WCSJ2017 Final Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chomsky and Pollin: We Can't Rely on Private Sector for Necessary
So-Called Democratic “Moderates” Are Actually Right-Wingers Who Have Always Thrown Up Roadblocks To Social Progress CJ Polychroniou The U.S. is the only liberal-democratic country in the world with a political system set up for two mainstream parties, a long and continuous history of union suppression, and without a major socialist party at the national level. How is it possible that the world’s largest economy has a crumbling infrastructure (“shabby beyond belief” is how the CEO of Legal & General, a multinational financial services and asset management company, described it back in 2016), and ranks in the lower half of second tier countries, behind economic powerhouses Cyprus and Greece, on the 2020 Social Progress Index? It’s the politics, stupid! The United States is the only liberal-democratic country in the world with a political system set up for two mainstream parties, a long and continuous history of union suppression, and without a major socialist party at the national level. Indeed, the countries that perform best on the Social Progress Index have multi- party systems, strong labor unions, a plethora of left-wing parties, and adhere to the social democratic model. In other words, politics explains why the United States did not develop a European-style welfare state. Political factors also explain why economic inequalities are so huge in the US and the middle class is shrinking; why the quality of America’s health care system is dead last when compared with other western, industrialized nations; why there are millions of homeless people; and why the infrastructure resembles that of a third-world country. -
Collins Challenged Over NCI-Funded Research Linking Tea Party
Vol. 39 No. 10 March 8, 2013 © Copyright 2013 The Cancer Letter Inc. All rights reserved. Price $405 Per Year. To subscribe, call 800-513-7042 or visit www.cancerletter.com. PO Box 9905 Washington DC 20016 Telephone 202-362-1809 Capitol Hill Collins Challenged Over NCI-Funded Research Capitol Hill Linking Tea Party With Tobacco Companies Collins: "I am quite By Paul Goldberg troubled by this NIH Director Francis Collins told a House subcommittee that he was “troubled” by a paper in which a prominent tobacco control expert, who particular circumstance." is funded by NCI, claims to have found a relationship between tobacco . Page 4 companies and the Tea Party conservative movement. The paper in question appeared in Tobacco Control, a peer-reviewed journal published by British Medical Journal Group. Drawing on documents Sequestration dating back to the 1980s and obtained from tobacco companies, the authors NCI Director Harold point to several instances in which the Tea Party and its predecessor Varmus Seeks to Protect organizations appear to act as proxies for tobacco interests. The paper cites Competitive Awards an NCI grant that supports analysis of tobacco industry documents. Page 5 The paper’s senior author is Stanton Glantz, professor in the Department of Medicine at the University of California San Francisco, a member of the Varmus' Address to Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, and director of the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education. The NCI Board of (Continued to page 2) Scientific Advisors Sequestration . Page 7 Federal Budget Cuts Enacted March 1; HHS Agencies Grapple with Consequences BSA Approves RFA By Matthew Bin Han Ong Reissuance for the The across-the-board 5.1 percent budget cuts that went into effect March Pediatric Brain 1 slash the NIH budget by $1.553 billion and the NCI budget by $219 million for the remaining fiscal year, officials say. -
The American Poetry Review
“As soon as we subscribe to a hierarchy, we circumscribe ourselves within a value system. This is perhaps the great conundrum AMERICAN of art—once we define a term, we impose a limit, thereby inviting both orthodoxy and transgression. Our concept of ‘art’ or ‘poem’ or ‘novel’ is, then, always in flux, and I think we’d agree that this is how art renews itself—through those who dare to challenge those terms. The making of art, and the evaluation of it, is always an act POETRY REVIEW of self-definition.” —KITANO, p. 37 MAY/JUNE 2021 VOL. 50/NO. 3 $5 US/$7 CA MEGAN FERNANDES MAGICAL REALISM IN AMERICA & OTHER POEMS FORREST GANDER OWNING YOURSELF: AN INTERVIEW WITH JACK GILBERT SALLY WEN MAO PARIS SYNDROME & OTHER POEMS ALSO IN THIS ISSUE: ALISON C. ROLLINS MAGGIE SMITH NATALIE EILBERT PHOTO: APRWEB.ORG RIVKAH GEVINSON 2 THE AMERICAN POETRY REVIEW The American Poetry Review (issn 0360-3709) is published bimonthly by World Poetry, Inc., a non-profit corporation, and Old City Publishing, Inc. Edi torial offices: 1906 Rittenhouse Square, Philadelphia, PA 19103-5735. Subscription rates: U.S.: 3 years, $78.00; 2 years, $56.00; 1 year, $32.00. Foreign rates: 3 years, $129.00; 2 years, $92.00; 1 year, $49.00. Single copy, $5.00. Special classroom adoption rate per year per student: MAY/JUNE 2021 VOL. 50/NO. 3 $14.00. Free teacher’s subscription with classroom adoption. Subscription mail should be addressed to The American IN THIS ISSUE Poetry Review, c/o Old City Publishing, 628 N. -
The Pulitzer Prizes 2020 Winne
WINNERS AND FINALISTS 1917 TO PRESENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Excerpts from the Plan of Award ..............................................................2 PULITZER PRIZES IN JOURNALISM Public Service ...........................................................................................6 Reporting ...............................................................................................24 Local Reporting .....................................................................................27 Local Reporting, Edition Time ..............................................................32 Local General or Spot News Reporting ..................................................33 General News Reporting ........................................................................36 Spot News Reporting ............................................................................38 Breaking News Reporting .....................................................................39 Local Reporting, No Edition Time .......................................................45 Local Investigative or Specialized Reporting .........................................47 Investigative Reporting ..........................................................................50 Explanatory Journalism .........................................................................61 Explanatory Reporting ...........................................................................64 Specialized Reporting .............................................................................70 -
Antisemitism 2.0”—The Spreading of Jew-Hatredonthe World Wide Web
MonikaSchwarz-Friesel “Antisemitism 2.0”—The Spreading of Jew-hatredonthe World Wide Web This article focuses on the rising problem of internet antisemitism and online ha- tred against Israel. Antisemitism 2.0isfound on all webplatforms, not justin right-wing social media but alsoonthe online commentary sections of quality media and on everydayweb pages. The internet shows Jew‐hatred in all its var- ious contemporary forms, from overt death threats to more subtle manifestations articulated as indirect speech acts. The spreading of antisemitic texts and pic- tures on all accessibleaswell as seemingly non-radical platforms, their rapid and multiple distribution on the World Wide Web, adiscourse domain less con- trolled than other media, is by now acommon phenomenon within the spaceof public online communication. As aresult,the increasingimportance of Web2.0 communication makes antisemitism generallymore acceptable in mainstream discourse and leadstoanormalization of anti-Jewishutterances. Empirical results from alongitudinalcorpus studyare presented and dis- cussed in this article. They show how centuries old anti-Jewish stereotypes are persistentlyreproducedacross different social strata. The data confirm that hate speech against Jews on online platforms follows the pattern of classical an- tisemitism. Although manyofthem are camouflaged as “criticism of Israel,” they are rooted in the ancient and medieval stereotypes and mental models of Jew hostility.Thus, the “Israelization of antisemitism,”¹ the most dominant manifes- tation of Judeophobia today, proves to be merelyanew garb for the age-old Jew hatred. However,the easy accessibility and the omnipresenceofantisemitism on the web 2.0enhancesand intensifies the spreadingofJew-hatred, and its prop- agation on social media leads to anormalization of antisemitic communication, thinking,and feeling. -
Inside Story of the Chaotic Struggle for Afghanistan Ben Anderson
NEWORLD O PUBLICATIONS Spring & Summer 2012 Oneworld Highlights Page 2 Page 6 Page 8 Page 10 Page 12 Page 16 Page 18 Page 24 Page 25 Page 30 Page 31 Page 36 Contents Contents Coming Soon 2 New in Paperback 24 Recently Released 30 Coping With 37 Beginner’s Guides 38 Select Backlist 40 Contacts 46 For more information visit www.oneworld-publications.com 2 Coming Soon This Flawless Place Between Bruno Portier A beautiful, modern-day reimagining of The Tibetan Book of the Dead, one of the world’s most influential and treasured spiritual texts Evoking inspirational classics like The Alchemist, This Flawless Place Between is a transcendent story about the end of life. It is a story of love, of the choices we make and the paths we walk, and how the great divide that we have built between the living and those that have passed is no divide at all. Fiction On an isolated stretch of road in the Tibetan About the Author: • UK: April 2012 mountains, a motorbike skids off the road. Bike and Bruno Portier is a writer, photographer, and • US: May 2012 riders spin over the edge, plunging into a ravine. A • Hardback documentary maker. He Tibetan peasant hurries to help, but while the young • B Format travelled around Asia • 208 pages husband tries in vain to save his wife’s life, the stranger for twelve years before • £10.99/$16.95 focuses on guiding her spirit along the new path it undertaking a PhD in social anthropology and writing • 9781851688500 must take. So begins a cathartic journey that carries this, his first novel. -
Bots and Political Influence: a Sociotechnical Investigation of Social Network Capital
International Journal of Communication 10(2016), 4952–4971 1932–8036/20160005 Bots and Political Influence: A Sociotechnical Investigation of Social Network Capital DHIRAJ MURTHY1 University of Texas at Austin, USA ALISON B. POWELL London School of Economics, UK RAMINE TINATI University of Southampton, UK NICK ANSTEAD London School of Economics, UK LESLIE CARR SUSAN J. HALFORD MARK WEAL University of Southampton, UK This study explains how bots interact with human users and influence conversational networks on Twitter. We analyze a high-stakes political environment, the UK general election of May 2015, asking human volunteers to tweet from purpose-made Twitter accounts—half of which had bots attached—during three events: the last Prime Dhiraj Murthy: [email protected] Alison B. Powell: [email protected] Ramine Tinati: [email protected] Nick Anstead: [email protected] Leslie Carr: [email protected] Susan J. Halford: [email protected] Mark Weal: [email protected] Date submitted: 2016-08-30 1 The authors gratefully acknowledge the feedback from the day-long workshop Algorithms, Automation and Politics, organized by the European Research Council–funded Computational Propaganda project of the Oxford Internet Institute and held as a preconference to the International Communication Association Meeting in Fukuoka, Japan, in June 2016. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Research Council. Copyright © 2016 (Dhiraj Murthy, Alison B. Powell, Ramine Tinati, Nick Anstead, Leslie Carr, Susan J. -
Amy Elizabeth Herr
Amy E. Herr, Ph.D. John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Professor Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Berkeley, CA 94720 BERKELEY [email protected] | herrlab.berkeley.edu EDUCATION 01/98 – 09/02 STANFORD UNIVERSITY Stanford, CA Doctor of Philosophy, Mechanical Engineering National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow “Isoelectric Focusing for Multi-Dimensional Separations in Microfluidic Devices” Advisors: Profs. Thomas W. Kenny & Juan G. Santiago 09/97 – 01/99 STANFORD UNIVERSITY Stanford, CA Master of Science, Mechanical Engineering National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow 09/93 – 06/97 CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (CALTECH) Pasadena, CA Bachelor of Science, Engineering & Applied Science with Honors APPOINTMENTS 07/19 – now JOHN D. & CATHERINE T. MACARTHUR PROFESSOR, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 07/14 – 07/19 LESTER JOHN & LYNNE DEWAR LLOYD DISTINGUISHED PROFESSOR (5-year appointment), UC BERKELEY 07/12 – 07/15 ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, BIOENGINEERING, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 07/07 – 07/12 ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, BIOENGINEERING, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY UC BERKELEY/UCSF GRADUATE GROUP IN BIOENGINEERING Directing a research group focused on design and study of microanalytical tools and methods that exploit scale-dependent physics & chemistry to address questions in the biosciences and biomedicine. Chan Zuckerberg Biohub Investigator (2017-21), National Advisory Council for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (2020-23), Faculty Director of Bakar Faculty Fellows Program (2016-now), Co-Convener of Chancellor’s Advisory Committee on Life Sciences (2019-22), BioE Vice-chair for Engagement (2016- now), Director’s Council for Jacobs Institute of Design Innovation, Board Member of Chemical & Biological Microsystems Society (2013-19; Awards Chair 2016-18), Director of Bioengineering Immersion Experience (2012-22; NIH R25). -
Rebranding “Made in India” Through Cultural Sustainability – Exploring and Expanding Indian Perspectives
REBRANDING “MADE IN INDIA” THROUGH CULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY – EXPLORING AND EXPANDING INDIAN PERSPECTIVES Thesis for Two year Master, 30 ECTS Textile Management Monica Boța-Moisin Raphael Schreiber Thesis Number: 2021.7.01 Title: Rebranding “Made in India” through Cultural Sustainability - Exploring and Expanding Indian Perspectives Year of publication: 2021 Authors: Monica Boța-Moisin and Raphael Schreiber Supervisor: Hanna Wittrock Abstract This exploratory study is a first attempt to translate the Indian cultural context from a socio- cultural, and legal perspective by identifying the values attributed to Indian textile craftsmanship by Indian textile and fashion stakeholders, and how their perspective is influenced by the global recognition and perception of Indian textile crafts and connotation of “Made in India”. At the same time the study investigates the meaning of “sustainability” in the Indian cultural context, in relation to textile craftsmanship, and how this relates to the Western concept of “sustainability”. Through field research in conjunction with a series of in- depth unstructured interviews, this study reveals that Cultural Sustainability is the dominating narrative in the Indian cultural context due to the prevalence of culturally embedded sustainability practices and the role of textile craftsmanship in sustaining livelihood, being a unique exercise of positioning Indian textile craftsmanship within a framework of cultural heritage as a valuable source of knowledge for sustainable practices in the fashion and textile industry. Unique about this study are the India-centric approach combined with the ethnicity of the subjects interviewed - who are, without exception, Indian nationals, whose work, voice and reputation are shaping India's contemporary textile craft-sustainability narrative (being referred to as the “Indian textiles and fashion elite”) and the framing of traditional craftsmanship from a legal perspective, introducing the notion of legal protection of traditional textile knowledge and traditional cultural expressions. -
The Open Notebook’S Pitch Database Includes Dozens of Successful Pitch Letters for Science Stories
Selected Readings Prepared for the AAAS Mass Media Science & Engineering Fellows, May 2012 All contents are copyrighted and may not be used without permission. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION PART ONE: FINDING IDEAS 1. Lost and found: How great non-fiction writers discover great ideas—In this topical feature, TON guest contributor Brendan Borrell interviews numerous science writers about how they find ideas. (The short answer: In the darndest places.) 2. Ask TON: Saving string—Writers and editors provide advice on gathering ideas for feature stories. 3. Ask TON: From idea to story—Four experienced science writers share the questions they ask themselves when weighing whether a story idea is viable. 4. Ask TON: Finding international stories—Six well-traveled science writers share their methods for sussing out international stories. PART TWO: PITCHING 5. Ask TON: How to pitch—In this interview, writers and editors dispense advice on elements of a good pitch letter. 6. Douglas Fox recounts an Antarctic adventure—Doug Fox pitched his Antarctica story to numerous magazines, unsuccessfully, before finding a taker just before leaving on the expedition he had committed to months before. After returning home, that assignment fell through, and Fox pitched it one more time—to Discover, who bought the story. In this interview, Fox describes the lessons he learned in the pitching process; he also shares his pitch letters, both unsuccessful and successful (see links). 7. Pitching errors: How not to pitch—In this topical feature, Smithsonian editor Laura Helmuth conducts a roundtable conversation with six other editors in which they discuss how NOT to pitch. -
Software for Microscopy Workshop Whitepaper
Software for Microscopy Workshop White Paper Raghav Chhetri1, Stephan Preibisch1,2, Nico Stuurman3 1 HHMI Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, VA, USA 2 Berlin Institute for Molecular Systems Biology, MDC, Berlin, Germany 3 Dept. of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of San Francisco and HHMI/UCSF, USA Workshop Participants: Nenad Amodaj, Luminous Point Hazen Babcock, Harvard University David Bennett, Janelia Research Campus/HHMI Andreas Boden, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm Ulrike Boehm, Janelia Research Campus/HHMI Peter Brown, Arizona State University Ahmet Can Solak, Chan Zuckerberg Biohub Yannan Chen, Columbia University Raghav Chhetri, Janelia Research Campus/HHMI Kevin Dean, UT Southwestern Medical Center Michael DeSantis, Janelia Research Campus/HHMI Brian English, Janelia Research Campus/HHMI Paul French, Imperial College London Adam Glaser, University of Washington John Heddleston, Janelia Research Campus/HHMI Elizabeth Hillman, Columbia University Georg Jaindl, Vidrio Technologies Justine Larsen, Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Jeffrey Kuhn, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sunil Kumar, Imperial College London Xuesong Li, National Institutes of Health/NIBIB Brian Long, Allen Institute Rusty Nicovich, Allen Institute Henry Pinkard, University of California, Berkeley Stephan Preibisch, Janelia Research Campus/HHMI Blair Rossetti, Janelia Research Campus/HHMI Loic Royer, Chan Zuckerberg Biohub Doug Shepherd, Arizona State University Nicholas Sofroniew, Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Elliot Steel, University -
CARL ZIMMER Author & Journalist
CARL ZIMMER Author & journalist carlzimmer.com @carlzimmer BIOGRAPHY The New York Times Book Review calls Carl Zimmer "as fine a science essayist as we have." He is the author of thirteen acclaimed books and a columnist for the New York Times. Zimmer first be- gan writing about science at Discover, where he served for five years as a senior editor, and has gone on to write hundreds of features for magazines including The Atlantic, The New York Times Magazine, Time, National Geographic, and Scientific American. He has also served as a scientific editor for television documentaries, consulted on museum exhibits, and contributed his writing to major science web sites. Zimmer has earned numerous honors for his work. In 2007 he won the National Academies Communication Award, and he has won the American Association for the Advancement of Sci- ences Science Journalism Award three times. In 2015, Zimmer won the Distinguished Service Award from the National Association of Biology Teachers, and in 2016, he won the Stephen Jay Gould Prize, awarded by the Society for the Study of Evolution. In 2018, Zimmer’s book She Has Her Mother’s Laugh was named by Publisher’s Weekly one of the ten best books of the year. The Guardian named it the best science book of 2018 and The New York Times Book Review chose it as a Notable Book of the Year. It was short-listed for the Baillie-Gifford Prize for Nonfiction and a fi- nalist for the PEN/E.O. Wilson Literary Science Writing Prize. His articles have been antholo- gized in both The Best American Science and Nature Writing series and The Best American Science Writing series.