DOCSLIB.ORG

Satellite Mod 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Satellite Mod 1 SATELLITE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS Girish K.P. www.edutalks.org Communication satellites bring the world to you anywhere and any time….. www.edutalks.org What exactly is a satellite? • The word satellite originated from the Latin word “Satellit”- meaning an attendant, one who is constantly hovering around & attending to a “master” or big man. • For our own purposes however a satellite is simply any body that moves around another (usually much larger) one in a mathematically predictable path called an orbit. • A communication satellite is a microwave repeater staion in space that is used for tele communcation , radio and television signals. • The first man made satellite with radio transmitter was in 1957. There are about 750 satellite in the space, most of them are used for communication. www.edutalks.org How do satellite work? www.edutalks.org How do Satellites Work? * Two Stations on Earth want to communicate through radio broadcast but are too far away to use conventional means. The two stations can use a satellite as a relay station for their communication. * One Earth Station transmits the signals to the satellite. Up link frequency is the frequency at which Ground Station is communicating with Satellite. * The satellite Transponder converts the signal and sends it down to the second earth station. This frequency is called a Downlink. www.edutalks.org Consider the light bulb example: www.edutalks.org Components of a satellite www.edutalks.org Advantages of satellite over terrestrial communication : * The coverage area of a satellite greatly exceeds that of a terrestrial system. * Transmission cost of a satellite is independent of the distance from the center of the coverage area. * Satellite to Satellite communication is very precise. * Higher Bandwidths are available for use. Disadvantages of satellites: * Launching satellites into orbit is costly. * Satellite bandwidth is gradually becoming used up. * There is a larger propagation delay in satellite communication than in terrestrial communication. www.edutalks.org How does a satellite stay in it’s orbit? www.edutalks.org How do we escape gravity & place an object in orbit? • If an object is fired fast enough it should escape the earths pull. • This is done through the use of Rocket Launchers www.edutalks.org Multi-stage Rockets • Stage 1: Raises the payload e.g. a satellite to an elevation of about 50 miles. • Stage 2: Satellite 100 miles and the third stage places it into the transfer orbit. • Stage 3: The satellite is placed in its final geo- synchronous orbital slot by the AKM, a type of rocket used to move the satellite. www.edutalks.org Applications www.edutalks.org Major problems for satellites • Positioning in orbit • Stability • Power • Communications • Harsh environment www.edutalks.org Positioning • This can be achieved by several methods • One method is to use small rocket motors • These use fuel - over half of the weight of most satellites is made up of fuel • Often it is the fuel availability which determines the lifetime of a satellite • Commercial life of a satellite typically 10- 15 years www.edutalks.org Stability • It is vital that satellites are stabilised - to ensure that solar panels are aligned properly, communication antennae are aligned properly • Early satellites used spin stabilisation - either this requires an inefficient omni-directional aerial Or antennae were precisely counter-rotated in order to provide stable communications. * Modern satellites use reaction wheel stabilisation - a form of gyroscopic stabilisation. www.edutalks.org Power • Modern satellites use a variety of power means •Solar panels are now quite efficient, so solar power is used to generate electricity • Batteries are needed as sometimes the satellites are behind the earth - this happens about half the time for a LEO satellite • Nuclear power has been used - but not recommended www.edutalks.org Satellite - satellite communication • It is also possible for satellites to communicate with other satellites • Communication can be by microwave or by optical laser 2. 2. 2. 1. 1. 1. Point-Point System Crosslink System Hybrid System www.edutalks.org Harsh Environment • Satellite components need to be specially “hardened” • Circuits which work on the ground will fail very rapidly in space • Temperature is also a problem - so satellites use electric heaters to keep circuits and other vital parts warmed up - they also need to control the temperature carefully www.edutalks.org Early satellites • Telstar – Allowed live transmission across the Atlantic • Syncom 2 – First Geosynchronous satellite TELSTAR SYNCOM 2 www.edutalks.org Satellite orbits Classification of orbits: www.edutalks.org * Circular orbits are simplest * Inclined orbits are useful for coverage of equatorial regions * Elliptical orbits can be used to give quasi stationary behavior viewed from earth using 3 or 4 satellites * Orbit changes can be used to extend the life of satellites www.edutalks.org Classification of orbits: Satellite orbits are also classified based on their heights above the earth: – GEO – LEO – MEO – Molniya Orbit – HAPs www.edutalks.org Satellite orbit altitudes www.edutalks.org Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) • These satellites are in orbit 35,786 km above the earth’s surface along the equator. • Objects in Geostationary orbit revolve around the earth at the same speed as the earth rotates. This means GEO satellites remain in the same position relative to the surface of earth. www.edutalks.org GEO contd. • Advantages –A GEO satellite’s distance from earth gives it a large coverage area, almost a fourth of the earth’s surface. – GEO satellites have a 24 hour view of a particular area. – These factors make it ideal for satellite broadcast and other multipoint applications – Minimal doppler shift • Disadvantages – A GEO satellite’s distance also cause it to have both a comparatively weak signal and a time delay in the signal, which is bad for point to point communication. – GEO satellites, centered above the equator, have difficulty for broadcasting signals to near polar regions – Launching of satellites to orbit are complex and expensive. www.edutalks.org Low Earth Orbit (LEO) • LEO satellites are much closer to the earth than GEO satellites, ranging from 500 to 1,500 km above the surface. • LEO satellites don’t stay in fixed position relative to the surface, and are only visible for 15 to 20 minutes each pass. • A network of LEO satellites is necessary for LEO satellites to be useful www.edutalks.org The Iridium system has 66 satellites in six LEO orbits, each at an altitude of 750 km. Iridium is designed to provide direct worldwide voice and data communication using handheld terminals, a service similar to cellular telephony but on a global scale www.edutalks.org LEO Contd. • Advantages A LEO satellite’s proximity to earth compared to a GEO satellite gives it a better signal strength and less of a time delay, which makes it better for point to point communication. A LEO satellite’s smaller area of coverage is less of a waste of bandwidth. • Disadvantages A network of LEO satellites is needed, which can be costly LEO satellites have to compensate for Doppler shifts cause by their relative movement. Atmospheric drag effects LEO satellites, causing gradual orbital deterioration. www.edutalks.org Medium Earth Orbit (MEO) • A MEO satellite is in orbit somewhere between 8,000 km and 18,000 km above the earth’s surface. • MEO satellites are similar to LEO satellites in functionality. • MEO satellites are visible for much longer periods of time than LEO satellites, usually between 2 to 8 hours. • MEO satellites have a larger coverage area than LEO satellites. www.edutalks.org MEO contd. • Advantage A MEO satellite’s longer duration of visibility and wider footprint means fewer satellites are needed in a MEO network than a LEO network. • Disadvantage A MEO satellite’s distance gives it a longer time delay and weaker signal than a LEO satellite, though not as bad as a GEO satellite. www.edutalks.org MEO satellites The GPS constellation calls for 24 satellites to be distributed equally among six circular orbital planes Glonass (Russian) www.edutalks.org Molniya Orbit Used by Russia for decades. Molniya Orbit is an elliptical orbit. The satellite remains in a nearly fixed position relative to earth for eight hours. A series of three Molniya satellites can act like a GEO satellite. Useful in near polar regions. www.edutalks.org High Altitude Platform (HAP) One of the newest ideas in satellite communication. A blimp or plane around 20 km above the earth’s surface is used as a satellite. HAPs would have very small coverage area, but would have a comparatively strong signal. Cheaper to put in position, but would require a lot of them in a network. www.edutalks.org HAP www.edutalks.org Satellite frequency band Downlink, Bandwidth, Band Uplink, GHz GHz MHz L 1.5 1.6 15 S 1.9 2.2 70 C 4 6 500 Ku 11 14 500 Ka 20 30 3500 www.edutalks.org Solar day and Sidereal day • A day is defined as the time that it takes the Earth to rotate on its axis. • However, there is more than one way to define a day: – A sidereal day is the time that it takes for the Earth to rotate with respect to the distant stars. – A solar day is the time that it takes to rotate with respect to the Sun. www.edutalks.org The Length of the Day • A solar day is slightly longer than a sidereal day. – A sidereal day is 23h 56m 4.091s. • We set our watches according to the solar day. • Astronomers use sidereal time because we are mostly interested in distant celestial objects. www.edutalks.org Solar day and Sidereal day • A solar day is measured using the passage of the Sun across the sky—it lasts 24 hours • A sidereal day (from the Latin word meaning star) is measured with respect to fixed stars—it lasts a little less than 24 hours.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analysis of Perturbations and Station-Keeping Requirements in Highly-Inclined Geosynchronous Orbits
    ANALYSIS OF PERTURBATIONS AND STATION-KEEPING REQUIREMENTS IN HIGHLY-INCLINED GEOSYNCHRONOUS ORBITS Elena Fantino(1), Roberto Flores(2), Alessio Di Salvo(3), and Marilena Di Carlo(4) (1)Space Studies Institute of Catalonia (IEEC), Polytechnic University of Catalonia (UPC), E.T.S.E.I.A.T., Colom 11, 08222 Terrassa (Spain), [email protected] (2)International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE), Polytechnic University of Catalonia (UPC), Building C1, Campus Norte, UPC, Gran Capitan,´ s/n, 08034 Barcelona (Spain) (3)NEXT Ingegneria dei Sistemi S.p.A., Space Innovation System Unit, Via A. Noale 345/b, 00155 Roma (Italy), [email protected] (4)Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Strathclyde, 75 Montrose Street, Glasgow G1 1XJ (United Kingdom), [email protected] Abstract: There is a demand for communications services at high latitudes that is not well served by conventional geostationary satellites. Alternatives using low-altitude orbits require too large constellations. Other options are the Molniya and Tundra families (critically-inclined, eccentric orbits with the apogee at high latitudes). In this work we have considered derivatives of the Tundra type with different inclinations and eccentricities. By means of a high-precision model of the terrestrial gravity field and the most relevant environmental perturbations, we have studied the evolution of these orbits during a period of two years. The effects of the different perturbations on the constellation ground track (which is more important for coverage than the orbital elements themselves) have been identified. We show that, in order to maintain the ground track unchanged, the most important parameters are the orbital period and the argument of the perigee.
    [Show full text]
  • Astrodynamics
    Politecnico di Torino SEEDS SpacE Exploration and Development Systems Astrodynamics II Edition 2006 - 07 - Ver. 2.0.1 Author: Guido Colasurdo Dipartimento di Energetica Teacher: Giulio Avanzini Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aeronautica e Spaziale e-mail: [email protected] Contents 1 Two–Body Orbital Mechanics 1 1.1 BirthofAstrodynamics: Kepler’sLaws. ......... 1 1.2 Newton’sLawsofMotion ............................ ... 2 1.3 Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation . ......... 3 1.4 The n–BodyProblem ................................. 4 1.5 Equation of Motion in the Two-Body Problem . ....... 5 1.6 PotentialEnergy ................................. ... 6 1.7 ConstantsoftheMotion . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... 7 1.8 TrajectoryEquation .............................. .... 8 1.9 ConicSections ................................... 8 1.10 Relating Energy and Semi-major Axis . ........ 9 2 Two-Dimensional Analysis of Motion 11 2.1 ReferenceFrames................................. 11 2.2 Velocity and acceleration components . ......... 12 2.3 First-Order Scalar Equations of Motion . ......... 12 2.4 PerifocalReferenceFrame . ...... 13 2.5 FlightPathAngle ................................. 14 2.6 EllipticalOrbits................................ ..... 15 2.6.1 Geometry of an Elliptical Orbit . ..... 15 2.6.2 Period of an Elliptical Orbit . ..... 16 2.7 Time–of–Flight on the Elliptical Orbit . .......... 16 2.8 Extensiontohyperbolaandparabola. ........ 18 2.9 Circular and Escape Velocity, Hyperbolic Excess Speed . .............. 18 2.10 CosmicVelocities
    [Show full text]
  • Positioning: Drift Orbit and Station Acquisition
    Orbits Supplement GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT PERTURBATIONS INFLUENCE OF ASPHERICITY OF THE EARTH: The gravitational potential of the Earth is no longer µ/r, but varies with longitude. A tangential acceleration is created, depending on the longitudinal location of the satellite, with four points of stable equilibrium: two stable equilibrium points (L 75° E, 105° W) two unstable equilibrium points ( 15° W, 162° E) This tangential acceleration causes a drift of the satellite longitude. Longitudinal drift d'/dt in terms of the longitude about a point of stable equilibrium expresses as: (d/dt)2 - k cos 2 = constant Orbits Supplement GEO PERTURBATIONS (CONT'D) INFLUENCE OF EARTH ASPHERICITY VARIATION IN THE LONGITUDINAL ACCELERATION OF A GEOSTATIONARY SATELLITE: Orbits Supplement GEO PERTURBATIONS (CONT'D) INFLUENCE OF SUN & MOON ATTRACTION Gravitational attraction by the sun and moon causes the satellite orbital inclination to change with time. The evolution of the inclination vector is mainly a combination of variations: period 13.66 days with 0.0035° amplitude period 182.65 days with 0.023° amplitude long term drift The long term drift is given by: -4 dix/dt = H = (-3.6 sin M) 10 ° /day -4 diy/dt = K = (23.4 +.2.7 cos M) 10 °/day where M is the moon ascending node longitude: M = 12.111 -0.052954 T (T: days from 1/1/1950) 2 2 2 2 cos d = H / (H + K ); i/t = (H + K ) Depending on time within the 18 year period of M d varies from 81.1° to 98.9° i/t varies from 0.75°/year to 0.95°/year Orbits Supplement GEO PERTURBATIONS (CONT'D) INFLUENCE OF SUN RADIATION PRESSURE Due to sun radiation pressure, eccentricity arises: EFFECT OF NON-ZERO ECCENTRICITY L = difference between longitude of geostationary satellite and geosynchronous satellite (24 hour period orbit with e0) With non-zero eccentricity the satellite track undergoes a periodic motion about the subsatellite point at perigee.
    [Show full text]
  • GPS Applications in Space
    Space Situational Awareness 2015: GPS Applications in Space James J. Miller, Deputy Director Policy & Strategic Communications Division May 13, 2015 GPS Extends the Reach of NASA Networks to Enable New Space Ops, Science, and Exploration Apps GPS Relative Navigation is used for Rendezvous to ISS GPS PNT Services Enable: • Attitude Determination: Use of GPS enables some missions to meet their attitude determination requirements, such as ISS • Real-time On-Board Navigation: Enables new methods of spaceflight ops such as rendezvous & docking, station- keeping, precision formation flying, and GEO satellite servicing • Earth Sciences: GPS used as a remote sensing tool supports atmospheric and ionospheric sciences, geodesy, and geodynamics -- from monitoring sea levels and ice melt to measuring the gravity field ESA ATV 1st mission JAXA’s HTV 1st mission Commercial Cargo Resupply to ISS in 2008 to ISS in 2009 (Space-X & Cygnus), 2012+ 2 Growing GPS Uses in Space: Space Operations & Science • NASA strategic navigation requirements for science and 20-Year Worldwide Space Mission space ops continue to grow, especially as higher Projections by Orbit Type* precisions are needed for more complex operations in all space domains 1% 5% Low Earth Orbit • Nearly 60%* of projected worldwide space missions 27% Medium Earth Orbit over the next 20 years will operate in LEO 59% GeoSynchronous Orbit – That is, inside the Terrestrial Service Volume (TSV) 8% Highly Elliptical Orbit Cislunar / Interplanetary • An additional 35%* of these space missions that will operate at higher altitudes will remain at or below GEO – That is, inside the GPS/GNSS Space Service Volume (SSV) Highly Elliptical Orbits**: • In summary, approximately 95% of projected Example: NASA MMS 4- worldwide space missions over the next 20 years will satellite constellation.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Satellites in Inclined Orbits to Increase Observation Capability Feasibility Analysis
    International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Volume 118 No. 17 2018, 273-287 ISSN: 1311-8080 (printed version); ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-line version) url: http://www.ijpam.eu Special Issue ijpam.eu Small Satellites in Inclined Orbits to Increase Observation Capability Feasibility Analysis DVA Raghava Murthy1, V Kesava Raju2, T.Ramanjappa3, Ritu Karidhal4, Vijayasree Mallikarjuna Kande5, G Ravi chandra Babu6 and A Arunachalam7 1 7 Earth Observations System, ISRO Headquarters, Bengaluru, Karnataka India [email protected] 2 4 5 6ISRO Satellite Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India 3SK University, Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh, India January 6, 2018 Abstract Over the period of past four decades, Remote Sensing data products and services have been effectively utilized to showcase varieties of applications in many areas of re- sources inventory and monitoring. There are several satel- lite systems in operation today and they operate from Po- lar Orbit and Geosynchronous Orbit, collect the imagery and non-imagery data and provide them to user community for various applications in the areas of natural resources management, urban planning and infrastructure develop- ment, weather forecasting and disaster management sup- port. Quality of information derived from Remote Sensing imagery are strongly influenced by spatial, spectral, radio- metric & temporal resolutions as well as by angular & po- larimetric signatures. As per the conventional approach of 1 273 International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue having Remote Sensing satellites in near Polar Sun syn- chronous orbit, the temporal resolution, i.e. the frequency with which an area can be frequently observed, is basically defined by the swath of the sensor and distance between the paths.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Process for Limiting Orbital Debris
    NASA-HANDBOOK NASA HANDBOOK 8719.14 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Approved: 2008-07-30 Washington, DC 20546 Expiration Date: 2013-07-30 HANDBOOK FOR LIMITING ORBITAL DEBRIS Measurement System Identification: Metric APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE – DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED NASA-Handbook 8719.14 This page intentionally left blank. Page 2 of 174 NASA-Handbook 8719.14 DOCUMENT HISTORY LOG Status Document Approval Date Description Revision Baseline 2008-07-30 Initial Release Page 3 of 174 NASA-Handbook 8719.14 This page intentionally left blank. Page 4 of 174 NASA-Handbook 8719.14 This page intentionally left blank. Page 6 of 174 NASA-Handbook 8719.14 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 SCOPE...........................................................................................................................13 1.1 Purpose................................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Applicability ....................................................................................................................... 13 2 APPLICABLE AND REFERENCE DOCUMENTS................................................14 3 ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS ...........................................................................15 3.1 Acronyms............................................................................................................................ 15 3.2 Definitions .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Open Rosen Thesis.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING END OF LIFE DISPOSAL OF SATELLITES IN HIGHLY ELLIPTICAL ORBITS MITCHELL ROSEN SPRING 2019 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Aerospace Engineering with honors in Aerospace Engineering Reviewed and approved* by the following: Dr. David Spencer Professor of Aerospace Engineering Thesis Supervisor Dr. Mark Maughmer Professor of Aerospace Engineering Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT Highly elliptical orbits allow for coverage of large parts of the Earth through a single satellite, simplifying communications in the globe’s northern reaches. These orbits are able to avoid drastic changes to the argument of periapse by using a critical inclination (63.4°) that cancels out the first level of the geopotential forces. However, this allows the next level of geopotential forces to take over, quickly de-orbiting satellites. Thus, a balance between the rate of change of the argument of periapse and the lifetime of the orbit is necessitated. This thesis sets out to find that balance. It is determined that an orbit with an inclination of 62.5° strikes that balance best. While this orbit is optimal off of the critical inclination, it is still near enough that to allow for potential use of inclination changes as a deorbiting method. Satellites are deorbited when the propellant remaining is enough to perform such a maneuver, and nothing more; therefore, the less change in velocity necessary for to deorbit, the better. Following the determination of an ideal highly elliptical orbit, the different methods of inclination change is tested against the usual method for deorbiting a satellite, an apoapse burn to lower the periapse, to find the most propellant- efficient method.
    [Show full text]
  • GEO, MEO, and LEO How Orbital Altitude Impacts Network Performance in Satellite Data Services
    GEO, MEO, AND LEO How orbital altitude impacts network performance in satellite data services COMMUNICATION OVER SATELLITE “An entire multi-orbit is now well accepted as a key enabler across the telecommunications industry. Satellite networks can supplement existing infrastructure by providing global reach satellite ecosystem is where terrestrial networks are unavailable or not feasible. opening up above us, But not all satellite networks are created equal. Providers offer different solutions driving new opportunities depending on the orbits available to them, and so understanding how the distance for high-performance from Earth affects performance is crucial for decision making when selecting a satellite service. The following pages give an overview of the three main orbit gigabit connectivity and classes, along with some of the principal trade-offs between them. broadband services.” Stewart Sanders Executive Vice President of Key terms Technology at SES GEO – Geostationary Earth Orbit. NGSO – Non-Geostationary Orbit. NGSO is divided into MEO and LEO. MEO – Medium Earth Orbit. LEO – Low Earth Orbit. HTS – High Throughput Satellites designed for communication. Latency – the delay in data transmission from one communication endpoint to another. Latency-critical applications include video conferencing, mobile data backhaul, and cloud-based business collaboration tools. SD-WAN – Software-Defined Wide Area Networking. Based on policies controlled by the user, SD-WAN optimises network performance by steering application traffic over the most suitable access technology and with the appropriate Quality of Service (QoS). Figure 1: Schematic of orbital altitudes and coverage areas GEOSTATIONARY EARTH ORBIT Altitude 36,000km GEO satellites match the rotation of the Earth as they travel, and so remain above the same point on the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Single Axis Tracking with the RC1500B the Apparent Motion Of
    Single Axis Tracking with the RC1500B The apparent motion of an inclined orbit satellite appears as a narrow figure 8 pattern aligned perpendicular to the geo-stationary satellite arc. As the inclination of the satellite increases both the height and the width of the figure 8 pattern increase. The single axis tracker can follow the long dimension of the figure 8 but cannot compensate for the width of the figure 8 pattern. A paper (available on our web site - http://www.researchconcepts.com/Files/track_wp.pdf) describes the height and width of the figure 8 pattern as a function of the inclination of the satellite’s orbit. Note that the inclination of the satellite increases with time. The maximum rate of increase is approximately 0.9 degrees per year. As the inclination increases, the width of the figure 8 pattern will also increase. This has two implications for system performance. One, the maximum signal loss due to antenna misalignment will increase with time, and two, the antenna must have range a of motion sufficient to accommodate the greatest satellite inclination that will be encountered. Many people feel that single axis tracking is viable for antenna’s up to 3.8 meters at C band and 2.4 meters at Ku band. Implicit in this is the fact that the inclination of most commercial satellites is not allowed to exceed 5 degrees. This assumption should be verified before a system is fielded. A single axis tracking system must be in precise mechanical alignment to minimize loss due to the mount’s inability to compensate for the width of the figure eight pattern.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement Techniques and New Technologies for Satellite Monitoring
    Report ITU-R SM.2424-0 (06/2018) Measurement techniques and new technologies for satellite monitoring SM Series Spectrum management ii Rep. ITU-R SM.2424-0 Foreword The role of the Radiocommunication Sector is to ensure the rational, equitable, efficient and economical use of the radio- frequency spectrum by all radiocommunication services, including satellite services, and carry out studies without limit of frequency range on the basis of which Recommendations are adopted. The regulatory and policy functions of the Radiocommunication Sector are performed by World and Regional Radiocommunication Conferences and Radiocommunication Assemblies supported by Study Groups. Policy on Intellectual Property Right (IPR) ITU-R policy on IPR is described in the Common Patent Policy for ITU-T/ITU-R/ISO/IEC referenced in Annex 1 of Resolution ITU-R 1. Forms to be used for the submission of patent statements and licensing declarations by patent holders are available from http://www.itu.int/ITU-R/go/patents/en where the Guidelines for Implementation of the Common Patent Policy for ITU-T/ITU-R/ISO/IEC and the ITU-R patent information database can also be found. Series of ITU-R Reports (Also available online at http://www.itu.int/publ/R-REP/en) Series Title BO Satellite delivery BR Recording for production, archival and play-out; film for television BS Broadcasting service (sound) BT Broadcasting service (television) F Fixed service M Mobile, radiodetermination, amateur and related satellite services P Radiowave propagation RA Radio astronomy RS Remote sensing systems S Fixed-satellite service SA Space applications and meteorology SF Frequency sharing and coordination between fixed-satellite and fixed service systems SM Spectrum management Note: This ITU-R Report was approved in English by the Study Group under the procedure detailed in Resolution ITU-R 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbital Debris Mitigation Standard Practices (ODMSP) Were Established in 2001 to Address the Increase in Orbital Debris in the Near-Earth Space Environment
    U.S. Government Orbital Debris Mitigation Standard Practices, November 2019 Update PREAMBLE The United States Government (USG) Orbital Debris Mitigation Standard Practices (ODMSP) were established in 2001 to address the increase in orbital debris in the near-Earth space environment. The goal of the ODMSP was to limit the generation of new, long-lived debris by the control of debris released during normal operations, minimizing debris generated by accidental explosions, the selection of safe flight profile and operational configuration to minimize accidental collisions, and postmission disposal of space structures. While the original ODMSP adequately protected the space environment at the time, the USG recognizes that it is in the interest of all nations to minimize new debris and mitigate effects of existing debris. This fact, along with increasing numbers of space missions, highlights the need to update the ODMSP and to establish standards that can inform development of international practices. This 2019 update includes improvements to the original objectives as well as clarification and additional standard practices for certain classes of space operations. The improvements consist of a quantitative limit on debris released during normal operations, a probability limit on accidental explosions, probability limits on accidental collisions with large and small debris, and a reliability threshold for successful postmission disposal. The new standard practices established in the update include the preferred disposal options for immediate removal of structures from the near-Earth space environment, a low-risk geosynchronous Earth orbit (GEO) transfer disposal option, a long-term reentry option, and improved move-away-and-stay-away storage options in medium Earth orbit (MEO) and above GEO.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Geosynchronous Objects
    esoc European Space Operations Centre Robert-Bosch-Strasse 5 D-64293 Darmstadt Germany T +49 (0)6151 900 www.esa.int CLASSIFICATION OF GEOSYNCHRONOUS OBJECTS Produced with the DISCOS Database Prepared by ESA’s Space Debris Office Reference GEN-DB-LOG-00211-OPS-GR Issue 20 Revision 0 Date of Issue 28 May 2018 Status Issued Document Type Technical Note Distribution ESA UNCLASSIFIED - Limited Distribution European Space Agency Agence spatiale europeenne´ Abstract This is a status report on geosynchronous objects as of 1 January 2018. Based on orbital data in ESA’s DISCOS database and on orbital data provided by KIAM the situation near the geostationary ring is analysed. From 1523 objects for which orbital data are available (of which 0 are outdated, i.e. the last available state dates back to 180 or more days before the reference date), 519 are actively controlled, 795 are drifting above, below or through GEO, 189 are in a libration orbit and 19 are in a highly inclined orbit. For 1 object the status could not be determined. Furthermore, there are 59 uncontrolled objects without orbital data (of which 54 have not been cata- logued). Thus the total number of known objects in the geostationary region is 1582. If you detect any error or if you have any comment or question please contact: Stijn Lemmens European Space Agency European Space Operations Center Space Debris Office (OPS-GR) Robert-Bosch-Str. 5 64293 Darmstadt, Germany Tel.: +49-6151-902634 E-mail: [email protected] Page 1 / 187 European Space Agency CLASSIFICATION OF GEOSYNCHRONOUS OBJECTS Agence spatiale europeenne´ Date 28 May 2018 Issue 20 Rev 0 Table of contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Sources 4 2.1 USSTRATCOM Two-Line Elements (TLEs) .
    [Show full text]