Innovation U 2.0: Reinventing University Roles in a Knowledge Economy Enters a Very Different World Than Its Predecessor

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Innovation U 2.0: Reinventing University Roles in a Knowledge Economy Enters a Very Different World Than Its Predecessor Innovation U 2.0 Reinventing University Roles in a Knowledge Economy Louis G. Tornatzky, PhD Elaine C. Rideout, PhD Innovation U 2.0 Reinventing University Roles in a Knowledge Economy Louis G. Tornatzky, PhD Elaine C. Rideout, PhD Contents Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................................................................vii Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................................................ix Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................1 Cases Arizona State University....................................................................................................................................................19 Brigham Young University ..............................................................................................................................................39 California Institute of Technology ........................................................................................................................51 Carnegie Mellon University ..........................................................................................................................................69 Clemson University ................................................................................................................................................................91 University of Florida ..............................................................................................................................................................109 Georgia Institute of Technology...............................................................................................................................127 Massachusetts Institute of Technology..............................................................................................................145 North Carolina State University ..............................................................................................................................171 Purdue University .....................................................................................................................................................................189 Copyright 2014 Louis G. Tornatzky. All rights reserved. Stanford University .................................................................................................................................................................205 This work was created for the purposes of advancing public and private discussion related to university innovation, and to advance education and understanding in that field. Any person or organization who acquires a paper or electronic version of this work, and who will use it for those University of Utah ....................................................................................................................................................................225 purposes, is permitted to freely copy and disseminate the entire volume or chapters thereof. A pdf version is available at: Summary and Recommendations .......................................................................................................................245 www.Innovation-U.com About the Authors and Contributors ............................................................................................257 v Foreword No one realized ten years ago how prescient Innovation U would be. Back then, the words economic development and universities rarely appeared together. Now, many economic developers include universities in their asset portfolios, and a large number of university officials purposefully interact with their local economies.Innovation U should not claim sole credit for this shift; it can, however, claim to have raised awareness in a few critical groups and helped build momentum for critical policies. Innovation U 2.0: Reinventing University Roles in a Knowledge Economy enters a very different world than its predecessor. Government officials are questioning the role of universities in society. The economic underpinnings of higher education, for universities and stu- dents, are stressed. Federal support for research is uncertain. Never have so many raised so many questions about the value, purpose, and impacts of higher education, at least in contemporary times. Amid all these questions, the strategies and practices encapsulated in this book present some answers. Innovation U institutions dramatically depict universities as creators of intellectual capital and economic growth. They show paths for universities to follow for larger impacts on their region. The cases are not exhaustive, and certainly there are omissions. Volumes could be written about each university, and many others are accom- plishing remarkable feats. Dr. Lou Tornatzky and his colleagues—fueled not by remuneration, but by an intense belief in the economic power of universities—should be commended for their dedica- tion and quality product. Dr. Tornatzky recently retired from Cal Poly, and this project caps an illustrious career as a teacher, manager, and researcher in all things in technology and policy. Scott Doron Director Southern Technology Council Research Triangle Park North Carolina vi vii Acknowledgements Financial and in-kind support from the following organizations were instrumental in enabling the execution of this project and the early dissemination of the final report: The National Science Foundation, Industry/University Cooperative Research Centers Program (IIP-1140438) provided monetary support for the research team. The William R. Kenan Jr. Institute for Engineering, Technology & Science provided monetary support for project execution including dissemination of the final report. The Orfalea College of Business, California Polytechnic State University, supported Dr. Tornatzky’s sabbatical leave in Research Triangle Park, NC. The North Carolina Office of Science and Technology provided logistical and dissemination support. The State Science and Technology Institute featured a digital version of the report in its online newsletter, and sponsored a Webinair to present the project to its large constituency. The Information Technology Innovation Foundation served as a dissemination partner and featured a digital version of the report in its online newsletter. North Carolina State University made office space and support services available for Dr. Tornatzky during his sabbatical leave in Research Triangle Park. A number of individuals made in-kind contributions: Susan Opava, Paul Waugaman and Trent Williams were outstanding in their roles as “critical readers” of draft chapters, and suggesting corrections in grammar, style, and substance. Scott Doron, former Director of Southern Technology Council and a long-time collaborator, was a rock of intellectual and organizational contributions of inestimable value to the execution of this project. His faith in what we wanted to do, with no money to start with, kept us going. Denis Gray was one of the authors on the 2002 Innovation U book, but regrettably took a pass on being a co-author on this project. Nonetheless, over the past 18 months he has provided logistical, intellectual, and political assistance that has gone beyond the call of duty and expectations of friendship. He also was a significant viii ix contributor in the key Introduction and Summary chapters, and co-designed and participated in the Case Selection process. Lynette Tornatzky put up with the senior author’s peaks of creative bliss and anguish, and contributed her graphic design skills to the format of the report. Introduction* During the case selection process, eight very knowledgeable individuals provided valuable substantive input and contributions of their time as a Project Advisory Committee member: John W. Ahlen, The suggestion that US universities do in each university case study; and (5) to describe ; President (retired), Arkansas Science and Technology Authority more to pursue and optimize the potential case selection and analysis methodologies that were Robert D. Atkinson, usefulness of the results of taxpayer-funded used, as well as ones that were avoided, and why. President, Information Technology and Innovation Foundation; research is not an acclamation that US universities have failed. Instead, it is a Innovation U - 2002 Elizabeth Popp Berman, suggestion that they can improve and, in Twelve years ago a slim paperback volume was Associate Professor, University of Albany, SUNY; doing so, better advance economic growth completed and widely distributed by the Southern and human welfare. Paraphrasing from 1 Barry Bozeman, Growth Policies Board (SGPB), located in elsewhere in this article, better than it Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. It was Arizona Centennial Professor of Public Management and Technology Policy, was is no excuse for failing to pursue or ; entitled Innovation U. New University Roles in a Arizona State University even achieve as good as it could be. Knowledge Economy. The heart of that book was Dan Berglund, — John E. Tyler III, twelve brief case studies of research universities President & CEO, State Science & Technology Institute; Redeploying Bayh-Dole: Beyond merely that
Recommended publications
  • Tenure Clock Extension
    11/2/2020 COVID-19 Tenure and Appointment Clock Extension Policy Published on Faculty Handbook (https://facultyhandbook.stanford.edu (https://facultyhandbook.stanford.edu)) Home (/) > Faculty Handbook (/index) > COVID-19 Tenure and Appointment Clock Extension Policy COVID-19 Tenure and Appointment Clock Extension Policy REVISED October 31, 2020 In recognition of the serious academic and personal challenges posed by the Covid-19 viral pandemic, a faculty member holding a tenure-accruing appointment is entitled to a one-year extension of the date (under the seven-year tenure clock) on which tenure would be conferred. This extension will normally have the effect of postponing for a year the initiation of the tenure review process. The Covid-19 Tenure Clock Extension, though it extends the seven-year tenure clock deadline, does not extend the ten-year appointment clock deadline except through an exception granted by the Provost for extraordinary personal or institutional circumstances. The Covid-19 Tenure Clock Extension is available to faculty members holding a tenure-accruing appointment with the exception of those currently in a terminal year appointment or those whose tenure-conferring promotion or reappointment process commenced prior to January 1, 2020, since the work to be evaluated was done prior to the current pandemic. Teaching relief is not associated with this extension. Effective October 1, 2020, this tenure clock extension will be automatically granted to eligible University Tenure Line junior faculty members (as defined above) whose faculty appointments at Stanford will begin prior by December 31, 2021. The extension is not available for faculty members whose tenure-conferring promotion or reappointment process has already commenced (with commencement defined as the date the department chair or school dean informs the candidate in writing that the review process has begun).
    [Show full text]
  • Stanford Presidents Collection
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt8b69s302 Online items available Guide to the Stanford Presidents Collection Daniel Hartwig Stanford University. Libraries.Department of Special Collections and University Archives Stanford, California October 2010 Copyright © 2015 The Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University. All rights reserved. Note This encoded finding aid is compliant with Stanford EAD Best Practice Guidelines, Version 1.0.This encoded finding aid is compliant with Stanford EAD Best Practice Guidelines, Version 1.0. Guide to the Stanford Presidents SCM0008 1 Collection Overview Call Number: SCM0008 Creator: Lee, Russell V. Title: Stanford presidents collection Dates: 1978 Physical Description: 0.02 Linear feet 1 folder Summary: Unpublished articles regarding Stanford University presidents David Starr Jordan, John Casper Branner, Ray Lyman Wilbur, and J. E. Wallace Sterling, and acting president Robert E. Swain. Language(s): The materials are in English. Repository: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford, CA 94305-6064 Email: [email protected] Phone: (650) 725-1022 URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc/university-archives Submitted by Lee to the Stanford Alumni Association; transferred to the University Archives, 1981. Ownership & Copyright All requests to reproduce, publish, quote from, or otherwise use collection materials must be submitted in writing to the Head of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, California 94304-6064. Consent is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission from the copyright owner. Such permission must be obtained from the copyright owner, heir(s) or assigns.
    [Show full text]
  • J. E. Wallace Sterling, President of Stanford University, Papers SC0216
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt587037x1 Online items available Guide to the J. E. Wallace Sterling, President of Stanford University, Papers SC0216 compiled by Phil Cline and Polly Armstrong Department of Special Collections and University Archives 1990 Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford 94305-6064 [email protected] URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Note This encoded finding aid is compliant with Stanford EAD Best Practice Guidelines, Version 1.0. Guide to the J. E. Wallace SC0216 1 Sterling, President of Stanford University, Papers SC0216 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Title: J. E. Wallace Sterling, president of Stanford University, papers creator: Sterling, J. E. Wallace (John Ewart Wallace) Identifier/Call Number: SC0216 Physical Description: 300 Linear Feet Date (inclusive): 1913-1969 Date (bulk): bulk Abstract: Papers primarily represent Sterling's years as President of Stanford University and include correspondence, memoranda, proposals, speeches, minutes, reports, budgets, clippings, and legal papers. Access Collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least 24 hours in advance of intended use. Publication Rights All requests to reproduce, publish, quote from, or otherwise use collection materials must be submitted in writing to the Head of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, California 94304-6064. Consent is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission from the copyright owner. Such permission must be obtained from the copyright owner, heir(s) or assigns. See: http://library.stanford.edu/depts/spc/pubserv/permissions.html.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stanford Senate Academic Council
    The Stanford Senate of the Academic Council Reflections on Fifty Years of Faculty Governance, 1968–2018 StanfordSenate4thpages.indd 1 3/4/18 11:54 AM StanfordSenate4thpages.indd 2 3/4/18 11:54 AM The Stanford Senate of the Academic Council Reflections on Fifty Years of Faculty Governance, 1968–2018 written, compiled, and edited by Peter Stansky Ethan W. Ris Susan W. Schofield Hans N. Weiler and Past Senate Chairs and Academic Secretaries with the assistance of the Stanford University News Service, Registrar’s Office, and University Archives published by the Stanford University Office of the Academic Secretary with the support of the Stanford Historical Society StanfordSenate4thpages.indd 3 3/4/18 11:54 AM StanfordSenate4thpages.indd 4 3/4/18 11:54 AM Robert W. Beyers. 1974 Dedicated to Robert W. Beyers, an intrepid newsman committed to the integrity of the press and to the effectiveness of faculty governance. Beyers served as the Information Officer for the Senate in its early years. This book was made possible through the generous support of the Robert & Charlotte Beyers Fund of the Stanford Historical Society. StanfordSenate4thpages.indd 5 3/4/18 11:54 AM Stanford University, Office of the Academic Secretary © 2018 by the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or in any informa- tion storage or retrieval system without the prior written permission of the Stanford University Office of the Academic Secretary.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanford Bondholder Information Website
    2002 Thinking Annual on Report New Lines STANFORD UNIVERSITY CONTENTS: STANFORD FACTS: Thinking on New Lines, Enrollment (2002): 14,339 by President John L. Hennessy 1 Undergraduate Students: 6,731 Supporting the Best Undergraduate Graduate Students: 7,608 Education Anywhere 3 A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Future 6 Degrees Awarded (2001–2002): A Tradition of Responsible Bachelor’s: 1,692 Land Management 9 Master’s: 1,959 The Relentless Pursuit of Doctoral: 818 New Knowledge 12 Keeping Stanford’s Commitments, by Board Chair Isaac Stein 16 The Stanford Professoriate: 1,714 Nobel Laureates: 17 2002 Financial Review 17 Pulitzer Prize Winners: 4 MacArthur Fellows: 23 National Medal of Science Recipients: 21 National Medal of Technology Recipients: 3 American Academy of Arts and Sciences Members: 220 National Academy of Sciences Members: 128 National Academy of Engineering Members: 81 American Philosophical Society Members: 42 National Academy of Education Members: 25 ON THE COVER: Proving its Wolf Foundation Prize Winners: 6 responsible land stewardship, Stanford University has left Koret Foundation Prize Winners: 6 open or lightly developed about two-thirds of its 8,180 Presidential Medal of Freedom Recipients: 2 acres. This photograph was taken from the Dish area, a foothills conservation area that the University has opened to the public. An estimated 1,000 people per day hike the popular four- mile network of trails that overlook the campus and San Francisco Bay. (Photograph by Linda A. Cicero) p.1 2002 annual report 2002 annual THINKING ON NEW LINES MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT today, little more than a century after developed to assure success in life.
    [Show full text]
  • Regionalism in Stanford's Contribution to the Rise of Silicon Valley
    Regionalism in Stanford’s Contribution to the Rise of Silicon Valley STEPHEN B. ADAMS In this article I explore the powerful sense of regional solidarity that accompanied the rise of Silicon Valley. From the early years of Stanford University, the university’s leaders saw its mission as service to the West and shaped the school accordingly. At the same time, the perceived exploitation of the West at the hands of eastern interests fueled booster-like attempts to build self-sufficient indige- nous local industry. Thus, regionalism helped align Stanford’s inter- ests with those of the area’s high-tech firms for the first fifty years of Silicon Valley’s development. The distinctive regional ethos of the West during the first half of the twentieth century is an ingredient of Silicon Valley’s already prepared environment, an ingredient that would-be replicators ignore at their peril. In his introduction to Understanding Silicon Valley, Martin Kenney notes, “Frederick Terman, credited by many as the founder of Silicon Valley, can better be understood as a catalyst and a booster in an already prepared environment.”1 What was the nature of that pre- pared environment? Recent scholarship suggests that well before 1925, when Terman joined the faculty of the Stanford engineering school, the environment included two ingredients: an active local high-tech industry and the early involvement of Stanford University Enterprise & Society, Vol. 4 No. 3, the Business History Conference 2003; all rights reserved. DOI: 10.1093/es/khg025 STEPHEN B. ADAMS is assistant professor of management, Franklin P. Perdue School of Business, Salisbury University.
    [Show full text]
  • J. E. Wallace Sterling, President of Stanford University, Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt587037x1 No online items Guide to the J. E. Wallace Sterling, President of Stanford University, Papers compiled by Daniel Hartwig Stanford University Libraries.Dept. of Special Collections & University Archives. Stanford, California 1990 Copyright © 2013 The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. All rights reserved. Note This encoded finding aid is compliant with Stanford EAD Best Practice Guidelines, Version 1.0. Guide to the J. E. Wallace SC0216 1 Sterling, President of Stanford University, Papers Overview Call Number: SC0216 Creator: Sterling, J. E. Wallace, (John Ewart Wallace), 1906-1985 Title: J. E. Wallace Sterling, president of Stanford University, papers Dates: 1913-1969 Bulk Dates: 1949-1969 Physical Description: 300 Linear feet Summary: Papers primarily represent Sterling's years as President of Stanford University and include correspondence, memoranda, proposals, speeches, minutes, reports, budgets, clippings, and legal papers. Language(s): The materials are in English. Repository: Dept. of Special Collections & University Archives. Stanford University Libraries. 557 Escondido Mall Stanford, CA 94305 Email: [email protected] Phone: (650) 725-1022 URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Information about Access Collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least 24 hours in advance of intended use. Ownership & Copyright All requests to reproduce, publish, quote from, or otherwise use collection materials must be submitted in writing to the Head of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, California 94304-6064. Consent is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission from the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanford Facts 2021 Stanford University Today
    Facts 2021 Stanford University Today Stanford Facts 2021 Stanford University Today Welcome to Stanford 2 About Stanford 5 Undergraduate Studies 10 Graduate Studies 18 Postdoctoral Scholars 22 Schools and Programs 24 Stanford Faculty 30 Staff 33 Research and Innovation 34 The Arts 41 Libraries and Resources 44 Student Life 46 Cardinal Athletics 50 Stanford Campus 52 Stanford Medicine 56 Finances 58 University Administration 60 Stanford Alumni 63 Front Cover: An aerial view of the Stanford Quad and surrounding area. This page: Hikers wearing face masks during Covid-19 pandemic walking the Stanford Dish trail. Stanford Memorial Church Stanfords Memorial Church was established by Jane Stanford in memory of her husband, Leland Stanford, as a symbol of the family’s commitment to an education informed by diverse religious, spiritual, moral and ethical values. Dedicated in 1903 as a non-sectarian religious center, Mem Chu remains the most prominent architectural feature of the Main Quadrangle and is home to University Public Worship. The church features five organs, including the Fisk-Nanney organ, which has 73 ranks and 4,332 pipes. It is one of three religious The Stanford Tree mascot and spiritual spaces on campus led by the Office for gives a signature greeting Welcome from the Green Library’s Lane Religious and Spiritual Life. Call 650-723-3469 for Reading Room. docent-led tours. For current information visit: orsl.stanford.edu/get-know-us/memorial-church/visit- to Stanford memorial-church Located in the San Francisco Bay Area, Stanford University is a place of learning, discovery, expression Hoover Tower and Pavilion and innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    176 Bibliography Collections All collections are in the University Archives, Green Library unless otherwise noted. Collections (call number) These include the most important collections for the study of Stanford architecture: Arboretum (SC 195); Architecture of Stanford University (SC 125); Roy Ballard (SC 203); John Casper Branner (SC 34); Birge M. Clark (SC 76b); Board of Trustees Supporting Documents (SC 27; SC 282); Peter Coutts (SC 202:1); John Dodds (SC 139); History of the American College Campus (SC 355); Humanities and Sciences (SC 36); David Starr Jordan (SC 58); Miscellaneous University Papers (SC 25); News Service (SC 122); Harry Peterson (SC 107); Planning Office (SC 123; SC 486); Plant Services Office [drawings] (SC 123); Jane Stanford (SC 33b); Leland Stanford (SC 33a); Leland Stanford Collection (SC 512); Leland Stanford Junior (SC 33c); Stanford Family Scrapbooks (SC 33f ); Stanford Property Deeds (SC 30); Stanford Ranches and Lands (SC 3); J. E. Wallace Sterling (SC 216); Palo Alto Stock Farm (SC 6); Archibald Treat Correspondence (SC 511); Archibald Treat Photographs (SC 005); Donald Tresidder (SC 151); University Clippings (SC 15); Ray Lyman Wilbur Presidential (SC 64a); and Ray Lyman Wilbur Personal (SC 64b). Four-Digit File Indexes (call number) These indexes contain a general and a detailed index, organized by subject matter, includ- ing buildings. The most important collections include: Arboretum (0321); Art and Architecture (3590-3629); Art Gallery (3600); Athletics (8500-8999); Board of Trustees Minutes (1101);
    [Show full text]
  • Stanford Oral History Project Interviews SC1017
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt3c603546 Online items available Guide to the Stanford Oral History Project Interviews SC1017 Daniel Hartwig & Jenny Johnson Department of Special Collections and University Archives October 2010 Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford 94305-6064 [email protected] URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Guide to the Stanford Oral SC1017 1 History Project Interviews SC1017 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Title: Stanford Oral History Project interviews creator: Stanford Historical Society Identifier/Call Number: SC1017 Physical Description: 16.75 Linear Feet(300 audiocassettes) Date (inclusive): 1971-1995 Language of Material: English Language of Material: English Scope and Contents note The Stanford Oral History Project (SOHP), a joint effort of the Stanford University Archives and the Stanford Historical Society, began in 1978 as an extension of their efforts to collect, preserve and make available to researchers the historical record of the Stanford University community. These taped interviews and their transcriptions supplement the already strong collection of written and photographic materials in the University Archives, and provide a unique resource containing experiences and viewpoints not often found in traditional documents. The oral history interviews in the SOHP collection are carefully planned historical documents which we hope will serve a wide range of scholarly interests. Five additional
    [Show full text]
  • Donald Kennedy, President of Stanford University, Papers SC0315
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt7z09s515 No online items Guide to the Donald Kennedy, President of Stanford University, Papers SC0315 compiled by University Archives Staff Department of Special Collections and University Archives September 2010 Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford 94305-6064 [email protected] URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Note This encoded finding aid is compliant with Stanford EAD Best Practice Guidelines, Version 1.0. Guide to the Donald Kennedy, SC031514123 1 President of Stanford University, Papers SC0315 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Title: Donald Kennedy, president of Stanford University, papers Creator: Kennedy, Donald Creator: Stanford University. Office of the President Identifier/Call Number: SC0315 Identifier/Call Number: 14123 Physical Description: 340.25 Linear Feet Date (inclusive): 1972-2006 Special Collections and University Archives materials are stored offsite and must be paged 48 hours in advance. For more information on paging collections, see the department's website: http://library.stanford.edu/spc. Information about Access Some accessions are restricted pending further review. Please consult the University Archivist for assistance. Preferred Citation [identification of item] Donald Kennedy, president of Stanford University, papers (SC0315). Dept. of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, Calif. Conditions Governing Use All requests to reproduce, publish, quote from, or otherwise use collection materials must be submitted in writing to the Head of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, California 94305-6064. Consent is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission from the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • ED125367.Pdf
    .DOCUMENT RESUME ED 125 367 HE 007 427 TITLE Faculty Handbook, Stanford University. INSTITUTION Stanford Univ., Calif. PUB DATE Nov 75 NOTE 72p. EDES PRICE MF-$0.83 HC-$3.50 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Academic Freedom; Academic Standards; Administrative Personnel; *Administrative Policy; Administrator Responsibility; Affirmative Action; *College Faculty; Faculty Promotion; Fringe Benefits; Governance; Grading; Grievance Procedures; *Higher Education; Job Tenure; Leave of Absence; *Personnel Policy; Research; Teacher Responsibility; *Universities IDENTIFIERS *Faculty Handbooks; Stanford University ABSTRACT University policies, regulations, and procedures that apply to faculty members directly or indirectly,as well as the university's organization and governance,are described in the 1975 handbook. A brief history of Stanford's academic development anda bibliography tc other information sources related to academic affairs are also provided. Specific topics covered include: terms and conditions of appointment; participation in universitygovernance; affirmative action program; academic officers andprograms of instruction; organized research and externally supperted projectsand programs; teaching responsibilities, grading, and academic standing; compensation, retirement, and benefits. Appendices provide information on the honor code, audited courses, awards, conferences, policy on campus disruption, the Legislative and JudicialCharter, the Fundamental Standard, visting scholars, and various faculty organizations and services (e.g., child care,
    [Show full text]