DOCSLIB.ORG

The Geographic and Economic Importance of Hunting In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Geographic and Economic Importance of Hunting In THE GEOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF HUNTING IN SOUTHWESTERN MONTANA, USA by RYAN DENNIS BERGSTROM A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Sciences MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana April 2008 ©COPYRIGHT by Ryan Dennis Bergstrom 2008 All Rights Reserved iii APPROVAL of a thesis submitted by Ryan Dennis Bergstrom This thesis has been read by each member of the thesis committee and has been found to be satisfactory regarding content, English usage, format, citation, bibliographic style, and consistency, and is ready for submission to the Division of Graduate Education. Dr. Katherine Hansen Approved for the Department of Earth Sciences Dr. Stephen Custer Approved for the Division of Graduate Education Dr. Carl A. Fox iv STATEMENT OF PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Master‟s degree at Montana State University, I agree that the Library shall make it available to borrowers under rules of the Library. If I have indicated my intention to copyright this thesis by including a copyright notice page, copying is allowable only for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed in the U.S. Copyright Law. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this thesis in whole or in parts may be granted only by the copyright holder. Ryan Dennis Bergstrom April 2008 v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to graciously thank my mentor and graduate advisor, Dr. Katherine J. Hansen, for her leadership, generosity, and patience over the years, as well as for exposing me to hunting. I also thank Dr. William Wyckoff, Dr. Shannon Taylor, Dr. Joseph Ashley, and Stuart Challender for their constant support and guidance in all aspects of my education. I am especially grateful for the generous funding I received from the Montana Wildlife Federation and the Phil Tawney Hunter Conservation Endowment. I would also like to thank Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, specifically Kurt Alt for the inspiration for this project, and David Clark-Snustad for his knowledge and guidance in all matters economic. Most importantly, I wish to thank my Father, my family, my friends, and Montana for their support, patience, guidance, and forgiveness. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. OBJECTIVES AND GEOGRAPHY .........................................................................................1 Objectives ..................................................................................................................................1 Background ................................................................................................................................1 Geography .................................................................................................................................3 Field Characteristics................................................................................................................3 Land Use and Management ...................................................................................................3 Study Area ................................................................................................................................5 Political and Demographic Characteristics of Counties ........................................................5 Physical Characteristics .........................................................................................................7 Geology ………………………………………………………………… ............................9 Ecotypes ………………………………………………………………………………… ...9 Intermountain-Foothill Grassland Ecotype ......................................................................10 Shrub-Grassland Ecotype..................................................................................................12 Montane Forest Ecotype ...................................................................................................13 Big Game Species ...................................................................................................................13 2. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ....................................17 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................17 Montana Perspectives: 1900 - 1930 ........................................................................................17 Montana Perspectives: 1930 - 1960 ........................................................................................19 Montana Perspectives: 1960 - 1980 ........................................................................................20 Montana Perspectives: 1980 – Present ...................................................................................20 Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Funding Sources ..............................................................26 Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act ...........................................................................26 Montana Variably Priced License and Permits .................................................................31 3. LITERATURE REVIEW .......................................................................................................34 Wildlife Valuation Techniques ...............................................................................................35 Economic Importance Methods .........................................................................................35 Input-Output Modeling ......................................................................................................36 The IMPLAN Model..............................................................................................37 Gross Expenditure Model ..................................................................................................39 Economic Value Methods ..................................................................................................40 Travel Cost Method ..............................................................................................40 Contingent Valuation Method ...............................................................................42 vii TABLE OF CONTENTS – CONTINUED National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation ..................................................................................43 4. DATA SOURCES AND METHODOLOGY .........................................................................46 Primary and Secondary Economic Model Data and Source ...................................................46 Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Expenditure Data .......................................................47 Project Funding Sources ....................................................................................................48 Hunter Participation and Harvest Data ....................................................................................49 Hunter Participation and Harvest Comparisons .................................................................49 Economic Input-Output Analysis ...........................................................................................50 Data Disaggregation ..........................................................................................................51 Model Implementation ......................................................................................................51 IMPLAN Descriptive Model ............................................................................................52 IMPLAN Predictive Model ...............................................................................................53 Spatial Visualization of Data ..................................................................................................54 Spatial Distribution of Attributes ......................................................................................55 5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .............................................................................................56 Expenditure Trends in Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Region 3 ......................................56 Expenditure by Project Category ............................................................................................58 Individual Project Expenditures ...............................................................................................58 Expenditure by Hunting District .............................................................................................59 Hunting District 319-341 ....................................................................................................60 Hunting District 380 ...........................................................................................................67 Hunting District 312 ...........................................................................................................70 Hunting District 310 ...........................................................................................................73 Hunting District 302 ...........................................................................................................75 Hunting District 309 ...........................................................................................................77 Hunting District 311 ...........................................................................................................78 Hunting District 323 ..........................................................................................................78
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Montana Forest Insect and Disease Conditions and Program Highlights
    R1-16-17 03/20/2016 Forest Service Northern Region Montata Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Forestry Division In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2020- January 2021
    AMERICAN LEGION DEPARTMENT OF MONTANA Non-Profit Org. ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER U.S. Postage P.O. BOX 6075 HELENA, MT 59604-6075 PAID Permit No. 189 Helena, MT 59601 Volume 98, No. 2 November 2020— January 2021 RAYMOND J NYDEGGER Important Upcoming Dates Nov 11 ........................... Veterans Day DEPARTMENT COMMANDER 1975-76 Nov 26 ........................... Thanksgiving Raymond J Nydegger, Depart- Ray was very civic minded, he Dec 7 .......................Pearl Harbor Day ment Commander 1975-76 of belonged to the Masons, Eastern Dec 9 .....................75% Target Date – Renewal Cut Off Date Melstone, a 65-year member of Star and Shrine; he was also Dec 11 .................................Hanukkah Townsend Post 42 passed away on a former Dad Advisor for the Dec 15 .............. All Employer Awards August 18, 2020. Ray served in the DeMolay and a former Mayor of due to Department US Navy aboard the AE4 USS MT Townsend. Dec 25 ............................... Christmas Baker, an ammunition ship, during Dec 26 .........All 2021 Cash Calendars Ray is survived by his wife due back to Department the Korean War. Jeanne of Melstone, who served Jan 1 ................. New Year’s Day 2021 Ray held all elected offices of the as the Department Auxiliary Jan 2 ..........First 2021 Big K Drawings Post and District; additionally, he President the same year Ray was First 2021 Cash Calendar held many of the appointed offices drawings Commander; and his daughters, Jan 5 ...........................MT Legionnaire in both the Post and District. At Jennifer Bergin and Jody Haa- Feb / Mar / Apr issue cutoff date the Department level he served as gland; and son John.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruby Valley Celebrates Dam Renovations
    THE LOCAL NEWS OF THE MADISON VALLEY, RUBY VALLEY AND SURROUNDING AREAS Montana’s Oldest Publishing Weekly Newspaper. Established 1873 75¢ | Volume 142, Issue 35 www.madisoniannews.com Thursday, June 26, 2014 Time is running out Cellular One customers must find new cell phone service Providers keeping mum; sheriff is ily has three phones.” during the year – and most is supported by AT&T-owned According to Sheriff Dave “I stirred up this can of will expect their cell phones and leased spectrum,” Suzanne worms intentionally to get concerned about public safety Schenk, the issue boils down more involvement because to work – in addition to the Tratnow, media contact for to the fact that neither Verizon [AT&T] wasn’t listening to Ruby Valley residents who AT&T, told The Madisonian. Abigail Dennis cell phone service, accord- nor AT&T – the two providers the customers.” must choose a new provider. “We recently agreed to The Madisonian ing to Matt Greemore, Twin likely to step up to the plate – – Matt Greemore, “We have a huge num- purchase additional spectrum, [email protected] Bridges Town Council member. have committed to anything. Twin Bridges council ber of cars driving through which will allow us to end our “I talked to Cellular One “We have major concerns Madison County every day,” agreement with Sprint at the Madison County Com- When Cellular One goes and they said there were 1,836 about this in terms of public Schulz said. “Everyone should end of our current lease term missioners Dave Schulz and dark in Montana on July 31, customers,” he said.
    [Show full text]
  • Spawning and Early Life History of Mountain Whitefish in The
    SPAWNING AND EARLY LIFE HISTORY OF MOUNTAIN WHITEFISH IN THE MADISON RIVER, MONTANA by Jan Katherine Boyer A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Fish and Wildlife Management MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana January 2016 © COPYRIGHT by Jan Katherine Boyer 2016 All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I thank my advisor, Dr. Christopher Guy, for challenging me and providing advice throughout every stage of this project. I also thank my committee members, Dr. Molly Webb and Dr. Tom McMahon, for guidance and suggestions which greatly improved this research. My field technicians Jordan Rowe, Greg Hill, and Patrick Luckenbill worked hard through fair weather and snowstorms to help me collect the data presented here. I also thank Travis Horton, Pat Clancey, Travis Lohrenz, Tim Weiss, Kevin Hughes, Rick Smaniatto, and Nick Pederson of Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks for field assistance and advice. Mariah Talbott, Leif Halvorson, and Eli Cureton of the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service assisted with field and lab work. Richard Lessner and Dave Brickner at the Madison River Foundation helped to secure funding for this project and conduct outreach in the Madison Valley. The Channels Ranch, Valley Garden Ranch, Sun West Ranch, and Galloup’s Slide Inn provided crucial land and river access. I also thank my fellow graduate students both for advice on project and class work and for being excellent people to spend time with. Ann Marie Reinhold, Mariah Mayfield, David Ritter, and Peter Brown were especially helpful during the early stages of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Stuart Homestead Site: Historic Context Report
    Thomas Stuart Homestead Historic Context Report Grant-Kohrs Ranch National Historic Site Avana Andrade Public Lands History Center at Colorado State University 2/1/2012 1 Thomas Stuart Homestead Site: Historic Context Report Grant-Kohrs Ranch National Historic Site in Deer Lodge Montana is currently developing plans for a new contact station. One potential location will affect the site of a late-nineteenth-century historic homestead. Accordingly, the National Park Service and the Montana State Historic Preservation Office need more information about the historic importance of the Thomas Stuart homestead site to determine future decisions concerning the contact station. The following report provides the historic contexts within which to assess the resource’s historic significance according to National Register of Historic Places guidelines. The report examines the site’s association with Thomas Stuart, a Deer Lodge pioneer, and the Menards, a French- Canadian family, and presents the wider historical context of the fur trade, Deer Lodge’s mixed cultural milieu, and the community’s transformation into a settled, agrarian town. Though only indications of foundations and other site features remain at the homestead, the report seeks to give the most complete picture of the site’s history. Site Significance and Integrity The Thomas Stuart homestead site is evaluated according to the National Register of Historic Places, a program designed in the 1960s to provide a comprehensive listing of the United States’ significant historic properties. Listing on the National Register officially verifies a site’s importance and requires park administrators or land managers to consider the significance of the property when planning federally funded projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Recreational Trails Master Plan
    Beaverhead County Recreational Trails Master Plan Prepared by: Beaverhead County Recreational Trails Master Plan Prepared for: Beaverhead County Beaverhead County Commissioners 2 South Pacific Dillon, MT 59725 Prepared by: WWC Engineering 1275 Maple Street, Suite F Helena, MT 59601 (406) 443-3962 Fax: (406) 449-0056 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 Overview ...................................................................................................................... 1 Public Involvement .................................................................................................... 1 Key Components of the Plan ..................................................................................... 1 Intent of the Plan ....................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1 - Master Plan Overview................................................................................ 3 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 3 1.1.1 Project Location ............................................................................................... 3 1.2 Project Goals ......................................................................................................... 3 1.2.1 Variety of Uses ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • East Bench Unit History
    East Bench Unit Three Forks Division Pick Sloan Missouri Basin Program Jedediah S. Rogers Bureau of Reclamation 2008 Table of Contents East Bench Unit...............................................................2 Pick Sloan Missouri Basin Program .........................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Investigations...........................................................7 Project Authorization....................................................10 Construction History ....................................................10 Post Construction History ................................................15 Settlement of Project Lands ...............................................19 Project Benefits and Uses of Project Water...................................20 Conclusion............................................................21 Bibliography ................................................................23 Archival Sources .......................................................23 Government Documents .................................................23 Books ................................................................24 Other Sources..........................................................24 1 East Bench Unit Pick Sloan Missouri Basin Program Located in rural southwest Montana, the East Bench Unit of the Pick Sloan Missouri Basin Program provides water to 21,800 acres along the Beaverhead River in
    [Show full text]
  • A HISTORY OP FORT SHAW, MONTANA, from 1867 to 1892. by ANNE M. DIEKHANS SUBMITTED in PARTIAL FULFILLMENT of "CUM LAUDE"
    A HISTORY OP FORT SHAW, MONTANA, FROM 1867 TO 1892. by ANNE M. DIEKHANS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF "CUM LAUDE" RECOGNITION to the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY CARROLL COLLEGE 1959 CARROLL COLLEGE LIBRARY HELENA, MONTANA MONTANA COLLECTION CARROLL COLLEGE LIBRAS/- &-I THIS THESIS FOR "CUM LAUDE RECOGNITION BY ANNE M. DIEKHANS HAS BEEN APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BY Date ii PREFACE Fort Shaw existed as a military post between the years of 1867 and 1892. The purpose of this thesis is to present the history of the post in its military aspects during that period. Other aspects are included but the emphasis is on the function of Fort Shaw as district headquarters of the United States Army in Montana Territory. I would like to thank all those who assisted me in any way in the writing of this thesis. I especially want to thank Miss Virginia Walton of the Montana Historical Society and the Rev. John McCarthy of the Carroll faculty for their aid and advice in the writing of this thesis. For techni­ cal advice I am indebted to Sister Mary Ambrosia of the Eng­ lish department at Carroll College. I also wish to thank the Rev. James R. White# Mr. Thomas A. Clinch, and Mr. Rich­ ard Duffy who assisted with advice and pictures. Thank you is also in order to Mrs. Shirley Coggeshall of Helena who typed the manuscript. A.M.D. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chggter Page I. GENERAL BACKGROUND............................... 1 II. MILITARY ACTIVITIES............................. 14 Baker Massacre Sioux Campaign The Big Hole Policing Duties Escort and Patrol Duties III.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Mcgirl Yellowstone County's First White Resident Was Thomas Mcgirl. He Was Born in County Leitrim in Ireland in 1845, T
    Thomas McGirl Yellowstone County’s first white resident was Thomas McGirl. He was born in County Leitrim in Ireland in 1845, the youngest of ten children. His father died a year later. This was the height of the great famine in Ireland, when people were desperate and starving. Somehow his mother was able to immigrate with her eight sons to America, settling at first in Rhode Island. There he received his scant schooling, but he left at age nine when the family moved to a farm in Missouri in 1855. When the Civil War came, McGirl and four of his brothers joined the Union Army. He served in Missouri, seeing only minor skirmishes. While still in the Army, his first experience on the frontier came on the job, hauling freight from Leavenworth, Kansas to Santa Fe, New Mexico, while the wagon teams were harried with raids on their stock. After his military service, McGirl returned to the family farm. In 1873, McGirl began working for the railroads as they expanded westward. Two years later, this landed him in Wyoming, building a railroad bridge at Rock Springs. From there, he made his way to Butte, where he worked in the mines, but also did construction work, working on the first brick building in what was then a glorified mining camp. Most settlers at the time arrived in Montana territory via the Bozeman Trail, and when Fort Keogh was established near present-day Miles City in the wake of the Little Bighorn battle, it was obvious that there would need to be a stage line between the two locations.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Southern Montana
    History of Southern Montana Alva J. (Al) Noyes History of Southern Montana Table of Contents History of Southern Montana..................................................................................................................................1 Alva J. (Al) Noyes.........................................................................................................................................2 INTRODUCTORY........................................................................................................................................3 Chapter I. Early History.................................................................................................................................4 CHAPTER II. The First Charter....................................................................................................................6 CHAPTER III. Lumber..................................................................................................................................8 CHAPTER IV. The Lost City......................................................................................................................10 CHAPTER V. First Probate Judge...............................................................................................................12 CHAPTER VI. Jeff. Davis Gulch................................................................................................................13 CHAPTER VII.............................................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethnography of On-Site Interpretation and Commemoration
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2013 The Ethnography of On-Site Interpretation and Commemoration Practices: Place-Based Cultural Heritages at the Bear Paw, Big Hole, Little Bighorn, and Rosebud Battlefields Helen Alexandra Keremedjiev The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Keremedjiev, Helen Alexandra, "The Ethnography of On-Site Interpretation and Commemoration Practices: Place-Based Cultural Heritages at the Bear Paw, Big Hole, Little Bighorn, and Rosebud Battlefields" (2013). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 1009. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1009 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ETHNOGRAPHY OF ON-SITE INTERPRETATION AND COMMEMORATION PRACTICES: PLACE-BASED CULTURAL HERITAGES AT THE BEAR PAW, BIG HOLE, LITTLE BIGHORN, AND ROSEBUD BATTLEFIELDS By HELEN ALEXANDRA KEREMEDJIEV Master of Arts, The University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, 2007 Bachelor of Arts, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts, 2004 Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment
    [Show full text]
  • Ranching in Beaverhead County, 1863--1960| Transition Through Three Generations
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1990 Ranching in Beaverhead County, 1863--1960| Transition through three generations Liza Nicholas The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Nicholas, Liza, "Ranching in Beaverhead County, 1863--1960| Transition through three generations" (1990). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 3353. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/3353 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY Copying allowed as provided under provisions of the Fair Use Section of the U.S. COPYRIGHT LAW, 1976. Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's written consent. MontanaUniversity of RANCHING IN BEAVERHEAD COUNTY: 1863-1960 TRANSITION THROUGH THREE GENERATIONS by Liza Nicholas B.A. Montana State University, 1987 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Montana 1990 \ Approved by: ik Chairman, Board of Examiners Dean, Graduate School Date UMI Number: EP36325 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]