DOCSLIB.ORG

DCR Watershed Protection Plan FY19-FY23 1 Chapter 1: Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DCR Watershed Protection Plan FY19-FY23 1 Chapter 1: Introduction Watershed Protection Plan FY19-FY23 June 2018 Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Division of Water Supply Protection Office of Watershed Management Abstract The Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Water Supply Protection, Office of Watershed Management manages and protects the drinking water supply watersheds that provide water for approximately 2.5 million Massachusetts residents. This Watershed System is comprised of three active water supply watersheds, the Quabbin Reservoir, Ware River, and Wachusett Reservoir, and an emergency supply comprised of the Sudbury and Foss Reservoirs. Watershed Protection Plans were initially developed for the active supply watersheds in 1991, with updates in 1998 and 2003 for the Wachusett Reservoir and 2000 for Quabbin Reservoir and Ware River. The Sudbury and Foss Reservoirs had a plan prepared in 1997. The 2008 Watershed Protection Plan updated and unified all of these documents. The 2013 Watershed Protection Plan update maintained the comprehensive, unified approach to this critical document. The Watershed Protection Plan FY19-FY23 continues DCR’s successful efforts of managing the source of an unfiltered water supply. This plan update provides a structured methodology to assess changes in watershed threats, develops programs to address the threats, and prioritizes staff assignments so they are congruent with current watershed management issues. The plan concludes with a five year implementation strategy that summarizes objectives for the Division of Water Supply Protection to achieve from Fiscal Years 2019 to 2023. CITATION Watershed Protection Plan Update FY19-FY23. Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Water Supply Protection. Boston, MA. 2018. Acknowledgements This plan was prepared by the staff of the Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Water Supply Protection, Office of Watershed Management. Principal authors are: Ken Canfield, Kelley Freda, Gabrielle Kurth, Lawrence Pistrang, and Joel Zimmerman. The plan was produced under the supervision of DCR/DWSP senior staff: John Scannell, Division Director; Dan Clark, Regional Director, Quabbin/Ware Region; Patricia Austin, Environmental Quality Chief and Acting Regional Director, Wachusett/Sudbury Region; and Lisa Gustavsen, Assistant Regional Director, Quabbin/Ware Region. ArcGIS Story of DWSP Accomplishments was coordinated by Patricia Austin. MWRA contributions and review by David Coppes, Stephen Estes-Smargiassi, and John Gregoire,. All maps were produced by DCR/DWSP Office of Watershed Management GIS staff Craig Fitzgerald, Phil Lamothe, and Erica Tefft, using DWSP and MassGIS data. Cover Images: “Quabbin Reflections” by Clif Read; “Bald Eagle” by Jamie Carr; “Old Stone Church at Wachusett Reservoir” by Kelley Freda. These three pictures were winners in the 2017 DCR Staff Photo Contest. Commonwealth of Massachusetts Charles D. Baker, Governor Karyn E. Polito, Lt. Governor Matthew A. Beaton, Secretary, Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Leo P. Roy, Commissioner, Department of Conservation and Recreation Priscilla E. Geigis, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Conservation and Recreation John M. Scannell, Director, Division of Water Supply Protection Department of Conservation and Recreation Watershed Protection Plan FY19-FY23 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 2. The Watershed System ....................................................................................... 3 2.1 Reservoir System ............................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Land Use, Land Cover, and Land Protection ................................................................... 4 2.3 Water Quality ................................................................................................................. 13 2.3.1 Watershed and Reservoir Monitoring ................................................................ 13 2.3.2 Monitoring for Compliance with Federal and State Drinking Water Standards ............................................................................................................................ 15 2.4 Hydrology ...................................................................................................................... 18 2.5 System Operation and Safe Yield .................................................................................. 24 3. Watershed Protection Program ....................................................................... 27 3.1 History............................................................................................................................ 27 3.1.1 Creation of the MWRA ....................................................................................... 28 3.1.2 SDWAA and SWTR ............................................................................................ 28 3.1.3 MassDEP Guidance for Development of a Watershed Protection Plan ........... 29 3.1.4 The 1991 Watershed Protection Plans .............................................................. 30 3.1.5 Wachusett Reservoir Filtration Waver .............................................................. 30 3.1.6 Watershed Protection Plan Updates 1998-2000 ............................................... 31 3.1.7 SWAP ................................................................................................................. 31 3.1.8 DCR and Subsequent Watershed Protection Plan Updates .............................. 32 3.1.9 Emergency System – Sudbury ............................................................................ 32 3.2 Pollution Sources and Assessment................................................................................. 33 3.2.1 Wildlife ............................................................................................................... 37 3.2.2 Public Access/Recreation................................................................................... 39 3.2.3 Timber Harvesting ............................................................................................. 40 3.2.4 Highways/Railways/ROW .................................................................................. 40 3.2.5 Agriculture ......................................................................................................... 42 3.2.6 Construction ....................................................................................................... 43 3.2.7 Commercial/Industrial/Governmental Sites ...................................................... 44 3.2.8 Residential Sites ................................................................................................. 45 3.2.9 Wastewater ......................................................................................................... 46 3.2.10 Future Growth ................................................................................................... 48 3.2.11 Climate Change ................................................................................................. 49 3.2.12 Security Threats ................................................................................................. 50 3.2.13 System-wide Assessment of Potential Threats ................................................... 50 DCR Watershed Protection Plan i FY19-FY23 3.3 Watershed Protection Control Programs ....................................................................... 51 3.3.1 Land Acquisition ................................................................................................ 55 3.3.2 Watershed Preservation Restriction Monitoring ............................................... 55 3.3.3 Land Management ............................................................................................. 56 3.3.4 Wildlife Management ......................................................................................... 59 3.3.5 Public Access Management ............................................................................... 59 3.3.6 Watershed Security ............................................................................................ 60 3.3.7 Infrastructure Maintenance ............................................................................... 61 3.3.8 Watershed Protection Act .................................................................................. 61 3.3.9 Education and Outreach .................................................................................... 62 3.3.10 Water Quality and Hydrologic Monitoring ....................................................... 62 3.3.11 Watershed Monitoring and Assessment ............................................................. 63 3.3.12 Aquatic Invasive Species Management .............................................................. 64 3.3.13 Wastewater Management ................................................................................... 65 3.3.14 Stormwater Management ................................................................................... 65 3.3.15 Emergency Response ......................................................................................... 65 4. Quabbin Reservoir Watershed Control Programs........................................ 67 4.1 Land Acquisition ............................................................................................................ 67 4.2 Watershed Preservation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Wild and Scenic River Conservation Plan
    The Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Wild and Scenic River Conservation Plan 2019 Update The Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Wild and Scenic River Conservation Plan May 2019 Update Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Wild and Scenic River Stewardship Council c/o National Park Service 15 State St Boston, MA 02109 617-223-5049 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................ 2 Map of the Watershed ................................................................................................... 3 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 4 History of the Wild and Scenic River Designation Management Principles of Partnership Wild and Scenic Rivers Achievements Resulting from Designation Changes in the Region Since 1996 Role of the River Stewardship Council Purpose and Process of the Update How to Use this Update II. The River Management Philosophy ........................................................................ 11 Goals of the Plan A watershed-wide Approach III. Updates to the Administrative Framework ............................................................. 13 IV. Threats to the Outstandingly Remarkable Resource Values .................................... 14 V. Resource Management .......................................................................................... 15 Overview Public and Private Lands Water Resources – Water Quality Water Resources – Water Quantity
    [Show full text]
  • Concord River Diadromous Fish Restoration FEASIBILITY STUDY
    Concord River Diadromous Fish Restoration FEASIBILITY STUDY Concord River, Massachusetts Talbot Mills Dam Centennial Falls Dam Middlesex Falls DRAFT REPORT FEBRUARY 2016 Prepared for: In partnership with: Prepared by: This page intentionally left blank. Executive Summary Concord River Diadromous Fish Restoration FEASIBILITY STUDY – DRAFT REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Purpose The purpose of this project is to evaluate the feasibility of restoring populations of diadromous fish to the Concord, Sudbury, and Assabet Rivers, collectively known as the SuAsCo Watershed. The primary impediment to fish passage in the Concord River is the Talbot Mills Dam in Billerica, Massachusetts. Prior to reaching the dam, fish must first navigate potential obstacles at the Essex Dam (an active hydro dam with a fish elevator and an eel ladder) on the Merrimack River in Lawrence, Middlesex Falls (a natural bedrock falls and remnants of a breached dam) on the Concord River in Lowell, and Centennial Falls Dam (a hydropower dam with a fish ladder), also on the Concord River in Lowell. Blueback herring Alewife American shad American eel Sea lamprey Species targeted for restoration include both species of river herring (blueback herring and alewife), American shad, American eel, and sea lamprey, all of which are diadromous fish that depend upon passage between marine and freshwater habitats to complete their life cycle. Reasons The impact of diadromous fish species extends for pursuing fish passage restoration in the far beyond the scope of a single restoration Concord River watershed include the importance and historical presence of the project, as they have a broad migratory range target species, the connectivity of and along the Atlantic coast and benefit commercial significant potential habitat within the and recreational fisheries of other species.
    [Show full text]
  • ¬«27 ¬«16 ¬«27 ¬«16 ¬«16 ¬«27 ¬«27
    (!T # # # (!T # # !i South Natick N ' N # at 6 ick 1 Sh ° er 2 b or 4 B n P e P Charles River r ro S ry sp # t ec Everett St Link Trail P t 27 lea ! St «¬ sa Peters Hill er n v S t Rd Town i t ill H R !i H u L 16 s !i h n Forest ak «¬ le Mumford s t e Broadmoor r ru in S a B g t h Wildlife Pegan ! t N ' L # Wildlife C Forest Hill S 5 n Brush Hill # 1 Little Farm Sanctuary n i ° Natick !i a 2 A G # !i Pond Res. 4 r D Dover M e t e C Little n # Town S Farm !i n L Pine Pond n Forest e l W Hill G e # Farm Rd L Peters s a t t t Sherborn S e S k Reservation rm Dover e r le a n F ap # M S A 16 t v «¬ 27 # Miller Hill N ' e «¬ # 4 Town Farm !i 1 ° Pond 2 n Hildreth Forest t r 4 t S o res b Res. Bailey Fo r r Goulding E e e # h v Oak Hill Res. St Rocky S o Chase # !i D # Narrows Woodlands Charles River t S # Link Trail e oodla tr W n d St F n Snow Hill S Medfield a e r C 16 o m u N «¬ Rocky State ' t S h 3 F Narrows Forest t 1 M ° Dover 2 a 4 i # n !i Medfield Medfield S State t t S Hospital g Rocky Woods !i n N # # !i !i i o d Reservation r r B # t a h u C H l h S l a a t r r !i d le s S N R ' t i G 2 v 1 e r ° ! 2 4 # Ce ntr South End 27 al S orn Pond «¬ t Sherb «¬115 llis Bridge on Mi Medfield # llist M Island t St Ho id Bogastow Wes dle 109 se Brook Meadows «¬ x St N ' ! # 1 1 ° 2 Millis nd Rd t 4 a sl d S H I Park R y r e 109 a v «¬ w o e M D M er s e i iv u l R a !i d l s i rle C Medfield w s ha a Millis C y Rhodo- t dendrons N S ' t Shattuck 0 Bay Circuit Trail h K t 1 S u ° 27 o 2 Map 9 No ¬ e Res.
    [Show full text]
  • Bicycle Network Gaps Feasibility Evaluations – Sudbury Aqueduct
    ON REG ST IO O N B BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION M Stephanie Pollack, MassDOT Secretary and CEO and MPO Chair E N T R O I Karl H. Quackenbush, Executive Director, MPO Staff O T P A O IZ LMPOI N TA A N G P OR LANNING TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM DATE: January 18, 2018 TO: Town of Framingham FROM: Casey Claude, Boston Region MPO Staff RE: Bicycle Network Gaps Feasibility Evaluations – Sudbury Aqueduct 1 INTRODUCTION Local, regional, and state government agencies in the Boston region are actively working on improving bicycling infrastructure to enhance safety, provide more connectivity between bicycle facilities, and increase the use of bicycling as a mode of transportation. Many bicycle facilities, such as shared-use paths, on- road bike lanes, and barrier-separated bike lanes (also called cycle tracks), were constructed as a result of these efforts. Consequently, a regionwide network of bicycle facilities connecting key destinations in the region, such as town centers and transit locations, has already been developed. However, within this network, there are gaps in continuity (a gap within one bicycle path) and connectivity (a gap between two paths or between a path and a roadway or transit service). These gaps necessitate that bicyclists use circuitous travel routes, reducing the efficiency of travel between key origins and destinations. These gaps exist for a number of reasons: a lack of coordinated planning; a lack of funding; right-of-way (ROW) constraints; competition for ROW space; difficulties related to coordinating efforts across multiple jurisdictions; and physical obstructions, such as waterways, bridges, roadways, and railroads.
    [Show full text]
  • 1992 Annual Town Report
    ... --- -- ----- ------~--------------------------~--- 1992 ANNUAL TOWN REPORT Fire Headquarters, Hudson Road TOWN OF SUDBURY SUDBURY, MASSACHUSETIS 01776 FRONT COVER: Fire Headquarters on Hudson Road Completed in 1992 BACK COVER: Twin Ash Farm Photo Courtesy Town Crier This weathervane of a fire­ man sits atop the new Sud­ bury Fire Dept. (Photo by Sandy Hill) Town Crier Photo 353rd Annual Report of the Offical Boards of Sudbury, Massachusetts year ending December 31, 1992 Table of Contents Administration Dog Officer . 78 Federal, State And County Officials I Animal Inspector 78 Elected Town Officials . 2 Appointed Town Officials 3 Public Works Board of Selectmen .10 Resource Recovery Committee . 79 Town Report Committee .12 Wayland-Sudbury Septage Disposal Facility . 79 Personnel Board .13 Highway Surveyor, Tree Warden, Landfill Agent, Town Counsel .13 Superintendent of Cemeteries . 80 Town Moderator .!4 Planning And Development Town Clerk Board of Appeals 81 Town Clerk's Report .15 Conservation Commission 84 Audits ..... .17 Design Review Board . 86 !992 Town Meetings Summary .19 Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) and Minute- Elections . .23 man Advisory Group On Interlocal Coordination (MAGIC) 86 Finances Earth Removal Board . 87 Finance Committee .33 Town Engineer . 87 Town Treasurer and Collector .33 Negotiating Advisory Committee 87 Board of Assessors .44 Long Range Planning Committee 88 Town Accountant .37 Metrowest Growth Management Committee 89 Permanent Building Committee . 90 Permanent Landscape Committee 90 Education Planning Board . 90 Sudbury Public Schools . .45 Inclusionary Zoning Study Committee 92 Lincoln Sudbury Regional High School District .47 Hop Brook Ponds Study Committee 92 Minuteman Regional Vocational Technical School District . .55 In Memoriam ........... 93 Human Services Goodnow Library .
    [Show full text]
  • The Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord Rivers Developing a Report Card Stakeholder Workshop Newsletter Great Meadows National Wildlife Refuge February - March 2018
    The Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord Rivers Developing a Report Card Stakeholder Workshop Newsletter Great Meadows National Wildlife Refuge February - March 2018 Watersheds As part of the landscape that saw the start of both Assabet River Watershed LOWELL the American revolution and the industrial revolution, Concord River Watershed TEWKSBURY Sudbury River Watershed the Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord Rivers in Streams CHELMSFORD Massachusetts have a long history of use and abuse. Designated Wild & Scenic Restoring the health of these three interconnected Massachusetts BILLERICA WESTFORD r rivers has been the mission of OARS, the watershed e CARLISLE Riv d organization for the Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord or c n LITTLETON o Rivers, for 31 years. Restoration takes many years of C BOXBOROUGH BEDFORD committed work by local communities and support ACTON from many sources. Effective actions depend on HARVARD a sound understanding of the science and the local context, which must be broadly understood STOW CONCORD and communicated. BOLTON MAYNARD LINCOLN CLINTON BERLIN In 2018, OARS partnered with the Integration and SUDBURY r HUDSON WAYLAND Rive Application Network, University of Maryland Center et ab ss A for Environmental Science to initiate a river report BOYLSTON WESTON card for the region. The report card will provide a MARLBOROUGH snapshot of current river conditions and the historical NORTHBOROUGH FRAMINGHAM trends and context of those conditions. NATICK WESTBOROUGH SOUTHBOROUGH To start the process, two workshops were held at SHREWSBURY Sudbury River HOPKINTON Great Meadows National Wildlife Refuge on 28 ASHLAND SHERBORN February and 1 March 2018, with key stakeholders GRAFTON from all three river basins. The initial workshop elicited UPTON what stakeholders value about the rivers, and the 10 mi N 10 km subsequent workshop focused on how to measure Location of the Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord River watersheds those values, and where to find data.
    [Show full text]
  • Neponset River Watershed Protecting Our Water, Wildlife and Land
    !"a$ QÈQÈ Neponset River Watershed Boston Protecting Our Water, Wildlife and Land There’s a lot going on in your watershed! QÂ • Fourteen cities & towns • Over 120 square miles QÂ Dorchester • 330,00+ people Visit us to learn more: QÂQÂ !"d$ ive !"d$ ponset River www.neponset.org Mattapan Neponset r Quincy QÈ ty k quity Bk Unqu e B n e e U Hyde Park re T r T Q} e !"c$ Qæ e n i !"c$ n Q¼ i P QÅ P Milton M o otther Dedham r ver QÒ Riive QÒ t R QÈ Westwood et QÑ s e M n s M o n Dover i p o ill e p l e l N PPl N laan Iq nti Iq tinng gfi P fie P eld u !"c$ l ur !"c$ d B rg Bk ga k at Qi to Medfield Qi or k ry o k y B o o B r k o y r k y B n Ponkapoag l B n Ponkapoag a l l P a Pond i l Pe Pond i m Norwood ec m cu M r un Qã M r e nit Randolph e i !"d$ t B onkapoag Bk Qæ G !"d$ Bk Ponkapoag Bk G P Q¸ k QÑ QÛ QÑ H Canton H Willett a Willett a PondPond ww ees s Reservoir MM Ip Pond ini k ne B e t QÆ B i t QÆ B E i QÉ r e E u ro l e u oo l a q o r h o a e q k t ive o s e k set R Traph st P QÅ Qz ponnse Trap t P QÅ NNeepo QÒ Qi er Meadow QÒ eaver Mea w B Walpole Be k QÏ S Sppr rin ing g k B B g B Iq k ag Qz k poa S sap Ste QÑ ass ee QÑ a p QÆ M H il Qp lll S B Qã Q} Sc k k chho Bk oo r B ol er lM v e Stoughton r M a v QÉ e r e e a ea e v e a B i v d B Sharon i d R o o R w t w QÆ e t B e s B s n k n k o o p p e !"d$ e !"d$ N Lake N Massapoag Legend Foxborough Canoe Launches NeponsetNeponset Reservoir QÅ Reservoir QÅ Ponds/Ocean Qz Streams Q¸Q¸ Parks/Conservation QÇ Towns Qæ 0 0.5 1 2 QÉ Miles IpIp QÆ QÒ QÑ %&l( Qv Qf Qz Q¸ A watershed is the area of land that drains The Watershed includes parts of 14 cities successful campaign to clean up and into a particular river, stream, or pond.
    [Show full text]
  • Map 1A - Newburyport, Newbury, Rowley - Skirting the End of the Airport's Grassy Runway BAY CIRCUIT TRAIL Route (CAUTION: This Is an Active Runway
    Disclaimer and Cautions: The Bay Circuit Alliance, as the advocate and promoter of the Bay Circuit Trail, expressly disclaims responsibility for injuries or damages that may arise from using the trail. We cannot guarantee the accuracy of maps or completeness of warnings about hazards that may exist. Portions of the trail are along roads or train tracks and involve crossing them. Users should pay attention to traffic and walk on the shoulder of roads facing traffic, not on the pavement, cross only at designated locations and use extreme care. Children and pets need to be closely monitored and under control. Refuge headquarters across the road. The BCT continues from the south side of the road just at the end of the Plum Island airport (an historic site). A signboard here usually has brochures about the BCT in Newbury. Proceed south on the Eliza Little Trail , Map 1A - Newburyport, Newbury, Rowley - skirting the end of the airport's grassy runway BAY CIRCUIT TRAIL route (CAUTION: this is an active runway. Keep to the (as shown on map dated March 2013) edge and keep dogs on leash ). Then go right on a (text updated May 2014) cart rd through high grass and through the fields of the Spencer-Peirce-Little Farm (bicycles not The BCT often follows pre-existing local trails; BCT- allowed). specific blazing is a work in progress and may be sparse 2.5 Pass through a gate south (left) of the historic in segments. We encourage you to review and carry Spencer-Peirce-Little Manor House , open to the corresponding local maps on your BCT walk.
    [Show full text]
  • Walden Pond R O Oa W R D L Oreau’S O R Ty I a K N N U 226 O
    TO MBTA FITCHBURG COMMUTER LINE ROUTE 495, ACTON h Fire d Sout Road North T 147 Fire Roa th Fir idge r Pa e e R a 167 Pond I R Pin i c o l Long Cove e ad F N Ice Fort Cove o or rt th Cove Roa Heywood’s Meadow d FIELD 187 l i Path ail Lo a w r Tr op r do e T a k e s h r F M E e t k a s a Heyw ’s E 187 i P 187 ood 206 r h d n a a w 167 o v o e T R n H e y t e v B 187 2 y n o a 167 w a 187 C y o h Little Cove t o R S r 167 d o o ’ H s F a e d m th M e loc Pa k 270 80 c e 100 I B a E e m a d 40 n W C Baker Bridge Road o EMERSON’S e Concord Road r o w s 60 F a n CLIFF i o e t c e R n l o 206 265 d r r o ’s 20 d t a o F d C Walden Pond R o oa w R d l oreau’s o r ty i a k n n u 226 o 246 Cove d C T d F Ol r o a O r i k l l d C 187 o h n h t THOREAU t c 187 a a HOUSE SITE o P P Wyman 167 r ORIGINAL d d 167 R l n e Meadow i o d ra P g .
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Water System Master Plan
    MWRA BOARD OF DIRECTORS Matthew A. Beaton, Chairman John J. Carroll, Vice-Chair Christopher Cook Joseph C. Foti Kevin L. Cotter Paul E. Flanagan Andrew M. Pappastergion, Secretary Brian Peña Henry F. Vitale John J. Walsh Jennifer L. Wolowicz Prepared under the direction of Frederick A. Laskey, Executive Director David W. Coppes, Chief Operating Officer Stephen A. Estes-Smargiassi, Director, Planning and Sustainability Lisa M. Marx, Senior Program Manager, Planning Carl H. Leone, Senior Program Manager, Planning together with the participation of MWRA staff 2018 MWRA Water System Master Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary Chapter 1-Introduction 1.1 Overview of MWRA 1-1 1.2 Purpose of the Water Master Plan 1-1 1.3 Planning Approach, Assumptions and Time Frame 1-2 1.4 Organization of the Master Plan 1-3 1.5 Periodic Updates 1-3 1.6 MWRA Business Plan 1-3 1.7 Project Prioritization 1-4 Chapter 2-Planning Goals and Objectives 2.1 Planning Goals and Objectives Defining MWRA’S Water System Mission 2-1 2.2 Provide Reliable Water Delivery 2-2 2.3 Deliver High Quality Water 2-3 2.4 Assure an Adequate Supply of Water 2-4 2.5 Manage the System Efficiently and Effectively 2-5 Chapter 3-Water System History, Organization and Key Infrastructure 3.1 The Beginning – The Water System 3-1 3.2 The MWRA Water System Today 3-5 3.3 Water Infrastructure Replacement Asset Value 3-8 3.4 The Future Years 3-11 Chapter 4-Supply and Demand 4.1 Overview of the Water Supply System 4-1 4.2 System Capacity 4-4 4.3 Potential Impacts of Climate Change 4-6 4.4 Current
    [Show full text]
  • Nichols, Oren Barn
    FRM.U / SBR.F fVIPG ~ T R A , M A S 3 < FORM A - A R E A Area Letter Form numbers 1n +,h1s Area F7-2,7-3,7-4,7-5,7-6,7-7, MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION F 7-8,7-9,7-10,7-11 80 BOYLSTON STREET, BOSTON, MA 0 2 1 1 6 Town Southborough Name of A r e a (if any) Sudbury Dam H i s t o r i c District Present Use water supply General Date or P e r i o d l894-1940 General Condition good Acreage Sketch Map. Draw a general map o f the area indicating properties within i t . Recorded by Martha Bowers Number each property for w h i c h Individual inventory forms have been completed. Organization Louis Berger & A s s o c i a t e s , Inc. Date February 1984; revised 1989 fmtw In B|gp§g DAM ^^j^HfiMEB 5 bi I1 ; .Stl.^UR&-DAM 1ft ° CHAMBER # 1 VV: SSI yfawmJ^VE DUCT VHEADHOUSE J 30 BRIDGE* , BRIDGE^ UTM REFERENCE USGS QUADRANGLE SCALE MDC - TRA, MASS. FRM.U / SBR.F NATIONAL REGISTER CRITERIA STATEMENT (If a p p l i c a b l e ) The Sudbury Dam Historic District is significant as representing the intersection of three phases in the development of the metropolitan Boston water supply system: construction of Sudbury Res ervoir (1893-98), last and largest in the "additional supply system" begun in 1875; the W e s t o n Aqueduct (D12-1), built in 1901-3 to augment' t h e supply from Sudbury Reservoir to Chestnut Hill anc to supply the northern distribution facility at Spot Pond; and the Hultman Aqueduct, built in 1939-40 to convey water directly from the Wachusett Aqueduct (see Wachusett Aqueduct Historic District) to the W e s t o n and to distribution in the first of a series of bypasses of existing portions of the system.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Water Resources Authority
    MASSACHUSETTS WATER RESOURCES AUTHORITY Fiscal Year 2019 Final CURRENT EXPENSE BUDGET The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) presented an award of Distinguished Budget Presentation to the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2017. In order to receive this award, a government unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, as an operations guide, as a financial plan and as a communication device. The award is valid for a period of one year only. We believe our current budget continues to conform to program requirements, and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another award. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Left to right seated: Henry F. Vitale, Paul E. Flanagan, John J. Carroll, Vice-Chairman, Brian Peña Left to right standing: John J. Walsh, Matthew A. Beaton, Chairman, Joseph C. Foti, Jennifer L. Wolowicz, Andrew M. Pappastergion, Secretary, Austin F. Blackmon, Kevin L. Cotter, Fredrick A. Laskey, MWRA Executive Director. Prepared under the direction of Frederick A. Laskey, Executive Director David W. Coppes, Chief Operating Officer Thomas J. Durkin, Director, Finance together with the participation of MWRA staff. Louis M. Taverna, Chairman September 2018 MWRA Advisory Board 100 First Avenue Boston, MA 02129 Dear Chairman Taverna: This letter transmits to the Advisory Board MWRA’s Current Expense Budget (CEB) for Fiscal Year 2019. The CEB was approved by the MWRS’s Board of Directors on June 20, 2018. The FY19 Final Budget recommends a combined assessment increase of 3.07%, which is lower than the 3.8% increase projected for FY19 last year.
    [Show full text]