Download, Receive, and Send Any Type of Information from Multiple Sources and to Multiple Destinations

UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date:___________________May 19, 2006 I, _________________________________________________________, Sean Clark Harry hereby submit this work as part of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Architecture in: The School of Architecture and Interior Design It is entitled: :Responsive Kinetic Systems: This work and its defense approved by: Chair: _______________________________ _______________________________ Michael McInturf _______________________________ _______________________________ Jay Chatterjee _______________________________ :Responsive Kinetic Systems: --Sean C. Harry-- --Master of Architecture Thesis 2005-2006-- A Thesis submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE in the School of Architecture and Interior Design of the College of Design, Architecture, Art, & Planning 22 May 2006 by Sean Clark Harry B. Arts in Architecture, Miami University, 2001 Committee Chairs: Michael McInturf Jay Chatterjee :ABSTRACT: Society is immersed in a myriad of techno-social processes and interchanges that augment our physical environment by adapting to our needs. Architecture’s reciprocation of these adaptations remains comparatively unnoticeable. Technology has greatly influenced design techniques in architecture, though the full potential of these capabilities have yet to be realized. Architects can produce precise virtual building models, and experiment with kinematics and motion conceived form(s), though their products, for the most part, remain static. Thus, they do not physically reflect the evolution of perpetual processes inherent in a design process, or the built environment. This thesis seeks to develop a synthesis between current architectural kinematics and aspects of emerging technologies from other fields of exploration to create responsive kinetic systems. An architecture in which surfaces and/or structures move according to the way humans do. An architecture that is capable of adapting to our changing needs and those of technology. Preliminary:Abstract: [00:15:00][01.01] Preliminary [01.01] [00.00.00] :Abstract: Preliminary [01.01] 1 :Contents: 00:15:00 :Abstract: 00:30:00 :Contents: 00:45:00 :List of figures, illustrations, and images: 00:55:00 :Figures, illustrations, and images credits: 01:00:00 :Kinetic » « Response [Introduction]: 02:00:00 :Non-linear progressions [Problems]: 03:00:00 :Kinetic Potentials [Preliminary options for thought]: 04:00:00 :Kinetic Potentials [Motion concieved form(s)]: 05:00:00 :Kinetic Architecture Realized: 06:00:00 :Precede [Precedents - adaptable and experiential environments]: 07:00:00 :Concept(s), Design Issues [Procede}: 08:00:00 :References: [00.00.00] :Abstract: :Contents: [00:30:00] 2 Preliminary [01.01] 3 :List of figures, illustrations, and images: Figure 2.1 matrix Figure 2.2 enlarged “arrival” of matrix Figure 2.3 enlarged “departure” of matrix Figure 3.1 taxonomy of technical elements Figure 4.1 Parc De La Villette “folies” – architect Bernard Tschumi Figure 4.2 Parc De La Villette “folie” – architect Bernard Tschumi Figure 4.3 box geometry functional diagram Figure 4.4 curved line Figure 4.5 horizontal algorithm Figure 4.6 tilt/twist algorithm Figure 4.7 locating the diagram in section Figure 4.8 locating the diagram in section Figure 4.9 torqued trace series – plan Figure 4.10 torqued trace series – section Figure 4.11 box geometry – diagram Figure 4.12 box geometry – diagram Figure 4.13 box geometry – atrium interstitial void Figure 4.14 box geometry – on site Figure 4.15 sequence creation of chevron diagram Figure 4.16 composite diagram Figure 4.17 interlocking boxes Figure 4.18 interlocking boxes Figure 4.19 author’s photos – interior grand stair Figure 4.20 author’s photos – interior atrium Figure 4.21 author’s photos – exterior North and East elevations Figure 4.22 author’s photos – exterior East elevations [00.00.00] :Abstract: :List of figures, illustrations and images: [00:45:00] 4 Figure 4.25 ramp movement – primary circulation – sketch Figure 4.26 building development Figure 4.27 implied motion through ramps Figure 4.28 mapped forces of the site and their behavior patterns Figure 4.29 the skeleton Figure 4.30 surfaces applied to the skeleton’s exterior Figure 4.31 forces in motion are applied to the skeleton and animate the surfaces Figure 4.32 animated sequence and resultant forms Figure 4.33 iterations depict change throughout animation sequence Figure 4.34 stereolithography models of the house prototype Figure 5.1 pin joint, permits rotation about an axis Figure 5.2 dual pin joint, double articulation permits rotation about an axis Figure 5.3 sliding joint, permits translation in one direction Figure 5.4 sliding pin joint, permits translation in two directions Figure 5.5 spherical joint (ball and socket), permits translation in three directions (x,y,z axes) Figure 5.6 the rhombus has 4 equal sides, the interior angle deformations are seen here Figure 5.7 repeated rhombus shapes Figure 5.8 rhombus connection diagram Figure 5.9 rhombus folded structure Figure 5.10 rhombus structure unfolded Figure 5.11 portion generator of the final unfolded product Figure 5.12 folded geometry – 01 Figure 5.13 unfolding geometry - 02 Figure 5.14 unfolding geometry – 03 Figure 5.15 unfolding geometry – 04 Figure 5.16 unfolding geometry – 05 Figure 5.17 unfolded geometry – 06 Figure 5.18 folded geometry, space frame Figure 5.19 unfolded geometry, space frame Figure 5.20 unfolded geometry, vertical space frame [00.45.00] :List of figures, illustrations and images: Preliminary [01.01] 5 Figure 5.21 folded geometry, vertical space frame Figure 5.22 two-way lattice dome Figure 5.23 cylindrical frame Figure 5.24 mechanical elements as actuators for movement Figure 5.25 exhibits the linearity and repetition of Calatrava’s built works Figure 5.26 study for folding roof, unfolded Figure 5.27 study for folding roof, folded Figure 5.28 iris dome unfolded – 01 Figure 5.29 iris dome folding – 02 Figure 5.30 iris dome folding – 03 Figure 5.31 iris dome folded – 04 Figure 5.32 iris dome unfolded – 01 Figure 5.33 iris dome folding – 02 Figure 5.34 iris dome folding – 03 Figure 5.35 iris dome folded – 04 Figure 5.36 stage + mechanical curtain at night Figure 5.37 stage + mechanical curtain Figure 5.38 mechanical curtain under construction Figure 5.39 mechanical curtain mock-up Figure 6.1 virtual diagram of human interaction with the surface Figure 6.2 virtual surface motion sequence Figure 6.3 surface deformations – built installation Figure 6.4 surface deformation sequence – built installations Figure 6.5 paramorph – virtual Figure 6.6 paramorph – models Figure 6.7 preliminary surface configurations Figure 6.8 grouped lesuire typologies per surface type Figure 6.9 schematic surface deformations diagram Figure 6.10 example of scenarios applied to the field Figure 6.11 Leisurator field process models [00.00.00] :Abstract: :List of figures, illustrations and images: [00:45:00] 6 Figure 6.12 applied leisure scenarios Figure 6.13 active computer renderings Figure 7.1 business virtual vs. physical connectivity Figure 7.2 envisioning global business expansion Figure 7.3 Madison Square Park, New York City (photo) Figure 7.4 site location plan Figure 7.5 hotel program diagram 2005 Figure 7.6 issue 1 – journey to the hotel Figure 7.7 inhabitant trajectory (overall) Figure 7.8 inhabitant trajectory Figure 7.9 author’s illustration – square footage trajectory diagram Figure 7.10 author’s illustration – trajectory time schedule diagram Figure 7.11 original trajectory diagram Figure 7.12 simplified trajectory diagram Figure 7.13 author’s illustration – schematic simplified trajectories Figure 7.14 trajectory option (a) Figure 7.15 trajectory option (b) Figure 7.16 business trajectories Figure 7.17 composite trajectories Figure 7.18 module volume Figure 7.19 business trajectory (a) Figure 7.20 three-dimensional business trajectory loop (a) Figure 7.21 trajectory loops Figure 7.22 composite trajectory loops Figure 7.23 composite trajectories are mirrored about the z-axis Figure 7.24 composite trajectory diagram Figure 7.25 prototype of (3) intersecting cords Figure 7.26 prototype of composite trajectories [00.45.00] :List of figures, illustrations and images: Preliminary [01.01] 7 [00.00.00] :Abstract: :List of figures, illustrations and images: [00:45:00] 8 Preliminary [01.01] 9 :Figures, illustrations, and images credits: Figure 2.1 illustration by author Figure 2.2 illustration by author Figure 2.3 illustration by author Figure 3.1 illustration by author Figure 4.1 Gleiniger, Andrea, with Gerhard Matzig, and Sebastian Redecke. Paris Contemporary Architecture, pg. 58-59. Figure 4.2 Gleiniger, Andrea, with Gerhard Matzig, and Sebastian Redecke. Paris Contemporary Architecture, pg. 58-59. Figure 4.3 Barry, Donna. “Connecting The Dots: The Dimensions Of A Wireframe”. In Eleven Authors in Search of a Building, p. 49. Figure 4.4 Barry, Donna. “Connecting The Dots: The Dimensions Of A Wireframe”. In Eleven Authors in Search of a Building, p. 50. Figure 4.5 Barry, Donna. “Connecting The Dots: The Dimensions Of A Wireframe”. In Eleven Authors in Search of a Building, p. 50. Figure 4.6 Barry, Donna. “Connecting The Dots: The Dimensions Of A Wireframe”. In Eleven Authors in Search of a Building, p. 50. Figure 4.7 Barry, Donna. “Connecting The Dots: The Dimensions Of A Wireframe”. In Eleven Authors in Search of a Building, p. 51. Figure 4.8 Barry, Donna. “Connecting The Dots: The Dimensions Of A Wireframe”. In Eleven Authors in Search of a Building, p. 52. Figure 4.9 Barry, Donna. “Connecting The Dots: The Dimensions Of A Wireframe”. In Eleven Authors in Search of a Building, p. 52. Figure 4.10 Barry, Donna. “Connecting The Dots: The Dimensions Of A Wireframe”. In Eleven Authors in Search of a Building, p. 52. Figure 4.11 Barry, Donna. “Connecting The Dots: The Dimensions Of A Wireframe”.

Load more