Shipyard Industry Standards

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Shipyard Industry Standards Shipyard Industry Standards OSHA 2268-11R 2015 Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 “To assure safe and healthful working conditions for working men and women; by authorizing enforcement of the standards developed under the Act; by assisting and encouraging the States in their efforts to assure safe and healthful working conditions; by providing for research, information, education, and training in the field of occupational safety and health.” This publication is not a standard or regulation, and it creates no new legal obligations. It contains recommendations as well as descriptions of mandatory safety and health standards. The recommendations are advisory in nature, informational in content, and are intended to assist employers in providing a safe and healthful workplace. The Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) requires employers to comply with safety and health standards and regulations promulgated by OSHA or by a state with an OSHA-approved state plan. In addition, the Act’s General Duty Clause, Section 5(a)(1), requires employers to provide their employees with a workplace free from recognized hazards likely to cause death or serious physical harm. Material contained in this publication is in the public domain and may be reproduced, fully or partially, without permission. Source credit is requested but not required. This information will be made available to sensory-impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 693-1999; tele- typewriter (TTY) number: 1-877-889-5627. Shipyard Industry Standards U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration OSHA 2268-11R 2015 Cover photo from the American Shipbuilding Association, courtesy of General Dynamics NASSCO in San Diego, CA. Foreword This booklet contains all the safety and health standards specific to the Shipyard Industry contained in Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 1915, as of July 1, 2014. Also included are brief discussions of the following: 1. The importance of regular employee training to establish and reinforce employee awareness in the areas of job safety and health. 2. The elements of a safety and health program that can be used by employers to develop effective programs at their work sites. A brief description of the OSHA Consultation Program, which is available to assist employers, is also included at the end of this publication. Hazards not covered by Shipyard Industry standards may be covered by General Industry standards contained in 29 CFR Part 1910 (OSHA website: www.osha.gov). Where a hazard is covered by both the Shipyard Industry standards and the General Industry standards, only the Shipyard Industry standard will be cited by OSHA inspectors (described in more detail in 29 CFR 1910.5, Applicability of Standards). In addition, OSHA regulations regarding general agency practices and procedures are applicable to shipyard employment. Particular attention is directed to the provisions of 29 CFR Part 1904, Recording and Reporting Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Employees of employers performing shipyard activities on the shore, pier, terminal, yard, shipyard, machine shop, riverbank, etc., as well as on the vessels afloat or in drydocks or graving docks are covered by the Shipyard standards. The OSH Act of 1970 encourages states to develop and operate their own job safety and health plans. States administering occupational safety and SHIPYARD INDUSTRY STANDARDS 5 health programs through plans approved under Section 18(b) of the OSH Act must adopt standards and enforce requirements that are “at least as effective” as Federal OSHA requirements. There are currently 28 OSHA-approved state plans: 22 cover both private and public sector employees (state and local government). Five additional states (Connecticut, Illinois, Maine, New Jersey, New York) and the Virgin Islands have plans that cover public sector workers only. For more information on state plans, see www.osha.gov/dcsp/osp. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION 6 Contents Maritime Coverage under State Plans ...... 13 Guidelines for Workplace Safety and Health Programs in the Shipyard Industry. 13 Basic Elements ............................. 14 Management Commitment ................... 14 Employee Participation ...................... 16 Large Shipyard ............................. 17 Medium Shipyard/Large Boatyard ............. 17 Small Shipyard or Boatyard .................. 18 Hazard Identification, Assessment and Control ....18 Accident and Incident Investigation ............ 22 Training ................................... 23 Program Evaluation ......................... 25 Procedures for Multi-Employer Workplaces ..... 26 Recordkeeping ............................. 27 Subpart A – General Provisions ............ 29 1915.1 – Purpose and authority ............... 29 1915.2 – Scope and application ............... 29 1915.3 – Responsibility ...................... 29 1915.4 – Definitions ......................... 30 1915.5 – Incorporation by reference ............ 32 1915.6 – Commercial diving operations ......... 37 1915.7 – Competent person .................. 37 1915.8 – OMB control numbers under the Paperwork Reduction Act ............. 40 1915.9 – Compliance duties owed to each employee .......................... 40 Subpart B – Confined and Enclosed Spaces and Other Dangerous Atmospheres in Shipyard Employment ..................... 41 1915.11 – Scope, application, and definitions applicable to this subpart ............ 41 1915.12 – Precautions and the order of testing before entering confined and enclosed spaces and other dangerous atmospheres ............. 44 1915.13 – Cleaning and other cold work ........ 50 1915.14 – Hot Work .......................... 53 1915.15 – Maintenance of safe conditions ....... 54 1915.16 – Warning signs and labels ............ 56 SHIPYARD INDUSTRY STANDARDS 7 APPENDIX A to SUBPART B — Compliance Assistance Guidelines for Confined and Enclosed Spaces and Other Dangerous Atmospheres .............................. 56 APPENDIX B to SUBPART B — Reprint of U.S. Coast Guard Regulations Referenced in Subpart B, for Determination of Coast Guard Authorized Persons ............ 56 Subpart C – Surface Preparation and Preservation ............................. 57 1915.31 – Scope and application of subpart ..... 57 1915.32 – Toxic cleaning solvents. 57 1915.33 – Chemical paint and preservative removers ......................... 57 1915.34 – Mechanical paint removers .......... 58 1915.35 – Painting .......................... 60 1915.36 – Flammable liquids .................. 63 Subpart D – Welding, Cutting and Heating ...65 1915.51 – Ventilation and protection in welding, cutting and heating ................. 65 1915.53 – Welding, cutting and heating in way of preservative coatings ............... 68 1915.54 – Welding, cutting and heating of hollow metal containers and structures not covered by §1915.12 ................ 70 1915.55 – Gas welding and cutting ............. 71 1915.56 – Arc welding and cutting ............. 75 1915.57 – Uses of fissionable material in ship repairing and shipbuilding ........... 77 Subpart E – Scaffolds, Ladders and Other Working Surfaces ......................... 79 1915.71 – Scaffolds or staging ................ 79 1915.72 – Ladders .......................... 88 1915.73 – Guarding of deck openings and edges ... 90 1915.74 – Access to vessels ................... 91 1915.75 – Access to and guarding of dry docks and marine railways ................ 93 1915.76 – Access to cargo spaces and confined spaces .................... 95 1915.77 – Working surfaces. 96 OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION 8 Subpart F – General Working Conditions ... 97 1915.80 – Scope, application, definitions, and effective dates ..................... 97 1915.81 – Housekeeping .................... 103 1915.82 – Lighting ......................... 104 1915.83 – Utilities .......................... 107 1915.84 – Working alone .................... 108 1915.85 – Vessel radar and communication systems ........... 108 1915.86 – Lifeboats ........................ 109 1915.87 – Medical services and first aid .........110 1915.88 – Sanitation. 114 1915.89 – Control of hazardous energy (lockout/tags-plus) ..................118 1915.90 – Safety color code for marking physical hazards .................. 141 1915.91 – Accident prevention signs and tags ....141 1915.92 – Retention of DOT markings, placards, and labels ........................ 141 1915.93 – Motor vehicle safety equipment, operation and maintenance ......... 142 1915.94 – Servicing multi-piece and single-piece rim wheels ...................... 144 Subpart G – Gear and Equipment for Rigging and Materials Handling .................. 145 1915.111 – Inspection ....................... 145 1915.112 – Ropes, chains and slings ........... 145 1915.113 – Shackles and hooks ............... 147 1915.114 – Chain falls and pull-lifts ............ 148 1915.115 – Hoisting and hauling equipment .... 148 1915.116 – Use of gear ...................... 149 1915.117 – Qualifications of operators ......... 151 1915.118 – Tables .......................... 151 1915.120 – Powered Industrial Truck Operator Training ................. 156 Subpart H – Tools and Related Equipment ...157 1915.131 – General precautions .............. 157 1915.132 – Portable electric tools ............. 158 1915.133 – Hand tools ...................... 158 1915.134 – Abrasive wheels ................. 159 1915.135 – Power actuated fastening tools ..... 161 1915.136 – Internal combustion engines other than
Recommended publications
  • Vanadium Pentoxide and Other Inorganic Vanadium Compounds
    This report contains the collective views of an international group of experts and does not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organization, or the World Health Organization. Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 29 VANADIUM PENTOXIDE AND OTHER INORGANIC VANADIUM COMPOUNDS Note that the layout and pagination of this pdf file are not identical to the printed CICAD First draft prepared by Dr M. Costigan and Mr R. Cary, Health and Safety Executive, Liverpool, United Kingdom, and Dr S. Dobson, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Huntingdon, United Kingdom Published under the joint sponsorship of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organization, and the World Health Organization, and produced within the framework of the Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals. World Health Organization Geneva, 2001 The International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS), established in 1980, is a joint venture of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the International Labour Organization (ILO), and the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the IPCS are to establish the scientific basis for assessment of the risk to human health and the environment from exposure to chemicals, through international peer review processes, as a prerequisite for the promotion of chemical safety, and to provide technical assistance in strengthening national capacities for the sound management
    [Show full text]
  • Peer Review of the Turkish Shipbuilding Industry 2 | Peer Review of the Turkish Shipbuilding Industry
    PEER REVIEW OF THE TURKISH SHIPBUILDING INDUSTRY 2 | PEER REVIEW OF THE TURKISH SHIPBUILDING INDUSTRY Foreword This report was prepared under the Council Working Party on Shipbuilding (WP6) peer review process. The opinions expressed and the arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries. The report will be made available on the WP6 website: http://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/shipbuilding.htm. This document, as well as any data and any map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. © OECD (2021) The use of this work, whether digital or print, is governed by the Terms and Conditions to be found at http://www.oecd.org/termsandconditions/ PEER REVIEW OF THE TURKISH SHIPBUILDING INDUSTRY | 3 Table of contents 1. Executive summary 5 2. Introduction 6 3. Global perspective 7 4. Structure and characteristics of the Turkish shipbuilding industry 9 4.1. The Turkish shipbuilding industry 9 4.2. Maritime equipment industry 17 4.3. Repair and recycling activities 18 4.4. Competitiveness of the Turkish shipbuilding industry 22 5. Government policies affecting the shipbuilding industry 24 5.1. Government policy 24 5.2. Support measures 27 5.3. Policy assessment 31 References 37 ANNEX I: SELECTED INFORMATION ON THE TURKISH SHIPYARDS 38 ANNEX 2: INSTITUTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SHIPBUILDING SECTOR 41 Tables Table 1. Completions of seagoing vessels by builder country and by ship type 8 Table 2. Building docks in Turkish shipyards 11 Table 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Shipyard Coatings Benchmarking Study
    Foreign Shipyard Coatings Benchmarking Study NSRP Surface Preparation and Coatings Panel Project Report MAY, 2013 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Category B Data – Government Purpose Rights Foreign Shipyard Coatings Benchmarking Study Client Name ELZLY CORPORATION Contact Peter Ault Contract Code 0825CSP3 Document Number 0825CSP3002R Safinah Contact Raouf Kattan Date 13/05/13 The information contained in this document is believed to be correct at the present time but the accuracy is not guaranteed. Safinah Ltd its employees and subcontractors cannot accept liability for loss suffered in consequence of reliance on the information contained given here. This document does not release the receiver of the need to make further appropriate enquiries and inspections. All information is supplied in accordance with our standard terms and conditions (a link to these can be found at the foot of our web site). Safinah Ltd 21A Bridge Street Morpeth NE61 1NT EN ISO 9001:2008 Tel: +44 1670 519900 compliant Fax: +441670519911 0825CSP3002R Sanitised (w edits).docx UNCONTROLLED IF PRINTED Created on 13/05/2013 09:22:00 0825CSP3002R 0825CSP3002R 1 DOCUMENT CONTROL Document No 0825CSP3002R Document Title Foreign Shipyard Coatings Benchmarking Study Client ELZLY CORPORATION Compiled by Rakat Approved by Rakat Revision Date Summary By 0825CSP3002R Sanitised (w edits).docx Page 2 of 44 UNCONTROLLED IF PRINTED Created on 13/05/2013 09:45 0825CSP3002R 0825CSP3002R Contents 1 DOCUMENT CONTROL ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Section 061053 - Miscellaneous Rough Carpentry
    SECTION 061053 - MISCELLANEOUS ROUGH CARPENTRY PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 01 Specification Sections, apply to this Section. 1.2 SUMMARY A. This Section includes the following: 1. Wood framing, blocking, and nailers 2. Wood battens, shims, and furring (for wall panel attachment). 3. Plywood sheathing for miscellaneous structures and replacement of deteriorated roof sheathing. B. Related Sections include the following: 1. Section 075216 "SBS Modified Bituminous Membrane Roofing" for adhesively applied 2-ply, SBS bituminous membrane roofing, with self-adhered base ply sheet. 2. Section 076200 "Sheet Metal Flashing and Trim" for installing sheet metal flashing and trim integral with roofing. 1.3 DEFINITIONS A. Dimension Lumber: Lumber of 2-inches nominal or greater but less than 5-inches nominal in least dimension. B. Lumber grading agencies, and the abbreviations used to reference them, include the following: 1. NLGA: National Lumber Grades Authority. 2. WCLIB: West Coast Lumber Inspection Bureau. 3. WWPA: Western Wood Products Association. 1.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Testing Agency Qualifications: For testing agency providing classification marking for fire- retardant treated material, an inspection agency acceptable to authorities having jurisdiction that periodically performs inspections to verify that the material bearing the classification marking is representative of the material tested. PRSD – Thompson Elementary School Roof Replacement 061053 – MISCELLANEOUS ROUGH CARPENTRY July, 2012 Page 1 of 7 B. Forest Certification: For the following wood products, provide materials produced from wood obtained from forests certified by an FSC-accredited certification body to comply with FSC 1.2, "Principles and Criteria": 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Tradepoint Atlantic Welcomes BAE Systems “Titan” Dry Dock to Baltimore Ushers in New Era of Ship Maintenance and Repair at Sparrows Point
    Tradepoint Atlantic Welcomes BAE Systems “Titan” Dry Dock to Baltimore Ushers in New Era of Ship Maintenance and Repair at Sparrows Point BALTIMORE, MD (June 3, 2020) ​– Tradepoint Atlantic, a 3,300-acre multimodal global logistics center in Baltimore, Maryland, featuring an unmatched combination of access to deep-water berths, rail and highway, today announced that BAE Systems’ “Titan” dry dock will be arriving and docking at the onsite dry dock to undergo a five-month-long repair and maintenance program starting on June 4. This announcement and project ushers in a new era of ship maintenance and repair at Tradepoint Atlantic, and represents a year of work and planning to reopen this legacy industry in Baltimore. The Titan docking process is expected to take nearly 20 hours. BAE Systems' massive Titan dry dock has a 52,534-ton lifting capacity and is one of the world’s largest and most modern floating steel dry docks. It measures 950-feet long, 192-feet wide, and 82-feet tall at the highest point. The Titan is used to service ships as long as 1,000 feet. “The shipyard at Sparrows Point has a rich and important history and it is amazing to see industry returning to it after too many dormant years,” said Governor Larry Hogan. “The growth at Tradepoint Atlantic and the opportunities being provided to the local communities is nothing short of incredible and our administration looks forward to partnering with them for years to come. The dry dock is open for business and that is great news.” The dry dock at Sparrows Point began construction in 1969, and was completed in 1971.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Use of Recycled Vegetable Oil As a Collector Reagent in the Flotation of Copper Sulfide Minerals Using Seawater
    recycling Article Evaluation of the Use of Recycled Vegetable Oil as a Collector Reagent in the Flotation of Copper Sulfide Minerals Using Seawater Felipe Arcos and Lina Uribe * School of Mining Engineering, University of Talca, Talca 3460000, Chile; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +56-220-1798 Abstract: Considering sustainable mining, the use of seawater in mineral processing to replace conventional water is an attractive alternative, especially in cases where this resource is limited. However, the use of this aqueous medium generates a series of challenges; specifically, in the seawater flotation process, it is necessary to adapt traditional reagents to the aqueous medium or to propose new reagents that achieve better performance and are environmentally friendly. In this research, the technical feasibility of using recycled vegetable oil (RVO) as a collector of copper sulfide minerals in the flotation process using seawater was studied. The study considered the analysis of the metallurgical indexes when different concentrations of collector and foaming reagent were used, considering as collectors the RVO, potassium amyl xanthate (PAX) and mixtures of these, in addition to the methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC) as foaming agent. In addition, it was evidenced that the best metallurgical indexes were achieved using 40 g/t of RVO and 15 g/t of MIBC, which corresponded to an enrichment ratio of 6.29, a concentration ratio of 7.01, a copper recovery of 90.06% and a selectivity index with respect to pyrite of 4.03 and with respect to silica of 12.89. Finally, in relation to the study of the RVO and PAX collector mixtures, it was found that a mixture of 60 g/t of RVO and 40 g/t of PAX in the absence of foaming agent presented the best results in terms of copper recovery (98.66%) and the selectivity index with respect to pyrite (2.88) and silica (14.65), improving Citation: Arcos, F.; Uribe, L.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenhouse Gas Impact of Marginal Fossil Fuel Use
    Greenhouse gas impact of marginal fossil fuel use Greenhouse gas impact of marginal fossil fuel use By: Arno van den Bos, Carlo Hamelinck Date: 12 November 2014 Project number: BIENL14773 © Ecofys 2014 by order of the European Oilseed Alliance (EOA), the European Biodiesel Board (EBB) and the European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry (FEDIOL) ECOFYS Netherlands B.V. | Kanaalweg 15G | 3526 KL Utrecht| T +31 (0)30 662-3300 | F +31 (0)30 662-3301 | E [email protected] | I www.ecofys.com Chamber of Commerce 30161191 Summary Biofuels represent a major option to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector. When assessing the benefits of biofuels, they are compared to the fossil fuels they replace. In the framework of the European Renewable Energy Directive and the Fuel Quality Directive, this is done by comparing the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of biofuels to a ‘fossil comparator’. This fossil comparator is based on the average greenhouse gas intensity of fossil fuels brought on the EU transportation market. Unconventional oils such as extra heavy oil and bitumen (tar sands), kerogen oil (oil shale), light tight oil (shale oil), deep sea oil and synthetic products such as gas-to-liquids and coal-to-liquids, typically have higher carbon footprints than conventional oil mainly because the effort required to extract, refine and/or synthesize them is much larger than for conventional oil. As the share of these unconventional oil-based fuels gradually rises in the total fuel supply over time, the greenhouse gas footprint of the average fuel consumption also rises. Even for conventional oil production fields, because larger existing fields get depleted, the extraction efforts increase while smaller fields are taken in operation.
    [Show full text]
  • US Schedule for Internet V2
    Draft as of March 23, 2007 Subject to legal review for accuracy, clarity and consistency. Annex 3.3 - - Industrial/Textile Schedule for the United States Tariff Elimination US 8 digit Description MFN RATE Schedule 03011000 Live ornamental fish Free I 03019100 Live trout Free I 03019200 Live eels Free I 03019300 Live carp Free I 03019900 Live fish, other than trout, eel, carp or ornamental fish Free I 03021100 Trout, fresh or chilled, excluding fillets, other meat portions, livers and roes Free I Pacific, Atlantic and Danube salmon, fresh or chilled, excluding fillets, other 03021200 meat portions, livers and roes Free I Salmonidae other than trout or Pacific, Atlantic & Danube salmon, fresh or 03021900 chilled, excluding fillets, other meat portions, livers & roes Free I Halibut and Greenland turbot, fresh or chilled, excluding fillets, other meat 03022100 portions, livers and roes Free I 03022200 Plaice, fresh or chilled, excluding fillets, other meat portions, livers and roes Free I 03022300 Sole, fresh or chilled, excluding fillets, other meat portions, livers and roes 1.1 cents/kg A Flat fish, nesi, fresh or chilled, excluding fillets, other meat portions, livers 03022900 and roes Free I Albacore or longfinned tunas, fresh or chilled, excluding fillets, other meat 03023100 portions, livers and roes Free I Yellowfin tunas, fresh or chilled, excluding fillets, other meat portions, livers 03023200 and roes Free I Skipjack or stripe-bellied bonito, fresh or chilled, excluding fillets, other meat 03023300 portions, livers and roes Free
    [Show full text]
  • Shipbuilding
    Shipbuilding A promising rst half, an uncertain second one 2018 started briskly in the wake of 2017. In the rst half of the year, newbuilding orders were placed at a rate of about 10m dwt per month. However the pace dropped in the second half, as owners grappled with a rise in newbuilding prices and growing uncertainty over the IMO 2020 deadline. Regardless, newbuilding orders rose to 95.5m dwt in 2018 versus 83.1m dwt in 2017. Demand for bulkers, container carriers and specialised ships increased, while for tankers it receded, re ecting low freight rates and poor sentiment. Thanks to this additional demand, shipbuilders succeeded in raising newbuilding prices by about 10%. This enabled them to pass on some of the additional building costs resulting from higher steel prices, new regulations and increased pressure from marine suppliers, who have also been struggling since 2008. VIIKKI LNG-fuelled forest product carrier, 25,600 dwt (B.Delta 25), built in 2018 by China’s Jinling for Finland’s ESL Shipping. 5 Orders Million dwt 300 250 200 150 100 50 SHIPBUILDING SHIPBUILDING KEY POINTS OF 2018 KEY POINTS OF 2018 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Deliveries vs demolitions Fleet evolution Deliveries Demolitions Fleet KEY POINTS OF 2018 Summary 2017 2018 Million dwt Million dwt Million dwt Million dwt Ships 1,000 1,245 Orders 200 2,000 m dwt 83.1 95.5 180 The three Asian shipbuilding giants, representing almost 95% of the global 1,800 orderbook by deadweight, continued to ght ercely for market share.
    [Show full text]
  • National Wood Preservative Decorative Coatings Technical Data Sheet
    NATIONAL WOOD PRESERVATIVE DECORATIVE COATINGS TECHNICAL DATA SHEET NATIONAL WOOD PRESERVATIVE PRODUCT National Wood Preservative is a solution containing broad DESCRIPTION microbiological activity spectrum biocide, which inhibits the growth of algae. It acts against blue stain fungi, brown red fungi, and wood destroying insects. In general product is useful as a wood preservative. RECOMMENDED For preservation of wood, wooden articles from algae, blue USES stain and general types of wood destroying insects. TECHNICAL DATA COLOUR, DRY FILM Liquid FINISH, DRY FILM Clear, Transparent SPECIFIC GRAVITY 0.80 ± 0.05 2 THEORETICAL SPREADING 15 M /LTR, indicative, depends on the nature of wood FLA SH POINT 38ºC DRYING TIME Drying time @ 30°C (Temperature, humidity, air movement, film thickness and number of coats all affect the drying time.) TOUCH DRY 5 – 10 minutes DRY TO OVER COAT 1 hour ADVANTAGES NATIONAL WOOD Easy to apply on wooden surface, uniform spreading on PRESERVATIVE SYSTEM surface, does not give any colour to surface, can be overcoated easily. APPLICATION INSTRUCTION SURFACE PREPARATION Before application, the surface should be sound, clean and free from oil, grease, loose particles, dust, etc. Application can be done by the recommended application methods. APPLICATION DATA APPLICATION METHOD Brush, cotton cloth wiping. CLEAN ING /THINN ING National G.P. Thinner THINNE R (VOLU ME) Ready to use CONV . S PRAY RE QUIREMENT S Not recommended NOZZLE SIZE NA Rev. 07/18 Page 1/2 www .natio nal -paints. com NATIONAL WOOD PRESERVATIVE DECORATIVE COATINGS TECHNICAL DATA SHEET SYSTEM For wooden surface: RECOMMENDED SYSTEM Remove oil or grease from the wooden surface.
    [Show full text]
  • UFGS 06 10 00 Rough Carpentry
    ************************************************************************** USACE / NAVFAC / AFCEC / NASA UFGS-06 10 00 (August 2016) Change 2 - 11/18 ------------------------------------ Preparing Activity: NAVFAC Superseding UFGS-06 10 00 (February 2012) UNIFIED FACILITIES GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS References are in agreement with UMRL dated July 2021 ************************************************************************** SECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS DIVISION 06 - WOOD, PLASTICS, AND COMPOSITES SECTION 06 10 00 ROUGH CARPENTRY 08/16, CHG 2: 11/18 PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 REFERENCES 1.2 SUBMITTALS 1.3 DELIVERY AND STORAGE 1.4 GRADING AND MARKING 1.4.1 Lumber 1.4.2 Structural Glued Laminated Timber 1.4.3 Plywood 1.4.4 Structural-Use and OSB Panels 1.4.5 Preservative-Treated Lumber and Plywood 1.4.6 Fire-Retardant Treated Lumber 1.4.7 Hardboard, Gypsum Board, and Fiberboard 1.4.8 Plastic Lumber 1.5 SIZES AND SURFACING 1.6 MOISTURE CONTENT 1.7 PRESERVATIVE TREATMENT 1.7.1 Existing Structures 1.7.2 New Construction 1.8 FIRE-RETARDANT TREATMENT 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE 1.9.1 Drawing Requirements 1.9.2 Data Required 1.9.3 Humidity Requirements 1.9.4 Plastic Lumber Performance 1.10 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS 1.11 CERTIFICATIONS 1.11.1 Certified Wood Grades 1.11.2 Certified Sustainably Harvested Wood 1.11.3 Indoor Air Quality Certifications 1.11.3.1 Adhesives and Sealants 1.11.3.2 Composite Wood, Wood Structural Panel and Agrifiber Products SECTION 06 10 00 Page 1 PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 MATERIALS 2.1.1 Virgin Lumber 2.1.2 Salvaged Lumber 2.1.3 Recovered Lumber
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Finishing Demonstration Project Final Report
    Wood Finishing Demonstration Project Final Report Paul Pagel Minnesota Technical Assistance Program & Barb Loida Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Small Business Compliance Assistance Program January 1997 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................... 1 FINDING AND SELECTING A CANDIDATE FOR THE PROJECT................................................... 1 THE WOOD FINISHING PROCESS......................................................................................................... 2 PROCESS CONSIDERATIONS AND COMPANY COMPARISONS............................................................................. 2 EMISSIONS AND WASTES ....................................................................................................................... 4 AT PINE-TIQUE ................................................................................................................................................ 4 AT VIKING ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 USE OF WATERBORNE FINISHES......................................................................................................... 6 FINISH CRITERIA AND PROCESS CONSIDERATIONS FOR SELECTING ALTERNATIVE COATINGS ......................... 6 TESTING, MODIFICATIONS AND RESULTS......................................................................................
    [Show full text]