DOCSLIB.ORG

Nevada 2014 Water Quality Integrated Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nevada 2014 Water Quality Integrated Report Nevada 2014 Water Quality Integgrated Report Assessment Period - October 1, 2007 through September 30, 2012 Prepared in accordance with thee requirements of Sections 303(d)/305(b)/314 of the Clean Wateer Act December 2016 Kings River in the Bllack Rock Desert Region Nevada Division of Environmental Protecction Bureau of Water Quality Planning [This page intentionally left blank] Nevada 2014 Water Quality Integrated Report Table of Contents Section 1.0 - Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 Section 2.0 - Background ................................................................................................................ 1 2.1 Topography and Hydrogeography ....................................................................................... 1 2.2 Climate and Precipitation ..................................................................................................... 1 2.3 Surface Water ...................................................................................................................... 2 Section 3.0 - Water Quality Control Programs ............................................................................... 5 3.1 Water Quality Standards ...................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Nevada’s Water Pollution Control Program for Point Source Discharges. ......................... 5 3.3 Nonpoint Source Pollution Management Program .............................................................. 6 3.4 Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund ............................................................................ 7 3.5 Total Maximum Daily Load Program ................................................................................. 7 Section 4.0 - Surface Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment ................................................. 9 4.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 9 4.2 Data Sources ......................................................................................................................... 9 4.3 NDEP Monitoring Data ..................................................................................................... 12 4.4 Other Sources of Monitoring Data ..................................................................................... 12 4.5 Assessment Methodology .................................................................................................. 14 Section 5.0 Assessment Results ................................................................................................... 21 5.1 Category Summary ............................................................................................................ 21 5.2 Beneficial Use Summary ................................................................................................... 24 5.3 Category 5 Waters (303(d) List) ........................................................................................ 26 5.4 Delisted Waters .................................................................................................................. 27 5.5 TMDLs ............................................................................................................................... 29 Section 6.0 - Public Participation .................................................................................................. 29 Section 7.0 - References ............................................................................................................... 30 Nevada 2014 Water Quality Integrated Report Page i December 2016 List of Tables Table 1. Summary of Nevada Waterbodies ................................................................................... 4 Table 2. Sources of Data Used for the 2014 Integrated Report ................................................... 13 Table 3. Minimum Number of Exceedances to Categorize a Standard as Not Met .................... 16 Table 4. Summary of Waterbody Segments Evaluated in the 2014 Integrated Report ............... 21 Table 5. Summary of Assessment Results – Streams .................................................................. 23 Table 6. Summary of Assessment Results – Lakes and Reservoirs ............................................ 23 Table 7. Summary of Assessment Results – Wetlands ................................................................ 24 Table 8. Summary of Beneficial Use Status for Streams ............................................................. 25 Table 9. Summary of Beneficial Use Status for Lakes and Reservoirs ....................................... 25 Table 10. Summary of Beneficial Use Status for Wetlands ........................................................ 26 Table 11. Summary of Category 5 waters ................................................................................... 26 Table 12. Causes of Impairment (Category 5 - 303(d) List) ........................................................ 27 List of Figures Figure 1. Nevada Hydrographic Regions and Basins .................................................................... 3 Figure 2. Water Quality Sample Sites Used in the 2014 Integrated Report ................................ 11 Figure 3. Waters Assessed for the 2014 Integrated Report ......................................................... 22 List of Attachments Attachment 1 – List of Waterbodies Included in the 2014 Integrated Report Attachment 2 – Assessment Sampling Stations Attachment 3(a & b) – 2014 Waterbody Assessment Results Attachment 4 – Category 5 Waters (303(d) List) Attachment 5 – Delisted Waters Attachment 6 – EPA Approved TMDL List Nevada 2014 Water Quality Integrated Report Page ii December 2016 Abbreviations and Acronyms The following abbreviation and acronyms appear throughout this document and the Attachments: A Acres AA Annual Average ADB Assessment Database AGM Annual Geometric Mean AQL Aquatic Life BLM United States Bureau of Land Management BWQP Bureau of Water Quality Planning CFR Code of Federal Regulations CORPS United States Army Corps of Engineers CWA Clean Water Act DRI Desert Research Institute EAV Water of Extraordinary Ecological or Aesthetic Value EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency EWQ Enhancement of Water Quality F Fully Supporting °F Degrees Fahrenheit FC Fish Consumption FDA United States Food and Drug Administration FM Freshwater Marsh I Insufficient Information IND Industrial Supply IR Integrated Report IRR Irrigation MCL Maximum Contaminant Limit MDS Municipal or Domestic Supply MGD Million gallons per day N Not Supporting NAC Nevada Administrative Code NDBU No Designated Beneficial Use NDEP Nevada Division of Environmental Protection NDPBH Nevada Division of Public and Behavioral Health NDOW Nevada Department of Wildlife NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPS Nonpoint source NRS Nevada Revised Statute PWL Propagation of Wildlife RMHQ Requirement to Maintain Higher Quality RNC Recreation Not Involving Contact with Water RWC Recreation Involving Contact with Water TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load TMWRF Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility USGS United States Geological Survey X Not Assessed WLS Watering of Livestock WQS Water Quality Standard Nevada 2014 Water Quality Integrated Report Page iii December 2016 [This page intentionally left blank] Nevada 2014 Water Quality Integrated Report Page iv December 2016 Section 1.0 - Introduction In 1972, Congress passed Public Law 92-500, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, commonly known as the Clean Water Act (CWA). The goal of the act is to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s surface waters. The Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) implements the CWA in Nevada with oversight from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). CWA Sections 303(d) and 305(b) require states to prepare and submit biennial reports to EPA. The 305(b) Report is an overall assessment of surface water quality within the state and describes the extent to which current conditions provide for the protection of beneficial uses of the waters. The 303(d) Report is a list of waters that are not meeting state water quality standards, known as the 303(d) List of Impaired Waters. EPA must review and approve or disapprove the 303(d) List. CWA Section 303(d) also requires that states develop a water quality control plan or total maximum daily load (TMDL) for waters on the 303(d) List. In 2006 and subsequent years, EPA issued guidance recommending that states prepare a combined or integrated 303(d)/305(b) report. NDEP has developed integrated reports for the 2008-2010, 2012 and 2014 reporting cycles. The 2014 Integrated Report assesses water quality data collected from October 1, 2007 through September 30, 2012. The 2014 Integrated Report is intended as a planning tool for use by NDEP, public agencies and the general public to manage and protect the quality of Nevada’s surface water resources. Section 2.0 - Background 2.1 Topography and Hydrogeography Nevada is characterized by isolated, long, narrow, roughly parallel mountain ranges and broad, intervening, near flat valleys and basins. The spectacular magnitude of alternating mountain ranges and valleys prompted the often used designation “Basin and Range Province” for most of Nevada. For water planning and management purposes, the U.S. Geological
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2007 Lake Monitoring Report Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program SWIM Phase I Part 2-CO
    2007 Lake Monitoring Report Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program SWIM Phase I Part 2-CO Prepared by: David Buetow Final Report for FY2007-2008 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND The Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program (MCWQP) has an ongoing program to monitor the water quality in the three Catawba Lakes bordering the county: Lake Norman, Mountain Island Lake and Lake Wylie. Samples are also routinely collected at the two water bodies in the northern end of Mecklenburg County cut off from Lake Norman proper by I-77: Lake Cornelius and Lake Davidson. Data collected from all lake sites are used to screen for environmental problems using MCWQP Action and Watch levels for various pollutants and also to rate the overall water quality at sampling locations in the lakes using a water quality index. Additional objectives are to describe seasonal trends and address spatial variability in the data. This report presents the lake monitoring data for the calendar year 2007 ACTIVITIES AND METHODS Regular monthly lake sampling was conducted at seven locations in Lake Norman and one location each on Lake Cornelius and Lake Davidson (Appendix A), ten locations in Mountain Island Lake (Appendix B) and eight sampling locations in Lake Wylie (Appendix C). In May 2007, the sampling program was changed in Lake Wylie to add several new cove monitoring sites. This resulted in an increase in regular sampling sites in Lake Wylie from eight to thirteen (Appendix D). Lakes Norman, Wylie and Mountain Island were sampled monthly from May through September and every other month during the rest of the year, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Throwing Distance and Competitive Performance of Boccia Players
    J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 32: 574–577, 2020 The Journal of Physical Therapy Science Original Article Throwing distance and competitive performance of Boccia players Masataka Kataoka, PhD1)*, Kuniharu Okuda, PhD1), Akira Iwata, PhD1), Shuji Imura, MS1), Kosuke Yahagi, MS1), Yohei Matsuo2) 1) Graduate School of Comprehensive Rehabilitation, Osaka Prefecture University: 3-7-30 Habikino, Habikino-city, Osaka 583-8555, Japan 2) Fukushima Rehabilitation Center for Children, Japan Abstract. [Purpose] This study aimed to clarify the relationship between throwing distance and competitive performance in Boccia players in order to establish a training program based on this evidence. [Participants and Methods] In total, 40 athletes, who competed in the Japan Boccia Championships and are certified players of the Japan Boccia Association, participated in the study. Participants threw the Boccia ball as far as possible, and throw- ing distances were compared between certified players (Group I, n=8), those who participated in the final round (Group II, n=9), and those who lost in the preliminary round (Group III, n=23). [Results] The maximum throwing distances were 16.38 ± 5.17 m (Group I), 10.67 ± 2.66 m (Group II), and 8.34 ± 2.73 m (Group III). Group I threw the ball significantly farther than Groups II and III. [Conclusion] Boccia is a target sport and throwing farther distances requires more effort. In addition, being able to throw at a longer distance means that Boccia players can throw a stronger ball and use this for various tactics. The results of this study suggest that long-distance throwing training would be effective in improving the competitive performance of Boccia players.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification Made Easy Class 1
    Classification Made Easy Class 1 (CP1) The most severely disabled athletes belong to this classification. These athletes are dependent on a power wheelchair or assistance for mobility. They have severe limitation in both the arms and the legs and have very poor trunk control. Sports Available: • Race Runner (RR1) – using the Race Runner frame to run, track events include 100m, 200m and 400m. • Boccia o Boccia Class 1 (BC1) – players who fit into this category can throw the ball onto the court or a CP2 Lower who chooses to push the ball with the foot. Each BC1 athlete has a sport assistant on court with them. o Boccia Class 3 (BC3) – players who fit into this category cannot throw the ball onto the court and have no sustained grasp or release action. They will use a “chute” or “ramp” with the help from their sport assistant to propel the ball. They may use head or arm pointers to hold and release the ball. Players with a impairment of a non cerebral origin, severely affecting all four limbs, are included in this class. Class 2 (CP2) These athletes have poor strength or control all limbs but are able to propel a wheelchair. Some Class 2 athletes can walk but can never run functionally. The class 2 athletes can throw a ball but demonstrates poor grasp and release. Sports Available: • Race Runner (RR2) - using the Race Runner frame to run, track events include 100m, 200m and 400m. • Boccia o Boccia Class 2 (BC2) – players can throw the ball into the court consistently and do not need on court assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • (VA) Veteran Monthly Assistance Allowance for Disabled Veterans
    Revised May 23, 2019 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Veteran Monthly Assistance Allowance for Disabled Veterans Training in Paralympic and Olympic Sports Program (VMAA) In partnership with the United States Olympic Committee and other Olympic and Paralympic entities within the United States, VA supports eligible service and non-service-connected military Veterans in their efforts to represent the USA at the Paralympic Games, Olympic Games and other international sport competitions. The VA Office of National Veterans Sports Programs & Special Events provides a monthly assistance allowance for disabled Veterans training in Paralympic sports, as well as certain disabled Veterans selected for or competing with the national Olympic Team, as authorized by 38 U.S.C. 322(d) and Section 703 of the Veterans’ Benefits Improvement Act of 2008. Through the program, VA will pay a monthly allowance to a Veteran with either a service-connected or non-service-connected disability if the Veteran meets the minimum military standards or higher (i.e. Emerging Athlete or National Team) in his or her respective Paralympic sport at a recognized competition. In addition to making the VMAA standard, an athlete must also be nationally or internationally classified by his or her respective Paralympic sport federation as eligible for Paralympic competition. VA will also pay a monthly allowance to a Veteran with a service-connected disability rated 30 percent or greater by VA who is selected for a national Olympic Team for any month in which the Veteran is competing in any event sanctioned by the National Governing Bodies of the Olympic Sport in the United State, in accordance with P.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryo-EM Structures of Respiratory Bc1-Cbb3 Type CIII2CIV Super-Complex and Electronic Communication Between the Complexes
    Cryo-EM Structures of Respiratory bc1-cbb3 type CIII2CIV Super-complex and Electronic Communication Between the Complexes Stefan Steimle1, Trevor VanEeuwen2, Yavuz Ozturk1, #, Hee Jong Kim2, Merav Braitbard3, Nur Selamoglu1, Benjamin A. Garcia4, Dina Schneidman-Duhovny3, Kenji Murakami4,* and Fevzi Daldal1,* 1Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104; 2Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics Graduate Group, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; #Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Albert Ludwigs University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; 3School of Computer Science and Engineering, Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 9190401, Israel and 4Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 Running title: Bacterial respiratory cytochrome bc1-cbb3 supercomplex Key words: cytochrome bc1 or Complex III; Cytochrome cbb3 oxidase or Complex IV; respiratory super-complex; electron carrier cytochrome c; membrane-anchored cytochrome cy; soluble cytochrome c2; Rhodobacter capsulatus; respiratory electron transport chain *Corresponding authors: Fevzi Daldal: [email protected] Phone: +1 215 898-4394 Kenji Murakami: [email protected] Phone: +1 215 573-1125 1 Methods Bacterial strains and growth conditions Bacterial strains and plasmids used are listed in Table S1. LB medium supplemented as appropriate with ampicillin, gentamicin, kanamycin or tetracycline at 100, 12, 50 or 12.5 μg/mL, respectively, was used for growing E. coli strains at 37 °C (Darrouzet and Daldal, 2002). R. capsulatus strains were grown chemoheterotrophically under semi-aerobic/dark conditions at 35 °C on enriched (MPYE) medium, supplemented as needed with gentamicin, kanamycin, spectinomycin, or tetracycline at 3, 10, 10 or 2.5 μg/mL, respectively (Davidson et al., 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Tps2583x-Q1 USB Type-C and BC1.2 5-V 3.5-A Output, 36-V Input Synchronous Step-Down DC/DC Regulator with Cable Compensation
    TPS25830-Q1, TPS25831-Q1 www.ti.com SLVSDP6F – JUNETPS25830-Q1, 2018 – REVISED TPS25831-Q1 AUGUST 2020 SLVSDP6F – JUNE 2018 – REVISED AUGUST 2020 TPS2583x-Q1 USB Type-C and BC1.2 5-V 3.5-A Output, 36-V Input Synchronous Step-Down DC/DC Regulator with Cable Compensation 1 Features –VBUS Short-to-VBAT protection – DP_IN and DM_IN Short-to-VBAT and VBUS • AEC-Q100 Qualified for automotive applications: – CC1 and CC2 Short-to-VBAT protection – Temperature grade 1: –40°C to +125°C, TA – DP_IN, DM_IN, CCx IEC 61000-4-2 rated – HBM ESD classification level H2 • ±8kV Contact and ±15kV air discharge – CDM ESD classification level C5 • Fault flag reports • Functional Safety-Capable • 32-Pin QFN package with Wettable Flank – Documentation available to aid functional safety system design 2 Applications • Synchronous buck DC/DC regulator • Automotive Infotainment – Input voltage range: 4.5 V to 36 V • USB Media Hubs – Output current: 3.5 A • USB Charger Ports – 5.1-V Output voltage with ±1% accuracy 3 Description – Current mode control – Adjustable frequency: 300 kHz to 2.2 MHz The TPS2583x-Q1 is a USB Type-C and BC1.2 charging port controller that includes a synchronous – Frequency synchronization to external clock DC/DC converter. With cable droop compensation, – FPWM with spread-spectrum dithering the VBUS voltage remains constant regardless of load – Internal compensation for ease of use current, ensuring connected portable devices are • Compliant to USB-IF standards charged at optimal current and voltage. – USB Type-C Rev 1.3 The TPS2583x-Q1 also integrates short to battery • CC logic, VCONN source and discharge protection on VBUS, CC1, CC2, DM_IN and DP_IN • USB cable polarity detection ( POL) pins.
    [Show full text]
  • UMTS); LTE; E-UTRA, UTRA and GSM/EDGE; Multi-Standard Radio (MSR) Base Station (BS) Radio Transmission and Reception (3GPP TS 37.104 Version 9.5.0 Release 9)
    ETSI TS 137 104 V9.5.0 (2011-06) Technical Specification Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; E-UTRA, UTRA and GSM/EDGE; Multi-Standard Radio (MSR) Base Station (BS) radio transmission and reception (3GPP TS 37.104 version 9.5.0 Release 9) 3GPP TS 37.104 version 9.5.0 Release 9 1 ETSI TS 137 104 V9.5.0 (2011-06) Reference RTS/TSGR-0437104v950 Keywords GSM, LTE, UMTS ETSI 650 Route des Lucioles F-06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex - FRANCE Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16 Siret N° 348 623 562 00017 - NAF 742 C Association à but non lucratif enregistrée à la Sous-Préfecture de Grasse (06) N° 7803/88 Important notice Individual copies of the present document can be downloaded from: http://www.etsi.org The present document may be made available in more than one electronic version or in print. In any case of existing or perceived difference in contents between such versions, the reference version is the Portable Document Format (PDF). In case of dispute, the reference shall be the printing on ETSI printers of the PDF version kept on a specific network drive within ETSI Secretariat. Users of the present document should be aware that the document may be subject to revision or change of status. Information on the current status of this and other ETSI documents is available at http://portal.etsi.org/tb/status/status.asp If you find errors in the present document, please send your comment to one of the following services: http://portal.etsi.org/chaircor/ETSI_support.asp Copyright Notification No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Bisfed International Boccia Rules 2018 –
    BISFed International Boccia Rules 2018 – v.3 English Rules to be used at all BISFed sanctioned events BISFed International Boccia Rules – 2018 (v.3) ________________________________________________________________________________________ Changes for V.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Changes made in the rulebook are highlighted in red. Most, but not necessarily all of the changes are summarized here 1 Definitions – some updates in the chart – added more definitions. Specifically defined “tournament’ and “competition” 3.2 removed “A Pair BC3 must include at least one athlete with CP on court at all times”. Deleted 3.4 and combined it with rule 10.8. 3.4.7 wording change to reflect electronic score sheet. 3.5 no touching whatsoever; added reference number 15.8.5. 4 added the need to have documented classification approval for gloves. Changed “competition” to “tournament”. Added “wheelchairs”. 4.7.2.3 clarified “up to three attempts”. Roll test device – use angle finder to confirm angle of 25 degrees (+/-0.5). 4.7.2.5 changed “competition” to “tournament”. 5.2 added “A fixed or temporary accessory attachment on the ramp may not be used for sighting/aiming/orienting the ramp”. 5.4 added “(ref.: 15.8.4 the pointer must be attached directly to the athlete's head, mouth or arm)”. 5.5 reworded and clarified swinging the ramp prior to first throws and when returning from playing area. 5.7 added “one”. 8.3 corresponding bib number. 8.9 added “and classification documentation”. 9.1 & 9.2 changed “competition” to “tournament”. 9.2 & 15.9.2 confiscated “extra balls”, if otherwise legal, may be used in ensuing competitions at the same tournament.
    [Show full text]
  • Doping Control Guide for Testing Athletes in Para Sport
    DOPING CONTROL GUIDE FOR TESTING ATHLETES IN PARA SPORT JULY 2021 INTERNATIONAL PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE 2 1 INTRODUCTION This guide is intended for athletes, anti-doping organisations and sample collection personnel who are responsible for managing the sample collection process – and other organisations or individuals who have an interest in doping control in Para sport. It provides advice on how to prepare for and manage the sample collection process when testing athletes who compete in Para sport. It also provides information about the Para sport classification system (including the types of impairments) and the types of modifications that may be required to complete the sample collection process. Appendix 1 details the classification system for those sports that are included in the Paralympic programme – and the applicable disciplines that apply within the doping control setting. The International Paralympic Committee’s (IPC’s) doping control guidelines outlined, align with Annex A Modifications for Athletes with Impairments of the World Anti-Doping Agency’s International Standard for Testing and Investigations (ISTI). It is recommended that anti-doping organisations (and sample collection personnel) follow these guidelines when conducting testing in Para sport. 2 DISABILITY & IMPAIRMENT In line with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), ‘disability’ is a preferred word along with the usage of the term ‘impairment’, which refers to the classification system and the ten eligible impairments that are recognised in Para sports. The IPC uses the first-person language, i.e., addressing the athlete first and then their disability. As such, the right term encouraged by the IPC is ‘athlete or person with disability’.
    [Show full text]
  • Publication 938 (Rev. December 1997)
    Publication 938 Introduction (Rev. December 1997) This publication contains directories relating Department Cat. No. 10647L to real estate mortgage investment conduits of the (REMICs) and collateralized debt obligations Treasury (CDOs). The directory for each calendar quarter is based on information submitted to Internal Real Estate the Internal Revenue Service during that Revenue quarter. This publication is only available on Service the IRS electronic bulletin board and the Internet. Mortgage For each quarter, there is: • A directory of new REMICs and CDOs, Investment and • A section containing amended listings. Conduits You can use the directory to find the repre- sentative of the REMIC or the issuer of the CDO from whom you can request tax infor- mation. The amended listing section shows (REMICs) changes to previously listed REMICs and CDOs. The directory for each calendar quarter Reporting will be added to this publication approximately six weeks after the end of the quarter. Other information. Publication 550, Invest- Information ment Income and Expenses, discusses the tax treatment that applies to holders of these (And Other investment products. For other information about REMICs, see sections 860A through Collateralized Debt 860G of the Internal Revenue Code and any Obligations (CDOs)) regulations issued under those sections. Back issues. To get information for a REMIC or CDO with a startup/issue date prior to 1997 follow these procedures. Prior to 1996. Paper editions of Publica- tion 938 are available for periods prior to 1996. The November 1991 edition contains a complete directory of REMICs and CDOs with startup/issue dates before October 1, 1991. After that edition, yearly supplements were issued.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Scrapbook
    1 ' 1898 THE. COrRIER-.TOU"R XAL. l QUI ~YI I.. I.~E, SATURDAY J\lOHNING, JUNE U, :::::::: THE MEANING OF THE HONOR. Dr. Muthcws (!! Now Presidl!ttt of America' s Greatest Medical A~soclation end Otte of the Most Splendid Itt the World. P R.. JO!'IEPH 111. :l\1,\TIIF:WS. \ Pr. J011~ph M. :Matb~wF. o! this ell>"• who was t:!'N:ted l're~~I<'INit of tho American lt('dl nl Auoclntlon nt Dcmver Wrdn<:'11<l11~·. hns 111 that < r lion r('r lv~IJ ''"" o! the hllrh<llt I onon that <'an bt> JULl·1 a ph~slclnn, M t 1th• 15 a. r uonal t o<J~·: and rom· pr 'u~ Stlltr> nnd T~rrltory tn tbo Lnl<m. Dr, N. Srnn,, <'r C'hl go, wne the J t1!•lcl n• !1st :re r. and Dr. ::lternberg, ~urgC>on l.<!lt>rnl o! the nrtn>'• Is the r <'tlt•· lng Prt1111t>nt. Dr 1\l uthc" bns had mnny honors confcn'(!\1 llt•ort him In t ' •e pant, !Ill Is •·X· Pr~ clt nt of the lth!slssii•PI \all·~· lllu.llral A CH llltton. l'r<'Bll! r. t tlf ~~'•" h•mttH'ky St I• ~I• lcnl ~o • ty, I'r stcl~nt or tho Stut.:- Bon•·•! or Ht>:tll\1 .>! Kl'tltllel;> . nntl has tbl• ) r b n l'lnt \'It'< .Prt (l(·nt ot tho ,\ malcan Mcdknl ,\ssoclnt lo'll, till• grt>at 004) ot wN,..h h• hn Ju~t b' n d•·<·Lo•l l'ru;LI .
    [Show full text]
  • Sledge Hockey
    SLEDGE HOCKEY... PAST TO PRESENT HockeyCanada.ca/SledgeHockey Table of Contents Introduction .................................................3 Appendix 6. History of the Paralympic Games .......................12 Lesson 1. People With Disabilities .................................4 Appendix 7. About Sledge Hockey ................................13 Lesson 2. History of the Paralympic Games ..........................5 Appendix 8. Sledge Hockey Timeline ..............................14 Lesson 3. Computer Lab ........................................6 Appendix 9. World Sledge Hockey Challenge Schedule .................15 Lesson 4. Video: Sledhead ......................................6 Appendix 10. Resource Summary ................................15 Activity 1. Learn to Sledge.......................................7 Activity 2. See the Sport Live! ....................................7 Hockey Canada greatly acknowledges the following individuals for their contribu- Appendix 1 Specific Disabilities ..................................8 tion to the manual: Appendix 2. Inclusion and Equity..................................9 Todd Sargeant - President, Ontario Sledge Hockey Association / Chair, 2011 Appendix 3. The Role of Sport ....................................9 World Sledge Hockey Challenge Appendix 4. Sports of the Paralympics.............................10 Jackie Martin - Tourism London, Sport Tourism Assistant Appendix 5. The International Paralympic Committee ..................12 © Copyright 2011 by Hockey Canada HockeyCanada.ca/SledgeHockey
    [Show full text]