberg, Richard Brookhiser, Dan Mahoney, and Kathryn Lopez. I have been privileged to kick off the series in New York City, Washington, D.C., Dallas, San Francisco, and Philadelphia with a profile of the polymath founder of National Review—William F. Buckley Jr. In the Q and A that follows two questions are invariably asked by the participants who are lawyers, educators, government employees, physicians, entrepreneurs, even pastors. The first usually comes half-way through the discussion: “Is there anyone on the scene today who will be the next Bill Buckley?” I decline to be pinned down to one name but point to dynamic young speakers like Ben Shapiro and Matthew Continetti and insightful editors like Yuval Levin and Dan McCarthy. When pressed I will respond that Bill Buckley was sui generis and it is unlikely we will see his like again. But, I am quick to add, there are a goodly number of conservatives under 40 whose talents in sum are equal to the man who more than anyone else made the modern conservative movement. The second question usually comes toward the end of the dinner: “What is conservatism?” Most of the NRI Fellows live in a hostile liberal world in which they are challenged to justify their positions philosophically.
    [Show full text]
  • America the Beautiful Part 1
    America the Beautiful Part 1 Charlene Notgrass 1 America the Beautiful Part 1 by Charlene Notgrass ISBN 978-1-60999-141-8 Copyright © 2021 Notgrass History. All rights reserved. All product names, brands, and other trademarks mentioned or pictured in this book are used for educational purposes only. No association with or endorsement by the owners of the trademarks is intended. Each trademark remains the property of its respective owner. Unless otherwise noted, scripture quotations are taken from the New American Standard Bible®, Copyright © 1960, 1962, 1963, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995 by the Lockman Foundation. All rights reserved. Used by permission. Cover Images: Jordan Pond, Maine, background by Dave Ashworth / Shutterstock.com; Deer’s Hair by George Catlin / Smithsonian American Art Museum; Young Girl and Dog by Percy Moran / Smithsonian American Art Museum; William Lee from George Washington and William Lee by John Trumbull / Metropolitan Museum of Art. Back Cover Author Photo: Professional Portraits by Kevin Wimpy The image on the preceding page is of Denali in Denali National Park. No part of this material may be reproduced without permission from the publisher. You may not photocopy this book. If you need additional copies for children in your family or for students in your group or classroom, contact Notgrass History to order them. Printed in the United States of America. Notgrass History Gainesboro, TN 1-800-211-8793 notgrass.com Tennessee America the Beautiful Part 1 Introduction Dear Student .....................................................................................................................................vii
    [Show full text]
  • ADDRESS: 1523 CHESTNUT ST Name of Resource: Love Building Proposed Action: Designation Property Owner: 1523 Chestnut Associates
    ADDRESS: 1523 CHESTNUT ST Name of Resource: Love Building Proposed Action: Designation Property Owner: 1523 Chestnut Associates Nominator: Center City Residents’ Association Staff Contact: Meredith Keller, [email protected] OVERVIEW: This nomination proposes to designate the Love Building at 1523 Chestnut Street and list it on the Philadelphia Register of Historic Places. The nomination contends that the property satisfies Criteria for Designation A and J. Under Criteria A and J, the nomination contends that the property is significant for its association with the Red Rose Girls, an enclave of notable female artists important in LGBTQ history that included Jessie Willcox Smith, Elizabeth Shippen Green, Violet Oakley, and others. The nomination contends that the women maintained studios in the building during their formative years as artists and became significant contributors to the golden age of American illustration at a time when Philadelphia served as a national center for that industry. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the nomination demonstrates that the property at 1523 Chestnut Street satisfies Criteria for Designation A and J. 1. ADDRESS OF HISTORIC RESOURCE (must comply with an Office of Property Assessment address) Street address: 1523 Chestnut Street Postal code: 19102 2. NAME OF HISTORIC RESOURCE Historic Name: The Love Building Current Name: Unknown 3. TYPE OF HISTORIC RESOURCE Building Structure Site Object 4. PROPERTY INFORMATION Condition: excellent good fair poor ruins Occupancy: occupied vacant under construction unknown Current use: Commercial 5. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION Please attach a narrative description and site/plot plan of the resource’s boundaries. 6. DESCRIPTION Please attach a narrative description and photographs of the resource’s physical appearance, site, setting, and surroundings.
    [Show full text]
  • Founding Father: Rediscovering George Washington'
    H-Pol Furlong on Brookhiser, 'Founding Father: Rediscovering George Washington' Review published on Friday, August 1, 1997 Richard Brookhiser. Founding Father: Rediscovering George Washington. New York: Free Press, 1997. 230 pp. $14.00 (paper), ISBN 978-0-684-83142-8. Reviewed by Pat Furlong (Indiana University South Bend) Published on H-Pol (August, 1997) George Washington Rediscovered Why another book about George Washington? Brookhiser is a magazine editor and columnist, not a professor of history or political science. He writes for citizens for whom Washington exists "in our textbooks and our wallets, but not our hearts" (p. 4). The reserve Washington so carefully cultivated made him a remote figure even to eighteenth-century Americans. Brookhiser writes to overcome the barriers of time and personality, to explain why modern Americans should appreciate Washington's greatness, stating that "His life still has the power to inspire anyone who studies it" (p. 13). This brief work is not a conventional biography, and it makes no effort to tell the full story of Washington's life. Brookhiser is sometimes careless with the fine points of historical accuracy, but in its major themes this is a fascinating book for mature readers, but probably not for college students. In his episodic account of Washington's public life, Brookhiser concentrates on his careers as general, constitution-maker, and president. He describes a politician more thoughtful than many imagine, a "founding father" who had the remarkable good sense to retire twice at the right moment, from the army in 1783 and from the presidency in 1797. What other revolutionary hero ever published a farewell address? Washington, aristocratic in manner and patriarchal in many ways, trusted his fellow citizens to manage without his leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Creating a Nation, Beginnings to 1789
    A Nation is Born Beginnings–1900 hy It Matters The history of the United States of America W begins with the decision of the thirteen English colonies to rebel against Britain. After emerging victorious from the Revolutionary War, the United States created a new form of govern- ment. The new republic struggled to balance federal versus states’ rights as the nation grew in size and the North and South divided over the issue of slavery. Unable to reconcile these differences, the country fought the Civil War. After a difficult period of reunification, the United States expanded across the continent Declaration of Independence and developed its industrial economy. As the twentieth century approached, a modern United States prepared to face a new century. The following resources offer more information about this period in American history. Primary Sources Library See pages 974–975 for primary source readings to accompany Unit 1. Use the American History Primary Washington’s Inauguration Source Document Library CD-ROM to find at Independence Hall additional primary sources about events in by Jean Leon Gérôme Ferris, 1793 early America. 92 “The country shall be independent, and we will be satisfied with nothing short of it.” —Samuel Adams, 1774 Lora Robins Collection of Virginia Art, Virginia Historical Society Beginnings to 1789 Creating a Nation . The Big Ideas , SECTION 1: Converging Cultures Societies change over time. European settlers established colonies in lands inhabited by Native Americans and developed new forms of government. SECTION 2: Dissent and Independence The quest for equality is eternal. American colonists developed an independent spirit, began to resent Britain’s mercantilist policies and tightening control, and fought a war for independence.
    [Show full text]