DOCSLIB.ORG

On Spasticity in Spinal Cord Injury: the Challenge Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On Spasticity in Spinal Cord Injury: the Challenge Of ON SPASTICITY IN SPINAL CORD INJURY: THE CHALLENGE OF MEASUREMENT AND THE ROLE OF NOVEL INTERVENTION (SEGWAY) by Grace Anne Boutilier B.KinH., Acadia University, 2003 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF APPLIED SCIENCE in The Faculty of Graduate Studies (Experimental Medicine) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) December 2009 © Grace Anne Boutilier, 2009 ABSTRACT Spasticity is a common sequale of spinal cord injury (SCI), and can have both beneficial and detrimental effects on mobility, functional independence and self-esteem. Clinical measurement of spasticity suffers from questions of credibility and contextual isolation. Recently self-report measures of spasticity have gained recognition as a viable alternative to independent examiner techniques. This pilot study endeavored to discern whether agreement was present between the clinical ‗gold standard‘ measure (the modified Ashworth scale or MAS) and a recently validated self-report tool (the Spinal Cord Injury Spasticity Evaluation Tool or SCI-SET). Spearman rank correlational analysis of measurement of spasticity using MAS and SCI-SET demonstrated some agreement, particularly with respect to the upper extremity musculature (ρ=.564, p=0.001). This relationship was much weaker comparing the lower extremity (ρ=.249, p=.161). They appear to measure similar, yet distinct aspects of the patients‘ spasticity. While the MAS is quick and offers an objective interpretation, perhaps the SCI-SET better reflects the multifaceted nature of spasticity and how it affects the individual, and may enable some interpretation regarding the upper and lower extremities. This information is helpful for clinicians to compile a more comprehensive picture of spasticity as it affects the individual. The Segway Personal Transporter® is a novel, yet practical mobility tool which has yet to garner widespread support in the SCI population. It requires minimal functional ability to operate, and is appropriate for use in individuals with disabilities. Previous work suggests a possible link between the Segway and physiologic benefits to spasticity, pain and fatigue. A one month intervention program targeted these outcome ii measures to determine (1) if they exist and (2) whether the effects are immediate or long-term in nature. The Segway provides evidence for short term reductions in clinical ratings of spasticity (p=.001) and self-report pain (p=.027). Self-evaluations of fatigue approached significance (p=.12). There is some evidence to suggest that these beneficial outcomes may have lasting effects. The Segway may provide an adjunct to current therapy options for treating spasticity by introducing a stimulus to the system which overrides some underlying mechanism(s). As this was pilot work, further investigation of a longitudinal nature with a larger sample size is required to substantiate these findings. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................ iv LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................... vii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................... viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................. ix DEDICATION .................................................................................................................. x CHAPTER 1- INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 1 1.1 Overview of Thesis ................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Introduction to Spinal Cord Injury ............................................................................ 2 1.3.1 Spinal Cord Injury.............................................................................................. 2 1.3.2 Incidence of SCI ................................................................................................ 2 1.3.3 Cost .................................................................................................................... 3 1.3.4 Classification Schemes: Traumas, Plegias, and Impairments ............................ 3 1.3.5 Spasticity in SCI ................................................................................................ 5 1.4 Measurement of Spasticity ...................................................................................... 19 1.4.1 Introduction to Measurement of Spasticity ...................................................... 19 1.4.2 The Ashworth Scale: A Closer Look ............................................................... 28 1.4.3 The Spinal Cord Injury-Spasticity Evaluation Tool ........................................ 35 1.4.4 Measurement Summary ................................................................................... 37 1.5 Other complications of SCI .................................................................................... 38 1.5.1 Pain .................................................................................................................. 38 1.5.2 Fatigue.............................................................................................................. 40 1.5.3 Other Impacts (Depression) ............................................................................. 42 1.5.4 The Role of Physical Activity .......................................................................... 43 1.6 Mobility................................................................................................................... 44 1.6.1 SCI and Upright Standing ................................................................................ 44 1.6.2 Current Options in Mobility............................................................................. 46 1.6.3 The Segway Personal Transporter ................................................................... 50 1.7.Summary ................................................................................................................. 52 1.8 Research Questions ................................................................................................. 53 1.8.1 Research Questions #1 (Chapter 2).................................................................. 53 1.8.2 Research Questions #2 (Chapter 3).................................................................. 54 1.9 Significance............................................................................................................. 54 1.10 References ............................................................................................................. 56 CHAPTER 2 –SPASTICITY: THE CHALLENGE OF MEASUREMENT ............ 66 2.1 Introduction: Measurement of Spasticity ................................................................ 66 2.1.2 The modified Ashworth Scale ......................................................................... 68 2.1.3 The Spinal Cord Injury-Spasticity Evaluation Tool ........................................ 69 2.2 Purpose and Objectives ........................................................................................... 71 2.3 Hypothesis............................................................................................................... 71 2.4 Methods................................................................................................................... 72 iv 2.4.1 Study Design .................................................................................................... 72 2.4.2 Eligibility and Recruitment .............................................................................. 72 2.4.3 Data Collection ................................................................................................ 73 2.4.4 Modified Ashworth Testing ............................................................................. 73 2.4.5 SCI-SET ........................................................................................................... 74 2.5 Data Analysis Procedures ...................................................................................... 75 2.6 Results ..................................................................................................................... 75 2.6.1 Correlational Agreement .................................................................................. 76 2.7 Discussion ............................................................................................................... 78 2.8 Limitations .............................................................................................................. 81 2.9 Bridging Summary .................................................................................................. 82 2.10 References ............................................................................................................. 83 CHAPTER 3- THE ROLE OF NOVEL INTERVENTION (SEGWAY) ................ 85 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 85 3.1.1 Spasticity
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Somatosensory Cortical Plasticity in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Treated by Acupuncture
    ᭜ Human Brain Mapping 28:159–171(2007) ᭜ Somatosensory Cortical Plasticity in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Treated by Acupuncture Vitaly Napadow,1,2* Jing Liu,1 Ming Li,1 Norman Kettner,2 Angela Ryan,3 Kenneth K. Kwong,1 Kathleen K.S. Hui,1 and Joseph F. Audette3 1Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts 2Department of Radiology, Logan College of Chiropractic, Chesterfield, Missouri 3Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts ᭜ ᭜ Abstract: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common entrapment neuropathy of the median nerve characterized by paresthesias and pain in the first through fourth digits. We hypothesize that aberrant afferent input from CTS will lead to maladaptive cortical plasticity, which may be corrected by appro- priate therapy. Functional MRI (fMRI) scanning and clinical testing was performed on CTS patients at baseline and after 5 weeks of acupuncture treatment. As a control, healthy adults were also tested 5 weeks apart. During fMRI, sensory stimulation was performed for median nerve innervated digit 2 (D2) and digit 3 (D3), and ulnar nerve innervated digit 5 (D5). Surface-based and region of interest (ROI)-based analyses demonstrated that while the extent of fMRI activity in contralateral Brodmann Area 1 (BA 1) and BA 4 was increased in CTS compared to healthy adults, after acupuncture there was a significant decrease in contralateral BA 1 (P Ͻ 0.005) and BA 4 (P Ͻ 0.05) activity during D3 sensory stimulation. Healthy adults demonstrated no significant test–retest differences for any digit tested. While D3/D2 separation was contracted or blurred in CTS patients compared to healthy adults, the D2 SI representation shifted laterally after acupuncture treatment, leading to increased D3/D2 separation.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Sensory and Proprioceptive Impairment on The
    Anesthesiology 2004; 100:979–86 © 2004 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. Influence of Sensory and Proprioceptive Impairment on the Development of Phantom Limb Syndrome during Regional Anesthesia Xavier Paqueron, M.D.,* Morgan Leguen, M.D.,† Marc E. Gentili, M.D.,‡ Bruno Riou, M.D., Ph.D.,§ Pierre Coriat, M.D.,ʈ Jean Claude Willer, M.D., Ph.D.# Background: The relation between impairment of sensorimo- frequently report perception of position of the anesthe- tor function and occurrence of phantom limb syndrome (PLS) tized limb that does not match its real position, and this during regional anesthesia has not been described. This study assessed the temporal relation between PLS and the progres- illusory position moves and changes until the limb be- sion of sensorimotor impairment during placement of a bra- comes motionless. At this point, most patients report the Downloaded from http://pubs.asahq.org/anesthesiology/article-pdf/100/4/979/354665/0000542-200404000-00032.pdf by guest on 01 October 2021 chial plexus nerve block. final phantom position of their anesthetized limb in a Methods: Fifty-two patients had their arm randomly placed similar and stereotyped position. either alongside their body (group A) or in 90° abduction Several previous studies devoted to phantom limb syn- (group B) immediately after brachial plexus nerve block place- ment. Responses to pin prick, cold, heat, touch, propriocep- drome during regional anesthesia have reported that the tion, and voluntary movement were assessed every 5 min for 60 former is related to the functional alteration of large- min. Meanwhile, patients described their perceptions of the diameter sensory fibers and to the disappearance of size, shape, and position of their anesthetized limb.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reality of Phantom Limbsl
    The Reality of Phantom Limbsl Joel Katzz This paper ualuates the joint influence of peripheral neurophysiological factors and higher-order cognitive and ffictive processes in trigeing or madulating a variety of phantow limb uperiences, includ.ing pain. Part I outlines one way in whbh the sympathetic nervaw rystem may influence phantom limb pain- A model involving a sympathetic-efferent somatic-afferent cycle is presented to oeplain fluctuations in the intensity of sewations refer"d to the phantorn limb. In part 2, the model b stended to explain the puzzling futding that only after amputatinn are thaughts and feelings capable of evaking referred sensati.ons to the (phantom) limb. While phantom pains and other sensations frequently are tigered by though* and feelings, there is no evidence that the painful or painl.ess phantom limb is a symptom of a psychological disorder. In part 3, the concept of a pain "memory" is introduced and descibed with examples. The data show that pain expeienced pior to amputation rnay percist in the form of a memory refened to the phantom limb causing continued suffeing and distress. It is argued that two independent and potentially dissocinble memoty components underlie the unified expertence of a pain memory. This conceptualization is evaluated in the context of the suryical arena, raising the possibility that under ceriain conditions postoperative pain may, in part, reflect the persistent central neural memory trace Ieft by the surgical procedure. It is concluded that the experience of a phantom lirnb is determined by a comple,r interection of inputs fram the periphery and widespreael reginns af the brain subserving sensoty, cognitive, and afective processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Post-Amputation Pain
    PAIN MANAGEMENT IN REHABILITATION Management of Post-Amputation Pain JACOB M. MODEST, MD; JEREMY E. RADUCHA, MD; EDWARD J. TESTA, MD; CRAIG P. EBERSON, MD 19 22 EN ABSTRACT infection, the need for revision amputation, economic cost, INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of amputation and and physical disability, one of the most debilitating results post-amputation pain (PAP) is rising. There are two main is chronic PAP. Comorbid conditions such as fibromyalgia, types of PAP: residual limb pain (RLP) and phantom limb migraines, irritable bowel syndrome, irritable bladder, and pain (PLP), with an estimated 95% of people with ampu- Raynaud syndrome have all been associated with chronic tations experiencing one or both. PAP. 4 The management of PAP is primarily medical, but sev- eral surgical options also exist. MEDICAL MANAGEMENT: The majority of chronic PAP is due to phantom limb pain, which is neurogenic in na- ture. Common medications used include tricyclic anti- PATHOPHYSIOLOGY depressants, gabapentin, and opioids. Newer studies are There are several methods to categorize PAP. Acute post-am- evaluating alternative drugs such as ketamine and local putation limb pain lasts less than two months and chronic anesthetics. post-amputation limb pain lasts more than two months.5 REHABILITATION MANAGEMENT: Mirror visual feed- Residual limb pain (RLP), often unfortunately referred to back and cognitive behavioral therapy are often effective as “stump” pain, is pain at the surgical site or proximal adjunct therapies and have minimal adverse effects. remaining extremity. Phantom limb pain (PLP) is described SURGICAL MANAGEMENT: Neuromodulatory treatment as pain localized distal to the amputation level.6 Ephraim and surgery for neuromas have been found to help select et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Brain Plasticity Influencing Phantom Limb and Prosthetics Heather Scott University of South Florida
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Outstanding Honors Theses Honors College 4-27-2011 Brain Plasticity Influencing Phantom Limb and Prosthetics Heather Scott University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/honors_et Part of the American Studies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Scott, Heather, "Brain Plasticity Influencing Phantom Limb and Prosthetics" (2011). Outstanding Honors Theses. Paper 71. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/honors_et/71 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Outstanding Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Brain Plasticity Influencing Phantom Limb and Prosthetics Heather Scott A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Biology The Honors College of the University of South Florida April 27, 2011 Thesis Committee: Ralph E. Leighty, Ph.D. Gordon A. Fox, Ph.D. Brain Plasticity Influencing Phantom Limb and Prosthetics The relationship between brain and behavior represents an important area of research. The complexity of the brain, however, poses significant challenges to investigators, while at the same time offers great promise for new discoveries. By selecting a specific structure or function of the brain, we may begin to explore the neural basis of behavior and cognition, and examine potential therapies for treating neurological disorders. For example, phantom limb syndrome is a mysterious medical condition in which individuals continue to perceive the presence of a missing body part -- typically a limb or limb segment -- for some time following its loss through amputation (e.g., combat-related injury).
    [Show full text]
  • Dealing with Pain: Phantom Limb Pain
    AMPUTATIONS Page 2 Dealing with Pain Series : Phantom Limb Pain Page 1 ➢Amputation of the arm is common after motorcycle accident injuries where the impact damages the nerves passing from the arm to the neck. This may leave the arm paralyzed and useless so that amputation is necessary. ➢Amputation of the leg is commonly done to relieve the pain caused by loss of the blood supply to the leg. The blood supply is lost because of www.painrelieffoundation.org.uk hardening of the arteries (called peripheral vascular disease, PVD). This condition is more common in smokers. Gangrene may develop in the leg and then the leg may have to be amputated. ➢Traumatic amputations due to war injuries, such as land mine explosions, PHANTOM LIMB PAIN are common in the armed forces and in war torn countries. WHAT CAUSES PHANTOM LIMB PAIN? WHAT IS PHANTOM LIMB PAIN? ➢The precise cause is unknown. Injury to the nerves during amputation ➢ Phantom limb pain refers to pain felt in an absent limb. The limb may causes changes in the central nervous system. It is likely that there is a have been lost because of an accident, or deliberately removed in an very important change in the way the brain reads messages coming from operation because of disease. This kind of pain is the subject of this the body. Parts of the brain, which controlled the missing limb, stay leaflet. active. This causes the very real illusion of the phantom limb even though the amputee knows it is not real! ➢ Phantom limb sensations, which are not painful, may also be felt in the absent limb.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Pain in Plexopathy, Radiculopathy
    anno: 2016 lavoro: 4538-EJprM Mese: december titolo breve: trEatMENt of NEuropathic aNd phaNtoM liMb paiN Volume: 52 primo autore: fErraro No: 6 pagine: 855-66 rivista: European Journal of physical and rehabilitation Medicine citazione: Eur J p hys rehabil Med 2016;52:855-66 cod rivista: Eur J p hys rehabil Med , © COPYRIGHT 2016 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA © 2016 EdiZioNi MiNErVa MEdica online version at http://www.minervamedica.it European Journal of physical and rehabilitation Medicine 2016 december;52(6):855-66 SPECIAL ARTICLE THE ITALIAN CONSENSUS CONFERENCE ON PAIN IN NEUROREHABILITATION - PART II dIagnosIs and treatment of paIn In plexopathy, radiculopathy, peripheral neuropathy and phantom limb pain Evidence and recommendations from the italian consensus conference on pain on Neurorehabilitation francesco fErraro 1 *, Marco JacopEtti 2, Vincenza spalloNE 3, luca padua 4, 5, Marco traballEsi 6, stefano bruNElli 6, cristina caNtarElla 7, cristina ciotti 7, daniele coraci 8, Elena dalla toffola 9, 10, silvia MaNdriNi 9, Giovanni MoroNE 6, costanza paZZaGlia 5, Marcello roMaNo 11, angelo schENoNE 12, rossella toGNi 9, stefano taMburiN 13 on behalf of the italian consensus conference on pain in Neurorehabilitation (iccpN) 1section of Neuromotor rehabilitation, department of Neuroscience, asst carlo poma, Mantova, italy; 2university of parma, parma, italy; 3department of systems Medicine, university of tor Vergata, rome, italy; 4department of GerIatrIcs, NeuroscIences and orthopaedics, catholic university, rome, italy; 5don carlo Gnocchi
    [Show full text]
  • Supernumerary Phantom Limbs in Spinal Cord Injury
    Spinal Cord (2011) 49, 588–595 & 2011 International Spinal Cord Society All rights reserved 1362-4393/11 $32.00 www.nature.com/sc REVIEW Supernumerary phantom limbs in spinal cord injury A Curt1, C Ngo Yengue1, LM Hilti2 and P Brugger2 1Spinal Cord Injury Centre, University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zu¨rich, Zurich, Switzerland and 2Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland Study design and objectives: Case report and review of supernumerary phantom limbs in patients suffering from spinal cord injury (SCI). Setting: SCI rehabilitation centre. Case report: After a ski accident, a 71-year-old man suffered an incomplete SCI (level C3; AIS C, central cord syndrome), with a C3/C4 dislocation fracture. From the first week after injury, he experienced a phantom duplication of both upper limbs that lasted for 7 months. The supernumerary limbs were only occasionally related to painful sensation, specifically when they were perceived as crossed on his trunk. Although the painful sensations were responsive to pain medication, the presence of the illusory limb sensations were persistent. During neurological recovery, the supernumerary limbs gradually disappeared. A rubber hand illusion paradigm was used twice during recovery to monitor the patient’s ability to integrate visual, tactile and proprioceptive stimuli. Conclusion: Overall, the clinical relevance of supernumerary phantom limbs is not clear, specific treatment protocols have not yet been developed, and the underlying neural mechanisms are not fully understood. Supernumerary phantom limbs have been previously reported in patients with (sub)cortical lesions, but might be rather undocumented in patients suffering from traumatic SCI. For the appropriate diagnosis and treatment after SCI, supernumerary phantoms should be distinguished from other phantom sensations and pain syndromes after SCI.
    [Show full text]
  • PHANTOM EYE SYNDROME (PES) Following Eye Removal
    2/12/2020 Counteracting The Consequences of PHANTOM EYE SYNDROME (PES) Following Eye Removal Presented by: Abeer Samir Salem; MD, EDA Researcher of Anesthesiology at RIO Why this topic??!!!!! Do you mean like phantom limb??!!!! 1 2/12/2020 Eye removal is a psychologically traumatic surgery as any other limb amputation But What is Phantom eye syndrome? 2 2/12/2020 Surprisingly, only few studies were related to this situation with curiosity to know the incidence of post operative symptoms Types of eye removal surgeries??! Three types of surgeries are applied evisceration, enucleation and exenteration. Evisceration describes the removal of the intraocular content leaving the sclera with all the muscles intact in the orbit. Enucleation refers to the surgical removal of the entire globe including the sclera Exenteration of the orbit refers to the surgical removal of the eye and the affected orbital contents with or without the eyelids 3 2/12/2020 EviscerationThe presence of PhantomEnucleation pain was not associated with the type of surgery used for the eye removal Exenteration Why do we remove the eye?? A study in Denemark between 1996- 2003 over 345 patient showing indications of eye removal 4 2/12/2020 The studies involved showed that phantom symptoms are of higher incidence with patients with preoperative pain and headache than who don’t 5 2/12/2020 Phantom vision (Visual hallucinations) Triggers: darkness, closing of the eyes, fatigue and psychological stress and sometimes without triggers at all Frequency: everyday, every week or infrequent 40% only had feelings towards it, and minority of them interfered with their daily life Patients are afraid to mention it, not to be considered a mental diseased patient elementary visual hallucinations, with white or colored light as a continuous sharp light or as moving dots, few patient described pictures Stops within 3-6 months.
    [Show full text]
  • INVITED REVIEW the Perception of Phantom Limbs the D
    Brain (1998), 121, 1603–1630 INVITED REVIEW The perception of phantom limbs The D. O. Hebb lecture V. S. Ramachandran and William Hirstein Center for Brain and Cognition, 0109, University of Correspondence to: V. S. Ramachandran, Center for Brain California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA and Cognition, 0109, University of California, San Diego, 1610, LaJolla, CA 92093, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Summary Almost everyone who has a limb amputated will humans, so that it is now possible to track perceptual experience a phantom limb—the vivid impression that changes and changes in cortical topography in individual the limb is not only still present, but in some cases, patients. We suggest, therefore, that these patients provide painful. There is now a wealth of empirical evidence a valuable opportunity not only for exploring neural demonstrating changes in cortical topography in primates plasticity in the adult human brain but also for following deafferentation or amputation, and this review understanding the relationship between the activity of will attempt to relate these in a systematic way to the sensory neurons and conscious experience. We conclude clinical phenomenology of phantom limbs. With the with a theory of phantom limbs, some striking advent of non-invasive imaging techniques such as MEG demonstrations of phantoms induced in normal subjects, (magnetoencephalogram) and functional MRI, topo- and some remarks about the relevance of these phenomena graphical reorganization can also be demonstrated in to the question of
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Current Theories and Treatments for Phantom Limb Pain
    A review of current theories and treatments for phantom limb pain Kassondra L. Collins, … , Robert S. Waters, Jack W. Tsao J Clin Invest. 2018;128(6):2168-2176. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI94003. Review Following amputation, most amputees still report feeling the missing limb and often describe these feelings as excruciatingly painful. Phantom limb sensations (PLS) are useful while controlling a prosthesis; however, phantom limb pain (PLP) is a debilitating condition that drastically hinders quality of life. Although such experiences have been reported since the early 16th century, the etiology remains unknown. Debate continues regarding the roles of the central and peripheral nervous systems. Currently, the most posited mechanistic theories rely on neuronal network reorganization; however, greater consideration should be given to the role of the dorsal root ganglion within the peripheral nervous system. This Review provides an overview of the proposed mechanistic theories as well as an overview of various treatments for PLP. Find the latest version: https://jci.me/94003/pdf REVIEW The Journal of Clinical Investigation A review of current theories and treatments for phantom limb pain Kassondra L. Collins,1 Hannah G. Russell,2 Patrick J. Schumacher,2 Katherine E. Robinson-Freeman,2 Ellen C. O’Conor,2 Kyla D. Gibney,2 Olivia Yambem,2 Robert W. Dykes,3 Robert S. Waters,1 and Jack W. Tsao2,4,5 1Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology and 2Department of Neurology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA. 3School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 4Department of Neurology, Memphis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reality of One's Own Body
    Ghost buster: The reality of one’s own body Frédérique de Vignemont To cite this version: Frédérique de Vignemont. Ghost buster: The reality of one’s own body. Theoria et Historia Scien- tarum, 2003, 7 (1), pp.121-140. ijn_00169617 HAL Id: ijn_00169617 https://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ijn_00169617 Submitted on 4 Sep 2007 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THEORIA ET HISTORIAGhost buster: The SCIENTIARUM, reality of one’s own body VOL. VII, N121o 1 Ed. Nicolas Copernicus University 2003 Frederique de Vignemont1 Ghost buster: The reality of ones own body Abstract What are the epistemic bases of the knowledge of the reality of our own body? Proprioception plays a primordial role in body representation and more particularly at the level of body schema. Without proprioception people can feel amputated and the mislocalization of proprioceptive information through the remapping of the Penfield Homonculus induces illusions of phantom limbs, illusions that contradictory visual feedback cannot erase. However, it turns out that it is not as simple as that and that vision also intervenes in body knowledge: vision of one’s own body allows deafferented patients to move and phantom limbs to disappear.
    [Show full text]