March 2, 2021
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Board Meeting Packet SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AT THE EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY, MARCH 2, 2021 at 1:00 pm
Pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive Order No. N-29-20 and the Alameda County Health Officer’s Shelter in Place Orders, the East Bay Regional Park District Headquarters will not be open to the public and the Board of Directors and staff will be participating in the Board meetings via phone/video conferencing.
Members of the public can listen and view the meeting in the following way: Via the Park District’s live video stream which can be found at https://youtu.be/qmta0ETqXKc
Public comments may be submitted one of three ways:
1. Via email to Yolande Barial Knight, Clerk of the Board, at [email protected]. Email must contain in the subject line public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item #. It is preferred that these written comments be submitted by Monday, March 1, 2021 at 3:00 pm.
2. Via voicemail at (510) 544-2016. The caller must start the message by stating public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item # followed by their name and place of residence, followed by their comments. It is preferred that these voicemail comments be submitted by Monday, March 1, 2021 at 3:00 pm.
3. Live via zoom. If you would like to make a live public comment during the meeting this option is available through the virtual meeting platform: https://zoom.us/j/97905565139
*Note that this virtual meeting platform link will let you into the virtual meeting for the purpose of providing a public comment. If you do not intend to make a public comment please use the YouTube link at: https://youtu.be/qmta0ETqXKc to observe the meeting. It is preferred that those requesting to speak during the meeting contact the Clerk of the Board at [email protected] by 3:00 pm on Monday, March 1, 2021 via email or voicemail (510) 544-2016 to provide name and the subject of the public comment or item to be addressed.
Comments received during the meeting and up until the public comment period on the relevant agenda item is closed, will be provided in writing to the Board of Directors, included transcribed voicemails. All comments received by the close of the public comment period will be available after the meeting as supplemental materials and will become part of the official meeting record. If you have any questions please contact Yolande Barial Knight, Clerk of the Board, at [email protected] or (510) 544-2020. Clerk of the Board YOLANDE BARIAL KNIGHT (510) 544-2020 PH MEMO to the BOARD OF DIRECTORS (510) 569-1417 FAX EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
East Bay Regional Park District Board of Directors
DEE ROSARIO The Regular Session of the TUESDAY, MARCH 2, 2021 President - Ward 2 Board Meeting is scheduled to commence via teleconference at 1:00 p.m. COLIN COFFEY Vice President - Ward 7 Park District’s live video stream can be found at: BEVERLY LANE https://youtu.be/qmta0ETqXKc Treasurer - Ward 6 DENNIS WAESPI Secretary - Ward 3 ELIZABETH ECHOLS Ward 1 ELLEN CORBETT Respectfully submitted, Ward 4 AYN WIESKAMP Ward 5 CAROL R. VICTOR CAROL VICTOR Interim General Manager Interim General Manager
2950 Peralta Oaks Court Oakland, CA 94605-0381 (888) 327-2757 MAIN (510) 633-0460 TDD (510) 635-5502 FAX ebparks.org
3 AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 2, 2021 BOARD OF DIRECTORS EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT The Board of Directors of 11:00 a.m. ROLL CALL (Virtual) the East Bay Regional Park District will hold a regular PUBLIC COMMENTS meeting virtually, commencing at 11:00 a.m. for Closed CLOSED SESSION Session and 1:00 pm for Open Session on Tuesday, March 2, 2021. Video Stream at: A. Conference with Labor Negotiator: Government Code Section 54957.6 https://youtu.be/qmta0ETqXKc
1. Agency Negotiators: Carol R. Victor, Ana M. Alvarez, Agenda for the meeting is Allison Picard, Eddie Kriesberg listed adjacent. Times for agenda Employee Organizations: AFSCME Local 2428, items are approximate only and Police Association are subject to change during the Unrepresented Employees: Managers, Confidentials and Seasonals meeting. If you wish to speak on matters not on the agenda, you may do so under Public 2. Agency Negotiators: Carol R. Victor, Jason Comments at the beginning of Rosenberg, Allison Picard the agenda. If you wish to Unrepresented Employee: General Manager comment on an item on the agenda, please send an email to [email protected] before B. Conference with Legal Counsel: 3:00 pm, Monday, March 1, 2021. 1. Anticipated Litigation (pursuant to Government Code § 54956.9: A copy of the background materials concerning these a) Initiation of litigation pursuant to Section 54956.9(d)(4):1 agenda items, including any case material that may have been submitted less than 72 hours C. Conference with Real Property Negotiator Regarding Price and/or before the meeting, is available for inspection on the District’s Terms of Payment: Government Code Section 54956.8 website (www.ebparks.org).
1. Agency Negotiators: Kristina Kelchner, Michael Reeves Agendas for Board Committee Meetings are available to the public upon request. If you wish PROPERTY OWNER/ to be placed on the mailing list APN/ADDRESS NEGOTIATING PARTIES PARK/TRAIL to receive future agendas for a Contra Costa County specific Board Committee, please call the Clerk of the 380-260-002 Adams, M and Hagglund, J District Corporation Yard Board’s Office at (510) 544- 4595 Pacheco Boulevard, 2020. Martinez District facilities and meetings comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. If special accommodations are needed for you to participate, please contact the Clerk of the Board as soon as possible, but preferably at least three working days prior to the meeting. 4 1:00 p.m. OPEN SESSION (Virtual)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
A. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
B. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Public comments may be submitted one of three ways:
1. Via email to Yolande Barial Knight, Clerk of the Board, at [email protected]. Email must contain in the subject line public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item #. It is preferred that these written comments be submitted by Monday, March 1, 2021 at 3:00 pm. 2. Via voicemail at (510) 544-2016. The caller must start the message by stating public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item # followed by their name and place of residence, followed by their comments. It is preferred that these voicemail comments be submitted by Monday, March 1, 2021 at 3:00 pm. 3. Live via zoom. If you would like to make a live public comment during the meeting this option is available through the virtual meeting platform: https://zoom.us/j/97905565139 *Note that this virtual meeting platform link will let you into the virtual meeting for the purpose of providing a public comment. If you do not intend to make a public comment please use the YouTube link at: https://youtu.be/qmta0ETqXKc to observe the meeting.
It is preferred that those requesting to speak during the meeting contact the Clerk of the Board at [email protected] by 3:00 pm on Monday, March 1, 2021 via email or voicemail (510) 544-2020 to provide name and the subject of the public comment or item to be addressed.
C. SPECIAL UPDATE
1. Interim General Manager’s Update on the Status of the East Bay Regional Park District Emergency During the COVID-19 Pandemic
1:30 p.m. D. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
a. Approval of District Check Listing for the Period of January 18, 2021 Through January 31, 2021 (Auker/Victor) (Resolution) (No Cost) b. Approval of the Minutes for the Board Meeting of February 16, 2021 (Barial Knight) (Resolution) (No Cost) c. Authorization to Appoint Ms. Alma Balmes as the Risk and Safety Manager at Step F of the Management Pay Range MG03: Legal Division, Risk Department (Picard/Victor) (Resolution) (Budgeted Funds) d. Authorization to Negotiate with Various Property Owners (Reeves/Kelchner) (Resolution) (No Cost)
5 e. Authorization to Enter into a License Agreement with the East Bay Municipal Utilities District for the Park District’s Continued Operation of a Public Recreational Trail: East Bay Skyline National Recreation Trail (Reeves/Kelchner) (Resolution) ( Budgeted Funds) f. Authorization to Award a Contract to Golden Gate Sign Company for Fabrication and Installation of Signs for Dumbarton Quarry Campground by the Bay: Coyote Hills Regional Park (Hobbs/Johnson) (Resolution) ( Budgeted Funds) g. Authorization to Appropriate Measure FF Funds and Amend the Contract with Moleaer, Inc. for the Service and Purchase of Three Nanobubbler Oxygenation Generators for Cyanobacteria Remediation: Temescal Regional Recreation Area (Graul/Kelchner) (Resolution) ( Measure FF Funds /Budget Change) h. Authorization to Reimburse Grazing Tenant for Remaining Final Project Costs for Fence Maintenance Repairs Pursuant to Grazing License Agreement: Bishop Ranch Open Space Regional Preserve (Graul/Kelchner) (Resolution) ( Budgeted Funds) i. Authorization to Partner with San Francisco Estuary Institute for the Coyote Hills Restoration and Public Access Project: Coyote Hills Regional Park (Hornbeck/Auker) (Resolution) ( Budgeted Funds) j. Authorization to Apply for Grant Funds from the Statewide Park Development and Community Revitalization Program (Prop 68) for Expansion of the Tidewater Area: Martin Luther King Jr. Regional Shoreline (Hornbeck/Perry/Auker) (Resolution) ( Rev Authorization) k. Adoption of East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule for Unrepresented Management Classifications to Reflect the Changes Approved by the Board of Directors in Resolution No. 2021-02-044 (Auker/Alvarez/Victor) (Resolution) ( Budgeted Funds) L. Approval of the District’s 2021 Investment Policy (Spaulding/Auker) (Resolution) ( No Cost)
2:00 p.m. 2. EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATIVE DIVISION
a. Appointment of Sabrina B. Landreth as the General Manager of the East Bay Regional Park District and Approval of an Employment Agreement: Executive and Legislative Division (Picard/Rosario) (Resolution) (Budgeted Funds) b. 2020 Year In Review Presented by Interim General Manager Carol Victor (Victor )
2:30 p.m. 3. BOARD AND STAFF REPORTS
a. Actions Taken by Other Jurisdictions Affecting the Park District (Victor)
6 3:00 p.m. 4. GENERAL MANAGER’S COMMENTS
a. STAFF PRESENTATION Chief of Government and Legislative Affairs Erich Pfuehler and Legislative and Policy Management Analyst Lisa Baldinger will provide an overview of a Beacon Economics study focused on the economic and employment creation impacts of numerous current or upcoming projects throughout the Park District.
3:15 p.m. 5. BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS
a. Executive Committee (02/04/2021) (Rosario) b. Executive Committee (12/03/2020) (Corbett)
3:25 p.m. 6. ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM CLOSED SESSION
3:30 p.m. 7. BOARD COMMENTS
4:00 p.m. E. ADJOURNMENT
7 CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
D. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
a. Approval of District Check Listing for the Period of January 18, 2021 Through January 31, 2021 (Auker/Doyle)
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve the Check Listing for the period of January 18, 2021 through January 31, 2021.
Per Resolution No. 1992-1-40, adopted by the Board on January 21, 1992, a copy of the Check Listing has been provided to the Board Treasurer for review. A copy of the Check Listing has also been provided to the Clerk of the Board and will become a part of the Official District Records.
8 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO.: 2021 – 03 -
March 2, 2021
APPROVAL OF DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 18, 2021THROUGH JANUARY 31, 2021
WHEREAS, District Resolution No. 1992 - 1 - 40, adopted by the Board of Directors on January 21, 1992, requires that a listing of District checks be provided to the Board Treasurer for review;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District hereby approves the check listing for the period of January 18, 2021 through January 31, 2021;
Moved by Director , seconded by Director , and adopted this 2nd day of March, 2021 by the following vote:
FOR:
AGAINST: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:
9 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
D. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
b. Approval of the Minutes for the Board Meeting of February 16, 2021 (Barial Knight)
10 Page Left Blank Intentionally
11 Unapproved Minutes Board Meeting of February 16, 2021
The Board Meeting, which was held February 16, 2021 at East Bay Regional Park District, 2950 Peralta Oaks Court, Oakland, CA 94605 called its Closed Session to order at 11:00 a.m. by Board Dee Rosario.
ROLL CALL
Directors Present: Dee Rosario, President Colin Coffey, Vice President Dennis Waespi, Secretary Beverly Lane, Treasurer Ayn Wieskamp Elizabeth Echols Ellen Corbett Directors Absent: None.
The Open Session of the Board Meeting was called to order at 2:37 p.m. by President Rosario.
Staff Present: Carol Victor, Ana Alvarez, Debra Auker, Anthony Ciaburro, Jim O’Connor, Carol Johnson, Kristina Kelchner, Lisa Goorjian, Jeff Rasmussen, Allison Picard, Lance Brede, Erich Pfuehler, Lisa Baldinger, Aileen Thiele, Brian Holt, Alan Love, Becky Tuden, Richard Guest, Sean Dougan, Chris Barton, Matthew Graul, Katy Hornbeck, Mike Mathieson, Mary Mattingly, Jim Tallerico, Matthew James, Sydney Erickson (PrimeGov) Guests: None.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Director Coffey led the Board, staff and meeting attendees in the Pledge of Allegiance.
Director Coffey acknowledged the land that the Park District sits on is the land of the indigenous people. The District are its stewards, and we value the history and culture of our indigenous people's communities and what they teach us as we in turn manage the lands. Coffey added that Hercules is located in the tribal Homeland of the Carquin and the Ohlone tribe whose territory for thousands of years encompassed the South and North side of the Carquinez Strait.
President Rosario opened the meeting and stated that consistent with Governor Gavin Newsom’s Executive Order N-25-20 issued on March 12, 2020 in response to the threat of COVID-19 and the Alameda County Health Department’s Order dated March 16, 2020, the Board of Directors may utilize teleconferencing to remotely participate in meetings. Clerk of the Board announced the three ways in which the public could participate in the meeting. President Rosario asked if the Board members had any questions about the meeting process. There were none.
A. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
By motion of Director Lane, and seconded by Director Wieskamp, the Board voted unanimously to approve the agenda. Roll Call Vote unanimous.
Directors Remote: Ellen Corbett, Colin Coffey, Elizabeth Echols, Beverly Lane, Dee Rosario, Dennis Waespi, Ayn Wieskamp. Directors Against: None. Directors Absent: None. 12 Unapproved Minutes Board Meeting of February 16, 2021 B. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Chris Newey, President AFSCME 2428, sent an email that was read into the record by the Clerk. Newey said that the ongoing turnover in Human Resources has been disruptive in developing constructive relationships to advance the Union and the District's goal. The hope is that the new Chief of HR will take time to meet with the Union to discuss changes before implementing anything new and would do their research on past practices. Newey highlighted the District’s narrow perspective that Union members can only observe District negotiations by taking leave without pay.
Eric Olafsson, a resident of Canyon, commented on two items in Closed Session. He asked why the District is buying inholdings in Canyon that are non-contiguous to Sibley. He requested to view the planning documents. Jonathan Goodwin, resident of Canyon, had the same request and commented that these inholdings are around EBMUD property. Goodwin also asked if there has been any progress with the property purchased next door to the Peralta Oaks building.
Carol Victor, Interim General Manager agreed with both Goodwin and Olafsson that closed session negotiations are confidential and referred them to the master plan and the Park District’s long-standing practice to the purchase of property in open sessions and at that time staff would be more forthcoming with information. Victor explained that the building across the street should be coming forward to the Board Executive committee in the near term with an update.
C. SPECIAL UPDATE
1. Interim General Manager’s Update on the Status of the East Bay Regional Park District Emergency During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Interim General Manager Carol Victor stated the Board reaffirmed that the Park District continues to be in a state of emergency. There has been a shelter in place order for eleven months. There are mass vaccination sites opening throughout the country and today one is opened at the Oakland Coliseum in coordination with FEMA. Staff continue to advocate that District frontline workers be given priority for vaccinations. The CDC has issued new guidance on mask wearing and some of this information was sent to staff. One concern is with spring weather and loosening of restrictions which may cause people to become less vigilant about prevention. Training, inspections and contact tracing continue and whenever there is exposure, preventative steps are put into place to prevent a reoccurrence. Director Waespi asked if there has been an update from the County on whether the Park District can get employees vaccinated. Victor replied staff are in active discussions with the County and are in Phase 1C as government workers. The District will continue to advocate for employees. President Rosario asked if we could get an update on the numbers for our employees from the EOC at the next meeting.
D. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
IGM, Carol Victor announced that the Brown Act requires that before the Board takes action on any highly paid executive compensation, there must be an announcement of the terms of the compensation. Item 1C on the consent agenda is to bring in Allyson Cook as the Chief Human Resources Officer in at Step E, MG07 at $197,433 per year.
By motion of Director Corbett, and seconded by Director Wieskamp, the consent calendar was unanimously approved.
Directors For: Ellen Corbett, Colin Coffey, Elizabeth Echols. Beverly Lane, Dee Rosario, 13 Unapproved Minutes Board Meeting of February 16, 2021 Dennis Waespi, Ayn Wieskamp. Directors Against: None. Directors Absent: None.
a. Approval of District Check Listing for the Period of January 4, 2021 Through January 17, 2021 Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 022 (attached)
b. Approval of the Minutes for the Board Meeting of February 2, 2021
c. Authorization to Appoint Ms. Allyson Cook as the Chief Human Resources Officer at Step E of the Management Pay Range MG07 in the Executive and Legislative Division, Human Resources Department Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 023 (attached)
Allison Picard, Acting Chief of HR stated if approved, Ms. Cook would begin on March 8th. Picard discussed Cooks’ job path, her skill and the experience she will bring to the District.
d. Resolution of the East Bay Regional Park District Recognizing February 2021 as Black History Month Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 024 (attached)
Director Corbett acknowledged that this item merits consent and approval by all Board members; however she believes it is important to pull this item off the consent calendar. Corbett appreciated that under the leadership of President Rosario and IGM Victor that the Board is passing this resolution to recognize this important month. Corbett congratulated and expressed appreciation to all of the African American employees current and past who mean so much to the District and continue to contribute. Corbett called out Clerk Knight as one of the leaders in the Park District. President Rosario requested the Board read this resolution out loud and into the record. Each board member read a Whereas section and Director Coffey and President Rosario read the Be It Resolved sections. President Rosario congratulated current and past black employees for their service accumulated and performed with incredible diligence and sacrifice.
e. Approval of Reappointments and Appointments to the Park Advisory Committee Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 025 (attached)
f. Resolution to Support AB 11 (Ward D-San Diego) – Regional Climate Change Coordinating Groups Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 026 (attached)
g. Resolution to Support AB 50 (Boerner Horvath D-Encinitas) – Regional Support Network for Climate Adaptation and Sea Level Rise Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 027 (attached)
h. Resolution to Support AB 51 (Quirk D-Hayward) – Establishment of Regional Adaptation Plans Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 028 (attached)
i. Resolution to Support AB 52 (Frazier D-Discovery Bay) –Account for Wildfire Emissions in Greenhouse Gas Fund Allocations Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 029 (attached)
j.Resolution to Support AB 67 (Petrie-Norris D-Laguna Beach) – Sea Level Rise Adaptation Economic Analysis Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 030 (attached) 14 Unapproved Minutes Board Meeting of February 16, 2021
k. Resolution to Support H.R. 159 (Sires D-NJ) – Investments in Parks Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 031 (attached)
L. Resolution to Support SB 1 (Atkins D- San Diego) – California Coastal Commission Sea Level Rise Planning Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 032 (attached)
m. Resolution to Support SB 27 (Skinner D-Berkeley) – California Carbon Sequestration and Climate Resiliency Project Registry Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 033 (attached)
n. Resolution to Support SB 45 (Portantino D-La Canada Flintridge) – Wildfire Prevention, Safe Drinking Water, Drought Preparation and Flood Protection Bond Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 034 (attached)
o. Resolution to Support SB 63 (Stern D-Los Angeles) – Defensible Space Standards Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 035 (attached)
p. Authorization to Execute a Contract with Restoration Design Group for Consulting Services for the Remove Crossing at Brook Road Project: Tilden Regional Park Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 036 (attached)
q. Authorization to Award Contract to Consolidated Engineering Inc. for Bay Water Trail Access Improvements: Point Pinole Regional Shoreline Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 037 (attached)
Director Lane asked if the Board could see a map of the sites. Jeff Rasmussen, Assistant Finance Officer, displayed a map of the completed Bay Water Trail sites, including the proposed project for approval. Rasmussen pointed out the location of the three remaining sites which are higher priorities for future sites. Lane said 11 sites are completed in the East Bay and some of will require special approval if people want to spend the night. All these sites require skill on the water and an enjoyment of our Bay.
r. Authorization to Purchase Cisco Phones from AMS.Net for District-wide Information Technology Infrastructure Replacements Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 038 (attached)
s. Authorization to Purchase Replacement Computers from Dell Computer Corporation Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 039 (attached)
t.Authorization to Purchase One Brush Bandit Chipper from Cal-Line Equipment Inc. as an Addition to the Fleet Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 040 (attached)
u. Authorization to Purchase One Compact Track Loader from Peterson CAT as an Addition to the Fleet Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 041 (attached)
v. Authorization to Apply for Grant Funds from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife for Coyote Hills Restoration and Public Access: Coyote Hills Regional Park Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 042 (attached) 15 Unapproved Minutes Board Meeting of February 16, 2021 w. Authorization to Apply to the California Office of Emergency Services for Funds from the Federal Emergency Management Agency for Hazardous Fuels Management in Tilden and Claremont Canyon Regional Parks Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 043 (attached)
2. EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATIVE DIVISION
By motion of Director Wieskamp, and seconded by Director Lane, the Board voted unanimously to approve the Item 2a.
Directors For: Colin Coffey, Ellen Corbett, Elizabeth Echols, Beverly Lane, Dee Rosario, Dennis Waespi, Ayn Wieskamp. Directors Against: None. Directors Absent: None.
a. Amendment to the East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule to Address the Findings and Implement Staff Recommendations as a Result of the Classification and Compensation Studies for Unrepresented Management Classifications and Classifications with a Confidential Designation, Including Eliminating the Top Merit Step Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 044 (attached)
DGM Ana Alvarez led this lengthy report to address the study findings for unrepresented employee groups in the management and confidential designations. Alvarez acknowledged the executive team that worked with her on this report. A benchmarking study was conducted and the results were reported on this group. By engaging in this process, the Board of Directors helped to establish district-wide classification and compensation plans for represented as well as unrepresented employees through a transparent public process, starting with the acceptance of the study reports in a public meeting which took place December 1, 2020. The expectation was there would be tangible outcomes from the study findings, including clear and up- to-date job classifications as well as compensation that is fair in today's public sector market. These are very important tools to attract and retain a workforce of excellence as called out in the District’s master plan. CFO/AGM Auker noted that one of the salary tables was not included in the packet when it was printed and asked for guidance from District Counsel. District Counsel Victor recommended the Board take the action and adopt the resolution as presented, but because it is required to publicly adopt the salary management schedules to comply with CalPERS rules, staff will bring it back at the next Board meeting. Victor asked the Clerk of the Board to bring a republishing of the salary schedule to the next board meeting.
3. FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES DIVISION
By motion of Director Echols, and seconded by Director Waespi, the Board voted unanimously to approve the Item 3a.
Directors For: Colin Coffey, Ellen Corbett, Elizabeth Echols, Beverly Lane, Dee Rosario, Dennis Waespi, Ayn Wieskamp. Directors Against: None. Directors Absent: None.
a.Authorization of a Grant Application for the Federal BUILD Grant: District-wide Regional Trails Resolution No. 2021 – 02 - 045 (attached)
Erich Pfuehler, Chief of Government & Legislative Affairs introduced this item giving some background on this grant. Katie Hornbeck, Grants Manager, gave the presentation. Hornbeck went over key components of the 16 Unapproved Minutes Board Meeting of February 16, 2021 BUILD grant and introduced the project team: Erich Pfuehler, Lisa Baldinger, Yulie Padmore of Government Affairs; Jeff Rasmussen, Assistant Finance Officer; Sean Dougan, Trails Program Manager; Brian Holt, Chief of Planning and Lisa Goorjian, Chief of Design and Construction. The group met on a bi-weekly basis for the last few month to prepare for the BUILD program previously known as the Transportation, Investment Generating Economic Recovery Program or TIGER program. Hornbeck explained what BUILD is, BUILD’s project criteria, the timeline, project maps consisting of Ward and Congressional Districts and the tentative project list. Staff are working with a consultant who is looking at a variety of factors to analyze. In March, staff will finalize the project list, and between March and May will prepare the grant application. The actual application will be submitted sometime between May and June.
Lisa Baldinger, Legislative and Policy Management Analyst thanked the Board for meeting with them to discuss their priorities. Baldinger stated it was confirmed from the Department of Transportation (DOT) that their criteria or priorities will be shifting slightly under the new leadership. Baldinger discussed the addition of the projects which will increase the total to 21 projects. All projects on the list are within existing capital improvement plans, so the projects are in the Park District master plan area or a city or county entity. Pfuehler stated the criteria will slightly change to recognize quality of life and environmental sustainability among other things. In 2010, when the District applied for the Tiger Grant, it was very important to have the entire congressional delegation work together as a team to help convince DOT that the District’s application was worth accepting.
Hornbeck commented that the list is not in order of priority and there is a mix of construction projects and preliminary engineering only projects. The Bancroft over-crossing was added to the list after the board material was submitted which makes a total of 21 projects. Staff are submitting the application with several urban projects, to make sure that the listed projects are the most competitive and project ready. Director Lane asked what is meant by readiness. Hornbeck responded that it refers to if a project can be completed in the grant performance period of three years. Lane inquired about the Iron Horse Trail to Benicia Bridge project. She added that the completed project is going to cost quite a bit more than that. Sean Dougan, Trails Program Manager replied that the phase listed for the Iron Horse Trail segment is for the preliminary design and engineering and the overall cost for construction of the Iron Horse Trail segment from its current Terminus to the Benicia Bridge will be quite a bit more expensive.
Director Waespi congratulated Katie on her promotion and asked if Alameda County is putting in a grant application. Pfuehler replied staff are in communication with the transportation agencies for each County, and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. Director Corbett asked for more information about the District’s engagement with regional partners, what it entails and what is a preliminary engineering project. Pfuehler replied staff have begun meeting with external agencies, but it is important to meet with BART and other transit agencies about connectivity. Staff should probably meet with other community groups and may ask Board members to assist in the process. Dougan explained that preliminary engineering is getting a project to a point where staff can define a project description and perform CEQA documentation and impacts. Corbett suggested the new head of the DOT be invited to the Park District soon. Director Lane asked if staff were working on a name for these projects. Hornbeck answered when staff get to the final project list they will have an exciting and compelling project. Rosario asked the due date for the application. Hornbeck replied it depends on when DOT makes its announcement.
4. BOARD AND STAFF REPORTS a. Actions Taken by Other Jurisdictions Affecting the Park District Interim General Manager Carol Victor discussed items in this report.
IGM Carol Victor, said that the CCC Board of Supervisors did approve a couple of improvements to the Iron Horse Trail crossings in Alamo which are expected to improve safety along the Iron Horse Trail. Victor included more detail on the improvements with the assistance of Brian Holt, Chief of Planning, Trails and GIS. 17 Unapproved Minutes Board Meeting of February 16, 2021 5. GENERAL MANAGER’S COMMENTS
a. STAFF PRESENTATION Ecological Services Manager Becky Tuden will provide a presentation on the harmful algal blooms and remediation efforts at Lake Anza and Lake Temescal.
IGM Victor introduced Becky Tuden, Ecological Services Manager and she gave an update on remediating harmful algal blooms (HAB) at District lakes. Tuden discussed the following topics: • Background on Cyanobacteria (aka blue green algae) • Our Cyanobacteria Management Program • Remediation Efforts for Lake Temescal • Remediation Efforts for Lake Anza • Planned Efforts for 2021 Tuden explained cyanobacteria are found worldwide and is the largest and most important group of organisms. It has several unique traits. It can release toxins, which if ingested, or come into contact with skin can cause health effects to both people and animals. Cyanobacteria likes high nutrients, low oxygen and warmer, slower waters. The overall remediation strategy is to reduce nutrients which come from internal or external loading. In August 2020, the Park District launched a Nannobubbler Project in Lake Anza and Temescal. Nannobubblers infuse oxygen and the more oxygen the less nutrients are available. This has been a success in Temescal. In Anza, the lake has been stratified and staff installed the oxygen system and it will take more time to take away the nutrients from Lake Anza. Director Wieskamp asked if there's some other agencies that use these technique. Tuden replied that the nano bubbler has been used by a lot of wastewater systems and agricultural ponds. The reason the Park District was able to pilot this program is because they wanted to see how it would work in a recreational Lake. Director Waespi asked if any human has had a bad reaction and if there is evidence that it could hurt a person. Tuden replied it's all about dosage and exposure and how your body reacts. Director Lane asked if we wanted Anza to be stratified? Tuden said it is stratified. Corbett asked if various practices to lessen the accumulation of the chemical compounds can be tracked. Tuden said she will look into it. President Rosario asked if staff are using dissolved oxygen at Lake Temescal why are we still getting a spike in algal blooms. Tuden said that we are not seeing that spike, the phosphorus and the oxygen are staying at a good level and over time, the algal blooms have decreased. Rosario asked if the nannobubblers are still operating? Tuden replied yes. Rosario asked about the e-coli leak. Graul said staff are still not sure after their investigation and will continue monitoring it this year. Corbett asked if there is data available to allow staff to predict in advance if there'll be a bloom, or are there too many different variables? Tuden said she has not heard anybody say it, but they are confident it can be done. Graul said that we might be able to identify trends if staff continues monitoring.
6. BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS
a. Natural and Cultural Resources Committee (12/9/2020) (Coffey) b. Legislative Committee (1/15/2021) (Wieskamp)
Director Coffey had to leave the meeting for another meeting.
7. ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM CLOSED SESSION
IGM Carol Victor stated were no announcements from closed session.
8. BOARD COMMENTS
Director Corbett reported on meetings attended. Director Corbett • Attended the Board meeting 2/3; 18 Unapproved Minutes Board Meeting of February 16, 2021 • Attended the Executive Committee meeting 2/4; • Attended the Finance Committee meeting 2/5; • Attended the Special Closed Session meetings on 2/9, 2/11; • Attended the EOC meeting on 2/10. Corbett represented the Park District at a taping with Doug McConnell.
Director Rosario reported on meetings attended. Director Rosario • Attended the Board meeting 2/3; • Attended a meeting with Eric Pfuehler and Lisa Baldinger 2/3; • Attended the Executive Committee meeting 2/4; • Attended the CCC Mayors Conference 2/4; • Attended the Finance Committee meeting 2/5; • Attended the Special Closed Session meetings on 2/9, 2/11; • Attended Lafayette’s State of the City 2/11. Rosario met with Jim O’Connor and Tiffany Margulici regarding Anthony Chabot Equestrian Center.
Director Lane reported on meetings attended. Director Lane • Attended the Board meeting 2/3; • Attended the Finance Committee meeting 2/5; • Attended the Pleasant Hill State of the City meeting; • Attended the Special Closed Session meetings on 2/9, 2/11. Lane hiked Sycamore Valley Open Space, observed that the visitors to the park are increasing.
Director Waespi reported on meetings attended. Director Waespi • Attended the board meeting 2/3; • Attended the Special Closed Session meetings on 2/9, 2/11. Waespi visited the McCosker property, commented on Larry Dunn one of our great African American employees who worked for the Park District.
Director Wieskamp reported on meetings attended. Director Wieskamp • Attended the Board meeting 2/3; • Attended the Special Closed Session meetings on 2/9 and 2/11; • Met with Nancy Rodrigue - Friends of Tesla. Wieskamp continues to give out calendars.
Director Echols reported on meetings attended. Director Echols • Attended the Board meeting 2/3; • Attended the Finance Committee meeting 2/5; • Attended the Special Closed Session meetings on 2/9 and 2/11; • Attended the liaison meeting for Unified Command, in response to the Chevron oil spill; • Attended Alameda Democratic Central Committee meeting.
E. ADJOURNMENT
President Rosario adjourned the meeting at 4:53 pm in memory of Douglas Coolidge who was Rosario’s first supervisor at Don Castro. Coolidge’s nickname was the Gentle Giant. The Board honors the black employees current and past in celebration of Black History Month.
19 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
D. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
c. Authorization to Appoint Ms. Alma Balmes as the Risk and Safety Manager at Step F of the Management Pay Range MG03: Legal Division, Risk Department (Picard/Victor)
RECOMMENDATION
The General Manager recommends that the Board of Directors appoint Ms. Alma Balmes as the Risk and Safety Manager at Step F of the Management Pay Range MG03.
REVENUE/COST
The cost associated with this action is within the adopted 2021 Budget.
BACKGROUND
The Risk Manger position became vacant with the retirement of Ms. Ana Fong in 2020. This is a key position in the Risk & Safety Department providing oversite to the Park District’s Workers’ Compensation and General Liability Insurance Program. This classification has been reviewed and modified as part of the 2020 Classification and Compensation Study for Unrepresented Managers Employee Group conducted by Ralph Andersen & Associates. The safety function and duties were included in the job classification specification to accurately reflect the responsibilities and duties of this single-encumbered position. The title change to this job classification also reinforces the critical need to expand resources for the Park District Safety Program.
An external recruitment process was conducted and closed in mid-December 2020. Candidates participated in several rounds of screening and a technical panel examination; final selection interviews were held with Park District executive staff. The recommended candidate, Ms. Alma Balmes, currently serves in the Alameda County Administrative Office and has held the position of Acting Risk Manager for approximately five years. In this capacity, she also acted as the Safety Manager and oversaw the Alameda County’s General Liability Program. She managed the countywide California Occupational of Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) complaint process including on site incident response and appeal process. She holds several US Department of Labor OSHA certifications in General Industry and Construction Industry Safety. Her breath of experience will be an asset to the Park District.
20 As Ms. Balmes brings significant experience with her, Step F of Management Pay Range MG03 is recommended. At this step the proposed salary is virtually a lateral transfer and does not reflect that she will now be contributing to social security (6.2% of salary). This action is above the General Manager’s authority, as a starting salary step in accordance with the Personnel Administrative Manual 6.01 (B), appointment beyond Step C must be authorized by the Board of Directors. If approved, Ms. Balmes’s tentative start date with the Park District will be March 10, 2021.
ALTERNATIVES
There are no alternatives recommended.
21 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO.: 2021 - 03 -
March 2, 2021
AUTHORIZATION TO APPOINT MS. ALMA BALMES AS THE RISK AND SAFETY MANAGER AT STEP F OF THE MANAGEMENT PAY RANGE MG03: LEGAL DIVISION, RISK DEPARTMENT
WHEREAS, the East Bay Regional Park District must recruit and retain a well-qualified workforce that reflects the diversity of the community served; and
WHEREAS, the District conducted an external process and determined that Alma Balmes is highly qualified for the position of Risk and Safety Manager; and
WHEREAS, the General Manager recommends the Board of Directors authorize the District to appoint Ms. Balmes at Step F of the management salary range MG03; and
WHEREAS, the General Manager is authorized to appoint managers up to Step C and compensation beyond Step C requires Board authorization;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District hereby authorize appointing Ms. Alma Balmes to the position of Risk and Safety Manager at Step F of the Management Salary Range MG03; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the District and in its name, to execute and deliver such documents and to do such acts as may be deemed necessary or appropriate to accomplish the intentions of this resolution.
Moved by Director , seconded by Director , and approved this 2nd day of March, 2021, by the following vote:
FOR:
AGAINST: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:
22 Page Left Blank Intentionally
23 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
D. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
d. Authorization to Negotiate with Various Property Owners (Reeves/Kelchner)
RECOMMENDATION
The General Manager recommends that the Board of Directors authorize the General Manager and the Assistant General Manager, Acquisition, Stewardship & Development Division, to negotiate with:
APN/ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER PARK/TRAIL Contra Costa County 380-260-002 Adams, M and Hagglund, J District Corporation Yard 4595 Pacheco Boulevard, Martinez
REVENUE/COST
Items of cost, terms or conditions of any option are subject to negotiation and would be presented to the Board for formal approval at a later date.
BACKGROUND
The proposed resolution for this item is in direct response to the Brown Act. According to District Counsel, "The Board may meet in Closed (Executive) Session prior to or during negotiations to give instructions to its negotiator regarding the price and terms of payment for the purchase or the lease of the property only after it has identified the parcels of concern, and has identified the people with whom this negotiator may negotiate in open session."
ALTERNATIVES
No alternatives are recommended.
24 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO.: 2021 – 03 -
March 2, 2021
AUTHORIZATION TO NEGOTIATE WITH VARIOUS PROPERTY OWNERS
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 54956.8 requires that prior to or during the negotiations concerning the acquisition of real property, the Board of Directors in closed session may give instructions to its negotiator regarding the price and terms of payment of such property; and
WHEREAS, prior to the closed session, the legislative body of the local agency shall hold an open and public session in which it identifies the real property or real properties which the negotiations may concern, and the person or persons with whom its negotiator may negotiate;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District hereby approves the authorization to negotiate as presented to the Board of Directors on March 2, 2021; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager and the Assistant General Manager, Acquisition, Stewardship & Development Division, are hereby authorized by the Board of Directors on behalf of the East Bay Regional Park District and in its name to negotiate the price and terms of payment of the following parcels of real property:
APN/ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER PARK/TRAIL Contra Costa County 380-260-002 Adams, M and Hagglund, J District Corporation Yard 4595 Pacheco Boulevard, Martinez
Moved by Director , and seconded by Director , and adopted this 2nd day of March, 2021, by the following vote:
FOR:
AGAINST: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:
25 Acquisition, Stewardship & AUTHORIZATION TO NEGOTIATE Development Division Date: March 2, 2021
1 Antioch
Concord
Richmond
Hwy 24 Contra Costa Berkeley County Mt. Diablo State Park
Danville
Oakland
Alameda San Francisco County Bay Livermore Hayward
EBRPD Lands 0 5 Miles [ O:\GIS\Land\A2Ns_2021\02_16_2021.mxd
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Park/Trail: District Corporation Yard 1 Owner: Adams, M and Hagglund, J APN: 380-260-002 Location: 4595 Pacheco Blvd, Martinez
26 Page Left Blank Intentionally
27 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
D. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
e. Authorization to Enter into a License Agreement with the East Bay Municipal Utilities District for the Park District’s Continued Operation of a Public Recreational Trail: East Bay Skyline National Recreation Trail (Reeves/Kelchner)
RECOMMENDATION
The General Manager recommends that the Board of Directors authorize a License Agreement with the East Bay Municipal Utilities District (EBMUD) that will renew for a ten-year term the Park District’s existing license to operate segments of the East Bay Skyline National Recreation Trail located within EBMUD watershed lands adjacent to Wildcat Canyon, Tilden, and Sibley Regional Parks.
REVENUE/COST
A $1,900 application fee will be paid to EBMUD to process the license renewal pursuant to EBMUD’s adopted fee schedule. An annual administrative cost recovery fee of $1,000 will also apply which will partially cover EBMUD’s expenses to administer the terms of the license including semi-annual inspections of the licensed area. The application fee will be funded by general funds previously appropriated to the 2021 Land Acquisition Department budget.
BACKGROUND
The East Bay Skyline National Recreation Trail (Skyline Trail) is a 31-mile continuous path that traverses through six of the East Bay’s most historic and picturesque parks and preserves. Skyline Trail traverses from Alvarado Park and the entrance to Wildcat Canyon Regional Park in Richmond, through Tilden Regional Park, Sibley Volcanic Regional Preserve, Huckleberry Botanic Regional Preserve, Reinhardt Redwood Regional Park, and ending at the Proctor Gate staging area at Anthony Chabot Regional Park near Castro Valley. Segments of the trail traverse EBMUD watershed lands above San Pablo Reservoir and over the Caldecott Tunnel and Highway 24. A 1974 license agreement with EBMUD allowed the establishment of these trail segments across EBMUD watershed lands (Board Resolution No. 4765 adopted on January 7, 1975). The license has been renewed several times over the years, most recently for a ten-year term that expired in 2017, continuing to operate since that time on a month-to-month basis. The proposed license
28 renewal will also be for a ten-year term, with the start of the term set retroactively to October 1, 2017 when the previous ten-year term expired and will run through October 1, 2027. The basic terms and conditions of the new license agreement are essentially the same as those in the license agreement that preceded it.
ALTERNATIVES
No alternatives are recommended.
29 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO.: 2021 – 03 -
March 2, 2021
AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO A LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DISTRICT FOR THE PARK DISTRICT’S CONTINUED OPERATION OF A PUBLIC RECREATIONAL TRAIL: EAST BAY SKYLINE NATIONAL RECREATION TRAIL
WHEREAS, the East Bay Regional Park District constructed and operates the 31-mile East Bay Skyline National Recreation Trail (Skyline Trail) for the use and enjoyment by all East Bay communities, one of 1,200 designated National Recreation Trails in the United States created through the historic 1968 National Trails System Act; and
WHEREAS, the Park District has operated portions of the Skyline Trail on watershed lands owned by the East Bay Municipal Utilities District (EBMUD) by license from EBMUD since 1975; and
WHEREAS, the license from EBMUD has been renewed several times over the years, most recently for a ten-year term that expired in 2017; and
WHEREAS, the Park District and EBMUD now wish to renew the Park District’s license for an additional ten-year term commencing retroactively on October 1, 2017 when the previous ten-year term expired, through October 1, 2027, with all other basic terms and conditions of the license agreement remaining unchanged; and
WHEREAS, a $1,900 application fee will be paid to EBMUD to process the license renewal, to be funded by general funds previously appropriated to the 2021 Land Acquisition Department general fund budget; and
WHEREAS, the renewal of the license is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements for preparing and processing environmental documentation pursuant to Section 15301 of State CEQA Guidelines which in part exempts the operation and leasing of existing public structures, facilities, or topographical features;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District hereby authorize executing a License Agreement with East Bay Municipal Utilities District for the Park District’s continued operation of portions of the East Bay Skyline National Recreation Trail located within EBMUD watershed lands, said Agreement to expire on October 1, 2027; and
30 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the District and in its name, to execute and deliver such documents and to do such acts as may be deemed necessary or appropriate to accomplish the intentions of this resolution.
Moved by Director , and seconded by Director and adopted this 2nd day of March 2021 by the following vote:
FOR:
AGAINST: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:
31 SKYLINE NATIONAL RECREATION TRAIL Vicinity Trail Segments Operated Under License from EBMUD East Bay Feet Regional Park District 0 2,000 4,000 [
Skyline Trail on EBMUD Land
San Pablo EBMUD EBRPD Reservoir Wildcat Canyon
Briones Reservoir
EBMUD
San Pablo Dam Rd
EBRPD Tilden
UC Berkeley
EBMUD
EBRPD Claremont Canyon
Location Map EBRPD Sibley ¨¦§24
32 O:\GIS\CMcKaskey\Projects_2020\ASD\Land\snht_EBMUD\SNHT_EBMUD_License.mxd Date: 10/7/2020 Page Left Blank Intentionally
33 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
D. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
f. Authorization to Award a Contract to Golden Gate Sign Company for Fabrication and Installation of Signs for Dumbarton Quarry Campground by the Bay: Coyote Hills Regional Park (Hobbs/Johnson)
RECOMMENDATION
The General Manager recommends that the Board of Directors award a contract to Golden Gate Sign Company of Concord, CA for the fabrication and installation of signs for Dumbarton Quarry Campground by the Bay at Coyote Hills Regional Park.
REVENUE/COST
Sign fabrication and installation is fully funded as part of the Develop DQ Campground Project (#149300).
SOURCE OF FUNDS Develop DQ Campground Project (No.149300) $ 3,470,168 Encumbrances & Expenditures to Date (2,945,705) AVAILABLE BALANCE $ 527,463
USE OF FUNDS Contract with Golden Gate Sign Company $ 115,217 BALANCE REMAINING $ 412,246
BACKGROUND
The Public Affairs-Creative Design Group has designed and programmed custom signs for Dumbarton Quarry Campground in coordination with ASD-Design and Construction Department.
In December 2020, a Request for Proposal was sent to 4 qualified sign fabricators, and 3 quotes were received as follows:
34 Golden Gate Sign Company $115,216.08
Ellis & Ellis Sign Systems $243,054.69
Thomas Swan Signs $187,693.47
The low bidder, Golden Gate Sign Company was selected by Creative Design.
ALTERNATIVES
None are recommended.
35 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO.: 2021 – 03 –
March 2, 2021
AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD A CONTRACT TOGOLDEN GATE SIGN COMPANY FOR FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION OF SIGNS FORDUMBARTON QUARRY CAMPGROUND BY THE BAY: COYOTE HILLS REGIONAL PARK
WHEREAS, the East Bay Regional Park District (Park District) is developing a new campground at the Dumbarton Quarry Recreational Area of Coyote Hills Regional Park; and
WHEREAS, the Park District is responsible for improvements that are not part of other Agreements, including signs; and
WHEREAS, Board Resolution 2018-08-212 has authorized the dispersal of funds for payment to vendors for expenses, including signs, for the Develop Dumbarton Quarry Campground Project (No. 149300); and
WHEREAS, the Creative Design Group within the Public Affairs Division has designed and programmed signs for the Campground; and
WHEREAS, the District released a Request for Proposals (RFP) in 2020 to qualified sign fabricators in the Bay Area, and three bids were received; and
WHEREAS, Golden Gate Sign Company has provided the lowest bid and has been selected as the most appropriate builder for the project; and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District hereby authorizes the award of a contract to Golden Gate Sign Company for the fabrication and installation of signs at Dumbarton Quarry Campground by the Bay, to be funded from Project No. 149300 for a total cost not to exceed $115,217 and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the District and its name, to execute and deliver such documents and to do such acts as may be deemed necessary or appropriate to accomplish the intentions of this resolution.
Moved by , seconded by , and adopted this 2nd day of March 2021, by the following vote:
FOR:
AGAINST: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:
36 Page Left Blank Intentionally
37 Scale: 3/8=1’-0” ATTACHMENT 1
Coyote Hills Regional Park Dumbarton Quarry Campground on the Bay Dumbarton Amphitheater Shorebird Dumbarton Quarry A1 A2 A3 Campground on the Bay
8'-0"
Centerville Store Drawn by J. Hobbs 510-544-3223
22” Service Yard
38 B1 A4 9580 Quarry Road
Day Use Parking Exit Date: 12.21.20 Overflow Campground Parking 1 Rev. 2 /11/ 21 64 Vinyl numbers applied to 48-52 (E) light bollards
V1 D2 D3 D4 F2 S1 Sign Key Page Left Blank Intentionally
39 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
D. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
g. Authorization to Appropriate Measure FF Funds and Amend the Contract with Moleaer, Inc. for the Service and Purchase of Three Nanobubbler Oxygenation Generators for Cyanobacteria Remediation: Temescal Regional Recreation Area (Graul/Kelchner)
RECOMMENDATION
The General Manager recommends that the Board of Directors appropriate $30,000 in Measure FF funds and authorize a $57,600 amendment to the contract with Moleaer, Inc. to extend the service agreement on three Nanobubble Generators at Temescal Regional Park for a 24-month term, concluding with the transfer of ownership of the units to the Park District.
REVENUE/COST
The amendment will extend the current service agreement for 24 months at a rate of $2,400/month. The contract amount will be increased by $57,600 for a new total of $81,600. Funding is available from Measure FF Water Resources Allocation Area to support the Blue- green Algae Management (Project No. 555900) as indicated below.
SOURCE OF FUNDS Blue-green Algae Management Project $ 30,000 (No. 555900) Appropriation from Measure FF – Water Resources Allocation Area $ 30,000
BALANCE AVAILABLE $ 60,000
USE OF FUNDS Contract Amendment with Moleaer, Inc. $ 57,600
BALANCE REMAINING $ 2,400
40 BACKGROUND
Cyanobacteria (also called Blue-green algae) are natural organisms present in almost all freshwater streams, rivers, and lakes. In some cases, these cyanobacteria form blooms which may contain toxins that, when released, can affect people and animals either through contact or ingestion. These toxic blooms are known as Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs). The Park District first began to regularly observe cyanobacteria blooms in 2008 and had its first documented harmful algal bloom at Lake Temescal in 2014.
Harmful Algal Blooms forced the closure of Lake Temescal to swimming for much of the swim seasons in 2015-2017. During that time, the Park District evaluated potential remediation efforts to reduce the occurrence of HABs at Lake Temescal. Most remediation efforts focus on nutrient reduction with the removal of phosphorus as the key target. The District treated Lake Temescal with Phoslock in 2016 and Alum in 2017 and 2018. Both treatments bind phosphorous so it is not bioavailable to the cyanobacteria. These treatments were successful in reducing HABs, but the effects were short-term.
In the summer of 2020, the Park District partnered with Moleaer, Inc. to pilot an innovative treatment method, called “nanobubbles”. Three (3) nanobubble oxygenation generators (NOGs) were used to inject high amounts of oxygen into Lake Temescal to reduce the occurrence of cyanobacteria. Water quality dataloggers and ongoing nutrient sampling were installed to monitor the performance of the NOGs. District staff collected water samples and closely monitored the amount of nutrients available. After four months, data show that NOGs are effective in binding phosphorus in Lake Temescal.
Staff recommends using the NOGs to continue the oxygenation of Lake Temescal and improve water quality. The results of the pilot program indicate that while cyanobacteria blooms may continue, the frequency of the blooms will be reduced. Five purchasing options were evaluated. Staff recommends the long-term rental to own agreement that allows the District to rent and receive ongoing maintenance of the units for $2,400/month for a 24-month term. After 24 months, the Park District will assume ownership at no additional cost.
ALTERNATIVES
Dredging Lake Temescal has been identified as the most effective solution to prevent HABs in the long-term. This nanobubbler treatment is proposed as a remediation measure to improve water quality in the short term until a long-term solution can be implemented.
41 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO.: 2021 – 03 -
March 2, 2021
AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE MEASURE FF FUNDS AND AMEND THE CONTRACT WITH MOLEAER, INC. FOR THE SERVICE AND PURCHASE OF THREE NANOBUBBLER OXYGENATION GENERATORS FOR CYANOBACTERIA REMEDIATION: TEMESCAL REGIONAL RECREATION AREA
WHEREAS, the East Bay Regional Park District (Park District) began to regularly observe cyanobacteria in 2008 and had its first documented harmful algal bloom at Lake Temescal in 2014; and
WHEREAS, while treatments were used to suppress cyanobacteria, the effects were short-term; and
WHEREAS, in the summer of 2020 the Park District conducted a four-month pilot study in partnership with Moleaer, Inc. using nanobubble oxygenation generators (NOGs), which inject high amounts of oxygen into the lake; and
WHEREAS, after the four-month pilot study, the data confirmed the NOGs increased oxygen in the lake and reduced the amount of nutrients available for cyanobacteria; and
WHEREAS, the Park District desires to amend the contract with Moleaer, Inc. through December 2022 and agree to rent three NOGs for $2,400 per month for a 24-month period; and
WHEREAS, after 24 months, the Park District will assume ownership of the three NOGs at no additional cost; and
WHEREAS, there is a current budget allocation available of $30,000 in Project No. 555900 for Blue-green algae management; and
WHEREAS, an additional $30,000 is available in Measure FF Funds;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District hereby appropriates $30,000 from Measure FF-Water Resources funds to Project No. 555900, as noted in the attached Budget Change Form; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors hereby authorizes a contract amendment with Moleaer, Inc. in the amount of $57,600 for a revised contract total of $81,600 for cyanobacteria remediation at Temescal Regional Park; and
42 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the District and in its name, to execute and deliver such documents and to do such acts as may be deemed necessary or appropriate to accomplish the intentions of this resolution.
Moved by Director , seconded by Director and approved the 2nd day of March 2021, by the following vote:
FOR:
AGAINST: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:
43 Temescal Regional Recreation Area
Installed Moleaer Nano-bubbler and Monitoring Sondes Feet [ 0 100 200
24 WI } Broadway
E Temescal Regional Recreation Area Ea st Sh ore Trail
Da m Trail (!
La nd v ale Sta tion Tra il
Monitoring Station 1 Unnamed Street NBG-1 (!
Lake Temescal NBG-2 (! (!
Monitoring Station 2
O a B k u B e a na y V T is r ta a
A il
v e Belap Path
e
v
A
e
t
a G C n on W
e Monitoring Sonde tr e
d l a (! C s
o o t sta S G Nano-bubble Generator (NBG) R h (! d o Hill r e REd Park Entrance T ra il WI Walk in Entrance/Gate O:\GIS\CMcKaskey\Projects_2021\ASD\Stewardship\Fisheries\TM_Moleaer\TM_Moleaer.mxd 2/24/2021Date: 44 Page Left Blank Intentionally
45 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT BUDGET CHANGE FORM
NEW APPROPRIATIONS BUDGET TRANSFERS X New Appropriations Between Funds From New Revenues Between Projects DECREASE BUDGET ACCOUNT AMOUNT INCREASE BUDGET ACCOUNT AMOUNT Account Name: Other Than Asset Fund- Stewardship Department-District Wide- Other Services/Blue Green Algae Mgmt- Measure FF Water Resource Allocation Area -Environmenal
Account: 336-7420-000-6191/ 555900FR23-001 $ 30,000 As being presented at the Board of Directors meeting on March 2, 2022 the General Manager recommends the transfer and appropriation of $30,000 from the Measure FF Water Resource Allocation Area into the Blue Green Algae Mgmt project 555900.
As approved at the Board of Directors Meeting on date: 3/2/2021 Board of Directors Resolution Number: 2021-03- Posted By: Posted date: Signature:
T:\BOARDCLK\BOARD MATERIAL\2021\4- March 2, 2021\S DRIVE\D-1-g 3 ASD STEW Amend Moleaer Contract with FF for Cyanobaceria BCF
46 Page Left Blank Intentionally
47 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
D. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
h. Authorization to Reimburse Grazing Tenant for Remaining Final Project Costs for Fence Maintenance Repairs Pursuant to Grazing License Agreement: Bishop Ranch Open Space Regional Preserve (Graul/Kelchner)
RECOMMENDATION
The General Manager recommends that the Board of Directors authorize reimbursement to Wiedemann Ranch for the remaining balance of a 2020 fence project at Bishop Ranch Regional Preserve. The total project cost exceeded the original estimate based on the actual amount of fencing needed. The Wildland Vegetation Program certified the completed fence project and will pay the grazing tenant the outstanding balance for this project.
REVENUE/COST
The estimated project cost for the replacement of 5800 linear feet of perimeter barbed wire fence was $49,335.00. The actual project cost for the replacement of 6717 linear feet of perimeter barbed wire fence was $59,192.40. The remaining project balance is $9,857.40. If approved, the remaining balance will be covered utilizing the Wildland Vegetation Program budget 101-7440-000-6414.
BACKGROUND
As part of the obligations under the District’s grazing license agreement, the grazing licensee is committed to perform resource improvements to sustain grazing operations or promote resource conservation. Such projects are approved in advance by the Park Supervisor and Wildland Vegetation Program Manager. Project description, costs, bids, and maps are attached to the Resource Improvement Authorization form as part of the approval process.
Google Earth imagery is typically used by a grazing tenant and/or fence contractor to acquire a rough estimate of fence footage for bids or quotes. These estimates are difficult to assess precisely in areas with lots of variation in the landscape (i.e. rough terrain, slope). In order to account for this discrepancy, a bid stipulation is included stating the final charge will be based upon actual feet built that is hand measured after final completion.
48 In this fence project at Bishop Ranch there was a discrepancy in the estimated versus actual fence length. The actual length was 917 linear feet over the bid amount. This difference between the estimated and actual length was determined after the project work was completed. The discrepancy in the estimated and actual length of the fence resulted in the project exceeding the approved estimated amount for the fence replacement.
ALTERNATIVES
The alternative is to not reimburse our grazing tenant for the remaining balance for the fence project. This is not recommended because it would negatively impact the Park District’s ability to work with licensees to conduct maintenance repairs.
49 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO.: 2021 – 03 -
March 2, 2021
AUTHORIZATION TO REIMBURSE GRAZING TENANT FOR REMAINING FINAL PROJECT COSTS FOR FENCE MAINTENANCE REPAIRS PURSUANT TO GRAZING LICENSE AGREEMENT: BISHOP RANCH OPEN SPACE REGIONAL PRESERVE
WHEREAS, the East Bay Regional Park District (Park District) grazing license agreement obligates the grazing licensee to perform resource improvements and special conservation activities; and
WHEREAS, Wiedemann Ranch completed a Resource Improvement Authorization form that included project description, bids, and maps that were approved in advance by the Park Supervisor and Wildland Vegetation Program Manager; and
WHEREAS, Google Earth imagery was used to acquire rough estimates of fence footage because the project was in an area with steep slopes and rough terrain. A bid stipulation was included stating the final charge will be based upon actual feet built; and
WHEREAS, after the completion of the fence project, there was a discrepancy in the estimated versus actual fence length resulting in the total project cost exceeding the approved estimated amount; and
WHEREAS, the Park District approved and certified the completed fence project and desires to reimburse Licensee the outstanding balance of $9,857.40; and
WHEREAS, the remaining balance would be covered utilizing the Wildland Vegetation Program budget 101-7440-000-6414;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District hereby authorizes the reimbursement of the remaining final project costs in the amount of $9,857.40 for a total project cost of $59,193 which exceeded the Resource Improvement Authorization (RIA) for the Wiedemann Ranch fence project at Bishop Ranch Open Space Regional Preserve; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the District and in its name, to execute and deliver such documents and to do such acts as may be deemed necessary or appropriate to accomplish the intentions of this resolution.
Moved by Director , seconded by Director and approved the 2nd day of March 2021, by the following vote:
FOR:
50 AGAINST: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:
51 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
D. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
i. Authorization to Partner with San Francisco Estuary Institute for the Coyote Hills Restoration and Public Access Project: Coyote Hills Regional Park (Hornbeck/Auker)
RECOMMENDATION
The General Manager recommends that the Board of Directors authorize a partnership with San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) for the Coyote Hills Restoration and Public Access Project at Coyote Hills Regional Park.
REVENUE/COST
This action proposes a partnership with San Francisco Estuary Institute for the Coyote Hills Restoration and Public Access Project at Coyote Hills Regional Park. The partnership agreement will not exceed $100,000. Funds will be budgeted in existing project #154800 (Improve Access and Habitat) under the Environmental Protection Agency grant.
BACKGROUND
The Park District has been, and continues to, submit grant applications for the Coyote Hills Restoration and Public Access, including an application to the Environmental Protections Agency (EPA) under the San Francisco Bay Area Water Quality Improvement Fund. This grant requires applicants form partnerships.
San Francisco Estuary Institute is an ideal partner for this EPA grant, as well as the project as a whole. Since 1993, SFEI has been developing holistic scientific approaches to support healthy estuaries and watersheds through three programs: Resilient Landscapes, Clean Water, and Environmental Informatics. In this project, SFEI will use expertise developed through all three programs to carry out a pre- and post-project assessment of the wetlands within Coyote Hills Restoration and Public Access project. The monitoring of the Coyote Hills project will be based on methodologies being applied by SFEI for other Bay Area project sites in support of the Wetland Regional Monitoring Program (WRMP). Additionally, the Coyote Hills project will benefit from ongoing development work on CRAM including habitat development curves, stress indices, and ecoregion-specific cumulative distribution function plots. SFEI is currently partnering with the Park District to provide similar work on the McCosker creek restoration project.
52 ALTERNATIVES
No alternatives are recommended.
53 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO.: 2021 – 03 -
March 2, 2021
AUTHORIZATION TO PARTNER WITH SAN FRANSISCO ESTUARY INSTITUTE FOR THE COYOTE HILLS RESTORATION AND PUBLIC ACCESS PROJECT: COYOTE HILLS REGIONAL PARK
WHEREAS, the Coyote Hills Restoration and Public Access project includes riparian restoration and will improve water quality in the upper San Leandro Creek sub watershed, which drains to San Francisco Bay; and
WHEREAS, San Francisco Estuary Institute is an ideal partner for the Coyote Hills project to carry out pre- and post-project assessments of the wetlands within Coyote Hills Restoration and Public Access project; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District hereby:
1. Approves a grant partnership with San Francisco Estuary Institute and to disburse funds per the partnership agreement; and
2. Appoints the General Manager or Assistant General Manager of Finance and Management Services/CFO as agent of the East Bay Regional Park District to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents, including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendment, payment requests and perform such acts, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project; and
2. Authorizes the Assistant General Manager of Finance and Management Services/CFO or Budget Manager to amend the current year’s budget, without further Board action, upon receipt of the executed grant contract from the Grants Manager. The budget amendment will include an increase in budgeted revenue and a corresponding increase in appropriation for the amount stipulated in the grant contract.
Moved by Director , seconded by Director , and adopted this 2nd day of March, 2021, by the following vote:
FOR:
AGAINST: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:
54 Page Left Blank Intentionally
55 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
D. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
j. Authorization to Apply for Grant Funds from the Statewide Park Development and Community Revitalization Program (Prop 68) for Expansion of the Tidewater Area: Martin Luther King Jr. Regional Shoreline (Hornbeck/Perry/Auker)
RECOMMENDATION
The General Manager recommends that the Board of Directors authorize an application for grant funds from the Statewide Park Development and Community Revitalization Program (Prop 68) for the Tidewater Public Access and Improvements project at Martin Luther King Jr. Regional Shoreline.
REVENUE/COST
This action approves a grant application up to the maximum allowed under the grant program, approximately $2,900,000. Matching funds are not required by the grant program. Grant funds would be budgeted into existing project #154300 - Improve Public Access. When completed, this project may increase the long-term operating cost of the Park District.
BACKGROUND
The Statewide Park Development and Community Revitalization Program (Prop 68) will be awarding competitive grants from Proposition 68 (2018 Bond Act) to create new parks and new recreation opportunities in critically underserved communities across California.
The Tidewater public access project is an excellent fit for the Statewide Park Development and Community Revitalization Program as the project will transform the 6.5-acre site, which is a former industrial location, into a park and plant over 200 trees. In addition, the project has multiple benefits that include providing a new recreational destination along the Oakland Estuary with small and large group picnic spaces, a play area for children, a network of pathways, and gathering spaces for educational or recreational outings. The park will also provide staging for hikers and bikers utilizing the San Francisco Bay Trail and for small-craft boaters using the Tidewater Boating Center and boat launch. The improvements will bring new park users to this area and increase recreational activity along the shoreline for families in neighboring communities,
56 youth and teachers from nearby schools, and residents throughout the East Bay looking for a waterfront experience.
The Tidewater project is consistent with the following Statewide Park Development and Community Revitalization Program:
✓ The public access improvements at Tidewater offer multiple urban greening benefits. ✓ The project will create and enhance public green space which will also create additional recreation opportunities in an underserved area. ✓ The project will provide access to the waterfront in a highly urbanized segment of the San Francisco Bay.
ALTERNATIVES
No alternatives are recommended.
57 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO.: 2021 – 03 -
March 2, 2021
APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR STATEWIDE PARK DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY REVIALIZATION PROGRAM GRANT FUNDS FOR THE TIDEWATER PUBLIC ACCESS AND IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT: MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. REGIONAL SHORELINE
WHEREAS, the State Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the responsibility by the Legislature of the State of California for the administration of the Statewide Park Development and Community Revitalization Grant Program (Prop 68), setting up necessary procedures governing the application; and
WHEREAS, said procedures established by the State Department of Parks and Recreation require the Applicant to certify by resolution the approval of the application before submission of said application to the State; and
WHEREAS, successful Applicants will enter into a contract with the State of California to complete the Grant Scope project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the East Bay Regional Park District’s Board of Directors hereby:
APPROVES THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR THE TIDEWATER PUBLIC ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT AREA AT MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. REGIONAL SHORELINE; AND
1. Certifies that said Applicant has or will have available, prior to commencement of any work on the project included in this application, the sufficient funds to complete the project; and 2. Certifies that if the project is awarded, the Applicant has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project, and 3. Certifies that the Applicant has reviewed, understands, and agrees to the General Provisions contained in the contract shown in the Grant Administration Guide; and 4. Delegates the authority to the Assistant General Manager of Finance and Management Services/CFO or General Manager to conduct all negotiations, sign and submit all documents, including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, and payment requests, which may be necessary for the completion of the Grant Scope; and 5. Agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and guidelines. 6. Will consider promoting inclusion per Public Resources Code §80001(b)(8 A-G).
58 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Assistant General Manager of Finance and Management Services/CFO or Budget Manager is hereby authorized to amend the project’s budget, and that the General Manager or Assistant General Manager Finance and Management Services/CFO is hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the Park District and in its name, without further Board action, upon receipt of an executed grant contract from the Grants Manager, including but not limited to any documents which may be necessary in the continuation of the project. The budget amendment will include an increase in budgeted revenue and a corresponding increase in appropriation for the amount stipulated in the grant contract; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager and Assistant General Manager of Finance and Management Services/CFO is hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the Park District and in its name, to execute and deliver such documents and such acts as may be deemed necessary or appropriate to accomplish the intentions of this resolution.
Approved and adopted the 2nd day of March 2021
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Number was duly adopted by the East Bay Regional Park District’s Board of Directors following a roll call vote:
Moved by Director , seconded by Director , and adopted this 2nd day of March, 2021, by the following vote:
FOR:
AGAINST: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:
59 IMPROVE PUBLIC ACCESS Martin Luther King Jr. Regional Shoreline
Oakland, Alameda County, CA Feet [ 0 100 200
SA
Lesser St
Tidewater Ave
BOAT DOCK
TIDEWATER AQUATIC CENTER
RESTROOM
PROJECT AREA
S F B A Y T R A IL
MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. REGIONAL SHORELINE 60 Page Left Blank Intentionally
61 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
D. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
k. Adoption of East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule for Unrepresented Management Classifications to Reflect the Changes Approved by the Board of Directors in Resolution No. 2021-02-044 (Auker/Alvarez/Victor)
RECOMMENDATION
The General Manager recommends that the Board of Directors adopt the Park District’s Salary Schedule (Attachment I) that designates job classifications and the compensation structure for Unrepresented Management Classifications, effective February 27, 2021 to reflect the changes approved on February 16, 2021 by the Board of Directors in Resolution No. 2021-02-044.
REVENUE/COST
This action includes the elimination of the top merit step from the salary range for the unrepresented Management Employee Group and will result in eventual cost avoidance to the General Fund; however, it is difficult to estimate as this is discretionary based on meritorious performance and meeting years of service criteria, per Human Resources Merit Step Policy.
BACKGROUND
On October 3, 2017 the Board of Directors authorized a contract with Ralph Andersen & Associates (Consultant), a human resources consulting firm, to embark on a classification and compensation study (Study) to review and update all Park District job classification specifications and evaluate internal compensation relationships within divisions, across the agency and between represented employee groups and unrepresented employee groups. On December 1, 2020 the Board of Directors received and accepted the final Study reports for all Park District Employee Groups. On February 16, 2021 the Board of Directors adopted revised salary schedules and implemented staff recommendations as a result of the Study for management and confidential classifications. During the meeting it was discovered that the Management salary schedules were missing from the report. Therefore, this action is requested to reaffirm the action of February 16, 2021 and adopt the management salary schedule as required by PERS.
62 ALTERNATIVES
No alternatives are recommended.
ATTACHMENT I. East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule for Management classifications effective February 27, 2021
63 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO.: 2021 – 03 -
March 2, 2021
ADOPTION OF EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT SALARY SCHEDULE FOR UNREPRESENTED MANAGEMENT CLASSIFICATIONS TO REFLECT THE CHANGES APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN RESOLUTION NO. 2021-02-044
WHEREAS, the East Bay Regional Park District Board of Directors establishes wages and benefits for employees of the Park District; and
WHEREAS, a review of the East Bay Regional Park District’s classification and compensation (Study) was conducted by Ralph Anderson & Associates and accepted by the Board of Directors on December 1, 2020; and
WHEREAS, the Study recommended new or revised job classification titles and an adjustment to the salary range structure for the MG00 range; and
WHEREAS, the Interim General Manager recommends, based on Study findings, realignment of compensation structure with the public sector market by eliminating the top merit step, Step “I”, for the Unrepresented Management Employee Group; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors approved Resolution No. 2021-02-044 adopting the proposed changes on February 16, 2021, however the management revised salary schedule was not provided as an attachment as require by PERS.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District hereby authorizes the adoption of the attached salary schedule for Management classifications, which includes revised job classification titles, restructuring the MG01 pay range, eliminating the top merit step (Step I) effective February 27, 2021; and directs to the General Manager to review the merit step policy for unrepresented groups; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the Park District and in its name, to execute and deliver such documents and to do such acts as may be deemed necessary or appropriate to accomplish the intentions of this resolution.
Moved by Director , seconded by Director and approved this 2nd day of March 2021, by the following vote:
FOR: AGAINST: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:
64 Page Left Blank Intentionally
65 East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule - Management
Annual Cost of Living Adjustment: Effective the pay period that includes April 1, 2017, a general increase of 4.3% is authorized. Effective the pay period that includes April 1, 2018, a general increase of 3.0% is authorized. Effective the pay period that includes April 1, 2019, a general increase of 3.0% is authorized. Effective the pay period that includes April 1, 2020, a general increase of 2.5% is authorized. Effective September 19, 2015, salary range adjustments were authorized, per Board Resolution 2015-07-184. Values for steps 1C were in effect prior to the adjustment.
Classification: ACCG ACCOUNTING MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG02 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $51.32 $8,895.46 B 1 YEAR $53.84 $9,332.26 C 2 YEARS $56.53 $9,798.53 D 3 YEARS $59.37 $10,290.80 E 4 YEARS $62.33 $10,803.86 F 5 YEARS $65.45 $11,344.66 G MERIT $68.73 $11,913.20 H MERIT $72.16 $12,507.73 I MERIT $75.76 $13,131.73 Classification: ADSM ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG02 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $51.32 $8,895.46 B 1 YEAR $53.84 $9,332.26 C 2 YEARS $56.53 $9,798.53 D 3 YEARS $59.37 $10,290.80 E 4 YEARS $62.33 $10,803.86 F 5 YEARS $65.45 $11,344.66 G MERIT $68.73 $11,913.20 H MERIT $72.16 $12,507.73 I MERIT $75.76 $13,131.73 Classification: AGAS AGM, ACQUIS/STEW/DEVELOPMENT Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG08 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $85.92 $14,892.80 B 1 YEAR $90.21 $15,636.40 C 2 YEARS $94.70 $16,414.66 D 3 YEARS $99.44 $17,236.26 E 4 YEARS $104.43 $18,101.20 F 5 YEARS $109.68 $19,011.20 G MERIT $115.16 $19,961.06 H MERIT $120.91 $20,957.73 I MERIT $126.95 $22,004.66 Classification: AGDC AGM, DISTRICT COUNSEL Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG09 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $94.52 $16,383.46 B 1 YEAR $99.21 $17,196.40
Report ID: Salary Schedule Report - Management Page: 1 66 East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule - Management
C 2 YEARS $104.20 $18,061.33 D 3 YEARS $109.38 $18,959.20 E 4 YEARS $114.85 $19,907.33 F 5 YEARS $120.63 $20,909.20 G MERIT $126.66 $21,954.40 H MERIT $132.99 $23,051.60 I MERIT $139.65 $24,206.00 Classification: AGFC AGM, FINANCE & MGMT SVCS/CFO Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG08 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $85.92 $14,892.80 B 1 YEAR $90.21 $15,636.40 C 2 YEARS $94.70 $16,414.66 D 3 YEARS $99.44 $17,236.26 E 4 YEARS $104.43 $18,101.20 F 5 YEARS $109.68 $19,011.20 G MERIT $115.16 $19,961.06 H MERIT $120.91 $20,957.73 I MERIT $126.95 $22,004.66 Classification: AGLG AGM, LEGAL RISK/ DIST. COUNSEL Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 02/27/2021 Range: MG09 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $94.52 $16,383.46 B 1 YEAR $99.21 $17,196.40 C 2 YEARS $104.20 $18,061.33 D 3 YEARS $109.38 $18,959.20 E 4 YEARS $114.85 $19,907.33 F 5 YEARS $120.63 $20,909.20 G MERIT $126.66 $21,954.40 H MERIT $132.99 $23,051.60 I MERIT $139.65 $24,206.00 Classification: AGOP AGM, OPERATIONS Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG09 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $94.52 $16,383.46 B 1 YEAR $99.21 $17,196.40 C 2 YEARS $104.20 $18,061.33 D 3 YEARS $109.38 $18,959.20 E 4 YEARS $114.85 $19,907.33 F 5 YEARS $120.63 $20,909.20 G MERIT $126.66 $21,954.40 H MERIT $132.99 $23,051.60 I MERIT $139.65 $24,206.00 Classification: AGPE AGM, PUB AFFIRS/EXEC DIR RPF Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 02/27/2021 Range: MG07 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $78.08 $13,533.86 B 1 YEAR $82.01 $14,215.06
Report ID: Salary Schedule Report - Management Page: 2 67 East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule - Management
C 2 YEARS $86.12 $14,927.46 D 3 YEARS $90.42 $15,672.80 E 4 YEARS $94.92 $16,452.80 F 5 YEARS $99.65 $17,272.66 G MERIT $104.64 $18,137.60 H MERIT $109.85 $19,040.66 I MERIT $115.35 $19,994.00 Classification: AGCP AGM, PUB SAFETY/CHIEF OF POLIC Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 02/27/2021 Range: MG09 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $94.52 $16,383.46 B 1 YEAR $99.21 $17,196.40 C 2 YEARS $104.20 $18,061.33 D 3 YEARS $109.38 $18,959.20 E 4 YEARS $114.85 $19,907.33 F 5 YEARS $120.63 $20,909.20 G MERIT $126.66 $21,954.40 H MERIT $132.99 $23,051.60 I MERIT $139.65 $24,206.00 Classification: AGPA AGM, PUBLIC AFFAIRS Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG07 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $78.08 $13,533.86 B 1 YEAR $82.01 $14,215.06 C 2 YEARS $86.12 $14,927.46 D 3 YEARS $90.42 $15,672.80 E 4 YEARS $94.92 $16,452.80 F 5 YEARS $99.65 $17,272.66 G MERIT $104.64 $18,137.60 H MERIT $109.85 $19,040.66 I MERIT $115.35 $19,994.00 Classification: AGPS AGM, PUBLIC SAFETY Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG09 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $94.52 $16,383.46 B 1 YEAR $99.21 $17,196.40 C 2 YEARS $104.20 $18,061.33 D 3 YEARS $109.38 $18,959.20 E 4 YEARS $114.85 $19,907.33 F 5 YEARS $120.63 $20,909.20 G MERIT $126.66 $21,954.40 H MERIT $132.99 $23,051.60 I MERIT $139.65 $24,206.00 Classification: AQMG AQUATIC MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG03 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $53.73 $9,313.20 B 1 YEAR $56.40 $9,776.00
Report ID: Salary Schedule Report - Management Page: 3 68 East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule - Management
C 2 YEARS $59.22 $10,264.80 D 3 YEARS $62.21 $10,783.06 E 4 YEARS $65.30 $11,318.66 F 5 YEARS $68.54 $11,880.26 G MERIT $71.98 $12,476.53 H MERIT $75.55 $13,095.33 I MERIT $79.34 $13,752.26 Classification: ADC1 ASSISTANT DISTRICT COUNSEL I Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG06 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $71.50 $12,393.33 B 1 YEAR $75.07 $13,012.13 C 2 YEARS $78.86 $13,669.06 D 3 YEARS $82.79 $14,350.26 E 4 YEARS $86.96 $15,073.06 F 5 YEARS $91.31 $15,827.06 G MERIT $95.89 $16,620.93 H MERIT $100.69 $17,452.93 I MERIT $105.71 $18,323.06 Classification: ADC2 ASSISTANT DISTRICT COUNSEL II Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG07 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $78.08 $13,533.86 B 1 YEAR $82.01 $14,215.06 C 2 YEARS $86.12 $14,927.46 D 3 YEARS $90.42 $15,672.80 E 4 YEARS $94.92 $16,452.80 F 5 YEARS $99.65 $17,272.66 G MERIT $104.64 $18,137.60 H MERIT $109.85 $19,040.66 I MERIT $115.35 $19,994.00 Classification: ASFO ASSISTANT FINANCE OFFICER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG05 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $64.97 $11,261.46 B 1 YEAR $68.22 $11,824.80 C 2 YEARS $71.67 $12,422.80 D 3 YEARS $75.25 $13,043.33 E 4 YEARS $78.95 $13,684.66 F 5 YEARS $82.90 $14,369.33 G MERIT $87.03 $15,085.20 H MERIT $91.39 $15,840.93 I MERIT $95.96 $16,633.06 Classification: ASFC ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG04 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $59.10 $10,244.00 B 1 YEAR $62.02 $10,750.13
Report ID: Salary Schedule Report - Management Page: 4 69 East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule - Management
C 2 YEARS $65.12 $11,287.46 D 3 YEARS $68.37 $11,850.80 E 4 YEARS $71.79 $12,443.60 F 5 YEARS $75.39 $13,067.60 G MERIT $79.15 $13,719.33 H MERIT $83.11 $14,405.73 I MERIT $87.28 $15,128.53 Classification: AUMG AUDIT MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG02 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $51.32 $8,895.46 B 1 YEAR $53.84 $9,332.26 C 2 YEARS $56.53 $9,798.53 D 3 YEARS $59.37 $10,290.80 E 4 YEARS $62.33 $10,803.86 F 5 YEARS $65.45 $11,344.66 G MERIT $68.73 $11,913.20 H MERIT $72.16 $12,507.73 I MERIT $75.76 $13,131.73 Classification: BEMG BENEFITS MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG02 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $51.32 $8,895.46 B 1 YEAR $53.84 $9,332.26 C 2 YEARS $56.53 $9,798.53 D 3 YEARS $59.37 $10,290.80 E 4 YEARS $62.33 $10,803.86 F 5 YEARS $65.45 $11,344.66 G MERIT $68.73 $11,913.20 H MERIT $72.16 $12,507.73 I MERIT $75.76 $13,131.73 Classification: BUDG BUDGET MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG02 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $51.32 $8,895.46 B 1 YEAR $53.84 $9,332.26 C 2 YEARS $56.53 $9,798.53 D 3 YEARS $59.37 $10,290.80 E 4 YEARS $62.33 $10,803.86 F 5 YEARS $65.45 $11,344.66 G MERIT $68.73 $11,913.20 H MERIT $72.16 $12,507.73 I MERIT $75.76 $13,131.73 Classification: BSMG BUSINESS SERVICES MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG04 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $59.10 $10,244.00 B 1 YEAR $62.02 $10,750.13
Report ID: Salary Schedule Report - Management Page: 5 70 East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule - Management
C 2 YEARS $65.12 $11,287.46 D 3 YEARS $68.37 $11,850.80 E 4 YEARS $71.79 $12,443.60 F 5 YEARS $75.39 $13,067.60 G MERIT $79.15 $13,719.33 H MERIT $83.11 $14,405.73 I MERIT $87.28 $15,128.53 Classification: CPMG CAPITAL PROGRAM MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG03 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $53.73 $9,313.20 B 1 YEAR $56.40 $9,776.00 C 2 YEARS $59.22 $10,264.80 D 3 YEARS $62.21 $10,783.06 E 4 YEARS $65.30 $11,318.66 F 5 YEARS $68.54 $11,880.26 G MERIT $71.98 $12,476.53 H MERIT $75.55 $13,095.33 I MERIT $79.34 $13,752.26 Classification: CHIO CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG05 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $64.97 $11,261.46 B 1 YEAR $68.22 $11,824.80 C 2 YEARS $71.67 $12,422.80 D 3 YEARS $75.25 $13,043.33 E 4 YEARS $78.95 $13,684.66 F 5 YEARS $82.90 $14,369.33 G MERIT $87.03 $15,085.20 H MERIT $91.39 $15,840.93 I MERIT $95.96 $16,633.06 Classification: CHDC CHIEF, DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG05 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $64.97 $11,261.46 B 1 YEAR $68.22 $11,824.80 C 2 YEARS $71.67 $12,422.80 D 3 YEARS $75.25 $13,043.33 E 4 YEARS $78.95 $13,684.66 F 5 YEARS $82.90 $14,369.33 G MERIT $87.03 $15,085.20 H MERIT $91.39 $15,840.93 I MERIT $95.96 $16,633.06 Classification: CHGA CHIEF, GOV & LEGIS AFFAIRS Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 04/07/2020 Range: MG04 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $59.10 $10,244.00 B 1 YEAR $62.02 $10,750.13
Report ID: Salary Schedule Report - Management Page: 6 71 East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule - Management
C 2 YEARS $65.12 $11,287.46 D 3 YEARS $68.37 $11,850.80 E 4 YEARS $71.79 $12,443.60 F 5 YEARS $75.39 $13,067.60 G MERIT $79.15 $13,719.33 H MERIT $83.11 $14,405.73 I MERIT $87.28 $15,128.53 Classification: CHRO CHIEF, HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG07 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $78.08 $13,533.86 B 1 YEAR $82.01 $14,215.06 C 2 YEARS $86.12 $14,927.46 D 3 YEARS $90.42 $15,672.80 E 4 YEARS $94.92 $16,452.80 F 5 YEARS $99.65 $17,272.66 G MERIT $104.64 $18,137.60 H MERIT $109.85 $19,040.66 I MERIT $115.35 $19,994.00 Classification: CHIR CHIEF, INTERP & REC SVCS Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG05 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $64.97 $11,261.46 B 1 YEAR $68.22 $11,824.80 C 2 YEARS $71.67 $12,422.80 D 3 YEARS $75.25 $13,043.33 E 4 YEARS $78.95 $13,684.66 F 5 YEARS $82.90 $14,369.33 G MERIT $87.03 $15,085.20 H MERIT $91.39 $15,840.93 I MERIT $95.96 $16,633.06 Classification: CHLA CHIEF, LAND ACQUISITION Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG05 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $64.97 $11,261.46 B 1 YEAR $68.22 $11,824.80 C 2 YEARS $71.67 $12,422.80 D 3 YEARS $75.25 $13,043.33 E 4 YEARS $78.95 $13,684.66 F 5 YEARS $82.90 $14,369.33 G MERIT $87.03 $15,085.20 H MERIT $91.39 $15,840.93 I MERIT $95.96 $16,633.06 Classification: CHMS CHIEF, MAINT & SKILLED TRADES Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG05 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $64.97 $11,261.46 B 1 YEAR $68.22 $11,824.80
Report ID: Salary Schedule Report - Management Page: 7 72 East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule - Management
C 2 YEARS $71.67 $12,422.80 D 3 YEARS $75.25 $13,043.33 E 4 YEARS $78.95 $13,684.66 F 5 YEARS $82.90 $14,369.33 G MERIT $87.03 $15,085.20 H MERIT $91.39 $15,840.93 I MERIT $95.96 $16,633.06 Classification: CHPO CHIEF, PARK OPERATIONS Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG06 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $71.50 $12,393.33 B 1 YEAR $75.07 $13,012.13 C 2 YEARS $78.86 $13,669.06 D 3 YEARS $82.79 $14,350.26 E 4 YEARS $86.96 $15,073.06 F 5 YEARS $91.31 $15,827.06 G MERIT $95.89 $16,620.93 H MERIT $100.69 $17,452.93 I MERIT $105.71 $18,323.06 Classification: CHPG CHIEF, PLANNING AND GIS Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG05 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $64.97 $11,261.46 B 1 YEAR $68.22 $11,824.80 C 2 YEARS $71.67 $12,422.80 D 3 YEARS $75.25 $13,043.33 E 4 YEARS $78.95 $13,684.66 F 5 YEARS $82.90 $14,369.33 G MERIT $87.03 $15,085.20 H MERIT $91.39 $15,840.93 I MERIT $95.96 $16,633.06 Classification: CHPT CHIEF, PLANNING, TRAILS & GIS Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 02/27/2021 Range: MG05 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $64.97 $11,261.46 B 1 YEAR $68.22 $11,824.80 C 2 YEARS $71.67 $12,422.80 D 3 YEARS $75.25 $13,043.33 E 4 YEARS $78.95 $13,684.66 F 5 YEARS $82.90 $14,369.33 G MERIT $87.03 $15,085.20 H MERIT $91.39 $15,840.93 I MERIT $95.96 $16,633.06 Classification: CHST CHIEF, STEWARDSHIP Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG05 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $64.97 $11,261.46 B 1 YEAR $68.22 $11,824.80
Report ID: Salary Schedule Report - Management Page: 8 73 East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule - Management
C 2 YEARS $71.67 $12,422.80 D 3 YEARS $75.25 $13,043.33 E 4 YEARS $78.95 $13,684.66 F 5 YEARS $82.90 $14,369.33 G MERIT $87.03 $15,085.20 H MERIT $91.39 $15,840.93 I MERIT $95.96 $16,633.06 Classification: COTB CLERK OF THE BOARD Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG02 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $51.32 $8,895.46 B 1 YEAR $53.84 $9,332.26 C 2 YEARS $56.53 $9,798.53 D 3 YEARS $59.37 $10,290.80 E 4 YEARS $62.33 $10,803.86 F 5 YEARS $65.45 $11,344.66 G MERIT $68.73 $11,913.20 H MERIT $72.16 $12,507.73 I MERIT $75.76 $13,131.73 Classification: CMMG COMM, RECORDS & PROP MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 02/27/2021 Range: MG03 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $53.73 $9,313.20 B 1 YEAR $56.40 $9,776.00 C 2 YEARS $59.22 $10,264.80 D 3 YEARS $62.21 $10,783.06 E 4 YEARS $65.30 $11,318.66 F 5 YEARS $68.54 $11,880.26 G MERIT $71.98 $12,476.53 H MERIT $75.55 $13,095.33 I MERIT $79.34 $13,752.26 Classification: COMM COMMUNICATIONS AND RECORDS MGR Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG03 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $53.73 $9,313.20 B 1 YEAR $56.40 $9,776.00 C 2 YEARS $59.22 $10,264.80 D 3 YEARS $62.21 $10,783.06 E 4 YEARS $65.30 $11,318.66 F 5 YEARS $68.54 $11,880.26 G MERIT $71.98 $12,476.53 H MERIT $75.55 $13,095.33 I MERIT $79.34 $13,752.26 Classification: CRMG COMMUNITY RELATIONS MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG02 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $51.32 $8,895.46 B 1 YEAR $53.84 $9,332.26
Report ID: Salary Schedule Report - Management Page: 9 74 East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule - Management
C 2 YEARS $56.53 $9,798.53 D 3 YEARS $59.37 $10,290.80 E 4 YEARS $62.33 $10,803.86 F 5 YEARS $65.45 $11,344.66 G MERIT $68.73 $11,913.20 H MERIT $72.16 $12,507.73 I MERIT $75.76 $13,131.73 Classification: COMG CONSTRUCTION MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG03 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $53.73 $9,313.20 B 1 YEAR $56.40 $9,776.00 C 2 YEARS $59.22 $10,264.80 D 3 YEARS $62.21 $10,783.06 E 4 YEARS $65.30 $11,318.66 F 5 YEARS $68.54 $11,880.26 G MERIT $71.98 $12,476.53 H MERIT $75.55 $13,095.33 I MERIT $79.34 $13,752.26 Classification: CDMG CREATIVE DESIGN MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG02 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $51.32 $8,895.46 B 1 YEAR $53.84 $9,332.26 C 2 YEARS $56.53 $9,798.53 D 3 YEARS $59.37 $10,290.80 E 4 YEARS $62.33 $10,803.86 F 5 YEARS $65.45 $11,344.66 G MERIT $68.73 $11,913.20 H MERIT $72.16 $12,507.73 I MERIT $75.76 $13,131.73 Classification: DPGM DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG10 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $109.17 $18,922.80 B 1 YEAR $114.69 $19,879.60 C 2 YEARS $120.40 $20,869.33 D 3 YEARS $126.39 $21,907.60 E 4 YEARS $132.73 $23,006.53 F 5 YEARS $139.39 $24,160.93 G MERIT $146.36 $25,369.06 H MERIT $153.69 $26,639.60 I MERIT $161.37 $27,970.80 Classification: DESM DESIGN MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG03 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $53.73 $9,313.20 B 1 YEAR $56.40 $9,776.00
Report ID: Salary Schedule Report - Management Page: 10 75 East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule - Management
C 2 YEARS $59.22 $10,264.80 D 3 YEARS $62.21 $10,783.06 E 4 YEARS $65.30 $11,318.66 F 5 YEARS $68.54 $11,880.26 G MERIT $71.98 $12,476.53 H MERIT $75.55 $13,095.33 I MERIT $79.34 $13,752.26 Classification: DOFF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG01 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $48.87 $8,470.80 B 1 YEAR $51.32 $8,895.46 C 2 YEARS $53.85 $9,334.00 D 3 YEARS $56.54 $9,800.26 E 4 YEARS $59.38 $10,292.53 F 5 YEARS $62.34 $10,805.60 G MERIT $65.47 $11,348.13 H MERIT $68.74 $11,914.93 I MERIT $72.17 $12,509.46 Classification: ECSM ECOLOGICAL SERVICES MANANGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 02/27/2021 Range: MG03 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $53.73 $9,313.20 B 1 YEAR $56.40 $9,776.00 C 2 YEARS $59.22 $10,264.80 D 3 YEARS $62.21 $10,783.06 E 4 YEARS $65.30 $11,318.66 F 5 YEARS $68.54 $11,880.26 G MERIT $71.98 $12,476.53 H MERIT $75.55 $13,095.33 I MERIT $79.34 $13,752.26 Classification: ENVM ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG02 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $51.32 $8,895.46 B 1 YEAR $53.84 $9,332.26 C 2 YEARS $56.53 $9,798.53 D 3 YEARS $59.37 $10,290.80 E 4 YEARS $62.33 $10,803.86 F 5 YEARS $65.45 $11,344.66 G MERIT $68.73 $11,913.20 H MERIT $72.16 $12,507.73 I MERIT $75.76 $13,131.73 Classification: ENSM ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG03 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $53.73 $9,313.20 B 1 YEAR $56.40 $9,776.00
Report ID: Salary Schedule Report - Management Page: 11 76 East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule - Management
C 2 YEARS $59.22 $10,264.80 D 3 YEARS $62.21 $10,783.06 E 4 YEARS $65.30 $11,318.66 F 5 YEARS $68.54 $11,880.26 G MERIT $71.98 $12,476.53 H MERIT $75.55 $13,095.33 I MERIT $79.34 $13,752.26 Classification: FACM FACILITIES MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG03 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $53.73 $9,313.20 B 1 YEAR $56.40 $9,776.00 C 2 YEARS $59.22 $10,264.80 D 3 YEARS $62.21 $10,783.06 E 4 YEARS $65.30 $11,318.66 F 5 YEARS $68.54 $11,880.26 G MERIT $71.98 $12,476.53 H MERIT $75.55 $13,095.33 I MERIT $79.34 $13,752.26 Classification: FCHF FIRE CHIEF Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG07 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $78.08 $13,533.86 B 1 YEAR $82.01 $14,215.06 C 2 YEARS $86.12 $14,927.46 D 3 YEARS $90.42 $15,672.80 E 4 YEARS $94.92 $16,452.80 F 5 YEARS $99.65 $17,272.66 G MERIT $104.64 $18,137.60 H MERIT $109.85 $19,040.66 I MERIT $115.35 $19,994.00 Classification: FIPM FISHERIES PROGRAM MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG02 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $51.32 $8,895.46 B 1 YEAR $53.84 $9,332.26 C 2 YEARS $56.53 $9,798.53 D 3 YEARS $59.37 $10,290.80 E 4 YEARS $62.33 $10,803.86 F 5 YEARS $65.45 $11,344.66 G MERIT $68.73 $11,913.20 H MERIT $72.16 $12,507.73 I MERIT $75.76 $13,131.73 Classification: FLMG FLEET MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG03 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $53.73 $9,313.20 B 1 YEAR $56.40 $9,776.00
Report ID: Salary Schedule Report - Management Page: 12 77 East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule - Management
C 2 YEARS $59.22 $10,264.80 D 3 YEARS $62.21 $10,783.06 E 4 YEARS $65.30 $11,318.66 F 5 YEARS $68.54 $11,880.26 G MERIT $71.98 $12,476.53 H MERIT $75.55 $13,095.33 I MERIT $79.34 $13,752.26 Classification: FFMG FOUNDATION FINANCE MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 02/27/2021 Range: MG01 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $48.87 $8,470.80 B 1 YEAR $51.32 $8,895.46 C 2 YEARS $53.85 $9,334.00 D 3 YEARS $56.54 $9,800.26 E 4 YEARS $59.38 $10,292.53 F 5 YEARS $62.34 $10,805.60 G MERIT $65.47 $11,348.13 H MERIT $68.74 $11,914.93 I MERIT $72.17 $12,509.46 Classification: FOMG FOUNDATION PROGRAM MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG02 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $51.32 $8,895.46 B 1 YEAR $53.84 $9,332.26 C 2 YEARS $56.53 $9,798.53 D 3 YEARS $59.37 $10,290.80 E 4 YEARS $62.33 $10,803.86 F 5 YEARS $65.45 $11,344.66 G MERIT $68.73 $11,913.20 H MERIT $72.16 $12,507.73 I MERIT $75.76 $13,131.73 Classification: GNMG GENERAL MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG11 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $126.39 $21,907.60 B 1 YEAR $132.77 $23,013.46 C 2 YEARS $139.39 $24,160.93 D 3 YEARS $146.33 $25,363.86 E 4 YEARS $153.68 $26,637.86 F 5 YEARS $161.38 $27,972.53 G MERIT $169.42 $29,366.13 H MERIT $177.93 $30,841.20 I MERIT $186.81 $32,380.40 Classification: GAMG GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG03 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $53.73 $9,313.20 B 1 YEAR $56.40 $9,776.00
Report ID: Salary Schedule Report - Management Page: 13 78 East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule - Management
C 2 YEARS $59.22 $10,264.80 D 3 YEARS $62.21 $10,783.06 E 4 YEARS $65.30 $11,318.66 F 5 YEARS $68.54 $11,880.26 G MERIT $71.98 $12,476.53 H MERIT $75.55 $13,095.33 I MERIT $79.34 $13,752.26 Classification: GRMG GRANTS MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG02 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $51.32 $8,895.46 B 1 YEAR $53.84 $9,332.26 C 2 YEARS $56.53 $9,798.53 D 3 YEARS $59.37 $10,290.80 E 4 YEARS $62.33 $10,803.86 F 5 YEARS $65.45 $11,344.66 G MERIT $68.73 $11,913.20 H MERIT $72.16 $12,507.73 I MERIT $75.76 $13,131.73 Classification: HRAN HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 02/27/2021 Range: MG00 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $43.12 $7,474.13 B 1 YEAR $44.60 $7,730.66 C 2 YEARS $46.83 $8,117.20 D 3 YEARS $49.17 $8,522.80 E 4 YEARS $51.63 $8,949.20 F 5 YEARS $54.21 $9,396.40 G MERIT $56.92 $9,866.13 H MERIT $59.77 $10,360.13 I MERIT $62.75 $10,876.66 Classification: HRA1 HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST I Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG00 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $43.12 $7,474.13 B 1 YEAR $44.15 $7,652.66 C 2 YEARS $45.28 $7,848.53 D 3 YEARS $46.43 $8,047.86 E 4 YEARS $47.58 $8,247.20 F 5 YEARS $48.78 $8,455.20 G MERIT $51.21 $8,876.40 H MERIT $53.77 $9,320.13 I MERIT $56.46 $9,786.40 Classification: HRA2 HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST II Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG01 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $48.87 $8,470.80 B 1 YEAR $51.32 $8,895.46
Report ID: Salary Schedule Report - Management Page: 14 79 East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule - Management
C 2 YEARS $53.85 $9,334.00 D 3 YEARS $56.54 $9,800.26 E 4 YEARS $59.38 $10,292.53 F 5 YEARS $62.34 $10,805.60 G MERIT $65.47 $11,348.13 H MERIT $68.74 $11,914.93 I MERIT $72.17 $12,509.46 Classification: HRSR HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST SENIOR Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG02 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $51.32 $8,895.46 B 1 YEAR $53.84 $9,332.26 C 2 YEARS $56.53 $9,798.53 D 3 YEARS $59.37 $10,290.80 E 4 YEARS $62.33 $10,803.86 F 5 YEARS $65.45 $11,344.66 G MERIT $68.73 $11,913.20 H MERIT $72.16 $12,507.73 I MERIT $75.76 $13,131.73 Classification: ISSM INFO SVCS SYSTEMS MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG02 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $51.32 $8,895.46 B 1 YEAR $53.84 $9,332.26 C 2 YEARS $56.53 $9,798.53 D 3 YEARS $59.37 $10,290.80 E 4 YEARS $62.33 $10,803.86 F 5 YEARS $65.45 $11,344.66 G MERIT $68.73 $11,913.20 H MERIT $72.16 $12,507.73 I MERIT $75.76 $13,131.73 Classification: ISMG INFORMATION SERVICES MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG04 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $59.10 $10,244.00 B 1 YEAR $62.02 $10,750.13 C 2 YEARS $65.12 $11,287.46 D 3 YEARS $68.37 $11,850.80 E 4 YEARS $71.79 $12,443.60 F 5 YEARS $75.39 $13,067.60 G MERIT $79.15 $13,719.33 H MERIT $83.11 $14,405.73 I MERIT $87.28 $15,128.53 Classification: LAMG LAND ACQUISITION MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG05 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $64.97 $11,261.46 B 1 YEAR $68.22 $11,824.80
Report ID: Salary Schedule Report - Management Page: 15 80 East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule - Management
C 2 YEARS $71.67 $12,422.80 D 3 YEARS $75.25 $13,043.33 E 4 YEARS $78.95 $13,684.66 F 5 YEARS $82.90 $14,369.33 G MERIT $87.03 $15,085.20 H MERIT $91.39 $15,840.93 I MERIT $95.96 $16,633.06 Classification: LDMG LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 02/27/2021 Range: MG02 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $51.32 $8,895.46 B 1 YEAR $53.84 $9,332.26 C 2 YEARS $56.53 $9,798.53 D 3 YEARS $59.37 $10,290.80 E 4 YEARS $62.33 $10,803.86 F 5 YEARS $65.45 $11,344.66 G MERIT $68.73 $11,913.20 H MERIT $72.16 $12,507.73 I MERIT $75.76 $13,131.73 Classification: LPMA LEGIS & POLICY MGMT ANALYST Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 04/07/2020 Range: MG01 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $48.87 $8,470.80 B 1 YEAR $51.32 $8,895.46 C 2 YEARS $53.85 $9,334.00 D 3 YEARS $56.54 $9,800.26 E 4 YEARS $59.38 $10,292.53 F 5 YEARS $62.34 $10,805.60 G MERIT $65.47 $11,348.13 H MERIT $68.74 $11,914.93 I MERIT $72.17 $12,509.46 Classification: MASP MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG04 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $59.10 $10,244.00 B 1 YEAR $62.02 $10,750.13 C 2 YEARS $65.12 $11,287.46 D 3 YEARS $68.37 $11,850.80 E 4 YEARS $71.79 $12,443.60 F 5 YEARS $75.39 $13,067.60 G MERIT $79.15 $13,719.33 H MERIT $83.11 $14,405.73 I MERIT $87.28 $15,128.53 Classification: MGAN MANAGEMENT ANALYST Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG01 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $48.87 $8,470.80 B 1 YEAR $51.32 $8,895.46
Report ID: Salary Schedule Report - Management Page: 16 81 East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule - Management
C 2 YEARS $53.85 $9,334.00 D 3 YEARS $56.54 $9,800.26 E 4 YEARS $59.38 $10,292.53 F 5 YEARS $62.34 $10,805.60 G MERIT $65.47 $11,348.13 H MERIT $68.74 $11,914.93 I MERIT $72.17 $12,509.46 Classification: PUMG PARK UNIT MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG04 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $59.10 $10,244.00 B 1 YEAR $62.02 $10,750.13 C 2 YEARS $65.12 $11,287.46 D 3 YEARS $68.37 $11,850.80 E 4 YEARS $71.79 $12,443.60 F 5 YEARS $75.39 $13,067.60 G MERIT $79.15 $13,719.33 H MERIT $83.11 $14,405.73 I MERIT $87.28 $15,128.53 Classification: CAPT POLICE CAPTAIN Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG07 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $78.08 $13,533.86 B 1 YEAR $82.01 $14,215.06 C 2 YEARS $86.12 $14,927.46 D 3 YEARS $90.42 $15,672.80 E 4 YEARS $94.92 $16,452.80 F 5 YEARS $99.65 $17,272.66 G MERIT $104.64 $18,137.60 H MERIT $109.85 $19,040.66 I MERIT $115.35 $19,994.00 Classification: LTPS POLICE LIEUTENANT Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG05 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $64.97 $11,261.46 B 1 YEAR $68.22 $11,824.80 C 2 YEARS $71.67 $12,422.80 D 3 YEARS $75.25 $13,043.33 E 4 YEARS $78.95 $13,684.66 F 5 YEARS $82.90 $14,369.33 G MERIT $87.03 $15,085.20 H MERIT $91.39 $15,840.93 I MERIT $95.96 $16,633.06 Classification: RCMG RECRUITMENT & CLASSIF. MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 01/01/2021 Range: MG02 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $51.32 $8,895.46 B 1 YEAR $53.84 $9,332.26
Report ID: Salary Schedule Report - Management Page: 17 82 East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule - Management
C 2 YEARS $56.53 $9,798.53 D 3 YEARS $59.37 $10,290.80 E 4 YEARS $62.33 $10,803.86 F 5 YEARS $65.45 $11,344.66 G MERIT $68.73 $11,913.20 H MERIT $72.16 $12,507.73 I MERIT $75.76 $13,131.73 Classification: RIRS REG INTERP & REC SVCS MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG04 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $59.10 $10,244.00 B 1 YEAR $62.02 $10,750.13 C 2 YEARS $65.12 $11,287.46 D 3 YEARS $68.37 $11,850.80 E 4 YEARS $71.79 $12,443.60 F 5 YEARS $75.39 $13,067.60 G MERIT $79.15 $13,719.33 H MERIT $83.11 $14,405.73 I MERIT $87.28 $15,128.53 Classification: RSPM RESTORATION PROJECTS MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 02/27/2021 Range: MG02 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $51.32 $8,895.46 B 1 YEAR $53.84 $9,332.26 C 2 YEARS $56.53 $9,798.53 D 3 YEARS $59.37 $10,290.80 E 4 YEARS $62.33 $10,803.86 F 5 YEARS $65.45 $11,344.66 G MERIT $68.73 $11,913.20 H MERIT $72.16 $12,507.73 I MERIT $75.76 $13,131.73 Classification: RISK RISK & SAFETY MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 01/01/2021 Range: MG03 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $53.73 $9,313.20 B 1 YEAR $56.40 $9,776.00 C 2 YEARS $59.22 $10,264.80 D 3 YEARS $62.21 $10,783.06 E 4 YEARS $65.30 $11,318.66 F 5 YEARS $68.54 $11,880.26 G MERIT $71.98 $12,476.53 H MERIT $75.55 $13,095.33 I MERIT $79.34 $13,752.26 Classification: RIMG RISK MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG02 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $51.32 $8,895.46 B 1 YEAR $53.84 $9,332.26
Report ID: Salary Schedule Report - Management Page: 18 83 East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule - Management
C 2 YEARS $56.53 $9,798.53 D 3 YEARS $59.37 $10,290.80 E 4 YEARS $62.33 $10,803.86 F 5 YEARS $65.45 $11,344.66 G MERIT $68.73 $11,913.20 H MERIT $72.16 $12,507.73 I MERIT $75.76 $13,131.73 Classification: RCAO RPF,CHIEF ADMIN OFFICER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG05 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $64.97 $11,261.46 B 1 YEAR $68.22 $11,824.80 C 2 YEARS $71.67 $12,422.80 D 3 YEARS $75.25 $13,043.33 E 4 YEARS $78.95 $13,684.66 F 5 YEARS $82.90 $14,369.33 G MERIT $87.03 $15,085.20 H MERIT $91.39 $15,840.93 I MERIT $95.96 $16,633.06 Classification: SRHR SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 02/27/2021 Range: MG01 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $48.87 $8,470.80 B 1 YEAR $51.32 $8,895.46 C 2 YEARS $53.85 $9,334.00 D 3 YEARS $56.54 $9,800.26 E 4 YEARS $59.38 $10,292.53 F 5 YEARS $62.34 $10,805.60 G MERIT $65.47 $11,348.13 H MERIT $68.74 $11,914.93 I MERIT $72.17 $12,509.46 Classification: CIMR SURVEY & CONSTR INSPECTION MGR Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 02/27/2021 Range: MG03 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $53.73 $9,313.20 B 1 YEAR $56.40 $9,776.00 C 2 YEARS $59.22 $10,264.80 D 3 YEARS $62.21 $10,783.06 E 4 YEARS $65.30 $11,318.66 F 5 YEARS $68.54 $11,880.26 G MERIT $71.98 $12,476.53 H MERIT $75.55 $13,095.33 I MERIT $79.34 $13,752.26 Classification: TRDM TRADES MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG03 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $53.73 $9,313.20 B 1 YEAR $56.40 $9,776.00
Report ID: Salary Schedule Report - Management Page: 19 84 East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule - Management
C 2 YEARS $59.22 $10,264.80 D 3 YEARS $62.21 $10,783.06 E 4 YEARS $65.30 $11,318.66 F 5 YEARS $68.54 $11,880.26 G MERIT $71.98 $12,476.53 H MERIT $75.55 $13,095.33 I MERIT $79.34 $13,752.26 Classification: TRMG TRAILS DEVELOP PROGRAM MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG02 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $51.32 $8,895.46 B 1 YEAR $53.84 $9,332.26 C 2 YEARS $56.53 $9,798.53 D 3 YEARS $59.37 $10,290.80 E 4 YEARS $62.33 $10,803.86 F 5 YEARS $65.45 $11,344.66 G MERIT $68.73 $11,913.20 H MERIT $72.16 $12,507.73 I MERIT $75.76 $13,131.73 Classification: TRPM TRAILS PROGRAM MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 02/27/2021 Range: MG02 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $51.32 $8,895.46 B 1 YEAR $53.84 $9,332.26 C 2 YEARS $56.53 $9,798.53 D 3 YEARS $59.37 $10,290.80 E 4 YEARS $62.33 $10,803.86 F 5 YEARS $65.45 $11,344.66 G MERIT $68.73 $11,913.20 H MERIT $72.16 $12,507.73 I MERIT $75.76 $13,131.73 Classification: WVPM WILDLAND VEG PROGRAM MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG02 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $51.32 $8,895.46 B 1 YEAR $53.84 $9,332.26 C 2 YEARS $56.53 $9,798.53 D 3 YEARS $59.37 $10,290.80 E 4 YEARS $62.33 $10,803.86 F 5 YEARS $65.45 $11,344.66 G MERIT $68.73 $11,913.20 H MERIT $72.16 $12,507.73 I MERIT $75.76 $13,131.73 Classification: WIPM WILDLIFE PROGRAM MANAGER Daily Hours: 8 Effective: 03/28/2020 Range: MG02 Note: Step Hourly Monthly A START $51.32 $8,895.46 B 1 YEAR $53.84 $9,332.26
Report ID: Salary Schedule Report - Management Page: 20 85 East Bay Regional Park District Salary Schedule - Management
C 2 YEARS $56.53 $9,798.53 D 3 YEARS $59.37 $10,290.80 E 4 YEARS $62.33 $10,803.86 F 5 YEARS $65.45 $11,344.66 G MERIT $68.73 $11,913.20 H MERIT $72.16 $12,507.73 I MERIT $75.76 $13,131.73
Report ID: Salary Schedule Report - Management Page: 21 86 Page Left Blank Intentionally
87 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
D. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
L. Approval of the District’s 2021 Investment Policy (Spaulding/Auker)
RECOMMENDATION
The General Manager and the Board Finance Committee, by unanimous vote on February 5, 2021, recommend that the Board of Directors approve the 2021 Investment Policy, applying to all financial assets of the District excluding: retirement and OPEB funds held by trustees; employee deferred compensation funds and bond proceeds.
REVENUE/COST
There is no cost associated with this item.
BACKGROUND
The Board Operating Guidelines specify that the Board Finance Committee monitors the District’s investment policies and portfolios, and that in January of each year, the investment policy will be reviewed by the Finance Committee and recommended to the full Board of Directors for approval. (Because the January Finance Committee was moved to February 5th this year, this process has been delayed from its normal timeline.) Investment of District funds is also governed by Section 53600 of the California Government Code and Section VIII (K) of the Board Operating Guidelines.
The Park District’s investment advisory firm, PFM, has prepared proposed changes to the Investment Policy for 2021 which are summarized below. A copy of the Investment Policy in “track changes mode” is attached as Attachment A. The Investment Policy was last reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors in March 2020.
Summary of Investment Policy Changes Proposed for 2021
In 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Senate Bill 998 (SB 998), which took effect on January 1, 2021 and will be in effect until January 1, 2026. It amended sections of the Code which govern the investment of public funds, including the following two additions, which are
88 recommended to be added to the Park District’s policy. These changes are proposed in order to improve flexibility to respond to the unusual low-interest rate investment environment caused by the COVID-19 pandemic:
1) allowing local agencies that have more than $100 million of investment assets under management to invest up to 40% in commercial paper (existing limit is 25% for all agencies, other than a county or a city and county);
2) allowing investment in securities issued or backed by the U.S. government that could result in zero or negative interest accrual if held to maturity, in the event of, and for the duration of, a period of negative market interest rates;
The Park District currently limits investment in commercial paper to 25% of its portfolio. Since the District has over $100 million of investment assets under management, PFM recommends increasing the maximum allocation allowed to the new limit of 40%. While the utilization of commercial paper does not play a significant role in the portfolio’s current strategy, PFM suggests increasing the limit in order to have the maximum flexibility to utilize commercial paper.
Policy section 9.3. Authorized and Suitable Investments. Commercial Paper Effective until January 1, 2026, the aggregate investment in commercial paper shall not exceed 25% 40% of the District’s total portfolio. After January 1, 2026, the aggregate investment in commercial paper shall not exceed 25% of the District’s total portfolio. Moreover, the District shall not purchase more than 10% of the outstanding commercial paper of any single issuer.
PFM also recommends adding Investment Policy language regarding investment in securities issued or backed by the U.S. government that could result in zero or negative interest accrual if held to maturity. While it is highly unlikely that the Park District would purchase a zero or negative interest security, PFM thinks it is appropriate to allow for this investment type, given Code now allows it, to have the option if needed.
Policy section 11. Prohibited Investments In accordance with Section 53601.6 of the California Government Code, the District shall not invest any funds in inverse floaters, range notes or interest-only strips that are derived from a pool of mortgages, collateralized mortgage obligations,. Except as provided in the subsequent paragraph, the District shall not invest or in any security that could result in zero-interest accrual if held to maturity. Notwithstanding the prohibition in prior paragraph, the District may invest in securities issued by, or backed by, the United States government that could result in zero- or negative-interest accrual if held to maturity, in the event of, and for the duration of, a period of negative market interest rates. The District may hold these instruments until their maturity dates. Purchase of this investment type is prohibited after January 1, 2026.
The District currently has a 5% issuer limit, except for US Government securities, agencies and instrumentalities, repurchase agreements, money market funds, LAIF, and CAMP. New code language imparts a 10% issuer limit on commercial paper and corporate note issuers, where there previously was no issuer limit. However, PFM recommends the District keep the more restrictive
89 5% limit to maintain the portfolio’s current level of diversification and safety. However, the language “regardless of sector” has been added to the Policy to make it clear that the issuer limit applies to an issuer regardless of what sector it falls into.
Policy section 9. Authorized and Suitable Investments With the exception of US Government securities, including its agencies and instrumentalities, repurchase agreements, money market funds, LAIF, and CAMP, no more than 5% of the investment portfolio may be invested in securities of a single issuer, regardless of security type.
On June 1, 2018, the Park District’s Investment Policy was amended to allow for investments with maturities beyond the standard five-year time horizon (see Policy section 11). However, at that time, this five-year investment time horizon extension was not applied to municipal bonds. PFM is now recommending that municipal bonds no longer be limited to the five-year time horizon, and that this change will safely widen the array of available investments for the Park District.
Policy section 9.11 Municipal Bonds Municipal bonds that are listed below with a final maturity not exceeding five years from the date of trade settlement and that must be and are rated in a rating category of “A,” its equivalent, or higher by a NRSRO at the time of purchase. The aggregate investment in municipal bonds shall not exceed 30% of the District’s total portfolio.
Throughout the policy, other changes are recommended in an effort to safely increase investment opportunities, clarify requirements, and clean up grammar errors.
ALTERNATIVES
There are none recommended.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Resolution B. 2021 Investment Policy with proposed changes in “track changes”
90
Page Left Blank Intentionally
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO.: 2021 – 03 -
March 2, 2021
APPROVAL OF THE DISTRICT’S 2021 INVESTMENT POLICY
WHEREAS, pursuant to Board Operating Guidelines the Board of Directors shall annually review and approve all changes to the District’s Investment Policy, as recommended by the Board Finance Committee; and
WHEREAS, the Board Finance Committee reviewed this item at their meeting on February 5, 2021, and unanimously recommended favorable consideration of this item by the Board of Directors; and
WHEREAS, management responsibility for the District’s investment program is delegated annually by the Board of Directors to the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to the Investment Policy; and
WHEREAS, the Investment Policy is in compliance with Government Code requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District hereby delegates responsibility for the District’s investment program to the Chief Financial Officer and approves the attached 2021 Investment Policy, which is effective for the 2021 Fiscal Year and until amended, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the General Manager and the Chief Financial Officer are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the District and in its name, to execute and deliver such documents and to do such acts as may be deemed necessary or appropriate to accomplish the intentions of the resolution.
Moved by Director seconded by Director , and adopted this 2nd day of March, 2021, by the following vote:
FOR:
AGAINST: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:
91
Page Left Blank Intentionally
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT 2020 2021 INVESTMENT POLICY
1. PURPOSE & POLICY
1.1 The purpose of this Investment Policy for the East Bay Regional Park District (the District) is to provide guidance and direction for the prudent investment of District funds, and to foster the creation of a systematic and controlled investment process. The ultimate goal is to maximize the efficiency of the District’s cash management system, and to enhance the economic status of the District while protecting its pooled cash. The initial step toward a prudent investment policy is to set out a clear statement of fundamental investment direction.
1.2 The District policy is to invest public funds in a prudent manner, providing the highest yield with the maximum security of principal invested, while also meeting the daily cash flow requirements of the District. Also, the District’s policy is to conform to all applicable federal, state and local statutes governing the investment of public funds.
2. SCOPE
This Investment Policy applies to all financial assets of the District excluding: (a) retirement funds held by trustees, but accounted for in the District’s general ledger as a trust fund; (b) OPEB funds held by trustees, but accounted for in the District’s general ledger as a trust fund, (c) employee deferred compensation funds held in a trust and not considered financial assets of the District, and; (d) bond proceeds, the investment of which shall be governed by the provisions of the related bond indentures or resolutions. Financial assets are reported in the District’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, and are accounted for in the following funds:
General Fund Special Revenue Funds Capital Project Funds Debt Service Funds Internal Service Funds Permanent Funds Any new fund created by the District unless specifically exempted.
3. PRUDENCE
The standard of prudence to be used for managing the District’s investment program is California Government Code Section 53600.3, the prudent investor standard which states, “When investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling, or managing public funds, a trustee shall act with care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing, including, but not limited to, the general economic conditions and the anticipated needs of the agency, that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the conduct of funds of a like character and with like aims, to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of the agency.”
2019 2021 Investment Policy Page 1
92 Investment officers acting in accordance with written procedures and this Investment Policy and exercising due diligence shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security’s credit risk or market risk, provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments.
4. RISK TOLERANCE
The District recognizes that investment risks can result from issuer defaults, or various technical complications leading to temporary illiquidity.
4.1 Credit risk, defined as the risk of loss due to failure of the issuer of a security, shall be mitigated by investing in high grade securities and diversification.
4.2 Market risk, defined as market value fluctuations due to overall changes in market price and rate, shall be mitigated by maintaining appropriate diversification of assets.
4.3 Interest rate risk, defined as market value fluctuations due to changes in interest rates, interest rate spreads, or the shape of the yield curve, shall be mitigated by maintaining an appropriate duration strategy and diversification of maturities.
4.4 Custodial credit risk, defined as the risk of loss due to the failure of the custodian, shall be mitigated by prudent custodian selection procedures and requirements, as described in section 14 of this Policy.
5. Objectives
The District strives to maintain in its investment portfolio 100% of all idle funds, given daily and projected cash flow needs. The District’s funds shall be invested in accordance with all applicable District policies and codes, State statutes, and Federal regulations, and in a manner designed to accomplish the following objectives, which are listed in priority order:
5.1 SAFETY. The safety and risk associated with an investment refers to the potential loss of principal, interest or a combination of those amounts. Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the District’s investment program, followed by liquidity and yield. Investments of the District shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio. The District only operates in those investments that are considered very safe. Also, safety is ensured by diversification, which is required in order that potential losses on individual securities do not exceed income from the remainder of the portfolio.
5.2 LIQUIDITY. Liquidity refers to the ability to sell an investment at any given moment with a minimal chance of losing some portion of principal or interest. The District’s investment portfolio shall remain sufficiently liquid to meet all operating requirements that might be reasonably anticipated. The District will maintain an adequate percentage of the portfolio in liquid short-term securities that can be converted to cash, if necessary, to meet disbursement requirements. This need for investment liquidity may be tempered to the extent the District is able to issue short-term notes to meet its operating requirements. However, in the absence of
2019 2021 Investment Policy Page 2 93 a Debt Issuance Policy approved by the Board of Directors, there should not be a reliance on short-term borrowing to provide liquidity.
5.3 YIELD/RETURN. The portfolio shall be designed to attain a market rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the investment risk constraints and the cash flow characteristics of the portfolio, and state and local laws, regulations and resolutions that restrict the placement of short-term funds.
5.4 SUSTAINABILITY. Wherever possible, investment decisions shall take into account environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors.
5.5 PUBLIC TRUST. All participants in the investment process shall act reasonably as custodians of the public trust. Investment officials shall recognize that the investment portfolio is subject and open to public scrutiny and evaluation. The overall program shall be designed and managed with the degree of professionalism required to be worthy of the public trust.
6. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
Management responsibility for the District’s investment program is delegated annually by the District’s Board of Directors to the Chief Financial Officer, who shall establish procedures for the operation of the investment program, consistent with this Investment Policy. Such procedures will include appropriate delegation of authority to persons responsible for investment transactions. No person may engage in investment transactions except as provided under the terms of this Investment Policy, and the procedures established by the Chief Financial Officer. The Chief Financial Officer is hereby delegated the authority from the Board of Directors to:
6.1 Enter into agreements with the District’s depository in order to enable the Chief Financial Officer, or his/her designee to execute investment transactions that will involve charges and credits to the District’s bank accounts.
6.2 Enter into banking arrangements with a third party bank trust department to facilitate the third-party safekeeping of District investments.
6.3 Establish operating procedures as deemed appropriate to operate an investment program consistent with this Investment Policy.
Upon the recommendation of the Chief Financial Officer, the Board of Directors may engage the support services of outside investment advisors with respect to the District’s investment program, so long as it can be demonstrated that these services produce a net financial advantage or necessary financial protection of the District’s financial resources.
7. ETHICS AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST
7.1 The Chief Financial Officer and all personnel responsible for authorizing the purchase of investments shall refrain from personal business activities that could conflict with proper execution of the investment program and/or which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions. The Chief Financial Officer and all responsible personnel shall disclose to the Board of Directors and the General Manager any material financial interests in any financial institutions that conduct
2019 2021 Investment Policy Page 3 94 business with the District that could be related in a conflicting manner to the performance of the District’s investment portfolio.
7.2 The Chief Financial Officer and all investment personnel, designated by the Chief Financial Officer, shall file a Statement of Economic Interests each year as required by California Government Code Section 87203 and regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission.
8. AUTHORIZED BROKER/DEALERS
8.1 The Chief Financial Officer shall maintain a list of broker/dealers approved for investment purposes, and it shall be the policy of the District to purchase securities only from those brokers and the firms they represent. Each approved broker/dealer must possess an authorizing certificate from the California Commissioner of Corporations as required by Section 25210 of the California Corporations Code. The firms they represent must:
a. be recognized as a Primary Dealer by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or have a primary dealer within its holding company structure, or
b. report voluntarily to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or
c. qualify under Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 15c3-1 (Uniform Net Capital Rule).
8.2 When purchasing investments, broker/dealers located in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties will be considered when possible provided that their offerings are competitive and meet the criteria established by this Investment Policy.
8.3 Each authorized broker/dealer shall be required to submit and annually update a District approved Broker/Dealer Information Request form that includes the firm's most recent audited financial statements. The registration status and standing of all brokers/dealers shall be verified with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) or other applicable regulatory organizations.
8.4 If the District has an investment advisor, the investment advisor may use its own list of authorized broker/dealers to conduct transactions on behalf of the District.
9. AUTHORIZED AND SUITABLE INVESTMENTS
All investments and deposits of the District shall be made in accordance with California Government Code Sections 16429.1, 53600-53609 and 53630-53686. Although the following includes authorized investments, the Chief Financial Officer shall determine the extent to which they are suitable based upon this Investment Policy and the resources used by the Chief Financial Officer in implementing it.
Limitations identified in the following sections shall be adhered to and the percentage limits and credit criteria shall be measured against portfolio value on the date the investment is purchased. In the event of a credit downgrade below the minimum acceptable credit rating, the District shall require investment advisors engaged in the investing of District
2019 2021 Investment Policy Page 4 95 funds to notify District staff of the downgrade, and provide a plan of action to address the downgrade:
9.1.a. United States Treasury bills, notes, bonds, or strips. There is no limit on the percentage of U.S. Treasury obligations that may be held in the District's portfolio.
9.1.b. Federal Agency or U.S. government-sponsored enterprise obligations, participations, or other instruments, including those issued by or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by federal agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprises. The aggregate investment in securities authorized in this section shall not exceed 75% of the District’s portfolio.
9.2 Eligible Banker’s Acceptances with a maturity not exceeding 180 days from the date of trade settlement, drawn on or accepted by a FDIC insured commercial bank with combined capital and surplus of at least $250 million, rated in a rating category of A-1, its equivalent, or higher by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO) at the time of purchase and whose senior long-term debt is rated in a rating category of “A” its equivalent, or higher by a NRSRO at the time of purchase. The aggregate investment in banker’s acceptances shall not exceed 40% of the District’s total portfolio.
9.3 Prime Commercial Paper with a maturity not exceeding 270 days from the date of trade settlement with the highest ranking or of the highest letter and number rating as provided for by a NRSRO. The entity that issues the commercial paper shall meet all of the following conditions in either sub-paragraph A. or sub-paragraph B. below: A. The entity shall (1) be organized and operating in the United States as a general corporation, (2) have total assets in excess of $500,000,000 and (3) have debt other than commercial paper, if any, that is rated in a rating category of “A”, its equivalent, or higher by a NRSRO. B. The entity shall (1) be organized within the United States as a special purpose corporation, trust, or limited liability company, (2) have program wide credit enhancements, including, but not limited to, over collateralization, letters of credit or surety bond and (3) have commercial paper that is rated in a rating category of A-1, its equivalent, or higher, by a NRSRO. Effective until January 1, 2026, The the aggregate investment in commercial paper shall not exceed 25%40% of the District’s total portfolio. After January 1, 2026, the aggregate investment in commercial paper shall not exceed 25% of the District’s total portfolio. Moreover, the District shall not purchase more than 10% of the outstanding commercial paper of any single issuer.
9.4 Non-negotiable certificates of deposit with a final maturity not exceeding five years and shall meet the conditions in either paragraph (a) or paragraph (b) below:
(a) Certificates of deposit shall meet the requirements for deposit under California Government Code Section 53630 et. seq. To be eligible to receive District deposits, the financial institution must meet the requirements of California Government Code Section 53635.2. Deposits are required to be collateralized as specified under California Government Code Section 53630 et. seq. The Chief Financial Officer, at his or her
2019 2021 Investment Policy Page 5 96 discretion, may waive the collateralization requirements for any portion that is covered by federal deposit insurance. The District shall also have a signed agreement with the depository per California Government Code Section 53649.
(b) Certificates of deposit placed through a deposit placement service shall meet the requirements of Government Code Section 53601.8. The full amount of the principal and the interest that may be accrued during the maximum term of each certificate of deposit shall at all times be insured by federal deposit insurance.
The aggregate investment in non-negotiable certificates of deposit and negotiable certificates of deposit shall not exceed 30% of the District’s total portfolio.
9.5 Negotiable Certificates of Deposit with a final maturity not exceeding five years issued by a nationally or state-chartered bank, a savings association or a federal association (as defined by Section 5102 of the Financial Code), a state or federal credit union, or by a federally- or state-licensed branch of a foreign bank. Negotiable CD issuers must be rated in a rating category of “A”, its equivalent, or higher by two NRSROs.
The aggregate investment in non-negotiable certificates of deposit and negotiable certificates of deposit shall not exceed 30% of the District’s total portfolio.
9.6 Repurchase Agreements with a final termination date not exceeding 30 days collateralized by U.S. Treasury obligations, Federal Agency securities, or Federal Instrumentality securities listed in Section 9.1 above with the maturity of the collateral not exceeding ten years. For the purpose of this section, the term collateral shall mean purchased securities under the terms of the District’s approved Master Repurchase Agreement. The purchased securities shall have a minimum market value including accrued interest of 102% of the dollar value of the funds borrowed. Collateral shall be held in the District’s custodian bank, as safekeeping agent, and the market value of the collateral securities shall be marked-to-the-market daily.
Repurchase Agreements shall be entered into only with broker/dealers who are recognized as Primary Dealers with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or with firms that have a primary dealer within their holding company structure. Repurchase agreement counterparties shall execute a District approved Master Repurchase Agreement with the District. The Chief Financial Officer shall maintain a copy of the District’s approved Master Repurchase Agreement along with a list of the broker/dealers who have executed same.
9.7 State of California’s Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), pursuant to California Government Code Section 16429.1. There is no limit on the percentage of LAIF that may be held in the District's portfolio. LAIF investments are subject to statutory limits.
9.8 California Asset Management Trust (CAMP), as long as the portfolio is rated among the top two rating categories by a NRSRO. There is no limit on the percentage of CAMP that may be held in the District's portfolio.
2019 2021 Investment Policy Page 6 97 9.9 Medium Term Notes issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States with a final maturity not exceeding five years from the date of trade settlement. These notes must have a rating in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent, or higher by a NRSRO. The aggregate investment in medium term notes shall not exceed 30% of the District’s total portfolio.
9.10 Money Market Funds registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 that (1) are “no-load” (meaning no commission or fee shall be charged on purchases or sales of shares); (2) have a constant net asset value per share of $1.00; (3) invest only in the securities and obligations authorized by state statute and (4) have attained the highest ranking or the highest letter and numerical rating provided by at least two NRSROs, or retained an investment advisor registered or exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five years experience managing money market mutual funds with assets under management in excess of $500 million dollars. No more than 10% of the District’s total portfolio shall be invested in money market funds of any one issuer, and the aggregate investment in money market funds shall not exceed 20% of the District’s total portfolio.
9.11 Municipal bonds that are listed below with a final maturity not exceeding five years from the date of trade settlement and that must beand are rated in a rating category of “A,” its equivalent, or higher by a NRSRO at the time of purchase. tThe aggregate investment in municipal bonds shall not exceed 30% of the District’s total portfolio.
(a) Bonds issued by the District, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by the District or by a department, board, agency, or authority of the District.
(b) Registered state warrants or treasury notes or bonds of the state of California, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by the state or by a department, board, agency, or authority of the state.
(c) Bonds, notes, warrants, or other evidences of indebtedness of a local agency within California, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by the local agency, or by a department, board, agency, or authority of the local agency.
(d) Registered treasury notes or bonds of any of the other 49 states in addition to California, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue- producing property owned, controlled, or operated by a state or by a department, board, agency, or authority of any of the other 49 states, in addition to California.
9.12 Supranationals which are United States dollar denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), International Finance Corporation (IFC), or Inter-American Development Bank (IADB), with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less, and eligible for purchase and sale within the United States. Investments under this subdivision shall be rated in the rating category of "AA," its equivalent, or better by at least one NRSRO.
2019 2021 Investment Policy Page 7 98 Purchases of supranationals shall not exceed 30 percent of the investment portfolio of the District.
9.13 Asset-Backed Securities including equipment lease-backed certificates, consumer receivable passthrough certificates, or consumer receivable-backed bonds of a maximum remaining maturity of five year. Securities eligible for investment under this subdivision shall be rated in a rating category of "AA,” its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO. Purchase of securities authorized by this subdivision may not exceed 20 percent of the District's total portfolio.
With the exception of US Government securities, including its agencies and instrumentalities, repurchase agreements, money market funds, LAIF, and CAMP, no more than 5% of the investment portfolio may be invested in securities of a single issuer, regardless of security type.
10. ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, GOVERNANCE (ESG) INVESTMENT INITIATIVE
ESG investing is the process of incorporating analyses of non-financial environmental, social, and governance factors into investment decisions alongside more traditional financial criteria. As indicated in Section 5.4 of this Investment Policy, it is the District’s objective to integrate environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors into investment decisions to the extent practical and possible. In order to achieve this objective, the District will apply the ESG Investment Criteria as defined herein to the Authorized and Suitable Investments as set forth below. The ESG investment criteria will be based on the ESG risk ratings and subindustry rankings provided by Sustainalytics as of the most recent prior-month end date. The investment criteria will be reviewed annually by the District’s Chief Financial Officer.
ESG Investment Criteria ESG Risk Rating Limit Issuer ESG Risk Rating < 30
ESG Risk Rating Exception: Top ESG Issuer ESG Risk Rating is between 30- Performers Within Industry Peer 39.99 and the Issuer subindustry ranking Groups is in the top 25th percentile
Authorized and Suitable Investments Banker’s Acceptances subject to ESG Investment Criteria Commercial Paper Negotiable Certificates of Deposit Corporate & Bank Notes Asset-Backed Securities
If an investment no longer satisfies the ESG Investment Criteria, the District may continue to hold the investment unless directed to liquidate by the District.
1011. PROHIBITED INVESTMENTS
In accordance with Section 53601.6 of the California Government Code, the District shall not invest any funds in inverse floaters, range notes or interest-only strips that are derived
2019 2021 Investment Policy Page 8 99 from a pool of mortgages. (Collateralized Mortgage Obligations) Except as provided in the subsequent paragraph, the District shall not invest or in any security that could result in zero-interest accrual if held to maturity.
Notwithstanding the prohibition in prior paragraph, the District may invest in securities issued by, or backed by, the United States government that could result in zero- or negative-interest accrual if held to maturity, in the event of, and for the duration of, a period of negative market interest rates. The District may hold these instruments until their maturity dates. Purchase of this investment type is prohibited after January 1, 2026.
1112. INVESTMENT POOLS
The District allows investments in two public agency investment pools: LAIF and CAMP (per sections 9.7 and 9.8). Although these pools are long-standing, the Chief Financial Officer will periodically require from each pool, information which will demonstrate operating information and may include the following information:
. A written statement of investment policies and objectives. . A description of interest calculations, how they are distributed, and how gains and losses are treated. . A description of how securities are safeguarded (including the settlement process), and how often the securities are priced and the program audited. . A schedule for receiving statements and portfolio listings. . A statement regarding whether and how reserves or retained earnings are used by the pool. . A description of who may invest in the program, how often, and what are the sizes and timing of deposits and withdrawals. . A fee schedule and how and when fees are assessed. . A statement of whether the pool is available for bond proceeds, and will it accept such proceeds.
1213. MATURITY
The District will not invest in instruments whose maturities exceed five years at the time of trade settlement unless the Board of Directors has provided approval for a specific purpose at least three months before the investment is made.
On February 6, 2018, the Board of Directors granted the District authorization to invest in instruments whose maturities exceed five years. Effective June 1, 2018 instruments whose maturities exceed five years may be purchased. Authorization to purchase instruments whose maturities exceed five years will continue until the Board explicitly revokes the authorization.
The Chief Financial Officer shall be responsible for determining and monitoring an average maturity which meets the District projected cash flow requirements and shall be reported to the Board of Directors as required under State Law.
1314. SELECTION OF DEPOSITORIES
The Chief Financial Officer shall be responsible for ensuring that only FDIC insured banks are utilized to provide depository and other banking services for the District. To be eligible,
2019 2021 Investment Policy Page 9 100 a bank must qualify as a depository of public funds in the State of California as defined in California Government Code Section 53630.5 and shall secure deposits in excess of FDIC insurance coverage in accordance with California Government Code Section 53652.
Under provisions of the Government Code, California banks and savings and loan associations are required to secure the District’s deposits by pledging government securities with a value of 110% of principal and accrued interest.
1415. SAFEKEEPING & CUSTODY
The Chief Financial Officer shall select one or more banks to provide third- party safekeeping and custodial services for the District, in accordance with the provisions of Section 53608 of the California Government Code. A Safekeeping Agreement approved by the District shall be executed with each custodian bank prior to utilizing that bank's safekeeping services. Custodian banks will be selected on the basis of their ability to provide services for the District's account and the competitive pricing of their safekeeping related services.
The purchase and sale of securities and repurchase agreement transactions shall be settled on a delivery versus payment basis. All securities shall be perfected in the name of the District. Sufficient evidence to title shall be consistent with modern investment, banking and commercial practices.
All investment securities , except non-negotiable certificates of deposit, money market funds, LAIF and CAMP, purchased by the District will be delivered by book entry and will be held in third-party safekeeping by a District approved custodian bank or its Depository Trust Company (DTC) participant account.
All Fed wireable book entry securities owned by the District shall be held in the Federal Reserve System in a customer account for the custodian bank which will name the District as “customer.”
All DTC eligible securities shall be held in the custodian bank’s DTC participant account and the custodian bank shall provide evidence that the securities are held for the District as “customer.”
1516. DIVERSIFICATION
The District shall diversify its investments to avoid incurring unreasonable risks inherent in over investing in specific instruments, individual financial institutions or maturities. Nevertheless, the asset allocation in the portfolio should be flexible depending upon the outlook for the economy, the securities markets, and the District's anticipated cash flow needs.
1617. REPORTING
Periodically, but within three months of the close of each quarter, the Chief Financial Officer shall submit to the Finance Committee, Board of Directors and the General Manager a report of the investment earnings and performance results of the District’s investment portfolio. The report shall include the following information:
2019 2021 Investment Policy Page 10 101 1. Investment type, issuer, date of maturity, par value and dollar amount invested in all securities, and investments and monies held by the District; 2. A description of the funds, investments and programs; 3. A market value as of the date of the report (or the most recent valuation as to assets not valued monthly) and the source of the valuation; 4. Current period earnings and rates of return for short-term and mid-term investments, including comparison to established benchmarks. 5. A statement of compliance with this Investment Policy or an explanation for non- compliance; and 6. A statement of the District’s ability to meet expenditure requirements for six months, and an explanation of why money will not be available if that is the case.
1718. INTERNAL CONTROLS
The Chief Financial Officer shall establish a system of internal controls, which shall be documented in writing. The controls shall be designed to prevent loss of public funds arising from fraud, employee error, misrepresentation by third parties, unanticipated changes in financial markets or imprudent actions by employees and officers of the District. Controls deemed most important include: control of collusion, segregation of duties, separating transaction authority from accounting and record keeping, custodial safekeeping, clear delegation of authority, written (email or faxed allowable) confirmation of telephone transactions, documentation of transactions and strategies and code of ethical standards. These controls will be audited by an independent external auditor and reviewed on an annual basis by the General Manager.
If an external investment advisor is used by the District, the name of the advisor and the custodial bank used shall be listed as an Addendum to this Policy. The District shall review the internal controls implemented by its Advisor on an annual basis.
1819. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The investment portfolio shall be designed to attain a market rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account prevailing market conditions, risk constraints for eligible securities, and cash flow requirements. The performance of the District’s investments shall be compared to an appropriate benchmark.
1920. REVIEW, ADOPTION & AMENDMENTS
This Investment Policy shall be reviewed and adopted annually by resolution of the Board of Directors. It may not be altered, amended or changed in any particular way, except by formal resolution of the Board of Directors.
2019 2021 Investment Policy Page 11 102 GLOSSARY OF INVESTMENT TERMS AND INSTRUMENTS
Term Description Asset-Backed Securities An asset-backed security (ABS) is a security whose income (“ABS”) payments and hence value is derived from and collateralized (or "backed") by a specified pool of underlying assets which are receivables. Pooling the assets into financial instruments allows them to be sold to general investors, a process called securitization, and allows the risk of investing in the underlying assets to be diversified because each security will represent a fraction of the total value of the diverse pool of underlying assets. The pools of underlying assets can comprise common payments credit cards, auto loans, mortgage loans, and other types of assets. Interest and principal is paid to investors from borrowers who are paying down their debt. Banker’s Acceptance Normally, a short-term bill of exchange that is accepted as payment by banks engaged in financing trade of physical assets or merchandise. Benchmark A passive index used to compare the performance, relative to risk and return, of an investor’s portfolio. Bond A debt obligation of a firm or public entity. A bond represents the agreement to repay the debt in principal and, typically, in interest on the principal. Broker/Dealer A person or a firm who can act as a broker or a dealer depending on the transaction. A broker brings buyers and sellers together for a commission. They do not take a position. A dealer acts as a principal in all transactions, buying and selling for his own account.
2019 2021 Investment Policy Page 12 103 Term Description CAMP California Asset Management Program (CAMP) provides California public agencies, together with any bond trustee acting on behalf of such public agency, assistance with the investment of and accounting for bond proceeds and surplus funds. For bond proceeds, the objective of CAMP is to invest and account of such proceeds in compliance with arbitrage management and rebate requirements of the Internal Revenue Service. The program includes the California Asset Management Trust, a California common law trust organized in 1989. The Trust currently offers a professionally managed money market investment portfolio, the Cash Reserve Portfolio, to provide public agencies with a convenient method of pooling funds for temporary investment pending their expenditure. The Trust also provides record keeping, custodial and arbitrage rebate calculation services for bond proceeds. As part of the program, public agencies may also establish individual, professionally managed investment accounts. The Pool seeks to attain as high a level of current income as is consistent with the preservation of principal. The Pool purchases only investments of the type in which public agencies are permitted by statute to invest surplus funds and proceeds of their own bonds. Cash Flow A comparison of cash receipts (revenues) to required payments (debt service, operating expenses, etc.). Certificate of Deposit A short-term, secured deposit in a financial institution that usually returns principal and interest to the lender at the end of the loan period. Certificates of Deposits (CDs) differ in terms of collateralization and marketability. Those appropriate to public agency investing include: Negotiable Certificates of Deposit, Non- Negotiable Certificates of Deposit. Commercial Paper A short-term, unsecured promissory note issued by a large corporation. Corporate Notes & Debt instruments, typically unsecured, issued by corporations, Bonds with original maturities in most cases greater than one year and less than ten years. Credit Risk The chance that an issuer will be unable to make scheduled payments of interest and principal on an outstanding obligation. Another concern for investors is that the market’s perception of a corporation’s credit will cause the market value of a security to fall, even if default is not expected. Credit Rating Various alphabetical and numerical designations used by institutional investors, Wall Street underwriters, and commercial rating companies to give relative indications of bond and note creditworthiness. Standard & Poor’s and Fitch Ratings use the same system, starting with their highest of “AAA, AA, A, BBB, BB, B, CCC, CC, C, and D” for default. Moody’s Investor Services uses “Aaa, Aa, A, Baa, Ba, B, Caa, Ca, C, and D”. Each of the services use pluses (+), minuses (-), or numerical modifiers to
2019 2021 Investment Policy Page 13 104 Term Description indicate steps within each category. The top four letter categories are considered investment grade ratings. Duration A fixed-income metric that measures the sensitivity of a bond or portfolio to changes in interest rates. A portfolio or security with a higher duration will experience larger changes in market value as interest rates change. Environmental, Social, ESG investing is the process of incorporating analyses of non- Governance (ESG) financial environmental, social, and governance factors into investment decisions alongside more traditional financial criteria. Examples of ESG factors are provided in the table below:
Environmental Social Governance
Green Building/Smart Human Rights Board Independence Growth
Climate change / Avoidance of Anti-Corruption Carbon tobacco or other Policies harmful products
Clean Technology Community Board Diversity Development
Pollution / Toxics Diversity & Anti-bias Executive issues Compensation
Sustainable Natural Workplace Benefits Corporate Political Resources / & Safety Contributions Agriculture
Water Use & Labor Relations Conservation
Federal Agency and Obligations issued by a government sponsored entity or a Instrumentality federally regulated institution. Obligations Issuer Any corporation, governmental unit, or financial institution that borrows money through the sale of securities. LAIF The Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), a voluntary program created by statute, began in 1977 as an investment alternative for California’s local governments and special districts and continues today under the State of California Treasurer’s office. The enabling legislation for the LAIF is Section 16429.1,2,3 of the California Government Code.
This program offers participating agencies the opportunity to participate in a major portfolio which daily invests hundreds of millions of dollars, using the investment expertise of the Treasurer’s Office Investment staff at no additional cost to the taxpayer.
2019 2021 Investment Policy Page 14 105 Term Description All securities are purchased under the authority of the Government Code Section 16430 and 16480.4. The State Treasurer’s Office takes delivery of all securities purchased on a delivery versus payment basis using a third party custodian. All investments are purchased at market, and market valuation is conducted monthly.
It has been determined that the State of California cannot declare bankruptcy under Federal regulations, thereby allowing the Government Code Section 16429.3 to stand. This Section states “money placed with the State Treasurer for deposit in the LAIF shall not be subject to impoundment or seizure by any State official or State agency.”
Deposits are subject to statutory limits. Liquidity The ease with which an investment may be converted to cash, either by selling it in the secondary market or by demanding its repurchase pursuant to a put or other prearranged agreement with the issuer or another party. Market Risk The chance that the value of a security will decline as interest rates rise. In general, as interest rates fall, prices of fixed income securities rise. Similarly, as interest rates rise, prices fall. Market risk also is referred to as systematic risk or risk that affects all securities within an asset class similarly. Maturity The stated date on which all or a stated portion of the principal amount of a security becomes due and payable. Money Market Fund A type of investment comprising a variety of short-term securities with high quality and high liquidity. The fund provides interest to shareholders and must strive to maintain a stable net asset value (NAV) of $1 per share. Nationally Recognized The formal term to describe credit rating agencies that provide Statistical Rating credit ratings that are used by the U.S. government in several Organization (NRSRO) regulatory areas. Ratings provided by Nationally Recognized Statistical Ratings Organizations (NRSRO) are used frequently by investors and are used as benchmarks by federal and state agencies. Generally, to be considered an NRSRO, the agency has to be “nationally recognized” in the U.S. and provide reliable and credible ratings. Also taken into consideration is the size of the credit rating agency, operational capability and its credit rating process. Some examples of NRSRO’s include Moody’s Investors Service Inc, Standard and Poor’s Inc, Fitch Inc, Dominion Bond Rating Services Limited (DBRS) and A.M. Best Company Inc. Notes Debt obligations of a firm or public entity, usually maturing in less than ten years. Portfolio The combined holdings of all investment assets held by an investor. Repurchase Agreement From the perspective of a local agency, the short-term, often overnight, purchase of securities with an agreement to resell the securities at an agreed upon price.
2019 2021 Investment Policy Page 15 106 Term Description Return The principal gains or losses (realized and unrealized)plus interest on an investment or portfolio of investments. In certain unfavorable market environments or due to risk factors, income derived from principal and interest may be less than the original amount invested. Risk The uncertainty of maintaining the principal or interest associated with an investment due to a variety of factors. State & Local The combined deposits of state and local agencies organized and Investment Pools operated by the state treasurer or a Joint Powers Agreement between local agencies. Deposits of various participating local agencies are pooled and invested. Each agency’s returns are based upon their share of the amount invested in the pool. This increases investment efficiencies, decreases costs, provides liquidity, and utilizes investment expertise of the pool managers. Supranational A supranational entity is formed by two or more central governments with the purpose of promoting economic development for the member countries. Supranational institutions finance their activities by issuing debt, such as supranational bonds. Examples of supranational institutions include the European Investment Bank and the World Bank. Similarly to the government bonds, the bonds issued by these institutions are considered direct obligations of the issuing nations and have a high credit rating. Yield to Maturity The rate of income return on an investment, minus any premium above par or plus any discount with the adjustment spread over the period from the date of the purchase to the date of maturity of the bond.
2019 2021 Investment Policy Page 16 107 ADDENDUM A– ADVISOR AND CUSTODY
The District has engaged PFM Asset Management LLC to provide investment advisory services. The District is aware the ongoing review and analysis of its investment advisor is just as important as the due diligence implemented during the manager selection process. The performance of the investment manager will be monitored on an ongoing basis and the District will review the internal controls of its advisor on an annual basis.
The District has engaged U.S. Bank National Association and Union Bank to provide custodial services. The District will review the internal controls of its custodian on an annual basis.
202118 Investment Policy Addendum A-1 108 EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATIVE DIVISION AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
D. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD
2. EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATIVE DIVISION
a. Appointment of Sabrina B. Landreth as the General Manager of the East Bay Regional Park District and Approval of an Employment Agreement: Executive and Legislative Division (Picard/Rosario)
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Board of Directors adopt the attached Resolution appointing Sabrina B. Landreth as General Manager and approving an Employment Agreement between the East Bay Regional Park District and Ms. Landreth.
REVENUE/COST
The cost associated with this action is within the adopted 2021 Budget.
BACKGROUND
Former General Manager Robert Doyle retired in December 2020 after 10 years as General Manager and more than 47 years of service with the East Bay Regional Park District. Beginning in the fall of 2020, the Board of Directors kicked off a national search for a new General Manager using CPS HR Consulting as the recruiter. After a nation-wide recruitment and the participation of several outstanding candidates, the Board identified Ms. Landreth as the top candidate for General Manager.
Ms. Landreth most recently served as City Administrator for the City of Oakland, in which she led the day-to-day operations of the eighth largest city in California, comprising 25 departments, 5,000 employees with a $1.7 billion budget. Under her leadership, Oakland achieved its highest bond rating in the City’s history, implemented its largest infrastructure bond ($600 million), and developed a Capital Improvement Program that incorporates community input around racial equity goals – a program that has become a model for local governments around the country.
Previous executive positions held by Ms. Landreth include Emeryville City Manager, the City of Oakland Budget Director, Legislative Analyst and Deputy City Administrator. Ms. Landreth has experience working in the California State Assembly and in various state agencies. She brings
109 deep relationships throughout both Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, as well as in Sacramento, along with her extensive experience advancing state and local legislative initiatives.
If the Employment Agreement is approved, Ms. Landreth will begin serving as the new General Manger on March 15, 2021. The agreement is for an initial three-year term beginning March 2021 and ending in March 2024. Given Ms. Landreth’s extensive management and leadership experience, her salary would be at Step F of Management Pay Range MG11 for an annual salary of $335,670.36. Ms. Landreth will be covered by the District’s CalPERS plan during her employment as a “New Member” under “PEPRA” and entitled to the “miscellaneous” 2.0% at 62 retirement formula. Landreth will make the same percentage contributions to her pension as required for other New Member PEPRA management employees, currently 50% of the normal cost of the 2.0% at 62 retirement formula.
ALTERNATIVES
There are no alternatives recommended.
110 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO.: 2021 - 03 -
March 2, 2021
APPOINTMENT OF SABRINA B. LANDRETH AS THE GENERAL MANAGER OF THE EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT AND APPROVAL OF AN EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT: EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATIVE DIVISION
WHEREAS, after 47 years in service to the East Bay Regional Park District, Robert E. Doyle retired as General Manager effective December 31, 2020; and
WHEREAS, following a nationwide recruitment, the Board of Directors identified Sabrina B. Landreth as the top candidate to serve as General Manager; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Landreth has extensive executive management experience, most recently serving as the City of Oakland’s longest-tenured City Administrator; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors now desires to appoint Sabrina B. Landreth as General Manager of the East Bay Regional Park District and to establish the terms and conditions for such employment by approving the attached Employment Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Landreth desires to be appointed and serve as General Manager of the East Bay Regional Park District.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District hereby appoints Sabrina B. Landreth to the position of General Manager to serve at the direction and pleasure of the Board of Directors effective March 15, 2021; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Employment Agreement between the East Bay Regional Park District and Sabrina B. Landreth attached hereto as Exhibit “A” is hereby approved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Board of Directors hereby authorizes the President of the Board to execute the Employment Agreement on behalf of the East Bay Regional Park District.
Moved by Director , seconded by Director , and approved this 2nd day of March, 2021, by the following vote:
FOR:
AGAINST: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:
111 Page Left Blank Intentionally
112 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made by and between SABRINA B. LANDRETH (hereinafter, "Landreth"), an individual, and the EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT (hereinafter, the "District"), a California special district.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the District desires to employ Landreth as General Manager of the District according to the terms set forth in this Employment Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Landreth agrees to serve as the General Manager of the District in accordance with the terms of this Employment Agreement; and
WHEREAS, both the District and Landreth wish to set forth in writing the terms and conditions of Landreth’s employment as General Manager for the District; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the District and Landreth agree as follows:
TERM AND PERFORMANCE OF DUTIES
1. EMPLOYMENT
The District hereby agrees to employ Landreth as an at will employee in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth below, and Landreth accepts the offer of such at will employment. During the term of the Agreement, the District will pay Landreth the compensation provided for in this Agreement.
2. TERM
This Agreement shall commence on March 15, 2021 and expire on March 14, 2024, subject to earlier termination as set forth in Sections 15-16 in this Agreement.
3. POSITION AND DUTIES
The General Manager shall serve as General Manager of the District. In that capacity she shall be accountable to the Board and shall assume overall responsibility for the management of the operations of the District, subject, however, to all applicable laws, rules and regulations and to the policies and directions heretofore and from time to time established by the Board. The General Manager shall exercise exclusive and direct administrative and functional authority over all employees and contractors of the District with the exception of any employee(s) the Board of Directors shall specify in a Board approved Resolution, and provided that the Chief Financial Officer and the Clerk of the Board shall be directly responsible to the General Manager, but may not be hired, retained, or discharged except with the consent of the Board.
113 Employment Agreement East Bay Regional Park District and Sabrina B. Landreth Page 2
The General Manager shall, while employed by the District, not accept other employment or perform other services for compensation without first having obtained permission from the Board, which the Board may withhold in its sole discretion. The employment of the General Manager shall be, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement or any future written amendments to it, in accordance with the policies, rules, and regulations of the District established for the District’s senior level management personnel as such policies, rules, and regulations presently exist or may be changed or modified by the Board from time to time in the future.
The District acknowledges a mutual interest with Landreth in having Landreth, on occasion, undertake limited outside activities, including serving as an officer or a board member of park/park district or municipal government organizations, or other related activities, provided that such activities do not distract Landreth from the performance of her duties as General Manager for the East Bay Regional Park District, or otherwise create negative impacts for the District.
The General Manager and Board acknowledge and agree that it is essential, in view of the important public policies and duties undertaken by the District, that the effective relationship between the Board and the General Manager be continued throughout the term of this Agreement, and the General Manager and Board shall work diligently toward that end.
4. HOURS OF WORK
Landreth shall be an exempt employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Landreth is expected to devote necessary time outside normal office hours to the business of the District. Landreth’s schedule of work each day and week may vary in response to the requirements of the work to be performed. Landreth is expected to spend sufficient hours at the District’s Administrative Offices to perform her duties.
SALARY
5. SALARY
Effective March 15, 2021, Landreth as General Manager shall receive a base gross salary of $27,972.53 per month or $335,670.36 annually. Salary is to be paid bi-weekly. Any future adjustments to salary shall be negotiable and based in part on periodic performance evaluations conducted by the Board as described in Section 6, though at all times in the discretion of the Board. Any other cost of living, merit and/or other salary adjustments provided to Landreth may be made in the discretion of the Board.
114 Employment Agreement East Bay Regional Park District and Sabrina B. Landreth Page 3
EVALUATIONS
6. EVALUATIONS
Performance evaluations are an important way for the Board and the General Manager to ensure effective communications about expectations and performance. To assure that the General Manager receives this feedback, the Board shall conduct an evaluation of the General Manager at least once a year. For purposes of providing additional input and feedback, evaluations may occur more frequently. When deemed desirable, the parties may use an outside facilitator paid for by the District to assist them in conducting an evaluation. If the Board, in consultation with the General Manager, develops a General Manager Evaluation Policy, that policy may further inform the process and criteria for a performance evaluation.
In the first two months of employment, Landreth and the Board shall jointly establish objective, verifiable measures of her performance to be completed during her first year of employment. The Board shall provide Landreth with a performance evaluation in approximately September 2021 and an annual performance evaluation in approximately March 2022. The Board will provide further performance evaluation on or about September 2022 and annually on or about September thereafter. For each subsequent evaluation period after the first year of this Agreement, Landreth and the Board shall endeavor to establish prospective objective, verifiable measures of performance for the ensuing year. Landreth shall not have any right to a compensation increase due to a particular rating on a performance evaluation. Rather, any decision to increase salary, provide a lump sum payment based on performance or enhance any other element of compensation during the term of this Agreement, or the timing of any such increase or enhancement, shall be in the discretion of the Board.
RETIREMENT, HEALTH & OTHER BENEFITS
7. RETIREMENT
Landreth will be covered by the District’s CalPERS plan during her employment as a “New Member” under “PEPRA” and entitled to the “miscellaneous” 2.0% at 62 retirement formula. Landreth will make the same percentage contributions to her pension as required for other New Member PEPRA management employees, currently 50% of the normal cost of the 2.0% at 62 retirement formula as defined by PEPRA and CalPERS and determined annually by CalPERS, which contributions shall be made in accordance with Section 414(h)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code.
8. HEALTH AND OTHER “FRINGE BENEFITS”
Landreth shall receive the same health, dental, life insurance, and disability benefits, as afforded other District management employees, excluding benefits specific
115 Employment Agreement East Bay Regional Park District and Sabrina B. Landreth Page 4
to public safety managers, if any, at the same levels and under the same conditions they are provided to other District management employees. Landreth shall be eligible for the retiree health benefits described in the District’s Personnel Administrative Manual for an employee in the General Manager classification hired or promoted to be a management employee at the District on or after January 1, 2012.
The District shall pay such other mandatory employer costs associated with Landreth’s employment including unemployment compensation, Workers' Compensation and Medicare contributions.
9. DEFERRED COMPENSATION
Landreth shall be eligible to participate in the District’s deferred compensation plan and receive the benefit of any District contributions (if any) to the deferred compensation plan to the same extent as the most generous rights of any other District management employees so long as consistent with PEPRA and the Internal Revenue Code.
10. HOLIDAYS AND OTHER LEAVES
Except as provided in Section 11 below, Landreth shall receive the same paid holidays, and other leaves as other District management employees.
11. ADMINISTRATIVE, VACATION AND SICK LEAVE
Landreth shall be provided a lump sum of eighty (80) hours of Administrative Leave upon commencing employment under this Agreement which shall be used or cashed out by the end of the 2021 calendar year but shall not be carried over into the 2022 calendar year. Landreth shall receive an additional eighty (80) hours of Administrative Leave in both January 2022 and in January 2023, which Administrative leave may not be carried over into a subsequent calendar year and may not be cashed out.
Landreth shall be provided ninety-six (96) hours of Vacation Leave upon commencing employment under this Agreement. In addition, Landreth shall accrue vacation on a bi-weekly basis at a rate equivalent to one hundred sixty-eight (168) hours per year, and thereafter be entitled to an annual accrual rate of eight (8) hours higher after each continuous year of District service. Annual carry-overs of vacation and cash- out shall be as provided in the District’s Personnel Administrative Manual for other District management employees.
Landreth shall be provided ninety-six (96) hours of Sick Leave upon commencing employment under this Agreement. In addition, Landreth shall accrue Sick Leave on a bi-weekly basis as set forth in the Personnel Administrative Manual for other District management employees.
116 Employment Agreement East Bay Regional Park District and Sabrina B. Landreth Page 5
12. AUTOMOBILE
During the term of her employment, Landreth shall be provided the use of a District vehicle. The terms of use of the vehicle shall be subject to the District’s vehicles policy as set forth in the Personnel Administrative Manual and other applicable documents.
13. PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS
Unless provided otherwise in the District’s adopted budget, the District shall pay Landreth’s membership dues in traditional organizations of benefit to General Manager and the District, including but not limited to the International City Managers’ Association (“ICMA”), and/or with such organizations and associations, that enhance both Landreth’s standing and the District’s reputation.
The District will pay for registration, travel, accommodations, meals, etc. for attendance at conferences deemed reasonably necessary by the General Manager subject to the Department’s budget and consistent with the District’s reimbursement policies and policies for out of state travel.
SEPARATION FROM EMPLOYMENT
14. AT WILL EMPLOYMENT
Landreth shall continue to be an at will employee, which employment the District may, in its sole discretion, terminate her employment at any time, with or without cause, with or without notice, and without any rights to process or appeal, except to the extent specifically set forth in this Agreement.
15. RESIGNATION/RETIREMENT/DEATH
Landreth agrees to make her best efforts to provide the District with at least ninety (90) days written notice of the effective date of Landreth’s resignation or retirement. Landreth and her assigns shall not be entitled to any severance payments, other than those required by law or District policy (for example, cash out of accrued vacation) if she resigns or retires or dies during the term of this Agreement.
16. TERMINATION
The District, through a majority vote of its Board of Directors, may terminate this Agreement prior to the expiration of the term of this Agreement at its sole and absolute discretion, with or without cause. The term "cause" is defined below for the purposes of this Agreement.
If the District terminates this Agreement without "cause " effective prior to March 14, 2024, the District will provide Landreth with a lump sum severance amount equal to Landreth’s monthly base salary at the time of payment multiplied by the lesser of either:
117 Employment Agreement East Bay Regional Park District and Sabrina B. Landreth Page 6
(a) twelve (12) months; or
(b) the number of months, including partial months, remaining before this Agreement expires.
Landreth shall only be eligible for severance under this Section and Agreement if she signs and delivers to the Board of Directors a general and full release of all claims (consistent with applicable state and federal laws) against the District, including without limitation its current and former elected officials, officers, agents and employees, in a form satisfactory to the Board of Directors.
In exchange for the payment of severance, Landreth also agrees to cooperate with the District in the transition of her duties to a new or interim General manager.
In the event Landreth is terminated for (1) continued abuse of drugs or alcohol which materially affects the performance of her duties; (2) repeated and protracted unexcused absences from the General Manager’s office; (3) conviction of or pleading nolo contendere to a felony or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude; (4) theft of District property or improper use of District funds; (5) willful misconduct or malfeasance; (6) dishonesty; (7) behavior during or outside of employment that causes discredit to the District; (8) acceptance of employment from another source which is inconsistent with full time employment as the District’s General Manager and in violation of Section 3 of this Agreement; (9) inability due to a health condition to perform the essential functions of the General Manager position; or (10) any material breach of this Agreement, the District shall have no obligation to continue the employment of Landreth or to pay any severance under this Agreement. Any one or more of the above enumerated items constitutes "cause" for purposes of this Agreement.
For the purpose of this Section and Agreement only, “inability due to a health condition to perform the essential functions of the General Manager position” means the written opinion of a licensed doctor appointed by the Board concluding that the General Manager more likely than not could not and will not be able to perform the essential functions of the General Manager position with or without reasonable accommodation, by reason of physical or mental disability, for a total period of six (6) or more months.
The status of General Manager during any period of disability prior to termination, shall be that of unpaid leave of absence, providing that nothing in this Section shall impair or limit the General Manager’s right to receive her full sick leave benefits under applicable District rules.
In accordance with Government Code sections 53243, 53242.1 and 53242.2, if Landreth is placed on paid leave pending an investigation, or the District pays for Landreth’s legal criminal defense, or if severance is paid Landreth due to termination of this contract, Landreth will fully reimburse the District for such costs and payments if she
118 Employment Agreement East Bay Regional Park District and Sabrina B. Landreth Page 7
is subsequently convicted of or pleads no contest to a crime involving the abuse of her office or position. For the purpose of this paragraph, “abuse of office or position” shall be as defined in Government Code section 53243.4.
17. INDEMNIFICATION
District shall defend and indemnify the General Manager and pay any costs, legal fees, and judgments assessed against the General Manager arising out of an act or omission occurring in the course and scope of the General Manager’s performance of her duties under this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing however, the District shall not be required to defend or indemnify the General Manager for claims, actions, damages, fees or actions when the defense or indemnity is prohibited, restricted or limited by law, including without limitation California Government Code sections 825 and 996.2 through 995.8.
18. EXPIRATION OF AGREEMENT
Per Section 2 of this Agreement, the expiration date of this Agreement shall be March 14, 2024, unless the District and Landreth enter into a written agreement to extend the term of this Agreement. Landreth shall not be entitled to any severance payments, other than those required by law or District policy (e.g., cash out of accrued vacation) if this Agreement is not extended and she works until the expiration of this Agreement. The District agrees to make its best efforts to provide Landreth with at least thirty (30) days’ notice of its intent not to extend the term of this Agreement.
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
19. LAW GOVERNING AGREEMENT
This Agreement will be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
20. REIMBURSEMENT
Landreth is entitled to reimbursement for all sums necessarily and reasonably incurred and paid by her in the performance of her duties so long as Landreth submits requests for reimbursement in the same form and manner as is required by the District and by custom and practice for other District Management employees.
21. SEVERABILITY
In the event that any term of this Agreement is finally held or determined to be illegal or void by a court having jurisdiction over the District and Landreth, the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless the term or terms held to be illegal or void are wholly inseparable from the remaining portions of the Agreement.
119 Employment Agreement East Bay Regional Park District and Sabrina B. Landreth Page 8
22. PARITY IN CONSTRUING AGREEMENT
Both the District and Landreth have had the opportunity to participate in the drafting of this Agreement. Consequently, terms, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement shall not be construed against one party and in favor of the other based upon who actually drafted the Agreement.
23. INTEGRATION CLAUSE
The District and Landreth acknowledge that this Agreement constitutes the sole and entire agreement of the parties in this matter, and supersede any prior agreements, and that any modifications may be made only in a writing signed by both the District and Landreth and approved by the Board of Directors. The District and Landreth agree that there are no representations, agreements, arrangements or understandings, whether written or oral, between the parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement which are not fully set forth in this Agreement.
24. NOTICES
All notices, requests, demands, consents, and other communications hereunder shall be transmitted in writing and shall be deemed to have been given at the time of delivery if given in person or within twenty-four (24) hours after being sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested and addressed to the District at its principal administrative office, to the attention of its Board President with a copy to the Clerk of the Board, and to the General Manager at the latest address in the District’s employment records or at any other address which a party shall give notice of pursuant to this Section.
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT SABRINA B. LANDRETH
______Dee Rosario, President Board of Directors
DATE: ______DATE: ______
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______Carol R. Victor, District Counsel
120 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
D. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD
2. EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATIVE DIVISION
b. 2020 Year In Review (Victor)
Interim General Manager Carol Victor will present the District’s 2020 Year in Review.
121 BOARD AND STAFF REPORTS AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
D. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD
3. BOARD AND STAFF REPORTS
a. Actions Taken by Other Jurisdictions Affecting the Park District (Victor)
Board of Directors of the Chabot Space and Science Center Joint Powers Agency – Resolution of Dissolution
On January 21, 2021, the Board of Directors of the Chabot Space and Science Center Joint Powers Agency (Chabot JPA) adopted a resolution declaring its intent to dissolve the Chabot JPA. The approved Notice of Intent was delivered to its members, the East Bay Regional Park District, Chabot Space and Science Center Foundation, City of Oakland, Oakland Unified School District, and Eastbay Astronomical Society. The public meeting is scheduled for April 22, 2021, when the Chabot JPA Board of Directors will discuss and adopt a Resolution of Dissolution of the Chabot JPA. The Chabot JPA was formed on May 26, 1989.
East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy – 2020 Updated Mitigation Fee Schedule
On February 22, 2021, the Board of the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy (Conservancy) adopted the 2017 East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan (HCP/NCCP) Mitigation Fee Audit and Nexus Study (Study). The HCP/NCCP requires periodic audits to assess changes to implementation costs over time and allows the Conservancy to adjust mitigation fees to address implementation needs. The mitigation fees collected by the Conservancy are used to acquire and manage preserve lands. The 2017 Study also includes a Post-Permit Funding Strategy to fund preserve management and monitoring following the 30-year term of the HCP/NCCP. The Park District’s long-term management funds will be held and administered by the Regional Parks Foundation and will be used to fund management of all HCP/NCCP preserve lands in perpetuity.
122 GM COMMENTS AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
D. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD
4. GENERAL MANAGER’S COMMENTS
STAFF PRESENTATION Chief of Government and Legislative Affairs Erich Pfuehler and Legislative and Policy Management Analyst Lisa Baldinger will provide an overview of a Beacon Economics study focused on the economic and employment creation impacts of numerous current or upcoming projects throughout the Park District.
GM COMMENTS PUBLIC SAFETY From December 21, 2020 – to January 20, 2021 the Public Safety Division handled 839 service calls and 1,757 total incidents. Highlights are included below.
Police There were 25 arrests made throughout the District for a variety of felony and misdemeanor offenses, including DUI, weapons possession, drug possession, violation of court restraining orders, disorderly conduct, and public intoxication. Officers handled 132 field interviews (contacts without citations or arrests) and issued 651 citations (483 for parking.)
• Alameda Creek Trail: On January 4, an officer took a report of a dangerous animal. The leashed dog escaped from its owner and attempted to attack another park user’s dog. No injuries were reported.
• Anthony Chabot: On December 31, an officer took a report of grand theft of a catalytic converter; suspect information was provided from witnesses in the area.
• Black Diamond Mines: On December 22, an officer responded to the report of a park user in need of a welfare check. The subject was located and taken to the hospital where they were identified as a missing person.
• Black Diamond Mines: On January 12, an officer, sergeant, and Eagle 7, responded to a report of an illegal discharge of a firearm. One Juvenile suspect was located and released to their parents; the other subject fled the scene with the weapon. The case has been referred to detectives for investigation.
123 • Don Castro: On January 20, officers responded to a report of gunfire; suspects were firing from the parking lot into the lake.
• Hayward Shoreline: On December 31, an officer arrested a subject for possession of a controlled substance and a probation violation.
• McLaughlin Eastshore State Park: On December 25, an officer and sergeant contacted a subject for a park curfew violation. A citation and promise to appear in court for failing to register as a sex offender were issued.
• McLaughlin Eastshore State Park: On December 25, a sergeant arrested a subject for multiple violations including being a felon in possession of a firearm in addition to multiple weapons offenses. The subject was transported to jail without incident.
• Point Pinole Regional Shoreline: On January 5, an officer took a report of a stolen vehicle. The victim’s vehicle was stolen from the parking lot; no suspects were located.
• Redwood: On January 5, 2021 an officer took a report of grand theft of a catalytic converter.
• Redwood: On January 14, officers and a sergeant responded to the report of illegal discharge of a firearm. Several spent shell casings were located and collected, but no suspects were located in the area.
• Wildcat Canyon: On December 21, an officer took a report of grand theft of a catalytic converter.
Fire Operations-Medical • Castle Rock: On December 20, District Fire personnel and Contra Costa Fire responded to a report of a person in respiratory distress; the patient was transported to John Muir Hospital.
• Diablo Foothills: On December 24, District Fire personnel, Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, and CHP H-32 helicopter responded to a medical incident at Diablo Foothills for a hip injury. The patient was transported via helicopter to John Muir Medical Center.
• Tilden: On January 1, District Fire personnel, along with Berkeley Fire and Moraga-Orinda Fire, responded to a report of a bicycle accident; the patient was transported to Alta Bates Hospital.
• Tilden: On January 1, District Firefighters responded to a reported bicycle accident at the intersection of Wildcat Canyon Road and South Park Drive. The patient was treated and transported to Summit Medical Center.
124 Staffing • On January 18-19, Fire Station 1 was staffed for extended hours due to high winds which increased the danger of downed trees and falling limbs.
Fuels Management • Redwood Park: On January 21, District Fire personnel and the Fuels Crew participated in pile burning. This project was funded by the Coastal Conservancy, with 124 piles prepared. This process will continue as weather and air quality permits.
• District Fuels Crew personnel began thinning and pruning trees at Tilden Park in recommended treatment area (RTA) TI011 to reduce fuel load and create burn piles. This project is funded by the Coastal Conservancy.
• District Fuels Crew personnel began thinning and pruning trees and removing French Broom at Wildcat Canyon in recommended treatment area (RTA) WC005.
Lifeguard Services • Lifeguard Services coordinated COVID vaccinations for the Fire Department and Public Safety.
• Lifeguard Services conducted returning Lifeguard II/III interviews.
• Lifeguard Services continues to assist in distribution of PPE for the entire District through the Logistics Section.
• Lifeguard Service continues with COVID-19 building site visits throughout the District.
125 BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
D. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD
5. BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS
a. Board Executive Committee (02/04/2021) (Rosario)
Participants (Via Video Conference):
Board: Committee Chair Dee Rosario, Ellen Corbett, Colin Coffey
Staff: Carol Victor, Carol Johnson, Becky Pheng, Juliana Schirmer, Jim O’Connor, Matthew James, Rachel Arbios, Erich Pfuehler
Public: Members of the public were able to access the meeting via live video stream.
The February 4, 2021 Joint Board Executive Committee and Regional Parks Foundation (“RPF”) meeting was held via video conference pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive Order No. N-29-20. Committee Chair Dee Rosario called the meeting to order at 12:30 p.m.
1. Roll Call
Becky Pheng, Recording Secretary, conducted a roll call of Board Executive Committee members and staff.
2. Regional Parks Foundation Annual Report for 2020
Carol Johnson, Assistant General Manager for Public Affairs, and Jeff Brown, RPF Board President, presented this agenda item. Ms. Johnson gave an overview of the role of the RPF in supporting the Park District. Mr. Brown presented a PowerPoint highlighting the RPF’s initiatives and projects in 2020. As of December 31, 2020, the RPF raised approximately $5,016,000 (includes $3.1M from East Contra Costa Habitat Conservancy for endowment). Despite the COVID-19 Pandemic, the RPF’s annual fundraising (Campership and the Year-End fundraiser) netted the same or slightly higher results over the previous year. Membership was down 16% from 2019. In 2019, the RPF formed the Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Committee to look at equity and inclusion programs and diversity initiatives. Ms. Johnson talked about the various partners and groups the RPF has worked with in the past year. The RPF continues to provide grants in support of the lifeguard services, community outreach initiatives, and Interpretive & Recreation programs. The RPF priorities for 2021 include:
126 • Continued messaging and community engagements, with potential virtual events; • Refresh general brochure; • Launch current internal analysis phase of the capital campaign which was delayed due to COVID-19; • Draft agreement with Botanic Garden which was delayed due to COVID-19.
Chair Rosario inquired about the definition of “underserved communities.” Mr. Brown responded that this includes ethnic/minority groups and factors such as age. Ms. Johnson added that it is income based and includes communities with which the Park District is interested in engaging. Juliana Schirmer, RPF Chief Administrative Officer, talked about the process in which the RPF engages with Park District staff to fund programs and how specific communities are targeted. The RPF is continuing to work on improving data collection. Chair Rosario noted that he could not find a definition of “underserved communities” in any official Park District document. The Committee and staff discussed the importance of user data collection to track Park District’s programs and services. Jim O’Connor, Assistant General Manager for Operations, talked about the Park District’s outreach efforts with various communities and groups to educate them about Park District programs and facilities. Peter Liu, RPF Board member, noted that equity and diversity is important, and data collection should be measured over a long period of time not year-by-year. Director Corbett asked if the Park District has a mapping system to show equity disparity in the communities the Park District serves. Interim General Manager Carol Victor highlighted the Park District’s upcoming diversity, equity, and inclusion program. It is important to find out which groups and communities are not served by the Park District. Chair Rosario inquired about where we obtain economic data to determine “low income”. Ms. Schirmer responded that this comes from the census and various websites. The Committee thanked the RPF for all their work and support of the Park District. Ms. Schirmer thanked the Park District and RPF Board for their support.
Recommendation: None. This was an informational item.
3. Open Forum for Public Comments
None.
4. Board Comments
None.
5. General Manager Comments
None.
There being no further business, Committee Chair Rosario declared the meeting adjourned at 1:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
127 /s/ Becky K. Pheng
Becky K. Pheng Legal Assistant
128 Page Left Blank Intentionally
129 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
D. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD
5. BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS
b. Board Executive Committee (12/03/2020) (Corbett)
Participants (Via Video Conference):
Board: Committee Chair Ellen Corbett, Dee Rosario, Ayn Wieskamp
Staff: Robert Doyle, Dr. Ana Alvarez, Becky Pheng, Ren Bates, Lisa Goorjian, Katherine Dudney, Toby Perry, Erich Pfuehler, Jeff Rasmussen, Lane Brede, Brian Holt, Kristina Kelchner, Carol Victor, Anthony Ciaburro, Matt Graul, Rachel Arbios, Matthew James
Public: Members of the public were able to access the meeting via live video stream.
The December 3, 2020 Board Executive Committee meeting was held via video conference pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive Order No. N-29-20. Committee Chair Ellen Corbett called the meeting to order at 12:32 p.m.
1. Roll Call
Becky Pheng, Recording Secretary, conducted a roll call of Board Executive Committee members and staff.
2. Roberts Regional Recreation Area Pool Renovation Update
Kristina Kelchner, AGM for Acquisition, Stewardship & Development, introduced this agenda item. Roberts Regional Recreation pool was built in 1954 and is in need of renovation. General Manager Robert Doyle talked about the history of the park and the importance this renovation project. The pool serves an important urban area and demographic in the East Bay. Lisa Goorjian, Chief of Design & Construction, showed a conceptual design of the renovated pool, and talked about funding sources and construction costs (est. $8.3 million). The Committee discussed the possibility of enlisting the Regional Parks Foundation (RPF) to assist with fundraising efforts. Director Wieskamp agreed that staff should enlist the help of the RPF to help raise money for this project. Jeff Rasmussen, Assistant Chief Financial Officer, talked about grant funding opportunities and Measures AA and WW.
130 Chair Corbett inquired about the project timeline and whether solar panels can be used to heat the pool. Staff responded that the consultant will be looking into this. Director Rosario commented that this is an important project and requested historical pictures of the pool before construction. Ms. Kelchner provided an overview of the project timeline: • Winter 2020: bid advertisement • Spring 2021: award construction contract • Spring 2022: complete construction.
Ren Bates, Capital Programs Manager, spoke briefly about the Park District’s construction management firm and their role in this project. Director Wieskamp remarked that having a construction management firm to assist with large projects, such as Dumbarton Quarry Campground, is vital to help move large, complex projects along.
Recommendation: None. This was an informational item.
3. Park Advisory Committee (PAC) Goals for 2021
Erich Pfuehler, Chief of Government & Legislative Affairs, presented this agenda item. He thanked Sharon Clay and Yolande Barial Knight for assisting the PAC meetings especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mr. Pfuehler highlighted the PAC’s 2020 goals and subject area discussions: • Trails working group • Community relations plan • Public interest community engagement project • Concord Hills naming recommendation.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the PAC was not able to meet some of the 2020 goals. The unmet goals will be carried over to 2021. Rick Rickard, PAC Chair, commented that trail issues and trail user conflicts are important topics that the PAC will study. He thanked staff for their help in navigating PAC members and coordinating meetings during the COVID-19 pandemic. Director Rosario thanked Mr. Rickard for his work on the PAC. Chair Corbett asked staff to provide more information about the community relations plan. Staff responded that this is an annual plan that is presented by Carol Johnson, AGM for Public Affairs. General Manager Doyle thanked Mr. Rickard for his work and leadership.
Recommendation: Moved by Director Dee Rosario and seconded by Director Ayn Wieskamp, the Board Executive Committee voted 3-0 to forward the Park Advisory Committee goals for 2021 to the full Board for consideration.
4. Climate Initiative Update
Dr. Ana Alvarez, Deputy General Manager, introduced this agenda item. In 2018, the Board adopted Resolution No. 2018-04-081 Climate Policy Framework. Katherine Dudney, Management Analyst, presented a PowerPoint on this agenda item. Climate is central to the Park District’s mission, and is referenced in the Park District’s Master Plan, Board policies, and performance plan. This is a Park District-wide commitment and shared duty and responsibility
131 among the divisions. Ms. Dudney talked about the current work and efforts undertaken by staff. The Park District enlisted the help of an intern to help draft a climate report and gather data. Brian Holt, Chief of Planning, highlighted key climate-related projects including the SF Bay Trail Risk Assessment Plan, land acquisition, and habitat protection. Matt Graul, Chief of Stewardship, highlighted the Hayward Regional Shoreline Adaptation Master Plan, sea level rise, and fuels management. Ms. Dudney talked about the 2019 climate mini-grant program for frontline staff to fund a variety of projects. The program was designed to get staff engaged and explore innovative projects and ideas. A total of 20 projects, totaling $127,000, were funded in 2019. Examples include water bottle filing stations, small tool electric conversion, and three-tier waste stream bins. Dr. Alvarez talked about nature-based solutions, and legislative activity and future funding. Chair Corbett expressed her strong interest in climate change and thanked staff for bringing this topic forward. Director Rosario thanked staff for this project and requested that this presentation be shared with staff. Director Wieskamp liked the concept of having mini- grants for staff projects, and expressed concerns about the N-3 Ranch property in Livermore and its impact on the lake and parklands.
Recommendation: None. This was an informational item.
5. Open Forum for Public Comments
None.
6. Board Comments
Director Rosario thanked staff for today’s presentation and requested a review of the Board Operating Guidelines in 2021.
Director Wieskamp noted that this was her last Board Executive Committee and looked forward to 2021.
Chair Corbett spoke about her time as Chair of the Board Executive Committee and thanked her fellow Committee members and staff for all their work during this challenging year. She expressed interest in a Board ad hoc committee to review and analyze the Board Operating Guidelines and to look at making meetings more efficient.
7. General Manager Comments
None.
There being no further business, Committee Chair Corbett declared the meeting adjourned at 3:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Becky K. Pheng
132 Becky K. Pheng Legal Assistant
133 NEWSCLIPS Park It: Fremont, Berkeley-area open spaces partially reopening Ardenwood, Tilden locations allowing visitors at limited capacity on reservation-only basis By NED MACKAY | East Bay Regional Park District PUBLISHED: February 21, 2021 at 5:00 a.m. | UPDATED: February 22, 2021 at 5:42 a.m
A wild turkey flies over a fence Nov. 10 as it follows its flock roaming around the Little Farm at Tilden Regional Park near Berkeley. The Little Farm, along with Tilden’s Regional Parks Botanic Garden and Fremont’s Ardenwood Historic Farm are three East Bay Regional Park District locations reopening from pandemic closures with limited capacity on a reservation-only basis. The East Bay Regional Park District is beginning to reopen some of its facilities as progress continues on controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. The latest reopenings are at Ardenwood Historic Farm in Fremont and, at Tilden Regional Park near Berkeley, the Little Farm and Regional Parks Botanic Garden.
All three are reopening with limited capacity on a reservation-only basis. To make reservations, visit bayareane.ws/3pAmg3n online for links to make reservations at each of the facilities.
Tilden’s Environmental Education Center next-door to the Little Farm remains closed for now, as do all the district’s other visitor centers. Earlier the district reopened the family campgrounds at Anthony Chabot Regional Park near Castro Valley and Del Valle Regional Park south of Livermore, both at 50% capacity. There’s also limited backpack camping available at Sunol and Ohlone Regional Wilderness in southern Alameda County. For all of these, you need to make advance reservations on the park district’s webpage at ebparks.org/activities/camping or by calling 888-327-2757.
Meanwhile, all the pandemic-related precautions are still in place. Park visitors should keep 6 feet of social distance and carry masks to wear when maintaining distance isn’t possible on narrow trails or at trail gates. Some toilets are open, but group picnic areas are generally closed. Bring your own drinking water, as most fountains remain shut off.
‘Pup Pro’ campaign: In other news, the district has launched a “Pup Pro” campaign designed to encourage park visitors to cooperate with dog-related rules in the parklands. You’ll see signs at
134 park entrances. Among other things, people are asked to pick up their dog’s waste and deposit it in trashcans and place their dogs on leash when cattle are near. Generally the park district’s dog rules are not onerous. Dogs can be off-leash in the backcountry, except where otherwise posted, as long as they are under their owners’ control. This means the dog will come when called. Dogs are supposed to be placed on leashes when livestock are near. Especially if your dog starts harassing wildlife and grazing cattle or has uninvited interactions with other park visitors, Fido has to be put on a leash.
Antioch: The park district is planning and developing a new regional park at the former Roddy Ranch golf course in Antioch. A public meeting is planned from 6:30 to 7:30 p.m. March 11, at which you can learn about planning for habitat restoration, recreation opportunities and public access.
There will also be a discussion of the property’s present condition, the project timeline and other ways in which the public can become involved. The meeting will be held online via Zoom. To register, contact Eddie Willis, the project planner, at [email protected]. For more information and to view a post-meeting recording, visit the project website, ebparks.org/about/planning/roddyranch.
Rancher and rodeo legend Jack Roddy had owned the property as part of his extensive ranch near Brentwood since the mid-1970s. He opened the 230-acre golf course in 2001 and operated it for the next 15 years. In partnership with the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy, the park district purchased Roddy’s property, including the golf course, in various transactions from 2014 to 2018. The former golf course is expected to be the first part of the future Deer Valley Regional Park to open to the public.
135
Hunt is on for coyote that attacked toddler in the East Bay Traps placed after toddler is bitten By PETER HEGARTY | PUBLISHED: February 19, 2021 at 7:00 a.m. | UPDATED: February 20, 2021 at 3:06 a.m.
MORAGA — An elusive coyote that attacked a toddler and three other people remains on the loose, roaming a sleepy neighborhood, sniffing for food and making residents edgy.
Traps are now set to snare the canine.
It will be no easy task, said Patrick Foy of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife.
“The public tends to oversimplify the process,” Foy said. “Coyotes are very wary. They are just too smart.”
Called “padded gripping body traps,” the traps are similar to steel jawed traps, except they have a rubber lining to reduce injuries. Bait typically is meat, Foy said.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s wildlife services division laid the traps on private properties near where the attacks have occurred, including Campolindo Drive and Calle la Montana in Moraga, where the coyote bit a 3-year-old girl Tuesday morning. It was not disclosed how many were set or the exact locations.
The intention in putting them on private property is to reduce the chance of people tripping them.
When the coyote is captured, it faces a grim fate. “It will be euthanized,” Foy said. “I will not try and mince words on that.”
If a trap does not capture the coyote, it might be shot, if law enforcement can swiftly arrive after an attack and spot the animal, he said.
That’s what happened in April last year in Dublin Hills Regional Park, where a coyote that bit a 5- year-old girl was killed with a rifle shot after a joint investigation by Fish and Wildlife, the East Bay Regional Park District, Dublin police and the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
“Coyote attacks on people are quite rare — with an average of about 10 to 20 cases per year in the U.S. — especially given how close coyotes and people live to one another in urban and suburban environments,” said Lynsey White, a director at the Humane Society of the United States in Washington, D.C., who has written an academic study on coyote attacks on humans.
Most aggressive interactions between coyotes and people happen when the coyote is rabid, or it’s defending itself, a mate or pups, or because people are feeding the coyote, White said in an email.
136 In the attack around 8:30 a.m. Tuesday, the girl was walking alongside her mother, who was pushing a stroller, when the coyote came up from behind.
“I heard her scream, and I looked down and a coyote was biting her,” the mother told NBC Bay Area. “So I screamed and yelled. The coyote at that point let go. I kept screaming and yelling and jumping and waving a blanket I had in my hand.”
The bite punctured the child’s skin.
The coyote ran off, headed north on Calle La Montana, according to police.
The girl’s family took her to UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital Oakland for treatment.
DNA evidence collected from saliva near the toddler’s wound linked the animal to the three attacks that occurred last year in the area of Moraga and Lafayette, Foy said.
“It was a match,” he said about the test, which was carried out at his agency’s forensic laboratory in Sacramento. “We have one coyote for four human attacks.”
The first attack happened in July, when a 2-year-old boy was bitten at Moraga Commons Park. In December, the coyote bit a man who was exercising after dark at Campolindo High School. The same month the animal bit an employee of Diablo Foods in Lafayette as he was taking a work break outside, also in the dark.
“Although it’s impossible to determine the cause without all the necessary details and information, in cases like this, where one coyote bites multiple people on different occasions, we usually learn later that the coyote has been fed by people in the community, often intentionally,” White said. “Coyotes that are fed by people can lose their fear of humans and become aggressive towards others while looking for food handouts. This is why it is so important not to feed wildlife.”
Exactly how many coyotes are in Contra Costa County is unknown, Foy said. “But coyotes are one of the few wild species that are here and active, despite human encroachment,” he said.
Members of the dog family, coyotes are native to California and resemble a small German shepherd with the exception of a long narrow snout and a bushy, black-tipped tail, according to the website of the Mount Diablo Interpretive Association, a volunteer group that helps the California Department of Parks and Recreation maintain Mount Diablo State Park.
Coyotes are especially active during the early morning or at night, when they are known for a high- pitched, yodel-like yapping.
They feed on rabbits, mice, birds and other small animals. Spread throughout California, they also sometimes sneak into backyards and strike at people’s pets and chickens.
With a coyote on the hunt in the neighborhood, the staff at Lamorinda Montessori on Moraga Road is taking no chances.
“We have ramped up our security,” said Antiono Betts, its executive administrator.
137 Additional outdoor cameras were installed following the attacks last year, Betts said, and children now get extra supervision on the playground and are brought back inside before evening.
Employees of the preschool, which serves 65 children who range in age from 4 months to 5 years old, are also encouraged to stay in pairs if they are outside at night, such as in the parking lot, Betts said. “We are trying to keep everyone safe,” he said.
White said she hoped the effort to trap the aggressive coyote will not lead to a broader push to drive all coyotes from the neighborhood.
“Given that DNA analysis has shown that the three prior attacks were caused by the same coyote, any kind of coyote removal program that goes beyond targeting the individual causing the problem is neither appropriate nor would be effective for preventing future conflicts with coyotes,” she said.
138
Park District General Manager Robert Doyle Retires After 47-Year Career February 18, 2021 By NRPA After dedicating 47 years to East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) in Oakland, California — including 10 years as general manager — Robert Doyle has retired, leaving many legacies that will benefit the lives of East Bay residents. “Parks do their best when they have a great leader, and the East Bay has had incredible leadership with Bob Doyle,” says Former Director of National Park Service Jonathan Jarvis, who served under President Barack Obama. “Bob is not only a visionary, but someone who can deliver on that vision at the same time, a rare quality.” During his tenure with EBRPD, Doyle more than doubled the size of the park district in acreage, parks and trails. Several of his other significant accomplishments include garnering approval for three former military bases closed during the Clinton administration to be redeveloped into the future with publicly accessible regional parklands; fighting a 20-year battle for environmental justice along the Richmond, California, shoreline, including the Dotson Family Marsh that offers access along the bay adjacent to a predominantly Black community near Point Pinole; closing gaps incrementally along the San Francisco Bay Trail and creating the park district’s mostly contiguous Bay Trail along the 55 miles of East Bay urban shoreline; and increasing the park district’s connection with multicultural communities through innovative health initiatives, educational programming and a record 10-year sustainable revenue growth of the Regional Parks Foundation, the private fundraising nonprofit that improves regional park access for underserved communities and communities of color. “The landscape of the East Bay would be significantly different if it were not for Bob Doyle,” says former Park District General Manager Pat O’Brien. “Not only did he help create parks and preserve properties and areas for wildlife, but he inspired other people, who took up the mantle to advocate for open space, for legislative priorities within the district, and to procure public access.”
139 Doyle was a co-leader in California’s first successful statewide park bond effort in 15 years for Proposition 68, generating $4 billion in per capita funding for every park agency in California. UnderDoyle’s leadership, the park district saw more support from the public than ever before with 85 percent voter approval for 2018’s Measure FF to provide additional revenues for parks. He has successfully advocated and helped the park district receive more than $1 billion in new revenue to pay for sorely needed capital development at parks and acquisition of parklands across Alameda and Contra Costa counties. Doyle concluded his career at the Park District leading the agency through one of the most challenging times in its history: the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. “COVID-19 has shown just how essential parks are to the community’s physical and mental health,” says Doyle. “The district overcame tremendous challenges to keep parks open and safe for the public when they needed them most. Our existing partnerships with the county health departments have been very effective in showing that parks are essential for health, not just recreation. I am extremely proud of how district staff answered the call and came to the public’s aid during this time.”
140
Parks, Funding and the Communities That Make Them Possible February 18, 2021 By: Erich Pfuehler and Lisa Baldinger The East Bay Regional Park District in Oakland, California, has a long history of community engagement. Over the years, thanks to legislative action and voter support, the park district has grown from 115,000 acres to more than 125,000 acres, preserving significant acreage of natural habitat and serving more communities through park and trail access. The park district currently manages nearly 200 miles of regional trails, serves 2.8 million residents and welcomes more than 25 million visitors a year. Creating accessible parks and trails across biologically diverse lands and shorelines takes creativity and investment. The founding land survey, Proposed Park Reservations for East Bay Cities, highlighted that preserving land would be a minimal cost, but maintaining, operating and developing access to the land would require annual revenue. Revenue also would be needed to expand services, such as utilities, restrooms, picnic areas and other amenities. This insight, unique at the time, remains relevant today as the park district continues its expansion of new park areas while maintaining existing assets: all new and upgraded infrastructure need continued revenue and investment. Over the past 30 years, the park district has led four significant voter-approved tax measures. These measures seed acquisition, environmental education and infrastructure investments. This funding is used with local, state and federal grants, such as those established by California State Park Bonds and the Land and Water Conservation Fund. A review of recently completed projects found nearly 88 percent of the park district’s large infrastructure has been funded by sources other than the general fund. Examining the Economic and Social Impact Wetland enhancements, trail connections and other infrastructure projects now require multiple sources to fund in full. These projects no longer cost thousands of dollars, but often millions. Acknowledging the increasingly significant level of public investment, the park district wanted
141 to better understand the full community benefits of these large infrastructure projects. A recent economic study commissioned by the park district found that they not only support the community, but also directly support the local economy and jobs beyond park staff. The East Bay Regional Park District Improvement Projects Economic and Social Impact Analysis by Beacon Economics identified large infrastructure projects to have direct, indirect and induced benefits. Direct benefits are derived from immediate spending by the park district’s construction and future day-to-day operations of project sites. Indirect benefits stem from the spending contractors and supplemental services expend in support of completing a park district project. Induced benefits come from the spending by those households associated with externally contracted work on a park district project. It is how they spend their income in the community. The report also quantifies the number of jobs created by job years. A job year equals one year of employment for one individual. The analysis provided estimates for 93 upcoming green infrastructure projects. The one- time impact for these projects would be $214.4 million in economic output, 1,199 job years of employment, $107.1 million in labor income, and $25.4 million in tax revenue. Annually, the completed projects support $23.7 million in economic output, 131 job years, $13.4 million in labor income and $3.6 million in tax revenue. Investing in Our Future Community and elected official support help make bonds, grants and taxes possible to establish funding that supports the completion of projects. The funding approved by East Bay voters goes directly back into the local economy in the form of jobs, economic output and taxes. That, in turn, bolsters community support for the park district. It is a cycle of support, funding, project delivery and positive user experience that will bind the East Bay community with its regional park district for years to come. Erich Pfuehler is Chief of Government and Legislative Affairs for East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD). Lisa Baldinger is Legislative and Policy Management Analyst for EBRPD.
142
143
Park It: Ladybugs converge on Oakland hills’ Redwood Regional park Location probably easiest place in East Bay to see insects’ clusters this time of year By NED MACKAY | East Bay Regional Park District PUBLISHED: February 14, 2021 at 5:00 a.m. | UPDATED: February 15, 2021 at 3:12 a.m.
Ladybugs gather on a log Jan. 30 at Reinhardt Redwood Regional Park in the Oakland hills, where visitors can see thousands of ladybugs along the park’s Stream Trail. The insects cluster in trailside shrubs during cold winter weather, then disperse in the warmer springtime. Ladybugs, those cute little red insects, are now having their annual winter convention at Reinhardt Redwood Regional Park in Oakland, although at the moment there don’t seem to be as many of them as in years past. Known more formally as ladybird beetles, the ladybugs cluster in trailside shrubs during cold winter weather, then disperse in the warmer springtime. Ladybugs are considered beneficial insects because they prey on aphids, an agricultural pest species. Please don’t collect any ladybugs for your garden, though, as it’s illegal to remove any plants or animals from East Bay Regional Park District property. Ladybugs’ bright red color signals to potential predators that the bugs taste bad. However that doesn’t deter some kinds of birds. Frogs, wasps, spiders and dragonflies also dine on ladybugs. When threatened, ladybugs secrete an oily, foul-tasting fluid from joints in their legs.
Although ladybug clusters can be found in many of the regional parks this time of year, Redwood Regional is probably the easiest place to see them. Enter the park from Redwood Road in Oakland, park at the innermost lot at Canyon Meadows, then walk a mile-and-a-half up the Stream Trail, almost to its junction with the Prince Trail. There’s an information panel on the fence line with lots of ladybug lore.
By the way, dogs are supposed to be on leashes on the Stream Trail. Please also keep them out of the creek, as that’s a habitat for spawning rainbow trout. Also, bicycles are not permitted on the Stream Trail past Trail’s End, which is about a half-mile before you reach the ladybug viewing area.
I recommend a weekday visit. The park can be crowded on weekends. Incidentally, Aurelia Henry Reinhardt’s name was recently added to Redwood Regional Park by vote of the district board of
144 directors. She was one of the founding park district directors back in 1934 and also was president of Mills College in Oakland.
Camping: The East Bay Regional Park District has resumed accepting camping and backpacking reservations either online or by phone, with some limitations. Here’s a summary: The family campgrounds at Anthony Chabot near Castro Valley and Del Valle south of Livermore have reopened. Del Valle campground will have no water until mid-March. You have to bring your own drinking water and RVs must fill water tanks before arrival. Fires and barbecues will be allowed.
Limited backpack sites are open in Ohlone Wilderness and Sunol. Maggie’s Half Acre in Ohlone is closed. The backpack camp at Round Valley south of Brentwood remains closed due to fire-related issues. More detailed information is available at ebparks.org/activities/camping. To make reservations, call 888-327-2757 and select option 2.
Cattle: Visitors may encounter grazing cattle in many of the regional parks. Remember that when cows are present, district rules require that dogs must be securely leashed and under control. It’s dangerous for your pet and the cattle if your dog starts chasing or harassing livestock.
Cattle are generally not aggressive. However, cows are protective of their calves, so don’t attempt to touch a cow, and don’t get between a mom and her kid. If cattle are blocking the trail, approach them slowly, speak normally and give them a chance to move away. If you see a stray calf, leave it alone. Its mother is likely nearby. If you encounter a cow that is acting threatening or appears to be injured or dead, please note the color of the animal and ear tag number, then report it to the park staff.
For lots of information about dog rules in the regional parks, visit the park district’s website, ebparks.org, and wait for the “Pup Pro” program to appear at the top of the home page.
145
How COVID changed Bay Area parks Crowds, litter, lost revenue: Bob Doyle says it's been rough, but they've (mostly) figured it out By PAUL ROGERS | PUBLISHED: February 14, 2021 at 6:00 a.m. | UPDATED: February 16, 2021 at 11:02 a.m.
Bob Doyle, of Walnut Creek, is photographed at Briones Regional Park in Martinez, Calif., on Friday, Jan. 29, 2021. Doyle retired Dec. 31, 2020 from the East Bay Regional Park District after 47 years. He spent the last 10 years as the district’s general manager. There’s no question that running a business during the COVID pandemic has been hard.
But how about a 125,000-acre spread — four times as large as the city of San Francisco — with 25 million visitors a year? For the last 10 years, Bob Doyle worked as the general manager of the East Bay Regional Park District, America’s largest regional park system. He managed 73 parks in Alameda and Contra Costa counties, with 1,300 miles of trails and more than 800 employees.
A 47-year veteran of the agency who started off as a park ranger, Doyle thought he’d seen everything. But no park systems in the Bay Area, California or the nation were prepared for the worst pandemic in 100 years.
Widely respected as a national leader in his field, Doyle retired Dec. 31 after doubling the protected acres in the district. He says keeping parks open hasn’t been easy. All across the country, the pandemic has closed visitors centers, historic buildings and school field trips. It has sparked health concerns from parks employees — even as parks see record numbers of visitors as people cooped up are desperate to get outside, and other activities, like movie theaters, restaurants, pro sports and amusement parks have been closed.
This conversation has been condensed and edited for clarity and length.
Q: It seems like ever since the pandemic began, parks have been really crowded. Why? A: We’ve been the only game in town. Parks were already seeing a surge in popularity before the pandemic at the local, state and national level. But people realized that the governor and the health department said at first that about the only thing you could do is go to a park. And frankly, it was overwhelming. We weren’t prepared.
146 Q: This has been about mental health as much as physical health, right? A: Yes. We’re always talking about physical health, physical exercise. People jog, they ride a bike, all those things. But what the health departments were really concerned about in the first couple of months was an increase in domestic violence, and an increase in child abuse. They said that not every family’s doing great. So the counties declared us an essential service. They said we need to get relief for families who are trapped in a crowded house or don’t have the best marriage or best domestic situation, we need the parks to be open.
Q: What kind of increases has your district seen overall in the number of visitors? A: We are looking at 30-to-50% increase in general. But on the regional paved bicycle trails that go through the neighborhoods to connect all the parks, it’s much higher, more like 50 to 75%.
Q: What kinds of challenges did all those extra people in the parks create? A: One impact has been constantly trying to get people to pick up their litter. And trying to get them to pick up after their dogs. But the biggest issue was masking. As the nation started to argue more about masks and the Trump administration was not helpful at all, we started getting into rebellion where we were seeing both sides, just like in Washington D.C., with one side saying ‘Why aren’t you enforcing and arresting people for not wearing a mask?’ And the other side was saying ‘I don’t have to wear a mask. I’m healthy.’ Over time the masking has really gotten better. We spent $200,000 on paid advertisements and signage. We put 5,200 signs up in the parks. So we went completely pedal to the metal. We told people ‘Keep your friends and loved ones safe. You know, it’s not just about you. Even if you think you’re Superman, it’s about keeping other people safe.’
Q: Nice. It worked? A: I really feel good about that. I really am proud of what our our staff and agency has done. And it’s worked, but I really think the staff is exhausted. It’s cost us a lot of money, and we lost a lot of revenue. We’ve lost about $7 million in revenue.
Q: Why? A: No weddings. No fee charges for the usual rentals in big picnic areas. We didn’t have big birthdays or anniversaries, or any of the things where somebody rents a picnic area with 100 people. And camping. We didn’t have camping. We didn’t have boat rentals.
Q: How has it been dealing with the park employees? A: Top to bottom, all of the employees, they’ve been miracle workers. They have been incredible. But the biggest fear is fear itself. And at first people were really scared. Our staff said ‘How are you protecting us?’ In the beginning, we could not get masks. We could not get a supply line for all the things you need to keep people safe. The over-garment when you’re cleaning a restroom. The gloves. All those things were really hard to come by it. So we put together an emergency operations center and worked with the counties to help us get supplies. We got through that. But in the beginning, it was was fear.
Q: How would you say the park system is running now? A: It’s good. You know, I think now everybody’s hopeful about the vaccines. Park rangers are an essential service. They’re responding to medical calls, emergencies in parks, heart attacks, car
147 accidents. So we’ve been really arguing that we need to get them vaccinated and I think the district is making progress.
Q: And the visitor experience? Is it better now? A: Well, I think it’s good. What’s been hard is that we have a huge environmental education program with six visitor centers. And those have all been closed. But our naturalist staff started doing online interpretation. We had online campfires and camp outs and even, s’mores and environmental education with wildlife and history talks. There’s just a ton of them on our website. We’ve gotten lots of comments from families.
Q: In hindsight, what would you do differently? A: We had a lot of neighborhoods that were complaining about crowded parks. We had cities who tried to close parks. The Fremont police chief closed Mission Peak. When all of the park agencies and health departments got together on our weekly Zoom calls, it really made a difference. At first, each park agency was going its own way, based on the politics of their agency, their board of supervisors or cities. Planning really needs to be done at a regional level. That’s what’s happened. And so, we went through this gauntlet. But we got through it. And we’ve learned a lot. We’ve learned that we could do it. And how important parks are for people.
Bob Doyle Age: 68 Position: Retired general manager, East Bay Regional Park District / Parks consultant at Bob Doyle Parks Consulting Hometown: Concord Residence: Walnut Creek Education: BA, management and administration, St. Mary’s College Five facts about Bob Doyle • He was a co-founder of Save Mount Diablo in the early 1970s • He has a black belt in Aikido • As a student at Concord High School, he helped organize the school’s events for the first Earth Day in 1970 • He’s a gardener and birder who loves classic rock and roll, like Santana • His favorite park in the Bay Area is Morgan Territory Regional Preserve in Livermore
148
Investigation promised: Officials criticize Chevron response to oil spill by: Bay City News Posted: Feb 10, 2021 / 09:37 AM PST / Updated: Feb 10, 2021 / 08:29 PM PST
RICHMOND (BCN) – A petroleum product leak that spilled an estimated five gallons a minute Tuesday afternoon at the Chevron refinery long wharf in Richmond is drawing criticism from some elected officials and an environmental group.
Some 600 gallons went into the Bay between 2:40 p.m. and 4:30 p.m., when the leak was stopped, according to Contra Costa Supervisor John Gioia, who said “This is unacceptable!” in a post on social media.
The Chevron refinery said in a statement that refinery workers noticed a sheen on the water about 3 p.m., and that “Chevron immediately initiated its response protocol, began working to isolate and contain the release, and notified all applicable agencies.”
The incident was classified as Level 2 (Level 1 is the lowest) and Contra Costa Health Services issued an advisory shortly before 4 p.m. for Richmond, San Pablo and unincorporated North Richmond, warning those with sensitive respiratory conditions to stay indoors to avoid irritation of nose, throat and eyes.
Booms were placed to control the spread of the spill, but the East Bay Regional Park District had to close beaches as a safety measure and “petroleum washed ashore along South Richmond shoreline which will harm wildlife and marine life,” Gioia said.
The refinery said it is “fully cooperating with authorities,” including the U.S. Coast Guard and the
Office of Spill Prevention and Response of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Chevron’s initial response was “inadequate” and “oil quickly breached Chevron’s containment boom,” Oakland-based environmental watchdog group San Francisco Baykeeper said in a statement, releasing photos to back its contentions.
“Chevron’s oil pipeline leak today is bad news for the Bay — we’re unfortunately still learning how big the oil spill was and what the impacts are. The Bay Area’s five refineries have a long history of environmental violations, so they should be prepared for a situation like this,” Baykeeper executive director Sejal Choksi-Chugh said, calling the initial containment response “pathetic.”
149 “Baykeeper’s field investigator was one of the first to arrive on the scene, and he saw one small yellow boom deployed near the wharf, with lots of oil already spread beyond the boom into the Bay and onto nearby shorelines and beaches,” Choksi-Chugh said.
Gioia promised a full investigation would be conducted and said that Assemblywoman Buffy Wicks told him she “plans to introduce a bill to increase fines and penalties in order to provide more effective deterrence.”
150
Chevron Richmond Refinery Spill: As Crews Mop Up, Investigators Move In Ted Goldberg Feb 10 Frame grab from drone video shows oily sheen that spread across bay waters to Point Richmond after a pipeline began leaking at Chevron's Richmond refinery on Tuesday. Federal, state and local agencies are continuing to investigate a spill from a wharf at Chevron's Richmond refinery that spread for several miles across San Francisco Bay, prompted a health advisory for nearby residents and led to the closure of a local beach.
A California Department of Fish and Wildlife spokesman said late Wednesday that up to 750 gallons of low sulfur diesel fuel mixed with water was released from a pipeline on the Chevron Long Wharf on Tuesday. The wharf extends 4,000 feet into the bay from the refinery complex.
In a brief incident report, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District said refinery officials were alerted to a sheen on the water at 2:32 p.m. that afternoon by someone from the local community. The substance was spurting from a quarter-inch hole in the pipeline and continued leaking for as long as two and a half hours before the line was clamped shut.
Contra Costa County officials issued a temporary advisory, warning residents of Richmond, North Richmond and San Pablo who have "respiratory sensitivities" to stay indoors. Health authorities lifted the advisory at 9 p.m. Tuesday.
Helicopter and drone video showed the sheen from the spill spread more than a mile along the Point Richmond shoreline by nightfall Tuesday. By Wednesday morning, responding agencies said the sheen was visible in the water from Point Molate to Brooks Island, a distance of about four miles.
The spill prompted East Bay Regional Park District to close Keller Beach at Point Richmond's Miller-Knox Regional Shoreline. The beach remained closed Wednesday afternoon.
Chevron, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife's Office of Spill Prevention and Response, the U.S. Coast Guard and Contra Costa County health officials are working to contain the spill.
151 A CDFW spokesman, Eric Laughlin, said crews have not yet observed any oiled wildlife. Laughlin said crews were trying to prevent oil from reaching some of the area's more ecologically sensitive sites, including at least one that houses eelgrass beds.
In a text message Wednesday evening, Laughlin said lab analysis and technical review of the substance in the bay determined it was a mix of diesel and water, and between 500 and 750 gallons had spilled.
In public statements Tuesday, Chevron described the oily liquid as "hydrocarbons." In its preliminary report to the state's hazardous materials spill database, the company said a "mixture of recovered oil and gasoline" was leaking from a pipeline on the refinery wharf at a rate of 5 gallons a minute.
A later statement from the "unified command" of Chevron and government agencies said "the line in question is used to transport a variety of oil and products that are returned to the refinery for reprocessing."
"There was a failure," said Contra Costa County Supervisor John Gioia, whose district includes the refinery and surrounding neighborhoods, in an interview Wednesday. "It's extremely frustrating to see any spill into the bay. Understanding what caused this will be key to preventing this in the future."
Gioia said Chevron would most likely have to pay for the cleanup and Contra Costa County will require the company to perform a root cause analysis into the incident.
The county supervisor said the pipeline that ruptured was not under high pressure at the time it began leaking.
The diesel smelled bad. Though both the air district and county health authorities said ground- level monitors had picked up no elevated levels of air pollution, there were at least two public complaints about the spill's odor.
Gioia, who also sits on the board that oversees the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, said agency officials planned to brief members of the board about the spill next Wednesday.
The spill prompted Assemblymember Buffy Wicks, D-Oakland, to start working on a potential proposal to increase fines for certain refinery oil releases.
"It's infuriating. We cannot tolerate a single drop of oil in our bay," Wicks, who represents the area of the Chevron facility, said in an interview Wednesday afternoon.
After seeing the images of the spill, Wicks reached out to Gioia, other state legislators and state fish and wildlife officials. Those talks centered on ways lawmakers could deter future similar releases.
152 Wicks says a future proposal would build off of legislation signed by the governor last year, authored by Assemblymember Monique Limón, D-Santa Barbara, that increased fines for oil spills in state waters. She said it could be part of a series of proposed reforms focusing on energy and climate change coming from several state lawmakers.
"We need a holistic look at how the fossil fuel industry impacts our public health across the board. This is one piece of a larger conversation," Wicks said. "I'm ready for the fight."
153
'Unacceptable': Chevron Oil Spill Leaks 600 Gallons of Petroleum Into San Francisco Bay BY AATIF SULLEYMAN ON 2/10/21 AT 8:31 AM EST
An oil spill close to Chevron's Richmond refinery has leaked approximately 600 gallons of a petroleum and water mixture into San Francisco Bay and San Pablo Bay.
The pollutant was pouring into the estuary at a rate of five gallons per minute, according to Contra Costa County Supervisor John Gioia, who described the incident as "unacceptable," and said that it "will harm wildlife and marine life."
The source of the leak is believed to be a pipeline on Chevron's "long wharf" tanker terminal.
Local beaches were closed, members of the public were advised to steer clear of the area, and a health advisory was issued for people with respiratory conditions in Richmond, North Richmond and San Pablo, who may have experienced eye, skin, nose or throat irritation as a result of the incident. Strong odors were also reported locally, and Miller/Knox Park has been temporarily closed. The spill was first noticed at around 3 p.m. PT on the afternoon of Tuesday, February 9.
Gioia said that the leak was stopped at approximately 4.30 p.m., and a boom was subsequently placed around the petroleum to limit its spread. The health advisory was lifted at 9 p.m., and a cleanup is underway.
The Oiled Wildlife Care Network has been notified of the incident, but at the time of publication there have been no reports of at-risk animals.
The waters of San Francisco Bay are home to more than 500 species of wildlife, according to the Marine Global Earth Observatory, including whales, dolphins, seals, sharks, salmon and migratory birds.
"A sheen has been observed in San Pablo Bay and there are unconfirmed reports of petroleum on the shoreline," the California Department of Fish and Wildlife's Office of Spill Prevention and Response (OSPR) team said.
It added: "OSPR's Field Response Team has mobilized to the scene to manage the incident in coordination with other responding agencies.
154 "An initial incident command post has been established and a full assessment of environmental impacts will be conducted."
Gioia confirmed that an investigation will be taking place.
"I spoke to [California State Assembly member] Buffy Wicks tonight and she plans to introduce a bill to increase fines and penalties in order to provide more effective deterrence," he wrote in a post on Facebook.
Chevron Richmond, which is attracting heavy criticism online, issued the following statement: "At approximately 3 p.m. today, the Richmond Refinery observed a sheen on the water near the Richmond Refinery wharf.
"Chevron immediately initiated its response protocol, began working to isolate and contain the release, and notified all applicable agencies. The hydrocarbon release has been stopped at this time and clean-up is ongoing. Chevron is fully cooperating with authorities, including the U.S. Coast Guard and OSPR.
"We have issued a community notice and ask the public to remain clear of the area so crews can quickly contain and clean up the released volumes."
155
Cleanup efforts underway after Chevron petroleum spill into bay By Allie Rasmus Published February 10
RICHMOND, Calif. - A health advisory for people living near the Richmond oil refinery was lifted by Wednesday morning, but clean-up efforts will continue after at least 600 gallons of a petroleum-water mixture spilled into the bay. How this spill happened on Tuesday afternoon, is still not clear.
That will be a focus of state and local health officials, and investigators heading to the site on Wednesday.
Chevron officials say it was around 2:30 p.m. when workers first saw an oil sheen on the water near the Richmond refinery wharf.
Chevron says crews were able to isolate and contain the spill by using two boom vessels and three skimmers to scoop up some of the petroleum-water mixture that had leaked out into the bay.
"That long wharf is where petroleum products are transferred from a line or a pipeline from the refinery out into the bay," said Contra Costa County Supervisor John Gioia. "It could have occurred in the line anywhere or with the transfer with the ship."
Gioia says some of the oil washed ashore along the south Richmond shoreline so there is a concern for marine life.
East Bay Regional Park has closed the beaches along the Richmond shoreline.
People living nearby were told to stay indoors, because of the strong smell of oil and chemicals in the air.
156 But that health advisory was lifted about 9 p.m. Tuesday.
Chevron could face fines and penalties for the spill.
If anyone sees an oiled bird in the Bay, they should call the Oiled Wildlife Care Network at 1- 877-UCD-OWCN (1-800-823-6926).
157
4 held after shootout with Fremont police By Henry Lee and KTVU staff Published February 9
FREMONT, Calif. - Four juveniles are in custody Tuesday after they led Fremont police on a chase in a stolen car to a dead-end street, where one suspect exchanged gunfire with officers, authorities. said The incident that began around 4:45 p.m. when officers spotted a stolen BMW near Auto Mall and Cushing parkways, said Fremont police Capt. Sean Washington.
The driver refused to stop and led officers on a chase to the dead of Stevenson Boulevard below I-880. The occupants ran from the car, and one of them opened fire, police said.
"One suspect fired several rounds at the pursuing officers. Officers returned fire at the suspect and established a perimeter around the area," Washington said. "Fortunately, no officers were injured during the exchange of gunfire."
Two juveniles were taken into custody shortly thereafter, but at least one armed suspect escaped. Later Tuesday night, police said two more juveniles had been taken into custody. One of those suspects was taken to the hospital after a takedown by a police K-9. Air units, drones and K9 units from other local law enforcement agencies were involved in the search, including officers from Newark, Milpitas, Union City and East Bay Regional Park Police as well as California Highway Patrol.
158
159 160