DOCSLIB.ORG

NEANDERTHAL MUSEUM · Krapina · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 10

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NEANDERTHAL MUSEUM · Krapina · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 10 Project Office Riesstraße 10 Phone +49 (0) 228 184967-25 Katrin Hieke 53113 Bonn [email protected] c/o projekt2508 GmbH Germany www.ice-age-europe.eu ICE AGE EUROPE 2 ICE AGE EUROPE 2 Network of Heritage Sites The Ice Age is one of the most fas- Links must be urgently established ness on the conservation of Ice Age cinating periods in early human his- between sites, especially across heritage and to develop valorization tory. The foundations of our culture national borders, and collabora- programs, to exchange best practic- today were established during more tion between European cities and es for site management and museum than two million years of Ice Age regions is essential. Finally, there display and to encourage collabora- history; its relicts are among the key is evidence of an ever-increasing tion of all kinds, e.g. in the fields testimonies of our cultural heritage public interest in visiting culturally- of science, management, pedagogy, and of human development. significant sites. tourism and governance. These issues will be addressed As a new umbrella brand, the Some of the most important Ice Age within the framework of a Euro- network provides an opportunity to heritage sites are located in Europe, pean network and the potential of reach both well-established and new where human remains and rock this network will be developed and target groups across Europe. This art have been revealed, as well as promoted from a scientific, touristic will enhance the attractiveness of campsites and living areas contain- and governmental perspective. the network to external collabora- ing many exceptional finds. The im- tion partners and increase success portance of the sites is reflected in The Ice Age Europe network tells the in applying for funding programs as the fact that an increasing number story of Ice Age people in Europe well as a joint World Heritage Site. of them have been declared UNESCO and our Pleistocene cultural heritage World Heritage Sites. UNESCO has in space and time. 15 archaeological sites with Ice Age even launched a special program heritage and affiliated museums known as HEADS (Human Evolution: In order to learn about this herit- or visitor centers from 6 different Adaptations, Dispersals and Social age, we must first enhance its European countries are the founding Developments) to promote this Ice conservation and protection. The members of this network established Age heritage. network’s aims are to raise aware- in 2013. ICE AGE EUROPE 4 5 Network of Heritage Sites The Ice Age is one of the most fas- Links must be urgently established ness on the conservation of Ice Age cinating periods in early human his- between sites, especially across heritage and to develop valorization tory. The foundations of our culture national borders, and collabora- programs, to exchange best practic- today were established during more tion between European cities and es for site management and museum than two million years of Ice Age regions is essential. Finally, there display and to encourage collabora- history; its relicts are among the key is evidence of an ever-increasing tion of all kinds, e.g. in the fields testimonies of our cultural heritage public interest in visiting culturally- of science, management, pedagogy, and of human development. significant sites. tourism and governance. These issues will be addressed As a new umbrella brand, the Some of the most important Ice Age within the framework of a Euro- network provides an opportunity to heritage sites are located in Europe, pean network and the potential of reach both well-established and new where human remains and rock this network will be developed and target groups across Europe. This art have been revealed, as well as promoted from a scientific, touristic will enhance the attractiveness of campsites and living areas contain- and governmental perspective. the network to external collabora- ing many exceptional finds. The im- tion partners and increase success portance of the sites is reflected in The Ice Age Europe network tells the in applying for funding programs as the fact that an increasing number story of Ice Age people in Europe well as a joint World Heritage Site. of them have been declared UNESCO and our Pleistocene cultural heritage World Heritage Sites. UNESCO has in space and time. 15 archaeological sites with Ice Age even launched a special program heritage and affiliated museums known as HEADS (Human Evolution: In order to learn about this herit- or visitor centers from 6 different Adaptations, Dispersals and Social age, we must first enhance its European countries are the founding Developments) to promote this Ice conservation and protection. The members of this network established Age heritage. network’s aims are to raise aware- in 2013. ICE AGE EUROPE 4 5 BELGIUM 1. PRÉHISTOMUSEUM · Flémalle · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 8 CROATIA 2. KRAPINA NEANDERTHAL MUSEUM · Krapina · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 10 FRANCE 3. PREHISTORY MUSEUM OF SOLUTRE · Solutré-Pouilly · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 12 4. INTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PREHISTORY · Les Eyzies-de-Tayac · · · · · · · · · · · · · 14 5. ISTURITZ, OXOCELHAYA AND ERBERUA CAVES · Saint-Martin d’Arberoue · · · · · · · · · 16 6. THE MUSEUM OF NEANDERTHAL MAN · La Chapelle aux Saints · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 18 GERMANY 7. MUSEUM OF PREHISTORY BLAUBEUREN · Blaubeuren · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 20 8. NEANDERTHAL MUSEUM · Mettmann · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 22 18 9 9. PALÄON - RESEARCH AND EXPERIENCE CENTRE SCHÖNINGEN SPEARS· Schöningen · · · · 24 8 10. ARCHAEOPARK VOGELHERD · Niederstotzingen · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 26 1 ITALY 11. FUMANE CAVE · Fumane · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 28 SPAIN 12. MUSEUM OF HUMAN EVOLUTION · Burgos · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 30 7 10 13. NATIONAL MUSEUM AND RESEARCH CENTER OF ALTAMIRA · Santillana del Mar · · · · · · 32 3 14. CAVES OF SANTIMAMIÑE AND BIZKAIA MUSEUM OF ARCHAEOLOGY · Bizkaia · · · · · · · 34 15 6 13 4 15. TITO BUSTILLO RUPESTRIAN ART CENTRE · Ribadesella · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 36 14 16. EKAINBERRI - THE REPLICA OF THE EKAIN CAVE · Zestoa · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 38 16 11 2 5 12 UNITED KINGDOM 17. THE GIBRALTAR MUSEUM · Gibraltar · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 40 18. KENTS CAVERN PREHISTORIC CAVES · Torquay · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 42 At the meanwhile 18 member sites, and overseas, in accordance with Europe will be developed into a a total of 350 personnel are dedicat- the requirements for their protec- European brand. All quality-oriented ed to the promotion of our common tion. Most international visitors sites in Europe with an adjoining 17 heritage – as scientists, managers, come from Europe, but nearly half museum or visitor center as well as curators or guides. Eleven of the of the sites welcome a significant all municipalities and local and gov- sites are funded by public bodies, number from all continents. Most ernment authorities concerned are four are in public-private partner- sites provide a wide range of offers invited to take part in the network. ships and three are run by private for these visitors, from information owners. in several languages to travel pack- For more information about the ages developed in collaboration with network and the sites please visit The sites attract no fewer than 1.4 tour operators. www.ice-age-europe.eu million visitors per year from Europe Within the next few years, Ice Age ICE AGE EUROPE 6 7 BELGIUM 1. PRÉHISTOMUSEUM · Flémalle · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 8 CROATIA 2. KRAPINA NEANDERTHAL MUSEUM · Krapina · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 10 FRANCE 3. PREHISTORY MUSEUM OF SOLUTRE · Solutré-Pouilly · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 12 4. INTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PREHISTORY · Les Eyzies-de-Tayac · · · · · · · · · · · · · 14 5. ISTURITZ, OXOCELHAYA AND ERBERUA CAVES · Saint-Martin d’Arberoue · · · · · · · · · 16 6. THE MUSEUM OF NEANDERTHAL MAN · La Chapelle aux Saints · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 18 GERMANY 7. MUSEUM OF PREHISTORY BLAUBEUREN · Blaubeuren · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 20 8. NEANDERTHAL MUSEUM · Mettmann · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 22 18 9 9. PALÄON - RESEARCH AND EXPERIENCE CENTRE SCHÖNINGEN SPEARS· Schöningen · · · · 24 8 10. ARCHAEOPARK VOGELHERD · Niederstotzingen · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 26 1 ITALY 11. FUMANE CAVE · Fumane · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 28 SPAIN 12. MUSEUM OF HUMAN EVOLUTION · Burgos · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 30 7 10 13. NATIONAL MUSEUM AND RESEARCH CENTER OF ALTAMIRA · Santillana del Mar · · · · · · 32 3 14. CAVES OF SANTIMAMIÑE AND BIZKAIA MUSEUM OF ARCHAEOLOGY · Bizkaia · · · · · · · 34 15 6 13 4 15. TITO BUSTILLO RUPESTRIAN ART CENTRE · Ribadesella · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 36 14 16. EKAINBERRI - THE REPLICA OF THE EKAIN CAVE · Zestoa · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 38 16 11 2 5 12 UNITED KINGDOM 17. THE GIBRALTAR MUSEUM · Gibraltar · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 40 18. KENTS CAVERN PREHISTORIC CAVES · Torquay · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 42 At the meanwhile 18 member sites, and overseas, in accordance with Europe will be developed into a a total of 350 personnel are dedicat- the requirements for their protec- European brand. All quality-oriented
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Palaeolithic Bone Retouchers from Belgium: a Preliminary­ Overview of the Recent Research Through Historic and Recently Excavated Bone Collections
    GRÉGORY ABRAMS PALAEOLITHIC BONE RETOUCHERS FROM BELGIUM: A PRE LIMINARY OVERVIEW OF THE RECENT RESEARCH THROUGH HISTORIC AND RECENTLY EXCAVATED BONE COLLECTIONS Abstract Since the first half of the 19th century, Belgium has provided a multitude of sites dating back to the Palaeo- lithic. These discoveries have contributed to the definition of the Palaeolithic and to the understanding of prehistoric people. This long tradition of research has resulted in the collection of thousands of bones that are increasingly the subject of extensive analysis, including the study of bone retouchers. At present, this re- search has identified 535 retouchers in various Belgian repositories. The tools come from different sites with highly variable and incomplete contextual information depending on their excavation history (e.g., Trou du Diable and the Caves of Goyet). In contrast, unit 5 of Scladina Cave constitutes a well-defined assemblage. Bones with fresh fracture patterns provide interesting technological data, such as a refitted cave bear femo- ral shaft that includes four retouchers. The use of cave bear bones for producing tools at Scladina Cave as well as retouchers made from Neanderthal remains from the 3rd Cave of Goyet gives rise to questions about the possible symbolic meanings attributed to particular species. Keywords Belgium; Middle Palaeolithic; Retouchers; Neanderthals; Cave bear; Refitting Introduction Belgian Palaeolithic research has its roots deep in ness of cave sites was such that most were explored the first half of the 19th century with the work of during the 19th century. Philippe-Charles Schmerling, who found the first Since the beginning of research into Belgian Neander thal remains in Engis Cave in the early prehistory, archaeologists have focused their atten- 1830s.
    [Show full text]
  • Homo Sapiens Julie Arnaud [email protected] out of Africa 1 Homo Ergaster
    Laurea Magistrale in Quaternario, Preistoria e Archeologia International Master in Quaternary and Prehistory Homo sapiens Julie Arnaud [email protected] Out of Africa 1 Homo ergaster (Cavalli Sforza & Pievani, 2012) Out of Africa 2 Core population? Homo heidelbergensis (Cavalli Sforza & Pievani, 2012) Out of Africa 3 Homo sapiens (Cavalli Sforza & Pievani, 2012) Homo sapiens morphological features Day & Stringer (1982) (paleontological definition of the specie) • Short and elevated cranial vault • Long and curved parietal bones in the sagittal plan • High and wide biparietal vault in the coronal plan • Long and narrow occipital bone, without projection • Elevated frontal bone • Non-continuous supra-orbital complex • Presence of a canine fossa Vandermeersch (1981, 2005) • rounded cranial shape • large cranial capacity • decreased robustness (reduction/disappearance of superstructures) • elevated cranial vault, with parallel or divergent (upward) lateral walls • regularly rounded occipital bone • short face • teeth-size reduction tendency Homo erectus Homo sapiens Sangiran 17 Pataud 1 Short and rounded vault Elevated frontal bone Rounded occipital bone Reduced face, placed under the braincase Global decrease of robustness Elevated and convex frontal bone Reduced supra- orbital relief (separated elements) Reduced relief of nuchal Canine fossa lines Individualized and Dental crowns well developped reduced in size mastoid process (particularly anterior teeth) Mental foramen Marked chin located under the (mental trigone) premolar G: Glabella
    [Show full text]
  • An Early Modern Human from the Pes¸Tera Cu Oase, Romania
    An early modern human from the Pes¸tera cu Oase, Romania Erik Trinkaus*†, Oana Moldovan‡,S¸ tefan Milota§, Adrian Bıˆlga˘r¶, Laurent¸iu Sarcina§, Sheela Athreyaʈ, Shara E. Bailey**, Ricardo Rodrigo††, Gherase Mircea§, Thomas Higham‡‡, Christopher Bronk Ramsey‡‡, and Johannes van der Plicht§§ *Department of Anthropology, Campus Box 1114, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130; ‡Institutul de Speologie ‘‘Emil Racovit¸a˘ ,’’ Clinicilor 5, P.O. Box 58, 3400 Cluj, Romania; §Pro Acva Grup, Strada˘Surduc 1, 1900 Timis¸oara, Romania; ¶Strada˘Decebal 1, 1500 Drobeta Turnu Severin, Romania; ʈDepartment of Anthropology, Texas A&M University, College Station TX 77843; **Department of Anthropology, George Washington University, 2110 G Street, Washington, DC 20052; ††Centro Nacional da Arqueologia Na´utica e Subaqua´tica, Instituto Portugueˆs de Arqueologia, Avenida da India 136, 1300 Lisboa, Portugal; ‡‡Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford, 6 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3QJ, United Kingdom; and §§Centrum voor Isotopen Onderzoek, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands Contributed by Erik Trinkaus, August 8, 2003 The 2002 discovery of a robust modern human mandible in the Pes¸tera cu Oase, southwestern Romania, provides evidence of early modern humans in the lower Danubian Corridor. Directly accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon (14C)-dated to 34,000– 36,000 14C years B.P., the Oase 1 mandible is the oldest definite early modern human specimen in Europe and provides perspec- tives on the emergence and evolution of early modern humans in the northwestern Old World. The moderately long Oase 1 mandi- ble exhibits a prominent tuber symphyseos and overall proportions that place it close to earlier Upper Paleolithic European specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • La Cueva De La Güelga. Cangas De Onís. Asturias
    PLEISTOCENE AND HOLOCENE HUNTER-GATHERERS IN IBERIA AND THE GIBRALTAR STRAIT: 60 THE CURRENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD edge about the lifestyles of the human groups at ing all stages of human presence dating back more this exciting time. than 300,000 years enables a wide range of work- ing hypotheses to be tested, both historically and in other disciplines (palaeontology, climatology, 6. Conclusions etc.). Our studies have focused on the transition period from the Middle to the Upper Palaeolithic. The El Castillo cave site is one of the most They have contributed several aspects that chal- important records of the Middle and Upper Pal- lenge –and indeed will continue to challenge– cur- aeolithic on the Iberian Peninsula and indeed in rent views. This confirms the importance of the Europe. The presence of a stratigraphy represent- site and the opportunities it presents. Mario Menéndez*, Gerd-Christian Weniger **-***, David Álvarez-Alonso1, María de Andrés-Herrero ***,Eduardo García *, Jesús F. Jordá *, Martin Kehl La Cueva de la Güelga. Cangas de Onís. ****, Julio Rojo *, José M.Quesada *, Isabell Schmidh ** Asturias Introduction of the Sella River, territorially linked with other coast sites, 15 km away, around the Ribadesella La Cueva de la Güelga, whose name in the lo- Bay (Menéndez, 2003). cal language refers to wet and shady sites, opens Areas A, B and C (Upper Paleolithic): Locat- to the heart of a limestone mountain valley, form- ed around the current cave entrance, they show ing a cul-de-sac. A stream flows from the current cave aperture and has configurated a karst system remains of an intense Solutrean occupation swept with corresponding terrace drain caverns that by the river into the karst.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 04 August 2017 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Fazenda, Bruno and Scarre, Chris and Till, Rupert and Jim¡enezPasalodos, Raquel and Rojo Guerra, Manuel and Tejedor, Cristina and Onta£n¡onPeredo, Roberto and Watson, Aaron and Wyatt, Simon and Garc¡a Benito, Carlos and Drinkall, Helen and Foulds, Frederick (2017) 'Cave acoustics in prehistory : exploring the association of Palaeolithic visual motifs and acoustic response.', Journal of the Acoustical Society of America., 142 (3). pp. 1332-1349. Further information on publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4998721 Publisher's copyright statement: c 2017 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Years on Ice Age Europe Network Celebrates – Page 5
    network of heritage sites Magazine Issue 2 aPriL 2018 neanderthal rock art Latest research from spanish caves – page 6 Underground theatre British cave balances performances with conservation – page 16 Caves with ice age art get UnesCo Label germany’s swabian Jura awarded world heritage status – page 40 5 Years On ice age europe network celebrates – page 5 tewww.ice-age-europe.euLLING the STORY of iCe AGE PeoPLe in eUROPe anD eXPL ORING PLEISTOCene CULtURAL HERITAGE IntrOductIOn network of heritage sites welcome to the second edition of the ice age europe magazine! Ice Age europe Magazine – issue 2/2018 issn 2568­4353 after the successful launch last year we are happy to present editorial board the new issue, which is again brimming with exciting contri­ katrin hieke, gerd­Christian weniger, nick Powe butions. the magazine showcases the many activities taking Publication editing place in research and conservation, exhibition, education and katrin hieke communication at each of the ice age europe member sites. Layout and design Brightsea Creative, exeter, Uk; in addition, we are pleased to present two special guest Beate tebartz grafik Design, Düsseldorf, germany contributions: the first by Paul Pettitt, University of Durham, cover photo gives a brief overview of a groundbreaking discovery, which fashionable little sapiens © fumane Cave proved in february 2018 that the neanderthals were the first Inside front cover photo cave artists before modern humans. the second by nuria sanz, water bird – hohle fels © urmu, director of UnesCo in Mexico and general coor­­­di nator of the Photo: burkert ideenreich heaDs programme, reports on the new initiative for a serial transnational nomination of neanderthal sites as world heritage, for which this network laid the foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genetic Analysis of the Gibraltar Neanderthals
    A genetic analysis of the Gibraltar Neanderthals Lukas Bokelmanna,1, Mateja Hajdinjaka, Stéphane Peyrégnea, Selina Braceb, Elena Essela, Cesare de Filippoa, Isabelle Glockea, Steffi Grotea, Fabrizio Mafessonia, Sarah Nagela, Janet Kelsoa, Kay Prüfera, Benjamin Vernota, Ian Barnesb, Svante Pääboa,1,2, Matthias Meyera,2, and Chris Stringerb,1,2 aDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; and bCentre for Human Evolution Research, Department of Earth Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom Contributed by Svante Pääbo, June 14, 2019 (sent for review March 22, 2019; reviewed by Roberto Macchiarelli and Eva-Maria Geigl) The Forbes’ Quarry and Devil’s Tower partial crania from Gibraltar geographic range from western Europe to western Asia (for an are among the first Neanderthal remains ever found. Here, we overview of all specimens, see SI Appendix, Table S1). Thus, show that small amounts of ancient DNA are preserved in the there is currently no evidence for the existence of substantial petrous bones of the 2 individuals despite unfavorable climatic genetic substructure in the Neanderthal population after ∼90 ka conditions. However, the endogenous Neanderthal DNA is present ago (4), the time at which the “Altai-like” Neanderthals in the among an overwhelming excess of recent human DNA. Using im- Altai had presumably been replaced by more “Vindija 33.19- proved DNA library construction methods that enrich for DNA like” Neanderthals (17). fragments carrying deaminated cytosine residues, we were able The Neanderthal fossils of Gibraltar are among the most to sequence 70 and 0.4 megabase pairs (Mbp) nuclear DNA of the prominent finds in the history of paleoanthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Art As Prehistoric Culture Studies in Honour of Professor Rodrigo De Balbín-Behrmann
    Prehistoric Art as Prehistoric Culture Studies in Honour of Professor Rodrigo de Balbín-Behrmann edited by Primitiva Bueno-Ramírez and Paul G. Bahn Archaeopress Archaeology Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Gordon House 276 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7ED www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978 1 78491 222 2 ISBN 978 1 78491 223 9 (e-Pdf) © Archaeopress and the individual authors 2015 Cover: “Galería de los Antropomorfos” Tito Bustillo cave, Asturias, Spain. Photos by Rodrigo de Balbín All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Printed in England by Oxuniprint, Oxford This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com Contents List of Figures and Tables �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������iii List of contributors �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������v Prehistoric Art as Prehistoric Culture ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ vii Primitiva Bueno-Ramírez and Paul Bahn ‘Science’ versus Archaeology: Palaeolithic Rock Art at the beginning of the 21st century ��������������������������������������1 José-Javier Alcolea-González and César González-Sainz
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Spain)
    Scientific Annals, School of Geology Special volume 98 163-172 Thessaloniki, 2006 Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH) TITO BUSTILLO, A NEW URSUS SPELAEUS ROSENMÜLLER, 1794 CAVE ASSEMBLAGE IN ASTURIAS (NORTHERN SPAIN) Ana C. Pinto Llona1, Aurora Grandal D’Anglade2 & Sara Robinson-ROXBURGH3 Abstract: The cave named Tito Bustillo (Ribadesella, Asturias, Spain) has been known for decades because of its Magdalenian rock-art. It is a large karstic system by the Atlantic shore of northern Spain; the entrance is almost at sea level and its lower levels are submitted to tidal action. Currently a show cave, an assemblage of bear Ursus spelaeus bones was discovered when improving on the walkways in the 80’s, and subsequently excavations were carried out. This is the only cave bear site documented so far in the Asturias region of northern Spain. Here we describe the site and the bear population excavated, and briefly compare it with other cave bear sites in the neighbouring regions. Key words: Ursus spelaeus, U. s. parvilatipedis, Cantabrian mountains, Late Pleistocene. INTRODUCTION The cave itself is renowned by its outstanding Mag- dalenian rock and mobile art (Moure Romanillo, Cave bears were probably present throughout the Atlan- 1992; Balbín et al., 2003) and can be visited as a show tic regions of northern Spain. Several cave bear sites have cave. The cave bear assemblage is in the central area of been excavated and published, most of these either in the the cave, quite separated from the archaeological site. It eastern range of the area, at the Basque Country region seems that the cave bear occupation of Tito Bustillo is (eg.
    [Show full text]
  • Vers Un Modèle Décoratif Pour La Grotte De La Peña De Candamo (Asturies, Nord De L’Espagne) À La Lumière De Nouvelles Découvertes
    CLOTTES J. (dir.) 2012. — L’art pléistocène dans le monde / Pleistocene art of the world / Arte pleistoceno en el mundo Actes du Congrès IFRAO, Tarascon-sur-Ariège, septembre 2010 – Symposium « Art pléistocène en Europe » Vers un modèle décoratif pour la grotte de la Peña de Candamo (Asturies, nord de l’Espagne) à la lumière de nouvelles découvertes Mª Soledad CORCHÓNa, Diego GARATEb, Clara HERNANDOa, Paula ORTEGAa, Olivia RIVEROb Résumé La grotte de La Peña (Candamo, Asturies) a été récemment déclarée Patrimoine de l’Humanité par l’UNESCO. Découverte et étudiée au tout début du XXe siècle, elle fait l’objet, depuis 2006, d’un nouveau projet de recherche qui a permis de découvrir des représentations graphiques inédites. L’intégration des nouvelles figures dans le dispositif iconographique de la cavité offre une vision très différente du modèle décoratif, qui montre un rapport étroit avec d’autres grottes ornées de la Corniche Cantabrique. Mots-clés : La Peña ; Candamo ; Asturies ; grotte ornée ; paléolithique. Resumen – Hacia un modelo decorativo para la cueva de La Peña de Candamo (Asturias, Norte de España), a la luz de los nuevos descubrimientos La cueva de La Peña (Candamo, Asturias) ha sido recientemente declarada Patrimonio de la Humanidad por la UNESCO. Descubierta y estudiada en los albores del siglo XX, es objeto desde 2006 de un nuevo proyecto de investigación que ha permitido el hallazgo de representaciones gráficas inéditas. La integración de las nuevas figuras en el dispositivo iconográfico de la cavidad ofrece una visión muy distinta del modelo decorativo, guardando fuertes relaciones con otras cuevas decoradas de la Cornisa Cantábrica.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Aurignacian Dispersal of Modern Humans Into Westernmost Eurasia
    The early Aurignacian dispersal of modern humans into westernmost Eurasia Jonathan A. Hawsa,b,1, Michael M. Benedettib,c, Sahra Talamod,e, Nuno Bichob, João Cascalheirab, M. Grace Ellisf, Milena M. Carvalhob,g, Lukas Friedlb,h, Telmo Pereirai,j,k, and Brandon K. Zinsiousb,l aDepartment of Anthropology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292; bInterdisciplinary Center for Archaeology and Evolution of Human Behaviour (ICArEHB), Universidade do Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal; cDepartment of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC 28403; dDepartment of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; eDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy; fDepartment of Anthropology and Geography, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521; gDepartment of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 871317; hDepartment of Anthropology, University of West Bohemia, 30614 Plzen, Czech Republic; iDepartment of History, Arts, and Humanities, Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa, 1169-023, Lisbon, Portugal; jCentro de Arqueologia da Universidade de Lisboa (UNIARQ), 1600-214, Lisbon, Portugal; kCentro de Geociências, Universidade de Coimbra, 3030-790, Coimbra, Portugal; and lDepartment of Anthropology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 Edited by Richard G. Klein, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved August 26, 2020 (received for review July 30, 2020) Documenting the first appearance of modern humans in a given modern humans were the makers of the entire Aurignacian region is key to understanding the dispersal process and the cultural complex. replacement or assimilation of indigenous human populations Undeterred by this uncertainty, the early appearance dates for such as the Neanderthals. The Iberian Peninsula was the last the Upper Paleolithic and late appearance dates for Middle refuge of Neanderthal populations as modern humans advanced Paleolithic Neanderthals in southern Iberia led to the construc- across Eurasia.
    [Show full text]