DOCSLIB.ORG

Release Notice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Release Notice Ecology Assessment Report - Lot 1 on RP138057 Report Release Notice This document is available through the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project controlled document system TeamBinder™. The responsibility for ensuring that printed copies remain valid rests with the user. Once printed, this is an uncontrolled document unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Third-party issue can be requested via the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project Document Control Group. Document Conventions The following terms in this document apply: • Will, shall or must indicate a mandatory course of action • Should indicates a recommended course of action • May or can indicate a possible course of action. Document Custodian The custodian of this document is the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Environmental Approvals Manager. The custodian is responsible for maintaining and controlling changes (additions and modifications) to this document and ensuring the stakeholders validate any changes made to this document. Deviations from Document Any deviation from this document must be approved by the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Environmental Approvals Manager. Doc Ref: Q-4300-15-RP-010 Revision: 0 Page 2 of 45 Approvals, Land & Stakeholder Team, Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Ecology Assessment Report - Lot 1 on RP138057 Report Table of Contents Release Notice .............................................................................................. 2 Document Conventions..................................................................................... 2 Document Custodian ....................................................................................... 2 Deviations from Document ................................................................................ 2 1. Introduction ........................................................................................... 6 1.1. Purpose and scope ......................................................................................... 6 1.2. Definitions & abbreviations .............................................................................. 7 1.2.1. Definitions................................................................................................. 7 1.2.2. Abbreviations ............................................................................................. 8 1.2.3. Document references .................................................................................... 9 2. Site context ........................................................................................... 12 2.1. Bioregion .................................................................................................. 12 2.2. Land use ................................................................................................... 12 2.3. Soils and geology......................................................................................... 12 2.4. Climate .................................................................................................... 12 2.5. Site description .......................................................................................... 12 3. Methods ............................................................................................... 13 3.1. Desktop and literature review ......................................................................... 13 3.2. Field survey ............................................................................................... 14 3.2.1. Vegetation community survey ......................................................................... 14 3.2.2. Fauna habitat surveys .................................................................................. 14 3.2.3. Threatened flora and fauna survey ................................................................... 15 3.2.4. Fauna survey ............................................................................................. 15 3.2.5. Exotic flora and fauna survey ......................................................................... 15 3.2.6. Disturbance survey ...................................................................................... 15 3.2.7. Survey limitations ....................................................................................... 15 4. Results and discussions.............................................................................. 17 4.1. Desktop and literature review ......................................................................... 17 4.1.1. Commonwealth environmental matters .............................................................. 17 4.1.2. Queensland environmental matters .................................................................. 20 4.2. Field survey results ...................................................................................... 22 4.2.1. Commonwealth environmental matters .............................................................. 22 4.2.2. Queensland environmental matters .................................................................. 29 4.2.3. Watercourses and wetland ecosystems .............................................................. 34 4.2.4. Disturbance .............................................................................................. 34 Doc Ref: Q-4300-15-RP-010 Revision: 0 Page 3 of 45 Approvals, Land & Stakeholder Team, Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Ecology Assessment Report - Lot 1 on RP138057 Report 5. Conclusions and recommendations ................................................................ 35 6. Appendix A: Site location and survey points ..................................................... 36 7. Appendix B: EPBC Act Protected Matters search results ...................................... 37 8. Appendix C: Wildlife Online database search results ........................................... 38 9. Appendix D: DEHP mapping of Regional Ecosystems ............................................ 39 10. Appendix E: DEHP referable wetlands mapping ................................................. 40 11. Appendix F: Flora and fauna species list ......................................................... 41 11. Appendix G: Ground-truthed Regional Ecosystems and High Value Regrowth .............. 43 12. Appendix H: Ground-truthed weeds and pest fauna ............................................ 44 13. Appendix I: Type A restricted plants .............................................................. 45 Doc Ref: Q-4300-15-RP-010 Revision: 0 Page 4 of 45 Approvals, Land & Stakeholder Team, Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Ecology Assessment Report - Lot 1 on RP138057 Report List of Tables Table 1: Definitions ....................................................................................................... 7 Table 2: Abbreviations .................................................................................................... 8 Table 3: Associated document references ............................................................................ 9 Table 4: Minimum, maximum and rainfall values for survey period* ........................................... 12 Table 5: EPBC Act protected matters search tool results for TECs ............................................. 17 Table 6: EPBC Act protected matters search tool results for threatened fauna species ................... 18 Table 7: EPBC Act protected matters search tool results for threatened flora species .................... 18 Table 8: EPBC Act listed migratory species potentially occurring in the Site. ............................... 19 Table 9: An analysis of EPBC Act listed marine species potentially occurring on Site. ..................... 19 Table 10: NC Act (Wildlife online) search tool results for threatened species potentially occurring on Site ......................................................................................................................... 20 Table 11: No concern at present REs mapped by DEHP on Site ................................................. 21 Table 12: HVR mapped by DEHP on Site ............................................................................. 21 Table 13: Weeds and pest fauna potentially present on Site .................................................... 22 Table 14: Analysis of potential presence of EPBC Act protected flora species based on field survey results ...................................................................................................................... 22 Table 15: Analysis of potential presence of EPBC Act protected fauna species based on field survey results ...................................................................................................................... 23 Table 16: EPBC Act listed migratory species potentially occurring in the Site and analysis of their potential presence based on field survey results .................................................................. 26 Table 17: EPBC Act listed marine species potentially occurring on the Site .................................. 27 Table 18: NC Act listed threatened flora occurring on Site and an analysis of their potential presence based on field survey results .......................................................................................... 29 Table 19: NC Act
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ecology Assessment Report – 11SP237009 Report
    Ecology Assessment Report – 11SP237009 Report Release Notice This document is available through the Australia Pacific LNG (Australia Pacific LNG) Upstream Phase 1 Project controlled document system TeamBinder™. The responsibility for ensuring that printed copies remain valid rests with the user. Once printed, this is an uncontrolled document unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Third-party issue can be requested via the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project Document Control Group. Document Conventions The following terms in this document apply: • Will, shall or must indicate a mandatory course of action • Should indicates a recommended course of action • May or can indicate a possible course of action. Document Custodian The custodian of this document is the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Environmental Approvals Manager. The custodian is responsible for maintaining and controlling changes (additions and modifications) to this document and ensuring the stakeholders validate any changes made to this document. Deviations from Document Any deviation from this document must be approved by the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Environmental Approvals Manager. Doc Ref: Q-4300-15-RP-009 Revision: 0 Page 2 of 48 Approvals, Land and Stakeholder Team, Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Ecology Assessment Report – 11SP237009 Report Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hemidactylus Frenatus Across an Urban Gradient in Brisbane: Influence of Habitat and Potential for Impact on Native Gecko Species
    Presence of Asian House Gecko Hemidactylus frenatus across an urban gradient in Brisbane: influence of habitat and potential for impact on native gecko species Author Newbery, Brock, Jones, Darryl Published 2007 Book Title Pest or Guest: The Zoology of Overabundance Copyright Statement © 2007 Royal Zoological Society of NSW. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the book link for access to the definitive, published version. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/18554 Link to published version http://www.rzsnsw.org.au/ Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Presence of Asian House Gecko Hemidactylus frenatus across an urban gradient in Brisbane: influence of habitat and potential for impact on native gecko species Brock Newbery1 and Darryl N. Jones1,2 1Suburban Wildlife Research Group, Australian School of Environmental Studies, Griffith University, Nathan, Qld. 4111, Australia. 2Corresponding author: Darryl Jones, [email protected] The Asian House Gecko Hemidactylus frenatus is an internationally significant invasive reptile which T has spread rapidly though the Pacific and elsewhere and has been implicated in the decline and extinction of a number of native gecko species. Although present in Darwin for some time, the C species has only recently become widespread in the Brisbane region. We investigated the density A and distribution of this and two native house-dwelling geckos in urban, suburban and bushland R environments within Brisbane. The spatially clumped insect resources associated with external light T sources were effectively utilised by both urban and suburban populations of Asian House Geckos, S suggesting likely competitive interactions between the species on structures where the species co-existed.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Animal Keepers Species List
    Revised NSW Native Animal Keepers’ Species List Draft © 2017 State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage With the exception of photographs, the State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. The Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) has compiled this report in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. OEH shall not be liable for any damage which may occur to any person or organisation taking action or not on the basis of this publication. Readers should seek appropriate advice when applying the information to their specific needs. All content in this publication is owned by OEH and is protected by Crown Copyright, unless credited otherwise. It is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), subject to the exemptions contained in the licence. The legal code for the licence is available at Creative Commons. OEH asserts the right to be attributed as author of the original material in the following manner: © State of New South Wales and Office of Environment and Heritage 2017. Published by: Office of Environment and Heritage 59 Goulburn Street, Sydney NSW 2000 PO Box A290,
    [Show full text]
  • Reintroducing the Dingo: the Risk of Dingo Predation to Threatened Vertebrates of Western New South Wales
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Wildlife Research http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WR11128 Reintroducing the dingo: the risk of dingo predation to threatened vertebrates of western New South Wales B. L. Allen A,C and P. J. S. Fleming B AThe University of Queensland, School of Animal Studies, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia. BVertebrate Pest Research Unit, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange Agricultural Institute, Forest Road, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia. CCorresponding author. Present address: Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Sulfide Street, Broken Hill, NSW 2880, Australia. Email: [email protected] Abstract Context. The reintroduction of dingoes into sheep-grazing areas south-east of the dingo barrier fence has been suggested as a mechanism to suppress fox and feral-cat impacts. Using the Western Division of New South Wales as a case study, Dickman et al. (2009) recently assessed the risk of fox and cat predation to extant threatened species and concluded that reintroducing dingoes into the area would have positive effects for most of the threatened vertebrates there, aiding their recovery through trophic cascade effects. However, they did not formally assess the risk of dingo predation to the same threatened species. Aims. To assess the risk of dingo predation to the extant and locally extinct threatened vertebrates of western New South Wales using methods amenable to comparison with Dickman et al. (2009). Methods. The predation-risk assessment method used in Dickman et al. (2009) for foxes and cats was applied here to dingoes, with minor modification to accommodate the dietary differences of dingoes. This method is based on six independent biological attributes, primarily reflective of potential vulnerability characteristics of the prey.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Reptiles and Amphibians at Bimblebox Nature Reserve - Queensland
    Summary of an Observational Survey of Reptiles and Amphibians at Bimblebox Nature Reserve - Queensland Graham Armstrong – May, 2016 Objective - to provide an updated and more complete list of the herpetofauna recorded from Bimblebox Nature Refuge. Approach - 1. Review available data and records pertaining to the herpetofauna at Bimblebox Nature Refuge. 2. Visit Bimblebox Nature Refuge during Spring, Summer and Autumn seasons to make observational and photographic records of the herpetofauna observed. Methodology - In order to maximise the number of species recorded, 3 successive 2.5 day visits were made to BNR, one in September 2015, Jan 2016 and the end of April 2016. This approach potentially broadens the range of weather conditions experienced and hence variety of reptiles and amphibians encountered when compared to a single field visit. Survey methodology involved walking and driving around the nature refuge during the day and after dark (with the aid of a head torch to detect eye-shine). Active reptiles including those that ran for or from cover while passing by were recorded. Frequently, in situ photographic evidence of individuals was obtained and the photographs are available for the purpose of corroborating identification. To avoid any double counting of individual animals the Refuge was traversed progressively and the locations of animals were recorded using a GPS. During any one visit no area was traversed twice and when driving along tracks, reptiles were only recorded the first time a track was traversed unless a new species was detected at a later time. Available Records The most detailed list of reptiles and amphibians recorded as occurring on Bimblebox Nature Reserve comes from the standardised trapping program of Eric Vanderduys of CSIRO in Townsville.
    [Show full text]
  • Brigalow Belt Bioregion – a Biodiversity Jewel
    Brigalow Belt bioregion – a biodiversity jewel Brigalow habitat © Craig Eddie What is brigalow? including eucalypt and cypress pine forests and The term ‘brigalow’ is used simultaneously to refer to; woodlands, grasslands and other Acacia dominated the tree Acacia harpophylla; an ecological community ecosystems. dominated by this tree and often found in conjunction with other species such as belah, wilga and false Along the eastern boundary of the Brigalow Belt are sandalwood; and a broader region where this species scattered patches of semi-evergreen vine thickets with and ecological community are present. bright green canopy species that are highly visible among the more silvery brigalow communities. These The Brigalow Belt bioregion patches are a dry adapted form of rainforest, relics of a much wetter past. The Brigalow Belt bioregion is a large and complex area covering 36,400 000ha. The region is thus recognised What are the issues? by the Australian Government as a biodiversity hotspot. Nature conservation in the region has received increasing attention because of the rapid and extensive This hotspot contains some of the most threatened loss of habitat that has occurred. Since World War wildlife in the world, including populations of the II the Brigalow Belt bioregion has become a major endangered bridled nail-tail wallaby and the only agricultural and pastoral area. Broad-scale clearing for remaining wild population of the endangered northern agriculture and unsustainable grazing has fragmented hairy-nosed wombat. The area contains important the original vegetation in the past, particularly on habitat for rare and threatened species including the, lowland areas. glossy black-cockatoo, bulloak jewel butterfl y, brigalow scaly-foot, red goshawk, little pied bat, golden-tailed geckos and threatened community of semi evergreen Biodiversity hotspots are areas that support vine thickets.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved EMP Appendices 1 to 12
    Appendix 1. Field Management Plans Environmental Management/ Control Monitoring Monitoring Report Objective Impact Activity Reporting Action Responsibility Value Strategy Action Frequency Frequency Flora/fauna No permanent Loss of protected • All vegetation Ensure all necessary Visual Weekly Corrective action record as Induction Person in charge detrimental flora species, clearing permits and approvals are required training impact to essential habitat • Removal of fertile in place and compliance Prior to start of biodiversity or and biodiversity topsoil obligations communicated work ecological to site personnel prior to function commencing vegetation clearing Mark the boundary of the Visual weekly Corrective action record as Monthly Person in charge work program area with required (summary in tape and/ or hi-viz fencing monthly designated for ‘No Go report) Zones’ and monitor integrity Ensure site specific fire Audit At start of new Audit report As required Person in charge management plans are in work and place quarterly Weed invasion/ • All vegetation Upgrade existing tracks Visual Weekly Corrective action record as Monthly Weeds Officer infestation and / clearing where practical to required increased • Accessing site by accommodate the heavy occurrence or vehicle vehicle traffic (including abundance of widening). feral animals Vehicle wash down prior Weed certificate Prior to Certificate At Weeds Officer to entering the area mobilization commencemen t Vehicle wash down for the Weed certificate As required Self-assessment As required
    [Show full text]
  • Cattle Creek Ecological Assessment Report
    CATTLE CREEK CCCATTLE CCCREEK RRREGIONAL EEECOSYSTEM AND FFFUNCTIONALITY SSSURVEY Report prepared for Santos GLNG Feb 2021 Terrestria Pty Ltd, PO Box 328, Wynnum QLD 4178 Emai : admin"terrestria.com.au This page left blank for double-sided printing purposes. Terrestria Pty Ltd, PO Box 328, Wynnum QLD 4178 Emai : admin"terrestria.com.au Document Control Sheet Project Number: 0213 Project Manager: Andrew Daniel Client: Santos Report Title: Cattle Creek Regional Ecosystem and Functionality Survey Project location: Cattle Creek, Bauhinia, Southern Queensland Project Author/s: Andrew Daniel Project Summary: Assessment of potential ecological constraints to well pad location, access and gathering. Document preparation and distribution history Document version Date Completed Checked By Issued By Date sent to client Draft A 04/09/2020 AD AD 04/09/2020 Draft B Final 02/02/2021 AD AD 02/02/2021 Notice to users of this report CopyrighCopyright: This document is copyright to Terrestria Pty Ltd. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Terrestria Pty Ltd. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the express permission of Terrestria Pty Ltd constitutes a breach of the Copyright Act 1968. Report LimitationsLimitations: This document has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Santos Pty Ltd. Terrestria Pty Ltd accept no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. Signed on behalf of Terrestria Pty Ltd Dr Andrew Daniel Managing Director Date: 02 February 2021 Terrestria Pty Ltd File No: 0213 CATTLE CREEK REGIONAL ECOSYSTEM AND FUNCTIONALITY SURVEY Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics of the Reduce-Limbed and Limbless Skinks Currently Assigned to the Genus Anomalopus (Lacertilia: Scincidae)
    AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Greer, Allen E., and Harold G. Cogger, 1985. Systematics of the reduce- limbed and limbless skinks currently assigned to the genus Anomalopus (Lacertilia: Scincidae). Records of the Australian Museum 37(1): 11–54. [1 August 1985]. doi:10.3853/j.0067-1975.37.1985.334 ISSN 0067-1975 Published by the Australian Museum, Sydney naturenature cultureculture discover discover AustralianAustralian Museum Museum science science is is freely freely accessible accessible online online at at www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/ 66 CollegeCollege Street,Street, SydneySydney NSWNSW 2010,2010, AustraliaAustralia Records of the Australian Museum (1985) Vo!. 37(1):11-54. ISSN-1975-0067. 11 Systematics of the Reduce-limbed and Limbless Skinks Currently Assigned to the Genus Anomalopus (Lacertilia: Scincidae) ALLEN E. GREER AND HAROLD G. COGGER Australian Museum, p.a. Box A285, Sydney South, N.S.W. 2000 ABSTRACT. The genus Anomalopus, as currently recognized, harbours many of the reduce-limbed and limbless skinks of eastern Australia. In this paper the genus is argued to be polyphyletic and, on the basis of shared derived character states, is subdivided into three genera, one with two subgenera. The taxa are: Anomalopus (Anomalopus) mackayi n. sp., A.(A.) verreauxii Dumeril & Dumeril, 1851 and A.(A.J leuckartii Weinland, 1862; Anomalopus (Vermiseps) swansoni n. subgen., n. sp., A.(V.J pluto Ingram, 1977, A.(V.) gowi n. sp. and A.(V.) brevicollis n. sp.; Ophioscincus truncatus Peters, 1876, O. ophioscincus Peters, 1873 and O. cooloolensis n. sp.; Coeranoscincus reticulatus Giinther, 1873 and C. frontalis De Vis, 1888.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Species Scientific Committee's Advice for the Wetlands and Inner Floodplains of the Macquarie Marshes
    Threatened Species Scientific Committee’s Advice for the Wetlands and inner floodplains of the Macquarie Marshes 1. The Threatened Species Scientific Committee (the Committee) was established under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) and has obligations to present advice to the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Water (the Minister) in relation to the listing and conservation of threatened ecological communities, including under sections 189, 194N and 266B of the EPBC Act. 2. The Committee provided this advice on the Wetlands and inner floodplains of the Macquarie Marshes ecological community to the Minister in June 2013. 3. A copy of the draft advice for this ecological community was made available for expert and public comment for a minimum of 30 business days. The Committee and Minister had regard to all public and expert comment that was relevant to the consideration of the ecological community. 4. This advice has been developed based on the best available information at the time it was assessed: this includes scientific literature, government reports, extensive advice from consultations with experts, and existing plans, records or management prescriptions for this ecological community. 5. This ecological community was listed as critically enadangered from 13 August 2013 to 11 December 2013. The listing was disallowed on 11 December 2013. It is no longer a matter of National Environmental Significance under the EPBC Act. Page 1 of 99 Threatened Species Scientific Committee’s Advice:
    [Show full text]
  • NSW REPTILE KEEPERS' LICENCE Species Lists 1006
    NSW REPTILE KEEPERS’ LICENCE SPECIES LISTS (2006) The taxonomy in this list follows that used in Wilson, S. and Swan, G. A Complete Guide to Reptiles of Australia, Reed 2003. Common names generally follow the same text, when common names were used, or have otherwise been lifted from other publications. As well as reading this species list, you will also need to read the “NSW Reptile Keepers’ Licence Information Sheet 2006.” That document has important information about the different types of reptile keeper licenses. It also lists the criteria you need to demonstrate before applying to upgrade to a higher class of licence. THESE REPTILES CAN ONLY BE HELD UNDER A REPTILE KEEPERS’ LICENCE OF CLASS 1 OR HIGHER Code Scientific Name Common Name Code Scientific Name Common Name Turtles Monitors E2018 Chelodina canni Cann’s Snake-necked Turtle G2263 Varanus acanthurus Spiney-tailed Monitor C2017 Chelodina longicollis Snake-necked Turtle Q2268 Varanus gilleni Pygmy Mulga Monitor G2019 Chelodina oblonga Oblong Turtle G2271 Varanus gouldii Sand Monitor Y2028 Elseya dentata Northern Snapping Turtle M2282 Varanus tristis Black-Headed Monitor K2029 Elseya latisternum Saw-shelled Turtle Y2776 Elusor macrurus Mary River Turtle E2034 Emydura macquarii Murray Short-necked Turtle Skinks T2031 Emydura macquarii dharra Macleay River Turtle A2464 Acritoscincus platynotum Red-throated Skink T2039 Emydura macquarii dharuk Sydney Basin Turtle W2331 Cryptoblepharus virgatus Cream-striped Wall Skink T2002 Emydura macquarii emmotti Emmott’s Short-necked Turtle W2375
    [Show full text]
  • Published on DES Disclosure Log RTI Act 2009
    Premium Ecotourism Products on Whitsunday Island Feasibility study Department of Environment and Science Reference: 503504 Final report 2019-01-17 Log Disclosure 2009 DES Act on RTI Published 19-067 File A Page 1 of 225 Document control record Document prepared by: Aurecon Australasia Pty Ltd ABN 54 005 139 873 Level 14, 32 Turbot Street Brisbane QLD 4000 Locked Bag 331 Brisbane QLD 4001 Australia T +61 7 3173 8000 F +61 7 3173 8001 E [email protected] W aurecongroup.com Log A person using Aurecon documents or data accepts the risk of: a) Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version. b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Aurecon. Document control Report title Feasibility study Disclosure Document code Project number 503504 File path C:\Users\anna.gannon\AppData\Roaming\OpenText\OTEdit\EC_cs\c187438359\Whitsunday Island feasibility study_final 10.12.18.docx2009 Client Department of DESEnvironment and Science Client contact Michael O’Neill ActClient reference DES 18007 Rev Date Revisionon details/status Author Reviewer Verifier Approver (if required) 1 2018-10-12 Draft feasibilityRTI study report AG PG LK 2 2018-11-23 Final draft feasibility study AG PG DK report 3 2018-11-29 Final draft feasibility study AG PG DK report v2 4 2018-12-12 Final feasibility study report AG PG DK 5 2018-12-21 Final feasibility study report v2 AG PG DK 6 Published2019-01-18 Final Feasibility Study AG DK Current revision 6 Approval Author signature Approver signature Name Name Title Title Project number 503504 File EDOCS-#7475505-v1-Whitsunday_Island_Feasibility_Study_Final 2019-01-17 Revision 6 19-067 File A Page 2 of 225 Contents 1 Background and strategic context ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]