DOCSLIB.ORG

OHAAKI = a POINTER to the FUTURE Johnw

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OHAAKI = a POINTER to the FUTURE Johnw Pmc. 1Ith New Zealand Geothermal Workshop 1989 OHAAKI = A POINTER TO THE FUTURE JohnW. Malcolmson Eiectricorp Production, Eiectridty Corporation of New Zealand Ltd ABSTRACT But the Minister's statement to Parliament in 1947 This paper briefly outlines the history of the really marks the beginning of the geothermal power development of the Ohaaki geothermal field and story. Conventional steam plant was virtually discusses some of the more recent legislative and damned for anything but standby purposes on the environmental issues that would now have to be grounds of high capital cost, long delivery and taken into account if a similar power station were cost and availability of fuel. Imported oil, even built today. These legislative and environmental then, was considered prohibitively expensive, and issues will make it more difficult to build future New Zealand Coal was seen as a very limited geothermal power stations in New Zealand. There resource. But the statement contains these are also a number of design concepts that may be significant words: approached differently If the project were comnenced today. These are briefly outlined and "There is one possibility which must not be discussed. overlooked and that i s the use of natural steam for power generation. It is proposed to investigate this matter without delay..." INTRODUCTION From that time on geothermal development was a reality. The DSIR began on the trail which made Electricorp will never build another Ohaaki! New Zealand the world leader in the investigation and application of geothermal power. By 1950 During this address I will cover the reasons why investigation had concentrated along a three and a Electricorp will never build another Ohaaki. half mile line running east west near the areas of However, before I do so I want to briefly describe natural activity at Wairakei. The Public Works the history of the development of Ohaaki and Department had six dri11ing rigs in operation. outline some of the aspects that we w i l l have to Steam was already being encountered although the take into account for future developments. light rigs were limited to a depth of about 150 metres. By 1952 two bigger drilling rigs were WHAT LED TO OHAAKI? brought i n and two bores were put down to a depth of 1200 metres. 20 MW of generation was already Ohaaki is the latest chapter in a story which had thought to ba justified and the Minister was its beginnings shortly after the Second World War. expressing "the utmost confidence' in geothermal It is worth casting our minds back to the vastly steam as a significant power source. From then different situation in New Zealand at that time on, driven by a dedicated and enthusiastic when compared with the present i n respect o? partnership of DSIR and the Ministry of Works, electricity generation and demand. Wairakei went from strength to strength. Overseas consultants were appointed, and an initial 40 HW I n 1946 the State Hydro-electric Department, i n development was approved, in conjunction with a its first year of independent existence, already heavy water distillation plant for the UK Atomic faced a chronic power shortage i n the North Energy Authority. In 1956 the heavy water plant Island, with the prospect of 10 percent annual was cancelled and the station output increased to demand growth into the foreseeable future. 69 MW. In parallel with this a coal fired station was in hand at Mercer (Meremere) and with I Water power had, up to then, been the o.nly increasing optimism about Wairakei s future technology considered appropriate and the potential the power planners were beginning to see remaining North Island resource was seen as the light at the end of the tunnel. The merit order Waikato River upstream of Karapiro. This demanded of alternative generation was at that time: a daunting rate of development at a stage when Kaitawa (Waikaremoana) and Karapiso were sti11 'Existing hydro 0.23 pencelkwh under construction. New hydro 0.50 pencelkwh Geotherma1 0.40 pence1kWh Steam 0.75 pence1kWh A few small fuel burning thermal plants were in Coal cost fifty two shillings and sixpence Per ton service. The only two of any significance were Kings Wharf and' Evans Bay but it is of Interest to recall that there was a steam station at Huntly But geothermal generation had some quite which merited a mention i n the General Manager's determined opposition in some quarters. The then Report to the Minister for the year ended 31 March Chief Engineer of the State Hydro Department, 1947. This station had run over the evening peak M G Latta, had published a paper in 1950 on future period for five days a week from June to November power supply to the North Island which had put 1946 forward the possibility of an inter-island link. The proposal was widely criticised at the time as impracticable. Cook Strait was seen as a fearsome stretch of sea with a bottom composed of precipices and canyons. Nevertheless its proponents persisted and i n 1957, backed by overseas experience, the relatively new Combined Comnittee on the NZ Electric Power Supply made a John W Malcolmson strong recomnendation to Government that the resource. Until this question of resource practicality and cost of installing submarine ownership i s resolved no developer i s going to cables across Cook strait be properly venture into an investment over which there i s no investigated. security. The rivalry between the supporters of geothermal Resolution of this question may take some time as power on the one hand and the inter-island link on the Tribunal now has a large backlog of claims to the other was exacerbated by the decision to hear. proceed with a further 53 MU of power at Wairakei and defer by one year the investigation of the DC Present legislation relating to resource use is 1ink. also overshadowed by the Resource Management Law Reform Review and, at the time of writing, the With hindsight the rivalry was unnecessary. The next public part of this process is the country needed both and both were eventually introduction of a Bill into Parliament. However built. Wairakei started generating in 1958 and by an emphasis of the new legislation is likely to be 1963 was developed to its final stage. Its on sustainability of resources. There is also progress and development has been well documented likely to be an emphasis on integrated consents by others, through its peak generation of 169 MU and a regional a1location of resources. down to a plateau of around 145 MU which has been maintained by various field developments to the The question as to who manages the resource must present day. Its record of load factor and be sorted out and it is hoped that this will be availability is impressive, both having remained achieved by this review. The conflict of the not far from 90 percent over long periods. resource allocation responsibilities between the jurisdiction of the Geothermal Energy Act 1953 and It is easy now to criticise the euphoria which in the Water and Soil Conservation Act 1967 needs to the middle to late 1950s led to over-estimating be resolved. the potential of the Wairakei field. But other fields were already being studied. In the early The Corporation is generally supportive uf the 1960s a consultant's report was obtained on a Resource Management Law Reform proposals to possible further geothermal power station at administer geothermal energy resources in the same Te Mihi, west of Uairakei. Although fears of manner as for water resource management. We can adverse effects on Wairakei resulted in this see no reason for additional geothermal licensing project being set aside, it is of interest that as this can be covered under the normal industrial steam fan new wells In the Te Mihi area are now safety legislation. making an increasing contribution to Wairakei. However, a more promising prospect was under study The Crown need no longer play a role as a at- Broadlands to the north. Drilling comnenced geothermal developer and should fulfil only its there in 1965 and by 1970 18 wells had been sunk, roles of policy development, natlonal interest and and the power potential was assessed as 120 MW. oversight and safety inspection. Also with the likely move to a regional allocation of resources, Further field investigations, in particular field most functions can be fully undertaken by the new draw down tests carried out by the Ministry of Regional Councils. Works and Development to determine basellne parameters and engineering studies, continued on a Additlonally, while accepting that ownership of stop-start basis as a response to changing the resource should control access, multiple or electricity demand forecasts, comQeting claims on large scale uses of one geothermal resource are natural gas resources, coal extraction problems not seen as appropriate If sustainable resource and the o i l crises. use is to be achieved without over regulation. More than any other policy or circumstance, thOs It was not until 1982 that Government finally gave will lead to exploitation and degradation of the approval for work to proceed on the design and field to the extent where no one wins on that construction of New Zealand's second geothermal field. power station. This has already become a problem with the recent OTHER GEOTHERMAL FIELDS splitting of the Wairakei field between two major users. The Corporation's assets have been clearly Over the years a number of other geothermal fields devalued by the decision to re-allocate same of have been studied for their electricity generation the geothermal resource to another user.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Waikato District Council
    WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Report and Decisions of the Waikato District Plan Hearings Panel REPORT 2 Ohinewai Rezoning 24 May 2021 Commissioners Dr Phil Mitchell (Chair) Mr Paul Cooney (Deputy Chair) Mr Dynes Fulton Mr Weo Maag Page | 1 Decision Report 2: Ohinewai Rezoning Report and Decisions of the Waikato District Plan Hearings Panel Page | 2 Decision Report 2: Ohinewai Rezoning Report and Decisions of the Waikato District Plan Hearings Panel TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 5 2 The APL submission ...................................................................................................................... 9 3 Statutory and planning framework ............................................................................................ 15 4 Site suitability and physical characteristics ............................................................................... 18 5 Three Waters Infrastructure ...................................................................................................... 20 6 Natural hazards ........................................................................................................................... 24 7 Transport and traffic ................................................................................................................... 26 8 Economic effects .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary
    2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Prepared for Waikato River Authority March 2016 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Prepared by: Bruce Williamson (Diffuse Sources) John Quinn (NIWA) Erica Williams (NIWA) Cheri van Schravendijk-Goodman (WRRT) For any information regarding this report please contact: National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd PO Box 11115 Hamilton 3251 Phone +64 7 856 7026 NIWA CLIENT REPORT No: HAM2016-011 Report date: March 2016 NIWA Project: WRA14203 Quality Assurance Statement Reviewed by: Dr Bob Wilcock Formatting checked by: Alison Bartley Approved for release by: Bryce Cooper Photo: Waikato River at Wellington Street Beach, Hamilton. [John Quinn, NIWA] 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Contents Summary ............................................................................................................................ 9 Reflections from the Project Team ..................................................................................... 12 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 18 1.1 Report Cards ........................................................................................................... 18 1.2 2015 Pilot Waikato River Report Cards .................................................................. 20 1.3 Purpose of this Technical Summary .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geothermal Power Development in New Zealand - Lessons for Japan
    Geothermal Power Development in New Zealand - Lessons for Japan - Research Report Emi Mizuno, Ph.D. Senior Researcher Japan Renewable Energy Foundation February 2013 Geothermal Power Development in New Zealand – Lessons for Japan 2-18-3 Higashi-shimbashi Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 105-0021 Phone: +81-3-6895-1020, FAX: +81-3-6895-1021 http://jref.or.jp An opinion shown in this report is an opinion of the person in charge and is not necessarily agreeing with the opinion of the Japan Renewable Energy Foundation. Copyright ©2013 Japan Renewable Energy Foundation．All rights reserved. The copyright of this report belongs to the Japan Renewable Energy Foundation. An unauthorized duplication, reproduction, and diversion are prohibited in any purpose regardless of electronic or mechanical method. 1 Copyright ©2013 Japan Renewable Energy Foundation．All rights reserved. Geothermal Power Development in New Zealand – Lessons for Japan Table of Contents Acknowledgements 4 Executive Summary 5 1. Introduction 8 2. Geothermal Resources and Geothermal Power Development in New Zealand 9 1) Geothermal Resources in New Zealand 9 2) Geothermal Power Generation in New Zealand 11 3) Section Summary 12 3. Policy and Institutional Framework for Geothermal Development in New Zealand 13 1) National Framework for Geothermal Power Development 13 2) Regional Framework and Process 15 3) New National Resource Consent Framework and Process for Proposals of National Significance 18 4) Section Summary 21 4. Environmental Problems and Policy Approaches 22 1) Historical Environmental Issues in the Taupo Volcanic Zone 22 2) Policy Changes, Current Environmental and Management Issues, and Policy Approaches 23 3) Section Summary 32 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Modelling of Wairakei Geothermal Field
    ANZIAM J. 50(2009), 426–434 doi:10.1017/S1446181109000212 MATHEMATICAL MODELLING OF WAIRAKEI GEOTHERMAL FIELD MALCOLM A. GRANT1 (Received 1 November, 2008; revised 22 April, 2009) Abstract Mathematical modelling of Wairakei geothermal field is reviewed, both lumped- parameter and distributed-parameter models. In both cases it is found that reliable predictions require five to ten years of history for calibration. With such calibration distributed-parameter models are now used for field management. A prudent model of Wairakei, constructed without such historical data, would underestimate field capacity and provide only general projections of the type of changes in surface activity and subsidence. 2000 Mathematics subject classification: primary 86A99. Keywords and phrases: geothermal, reservoir modelling, Wairakei, review. 1. Introduction Wairakei geothermal field is located in the North Island of New Zealand, in the Taupo Volcanic Zone. In the late 1940s there was one geothermal field developed for electrical generation in the world, Laraderello in Italy. This example, and a looming electricity shortage, led to the decision to develop Wairakei for power generation. The first drilling showed a field markedly different from Larderello, as it was full of hot water rather than the expected steam. The subsequent development had a large element of exploration, and there was a significant scientific effort to understand the physical nature of the field. The power station was built by 1958, but research continued thereafter, and to the present day. Part of this effort was mathematical modelling. As pressures drew down with exploitation, it was discovered that the drawdown at depth was extremely uniform across the entire field, so that a single pressure history described this drawdown.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy - Industry Status Report (Year Ending March 2006)
    Prepared for The Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority Renewable Energy - Industry Status Report (year ending March 2006) By East Harbour Management Services EAST HARBOUR MANAGEMENT SERVICES P O BOX 11 595 WELLINGTON Tel: 64 4 385 3398 Fax: 64 4 385 3397 www.eastharbour.co.nz www.energyinfonz.com June 2006 East Harbour Project # EH243 Field Code Changed - Third Edition This study has been commissioned by the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority (EECA). EECA welcome any feedback this report. For further information contact: EECA Phone 04 470 2200 PO Box 388 Wellington New Zealand http://www.eeca.govt.nz/ [email protected] EECA disclaimer: ―It will be noted that the authorship of this document has been attributed to a number of individuals and organisations involved in its production. While all sections have been subject to review and final editing, the opinions expressed remain those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority. Recommendations need to be interpreted with care and judgement.‖ Notes: 1. The report focuses on useable energy at source from renewable energy resources, because this is what is pragmatically measurable. Hydro, wave, tidal and wind useable energy is measured as direct output from the electricity generator. Solar primary energy is measured as direct output from the collector. Geothermal primary energy is measured at the well head. Bioenergy is measured as direct output from the heat plant. Solar space heating is not measured. 2. To allow comparison with other studies the following methodologies are followed: Electricity Primary energy for electricity generation (excluding PV) is useable energy at source plus generator losses.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercer Airport – Submitter #921 – Hearing Highlights Package
    Mercer Airport – Submitter #921 – Hearing Highlights Package Chris Dawson - Planning 1.1 The correct approach under the RMA is to determine what district plan provisions (or zone) most appropriately assist Waikato District Council to carry out its functions to achieve the purpose of the Act. The critical evaluation is set out in s32 of the Act which determines determine the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed provisions in achieving the objectives of the Proposed Waikato District Plan (PDP). 1.2 Mercer Airport requires a special zone to recognise that it is already a regionally significant aviation resource and should be formally protected in the District Plan as such. The rezoning, plus Obstacle Limitation Surfaces1 and Air Noise Boundary2 provisions are required to protect that facility and provide it with the operational certainty to grow over time in the future. 1.3 The most appropriate time to provide the statutory protection for the airport and the surrounding community is now before the Mercer area gets more developed than it already is. The implementation of a Special Zone for Mercer Airport is essential to ensure that the Proposed Waikato District Plan is consistent with the relevant higher order documents, specifically the Operative Waikato Regional Policy Statement Policy 6.3 and Method 6.3.1. 1.4 The policy direction of the Rural Zone is a relevant consideration under s32 of the Act, and Lens 2 of the s42A Framework report because that zone informs the existing environment and will continue to be applied over the
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Early History of Wairakei
    Proceedings 20th Geothermal Workshop 1998 NOTES ON THE EARLY HISTORY OF WAIRAKEI R.S. 11Fiesta Grove, Raumati Beach, New Zealand SUMMARY These notes outline the major circumstancesand events influencing the decision to investigate the resources of New Zealand, together with problems faced in the early days of the development of They cover the period fiom 1918when the first suggestion for the investigationof the resource appeareduntil early 1953when Wairakei's development began in earnest. 1. INTRODUCTION would be more economical than the further use of water." 1924) 1.1. Early Interest in the Resource Eighty years ago, on 2 February, 1918, the Coincidentally, in 1925, a 250 generator was Masterton Chamber of Commerce requested the operating at the Geysers. However, no further Minister of Public Works to enquire into the development was being carried out because of the utilization of thermal energy for industrial and competition hydro and natural gas. other purposes, pointing out that the Italians were 1980). In other words, although now generating electrical energy fiom thermal districts the intensively developed geothermal field and were using it for lighting, and in the world, the Geyser's early development was munitions manufacture with great success. inhibited for much the same reasons as was New 1918). However, another four decades passed Zealand's. before New Zealand could say with some truth that it was using electricity fiom thermal The literature from this period is district "with great success". sparse, but one publication of significance is Geological Survey Bulletin 37. (Grange, 1937). Among a number of similar suggestions which This is the first detailed description of the geology appeared over the next two decades, perhaps the of the Zone and made an most unusual New Zealand's High important contribution to the subsequent Commissioner in London.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Overview - Pokeno & District
    WDC District Plan Review – Built Heritage Assessment Historic Overview - Pokeno & District Pokeno The fertile valley floor in the vicinity of Pokeno has most likely been occupied by Maori since the earliest days of their settlement of Aotearoa. Pokeno is geographically close to the Tamaki isthmus, the lower Waikato River and the Hauraki Plains, all areas densely occupied by Maori in pre-European times. Traditionally, iwi of Waikato have claimed ownership of the area. Prior to and following 1840, that iwi was Ngati Tamaoho, including the hapu of Te Akitai and Te Uri-a-Tapa. The town’s name derives from the Maori village of Pokino located north of the present town centre, which ceased to exist on the eve of General Cameron’s invasion of the Waikato in July 1863. In the early 1820s the area was repeatedly swept by Nga Puhi war parties under Hongi Hika, the first of several forces to move through the area during the inter-tribal wars of the 1820s and 1830s. It is likely that the hapu of Pokeno joined Ngati Tamaoho war parties that travelled north to attack Nga Puhi and other tribes.1 In 1822 Hongi Hika and a force of around 3000 warriors, many armed with muskets, made an epic journey south from the Bay of Islands into the Waikato. The journey involved the portage of large war waka across the Tamaki isthmus and between the Waiuku River and the headwaters of the Awaroa and hence into the Waikato River west of Pokeno. It is likely warriors from the Pokeno area were among Waikato people who felled large trees across the Awaroa River to slow Hika’s progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Waikato District Plan Review Archaeological Heritage Project Phase V
    Waikato District Plan Review Archaeological Heritage Project Phase V Dr Alexy Simmons Simmons & Associates Ltd. November 2016 Executive Summary Waikato District Council is currently drafting a new District Plan and is required to recognise and provide for the protection of New Zealand's historic heritage under the Resource Management Act 1991. To accomplish this task a multi-phased WDC Archaeological Heritage Project was commissioned. The information included in this report relates to Phase V of the project. Phase V of the project entails the review and updating of ten archaeological sites that have been scheduled in the operative Waikato District Plan and the Franklin District Plan. The sites are reviewed using the Waikato Regional Council heritage criteria included in the Regional Policy Statement. The other task addressed in this Phase V report is the review of the three ‘Battlefield Viewshafts’ in Appendix C2 of the operative Waikato District Plan. 1 Simmons & Associates Ltd. November 2016 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 5 Background Information on the Archaeological Heritage Project .................................. 5 Definition of an Archaeological Site ................................................................................. 6 Purpose of Phase V ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pollution of the Aquatic Biosphere by Arsenic and Other Elements in the Taupo Volcanic Zone
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. ~.. University IVlassey Library . & Pacific Collection New Z eaI an d Pollution of the Aquatic Biosphere by Arsenic and other Elements in the Taupo Volcanic Zone A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology at Massey University Brett Harvey Robinson 1994 MASSEY UNIVERSITY 11111111111111111111111111111 1095010577 Massey University Library New Zealand & Pacific Collection Abstract An introduction to the Tau po Volcanic Zone and probable sources of polluting elements entering the aquatic environment is followed by a description of collection and treatment of samples used in this study. The construction of a hydride generation apparatus for use with an atomic absorption spectrophotometer for the determination of arsenic and other hydride forming elements is described. Flame emission, flame atomic absorption and inductively coupled plasma emission spectroscopy (I.C.P.-E.S.) were used for the determination of other elements. Determinations of arsenic and other elements were made on some geothermal waters of the area. It was found that these waters contribute large (relative to background levels) amounts of arsenic, boron and alkali metals to the aquatic environment. Some terrestrial vegetation surrounding hot pools at Lake Rotokawa and the Champagne Pool at Waiotapu was found to have high arsenic concentrations. Arsenic determinations made on the waters of the Waikato River and some lakes of the Taupo Volcanic Zone revealed that water from the Waikato River between Lake Aratiatia and Whakamaru as well as Lakes Rotokawa, Rotomahana and Rotoehu was above the World Health Organisation limit for arsenic in drinking water (0.05 µglmL) at the time of sampling.
    [Show full text]
  • Waikato River & Hydro Lakes
    Waikato River & Hydro Lakes Image Josh Willison E A S T E R N R1 E G I O N Waikato River Fishery The Waikato River flows out of Lake Taupō, through the central north island and Waikato regions before joining the sea south of Auckland at Port Waikato on the west coast. It is the longest river in NZ at about 425 km in length. A considerable length of the Waikato River flows within the Eastern Fish & Game region, and that portion also contains 5 hydro lakes. The Eastern region starts below Huka Falls near Taupō and ends just below Lake Maraetai. The river and its hydro lakes offer a huge amount of angling opportunity and many parts seldom see an angler. There are opportunities for trolling, fly and spin fishing, and bait fishing is also permitted on the Waikato River and its lakes. In summer when water temperatures rise excellent fishing can be had at the mouths of tributary streams where fish tend to congregate seeking cooler water conditions. As well as holding rainbow and brown trout the river and hydro lakes also contain other fish species in various areas including pest fish such as Rudd and carp and in some places catfish. If any of these species are caught anglers should kill them and dispose of them carefully and never transfer them to other waters. As the river and its lakes are used for hydro-power generation the water levels can fluctuate dramatically and without warning and due to this care is needed when on and around the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Te Mihi Power Station Contact Energy | Investor Day | 6 November 2018 6 November 20181 Disclaimer
    2018 Investor day Te Mihi Power Station Contact Energy | Investor day | 6 November 2018 6 November 20181 Disclaimer This presentation may contain projections or forward-looking statements regarding a variety of items. Such forward-looking statements are based upon current expectations and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those stated in any forward-looking statement based on a number of important factors and risks. Although management may indicate and believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate or incorrect and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the results contemplated in the forward-looking statements will be realised. EBITDAF, underlying profit, free cash flow and operating free cash flow are non-GAAP (generally accepted accounting practice) measures. Information regarding the usefulness, calculation and reconciliation of these measures is provided in the supporting material. Furthermore, while all reasonable care has been taken in compiling this presentation, Contact accepts no responsibility for any errors or omissions. This presentation does not constitute investment advice. Contact Energy | Investor day | 6 November 2018 2 Agenda 1 Wholesale James Kilty 2 Geothermal advantage Mike Dunstall 3 Geothermal options James Kilty 4 Closing remarks and Q&A Dennis Barnes Contact Energy | Investor day | 6 November 2018 3 Wholesale – James Kilty Contact Energy | Investor day| 6 November 2018 Wholesale James Kilty – Chief Generation and Development Officer 1 Environment and strategy 2 Organising for success 3 Wholesale market outlook Contact Energy | Investor day | 6 November 2018 5 About Contact * - All figures as at June 30 2018 Contact Energy | Investor day | 6 November 2018 6 Sustainability is business as usual Sustainability is about integrating diverse interests into our strategy to ensure long term People value creation.
    [Show full text]