Draft Manuscript

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Draft Manuscript ATOLL RESEARCH BULLETIN NO. 500 CRUSTACEA DECAPODA AND STOMATOPODA OF EASTER ISLAND AND SURROUNDING AREAS. A DOCUMENTED CHECKLIST WITH HISTORICAL OVERVIEW AND BIOGEOGRAPHIC COMMENTS BY JOSEPH POUPIN ISSUED BY NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION WASHINGTON D.C., U.S.A. AUGUST 2003 i CONTENT ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................. 2 METHODS............................................................................................................................. 2 HISTORICAL OVERVIEW .................................................................................................. 3 RESULTS............................................................................................................................... 7 Statistics on Taxa................................................................................................................ 7 Ecology............................................................................................................................... 7 Biogeographic study......................................................................................................... 10 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.................................................................................................... 15 LIST OF THE SPECIES ...................................................................................................... 17 Class Malacostraca .......................................................................................................... 17 Subclass Hoplocarida ...................................................................................................... 17 Order Stomatopoda.......................................................................................................... 17 Family Odontodactylidae ........................................................................................ 17 Family Pseudosquillidae.......................................................................................... 17 Subclass Eumalacostraca................................................................................................. 17 Order Decapoda............................................................................................................... 17 Suborder Dendrobranchiata.............................................................................................. 17 Family Aristaeidae................................................................................................... 17 Family Benthesicymidae ......................................................................................... 18 Family Penaeidae..................................................................................................... 18 Family Sicyoniidae.................................................................................................. 18 Family Solenoceridae .............................................................................................. 18 Family Sergestidae .................................................................................................. 18 Suborder Pleocyemata ...................................................................................................... 19 Infraorder Stenopodidea ...............................................................................................19 Family Spongicolidae.............................................................................................. 19 Family Stenopodidae ............................................................................................... 19 Infraorder Caridea.........................................................................................................19 Family Pasiphaeidae................................................................................................ 19 Family Oplophoridae............................................................................................... 20 Family Disciadidae.................................................................................................. 20 Family Nematocarcinidae........................................................................................ 20 Family Rhynchocinetidae........................................................................................ 21 Family Stylodactylidae............................................................................................ 21 Family Gnathophyllidae .......................................................................................... 21 ii Family Palaemonidae .............................................................................................. 21 Family Alpheidae .................................................................................................... 21 Family Hippolytidae................................................................................................ 22 Family Processidae.................................................................................................. 22 Family Pandalidae ................................................................................................... 22 Family Crangonidae ................................................................................................ 23 Family Glyphocrangonidae ..................................................................................... 23 Infraorder Thalassinidea...............................................................................................23 Family Callianassidae.............................................................................................. 23 Infraorder Palinura........................................................................................................24 Family Polychelidae ................................................................................................ 24 Family Palinuridae................................................................................................... 24 Family Scyllaridae................................................................................................... 24 Infraorder Anomura......................................................................................................24 Family Galatheidae.................................................................................................. 24 Family Porcellanidae ............................................................................................... 25 Family Albuneidae .................................................................................................. 25 Family Diogenidae .................................................................................................. 25 Family Paguridae..................................................................................................... 25 Family Parapaguridae.............................................................................................. 26 Infraorder Brachyura ....................................................................................................27 Family Dromiidae.................................................................................................... 27 Family Dynomenidae .............................................................................................. 27 Family Homolidae ................................................................................................... 27 Family Latreilliidae ................................................................................................. 27 Family Calappidae................................................................................................... 28 Family Leucosiidae ................................................................................................. 28 Family Majidae........................................................................................................ 28 Family Hymenosomatidae....................................................................................... 28 Family Parthenopidae.............................................................................................. 28 Family Atelicyclidae ............................................................................................... 29 Family Geryonidae .................................................................................................. 29 Family Portunidae ................................................................................................... 29 Family Carpiliidae ................................................................................................... 29 Family Goneplacidae............................................................................................... 29 Family Trapeziidae.................................................................................................. 29 Family Xanthidae .................................................................................................... 30 Family Cryptochiridae............................................................................................. 30 Family Pinnotheridae............................................................................................... 30 Family Grapsidae....................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/11/2021 08:33:28AM Via Free Access 224 E
    Contributions to Zoology, 67 (4) 223-235 (1998) SPB Academic Publishing bv, Amsterdam Optics and phylogeny: is there an insight? The evolution of superposition eyes in the Decapoda (Crustacea) Edward Gaten Department of Biology, University’ ofLeicester, Leicester LEI 7RH, U.K. E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Compound eyes, superposition optics, adaptation, evolution, decapod crustaceans, phylogeny Abstract cannot normally be predicted by external exami- nation alone, and usually microscopic investiga- This addresses the of structure and in paper use eye optics the tion of properly fixed optical elements is required construction of and crustacean phylogenies presents an hypoth- for a complete diagnosis. This largely rules out esis for the evolution of in the superposition eyes Decapoda, the use of fossil material in the based the of in comparatively on distribution eye types extant decapod fami- few lies. It that arthropodan specimens where the are is suggested reflecting superposition optics are eyes symplesiomorphic for the Decapoda, having evolved only preserved (Glaessner, 1969), although the optics once, probably in the Devonian. loss of Subsequent reflecting of some species of trilobite have been described has superposition optics occurred following the adoption of a (Clarkson & Levi-Setti, 1975). Also the require- new habitat (e.g. Aristeidae,Aeglidae) or by progenetic paedo- ment for good fixation and the fact that complete morphosis (Paguroidea, Eubrachyura). examination invariably involves the destruction of the specimen means that museum collections Introduction rarely reveal enough information to define the optics unequivocally. Where the optics of the The is one of the compound eye most complex component parts of the eye are under investiga- and remarkable not on of its fixation organs, only account tion, specialised to preserve the refrac- but also for the optical precision, diversity of tive properties must be used (Oaten, 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Papers
    NUMBER 120, 17 pages 25 May 2017 BISHOP MUSEUM OCCASIONAL PAPERS THE SPIDERS OF RAPA NUI (E ASTER ISLAND ) R EVISITED DARKO D. C OTORAS , J. J UDSON WYNNE , LUIS FLORES -P RADO & C RISTIAN VILLAGRA BISHOP MUSEUM PRESS HONOLULU Cover image: The potentially endemic and undescribed Tetragnatha sp., believed restricted to the totora reeds lin - ing the shores of Rano Raraku crater lake. Photo: Darko Cortoras. Bishop Museum Press has been publishing scholarly books on the natu - ESEARCH ral and cultural history of Hawai‘i and the Pacific since 1892. The R Bishop Museum Occasional Papers (eISSN 2376-3191) is a series of short papers describing original research in the natural and cultural sci - PUBLICATIONS OF ences. BISHOP MUSEUM The Bishop Museum Press also publishes the Bishop Museum Bulletin series. It was begun in 1922 as a series of monographs presenting the results of research throughout the Pacific in many scientific fields. In 1987, the Bulletin series was separated into the Museum’s five current monographic series, issued irregularly and, since 2017, electronically: Bishop Museum Bulletins in Anthropology (eISSN 2376-3132) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Botany (eISSN 2376-3078) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Entomology (eISSN 2376-3124) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Zoology (eISSN 2376-3213) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Cultural and Environmental Studies (eISSN 2376-3159) To subscribe to any of the above series, or to purchase individual publi - cations, please write to: Bishop Museum Press, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA. Phone: (808) 848-4135. Email: [email protected]. BERNICE PAUAHI BISHOP MUSEUM ISSN 0893-1348 (print) The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History ISSN 2376-3191 (online) 1525 Bernice Street Copyright © by Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA Published online: 25 May 2017 ISSN (online): 2376-3191 Spiders of Rapa Nui (Easter Island) Revisted .
    [Show full text]
  • Chile and Argentina Easter Island Ext Feb2022 Updatedjun2020
    E CHE SEM A N CHEESEMANS’ ECOLOGY SAFARIS E S C 2059 Camden Ave. #419 ’ O San Jose, CA 95124 USA L (800) 527-5330 (408) 741-5330 O G [email protected] Y S cheesemans.com A FA RIS Easter Island Extension Mysterious Moai February 23 to 28, 2022 Moai © Far South Expeditions EXTENSION OVERVIEW Join us on an exciting extension where you’ll stroll amongst the monolithic moai statues of Easter Island, carved from basalt lava by Polynesian settlers centuries ago. Visit abandoned settlements, explore ceremonial centers, and take a boat ride for a different perspective of the island, where you might see petroglyphs painted high on the cliffs above. Come along for an unforgettable journey of exploration into the history of Easter Island (Rapa Nui). HIGHLIGHTS • Learn about Easter Island’s moai statues and the tangata manu competition where rulership of Easter Island was defined through a ritual race for a bird egg. TRIP OPTION: This is a post-trip extension to our Chile and Argentina trip from February 11 to 24, 2022 (http://cheesemans.com/trips/chile-argentina-feb2022). Cheesemans’ Ecology Safaris Page 1 of 6 Updated: June 2020 LEADER: Josefina ‘Josie’ Nahoe Mulloy. DAYS: Adds 3 days to the main trip to total 17 days, including estimated travel time. GROUP SIZE: 8 (minimum of 4 required). COST: $2,230 per person, double occupancy, not including airfare, singles extra. See the Costs section on page 4. Date Description Accommodation Meals Feb 23 Fly from Punta Arenas to Santiago from our Chile Santiago Airport D and Argentina trip.
    [Show full text]
  • Decapod Crustacean Phylogenetics
    CRUSTACEAN ISSUES ] 3 II %. m Decapod Crustacean Phylogenetics edited by Joel W. Martin, Keith A. Crandall, and Darryl L. Felder £\ CRC Press J Taylor & Francis Group Decapod Crustacean Phylogenetics Edited by Joel W. Martin Natural History Museum of L. A. County Los Angeles, California, U.S.A. KeithA.Crandall Brigham Young University Provo,Utah,U.S.A. Darryl L. Felder University of Louisiana Lafayette, Louisiana, U. S. A. CRC Press is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Croup, an informa business CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300 Boca Raton, Fl. 33487 2742 <r) 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, I.I.G CRC Press is an imprint of 'Taylor & Francis Group, an In forma business No claim to original U.S. Government works Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 109 8765 43 21 International Standard Book Number-13: 978-1-4200-9258-5 (Hardcover) Ibis book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the valid­ ity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint. Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Faw, no part of this book maybe reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or uti­ lized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopy­ ing, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura, Paguroidea) with Subconical Corneas, and New Data on Biology of Some Rare Species
    Two new species of Parapaguridae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura, Paguroidea) with subconical corneas, and new data on biology of some rare species Rafael LEMAITRE Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, MRC 163, Deparment of Invertebrate Zoology, P.O. box 37012, Washington, D.C., 20013-7012 (USA) [email protected] Lemaitre R. 2006. — Two new species of Parapaguridae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura, PaguroKlea) with subconical corneas, and new data on biology of some rare species. Zoosvs- tema28(2):517-532. ABSTRACT Two new parapagurid species with subconical corneas, Oncopagurus conicus n. sp. and Paragiopagurus schnauztr n. ap., are described based on collections by French expeditions to New Caledonia, the Philippines and Solomon Islands, in the we-stern Pacific. These represent the 16th and 18th documented species of Oncopagurus Vemixtyc, 1996 and Paragiopagurus\jimw.K, 1996, respectively. KEYWORDS Two other parapagurids arc known to have subconical corneas, Sympagurus Crustacea, acinops Lemaitre, 1989, and Oncopagurus minutus (Henderson, 1896). Also Decapoda, Anotnura, rejxirtcd are specimens of two rare and morphologically unique parapagurids, Parapaguridae, lyphlopagurtis foresti de Saint Laurent, 1972 and Bivalvopagurus sinensis (de ParagiopaguruSy Saint I aurent, 1972), and represent geographical and bathymetric range c-xten- Oncopagurus, Typhlopagurtis, sions for both species. The diagnoses of the monotypic genera Typhlopagurus Bivalvopagunis, and Bivalvopagurus are to be modified due lo new data on morphology and hermit crabs, biology. The former genus was given to inclutle T foresti, wrongly assumed to deep-water, misnomers, lack a>rnea, thus presumed blind; and the latter for B. sinensis, prematurely new species. assumed to exclusively use bivalve shells as housing. ZOOSYSTEMA • 2006 • 28 (2) O Publications ScientHiquas du Musium national d'Histoire natureNe, Paris.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetics of the Brachyuran Crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda): the Status of Podotremata Based on Small Subunit Nuclear Ribosomal RNA
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45 (2007) 576–586 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogenetics of the brachyuran crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda): The status of Podotremata based on small subunit nuclear ribosomal RNA Shane T. Ahyong a,*, Joelle C.Y. Lai b, Deirdre Sharkey c, Donald J. Colgan c, Peter K.L. Ng b a Biodiversity and Biosecurity, National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Private Bag 14901 Kilbirnie, Wellington, New Zealand b School of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore c Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia Received 26 January 2007; revised 13 March 2007; accepted 23 March 2007 Available online 13 April 2007 Abstract The true crabs, the Brachyura, are generally divided into two major groups: Eubrachyura or ‘advanced’ crabs, and Podotremata or ‘primitive’ crabs. The status of Podotremata is one of the most controversial issues in brachyuran systematics. The podotreme crabs, best recognised by the possession of gonopores on the coxae of the pereopods, have variously been regarded as mono-, para- or polyphyletic, or even as non-brachyuran. For the first time, the phylogenetic positions of the podotreme crabs were studied by cladistic analysis of small subunit nuclear ribosomal RNA sequences. Eight of 10 podotreme families were represented along with representatives of 17 eubr- achyuran families. Under both maximum parsimony and Bayesian Inference, Podotremata was found to be significantly paraphyletic, comprising three major clades: Dromiacea, Raninoida, and Cyclodorippoida. The most ‘basal’ is Dromiacea, followed by Raninoida and Cylodorippoida. Notably, Cyclodorippoida was identified as the sister group of the Eubrachyura.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura)
    Revision of the family Latreilliidae Stimpson, 1858 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura) Peter CASTRO Biological Sciences Department, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, California 91768-4032 (USA) [email protected] Austin B. WILLIAMS Deceased in 1999 National Marine Fisheries Service Systematics Laboratory, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC 20560 (USA) Lara L. COOPER Biodiversity Science Branch, Fisheries and Oceans Canada Ottawa, Ontario, KIA OE6 (Canada) Castro P., Williams A. B. & Cooper L. L. 2003. — Revision of the family Latreilliidae Stimpson, 1858 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura). Zoosystema 25 (4): 601-634. ABSTRACT A study of specimens from around the world and the re-examination of addi- tional material used by Williams for his revision of Latreillia Roux, 1830 have lead to a revision of the family Latreilliidae Stimpson, 1858 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura). The family now consists of two genera: Latreillia, with five species (L. elegans Roux, 1830, L. metanesa Williams, 1982, L. pen- nifera Alcock, 1900, L. valida de Haan, 1839, and L. williamsi Melo, 1990), and Eplumula Williams, 1982, with two species (E. australiensis (Henderson, 1888) and E. phalangium (de Haan, 1839)). Latreillia manningi Williams, 1982, which was described as a western Atlantic species distinct from the Mediterranean and eastern Atlantic populations of L. elegans, is now regarded as a very close geographical variant of L. elegans because the differences between the two populations are insignificant and overlapping. The revision KEY WORDS has resulted in an updated and more detailed definition of the Latreilliidae Crustacea, with the addition of characters such as the type of abdominal holding system Decapoda, Brachyura, and the morphology of the coxae of the last pair of pereopods (P5) of males.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Parapaguridae), with Descriptions of Nine New Species
    Lemaitre: Oncopagurus taxonomic synthesis and new species Taxonomy & Systematics RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 62: 210–301 Date of publication: 19 May 2014 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:08BE1873-6F6F-4255-9520-9A89F48E4F16 A worldwide taxonomic and distributional synthesis of the genus Oncopagurus Lemaitre, 1996 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Parapaguridae), with descriptions of nine new species Rafael Lemaitre Abstract. A worldwide taxonomic and distributional synthesis of the deep-water hermit crab genus Oncopagurus Lemaitre, 1996 is presented. This genus, originally defi ned for 10 species is set apart from other Parapaguridae as well as other Paguroidea, by one synapomorphy: the presence of an upwardly curved epistomial spine. This study is based on a large amount of specimens deposited in major museums and collected during deep-sea sampling across the world oceans since the late 1800s, with the bulk of material coming from French campaigns in the Indo-Pacifi c, central and south Pacifi c during the last 40 years. A total of 24 species are recognised in this investigation, nine of which are new and fully described and illustrated. All previously known species are diagnosed or re-described, including fi gures assembled from recent published accounts or newly illustrated, of the most important morphological features useful for identifi cations. Information for each species includes a synonymy (full or abbreviated if a synonymy has recently been published), material examined (type and non-types), variations when signifi cant, colouration when available, habitat or type of housing used, distribution, and remarks on taxonomy and morphological affi nities. Rare colour photographs are included for fi ve species.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea)
    Tuhinga 22: 171–272 Copyright © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (2011) Annotated checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea) John C. Yaldwyn† and W. Richard Webber* † Research Associate, Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa. Deceased October 2005 * Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand ([email protected]) (Manuscript completed for publication by second author) ABSTRACT: A checklist of the Recent Decapoda (shrimps, prawns, lobsters, crayfish and crabs) of the New Zealand region is given. It includes 488 named species in 90 families, with 153 (31%) of the species considered endemic. References to New Zealand records and other significant references are given for all species previously recorded from New Zealand. The location of New Zealand material is given for a number of species first recorded in the New Zealand Inventory of Biodiversity but with no further data. Information on geographical distribution, habitat range and, in some cases, depth range and colour are given for each species. KEYWORDS: Decapoda, New Zealand, checklist, annotated checklist, shrimp, prawn, lobster, crab. Contents Introduction Methods Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda Suborder DENDROBRANCHIATA Bate, 1888 ..................................... 178 Superfamily PENAEOIDEA Rafinesque, 1815.............................. 178 Family ARISTEIDAE Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891..................... 178 Family BENTHESICYMIDAE Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891 .......... 180 Family PENAEIDAE Rafinesque, 1815 ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Art of the Sacred Precinct at Mata Ngarau, 'Orongo
    Rapa Nui Journal: Journal of the Easter Island Foundation Volume 22 Issue 2 October Article 6 2008 ROCK ART OF THE SACRED PRECINCT AT MATA NGARAU, 'ORONGO Paul Horley Yuri Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University Georgia Lee Easter Island Foundation Follow this and additional works at: https://kahualike.manoa.hawaii.edu/rnj Part of the History of the Pacific Islands Commons, and the Pacific Islands Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Horley, Paul and Lee, Georgia (2008) "ROCK ART OF THE SACRED PRECINCT AT MATA NGARAU, 'ORONGO," Rapa Nui Journal: Journal of the Easter Island Foundation: Vol. 22 : Iss. 2 , Article 6. Available at: https://kahualike.manoa.hawaii.edu/rnj/vol22/iss2/6 This Research Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Hawai`i Press at Kahualike. It has been accepted for inclusion in Rapa Nui Journal: Journal of the Easter Island Foundation by an authorized editor of Kahualike. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Horley and Lee: ROCK ART OF THE SACRED PRECINCT AT MATA NGARAU, 'ORONGO ROCK ART OF THE SACRED PRECINCT AT MATA NGARAU, 'ORONGO Paul Horley Yuri Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University Georgia Lee Easter island Foundation INTRODUCTION rock surfaces are covered with numerous petroglyphs, creating the highest concentration ofrock art on Easter Island (Lee he ceremonial village of 'Orongo is one of the most 1992: 137). Due to intensive activity over a significant fascinating and important sites on Easter Island. historical period, the rocks of Mata Ngarau present evidence TLocated at the top ofRano Kau's precipitous cliffs, ofre-use and re-carving, allowing us to trace the evolution of 'Orongo offers awe-inspiring views toward the three off-shore petroglyph motifs from simple, incised fom1s to elaborate, islets of Motu Kao Kao, Motu Iti, and Motu Nui.
    [Show full text]
  • Hermit Crabs from the South China Sea (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae, Parapaguridae)
    THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2000 Supplement No. 8: 377-404 © National University of Singapore HERMIT CRABS FROM THE SOUTH CHINA SEA (CRUSTACEA: DECAPODA: ANOMURA: DIOGENIDAE, PAGURIDAE, PARAPAGURIDAE) Dwi Listyo Rahayu Rand D Center for Oceanology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIP/), Jt. Pasir Putih I, Ancol Timur, PO Box 4801 JKTF, Jakarta 11048, Indonesia ABSTRACT. - One hundred and two species of hermit crabs are recorded from the South China Sea. Information presented is from published references to the species. Most of the species are widely distributed in the Indo-West Pacific. INTRODUCTION Studies on hermit crabs of the South China Sea were done mostly according to country border and not to geographical border, such as hermit crab of Singapore and Malaysia (Nobili, 1900; 1903a, c; Lanchester, 1902; Rahayu, 1996), Vietnam (Fize & Serene, 1955; Forest, 1956c; 1958), Philippines (Estampador, 1937, 1959), Taiwan (Yu, 1987; Yu & Foo, 1990) and China (Wang, 1994). Some hermit crabs from this region are mentioned in the revision of one or more taxonomical groups, such as revision of the family Parapaguridae (de Saint Laurent, 1972; Lemaitre, 1996, 1997), genus Aniculus (Forest, 1984), genus Pagurixus (McLaughlin & Haig, 1984), genus Pylopaguropsis (McLaughlin & Haig, 1989), genus Pylopagurus and Tomopagurus (McLaughlin & Gunn, 1992) and genus Trizopagurus (Forest, 1995). One hundred and two species belonging to family Diogenidae, Paguridae and Parapaguridae are recorded from the South China Sea. The family Diogenidae is represented by eight genera (Aniculus, Calcinus, Ciliopagurus, Clibanarius, Dardanus, Diogenes, Paguristes and Strigopagurus), the family Paguridae is represented by eight genera (Australeremus, Ceratopagurus, Nematopagurus, Paguritta, Pagurixus, Pagurus, Pylopaguropsis and Spiropagurus) and the family Parapaguridae is represented by four genera (Bivalvopagurus, Oncopagurus, Paragiopagurus, and Sympagurus).
    [Show full text]