Arxiv:1512.00417V1 [Astro-Ph.EP] 1 Dec 2015 Velocity Surveys
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Draft version December 2, 2015 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 THE LICK-CARNEGIE EXOPLANET SURVEY: HD 32963 { A NEW JUPITER ANALOG ORBITING A SUN-LIKE STAR Dominick Rowan 1, Stefano Meschiari 2, Gregory Laughlin3, Steven S. Vogt3, R. Paul Butler4,Jennifer Burt3, Songhu Wang3,5, Brad Holden3, Russell Hanson3, Pamela Arriagada4, Sandy Keiser4, Johanna Teske4, Matias Diaz6 Draft version December 2, 2015 ABSTRACT We present a set of 109 new, high-precision Keck/HIRES radial velocity (RV) observations for the solar-type star HD 32963. Our dataset reveals a candidate planetary signal with a period of 6.49 ± 0.07 years and a corresponding minimum mass of 0.7 ± 0.03 Jupiter masses. Given Jupiter's crucial role in shaping the evolution of the early Solar System, we emphasize the importance of long-term radial velocity surveys. Finally, using our complete set of Keck radial velocities and correcting for the relative detectability of synthetic planetary candidates orbiting each of the 1,122 stars in our sample, we estimate the frequency of Jupiter analogs across our survey at approximately 3%. Subject headings: Extrasolar Planets, Data Analysis and Techniques 1. INTRODUCTION which favors short-period planets. The past decade has witnessed an astounding acceler- Given the importance of Jupiter in the dynamical his- ation in the rate of exoplanet detections, thanks in large tory of our Solar System, the presence of a Jupiter ana- part to the advent of the Kepler mission. As of this writ- log is likely to be a crucial differentiator for exoplanetary ing, more than 1,500 confirmed planetary candidates are systems. The dynamical evolution of Jupiter profoundly known7. The excitement of the modern exoplanet age is shaped the early history of the Solar System (see, e.g. largely driven by the discovery of low-mass, potentially- Morbidelli et al. 2007). Recently, Batygin & Laughlin habitable planets detected through transit observations. (2015) suggested that if Jupiter migrated inwards early Figure 1 shows a mass-period diagram of the known on, it would have increased the rate of collisions between planetary candidates. As is well known, three broad but planetesimals, initiating a collisional cascade (Kessler & well-separated families of exoplanets that have no coun- Cour-Palais 1978), and effectively clearing out the inner terpart in the Solar System populate the mass-period annulus of the Solar System (as well as potentially ex- diagram: (1) close-in super-Earths, (2) hot Jupiters with plaining the low mass of Mars as well; Walsh et al. 2011). P < 10 days, and (3) exo-Jupiters with P > 100 days. With the formation of Saturn, a mean motion resonance At first glance, it is tempting to conclude that the So- with Jupiter was created, reversing Jupiter's migration lar System is an outlier within the galactic exoplanet direction. In this picture, the Solar System was then census. Martin & Livio (2015), however, argue that left with Jupiter in a long-period orbit and small, gas- based on a number of metrics, the Solar System plan- starved planetary bodies in the terrestrial region. The ets are relatively \typical", concluding that Solar System presence of a Jupiter-like planet in the system may also analogs (and, by extension, potentially life-bearing plan- influence the habitability of Earth analogs (e.g. Horner etary systems) might be common after all. They note et al. 2010). As a consequence, substantiating whether that the main properties that distinguish the Solar Sys- Jupiter lies at the edge of the exo-Jupiter locus, or is tem from other exoplanetary systems are the absence of a typical member of an as-yet undiscovered population, very close-in terrestrial planets at P < 100 days (e.g. Chi- may be key to constraining the frequency of true Solar ang & Laughlin 2013), and the orbital location of Jupiter System analogs, and, by extension, worlds like Earth. (P = 11:86 years, a = 5.2 AU, e = 0.05). They attribute Currently, the most prolific technique to populate the the status of Jupiter as an outlier to observational bias, exo-Jupiter region of the mass-period diagram is radial arXiv:1512.00417v1 [astro-ph.EP] 1 Dec 2015 velocity surveys. Unlike the transit method, which has a strong bias for short-period orbits, the radial velocity [email protected] method can probe the outer regions of extraplanetary 1 Byram Hills High School, Armonk, NY 10504 2 McDonald Observatory, University of Texas at Austin, systems over the bulk of the parent star's lifetime. In Austin, TX 78712 order to safely detect a planetary signal, the minimum 3 UCO/Lick Observatory, Department of Astronomy and As- baseline is approximately 0.7 to 1 cycles (Wittenmyer trophysics, University of California at Santa Cruz,Santa Cruz, et al. 2011), which translates to 5 T 15 years CA 95064 . minimum . 4 Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institute of for Jupiter-like planets. This period range has become Washington, Washington, DC 20015 fully accessible by established RV surveys over the past 5 School of Astronomy and Space Science and Key Laboratory few years. Figure 2 shows a histogram of the baseline of of Modern Astronomy and Astrophysics in Ministry of Educa- the RV observations of stars. In our Keck sample alone, tion, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China 6 Departamento de Astronomia, Universidad de Chile there are 793 stars that have been observed for more than 7 See http://stefano-meschiari.shinyapps.io/PlanetPlot 5 years and 489 stars that have been observed more than for an interactive mass/period/discovery method/discovery year 10 years. plot. 2 Rowan & Meschiari TABLE 1 101 Stellar parameters for HD 32963 100 ● Parameter Value Reference ● J b ● Discovery method Teff (K) 5727 ± 32 (Ram´ırezet al. 2013) ] S RV jup −1 10 Transit [F e=H] 0.11 ± 0.05 (Ram´ırezet al. 2013) [M Imaging log g 4.41 ± 0.03 (Ram´ırezet al. 2013) Timing Mass Shk 0.159 ± 0.008 This work Microlensing 10−2 6:71 Age (Gyr) 4.993:55 (Ram´ırezet al. 2013) Mass (M ) 1.03 (Ram´ırezet al. 2013) −3 V 7.60 (Ram´ırezet al. 2013) 10 B − V 0.6 SIMBAD Mbol 4.85 ± 0.09 (Porto de Mello et al. 2014) 10−4 100 101 102 103 104 105 Period [days] In this paper, we report that our set of 109 veloci- ties obtained for the star HD 32963 (spanning approx- 0.6 imately 16 years) strongly suggests the presence of a Jupiter analog with P ≈ 2372 days (6.5 years), M ≈ 0:7 −1 Mass [Mjup] MJ, K ≈ 11 m s , and e ≈ 0:07. The host star 0.5 1.0 can be considered a close solar analog (Porto de Mello 0.4 1.5 et al. 2014), therefore making HD 32963 a benchmark for 2.0 2.5 Jupiter analogs orbiting Sun-like stars. 3.0 Subsequently, we analyze a snapshot of our Keck sam- Eccentricity ple of RV observations, and derive an occurrence rate of 0.2 All EDE planets Jupiter analogs (defined here to lie within the parameter Jupiter HD32963 b region with 5 ≤ P ≤ 15 years, 0:3 ≤ M ≤ 3MJ, and e ≤ 0:3), corrected for the relative observability around each of the 1,122 stars in our sample. We find an occur- 0.0 rence rate of Jupiter analogs across our sample of approx- 5 10 15 20 Period [years] imately 3% for the period range spanned by our obser- Fig. 1.| (Top) Period-mass diagram for the exoplanet candi- vations, consistent with previous findings (Wittenmyer dates known as of August 2015 (data from the Exoplanetary Data et al. 2011). Under some reasonable assumptions about Explorer). The box marks the region of parameters that we use to the underlying mass-period distribution of the Jupiter define a Jupiter analog (0:3 < M < 3MJ and 5 < P < 20 years. analogs, we find that the occurrence rate should lie be- The labeled points represent Jupiter, Saturn, and HD 32963 b. (Bottom) Period-eccentricity diagram of planets with 0:3 < M < tween 1% and 4%. We conclude that the position of 3MJ. We only consider planets with e < 0:3 as Jupiter analogs. Jupiter on the \fringe" of the exo-Jupiter population is likely real, and that long-period Jupiter analogs are rel- atively rare. The plan for the paper is as follows: in x2, we review the stellar properties of HD 32963 and our Doppler tech- nique. In x3, we discuss our radial velocity observations and the 1-planet model we use to interpret the RV vari- ations exhibited by the star. In x4, we present a simple calculation to derive an estimate for the occurrence rate of Jupiter analogs. In x5, we discuss the HD 32963 sys- 100 tem in light of the broader exoplanetary population and conclude. 2. STELLAR PARAMETERS N < 10 HD 32963 (HIP 23884) is a bright (V = 7.6) star8. N >= 10 Given Porto de Mello et al. (2014) included this star in 50 their study of nearby stars exhibiting similarities in their stellar parameters to those of the Sun. Using photomet- Number of stars intheKECKsample ric and spectroscopic observations, Ram´ırezet al. (2013) derived M ≈ 1:03M , effective temperature Teff ≈ 5727 K, and age ≈ 4.9 Gyr. Stellar parameters are reported in Table 1. 0 In order to evaluate the level of stellar activity, we 0 5 10 15 20 obtained Mt. Wilson S-index values for each radial ve- Baseline (years) locity observation. The S-index measures the ratio of Fig. 2.| Histogram of the RV baseline for stars in our Keck sample.