DOCSLIB.ORG

Report to the Hon. Peter Collier MLC Minister for Indigenous Affairs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report to the Hon. Peter Collier MLC Minister for Indigenous Affairs “Aboriginal people and their culture are critical to the future of our State. Their unique knowledge is the defining element in building a sustainable future for Western Australia.” Indigenous Implementation Board Report to the Hon. Peter Collier MLC Minister for Indigenous Affairs February 2011 Table of Contents FROM THE CHAIR ................................................................................................................ 1 THE BOARD ........................................................................................................................... 7 TERMS OF REFERENCE. .................................................................................................... 9 THE BOARD’S STRATEGY ................................................................................................ 11 DEFINITION OF TERMS. .................................................................................................. 13 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 15 RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................................... 21 Section One RESETTING THE RELATIONSHIP ................................................................................. 27 Why the Board was established The Board’s philosophy and strategy Developments regarding regional governance Comment on progress to date Section Two SUPPORTING THE NEW RELATIONSHIP ................................................................... 53 Promotion of Aboriginal Culture Healing Leadership and Governance Economic Participation Section Three MAINTAINING DIRECTION ............................................................................................. 75 APPENDICES ....................................................................................................................... 79 Minutes of Regional Roundtables __________________________________ ATTACHMENTS Report on the Goldfields Conversation: Kalgoorlie 2-3 February2010 A new Dreaming: Noongar Dialogue February 24 – 25 2010 Mid West and Gascoyne Conversations FROM THE CHAIR Introduction This is the third and final report of the Indigenous Implementation Board submitted in accordance with its Terms of Reference and Ministerial direction. This report maintains the strategic theme developed by the Board in its initial and second reports of the need for fundamental change to the structures and processes of Government engagement with the Aboriginal people of Western Australia. The need for such strategic change was first identified in the early stages of the Board’s discussions and has constantly been reinforced throughout two years of conversations with Aboriginal community leaders in the regions of the State. The evidence is clear – the existing strategies are costly and do not deliver sustained change to the well being and prospects of the majority of Aboriginal people in either the cities or the regions. The exceptions to this finding offer some encouragement but, despite the best intent of many hard working people, are too few to justify the expenditure of the existing federal and state programs. Many of the accepted indicators of the effects of Council of Australian Government programs, i.e. education participation, health, engagement with the justice and corrective systems, are worsening for Western Australia. This suggests that the ongoing philosophy of assimilation that is obvious if unstated in underpinning “overcoming disadvantage” and “closing the gap” programs may be a contributor to growing Aboriginal alienation and dysfunction. The objectivity of these assessments has been hampered by the fact that the Board has been unable to gain from Government an accurate picture of the objectives, costs and outcomes of the existing programs. While the Board has formally noted this as a matter of concern to the Auditor General, it is also readily apparent that program objectives, where they exist, are not developed within anything that would pass for a strategic framework aimed at a sustainable future for Western Australia and its people. Evidence from the broad data available suggests that, despite the growing wealth of the State, the foreseen costs, both financial and social, are, in all probability, unsustainable. The Board has developed the view that the help and cooperation of Aboriginal people are required if this trend is to be turned around. The fundamental premise is that only Aboriginal people can solve Aboriginal problems and they can only be empowered to do this through shared strategies and plans developed in a partnership that is based on equality and recognises and respects their cultures and knowledge. 1 The Board also recognises that the deliberate and sustained erosion of Aboriginal culture over many years and attempts to replace it with layers of corporate structures makes this empowerment a task of considerable complexity. Over the last ten years Native Title bodies and emerging prescribed bodies corporate have helped form a pathway to more advanced forms of negotiation and participation by traditional owners but they are not sufficiently embracing in their current form to address all the requirements of a successful strategy. It will therefore require significant resourcing to build the leadership, trust and confidence and to allow the building or rebuilding of culturally legitimate structures that can partner governments in the business of strategy development and governance. In keeping with its Terms of Reference this report of the IIB identifies Aboriginal views on how this might be done and suggests guidelines for the ongoing work of the Government, particularly the Department of Indigenous Affairs, to engage Aboriginal people in the task of rebuilding their communities and making their culture a central part of Western Australia’s future. Regional Government At the request of the Minister for Indigenous Affairs the Board has concentrated its attention over the last period on the development of proposals for regional government in two of Western Australia’s northern regions – the Pilbara and the Kimberley. This activity coincides with the Board’s recommendation in its second report that, as a first step to building a strategic partnership with Aboriginal people throughout the State, Government should begin the process of establishing regional government in one region and form an inter departmental working group to work with all parties to that end. The Board has been working with the Department of Indigenous Affairs and Aboriginal communities as part of this process. A summary of the Department’s recommendations are included in this Report together with the Board’s views on the proposed way forward. Whatever approach is decided by Government to develop the options offered, it is considered to be vital that there is a shared vision of the way in which regional governance will work and the processes by which a legitimate Aboriginal contribution will be generated. This recent activity has confirmed the Board’s original findings that there are no preceding regional strategies and plans that have engaged Aboriginal people in solutions to their contemporary problems and futures. Rather, there continues to be a series of unconnected and overlapping programs at the end of uncoordinated stovepipes extending from both Canberra and Perth. Recent COAG attempts to coordinate service delivery with Aboriginal participation in selected regions aside, there are no current mechanisms that allow Aboriginal people to contribute to strategies for regional development in a way that empowers them to have control over their own futures. In many ways this lack of power is a reflection of the general malaise that affects all rural communities in Western Australia – Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal. 2 Governance structures in Western Australia continue to reflect the lack of maturity at the time of Federation when the population of an area greater in physical size than Western Europe was less than 250,000. It had grown rapidly to this size from a figure of 50,000 at the time of Proclamation in 1890, primarily due to the gold rush in the Eastern Goldfields in that decade. In all probability the newly declared dominion would not have joined the Australian Federation had it not been for the newly arrived miners threatening to form a separate region and federate without the rest of Western Australia. An emergent natural aversion to regionalism has left the State with central governance in Perth and more than 140 local government authorities based primarily on the immature philosophy of Country Roads Boards that existed from the time of Proclamation. Most contemporary local government authorities are therefore mendicant in the sense that they generate minimum revenue internally and are almost entirely dependent on grants from both the State and Federal Governments. Such structures are incapable of generating strategic vision and are therefore limited to service delivery of a simple and uncomplicated nature. Capital works other than of a minor nature remain at the discretion and in accordance with the vision of the central governments. Having been regulated under separate legislation since the time of Federation, Aboriginal people have been faced in recent times with being thrown at the mercy of this dysfunctional governance structure that shows clear signs of even failing to meet the needs and gain the commitment of its non-Aboriginal constituents. These attempts to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aboriginal History Journal
    ABORIGINAL HISTORY Volume 38, 2014 ABORIGINAL HISTORY Volume 38, 2014 Published by ANU Press and Aboriginal History Inc. The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://press.anu.edu.au All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Aboriginal History Incorporated Aboriginal History Inc. is a part of the Australian Centre for Indigenous History, Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University, and gratefully acknowledges the support of the School of History and the National Centre for Indigenous Studies, The Australian National University. Aboriginal History Inc. is administered by an Editorial Board which is responsible for all unsigned material. Views and opinions expressed by the author are not necessarily shared by Board members. Editor Shino Konishi, Book Review Editor Luise Hercus, Copy Editor Geoff Hunt. About Aboriginal History Aboriginal History is a refereed journal that presents articles and information in Australian ethnohistory and contact and post-contact history of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Historical studies based on anthropological, archaeological, linguistic and sociological research, including comparative studies of other ethnic groups such as Pacific Islanders in Australia, are welcomed. Subjects include recorded oral traditions and biographies, narratives in local languages with translations, previously unpublished manuscript accounts, archival and bibliographic articles, and book reviews. Contacting Aboriginal History All correspondence should be addressed to the Editors, Aboriginal History Inc., ACIH, School of History, RSSS, Coombs Building (9) ANU, ACT, 0200, or [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Noongar (Koorah, Nitja, Boordahwan) (Past, Present, Future) Recognition Bill 2015
    Western Australia Noongar (Koorah, Nitja, Boordahwan) (Past, Present, Future) Recognition Bill 2015 Contents Preamble 2 1. Short title 3 2. Commencement 3 3. Noongar lands 3 4. Purpose 3 5. Recognition of the Noongar people 3 6. Effect of this Act 4 Schedule 1 — Noongar recognition statement Schedule 2 — Noongar lands: description Schedule 3 — Noongar lands: map 112—1 page i Western Australia LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Noongar (Koorah, Nitja, Boordahwan) (Past, Present, Future) Recognition Bill 2015 A Bill for An Act for the recognition of the Noongar people as the traditional owners of lands in the south-west of the State. page 1 Noongar (Koorah, Nitja, Boordahwan) (Past, Present, Future) Recognition Bill 2015 Preamble 1 Preamble 2 A. Since time immemorial, the Noongar people have 3 inhabited lands in the south-west of the State; these 4 lands the Noongar people call Noongar boodja (Noongar 5 earth). 6 B. Under Noongar law and custom, the Noongar people are 7 the traditional owners of, and have cultural 8 responsibilities and rights in relation to, Noongar 9 boodja. 10 C. The Noongar people continue to have a living cultural, 11 spiritual, familial and social relationship with Noongar 12 boodja. 13 D. The Noongar people have made, are making, and will 14 continue to make, a significant and unique contribution 15 to the heritage, cultural identity, community and 16 economy of the State. 17 E. The Noongar people describe in Schedule 1 their 18 relationship to Noongar boodja and the benefits that all 19 Western Australians derive from that relationship. 20 F. So it is appropriate, as part of a package of measures in 21 full and final settlement of all claims by the Noongar 22 people in pending and future applications under the 23 Native Title Act 1993 (Commonwealth) for the 24 determination of native title and for compensation 25 payable for acts affecting that native title, to recognise 26 the Noongar people as the traditional owners of the 27 lands described in this Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Archaeological and Ethnographic Survey Report, Grange Resources Desalination Pipeline, Cape Riche, Great Southern, WA
    Aboriginal Archaeological and Ethnographic Survey Report, Grange Resources Desalination Pipeline, Cape Riche, Great Southern, WA Dr Peter Gifford & Phil Czerwinski February 2010 Aboriginal Archaeological and Ethnographic Survey Report, Grange Resources Desalination Pipeline, Cape Riche, Great Southern, WA Dr Peter Gifford & Phil Czerwinski February 2010 Client: Grange Resources Ltd C/o 360 Environmental Pty Ltd Attention: Beth Lewis Environmental Scientist 22 Altona St, West Perth, 6005 [email protected] • • • Australian Cultural Heritage Management • • • • Adelaide • PO Box 451, Hindmarsh, SA 5007 • Perth • PO Box 2031, Warwick, WA, 6024 • Melbourne • GPO Box 5112, Melbourne, VIC 3000 • P : (08) 8340 9566 • F : (08) 8340 9577 • P : (08) 9247 1217 • F : (08) 9247 1217 • P : 1300 724 913 • F : (03) 5781 0860 • W : www.achm.com.au • E : • W : www.achm.com.au • E : • W : www.achm.com.au • E : ABORIGINAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND ETHNOGRAPHIC SURVEY REPORT, GRANGE RESOURCES DESALINATION PIPELINE, CAPE RICHE, GREAT SOUTHERN, WA Page | 2 Disclaimer Ownership of the intellectual property rights of ethnographic information provided by Aboriginal people remains the property of those named persons. Ownership of the primary materials created in the course of the research remains the property of the named researchers and Australian Cultural Heritage Management (ACHM). Ownership of this report remains the property of 360 Environmental Pty Ltd and Grange Resources. This report may not be used, sold, published, reproduced or distributed wholly or in part without the prior written consent of 360 Environmental Pty Ltd and/or Grange Resources. The professional advice and opinions contained in this report are those of the consultants, Australian Cultural Heritage Management Pty Ltd, and do not represent the opinions and policies of any third party.
    [Show full text]
  • FIGHTING OVER COUNTRY: Anthropological Perspectives
    FIGHTING OVER COUNTRY: Anthropological Perspectives Edited by D.E. Smith and J. Finlayson Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research The Australian National University, Canberra Research Monograph No. 12 1997 First published in Australia 1997. Printed by Instant Colour Press, Canberra, Australia. © Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, The Australian National University. This book is copyright Apart from any fair dealings for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Inquiries should be directed to the publisher, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia. National Library of Australia. Cataloguing-in-publication entry. Fighting over country: anthropological perspectives ISBN 07315 2561 2. 1. Aborigines, Australian - Land tenure. 2. Native title - Australia. 3. Torres Strait Islanders - Land tenure. 4. Land use - Australia. I. Finlayson, Julie, n. Smith, Diane (Diane Evelyn). ID. The Australian National University. Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research. (Series: Research monograph (The Australian National University. Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research); no. 12). 306.320899915 Acknowledgments A number of people assisted in the organisation and conduct of the workshop Fighting Over Country: Anthropological Perspectives held in Canberra in late September 1996. The workshop was the latest in a series sponsored by the Australian Anthropological Society focusing on land rights and native title issues. Diane Smith, Julie Finlayson, Francesca Merlan, Mary Edmunds and David Trigger formed the organising committee, and ongoing administrative support was provided by the Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR). The Native Titles Research Unit of the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) provided modest but very helpful financial assistance towards catering for the workshop.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook of Western Australian Aboriginal Languages South of the Kimberley Region
    PACIFIC LINGUISTICS Series C - 124 HANDBOOK OF WESTERN AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES SOUTH OF THE KIMBERLEY REGION Nicholas Thieberger Department of Linguistics Research School of Pacific Studies THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Thieberger, N. Handbook of Western Australian Aboriginal languages south of the Kimberley Region. C-124, viii + 416 pages. Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University, 1993. DOI:10.15144/PL-C124.cover ©1993 Pacific Linguistics and/or the author(s). Online edition licensed 2015 CC BY-SA 4.0, with permission of PL. A sealang.net/CRCL initiative. Pacific Linguistics is issued through the Linguistic Circle of Canberra and consists of four series: SERIES A: Occasional Papers SERIES c: Books SERIES B: Monographs SERIES D: Special Publications FOUNDING EDITOR: S.A. Wurm EDITORIAL BOARD: T.E. Dutton, A.K. Pawley, M.D. Ross, D.T. Tryon EDITORIAL ADVISERS: B.W.Bender KA. McElhanon University of Hawaii Summer Institute of Linguistics DavidBradley H.P. McKaughan La Trobe University University of Hawaii Michael G. Clyne P. Miihlhausler Monash University University of Adelaide S.H. Elbert G.N. O'Grady University of Hawaii University of Victoria, B.C. KJ. Franklin KL. Pike Summer Institute of Linguistics Summer Institute of Linguistics W.W.Glover E.C. Polome Summer Institute of Linguistics University of Texas G.W.Grace Gillian Sankoff University of Hawaii University of Pennsylvania M.A.K Halliday W.A.L. Stokhof University of Sydney University of Leiden E. Haugen B.K T' sou Harvard University City Polytechnic of Hong Kong A. Healey E.M. Uhlenbeck Summer Institute of Linguistics University of Leiden L.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of the Late Edward Mippy: an Ethnographic Biography
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by espace@Curtin i Centre for Aboriginal Studies The Legacy of the Late Edward Mippy: An Ethnographic Biography Bernard Rooney This thesis is presented as part of the requirements for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the Curtin University of Technology March 2002 ii TO MY FRIEND THE LATE EDWARD “NED” MIPPY iii ABSTRACT Cast in the dual genre of ethnographic biography, this thesis is focused on the life, work and vision of the late Edward “Ned” Mippy, an Aboriginal Elder of the Yuat Nyoongara Community who devoted the latter years of his life to promoting and developing the cultural identity of his people. As biography, it portrays the life of Mr. Mippy with particular emphasis on the factors which help to highlight his understandings and his vision for an Indigenous cultural renewal. As ethnography, the study is intended as a vehicle for wider concerns, evoking an interpretative glimpse of his community and contributing a new perspective of that community as a continuing social entity. These aims are broadly set forth in the brief introduction. The first chapter of the thesis then outlines the origin and development of the research project and the evolution of its methodology. Chapter two presents a picture of Mr. Mippy’s life experience, largely in terms of his own recorded memories and perceptions, while chapter three places his later life in a community context which includes historical, personal and demographic perspectives. The following two chapters, four and five, present various accounts of the work undertaken by Edward Mippy.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Texts and Other Sources
    7 Early texts and other sources Introduction In order to demonstrate that native title has survived, the court will require that the laws and customs of the claimant society be shown not only to have survived substantially uninterrupted but also to have remained ‘traditional’1 in their content. What exactly is to be understood by the use of the term ‘traditional’ has been subject to extensive debate.2 Most, if not all, of the ethnography relevant to a native title inquiry will demonstrate the fact of some form of change. This is unsurprising since few anthropologists would argue for an unchanging society. It is the degree and measure of the change against customary systems that is subject to contestation. In short, 1 ‘A traditional law or custom is one which has been passed from generation to generation of a society, usually by word of mouth and common practice. But in the context of the Native Title Act, “traditional” carries with it two other elements in its meaning. First, it conveys an understanding of the age of the traditions: the origins of the content of the law or custom concerned are to be found in the normative rules of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander societies that existed before the assertion of sovereignty by the British Crown. It is only those normative rules that are “traditional” laws and customs. Second, and no less important, the reference to rights or interests in land or waters being possessed under traditional laws acknowledged and traditional customs observed by the peoples concerned, requires that the normative system under which the rights and interests are possessed (the traditional laws and customs) is a system that has had a continuous existence and vitality since sovereignty.
    [Show full text]
  • 82 3.3.4.4.3 Ecogeographic Studies of the Cranial Shape The
    82 3.3.4.4.3 Ecogeographic studies of the cranial shape The measurement of the human head of both the living and dead has long been a matter of interest to a variety of professions from artists to physicians and latterly to anthropologists (for a review see Spencer 1997c). The shape of the cranium, in particular, became an important factor in schemes of racial typology from the late 18th Century (Blumenbach 1795; Deniker 1898; Dixon 1923; Haddon 1925; Huxley 1870). Following the formulation of the cranial index by Retzius in 1843 (see also Sjovold 1997), the classification of humans by skull shape became a positive fashion. Of course such classifications were predicated on the assumption that cranial shape was an immutable racial trait. However, it had long been known that cranial shape could be altered quite substantially during growth, whether due to congenital defect or morbidity or through cultural practices such as cradling and artificial cranial deformation (for reviews see (Dingwall 1931; Lindsell 1995). Thus the use of cranial index of racial identity was suspect. Another nail in the coffin of the Cranial Index's use as a classificatory trait was presented in Coon (1955), where he suggested that head form was subject to long term climatic selection. In particular he thought that rounder, or more brachycephalic, heads were an adaptation to cold. Although it was plausible that the head, being a major source of heat loss in humans (Porter 1993), could be subject to climatic selection, the situation became somewhat clouded when Beilicki and Welon demonstrated in 1964 that the trend towards brachycepahlisation was continuous between the 12th and 20th centuries in East- Central Europe and thus could not have been due to climatic selection (Bielicki & Welon 1964).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Reconciliation Action Plan
    Central Regional TAFE RECONCILIATION ACTION PLAN January 2020-2021 REFLECT 2 CONTENTS Artwork 4 Acknowledgement 5 Our Vision for Reconciliation 6-7 Our Business 8-9 Our Partnerships and current activities 10 Our Reconciliation Action Plan 11-19 Reporting 20 Aboriginal diversity within campus regions (shown in maps) 22-23 Additional Information 24 Acknowledgements 25 CR TAFE | RECONCILIATION ACTION PLAN | JANUARY 2020-2021 3 ARTWORK In 2016, Durack Institute of Technology, Goldfields Institute of Technology and CY O’Connor Institute amalgamated to form Central Regional TAFE. The artworks below were existing pieces from each of the colleges; unfortunately, the titles and stories where misplaced during the merge. As a result, Central Regional TAFE has chosen to show respect to the Aboriginal peoples and the Aboriginal artists of these regions by using the artworks to signify those individual colleges. We would like to acknowledge and thank the below Aboriginal artists whose work appears throughout this document. Untitled | Nicole Dickerson | Geraldton Untitled | Judith Davis | Northam Untitled | Brett Boddington | Kalgoorlie 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Central Regional TAFE acknowledges the Australian Aboriginal Peoples of this nation. We acknowledge each of the language groups within the Mid-West, Murchison, Gascoyne, Wheatbelt and Goldfields regions, the true custodians of the lands on which our campuses are located. We pay our respects to ancestors and Elders, past, present and emerging. Central Regional TAFE recognises Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples’ unique cultural and spiritual relationships to the land, waters and seas and their enduring rich contribution to our society. CR TAFE | RECONCILIATION ACTION PLAN | JANUARY 2020-2021 5 OUR VISION FOR RECONCILIATION 6 MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNING COUNCIL AND MANAGING DIRECTOR Central Regional TAFE recognises that reconciliation is not primarily the business of government; it is everybody’s business and it benefits everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Welcome to Country Alan Carter, Reconciliation WA Sandra
    2:00 Introduction Alan Carter, Reconciliation WA Welcome to Country Sandra Harben 2:15-2:30 The Uluru Meeting David Collard 2.30- 3:30 Historians before Uluru Jenny Gregory, History Council of WA Truth Telling: an historian’s view Ann Curthoys Tokol – talking straight history John Maynard Q & A 3:30-4:00 Afternoon tea 4:00-5:00 Truth Telling Panel Jenny Gregory, History Council of WA Storytelling and Makarrata Elfie Shiosaki Uluru and Wadjemup Ezra Jacobs Smith Ancient Memories Aileen Walsh Acknowledging Massacres Chris Owen Q & A 5:00-5:30 Close and wrap up Kim Scott Fred Chaney Abstracts Ann Curthoys, ‘Truth Telling: an historian’s view’ I will outline my experiences, as a non-Aboriginal historian, with research, writing, and teaching in the field of Aboriginal history since I was an undergraduate student in the 1960s. I will look at some of the landmark works of history produced by both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people over the last fifty years, and will talk about some of the issues I faced when writing about the Freedom Ride of 1965, and about government policies, settler attitudes, and Aboriginal responses to colonisation in the nineteenth century. I will ask why, given the extensive body of knowledge about Aboriginal history expressed in books, film, and television, we still find that many people are unaware of that history, cannot acknowledge the destructiveness of colonisation, and see little connection between past events, present concerns, and plans for the future. John Maynard, ‘Tokol – talking straight history’ Tokol is a local Awabakal (Newcastle) word recorded by the missionary Threlkeld in the years 1821-1850 meaning – truth, to be true, straight.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Select Committee on Native Title Rights in Western Australia
    REPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON NATIVE TITLE RIGHTS IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA Presented by the Hon Tom Stephens MLC (Chairman) Report SELECT COMMITTEE ON NATIVE TITLE RIGHTS IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA Date first appointed: 17 September 1997 Terms of Reference: (1) A Select Committee of five members is hereby appointed. Three members of the committee shall be appointed from among those members supporting the Government. (2) The mover be the Chairperson of the Committee. (3) The Committee be appointed to inquire into and report on — (a) the Federal Government’s proposed 10 Point Plan on native title rights and interests, and its impact and effect on land management in Western Australia; (b) the efficacy of current processes by which conflicts or disputes over access or use of land are resolved or determined; (c) alternative and improved methods by which these conflicts or disputes can be resolved, with particular reference to the relevance of the regional and local agreement model as a method for the resolution of conflict; and (d) the role that the Western Australian Government should play in resolution of conflict between parties over disputes in relation to access or use of land. (4) The Committee have the power to send for persons, papers and records and to move from place to place. (5) The Committee report to the House not later than November 27, 1997, and if the House do then stand adjourned the Committee do deliver its report to the President who shall cause the same to be printed by authority of this order. (6) Subject to the right of the Committee to hear evidence in private session where the nature of the evidence or the identity of the witness renders it desirable, the proceedings of the Committee during the hearing of evidence are open to accredited news media representatives and the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Development Australia Wheatbelt WA
    Regional Development Australia Wheatbelt Inc Submission to the Productivity Commission Indigenous Evaluation Strategy August 2019 1 | P a g e Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 2 A case study .................................................................................................................................... 7 Discussion ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 10 References .................................................................................................................................... 11 Introduction Regional Development Australia Wheatbelt Inc. (RDAW) makes this submission as a stakeholder and on behalf of the WA Wheatbelt’s Aboriginal population. RDAW is a locally based, not-for-profit, incorporated association governed by a volunteer committee and funded by the Federal Government. A key role of RDAW is to build and strengthen partnerships across all levels of Government with industry, communities and other regional stakeholders to facilitate economic investment and development in the region. The Wheatbelt region has an Aboriginal population of around 4,000 out of a total population of approximately 75,000. The region comprises the traditional
    [Show full text]