Feminism and Art: Unexpected Encounters Susan (Su) Ballard University of Wollongong, [email protected]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Feminism and Art: Unexpected Encounters Susan (Su) Ballard University of Wollongong, Sballard@Uow.Edu.Au University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts - Papers Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts 2015 Feminism and art: unexpected encounters Susan (Su) Ballard University of Wollongong, [email protected] Agnieszka Golda University of Wollongong, [email protected] Publication Details Ballard, S. and Golda, A. "Feminism and art: unexpected encounters." Australian Feminist Studies 30 .84 (2015): 199-210. Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Feminism and art: unexpected encounters Abstract Since the revolutions of the 1960s, feminism and art have created spaces for thinking and rethinking the links between gender and creativity. Art has been challenged both within and without the frame, as artists and feminists disrupt and complicate pre-established modes of production and representation. Keywords art, encounters, feminism, unexpected Disciplines Arts and Humanities | Law Publication Details Ballard, S. and Golda, A. "Feminism and art: unexpected encounters." Australian Feminist Studies 30 .84 (2015): 199-210. This journal article is available at Research Online: http://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers/2107 Australian Feminist Studies. Volume 30 Number 84 June 2015, pp.199-209. Feminism and Art: Unexpected Encounters Review Essay Susan Ballard and Agnieszka Golda [email protected] Books Reviewed: ● Susan Best, Visualizing Feeling: Affect and the Feminine Avant-garde, I. B. Tauris: London and New York, 2013. ● Katy Deepwell (ed.), Feminist Art Manifestos: An Anthology, KT Press: London, 2014. ● Eleanor Heartney, Helaine Posner, Nancy Princenthal and Sue Scott, The Reckoning: Women Artists of the New Millennium, Prestel: Munich, London, New York, 2013. ● Amelia Jones (ed.), The Feminism and Visual Culture Reader, (2nd edition) Routledge: New York and London, 2010. ● Helena Reckitt (ed.), Art and Feminism, (Abr Rev Up edition,) Peggy Phelan (survey) Phaidon Press: New York, 2012. The artworld has been transformed by feminists at the same time as feminists have been among its chief critics. (Reckitt, 2012, p.13) What we call feminism here is not a movement for increasing women's equality to men. What we call feminism is for all, not only for the biological female. (FAAB Tokyo in Deepwell, 2014, p.93) Since the revolutions of the 1960s, feminism and art have created spaces for thinking and rethinking the links between gender and creativity. Art has been challenged both within and without the frame, as artists and feminists disrupt and complicate pre-established modes of production and representation. Feminism in turn has been challenged by art that asks: what does a feminist subject look like? What does she read? Think? Feel? Make? Amidst the constant questioning some unexpected encounters occur: art made by women is not necessarily feminist art; patriarchal logics continue to dominate the ongoing boundaries of canon formation; and, it remains necessary to examine gender in all its potentialities. As Susan Best writes, it continues to be our job as feminist artists and art historians to address ‘the refraction of the question of the subject through the lens of gender’ (2013, p.143). Subsequently, this review asks: What do you feel when you encounter feminist art? And, who is art AND feminism for? We pursue these questions through five new or recently updated titles broadly collected under the heading of contemporary feminist art history and theory. In many ways the transformations of art and feminism have paralleled those of feminism more generally. In its online glossary of terms, the TATE Britain defines feminist art as “art by women artists made consciously in the light of developments in feminist art theory in the early 1970s” (2014). However, feminist art historian Whitney Chadwick reminds us that “Feminism’s success as a cultural force can be measured in the ways that artists – men and women – have embraced, challenged, and renegotiated its assumptions” (Heartney, Posner, Princenthal & Scott, 2013). Each of the books discussed here challenges a narrow model of feminism, locating their arguments not just amidst the familiar waves of feminism but in the mapping of broader genealogies of concern. A common beginning point for feminist art histories is statistical with processes of counting and accounting used to identify inconsistencies in representation. For example, Gemma Rolls-Bentley discovered that in 2012 not one female artist was represented in the top 100 auction sales in England.1 Representation then, becomes a focal point for questioning not just access but control of the means of production: who has the tools to represent, in what kinds of modes, through which kinds of means, and where? 1The Guardian, (2013) http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/the-womens-blog-with-jane- martinson/2013/may/24/women-art-great-artists-men The need to address specific equity issues is paralleled by exhibitions that present a visual challenge to art history. Yet, the sites of feminist power seem to replicate those of contemporary art more generally. For example, the Bad Girls exhibition at the New Museum New York, curated by Marcia Tucker in 1993, and the two major survey shows – Maura Reilly’s Global Feminisms, 2007 at the Brooklyn Museum, and Connie Butler and Linda Nochlin’s Wack! Art and the Feminist Revolution, 2007 at SF MOMA – all mark important moments of transformation in American feminist thought. However, these exhibitions do not easily translate into global and colonial contexts. In GOMA’s broadly inclusive Contemporary Australia: Women, 2012, Australian curators celebrated ‘the diversity, energy and innovation of contemporary women artists working in this country today’, while at pains to avoid the ‘f’ word. The five books reviewed here open up the two politics of art and feminism (with the emphasis placed on the conjunction and). Shared between all the books is a concern for new ways of thinking about art that can enable a historically informed and future focused understanding of feminism. Each suggests a specific context for particular art practices, while at the same time disciplinary boundaries in the visual arts are consciously dismantled. Finally, most of these titles (with various levels of success) make an attempt to challenge the Euro-American-centric dominance of thinking and writing about art. Two of the books discussed here are new editions of important texts originally published at the turn of the millennia. The second edition of The Feminism and Visual Culture Reader (2010), edited by Amelia Jones embraces the expanded fields of visual culture as defined by critical thinkers such as Stuart Hall and Mieke Bal. Initially visual culture was a method for reading art differently, highlighting ethics that do not discriminate by class or material and that emphasise the social, the bodily, and the cultural. Yet, as Jones explains in her introduction, ‘cultural studies has not always embraced or even acknowledged the theoretical or political pressures of feminism in its critical practices’ (Jones, 2010, p.4). The point of the second edition of the Reader is to counter this tendency. As the volume’s title encapsulates, ‘feminism’ is a theoretical foundation with equal weight rather than a subset of visual culture or cultural studies. Jones has completely restructured the 73 essays in this edition into seven parts to identify a transformative genealogy at the site of feminism and visual culture. This is much more than a temporal update. In particular, Jones takes into account the election of Barak Obama and the ‘global financial crisis’, which she rightly calls the ‘collapse of a global capitalist economy’ (Jones, 2010, p.1). Jones argues these two events have changed everything. In this context, she says, we must rethink power, the body, and representation. The first section, ‘Provocations’, has six commissioned texts that situate feminist visual culture as a site of intersection with globalism, and identifications of race, class, gender and ethnicity. The next section, ‘Representation’, leads off with John Berger’s Ways of Seeing reminding us of its original televised audience2 who reeled with shock at the binary of “men look, women appear.” The other authors here make up a significant reader in their own right, and it is exciting to see Laura Mulvey, bell hooks, Elizabeth Grosz and Laura U. Marks in such close proximity. ‘Differences’ moves toward both the intercultural and the transsexual, with Trinh T. Minh-ha’s challenge to ‘authenticity’ as aligned with concepts of first and third world ethnographic subjects, alongside Sandy Stone’s posttransexual manifesto. ‘Histories’ includes both Mira Schor’s groundbreaking ‘patrilineage’ essay and Catriona Moore’s curatorial essay employing Kristeva’s critique of the semiotics of masculine time. The ‘Readings/Interventions’ section steps into the difficult territories of self, body, colour and violence, and again includes major Australian contributions such as Jill Bennett’s challenging work on trauma. ‘Bodies’ places Judith Butler’s speech act ‘performativity’ alongside Rebecca Schneider’s study of the performing body. The difference between the two essays has always challenged readers to come to grips first with performance as an action and then as an act and it is interesting to see them here together. The final section, ‘Technologies’, leads off with Haraway’s ‘Cyborg Manifesto’, which for those of us who were studying as undergraduates when it first came out, transfixed us and transformed everything from that moment on. Jones does not just present a substantial reader in visual culture, but makes accessible a rich resource of key feminist texts. It is exciting to now see more Australian voices woven throughout this historiography of feminist thought in and of the visual. 2 Ways of Seeing began as a 1972 BBC four-part television series created by Berger with producer Mike Dibb. However, the decision to exclude “the French Feminists” from the second edition is a strange one, as it indicates a decision based on geography and language.
Recommended publications
  • Dear Sister Artist: Activating Feminist Art Letters and Ephemera in the Archive
    Article Dear Sister Artist: Activating Feminist Art Letters and Ephemera in the Archive Kathy Carbone ABSTRACT The 1970s Feminist Art movement continues to serve as fertile ground for contemporary feminist inquiry, knowledge sharing, and art practice. The CalArts Feminist Art Program (1971–1975) played an influential role in this movement and today, traces of the Feminist Art Program reside in the CalArts Institute Archives’ Feminist Art Materials Collection. Through a series of short interrelated archives stories, this paper explores some of the ways in which women responded to and engaged the Collection, especially a series of letters, for feminist projects at CalArts and the Women’s Art Library at Goldsmiths, University of London over the period of one year (2017–2018). The paper contemplates the archive as a conduit and locus for current day feminist identifications, meaning- making, exchange, and resistance and argues that activating and sharing—caring for—the archive’s feminist art histories is a crucial thing to be done: it is feminism-in-action that not only keeps this work on the table but it can also give strength and definition to being a feminist and an artist. Carbone, Kathy. “Dear Sister Artist,” in “Radical Empathy in Archival Practice,” eds. Elvia Arroyo- Ramirez, Jasmine Jones, Shannon O’Neill, and Holly Smith. Special issue, Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies 3. ISSN: 2572-1364 INTRODUCTION The 1970s Feminist Art movement continues to serve as fertile ground for contemporary feminist inquiry, knowledge sharing, and art practice. The California Institute of the Arts (CalArts) Feminist Art Program, which ran from 1971 through 1975, played an influential role in this movement and today, traces and remains of this pioneering program reside in the CalArts Institute Archives’ Feminist Art Materials Collection (henceforth the “Collection”).
    [Show full text]
  • “My Personal Is Not Political?” a Dialogue on Art, Feminism and Pedagogy
    Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies Vol. 5, No. 2, July 2009 “My Personal Is Not Political?” A Dialogue on Art, Feminism and Pedagogy Irina Aristarkhova and Faith Wilding This is a dialogue between two scholars who discuss art, feminism, and pedagogy. While Irina Aristarkhova proposes “active distancing” and “strategic withdrawal of personal politics” as two performative strategies to deal with various stereotypes of women's art among students, Faith Wilding responds with an overview of art school’s curricular within a wider context of Feminist Art Movement and the radical questioning of art and pedagogy that the movement represents Using a concrete situation of teaching a women’s art class within an art school environment, this dialogue between Faith Wilding and Irina Aristakhova analyzes the challenges that such teaching represents within a wider cultural and historical context of women, art, and feminist performance pedagogy. Faith Wilding has been a prominent figure in the feminist art movement from the early 1970s, as a member of the California Arts Institute’s Feminist Art Program, Womanhouse, and in the recent decade, a member of the SubRosa, a cyberfeminist art collective. Irina Aristarkhova, is coming from a different history to this conversation: generationally, politically and theoretically, she faces her position as being an outsider to these mostly North American and, to a lesser extent, Western European developments. The authors see their on-going dialogue of different experiences and ideas within feminism(s) as an opportunity to share strategies and knowledges towards a common goal of sustaining heterogeneity in a pedagogical setting. First, this conversation focuses on the performance of feminist pedagogy in relation to women’s art.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Schedule Feminist
    Art 305 Women in Art/ WGS 488 Senior Sem. Covid Dr. Christine Filippone Email: [email protected] (Please do not reply to emails I send you through D2L. I may not receive them.) T/Th. 2:25-3:40, W. 12:55-3:00 and 4:15-4:40 Advising link: https://millersville.zoom.us/j/3146969526 Link to Register for the course to receive your Zoom meeting link: Lectures: T/Th 305.01: 1:10-2:25: Zoom: https://millersville.zoom.us/meeting/register/tJcvcOmvrT8vH9KvqTrT6RT1_fnZ M8d-M2wl Lectures: T/Th 305.02: 3:40-4:55 p.m. Zoom: https://millersville.zoom.us/meeting/register/tJIucuugpjstE9Ttjfu2ujfGpJYL6Ir6r SAk Lecture Power Points are available on Desire2Learn. The syllabus, detailed description of the paper, and readings are also posted to Desire2Learn. *Every class is recorded Course Description This course will address the relationships between gender and the visual arts, with an emphasis on art and culture since World War II. This class explores the role of the visual in constructing ideas of “woman” and how women artists have addressed these constructions in their works and in their lives. Students will critically examine the ways Western culture has defined art and artists in gendered terms and will extend this study to contemporary art practice with attention to intersectionality and difference. Through weekly readings, class discussions, written assignments, and oral presentations, students will consider how gender is relevant to the creation and study of art and culture. Important to this course are the relationships between art and critical/literary theory, including feminism (obviously), Marxism, psychoanalysis, post-modernism, and theories of race and gender, all of which radically altered the perception as well as practice of art over the past century and a half.
    [Show full text]
  • Fluxus: the Is Gnificant Role of Female Artists Megan Butcher
    Pace University DigitalCommons@Pace Honors College Theses Pforzheimer Honors College Summer 7-2018 Fluxus: The iS gnificant Role of Female Artists Megan Butcher Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/honorscollege_theses Part of the Contemporary Art Commons, and the Other History Commons Recommended Citation Butcher, Megan, "Fluxus: The iS gnificant Role of Female Artists" (2018). Honors College Theses. 178. https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/honorscollege_theses/178 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Pforzheimer Honors College at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract The Fluxus movement of the 1960s and early 1970s laid the groundwork for future female artists and performance art as a medium. However, throughout my research, I have found that while there is evidence that female artists played an important role in this art movement, they were often not written about or credited for their contributions. Literature on the subject is also quite limited. Many books and journals only mention the more prominent female artists of Fluxus, leaving the lesser-known female artists difficult to research. The lack of scholarly discussion has led to the inaccurate documentation of the development of Fluxus art and how it influenced later movements. Additionally, the absence of research suggests that female artists’ work was less important and, consequently, keeps their efforts and achievements unknown. It can be demonstrated that works of art created by little-known female artists later influenced more prominent artists, but the original works have gone unacknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Studies > Reclaiming Histories: Betye and Alison Saar, Feminism, and the Representation of Black Womanhood
    Reclaiming Histories: Betye and Alison Saar, Feminism, and the Representation of Black Womanhood Jessica Dallow The feminist movement has given me more professional exposure. But I resist that now, just like I resist exhibiting in African Amer- ican artists' shows. I've always worked the same way, and haven't done anything I would consider "feminist art." –Betye Saar Yes, I am a feminist. I was involved with the Women's Space [Womanspace] here in Los Angeles. Feminism for me implies more like humanism, just accepting yourself and knowing that it's okay to be the way you are. For me the ultimate goal is to be a whole person and to accept the outcome. –Betye Saar People aren't really ready to deal with fierce female passion. –Alison Saar Betye Saar considers herself a feminist; however she resists designating her artwork as such. Similarly, Alison Saar, Betye's daughter, avoids labeling her own art as feminist.1 Yet, both artists have helped to shape a feminist consciousness in the arts since the early 1970s through their probing constructions of autobiography, self-identity, family, and the fe- male body: a consciousness circulating around the historical develop- ment of the African American female nude. Betye's early ideas of spiritu- ality and ethnicity, shaped in the early 1970s, have germinated within her daughter, evidenced by Alison's bust- and full-length nude, non- white female figures of the 1980s and 1990s. The Saars' intergenera- tional explorations of race, history, and the black female body represent a crucial step to reclaim the contentious history surrounding the visual representation of African American women.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Is Feminism in Cyberfeminism? Faith Wilding The
    Where is Feminism in Cyberfeminism? Faith Wilding The First Cyberfeminist International took place in Kassel, Germany, September 20-28, l997, as part of the Hybrid Workspace at Documenta X. After eight days of intense daily life and work with over 30 participants at this event, Faith Wilding reflects on the significance of these discussions and their implications both for the attempts to define, and the arguments against defining, cyberfeminism. While these and subsequent on-line discussions, especially through the FACES list, provide a browser through which possible practices of a cyberfeminist movement become visible, what concerns her is how such a politics might be translated into practice for an engaged (cyber)feminist politics on the Net. Against Definition The question of how to define cyberfeminism is at the heart of the often contradictory contemporary positions of women working with new technologies and feminist politics. Sadie Plant’s position on cyberfeminism, for example, has been identified as “an absolutely post- human insurrection - the revolt of an emergent system which includes women and computers, against the world view and material reality of a patriarchy which still seeks to subdue them. This is an alliance of the goods against their masters, an alliance of women and machines” (1). This utopian vision of revolt and merger between woman and machine is also evident in VNS Matrix s Cyberfeminist Manifesto for the 21st Century: “ we are the virus of the new world disorder/rupturing the symbolic from within/saboteurs of
    [Show full text]
  • Queerly Made: Harmony Hammond's Floorpieces
    The Journal of Modern Craft Queerly Made: Volume 2—Issue 1 Harmony Hammond’s March 2009 pp. 59–80 Floorpieces DOI 10.2752/174967809X416279 Julia Bryan-Wilson Reprints available directly from the publishers Photocopying permitted by Julia Bryan-Wilson is Assistant Professor of Contemporary licence only Art in the Department of Art History and Director of the © Berg 2009 Ph.D. program in Visual Studies at the University of California, Irvine. She is also a curator and critic, and her writing has appeared in The Art Bulletin, Artforum, Bookforum, Frieze, and Oxford Art Journal. Her book Art Workers: Radical Practice in the Vietnam War Era will be published in 2009 by the University of California Press. This article draws upon her recent research in feminist and queer craft since 1970. Abstract In 1973, the artist Harmony Hammond made a series of artworks entitled Floorpieces. Based on traditional rag-rug techniques, these braided fabric pieces were selectively painted and then placed, like rugs, directly on the ground. The making of the Floorpieces coincided with Hammond coming out, and their spiraling, braided form is suggestive of both lesbian erotics and traditions of women’s handicraft. Hammond’s work challenges many of the binary oppositions that continue to structure conversations of craft—high/low, masculine/feminine, functional/decorative. This article argues that Hammond’s destruction of binaries activates a queer space, and that her handmade abstractions open up possible directions for a productive queering of the category of craft that is attentive to sexuality and class. Keywords: Harmony Hammond, craft, queer theory, feminism, class, lesbian art.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecofeminist Lens
    The Ecofeminist Lens: Nature, Technology & the Female Body in Lens-based Art Nikki Zoë Omes Nikki Zoë Omes S2103605 Master’s Thesis Faculty of Humanities, Leiden University MA Media Studies, Film & Photographic Studies Supervisor: Helen Westgeest Second Reader: Eliza Steinbock 14 August 2019 21,213 words Contact: [email protected] ​ Cover page collage created by writer. 1 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Chapter 1: Photographic Transitions in Representing the Human-Nature Relation 10 ​ ​ 1.1. From Documentary to Conceptual: Ana Mendieta’s Land Art 11 1.2. From Painterly to Photographic: The Female Nude in Nature 17 Chapter 2: The Expanding Moving Image of the Female Body in Nature 27 ​ ​ 2.1. From Outside to Inside: Ana Mendieta’s Films in the Museum 28 2.2. From Temporal to Spatial: Pipilotti Rist’s Pixel Forest as Media Ecology 35 Chapter 3: An Affective Turn Towards the Non-human/Female Body 42 ​ ​ 3.1. From Passive Spectator to Active Material: The Female Corporeal Experience 43 3.2. From Iconic to Immanent: The Goddess in Movement 49 Conclusion 59 Works Cited 61 Illustrations 68 2 Introduction I decided that for the images to have magic qualities I had to work directly with nature. I had to go to the source of life, to mother earth (Mendieta 70). Ana Mendieta (1948-1985) was a multimedia artist whose oeuvre sparked my interest into ​ researching the intersection between lens-based art and ecofeminism.1 Mendieta called her interventions with the land “earth-body works,” which defy categorization and instead live on within several discourses such as performance art, conceptual art, photography and film.
    [Show full text]
  • Activists Who Yearn for Art That Transforms: Parallels in the Black
    Activists Who Yearn for Art That Transforms: Parallels in the Black Arts and Feminist Art Movements in the United States Author(s): Lisa Gail Collins Source: Signs, Vol. 31, No. 3, New Feminist Theories of Visual Culture (Spring 2006), pp. 717-752 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/498991 Accessed: 12-04-2016 03:30 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Signs This content downloaded from 134.139.46.24 on Tue, 12 Apr 2016 03:30:04 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Lisa Gail Collins Activists Who Yearn for Art That Transforms: Parallels in the Black Arts and Feminist Art Movements in the United States What we got to do is to dig into this thing that tugs at our souls—this blue yearning to make a way of our own. Black people you are Black art. —Larry Neal (1969, 58) I wanted to wed my skills to my real ideas and to aspire to the making of art that could clearly reveal my values and point of view as a woman.
    [Show full text]
  • Senga Nengudi's Art Within and Without Feminism, Postminimalism
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works School of Arts & Sciences Theses Hunter College Spring 5-13-2020 Beyond Movements: Senga Nengudi’s Art Within and Without Feminism, Postminimalism, and the Black Arts Movement Tess Thackara CUNY Hunter College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/hc_sas_etds/605 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Beyond Movements: Senga Nengudi’s Art Within and Without Feminism, Postminimalism, and the Black Arts Movement by Tess Thackara Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Art History, Hunter College The City University of New York 2020 Thesis Sponsor: May 4, 2020 Dr. Howard Singerman _____________ ______________________ Date Signature May 4, 2020 Dr. Lynda Klich _____________ ______________________ Date Signature Table of Contents List of Illustrations……………………………………………………………………………....ii Introduction……………………………………………………………………….......................1 Chapter 1: “Black Fingerprints and the Fragrance of a Woman”: Senga Nengudi and Feminism………………………………………………………………………………………..12 Chapter 2: Toward Her Own Total Theater: Senga Nengudi and Postminimalism…………….31 Chapter 3: Ritual and Transformation: Senga Nengudi and the Black Arts Movement……………………………………………………………………………………….49 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………………64 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………………….68 Illustrations……………………………………………………………………………………...72 i List of Illustrations Fig. 1: Senga Nengudi, ACQ series (install view), 2016–7, refrigerator and air conditioner parts, fan, nylon pantyhose, and sand. © Senga Nengudi. Courtesy of the artist, Lévy Gorvy, Thomas Erben Gallery, and Sprüth Magers. Fig. 2: Senga Nengudi, ACQ I, 2016–7, refrigerator and air conditioner parts, fan, nylon pantyhose, and sand.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Essentialism in Ana Mendieta's "La Maja De Yerba"
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Art and Design Theses Ernest G. Welch School of Art and Design Spring 5-13-2011 Beyond Self: Strategic Essentialism in Ana Mendieta's "La Maja de Yerba" Michelle L. Hudson Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/art_design_theses Recommended Citation Hudson, Michelle L., "Beyond Self: Strategic Essentialism in Ana Mendieta's "La Maja de Yerba"." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2011. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/art_design_theses/72 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Ernest G. Welch School of Art and Design at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Art and Design Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BEYOND SELF: STRATEGIC ESSENTIALISM IN ANA MENDIETA‟S LA MAJA DE YERBA by MICHELLE HUDSON Under the Direction of Susan Richmond ABSTRACT Artist Ana Mendieta frequently conjoined the female body with nature to express her search for personal identity and support for feminist topics. Her last intended and least scholarly examined work, La Maja de Yerba (Grass Goddess), continues specific visual and thematic elements of her previous Silueta Series (Silhouette) yet also presents an aesthetically unique creation. Despite its incompletion as a result of her premature death, the preserved maquette directly stipulates a female form to be planted in grass on the Bard College campus grounds. This alignment of women and nature garners criticism for its reliance on universalism and categorizations of women‟s experiences; however, Mendieta‟s use of essentialism in public art contributes to circulating feminist discourse to a wider audience.
    [Show full text]
  • Judy Chicago: Visions for Feminist Art Francesca Debiaso Gettysburg College
    Student Publications Student Scholarship Spring 2012 Judy Chicago: Visions for Feminist Art Francesca DeBiaso Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship Part of the American Art and Architecture Commons, and the Contemporary Art Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. DeBiaso, Francesca, "Judy Chicago: Visions for Feminist Art" (2012). Student Publications. 6. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/6 This is the author's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/ 6 This open access student research paper is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Judy Chicago: Visions for Feminist Art Abstract Controversy, awe, and revelation distinguish Judy Chicago's now 40 year career in the art world. Chicago's large body of work is inseparable from her ideologies pertaining to women's crippling exclusion from male dominated disciplines within art, history, and society overall. Her work is characterized by a desire to establish feminine iconography ("central-core imagery") and create a feminist lexicon applicable to the arts as to validate and celebrate women's experience. Viewing her artwork as a tool for social change and dialogue, Chicago has incorporated collaboration and consciousness-raising into her art making process. Thus, her collaborators gain not only the participation of creating the works, but also share in the cultivation of a female (art) history.
    [Show full text]