DOCSLIB.ORG

Renzo Piano Building Workshop

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Renzo Piano Building Workshop Renzo Piano Antonio Belvedere Founding Partner, Chairman Partner-director In charge of the V-A-C Cultural Space, Moscow Company Profile Renzo Piano was born in Genoa in 1937 Born in 1969, Antonio Belvedere graduated into a family of builders. in architecture from the University of The Renzo Piano Building Workshop While studying at Politecnico of Milan Florence. He joined RPBW’s Paris (RPBW) is an international architectural University, he worked in the office of office in 1999, working on phase three practice with offices in Paris and Genoa. Franco Albini. of the Fiat Lingotto factory conversion In 1971, he set up the “Piano & Rogers” project, particularly on the design of the The Workshop is led by eight partner- office in London together with Richard Polytechnic and the Pinacoteca Agnelli. directors, including the founder and Pritzker Rogers, with whom he won the competition He was subsequently lead architect on Prize laureate, architect Renzo Piano, and for the Centre Pompidou. He subsequently the masterplan for Columbia University’s 3 partners. The company permanently moved to Paris. Manhattanville development in New York. employs nearly 130 people. Our 90- From the early 1970s to the 1990s, he Following promotion to Associate in 2004, plus architects are from all around the worked with the engineer Peter Rice, he worked on the masterplan for the ex- world, each selected for their experience, sharing the Atelier Piano & Rice from 1977 Falck area in Milan. enthusiasm and calibre. to 1981. He became a Partner in 2011. Recently The company’s staff has the expertise to In 1981, the “Renzo Piano Building completed projects include the Valletta City provide full architectural design services, Workshop” was established, with 150 staff Gate in Malta. He is now leading the design from concept design stage to construction and offices in Paris, Genoa, and New York. of the Bishop Ranch project in California, supervision. Our design skills also include He has received numerous awards and a Performing Arts Center in India and interior design, town planning and urban recognitions among which: the Royal Gold most recently, the V-A-C cultural project in design, landscape design and exhibition Medal at the RIBA in London (1989), the Moscow. design services. Kyoto Prize in Kyoto, Japan (1990), the He has lectured widely. Some of his Goodwill Ambassador of UNESCO (1994), most recent lectures include EASA Links Since its formation in 1981, RPBW has the Praemium Imperiale in Tokyo, Japan (European Architecture Student Assembly) successfully undertaken and completed (1995), the Pritzker Architecture Prize at in Malta, August 2015 and “Stone and over 120 projects across Europe, North the White House in Washington (1998), the Architecture” at SIPPA (Salon International America, Australasia and East Asia. Leone d’oro alla Carriera in Venice (2000), Professionnels du Patrimoine), Arles, Among its best known works are: the Menil the Gold Medal AIA in Washington (2008) France, May 2015. Collection in Houston, Texas; the Kansai and the Sonning Prize in Copenhagen International Airport Terminal Building in (2009). Osaka; the Kanak Cultural Center in New Since 2004 he has also been working for Caledonia; the Beyeler Foundation in Basel; the Renzo Piano Foundation, a non-profit the Rome Auditorium; the Maison Hermès organization dedicated to the promotion in Tokyo; the Morgan Library and the New of the architectural profession through York Times Building in New York City; and educational programs and educational the California Academy of Sciences in activities. The new headquarters was San Francisco. Recently completed works established in Punta Nave (Genoa), in include the Shard in London, and the new June 2008. Whitney Museum in New York. In September 2013 Renzo Piano was appointed senator for life by the Italian The quality of RPBW’s work has been President Giorgio Napolitano and in May recognised by over 70 design awards, 2014 he received the Columbia University including major awards from the American Honorary Degree. Institute of Architects (AIA) and the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA)..
Recommended publications
  • Peter Rice (1935-1992) and Richard Rogers (1933)

    Peter Rice (1935-1992) and Richard Rogers (1933)

    Module 8 HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE PETER RICE (1935-1992) AND RICHARD ROGERS (1933) Peter Rice was one of the most imaginative and gifted structural engineers of the late 20th century. He was much loved by the architects with whom he collaborated, and together they achieved some of the most technically ingenious buildings of the period. He was born in Dundalk, Ireland, in 1935 and studied engineering at Queens University in Belfast and Imperial College London. In 1956, he joined the engineering practice of Ove Arup and Partners, which he collaborated with for 30 years. His first major project was working on the Sydney Opera House (designed by Jørn Utzon) when he was only 28. It was this project which gave him the experience of working on a large and complex project – a knowledge he would put to good use in his future career. Rice worked closely on major projects with architects such as Norman Foster, Ian Ritchie, Kenzo Tange and Renzo Piano. Piano said of him, “Peter Rice is one of those engineers who has greatly contributed to architecture, reaffirming the deep creative inter-connection between humanism and science, between art and technology.” The long list of significant buildings for which his rigorous approach created poetic results includes a series studies of structural forms and the possibilities of various materials – concrete at Lloyd’s of London (designed by Richard Rogers), glass at Les Serres at La Villette in Paris, ferro-cement and iron at the Menil Collection Museum in Houston (designed by Renzo Piano), and stone at the Pabellón del Futuro, Expo ’92 in Sevilla, Spain, to name a few.
  • The Imaginative Engineer

    The Imaginative Engineer

    GREAT ACHIEVEMENTS notable structural engineers He used these materials to express the ideas within the architecture. The Imaginative Engineer Peter and his team combined advanced structural analysis tech- Peter Rice (1935-1992) niques with investigations of materials By Lorraine Lin, Ph.D., P.E. and Bruce Danziger, S.E. to develop structural systems appropri- ® Peter Rice’s approach to structural engineering expands our under- ate for each material. He believed that standing of the engineer’s role. Peter contributed to the design of build- materials should be detailed to express ings considered icons of structural achievement today. These include their true nature. the Pompidou Center and the “greenhouses” at La Villette in Paris, the “I have noticed over the years that Pavilion of the Future for the 1992 World’s Expo in Seville, Lloyd’s of the most effective use of materials is Greenhouses at LaVillette, London and the Sydney Op- often achieved when they are being Paris. Materials: Tempered era House. Many of his col- explored and used for the first time. Glass and Cables. Architect: laborators, such as architects The designer does not feel inhibited by Adrien Fainsilber. (©ARUP) Renzo Piano, Richard Rogers precedent. In any of these structures, and I.M. Pei, areCopyright today re- there is a simple honesty which goes straight to the heart of the nowned in their field partially physical characteristics of the material and expresses them in as the result of their collabo- an uninhibited way.” ration with Peter. An Engineer Imagines, Peter Rice Peter was a humanist and these beliefs are clearly pres- The design team for the Pompidou Center, which included Peter ent in his work.
  • Iceland, Scandinavia, England & Scotland

    Iceland, Scandinavia, England & Scotland

    OUR 15TH ARCHITECTURE TOUR JOIN MALCOLM CARVER’S ARCHITECTURE TOUR OF ICELAND, SCANDINAVIA, ENGLAND & SCOTLAND London, Manchester, Glasgow, Reykjavik, Oslo, Aalborg & Copenhagen 4 -24 August 2018 A tour for architects and everybody that enjoys beautiful buildings ARCHITECTURE TOUR OF The tour at a glance… Three previous architecture tours to this delightful part of the world were limited ICELAND, to the work of the renowned modernist architect, Alvar Aalto in Finland. This grand tour of Scandinavia extends beyond Finland and begins in the City of London where many may wish to explore before we begin our northern hemisphere SCANDINAVIA, journey. Scandinavia has long been on our horizon particularly with enthusiastic ENGLAND & SCOTLAND encouragement from our many friends and previous eminent guests who we hope will again join another grand architectural pilgrimage. This region of the world has long shown exceptional, original leading modernist trends in architecture, art and Recent contemporary design that continues to inspire the whole world. architecture coupled with Our itinerary includes exciting and outstanding buildings with orientation tours of iconic modern buildings, by the gems in each city, providing a balance of old and new. We have also allowed outstanding award-winning free time for participants to individually enjoy particular buildings and landmarks of their choice, or time to enjoy galleries and museums and share the sheer pleasures and internationally renowned these beautiful cities traditionally have to offer. architects including Norman Foster, Renzo Piano, Jorn Utzon, Santiago Calatrava, Charles Rennie Mackintosh Daniel Libeskind, Denton, Corker Marshall, Stephen Holl and Zaha Hadid. TOUR ITINERARY DAY 7 Friday 10 August 2018 Glasgow Today begins with one of Zaha Hadid’s recent buildings before her sad DAY 1 Saturday 4 August 2018 Departure passing last year, Maggies Centre Kircaldy, then Glasgow School of Art Tour members depart Australian for London.
  • The Pritzker Architecture Prize1998[1]. RENZO PIANO 2

    The Pritzker Architecture Prize1998[1]. RENZO PIANO 2

    Photo by M. Denancé Reconstruction of the Atelier Brancusi, Paris, France — 1997 Photo by C. Richters Photo by M. Denancé The Beyeler Foundation Museum Basel, Switzerland 1997 Ushibuka Bridge linking three islands of the Amakusa Archipelago, Japan — 1997 Photo by Paul Hester The Menil Collection Museum Houston, Texas — 1987 Photo by Paul Hester Drawing illustrating the roof system of “leaves” for adjusting the amount of light admitted to the galleries. Photo by Hickey Robertson The Cy Twombly Gallery at the Menil Collection Museum Houston, Texas — 1995 Photo by Hickey Robertson THE ARCHITECTURE OF RENZO PIANO — A T RIUMPH OF CONTINUING CREATIVITY BY COLIN AMERY AUTHOR AND ARCHITECTURAL CRITIC, THE FINANCIAL TIMES SPECIAL ADVISOR TO THE WORLD MONUMENTS FUND It was modern architecture itself that was honored at the White House in Washington, D.C. on June 17, 1998. The twentieth anniversary of the Pritzker Prize and the presentation of the prestigious award to Renzo Piano made for an extraordinary event. Piano’s quiet character and almost solemn, bearded appearance brought an atmosphere of serious, contemporary creativity to the glamorous event. The great gardens and the classical salons of the White House were filled with the flower of the world’s architectural talent including the majority of the laureates of the previous twenty years. But perhaps the most significant aspect of the splendid event was the opportunity it gave for an overview of the recent past of architecture at the very heart of the capital of the world’s most powerful country. It was rather as though King Louis XIV had invited all the greatest creative architects of the day to a grand dinner at Versailles.
  • Renzo Piano 1998 Laureate Essay

    Renzo Piano 1998 Laureate Essay

    Renzo Piano 1998 Laureate Essay The Architecture of Renzo Piano—A Triumph of Continuing Creativity By Colin Amery Author and Architectural Critic, The Financial Times Special Advisor to the World Monuments Fund It was modern architecture itself that was honored at the White House in Washington, D.C. on June 17, 1998. The twentieth anniversary of the Pritzker Prize and the presentation of the prestigious award to Renzo Piano made for an extraordinary event. Piano’s quiet character and almost solemn, bearded appearance brought an atmosphere of serious, contemporary creativity to the glamorous event. The great gardens and the classical salons of the White House were filled with the flower of the world’s architectural talent including the majority of the laureates of the previous twenty years. But perhaps the most significant aspect of the splendid event was the opportunity it gave for an overview of the recent past of architecture at the very heart of the capital of the world’s most powerful country. It was rather as though King Louis XIV had invited all the greatest creative architects of the day to a grand dinner at Versailles. In Imperial Washington the entire globe gathered to pay tribute to the very art of architecture itself. Renzo Piano was not overwhelmed by the brilliance of the occasion, on the contrary he seized his opportunity to tell the world about the nature of his work. In his own words, he firmly explained that architecture is a serious business being both art and a service. Those are perhaps two of the best words to describe Renzo Piano’s work.
  • The Things They've Done : a Book About the Careers of Selected Graduates

    The Things They've Done : a Book About the Careers of Selected Graduates

    The Things They've Done A book about the careers of selected graduates ot the Rice University School of Architecture Wm. T. Cannady, FAIA Architecture at Rice For over four decades, Architecture at Rice has been the official publication series of the Rice University School of Architecture. Each publication in the series documents the work and research of the school or derives from its events and activities. Christopher Hight, Series Editor RECENT PUBLICATIONS 42 Live Work: The Collaboration Between the Rice Building Workshop and Project Row Houses in Houston, Texas Nonya Grenader and Danny Samuels 41 SOFTSPACE: From a Representation of Form to a Simulation of Space Sean tally and Jessica Young, editors 40 Row: Trajectories through the Shotgun House David Brown and William Williams, editors 39 Excluded Middle: Toward a Reflective Architecture and Urbanism Edward Dimendberg 38 Wrapper: 40 Possible City Surfaces for the Museum of Jurassic Technology Robert Mangurian and Mary-Ann Ray 37 Pandemonium: The Rise of Predatory Locales in the Postwar World Branden Hookway, edited and presented by Sanford Kwinter and Bruce Mau 36 Buildings Carios Jimenez 35 Citta Apperta - Open City Luciano Rigolin 34 Ladders Albert Pope 33 Stanley Saitowitz i'licnaei Bell, editor 26 Rem Koolhaas: Conversations with Students Second Editior Sanford Kwinter, editor 22 Louis Kahn: Conversations with Students Second Edition Peter Papademitriou, editor 11 I I I I I IIII I I fo fD[\jO(iE^ uibn/^:j I I I I li I I I I I II I I III e ? I I I The Things They've DoVie Wm.
  • Steel and Beyond

    Steel and Beyond

    Metals, Machines and Modernity Crystal Palace, london, Joa&p/1 Paxton, t85t. Paradigm lor mau -prochx'ed 1, l teml bY lldlng. 6 One day'" OIIlput. Ford Mo!or Company, H ~hl.nd Pari< , Michigan, 1\1 14. 7 The building industry is currently undergoing the The decades following the construction of most rapid and radical transformation it has e)(pe· the Crystal Palace saw the deyelopment of econom­ rJenced in over a century. This change is in large ical steel smelting methods. The conditions were measure being led by the exploitation of new design, thus created for the steellrame - made 01 standard fabrication and assembly processes which make components that were mass-produced in widely possible the realization of buildings and structures dispersed factories and brought together for rapid that would not have been technically or economi­ dry assembly on site - t o become the paradigm cally feasible even ten years ago. The dogma of for the systems buildings that would dominate the mass production that dominated the 20th century. 20th century. The intrOduction of steel was impor­ epitomized by the universal steel section, is being tant, not only because it was shaped by industrial challenged by the liberating potential of computer­ processes of production, but also for its inherent aided design and manufacture, with profound impli­ material attributes. For the first time, architects and cations for the conceptualization and construction engineers had at their disposal a very strong mate­ of built form. rial with enormous capacity in tension as well as The last period of comparably fundamental compression.
  • “Shall We Compete?”

    “Shall We Compete?”

    5th International Conference on Competitions 2014 Delft “Shall We Compete?” Pedro Guilherme 35 5th International Conference on Competitions 2014 Delft “Shall we compete?” Author Pedro Miguel Hernandez Salvador Guilherme1 CHAIA (Centre for Art History and Artistic Research), Universidade de Évora, Portugal http://uevora.academia.edu/PedroGuilherme (+351) 962556435 [email protected] Abstract Following previous research on competitions from Portuguese architects abroad we propose to show a risomatic string of politic, economic and sociologic events that show why competitions are so much appealing. We will follow Álvaro Siza Vieira and Eduardo Souto de Moura as the former opens the first doors to competitions and the latter follows the master with renewed strength and research vigour. The European convergence provides the opportunity to develop and confirm other architects whose competences and aesthetics are internationally known and recognized. Competitions become an opportunity to other work, different scales and strategies. By 2000, the downfall of the golden initial European years makes competitions not only an opportunity but the only opportunity for young architects. From the early tentative, explorative years of Siza’s firs competitions to the current massive participation of Portuguese architects in foreign competitions there is a long, cumulative effort of competence and visibility that gives international competitions a symbolic, unquestioned value. Keywords International Architectural Competitions, Portugal, Souto de Moura, Siza Vieira, research, decision making Introduction Architects have for long been competing among themselves in competitions. They have done so because they believed competitions are worth it, despite all its negative aspects. There are immense resources allocated in competitions: human labour, time, competences, stamina, expertizes, costs, energy and materials.
  • C O M P a N Y P R O F I

    C O M P a N Y P R O F I

    company profile whotectoo is a creative hub of architects whose partners’ background experience spans across many countries and continents: Europe, North America, Middle East and Far East, Australia and Africa. Our people We trust in what we do and how it is conceived selecting the right people with different attitudes, expertise and ambitions but with common qualities: trust, motivation and knowledge. 1 Tectoo is an architectural design firm established by the Architect Susanna Scarabicchi, former partner of Renzo Piano Building Workshop (RPBW). Her expertise, sensitivity and competence have been highly recognized around the world throughout the projects she led and designed over the past 30 years. She developed a commendable portfolio of projects that prompted community regeneration, sense of place and design quality. Tectoo’s cutting-edge approach is also enhanced by the expertise of Architect Andrea Peschiera, with whom Architect Scarabicchi has had a close and productive collaboration during the last five years at RPBW and who joined the firm as partner and director since the early stages, sharing the common focus on technical excellence and experimentation developed through his international experience. Tectoo is deeply rooted by architectural, environmental and social convictions for what designing for the future means. Creating something new in a world everyday more fragile requires the profound awareness that the best building concepts grow by means of a rigorous and innovative approach. Our view is that creating good architecture involves developing and implementing competencies in collaboration with an extensive network of experts from many fields and disciplines whilst engaging in a strong relationship with our clients in order to define common goals.
  • Architectural Thought : the Design Process and and the Expectant

    Architectural Thought : the Design Process and and the Expectant

    184 Drexler, Arthur (1955) The Architecture of Japan, New York Evans, Robin (1986) ‘Translations from drawing to building’, AA Files, no. 12, London Fawcett, Chris (1980) ‘Colin St J Wilson’ in Contemporary Architects, London Fletcher, B.C. (1943) A History of Architecture: On the Comparative Method, Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, 11th edn Foster, Norman (1996) ‘Carré d’Art’ in The Architecture of Information (ed. Michael Brawne), London Gaskell, Ivan (2000) Vermeer’s Wager: Speculations on Art History, Theory & Museums, London Gideon, Sigfried (1954) Space, Time and Architecture: the growth of a new tradition, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, London Gimpel, Jean (1993) The Cathedral Builders (translated from the French by Michael Russell), London Girouard, Mark (1998) Big Jim: the Life & Work of James Stirling, London Gombrich, E.H. (1960/77) Art and Illusion, Oxford Hays, K. Michael (ed.) (2000) Architecture Theory Since 1968, Cambridge, Mass Isaacs, Jeremy (2000) ‘Wunderkind’ in The Royal Academy Magazine, no. 68, Autumn, London Johnson, Eugene V. & Lewis, Michael J. (1996) The Travel Sketches of Louis I. Kahn, Cambridge, Mass Johnson, N.E. (1975) ‘Light is the Theme’, Fort Worth, Texas Kruft, Hanno-Walter (1994) A History of Architectural Theory from Vitruvius to the Present, London Latour, Alessandra (1991) Louis I. Kahn: writings, lectures & interviews, New York LeCuyer, Annette (1997) ‘Building Bilbao’ in Architectural Review, December Leiviskä, Juha (1999) Juha Leiviskä, Helsinki Libeskind, Daniel (1992) ‘Between the Lines’ in Extension to the 185 Berlin Museum with Jewish Museum Department (ed. Kristin Feireiss), exhibition catalogue, Berlin McLaughlin, Patricia (1991) ‘How am I doing, Corbusier’ in Louis I.
  • Vision for M+ Herzog & De Meuron Start Each Project Free Of

    Vision for M+ Herzog & De Meuron Start Each Project Free Of

    Herzog & de Meuron + TFP Farrells Vision for M+ Herzog & de Meuron start each project free of M+ shall be much more than an individual building, but predetermined ideas, guided by curiosity and conscious instead like a small city with entrance gates, gathering naivety. Developed through rational methodologies and places, main avenues and side streets. Movement, of open dialogue, we design projects that respond to the people and objects, shall be conceived horizontally and needs of users and are meaningful to their context. vertically, like Hong Kong itself, to achieve openness and accessibility. M+ has the opportunity and responsibility to lead the architecture and atmosphere of the West Kowloon As a shared platform for the local and global to meet, M+ Cultural District in its development. M+ shall address shall both grow out of and nourish the evolving cultural all of its neighbours with equal consideration whether it community of Hong Kong and include a large distribution be sea or land, city or park, underground or sky, tunnel of education spaces that encourage direct and spontaneous or tower. The responses to each internal and external learning. condition will ultimately shape M+ into its final form. The ability to choose and create one’s own experience We imagine a variety of exhibition possibilities – both could be a key factor that differentiates M+ from previous inside and outdoors – that provide the very specific and incarnations of the big museum, and leads it to become the very flexible by offering a range of spaces and uses not only a global centre of culture, but a common space in that embrace difference and individuality, rather than Hong Kong to generate new perceptions, new phenomena repetition or one-size-fits-all universality.
  • Introduction to Modern Literature David Spurr, Fall 2020 11 Nov

    Introduction to Modern Literature David Spurr, Fall 2020 11 Nov

    Introduction to Modern Literature David Spurr, Fall 2020 11 Nov. Architectural form and representation: Some principles American beginnings of modernism: The Chicago School Louis Sullivan, “The Tall Office Building Artistically Considered,” 1896 https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/architecture/4-205-analysis-of-contemporary- architecture-fall-2009/readings/MIT4_205F09_Sullivan.pdf 18 Nov. Organic architecture: Frank Lloyd Wright Wright, “In the Cause of Architecture,” 1908 https://www.architecturalrecord.com/ext/resources/news/2016/01- Jan/InTheCause/Frank-Lloyd-Wright-In-the-Cause-of-Architecture-March- 1908.pdf “Frank Lloyd Wright: American Architect,” Museum of Modern Art, 1940: https://www.moma.org/calendar/exhibitions/2992 Architectural Forum, special issue on Wright, January 1938: https://usmodernist.org/AF/AF-1938-01.pdf 25 Nov. European beginnings of modernism: Walter Gropius Gropius, “Bauhaus Manifesto and Programme,” 1919 http://mariabuszek.com/mariabuszek/kcai/ConstrBau/Readings/GropBau19.p df Gropius, “Principles of Bauhaus Production,” 1926 http://mariabuszek.com/mariabuszek/kcai/ConstrBau/Readings/GropPrdctn.p df Gropius, ”The Theory and Organization of the Bauhaus,” 1923, in Herbert Bayer, Bauhaus 1919-1928, Museum of Modern Art: https://www.moma.org/documents/moma_catalogue_2735_300190238.pdf De Stijl: Gerrit Rietveld Theo van Doesburg, First De Stijl Manifesto, 1918 https://www.readingdesign.org/de-stijl-manifesto Rietveld, “The New Functionalism in Dutch Architecture,“ 1932 https://modernistarchitecture.wordpress.com/2010/10/20/gerrit-rietveld- %E2%80%9Cnew-functionalism-in-dutch-architecture%E2%80%9D-1932/ Machines for Living: Le Corbusier Le Corbusier, “Five Points Towards a New Architecture,” 1926 https://www.spaceintime.eu/docs/corbusier_five_points_toward_new_archit ecture.pdf Le Corbusier, “Towards a New Architecture,” 1927 https://archive.org/details/TowardsANewArchitectureCorbusierLe/page/n91/ mode/2up E1027: Eileen Gray Joseph Rykwert, “Eileen Gray, Design Pioneer,” 1968.