DOCSLIB.ORG

Nuweveld North Wind Farm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nuweveld North Wind Farm Nuweveld North Wind Farm Red Cap Nuweveld North (Pty) Ltd Avifaunal assessment April 2021 REPORT REVIEW & TRACKING Document title Nuweveld North Wind Farm- Avifaunal Impact study (Assessment Phase) Client name Patrick Killick Aurecon Status Final-for client Issue date April 2021 Lead author Jon Smallie – SACNASP 400020/06 WildSkies Ecological Services (Pty) Ltd 36 Utrecht Avenue, East London, 5241 Jon Smallie E: [email protected] C: 082 444 8919 F: 086 615 5654 2 Regulation GNR 326 of 4 December 2014, as amended 7 April 2017, Appendix 6 Section of Report (a) details of the specialist who prepared the report; and the expertise of that specialist to Appendix 5 compile a specialist report including a curriculum vitae; (b) a declaration that the specialist is independent in a form as may be specified by the Appendix 6 competent authority; (c) an indication of the scope of, and the purpose for which, the report was prepared; Section 1.1 & 2.1 an indication of the quality and age of base data used for the specialist report; Section 3 a description of existing impacts on the site, cumulative impacts of the proposed development Section 3.8 and levels of acceptable change; (d) the duration, date and season of the site investigation and the relevance of the season to Section 2.5 to 2.7 the outcome of the assessment; (e) a description of the methodology adopted in preparing the report or carrying out the Section 2 specialised process inclusive of equipment and modelling used; (f) details of an assessment of the specific identified sensitivity of the site related to the Section 3.7 & proposed activity or activities and its associated structures and infrastructure, inclusive of a Section 4 site plan identifying site alternatives; (g) an identification of any areas to be avoided, including buffers; Section 3.7 (h) a map superimposing the activity including the associated structures and infrastructure on Section 3.7 the environmental sensitivities of the site including areas to be avoided, including buffers; (i) a description of any assumptions made and any uncertainties or gaps in knowledge; Section 2.11 (j) a description of the findings and potential implications of such findings on the impact of the Section 5 proposed activity, including identified alternatives on the environment, or activities; (k) any mitigation measures for inclusion in the EMPr; Section 5 (l) any conditions for inclusion in the environmental authorisation; Section 5 (m) any monitoring requirements for inclusion in the EMPr or environmental authorisation; Section 5 (n) a reasoned opinion— Section 7 i. as to whether the proposed activity, activities or portions thereof should be authorised; iA. Regarding the acceptability of the proposed activity or activities; and ii. if the opinion is that the proposed activity, activities or portions thereof should be authorised, any avoidance, management and mitigation measures that should be included in the EMPr or Environmental Authorization, and where applicable, the closure plan; (o) a summary and copies of any comments received during any consultation process and n/a where applicable all responses thereto; and (p) any other information requested by the competent authority n/a Where a government notice gazetted by the Minister provides for any protocol or minimum Government information requirement to be applied to a specialist report, the requirements as indicated in Notice No. 320 has such notice will apply. been gazetted, and a verification report has been produced and the assessment follows the avifaunal protocol (Appendix 4) 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Red Cap Energy (Pty) Ltd (Red Cap) is proposing to develop up to three wind farms on a site in the Beaufort West Local Municipality, Central Karoo District Municipality, Western Cape. The wind farms are located approximately 65km north of Beaufort West and approximately 30km south of Loxton and are approximately 32 000 hectares in extent. The proposal also includes the development of an approximately ≤120km 132/400kV grid connection power line which will connect the proposed wind farms to the Eskom Droërivier Substation located south west of Beaufort West. The project is comprised of four discreet applications (3 wind farms & 1 grid connection) all subject to the Scoping and EIA process in terms of the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA). This report deals with the Nuweveld North Wind Farm application and reaches the following conclusions regarding the avifaunal community and potential impacts of the Nuweveld North Wind Farm: » We classified nine species as top most priority for this assessment. Four of these are judged to be at high risk before avoidance and mitigation. These are: Ludwig's Bustard; Martial Eagle, Verreaux’s Eagle and Jackal Buzzard. Three species are at moderate risk: Karoo Korhaan, African Rock Pipit and Pale Chanting Goshawk. The Black Stork and Booted Eagle are deemed to be at low risk. » The key avifaunal aspect on site requiring management is the presence of a potential Martial Eagle nesting site. This is buffered in the sensitivity maps, where relevent. » Crude turbine collision fatality rates were calculated for each species in order to estimate how many birds the proposed Nuweveld North Wind Farm could kill. This calculation is considered to be a worst case scenario and is fraught with assumptions. It is estimated that approximately 0.54 bird fatalities could be recorded at Nuweveld North Wind Farm per year across the 9 target bird species recorded flying on site to date (Table 9). This includes the following priority species: 0.19 Jackal Buzzards; 0.10 Ludwig’s Bustards; 0.10 Verreaux’s Eagles; 0.05 Karoo Korhaans; 0.05 Pale Chanting Goshawks; 0.03 Martial Eagle; 0.02 Booted Eagles; 0.01 Black Stork; and 0.01 Rock Kestrel. Comparatively, these fatality rates are very low, reflecting the low flight activity rates by these species on site to date. Two of the key species for the site Verreaux’s Eagle and Martial Eagle have very low estimated fatality rates of 0.10 and 0.03 birds/year respectively. Based on the data collected on site we make the following findings with respect to impact significance for avifauna, according to the formal impact assessment methods provided by Aurecon. Impact Pre-mitigation Post-mitigation Nuweveld North Wind Farm Construction Phase Impact 1 – Habitat destruction Minor Minor Construction Phase Impact 2 - Disturbance Minor Minor Operational Phase Impact 1 – Disturbance Minor Minor Operational Phase Impact 2 – Displacement Minor Minor Operational Phase Impact 3 – Turbine collisions Moderate Moderate Operational Phase Impact 4 – Power line Collision & Electrocution Major Minor Decommissioning Phase Impact 1 – Disturbance Minor Minor Cumulative Impacts Construction Phase Impact 1 – Habitat destruction Moderate Moderate Construction Phase Impact 2 - Disturbance Moderate Minor Operational Phase Impact 1 – Disturbance Moderate Moderate Operational Phase Impact 2 – Displacement Moderate Moderate Operational Phase Impact 3 – Turbine collisions Moderate Moderate 4 Operational Phase Impact 4 – Power line Collision & Electrocution Major Minor Decommissioning Phase Impact 1 – Disturbance Moderate Minor Although extensive avoidance of impacts has already been applied on this project via a screening and constraints phase, we recommend the following additional mitigation measures be applied to manage and further reduce the significance of impacts on birds: » The No-Go areas identified by this study (which build on those identified in the screening and pre-app Scoping phase) should be adhered to. » A pre-construction avifaunal walk down should be conducted to confirm final layout and identify any sensitivities that may arise between the conclusion of the EIA process and the construction phase. » All construction activities should be strictly managed according to generally accepted environmental best practice standards, so as to avoid any unnecessary impact on the receiving environment. » A post construction inspection must be conducted by an avifaunal specialist to confirm that all aspects have been appropriately handled and in particular that road and hard stand verges do not provide additional substrate for raptor prey species. » Monitoring of the breeding status of Verreaux’s and Martial Eagles should be conducted in all breeding seasons post acceptance of the project as preferred bidder (to establish baseline) prior to and during construction. » Given that the impact of bird collision with turbines could occur once the wind farm is operational and require mitigation, we recommend strongly that an appropriate mitigation budget be provided for by the Applicant. At this stage it is not possible to determine what mitigation may be appropriate, and in the time between writing this report and the mitigation need arising (likely several years) new mitigation methods may be developed. However if such a need arises and suitable mitigation is identified it cannot be argued by the wind farm operator that mitigation was not budgeted for. Mitigation could cost the operator either in the form of additional costs or lost productivity as a result of changes to turbine operations. We have suggested a budget for this aspect in this report. It is also important that the developer be aware that mitigation measures may require the installation of equipment on turbines, or possibly the painting of blades. Potential technical and warrantee challenges should be noted where possible throughout the planning process so that they do not prevent the implementation of reasonable mitigation if required. » Internal power line must be placed underground except where absolutely necessary such as to cross drainage lines or get up steep/ extremely rocky slopes. Internal overheads power lines may not exceed a total of 7km in length. This excludes overhead lines that run next to other 22 kV or higher lines. An exception of up to 500m of internal overhead powerlines can go through identified no-go areas if approved by the specialist to, for example, allow a line to get up a steep slope. » An avifaunal walk down should be conducted to confirm final layout and identify any new sensitivities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Freshwater Fishes
    WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE state oF BIODIVERSITY 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction 2 Chapter 2 Methods 17 Chapter 3 Freshwater fishes 18 Chapter 4 Amphibians 36 Chapter 5 Reptiles 55 Chapter 6 Mammals 75 Chapter 7 Avifauna 89 Chapter 8 Flora & Vegetation 112 Chapter 9 Land and Protected Areas 139 Chapter 10 Status of River Health 159 Cover page photographs by Andrew Turner (CapeNature), Roger Bills (SAIAB) & Wicus Leeuwner. ISBN 978-0-620-39289-1 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES 2 Western Cape Province State of Biodiversity 2007 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Andrew Turner [email protected] 1 “We live at a historic moment, a time in which the world’s biological diversity is being rapidly destroyed. The present geological period has more species than any other, yet the current rate of extinction of species is greater now than at any time in the past. Ecosystems and communities are being degraded and destroyed, and species are being driven to extinction. The species that persist are losing genetic variation as the number of individuals in populations shrinks, unique populations and subspecies are destroyed, and remaining populations become increasingly isolated from one another. The cause of this loss of biological diversity at all levels is the range of human activity that alters and destroys natural habitats to suit human needs.” (Primack, 2002). CapeNature launched its State of Biodiversity Programme (SoBP) to assess and monitor the state of biodiversity in the Western Cape in 1999. This programme delivered its first report in 2002 and these reports are updated every five years. The current report (2007) reports on the changes to the state of vertebrate biodiversity and land under conservation usage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eco-Ethology of the Karoo Korhaan Eupodotis Virgorsil
    THE ECO-ETHOLOGY OF THE KAROO KORHAAN EUPODOTIS VIGORSII. BY M.G.BOOBYER University of Cape Town SUBMITIED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE (ORNITHOLOGY) UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN RONDEBOSCH 7700 CAPE TOWN The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town University of Cape Town PREFACE The study of the Karoo Korhaan allowed me a far broader insight in to the Karoo than would otherwise have been possible. The vast openness of the Karoo is a monotony to those who have not stopped and looked. Many people were instrumental in not only encouraging me to stop and look but also in teaching me to see. The farmers on whose land I worked are to be applauded for their unquestioning approval of my activities and general enthusiasm for studies concerning the veld and I am particularly grateful to Mnr. and Mev. Obermayer (Hebron/Merino), Mnr. and Mev. Steenkamp (Inverdoorn), Mnr. Bothma (Excelsior) and Mnr. Van der Merwe. Alwyn and Joan Pienaar of Bokvlei have my deepest gratitude for their generous hospitality and firm friendship. Richard and Sue Dean were a constant source of inspiration throughout the study and their diligence and enthusiasm in the field is an example to us all.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa Mega Birding Tour I 6Th to 30Th January 2018 (25 Days) Trip Report
    South Africa Mega Birding Tour I 6th to 30th January 2018 (25 days) Trip Report Aardvark by Mike Bacon Trip report compiled by Tour Leader: Wayne Jones Rockjumper Birding Tours View more tours to South Africa Trip Report – RBT South Africa - Mega I 2018 2 Tour Summary The beauty of South Africa lies in its richness of habitats, from the coastal forests in the east, through subalpine mountain ranges and the arid Karoo to fynbos in the south. We explored all of these and more during our 25-day adventure across the country. Highlights were many and included Orange River Francolin, thousands of Cape Gannets, multiple Secretarybirds, stunning Knysna Turaco, Ground Woodpecker, Botha’s Lark, Bush Blackcap, Cape Parrot, Aardvark, Aardwolf, Caracal, Oribi and Giant Bullfrog, along with spectacular scenery, great food and excellent accommodation throughout. ___________________________________________________________________________________ Despite havoc-wreaking weather that delayed flights on the other side of the world, everyone managed to arrive (just!) in South Africa for the start of our keenly-awaited tour. We began our 25-day cross-country exploration with a drive along Zaagkuildrift Road. This unassuming stretch of dirt road is well-known in local birding circles and can offer up a wide range of species thanks to its variety of habitats – which include open grassland, acacia woodland, wetlands and a seasonal floodplain. After locating a handsome male Northern Black Korhaan and African Wattled Lapwings, a Northern Black Korhaan by Glen Valentine
    [Show full text]
  • Nuweveld North Wind Farm
    Nuweveld North Wind Farm Red Cap Nuweveld North (Pty) Ltd Avifaunal assessment October 2020 REPORT REVIEW & TRACKING Document title Nuweveld North Wind Farm - Avifaunal Impact study (Scoping Phase) Client name Patrick Killick Aurecon Status Final-for client Issue date October 2020 Lead author Jon Smallie – SACNASP 400020/06 WildSkies Ecological Services (Pty) Ltd 36 Utrecht Avenue, East London, 5241 Jon Smallie E: [email protected] C: 082 444 8919 F: 086 615 5654 2 Regulation GNR 326 of 4 December 2014, as amended 7 April 2017, Appendix 6 Section of Report (a) details of the specialist who prepared the report; and the expertise of that specialist to Appendix 5 compile a specialist report including a curriculum vitae ; (b) a declaration that the specialist is independent in a form as may be specified by the Appendix 6 competent authority; (c) an indication of the scope of, and the purpose for which, the report was prepared; Section 1.1 & 2 .1 an indication of the quality and age of base data used for the specialist report; Section 3 a description of existing impacts on the site, cumulative impacts of the proposed development Section 3.8 and levels of acceptable change; (d) the duration, date and season of the site investigation and the relevance of the season to Section 2.5 to 2.7 the outcome of the assessment; (e) a description of the methodology adopted in preparing the report or carrying out the Section 2 specialised process inclusive of equipment and modelling used; (f) details of an assessment of the specific identified sensitivity
    [Show full text]
  • The Karoo Birds Research and Conservation Project
    The Karoo Birds Research and Conservation Project Final Project Report based on fieldwork conducted through the Karoo south of the Orange River during 2017 and 2018 A BirdLife South Africa conservation project by Alan Lee and Dale Wright. Report by: Alan Lee January 2019 1 Summary The Karoo biome is a vast arid zone environment covering 26% of South Africa, as well as Namibia, and is home to 11 endemic bird species. The Karoo Birds Project was a BirdLife South Africa initiative run from 2017-2018, which aimed to provide a conservation assessment by obtaining data on population size, range and population trends primarily of the Karoo endemic bird species. This report was obtained through a point count and atlasing project across the Karoo region south of the Orange River, South Africa. This was partly run in conjunction with the Karoo BioGaps project. The South African National Biodiversity Institute’s (SANBI) Karoo BioGaps project aimed to gather foundational biodiversity data to support the impact assessments for Shale Gas and other infrastructure development projects in the Karoo basin. During 2017 and 2018 we conducted 2854 point counts across 150 pentads, mostly from end of July to October, largely corresponding to the late winter to early spring period. We found that avian species richness and bird abundance increased eastwards, mostly explained by increasing overall vegetation height, but accompanied by increasing grass cover and decreasing sand cover. In contrast, Karoo endemic bird species richness decreased eastwards, negatively correlated with increasing grass and acacia tree cover. Density and species richness were especially high around water locations and farmhouses, and we found that the presence of many species to be influenced by water, a surprising result for an arid environment.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa Mega Birding III 5Th to 27Th October 2019 (23 Days) Trip Report
    South Africa Mega Birding III 5th to 27th October 2019 (23 days) Trip Report The near-endemic Gorgeous Bushshrike by Daniel Keith Danckwerts Tour leader: Daniel Keith Danckwerts Trip Report – RBT South Africa – Mega Birding III 2019 2 Tour Summary South Africa supports the highest number of endemic species of any African country and is therefore of obvious appeal to birders. This South Africa mega tour covered virtually the entire country in little over a month – amounting to an estimated 10 000km – and targeted every single endemic and near-endemic species! We were successful in finding virtually all of the targets and some of our highlights included a pair of mythical Hottentot Buttonquails, the critically endangered Rudd’s Lark, both Cape, and Drakensburg Rockjumpers, Orange-breasted Sunbird, Pink-throated Twinspot, Southern Tchagra, the scarce Knysna Woodpecker, both Northern and Southern Black Korhaans, and Bush Blackcap. We additionally enjoyed better-than-ever sightings of the tricky Barratt’s Warbler, aptly named Gorgeous Bushshrike, Crested Guineafowl, and Eastern Nicator to just name a few. Any trip to South Africa would be incomplete without mammals and our tally of 60 species included such difficult animals as the Aardvark, Aardwolf, Southern African Hedgehog, Bat-eared Fox, Smith’s Red Rock Hare and both Sable and Roan Antelopes. This really was a trip like no other! ____________________________________________________________________________________ Tour in Detail Our first full day of the tour began with a short walk through the gardens of our quaint guesthouse in Johannesburg. Here we enjoyed sightings of the delightful Red-headed Finch, small numbers of Southern Red Bishops including several males that were busy moulting into their summer breeding plumage, the near-endemic Karoo Thrush, Cape White-eye, Grey-headed Gull, Hadada Ibis, Southern Masked Weaver, Speckled Mousebird, African Palm Swift and the Laughing, Ring-necked and Red-eyed Doves.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy's Impacts on Birds in South Africa
    OCCASIONAL REPORT SERIES: 2 Wind energy’s impacts on birds in South Africa: A preliminary review of the results of operational monitoring at the first wind farms of the Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Procurement Programme in South Africa 1 • BIRDLIFE SOUTH AFRICA OCCASIONAL REPORT SERIES BirdLife South Africa, Private Bag X5000, Parklands, 2121, South Africa Website: www.birdlife.org.za • E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +27 11 789 1122 • Fax: +27 11 789 5188 Recommended citation: Ralston Paton, S., Smallie J., Pearson A., and Ramalho R. 2017. Wind energy’s impacts on birds in South Africa: A preliminary review of the results of operational monitoring at the first wind farms of the Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Procurement Programme in South Africa. BirdLife South Africa Occasional Report Series No. 2. BirdLife South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa Copyright: © 2017 BirdLife South Africa The intellectual property rights of this publication belong to BirdLife South Africa. All rights reserved. Copyright for the images remains with the indi- vidual photographers. Author: Samantha Ralston-Paton (BirdLife South Africa)1, Jon Smallie (WildSkies Ecological Services), Andrew Pearson (Arcus Consult- ing), and Ricardo Ramalho (Biosinight). 1 Corresponding author, email: [email protected]. Design: Bryony van Wyk Acknowledgements: This document was peer reviewed by the Birds and Renewable Energy Specialist Group (Andrew Jenkins, Andrew Pearson, Alvaro Camiña, Birgit Erni, Chris van Rooyen, Craig Whittington-Jones, David Allan, Hanneline Smit-Robinson, Jon Smallie, Kevin Shaw, Lourens Leeuwner, Michael Brooks, Phoebe Barnard, Peter Ryan, Theoni Photo- poulou and Vonica Perold). The input and advice of this group is greatly valued and appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • Avifauna Survey
    AVIFAUNA SURVEY Prepared by: Dr W. Richard J Dean, Research Associate at the DST/NRF Centre of Excellence at the Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology at the University of Cape Town Reviewed and edited by: Dr Penn Lloyd, Principal Ecologist and Director at Biodiversity Assessment and Management Pty Ltd; and Patrick Morant, SACNASP Professional Natural Scientist (Reg. No. 401514/83). Table of content II. SURVEY RESULTS 3 III. INFRASTRUCTURE AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON BIRDS 10 IV. CONSERVATION RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER LONG-TERM MONITORING AND RESEARCH PROGRAMME WITHIN THE SKA CORE AREA AND KCAAA1 13 V. LIST OF ALL BIRD SPECIES RECORDED WITHIN KCAAA1 14 VI. REFERENCES 22 I. Introduction The Square Kilometre Array (SKA) is situated in the Nama Karoo, so only those bird species that occur in the Nama Karoo will be discussed here. The study area of the strategic environmental assessment (SEA) for the first phase of the SKA project (SKA1_MID) covers 153 Quarter Degree Grid Cells (QDGC)1, fairly well covered by participants in the Bird Atlas project in the late 1980s and early 1990s with lists of bird species for all 153 QDGC. Data for the 153 QDGC are a combination of the South African Bird Atlas Project data, museum specimen data and sight data (WRJD pers. obs.) and includes a recent bird list compiled by Etienne Marais. The avifauna of the Nama Karoo is not distinctive, and there are no families of birds endemic to the Karoo, but there are 25 species that are near-endemic to the region (Table 1). Only two species, Red Lark Calendulauda burra and Sclater's Lark Spizocorys sclateri, whose distribution ranges are almost entirely within the Nama Karoo, can be considered true endemics to the Nama Karoo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Best of SOUTH AFRICA October 15-31 2018
    TRIP REPORT: The Best of SOUTH AFRICA October 15-31 2018 The Best of SOUTH AFRICA Birding Safari October 15-31, 2018 Tour leaders: Josh Engel and David Nkosi Click here for the trip photo gallery Next trip: October 10-26, 2020 South Africa never fails to amaze. From the spectacular scenery and endemic birds of the Cape to the megafauna-filled wilderness of Kruger National Park, every single day brings something new, surprising, and awe-inspiring. This trip exceeded expectations—over 400 species of birds and an incredible 60 species of mammals, all seen while staying in interesting, varied, and excellent accommodations, eating delicious food, and thoroughly enjoying all aspects of traveling in South Africa. It’s hard to know where to start with bird and animal highlights. There are, of course, the most sought-after birds, like Protea Canary, Cape Rockjumper, Black Harrier, Rudd’s Lark, Black-eared Sparrowlark, Southern Black Korhaan, and Blue Korhaan. There were also the incredible bird experiences—the Shy Albatrosses surrounding our pelagic boat, the Cape Sugarbird singing from atop of king protea flower, the nest-building Knysna Turacos, the Water Thick-knees trying to chase a Water Monitor away from their nest. Mammals take a front seat in South Africa, too. We had incredible sightings of Leopard and Lion in Kruger, numerous White and a single Black Rhinoceros, along with many encounters with Elephant, Giraffes, and other iconic African animals. But we also saw many awesome small mammals, including Meerkat, Large- and Small- spotted Genet, White-tailed Mongoose, and a Cape Clawless Otter munching on a fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Atlasing in the Hardap and Karas Regions 1965.Pdf
    Volume 50 No 1 January 2017 About the Namibia Bird Club The Namibia Bird Club was founded in 1962 and has been active since then. The club’s mission is to contribute to Namibian ornithology by, amongst other things, arranging regular birding outings, conducting bird ringing and atlasing excursions and educating the public about the value of birds. To achieve this, we organize monthly visits to interesting birding sites around Windhoek as well as regular visits to Avis Dam and the Gammams Sewage Works and occasional weekend trips further afield. Bird club members also participate in the African Waterbird Census twice a year. Experienced birders are more than happy to help beginners and novices on these outings. If you have a transport problem or would like to share transport please contact a committee member. Depending on the availability of speakers and suitable material we present occasional lecture or video evenings at the Namibia Scientific Society premises. Members receive a digital newsletter, Namibia Bird News, which includes a programme of forthcoming events and the Bird Club journal, Lanioturdus. The Namibia Bird Club is not affiliated to any global or regional organization and relies entirely on members’ subscriptions and donations to fund its activities. The opinions expressed in this journal are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Namibia Bird Club or its committee. Instructions to Authors Lanioturdus is a journal dedicated to birds and birding. Although the journal’s primary focus is on Namibia, articles from other geographical parts of the globe will also be considered for publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Agulhas National Park State of Knowledge
    AGULHAS NATIONAL PARK STATE OF KNOWLEDGE Contributors: T. Kraaij, N. Hanekom, I.A. Russell, R.M. Randall SANParks Scientific Services, Garden Route (Rondevlei Office), PO Box 176, Sedgefield, 6573 Last updated: 16 January 2008 Disclaimer This report has been produced by SANParks to summarise information available on a specific conservation area. Production of the report, in either hard copy or electronic format, does not signify that: . the referenced information necessarily reflect the views and policies of SANParks; . the referenced information is either correct or accurate; . SANParks retains copies of the referenced documents; . SANParks will provide second parties with copies of the referenced documents. This standpoint has the premise that (i) reproduction of copywrited material is illegal, (ii) copying of unpublished reports and data produced by an external scientist without the author’s permission is unethical, and (iii) dissemination of unreviewed data or draft documentation is potentially misleading and hence illogical. This report should be cited as: Kraaij T, Hanekom N, Russell IA & Randall RM. 2009. Agulhas National Park – State of Knowledge. South African National Parks. TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTE: TEXT IN SMALL CAPS PERTAINS TO THE MARINE COMPONENT OF THE AGULHAS AREA Abbreviations used 3 Abbreviations used............................................................................................................4 1. ACCOUNT OF AREA...................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa Mega II Trip Report 8Th October to 1St November 2016
    South Africa Mega II Trip Report 8th October to 1st November 2016 Drakensberg Rockjumper by Adam Riley Trip report compiled by Tour Leader: Andre Bernon RBT South Africa – Mega II Trip Report 2016 2 Top 10 birds seen on the trip (as voted by the participants) 1. Drakensberg Rockjumper 2. Blue Crane 3. Botha’s Lark 4. Cape Rockjumper 5. African Penguin 6. Eastern Bronze-naped Pigeon 7. Pink-throated Twinspot 8. Cape Sugarbird 9. Blue Swallow 10. Spotted Eagle-Owl Tour Summary The southern African sub-region has one of the highest number of endemic and near-endemic bird species on the continent. This, coupled with great infrastructure, makes South Africa a highly rewarding country to explore. Our first day was set to be an arrival day where everyone was met by their Rockjumper tour leader at our accommodation in South Africa’s largest city - Johannesburg. This did not stop us from ticking off a few bird species; these came in the form of Karoo Thrush, Crested Barbet, Cape Robin-Chat, Red- headed Finch, Cape Wagtail, Southern Masked Weaver and Southern Red Bishop. After an introductory chat during our first dinner together, talking about the day planned ahead, we made our way to bed in preparation for an early start the following morning. We managed to leave before sunrise and arrived at our first birding destination north of Pretoria, in the Rust de Winter area, when the temperature was still cool and the sky a bit overcast. This aided us in our birding success as we managed to get great views of some target species reaching their easternmost distribution here.
    [Show full text]