Margaret Weichert

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Margaret Weichert Payments Evolution in the Mobile Millennium: The Challenge of Aligning Solutions to Customer Needs Margaret Weichert Market Platform Dynamics In the United States and much of the Western world, discussion and debate among “payments professionals” has been consumed in recent years with technology debates and regulatory battles, even while the broader world continues its steady march towards the new realities of a mobile millennium. In developed markets, e-commerce continues to grow at double-digit rates, despite the relative maturity of those markets. Still other less developed markets, such as Mexico, are experiencing triple digit e- commerce is growth, as broader economic growth and technology access to mobile Internet capabilities dramatically ramps up the e-Commerce/m-Commerce markets. Even markets with relatively low overall Internet usage are poised to experience dramatic e-Commerce growth as banks, policy makers and business leaders recognize that the mobile web is a profound tool for financial inclusion. Low cost internet-enabled POS devices will enable a wide range of consumers to have access to web-enabled commerce. In India, for example, nimble entrepreneurs and technology companies are working diligently to enable 250 million Indian debit card users to get access to the mobile web via POS mobile technology. Mobile commerce is already a meaningful part of the payments ecosystem and is poised to grow even faster than e-commerce did. However, one of the biggest challenges in global adoption of mobile commerce solutions is a fundamental mismatch between the payment preferences of most global consumers – for debit card payments – and the accessibility of debit-oriented mobile payment solutions, especially in the quickly evolving world of mobile web commerce. While mobile innovators are developing entirely new mobile business models, complete with different economics, customer value propositions and consumer-oriented, lightweight (often cloud based) technology solutions, traditional payments companies are deep in discussions about NFC, EMV, and interchange – issues that remain rooted in the realities of the 20th century, and do little to meet the practical challenges of the new mobile ecosystem. Many in the payments industry have focused on credit-card centric models that view mobile technology as simply another form factor that will replace plastic cards for POS transactions. However, the reality of the evolving mobile commerce is much more complex and dynamic and requires more thoughtful solutions. First and foremost, what is clear is that response to emerging mobile commerce capabilities must address the needs and realities of the market and meet fundamental market needs for 1) customer ease/convenience; 2) seamless portability across channels; 3) security and scalability; and 4) global solutions for merchants. A range of players — both traditional payments companies and alternative players — have introduced innovations designed to address these global commerce challenges. However, only a few of the solutions attempt to bridge the core challenges of serving all payment channels (physical POS, e- commerce and mobile) across geographies. Three key solution categories bear watching: • Innovative PIN Debit Solutions (e.g. Acculynk PaySecure) • Global Card Networks (e.g. Visa, MasterCard) • Alternative Payment Networks –(e.g. PayPal ) ImportanCe of Emerging Channels – Why Cross Channel Payment Evolution Matters Although some merchants took a while to understand the importance of taking a cross-channel approach to retailing, consistent double-digit growth in e-commerce sales volume educated most merchants of the importance of a solid cross-channel strategy. Today some of the largest e-commerce merchants are multichannel retailers, with multi-channel powerhouses like Walmart, Target, Tesco and Staples dominating the e-commerce top 10 lists globally and in individual markets. Continued impressive growth rates in e-commerce sales (NRF U.S. estimates - 12% YOY) will partially offset lackluster growth in the retail sector overall (expected to be between 3-4% in the U.S. and less than 2% growth in the UK)1 Mobile growth rates are even more impressive, and are expected to grow over 98.6% to $20.85 Billion in the U.S. alone.2 This growth trend is expected to continue unabated, as sales of tablets and smart phones will soon cause mobile web access to outstrip PC-based web access. (Figure 1). Figure 1 Source: Gartner Research, 2010 1 National Retail Federation – U.S. Holiday Sales Estimates – October 2012; Opera Solutions Retail Predictor, September 2012. 2 Internet Retailer, MCommerce Sales, September 2012. In addition to expected mobile retailers like Apple and Amazon, major multi-channel players like Walmart, Marriott, Orbitz, EasyJet, Intercontinental and Expedia are driving significant commerce volume via the mobile channel. And far from being a channel for just digital goods, data already shows that mass merchandisers like Walmart and Amazon account for 63% of mobile sales volume.3 Given these impressive growth rates and meaningful mobile sales results already, it is clear that mobile web payments are already taking place, despite lack of significant uptake of mobile payments at the point of sale (POS). This trend suggests that mobile web payments will in fact lead the way to broader mobile payments activity, so any mobile payment strategy must start with a mobile web strategy. As such, a comprehensive payments approach should address all the existing barriers to mobile web growth and adoption. Market Requirements As outlined above, it is clear that e-commerce has established itself as a mainstream channel, while mobile web commerce is well on its way to becoming ever more important. As Internet commerce has grown over the last 10-15 years, a range of new payment solutions evolved to ease the friction and challenges associated with the new channel. PayPal, Bill Me Later, Acculynk, eBillMe, Secure Vault Payments, and many others created capabilities that addressed unique challenges of e-commerce payments. As the mobile payments market evolves, some of these same players may emerge as leading mobile commerce solution providers, even as purpose-built mobile payment experiments attempt to gain scale. What will determine which solutions succeed is how well they meet fundamental market needs for 1) alignment with customer needs; 2) seamless portability across channels; 3) security and scalability; and 4) global solutions for merchants. • Alignment with Customer needs – successful payment solutions must be easy to use, with minimal enrollment or change required by consumers. Solutions that require consumers to change behavior spend more, or sacrifice convenience, rewards or other benefits will face major challenges in competitive markets like the US. Most importantly, solutions must incorporate the underlying electronic payment types that consumers prefer, which in most of the world means debit and prepaid. • Seamless payment portability across channels – solutions must easily adapt across channels so that consumers and merchants aren’t required to adopt completely new payment solutions to take advantage of new business models or channels, especially in the evolving mobile payments ecosystem. 3 Internet Retailer, Mobile 400 Merchants, September 2012 • Secure, technically scalable solutions - beyond all the “sexy” attributes of a mobile payments solution, consumers won’t adopt and continue to use a solution unless it has robust security features and near flawless technical delivery. Consumers may accept imperfect service delivery when it comes to cell phone coverage, but they will not trust or tolerate service quality or security issues when it comes to their money. • Global merChant solutions – practical evolution of global commerce solutions require the ability to operate at scale across national boundaries, since most of the global e-commerce and mobile commerce volume is being driven by global retailers that operate across broad geographic boundaries. In addition, many of the global commerce innovations are being driven by global players like Apple, Amazon, PayPal, and retailers that want to expand revenues by selling globally. To date, key players have customized payment solutions to work differently according to the underlying requirements of different national payments systems. However, this national customization is expensive, inefficient, and sometimes confusing for consumers that need to adopt varying solutions depending on the country of origin of the merchant or retailer. Solutions with the most scalability will work seamlessly for both retailers and consumers, regardless of payment preference and/or country of origin. How Different Alternatives StaCk Up – Evaluation of Potential Solutions Although there are a host of solutions evolving to address these complex market requirements, three categories of solution have the most promise for developing global scale. These three include: • PIN Debit - Globally PIN debit is the preferred electronic payment solution by far. However, PIN debit’s evolution in e-commerce and mobile channels have been hindered by lack of cross- border consistency, and the challenges of securely adapting PIN debit to non-face-to-face channels. Innovators like Acculynk have partnered with debit networks worldwide to attempt to address these challenges in a consumer friendly way. At the same time, national debit networks, have introduced unique innovations (including PINless debit, online “credit
Recommended publications
  • Savantor Marketeye: 17 October – 16 November 2020 2011
    ype text]pe text] [Type text] [Type text] Savantor MarketEye: 17 October – 16 November 2020 2011 Savantor Limited 68 Lombard St London EC3V 9LJ This is a high-level industry news and business intelligence update Tel: +44 20 7868 1734 bulletin. For further information on any of the items contained within the email: [email protected] bulletin or to discuss the potential impact of these items on your www.savantor.com business, please contact Savantor on [email protected]. Items in this issue: Savantor’s View ....................................................... 1 Vocalink wins Canadian clearing and settlement system Contactless and debit cards ............................................. 1 contract ............................................................................. 3 Norway – cash and digital currency ................................. 3 Products and Initiatives .......................................... 2 Visa Plaid acquisition opposed by Department of Standard Chartered to run customer-facing applications Justice .............................................................................. 3 in the cloud ....................................................................... 2 Shanghai Stock Exchange suspends Ant Group IPO ...... 3 Mastercard helps banks combat cyber risks using AI ....... 2 Visa to acquire YellowPepper for Latin America push ..... 4 Danske Bank to replace plastic payments cards .............. 2 UK retailers attack Visa and Mastercard over card fees .. 4 PayPal to support cryptocurrencies across consumer and
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Terms
    Glossary of Terms Term Definition ABCI Association of Bank Card Issuers and Merchant Acquirers ABSA Absa Bank Limited AEDO Authenticated Early Debit Order ACB Automated Clearing Bureau for the clearing of cheques and electronic payments ACSS Automated Clearing and Settlement System. ACSS is owned and operated by the Canadian Payments Association. (http://www.bank-banque-canada.ca/en/financial/financial_pay.html). Acquiring The service of accepting, processing, clearing and settling of payment transactions on the merchant’s or beneficiary’s side. Ad valorem fee A fee that varies according to the value of the transaction. ALLPS See Intecon AMEX American Express APACS Association for Payment Clearing Services. APACS is the UK trade association for payments and for those institutions that deliver payment services to customers. http://www.apacs.org.uk/media_centre/press/05_05_24.html APCA Australian Payments and Clearing Association APRA Australian Prudential Regulation Authority ASO Association of System Operators ATC Average Total Cost ATM Automated teller machine BACS (Originally an acronym for Bankers Automated Clearing Services). This is one of the three constituents of APACS and is responsible for bulk clearing of electronic payments between bank accounts by using direct debits and credits, as well as standing orders. http://www.competition- commission.org.uk/rep_pub/reports/2002/fulltext/462glossary.pdf Bankserv Bankserv is South Africa’s major Automated Payment Clearing House System Operator. http://www.bankserv.co.za/ BASA Banking Association of South Africa BESA Bond Exchange of South Africa BIN Bank Identification Number BIS Bank of International Settlements BSD Bank Supervision Department, a division of the SARB CAGR Compound Average Growth Rate Carriage fee In the case of ATM transactions, this represents the compensation paid from the issuing to the acquiring participant for the use of their infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Role of Cash in Society
    DANISH PAYMENTS COUNCIL REPORT ON THE ROLE OF CASH IN SOCIETY August 2016 Report on the Role of Cash in Society Text may be copied from this publication provided that the Danish Payments Council is specifically stated as the source. Changes to or misrepresentation of the contents are not permitted. The Report can be downloaded from Danmarks Nationalbank's website, www.nationalbanken.dk, under Banking and payments, Danish Payments Council. The Report is based on information available up to 23 June 2016. Inquiries about the Report should be directed to: Danmarks Nationalbank Communications Havnegade 5 DK-1093 Copenhagen K Telephone +45 33 63 70 00 (direct) or +45 33 63 63 63 Inquiries: Monday-Friday 9:00 am-4:00 pm Email: [email protected] www.nationalbanken.dk 2 CONTENTS 1 Summary and deliberations on the cash rule ........................................................................5 2 The role of cash today ..........................................................................................................11 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................11 2.2 What is cash? ................................................................................................................11 2.3 Use of cash as a means of payment .............................................................................. 12 2.4 Digitisation and the use of cash ......................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Interchange Fee Na Rynku Polskim
    National Bank of Poland Payment Systems Department Analysis of the functioning of the interchange fee in cashless transactions on the Polish market Warsaw, January 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 1. Description of the payment card market ......................................................... 6 1.1. Types of payment cards .......................................................................................... 6 1.2. Payment card systems ............................................................................................ 7 1.2.1. Types of systems and business models ............................................................... 7 1.2.2. Examples of schemes .........................................................................................10 1.3. Importance of the payment card market for its participants and the development of cashless transactions .........................................................................................11 Chapter 2. The development of the payment card market in Poland compared to other countries ............................................................................................17 2.1. Selected indicators of the development of the Polish payment card market ...........17 2.2. Selected indicators of the development of the payment card market - Poland against other EU countries .....................................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • How Will Traditional Credit-Card Networks Fare in an Era of Alipay, Google Tez, PSD2 and W3C Payments?
    How will traditional credit-card networks fare in an era of Alipay, Google Tez, PSD2 and W3C payments? Eric Grover April 20, 2018 988 Bella Rosa Drive Minden, NV 89423 * Views expressed are strictly the author’s. USA +1 775-392-0559 +1 775-552-9802 (fax) [email protected] Discussion topics • Retail-payment systems and credit cards state of play • Growth drivers • Tectonic shifts and attendant risks and opportunities • US • Europe • China • India • Closing thoughts Retail-payment systems • General-purpose retail-payment networks were the greatest payments and retail-banking innovation in the 20th century. • >300 retail-payment schemes worldwide • Global traditional payment networks • Mastercard • Visa • Tier-two global networks • American Express, • China UnionPay • Discover/Diners Club • JCB Retail-payment systems • Alternative networks building claims to critical mass • Alipay • Rolling up payments assets in Asia • Partnering with acquirers to build global acceptance • M-Pesa • PayPal • Trading margin for volume, modus vivendi with Mastercard, Visa and large credit-card issuers • Opening up, partnering with African MNOs • Paytm • WeChat Pay • Partnering with acquirers to build overseas acceptance • National systems – Axept, Pago Bancomat, BCC, Cartes Bancaires, Dankort, Elo, iDeal, Interac, Mir, Rupay, Star, Troy, Euro6000, Redsys, Sistema 4b, et al The global payments land grab • There have been campaigns and retreats by credit-card issuers building multinational businesses, e.g. Citi, Banco Santander, Discover, GE, HSBC, and Capital One. • Discover’s attempts overseas thus far have been unsuccessful • UK • Diners Club • Network reciprocity • Under Jeff Immelt GE was the worst-performer on the Dow –a) and Synchrony unwound its global franchise • Amex remains US-centric • Merchant acquiring and processing imperative to expand internationally.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Non-Banks in the Payments Market
    DANISH PAYMENTS COUNCIL REPORT ON NON-BANKS IN THE PAYMENTS MARKET September 2016 Report on non-banks in the payments market Text may be copied from this report provided that the Danish Payments Council is specifically stated as the source. Changes to or misrepresentation of the contents are not permitted. The report can be downloaded from Danmarks Nationalbank's website, www.nationalbanken.dk, under Banking and payments, Danish Payments Council. The report is based on information available up to 19 August 2016. Inquiries about the report should be directed to: Danmarks Nationalbank Communications Havnegade 5 DK-1093 Copenhagen K Telephone +45 33 63 70 00 (direct) or +45 33 63 63 63 Inquiries: Monday-Friday 9:00 am-4:00 pm Email: [email protected] www.nationalbanken.dk 2 CONTENTS 1 Introduction and conclusions.................................................................................................5 1.1 Conclusions .....................................................................................................................5 1.2 Background .....................................................................................................................6 1.3 Definition and scope ........................................................................................................7 1.4 Contents ..........................................................................................................................7 2 The payments market undergoing change ............................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • List of Charges for Mastercard Direct Effective from 1 January 2018
    List of charges for Mastercard Direct Effective from 1 January 2018 Annual card fee (standard) DKK 60 Contactless debit function of MasterCard Fee per cash withdrawal of foreign exchange for - with Danske Hverdag1 DKK 0 Direct travel at Danske Bank's ATMs in Denmark - with Danske Hverdag+2 DKK 0 The limit on amounts of purchases made in Standard fee DKK 35 shops without the use of a PIN is DKK 200 - with Danske Hverdag DKK 35 Other fees per purchase. You may occasionally be - with Danske Hverdag+ DKK 0 Establishment fee DKK 0 asked to confirm your transaction by means The conversion rate is Danske Bank's cash selling rate (notes). of your chip or PIN. Express order DKK 200 Conversion rates for use outside Denmark Fee per cash withdrawal at International courier service DKK 150 Conversion is based on the exchange rates Danske Bank's ATMs in Denmark Replacement card DKK 100 set by Mastercard at any time plus a - Standard fee DKK 0 variable margin set by Danske Bank, - with Danske Hverdag DKK 0 Copy of receipts (per receipt) DKK 200 currently 1.5% for European* and - with Danske Hverdag+ DKK 0 - We charge this fee only if the 2,0% for other currencies. amount stated in the copy of the receipt is equal to the disputed Other ATMs in Denmark Conversion takes place at the exchange rate amount withdrawn from the Standard fee DKK 10 prevailing on the same business day as the account. - with Danske Hverdag DKK 10 transaction is completed in Nets. The - with Danske Hverdag+ DKK 0 exchange rates applicable at any time are København Transaction fee – available at nets.eu/valutakurser (website in Using the card function is free of charges, Fees for use of MasterCard Direct Danish only).
    [Show full text]
  • Conditions for Dankort and Visa/Dankort
    1 Conditions for Dankort and Visa/Dankort Effective from 1. January 2019 “This document has been translated from Danish into English. About your Dankort and Visa/Dankort However, the original Danish text is the governing text for all Keep your card safe purposes, and in case of discrepancy the Danish wording will be Check at regular intervals that you have not lost your card. It is applicable.” just as personal as a passport, driver’s licence, national health insurance card and the like. Contents Memorise your PIN If you need to make a note of your personal identification 1 Visa/Dankort conditions ................................................... 2 number (PIN), you can ask Nordea for a PIN-memorising card. Your PIN must always be kept separate from your card and 2 What can you use the card for? ........................................ 2 never be written on your card. 3 Safeguarding your card, PIN and Verified Do not reveal your PIN to any other person by Visa password ............................................................. 2 The PIN is your electronic signature. No matter what happens and 4 Verified by Visa ................................................................ 2 where you are in the world, never reveal your PIN to any other 5 Use of the card ................................................................ 2 person. Never choose your PIN as a password for a PC or any other system operated by means of a code chosen by yourself. 6 Cheking entries to your account ....................................... 3 Likewise, do not key in your PIN on a telephone keypad or the 7 Reversal of payments which you have approved .............. 3 like. 8 Reversal of payments which you have not approved ........ 3 Be careful when using your PIN 9 Your obligation to block your card ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Economics of Payment Card Systems Table of Contents
    An examination of the economics of payment card systems Table of contents Page 2 Abstract 3 1 Introduction 3 2 The history of the payment card 4 3 Different types of payment card 4 3.1 Pay later cards 5 3.2 Pay now cards 5 3.3 Pay before cards 5 3.4 Multifunction cards 5 4 How payment card markets work 5 4.1 The economics of two-sided markets 6 4.2 Challenges in two-sided markets 8 4.3 The structure of card systems 9 4.4 Players in the payment card market 12 5 Interchange fees 12 5.1 Equalisation mechanism 12 5.2 The non-discrimination rule and the honour all cards rule 12 5.3 Types of interchange fee 13 5.4 Criticism of the interchange fee 14 5.5 Regulation of interchange fees 15 5.6 Economic findings on interchange fees 16 6 Conclusion 17 7 Bibliography Abstract would lead one to expect. This paper aims to provide The use of payment cards has increased subs- an understanding of the various payment card types tantially in recent years. These cards have become and systems, their mode of operation and the cost/ an indispensable and natural payment instrument for benefit considerations of the parties involved. Parti- many consumers. On closer examination, a complex cular attention is paid to the economics of two-sided network of interdependencies underlies these incons- markets, the principles of which govern the operation picuous pieces of plastic. The coordination of all the of payment card systems. Finally, the paper examines parties involved in a payment card system is far more the interchange fees which – arguably – are required complex than the simplicity of the payment process for the smooth functioning of payment card systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Go Beyond Physical Cards DIGITAL
    Your foundation for a Go beyond physical cards DIGITAL Nets Digital Life Cycle Service (DLCM) Service enables you with one FIRST interface to create digital customer journeys for your full card portfolio card experience of physical and virtual cards. Both as mono- and multi-scheme issuer, you benefit greatly from the state-of-the-art scheme agnostic interface delivered via the DLCM API. One API Interface for three modular services enables you to provide a digital first user experience for your customers with minimal investments, while reducing operating expense. Customers can intuitively provision their cards to their preferred digital wallet and enable automatic updates of latest card credentials at the merchants, and securely and compliant be enabled to read all card credentials directly in the mobile bank app. End-to-End Digital: Solution provides full digitised card life-cycle management Low cost: Reduce investments and running costs for the foundation of your digitised card strategy Cost transparency: Complete cost transparency for the full lifetime of the service Simplicity: One offload of cards from CMS for access to the full stack of modular services Customer Satisfaction: Attract and retain customers with leading card payment experiences Grow Digital Turnover: Increase customer usage by securing top-of-wallet status Seamless UX: Easily integrates into an existing digital banking experience PCI Scope: Option to remove your PCI Scope Live today: In production with customers xPay Complementary services to DLCM API: MDE isa) S ( (V Ma TS st V er Instant Issuing e token se ca em rv rd h ic ) Sc e Instant enablement of card usage A Notifications c c o (Visa) Instant notifications to the u DLCM s n e customer for card usage events.
    [Show full text]
  • Danmarks Nationalbank Costs of Payments in Denmark Havnegade 5 DK-1093 Copenhagen K 1
    Danmarks Nationalbank Danmarks Costs of payments in Denmark Nationalbank Costs of payments in Denmark Danmarks Nationalbank Havnegade 5 DK-1093 Copenhagen K Telephone +45 33 63 63 63 Fax +45 33 63 71 29 www.nationalbanken.dk E-mail: [email protected] 00008_omkost_omslag.indd008_omkost_omslag.indd 1 222-11-20112-11-2011 114:52:284:52:28 COSTS /&0!9-%.43IN DENMARK Text may be copied from this publication provided that Danmarks Nationalbank is specifically stated as the source. Changes to or misrepresentation of the content are not permitted. #osts OFPAYMENTSin Denmark is available on Danmarks Nationalbank's website: www.nationalbanken.dk under publications. This report is based on information available up to November 2011. #osts OFPAYMENTSin Denmark is available on request from: Danmarks Nationalbank Communications Havnegade 5 DK-1093 Copenhagen K Tel. +45 33 63 70 00 (direct) or +45 33 63 63 63 Office hours: Monday-Friday 9.00 am-4.00 pm. E-mail: [email protected] www.nationalbanken.dk Explanation of symbols: - Magnitude nil 0 Less than half of unit employed • No applicable data or data irrelevant …Data not available Danmarks Nationalbank, Copenhagen ISBN 978-87-87251-93-8 (Online) ISBN 978-87-87251-94-5 Contents PREFACE ................................................................................................ 5 SUMMARY ............................................................................................ 7 Background and conclusion ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Open Terminal Requirement Specification 2006–07–01
    Technical Reference Guide – Open Terminal Requirement Specification 2006–07–01 Public Version © PBS A/S 1999–2006 i 2006–07–01 Technical Reference Guide – Open Terminal Requirement Specification Version 2.5 How to Contact PBS A/S PBS A/S Lautrupbjerg 10 DK–2750 Ballerup DENMARK Tel.no.: +45 44 68 44 68, att. PE 862 Chip og Terminaler Fax.no.: +45 44 86 09 30 E–mail: [email protected] Web–site: www.pbs.dk Disclaimers Copyright Information This document contains information proprietary to PBS A/S. The informa- tion, whether in the form of e.g. text, schematics, tables, drawings or illustra- tions, must not, without the prior, written consent of PBS A/S, be copied, re- produced or otherwise duplicated, disclosed outside the recipient company or organization or used by the recipient for purposes other than those explic- itly agreed in writing with PBS A/S. This limitation does not limit the recipient’s right to duplicate and use infor- mation contained in the document if such information is received from another source without restriction provided such source is not in breach of an obligation of confidentiality towards PBS A/S. Trademarks PBS and the PBS–logo are registered trademarks of PBS A/S. Dankort, VISA, Eurocard, MasterCard and Maestro names and logos are registered trademarks of PBS A/S and its international partners. Limitation of Liability Under no circumstances shall PBS A/S be liable for any direct incidental, in- direct, special or consequential damages whatsoever (including but not lim- ited to lost profits) arising out of or relating to this document or the informa- tion contained in it, even if PBS A/S has been advised, knew or should have known of the possibility of such damages.
    [Show full text]