The Importance of Maintaining Access Berths Within Long Island, Manhattan and Its

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Importance of Maintaining Access Berths Within Long Island, Manhattan and Its Running head: THE IMPORTANCE OF MAINTAINING ACCESS BERTHS FOR PGC DELIVERY 1 The Importance of Maintaining Access Berths Within Long Island, Manhattan and Its Surrounding Boroughs Jason Marchioni California Maritime Academy Running head: THE IMPORTANCE OF MAINTAINING ACCESS BERTHS FOR PGC DELIVERY 2 Abstract The basis of this project is to reinforce the necessity of maintaining access berths within Long Island, Manhattan and the surrounding New York City boroughs to support the delivery of power generation components by way of water. The region produces the majority of its own electricity at several plants and substations that are managed by two utility providers, Con Edison and PSE&G Long Island. These companies hire Weeks Marine, the largest marine contractor in the region, to engineer and perform the waterborne portions of the supply chain, which involves careful consideration of availability, costs and access to other modes of transportation. The project details the logistical challenges created by the region’s infrastructure and geography and how gentrification on the New York waterfront threatens to limit commercial access further. In addition, the project identifies several locations on the waterfront that are suitable for the delivery of power generation components and the types of equipment that can transport oversized components to these locations. Finally, the project will incorporate a plan of action that utility companies, along with the appropriate contactors and agencies, could undertake to maintain these areas for present and future use. Keywords: Weeks Marine, Con Edison, PSE&G Long Island, New York Harbor THE IMPORTANCE OF MAINTAINING ACCESS BERTHS FOR PGC DELIVERY 3 Introduction Long Island and the five boroughs of New York, which include Manhattan, the Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island, are unique in the fact that the majority of their geographical boundaries are surrounded by water. The Bronx is the only borough on the mainland of the United States while Brooklyn and Queens are part of Long Island. While this type of geography may appear to be lucrative for waterborne projects, the majority of the shorelines are rocky and irregular and do not have sufficient water depth to sustain accessibility. In addition to natural obstacles, many man-made obstacles have been built through the gentrification of the waterfront and shoreline, making these areas, which were once ideal for commercial activities, inaccessible. Commercial ports and docks that were once considered the lifeline for these communities for receiving imported and domestic products and supporting infrastructure projects have given way to public marinas and recreational piers. While they are suitable for recreational activities they lack sufficient draft for commercial activities. The piers have been lightly built with deck loading ratings that are inadequate for supporting heavy loads, such as transformers and generators used by the region’s power generation companies. To further complicate these accessibility issues, access to Long Island and most of New York City’s boroughs must be accomplished by either crossing a bridge or traveling through a tunnel. While this type of access is suitable for pedestrian vehicles and standard trailer loads they are not suitable for transporting heavy or oversized loads due to their limited width, height and restrictions on axle loading. In addition to inadequate road infrastructure for heavy commercial loads, the region has very limited commercial rail access, with Staten Island and Long Island having limited rail lines available for commercial use. THE IMPORTANCE OF MAINTAINING ACCESS BERTHS FOR PGC DELIVERY 4 Due to the geographical, logistical and infrastructure limitations that seem to have the region’s infrastructure bottle-necked, it is imperative that the region identifies and maintains berths that can be accessed for commercial purposes by water. Waterfront access is critical for the region to support commercial activities, maintain the existing infrastructure and provide access to contractors and authorities during times of emergency. Water access to this region played key roles during the 9-11 attacks on the Twin Towers and Superstorm Sandy by reducing the response times and reducing the extra burden on the already gridlocked streets and highways. Having participated in both of these critical events in the New York region I can honestly say the recovery operations after 9-11 and Hurricane Sandy would have crippled the roads due to the amount of debris and goods that needed to be moved in a short amount of time. This paper is broken up in three parts. The Literature Review discusses the transformation of the New York waterfront and details the existing infrastructure. The Creative Project will identify several locations throughout Long Island, Manhattan and the surrounding New York City boroughs that Weeks Marine has utilized over the years which are suitable to support waterborne delivery of power generation components (“PGC”) and essential to support the waterborne delivery portion of the supply chain. I will also discuss their importance, physical limitations and identify alternative sites that should be maintained for commercial use. The Summary concludes with a plan of action for utility companies to work with the governing agencies or owners to preserve the identified locations. THE IMPORTANCE OF MAINTAINING ACCESS BERTHS FOR PGC DELIVERY 5 Literature Review History of Port Infrastructure The piers of New York have undergone a major transition over the course of the last 50 years. As Life magazine reminded readers in November 1944, “With its seven bays, four river mouths four estuaries, it is by far the world’s best and biggest natural harbor and most of the world’s major ports could easily be tucked into it.” Over time, the majority of manufacturers left the region and most commercial piers became inactive. Piers and warehouses that once bustled with activity now lie dormant. The only reminder of an industry that once flourished is the remnants of rotting piers, abandoned parking lots and industrial sites. Prior to WWII, cargoes flowed freely in and out of the port of New York. The Hudson River provided deepwater access to the harbor from the north. Vessels laden with the produce and products of upper mid-west states such as Ohio, Illinois and Michigan navigated their way to New York via the Great Lakes and through the locks of the Erie Canal, which has since been renamed the New York State Barge Canal. From the north east, vessels calling from New England utilized Long Island Sound (New York State). Meanwhile, vessels calling from international ports crossed the Atlantic and entered New York Harbor through the Verrazano Narrows, the body of water that separates the boroughs of Staten Island and Brooklyn, which is now spanned by the Verrazano Bridge (MTA, 2014). Meany (2002) stated the following: The Port of New York was really eleven ports in one. It boasted a developed shoreline of over 650 miles comprising the waterfronts of Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, and Staten Island as well as the New Jersey shoreline from Perth Amboy to Elizabeth, Bayonne, Newark, Jersey City, Hoboken and Weehawken. The Port of New York included some 1,800 docks, piers, and wharves of every conceivable size, condition, and THE IMPORTANCE OF MAINTAINING ACCESS BERTHS FOR PGC DELIVERY 6 state of repair. Some 750 were classified as "active" and 200 were able to berth 425 ocean-going vessels simultaneously in addition to the 600 able to anchor in the harbor. These docks and piers gave access to 1,100 warehouses containing some 41 million square feet of enclosed storage space (p.1). As World War II came to an end, so did the industries that supported the industry of war. Merchant ships that once carried ammunition and supplies to all theaters of war no longer called in the harbor. Containerization reduced the need to have multiple facilities to berth vessels as cargoes could be unloaded much more efficiently and ships could move in and out of port faster. Also, trucks began to be the desired mode of transport over waterborne transportation, as containers could be loaded directly to truck chassis and moved over the roads (“Everything About ISO”). The drastic decline in ships calling in at the port of New York prompted the development of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (“PANYNJ”) to take over the Port of Newark in New Jersey and focus its efforts on developing a more viable option that would help secure New York’s shipping commerce in the future. In 1921, the states of New York and New Jersey signed a compact that created the PANYNJ. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (2014) states their purpose as an agency is to: Build, operate, and maintain critical transportation and trade assets. Its network of aviation, rail, surface transportation and seaport facilities annually moves millions of people and transports vital cargo throughout the New York/New Jersey region. The agency was given a broad mandate to develop and modernize the entire port district and in 1948 the agency focused its efforts on the development of Port Newark, which was greatly in need of repair (PANYNJ, 2014). In addition to the oversight of Port Newark, the PANYNJ also THE IMPORTANCE OF MAINTAINING ACCESS BERTHS FOR PGC DELIVERY 7 manages and maintains six of the tunnels and bridges that connect New Jersey to New York and its surrounding boroughs. These bridges and tunnels were instrumental in the success of Port Newark as goods could now be trucked into the New York City. An increasing number of shipping companies began to pull out of Brooklyn and Manhattan and take their business to the modernized port of Newark, New Jersey, which had direct connections to railroads and highways, allowing goods to be moved more efficiently to other parts of the country. The last of the bridges to be built, the Verrazano Narrows Bridge, was completed in 1964.
Recommended publications
  • Super Chief – El Capitan See Page 4 for Details
    AUGUST- lyerlyer SEPTEMBER 2020 Ready for Boarding! Late 1960s Combined Super Chief – El Capitan see page 4 for details FLYER SALE ENDS 9-30-20 Find a Hobby Shop Near You! Visit walthers.com or call 1-800-487-2467 WELCOME CONTENTS Chill out with cool new products, great deals and WalthersProto Super Chief/El Capitan Pages 4-7 Rolling Along & everything you need for summer projects in this issue! Walthers Flyer First Products Pages 8-10 With two great trains in one, reserve your Late 1960s New from Walthers Pages 11-17 Going Strong! combined Super Chief/El Capitan today! Our next HO National Model Railroad Build-Off Pages 18 & 19 Railroads have a long-standing tradition of getting every last WalthersProto® name train features an authentic mix of mile out of their rolling stock and engines. While railfans of Santa Fe Hi-Level and conventional cars - including a New From Our Partners Pages 20 & 21 the 1960s were looking for the newest second-generation brand-new model, new F7s and more! Perfect for The Bargain Depot Pages 22 & 23 diesels and admiring ever-bigger, more specialized freight operation or collection, complete details start on page 4. Walthers 2021 Reference Book Page 24 cars, a lot of older equipment kept rolling right along. A feature of lumber traffic from the 1960s to early 2000s, HO Scale Pages 25-33, 36-51 Work-a-day locals and wayfreights were no less colorful, the next run of WalthersProto 56' Thrall All-Door Boxcars N Scale Pages 52-57 with a mix of earlier engines and equipment that had are loaded with detail! Check out these layout-ready HO recently been repainted and rebuilt.
    [Show full text]
  • Freight Transportation Means and Modes
    FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION MEANS AND MODES OBJECTIVES: ● Discovering the different means of freight transport: specific vocabulary ● Discussing their characteristics, advantages and disadvantages ● Discovering the usefulness to combine many way of transporting fright: multi-modality and inter-modality FINAL TASK: A multimodal shipment 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ● Slide n°1: TITLE AND OBJECTIVES ● Slides n°2 to n° 6: OVERVIEW ● Slide n°7 part n°1: TITLE FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION ● Slide n°8: DIFFERENT WAYS OF TRANSPORTING GOODS ● Slide n°9: ROADS: FROM SIMPLE TRUCKS TO AUSTRALIAN ROAD TRAINS ● Slide n°10: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES ● Slides n°11 and n°12: Act n° 1 ● Slides n°13 and n°14: Act n° 2 ● Slides n°15 and n°16: Act n° 3: intermediate task: CROSSWORD 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ● Slide n°17: RAIL TRANSPORTATION : TITLE PAGE ● Slide n°18: RAIL TRANSPORTATION: DEFINITION ● Slides n°19 and n°20: Act n° 4 ● Slide n°21: Act n° 5 Grammar point: comparisons ● Slides n°22 and n°23: Act n° 6: Advantages and Disadvantages ● Slide n°24: Act n°7: Intermediate task ● Slide n°25: MARITIME TRANSPORTATION SEAS AND RIVRS ● Slide n°26: DESCRIPTION ● Slides n°27 and n°28: MAIN TYPES OF MERCHANT SHIPS 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ● Slides n°29 and n°30: Act n° 8 ● Slide n°31: act n°9: Oral interaction ● Slide n°32: INLAND WATERWAYS TRANSPORTATION ● Slide n°33: DIFFERENT TYPES OF BARGES ● Slides n°34 and n°35: Act n° 10 ● Slides n°36 and n°37: Act n° 11 ● Slide n°38: AIR AND SPACE TRANSPORTATION TITLE PAGE ● Slides n°39: AIR FREIGHTING ● Slides n°40 and n°41: ADVANTAGES 4 TABLE
    [Show full text]
  • Ships and Boats for the HO Waterfront
    Ships and Boats for the HO Waterfront Mat Thompson ocrrnet.ipage.com Oregon Coast Railroad Waterways Portland is Pacific Ocean Port Portland water front served by railroads Small Fishing harbor outside Hoyt Street Railroad follows Columbia River 100 miles Astoria is Pacific Ocean port Tillamook is fishing port What I think I Know… Ships and boats are purpose designed and purposes are local… …but if it floats, somebody always has a scheme… Sails gone by World War I…mostly Wooden boats until mid 50s, then steel 10% out of scale probably works 1/96 ship – OK 1/72 – probably too big Manufacturers careless about scale Old boats - wreaks or abandoned What I think I Know… Waterline models are best for layouts Wash resin in soap and water Resin requires filing and trimming Solid wire for lines (Tichy .010, .015, .020) European work boats = colors, U.S. = white Oregon Coast Railroad Wharf • Wharf – Sheet & strip styrene painted concrete • Notice cleats and bitts and wooden snubbers RATING THE MODEL INSTRUCTIONSOregon NA Coast Railroad Wharf MATERIALS GOOD DIFFICULTY EASY APPEAL GOOD • Wharf – Sheet & strip styrene painted concrete - wood snubbers • Notice cleats and bitts - Seaport Models OCR Seawall • Mr Plaster Seawall • FOS Models construction barge Campbell Piers Campbell • Currently available – $90 • All wood construction, great template • Wharf has tracks • Decking is panels - stripwood looks better • Other craft kits makers have released wood piers Walthers Pier Walthers • Currently available – crane pier $75, pier $22
    [Show full text]
  • GREENVILLE YARD, TRANSFER BRIDGE SYSTEM HAER No. NJ-49-A Jersey City Hudson County New Jersey ' "R ' PHOTOGRAPHS WRIT
    GREENVILLE YARD, TRANSFER BRIDGE SYSTEM HAER No. NJ-49-A Jersey City • Hudson County \ I/\L '. - New Jersey ' "r~ ' PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORDS National Park Service Northeast Region Philadelphia Support Office U.S. Custom House 200 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, P.A. 19106 C HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD GREENVILLE YARD, TRANSFER BRIDGE SYSTEM HAERNo.NJ-49-A LOCATION: Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey USGS Jersey City, NJ Quadrangle, UTM Coordinates: 18.578260.4503280 DATES OF CONSTRUCTION: 1904, 1910,1925, 1931,1943, 1945 ENGINEER/BUILDER: J.A. Bensel, F.L. DuBosque, W.C. Bowles, and W.H. Brown, engineers, Pennsylvania Railroad (PRR); American Bridge Company, Trenton, New Jersey, and Steele & Condict Co., Jersey City, New Jersey, principal contractors PRESENT OWNER: Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conxail), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and the New York Cross Harbor Railroad, Brooklyn, New York PRESENT USE: Railroad car float transfer bridge SIGNIFICANCE: The Greenville Yard Transfer Bridge System is the last surviving example in New York Harbor of a suspended-type car float transfer bridge. The innovative design of the transfer bridge was introduced by PRR engineers in 1888, and proved superior to other types in ease and speed of operation. The design was perfected and electrified with the building of the Greenville facility in 1905, and became the standard adopted by many other railroads. PROJECT INFORMATION: The Greenville Yard Transfer Bridge System was recorded in December 1996 by the Cultural Resource Group of Louis Berger & Associates, Inc., East Orange, New Jersey, for Conrail. The recordation was undertaken pursuant to Condition 1 of Permit No.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan's Railroad History
    Contributing Organizations The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) wishes to thank the many railroad historical organizations and individuals who contributed to the development of this document, which will update continually. Ann Arbor Railroad Technical and Historical Association Blue Water Michigan Chapter-National Railway Historical Society Detroit People Mover Detroit Public Library Grand Trunk Western Historical Society HistoricDetroit.org Huron Valley Railroad Historical Society Lansing Model Railroad Club Michigan Roundtable, The Lexington Group in Transportation History Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers Michigan Railroads Association Peaker Services, Inc. - Brighton, Michigan Michigan Railroad History Museum - Durand, Michigan The Michigan Railroad Club The Michigan State Trust for Railroad Preservation The Southern Michigan Railroad Society S O October 13, 2014 Dear Michigan Residents: For more than 180 years, Michigan’s railroads have played a major role in the economic development of the state. This document highlights many important events that have occurred in the evolution of railroad transportation in Michigan. This document was originally published to help celebrate Michigan’s 150th birthday in 1987. A number of organizations and individuals contributed to its development at that time. The document has continued to be used by many since that time, so a decision was made to bring it up to date and keep the information current. Consequently, some 28 years later, the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) has updated the original document and is placing it on our website for all to access. As you journey through this history of railroading in Michigan, may you find the experience both entertaining and beneficial. MDOT is certainly proud of Michigan’s railroad heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • New York State Freight Transportation Plan Background Analysis (Deliverable 1)
    NEW YORK STATE FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION PLAN BACKGROUND ANALYSIS (DELIVERABLE 1) JUNE 2015 PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NEW YORK STATE FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION PLAN BACKGROUND ANALYSIS (DELIVERABLE 1) PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................ III 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 COMMON GOALS AND THEMES................................................................................................... 2 2.1 | Goals Identification ........................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 | Theme Identification ...................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 | Gap Identification......................................................................................................................... 10 Gaps in Geographic Coverage......................................................................................................................................... 10 Gaps in Modal Coverage ................................................................................................................................................. 11 Gaps in Coordination ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Car Ferry) Page 1 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 MARITIME HERITAGE OF THE UNITED STATES NHL THEME STUDY—LARGE VESSELS City of Milwaukee (Car Ferry) Page 1 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: City of Milwaukee (Car Ferry) Other Name/Site Number: S.S. City of Milwaukee 2. LOCATION Street & Number: Marine Terminal Railyard, Not for publication: East Slip City/Town: Elberta Vicinity: State: MI County: Benzie Code: 019 Zip Code: 49628 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: X Building(s):__ Public-local: District: Public-State: Site: Public-Federal:__ Structure; X Obj ect:__ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing ____ ____ buildings ____ ____ sites 1 ____ structures ____ ____ objects 1 ____ Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 0 Name of related multiple property listing:_____________________ NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 City of Milwaukee (Car Perry) Page 2 USDI\NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this ___ nomination ___request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    to approximately 1838 in the mid-Atlantic States Introduction prior to the American Civil War.” History of the Transfer Bridges: What Are They? Cross Harbor Freight Program (taken from the PA Greenville Yard Cross Harbor Freight Program-Basis Transfer Bridges are used to transfer automobiles, rail of Design Report December 20, 2012) cars or pedestrians from land based to water based transportation systems or vice versa. For example a Greenville Yard is the western terminus of the current ferry ramp that acts as a bridge between land and the rail car float (barge) system, which operates between ferry is an example of a transfer bridge. Transfer Jersey City and 65th Street Facility on the Brooklyn bridges can also be used to transfer rail cars onto and waterfront. The barge rail car float system that moves off of car floats. A car float is a barge that has rails goods across the New York Harbor has been in mounted on the deck so that rail cars can be pushed existence since before the growth of the national onto the barge for transport across a river or harbor. highway system and before the construction of vehicular bridges spanning the Hudson River. The Car floats rise and fall with the tide. Also the Cross Harbor rail freight operation at Greenville Yard freeboard on the car float changes as the loading on once encompassed six rail transfer bridges; as many the car float changes. The freeboard is the distance as thirty-nine rail car floats barges, and upland rail from the waterline to the top of deck.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rail and Transit Gallery
    THIS MONTH IN RAIL AND TRANSIT 3 RAILROADED INTO A CAREER David Kwechansky's experience as the first passenger on the CN Rapido in 1965 launched his research career. 6 ART GALLERY A Roil ond Transit Gallery: NUMBER 534 - JUNE 1994 Photos of Kenora, Ontario. 8 PUBLISHED BY CAR-FLOAT OPERATION ENDS Upper Canada Railway Society ON THE DETROIT RIVER RO. Box 122, Station A The history, operations, and demise of the Toronto, Ontario M5W IA2 Norfolk Southern service between Windsor EDITOR'S NOTES and Detroit, by Gordon Webster. I'll start by admitting two mistakes last 10 month. On the front cover of the May issue, EDITOR RESEARCH AND REVIEWS the number 9015 can be clearly seen on John Pat Scrimgeour RAILWAY ARCHAEOLOGY . Carter's photo in the Thompson Canyon, but 250 Queens Quay West #1607 . More in the Eastern Townships not clearly enough that 1 could get the num• Toronto, Ontario M5J 2N2 . Prescott show ber right in the photo caption inside. 1 missed E-Mail: 731 [email protected] BOOKS Kaslo and Slocan on another of John's photos at the top of the CONTRIBUTING EDITORS 13 Transcontinental section by inadvertently John Carter, Art Clowes, TRANSCONTINENTAL deleting his name from the description on Scott Haskill, Don McQueen, THE RAPIDO Newco and CAR updates Page 10. Sorry, John. Sean Robitaille, Cray Scrimgeour, . Amtrak overnight train to Toronto Now that winter is over - 1 know it is, Chris Spinney, Gordon Webster THE PANORAMA Decision on E&N the last hockey game just ended - railfan . Vancouver commuter train season is beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop Tips Layout Design for Operation by Andy Sperandeo
    IDEAS FOR PROTOTYPICAL LAYOUT OPERATION A SUPPLEMENT TO MODEL RAILROADER MAGAZINE Workshop tips Layout design for operation by Andy Sperandeo Track 1 EAST PORT MARQUETTE YARD, North Western Transfer just arrived Track 6 WEST Chicago & North Western Rockford and west Milwaukee Road Williams Bay/Winter Hill/Lake Beulah Soo Line Hales Corners/Big Bend/Mukwonago Milwaukee deliveries Kansas City and west via Santa Fe Williams Bay block to go on RFX for setout by Williams Bay Switcher, WBS Rockford Extra, symbol “RFX” After classification of NW Transfer Mukwonago Turn, MUT Soo Line Santa Fe Run- Milwaukee Road Through West, SFW Milwaukee deliveries • How a busy model railroad freight yard works • Learn how to reproduce realistic engine terminal and caboose activities • Types of staging yards and tips on how to use them effectively • Prototype passenger train servicing activities that you can model 618262 2015 Layout Planning Ideas 1 © 2015 Kalmbach Publishing Co. This material may not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher. www.ModelRailroader.com SUBSCRIBERALL-NEW! EXCLUSIVE THE OPERATORS Layout design for operation What makes one track plan better for an operating layout than another? Here are some things I look for in pub- lished track plans, plans I design myself, and plans my friends show me. Then on the following pages I’ll describe opera- tional features both prototype and model that can be planned into our layouts. Staging. It’s a given that any model railroad can represent only part of a major railroad, let alone the continental railroad network. So any operating lay- out needs offstage tracks to represent the distant places our trains come from and go to when they aren’t passing across our too-short main lines.
    [Show full text]
  • East Coast Marine Highway Report
    EAST COAST MARINE HIGHWAY INITIATIVE M-95 STUDY FINAL REPORT October 2013 PREPARED FOR: East Coast Marine Highway Initiative Awarding Authority New Bedford Harbor Development Commission Maryland Port Administration New Jersey Department of Transportation Canaveral Port Authority I-95 Corridor Coalition DISCLAIMER AND LIMITATIONS This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the East Coast Marine Highway Initiative Awarding Authority, a cooperative formed between the ports of New Bedford, Baltimore and Canaveral, the New Jersey Department of Transportation, and the I-95 Corridor Coalition. The cooperative agreement was funded by the U.S. Maritime Administration. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations in this report are those of the researchers and staff, and do not necessarily reflect the views of any government agencies or organizations that funded the study. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Certain forward-looking statements are based upon interpretations or assessments of best available information at the time of writing. Actual events may differ from those assumed, and events are subject to change. Findings are time-sensitive and relevant only to current conditions at the time of writing. Factors influencing the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements may exist that are outside of the purview of the consulting firm. Parsons Brinckerhoff’s report is thus to be viewed as an assessment that is time-relevant, specifically referring to conditions at the time of review. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party's use or the results of such use of any information contained in this document in whole or in part.
    [Show full text]
  • State Rail Plan FINAL
    Delaware State Rail Plan FINAL Acknowledgements DelDOT would like to recognize the following individuals for their contributions as a Stakeholder in this Plan’s development: Name Company Jeffrey Gerlach AMTRAK David Blankenship City of Wilmington Sharon Daboin CSX Jeffrey Stone Delaware Office of Economic Development Roberta Geier Delaware Department of Transportation Gregory Oliver Delaware Department of Transportation Dwayne Day Delaware Department of Transportation David Campbell Delaware Transit Corporation Kennard Potts Delaware Transit Corporation Albert Loyola Delaware Transit Corporation Cathy Smith Delaware Transit Corporation James Galvin Dover Kent MPO Daniel Wolfensberger Kent Economic Partnership, Inc. Jeannie Fazio Maryland Department of Transportation Debbie Bowden Maryland Department of Transportation Nicole Katsikides Maryland Department of Transportation Karl Kalbacher New Castle County Rick Crawford Norfolk Southern Herb Inden Office of State Planning Coordination David Edgell Office of State Planning Coordination Bryan Hall Office of State Planning Coordination Julie Wheatley Sussex County Economic Development Office Byron Comati SEPTA Harry Garforth SEPTA Hal Godwin Sussex County Dave Gula WILMAPCO Daniel Blevins WILMAPCO Foster Nichols Parsons Brinckerhoff John Baesch Parsons Brinckerhoff Joseph Gurskis Parsons Brinckerhoff Anna Lynn Smith Parsons Brinckerhoff Stephanie Jackson Parsons Brinckerhoff Len Usvyat Parsons Brinckerhoff Stephen Bassford S.L. Bassford and Associates Delaware State Rail Plan FINAL Table of
    [Show full text]