Nanosat ADCS Design and Performance Analysis

Home , Magnetorquer

İSTANBUL TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ ★ UÇAK ve UZAY BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ

UNDERGRADUATE THESIS PROJECT

Veysel Abdullah TEKİN (110140156)

Department of Aerospace Engineering

Thesis Advisor : Professor Doctor Alim Rüstem ASLAN

February 2021

İSTANBUL TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ ★ UÇAK ve UZAY BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ

Nanosat ADCS Design and Performance Analysis

UNDERGRADUATE THESIS PROJECT

Veysel Abdullah TEKİN (110140156)

Department of Aerospace Engineering

Thesis Advisor : Professor Doctor Alim Rüstem ASLAN

February 2021

ii Veysel Abdullah TEKİN, student of ITU Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics student ID 110140156, successfully defended the graduation entitled “NANOSAT ADCS DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS”, which he/she prepared after fulfilling the requirements specified in the associated legislations, before the jury whose signatures are below.

Thesis Advisor : Prof. Dr. Alim Rüstem ASLAN ………………… İstanbul Technical University

Jury Members : Prof. Dr. Cengiz HACIZADE ………………… İstanbul Technical University

Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Cuma YARIM ………………… İstanbul Technical University

Date of Submission : 1 February 2021 Date of Defense : 8 February 2021

iii

To Dr. Öğr. Kemal Bülent Yüceil and Halit Ayar

FOREWORDS

First of all, I am very happy and proud to have graduated from Technical University. The meaning of taking lessons from the Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautic’s Academicians is that The privilege that was only able to get 80 people each year in Turkey.

My process of determining the subject of my graduation thesis developed as follows. I met with aerospace engineering during the Introduction to Aerospace Engineering lecture opened by Dr. Öğr. Cuma YARIM. Due to the content of the course, I got acquainted with topics such as orbit mechanics, imaging techniques and satellite technology thus I started to lay the foundations of what I want to study in the future.

The late Dr. Öğr. Kemal Bülent YÜCEIL had a very special place in me as well as everyone else in the Faculty. I learned orbital mechanics in depth from Dr. Öğr. Kemal Bülent YÜCEIL, He was a great scientist. In this way, I started to create the infrastructure for the location. May Allah raise your soul to the highest heights!

In the 4th year, I took the Attitude control and determination systems course from Prof. Dr Cengiz HACIZADE. Thanks to the course, I understood the key role and working principles of Attitude Determination and Control in order to perform the missions of all spacecraft.

Finally, In Spacecraft Systems Design course, which is considered a undergraduate course. In this course, Prof. Dr. Alim Rüstem ASLAN made us work with the content that we could use what we learned in 4 years and feel like a real Aerospace Engineer. Working with Prof. Dr. Alim Rüstem ASLAN was unique experience as an aerospace engineer candidate. During this period, I followed his work from the press and felt proud. Thank you very much for everything.

To sum up, I am grateful for all your efforts and dedication.

February 2021 Veysel Abdullah TEKİN

vi TABLE OF CONTENT

Page

FOREWORDS v TABLE OF CONTENT vii ABBREVIATIONS ix LIST OF FIGURES x SUMMARY xi ÖZET xiii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. ATTITUDE DETERMINATION SYSTEMS 2 2.1 Reference Frames 2 2.1.1 Sun Referenced 2 2.1.2 Central Body Referenced 3 2.1.3 Magnetic Field Referenced 3 2.1.4 Stars and Distanced Planet Referenced 4 2.1.5 Inertial Referenced 4 2.2 Attitude Determination Algorithms 4 2.3 Attitude Determination Systems Sensors 5 2.3.1 Star Tracker 5 2.3.2 Sun Sensor 6 2.3.2.1 Analog Sun Sensor 6 2.3.2.2 Digital Sun Sensor 7 2.3.3 Magnetometer 7 2.3.4 Horizon Sensor 8 2.3.5 Global Positioning System (GPS) 8 2.3.6 Gyroscope 9 2.3.6.1 The gyroscope has two principles 9 3. ATTITUDE CONTROL SYSTEMS 12 3.1 Active Systems 12 3.1.1 Gas Jets/Thruster 12 3.1.2 Reaction Wheels 13 3.1.3 Magnetorquer 13 3.1.4 Ion Thruster 14

vii 3.2 Passive Systems 15 3.2.1 Spin stabilized 15 3.2.2 Gravity Gradient Stabilization 16 4. SIMILAR MISSIONS 18 4.1 CubeSat List 18 4.2 ADC Analysis Of Similar Cube Satellites According To Their Duties 22 5. MISSIONS : ADCS SELECTIONS 25 5.1 Earth Observation Mission 25 5.1.1 Mission in brief 25 5.1.2 Camera’s Point of View Calculation 26 5.1.3 Selected Attitude Determination and Control System 26 5.1.4 Reason for Choice 26 5.2 Mapping Mars South Pole 28 5.2.1 Mission in brief 28 5.2.2 In Scenario 1: Mapping Mars South Pole 29 5.2.2.1 Mission in brief 29 5.2.2.2 In Scenario 1, Camera's Point of View Calculation 29 5.2.2.3 Scenario 1, Selected Attitude Control and Determination 30 5.2.2.4 Reason for Choice 30 5.2.3 In Scenario 2: Mapping Mars South Pole 31 5.2.3.1 Mission in brief 31 5.2.3.2 In Scenario 2, Camera's Point of View Calculation 31 5.2.3.3 Scenario 2, Selected Attitude Control and Determination 32 5.2.3.4 Reason for Choice 32 5.3 Sun Observation 33 5.3.1 Mission in brief 33 5.3.2 Selected Attitude Determination and Control Systems 33 5.3.3 Reason for Choice 34 CONCLUSION 35 REFERENCE 36 CURRICULUM VITAE 41

viii ABBREVIATIONS

ADCS : Attitude Determination and Control Systems ADS : Attitude Determination Systems ACS : Attitude Control Systems GPS : Global Positioning System

ix LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1 : Closed Loop of ADCS xi Figure 2.1 : References Frames 2 Figure 2.1.1 : Central Body Referenced Frame 3 Figure 2.1.2 : Density of The Earth Magnetic Field 4 Figure 2.3 : Basic Working Principle of Star Tracker 5 Figure 2.3.1 : Star Tracker in PicSat 6 Figure 2.3.2 : Basic Analog Sun Sensor Working Principle 6 Figure 2.3.3 : NASA’s Digital Sun Sensor and Its Working Principle Basically 7 Figure 2.3.4 : Magnetometer Working Principle 7 Figure 2.3.5 : Horizon Sensor Principle 8 Figure 2.3.6 : GPS, ADS Working Principle and Signal Catching with Antenna 9 Figure 2.3.7 : Gyroscope Working Principle 9 Figure 2.3.8 : Gyroscope’s Precession Principle Formula 10 Figure 3.1 : Apollo 11’s Thruster 12 Figure 3.1.1 : Reaction Wheel Devices 13 Figure 3.1.2 : Magnetorquer for CubeSat 14 Figure 3.1.3 : Ion Thruster Schema and Working Principle 15 Figure 3.2 : Spin Stabilization Working Principle 15 Figure 3.2.1 : Gravity-Gradient Stabilization Working Principle 16 Figure 5.1 : Earth Observation’s Concept Of Operation 25 Figure 5.1.1 : Point of View Calculation 26 Figure 5.2 : Mars South Pole’s Mapping Concept Of Operation 28 Figure 5.2.1 : In Scenario 1: Mars South Pole’s Mapping Concept Of Operation 29 Figure 5.2.2 : In Scenario 1, Camera's Point of View Calculation 29 Figure 5.3 : In Scenario 2: Mapping Mars South Pole Concept Of Operation 31 Figure 5.3.1 : In Scenario 2: Camera's Point of View Calculation 31 Figure 5.4 : Sun Observation Concept Of Operation 33

x Nanosat ADCS Design and Performance Analysis

SUMMARY

Attitude determination and control system consists of 2 main titles determination and control. attitude determination is the process of providing the spacecraft's current orientation information in space. The instantaneous orientation of the spacecraft is one of the two basic inputs for the realization of the mission. Control refers to the process of transition from the current management to its new orientation or maintaining orientation in line with the instructions. The control may not always be active. The requirements of the task affect the attitude determination and control systems type. Spacecraft use many sensor activators and algorithms in the Attitude determination and control process. This relationship is shown in the diagram below.

Figure 1 : Closed Loop of ADCS (Markley & Crassidis, 2014, pp. 1–3)

According to the given scheme, first the data received from the sensor for the orientation of the satellite is processed with the algorithm and the location is determined according to the result of the algorithm. The order is created or it occurs autonomously. Thus, it passes to the software stage of the control system, the command created here turns into dynamite through the activator and the closed loop starts again. For example, TRYAD cubesat is in charge of measuring the amount of Gamma rays in storms. It should be directed towards the storm detected due to its mission and should monitor the region precisely during the storm. Therefore, it uses high precision sun sensor and reaction

xi wheel, so it can precisely determine and control attitude. In order to monitor the area in question with high precision, the observation mission can control its orientation with the reaction wheel used in spacecraft. Attitude determination systems vary according to the degree of sensitivity and reference, while control systems are examined under two headings as active and passive. First of all, attitude determination systems are as follows; star tracker, sun sensor, Earth / Horizon (body centered), Magnetometer, Global Positioning System GPS and Gyroscope. Each of these systems has different reference systems for different purposes and different requirements. Each system details will be covered in the following sections. There are two different types of control systems, active and passive. Active systems are Gas jets, magneto torquer, ion thruster, reaction wheel and hysteresis rods, respectively. Passive ones are; spin stabilized, gravity gradient stabilized. (Markley & Crassidis, 2014, pp. 1–3)

xii Nanosat ADCS Design and Performance Analysis

ÖZET

ADCS, 2 Ana başlıktan oluşur Yönelim belirleme ve kontrol. Yönelim belirleme uzay aracının uzaydaki mevcut yönelim bilgisini sağlama sürecidir. Uzay aracının anlık yönelimi görevin gerçekleşmesi için temel iki girdi den biridir. Kontrol ise mevcut yönetimden talimatlar doğrultusunda yeni yönelimine geçiş sürecini veya yönelimin korunmasını ifade eder. Kontrol her zaman aktif şekilde olmayabilir görevin isterleri adcs çeşidine etki eder. ADCS sürecinde uzay aracı birçok sensör aktivatör ve algoritma kullanır. Bu ilişki aşağıdaki şemada gösterilmiştir

. Figure 1 : Closed Loop of ADCS (Markley & Crassidis, 2014, pp. 1–3)

Semaya göre ilk önce uydunun yönelimi için sensör dan alınan veri algoritma ile işlenir ve algoritmanın sonucuna göre konum belirlenir belirlenen konum doğrultusunda. Emir oluşturulur veya otonom oluşur. Böylece kontrol sisteminin yazılım aşamasına geçer burada oluşturulan komut aktivatör aracılığıyla dinamige dönüşür ve closed loop tekrar başlar. Örnek vermek gerekirse TRYAD cubesat i fırtınalarda ki Gamma işini miktarını ölçmek ile görevlidir. Görevi gereği tespit edilen fırtınaya doğru yönlenlenmeli ve fırtına sürecinde bölgeyi hassas şekilde izlemelidir. Bu sebepten yüksek hassasiyetli sun sensör ve rate gyros kullanır böylece hassas bir şekilde attitude determination yapabilir. Sözkonusu bölgeyi yüksek hassasiyetle takip edebilmek için geriliği itibariyle gözlem görevli uzay araçlarında kullanılan reaction wheel ile yonelimini kontrol edebilir. Attitude determination sistemleri hassasiyet derecesine ve referansa göre değişirken kontrol

xiii sistemleri aktif ve pasif olmak üzere iki başlıkta incelenir. Öncelikle Atatürk determination sistemleri şunlardır; star tracker, sun sensor, Earth/Horizon(body centered), Magnetometer, Global Positioning System GPS and Gyroscope. Bu sistemlerin her biri farklı amaçlara farklı referans sistemlerine ve farklı isterlere sahiptir. İlerleyen bölümlerde her sistem ayrıntıları ile işlenecektir. Kontrol sistemlerinde ise aktif ve pasif olmak üzere iki farklı çeşit vardır. Aktif sistemler sırasıyla, Gas jets, magneto torquer, ion thruster, reaction wheel and hysteresis rods. Pasif olanlar ise; spin stabilized, gravity gradient stabilized. (Markley & Crassidis, 2014, pp. 1–3)

xiv 1. INTRODUCTION

The main purpose of the graduation project is to examine the design and performance analysis of Attitude Determination and Control Systems in CubeSats. In order to grasp this process in the best way, the following steps have been followed and made into a report. ● Literature survey ● Requirements definition ● ADCS elements and design ● ADCS usage for selected missions ● Comparison of designs and effect on operations After this research and review of literature. 14 CubeSats from different fields and tasks were selected to embody the work. Each Cubesat's adcs content and tasks were examined and a trade off table was made. The reason for choosing the ADCS of CubeSats in 14 different tasks is revealed with a result. The concept of operation, ADCS and trajectory were determined for the 3 tasks determined by the analysis performed at the end of the research process. Missions are given below.

Mission 1: Earth observation, 500 km SSO orbit, mission: take a photo of a 1km*1km area of a defined location. Determine ADCS requirements, choose suitable ADCS system, describe how to use the system.

Mission 2: Mars Observation, determine a suitable orbit to place a nanosat with 3 axis ADCS to MAP mars South pole

Mission 3. Sun observation, place a nanosat around earth orbit or sun orbit, to track sun coronal ejection using a sensor with a field of view of 10 degrees. Selec ADCS and describe its usage.

2. ATTITUDE DETERMINATION SYSTEMS

2.1 Reference Frames

Attitude determination systems are basically classified according to reference systems. Along with the systems, the sensitivity and the requirements affect the system. To better understand Attitude-determining systems, we should look at priority reference systems

Figure 2.1 : References Frames (Wu, 2019)

2.1.1 Sun Referenced Sun Referenced The determination system, which refers to the sun, determines the position of the spacecraft according to the angle of incidence of solar rays. In this system, location determination is highly accurate (potential arc 1 minute). Sun reference is required to protect the systems from high energy rays and particles coming from the sun. Sun reference system enables spacecraft to provide efficient energy with solar cells. In sun referenced determination systems, reference loss may occur due to the central body. (Wu, 2019)

2.1.2 Central Body Referenced Central body referenced systems require a central mass. The spacecraft / Satellite must be in or near the central body. The orbiting satellite tracks and defines the earth and the horizon of the central body optically, therefore the angle of incidence of sunlight is decisive for the central body (horizon). Its sensitivity is 6 arc minutes. (Hadi, 2015)

Figure 2.1.1 : Central Body Referenced Frame (Hadi, 2015)

2.1.3 Magnetic Field According to the magnetic field reference, the earth's magnetic field is used in this system. Sensitivity increases as getting closer to the earth, in LEO, because the earth's magnetic field decreases from the center to the space. Despite the low energy consumption in the MFS, the sensitivity is low. (30 arc minutes) In addition, the systems must be insulated against magnetic effects

Figure 2.1.2 : Density of The Earth Magnetic Field (Glatzmaier, 2003)

2.1.4 Stars And Distanced Planet In order to determine the spacecraft position with respect to the star map reference system, the position of the stars is identified through optics and their orientation is determined regarding the assembled map. Additionally, this system is independent of the orbital and can be used easily in deep space missions. The sensitivity of this system is very high however the sun rays can mislead the optics of the system. For this reason, it must be isolated from the sun rays. (Markley & Crassidis, 2014)

2.1.5 Inertial Source of the inertial reference system is mainly the conservation of angular momentum. The reference system provides momentum conservation with a gyroscope. The sensitivity is very high at certain times (when angular momentum is provided) and it is independent from external reference sources. (Markley, & Crassidis, 2014)

2.2 Attitude Determination Algorithms Four different algorithms are also commonly used. These algorithms are Geometric method, algebraic (two vector) method and Wahba method (qmethod). There will be no detailed discussion of determination algorithms.(Markley, & Crassidis, 2014)

2.3 Attitude Determination Systems Sensors Commonly used attitude determination systems are as follows. They include Star Tracker, sun sensor, Magnetometer, Horizon sensor, GPS global positioning system and Gyroscope. (Markley, & Crassidis, 2014)

2.3.1 Star Tracker Star trackers autonomously make a position estimation in the celestial Frame by comparing the internal Star catalogs they contain with the Star position detected by their optical sensors. Their precision is 1 arc second. A star tracker has two modes of operation: tracking mode and initial attitude acquisition. Tracking mode is mainly the definition of Star Tracker. It is the process of providing location information in mini seconds by comparing the images of the spacecraft with its internal catalogs. The initial attitude acquisition mode, on the other hand, maps the bright star clusters of the spacecraft used mostly in deep space missions to distant objects and maps the star reference information in its internal catalog. During this process, tree centroid calculation is essential for determining location. (Liu, 2011)

Figure 2.3 : Basic Working Principle of Star Tracker (Liu, 2011) Besides the high sensitivity the sensor provides, it also has a few problems. First of all, the sensor has a heavy construction, it is an expensive and complex design. The system consumes high energy. Besides, it must be supplemented with extra sensors and optics to eliminate the margins of error caused by double stars and multiple systems. Therefore, a second attitude determination system is often added

Figure 2.3.1 : Star Tracker in PicSat (L.E.S.I.A., 2018)

2.3.2 Sun sensor Sun sensor basically determines the position of the spacecraft by detecting, collecting and detecting the angle of incidence of the collected rays. Sun sensor is very crucial in many ways such as angle of incidence of sunlight, energy requirement of the spacecraft, protection of sensitive components, and protection of sensors using optical data from sunlight such as Star Tracker. There are two commonly used types of sensors. Digital and analog sun sensors. (Markley, & Crassidis, 2014)

2.3.2.1 Analog Sun Sensor It is basically measured by the amount of electric current produced by the sun rays falling on the photocell. The angle of the sun rays received in the photocell surface is used to determine the orientation. It has a conical shape to collect much light and it is more effective in a wide field of views. (Post et al., 2013, p. 6)

Figure 2.3.2 : Basic Analog Sun Sensor Working Principle (Post et al., 2013, p. 6)

6 2.3.2.2 Digital Sun Sensor It consists of two main parts: command component and measurement component. The Measurement component gives input to the command component according to the angle of arrival of the sun rays and it is transformed into input attitude information. (NASA, 2012)

Figure 2.3.3 : NASA’s Digital Sun Sensor and Its Working Principle Basically (NASA, 2012)

2.3.3 Magnetometer It is basically used for the determination of earth's magnetic field for orientation. Magnetic field lines are from south pole to north pole. Magnetic fields, according to Faraday principle, create current on the magnetometer and it is used to determine the direction and density of the current.(Markley, & Crassidis, 2014)

Figure 2.3.4 : Magnetometer Working Principle (ARCBOTICS, 2012)

7 It is a very suitable system for CubeSats in addition to its being low-cost and reliable. However, it is influential in LEO because of density of Earth's Magnetic Field

2.3.4 Horizon Sensor The working principle of this sensor is as follows: The spacecraft sees and defines the horizon of the central body by means of its optics, thus the resulting output creates the current orientation information. Many of them scan at the infrared wavelength due to errors or losses in the visible wavelength. Specifically, it works with the same principle as Star Tracker, but the Reference Frame is the world (for Earth fixed). (Bahar et al., 2006)

Figure 2.3.5 : Horizon Sensor Principle (Bahar et al., 2006)

2.3.5 Global Positioning System (GPS) As it is known, GPS is a reliable system that has been used for years to determine location on Earth. It was first used in 1993 to determine the orientation for satellites. (Tans vector Sensor). The orientation determination is performed by antennas that receive signals from different GPS satellites. Position information is obtained by measurement of the carrier wavelength of the GPS signal falling on the antennas. It is shown in the figure.(Bahar et al., 2006)

Figure 2.3.6 : GPS, ADS Working Principle and Signal Catching with Antenna (Markley, & Crassidis, 2014)

2.3.6 Gyroscope Gyroscope has acquired conservation of angular momentum as its basic principle. Thus, the gyro can measure orientation and maintain this amount. It consists of rotors intertwined in structure, rotating at high speeds. There are two types of common gyroscope as rate and laser (Markley, & Crassidis, 2014)

Figure 2.3.7 : Gyroscope Working Principle (Britannica,2020)

2.3.6.1 The gyroscope has two principles; 1-The rotor of the gyroscope tending to keep its rotating axis in space steady. If an external moment applied to the gyroscope in order to change the conditions of these

9 axes, then the gyroscope would resist rotating and in this case frames of suspension would rotate. 2-The other, second property of the rate gyroscope is called “precession”. Precession is a special movement of a spinning rotor as a result of external forces acting on it. Precession refers to a change in the direction of the axis of a rotating object.(Markley, & Crassidis, 2014)

Figure 2.3.8 : Gyroscope’s Precession Principle Formula

Table 2: Attitude Determination Systems Trade-Off table (CubeSatShop, 2009)

Attitude Determination Systems Trade-Off table

Referan Power Orbital Type and Ma Pri Accuracy ce Reqire Indepen Disadvantages Brand ss ce Source ments dence Analog Sun 1 arc 330 Sensor (NCSS- Sun 50 mW Yes 5 g minute 0 $ SA05) 1-Because of the Central Body, Digital Sun 120 Input might be lost 1 arc 35 Sensor (NFSS- Sun 150 mW Yes 00 minute g 411) $

Star Tracker >30 Multiple star 1 arc 170 must be protect (STELLA star Stars 250 mW Yes 000 might be second g to Sun tracker) $ problem Magnetometer Earth' No, must 150 must be 30 arc 85 (NSS Magneti 750 mW be in 00 toleranced to Work only LEO minutes g Magnetometer) c Fields LEO $ magnetic field Central 160 Horizon ( 6 arc 100 Body 50 mW No 00 must be protect to Sun OETI) minutes g (Earth) $ Gyroscope need external (GG1320AN >20 1 arc 474 contain many sensor Digital Ring Inertial 1,6 W Yes 000 minute g moving part determine exact Laser $ attitude Gyroscope) Global Positioning Central 6 arc 500 might be connection problem with System GPS Body 1,5 W No - minutes g GPS satellites The (NSS GPS (Earth) Receiver)

11 3. ATTITUDE CONTROL SYSTEMS

Attitude Control Systems are provided in two forms, active and passive. During the space mission, it may need to change its orientation to perform the spacecraft mission. Orientation systems allow the orientation to be changed or maintained actively and passively. Active systems provide the new position by using energy with actuators in the orientation determination process or maintain their current conservation. Passive systems, on the other hand, do not use energy for orientation determination, they either physically perform the process or orientation is set free. Active Systems: Gas jets, Magnetorquer, Reaction wheels, Ion and electrical thruster. Passive Systems: Spin Stabilized, Gravity Gradient Stabilized. (Markley, & Crassidis, 2014)

3.1 Active Systems 3.1.1 Gas Jets/Thruster This system basically works on the principle of momentum exchange. Attitude control is provided by the systems similar to the liquid fuel rocket engine on the body of the spacecraft and high speed gas release from the body. Three-axis attitude provides control. Thanks to the thruster, very precise and sensitive control is provided. This system is used in the merging of spacecraft, orbit maneuvers, reparation in orbit, and missions involving landing where precision is very important. However, since the system control is provided with high speed gas, the amount of fuel affects the continuity and quantity of the system. In addition, the correct operation of the thruster is very crucial for the mission, since there are valves and pipes in the system that carry fuel and high-pressure gas. Otherwise, the whole task could be endangered. Thruster was used in Dragon Cargo module, Space Shuttle, Apollo missions and Soyuz module. (Markley, & Crassidis, 2014)

12 Figure 3.1 : Apollo 11’s Thruster (National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution, 2009)

3.1.2 Reaction Wheels It is a system that uses angular momentum as its basic principle. To illustrate this, we can give helicopters as an example. In most helicopter systems, when the main rotor rotates, the tail rotor is activated to prevent the effect of 'turning around itself' and if it does not balance the rotation effect of the rotor, it starts to rotate with the helicopter fuselage. Reaction wheel works in the same way. For three-axis rotating, 3 or 4 high speed rotors are rotated. The amount of rotation speed determines the orientation. Reaction wheel is a system that can work very precisely and consumes less energy. It can also be applied to all observation satellites of spacecraft that are larger than CubeSat. As an example, the Hubble Space Telescope and Kepler telescope use the reaction wheel to control orientation in deep space observations.(Cortes-Martinez & Rodriguez-Cortes, 2019, p. 113001)

Figure 3.1.1 : Reaction Wheel Devices (Cortes-Martinez & Rodriguez-Cortes, 2019, p. 113001)

13 3.1.3 Magnetorquer Magnetorquers generate a magnetic field around the satellite that interacts with the Earth's own magnetic field, thus creating a torque on the satellite. In this way, the angular momentum of the satellite can be changed and controlled. The system is usually used with reaction wheels however it can provide three-axis control in smaller sizes such as CubeSat. Although the sensitivity is not very high, it consumes a little energy. Thanks to this feature, it becomes an alternative for orientation in cases of energy loss that may occur in a satellite or spacecraft. (Markley, & Crassidis, 2014)

Figure 3.1.2 : Magnetorquer for CubeSat (ısıspace, 2013)

3.1.4 Ion Thruster Ion thrusters are mostly suitable for deep space missions, such as interplanetary missions, for long-term and highly efficient missions because it can provide propulsion for very long periods. Besides, as there is no drag force in deep space, the spacecraft can reach very high speeds even if the amount of thrust is small. Ion thruster is an advancing technology and it is predicted to be a new generation propulsion system. Basically, the working principle is based on the acceleration of positive ions in the magnetic field and the rapid removal of accelerated ions from the nozzle. It is similar to Gas Thruster with this feature. The process is as follows. Gases are sent to the fuel tank, the gases in the tank are bombarded with an electron gun. The positive ions that lose their electrons due the collision, the ions accelerate in the magnetic field, and the negative and positively charged two plates meet. Due to the potential difference that occurs here, the plasma, which accelerates rapidly, is thrown from the nozzle and

14 impulse is provided. Thus, the orientation is provided by changing the direction and geometry of the nozzle. (Edwards & Gabriel, 1993)

Figure 3.1.3 : Ion Thruster Schema and Working Principle (Räisänen, 2012)

3.2 Passive Systems

3.2.1 Spin stabilized This system is a passive orientation system, it is generally used for academic purposes. Basically, it does not give a precise orientation control for the satellite. It rotates around its axis during the mission process by rotating the satellite while it is put into orbit. For this reason, CubeSats using Spin Stabilized have limited tasks. It is not suitable for observation and sensitive experiments.(Markley, & Crassidis, 2014)

Figure 3.2 : Spin Stabilization Working Principle

3.2.2 Gravity Gradient Stabilization Another passive control system is gravity-gradient stabilization. The system directly uses the law of gravity. A mass is extended (boom-shaped) from the fuselage of the spacecraft towards the central body. As it is commonly known, the force of gravity increases and decreases exponentially with the square of the distance. Gravity-gradient takes full advantage of this law of physics. Since the mass attached to the spacecraft is closer to the central mass, it is exposed to more force. That is why, the spacecraft constantly faces the center mass. We can compare this to hammer throwing sport. It is detailed in the diagram below. This system is not precise and slips may occur. However, it is a cheap and effective solution.(Wisnievski & Blanke,1999)

Figure 3.2.1 : Gravity-Gradient Stabilization Working Principle

16 Table 3. : Attitude Control Systems Trade-Off Table (CubeSatShop, 2009)

Attitude Control Systems Trade-Off Table Orbit al Referen Power Indep Active or Accu ce Reqire enden Type and Brand Passive racy Source ments ce Mass Price Disadvantage can Limite Gas Jet/Thruster ( operate d due MicroSpace all to the valve and MEMS-based Enviro amou pipe might Micropropulsion High ment in 300 >9000 nt of cause System) Active est Space 2 W yes g 0 $ fuel problem Magnetorquer (The ISIS Earth's Low need MagneTorQuer Magneti 196 accura magnetic board (iMTQ)) Active Low c field 1,2 W no g 8000 $ cy field can operate all Reaction Wheel Enviro contains parts that (The CubeWheel ment in 140 rotate at high Medium) Active High Space 1,5 W yes g 7850 $ speeds can operate all Environ there is no commercial ment in example because of the fact Ion Thuster Active Mid Space it is still in improvement Low thrust

Spin Stabilization Passive - - no required - It permit s one Central no or two Gravity-Gradient Lowe Body require depending on orient Low Stabilization Passive st (Earth) d no the design ations accuracy

4. SIMILAR MISSIONS Names, tasks and payloads of nano satellites (less than 20 kg) in the last 10 years that orient and control on 3 axes, the adcs they use.

4.1 CubeSat List

Name: nCube: The first Norwegian Student Satellite Mission: The main mission of the satellite is to demonstrate ship traffic surveillance from a LEO satellite using the maritime Automatic Identification System (AIS) recently introduced by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) (Riise et al., 2003, p. 2) ADCS system:3-axis Magnetometer, Gravity gradient stabilization

Name: AAU CubeSat Mission: AAU CubeSat's payload is a CMOS digital camera. It has a resolution of 1.3 megapixels and has a color depth of 24 bit. From the satellite's 900 km altitude, the camera will capture pictures with a resolution of 120x110 m per pixel. The camera- chip was provided by a company called Devitech which is in Aalborg. The Copenhagen Optical Group and the mechanical group developed the lens system. The structure for the lens system is made out of titanium (Alminde et al., 2003) ADCS system: magnetometer and a sun sensor

Name: STARS Mission: The STARS will be normally operated under docking condition, and the mother and the daughter satellites separated away only when the main mission performed during roughly 30 seconds.The mission begins based on the command from the ground station. (Kagawa University & Takamatsu National College of Technology, 2005, p. 2) ADCS system:magnetic torquer and arm link

Name: CubeSail (UltraSail) Mission:UltraSail is a proposed type of robotic spacecraft that uses radiation pressure exerted by sunlight for propulsion. It builds upon the "heliogyro" concept by Richard

18 H. MacNeal, published in 1971, and consists of multiple rotating blades attached to a central hub (Burton et al., 2021) ADCS system: blade control (and hence the spacecraft's attitude control)

Name: O/OREOS Mission: The O/OREOS satellite is NASA's first cubesat to demonstrate the capability to have two distinct, completely independent science experiments on an autonomous satellite. One experiment will test how microorganisms survive and adapt to the stresses of space; the other will monitor the stability of organic molecules in space. (NASA/ARC (Ames Research Center), 2008, p. 6) ADCS system: passive magnetic attitude control system

Name: TRYAD Mission: The Terrestrial Rays Analysis and Detection (TRYAD) project uses 2 small satellites called CubeSats to measure gamma rays produced by high altitude thunderstorms. The two CubeSats, TRYAD 1 and TRYAD 2, will use a science instrument to detect and measure the gamma rays. The science instrument is under development by the University of Alabama in Huntsville in collaboration with NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. The two CubeSats carrying the science instrument will be developed by AUSSP students with mentoring from professors. (the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) & Auburn University (AU), 2015) ADCS system:Magnetometers, sun sensors, and rate gyros,Reaction wheels and magnetic torquers

Name: STRaND Mission: STRaND started out as a feasibility study and mission requirement exercise in the Mission Concepts team at SSTL, with the aim of answering the question: ‘what could SSTL do to leverage the explosion in miniature consumer-level technology that has occurred in the last 10 years?’. At the same time, SSC were developing an advanced Cubesat bus, so with input from the advanced space system research at the Surrey Space Centre, the result of the feasibility study and requirements exercise was an initial mission concept for a rapid, low cost technology demonstrator and requirements list, including a list of payload candidates, a component make/buy list,

19 high level concept of operations (CONOPS) and mass, power and budgets. (Bridges et al., 2011, p. 7) ADCS system:nano-reaction wheels, nano-magnetorquers, SSTL’s SGR05 GPS receiver, 8 pulse plasma thrusters (PPTs), and a butane thruster. Except for the SGR05

Name: ExoCube (CP-10) Mission:ExoCube's primary mission is to measure the density of hydrogen, oxygen, helium, and nitrogen in the Earth's exosphere. It is characterizing [O], [H], [He], [N2], [O+], [H+], [He+], [NO+], as well as the total ion density above ground stations, incoherent scatter radar (ISR) stations, and periodically throughout the entire orbit.(NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (NSF), 2013, p. 44) ADCS system:Environmental Chamber, gravity-gradient stabilization, magnetorquers.

Name:PhoneSat 2.0 Mission:PhoneSat is an ongoing NASA project, part of the Small Spacecraft Technology Program, of building nanosatellites using unmodified consumer-grade off-the-shelf smartphones and Arduino platform and launching them into Low Earth Orbit. This project was started in 2009 at NASA Ames Research Center (NASA, 2013) ADCS system: Magnetometer,Gyroscope,Coarse Sun Sensor,Magnetorquers,Reaction wheels

Name:ESTCUBE-2 Mission:ESTCube-2 is a technology demonstration mission for deorbiting technology plasma brake, the interplanetary propulsion system electric solar wind sail (E-sail) and advanced satellite subsystem solutions. To test the plasma brake and the electric solar wind sail, commonly called Coulomb drag propulsion, the satellite will deploy and charge a 300 m long wire which is also called ‘tether’. Interacting with the ionospheric plasma, the plasma brake will be able to deorbit the satellite from 700 km altitude to 500 km in half a year. (ESTCUBE, 2020) ADCS system:sun sensors, magnetometers, magnetorquers and gyroscopes.

20 Name:Chasqui I Mission:The nanosatellite Chasqui I research project is an effort to secure Peru's access to space, along with the previous launched satellites, and gives the opportunity to open new application areas specific to its own geographical and social reality. It is also from an academic point of view a tool that facilitates collaboration between the various faculties of the university trains students and teachers with real world experience in satellite, allowing technological advances in the aerospace industry in the country. The development of small-scale satellites like Chasqui I gives way to the various opportunities of access to space with lower costs and development time. For this reason, various universities, companies and government organizations in the world show interest in developing nanosatellites that allow to carry out experiments and scientific missions. The educational benefits of the project can be emphasized in training camp for future engineers and scientists. (Peru’s National University of Engineering (UNI), 2014) ADCS system:magnetometers, sun sensors, GPS and gyroscopes,magnetorquers

Name:SkyCube Mission:SkyCube had three major mission components: the broadcast of messages from its radio, the capture of pictures from space via its three cameras, and the deployment of a large balloon. (Southern Stars Group LLC, 2014) ADCS system:Magnetometer,magnetorquers

Name:Swayam Mission:Mission Swayam is the first satellite project of COEP's Satellite Initiative under the CSAT programme. The team consists of students from freshers to seniors and spans all the engineering disciplines in the college. The project is in a true sense an interdisciplinary project. The students in this team are selected after a rigorous selection avs academic work the team members dedicatedly work on this project all year round to meet the project deadlines. The team can proudly claim to have published more than 15 research papers in international conferences for last 7 consecutive years.(College of Engineering, Pune (CoEP), 2008)

21 ADCS system:magnetometers,MEMS gyroscope,magnets and hysteresis rods Name:Mars Cube One Mission:Mars Cube One is the first spacecraft built to the CubeSat form to operate beyond Earth orbit for a deep space mission. CubeSats are made of small components that are desirable for multiple reasons, including low cost of construction, quick development, simple systems, and ease of deployment to low Earth orbit. They have been used for many research purposes, including: biological endeavors, mapping missions, etc. CubeSat technology was developed by California Polytechnic State University and Stanford University, with the purpose of quick and easy projects that would allow students to make use of the technology. They are often packaged as part of the payload for a larger mission, making them even more cost effective.(NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 2019) ADCS system: cold gas thrusters,reaction control system,star tracker

4.2 ADC Analysis Of Similar Cube Satellites According To Their Duties When the above CubeSats tasks are reviewed, there are tasks such as earth and Mars observation, atmospheric analysis, scientific and academic studies, testing of new technologies and detection of high energy particles. The ADC system is selected according to the requirements of each task. As an example, the aim of the TRYAD Cubesat mission is to measure the Gamma ray generation in storms that occur around the world. As part of the task, CubeSat should regularly monitor the storm and turn its sensors to the storm center. For this reason, we see that a sun sensor is used for energy and to protect its optics from the sun. For directional control, reaction wheel which has a sensitive control capability and used mainly by observation satellites, is used. Reaction wheel and magnetorquer are also usually present in our system. Magnetorquer and Magnetometer are included in most CubeSat missions due to their low energy use and high reliability. The O / OREOS mission is an astrobiology experiment. It aims to monitor the life cycle of microorganisms under space and stress. As is seen, the O / OREOS CubeSat does not need to determine the orientation, so it only carries hysteresis rods. Another specific mission, Mars Cube One, is a Cubesat made for deep space missions. In this mission, it is planned to test the missions for Mars. In short, mapping, orbit spiritualities and astrobiological tasks are included. As mentioned in previous tasks, the reaction wheel is highly essential for observation and mapping. Star Tracker, which is a suitable system for deep space missions, was used.

22 Considering the spacecraft planned to travel in deep space, Star Tracker is unique for reference determination and position determination. We see that Mars Cube One uses cold gas thruster for direction control. The reason for this is that the satellite performs an orbital maneuver due to its mission. Ion thruster and has jets systems help to change the satellite's location and orbit as well as the location of the satellite. The ExoCube example is another useful example in terms of understanding the use of ADC systems. It does the job of measuring the density of hydrogen, oxygen, helium and nitrogen in the exosphere during its satellite mission. ExoCube uses gravity-gradient stabilization, which is a passive system for orientation control, magnetorquer, and a mass spectrometer and ion sensor for orientation determination. As can be guessed, its orbit passes through the exosphere, so it does not need an accurate directional control to catch the gases. As can be understood from the orientation determination system, it uses an ion sensor to detect the gases that it analyzes. Finally, in the STARS example, we see that CubeSat was sent for a technology test and the ADC system was chosen accordingly. In brief, CubeSat consists of two parts and the technology that will allow these parts to be combined and separated in the orbit is tested, hence it uses a 3 Axis Magnetometer to determine the orientation. There is no system used for orientation control other than its own test technology. Thus, as we have experienced from similar tasks, task requirements determine the correct Attitude determination and control system.

23 Table 4. : Similar Missions’s ADCS table

Similar Missions’s ADCS table

ADCS systems CubeSat’s Missions briefly Name Control Determination

Gravity gradient nCube To demonstrate ship traffic. 3-axis Magnetometer stabilization AAU sun sensor, 3-axis To capture pictures into the Earth. B-dot, inertial CubeSat Magnetometer To verify the TSR (Connected STARS arm link 3-axis Magnetometer Space Robot) system. To use radiation pressure exerted sun sensor, 3-axis CubeSail blade control by sunlight for propulsion. Magnetometer To test how microorganisms permanent O/OREOS survive and adapt to the stresses of magnets, hysteresis - space. rods Reaction wheels To measure gamma rays produced Magnetometers, sun TRYAD and magnetic by high altitude thunderstorms. sensors, rate gyros torquers To test the capabilities of a number nano-reaction SSTL’s SGR05 GPS STRaND of smartphone components in a wheels, 8 pulse receiver space environment. plasma thrusters gravity-gradient To measure the density of gases in mass spectrometer, an ExoCube stabilization, the Earth's exosphere. ion sensor magnetorquers. To investigate deorbiting ESTCUBE technology plasma brake, the -2 propulsion system electric solar magnetorquers, sun sensors, wind sail gyroscopes magnetometers PhoneSat to use unmodified consumer-grade Magnetorquers,Rea Magnetometer,Gyroscop 2.0 off-the-shelf smartphones ction wheels e,Coarse Sun Sensor magnetometers, sun To launch Peru's Space and Chasqui I magnetorquers sensors, GPS, Satellite program gyroscopes To broadcast, take pictures and SkyCube magnetorquers Magnetometer deploy large balloons. To investigate academics for a magnetometers,MEMS Swayam hysteresis rods group of students. gyroscope cold gas Mars Cube To operate beyond Earth orbit for a thrusters,reaction star tracker One deep space mission. control system

24 5. MISSIONS : ADCS SELECTION Concept Of Operation, ADCS Analysis, and ADCS Selection for Missions.

5.1 Earth Observation Mission

Figure 5.1 : Earth Observation’s Concept Of Operation

5.1.1 Mission in brief In the first mission, CubeSat is asked to take a 1km * 1km photograph of a designated point on the earth. First, the orbital calculation was made using the given parameters. According to calculations, the satellite passes vertically above the point to be photographed every 01,34,36,98 (approximately 1 hour 35 minutes). By the sensor size and focal length calculation thereafter, the area to be photographed and perceived in an upright position is shown in the calculations.

25 5.1.2 Camera’s Point of View Calculation

Figure 5.1.1 : Point of View Calculation (70,5 ) + (0625 ) = 50,105725, 2 2 =7,078539𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 cm 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 , , = x = 4,503546099 km 2 ( ) 2 0 635 7 078539 2 2 2 Camera’s𝑥𝑥 500 Point𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 +of𝑥𝑥 View⇒ in 90° = 81,12767 2 𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 5.1.3 Selected Attitude Determination and Control System Attitude Determination Systems: Digital Sun Sensor, Magnetometer ve Horizon (Earth) Attitude Determination Systems: Reaction Wheels and Magnetorquer Possible cost: 58,850 $ ( cubesatshop.com daki fiyatlar dikkate alınmıştır)

5.1.4 Reason for Choice The task is an observation mission that requires high precision, as mentioned above. Hence, it is necessary to determine the area with high accuracy as well as the optics to be turned to a determined point with the same precision. Primarily, the position of the sun should be known due to the protection of the optics and energy concerns, and this is provided by the sun sensor. Since earth observation is in question, the area to be photographed must be recognized by the satellite and accordingly, the Horizon sensor is suitable. The Magnetometer, a system that has proven itself many times, has been used during the mission considering the energy and stand-by conditions. For the

26 control, Reaction wheel, which is used by the largest to small observation satellites, is preferred. This system is used in large systems such as Kepler and Hubble. With Reaction Wheel, Magnetorquer is used as it is used in many systems. Thus, an auxiliary and secondary guidance system is available in energy saving and stand-by conditions.

5.2 Mapping Mars South Pole

Figure 5.2: Mars South Pole’s Mapping Concept Of Operation

5.2.1 Mission in brief In the given mission, it is requested to map the planet Mars via the southern hallowed CubeSat. Orbital selection and operation details are left to the thesis owner. For this reason, 2 different missions were designed. According to the first scenario, active orientation determination and control systems were selected same as in the earth observation mission. In the second method, a choice was made that could be made at much more affordable prices. Under this scenario, CubeSat will be able to view the 90,000,000 km ^ 2 south polar circle at a time, within the calculations shown in the diagrams.

28 5.2.2 In Scenario 1: Mapping Mars South Pole

Figure 5.2.1 : In Scenario 1: Mars South Pole’s Mapping Concept Of Operation

5.2.2.1 Mission in brief the CubeSat passes over the Mars South Pole in every 1 hour and 45 minutes. Thanks to Active ADC systems, it can photograph 3000*3000 kilometers field from many angles

5.2.2.2 In Scenario 1, Camera's Point of View Calculation

Figure 5.2.2 : In Scenario 1, Camera's Point of View Calculation (Schenk & Moore, 1999)

(70,5 ) + (0,625 ) = 50,105725, = 7,078539 cm 2 2 , , =𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 x = 9,00709 km 2 ( ) 2 0 635 7 078539 2 2 2 Camera’s𝑥𝑥 100 Point𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 +of𝑥𝑥 View⇒ in 90° = 324,51068 2 𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 5.2.2.3 Scenario 1, Selected Attitude Control and Determination Attitude Determination system: Digital Sun Sensor, Horizon sensor for Mars, Star Tracker. Attitude control system: Reaction Wheels, thruster/Gas Jets. Possible cost: 155850 $

5.2.2.4 Reason for Choice: In our mission, high resolution images should be taken for mapping. Since Marsin does not have a dense atmosphere, an orbit relatively close to Mars can be chosen, thus allowing a clear picture. Due to the width of the field, CubeSat's camera must continually change angle. In this way, it can map with photos taken from many angles. The system that will provide this orientation capability is Reaction Wheels, which has been emphasized many times. Since polar orbit is in question, Mars passes through the south pole every 1 hour and 44 minutes. However, if clearer photos are needed, orbital transfer may be required. For this reason, Thruster has been added to control systems. Orbital transfer can be made with this system if requested. In the Attitude determination section, magnetism based sensors cannot be used since there is no magnetic field of mars. Since the south pole mapping mission is in question, the Mars- based base of the Horizon sensor system is used. There is no magnetic based auxiliary Attitude determination sensor, in addition to the possibility of orbital transfer, the satellite's position must be determined precisely, so the Star Tracker is assumed suitable for precise and accurate maneuver. A sun sensor is essential for both energy supply and protection of the Star Tracker and optical sensors.

30 5.2.3 In Scenario 2: Mapping Mars South Pole

Figure 5.3 : In Scenario 2: Mapping Mars South Pole Concept Of Operation (Schenk & Moore, 1999)

5.2.3.1 Mission in brief As mentioned in the beginning of the Mars mapping mission, a low budget is targeted in this scenario. In each period, the optical sensor scans an area of 3000 km * 3000 km

5.2.3.2 In Scenario 2: Camera's Point of View calculation

Figure 5.3.1 : In Scenario 2: Camera's Point of View Calculation (Schenk & Moore, 1999)

31 To find Apogee of Ellipse: (70,5 ) + (0,625 ) = 50,105725, = 7,078539 cm 2 2 , , =𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 x = 16720,960004 km 2 ( ) 2 0 635 7 078539 2 2 2 1500 1500 𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 + 𝑥𝑥 ⇒

5.2.3.3 Scenario 2 Selected Attitude Determination and Control Systems Attitude determination Systems: Horizon sensor for Mars Attitude control systems : gravity-gradient stabilization Possible Cost: 16000 $

5.2.3.4 Reason for Choice As mentioned in my task description, the aim is a low budget and effective solution. CubeSat will look towards Mars by taking advantage of the gravity difference with its gravity-gradient Stabilization system. The mass extending from the body, providing gravity-gradient stabilization at the exact apogee point, will turn the satellite optics exactly to the south pole of Mars. Thus, Mars South Pole will be displayed for mapping in line with the calculations made during the transition from each apogee point. In addition, the lack of atmosphere will be an advantage to take clear photos even at a distance.

5.3 Sun Observation

Figure 5.4 : Sun Observation Concept Of Operation

5.3.1 Mission in brief CubeSat will track coronal ejections in the sun as defined in the diagram. Effective solutions were also sought in this task. The most effective solution with the most affordable costs is of vital importance for an engineer. The sun-synchronous orbit (SSO), frequently used by weather satellites, is constantly facing the sun, with it crossing the equator perpendicularly. It is a polar orbit. In this way, CubeSat can stay facing the sun for 24 hours and throughout its life. Thus, it does not have problems in terms of energy and can make uninterrupted solar observation.

5.4.2 Selected Attitude Determination and Control Systems Attitude determination Systems: Sun Sensor and Magnetometer Attitude control systems: Reaction Wheels and Magnetorquer. Possible Cost: 42870$

5.4.3 Reason for Choice Sun sensor is used to track the position of the sun, Magnetometer used for situations such as backup, stand by, energy problems, Reaction Wheels used for precise orientation to the sun's position, Magnetorquer used for auxiliary and backup systems.

34 CONCLUSION

The graduation thesis is discussed in 3 main sections. Firstly, in-depth information about ADCS, which was reviewed in the literature, was obtained. The aforementioned information was added to the study together with the visuals in summary. Secondly, 14 different CubeSat tasks were selected and the ADCS systems used by these tasks were examined. Tasks and suitable ADCS systems are shown in tabular form. Thirdly, the operation concept was determined for 3 different tasks and the appropriate adcs were selected.

To summarize, Reaction wheel, which is an active attitude control system, has been chosen as it will actively observe a point in the world. For Attitude Determination, sun Sensor was chosen for the protection of optics and energy requirements. The Horizon sensor is the most suitable for the area to be imaged in the world. In addition, a magnetic based sensor and actuator were used to benefit from the magnetic field of the earth for “Mission 1 : Earth observation, 500 km SSO orbit, mission: take a photo of a 1km*1km area of a defined location. Determine ADCS requirments, choose suitable ADCS system, decsrine how to use the system.” For “Mission 2 : Mars Observation, determine a suitable orbit to place a nanosat with 3 axis ADCS to MAP mars South pole”, Two different scenarios are planned. The scenario is similar to a world observation mission. For this reason, Reaction Wheel, which is an active orientation system, is used. The thruster was added as it is a deep space mission and orbital maneuvers may be required. For Attitude determination, a sun sensor and a Horizon sensor have been added, and since magnetic sensors are not available, the task is guaranteed with Star Tracker. In the second scenario, it is aimed to display the south pole of mars in one go, and it is aimed to provide gravity-gradient stabilization, which is a passive attitude control. Thus CubeSat will always be facing Mars. Horizon sensor is planned for Attitude determination. Finally in Mission 3 : “Sun observation, place a nanosat around earth orbit or sun orbit, to track sun coronal ejection using a sensor with a field of view of 10 degrees. Selec ADCS and describe its usage.” Due to the mission context, CubeSat needs to see as much of the sun as possible. Thanks to the Sso Orbit, it can orbit perpendicular to the equator like meteorology satellites and watch the sun without interruption. Reaction wheel is also suitable for aiming at the sun at any moment. A sun sensor is ideal if the position of the sun is to be noticed at all times. Magnetorquer and magnetometer were chosen to take advantage of the magnetic field again.

35 REFERENCES

Alminde, L., Bisgaard, M., Vinther, D., Viscor, T., & Østergaard, K. Z.

(2003). Educational Value and Lessons Learnt from the AAU-Cubesat

Project.

ARCBOTICS. (2012). Magnetometer [Photograph].

http://arcbotics.com/products/sparki/parts/magnetometer/

Bahar, M., Effandi, M., Hassan, M., Hamzah, N., Arshad, A.S., Farr, X.C.,

Visagie, L., & Steyn, W.H. (2006). Modular CMOS Horizon Sensor

for Small Satellite Attitude Determination and Control Subsystem

Bridges, C. P., Kenyon, S., Underwood, C. I., & Sweeting, M. N. (2011).

STRaND: Surrey Training Research and Nanosatellite Demonstrator.

STRaND:

Surrey Training Research and Nanosatellite Demonstrator, 3–10.

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/397622.pdf

Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia (2020, November 12). Gyroscope.

Encyclopedia Britannica.

https://www.britannica.com/technology/gyroscope

Burton, Rodney & Laystrom-Woodard, Julia & Benavides, G & Carroll,

David & Coverstone, Victoria & Swenson, Gary & Pukniel, A &

Ghosh, A & Moctezuma, A. (2021). INITIAL DEVELOPMENT OF

THE CUBESAIL/ULTRASAIL SPACECRAFT.

36 C. H. Edwards and S. B. Gabriel, "Ion thrusters for orbit/attitude control of large flexible spacecraft," IEE Colloquium on High Accuracy Platform Control in Space, London, UK, 1993, pp. 9/1-9/4.

College of Engineering, Pune (CoEP),. (2008). SWAYAM. College of

Engineering, Pune. https://www.coep.org.in/clubs/satellite_team

Cortes-Martinez, R., & Rodriguez-Cortes, H. (2019). A Total Energy

Attitude Control System Strategy for Rigid Spacecraft. IEEE Access, 7,

112996–113004. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2934424

CubeSatShop. (2009). CubeSat Attitude sensor.

Https://Www.Cubesatshop.Com/.

https://www.cubesatshop.com/product-category/attitude-

sensors/atic_ion_thruster-en.svg

CubeSatShop. (2009). CubeSat Attitude actuators.

Https://Www.Cubesatshop.Com/.

https://www.cubesatshop.com/product-category/attitude-actuators/

ESTCUBE. (2020). ESTCUBE-2. https://www.estcube.eu/en/estcube-2

Glatzmaier, G. A. (2003). Geodynamo Between Reversals [Photograph].

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Geodynamo_Between_Rev

ersals.gif

Hadi, R. F. (2015). How Static Earth Horizon Sensor Works [Photograph].

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/17-How-Static-Earth-Horizon-

Sensor-Works_fig12_281113325

37 Isıspace. (2013). ISIS magnetorquer board [Phograph].

https://www.cubesatshop.com/product/isis-magnetorquer-board/

Kagawa University & Takamatsu National College of Technology. (2005).

STARS (Space Tethered Autonomous Robotic Satellite). STARS

(Space Tethered Autonomous Robotic Satellite), 1–7.

https://earth.esa.int/web/eoportal/satellite-missions/s/stars

LESIA (2018). star tracker in PicSat [Photograph].

https://directory.eoportal.org/web/eoportal/satellite-

missions/p/picsat#launch

Liu, H. B. (2011). Measurement model of star tracker [Photograph].

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Measurement-model-of-star-

tracker_fig1_252685563

Markley, L. F., & Crassidis, J. L. (2014). Fundamentals of Spacecraft

Attitude Determination and Control (Space Technology Library (33))

(2014th ed.). Springer.

NASA (2012). ithaco 2-axis digital sun sensor [Photograph].

https://slideplayer.com/slide/10291582/

NASA. (2013). The PhoneSat Series of Smartphone Nanosatellites.

https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/phonesat_fact_she

et-6may15.pdf

NASA/ARC (Ames Research Center). (2008). O/OREOS

(Organism/ORganics Exposure to Orbital Stresses) Nanosatellite.

O/OREOS (Organism/ORganics Exposure to Orbital Stresses)

38 Nanosatellite, 1–7.

https://directory.eoportal.org/web/eoportal/satellite-missions/o/ooreos

NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory. (2019). InSight Launch Press Kit | Mars

Cube One.

https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/press_kits/insight/launch/appendix/ma

rs-cube-one/#technology_demo

National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution. (2009). R4-D

Apollo 11 Thruster. http://howthingsfly.si.edu/media/apollo-reaction-control- system-rcs

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (NSF). (2013). National Science

Foundation (Nsf) Cubesat-based Science Missions For Geospace And

Atmospheric Research. National Science Foundation (Nsf) Cubesat-

based Science Missions For Geospace And Atmospheric Research, 44–

45. https://www.nsf.gov/geo/ags/uars/cubesat/nsf-nasa-annual-report-

cubesat-2013.pdf

Peru’s National University of Engineering (UNI). (2014). Chasqui 1.

Chasqui 1. http://www.chasqui.uni.edu.pe/

Post, M. A., Li, J., & Lee, R. (2013). A Low-Cost Photodiode Sun Sensor for

CubeSat and Planetary Microrover. International Journal of Aerospace

Engineering, 2013, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/549080

Riise, Å. G., Samuelsen, B. C. H., Sokolova, N., Cederblad, H. D.,

Fasseland, J., & Nordin, C. O. (2003). nCube: The first Norwegian

Student Satellite. NCube: The First Norwegian Student Satellite, 1–7.

39 https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1791&co

ntext=smallsat

Räisänen, O. (2012). Ion Thruster [Photograph].

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gridded_ion_thruster#/media/File:Electr

ost

Schenk, P. M., & Moore, J. M. (1999). VIKING STEREO IMAGES GIVE US

FIRST 3-D VIEW OF THE SOUTH POLE OF MARS.

https://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/msp/msp.html

Southern Stars Group LLC. (2014). SkyCube. Space.Skyrocket.

https://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/skycube.htm

The University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) & Auburn University

(AU). (2015). TRYAD. Https://Www.Space.Auburn.Edu/Tryad.

https://www.space.auburn.edu/tryad

Wisnievski, R., & Blanke, M. (1999). Fully Magnetic Attitude Control for

Spacecraft Subject to Gravity Gradient. Automatica, 35(7), 1201-1214.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(99)00021-7

Wu, J. (2019). The simulated spacecraft mission with horizon detector, Sun sensor, star tracker and magnetometer. The magnetometer is installed in the interior part of the satellite and is invisible in the current image. [Photograph]. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-simulated-spacecraft-mission-with- horizon-detector-Sun-sensor-star-tracker-and_fig5_335691309

40 CURRICULUM VITAE

Name – Surname : Veysel Abdullah TEKİN

Place and Date of Birth (city, dd.mm.yy): ESKİŞEHİR 01.01.1996

E-mail : [email protected]

EDUCATION: B.Sc.: İstanbul Technical University, Faculty of

Aeronautics and Astronatics, Astronautical Engineering