Collins Challenged Over NCI-Funded Research Linking Tea Party
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Vol. 39 No. 10 March 8, 2013 © Copyright 2013 The Cancer Letter Inc. All rights reserved. Price $405 Per Year. To subscribe, call 800-513-7042 or visit www.cancerletter.com. PO Box 9905 Washington DC 20016 Telephone 202-362-1809 Capitol Hill Collins Challenged Over NCI-Funded Research Capitol Hill Linking Tea Party With Tobacco Companies Collins: "I am quite By Paul Goldberg troubled by this NIH Director Francis Collins told a House subcommittee that he was “troubled” by a paper in which a prominent tobacco control expert, who particular circumstance." is funded by NCI, claims to have found a relationship between tobacco . Page 4 companies and the Tea Party conservative movement. The paper in question appeared in Tobacco Control, a peer-reviewed journal published by British Medical Journal Group. Drawing on documents Sequestration dating back to the 1980s and obtained from tobacco companies, the authors NCI Director Harold point to several instances in which the Tea Party and its predecessor Varmus Seeks to Protect organizations appear to act as proxies for tobacco interests. The paper cites Competitive Awards an NCI grant that supports analysis of tobacco industry documents. Page 5 The paper’s senior author is Stanton Glantz, professor in the Department of Medicine at the University of California San Francisco, a member of the Varmus' Address to Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, and director of the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education. The NCI Board of (Continued to page 2) Scientific Advisors Sequestration . Page 7 Federal Budget Cuts Enacted March 1; HHS Agencies Grapple with Consequences BSA Approves RFA By Matthew Bin Han Ong Reissuance for the The across-the-board 5.1 percent budget cuts that went into effect March Pediatric Brain 1 slash the NIH budget by $1.553 billion and the NCI budget by $219 million for the remaining fiscal year, officials say. Tumor Consortium These deep budget reductions, known as sequestration, affect the . Page 10 entire federal government—with no exemptions for the components of the Department of Health and Human Services. Research Leaders (Continued to page 5) Address International In Brief Cancer Challenges Breakthrough Prize Awarded to 11 Scientists . Page 10 THE BREAKTHROUGH PRIZE, dedicated to excellence in research Obituary aimed at curing intractable diseases, was launched Feb. 20. The 11 inaugural Zora Brown, 63 recipients of the prize, who will receive $3 million each, are: . Page 12 Cornelia Bargmann, for her work in the genetics of neural circuits and behavior, and synaptic guidepost molecules. She is the Torsten N. Wiesel Professor and head of the Lulu and Anthony Wang Laboratory of Neural (Continued to page 11) Collins Offers No Defense Collins didn’t defend either the NCI grant or the Glantz paper. Instead, the NIH director said that Glantz’s For NCI-Funded UCSF Paper paper falls outside the objectives of NCI grants. (Continued from page 1) “I, too, am quite troubled about this particular The paper states that “rather than being a purely circumstance,” Collins said. “Dr. Stanton Glantz, who grassroots movement that spontaneously developed in is the author of that article, has been a funded grantee 2009, the Tea Party has developed over time, in part of the NIH’s cancer institute for 14 years and has done through decades of work by the tobacco industry and some very important work in tobacco control over those other corporate interests. It is important for tobacco years, and is considered by peers to be among the best in control advocates in the USA and internationally, to the field. If you look carefully at the acknowledgements anticipate and counter Tea Party opposition to tobacco at the end of this particular paper, which came as a control policies and ensure that policymakers, the media surprise to us as well, it does cite two different grants and the public understand the longstanding connection from the NCI. between the tobacco industry, the Tea Party and its There is also wording there, and maybe you can associated organizations.” read it off to us, which says that this particular work and At a hearing of the House Labor HHS Appropriations this particular paper was not suggested or encouraged Subcommittee March 6, Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.), a by the NIH. It is on its own.” physician who serves on the committee, challenged NCI Director Harold Varmus did not testify at the the appropriateness of NCI supporting what amounts hearing. to Glantz’s investigative work, as opposed to basic or Glantz said he was surprised by this characterization clinical cancer research. of his work. The BMJ paper “alleged that somehow the Tea “I was very troubled by it,” Glantz said to The Party had its origin in 1980s, with tobacco funding, Cancer Letter. “We just published an important paper in which is pretty incredible, because, I mean, I’m a the leading specialty journal in the field, after extensive Tea Party guy,” Harris said. “I was there when it peer review. The work is completely within the scope of was established in 2009. I know the origins. I find the grant. It is Aim Two of the grant—to understand how it incredible that NIH funding is funding this… Dr. the tobacco companies work to prevent effective tobacco Collins, what methods does the NIH have in this kind control policies, including through the creation of third of research takes dollars from cancer research and parties, which is what the Tea Party connection is. other important vital research—what does the NIH do “The grant, when it was peer reviewed got a 119, to universities that waste federal tax dollars this way?” which was the second percentile. The study section specifically highlighted the importance of this kind of research to cancer control. “I don’t understand what the problem is.” ® The Cancer Letter is a registered trademark. An Echo of Tempest Past Editor & Publisher: Paul Goldberg Glantz is no ordinary researcher. He has pioneered Associate Editor: Conor Hale the field of systematic analysis of tobacco industry Reporter: Matthew Bin Han Ong documents. Editorial, Subscriptions and Customer Service: Now, scientists all over the world sift through such 202-362-1809 Fax: 202-379-1787 documents. Altogether, the UCSF library lists 656 peer PO Box 9905, Washington DC 20016 reviewed journal papers based on analysis of tobacco General Information: www.cancerletter.com industry documents. This isn’t the first time NIH has been criticized for Subscription $405 per year worldwide. ISSN 0096-3917. Published 46 times a year by The Cancer Letter Inc. Other supporting Glantz’s work. than "fair use" as specified by U.S. copyright law, none of In 1995, an article in The Washington Times the content of this publication may be reproduced, stored in quoted a spokesman for former Rep. John Porter a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form (electronic, (R-Ill.), then chair of the Labor, HHS and Education photocopying, or facsimile) without prior written permis- Appropriations Subcommittee, objecting to NCI funding sion of the publisher. Violators risk criminal penalties and a Glantz project of tracking campaign contributions damages. Founded Dec. 21, 1973, by Jerry D. Boyd. from tobacco companies and correlating them with The Cancer Letter • March 8, 2013 Vol. 39 No. 10 • Page 2 pro-tobacco measures. connections are exposed and lose their value to the “NCI has gone beyond its mandate to conduct tobacco companies. clinical and behavioral research regarding cancer,” the “By identifying and analyzing these industry staff member said. tactics, our research helps U.S. and global tobacco public At that time, the controversy was resolved when health policy makers anticipate and counter industry the American Cancer Society stepped in to provide activities, increasing the likelihood that tobacco control funding for the small portion of the grant that offended initiatives will succeed in protecting human health. Porter. The NIH study section, which gave the grant the The grant, which focuses on state and local score of 119, wrote: policymaking, was otherwise untouched, and is now in “This outstanding application from a stellar team the 19th year of being funded. (That action prompted an of investigators focuses on a highly significant public investigation by Glantz and resulted in a 2009 paper in health issue in its plan to examine the tobacco industry’s the American Journal of Public Health.) efforts to influence the conduct, interpretation and In 1995, Porter was a friend NIH could ill-afford dissemination of science in order to oppose tobacco to lose. control policies. Now, as NIH faces 5.1 percent or $1.553 billion “The investigators also plan to analyze tobacco in sequestration cuts, it needs friends even more than it industry marketing and advertising strategies targeting did 17 years ago, and the prospect of upsetting an entire women and young adults in order to inform future efforts segment of the Republican Party would be remarkably to develop potential counter-strategies. The investigators unwelcome. have been extremely productive in the prior project Examination of tobacco documents is research, not period and have produced around 60 publications. politics, Glantz said. It’s an assessment of the industry’s “The proposed methodology is sound and based efforts to thwart tobacco control measures. on best practices for this kind of inquiry. Indeed, “One of the important points of this research is the investigator has contributed significantly to the that in order to control cancer and heart disease and methodology, and the development and maintenance of other bad things that tobacco causes, you have to reduce the documents library is cutting edge. Triangulation with smoking, and in order to reduce smoking you have to other sources of data, such as interviews, government understand what the tobacco companies are doing to records, and media coverage will be used to validate try to prevent the implementation of effective tobacco and contextualize the information.