Stanford Bondholder Information Website

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stanford Bondholder Information Website 2002 Thinking Annual on Report New Lines STANFORD UNIVERSITY CONTENTS: STANFORD FACTS: Thinking on New Lines, Enrollment (2002): 14,339 by President John L. Hennessy 1 Undergraduate Students: 6,731 Supporting the Best Undergraduate Graduate Students: 7,608 Education Anywhere 3 A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Future 6 Degrees Awarded (2001–2002): A Tradition of Responsible Bachelor’s: 1,692 Land Management 9 Master’s: 1,959 The Relentless Pursuit of Doctoral: 818 New Knowledge 12 Keeping Stanford’s Commitments, by Board Chair Isaac Stein 16 The Stanford Professoriate: 1,714 Nobel Laureates: 17 2002 Financial Review 17 Pulitzer Prize Winners: 4 MacArthur Fellows: 23 National Medal of Science Recipients: 21 National Medal of Technology Recipients: 3 American Academy of Arts and Sciences Members: 220 National Academy of Sciences Members: 128 National Academy of Engineering Members: 81 American Philosophical Society Members: 42 National Academy of Education Members: 25 ON THE COVER: Proving its Wolf Foundation Prize Winners: 6 responsible land stewardship, Stanford University has left Koret Foundation Prize Winners: 6 open or lightly developed about two-thirds of its 8,180 Presidential Medal of Freedom Recipients: 2 acres. This photograph was taken from the Dish area, a foothills conservation area that the University has opened to the public. An estimated 1,000 people per day hike the popular four- mile network of trails that overlook the campus and San Francisco Bay. (Photograph by Linda A. Cicero) p.1 2002 annual report 2002 annual THINKING ON NEW LINES MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT today, little more than a century after developed to assure success in life. A man will never construct its founding, Stanford University is recognized as one of anything he cannot conceive.” the world’s leading teaching and research institutions. I believe The importance placed on imagination, together with the that three interrelated factors, each critical to overall excellence, Stanfords’ goal to produce “cultured and useful citizens,” helped have contributed to this hard-earned and well-deserved reputa- set the stage for an undergraduate education quite different both tion. First, our long commitment to an uncommon vision of from a strictly European model and from that offered at the undergraduate education, together with the exceptional enhance- more established institutions on the East Coast. From its earliest ments we have made in recent years, has enabled us to offer an days, a Stanford education recognized the importance of instill- undergraduate experience that is incomparable. Second, the qual- ing in students the ability to question and think for themselves ity of our faculty and the strength of our research programs and looked to the liberal arts for providing the necessary foun- position us among the very best research institutions in the world. dation for such critical inquiry. Finally, our innovative and entrepreneurial spirit has enabled us Under David Starr Jordan’s leadership, Stanford University to reinvent Stanford and to continue to be bold in charting our developed an undergraduate program that also aimed to provide course, making us a leader among universities. students with the mastery of a discipline through the selection of I could write at length about each of these three factors an academic major. This combination of a broad foundation in to describe in detail the qualities of a Stanford undergraduate the liberal arts and an in-depth exposure to a field was pio- education, the excellence and breadth of our research programs, neered around the turn of the century at Stanford and a few and examples of our pioneering spirit. Instead, I would like to other institutions. One hundred years later, this fusion touch briefly on some examples of these defining attributes and is the dominant form of undergraduate education throughout focus my attention on how we achieved these remarkable traits. the world. I believe that both Stanford’s excellence and its entrepre- In recent years, we have focused on engaging our students neurial spirit are characteristics rooted in its founding and in critical inquiry and in the search for knowledge from their very carefully tended and strengthened through generations of facul- first days on campus. The section in this annual report called ty and University leadership. Each succeeding generation of “Supporting the Best Undergraduate Education Anywhere” Stanford’s leaders and faculty has built upon an increasingly details the innovative programs implemented, such as fresh- strong foundation and left the University better positioned. man and sophomore seminars and new programs for under- Jane and Leland Stanford were products of the pioneering graduate research. As noted in that section, to make these West. When they decided to found this University, they thought and other programs a permanent feature of undergraduate carefully about the nature of the education to be provided. education, The Campaign for Undergraduate Education was Initially they were interested in offering a “practical educa- launched two years ago. Today, through the generous support tion,” but their thoughts clearly evolved, and Leland Stanford of alumni and friends, we are more than three-quarters of the later wrote: “The imagination needs to be cultivated and way to our goal. p.2 A great undergraduate education is a cornerstone of a great work under our care. Let us not be poor copies of other university, but it is not sufficient by itself. Greatness in a research universities. Let us be progressive.” university also rests on the excellence of its faculty and its success Each generation at Stanford has taken this to heart and boldly in creating new knowledge. From the earliest days, Stanford launched new efforts, from the classroom to the laboratory. University has focused on the excellence of its faculty. Indeed, Today, some of our most exciting opportunities are in multidisci- stanford university stanford recruiting an excellent faculty was one of the most important plinary studies. David Starr Jordan foresaw the importance of directives that Leland Stanford gave to David Starr Jordan. allowing for such efforts 100 years ago when he said this to the Today, our faculty includes 17 Nobel laureates, four Pulitzer graduating class of 1902: Prize winners, 23 MacArthur Fellows, 21 recipients of the National Medal of Science, and some 500 members of the major “A true university is not a collection of colleges. ... It is national academies. not a cluster of professional schools. It is the association Much of this rise to excellence among our faculty has come of scholars.” in the last 50 years, starting under the inspired leadership of As we think about the course of the University in the coming President Wallace Sterling and Provost Fred Terman. Terman’s decade, I believe that several of the multischool initiatives now emphasis on “steeples of excellence” and his relentless quest to being planned or in their early stages are likely to become flag- hire the very best faculty helped transform Stanford in the years ships that will lead Stanford in the next 10 or 20 years. Recent following World War II. One piece of evidence for this is that all innovations in interdisciplinary and multischool programs are of Stanford’s Nobel Prizes have been earned in the last 50 years, discussed in detail in the section called “A Multidisciplinary starting with Felix Bloch in 1952. In parallel with Terman’s Approach to the Future.” Some of these initiatives, such as those recruiting efforts, Wally Sterling led Stanford’s first major devel- in the biosciences and bioengineering, already have led to opment campaign. pace (Plan of Action for a Challenging Era) successful research collaborations. These new programs build on raised $114 million from 1961 to 1964. This campaign was cru- the University’s broad scholarly strengths and on Jordan’s pre- cial to recruiting faculty and building much-needed facilities to scient vision. I have no doubt that these activities will lead to accommodate their research and teaching. ground-breaking discoveries and novel approaches to the most The quality of Stanford’s faculty alone ranks it among the pressing problems of our day. leading institutions in the world. What makes the University In the space of 117 years, Stanford University has become great is the combination of quality and breadth. Three-quarters a great university. Although we face a number of challenges—lim- of Stanford’s departments were ranked among the top 10 nation- ited space for growth, an endowment that is too small on a per-stu- ally by the National Research Council, and its graduate schools dent basis, aging facilities that must be renovated or replaced, and in Law, Medicine, Business, and Education are among the best a downturn in the u.s. economy—the opportunities before us are in the country. In a recent study of research universities by remarkable. We will continue to innovate and invest in the future, TheCenter, a program on measuring university performance whether that means a series of multidisciplinary initiatives or new hosted at the University of Florida, Stanford was one of only opportunities for undergraduates. The pioneering spirit that led the three institutions to receive a top ranking based on nine different founders and early leaders to “dare to think on new lines” contin- metrics of quality and institutional strength. ues to guide us, and I am confident that Stanford University will Our bold entrepreneurial spirit has its roots in the founders continue as a great university for generations to come. and our location in the pioneering West. In 1904, Jane Stanford defined the challenge for the young University when she exhort- ed the Board of Trustees: john l. hennessy “Let us not be afraid to outgrow old thoughts and ways, and dare to think on new lines as to the future of the p.3 the campaign for undergraduate education at stanford (cue) Supporting celebrated its second anniversary at the end of October of 2002, having the Best raised $797 million in gifts and pledges toward its five-year, $1 billion goal.
Recommended publications
  • Stanford University Budget Plan 2017/18
    STANFORD UNIVERSITY STANFORD UNIVERSITY BUDGET PLAN STANFORD 2017/18 BUDGET PLAN 2017/18 Approved: This Budget Plan was approved by the Stanford University Board of Trustees June 14–15, 2017. This publication can be found at: http://www.stanford.edu/dept/pres-provost/budget/plans/plan18.html STANFORD UNIVERSITY BUDGET PLAN 2017/18 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY To The Board of Trustees: It is a pleasure to submit my first Budget Plan as Stanford’s provost. This budget maintains our university’s pre-eminent academic and research programs. It calls for selective investments in high priority areas. It also strengthens our financial base, thereby providing the foundation for the strategic initiatives expected to emerge from the Long Range Planning process. Our approach in developing the 2017/18 Budget Plan has been a cautious one. Slow growth in endowment payout and uncertainty around government sponsored research have created a planning context in which we have reduced the growth of new program investment compared to recent years. At the same time, we have increased our financial reserve position should external funding conditions deteriorate. We are confident this budget both furthers Stanford’s programmatic objectives and maintains a strong underlying financial condition. This document presents Stanford’s 2017/18 Budget Plan for Trustee approval. The Budget Plan has two parts. The first is the Consolidated Budget for Operations, which includes all of Stanford’s anticipated operating revenue and expense for next year. The second is the Capital Budget, which is set in the context of a multi-year Capital Plan. The budgets for Stanford Health Care and Stanford Children’s Health, both separate corporations, are not included in this Budget Plan, although they are incorporated into the university’s annual audited financial report.
    [Show full text]
  • Leading the Movement
    july 2010–june 2011 annual report leading the movement 1 American public schools are failing to prepare millions of children to succeed in the competitive global marketplace. Continuing on this trajectory will have serious consequences for the future economic progress and innovation of our country. Last year in California, 17,000 eighth-graders dropped out before attending a single day of high school. Out of 50 states, California is near the bottom in student achievement, and in funding for public schools. Nearly 75,000 low-income students in five of the most underserved neighborhoods in the Bay Area do not have access to a high-quality public school. statistically, only 8 percent of them will graduate from college. 1 kipp is showing something very different is possible. KIPP Bay Area Schools In the San Francisco Bay Area, five KIPP middle schools and two KIPP high schools are closing the achievement gap between low-income students and Across the nation, KIPP’s 109 non-selective, public charter schools their more advantaged peers. Our innovative, tuition-free, college-preparatory schools in 20 states and the District of Columbia are putting are located in the underserved neighborhoods of Bayview Hunters Point and the Western Addition in San Francisco, East San Jose, San Lorenzo, and West Oakland. low-income students on a dramatically different path. KIPP across the Nation KIPP, the Knowledge Is Power Program, is a national network of With a focus on academics and character, free, open-enrollment, college-preparatory public schools dedicated to preparing stu- dents in underserved communities for success in college and in life.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Plan and Capital Budget 67
    CAPITAL PLAN AND CAPITAL BUDGET 67 CHAPTER 4 CAPITAL PLAN AND CAPITAL BUDGET tanford’s 2017/18–2019/20 Capital Plan and 2017/18 Capital Budget are based on projections of the major capital projects that the university plans to pursue in support of its academic mission. The rolling SCapital Plan includes projects that are in progress or are expected to commence during the next three years. The Capital Budget represents the anticipated capital expenditures in the first of these years. Both the Capital Plan and the Capital Budget are subject to change based on funding availability, budget affordability, and university priorities. At almost $4.3 billion, the Capital Plan reflects the larg- (EOC/ECH) ($35.1 million), new faculty homes at Cabrillo/ est capital program in Stanford’s history. It demonstrates Dolores ($18 million), and renovations at both the Li Ka Shing the significant investment Stanford continues to make in Center ($10 million) and the Center for Advanced Study in its facilities, driven by the academic priorities for teaching, Behavioral Sciences ($9.8 million). research, and related activities, described in Chapter 2, and The following ten significant projects make up 81% of the initiatives of the administrative and auxiliary units that Stanford’s Capital Plan: the EV Graduate Residences support the academic mission, described in Chapter 3. It ($1,091.7 million), Stanford Redwood City Phase 1 ($568.8 also demonstrates Stanford’s commitment to student and million), the Housing Acquisition Initiative ($500 million), faculty housing, with 47% of the plan allocated to building, the Neuro/ChEM-H (Chemistry, Engineering & Medicine for acquiring, or renovating new and existing housing inventory.
    [Show full text]
  • Tenure Clock Extension
    11/2/2020 COVID-19 Tenure and Appointment Clock Extension Policy Published on Faculty Handbook (https://facultyhandbook.stanford.edu (https://facultyhandbook.stanford.edu)) Home (/) > Faculty Handbook (/index) > COVID-19 Tenure and Appointment Clock Extension Policy COVID-19 Tenure and Appointment Clock Extension Policy REVISED October 31, 2020 In recognition of the serious academic and personal challenges posed by the Covid-19 viral pandemic, a faculty member holding a tenure-accruing appointment is entitled to a one-year extension of the date (under the seven-year tenure clock) on which tenure would be conferred. This extension will normally have the effect of postponing for a year the initiation of the tenure review process. The Covid-19 Tenure Clock Extension, though it extends the seven-year tenure clock deadline, does not extend the ten-year appointment clock deadline except through an exception granted by the Provost for extraordinary personal or institutional circumstances. The Covid-19 Tenure Clock Extension is available to faculty members holding a tenure-accruing appointment with the exception of those currently in a terminal year appointment or those whose tenure-conferring promotion or reappointment process commenced prior to January 1, 2020, since the work to be evaluated was done prior to the current pandemic. Teaching relief is not associated with this extension. Effective October 1, 2020, this tenure clock extension will be automatically granted to eligible University Tenure Line junior faculty members (as defined above) whose faculty appointments at Stanford will begin prior by December 31, 2021. The extension is not available for faculty members whose tenure-conferring promotion or reappointment process has already commenced (with commencement defined as the date the department chair or school dean informs the candidate in writing that the review process has begun).
    [Show full text]
  • 13/13 Stanford Cardinal (0-0) Vs. San Diego State Aztecs (0-0)
    #13/13 Stanford Cardinal 0-0 overall • 0-0 Pac-12 Date Opponent Time • Result August 31, 2018 • 6 p.m. PT 8.31 San Diego State ................................................... 6 p.m. Stanford Stadium (52,424) • Stanford, Calif. 9.8 USC* ................................................................ 5:30 p.m. FS1 • Justin Kutcher, Demarco Murray and Petros Papadakis 9.15 UC Davis ............................................................. 11 a.m. KNBR 680 AM • Scott Reiss ’93, Todd Husak ’00 and John Platz ’84 9.22 at Oregon* ...............................................................TBA #13/13 Stanford Cardinal (0-0) KZSU 90.1 FM 9.29 at Notre Dame ................................................ 4:30 p.m. vs. 10.6 Utah* ........................................................................TBA San Diego State Aztecs (0-0) Director of Athletic Communications • Alan George 10.18 at Arizona State* ................................................. 6 p.m. [email protected] • 574.340.3977 • @treeSIDjorge 10.27 Washington State* ..................................................TBA GoStanford.com 11.3 at Washington* ........................................................TBA Twitter • @StanfordFBall Assistant Director • Eric Dolan 11.10 Oregon State* ..........................................................TBA Instagram • @StanfordFBall [email protected] • 585.260.8322 • @EJDolan 11.17 at Cal* ......................................................................TBA Snapchat • StanfordFBall 11.24 at UCLA* ...................................................................TBA
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Plan and Capital Budget
    CHAPTER 4 CAPITAL PLAN AND CAPITAL BUDGET tanford’s 2015/16–2017/18 Capital Plan and 2015/16 Capital Budget are based on projections of the major capital projects that the university will pursue in support of its academic mission. The rolling SCapital Plan includes projects that are in progress or are expected to commence during the three years it covers. The Capital Budget represents the anticipated capital expenditures in the first of these years. Both the Capital Plan and the Capital Budget are subject to change based on funding availability, budget affordability, and university priorities. At $2.9 billion, the Capital Plan reflects the significant ($5.6 million), and the Building 60 Physics Teaching Lab investment Stanford continues to make in its facilities, ($4.6 million). driven by the academic priorities for teaching, research, and The following eight significant projects make up 64% of related activities, described in Chapter 2, and the initiatives Stanford’s Capital Plan: Stanford in Redwood City Phase of the administrative and auxiliary units that support the 1 ($543.7 million), the Stanford ChEM-H (Chemistry, academic mission, described in Chapter 3. Engineering & Medicine for Human Health) and Stanford With the 2014/15 project completions, Stanford will have Neurosciences (Neuro) Institutes Building ($252.6 mil- invested $5.6 billion in its facilities, infrastructure, and com- lion), the CEC 1 ($230.1 million), the Biomedical Innovation 65 mercial real estate since 2000. Across the campus, aging Building and Tunnel ($200.8 million), the Housing facilities have been replaced with new and renovated build- Acquisition Initiative ($200 million), the California Avenue ings capable of supporting cutting-edge science, engineer- Faculty Homes ($162 million), the Anne T.
    [Show full text]
  • Palo Alto Activity Guide
    FALL/WINTER 2018 Visitors Guide to the Midpeninsula DISCOVER WHERE TO DINE, SHOP, PLAY OR RELAX Fa r m -to- table A local’s guide to seasonal dining Page 26 DestinationPaloAlto.com TOO MAJOR TOO MINOR JUST RIGHT FOR HOME FOR HOSPITAL FOR STANFORD EXPRESS CARE When an injury or illness needs quick Express Care is attention but not in the Emergency available at two convenient locations: Department, call Stanford Express Care. Stanford Express Care Staffed by doctors, nurses, and physician Palo Alto assistants, Express Care treats children Hoover Pavilion (6+ months) and adults for: 211 Quarry Road, Suite 102 Palo Alto, CA 94304 • Respiratory illnesses • UTIs (urinary tract tel: 650.736.5211 infections) • Cold and flu Stanford Express Care • Stomach pain • Pregnancy tests San Jose River View Apartment Homes • Fever and headache • Flu shots 52 Skytop Street, Suite 10 • Back pain • Throat cultures San Jose, CA 95134 • Cuts and sprains tel: 669.294.8888 Open Everyday Express Care accepts most insurance and is by Appointment Only billed as a primary care, not emergency care, 9:00am–9:00pm appointment. Providing same-day fixes every day, 9:00am to 9:00pm. Spend the evening at THE VOICE Best of MOUNTAIN VIEW 2018 THE THE VOICE Best of VOICE Best of MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN VIEW VIEW 2016 2017 Castro Street’s Best French and Italian Food 650.968.2300 186 Castro Street, www.lafontainerestaurant.com Mountain View Welcome The Midpeninsula offers something for everyone hether you are visiting for business or pleasure, or W to attend a conference or other event at Stanford University, you will quickly discover the unusual blend of intellect, innovation, culture and natural beauty that makes up Palo Alto and the rest of the Midpeninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanford Presidents Collection
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt8b69s302 Online items available Guide to the Stanford Presidents Collection Daniel Hartwig Stanford University. Libraries.Department of Special Collections and University Archives Stanford, California October 2010 Copyright © 2015 The Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University. All rights reserved. Note This encoded finding aid is compliant with Stanford EAD Best Practice Guidelines, Version 1.0.This encoded finding aid is compliant with Stanford EAD Best Practice Guidelines, Version 1.0. Guide to the Stanford Presidents SCM0008 1 Collection Overview Call Number: SCM0008 Creator: Lee, Russell V. Title: Stanford presidents collection Dates: 1978 Physical Description: 0.02 Linear feet 1 folder Summary: Unpublished articles regarding Stanford University presidents David Starr Jordan, John Casper Branner, Ray Lyman Wilbur, and J. E. Wallace Sterling, and acting president Robert E. Swain. Language(s): The materials are in English. Repository: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford, CA 94305-6064 Email: [email protected] Phone: (650) 725-1022 URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc/university-archives Submitted by Lee to the Stanford Alumni Association; transferred to the University Archives, 1981. Ownership & Copyright All requests to reproduce, publish, quote from, or otherwise use collection materials must be submitted in writing to the Head of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, California 94304-6064. Consent is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission from the copyright owner. Such permission must be obtained from the copyright owner, heir(s) or assigns.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanford Football
    2019 GAME NOTES STANFORD FOOTBALL @STANFORDFBALL @STANFORDFOOTBALL CONTACT: Scott Swegan | 419.575.9148 | [email protected] SCHEDULE OVERALL 1-2 HOME 1-0 | AWAY 0-2 | NEUTRAL 0-0 PAC-12 0-1 HOME 0-0 | AWAY 0-1 | NEUTRAL 0-0 NORTHWESTERN (FOX) W 1 PM PT • AUG. 31 17-7 at USC (ESPN) L 7:30 PM PT • SEPT. 7 20-45 at #17/16 UCF (ESPN) L Oregon Ducks Stanford Cardinal 12:30 PM PT • SEPT. 14 27-45 Record ..................................................................2-1 (0-0 Pac-12) Record ..................................................................1-2 (0-1 Pac-12) Ranking (AP/Coaches)..........................................................16/17 Ranking (AP/Coaches)........................................................NR/NR #16/17 OREGON (ESPN) 4 PM PT • SEPT. 21 • STANFORD STADIUM Head Coach .......................................................... Mario Cristobal Head Coach ................................................................David Shaw Career Record ..............................................................38-53 (8th) Career Record ..............................................................83-28 (9th) at OREGON STATE (PAC-12 NETwOrk) Record at Oregon .........................................................11-5 (2nd) Record at Stanford ...............................................................same 4 PM PT • SEPT. 28 • CORVALLIS, ORE. Location ................................................................... Eugene, Ore. Location ........................................................Stanford, California
    [Show full text]
  • K-12 Education Innovation Initiative
    K-12 Education Innovation Initiative The following grants were awarded as part of the Koret Foundation’s 2018 initiative: • National Math & Science Initiative will receive $2,000,000 to expand their College Readiness Program into the Hayward Unified School District • Beyond 12 will receive $1,500,000 to make their coaching app and support available to all low-income and first-generation college-bound students • The Hoover Institution will receive $1,426,150 for a state-based pilot for K-12 Education reform • College Track will receive $1,000,000 to pilot a new STEM program in Bay Area centers • The Exploratorium will receive $1,000,000 to train Bay Area teacher-leaders in Next Generation Science Standards • KIPP Bay Area Schools will receive $750,000 for the KIPP Through College program to help community college alumni complete their higher education degree • Summer Search will receive $750,000 to pilot and implement a new group mentoring model nationwide • KQED will receive $600,000 for the Teacher Academy to test new teacher and student learning platforms with underserved communities • YMCA of San Francisco will receive $600,000 to pilot a new STEAM Academy Workforce Development Program with high school students • Teach for America Bay Area will receive $450,000 to launch Innovation Collaboratives, human-centered design capstone projects for second year corps members • Boys & Girls Clubs of SF will receive $200,000 to pilot an on-site school model with Gateway High School Additionally, grants totaling $870,000 were awarded to the following organizations: 49ers Foundation iCivics 826 Valencia JUMA Ventures Bay Area Discovery Museum Oakland Public Education Fund Beyond Differences Ronald McDonald House Charities – Bay Area California Academy of Sciences Sharks Foundation Children's Creativity Museum Stiles Hall East Palo Alto Tennis & Tutoring Student Program for Academic & Athletic Gatepath Transitioning (SPAAT) Genesys Works Bay Area Students Rising Above Girls Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • J. E. Wallace Sterling, President of Stanford University, Papers SC0216
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt587037x1 Online items available Guide to the J. E. Wallace Sterling, President of Stanford University, Papers SC0216 compiled by Phil Cline and Polly Armstrong Department of Special Collections and University Archives 1990 Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford 94305-6064 [email protected] URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Note This encoded finding aid is compliant with Stanford EAD Best Practice Guidelines, Version 1.0. Guide to the J. E. Wallace SC0216 1 Sterling, President of Stanford University, Papers SC0216 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Title: J. E. Wallace Sterling, president of Stanford University, papers creator: Sterling, J. E. Wallace (John Ewart Wallace) Identifier/Call Number: SC0216 Physical Description: 300 Linear Feet Date (inclusive): 1913-1969 Date (bulk): bulk Abstract: Papers primarily represent Sterling's years as President of Stanford University and include correspondence, memoranda, proposals, speeches, minutes, reports, budgets, clippings, and legal papers. Access Collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least 24 hours in advance of intended use. Publication Rights All requests to reproduce, publish, quote from, or otherwise use collection materials must be submitted in writing to the Head of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, California 94304-6064. Consent is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission from the copyright owner. Such permission must be obtained from the copyright owner, heir(s) or assigns. See: http://library.stanford.edu/depts/spc/pubserv/permissions.html.
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight on Arts Grantmaking in the San Francisco Bay Area
    The Foundation Center–San Francisco OCTOBER 2007 SPOTLIGHT ON ARTS GRANTMAKING IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA The Foundation Center’s mission is to strengthen the nonprofit TYPES OF SUPPORT sector by advancing knowledge about U.S. philanthropy. We are pleased to present this brief exploration into arts Consistent with national trends, arts grant dollars awarded to and culture grantmaking (referred to as “arts” throughout Bay Area recipients in 2005 primarily provided capital support, the report). We hope this look at San Francisco Bay Area followed by program and general support. Foundations provided an grantmakers and recipients and those foundations outside additional 9 percent of grant dollars for professional development, the Bay Area that support the region’s arts organizations will which includes support for fellowships and residencies, internships, help you gain insights into the state of arts grantmaking in the scholarships, and awards, prizes, and competitions (Figure 2). Bay Area. The report includes statistical charts and tables based on the Center’s annual grants sample; a mini-directory of significant arts funders in the Bay Area; and profiles of select FIGURE 1 foundations that support individual artists in the Bay Area. Performing Arts and Museums captured the largest share of giving to Bay Area arts recipients in 2005 CALIFORNIA GRANTS SAMPLE Each year the Foundation Center indexes all of the grants of $10,000 and up awarded by approximately 1,200 of the nation’s largest foundations. Overall, in 2005 foundations included in the Center’s annual grants sample provided over 18,500 grants totaling $2.1 billion for arts and culture on a national basis.
    [Show full text]