Book Reviews

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Book Reviews BOOK REVIEWS A Noteworthy Synthesis of Eighteenth-Century Philadelphia* The scholarly and readable volume which Carl and Jessica Bridenbaugh have devoted to Philadelphia in mid-eighteenth century makes a significant contribution to a significant theme. The thirty-five years immediately pre- ceding the outbreak of the American Revolution witnessed the growth of Philadelphia from a town of 13,000 to over three times that size and the second city of the Empire it was about to repudiate. Contemporaneously there took place a remarkable deepening of cultural life. Both of these developments were furthered by Philadelphia's contacts with the sea. "The steady passage of Delaware-built ships . produced two results ... it yielded wealth to the merchants of Philadelphia and their dependents, and it brought to the Pennsylvania capital not only the material commodities of comfortable living, but also larger cargoes of people and ideas," enrich- ing "not only the pockets but the minds of its citizens." "After 1735 it is an anachronism to speak of Philadelphia as the Quaker City." On the eve of the Revolution Friends numbered only one seventh of the population, the Presbyterians being the strongest denomination numer- ically. "In this period of generally declining religious enthusiasms Phila- delphia churches exercised probably more influence upon the social and political than upon the spiritual lives of their communicants." Congrega- tions tended to be divided along linguistic or national lines, while "wealth was largely concentrated in the hands of Friends and Anglicans" and "all looked upon the latter as the stronghold of aristocracy." More productive than the churches of that free association of peoples so necessary to the growth of the democratic spirit were the many clubs organized in Philadelphia during this period. They ran the gamut from "glutton clubs" to Franklin's Junto and "The Society meeting weekly for their Mutual Improvement in Useful Knowledge." "Perhaps the most im- portant organizations in the city were the seventeen fire companies, which . had come by the seventies to involve a membership of from five to seven hundred citizens. Persons of all ranks and nationalities joined to form these bodies," and "convivial, benevolent, or political functions occupied the membership of all companies quite as much as the satisfaction of the natural desire in men of all ages to attend fires." In 1740 "the Quaker system of schools comprised the town's principal educational facilities," with Anthony Benezet the most famous teacher in * Rebels and Gentlemen: Philadelphia in the Age of Franklin, By CARL and JESSICA BRIDEN- BAUGH. (New York: Reynal and Hitchcock, 1942. xvii, 393 p. #3.50.) 166 1943 BOOK REVIEWS l6j its "English School," and with emphasis on utilitarian studies, "writing, arithmetic, bookkeeping, French and German—though 'not the whole vari- ation of the nouns and irregular verbs.'" Other denominations also estab- lished schools for the education of their youth, and many private teachers formed classes in a wide variety of subjects classical as well as useful. "As early as 1743 Franklin had conceived a plan for a quasi-public academy to prepare boys for business and civil life," but it was not until 1751 that the first classes were held in what was to become the University of Pennsyl- vania. By the end of the colonial period, education, whether parochial, public, or private, male or female, aristocratic or democratic, was definitely a business in Philadelphia, and almost complete literacy prevailed. Phila- delphians even took a hand in the education of other localities, sending out teachers, and aiding in the organization of at least two institutions of higher learning, the Academy of Newark, later the University of Delaware, and the College of New Jersey, now Princeton University. To supply the market created by this expanding educational program, forty-two printers, Franklin and the Bradfords foremost among them, were at work in Philadelphia in the period under discussion, putting out fifteen newspapers, several magazines, and innumerable books and pamphlets. The number of book stores increased from five in 1742 to thirty in the seventies, and some specialized in certain types of books. Gentlemen such as James Logan, Samuel Powel, Richard and William Peters, Francis Hopkinson, and Dr. John Morgan accumulated valuable private libraries, while others joined together to form circulating libraries. Three of these eventually merged with Franklin's Library Company of 1742, and the combined col- lection was installed in Carpenters' Hall in 1773. James Logan bequeathed his library to the city and it was opened to the public in 1768, housed in a one-story brick building on the corner of Sixth and Walnut Streets. Increased reading led to attempts at literary production. James Logan stood first among classical scholars of the colonies, publishing scientific papers in Latin in Europe and America. William Smith, brought to Phila- delphia in 1753 by Franklin as Provost of the College, himself wrote in many forms, and consciously sought to foster literary development among young men of promise of such diverse origin as the blue-blooded Francis Hopkinson and Thomas Godfrey, Jr., son of a lowly glazier. Of more natural charm were the diaries kept by Hannah Callendar, Sarah Eve, and Sally Wister. Most prominent was a voluminous literature of controversy, religious and political, written by such men as Franklin, Smith, David James Dove, John Dickinson, Joseph Galloway, James Wilson, and Tom Paine. Native dramatists were not so productive, though Thomas Godfrey, Jr., and Thomas Forrest each had a play produced at the Southwark Theatre. Despite the opposition of Quakers and Presbyterians, plays were acted professionally in Philadelphia in 1749, 1753, and from 1759 until the out- break of the Revolution. "As many as forty different plays, most of them 168 BOOK REVIEWS April well selected, with an equal number of farces or musical afterpieces, were presented in a single season; included were some thirteen works of Shake- speare, usually, it must be confessed, in the diluted versions of Thomson, Dryden, Cibber, or Garrick." The theater accomplished much in the way of general education sweetened with diversion, but unfortunately it also served as a social divisor by giving an aristocracy on the make the occasion for ostentatious display bitterly resented by the powerful middle class, also on the make. Increasingly elaborate church music, folk music brought by immigrants, political songs enjoyed at taverns or clubs, not to mention formal instruc- tion from some thirty teachers, enabled Philadelphia to overtake and pass her sister cities of Boston and Charleston in the encouragement of music. Shops carried or even specialized in sheet music and musical instruments, and all sorts of the latter were made in the city, many of them by German artisans. Various musical societies were organized, and gave soirees in private homes, while students at the College formed the Orpheus Club in 1759. The first subscription series of concerts was organized and directed by Signor Giovanni Gualdo in 1769, in an atmosphere of "Decency, good Manners and silence" at Davenport's Hall. The theater company even produced a few operas, with local gentry forming the orchestra. "In con- trast with the theater, music, which knew no nation and no class, was a cultural force making for social unity in Philadelphia." As in literature, so in the graphic arts, Philadelphians progressed from possession and enjoyment of the products of others to attempts at produc- tion themselves. Prints were sold at first by booksellers, later at print shops, and copies of paintings in European galleries as well as "engraved views of cities, mezzotints, cartoons, 'perspective views of Gentlemen's Seats,' maps and 'history pieces' found a ready market, first with the gentry, and later among all classes." As early as 1743 James Claypoole "opened a shop in Walnut Street where he sold books and 'most sorts of Painter's Colours, ready prepar'd for Use and neatly put up in Bladders.' " Sign painting furnished apprenticeship and a source of income to would-be portrait painters. During this period some thirty-six portraitists immor- talized the features of Philadelphia's leading citizens. "Much of the work was unschooled and poorly executed," but it reveals an honest craftsman- ship which felt no need of "the fashionably aristocratic deceptions of cur- rent English portraiture." Besides James Claypoole this group included Gustavus Hesselius, Matthew Pratt, Henry Groath, William Bartram, William Williams, and Benjamin West. After 1769 Charles Willson Peale of Maryland joined the group. "Just as the Philadelphia school seemed on the verge of genuine accomplishment an unfortunate mutation occurred" in the sending of Benjamin West to Europe for further study. His subse- quent triumphs filled Philadelphians with pride and caused other young men of promise to follow him to London, where they became imitators of English or European traditions instead of perfecting a native American I943 BOOK REVIEWS 169 art. So far as it went, however, painting had already become more natural- ized than either music or the theater. The three most prominent architects of the Philadelphia of this period happened all to be Quakers: Samuel Powel the elder, known as "the rich carpenter," Samuel Rhoads, designer of the Pennsylvania Hospital, and Robert Smith, who was "responsible for the first, and probably the most valid, American style of college building." Nassau Hall at Princeton and the "New College" building at Philadelphia were designed by him, and the former "clearly furnished the pattern for" both Dartmouth Hall and the "college edifice" at Providence, Rhode Island. He also planned Car- penters' Hall, the Walnut Street Prison, and St. Peters Church. These men, along with such cabinetmakers as William Savery and Thomas Tufft, and such silversmiths as Joseph Richardson, Philip Syng, and David Hall, prospered and took their places in the social and philanthropic life of the town.
Recommended publications
  • Documenting the University of Pennsylvania's Connection to Slavery
    Documenting the University of Pennsylvania’s Connection to Slavery Clay Scott Graubard The University of Pennsylvania, Class of 2019 April 19, 2018 © 2018 CLAY SCOTT GRAUBARD ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DOCUMENTING PENN’S CONNECTION TO SLAVERY 1 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 2 OVERVIEW 3 LABOR AND CONSTRUCTION 4 PRIMER ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE COLLEGE AND ACADEMY OF PHILADELPHIA 5 EBENEZER KINNERSLEY (1711 – 1778) 7 ROBERT SMITH (1722 – 1777) 9 THOMAS LEECH (1685 – 1762) 11 BENJAMIN LOXLEY (1720 – 1801) 13 JOHN COATS (FL. 1719) 13 OTHERS 13 LABOR AND CONSTRUCTION CONCLUSION 15 FINANCIAL ASPECTS 17 WEST INDIES FUNDRAISING 18 SOUTH CAROLINA FUNDRAISING 25 TRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE AND ACADEMY OF PHILADELPHIA 31 WILLIAM ALLEN (1704 – 1780) AND JOSEPH TURNER (1701 – 1783): FOUNDERS AND TRUSTEES 31 BENJAMIN FRANKLIN (1706 – 1790): FOUNDER, PRESIDENT, AND TRUSTEE 32 EDWARD SHIPPEN (1729 – 1806): TREASURER OF THE TRUSTEES AND TRUSTEE 33 BENJAMIN CHEW SR. (1722 – 1810): TRUSTEE 34 WILLIAM SHIPPEN (1712 – 1801): FOUNDER AND TRUSTEE 35 JAMES TILGHMAN (1716 – 1793): TRUSTEE 35 NOTE REGARDING THE TRUSTEES 36 FINANCIAL ASPECTS CONCLUSION 37 CONCLUSION 39 THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA’S CONNECTION TO SLAVERY 40 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 42 BIBLIOGRAPHY 43 DOCUMENTING PENN’S CONNECTION TO SLAVERY 2 INTRODUCTION DOCUMENTING PENN’S CONNECTION TO SLAVERY 3 Overview The goal of this paper is to present the facts regarding the University of Pennsylvania’s (then the College and Academy of Philadelphia) significant connections to slavery and the slave trade. The first section of the paper will cover the construction and operation of the College and Academy in the early years. As slavery was integral to the economy of British North America, to fully understand the University’s connection to slavery the second section will cover the financial aspects of the College and Academy, its Trustees, and its fundraising.
    [Show full text]
  • 1761-62] the Sz~Az~U'esal Large of Pennsylvania. Through and Break
    1761-62] The Sz~az~u’esal Large of Pennsylvania. 173 through and break down or endamage any of th~said banks, dams, sluices or flood-gates either their own or others’, or shall let in any creek or water to annoy, injure or overflowany of their neighbors’ lands, and shall thereof be convicted before the jus- tices of the court of quarter sessions of the said county of Chester, in all such cases the persons so offending shall be fined treble the value of all the damages, to be assessed by two or more indifferent persons to be appointed by the said court to value the same, which fine shall be added to the common stock for the general use andbenefit of the said district. Passed February 17, 1762. Referred for consideration by the King in Council, February 14, 1763, and allowed to become a law by lapse of time in accordance with the proprietary charter. See Appendix XXIV, Secti~nII, and the Acts of Assembly paesed March 4, 1763, Chapter 492; February 15, 1765, Chapter 523; March 4, 1797, Chapter 1922; February 26, 1800, Chapter 2108. CHAPTER CCCCLXXVI. AN ACT FOR THE RECOVERY OF THE DUTIES OF TONNAGE UPON SHIPS AND VESSELS AND CERTAIN OTHER DUTIES UPON WINE, RUM, BRANDY AND OTHER SPiRITS AND UPON SUGAR WHICH BECAME DUE BY VIRTUE OF A LAW OF THIS PROVINCE LATELY EXPIRED, AND WHICH WERE NOT RECEIVED OR SECURED DURING THE CON- TINUANCE THEREOF, AND FOR APPROPRIATING THE SURPLUS. OF THE SAID DUTIES. Whereas by an act of General Assembly~of this province passed in the thirty-first year of his late Majesty, George the Second, entitled “An actfor
    [Show full text]
  • Haverford College Bulletin, New Series, 7-8, 1908-1910
    STACK. CLASS S ^T^J BOOK 1^ THE LIBRARY OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE (HAVERFORD, pa.) BOUGHT WITH THE LIBRARY FUND BOUND ^ MO. 3 19) V ACCESSION NO. (d-3^50 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from LYRASIS Members and Sloan Foundation http://www.archive.org/details/haverfordcollege78have HAVERFORD COLLEGE BULLETIN Vol. VIII Tenth Month, 1909 No. 1 IReports of tbe Boaro of flDanaaers Iprestoent of tbe College ano treasurer of tbe Corporation 1908*1009 Issued Quarterly by Haverford College, Haverford, Pa. Entered December 10, 1902, at Haverford, Pa., as Second Class Matter under the Act of Congress of July 16, 1894 THE CORPORATION OF Haverford College REPORTS OF BOARD OF MANAGERS PRESIDENT OF THE COLLEGE TREASURER OF THE CORPORATION PRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING TENTH MONTH 12th, 1909 THE JOHN C. WINSTON COMPANY PHILADELPHIA CORPORATION. President. T. Wistar Brown 235 Chestnut St., Philadelphia Secretary. J. Stogdell Stokes ion Diamond St., Philadelphia Treasurer. Asa S. Wing 409 Chestnut St., Philadelphia BOARD OF MANAGERS. Term Expires 1910. Richard Wood 400 Chestnut St., Phila. John B. Garrett Rosemont, Pa. Howard Comfort 529 Arch St., Phila. Francis Stokes Locust Ave., Germantown, Phila. George Vaux, Jr 404 Girard Building, Phila. Stephen W. Collins 69 Wall St., New York, N. Y. Frederic H. Strawbridge 801 Market St., Phila. J. Henry Scattergood 648 Bourse Building, Phila. Term Expires 1911. Benjamin H. Shoemaker 205 N. Fourth St., Phila. Walter Wood 400 Chestnut St., Phila. William H. Haines 1136 Ridge Ave., Phila. Francis A. White 1221 N. Calvert St., Baltimore, Md. Jonathan Evans "Awbury," Germantown, Phila.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin's Bench and Bar of Philadelphia
    MARTIN'S BENCH AND BAR OF PHILADELPHIA Together with other Lists of persons appointed to Administer the Laws in the City and County of Philadelphia, and the Province and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania BY , JOHN HILL MARTIN OF THE PHILADELPHIA BAR OF C PHILADELPHIA KKKS WELSH & CO., PUBLISHERS No. 19 South Ninth Street 1883 Entered according to the Act of Congress, On the 12th day of March, in the year 1883, BY JOHN HILL MARTIN, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. C. W. H. PILE, PRINTER, No. 422 Walnut Street, Philadelphia. Stack Annex 5 PREFACE. IT has been no part of my intention in compiling these lists entitled "The Bench and Bar of Philadelphia," to give a history of the organization of the Courts, but merely names of Judges, with dates of their commissions; Lawyers and dates of their ad- mission, and lists of other persons connected with the administra- tion of the Laws in this City and County, and in the Province and Commonwealth. Some necessary information and notes have been added to a few of the lists. And in addition it may not be out of place here to state that Courts of Justice, in what is now the Com- monwealth of Pennsylvania, were first established by the Swedes, in 1642, at New Gottenburg, nowTinicum, by Governor John Printz, who was instructed to decide all controversies according to the laws, customs and usages of Sweden. What Courts he established and what the modes of procedure therein, can only be conjectur- ed by what subsequently occurred, and by the record of Upland Court.
    [Show full text]
  • The Presidents House in Philadelphia: the Rediscovery of a Lost Landmark
    The Presidents House in Philadelphia: The Rediscovery of a Lost Landmark I R MORE THAN 150 YEARS there has been confusion about the fPresident's House in Philadelphia (fig. 1), the building which served s the executive mansion of the United States from 1790 to 1800, the "White House" of George Washington and John Adams. Congress had named Philadelphia the temporary national capital for a ten-year period while the new Federal City (now Washington, D.C.) was under con- struction, and one of the finest houses in Philadelphia was selected for President Washington's residence and office. Prior to its tenure as the President's House, the building had housed such other famous (or infamous) residents as proprietary governor Richard Penn, British general Sir William Howe, American general Benedict Arnold, French consul John Holker, and financier Robert Morris. Historians have long recognized the importance of the house, and many have attempted to tell its story, but most of them have gotten the facts wrong about how the building looked when Washington and Adams lived there, and even about where it stood. 1 am indebted to John Alviti, Penelope Hartshorne Batcheler, George Brighitbill, Mr. and Mrs. Nathaniel Burt, Jeffrey A- Cohen, William Creech, David Dashiell, Scott DeHaven, Susan Drinan, Kenneth Fmkel, Jeffrey Faherty, Marsha Fritz, Kristen Froehlich, Roy Harker, Sharon Ann Holt, Sue Keeler, Roger G. Kennedy, Bruce Laverty, Edward Lawler, Sr., Jack and Alice-Mary Lawler, Joann Lawler, Andrea Ashby Lerari, Mark Fraze Lloyd, Barbara A. McMillan, Jefferson M. Moak, Howell T. Morgan, Gene Morris, Roger W. Moss, C.
    [Show full text]
  • Marriage Certificates
    MARRIAGE CERTIFICATES. (Abstracts.) Note. —Some of the names are very difficult to decipher. Should doubt ex- ist as to their correctness, the originals may be consulted at the Historical Society. r e John Woolston Sen - of Burlington, upon y River Dalla- ware in America, Husbandman and Hannah Cooper, Daughter of William Cooper, Smith, of Pine Poynte, upon e y River aforesaid, were married at Burlington the eight e day of y seventh month, one thousand six hundred and eighty one. John Woolston. Hannah Woolston. r William Cooper, Sen . Daniel Leeds Grace Hollinshed r Wm. Cooper, Jun . Robert Powell Suzana Budd Tho. Olive John Stacy Ann Leeds Robert Stacy Margaret Cooper Joyce Marriott Wm. Brightwen Elizabeth Gardiner Isaac Marriott Tho. Gardiner Ann Butcher Ellen SUcej Wm. Peachee Ann Peachee Walter Pumphrey Samuel Jennings Ann Jennings Henry Hollingsworth of Pensilvania, County of New Castle in America and Lidia Atkinson, in the parish of Sego and County of Ardmah in Ireland having declared their Intentions of Marriage with each other in severall publick meetings of the people of God called Quakers, in e and nere Lurgan (in y province of Ulster) were married the Two and Twentieth day of the sixt month in the ware 1688 in their publick meeting house at John Robsons. Henery Hollingsworth. Lidea Hollingsworth. John Robson Roger Kirk James Robert Hoope Mark Wright John Hoops (60) Marriage Certificates. 61 Sill Richardson James Greer Mary roda Allphonsus Kirk William Crook a Sarah Robson Jacob Robson Thomas Doall Sarah neb 1 Alex Walkers Thomas Braidshaw Jane Mathews Thomas Walker John Walker Kathreen Kirk William Porter Sarah Robson Elizabeth Lyues Thomas Turnor Issabell Atkinson Deborah Lynes Th : Wainwright Mary Rottleff Alyce Ball .
    [Show full text]
  • "Philadelphia*S <J)(Cunicipal Corporation
    "Philadelphia*s <J)(Cunicipal Corporation, 1701-1776 URING the colonial period two American cities, New York and Philadelphia, were nominally governed by municipal D corporations closely resembling their English models, and displaying many of the same deficiencies but little of the vitality that still characterized some of their English counterparts. The Philadel- phia Corporation was a close one, entirely self-perpetuating. During its seventy-five-year existence (1701-1776), it became ever more closely bound to its own interests as a legal entity and thus more estranged from the interests of the inhabitants of Philadelphia. Under its charter, the Corporation received powers that were static and somewhat antiquated. As a consequence, the increasing size of the city and the complexity of urban life left the Corporation iso- lated, further and further out of touch with public opinion, while the actual government of Philadelphia went piecemeal into the hands of boards of commissioners, wardens, overseers, and the like. These derived their authority from the Pennsylvania Assembly rather than from the municipal charter.1 The Philadelphia Corporation played second fiddle to the pro- vincial government on every count. It suffered from the Assembly's presence in Philadelphia and from its tendency to interest itself in the details of the city government. E. S. Griffith, a historian of city government, has stated that this situation was common in the colonies: "In many instances, notably in the capital cities, the assembly appeared to regard itself as the actual government of the town, solemnly considering details which might more properly have been delegated—and which in fact in some instances had actually 1 The actual government of Philadelphia by these boards is a related study, one that has not as yet been done except in the general terms of Carl Bridenbaugh's two books, Cities in the Wilderness and Cities in Revolt.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genea-Biographical History of the Rittenhouse Family and All Its
    ' l_ IIr N l_ 11 i-± ¦ > ": IT= ? o =-— P" o ~n =**. • z O « 0 JZ ¦ : ro m Z —— ' i S 2 0 Z :• oI ' _Z j = 8 S — \ rio _z: ; - ~* ' ,I __ I : —_ \j [f Ml 111 KSEI Daniel K. Cassel. Wit §ulknU this Wiorl: FIRST, TO THE MEMORY OF OUR ANCESTORS, WHO BEQUEATHED TO US THE GLORIOUS PRIVILEGE OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, AND SET US EXAMPLES OP BLAMELESS, EXEMPLARY LIVES. SECOND, TO OUR PARENTS, WHO TAUGHT US TO PRIZE THIS INHERITANCE AS A PRICELESS BOON, DIRECT FROM THE HAND OP GOD. THIRD, TO OUR CHILDREN, WHOM WE ADJURE TO CHERISH THEIR INESTIMABLE PRIVILEGES, AND KEEP UNSULLIED THE FAMILY"NAME, UNSPOTTED FROM THE WORLD. FOURTH, TO OUR POSTERITY. KAY THEY EMULATE THE WORTHY EXAMPLE OF THE "GOOD AND TRUE" WHO HAVE PRECEDED THEM, AND "HONOR GOD AND OBEY HIS COMMANDMENTS." A GENEA-BIOGRAPHICAL HISTORY OF THE RITTENHOUSE FAMILY AND ALLITS BRANCHES IN AMERICA, jr" WITH SKETCHES OF THEIR DESCENDANTS, FROM THE EARLIEST AVAILABLERECORDS TO THE PRESENT TIME,INCLUDING , THE BIRTH OF WILHELM IN1644. Wiitlx portraits and other Jtlustrations. BY y/ DANIEL K. CASSEL, OF GEKMAUTOWN, PHILADELPHIA,PA. WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY ALVAH RITTENHOUSE, M.D. VOLUME I. -j-rv- Uan : PUBLISHED BY THE RITTENHOUSE MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION, PHILADELPHIA,.PA. 1893. COPYRIGHT, 1893, BY THE RITTENHOUSE MEMORIALASSOCIATION. Press of Wm. f.Fell& Co., 122024 SANSOM ST., PHILADELPHIA. MOTTO. Which we have heard and known, and our fathers have told us That the generations to come might hnoio them, even the children which should be born; who should arise and declare them to their children.
    [Show full text]
  • The Private and Public Responses to Yellow Fever In
    Living in fear of the pale faced messenger : the private and public responses to yellow fever in Philadelphia, 1793-1799 by Anita Marie DeClue A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Art in History Montana State University © Copyright by Anita Marie DeClue (2001) Abstract: When yellow fever struck Philadelphia—the premier city of the New Republic— it was the political, cultural, economic, social, and medical capital of America. When the pale faced messenger unleashed itself, with unbelievable ferocity in 1793, this charming and prosperous nerve center of the nation almost crumpled under the weight. This thesis analyses how private citizens, physicians, and governments dealt with the overwhelming problems caused by the almost annual visitation of yellow jack to the Quaker City between 1793 and 1799. While society practically disintegrated under that first ferocious onslaught, the great tradition of citizen involvement saved the city. While thousands fled, often leaving behind sick loved ones, a volunteer committee took over the administration of the city and a group of black Americans assisted, playing a key role in the recovery of the city. In subsequent epidemics, citizens continued to volunteer their services, but only in ancillary capacities. Although the real source of yellow fever—the Aedes aegypti mosquito—remained unknown for another one hundred years, physicians argued vociferously over every aspect of the disease. The medical community split into two camps. One group believed in local generation, its noncontagious nature, and a direct-heroic intervention treatment approach. The other group believed it was imported, contagious, and supported gentle-natural healing methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Magazine of HISTORY and BIOGRAPHY
    THE Pennsylvania Magazine OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY VOLUME LXVII JANUARY, 1943 NUMBER ONE Philadelphia Medical Students in Europe, 1750-1800 ORE than half the twenty-four founding members of the College of Physicians of Philadelphia in 1787 had received M a part of their formal medical training in Europe; and when in the succeeding decade Caspar Wistar, Junior, Benjamin Smith Barton, Philip Syng Physick, and Isaac Cathrall began to practice, the number of Philadelphia physicians with foreign educa- tion was increased. What was true of Quakerdelphia was true also, though usually to a lesser degree, elsewhere in the United States. From 1749, when John Moultrie, of South Carolina, was made a doctor of medicine of the University of Edinburgh, to the close of the century, no fewer than 117 Americans received the medical degree of that institution alone; while uncounted others, like Thomas Parke, Samuel Powel Griffitts, and Benjamin Smith Barton, studied there for a term or two. Indeed, so constant was the flow of American medical students to England, Scotland, and the Continent in the lat- ter half of the eighteenth century, that one might speak of a kind of trade in them, America exporting the raw materials for physicians 1 2 WHITFIELD J. BELL, JR. January and surgeons and receiving after the passage of three or four years the finished products. These colonials and young republicans filled themselves at the fountainheads of science abroad; and, returning with the knowledge of the European schools and hospitals, were pre- pared and eager, the Philadelphians at least, to spread their learning through the United States and make Philadelphia the Edinburgh of America.1 The medical students who went abroad in the half century after 1750 were not, however, pioneers in a new movement, for in the second quarter of the century several Philadelphians had sought medical instruction in England and on the Continent.
    [Show full text]
  • When We Were Young: the American Philosophical Society in the 18Th Century1
    When We Were Young: The American Philosophical Society in the 18th Century1 GARY B. NASH Distinguished Research Professor University of California, Los Angeles n 2018 the American Philosophical Society celebrated its 275th anniversary, though in truth, 1743 is a shadowy date. Some think Ithe APS began in 1727, when Benjamin Franklin, at age 21—having resided in Philadelphia for less than two years since he first arrived in late 1723—convened his famous Junto of leather apron men (Figure 1). Drawing up rules for this private self-improvement group, 12 in number and limited to that size, he tasked “every Member in his Turn” to produce “one or more Queries . to be discuss’d by the Company.’’2 Among the founding group, four were from Samuel Keimer’s print shop (Franklin, Hugh Meredith, Stephen Potts, and George Webb) while the others were shoemakers (John Jones and William Parsons); a surveyor (Nicholas Scull); a scrivener (Joseph Breitnall); a carpenter (William Coleman); an ironmaker (Robert Grace); a glass maker (Thomas Godfrey); and a cabinet maker (William Mangrudge). It was a noble start, indeed an astounding venture, ushered into the world by such a youth striving to implant himself in a young river port, where Quaker merchants and landowners of growing wealth held sway.3 The APS website today claims our Society as an “offshoot” of 1 Read 26 April 2018. My thanks to the anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions for this paper. 2 The editors of the comprehensive edition of the Papers of Benjamin Franklin aver that Franklin had been influenced by Boston’s venerable Cotton Mather’s Essays to Do Good (1710), which proposed voluntary groups to encourage morality and religion.
    [Show full text]
  • An Historical Account of the Old State House of Pennsylvania Now
    Independence Hall, 1876. FRONT VIEW. AN HISTORICAL ACCOUNT UK THE OLD STATE HOUSE OF PENNSYLVANIA NOW KNOWN AS THE HALL OF INDEPENDENCE « BY / FRANK M ETTING WITH NUMEROUS ILLUSTRATIONS BOSTON JAMES R. OSGOOD AND COMPANY 1876 Copyright, 1874, By FRANK M ETTING KIVERSIDE, CAMBRIDGE: •EREOTYPED AND PRINTED BY H. O. HOUGHTON AND COMPANY. PREFACE In the work that I had " found for my hand to do," it became necessary to examine carefully into the details of the building of the State House of Pennsylvania ; much that surprised me came to light not only in the circumstances of its erection but in its subsequent C history. Instead of Dr. Kearsley, to whom the credit had been as- cribed, I discovered that its Architect and actual Builder was one of the greatest men ever fostered by Pennsylvania ; and that every important movement, from the very inception of the efforts of the colonists to assert their constitutional liberty, first assumed shape either within this building or under the shadow of its walls. A friendly suggestion thrown out induced me to extend still further my investigations, with a view of preserving the information in print in some accessible form. This desire was enhanced by the hope that the general public would ultimately share in the interest which every brick of this old build- ing possesses for me, and thus be inclined to lend each his individual aid towards its preservation, and to insure its proper custodianship for all time. The desultory way in which, from causes unnecessary to be detailed, my memoranda have been thrown together, must leave its impress, and I cannot expect to be exempt from inaccuracies ; but having done my best without fee or reward, present or prospective, I have no apologies to make to the public for claiming their notice.
    [Show full text]