DOCSLIB.ORG

India: Death Despite Dissenting Judgements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
India: Death Despite Dissenting Judgements Asian Centre For Human Rights May 2015 INDIA: Death despite dissenting judgements 1. Preface Inside Justice P N Bhagwati in his minority judgement in 1. Preface ......................................................... 1 the Bachan Singh1 case held that the “only way in which 2. Death despite dissenting judgements .................... 2 the vice of arbitrariness in the imposition of death penalty 3. Experiences of the US: Lessons for India ................ 5 4. Conclusion and recommendations ........................ 6 can be removed is by the law providing that in every case Annexure I: Summary of the cases referred .............. 6 where the death sentence is confirmed by the High Court i. Acquittal Vs death sentence ............................... 6 there shall be an automatic review of the death sentence Case 1: Gurmeet Singh, Uttar Pradesh ............... 6 by the Supreme Court sitting as a whole and the death Case 2: Lalit Kumar Yadav, Uttar Pradesh ............. 7 ii. Death penalty vs life imprisonment .................... 7 sentence shall not be affirmed or imposed by the Supreme Case 1: Saibanna Nigappal Natikar, Karnataka ...... 7 Court unless it is approved unanimously by the entire Case 2: B A Umesh, Karnataka .......................... 8 court sitting enbanc and the only exceptional cases in Case 3: Swamy Shraddananda, Karnataka ............ 9 which death sentence may be affirmed or imposed should Case 4: Rameshbhai Chandubhai Rathod, Gujarat ..10 be legislatively limited to those where the offender is found iii. Normal capital crimes vs terror capital crimes .....10 Case 1: Bishnu Prasad Sinha and Anr. Vs. to be so depraved that it is not possible to reform him by State of Assam ............................................10 any curative or rehabilitative therapy and even after his Case 2: Devender Pal Singh Bhullar, Delhi ...........11 release he would be a serious menace to the society and Case 3: State (N.C.T of Delhi) Vs. Navjot Sandhu @ Afsan Guru And Shaukat Hussain Guru Vs. therefore in the interest of the society he is required to be State (N.C.T. of Delhi) ...................................13 eliminated”. Case 4: State through Superintendent of Police, CBI/SIT vs. Nalini and Ors .....................15 The vice of arbitrariness on imposing death penalty iv. The issue of determining juvenility ...................17 Case 1: Ram Deo Chauhan @ Rajnath has come to haunt Indian justice system. The Supreme Chauhan, Assam ..........................................17 2 Court in Sangeet & Anr Vs State of Haryana of 20 Abbreviations November 2012 admitted “judge centric” character CrPC Code of Criminal Procedure in death sentencing, a euphemistic term to describe FIR First Information Report IPC Indian Penal Code the vice of the arbitrariness. JJB Juvenile Justice Board MHA Ministry of Home Affairs The lack of unanimity in death sentencing is a serious NHRC National Human Rights Commission issue of concern. The ratio of differences of opinion TADA Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act 2 INDIA: DEATH DESPITE DISSENTING JUDGEMENTS whether somebody convicted for offences punishable has come for India to make imposition of death with death should die or live in most cases is 2:1. The penalty solely based on unanimous decisions of a differences of opinion are not usual one of whether constitutional bench of the Supreme Court. The to impose death penalty or life imprisonment, but President of India too ought to automatically grant ranges between acquittal and death sentence. In mercy if there are differences of opinion at any stage exceptional cases, there are differences on the issue of the proceedings, and not only at the stage of of determining juvenility while for terror capital the High Court. The differences of opinion at the crimes, death sentencing is the rule. level of the Supreme Court ought to be given more importance. The experiences of the United States on the need for unanimity of judges for death sentencing are 2. Death despite dissenting judgements instructive. In 2002, the United States Supreme Court in Timothy Ring (Ring v. Arizona) ruled “312. Before I part with this topic I may point out Arizona’s death penalty statute as unconstitutional that only way in which the vice of arbitrariness in because it allowed “a sentencing judge, sitting without the imposition of death penalty can be removed is a jury, to find an aggravating circumstance necessary by the law providing that in every case where the for imposition of the death penalty.”3 A study in the death sentence is confirmed by the High Court US in 2005 had shown that if there is no unanimity there shall be an automatic review of the death for imposition of death penalty, in 20 states of the sentence by the Supreme Court sitting as a whole United States, courts must impose a lesser penalty and the death sentence shall not be affirmed or when the jury cannot agree on whether to impose the imposed by the Supreme Court unless it is approved death penalty, in four states the jury can continue to unanimously by the entire court sitting enbanc and deliberate on penalties other than the death penalty the only exceptional cases in which death sentence before the court imposes a sentence, in one State the may be affirmed or imposed should be legislatively judge has the option of imposing a sentence of life limited to those where the offender is found to be imprisonment without parole or impaneling a new so depraved that it is not possible to reform him jury, and in two states, statutes authorise the court by any curative or rehabilitative therapy and even to impanel a new jury if the first jury cannot reach a after his release he would be a serious menace to the verdict.4 society and therefore in the interest of the society he is required to be eliminated. Of course, for The “differences of opinion at the level of High reasons I have already discussed such exceptional Court” is recognised as a ground for commutation cases would be practically nil because it is almost of death sentences under the broad guidelines impossible to predicate of any person that he is on consideration of mercy pleas adopted by the beyond reformation or redemption and therefore, Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), Government of from a practical point of view death penalty would India.5 However, the MHA regularly flouts its own be almost non-existent. But theoretically it may be guidelines including on ‘the differences of opinion at possible to say that if the State is in a position to the level of High Court’ while advising the President establish positively that the offender is such a social of India on mercy pleas. monster that even after suffering life imprisonment and undergoing reformative and rehabilitative Considering the miscarriage of justice and admitted therapy, he can never be reclaimed for the society, judge-centric character of death sentencing, the time then he may be awarded death penalty. If this test INDIA: DEATH DESPITE DISSENTING JUDGEMENTS 3 is legislatively adopted and applied by following deliberated upon by the Indian judiciary and the the procedure mentioned above, the imposition government. There is need to address this issue of death penalty may be rescued from the vice of considering the fact that the differences of opinion arbitrariness and caprice. But that is not so under range from acquittal to death sentence. the law as it stands today.” Justice P N Bhagwati in his dissenting judgement in Bachan Singh Differences of opinion: acquittal vs death sentence vs State of Punjab (1982 AIR 1325) on 16 There is no doubt that if the difference of opinion August 1982 declaring the death penalty is a serious as acquittal vs death sentence, death provided under Section 302 of the Indian penalty ought not to be imposed as ratio decidendi. Penal Code read with Section 354 Sub-section However, in such cases, the Supreme Court awarded (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 both death sentence and life imprisonment. It is as unconstitutional and void as being violative clear that the Supreme Court has not yet considered of Articles 14 and 21. differences of opinion among judges of a bench as a ground for not imposing death sentences. In India, it is only when two judge bench of the High Courts or the Supreme Court differ on the issue of In the case of Gurmeet Singh of Uttar Pradesh, imposing death penalty that the case is referred to a out of the two judges of the High Court one was third judge at the High Court level and three bench for upholding the Sessions Court’s conviction judges at the Supreme Court. Therefore, the ratio including the death sentence, the other judge was of difference of opinion is often as narrow as 2:1. for acquittal of the accused.8 The matter was referred This makes decisions on imposing death penalty to a third judge who upheld conviction and death extremely vulnerable to arbitrariness, irrationality sentence.9 The Supreme Court also upheld the and unfairness. conviction and death sentence considering the case as ‘rarest of the rare’. On 1 March 2013, President The minority view in the judgements is seldom Pranab Mukherjee rejected the mercy petition referred as stare decisis. Otherwise, the judgement of Gurmeet Singh and failed to comply with the of Justice Bhagwati in the Bachan Singh case in guidelines of the Government of India to grant 1980 would have significantly addressed what mercy in case of “difference of opinion in a Bench of the Supreme Court in Sangeet & Anr Vs State of two Judges necessitating reference to the third Judge of 6 Haryana of 20 November 2012 termed as “judge the High Court”10. Thereafter, the Supreme Court in centric”, an euphemistic term to describe the vice of Shatrughan Chauhan Vs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Status of Mercy Petitions in India
    The National Campaign for Abolition of Death Penalty in India - a programme of the Asian Centre for Human Rights (ACHR) supported by the European Commission under the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) - conducts research, analysis and advocacy on issues relating to death penalty with the aim for its eventual abolition. THE STATUS OF MERCY The National Campaign for Abolition of Death Penalty in India has published the following reports relating to the issue of death penalty in India: PETITIONS IN INDIA • The Status of Mercy Petitions in India • Our Standards and Their Standards: India Vs Abolitionist Countries • India: Not safe for extradition of those facing death sentences? • The State of the Right to Life in India, August 2015 • India: Death Without Legal Sanction, June 2015 • India: Death despite dissenting judgements, 02 June 2015 THE S • India: Death in the name of conscience, May 2015 • Arbitrary on all Counts: Consideration of mercy pleas by President of India, 10 December T 2014 A T • Death Reserved for the Poor, November 2014 U S OF MERCY PE MERCY • Death penalty through self incrimination in India, October 2014 • India: Death Without the Right to Appeal, September 2014 • Award of enhanced punishment of death by the Supreme Court, 26 September 2014 NO • India: Death Penalty Has No Deterrence, August 2014 MERCY • India: Death Penalty Statistics, June 2014 • The Case for Abolition of Death Penalty in India - ACHR’s submission to the Law T I Commission of India on Capital Punishment, May 2014 T ION • Mercy on Trial in India, 22 October 2013 • The State of Death Penalty in India 2013, 14 February 2013 S IN The following publications are expected: I NDIA • Right to life in the context of death penalty: Death Penalty and the UN Human Rights Committee • Death Penalty in India: Issues and contentions All the reports are available at http://www.
    [Show full text]
  • 66Th ILA Conference” Payable at Theme Or Sub Theme of the Conference
    International Conference on Visualizing Librarianship in the 21st Century Connecting Minds & Creating the Future th Annual Conference of 66 Indian Library Association-2021 Venue Ambedkar Bhavan Date Gulbarga University May 24-26, 2021 Kalaburagi - Karnataka - India Organized by ð «±é«À UÁ zÁ § å® Indian Library A Gulbarga ® ÀÄ i ÀÄ U University Library Association «zÉåAiÉÄà CªÀÄÈvÀ Kalaburagi, Karnataka New Delhi Karnataka State College Librarians Association Bangalore About the Conference... leap into information age supporting e-LTR The origin of Librarianship lies in the creation of (e-Learning Teaching and Research), provides access libraries and the profession was created to serve the to e-resources (10,000 e-journals+ & databases), needs of the institution and its clientele. Librarianship course materials and e-books using one GBPS leased is a noble and thriving profession, although faced with line connectivity under NMEICT Project. Established challenges as a result of the electronic transformation Green Library, Remote access facility, Wi-fi facility, of professional life. It is a profession facing a crisis of Virtual Reference through QuestionPoint Service, identity as a result of the changing nature of Institutional Repository, Career Planning and User Information and Communication Technologies, Sensitization Programs are a few unique services including the access to electronic resources, the rendered to promote the optimum use of library altering scholarly publishing paradigm, and the resources. abundance of free, although often unfiltered, information via the World Wide Web. Considering that Indian Library Association (ILA) LIS is an evolving and hybrid field, it is appropriate to The Indian Library Association is a premier examine and visualize the dimensions of Librarianship association committed to the cause of Library from various disciplinary perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Poll Gambits April 7, 2013 S
    Established 1946 Price : Rupees Five Vol. 68 No. 11 Pre-poll gambits April 7, 2013 S. Viswam Both the Congress and the BJP Modi’s instance that Varun Gandhi Travails of Pakistan spent the last few days mapping out who has emerged as an anti-Muslim Kuldip Nayar strategies incidental to the beginning campaigner in the party brought in as of the run-up to 2014. The Congress a general secretary? is still in two minds about formally World Social Forum, naming Rahul Gandhi as its prime Modi is the only chief minister to Tunisia - Few Reflections ministerial candidate. The general have been elevated within the BJP Dr. Sunilam notion within the party is that any hierarchy as a reward for winning announcement in this regard needs to three assembly elections in a row. be made only ahead of the actual poll. Other chief ministers with the same India needs In the BJP, the situation is somewhat achievement have been ignored. All democratic socialism different. With the induction of in all, the 2014 Rajnath Singh team Brij Khandelwal Narendra Modi into the central seems to confer special status to parliamentary board and the central hard core party workers and leaders election committee, the issue seems at the cost of the tried and tested World Bank’s to have been resolved. Modi ought leaders. L. K. Advani has been put Sham Consultations to be the BJP’s official candidate if in his place, while Yashwant Sinha, President Raj Nath’s reshuffle makes Jaswant Singh and Arun Shourie sense. The assumption is that he will have been sidelined.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2006 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 6, 2007
    India Page 1 of 39 India Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2006 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 6, 2007 India is a longstanding and stable multiparty, federal, parliamentary democracy with a bicameral parliament and a population of approximately 1.1 billion. Manmohan Singh was named prime minister following his Congress Party-led coalition's victory in the 2004 general elections, which were considered free and fair, despite scattered episodes of violence. Serious internal conflicts affected the state of Jammu and Kashmir, as well as several states in the northeast. The Naxalite conflict affected Andhra Pradesh, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal, and eastern Maharashtra. While the civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the security forces, there were frequent instances in which some elements acted independently of government authority. The government generally respected the rights of its citizens; however, numerous serious problems remained. Major problems included extrajudicial killings of persons in custody, disappearances, torture and rape by police and security forces. The lack of accountability permeated the government and security forces, creating an atmosphere in which human rights violations often went unpunished. Although the country has numerous laws protecting human rights, enforcement was lax and convictions were rare. Poor prison conditions, lengthy pretrial detention without charge, and prolonged detentions while undergoing trial remained significant problems. Government officials used special antiterrorism legislation to justify the excessive use of force while combating terrorism and active, violent insurgencies in Jammu and Kashmir and several northeastern states. Security force officials who committed human rights abuses generally enjoyed de facto impunity, although there were investigations into individual abuse cases as well as punishment of some perpetrators by the court system.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights with New Preface 2009.Indd
    Asian Centre for Human Rights is dedicated to promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the Asian region by: n providing accurate and timely information and complaints to the National Human Rights Institutions, the United Nations bodies and mechanisms as appropriate; INDIA n conducting investigation, research, campaigning and lobbying on country HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT situations or individual cases; n increasing the capacity of human rights defenders and civil society groups through relevant trainings on the use of national and international human rights procedures; n providing input into international standard setting processes on human rights; n providing legal, political and practical advice according to the needs of human rights defenders and civil society groups; and n by securing the economic, social and cultural rights through rights-based approaches to development. ASIAN CENTRE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS C-3/441-C, Janakpuri, New Delhi 110058 INDIA Phone/Fax: +91 11 25620583, 25503624 Website: www.achrweb.org Email: [email protected] ASIAN CENTRE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INDIA HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT ASIAN CENTRE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS India Human Rights Report 2009 Edited by: Suhas Chakma, Director, Asian Centre for Human Rights Published by: Asian Centre for Human Rights C-3/441-C, Janakpuri, New Delhi 110058, INDIA Tel/Fax: +91 11 25620583, 25503624 Website: www.achrweb.org Email: [email protected] First published May 2009 ©Asian Centre for Human Rights, 2009 No part of this publication can be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without prior permission of the publisher. Cover photo: Voters for the 2009 general elections; Source: http://www.
    [Show full text]
  • R.Vase Computer Science 2018-20
    Fergusson College (Autonomous), Pune -4 F.Y.B.Sc. Computer Science - 2019 -20 Admission First Round Admission Type: Maharashtra Students : Physical Handicap Sr. No. Full Name Category Domicile State Twelth Army or Physical Reservation Percentage Exservice Handicap 1 VIKAS RAJENDRA PATIL OBC Maharashtra 71.85 manNA Yes 2 Silveet Kashmir Singh OPEN Maharashtra 60.92 NA Yes 3 Hridaya Sunil Ghanmode SC Maharashtra 59.8 NA Yes Admission Type: Maharashtra Students : Army / Ex-Serviceman 1 Sagarika Bose OPEN Chhattisgarh 95 Army No 2 DIVYANK DIXIT OPEN Uttar Pradesh 94.2 Army No 3 Hridya K Prasanth OPEN Kerala 94 ExserviceArmy No 4 DEBASISH PANIGRAHI OPEN Orissa 94 man No 5 roshan singh OPEN Maharashtra 93.8 ExserviceArmy No 6 Pramod Shivaji Pilane OPEN Maharashtra 93.6 Exserviceman No 7 Muskan Qamar Khan OPEN Maharashtra 93.6 Exserviceman No 8 Shubham Prashant Shigwan OBC Maharashtra 93.4 Exserviceman No 9 Swati Rajesh Srivastava OPEN Delhi 93.2 Exserviceman No 10 RITIK K YADAV OPEN Haryana 91.4 man No 11 ABHIJEET SINGH OPEN Maharashtra 91.2 Army No 12 Kapil Yadav OBC Haryana 90.8 Army No 13 VISHAL NAGNATH KARANDE OBC Maharashtra 90.8 Army No 14 SakshamNitesh D KawadePraveen Kumar Tiwari OPEN Maharashtra 90.4 Army No 15 Tiwari OPEN Bihar 90.2 ExserviceArmy No 16 Kiran OPEN Maharashtra 89.8 man No 17 Omkar Kailash Raut OPEN Maharashtra 89 ExserviceArmy No 18 DIVYA SUMAN OPEN Bihar 89 man No 19 Khushi Tiwari OPEN Maharashtra 87.6 Army No 20 Binay Kumar OPEN Uttar Pradesh 87.4 Army No 21 Shree Devi Patil OPEN Karnataka 87.2 Army No 22 HITESH KUMAR
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    50th YEAR OF THE COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT annual report 2012-13 Council for Social Development Sangha Rachna, 53, Lodhi Estate, New Delhi – 110003, India Tel: 91-11-24615383, 24692655, 24611700, 24618660 Fax: 91-11-24616061 <[email protected]> www.csdindia.org COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL REPORT 2012-2013 Sangha Rachna, 53, Lodhi Estate, New Delhi – 110003, India Tel: 91-11-24615383, 24692655, 24611700, 24618660 Fax: 91-11-24616061 <[email protected]> www.csdindia.org Southern Regional Centre 5-6-151, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad – 500030 Tel: 40-24016395 Fax: 91-40-24001958 [email protected] www.csdhyd.org CONTENTS DIRECTOR’S NOTE 03 ABOUT US 05 Origin 06 Vision 07 Objectives 07 RESEARCH 09 Projects Completed 10 Projects Ongoing 20 ADVOCACY 36 Seminars/Workshops 37 TRAINING 51 PUBLICATIONS 61 Books 62 India: Social Development Report (SDR) 62 Journal 63 Papers 63 DURGABAI DESHMUKH MEMORIAL LECTURE 65 LIBRARY 67 FACULTY ACTIVITIES 69 Publications Lectures Seminars Training Programmes ORGANISATIONAL PROFILE 96 Organisational Structure 97 Faculty 99 Staff 110 AUDITOR’S REPORT 112 2 Traditional Subsistence to Means of Livelihood. DIRECTOR’S NOTE Besides, there were important on-going The Council for Social Development research projects, namely (i) The Crisis successfully completed its 50th year in of the Indian Left and Social 2012. During the past 50 years, the Development Issues, (ii) National Council continued to engage in Campaigns for an Inclusive research and advocacy to influence Implementation of Right to Education, government policy, social action and (iii) Institutional credit, Farm public discourse for the advancement of Productivity and Farm Distress, (iv) the socially disadvantaged, Mining closure and the Issues of marginalized and oppressed sections of Livelihoods, (v) Socio-economic the Indian society.
    [Show full text]
  • VETRII IAS STUDY CIRCLE Current Affairs
    VETRII IAS STUDY CIRCLE Current Affairs (A book for TNPSC Examination) MARCHMAY - 2021 - 2021 An ISO 9001: 2015 Institution | Providing Excellence Since 2011 Head Office Old No.52, New No.1, 9th Street, F Block, 1st Avenue Main Road, (Near Istha siddhi Vinayakar Temple), Anna Nagar East – 600102. Phone: 044-2626 5326 | 98844 72636 | 98844 21666 | 98844 32666 Branches SALEM KOVAI MADURAI No.189/1, Meyanoor Road, No.347, D.S.Complex (3rd floor), 199, Dharshini Tower, Near ARRS Multiplex, Nehru Street, Near Gandhipuram 1st Floor, Vaigai Colony, (Near Salem New bus Stand), Central Bus Stand, Ramnagar, Anna Nagar, Opp. Venkateshwara Complex, Kovai - 9 Madurai - 625 020. Salem - 636004. Ph: 75021 65390 Ph: 91500 21999 | 91500 21998 Ph: 0427-2330307 | 95001 22022 EduCareer Location VIVEKANANDHA EDUCATIONAL PATRICIAN COLLEGE OF ARTS SREE SARASWATHI INSTITUTIONS FOR WOMEN AND SCIENCE THYAGARAJA COLLEGE Elayampalayam, Tiruchengode - TK 3, Canal Bank Rd, Gandhi Nagar, Palani Road, Thippampatti, Namakkal District - 637 205. Opp. to Kotturpuram Railway Station, Pollachi - 642 107 Ph: 04288 - 234670 Adyar, Chennai - 600020. Ph: 73737 66550 | 94432 66008 94437 34670 Ph: 044 - 24401362 | 044 - 24426913 90951 66009 www.vetriias.com My Dear Aspirants, Greetings to all of you! “What we think we become” Gautama Buddha. We all have dreams. To make dreams come into reality it takes a lot of determination, dedication, self discipline and continuous effort. We at VETRII IAS Study Circle are committed to provide the right guidance, quality coaching and help every aspirants to achieve his or her life’s cherished goal of becoming a civil servant. The class room coaching at VETRII IAS Study Circle is meticulously planned to equip the aspirants with all the relevant facts and fundamentals of the subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Torture in India 2011
    14,231 custodial deaths from 2001 to 2010 Asian Centre for Human Rights TORTURE IN INDIA 2011 ASIAN CENTRE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS TORTURE IN INDIA 2011 First published 21 November 2011. © Asian Centre for Human Rights, 2011. No part of this publication can be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without prior permission of the publisher. Published by: Asian Centre For Human Rights C-3/441-C, Janakpuri, New Delhi - 110058, India Phone/Fax: +91-11-25620583, 25503624 Website: www.achrweb.org Email: [email protected] CONTENTS PREFACE ....................................................................................................v 1. 14,231 CUSTODIAL DEATHS FROM 2001 TO 2010: INDIA MUST ENACT ANTI-TORTURE LAW ........................................3 2. TORTURE IN POLICE CUSTODY ...........................................................9 I. PatterNS AND PRACTICES OF Torture IN POLICE CUStody .....................................................................9 A. Custodial deaths ......................................................................... .9 i. Individual cases of custodial deaths through torture: ................ 9 ii. Custodial death through torture: alleged suicide ...................... 16 iii. Custodial death through torture: alleged sudden medical complications ............................................................................. 24 B. Torture not resulting in deaths ................................................... 29 i. Torture to extract confessions ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Current Awareness Bulletin
    No.5-6 May-June 2018 Current Awareness Bulletin Centre for Women’s Development Studies 25, Bhai Vir Singh Marg (Gole Market), New Delhi-110001, India. Ph.: 011-9555231324; 9555231354. Fax: 91-23346044 E-mail: [email protected] | URL: http://www.cwds.ac.in/library/ 1 CONTENTS Section 1: Journals/ Periodicals/ Newsletters Articles Abortion ...........................................................................001 Adoption ...........................................................................002-004 Ageing ..............................................................................005-006 Agriculture ........................................................................007-008 Breastfeeding ....................................................................009 Child Abuse ......................................................................010-021 Child Labour .....................................................................022-023 Children ............................................................................024-051 Demography .....................................................................052-055 Disabilities ........................................................................056-058 Education ..........................................................................059-061 Family...............................................................................062 Feminism ..........................................................................063-075 Gender Studies ..................................................................076-079
    [Show full text]
  • April-2+Miscellanous
    APRIL-2+MISCELLANOUS NATIONAL Prime Minister Narendra Modi is visiting Bihar today to participate in the concluding ceremony of Centenary of Mahatma Gandhi’s Champaran Satyagraha at Motihari in East Champaran district. According to the Union Agriculture Ministry, India has been the largest producer of milk in the world for the past 15 years. Uttar Pradesh govt. decided to change the name of Allahabad as Prayagraj ahead of the 2019 Ardh Kumbh fair to be held in the holy city. Union government announced a fund of Rs 1.4 lakh-crore for the ambitious Kisan Urja Suraksha evam Utthaan Mahaabhiyan (KUSUM) scheme to promote solar farming among farmers #SecurityCheckKiya campaign started by search engine giant Google in India India’s Largest Floating Treatment Island is Reviving This Hyderabad Lake. Dhruvansh, an NGO, chose the World Wetland Day to introduce a “floating island” in Neknampur Lake. The Ministry of Railways has decided to set up of a massive rail coach factory in Latur district i.e. in Marathwada region of Maharashtra Centre ties up with IIT-Delhi for safety switches on vehicles. The Ministry of Electronics and IT in partnership with IIT-Delhi is working on a switch-based device in cars and buses to aid safety of women. The proposed panic switch system when invoked will generate a loud alarm in the vehicle which will attract public attention, and send the coordinates of the person to a server (police control room) to provide necessary help. Chairman of the Defence Planning Committee (DCP) is National Security Advisor (NSA) Ajit Doval. © Clat Possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Rice Research
    ISSN 2319-3670 Journal of Rice Research Volume 13, No. 2 December 2020 Society for Advancement of Rice Research ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research (ICAR-IIRR) Rajendranagar Hyderabad – 500 030 (India), Phone No: 091 40 24591221, 24591216 Society for Advancement Fax: +9140 24591217, www.sarr.co.in of Rice Research Society For Advancement of Rice Research (Regd. No.2175/2004 of A.P. Society Regn. Act. 2001) Journal of Rice Research - Authors Guidelines Scope: Journal of Rice Research is a channel for publication of full length papers covering results of original research, invited critical The Society for Advancement of Rice Research is a registered society started with main objective of providing a platform for exchange of reviews or interpretative articles related to all areas of rice science, rice based crop systems and rice crop management. The journal also information and knowledge related to latest developments in rice research. publishes short communications, book reviews and letters to the editor. Aims and Objectives Articles reporting experimentation or research in any field involving rice or rice based cropping systems will be accepted as original articles Ÿ To advance the cause of rice research and development in the country. while critical reviews are generally invited. Short articles concerned with experimental techniques or observation of unique nature will be Ÿ To disseminate knowledge on latest developments in rice research through publications, seminars, lectures and training programmes. accepted as short communication. Letters to the editor concerning previous articles are welcome and are published subject to review and approval by the editorial board. The original authors will be invited to reply to the points raised in these letters for their response which are Ÿ To provide consultancy in rice production and development.
    [Show full text]