Commission on the Private Sec t o r Dev&el o p m e n t
R E P O R T TO THE SECRETA RY - G E N E R AL OF THE UNITED NA T I O N S
UNLEASHING EN T R E P R E N E U R S H I P
MAKING BUSINESS WORK FOR THE POOR Commission on the Private Sector Development&
REPORT TO THE SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE UNITED NATIONS
UNLEASHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP MAKING BUSINESS WORK FOR THE POOR 1 March 2004
The analysis and policy recommendations of this Report do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Development Programme, its Executive Board or the United Nations Member States. The Report is an independent publication by UNDP and reflects the views of the members of the Commission on the Private Sector and Development.
Copyright © 2004 United Nations Development Programme One United Nations Plaza, New York, NY 10017, USA
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without prior permission of UNDP. COMMISSION MEMBERS
CO-CHAIRS The Right Honourable Paul Martin Prime Minister, Canada Ernesto Zedillo Director,Yale University Center for the Study of Globalization Former President, Mexico
MEMBERS Eduardo Aninat (Chile) Alan Patricof (United States) Former Deputy Managing Director, Vice-Chairman and Founder, Apax Partners International Monetary Fund Kwame Pianim (Ghana) Jorge Castañeda (Mexico) CEO, New World Investments Former Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mexico C.K. Prahalad (United States) Distinguished Professor of Politics & Harvey C. Fruehauf Professor of Business Latin American Studies, New York University Administration, University of Michigan Luisa Diogo (Mozambique) Business School Minister of Planning and Finance, Mozambique Robert Rubin (United States) Carleton Fiorina (United States) Director and Chairman, President and CEO, Hewlett-Packard Company Executive Committee, Citigroup Former Secretary of the Treasury, United States Rajat Gupta (India) Senior Partner Worldwide, Miko Rwayitare (South Africa) McKinsey & Company President and Executive Chairman, Telecel International Anne Lauvergeon (France) Owner Mont Rochelle Winery Chairman of the Executive Board, Areva Group President and CEO, Cogema Juan Somavia (Chile) Director-General, Jannik Lindbaek (Norway) International Labour Organization Chairman, Statoil ASA Hernando de Soto (Peru) Peter McPherson (United States) President, Institute for Liberty President, Michigan State University and Democracy, Peru
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS Maurice Strong (Canada) Special Adviser to the Commission Mark Malloch Brown (United Kingdom) Administrator, United Nations Development Programme
ALTERNATES Debra Dunn for Carleton Fiorina (United States) Senior Vice President of Corporate Affairs, Hewlett-Packard Company Michael Froman for Robert Rubin (United States) President and CEO, CitiInsurance
COMMISSION SECRETARIAT Executive Director: Nissim Ezekiel Core Team: Jan Krutzinna, Naheed Nenshi,Yann Risz and Sahba Sobhani UNLEASHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP: MAKING BUSINESS WORK FOR THE POOR i Photo: Somalia Green/UNDP Laurence Sonya
FOREWORD
nding poverty, the aspiration of the Millennium Development Goals, is the overriding developmental objective of the 21st century. Despite great progress E in the past 50 years, 1.2 billion people—one-fifth of the people on Earth—live on less than US $1 a day, without access to many of the social services basic to a decent human life. Their plight requires a global response making full use of all the financial, intellectual and organizational resources that we can muster. It is against this urgent background that Secretary-General Kofi Annan asked us to convene the Commission on the Private Sector and Development to answer two questions. How can the potential of the private sector and entrepreneurship be unleashed in developing countries? And how can the existing private sector be engaged in meeting that challenge? This report is our responses to these questions. The report offers recommendations on how the major actors—governments, public development institutions, the private sector and civil society organizations— can modify their actions and approaches to significantly enhance the ability of the private sector to advance the development process. The objective of ii UNLEASHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP: MAKING BUSINESS WORK FOR THE POOR poverty alleviation leads us to focus based individuals as much as it does believe that it is critical to develop on developing businesses that create that of the managers and innovators a set of pilot actions and initiatives domestic employment and wealth— in multinational corporations and that would test the main observations by unleashing the capacity of large local companies. It is their voices and conclusions of our work— local entrepreneurs. that we have heard the loudest. so that their relevance to the real world of development could be We set an ambitious time limit for The Commission has also demonstrated on the ground. That our work, which has been completed attempted to highlight a broad is why the report ends with an in a little more than half a year since range of good practices that show illustrative portfolio of actions that our first meeting in June 2003. Our how the capabilities of the private will be developed in greater detail intention was not to carry out basic sector can best be harnessed for the over the next few months—actions research. Much work on the subject cause of development and poverty that could be implemented on a is already under way, and major alleviation. The cases include pilot basis shortly thereafter. Some development agencies, private successful approaches that originate of them could be driven by the UN foundations and academic institutions with the traditional development system, and some by other partners are already focusing their energies players, such as the multilateral and stakeholders. on the private sector’s contributions development institutions and to development. Instead, our approach bilateral aid agencies. But more These initiatives are far from has been to understand and assimilate often they include lesser known but enough. We put them out to all of the work already carried out by all innovative approaches implemented you as indicative of the types of parts of the development coalition, by the private sector—both by actions that we believe can and including business, civil society and companies and civil society should be replicated for the widest labour organizations, and to integrate organizations. Those approaches possible impact. Nor do we believe that thinking in the framework rely on market mechanisms and that each of them is a perfect model. presented here. private sector incentives and thus Country differences require modifying lend themselves much more to the the initiatives—as well as some of The Commission’s work has been replicability and scalability that our overall recommendations—to heavily influenced by the voices of we believe needed. One of our key fit particular circumstances. Our entrepreneurs, expressed through observations is the lack of knowledge ideas and conclusions are presented their actions and through their about best practices and the great as directional, to elicit reaction and responses to wide-ranging surveys need for more sustained research constructive dialogue. The intent is launched to understand what most and analysis of what works and to catalyze a renewed coalition of affects their ability to be productive the major stakeholders—focused what doesn’t. and to grow. It is the capacity, drive more clearly on the challenges and innovation of entrepreneurs We concluded at the outset that outlined here. Such a coalition is that increase the impact of a it would not be enough for this essential to unleashing the capacity broadly constituted private sector. Commission to produce a traditional of the private sector, to achieving Entrepreneurship encompasses the report voicing opinions and urging the Millennium Development actions of small, informal, village- others to take action. Instead, we Goals and to alleviating poverty.
Paul Martin Ernesto Zedillo Co-Chair Co-Chair Photo: Luc Anh/UNDP ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS NESIGETERNUSI:MAKINGBUSINESS WORK FOR THE POOR UNLEASHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP: I These include: Adrian Hodges, International Business Leaders Forum; BusinessLeaders International Hodges, Adrian These include: tohelpshapeourthinking. gaveoftheirtimeandexpertise of themgenerously andanumber work bymanywhohavegonebefore, hasbeeninformed Our READERS ANDEXPERTS vital inputstothework oftheSecretariat. Prabal andIrene who alsoprovided Chakrabarti Philippi To JenniferBarsky, Silverman. Jeremy OppenheimandLes DianaFarrell, Monson andMark Templeton wasledby Ehrbeck, Tilman Michael Blair, TheteamofMaria throughout theproject. and itsSecretariat whoprovided inputandcounsel totheCommission To McKinsey&Company, A SPECIAL THANKS… grateful to allthoselisted here. are deeply individuals andorganizations.We possible withouttheinputandassistance ofmany he Commission’s work would nothave been iii iv UNLEASHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP: MAKING BUSINESS WORK FOR THE POOR
Lalita Gupte, Mahdav Kalyan Bill Kramer, Water Research Institute; Arvind Gupta, Jemal-ud-din and K. V. Kamath, ICICI Bank; Hugh Locke, Locke Associates; Kassum, Michael Klein, Khalid Nandan Nilekani and Sanjay Purohit, Bill Draper, DraperRichards; Mirza, Francois Nankobogo, Neil Infosys Ltd.; Percy S. Mistry, Joaquim Boborquez; Maria Cattaui Roger, Marilou Uy and Dileep Oxford International Group; Livanos and William Stibravy, Wagle, the World Bank; Gerald T. Richard Frank, Bob Graffam, Julio the International Chamber of West, the Multilateral Investment Lastres and Alexander Schwedelheim, Commerce; Robert Litan, Robert Guarantee Agency; Jonathan Darby Overseas Investments Ltd; Chernow, The Ewing Marion Fiechter and Prakash Loungani, Michael Barth, Netherlands Kauffman Foundation; Professors the International Monetary Fund; Development Finance Company; John McMillan and Paul Milgrom, Karen Decker and Arvind Mathur, Nancy Bearg, Enterprise Works; Stanford University; Christopher the Asian Development Bank; Gary Bond, Noreen Doyle and Woodruff, University of California, Nancy Boswell, Transparency Michael McCullough, the European San Diego; Professor Jonathan International; Antonio Vives, the Bank for Reconstruction and Morduch, New York University; Inter-American Development Development; Cameron Rennie, Jeb Brugman and Craig Cohon, Bank; and Ric Cameron and the World Business Council for GlobalLegacy; Bob Fitch, Arthur Saper, the Canadian Sustainable Development; Enrique Enterplan; Daniel Zelikow, International Development Agency. Ferraro, Jim Kaddaras and Maria JP Morgan; Kenny Pegram and Otero, Accion; Jide Zeitlin, Ray Smilor, the Foundation for CONSULTATIONS Goldman Sachs; Masood Ahmed, Enterprise Development; Sunil David Stanton and Adrian Wood, Sinha, Emerging Market Economics; The Commission Secretariat the U.K. Department for Roland Dominicé and Jean-Philippe conducted four formal consultations International Development; de Schrevel, BlueOrchard; with international labour represen- Professors Michael Chu, Calestous Professor Roger Leeds, Johns tatives; European foundations, Juma, Tarun Khanna, George Hopkins University; Professor academics, and Canadian civil Lodge, Michael E. Porter, Iqbal Ted London, the Base of the society organizations. Our thanks Quadir and Deborah Spar, Harvard Pyramid Learning Laboratory at to the hosts of these consultations, University; Michael Fairbanks, the University of North Carolina; including the International Labour On the Frontier; Craig Wilson, John Richardson and Sevdalina Organization and the European DeltaPearl; Elli Kaplan; Benjamin Rukanova, the European Foundations Foundations Centre, as well as to Krutzinna; Neysan Rassekh; Alex Centre; Kenneth Borghese, John participants of these consultations, Shakow; George Ivanov; Eleonore E. Wasielewski, the United States who included: Bob Kyloh, workers’ Kopera, Business Humanitarian Agency for International relations branch, the International Forum; Barbara Samuels, Samuels Development; S. Aftab Ahmed, Labour Organization; Raul Requena, Associates; Donald Snodgrass, Sabine Durier, Mariann Kurtz, Union Network International; Development Alternatives, Inc.; Guy Pfeffermann, Harold Rosen, Wendy Caird, Public Services Elizabeth Littlefield, CGAP; Thomas Schipani, Bernard Sheahan International; Carla Coletti, the and Udayan Wagle, the International International Metalworkers’ Finance Corporation; Gerard Byam, Federation; Esther Busser, the Cesare Calari, Gerard Caprio, International Confederation of Free Trade Unions; Sándor Köles, the Carpathian Foundation; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v
Matthieu Vanhove, Cera Holding; North-South Institute; and Kathy Gilbert Houngbo, Lauren Canning, William White, the Charles Vandergrift, World Vision Canada. Alan J. Lee and Mark Suzman; Stewart Mott Foundation; Dario Djibril Diallo, Victor Arango, Disegni, Compagnia di San Paolo; UNITED NATIONS Carmen Higa, Hyacinth Morgan Charles Buchanan, the Luso- and William Orme in the American Foundation; Michael Many within the extended UN Communications Office of the Brophy, Help for All Trust; Luc family gave generously of their time Administrator; Christina Barrineau, Tayart de Borms, the King Baudouin and expertise, including Michael Normand Lauzon and Peter Kooi Foundation; Michel Bourges Henriques and Stephen Pursey at the of the United Nations Capital Maunaury, the Madariaga European International Labour Organization; Development Fund; and Bibi Foundation; Raymond Georis Wilfried Luetkenhorst and his team Amina Khan and Golda Kruss and Alexandre Kirchberger, the at the United Nations Industrial who provided assistance to the Network of European Foundations Development Organization; Commission Secretariat. for Innovative Cooperation; Ineke Georg Kell and his team, Global Derkzen, the Rabobank Foundation; Compact; and Antti Piispanen, EDITING, DESIGN John Mroz, the EastWest Institute; Lorraine Ruffing, Karl Sauvant and AND PRODUCTION Charles Maynes, the Eurasia the team at the United Nations Foundation; John Wyn Owen, Conference on Trade and Last but not least, we thank whole- the Nuffield Trust; David Dollar, Development. Our thanks also heartedly those who have helped us the World Bank; Michael Klein, to John McArthur and his team with the editing, production and the World Bank Group; Raymond of the Millennium Project; and translation, working under very Fisman, Columbia University; colleagues in the United Nations tight deadlines: Bruce Ross-Larson Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Yale Development Programme (UNDP): and Meta de Coquereaumont, University; Nazeer Aziz Ladhani, Zéphirin Diabré, Associate Elizabeth McCrocklin, Thomas the Aga Khan Foundation; Gerry Administrator; Bruce Jenks of the Roncoli and Christopher Trott of Barr, the Canadian Council for Bureau of Resources and Strategic Communications Development, International Co-operation; Partnerships, who provided the over- Inc.; Julia Dudnik-Ptasznik of John Watson of Cooperative for all UNDP guidance to the project; Colonial Communications; Michel Assistance and Relief Everywhere Sanjay Gandhi, Connie Gratil, Coclet; Edward Ranney Carta (CARE) Canada; Patricia McCullagh, Sirkka Korpela and Casper of EurOz Technologies; Thomas Ric Cameron and Arthur Saper, Sonesson, also of the Bureau of Barbush and the team at Moore the Canadian International Resources and Strategic Partner- Wallace-Hoechstetter Printing; Development Agency; Michel ships; Kalman Mizsei of the Bureau Kaika Clubwala of A.K. Office Chaurette, the Canadian Centre for Europe and CIS; Shoji Supplies and Elizabeth Scott Andrews, for International Studies and Nishimoto of the Bureau for Naeem Arastu, Sokhna Diouf, Cooperation; Pam Foster, the Development Policy; Hafiz Pasha Françoise Gerber, Rajeswary Halifax Initiative; Molly Kane, of the Bureau for Asia and the Iruthayanathan, Maureen Lynch Inter Pares; Robert Letendre, the Pacific; the staff of the Office of and Jeremy Owens of UNDP. Canadian Catholic Organization the Administrator, particularly for Development and Peace; Mark Fried and Rieky Stuart, OXFAM Canada; Roy Culpeper, the TABLE OF CONTENTS
COMMISSION MEMBERS
FOREWORD i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii
HIGHLIGHTS 1
CHAPTER 1. WHY THE PRIVATE SECTOR IS SO IMPORTANT IN ALLEVIATING POVERTY 5 Deep poverty remains intractable 6 The private sector is important for the poor—and often is the poor 7 Who are all the entrepreneurs? 8 A focus on the domestic private sector 9
CHAPTER 2. CONSTRAINTS ON THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES 11 Widespread informality for microenterprises 12 Few competitive small and medium size enterprises 13 Lack of competitive pressure on large companies 14 Foundations for entrepreneurship—not yet in place 14 Three pillars of entrepreneurship—too often missing 17
CHAPTER 3. UNLEASHING THE POTENTIAL OF THE PRIVATE SECTOR 21 Building the foundations 23 Erecting the pillars 24
CHAPTER 4. ENGAGING THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN DEVELOPMENT 29 Serving markets at the bottom of the pyramid 30 Forming ecosystems and building networks 30 Fostering public-private partnerships for sustainable development 33 Improving corporate governance 34 Advancing responsible business practices and corporate social responsibility standards 34
CHAPTER 5. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 37 Actions in the public sphere: create an enabling environment 38 Actions in the public-private sphere: partner and innovate 40 Actions in the private sphere: mobilize capabilities and resources 41 Looking forward 42
BIBLIOGRAPHIC NOTE 43
BIBLIOGRAPHY 45 BOXES Box 1.1 The Millennium Development Goals 7 Box 3.1 Costa Rica’s private sector—unleashed 27 Box 4.1 Resources under the radar screen for private sector development 30 Box 4.2 Showing what’s possible at the bottom of the pyramid 32
FIGURES Figure 1.1 More investment—more growth 7 Figure 1.2 Four billion people at the bottom of the pyramid 8 Figure 2.1 Informality thrives in poorer countries 12 Figure 2.2 Small and medium enterprises become more important and informality less important as countries become wealthier 13 Figure 2.3 Foundations for the private sector and pillars of entrepreneurship 15 Figure 2.4 Enterprises in low income countries face many more burdens when registering 17 Figure 3.1 Strengthening the effectiveness of traditional private sector development activities 22 Figure 4.1 Private sector contributions to private sector development 30 Figure 5.1 Actions in the three focus areas 38 Photo: Pedro Cote/UNDP HIGHLIGHTS NESIGETERNUSI:MAKINGBUSINESS WORK FOR THE POOR UNLEASHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP: I rwhadeutbedvlpetle ihdvlpn onre.This countries. lieswithdeveloping growth andequitabledevelopment forachieving responsibility thattheprimary The Commissionbelieves base thatcompaniesare built on. the capital, accesstofinancingandlong-term lack They low productivity. and towidespread informality contributing legal system, outside theformal Manyoperate are marginalinthedomesticecosystem. medium enterprises and small Butinmanypoorcountries, for innovation andentrepreneurship. beenginesofjobcreation—seedbeds can andmediumenterprises Small atlower prices. people byproviding abroad of products range andservices alsoempower Itcan poor jobcreation andpoor people’s incomes. growth, toeconomic bycontributing poverty alleviate sectorcan The private andcommunities. corporations individuals, byprivate largely areand innovation undertaken thatleadtodevelopment ruddi h elzto httesvns investment grounded intherealization thatthesavings, recommendations thataccompany it—shouldbe andaction development—andsector thepolicy he Commission believes thatany approach to private 1 2 UNLEASHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP: MAKING BUSINESS WORK FOR THE POOR responsibility includes creating the 2. In the public-private sphere, with representatives of the domestic conditions that make it possible facilitating cooperation and private sector to implement changes to secure the needed financial partnerships between public and and ensure that the voice of the private resources for investment. private players to enhance access sector includes small and medium to such key factors as financing, enterprises and microenterprises. Those conditions—the state of skills and basic services. governance, macroeconomic and For developed 3. In the private sphere, microeconomic policies, public country governments encouraging the development finances, the financial system and Foster a conducive international of business models that can be other basic elements of a country’s macroeconomic environment and scaled up and copied and that economic environment—are largely trade regime. Increasing the flow of are commercially sustainable. determined by the actions of development aid and reforming the domestic policymakers. Their global trading system to provide fair challenge is to capitalize on advances ACTIONS IN THE economic opportunities to producers in macroeconomic stability and PUBLIC SPHERE: from developing countries are democracy and to launch reforms CREATE AN ENABLING essential for promoting rapid growth that bring about further changes in ENVIRONMENT in domestic private investment. institutional frameworks to unleash Creating an enabling environment Redirect the operational and foster the private sector. involves steps to reduce the share of strategies of multilateral and Most of the recommended actions the informal sector in an economy, bilateral development institutions involve more than one of the through reform of the overall and agencies. In encouraging actors working together. Where enabling environment for the sustainable private sector develop- governments are implementing formal economy. ment developed countries need to policy change, it is often with the For developing ensure that the collective actions direct support and involvement of country governments of these agencies are better multilateral development institutions. Reform regulations and strengthen coordinated—to improve their Where the private sector is taking a the rule of law. Developing country efficiency and to reduce the pressures more active stance on sustainable governments have to make a strong on the administrative capacity of development, it is often with civil and unambiguous policy commit- developing country governments. society raising the profile of this ment to sustainable private sector Untie aid. Changes in the issue. Where governments are development—and combine that administrative rules controlling implementing regulatory reform, with a genuine commitment to tied funds would permit more it may be in direct consultation reform the regulatory environment effective use and delivery of with representatives of the private by eliminating artificial and policy- technical assistance to stimulate sector. The individual actions induced constraints to strong private sector development. identified here should be seen in economic growth. the framework of this broader For multilateral cooperation—needed even more Formalize the economy. development institutions to reduce poverty. Developing country governments Apply the Monterrey recommen- need to focus on creating the dation of specialization and Our interest lies in three areas: conditions to reduce informality partnership to private sector 1. In the public sphere, promoting and change the composition of the development activities. The the reform of laws, regulations private sector ecosystem over time. extent of overlapping activities is and other barriers to growth. Engage the private sector in counterproductive and needs to the policy process. Governments be urgently addressed. need to create a real partnership Address informality in developing countries. Some pioneering work is underway to map the structure of the informal sector, and a global HIGHLIGHTS 3 effort to expand the coverage For the private sector Increase accountability in the of this work is likely to yield Channel private initiative system. This is a core part of the significant benefits. into development efforts. We work of civil society organizations, believe that the private sector has as is their leadership in pushing ACTIONS IN THE tremendous potential to contribute forward the concept of sustainable PUBLIC-PRIVATE to development through its development. This work should SPHERE: PARTNER knowledge, expertise, resources be strengthened. and relationships. AND INNOVATE Develop new partnerships and The Commission believes that all Develop linkages with relationships to achieve common stakeholders need to make concerted multinational and large domestic objectives. Civil society organizations efforts in finance, skills and public- companies to nurture smaller are closest to the base of the pyramid. private partnerships for the delivery companies. Linkages between They also are often proxies for of basic services. different types of firms in experimenting with new technologies developing countries provide an for solving problems. Facilitate access to broader effective channel for local companies financing options. We envision to gain access to markets, financing, LOOKING FORWARD continuing development of domestic skills and know-how. financial markets coupled with To promote progress, the Commission skill-building for regulators and Pursue business opportunities recommends that the United Nations private financial institutions. in bottom-of-pyramid markets. sponsor the tracking of private Recognizing the needs of bottom-of- Assist skill and knowledge sector development. An annual the-pyramid markets (the 4 billion progress report would maintain the development. Skill-building people who are earning less than activities could range from prominence of the Commission’s $1,500 a year) and creating innovative programs for top public and overall recommendations and ensure solutions to meet these needs are private leadership to training the commitment to addressing the other vital actions required from microentrepreneurs to joint efforts many issues identified here. the private sector, both domestic with public authorities and unions and international. The Commission is assembling to improve workforce skills. a first set of actionable initiatives Set standards. The private Make possible sustainable delivery to facilitate transformations in sector needs to make a genuine of basic services, particularly energy individual countries and to provide commitment to sustainable and water. The Commission sees the tools for governments and development—with a sharp the need to develop innovative the private sector to supplement focus on corporate governance models for partnerships of available resources and begin rapidly and transparency. governmental service providers, implementing a programme of multinational companies and For civil society and change. These first actions are local companies. labour organizations intended to stimulate a collaborative The Commission believes that civil response from potential partners ACTIONS IN THE society and labour organizations who read this report. Our message PRIVATE SPHERE: have to continue as critical to all of you is: join us. MOBILIZE CAPABILITIES observers of the development AND RESOURCES agenda—and as facilitators and supporters of innovative approaches The Commission believes that the for meeting the Millennium private sector, particularly large Development Goals and improving local companies and multinational the quality of life for poor people. corporations, must realize that it can contribute to accelerated economic development and to poverty alleviation. Photo: Boris Missirkov ALLEVIATING POVERTY IS SOIMPORTANT IN WHY THE PRIVATE SECTOR NESIGETERNUSI:MAKINGBUSINESS WORK FOR THE POOR UNLEASHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP: leit oet.Cnie amn xot nBnlds,information inBangladesh, exports Consider garment poverty. alleviate can examplesshow Butsomeencouraging how enterprise private $1 aday. oftheplanet’s peoplelivingonless than with afifth The problem ishuge, ofbest knowledge through committedapplication andpractice. only achieved be can andscope, ambitious inscale Goals, Development The Millennium their communities andnations. It isaboutunleashingthepower entrepreneurs oflocal in toreduce poverty innovation sectortoimprove thatresides intheprivate thelivesofpoor. andtechnological organizational Itisaboutusingthemanagerial, lives better. is already tothelivesofpoorandhaspower central tomakethose sector Itisaboutacknowledging thattheprivate multinational corporation. I CHAPTER 1 is as important a part ofthe private asthe sector apart is asimportant isaboutrealizing thatthepoorentrepreneurIt dayon market andseeingentrepreneurs atwork. into thepoorest village isaboutwalking his report 5 6 UNLEASHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP: MAKING BUSINESS WORK FOR THE POOR technology in Costa Rica and cut more than one-third of electricity DEEP POVERTY flowers in Kenya—new industries customers nationwide. REMAINS INTRACTABLE creating jobs, boosting incomes, Fierce competition between lifting hopes. And consider the private locally owned mobile Despite great progress in some following successes, ranging from phone companies in Somalia has countries and regions, deep poverty modern multinationals to domestic driven costs on international remains a stubborn and intractable entrepreneurs, demonstrating phone calls to less than $1 a problem across much of the world. the potential of private return minute, about a sixth that in Substantial gains in some countries to boost development. many other African countries. have been accompanied by deep This, in a country where there losses in others, and far too many Cemex, the Mexican cement is no official banking or postal people still earn less than $1 a day, firm, has become one of the system and where many do suffer from hunger and lack access world’s leading producers and not have regular running water to water, sanitation and energy. innovators in the industry, or electricity. The latest Human Development employing thousands. In Guatemala the Confederation Report of the United Nations Casas Bahia in Brazil has of Agricultural Cooperatives Development Programme reports developed a unique business formed a joint venture with a that the proportion of people in model providing efficient retail Canadian firm. The enterprise extreme poverty fell to 23.2% in services aimed at poorer customers. now exports vegetables worth 1999 from 29.6% in 1990. But the Infosys, an Indian information more than $3 million a year number of people living on $1 a technology services firm, grew to Canada, providing steady day slipped only to 1.17 billion from from less than $10 million in income for 100 indigenous 1.29 billion a decade earlier. Moreover, sales in the early 1990s to become women and supporting more if the dramatic improvement in a leading global player with than 1,000 farmers. China’s poverty indicators is excluded, almost $800 million in sales In Mozambique a farmer bought the number of people living in today. Along the way, it has also an oilseed press on credit. Now absolute poverty actually increased. been setting international standards as the owner of four presses, he for corporate governance and In recent years poverty alleviation has organized nine other press creating a new partnership for has moved to the centre of the global operators into a small cooperative development with local and dialogue as the primary overriding association, bargaining with local central government. objective of development—not a banks and customers as a group. ICICI Bank, also in India, is derived outcome. The Millennium In India small-scale soybean applying technology and a Declaration was an unprecedented farmers use a village Internet comprehensive approach to the expression of solidarity and determi- kiosk to check spot prices for full range of its client base— nation to rid the world of poverty, their products on the Chicago particularly in rural markets and committing countries, rich and Board of Trade’s website, to small and medium enterprises poor, to eradicate poverty, promote bypassing local intermediaries human dignity and equality and and microentrepreneurs. and getting better prices. achieve peace and environmental In Cambodia hundreds of small sustainability. It led to agreement private providers offer services These examples are not just success on the Millennium Development ranging from battery recharging stories—they are stories about the Goals (box 1.1). to fully metered electricity successes of the domestic private provision for entire communities. sector. They are what this report is Yet progress is more than possible— These providers now serve an about. But moving from example and it occurs with regularity under the estimated 115,000 customers— to broad achievement requires right conditions. Economic growth thinking freshly about development, has lifted hundreds of millions of unconstrained by ideology, unhinged people out of subsistence agriculture from tired debate. into manufacturing and service employment, increasing wealth and reducing poverty. Witness the CHAPTER 1: WHY THE PRIVATE SECTOR IS SO IMPORTANT IN ALLEVIATING POVERTY 7
BOX 1.1 THE MILLENNIUM FIGURE 1.1 MORE INVESTMENT—MORE GROWTH DEVELOPMENT GOALS 16 1. Eradicate extreme poverty and Private Public hunger: reduce by half the proportion 14 of people living on less than $1 a day; reduce by half the proportion of people 12 who suffer from hunger. 10 2. Achieve universal primary education: ensure that all boys and girls complete 8 a full course of primary schooling. 6 3. Promote gender equality and empower women: eliminate gender 4 disparity in primary and secondary education by 2005, and at all levels of 2 education by 2015. Investment as percent of GDP,1970–98 as percent Investment 4. Reduce child mortality: reduce by 0 < 3% 3–5% > 5% two-thirds the mortality rate for children Growth rates, 1970–98 under five. 5. Improve maternal health: reduce Source: Bouton and Sumilinski (2000) by three-quarters the maternal mortality ratio. 6. Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other 6.4% resulted in a 15% decline in quantity of employment and the diseases: halt and begin to reverse the the rate of poverty (using the $2 a rate of pay are crucial. For the self- spread of HIV/AIDS; halt and begin to day criterion), and in South Asia employed, productivity and returns reverse the incidence of malaria and 3.3% annual growth led to an 8.4% are important, influenced by other major diseases. decline. In contrast, the slow growth technology, inputs and prices. 7. Ensure environmental sustainability: Employment is thus the key link integrate the principles of sustainable of 1.6% in Latin America and the development into country policies Caribbean and 1.0% in the Middle between output growth and and programmes; reverse the loss of East and North Africa caused a poverty alleviation. environmental resources; reduce by marginal deterioration in poverty half the proportion of people without sustainable access to safe drinking water rates. More dramatically, negative THE PRIVATE SECTOR and basic sanitation; achieve significant growth rates increased poverty rates IS IMPORTANT FOR improvement in the lives of at least by 1.6% in Sub-Saharan Africa and THE POOR—AND 100 million slum dwellers by 2020. 13.5% in Europe and Central Asia. OFTEN IS THE POOR 8. Develop a global partnership for development. The message is clear: sustained The private sector is central to the economic growth reduces poverty. lives of the poor. First, all poor The link is equally clear between people are consumers. Across the dramatic improvement in the living economic growth and strong private standards in East Asian countries, world the story is the same—poor investment. A study of 50 developing consumers pay more than rich including Indonesia, The Republic of countries from 1970 to 1998 examined Korea, Malaysia and Thailand, and consumers for basic services. In the relationship between private Mumbai, slum-dwellers in Dharavi the sizable reduction in the number and public investment and growth of people in poverty in China. pay 1.2 times more for rice, 10 times and incomes. Countries with higher more for medicine and 3.5 times The impact of economic growth, growth featured higher private more for water than do middle class overall, on poverty depends on a investment (figure 1.1). people living at the other end of range of factors that influence the But for output growth to contribute the city on Bhulabhai Desai Road. nature of this growth, but the empirical to poverty alleviation, it must translate evidence is compelling. In East Asia into incomes of the poor. For wage and the Pacific, the region with the labourers and salaried workers, the strongest growth in the 1990s, annual per capita GDP growth of 8 UNLEASHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP: MAKING BUSINESS WORK FOR THE POOR
Fully 4 billion people in the world— FIGURE 1.2 FOUR BILLION PEOPLE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PYRAMID those who earn less than $1,500 a year—make up the “bottom of the Purchasing power Population parity in dollars in millions pyramid” markets (figure 1.2).
The quality of goods that poor > $20,000 Tier 1 75–100 people purchase—whether food, water or financial services—is almost always substandard. Often, $1,500–20,000 Tiers 2–3 1,500–1,750 an informal private sector fills the gaps with goods of higher prices and varying quality. It serves an important need, for informal < $1,500 Tier 4 4,000 economies sustain the majority of poor families in many countries. Yet the advantages of economies of scale and scope are missing Source: Prahalad and Hammond (2002) from the lives of people at the bottom of the pyramid. Some of the barriers are poor marketing data on the distribution of new The first creates employment and poor distribution. water connections by income and income growth. The second quintile from three countries in improves the quality of life for the The private sector is already Latin America show that 25–30% poor. And the greater interaction meeting the needs of poor people of the network expansion was between those at the base of the in places governments do not reach. targeted at the lowest fifth of pyramid and the private sector creates In some countries, for example, the income profile. opportunities for direct involvement the government has little impact on in the market economy. the poor. In the slums there are no Put simply, an innovative private health services, no public education sector can find ways to deliver low-cost (even sophisticated) WHO ARE ALL THE and no infrastructure. This story ENTREPRENEURS? repeats itself across the developing goods and services to demanding world. In many cases, where services consumers across all income ranges. The Commission takes an expansive exist, they are provided by private It can sell to the urban distressed view of the private sector. Large sources. Anywhere from 15% area as well as the poor rural village companies are a vital part of the to 90% of primary education is or town. It can develop distribution private economy, but the poor are provided in private schools. Some links to the consumer in the village an equally important part. They are 63% of health care expenditures in and so be better able to harness often entrepreneurs themselves— the poorest countries are private, knowledge about the actual needs frequently of necessity, operating almost twice the 33% in high of this segment of the market. informally, trapped in subscale income countries that belong to It can keep costs low through enterprises. We endorse the view the Organisation for Economic outsourcing, for greater flexibility. that market-oriented business Co-operation and Development. The private sector can thus alleviate ecosystems comprise many forms of private enterprise coexisting With the right attention and poverty by: in a symbiotic relationship. The regulatory requirements, privately Contributing to economic growth. ecosystem generally includes provided services can help meet Empowering poor people by multinational corporations, large the needs of poor people. Recent providing them with services and domestic companies, cooperatives, consumer products, increasing small and medium enterprises and choices and reducing prices. microenterprises, with formal and informal players. It thus encompasses CHAPTER 1: WHY THE PRIVATE SECTOR IS SO IMPORTANT IN ALLEVIATING POVERTY 9 the farmer in the field as much as executives take the initiative to the potential value of land, the the multinational company. innovate and expand the business. domestic assets that can be tapped This report highlights many are significantly larger than the Agriculture is of particular interest instances of large companies that cumulative FDI or private portfolio because 75% of the people living have targeted bottom-of-the-pyramid flows. Third, unleashing the domestic on less than $1 a day are in rural markets and developed products resources in an economy—both areas, with livelihoods dependent and processes to serve the poor financial and entrepreneurial—is on mostly subsistence production. profitably or to operate sustainably likely to create a more stable and In Africa agriculture supports in very challenging environments. sustainable pattern of growth. more than 70% of the population, Entrepreneurship by individual contributing an average of 30% Estimates of the informal assets in engineers and executives is often of GDP. Providing inputs to the developing countries range as high at the root of such moves by big agricultural sector and the value as $9.4 trillion, many multiples of corporations, which can have a major added processing and marketing cumulative portfolio flows or of positive impact on development. of agricultural goods are important FDI flows to developing countries parts of private sector development. Entrepreneurship also drives many over the past 15 years. These The critical importance of agriculture civil society organizations, and it comparisons are illustrative only, in alleviating poverty reinforces exists in government and public comparing flows and stocks of assets. the need for urgent progress on administrations. Individuals in these Converting informal assets into eliminating subsidies for producers organizations have the drive to financial resources will require a in developed markets, and on innovate and pursue opportunities broad programme of reform that trade reform. with the passion and dedication of will enable these assets to be used an entrepreneur, albeit with little In many developing countries, as collateral in the banking system. if any pecuniary reward. women constitute the majority of But keep in mind the size of these microentrepreneurs in the informal Entrepreneurship flourishes assets. Recent work in Egypt, for economy and a significant percentage perhaps most in small and medium example, concludes that the country of the formal sector. Many of them firms with significant potential to has a large and vibrant extra-legal are illiterate and live in poor rural grow and innovate. This dynamic economy that employs over 8 communities. And setting up segment is typically the hotbed of million people (about 40% of the their own enterprises—generally entrepreneurship and innovation. workforce) and has assets of almost microenterprises—is usually the It can drive economic growth, $250 billion, 30 times the market only possibility for them to be create jobs and foster competition, value of all companies registered employed and earn an income innovation and productivity. on the Cairo Stock Exchange. on their own. In Latin America This focus on the domestic and the Caribbean between 25% A FOCUS ON private sector does not diminish and 35% of formal sector micro- THE DOMESTIC the importance of FDI. Beyond the enterprises and small and medium PRIVATE SECTOR financial resources that FDI brings, enterprises are owned and operated its infusion of a corporate culture by women. In the Philippines women We focus here on the domestic can change the way business is own 44% of the microenterprises, private sector—for three main done, bring managerial know-how more than 80% in rural areas. reasons. First, domestic resources and best practices, provide access In Zimbabwe women run the are much larger than actual or to international markets, transfer majority of microenterprises and potential external resources. technology and innovation, introduce small enterprises (67%), while Domestic private investment competitive pressures in previously enterprises run by men tend to averaged 10–12% of GDP in the closed markets and be the principal provide proportionally more of 1990s, compared with 7% for driver for the growth of local business. the household income and have domestic public investment and In these situations, FDI can improve more employees. 2–5% for foreign direct investment (FDI). Second, when informal the overall investment climate. Entrepreneurship exists in large resources are examined, such as companies, where individual UNLEASHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP: MAKING BUSINESS WORK FOR THE POOR 11 Photo: UNDP Cuba
CHAPTER 2 CONSTRAINTS ON THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
eveloping countries have remarkable energy and assets, and all segments of the private sector have demonstrated the ability to respond when D empowered. But the Commission finds that three major structural challenges confront the private sector in all developing countries, to varying degrees. Microenterprises and many small and medium enterprises operate informally. Many small and medium enterprises have barriers to growth. A lack of competitive pressure shields larger firms from market forces and the need to innovate and become more productive. 12 UNLEASHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP: MAKING BUSINESS WORK FOR THE POOR
FIGURE 2.1 INFORMALITY THRIVES IN POORER COUNTRIES could otherwise be invested in making operations more productive. Estimated share of nonagricultural workforce that is informal Cruel and arbitrary informal enforcement systems limit the ability Portugal 30 of entrepreneurs to be productive as well. Local debtor prisons and Chile 38 mafia-like punishments can hurt Mexico 40 an entrepreneur’s full access to crucial human inputs. According to Thailand,Turkey, Brazil 50 Hernando de Soto, a third of debtors India, Indonesia, who obtained credit informally in Pakistan, Philippines 70 Egypt spent some time in private jails because they did not pay back Sub-Saharan Africa 80 what they owed.
Source: World Bank and International Labour Organization Entrepreneurs who operate formally are hurt by the implicit subsidies that informal enterprises receive WIDESPREAD Difficulties in getting finance also through uneven enforcement and INFORMALITY FOR trap developing country entrepreneurs by poor mechanisms for protecting MICROENTERPRISES in subscale operations. Entrepreneurs property and contracts, both of which and enterprises that operate informally distort competition. Both aspects Microentrepreneurship is a common cannot borrow at a reasonable cost create an uneven playing field and form of employment in many because they do not have legal status reduce formal entrepreneurs’ access developing countries (figure 2.1). or title to the land they occupy. to inputs and markets, discouraging Almost all microenterprises operate Frequently, the only option for entrepreneurs who operate formally outside the formal legal system, access to capital is through illegal from making investments to contributing to widespread informality. moneylenders who charge high increase productivity. Informality provides some benefits rates and who may be able to lend Informal firms can charge less in some circumstances. It can act as only small sums relative to the because they avoid paying taxes or a form of employment substitution needs of a growing enterprise. complying with other regulations. for labourers who have difficulty The access of businesses that More productive formal firms have finding jobs. For example, urban difficulty capturing market share dwellers in Thailand who lost their operate informally to the formal from informal firms because the jobs during the economic crisis of legal system and its benefits are formal firms pay taxes and other the late 1990s supported themselves limited. In general, the formal legal contributions, which increases their by turning to informal street-vending system should enforce contracts and costs significantly. More productive opportunities. In societies that limit protect property rights more fairly firms are less able to drive the less the economic role of women, home- than informal enforcement systems do. competitive informal firms out based enterprises provide women Predictable rules and dispute of business. So, poor enforcement with opportunities to earn money. resolution mechanisms are essential permits the informal firms to If the formal rules, enforcement for entrepreneurs to engage in the continue to exist, holding back the systems and cultural conditions in a long-term arrangements that enable productive firms from reaching country are so restrictive that most them to innovate, to scale up and maximum scale. Yet, given the entrepreneurs cannot use their to diffuse their knowledge and significant productivity advantage talents, the economy may benefit benefits. Side payments to officials held by formal firms, the inability if they operate informally. that increase predictability in an to compete may reflect an unwill- uncertain world reduce income that ingness to serve some parts of the market rather than the cost advantages offered by informality. CHAPTER 2: CONSTRAINTS ON THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES 13
Moreover, worker rights and developing countries, exposing FIGURE 2.2 SMALL AND MEDIUM protections in the informal sector formal entrepreneurs to even more ENTERPRISES BECOME MORE IMPORTANT AND INFORMALITY stand up poorly to those in the risks (due to more visibility) than LESS IMPORTANT AS COUNTRIES formal sector. And consumers— if they remained informal. BECOME WEALTHIER able to purchase only goods of Percentage of GDP inappropriate quality and safety FEW COMPETITIVE standards—do not have access to the SMALL AND MEDIUM 13 greater choice and lower prices in ENTERPRISES 31 truly competitive consumer markets. 47 Small and medium enterprises tend There are many constraints on to be engines of job creation— 51 entering the formal sector. The over- seedbeds for innovation and 39 arching issue is one of costs versus entrepreneurship. By providing 16 benefits for the individual entrepreneur new entry and competition, they who has to choose between formal can boost efficiency and growth and informal operations. and lead to economic development. 37 36 30 In most developing countries it is Indeed, recent research indicates costly to be formal. Formal players that economic growth in poor Low Middle High are often overtaxed (a vicious circle, income income income countries is accompanied by a countries countries countries since they are overtaxed because a more than proportional growth in few formal companies carry most the share of the formal small and Informal activity of the tax weight). Registering a Small and medium enterprise activity medium enterprise sector. In low Remaining activity business can be a long and expensive income countries the share of formal proposition (in Angola it takes 146 small and medium enterprises in Source: Ayyagari, Beck, and Demirguc-Kunt (2003) days and more than 8 times the per employment is about 30% and in capita income). Regulations and GDP about 17%, while in high government requirements are income countries the shares are Rules that constrain market entry and complex—and compliance costs about 60% and 50%. Indeed, richer expansion have a chilling effect on high. The opportunities for bribery countries see far less informal and small and medium enterprises at the increase with the complexity of much more small and medium expense of established larger firms. regulations, exposing smaller players enterprise activity (figure 2.2). Small and medium enterprises who lack the legal resources to often could compete effectively in defend themselves. The reality in many poor countries, niche markets, but the advantages especially in Sub-Saharan Africa, that accrue to established large Entrepreneurs also see little benefit is that the small and medium players fend off competition from in going formal. While formal enterprise sector is relatively the small and medium enterprise businesses in developed countries marginal in the domestic ecosystem. sector. Without the reasonable can raise capital by mortgaging their Why are small and medium compliance costs that exist only in a assets, this is often not possible in enterprises not able to “graduate” fairer system of competition, small many developing countries where to the ranks of larger companies? and medium enterprises cannot mortgage laws are weak and banks grow and become more productive. prove reluctant to finance small For this evolution to be possible, Ineffective or arbitrary tax laws, players. In theory, being formal it is essential that a reasonably onerous business regulations and would facilitate selling beyond level playing field and supporting other restrictions penalize them. geographic boundaries, but poor institutional structures exist local infrastructure and customs between (often larger) incumbents abuse limit the opportunities. and (often smaller) new entrants. And bankruptcy laws, which protect formal players in developed countries, are often ineffective in 14 UNLEASHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP: MAKING BUSINESS WORK FOR THE POOR
Widespread informality and the LACK OF COMPETITIVE alliance between large protected lack of skills also affect the ability PRESSURE ON LARGE incumbents and poor people, of entrepreneurs to scale up a COMPANIES who fear a loss of jobs in business. While often animated competitive markets. by innovative ideas or addressing Large companies form the hub of Corruption combined with weak untapped markets, small and networks and clusters and, by the and arbitrary legal enforcement medium enterprises suffer from virtue of their size and range of buttresses incumbent firms at lower total factor productivity, business activities, provide the spark the expense of potentially more by using older technologies or for the private sector ecosystem. competitive ones. Specifically, employing inferior workforce But in many developing countries incumbents might receive subsidies, practices. The cost of business large incumbent companies can also special licenses or other privileges services is often more than small stifle entrepreneurial energy and that preserve their position and and medium enterprises can pay, initiative. Too often, they can take dampen the incentive to innovate or is not in tune with their needs. advantage of weak institutional and reduce prices. Such firms may Lower export sales from small environments to raise anticompetitive respond to perverse incentives to and medium enterprises come barriers and protect their dominant strip assets or dole out contracts to in large part from lack of access position. While local informal uncompetitive suppliers even when to knowledge about foreign markets can often function without more efficient providers exist. The standards of quality. much regulation, more mature and complex markets need appropriate poor domestic macro environment Perhaps most important, small and regulations to function effectively. encourages wasteful rent-seeking and medium enterprises lack access to retards the growth of competitive financing and long-term capital, A dynamic financial sector, in which firms based on productivity. the base that companies are built new entrants and incumbents can These firms might also indirectly on. High risks associated with get finance under competitive terms, starve competitors from receiving small and medium enterprises, is also important for creating capital by contributing to an whether real or perceived, exist in competitive pressures in the market. environment that keeps finance the absence of financial instruments But companies with a protected underdeveloped. Large firms that manage and diversify the risk. position in these markets often thus command the lion’s share of Banks also face high costs or have strong incentives to use their resources in an underdeveloped cannot acquire information that lobbying power to slow government financial system. they can trust, even when small progress in improving the institutional and medium enterprises are credit- infrastructure for markets. worthy. These factors raise interest Such practices directly hurt poor FOUNDATIONS FOR rates and reduce lending volumes, people, through higher prices ENTREPRENEURSHIP— setting up price and quantity and lower quality products. Poor NOT YET IN PLACE barriers to small and medium people benefited from the opening Building a sound private sector enterprise growth. Small and medium of competitive markets in India in requires a strong foundation in enterprises have to resort to financing the early 1990s. Until then the the global and domestic macro from networks of family or friends, population was effectively subsidizing environments, physical and social from retained earnings, or from a large part of the private sector, infrastructure and rule of law short-term credit from other small which was selling low quality (figure 2.3). buyers or suppliers, rather than products at high prices—made from larger institutions providing possible by controls on entry by Global macro environment dedicated long-term financing domestic competitors and severe The foundations for growth in vehicles for specific purposes. quotas and high tariffs on imports. the private sector start with a well- Such anticompetitive policies are functioning global macro business often perpetuated by an unlikely environment involving a dynamic global economy that provides markets, as well as adequate trade CHAPTER 2: CONSTRAINTS ON THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES 15
rules that enable competitive access FIGURE 2.3 FOUNDATIONS FOR THE PRIVATE SECTOR to market opportunities. The open AND PILLARS OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP exchange of goods, capital and information—and the transfer of technology and ideas—stimulates Private sector growth private sector development. This occurs through several mechanisms: open markets, good-quality foreign investment, effective development aid Level Access to and efficient transfers of technology Pillars of Access to entrepreneurship playing financing skills and and knowledge. It requires such field knowledge reforms as dismantling the agri- cultural subsidies and other forms of protection that so evidently impede export-oriented private sector development in the rural Rule of law areas of developing countries. Physical and social infrastructure There is broad agreement that open Foundations for the private sector markets have supported economic Domestic macro environment growth. The advantages, while well catalogued, merit repeating. Global macro environment An open trade policy fosters productivity growth by opening the private sector to competition. human capital, the misallocation of Low quality roads can shut small Free trade helps countries allocate scarce public funds, the devastation of producers off from regional markets— their resources towards their most land, the seizure of natural resources and encumber large producers with productive areas of comparative and the elimination of market access. shortages of critical inputs. advantage. Cheaper imports raise Physical and Well-maintained infrastructure the domestic standard of living social infrastructure improves commerce by speeding and allow for the use of lower cost A country’s physical and social the transport of goods and raw inputs as the private sector produces infrastructure includes roads, power, materials, sustaining energy- for domestic or foreign customers. ports, water and telecommunications intensive production and making Such a regime provides open market as well as basic education and health. information readily accessible access through lower tariff and Building up these basic services has and communication timely. Poor nontariff barriers. a dual benefit: improving the lives physical infrastructure often Domestic macro environment of poor people directly and enabling precludes business activity. the growth of businesses. The central elements of a strong Ensuring connectivity through domestic macro environment for Technical inefficiencies in roads, telecommunications and information business include peace and political railways, power and water alone technology has become particularly stability, good governance with policy caused an estimated $55 billion a important in recent years, helping predictability, transparency and year in losses in the early 1990s— to overcome some of the barriers of accountability, and sound macro- an amount equal to 1% of the inadequate physical infrastructure. economic policies. For businesses, GDP of developing countries Efficient access to information is internal or external conflict increases or twice the annual budget for clearly a vital part of the basic infra- cost and uncertainty, deterring both financing infrastructure in the structure need of modern economies. domestic and foreign investment. developing world. These losses fall Worse, conflict forestalls private on firms large and small—and on sector development, because it often individuals, especially the poorest. leads to the tragic destruction of 16 UNLEASHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP: MAKING BUSINESS WORK FOR THE POOR
Maintaining high quality physical Improving the social infrastructure property rights circumscribe private infrastructure is largely, but not and ensuring that those surviving sector behaviour. Confusing and solely, a matter of capital investment. on the lowest incomes have access contradictory legal systems make Efficient contracting, open bidding, to affordable and high quality formal business practices difficult regulatory credibility and private health and education services is an and push businesses to become or and public managerial capability important foundation for private remain informal. Poor legislation carry weight as well. sector development. buttresses oligarchic and corrupt firms against competitive forces, Studies demonstrating the social The rule of law often at the expense of small and private returns from investments The rule of law means that and medium enterprises. Cosy in education and health spotlight government decisions are made relationships between business and their efficacy. High levels of according to a set of written laws and regulator impair the development investment in human capital, rules, to be followed by every citizen. of open, free market competition. especially in education and health, The rules are applied consistently, The poor are likely to be the first lay the groundwork for private administered by a professional victims of lawlessness. sector growth. A healthy, educated bureaucracy and adjudicated by a workforce is a productive workforce. fair and transparent judiciary that is Even though a written set of laws One need look only at countries adequately compensated. In nearly may exist, the legal system in many ravaged by poor health or disease all cases, courts provide reasons for developing countries works informally. to see the deleterious effects of their decisions based on the law, In the shift from informal to formal an underfinanced or inadequate through some form of due process. systems, many countries have old health infrastructure on previously Countries may subscribe to different and new systems coexisting, often in productive economies. Private firms legal systems arising from different conflict. The loser is often the more profit from investments in education, political and social cultures, but the formal new system, implemented in from primary to university, from fair administration and enforcement a shallow and ineffective manner. universal to targeted. Ensuring that of a just system of laws is a cardinal One estimate suggests that as many such education is appropriate for a principle. Both elements matter— as 80% of the legal issues facing the future workforce is a core task of laws and their administration. poor are addressed through customary a well-functioning education or informal systems. Laws form an intrinsic layer of infrastructure. Educating women the foundation for a robust private Corruption and confusion over the has particularly positive effects on sector. Without a transparent legal enforcement of rules are often to their future earnings—and society’s. framework and a fair judicial and blame for high compliance costs. Investments in health and education administrative system, other efforts Bureaucratic red tape, backlogs, involve both the public and private to foster private sector development arbitrary decisionmaking and other sectors, and counter to conventional cannot work as intended, and may onerous requirements and inefficient belief, many education and health even do harm. Home governments practices hamper private activity. services in developing countries are must establish the “rules of the game”, Arbitrary or corrupt enforcement delivered through private initiatives, a system that reduces transaction subvert laws intended as benevolent including cooperatives and mutual costs by making them predictable protections, including laws for worker health insurance organizations. In and enforceable. Legal and admin- safety, environmental protection some systems 70–80% of health care istrative systems influence whether and consumer safety. And corrupt expenditures are through private and how transactions take place. practices distort prices and markets, actors. Often, but not always, and hinder free and fair competition. The rule of law manifests itself in private involvement is a response the private sector with commercial to government underinvestments. The World Bank estimates that laws, customs laws and contract corruption can reduce a country’s laws, among others. Critically, growth rate by 0.5 to 1.0 percentage the assignment and protection of points a year. Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index could, with CHAPTER 2: CONSTRAINTS ON THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES 17
very few exceptions, almost FIGURE 2.4 ENTERPRISES IN LOW INCOME COUNTRIES be ordered by income—poorer FACE MANY MORE BURDENS WHEN REGISTERING countries are almost universally Income Number of Duration Cost (% of rated more corrupt, though there procedures (days) GNI per capita) is plenty of recent evidence that corruption is not limited to lower Low and 11 70 115 Enterprises income categories. lower in low and middle lower middle income countries face THREE PILLARS OF the longest ENTREPRENEURSHIP— Upper 11 58 29 duration and middle the highest TOO OFTEN MISSING cost (as a percent of GNI Even with strong macroeconomic per capita). and institutional foundations, three High 8 42 17 additional factors are indispensable for entrepreneurship and the private sector to flourish in an economy: a Note: Low and lower middle-income countries had GDP per capita (purchasing power level playing field, access to finance, parity) of less than $2,976 in 2001, upper middle-income countries were between $2,976 and $9,205, and high income countries were above $9,205. and knowledge and skills. Source: World Bank (2003a) A level playing field— with fair rules, fairly enforced Perhaps most important in allowing and licensing procedures raise the need to make choices about the entrepreneurship and the private cost of entry into the formal sector products they purchase and the sector to blossom is a level playing and tilt the playing field in many capital they allocate. Labour market field for firms competing in the developing countries (figure 2.4). rules are critical to protecting domestic market. That can be For example, the World Bank’s Cost employees from exploitation. But created only by a system of rules of Doing Business survey estimates a number of developing countries and enforcement mechanisms that that starting a business requires have excessively complex labour is fair, trustworthy and effective. $5,531 in Angola (more than eight rules, more than wealthier countries. Predictable rules ensure that times the per capita income) and For laying off employees, companies entrepreneurs have open access about $28 in New Zealand (far less in middle and low income nations to markets and can do business than 1% of the per capita income). face higher barriers on average than efficiently. And basic trust in the Cumbersome entry regulations their counterparts in developed system encourages entrepreneurship are directly correlated with lower economies. The mechanisms for and attracts talent (local, foreign productivity. When countries are social dialogue to find ways of and diaspora) to embark on ranked by ease of starting a business, mitigating the effects of layoffs, entrepreneurial ventures. the top quartile of countries has and safety nets to protect the poor labour productivity of about $40 are often weak or non-existent Good rules are a critical element in per worker, almost twice that of the in most developing countries. creating a level playing field, and bottom quartile. Longer registration Moreover, rigid employment effective regulations are essential processes are directly associated regulations are associated with for the market economy. Rules, if with higher levels of corruption. higher female unemployment. excessively complex and incorrectly Note, however, that few of these Operating rules. Disclosure applied, can turn into significant rules are regularly enforced, making requirements can have a positive barriers for enterprises and hamper the case for simpler rules with business growth. This applies to rules impact at the industry and business for entry, operating, market and exit. environment by giving consumers and investors the information they Entry rules. Excessive procedural requirements for business registration 18 UNLEASHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP: MAKING BUSINESS WORK FOR THE POOR better enforcement. Complex tax Product market barriers also not have the skills and resources rules and structures also impose stifle growth. Subsidies and trade they need to enforce the laws. high costs that fall more on small barriers in the developed world They often require additional and medium enterprises than on are the biggest culprits. But many training or tools. large enterprises, which can afford developing countries also raise Access to financing tax experts. barriers to entry—say, by forbidding While foreign direct investment small companies to distribute Credit rules. Many countries lack has had an essential role in the electricity in rural areas, even rules for sharing credit information, development process, it is impossible when state monopolies do not which makes it virtually impossible for a country to progress without serve those areas. for creditors to check how indebted a domestic investment based on potential client already is. In addition, Restrictions on pricing can also domestic savings. This requires domestic financial institutions creditors have limited protection in cloud the business environment. that can efficiently manage risk the case of default, significantly For example, many governments and allocate capital to productive lessening their willingness to assume charge excessively high prices for investments. Many developing the risks associated with small and fixed-line domestic and international countries have had weak, state- medium enterprise lending. telecommunications services. The dominated financial sectors unable monopolies that operate in these Tax rules. High tax rates and to act as a catalyst for development. conditions are highly profitable as a complex tax administration is a But where genuine reform has been result, but their capital and labour significant constraint for small and implemented, the benefits have productivity are low. The high medium enterprises and can lead been quick and evident, even if prices provide few incentives for them to the informal sector if tax creating and restructuring an telecommunications players to use efficient domestic financial sector burdens become excessive. their resources more effectively. is a long task. A large informal economy can Exit rules. Inadequate bankruptcy Large companies are well served mean lower government revenues rules and protections can create by existing banking systems, and and higher taxes for firms in the additional hurdles for financing there has been good progress in formal economy, creating more enterprises. Countries with better microfinance over the last 10 years— incentives for informal operation. insolvency regulations tend to have with 41 million poor people served For example, in Brazil the informal more and cheaper lending. in more than 65 countries. But the economy grew as tax revenues progress on small and medium increased from 24% of GDP in Poor enforcement by formal enterprise financing has been slow 1991 to 29% in 1999. institutions permits enterprises at best. It is not only about money to avoid some or all of these rules, Market rules. Barriers in the land needed, though. Small and medium advantaging some of them over market are high in many nations. enterprises are risky ventures. They others. Breakdowns in formal For example, it takes about 168 require risk capital, but the sources institutions occur when officials steps, involving 53 public and private of such capital are difficult to tap. do not have the skill or will to agencies and 13–25 years to acquire So small and medium enterprises carry out their oversight functions. “informal” land and receive legal generally have to turn to classic debt Government officials may not have title to it in the Philippines. This financing. This can be difficult for the will to enforce the laws because arduous process discourages people them, because few entrepreneurs in the institutions they work for do from formally purchasing land, developing countries can leverage not provide the right incentives. making it impossible to use land assets as collateral the way they do in The institutions may not reward as collateral for getting credit, one developed countries. Why? Mainly officials for applying the law fairly because of informal property rights of the main sources of capital in and equally, and the organizations and the lack of mortgage markets. developed countries. may lack transparency and may not Collateral requirements act as a supervise officials sufficiently. In screen that selects wealthy borrowers addition, government officials may and crowds out many entrepreneurs with high growth potential. CHAPTER 2: CONSTRAINTS ON THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES 19
Most emerging markets finance up accustomed to full-blown risk It contributes directly to a firm’s to 90% of their investments locally, assessments working with large productivity by enabling the although for Sub-Saharan Africa clients—too costly for small adoption of innovative technologies the figure is closer to 65% and medium enterprises. and processes. A firm’s competitive (and most productive enterprises At the other end of the spectrum advantage comes from its generate revenue in local currency, microfinance institutions lend with entrepreneurial capabilities; so the reliance on local financing very limited analysis, relying mostly its management and technical is sustainable). Private credit as a on social networks for repayment. know-how, including labour- percentage of GDP rises from This does not work well for the management relations; and the 12% in low income countries larger amounts that small and skills, education and adaptability to 25% in lower middle-income medium enterprises require. of its employees. countries, 30% in upper middle- A lack of reliable credit information The level of education matters, income countries and 85% in also hampers the growth of and the skills of employees need to high income countries. small and medium enterprise be continually upgraded through lending—usually because there A web of factors is at work, more on-the-job training to increase the are no credit information agencies than just the lack of capital. firm’s productivity and its ability to and disclosure requirements are absorb new technologies. In Costa Rules and their enforcement are weak or not enforced. Rica, Mauritius and Singapore the often at the core. Most countries Investors lack exit opportunities. private sector has benefited from a have weak property rights, Capital markets are absent or virtuous cycle with formal education making the use of assets as highly illiquid in many poor reinforced by on-the-job learning collateral difficult. Even when countries, making public offerings and training. Costa Rica has the property rights are well defined, impossible. Private offerings most software exports per capita the enforcement of mortgage can work, but most markets are in Latin America, making it a contracts is often impossible, far from liquid, with very few technological hub in the region, for both political and judicial transaction opportunities. thanks to its investments in both reasons. In addition, bankruptcy Entrepreneurs often lack the skill basic education (producing one laws are typically lacking, and the will for receiving risk of the highest literacy rates) and increasing the risk to creditors capital. On skill, management technical education. and further deterring them talent is limited. On will, from investing in small and private equity investors report Many developing countries suffer medium enterprises. the reluctance of small and from low levels of human capital Poor financial institutions medium enterprises to open investment, aggravated by the are also a problem. Domestic their books to outsiders in outward migration of highly skilled financial institutions can operate environments where parallel professionals. The cumulative in oligopolistic or monopolistic accounting is widespread. “brain drain” since 1990 has been conditions, with limited share- estimated at 15% for Central Access to skills and knowledge holder pressure to enter new and America, 6% for Africa, 5% for Technological innovations and the more difficult markets, such as Asia and 3% for South America. shift towards knowledge-based lending to small and medium The International Organization economies make human capital enterprises. Added to the lack for Migration estimates that some investment a prerequisite for of incentives is the public 300,000 professionals from the sustained economic growth and borrowing that crowds out African continent live and work central to the start-up, growth private borrowing. in Europe and North America. and productivity of firms. Human Even when financial institutions capital can determine the potential have the will, they often lack for a firm’s growth and survival. the skills for small and medium enterprise lending. Banks are 20 UNLEASHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP: MAKING BUSINESS WORK FOR THE POOR
By some estimates up to a third of R&D professionals from This diagnosis of the structure the developing world reside in of the private sector and the OECD countries. constraints to its rapid growth This persistent brain drain deprives applies in differing degrees across a developing countries of the know-how wide range of developing countries. of thousands of their most talented The balance among the different people. It reduces the stock of factors varies with income, human capital at home, erodes the institutional development and domestic tax base and shrinks the the composition of the private educated middle class, a stabilizing sector. Addressing the constraints factor in most societies. to unleash the potential of the private sector will require The migration of talented risk- programmes tailored to the needs seeking entrepreneurs from the of individual countries, but the developing world seeking opportu- underlying approaches will be nities in more entrepreneurially broadly similar. We turn to minded societies spotlights the them now. obstacles to starting and scaling up businesses in their native countries. The underlying cause is a disabling social environment that limits both the number of potential entrepreneurs and the degree to which they can unfold their potential. Photo: Evan Schneider/UNDP OF THE PRIVATE SECTOR POTENTIAL UNLEASHING THE NESIGETERNUSI:MAKINGBUSINESS WORK FOR THE POOR UNLEASHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP: a comprehensive programme ofreform andchange. provide thatthiscreates for and consensusforchange can thespringboard Andthemomentum support. translateinto greater political can development sector approaches toprivate constructive results evident, ofreform are quickly andthe articulated Ifthebenefitsofreform are clearly poor inmanyways. tothe sectorisimportant thattheprivate The Commissionhasemphasized sector andtotheefficientfunctioningofamarket economy. oftheprivate thatisvitaltothedevelopment capacity govern transactions, neededto andhelpcreate theseconstraints thecapacity alleviate that can Here steps weexaminethepolicies andadministrative them. istolift “who” and are they tobelifted are theconstraints to “how” determining “what” Now from thefocusmust shift packages. country putting togetherspecific, ismovingchallenge from anunderstandingofthebroad to constraints I CHAPTER 3 elements of policies for addressing them.The big elements ofpoliciesfor addressing them.The are So thekey generally accepted. known—and on developing asustainableprivate are widely sector he Commission thattheconstraints acknowledges 21 22 UNLEASHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP: MAKING BUSINESS WORK FOR THE POOR
FIGURE 3.1 STRENGTHENING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF The main public players in this TRADITIONAL PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES field are the World Bank Group Targeted at public Targeted at private (including the International sector players sector players Finance Corporation and the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Driven by private Setting broader standards Business linkages and Agency) and the International sector players (industry norms,sustainability, partnerships Companies corporate governance) Investment, including Monetary Fund. The regional Civil society Lobbying for policy changes foreign direct investment development banks, including the organizations Promoting participatory Mentorship for Asian Development Bank, the Foundations processes through entrepreneurs social dialogue African Development Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction Driven by public Policy reform Public-private partnerships, and Development and the Inter- sector players Policy advice for example, for basic American Development Bank, are Local Funding and delivering service delivery governments technical assistance for Public-private also focused on helping to create Donor public sector reforms consultative bodies the enabling environment for governments Financial transfers Privatization or contracting entrepreneurial development in Development (aid, loans) Investment promotion agencies Direct business their respective regions. Important development services roles are also being played by Direct financing the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development in research and policy, and by the Some broad lessons of experience: of poor governance (Kenya, major UN specialized organizations Nigeria in the past few years) Successful policy reforms have such as the United Nations Industrial can often use the impetus of generally been those in which Development Organization, the change to implement reforms. concerned governments and United Nations Conference on Changes almost always policymakers have made strong Trade and Development, the include new roles for the local and voluntary commitments International Labour Organization private sector and civil society to change. and the United Nations Development organizations, including employer Reforms linked to conditionality Programme. Bilateral agencies and and worker organizations. rarely succeed when implementing institutions (such as the United Technology is the agent for much governments are not committed States Agency for International of the needed change, and new to them. Development, the U.K. Department technology enables change to be Significant changes often occur for International Development, the implemented much faster than when countries are faced with Canadian International Development might generally be expected. major economic crisis (India in Agency and the Netherlands 1991, East Asia in the late 1990s), Support to private sector Development Finance Company) and the response to these changes development—both global and are also focused on important can be rapid. Of course, it is better national—can involve economic elements of the task, including not to wait for a crisis to reform. research, macro and sector policy enhancing access to capital and Changes can also follow advice, technical assistance and supporting the development of major shifts in basic economic direct financial support to specific micro entrepreneurs and small philosophy (China, Vietnam private sector projects. Barring and medium enterprises. and Eastern Europe). the latter, the bulk of these The Commission believes that New governments that replace interventions involve governments any approach to private sector previous regimes with a history and public institutions directing development—and the policy their support to governments and and action recommendations that public institutions in developing accompany it—needs to be grounded countries (figure 3.1). in the realization that the savings, investment and innovation that CHAPTER 3: UNLEASHING THE POTENTIAL OF THE PRIVATE SECTOR 23 lead to development are undertaken enforcement is required before implementation of these policies primarily by private individuals, proceeding to full liberalization. can help private entrepreneurs enter corporations and communities. Influencing national, regional into transactions with confidence Governments should thus act and global risk perceptions that the contractual underpinnings as facilitators of private sector favourably through better of these transactions can be enforced. development and avoid actions information dissemination in In any economy, a strong that impede it. Governments and real time (rather than simply capacity to govern transactions intergovernmental agencies can through promotional marketing is needed to unleash domestic facilitate private sector development of investment opportunities) entrepreneurial energy. only by fostering properly functioning and encouraging government Strengthening the rule of law competitive markets. behaviour that excites and For private enterprises the rule of supports rather than turns off Providing conducive operating law provides the foundation for a investors, whether domestic and investment environments predictable regulatory framework or foreign. in which all private enterprise and capacity to govern transactions Targeting subsidies and tax (domestic, foreign, politically between private parties. Ensuring the incentives where clearly needed connected or otherwise) can rule of law is not only about having to address market imperfections, flourish without fear or favour. or introducing the appropriate set and moving away from broader This involves an overall social of laws—it is about ensuring that reliance on measures that may context that is politically stable laws can be enforced, fairly. and predictable, with appropriate be politically attractive in the procompetition rules and short run but are generally The overriding need is to ensure effective enforcement and sound counterproductive for sound integrity in public service, which macroeconomic fundamentals, private sector development in requires governments to: the long run. including a fiscal policy conducive Establish and use transparent, Providing or enabling the private to the development of the formal public, open, nonexclusionary provision of essential infrastructure private sector and adequate to the and objective procedures in (power, water, communications, financing of the required human public procurement contracts. transport) through public-private and physical infrastructure. Establish open, transparent, partnerships, innovative regulatory Establishing properly functioning efficient and fair employment models and other means to ensure legal and judicial systems for systems for public officials to that private enterprises are not protecting property rights ensure efficiency and good put at a competitive disadvantage. and resolving contractual service and avoid patronage, disputes—systems seen to nepotism and favouritism. operate credibly and efficiently BUILDING Provide education, training, when judged by international THE FOUNDATIONS supervision, incentive structures (not national) standards. Chapter 2 discussed the global and and codes of conduct that Facilitating the movement of domestic macro environment and breed and reward integrity private capital of all kinds, not the availability of physical and and professionalism. just foreign direct investment, social infrastructure. We focus here Establish a system to avoid through the progressive devel- on more specific actions relating to conflicts of interest and improper opment of national capital fostering the rule of law and creating influence on officials and to markets and their links to a level playing field for entrepreneurs. provide mechanisms for officials regional and global capital We also address the broad principles to report such misconduct markets. Liberalization of that need to be applied to improve without endangering their financial capital flows requires access to financing and the availability safety and professional status. great prudence, however. of skills and knowledge. Effective A sound financial system with good regulations and 24 UNLEASHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP: MAKING BUSINESS WORK FOR THE POOR
Related to ensuring integrity in public countries—the court system, property ERECTING service is ensuring accountability registries and law enforcement THE PILLARS and transparency in the actions agencies—are often the least of public officials. This requires modern and least funded of all Chapter 2 also described the three governments to: public institutions. pillars that are indispensable for entrepreneurship and the private Build a broad base of support Business property rights can often sector to flourish: a level playing by running well publicized, be protected by providing alternative field, access to finance, and participatory anticorruption channels for resolving disputes with knowledge and skills. campaigns addressing the public other businesses, customers, suppliers Creating a level playing field and private sectors. and government officials. Establish appropriate auditing Creating and defending a level Alternative dispute resolution procedures for public adminis- playing field for companies requires systems provide a substitute tration and the public sector, a system of rules and enforcement for slow and expensive formal and measures and systems to that inspires trust and reasonably courts in their ability to provide provide timely public reporting on limits the cost and burden on predictable legal protection for performance and decisionmaking. enterprises. In recent years this the contracts and property of Ensure transparent procedures area has received more attention small entrepreneurs. Argentina for public procurement, privatiza- from private and public players in piloted such a system, with tion, state projects, state licenses, development. One focus has been on 66% of 32,000 commercial cases state commissions, national improving legislation and regulation. resolved in an average of 2 months bank loans, other government In Vietnam a new enterprise law (not the typical 3–4 years). guaranteed loans, budget helped create a million new jobs. Automated assignment of cases, allocations and tax breaks. These A level playing field also requires involving random computerized procedures should promote fair strengthening the institutions that assignment of individual cases to competition and deter corrupt implement and enforce regulations. judges, increases a judiciary’s activity. They should also establish The content of the solution seems efficiency and reduces corruption. adequate simplified regulatory clear—overcoming the entrenched In a Slovakian pilot case the time environments by abolishing behaviour that led to poor regulation between the filing and the first overlapping, ambiguous or excessive in the first place. Someone benefits hearing fell from 73 days to 28, regulations that burden business. from every rule, and finding out with the number of steps in case Promote systems for access how to overcome resistance by processing reduced from 23 to 6. to information about public those who benefit is the first step Specialized debt collection expenditure. in effective reform. courts resolve claims faster Strengthen antibribery actions because those who preside over Simplifying regulations. An and promote integrity in them have more command over important element for a level playing business operations. the law and have responsibility field is simplifying regulations Enforcing property rights for the entire debt collection affecting the entry, operation and There is also evidence that system, from seizure to auctioning exit of private enterprises. The governments do too little to protect of property, if necessary. In approach to resolving these issues property rights. The best-practice Colombia a specialized debt is simple, and the experience is countries build efficient courts and collection court increased the well demonstrated—needed is the support laws and institutions that number of cases filed from will to implement change. The define the rights of citizens and 4,000 a year to 11,000 (1996– basic steps involve adopting best businesses to their property. Yet, the 2000), with 75% of cases practices for business registration, institutions that define and enforce resolved in a year and the for changes of ownership and property rights in many developing number of pending cases closures and for the governance falling by 5,000. of transactions. Illustrative action programmes include: CHAPTER 3: UNLEASHING THE POTENTIAL OF THE PRIVATE SECTOR 25