The Creation of the Universe and the Monopole String of Paul Dirac for the Magnetic Monopoles of t’Hooft-Polyakov
Tony Bermanseder
Abstract The Dirac quantization condition and its relationship to the electromagnetic finestructure constant alpha is derived from the initial boundary conditions of the Quantum Big Bang Singularity (QBBS). The QBBS is shown to form a 2/11-dimensional mirror membrane as a 1- dimensional Dirac string relating timespace of a string-membrane epoch preceding the QBBS to the spacetime following the creation event. The Dirac monopole then transforms as a point particle into a space extended elementary particle known as the classical electron and is electro charge coupled as an electropole to the magneto charge of a magnetopole. The electron as a point particle of QFT and QED so becomes the monopolar form of the Dirac monopole as the Dirac electron, but coupled to the elementary quantum geometric templates of the scalar Higgs boson with a dark matter particle defined as a RMP or Restmass Photon. The space occupying classical electron is shown to oscillate on the fermi scale of the nuclear interactions of colour charge asymptotic gluon-quark confinement, with the ground state for the electron defining the wormhole singularity of the QBBS in spacetime as the fifth transformation of superstring classes (heterotic class 64) from the timespace era. The Dirac string so manifests as a membrane-mirror for a 4-dimensional spacetime embedded within a 5-dimensional spacetime and descriptive for a 3-dimensional surface embedded as volumar within a higher dimensional cosmology, described in the properties of a Möbian-Klein Bottle geometric connectivity for a one-sided manifold becoming two-sided in the original form of the Dirac string as a one-dimensional mathematical singularity mirroring itself in the monopolar string self-duality of a multidimensional holographic cosmology.
Note: This page is added by viXra Admin – See requirements/instructions on the submission form.
Video link: https://youtu.be/zOVag2pcApo
https://www.bitchute.com/video/mMVoAb4t9xtg/
The Creation of the Universe and the Monopole String of Paul Dirac for the Magnetic Monopoles of t’Hooft-Polyakov
Abstract: The Dirac quantization condition and its relationship to the electromagnetic finestructure constant alpha is derived from the initial boundary conditions of the Quantum Big Bang Singularity (QBBS). The QBBS is shown to form a 2/11-dimensional mirror membrane as a 1-dimensional Dirac string relating timespace of a string-membrane epoch preceding the QBBS to the spacetime following the creation event. The Dirac monopole then transforms as a point particle into a space extended elementary particle known as the classical electron and is electro charge coupled as an electropole to the magneto charge of a magnetopole. The electron as a point particle of QFT and QED so becomes the monopolar form of the Dirac monopole as the Dirac electron, but coupled to the elementary quantum geometric templates of the scalar Higgs boson with a dark matter particle defined as a RMP or Restmass Photon. The space occupying classical electron is shown to oscillate on the fermi scale of the nuclear interactions of colour charge asymptotic gluon-quark confinement, with the ground state for the electron defining the wormhole singularity of the QBBS in spacetime as the fifth transformation of superstring classes (heterotic class 64) from the timespace era. The Dirac string so manifests as a membrane-mirror for a 4- dimensional spacetime embedded within a 5-dimensional spacetime and descriptive for a 3-dimensional surface embedded as volumar within a higher dimensional cosmology, described in the properties of a Möbian-Klein Bottle geometric connectivity for a one-sided manifold becoming two-sided in the original form of the Dirac string as a one-dimensional mathematical singularity mirroring itself in the monopolar string self-duality of a multidimensional holographic cosmology .
The natural stability of the proton and the absence of an original supersymmetry between matter and antimatter is shown to be the result of the non-existence of antimatter in the primordial universe and the coupling of the Higgs boson to the RMP of spin -1 and energy 14.03 TeV*. Primordial neutron decay becomes the transformation of a RMP boson in the form of an ylemic dineutron into two lefthanded neutrons quantum spin coupled to a graviphoton as the scalar Higgs bosonic blueprint of the wave- quarkian quantum geometry. Particular initial boundary conditions for the QBBS, defined as the Dirac magnetic monopole indicate the energy regime for the Higgs Boson as being bounded in a subatomic displacement scale from 0.000014-0.0028 fermi. This displacement scale forms a natural boundary for the mesonic scale for the strong nuclear interaction and resolves the discrepancy in the mean lifetime for beta minus decay in showing that the excess of neutrons at the Higgs energy with RMP-dark matter excess is 126.95/125.78=1.0093 and becomes balanced by a deficit of neutrons at the Higgs energy with RMP -dark matter deficit in 122.49/123.57=0.9913 and time differences of 10.28 and 9.92 seconds* for a mean neutron lifetime of 880.14 s* respectively.
The thermodynamic evolution of the universe is shown to relate a general evolution of neutron stars with specific nuclear densities with respect to the cosmic radiation background to the Hawking properties of black holes as a background energy matrix originating from the distribution of a baryonic mass seedling and its coupling to the QBBS parameters. The Hawking-Gamow Temperature Unification for classical and quantum gravitation is so derived as the temperature ratio: 3 2 2 3 2 THawking/Tylem = 1 = hcRe /2Gomc Rylem RHawking = Re /nucleon.Rylem RHawking 18 with nucleon = plancke .
Ha ki g s i o la k holes a e sho to pla a de isi e ole i the u i e sal os olog , as the modulate the quantum gravitational universe of the creation event with the classical gravitation of the spacetime geometry. In particular the micro black holes form the energy centers within encompassing vortices of potential energy modelled on the Jeans length applied to the general temperature evolution of the universe and inclusive of dark matter haloes around galaxies deriving from the original intersection of the higher dimensional inflaton superluminal light path with the lower dimensional light path of the instanton.
The diffi ulties i easu i g Ne to s g a itatio al o sta t a e fou d to e directly related to the measured variation in the electromagnetic finestructure constant alpha e as the polar orientation of the Di a st i g of the QBB“ a d as a dist i utio of t Hooft-Polyakov monopoles in the Schwarzschild metric at the GUT unification energy scale from 2.7x1016 GeV* to 8.1x1017 GeV*.
Introduction
Paul A.M. Dirac said in his 1931 paper addressing his work on the quantization of electric charge in connection with the magnetic charge of a magnetic monopole:
The theo leads to a o e tio , a el , [eg0 = hc/4], between the quantum of magnetic pole and the electronic charge. It is rather disappointing to find this reciprocity between electricity and magnetism, instead of a purely electronic quantum condition such as [hc/2e2].
In his 1948 paper Dirac emphasized his belief in magnetic monopoles:
The ua tizatio of ele t i it is o e of the ost fu da e tal a d st iki g featu es of ato i ph si s, and there seems to be no explanation for it apart from the theory of poles. This provides some grounds for elie i g i the e iste e of these poles.
Then in 1978, Dirac expressed his disappointment as to the apparent unreality of magnetic monopoles and the physical importance of the electromagnetic finestructure constant alpha:
…[the theo ]...did not lead to any value for this number value [-1 ≈ 137], and, for that reason, my a gu e t see ed to e a failu e a d I as disappoi ted ith it. The p o le of e plai i g this u e hc/2e2 is still completely unsolved. Nearly 50 years have passed since then. I think it is perhaps the most fundamental unsolved problem of physics at the present time, and I doubt very much whether any really big progress will be made in understanding the fundamentals of ph si s u til it is sol ed.
Ref:
Dirac, P.A.M. (September 1931). "Quantized Singularities in the Electromagnetic Field . P o eedi gs. 133 (821): 60–72.Bibcode:1931RSPSA.133...60D. doi:10.1098/rspa.1931.0130.
1. Dirac PAM. Quantized singularities in the electromagnetic field. Proc R Soc Lond A. 1931; 133: 60-72. 2. Dirac PAM. The theory of magnetic poles. Phys Rev. 1948; 74: 817-830. 3. Dirac PAM. The monopole concept. Int J Theor Phys. 1978; 17: 235–247. 4. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.13403.pdf
The Creation in a Quantum Big Bang in Spacetime from Timespace
The origin and nature of the universe has been a question of inquiry since the beginnings of sentient life forms experiencing themselves in a variety of forms and degrees of being self-aware. Many cosmological models have and are being constructed from the beginnings of speech and sound and geometric symbolism to words and written record keeping in parchments, scrolls, paper, manuscripts, and the digitalization of libraries.
The Big Bang model for the creation of the universe
In the journey through the history of planet earth in time, the models created and composed to explain this history and the encompassing history of the universe itself, have attained a nexus point of comprehension and understanding to enable the planetary civilization on earth to collectivize and universally share its information basis with the overall universe. A universal civilization potential can then be realised, by substituting an older historical timeframe of Universal Political Correctness by the Uniphyscon or Universal Physicalized Consciousness and as a synonym for a new historical timeframe and timespace as the generator of spacetime. Timespace differs from spacetime in that time can exist without space as a simple count of mathematical point singularities or frequency permutation states in the case of particular modular dualities relating the mathematically abstract inversion properties of numbers to the physicalizations of the frequency states as inverse time to the period of oscillatory physical systems, such as a world defined in energy and its mathematical representations modelling the physical reality.
The universe was born from a mathematical singularity, known as a quantum fluctuation creating space and time in a minimized spacetime parameter configuration known as the Quantum Big Bang Singularity or QBBS. This quantum fluctuation is defined as the energy potential of a Zero-Point Planckian Quantum Harmonic Oscillator and as a minimum displacement configuration in a QBBS timespace and can also be te ed as the ou e of the Pla k le gth as this i i u le gth a displacement defined in space a ha e. It as this ou e of ti espa e hi h formed the required original boundary conditions for the universe to be born in spacetime i the oupli g of this i sta t i ti espa e alled a i sta to a d oupled to a i sta t i spa e as the i flaton. The QBBS then defined the concept of multidimensional spacetime in a dual action of a lower dimensional universe becoming embedded in a higher dimensional universe as effect of the inflaton utilizing the boundary condition of the instanton to manifest a parallel cosmology in the lower- and higher dimensional spacetimes.
This minimum spacetime configuration of the instanton-inflaton parameter space coupling is defined as a parameter space of the QBBS and containing other mathematical abstract point spaces such as symbolic representations known as fundamental constants and elementary mathematical relationships between numbers and equations of different degrees of interwovenness and complexity. All entities in the QBBS parameter space shared a common origin in the abstraction of an encompassing data collective, which can be called the plenum or world of Information-Energy. This world existing before the QBBS, so defines a notime in nowhere, where the concept of order precedes the concept of time in its independence of duration or time intervals; but where event B cannot occur before event A has occurred and independent from how far apart events A and B would be in an existing spacetime. As time and space became manifest with the universe in the QBBS, the abstract entities emerging from it did not exist in the form of the QBBS parameter spacetime, but in the QBBS timespace. This QBBS parameter timespace can be described as a prior realm of abstract mathematical definition and algorithmic identities and as a mirror universe awaiting its own metaphysical creation and manifestation through the emergence of particular data collectors and information gatherers within a then existing spacetime. The universal data collectors would evolvingly become self-aware in universal physicalized consciousness to utilize the abstract entities from the plenum of the information world to connect the spacetimed universe with the time spaced mirror universe. As the mirror of the timespace was also a mirror of the spacetime, it could and would image all particulars of the physical universe in global and local parameters into Khaibit, the shadow of the physical universe as the mirror universe of the QBBS parameter spacetime.
This scenario required a medium of super-universal communication to connect the physical universe with Khaibit as its metaphysical shadow and mirror universe. The medium for the super-universal communication took the form of quantum entangled universal physicalized consciousness and where this QE of the U iph s o e a led the two worlds to blend and merge from the platform of an old timespace configuration into a form of a new spacetime configuration. The difference between the old form and the new form is that the old form began in time to create space and that the new form will be able to start from the space to create time. The implication is that the old spacetime could not manipulate the interdependency of space and time, such as the initial boundary conditions defined in the QBB“, i ludi g the i a ia e of the speed of light c as a li it fo elo it and the acceleration of any material object could achieve. This dependency found in the natural laws was a consequence of the spacetime matrix beginning with time as the first and generating dimension and not with space as the generator dimension. In the old world the time dimension generated three expanding space dimensions with an additional six twistor space dimensions, strongly associated with the first time dimension for a 10-dimensional string spacetime. The twistor dimensions are different from the expanding time dimensions in that the twistor dimensions remain independent from space, except for their minimum spacetime configuration of forming little curls or circles around the time dimension.
In the new world, the 1st time dimension will exchange with the 10th string dimension to change the old starting 1st time dimension into the 1st space dimension and opening up the 4th, previously curled up string dimension as a new space dimension. This will transform the old universe of 4-dimensional flat Minkowski spacetime into a new universe, defined physically as a 5-dimensional flat Kaluza-Klein hyper- spacetime. In the old world, the 4th expanding time dimension formed the boundary for an expanding universe, but in the new world, the 10th dimension will be the endpoint time dimension as a new boundary for the universe and connecting a new mirror of the 11th dimension to the mirror universe Khaibit as the inside of the boundary of the 10th dimension. The outside of the Witten membrane spacetime mirror will be the inside of Khaibit as a 12th dimensional Vafa spacetime forming a spacetime perfect image of the inside of the 10-dimensional spacetime of the universe. The timespace of the QBBS generator will so become equivalent to the spacetime of the QBBS evolutionary path in the form of information exchange across the boundary of the Witten membrane mirror of the 11th dimension. The end result will be a holographic multiverse in 12 dimensions and where the 11-dimensional membrane mirror will become the universal data collector as a root-reduced two-dimensional and two-sided Klein bottle manifold, yet one-sided as a Möbian connector having effectively doubled the old spacetime universe in 10 dimensions of the 4-dimensional hyperspace with a 6-dimensional twistor space and the 11th dimension as the new shared time dimension between Klein as Möbius and Khaibit. The two sidedness of Klein so is defined in the new time dimension as a 10-dimensional string space of 4 hyperspace dimensions with 6 quantumspace dimensions to bridge the difference to the 11-dimensional membrane space as the 10th spacetime dimension connecting as a brane space to the 11th spacetime dimension to generate the 12th spacetime dimension as a superbrane volumar spacetime , so creating the shadow universe through the mathematical topology and definition of the Klein Bottle manifold of being one-sided but self-intersecting itself in the 11-dimensional Witten surface.
This Witten Mother-Magic-Membrane-Mirror as the 11th dimension and connector of the two universes will encompass the hyper-spacetime of Kaluza-Klein as four space dimensions with one time dimension, embedding five dimensions within 11 dimensions and displacing the six twistor dimensions as three rotation dimensions in rotation space and with three vibration- or frequency dimensions in quantum space. The boundary of the hyper-spacetime will be a 3-dimensional surface or volumar, embedded 2 4 within a 4-dimensional volumar, defined in the geometry and topology of hyperspace as V4=½ R and 2 2 3 dV4/dR=(2R)(R )=2 R and so the volume of a Horn torus in 3 dimensions, also known as a Riemann sphere with radius Rtorus. In geometric terms, this indicates that a 3-dimensional sphere as the size and volume of the universe with radius R3 is equal in volume to a Horn torus with radius Rtorus= {2/3}R3 and so the radius of the Horn torus is reduced by a fa to of . … f o the adius R3 of the sphere in three dimensions. Doubling the radius of the Horn torus as the radius for the encompassing sphere as R3=2Rtorus so shows that 8 spheres of radius Rtorus fit precisely into an encompassing sphere with radius 2Rtorus. But considering the volume of the universe as a 3-dimensional 2 3 3 boundary with V3=dV4/dR=2 R4 to embed a 3-dimensional volume V2=(4/3)R2 with its boundary as 2 surface area dV2/dR=4R2 then defines a boundary condition of R4 ≥ {2/3}R2 , showing that in an expanding and time evolving universe; the 3-dimensional torus volumar will attain its critical nexus of changing from its 3-dimensional volumar status into a 3-dimensional surface membrane status at a time given by the boundary condition. This time marker has been calculated as occurring 994.78 million years ago and so the topological geometry of the universe changed from a single positive de Sitter curvature into a combination of its positive spheroidal de Sitter curvature with a negative hyperbolic Anti de Sitter curvature in 4- dimensional spacetime, cancelling the positive curvature to manifest a perfectly flat universe with zero curvature. This can be visualized at the center of the Horn torus, where the tangential curvature of the torus radii meet in the horizontal plane to create the concave topology of a wormhole or an Einstein-Rosen bridge with the surface of the torus radii curving away from the center and for the emergence of geometric circular cross sections as the northern top and the southern bottom of the Horn torus. But at the north pole and south poles of the vertical plane connecting the two hemispheres of the prior encompassing 3-dimensional spherical volumar, the curvature is convex, cancelling the concave curvature intrinsic for the cosmological evolution of the universe to all of the time prior to the critical curvature time marker and as measured and observed by any observer within the expanding universe.
This prior realm or world is described as the outside boundary of the manifested singularity of the QBBS, with the inside boundary defining physical universe as the fifth of five abstract mathematical singularities and as a one-dimensional entity in transforming its nature as a mathematical point into that of a mathematical line known as a Dirac string. A Dirac string so allows the mathematical abstraction of the point space to transform into a point line requiring space to extend into as itself and as a Y direction in some coordinate system. The minimum parameter spacetime so enables a 2nd dimension to emerge from the Dirac string, as the st 1 dimension of a minimized line segment of wavelength weyl curls itself around the mathematical point space it used to occupy as a segment of the Dirac string. This process changes the 1st dimension of the Dirac string from a time dimension into a 1st space dimension as the now space limited summation of mathematical line segments and redefines the newly created space dimension of the XY-plane as a quasi-time dimension. The entire Dirac string so transforms itself as a mathematical point without extent into a mathematical line of any number of such point spaces to create the Dirac string extending in two polar directions from the mathematical singularity of the QBBS. As there is no limit of how many mathematical point can exist in the Information-Energy prior spacetime plenum, the Dirac string is initially infinite as a consequence of no spacetime existing at the point of creation known as the first instant of time or the Instanton. As the individual point spaces integrate as a sum of such point spaces however, each individual point preserved its individual universal identity in circularizing its point space into a membrane- or string space in the XY-plane. The Weyl wavelength weyl so became redefined from its circular form as the perimeter of a point circle as the displacement of the circumference from the center of the point circle as its wormhole radius. With the creation of a 2nd area or surface dimension from the point circle count from the mathematical point count, two orthogonal directions emerged from the potential infinite Dirac string, which became upper and lower bounded in changing the expansion from the lower bounded origin to the universal north as self-relative positive upper bound in a direction from the origin towards the self-relative positive east with a simultaneous creation of the self-relative negative west direction in the transformation of the expansion towards the self-relative south as the mirror of the positive and negative polarities of the upper bound in the origin.
This creation of the 2nd dimension so formed a limit for the mathematical point spaces extending in space and in time into two opposite directions. The potential infinite linespace became halted in the QBBS defining the two endpoints as two Weylian wormholes defined in the Guth-de Broglie Inflaton and mirrored at the origin as two polar opposite but identical minimum timespace configurations. The northern positively charged wormhole so observes the self-relative anticlockwise rotation as effect of the righthanded torque of the Dirac string projecting orthogonally from the newly created XY-plane into the XZ-plane of a so created 3rd dimension and with the torque angular displacement defining a new positively charged part of the northern hemisphere as pointing into the positive Z-a is di e tio o out from the XY-plane. The southern negatively charged wormhole in the southern hemisphere corollary projects the torque in the negatively charged XY-plane in a clockwise otatio i to the XY-plane of the 3rd dimension to complete the 8 sectors of the geometrically defined encompassing 3-dimensional sphere with radius twice the torus radius. The four torus radii so define the radius of the sphere in meeting at the QBBS singularity physically defined as the Dirac magnetic monopole. The 2nd quasi-time dimension so becomes a real space dimension and the newly created 3rd dimension takes its place as a quasi-time dimension acting on the XY-plane as a flatland of membrane spacetime.
The Dirac Magnetic Monopole and the Instanton-Inflaton Quantum Entanglement of Wormholes
The Dirac monopole is defined only at the singularity as the QBBS, but is connected via the Dirac string in an arbitrary gauge space, defining potential energy in any place of the universe defined in a three- dimensional parameter space, subject to the initial boundary conditions derived from the timespace of the higher dimensional plenum of nowhere in notime. It so is the Dirac string, which allows the point potentials to transform into string potentials in the rotation space around the Dirac string transforming individual point potentials into the Weylian wormhole potentials and integrating and summing subsequently about the three orthogonal space directions of the X-Y-Z plane intersection. The magnetic monopole singularity of the QBBS so is defined as the Weylian wormhole of creation and the initial boundary condition for this minimum spacetime configuration becomes a conformal mapping of the Planckian wormhole from the timespace of the information plenum of algorithmic and mathematical definitions.
The northern- and southern parts of the Dirac string were defined as infinite, before becoming bounded in the creation of the 2nd dimension followed by the emergence of the 3rd dimension and the Weyl string in 2 space dimensions with a quasi-spacetime dimension, able to potentialize the timespace parameter definitions to create a 3-dimensional space with a 4th spacetime dimension. The QBBS parameter spacetime definitions of the boundary conditions for the inflaton now fully integrate a 4th real time dimension and manifest the Weylian wormhole volumar as a Black Hole defined by the instanton. The nature of the inflaton so is to free the 3rd quasi-spacetime dimension from its original definition of being potentially infinite in extent, but existing in a space less gauge free parameter realm of pure real time without one-dimensional space defining the number count of the timespace in nowhere in notime; or as existing in a free parameter world of infinite one-dimensional space without time.
Dirac’s Qua tizatio Co ditio for ag etic charge g as proportional to electric charge e
The monopole of mass mm and magnetic charge qm circulates at a radius r and velocity v in the electric field between two capacitor plates in the XY-plane within a constant electric field E=Ez and where z is the unit vector in the Z direction connecting the two poles.
2 The Lorentz force qmvB=qmvE/c balanced by the centripetal force mmv /r then gives, in the classical high energy limit for v~c
E=mmvc/rqm ……………………………..[Eq.1a]
The energy of the monopole is quantized in the Landau quantization En=hf(n+½)= (h/2)(n+½) and as a result of using the Hermitian function n(x) as general form for a probability frequency distribution and used to derive the form for a classical 1-dimensional harmonic oscillator in the form of a quantum harmonic oscillator in quantum mechanics.
The Normal distribution formula has a form (x) = {1/ } which is found in the Hermitian 2 function: −½� √2� �
The classical form for the harmonic oscillator are given by the Hamiltonian: = 2/2m +½ k 2= 2/2m + ½m2 2
Theℋ kinetic� energy� p2/2m=m� 2v2/2m=½mv� 2 and potential energy ½kx2=½m2x2 f o Hooke s la a d the equation of motion: F=-kx =md2x/dt2 and a solution x(t)=Acos(t+constant) with dx/dt=-Asin(t+constant) and with d2x/dt2=-2Acos(t+constant) , defining =√ k/ = f=2/T
The energy levels of the classical Hamiltonian then correspond to the eigenvalues of the Hermitian operator (Y)=(ih/2)d for the momentum operator = -(ih/2 ∂/∂x The time independent Schrödinger equation (Y)=(ih/2)d=E() then allows solution for the wave function x|(ℋ)=(x) for the eigenvalues of the Hermite �function Hn(x) as Landau poles and with energy levels En quantizedℋ in integer n and defining a minimum harmonic quantum oscillator for n=0 as the Zero-Point Energy of the Planck oscillator
Eo=½(h/2)o=½(h/2)(2fo)=½hfo
The mass of the monopole can be equated with the mass of a particle accelerated in a cyclotron for the high energy limit. 2 For a cyclotron frequency =2fc from mv /r=qBv with v=rqB/m and =v/r=qB/m=qE/mc and E=cB for the coupling of the electric field with the magnetic field for
= qmE/mmc……………………………...[Eq.2a]
2 The quantized kinetic energy for the orbit of the magnetic monopole so is ½mmv =n.hf for
=2f=qmE/mmc for 2 ½mmv =n.hf=n.h/2=n.hqmE/2mmc and describing the quantization of angular momentum JZ for the magnetic monopole about the Dirac string.
JZ = mmvr = 2n.(h/2) ………………..…[E . a]
mmv = 2n.(h/2)/r = Erqm/c by [Eq. 2a] for a quantization condition for the electric field 2 E=2n.(hc/2)/r qm………………………..[Eq.4a]
And without the zero-point dark energy minimum Planck quantum harmonic oscillator, in the Landau poles En = hf(n+½), which can be said to exist as a precursor of the manifestation of the Quantum Big Bang in a string-membrane epoch defined from an oscillation of the Planck displacement as the original quantum fluctuation 2 3 2 Lplanck = e/c √ = √{hGo/2c } = {Go/c }mplanck
This ua tu displa e e t ou e of the i i u spa eti e o figu atio i itiated the interdependency of fundamental constants, utilized in the laws of nature in defining the ratio of electrocharge over the squared speed of light c2 in unitizing two unitary measurement systems; one mass centered in the form of Planck units suppressing universal charge, both electric and magnetic and the other suppressing universal mass in the corollary of charge centered Stoney units. The coupling of those two unitary systems then unify the finestructures of energy-charge based electromagnetism with those of an energy-mass based gravitational interaction.
The angular momentum JZ relates to the electric field E in [Eq.3a] for the mass of the monopole in Erqm/vc=mm=2n.(h/2)/vr and the positive charge at the north pole and the negative charge on the south pole, considered to be infinite in extent but intersected by the cylindrical circular flux areas at the 2 2 2 two poles for a total charge density of E.dA=E.2r = 2Q/o =2er /o for E=2e/2o = e/o = 2Q/2or 2 2 = Q/or for Q=er for each capacitor plate
2 2 E=2n.(hc/2)/r qm = e/o = Q/r o … a d charge quantization Q = 2o{n.hc/2}/qm …for Q=e=N.e…………………..………………………….…….…….…[E .5a]
2 2 2 Di a s ua tizatio o ditio follo s as mQ=2o{n.hc/2}={(4ohc)/2e }{½n.e }={n.e /2} for 2 qm=n.e /2N.e=n.e/2N
Magnetic monopole qm =n.e/2N={n/N}{e/2} ……..[Eq.6a]
Di a s ua tizatio o ditio fo the atu e of a ag eti o opole ei g oupled i its ag eti ha ge to the ele t i ha ge of a ele t o , so elates Di a s o sta t of [E . ] i defi i g qm= Di a s Co sta t an expression as a multiple of e/2) and so presenting [Eq.7a] in a form of: e* = n.e/4 = {n/2}{e/2} = ðdirac {e/2} ……..……[Eq.7a]
and where ðdirac becomes Di a s Co sta t 2 3 19 3 -2 ðdirac = 8cRee/Goh = 4Re[ec]/Lplanck c = 4.54214x10 [C/m s ]*……………...[EQ.1]
The de i atio of Di a s o sta t i di ates the s et i Ma ell s e uatio s i a fo of e de i g the poi t ha ge ag eti o opole of Paul Di a as e ui ale t to the t Hooft-Polyakov magnetic monopole of a Grand Unification energy spectrum, bounded in a finestructure unification condition relating the gravitational interaction to the electromagnetic interaction and so allowing the point charge electron of QFT and QED to reclaim its classical definition in the parameters of the electromagnetic fine 2 2 2 2 structure alpha =2kee /hc=e /2ohc=ce /2h=60e /h ia the ele t o s total e e g gi e
2 2 mec =kee /Re for the classical electron radius as a function of its mass me for 2 2 2 2 Re=kee /mec =2kehe /2hc me=h/2cme={h/2cme} 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 =Rcompton= {h /4 kemee }= RBohr1 = {ZRn/n }= {Z/RRydbergn } and where RRydberg defines the quantized electron energy levels in the wavelength 2 2 1/e=RRydberg{1/n – 1/(n+1) } in the Bohr atom for quantized angular momentum nh/2=mevR for v=nh/2meR or total energy 2 2 2 KE+PE={-½PE+PE}=½mev -Zkee /R=-Zkee /2R for En=hfn=hc/n
The lower bounded unification monopole describing the Dirac magnetic monopole has a Maxwellian displacement current along the Dirac string in units of [Am], but manifesting as a mass equivalence -11 2 3 16 mmonopole=[ec]mod =4.818x10 kg* for an energy [ec]modc =ec =2.7x10 GeV*
Richard Fey a ’s derivatio for Dirac’s Qua tizatio Co ditio for ag etic charge g as proportional to electric charge e
‘i ha d Fe a s ethod to de i e Di a s ua tizatio o ditio sho s ho to e ed the Di a string into two path integrals in a quantum-mechanical derivation, using two wave functions (x1,t1); [2i/h]S(x1) [2i/h]S(x2) (x2,t2), connecting two points A and B in two path integral summations e , e for 2 [2i/h]S(x) probability amplitudes P=|K| and K= 1.2 = ∫D(x)e a d fo lassi al a tio “ =∫ (x,dx/dt)dt and Lagrangian and where the summation of all paths is symbolised by D(x) [2i/h]S(x1) [2i/h]S(x2) Then K=K1+K2= ∫D(x)e + ∫D(x) e for the action of a free particle unaffected byℒ the Dirac string field enclosedℒ by the two path integrals summed over all possible paths, S(0)= ∫KE dt=∫(½mdx/dt) 2 dt P=|K1+K2| Action S(1) however interferes with action S(2) in the external vector potential AL in units of charge density (q/o=og) in the action S=S(0)+(q/c) ∫ AL .dL The closed path integral so becomes C AL .dl = ∫ A2 .dl - ∫ A1.dL for path A to B to A changing direction from clockwise to anticlockwise or vice versa. [2i/h](S[0]+[q/c] ∫ A.dL) [2i/h](S[0]+[q/c] ∫ A.dL) [2iq/hc] AL .dl [2iq/hc] ∫ A.dL) K = ∫1D(x)e 1 + ∫2D(x)e 2 = {K1 + e K2} e 1 C [2iq/hc] AL .dl The interference term of the closed path e for C AL .dl = AL dA = Bmonopole .dA + Bstring .dA C ∇x Then e[2iq/hc] AL .dl = e[2iq/hc] Bmonopole.dA e[2iq/hc] Bstring.dA for e[2iq/hc] Bstring.dA =1, as the Dirac string of dimension 1 is C not observable, the vector potential being undefined everywhere except at the singularity 2i(qg/hco) The magnetic flux is however Bstring .dA = oqm=g/o for e = 1 for 2 2 2 2i.n 4qge /4ohce =2.qg/e =2g/e and g=n.e/2 for q=e and e =1
Fe a s path i teg als e o pass the Di a st i g ot at the e te of the olu e ha o i g the magnetic monopole singularity. Placing the singularity at the center and allowing the two parts of the Feynman derivation of the Dirac quantization condition to be the two hemispheres of a sphere with the magnetic monopole at the center of the sphere as done by the Wu-Yang configuration allows a cylindrical representation of the topology applicable to the entire universe.
As the Dirac string is one-dimensional without any width, the surface area for the magnetic flux of 2(2R2) the magnetic monopole for cylinder radius R2 describes the Dirac monopole as the central singularity and magnetic point charge for the cosmology. √2R for surface area 4
The surface area for the universe is represented by the magnetic flux of the monopole as a one-dimensional form of energy manifesting the Quantum Big Bang from the monopolar singularity, albeit in using a higher dimensional string-membrane epoch characterised by the definition of a minimum spacetime configuration as a quantum fluctuation of the Planck length by the zero point quantum harmonic oscillator, defined as the Weyl-Eps quantum of creation as the inverse of the magneto charge e* in units of the gravitational parameter GM, defining a new charge unit of the star coulomb as the physicalisation of consciousness as a quantum angular acceleration acting on any spacetime volumar.
Quantum Field Theory (QFT) and Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) become enabled to replace the point charge electron with the point charge of the Dirac-'t Hooft-Polyakov magnetic monopole, so allowing the classical electron radius Re to enter the physical descriptions in the quantum field theories.
Dirac’s string modeled as spanning the universe for a singular magnetic monopole at the center of the earth
Di a s o opole a the e defi ed as a si gula it o opole of magnetopole charge e*=Qm, connecting the two opposite sides of the universe in the Hubble horizon RH=c/Ho in the Dirac string. The spacetime observer relative universal north pole so is given as the positive charge distribution placed onto the northern hemisphere of the universe in a 3-dimensional surface derivative 2 2 3 2 4 dV4/dR=(2RH)(RH )=2 RH from the 4-dimensional hypersphere V4(R)=½ R . The southern hemisphere then becomes the negative charge distribution as a 3-dimensional volumar connecting the Dirac string from its south pole to the north pole. The two infinite capacitor plate surfaces so are given in the higher dimensional string-me a e spa e hi h so effe ti el u e the olu e of the - dimensional sphere embedded in a 4-dimensional hyperspace as a 3-dimensional surface or membrane space.
The Dirac string starts from, and terminates on, a magnetic monopole. Thus, assuming the absence of an infinite-range scattering effect by this arbitrary choice of singularity, the requirement of single-valued wave functions (as above) necessitates charge-quantization. That is, 2 4.2qeqm/4ohc=8qeqm{}/{2e }=2ee*/ohc=4e*/e must be an integer n for any electric charge qe and magnetic charge qm. e*=n.e/4a={n/2}{e/2}= {e/2} and where ðdirac e o es Di a s Co sta t
The Dirac Constant for� the Universal Cosmology: [EQ1] 2 3 19 3 -2 ðdirac = 8cRee/Goh = 4Re[ec]/Lplanck c = 4.54214x10 [C/m s ]* in units of the star coulomb defining the magneto charge e* in a universal unit calibration [C*]=[C2/C*]=[C2s2/m3] and where the mensuration units for the gravitational parameter [GM]=[Nm2kg/kg2]=[m3/s2]=[C*] as the units for universally defined physicalized consciousness as an angular quantum acceleration (df/dt) acting on any spacetime volumar of units [m3] as the effect of the Dirac string manifesting at the observer relative center of the universe and as given in the location of the Dirac magnetic monopole at this center as a definition of the Quantum Big Bang Singularity (QBBS).
-6 The derivations consider the magnetic pe ea ilit o sta t of f ee spa e o= H/m as a u i e sal o sta t elated to the i peda e of f ee spa e 2 2 2 2 2 Zo =|E/H| =| oE/B| =| ocB/B| = o/eo={ / }/{ / }={ } and so describe a finestructure for 2 2 Ma ell s o sta t o o=1/c [m/s] * for the units of universal resistance in a calibrated mensuration s ste e ui i g the speed of light i u its of [ /s]SI to transform into units of [m/s]*. The units for 2 2 2 2 the impedance Zo so e o e easu ed i √ [H/ ]/[F/ ] *=√ [Js /C m][Jm/C ])*=[V/I]*=[Js/C ]*=[ ]* and are observed in the physics of superconductivity in the form of the Quantum Hall effect n.h/e2 , the conductance quantum 2e2/h and Josephson frequencies f=n.E/h. The f ee i peda e ho e e elates to a deeper nature found in superconductive phenomena in that a dimensionless or modular resistance implies a natural law in the form of Action=Charge Squared as {h=ee=ee*=e*e*}.
The Action Law is therefore descriptive for the relationship between electric charges of electropoles and magnetic charges of magnetopoles.
Electric flux e = qe/o = reV/o = Qe/o Magnetic flux m = qm(oc) = rmV(oc) = (oc)Qm
2 2 3 2 Electric flux e = .E = [J/Cm ] = {qe}[Jm/C m ]={e}[C /Jm] = e/o for the electric charge density per unit volume 3 2 Magnetic flux m∇ = .B = {1/c} .E = [Js/Cm ]= {qm}[Js/C m] = om for the magnetic charge density per unit area ∇ ∇
The magnetic charge density for the Dirac monopole is m = e*f as a source energy monopolar current imonopolar per unit area as the Maxwell displacement current per unit area 3 2 3 oe*f/Aps=(df/dt)/e*ec and f*= c/*=Aps (dt/df)/oe* ec
The magnetic flux for the Dirac monopole is 2 2 3 m = om = mps/[ec]mod = mpsc /[ec]mod c = Eps/[ec ]mod 3 3 3 = [J/Am ]/{df/dt} = [J/Am ]/{dfps/dtps}= [J/Am ] 2 2 by modular string-membrane mirror duality Eps=hfps=h/fss and Eps/Ess=fps =1/fss with ps.fps=c=1/ssfss
The Maxwell displacement current for the Dirac magnetic monopole as the QBBS singularity manifests as the t Hooft-Pol ako hedgehog ag eti o opole i GUT u ifi atio as the i i u o opola -11 2 6 16 mass of [ec]mod =4.819369011x10 kg* and energy [ec]mod c = 4.33743211x10 J* as precisely 2.7x10 8 17 GeV*. The uppe ou d fo the t Hooft-Polyakov monopole is 30[ec]mod=1.301229633x10 J* or 8.1x10 GeV* with the two bounds related to the gravitational parameter GM partial to the measurements of Newton's gravitational constant G and the energy of the t'Hooft-Polyakov magnetic monopoles of 'Grand-Unification' or GUT energy regimes.
The magnetic flux of the Dirac monopole becomes a mass ratio per unit area expressed as source energy per monopolar unification energy per unit area A with wormhole unit area 2 2 2 -44 2 Aps=6 rps =3ps /2=1.5x10 [m ]* 2 2 3 3 m = om = oe*f = mps/[ec]mod = mpsc /[ec]mod c = Eps/[ec ]mod = 1/e*ec = 4.611023179x10-10
3 2 3 2 2 3 oe*f/Aps=(df/dt)|1/e*ec and f*= c/*= (df/dt)|1/oe* ec = 3ps (df/dt)|1/2oe* ec 2 -7 = 3h (df/dt)|1/2o[ec] = 7.338671173x10 Hz* per unit wormhole surface area, time t*=1,362,644.512 s* and *=c/f*=4.087933536x1014 m* for radius -13 13 R*=*/2=R(n*=Hot* = . )=6.506148293x10 m* for a time t* = , . s* i to the e pa sio a d the od a i e olutio of the u i e se with a coordinate 928,452.09 seconds before the E-googol marker for the classical electron radius modulation. 14 As the E-googol defines RE(n)= 3.43597108x10 m* for a time -12 tE=nE/Ho=2.1506x10 /Ho=1,145,323.7 s*; 217,320.8 s* or 2.515287 days
Re/RE=r*/R* for r*=R*Re/R* =(6.506148293x1013)(2.777777x10-15)/(3.43597108x1014)=5.25983302x10-16 m*. This displacement radius defines an effective electron mass via the Compton constant as -30 me=h/2cr*=4.906433293x10 kg* and reducing to a maximum mass at the QBBS instanton boundary -20 as meeff=mps=h/2crps=2.222x10 kg*
The Dirac constant calculates as:
ðdirac =2e*/e = 2/eEps=4emplanck√/emelectron 2 2 2 2 2 =4√{ h / Go)(2kee /hc)}/{kee /Rec }=4√{kee /Go}{2Rec /hc} 3 -2 = 8Re[ec]/Goh [C/m s ]* 2 for fine structure unification Go=4o for √{kee /Go}=e/Go
The inflaton so draws the data from the information space to manifest the number count for the inflaton from the algorithmic definition of the mathimatia, which is a label for the collected library in the timespace prior to the QBBS. This number count would count the number of spacetime quanta the inflaton would encompass as a 3- dimensional surface bounding the 10-dimensional string space as the boundary of a Riemann sphere in de Sitter spacetime embedding the Anti de Sitter spacetime in the cancelling of the topological curvatures. The number of space quanta for the inflaton to use is a googolplex of a number of googols, meaning number counts exceeding 100 digital places.
The 4 googols and 8 data strings generated by particular algorithms and number sequences in the mathimatia were: E=26x6561=1.006208782x10112 as data string E*={266561] generating data string F*={136656} from programming code: {Add the End to the Beginning and Start the New Beginning with the Old Beginning}=Line A-Repeat F=13x6656=1.019538764x10103 as data string F*={136656} and generating data string G*={673665} from programming code: {Add the End to the Beginning and Start the New Beginning with the Old Beginning}=Line A-Repeat G=67x3665=9.676924497x10102 as data string G*={673665} and generating data string H*={ [ + = ] }≠H* f o the p og a i g o a d: {If “u is edu ti e}=Κi e B-End-Line C- Reverse Line A-Repeat H=Undefined, because 5+6=11=2 is root reductive in the number 11 the first initializing Maria Number in the Maria matrix for the numerical archetypes in time connector dimensions 1, 4 and 7 [Footnote1] D=46x5612=4.375363663x1022 as data string D*={465612} from data string E*={266561} from programming code: {If Line A} Repeat C=25x6124=1.761392119x1044 as data string C*={256124} from data string D*={465612} from programming code: {If Line A} Repeat B=36x1242=7.619295808x1046 as data string B*={361242} from data string C*={256124} from programming code: {If Line A} Repeat A=31x2423=1.722742045x1033 as data string A*={312423} from data string B*={361242} from programming code: {If Line A} Repeat Z=Undefined, because no process of 3[3+U=1]2423 can yield 312423 from data string U24233 with U=- 2=-11 for mirror root reduction in the Maria code and programming command: {If Sum is reductive}=Line D-Define H H=ABCD=(31x36x25x46)x(2423x1242x6124x5612)=(1,283,400)x(7.882123905x101141) =1.011591782x10147 from programming code:{if Line D}-End-Define H=ABCD-End-
The end of the googolplex algorithm, self-limited in the Maria matrix and the SEps algorithm limiting the universe defined from Khaibit and the timespace of a Planck-Stoney membrane timespace epoch immediately adjacent to the QBBS in the timespace-spacetime boundary of the Dirac string and the magnetic Dirac monopole so defines four spacetime markers E with F and G to be encompassed by the inflaton boundary H defined as a summation of wormhole quanta comprising the Riemann sphere as a 2 2 3 3-dimensional surface of volume dV4/dR=(2R)(R )=2 R and for a specific redefinition for the radius of the Riemann sphere as the Hubble event horizon RH=c/Ho.
[Footnote 1:] The Maria Code in the Riemann analysis specifies the partitioning of the decimal monad: {1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9;10} around the primary Maria number and SEps-Co sta t fo a p i e u e algorithm +1+11+10+11+ as 33-tiered segments, transforming the wave mechanics of the SEps number sequence into the 64-codex of a DNA/RNA genomatrix for its potential quadrupling as a 256-codex incorporative of dormant intron/intein coding. The Maria Code is defined in the distribution of Maria numbers Mp+99=Mp+12 fo =½{√ k+ – 1} by the quadratic n2+n-66k=0.
Maria numbers are those integer counters, which contain all previously counted integers as mod|33|. The first Maria number so is 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11=66=2x33 for Maria#1=11 for k=2. Archetypes 2+3+5+6+8+9=33 so define 6 of the 11 dimensions in the defined omnispace for archetypes 1+4+7=12 completing the remaining 4 time connector dimensions in mirroring the limiting and boundary 12th dimension of Vafa omnispace in the 10th omnispace dimension across the11-dimensional Witten-Mirror as the Maria-Mirror or Maria membrane connecting higher dimensional omni-spacetime to lower dimensional quantum-spacetime.
A repeating Maria matrix is symbolised in this table with symbols =54=Love and =45=Use 11 65 110 164 209 263 …A het pe 21 66 120 165 219 264 …A het pe 32 77 131 176 230 275 …A het pe 33 87 132 186 231 285 …A het pe 44 98 143 197 242 296 …A het pe 54 99 153 198 252 297 …A het pe 65 110 164 209 263 308 …A het pe * [End of Footnote 1:]
The Hubble radius RH is defined from first principles as the light path of the higher 11-dimensional monopolar light emitted in the QBBS as a monopolar electromagnetic radiation wave, travelling invariantly with lightspeed c in two parallel cosmologies. The first cosmology in a lower dimensional universe is described by a Black Body Planckian Radiator modeled on a thermodynamic cosmological evolution in the hyperbolic negatively curved Anti de Sitter spacetime however enveloped by a de Sitter universe of positive curvature , thereby cancelling the curvatures to result in a flat Minkowski spacetime in 4-dimensional spacetime. This Temperature dependent universe experiences its spacetime evolution in the energy interactions of the QBBS parameter space and engage a gravitational deceleration, which asymptotically will approach but never reach the asymptotic boundary as set by the inflaton.
This becomes a consequence of the higher dimensional universe; whose definitive parameter is the light path of the monopolar light and a light path not restricted by the matter content and the gravitational parameters in their lower dimensional form. The QBBS parameter space allows a parallel evolutionary of the gravitational parameter GM in the unification of the electromagnetic and gravitational pa a ete s appli a le to the oth of the pa allel os ologies th ough the defi itio of the QE U iPh sCo as a ph si alized u i e sal o s ious ess defi ed i the atu e of the Dirac monopole and its e te sio i the t Hooft-Pol ako o opole of e e g u ifi atio . The Qua tu E ta gled UniPhysCon then is defined by the gravitational parameter GM in the lower dimensional universe, but in the higher dimensional universe the definition of GM translates into the form of any spacetime volumar being acted upon by a radius independent quantum acceleration or a frequency differential over time subject to the modular duality defined in the timespace of the string-membrane-volumars in modular dualities of inversion and mirror properties of the parameters. The motive a d p i e di e ti e for the QE UniPhysCon so is to transform gravitational potential energy in the form of the GM parameter and the matter content in the universe into physicalized universal consciousness quanta as the source energy quanta defined in the original Weylian wormhole as the effect of the nature of the Dirac monopole changing its status as a undefined source of magnetopolar charge into a defined source of electropolar charge, proportional to the nature of a magnetic charge, however able to manifest as magnetopolar charge as the inverse of the Weyl energy as the original source quantum of the QBBS. An overarching reason and purpose for the existence of the universe as a multiverse within an omniverse from first principles is found in the nature of the universe as a holographic universe requiring a doubling of the physicalized universe from spacetime into timespace to satisfy the initial boundary conditions of the described omni spacetime of the 10-11-12 dimensional cosmology.
The 11-dimensional light path so defines the guiding evolutionary parameter for the thermodynamic expansion of the universe in the invariance of lightspeed c moving further away from the asymptotic gravitationally decelerating universe. But there will be a time marker for the EMMR, as the Electro- Magnetic Monopolar Radiation meets the inflationary boundary at the intersection of the 10th string dimension with the 11th dimension of the Witten mirror in omnispace.
This time marker has been calculated as the inverse of Ho=c/RH and where Ho defines a nodal Hubble constant varying in time relative to a cycle time coordinate given in n=Hot or dn/dt=Ho. This nodal Hubble constant represents the upper time boundary as the mirror of the wormhole Weyl frequency fweyl=Eweyl/h as the source energy quantum of the QBBS.
The inflaton defined the size of the 11-dimensional universe in the nodal Hubble bound as the number 2 3 of space quanta contained in the Riemann toroidal surface VH=2 R and as H is known from the googolplex algorithm obtained from the mathimatia of the time space plenum
2 3 2 3 2 3 VH= R = H. (rweyl) = H weyl/ for
49 -22 26 RH = H weyl/ = . (10 / = . m* or 16.87610655 Billion lightyears for the Weyl wormhole perimeter of the QBBS -22 weyl =2rweyl= 10 [m*]
This then also defines the nodal Hubble constant Ho as the upper boundary of the -18 inflaton hyperspace as Ho=c/RH=1.877728042x10 [Hz or 1/s]*
The inflaton wave matter speed is then the tachyon speed as the Guth-Weyl inflaton for inflaton velocity 56 vdB=RHfweyl= . … [m/s]*
And the inflaton hyper-acceleration at instanton time as the Guth-Inflaton wave speed phase acceleration 2 87 2 adB=RHfweyl = . … [m/s ]*
The inflaton then connects the birth of the universe at the instanton with the death of the universe as a rebirth in the ending of a first semi-cycle at the Hubble node as the size of the universe defined by the instanton-inflaton coupling. This becomes the effect of the two wormhole images projected by the Hubble Horizon and its image in the shadow-mirror universe Khaibit back to the new created singularity of the QBBS, albeit now having a physical nature replacing the purely mathematical singularity of the mathematical point singularity of the Dirac magnetic monopole. The inflaton mapped the Weylian wormhole onto a new north pole at the inside of the Witten membrane of the 11th dimension and this creation of space naturally became mirrored in creating the shadow-mirror space for Khaibit and a new south pole now no longer trapped in the infinity potential of the Dirac string but finitized in the existence of a physical universe expanding in a lower dimension under gravitational retardation and the laws of nature and oscillating with invariant lightspeed in a higher dimensional cosmology.
The 10-dimensional universe embedded itself in a multiverse of 3 spacial dimensions given by the Riemann manifold, with a time dimension conformally projecting the time connector dimensions 4, 7 and 10 to the 11th dimension of the Witten-Maria mirror across line spacetime as the 4th dimension with the 7th dimension of twistor spacetime and the 10th dimension of the quantum spacetime. The connection between the 10th dimension of string spacetime in the quantum universe as a Dirichlet brane so forms the mirror image for the original 1st time dimension in line spacetime changing into a 1st space dimension with a quasi-spacetime in flatland for the second dimension assuming a time like nature to mirror the lower dimensional flatland in a higher dimensional flatland in a 11D-9D =2D dimensional root reduction.
The south pole in Khaibit so is also the south pole of the universe for a total extent of the inflaton as twice the Hubble event horizon and as three new singularities, each one separated from the adjacent one by one Hubble radius RH. This now renders the midpoint in the expansion of the universe at a radial displacement of ½RH as a rather special displacement coordinate, as at this point a new center for the universe must be defined to allow the Weyl wormhole of the QBBS to function as the south pole for the north pole at the intersection of the boundary of the Riemann universe with the Witten mirror. The Riemann universe as a 3-dimensional surface volumar embedding a 7-dimensional twistor spacetime is also named as Baab or Gate or Mother Black Hole to distinguish it from an ordinary 3-dimensional volumar within a 4-dimensional spacetime volumar.
The Dark Energy coupled to the Light Energy of a Quantum Entangled Mirror Universe
This midpoint will be imaged in Khaibit and allow the manifestation of Dark Energy from the mirror universe to affect and participate in the cosmological evolution of the physical universe. The displacement of the QBBS from a coordinate ½RH=function(n) must so define a scale factor for the expansion of the universe in the collinear two directions from the QBBS coordinate to the south pole in Khaibit and the north pole in Baab separated by precisely 4 Hubble radii, which geometrically become the total size of the 3-dimensional Riemann surface-volumar. The timeless shadow universe in three imaged spacial dimensions so is defined as a projection of its information onto the surface boundary of a 3-dimensional surface as the Riemann volumar in time as the 4-dimensional spacetime of Minkowski, Riemann and Einstein and becomes the holographic u i e se of t Hooft, Beke stei , Tho , Bousso, Malda e a a d “usski d.
The coordinate ½RH=function(n) for the expansion of the universe in the instanton-inflaton coupling with scale factor a is
R(n) = aRH = RH(n/(n+1) for a scale factor a=(n/(n+1) with dn/dt=Ho and parametrization for velocity vH(n)
2 2 vH(n) = dR(n)/dt = (dR/dn).(dn/dt) = RHHo/(n+1) = c/(n+1) and a parametrization of acceleration aH(n)
2 2 2 3 3 aH(n) = d R(n)/dt = (dvH(n)/dn).(dn/dt) = -2RHHo /(n+1) = -2cHo/(n+1)
Then for n=½, the Hubble radius for the higher dimensional universe will be the invariant light path of the EMMR, travelling at light speed c for a displacement from the QBBS of as nRH=½RH. and being emitted from the first wormhole coordinate of the instanton as the inflaton. The end of the inflation period is however defined in the Weyl wormhole frequency of 30 -31 fweyl=c/weyl=3x10 [Hz]* for an inverse time tweyl= . … [s]* defining the time coordinate for the second wormhole at the Hubble event horizon reflecting or imaging the light path of the i flato s EMM‘ to the eet a d i te se t the i sta to s light path at cycle coordinate n=½ tweyl [s]* after the i sta to s light path had reached this n cycle coordinate.
The lower dimensional light path R(n)=ct=nc/Ho= is equal to the light path of the EMMR so just for a time tweyl , after which the EMMR light path continues to increase the separation between the two displacements due to the gravitational retardation of the initial QBBS initial boundary conditions for the energy-matter-charge content of the universe.
For cycle coordinate n=1, the EMMR light path has reached the Hubble node, but the expansion of the lower dimensional universe under scale factor a=n/(n+1)=1/(1+1)=½ defines the critical halfway point for the onset of the dark energy from Khaibit and the shadow universe intersecting the light energy of the Riemann universe Baab.
The size of the universe at cycle coordinate n=1 is 25 R(1)=½RH =7.988377265x10 [m]* or 8.438053275 Gly fo a i il ea of . ea sola da s a d 1 Billion lightyears equal to 1 Gly.
The size of the universe at cycle coordinate n=½ is 25 R(½)=(½.⅔ RH=⅓RH=5.325584843x10 [m]* or 5.62536885 Gly.
The dark energy so began to interact with the light energy 5.625 billion years after the Quantum Big Bang Singularity as the QBBS.
The time marker for the EMMR meeting the 11-dimensional boundary so is 17 1/Ho = 5.325584843x10 [s]* o a light path of . Billio light ea s fo a i il ea of . mean solar days. When this event occurs, the EMMR will both refract and reflect its light path. The refraction will define a new 11-dimensional boundary in moving the Witten mirror into a previously undefined part of the spacetime created by the inflaton-instanton coupling, however defined in the timespace of the monopolar singularity as the precursor for the QBBS coupled to the Dirac string. This event will naturally become imaged in the 12-dimensional Vafa omni spacetime of Khaibit as the shadow-mirror universe and the reflection of the light path of the EMMR will begin a return journey to meet the asymptotically expanding Anti de Sitter universe in a baryonic dark matter intersection nexus.
The nexus point for the evolution of the seedling universe as a protoverse so is defined as the intersection of the EMMR light path beginning its journey from the wormhole of the instanton and ending it at the location of the wormhole of the inflaton one half-cycle of period 1/Ho=RHubble/c=16.876 billion lightyears. At this cycle time coordinate a second universe was born from the instanton in the creation of a multiverse from the seedling universe. This second universe is collocal with the protoverse, but its initial boundary parameters are a function of the seedling parameters depending on a superposed asymptotic cosmology for the protoverse to have completed its evolution in spacetime in satisfying its boundary conditions set in the generating timespace of the imaginary space, albeit ordered in principalities of time as events as definitions. {Ref.: https://www.academia.edu/39210286/The_Origins_of_the_Mathimatia_and_Four_Pillars_of_Creation ; https://www.academia.edu/39210281/The_Beginning_of_Space_in_Time }
The evolution of the multiverse, embedded in an omniverse is based on the nature of the QBBS as emerging from a wormhole singularity, physicalizing the Dirac monopole mathematical and one- dimensional originator from timespace. All cosmological black holes are limited in their metric inertia in their Schwarzschild radii. The entire universe is a 'Black Holed Hierarchy', but there are black holes evolving with the matter o te t of the u i e se as ph si alized pote tials of the QBB“ a d the e a e p i o dial black holes such as the Weyl wormholes of the instanton-inflaton quantum entanglement.
Primordial black holes are known as 'Boundary' Black Holes and those engage in their own black hole evolution as so called 'Extremal Strominger Branes'. This allows definition of the Weyl wormhole as a Strominger boundary wormhole brane of the instanton 2 and the QBBS and of a mass of mweyl={weylc /4G} = 6445.7753 kg*. The QBBS of the creation of spacetime so was seeded by the weight of about one large or two elephants in the gravitational field of the earth as about 6.5 metric tons. Strominger extremal black holes are massless in the sense that their wormhole masses can be expressed as frequency energy states in 2 2 2 mweyl=Eweyl/c =hfweyl/c =kTweyl/c and that such extremal black holes do not emit Hawking radiation in evaporating their matter content over the course of large cosmological time scales.
51 At the Quantum Big Bang instanton, a baryonic restmass seedling Mo of about 1.814x10 kg* became distributed in spacetime vortices given in a de Broglie wave matter inflaton. This inflaton defined the Hubble horizon as a wavefunction for the holistic holographic de Sitter universe and set a supercluster scale for a daughter black hole known as a Sarkar Schwarzschild metric, e edded ithi a othe la k hole defi ed in the Hubble event horizon as a function of the total mass content of the QBBS as defined from the timespace and manifesting in spacetime. The Sarkar black hole is an extremal black hole and forms the upper limit for gravitational scale interaction between galactic superclusters. This shows that the universe will become isotropic and homogeneous beyond the supercluster scale and so manifest the 'Cosmological Principle' in the uniformity of the topology and structure of the universe in cosmological models. The distribution of inertia then takes the form of voids and textures akin a honeycomb geometry and where the individual 'cosmic cells' span across scales of about 470 million lightyears, which so define the Sarkar metric. But the Sarkar Black Hole is extremal and so is a limiting Black Hole in having a mass Mo as the evolution of the wormhole mass of the QBBS. It does not exist as a 'normal' black hole, such as found at the core of galaxies, which describe a M-Sigma relation in a general ratio of 0.1%-0.2% between the galactic core inertia and the total galactic mass.
The overall black hole evolution takes about 4 trillion years as a Strominger brane to satisfy the boundary condition for the Sarkar black hole to become massless after the completion of the spacetime evolution of the Weyl brane of the instanton merging with the wormhole of the inflaton in the size of the mother black hole of the Hubble event horizon at the boundary of superstring spacetime in 10 dimensions to the intersection with the membrane spacetime of omnispace in the Witten-Maria mirror.
For rps to grow to the Hubble event horizon RH in a time t=n/Ho=nRH/c, the wormhole mass mps must n n increase in the n-cycle function for the gravitational parameter G(n)Y(n)=GoMo=GoX MoY for(XY)n=XnYn=1 and this function is proportional to the increase of the wormhole radius for the instanton growing into the size of the Hubble event horizon as the mirror wormhole of the inflaton.
n nlnY rpsY =RH for rps.℮ =RH for nlnY=ln{RH/rps} and 26 -23 ncritical = ln{RH/rps}/lnY=ln{1.5977x10 /1.5916x10 }/ln{1.618034} =ln(2nps /l Y= . …, implying that 234.4715..Hubble cycles are required for the asymptotic expansion of the lower dimensional universe to enable the second universe, born when the EMMI light path reached the Witten-Maria mirror membrane of the 11th dimension to quantum tunnel into the subsequent universal cycle. As 234.4715 Hubble semi-cycles are 234.4715x16.876 Gy=3.957 Trillion years for a time, the protoverse would be destined to exhaust its nuclear fuel supplied by stellar and galactic evolution and in the transmutation of the chemical and atomic elements.
The critical density of the universe derives from the total mass density of the QBBS instanton-inflaton coupling as 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 critical=Muniverse/Vuniverse=MH/2 RH =c /4 GoRH =Ho /4 Go for the Riemann-Baab 2 2 2 3D-surface universe and as critical=(3/2)Ho /4 Go=3Ho /8Go for the 3D-volumar universe.
The primordial Mass-Charge definitions from the Logos mathimatia in timespace
2 2 2 Ele t o ag eti Fi e st u tu e: αe= ke /hc = e / oh = oe c/2h = e2/h (Planck-Stoney-QR units *) 2 G a itatio al Fi e st u tu e Ele t o : αg = Gomelectron /hc 2 = {αg/αplanck} = {melectron/mplanck} 2 G a itatio al Fi e st u tu e P i o dial Nu leo : αnucleon = Gomc /hc for mc 9 = mplanck.e 2 G a itatio al Fi e st u tu e Pla k Boso : αplanck = Gomplanck /hc = 1 2 Gravitational Fine structure unification: {αg/αplanck} = {melectron/mplanck} 2 18 = {melectron/mc} e
2 2 2 Mass Seed = Mo =√{E. c .mplanck /melectron } = mc√{E}{αplanck/αg} for googol space quanta counter E=26x6561 = 1.006...x10112. 2 Charge Seed = Co = √{E.e /αe} = √{E.h / ke} = √{E.h Go/ } = { e}.{Mo/mc}.{Eps.e} = {2e}.{Mo/mc}{e/e*} for Eps=1/e*
Source energy quantum Eps = {Quantized charge in Dirac monopole as dipole}{Number of elementary charged particles} 2 2 Eps = 1/e*= {Co/2e }.{mc/Mo} = {Co/Mo}.{mc/2e } 2 2 = {√{E.e /αe}/{mc√{E}{αplanck/αg}}.{mc/2e }
Eps = {1/2e}√{g/planckαe} 2 2 Eps = 1/e* = hfps = h/fss = h /Ess = mpsc = kTps = 1/2e√e}{melectron/mplanck} 2 = √{αg/planckαe}/2e = Gomelectron/2e
2 2 2 1/Eps = e* = 2Rec = √{ αh e / Gome } = e√αe[mplanck/melectron] 2 2 2 = e√{αeplanck/αg} = {2e /melectron}√ ke/Go) = 2e /Gome = e / ome for Go=1/ke= o for a cosmological unification of fine structures in unitary coupling E*.e*=1 in [Nm2/kg2]=[m3s- 2/kg]=1/[Nm2/C2]=[C2m-3s2/kg] for [C2]=[m6/s4] 3 2 2 and [C]=[m /s ]. Eps = 1/Ess = /e* = √{αg/αe}/2e = Gome/2e
The Charge seed is proportional to the number of particles in Universe as {Mo/mc} and where the primordial nucleons are all ylemic neutrons of spin ½ and which so define their radioactive decay products in a charge twin of positively charged protons and negatively charged electrons and with uncharged antineutrinos. The unification between dipolar electropolar Coulomb charge 'e' and monopolar magnetopolar Star-
Coulomb charge 'e*' unifies the Consciousness quantum Eps=1/e* in the nature of dipolar electric charge in the redefinition of the Dirac string and the Dirac magnetic monopole from timespace into spacetime. In the universe the consciousness quantum manifests as the inverse of the electric charge quantum 'e', so cancelling any dipolar magnetic effects of the monopolar charge e* in Khaibit. In the universe this monopolar equivalence manifests in its elementary form as the diameter of the electron multiplied by the square of the speed of light c2.
The Dark Matter energy so becomes defined in the Universal Consciousness Qua tu U iPh sCo → 2 2 3 Eps = 1/e* = 1/{2Rec } = 1/{Volume [ RRMP ]}x{Angular Acceleration df/dt} for the dark matter 2 elementary consciousness particle RMP=Restmass-Photon RRMP = {e*.dtss/dfps|resonance/2 }
2 60 -20 RRMP = {(e*/2 )/(9x10 )} = 1.411884763x10 m* and of spin quantum -1 and a wavelength -20 RMP=2RRMP=8.8711336x10 m* -23 The dark matter particle has a mass of mRMP=h/cRMP=2.50500367x10 kg* and an energy of -6 2.2545033xd10 J* or 14,034.0 GeV* or 14.034 TeV* (13.999 TeVSI) as the maximum capacity for the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN, the international research center for probing the universal energy scales in particle accelerators in Geneva, Switzerland.
2 Magneto-Monopolar charge quantum e*/c = 2Re super-membrane displacement transformation 2 √α.lplanck = e/c as Electropolar charge quantum ……[EQ.2] ⇐
⇒ Di a s ua tizatio o ditio stallizes atu all f o the elatio ship et ee the lassi al ele t o radius and its relation to the Compton radius for the oscillation scale for the electron exchanging the nature of the Dirac monopole as a monopolar singularity in timespace and the QBBS with the classical electron scale from the wormhole radius rps to the classical electron radius Re=h/2cmelectron=Rcompton in spacetime.
Di a s ua tizatio o ditio de i ed i its histo i al o te t before; states Magnetic monopole qm = n.e/2={n/N}{e/2} for electropolar charge e quantized in integer n equal to the magnetopolar charge qm multiplied by 2.
Di a s ag etopola ha ge qm=g is however defined as: 2 2 e* = 2Rec = 2Rcomptonc = 1/Eps = {2e}√{planckαe/g} 2 for the result e*/2e = Rcomptonc = {e/e}√{planckαe/g} for quantized (2e) = e*√{g/planckαe} = e*{melectron/mplanck}/√{αe} 17 = e*{melectron/mc}√{e
Magneto-Monopolar singularity charge quantum e*√{planckαg/e} = 2e as Dipolar Electropolar charge quantum (2e) ……[EQ.3]
The singularity magnetic monopole of the QBBS becomes the point charge elementary electron in Quantum Field Theory (QFT) and Quantum Electro-Dynamics (QED). The classical electron is then enabled to physicalize the Dirac string from timespace in the created spacetime quantizing the previously infinite Dirac string in the inflaton as two boundary wormhole singularities in multiples of the 10 wormhole radius rps=ps/2 quantized in the classical electron radius in 360Re=10 ps as a classical monopolar bound in the spacetime quanta count E.
The ylemic universe and the cosmic temperature evolution for the birth of stars and galaxies
Many questions raised in the avenues of astrophysics and cosmology engage the quantum physics of the early universe following the QBBS.
When did the first stars and galaxies form from their black hole seeds and how did the dark matter cosmology change its nature from a decelerating universe into a universe apparently dominated by dark energy, responsible for an apparent acceleration of the universe, beginning about halfway through the age of the universe in its thermodynamic evolution?
The answers are found in the timespace definitions to provide the initial boundary conditions for the spacetime instantaneity defined in the instanton-inflaton coupling.
The timespace defined five superstring classes, which defined the Zero-Point Planck Harmonic Oscillator from the undefined timespace to the five superstring classes in the timespace to be then mirrored by the Dirac monopole at the QBBS singularity as a double-sided Möbius-Klein supe e a e i to spa eti e. At the Di a si gula it , the poi t pa ti ula atu e e a e st i ged with the Weyl-Eps boson forming the physicalized manifestation of the Planck boson string for the initializing definition by the Logos mathimatia. The Planck Harmonic Zero-Point Oscillator so became the Weyl-Harmonic Zero-Point Oscillator in a conformal mapping of the timespace onto the QBBS supermembrane and then manifesting the five superstring classes of the timespace in the spacetime.
String- Classification Realm Time Formula Manifest Energy Displacement Scale Membrane Time hf=h/t Boson J*/GeV* - 15 -40 Algo-Boson Time=Frequency Abstract nps=ps/RH 6.256x10 1.066x10 RALGO=2LALGO=1.878x10 49 24 -41 tps=1/fps=fss=1/tss Definiton nps=Hotps=ctps/RH 6.635x10 LALGO=rALGO=2.989x10 - 10 -35 Planck- Zero-Point Timespace tOPL=√ tps 3.739x10 1.783x10 ROPL=2LOPL=1.122x10 3 44 20 -36 Oscillation Quantum √ RPL/c=e/c 1.110x10 LOPL=rOPL=√Lplanck=1.786x10 Boson Fluctuation - 9 -34 Planck- string class I Timespace tPL=2RPL/c 4.377x10 1.523x10 RPL=2Lplanck=1.313x10 3 43 18 -35 Boson Planck open RPL=√{hGo/2c } 9.484x10 Lplanck=rPL=2.090x10
- 8 -33 Monopole Maximum 30[ec] Timespace tMO=h/EMO 5.124x10 1.301x10 RMO=2LMO=1.537x10 42 26 -34 Boson fo g a it GM↔ 8.100x10 LMO=rMO=2.446x10 2GoM - 6 -32 Monopole string class Timespace tMO=2RMO/c 1.537x10 4.337x10 RMO=2LMO=4.611x10 40 25 -33 Boson heterotic HO(32) 2.700x10 LMO=rMO=7.339x10 closed - 5 -31 XL-Boson string class IIB Timespace tXL=2RXL/c 2.202x10 3.028x10 RXL=2LXL=6.606x10 39 15 -31 closed 1.885x10 LXL=rXL=1.051x10 - -25 Ecosmic- string class IIA Timespace tEC=2REC/c 6.618x10 0.833 REC=2LEC=1.985x10 34 9 -26 Boson closed 5.189x10 LEC=rEC=3.159x10 2 - -24 False Higgs string Timespace GoMotps/RHc 4.672x10 0.143 RHiggs=2LHiggs=1.402x10 33 8 -25 Vacuum 8.885x10 LHiggs=rHiggs=2.231x10 Higgs-Boson Upper - -24 False Timespace OPL- Timespace √ tps 2.847x10 0.0234 RHiggs=2LHiggs=8.541x10 32 8 -24 Vacuum Image 1.458x10 LHiggs=rHiggs=1.359x10 Higgs-Boson Lower - -23 Weyl-Boson- string class QBBS tps=rps/c 5.305x10 0.0126 rps=ps/2=1.592x10 QBBS radius heterotic HE(64) Spacetime 32 7.823x107 closed - -3 -22 Weyl-Boson- Closed string class QBBS tps=2rps/c 3.333x10 2x10 ps=10 QBBS heterotic HE(64) Spacetime 31 1.245x107 wavelength closed - -4 -22 Weyl-Boson- string class QBBS tps=2ps/c 2.094x10 3.184x10 2ps=6.283x10 QBBS heterotic HE(64) Spacetime 30 1.982x106 modular closed wavelength - -4 -21 False Spacetime OPL- Spacetime tps/√ 3.902x10 1.709x10 RHiggs=2LHiggs=1.171x10 30 6 -22 Vacuum Image 1.064x10 LHiggs=rHiggs=1.864x10 Higgs- Boson Lower 2 - -5 -21 False Higgs string Spacetime RHc tps/GoMo 2.378x10 2.803x10 RHiggs=2LHiggs=7.134x10 29 5 -21 Vacuum 1.746x10 LHiggs=rHiggs=1.135x10 Higgs- Boson Upper 2 - -6 -20 Ecosmic Cosmic Ray Image Spacetime tps /tEC 1.679x10 3.971x10 REC=2LEC=5.037x10 28 4 -21 Boson Knee 2.472x10 LEC=rEC=8.017x10 2 - -11 -19 XL-Boson Cosmic Ray Image Spacetime tps /tXL 5.046x10 1.321x10 RXL=2LXL=1.514x10 23 -2 -20 Ankle 8.225x10 LXL=rXL=2.410x10 2 - -13 -13 Monopole Cosmic Ray Image Spacetime tps /tMO 7.229x10 9.222x10 RMO=2LMO=2.169x10 22 -3 -14 Boson Toe 5.742x10 LMO=rMO=3.451x10 Universe the size of the Compton quantum scale Rcompton= Re/=h/2mc - -14 -12 Monopole Minimum 30[ec] Spacetime tMO=h/EMO 2.169x10 3.074x10 RMO=2LMO=6.507x10 20 -4 -12 Boson for quantum 1.914x10 LMO=rMO=1.036x10 gravity Universe the size of the wave matter de Broglie quantum
scale dB=h/mc 2 - -15 -11 Planck Planck boson Spacetime tps /tPL 2.539x10 2.626x10 RPL=2LPL=7.617x10 19 -5 -11 Boson Image 1.635x10 LPL=rPL=1.212x10 Universe the size of the Bohr atom 2 scale bohr1=Re/ 2 - -16 -10 Planck- Planck bounce Spacetime tps /tOPL 2.972x10 2.243x10 ROPL=2LOPL=8.916x10 18 -6 -10 Oscillation Image 1.396x10 LOPL=rOPL=1.419x10 Boson Universe the size of an atom 2 - -21 -5 Algo Boson Genesis boson Spacetime tps /tAlgo 1.775x10 3.756x10 RALGO=2LALGO=5.32558484x10 13 -11 -6 Image 2.338x10 LALGO=rALGO=8.47593x10 Universe the size of smallest life bio-organisms; cellular complex
2 This evolution is defined in the wormhole mass mweyl={weylc /4G} transforming into the mass of the 2 mother black hole MH={RHc /2G} in using the time coordinate for the Sarkar daughter black hole given as 2 the coordinate of the E-googol from the timespace definitions as the mass seedling Mo={Rsarkarc /2Go} = (proportionality constant qo)MH. The proportionality constant qo is known as the deceleration parameter for the QBBS cosmology. The H-googol defined the Hubble event horizon and so the boundary conditions for the age and size for the protoverse as a seed for the multiverse emerging after one completion of the light path of the EMMR travelling in spacetime from the instanton to the inflaton.
The F-googol and the G-googol as counts of source energy wormhole quanta reduce the encompassing Riemann volumars in a factor of F/E=1.019538764x10103/1.006208782x10112=1.0132477x10-9 and G/E=9.676924497x10102/1.006208782x10112=9.61721332x10-10 to set a particular energy ratio between the light energy parameters and the dark energy parameters in the QBBS. The light energy parameter refers to the part of Electromagnetic radiation (EMR) emerging from the instanton as the effect of the acceleration electropolar charge coupled to the wormhole mass mweyl and as different from the Electromagnetic monopolar radiation of the EMMR, which is the effect of the acceleration of magnetopolar charge as given in the Dirac monopole manifesting from imaginary timespace as physicalized spacetime. The dark energy parameter then refers to the part associated with the matter content of the QBBS and so the mass seedling Mo of the instanton defined in spacetime at the E-googol marker and as part of the encompassing dark energy mass of the mother black hole MH of the Hubble event horizon.
The Riemann volumar R(n)=RH{n}/{n+1} at the E-googol marker for the Strominger black hole so is 2 3 2 3 calculated as 2 RE ={E}{2 rweyl } 14 for RE= E weyl/ = . m* for a time -12 tE=nE/Ho=2.1506x10 /Ho=1,145,323.7 s* 9 3 2 2 3 and a temperature TE=1.163x10 K*from T(n)= {{Ho Mo/ σSB}.{(n+1) /n }} The Riemann volumar at the F-googol marker for the Strominger black hole so is 2 3 2 3 calculated as 2 RF ={F}{2 rweyl } for 11 -15 RF= F weyl/ = . 5107750x10 m* for a time tF=nF/Ho=2.1601x10 /Ho=1150.36 s* and a temperature 11 TE=2.0614x10 K*. The Riemann volumar at the G-googol marker for the Strominger black hole so is calculated as 2 3 2 3 2 RG ={G}{2 rweyl } for 11 -15 RG= G weyl/ = . m* for a time tG=nG/Ho=2.1228x10 /Ho=1130.52 s* and a 11 temperature TE=2.0885x10 K* 102 11 For F = G-F)=9.158461354x10 space quanta = RF = F weyl/ = . m* for a time -15 tF =nF /Ho=2.0842x10 /Ho=1109.96 s* 11 and temperature TE=2.1173x10 K* a d he e googol F is the i o i age of googol F about googol G
Those Strominger black holes then became physically manifest as the first Gamow ylem protostars, physicalizing the potential matter vortices from the initial potential mass distribution of the Mo matter seedling. Ylemic neutron stars form the boundary conditions for quark-gluon stars with characteristic radii relating the temperature of the universe at the particular n-cycle coordinate to vortex potential energy concentrations materializing from the matter distribution of the matter seedling Mo as ylemic neutron stars. The thermodynamic evolution of the universe then relates a general evolution of neutron stars with specific nuclear densities with respect to the cosmic radiation background to the Hawking properties of black holes as a background energy matrix originating from the distribution of a baryonic mass seedling and its coupling to the QBBS parameters. The Hawking-Gamow Temperature Unification for classical and quantum gravitation is so derived as the temperature ratio: 3 2 2 THawking/Tylem = 1 = hcRe /2Gomc Rylem RHawking 3 2 18 = Re /nucleon.Rylem RHawking with nucleon= plancke .
Ha ki g s i o la k holes pla a de isi e ole i the u i e sal os ology, as they modulate the quantum gravitational universe of the creation event with the classical gravitation of the spacetime geometry. In particular the micro black holes form the energy centers within encompassing vortices of potential energy modelled on the Jeans length applied to the general temperature evolution of the universe.
The ylemic radius is independent from mass as a function of the ylemic Gamow temperature, decreases with time and only depends on atomic and subatomic parameters as the classical electron radius Re and the 9 primordial nucleon as the ylemic neutron mc=mplanck from the gravitational finestructure 2 2 2 18 g=2mc /hc=mc /mplanck =e for kB the Stefan-Boltzmann constant for thermodynamic energy, Re the classical electron radius, Go the quantum gravitational constant and mc the proto-nucleonic mass from the gravitational finestructure in:
The Gamow Ylemic dineutronic radius for Black Hole Temperature evolution:
3 2 Rylem = √{kBTylemRe /Gomc } …………………….……[EQ.4]
The ylem radius so is descriptive for a spacetime metric coupling the quantum gravitation of a Hawking micro black hole at the high fusion temperatures of the early universe to its later manifestation in neutron stars defined by their nuclear densities with electron and neutron degeneracies. The maximum temperature for a black hole is given at a nexus point in the thermodynamic evolution of the universe, known as the bosonic unification of the background temperature with that of the bosonic temperature of the Weyl wormhole of the QBBS. The universe had cooled to a temperature of 1.42x1020 Kelvin from the QBBS temperature of a temperature of 2.30x1036 Kelvin at a time of 2 nanoseconds from the instanton. At this time, the ylem dark matter radius was 6.26x108 meters encompassing a lower dimensional universe of just 1.1382 meters across in the higher dimensional universe created by the inflaton and the hyper accelerated de Broglie wave matter EMMI light path.
Quantum gravity defined the Hawking micro black hole to have a mass of 2 MHawking=rpsc /2Go=6445.77 kg* as minimum mass a black hole can have for a Hawking maximum 20 temperature of Tps=1.41671x10 K*. This is defined as an inverse proportionality between the mass and the temperature of a black hole. The hotter a black hole is, the smaller it must be and the larger a black hole can grow, the cooler it must become. This quantum gravitational Hawking mass of about the weight of a large elephant, compares to the Planck black hole radius -35 2 -9 Lplanck=2.090x10 m*=2Gomplanck/c for a halved Planck mass mplanck=8.463x10 kg*, indicating the nature of quantum gravitation as a transformation of the timespace energy scale into the spacetime energy scale.
2 The Schwarzschild metric for 2Lp = 2GoMp/c transforms a 3D Planck-length in the Planck-mass 2 Mp = √{h / Go} from the Planck- oso g a itatio al fi e st u tu e o sta t = GoMp /hc. The Schwarzschild metric for the Weyl-wormhole radius Rps then defines a hypermass Mhyper as the conformal mapping of the Planck-mass Mp as
2 2 2 2 Mhyper = ½{Rps/Lp}Mp = ½{Rps/Lp} .Mps and where Mps = Eps/c = hfps/c = kTps/c in fundamental expressions for the energy of Abba-Eps as one part of the supermembrane Eps.Ess in physical quantities of mass m, frequency f and temperature T. c2 and h and k are fundamental constants of nature obtained from the initializing algorithm of the Mathimatia and are labeled as the 'square of lightspeed c' and 'Planck's constant h' and 'Stefan-Boltzmann's constant k' respectively.
The complementary part of supermembrane EpsEss is Ess-Baab. Eps-Abba is renamed as 'Energy of the Primary Source-Sink' and Ess-Baab is renamed as 'Energy of the Secondary Sink-Source'. The primary source-sink and the primary sink-source are coupled under a mode of mirror- inversion duality with Eps describing a vibratory and high energy micro-quantum quantum entanglement with Ess as a winding and low energy macro-quantum energy. It is this quantum entanglement, which allows Abba to become part of Universe in the encompassing energy quantum of physicalized consciousness, defined in the magnetopolar charge. The combined effect of the applied Schwarzschild metric then defines a Compton Constant to characterize the conformal transformation as:
Co pto Co sta t h/ = MpLp = MpsRps.
Quantum gravitation now manifests the mass differences between Planck-mass Mp and Weyl- mass Mps.
The Black Hole physics had transformed Mp from the definition of Lp; but this transformation did not generate Mps from Rps, but rather hypermass Mhyper, 2 differing from Mps by a factor of ½{Rps/Lp} . To conserve supersymmetry, Logos defined an Anti-Instanton as the Inflaton of Khaibit to 2 define the conformal mapping of Mps from Universe into Khaibit as 2Mp{Lp/Rps} .
o 2 Hawking Modulus HM = MHawkingTHawking=mPlanck.E Planck/kB = √{h / Go}{½mPlanck.c /kB} 3 2 23 = hc / GokB = {MHminin.THmax}={rpsc /2Go}{Tps}=9.1317939x10 [kgK]*
The maximum Hawking temperature for micro black holes so is given as Tps=Tweyl as a maximized bosonic or Einstein-Boson-Condensate temperature for the QBBS.
The Hawking-Unruh form for the Hawking Modulus is HUM=MHawking.THawking 3 2 22 = mplanck.Tplanck/8 = hc /16 GokB =7.2668507x10 [kgK]* for the extent of the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity (UFoQR) requiring 1440° or 8 radians to repeat its superposed electromagnetic-gravitational wavefunction.
The Unruh acceleration within a temperature background so relates to the surface properties of the holographic AdS-CFT (conformal field theory) cosmology and the entropy of a black hole in the Hawking- 3 Bekenstein bound of S=2kBAc /4Goh in the UFoQR then becomes aunruh=2cMHawkingkBTHawking/h and would give a black hole Hawking temperature of 2.46x10-19 K* for a gravitational acceleration of 9.8 [m/s2]*.
The entropy of the Hawking-Bekenstein cosmology therefore relates to the conformal mapping of the Planck displacement scale onto the Weyl-Eps displacement scale in entropy 2 3 S=¼{Area/Lplanck }=¼{2Ac /Goh}. The Weyl-wormhole of heterotic supermembrane EpsEss and given by the sinusoidal waveform 2 fUFoQR(x)=sin(3x/2)-cos(3x/4) so represents the four Planck areas Lplanck per information bit in its 12 monopolar current loops spanning a wave number of k=4 in 8ps radians. As the Feigenbaum complexity bound for the universal base topology is 3/2, and the surface area for the Riemann 3- 2 2 dimensional manifold is 6 R3 , the Hawking-Unruh factor of 4=62/(3/2)=122/3= as a coefficient modulation in the multidimensional universe.
As indicated by cosmological models, including Susskind, Maldacena, Bousso and Verlinde, relating string theory with gravitation and the holographic principle; crystallizes that quantum information from timespace allows gravitation and all interactions to emerge in spacetime. The transition from timespace into spacetime then is enabled by the Dirac string and the mirror modular dualities of string-membrane realm imaging the string parameters from timespace into spacetime. The primary physical parameter for the subsequently evolving cosmology then is the definition of temperature as a kinetic energy effect for the lower dimensional and gravitational universe and with entropy as a count of energy-frequency micro eigenstates as bits of information. The higher dimensional information universe so forms a corollary in the EMMI light path of the monopolar source radiation to the EMI light path for the matter dependent electromagnetic radiation (EMR). As the EMR is produced by the dynamics of electropolar charges, as in the angular acceleration of protons in a fusion star; but the magnetopolar charges are accelerated in the frequency differential over time in df/dt as a radial independent angular quantum spin; the Unruh acceleration can be generalised to the gravitational acceleration g=GM/R2 for the entropic cosmology and bounded in the Schwarzschild metric in partitioning lightspeed c in the product of wavelength times frequency.
2 2 2 3 2 For a temperature T=hg/4 ckB=GoMh/4 ckBR =hc /16 kBGoM the square of the Schwarzschild metric 2 2 2 4 results in 4Go M =R c
In particular, the definitions of the dark matter particle in the RMP and the Dirac monopole as the Weyl- wormhole indicate that for the first 6.662x10-29=light path/c seconds from the QBBS, the physical energy content of the universe was purely restmass photonic in forming the ylemic dineutron bosons as the primordial radiation background for the thermodynamic expansion of the universe. As the volume of 2 3 87 2 3 the universe at electroweak unification is 2 REW ={2.434875x10 }{2 rps }, the physicalised matter 87 content in the universe from baryon seedling Mo consisted of 2.43x10 dark matter particles in the form of bosonic ylemic dineutrons coupled as a doubled or squared matter colour charge template Y2C2M2 containing the soon to be born Higgs boson as the scalar Goldstone boson coupled to a spin conserving olou eut al g a iphoto of spi + oupled to the ‘MP s egati e ua tu spi of -1.
The wave quark geometric Y2C2M2(-1) decays into two lefthanded neutrons each of quantum spin -½ to manifest the charge-parity violation of the weak interaction and the suppression of antimatter in the form of the M2C2Y2 antimatter template for the Anti-Higgs boson and the Anti-RMP.
The graviphoton coupled to a matter weakon (W-)(+1) can then couple to a weakly interacting neutron to flip the lefthanded neutron into a righthanded neutron in conjunction with an antimatter weakon (W+)(-1) coupled to an anti-graviphoton conserving weak interaction parity across the mirror of the QBBS as the Dirac string with the Khaibit shadow-mirror universe. The neutral current weakon (Zo)(±1) similarly engages anti-neutrino and neutrino interactions from their colour charged R2G2B2(+½) and B2G2R2(-½) templates, their Dirac form of weakonness being massless, but their Majorana form of unified field interaction resulting in the mass induction by the scalar Higgs (anti)neutrino of squared template form (R4G4B4)(0) and B4G4R4(0).
The production of antimatter in the form of pair production in the UfoQR between monopolar current loops for junctions 6-7-8 then became defined at the electroweak unification cycle coordinate in the cosmogenesis.
The Dirac monopole is defined in the units of the gravitational parameter or [m3/s2]=[Volume][Angular Acceleration] as: 2 2 2 2 10 2 e*=2Rec = 2Re{ps }{fps }=1/Eps for 2Re{ps }=2Re{360Re/10 } -15 3 2 2 60 ={2.592x10 }Re =e*/fps =e*fss =e*(9x10 ) entropy self-states 2 3 2 60 The RMP is defined in its volumar 2 RRMP =e*/fps = e*/(9x10 ) entropy self-states) to define the ratio 2 -15 15 {Re/RRMP}= {2 /2.592x10 }=7.6154355x10 showing that so 7.615 quadrillion RMPs will fit into the source energy quantum and the inversion charge energy of the Dirac monopole and so the QBBS instanton.
-20 The radius of the RMP is given RRMP=1.411884763x10 m* from the source energy quantum definition fo the lassi al ele t o adius of . … -15 m*. The unification condition for the physicalisation of the Di a o opole as the t Hooft-Polyakov monopole requires however the Mean Monopolar Quantum Bound (MQB) as the alignment of the Dirac monopole wavelength mapped onto the electron wavelength and this MQB is calculated from the quantization condition to align the Dirac wavelength with the mirror modular duality of the supermembrane EpsEss. As the inversion properties apply throughout the cosmology defined by the googolplex markers EFGF , the Dirac wavelength aligns the divergence between the product RERe in the coupling of * to RE and r* to Re
in the ratio = MO=(MQB/RERe)=(1.351/0.9544)=1.41555 and in multiplying the RMP radius by (MQB/RERe) for an effective dark matter displacement coordinate -20 RRMPeff=1.9986x10 m*. .
*=4.087933536x1014 2r** 2r*=3.30485x10-15 Monopolar mean classical bound MQB=1.351 Monopolar mean quantum bound 14 12 10 RE*=3.6x10 = 360x10 RE*Re*=1 Re*=Re=10 ps/360
14 -15 RE= E weyl/ = . RERe=0.9544 Re=2.7777x10
The RMP dominated era ended when the ylemic dineutron radius became equal to the size of the universe at a time about 1/140th of a second for a radius of 2.14114x106 m*. This was the nexus for the RMP-Higgs ylemic quarkian geometry template to differentiate between the mesonic inner and the leptonic outer ring to kernel the proton in electroweak unification at a temperature of 1.68x1015 K* and when the dark matter universe became illuminated in the EMMI light path intersecting the RMP haloed universe.
The number of space quanta comprising the universe at RMP time is the size of the universe for cycle 2 3 coordinate divided by 2 rps 3 3 9 -10 as a space quanta count EtaRMP =RMP= RRMPeff /rps =1.9802x10 =1/5.0500x10
For the googolplex E-FGF , the photon baryon ratios for the time of the primordial neutron decay from to 1150.36 – 1130.52 – 1109.96 – 229.821 seconds for a time interval from 880.14 to 900.70 to 920.54 seconds, the respective photon-baryon ratios then replace the ratio of the dark matter restmass photons in the illuminated universe now enabled to freely produce protons, electrons with anti- neutrinos in beta minus weak interaction decay and completing the first 20 minutes of the thermodynamic evolution of the universe in the formation of primordial helium, deuterium, tritium and lithium in the nucleosynthesis of the QBBS.
3 112 103 MO {RE/RF} ={1.41555}{1.006208782x10 /1.019538764x10 } ={1.41555}{9.8692548x108}=1.397042x109=1/7.15799x10-10 3 112 102 MO {RE/RG} ={1.41555}{1.006208782x10 /9.676924497x10 } ={1.41555}{1.03980225x109}=1.471892x109=1/6.79398x10-10 3 112 102 MO {RE/RF } ={1.41555}{1.006208782x10 /9.158461354x10 } ={1.41555}{1.09866575x109}=1.555216x109=1/6.42998x10-10
As the displacement string modular dualities define the minimum-maximum winding mode-frequency mode boundary conditions in string displacement/time rps/tps = psfps/2 = c/2 modular dual to rss/tss=2ssfss=2/c the minimum Hawking temperature is modulated in 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 {rpstss/rsstps}={c /4 } as THmin = {c /4 }Tss = {c /4 }Ess/kB ={hfssc /4kB } -26 2 2 2 2 =3.58856785x10 K* = Tss{c /4 }mod and where {c /4 }mod is dimensionless due to the string modular duality.
This minimum Hawking temperature for black hole modulation now defines the modular black hole mass dual to the micro black hole of the QBBS as 3 2 2 MHawkingmax=MHmax={MHminin.THmax}/{THmin} = {hc /4kBGo}/{hfssc /4kB } = {cfps/Go}mod = 2.544690x1049 kg*
This maximum Hawking mass so refers to the cycle time coordinate in the evolution of the thermodynamic universe, when the bosonic unification Hawking micro black hole mass with its dark matter ylemic halo will be balanced in a Hawking macro black hole mass descriptive in the encompassing temperature evolution of the universe.
As the micro black hole has the wormhole radius rps=ps/2 of the QBBS at the bosonic unification time 2 nanoseconds into the expansion of the universe; the macro black hole will have the modular dual radius 22 to the wormhole radius as rss=2ss or 6.283x10 m* at a time characterizing the dark matter halo of the micro quantum state to reverse in a modulation of rendering the dark matter halo visible and illuminated. The cycle time n=0. … o . illio ea s f o the QBBS so manifests an anti-wormhole or white hole perimeter for the supermembrane sourcesink Eps mirroring the supermembrane sinksource Ess as the micro black hole perimeter of the bosonic temperature unification. Monopolar sourcesink Eps so begins to activate in the cosmology in applying the dark matter haloes from a global universal perspective onto a galactic local disposition and preparing the universe for the birth of stars and galaxies, based on the displacement scale of the modulated Hawking macro quantum black hole. The temperature for this nexus coordinate was 358.05 K* and with a cosmological comoving redshift of z=49.421. A universal radius of 6.283x1022 m* calculates for the Strominger form of the universe as a black hole as 2 49 MHmax=2ssc /2Go=2.5447x10 kg*
The critical displacement scale for the dark matter haloes from {ss/2 – ss – 2ss} or {0.159-1.00-6.28}x1022 m* is conformally mapped onto the galactic seeds encompassed by supercluster 2 24 seeds of the Sarkar scale defined in the baryon mass seed Rsarkar=GoMo/c from {1.12-2.23-4.47}x10 m* with the Hawking modulus applied to the Strominger black hole universal evolution.
2 2 2 The supermembrane modulation factor {c /4 }mod={c /39.478} so defines a generalized displacement scale for a galactic seed with its core and bulge separated from its inner and outer haloes in 22 as the 2 3 2 6 5 6 5 volumar coefficient for a space quantum (Vsq=2 rps ) in 2 ~2x10 /10 =20=4x10 /2x10 and for psfps=c=1/ssfss.
The ylem radius at the bosonic unification temperature was 6.2584x108m* and it was 2.1411x106 m* for the electroweak unification when the ylemic radius matched the size of the expanding universe. The intersection of the ylemic radius in the inflaton universe with the instanton universe so was (6.2584x108-2.1411x106)m* = 6.1370x108 m* and representing 2.04 light seconds and a volume of 2 3 2 3 27 3 94 2 (2.04HoRH) =2 (2.04c) = 4.5246x10 [m ]* or 5.686x10 dark matter space quanta from the higher dimensional universe, the lower dimensional universe was expanding into.
From the electroweak unification nexus at 1/140th of a second into the cosmogenesis; the dark matter haloes became fully integrated into the lower dimensional universe with the ylemic radius continually shrinking relative to the expanding Hubble universe aiming for the Hubble event horizon set by the inflaton of the QBBS. At the present cycle time coordinate for the universe, the ylemic radius is 87.15 mm* for a Hawking-ylem-universal temperature of 7.474 K* and a lower dimensional radius of 8.96 billion light years within a higher dimensional radius of 16.88 billion light years of the EMI light path within 19.12 billion light years of the EMMI light path. The gravitationally closed universe in de Sitter spacetime so is at the 53.11% (n/n+1) marker relative to its closure mass in de Sitter spacetime but is at the 86.73% (n) marker relative to its open anti de Sitter spacetime. As 86.73% of the closure mass represent 0.8673RH=14.64 billion light years; the true EMMI age of the universe is underestimated in the intersection of the EMMI light path relative to the de Sitter spacetime observer in 13.27% of the true age as 16.88+2.24=19.12 billion years.
Relating the ylem temperature of the Gamow radius of the Schwarzschilded protostar vortex to the Hawking temperature of black holes forms the relationship between the ylemic radius of the Gamow protostar and the Hawking black hole.
3 2 MHawking=HM/THawking=(hc /4GokB)/THawking = RHawkingc /2Go for RHawking = hc/2kBTHawking as the curvature Schwarzschild radius for a Hawking black hole
2 2 3 THawking = hc/2kBRHawking for Tylem = Gomc .Rylem /kBRe
3 2 2 3 2 with THawking/Tylem = hcRe /2Gomc Rylem RHawking = Re /nucleon.Rylem RHawking
for the gravitational finestructure constant nucleon for nucleons with 9 2 [17/2] [17/2] [17/2] mplancke =√{(hc/2Go)(2kee /hc)}e = {e/Go}e = keee = mc
2 for the Planck mass mplanck =hc/2Go and the gravitational fine structure 18 =Stoney-Planck unification Go=1/ke=4o and the general unitary unification of Di a s o opole in the identity of the gravitational parameter GM equal to magneto charge e* in 3 2 2 2 [e*/Go]=[m /s ]/[Nm /kg ]=[kg]=[M]
Electromagnetic Fine structure: 2 2 2 2 αe = kee /hc = e / oh = oe / h = e /h ...... (Planck-Stoney-QR units *)
Gravitational Fine structure (Electron): 2 2 αg = Gomelectron /hc = {αg/αplanck} = {melectron/mplanck}
2 Gravitational Fine st u tu e P i o dial Nu leo : αnucleon = Gomc /hc for 9 mc = mplanck.e 2 G a itatio al Fi e st u tu e Pla k Boso : αplanck = Gomplanck /hc 2 Gravitational Fine structure unification: {αg/αplanck} = {melectron/mplanck} 2 18 = {melectron/mc} e
The Hawking-Gamow Temperature Unification for classical and quantum gravitation in Hawking Micro Black Holes:
3 2 2 3 2 THawking/Tylem = hcRe /2Gomc Rylem RHawking = Re /nucleon.Rylem RHawking with nucleon= 18 plancke ………………………………………………….[EQ.5]
For Hawking Micro Black Holes THawking=Tylem: 2 RHawking = hc/2kBTHawking = 2GoMHawking/c
The ylem temperature is therefore the Hawking temperature for black holes and also the temperature of the universe as the Cosmic Background Radiation or CBR, presently in the microwave region of the electromagnetic spectrum.
For any time in the cosmic evolution, an ylemic radius and temperature is defined as a background spacetime matrix guiding the universal evolution of the Quantum Big Bang Singularity from the instanton to the inflaton for both the higher dimensional light path of the EMMI and the lower dimensional cosmology of the Planck-Ei stei Bla k Bod adiato s the od a i e olutio .
The original mass seedling Mo=2qoMH =oMH= 2oMH/AdB is distributed as primordial Hawking Black Holes potentials as function of the Hawking modulus 3 HM=MHawkingTHawking=hc /4kBGo beginning at a time coordinate defining the Bosonic Temperature 20 Unification (BTU) at a temperature defined by the Weyl-Eps boson string Tps=Eps/kB=2.222x10 K*. The time coordinate for this event calculates as about 2 nanoseconds from the QBBS, the instanton and the inflaton. Prior to the BTU, the universe expanded as a Boson-Einstein-Condensate of nucleonic quark- lepton-gluon plasma with the background temperature of the universe exceeding the temperature of the BTU.
The Hawking mass-temperature relation for this black hole evolution then begins to manifest the mass seedling Mo in seedling vortices, destined to evolve into the seeds for ylemic protostars, then growing in size to the scale of dark matter galaxies from which individual stars would form from the previously Schwarzschilded le i p otosta s. The ti e fo the t a sfo atio of the le i seedli g sta s, ould be the time in the evolution of the universe, when the general scale of the universe would equal the curvature radius defined in the baryonic mass seedling Mo as the gravitational bounding limit of galactic 2 24 superclusters Rsarkar=2GoMo/c ranging from 1.12 to 2.24 to 4.48x10 m* as the Sarkar radius for a black hole and its diameter and as half its radius for the black hole gravitational potential energy calibration from Einstein quintessence as the cosmological constant as ratio to the de Broglie phase inflaton hyper- 2 2 2 2 acceleration AdB in o/AdB=GoMo/R(nps) /AdB={GoMo/ps }/{RHfps }={GoMo/RHc }=Msarkar/2MH=Mo/2MH. These three supercluster scales relate to 118 to 237 to 473 million light years respectively and show the birth of the first stars and galaxies in this time period.
But o/AdB = Mo/2MH = Msarkar/2MH = qo = 2o for deceleration parameter qo=0.014015 for the baryon 2 seedling o=2qo=0.028030 for MH=RHc /2Go. The baryonic mass seed so represents 2.8% of the closure mass MH of the QBBS and increases as a function of the gravitational parameter G(n)M(n)=constant=GoMo. It has reached the value of 4.85% for a present n-cycle time coordinate of npresent=1.132711, showing that the dark matter proportion will be 27.43% of the total and as 85% of the matter content and the dark energy as the Einstein quintessence closing the universe in 67.73% for the present time.
n 1.132711 The baryonic matter component evolves according to BM=oY =0.02803{1.618034} = 0.0483 until saturation coordinate for the baryonic matter BM intersecting dark matter DM n √2 for n=√2 for BM=oY =0.02803{1.618034} = 0.055357=constant for the cosmic matter evolution from 23.866 Gy. The da k atte DM = 1- BM until onset of the dark energy component DE at n=½, from which DM is 3 calculated by DM=BM{[1+1/n] - 1} and as 0.27434 for the present time.
2 n 3 2 3 n n 3 BM+DM/ critical = 2 MoY RH /2 R(n) MH = oY {VAdS/VdS} = oY {[n+1]/n} n 3 = oY {1+1/n} from n=½ n 3 fo DM/critical= oY {(1+1/n) – 1}
3 The Da k E e g F a tio DE = 1- DM - BM = 1 - BM[1+1/n] and 3 npresent 3 DE = 1 - DM - BM = 1 - BM[1+1/n] = 1 – oY {1+1/npresent} = 1 – 0.32269 = 0.67731 for the present time.
A Revision of the Friedmann Cosmology, Emergent Gravity and Dark Energy as entangled Quantum Information
It is well known, that the Radius of Curvature in the Field Equations of General Relativity relates to the 2 Energy-Mass Te so i the fo of the iti al de sit critical = 3Ho / G a d the Hu le Co sta t Ho as the square of frequency or alternatively as the time differential of frequency df/dt as a cosmically applicable angular acceleration independent on the radial displacement. The scientific nomenclature (language) then describes this curved space in differential equations relating the positions of the 'points' in both space and time in a 4-dimensional description called Riemann Tensor Space or similar. This then leads mathematically, to the formulation of General Relativity in Einstein's field Equations:
for the Einstein-Riemann tensor
and is built upon ten so-called nonlinear coupled hyperbolic-elliptic partial differential equations, which are mathematically rather complex and often cannot be solved analytically without simplifying the geometries of the parametric constituents (say objects interacting in so called tensor-fields of stress- energy {T } and curvatures in the Riemann-Einstein tensor {G }, either changing the volume in reduction of the Ricci tensor {Rij} with scalar curvature R as {Rg } for the metric tensor {g } or keeping the volume of considered space invariant to volume change in a Tidal Weyl tensor {R }). The Einstein-Riemann tensor then relates Curvature Radius R to the Energy-Mass 2 4 2 2 4 tensor E=Mc ia the iti al de sit as G/c =3Ho VcriticalMcritical.c /Mcritical.c 2 2 2 = 3Ho Vcritical/c = 3Vcritical/R as Curvature Radius R by the Hubble Law applicable say to a nodal Hubble
Constant Ho = c/RHubble The cosmological field equations then can be expressed as the square of the nodal Hubble Constant and inclusive of a 'dark energy' terms often identified with the Cosmological Constant of Albert Einstein, he e de oted Einstein. Substituting the Einstein Lambda with the time differential for the square of nodal Hubble frequency as the angular acceleration acting on a quantized volume of space however; naturally and universally replaces the enigma of the 'dark energy' with a space inherent angular acceleration component, which can be identified as the 'universal consciousness quantum' directly from the standard cosmology itself. The field equations so can be generalised in a parametrization of the Hubble Constant assuming a cyclic form, oscillating between a minimum and maximum value given by Ho=dn/dt for cycle time n=Hot and where then time t is the 4-vector time-space of Minkowski light-path x=ct. The Einstein Lambda then becomes then the energy-acceleration difference between the baryonic mass content of the universe and an inherent mass energy related to the initial condition of the oscillation parameters for the nodal Hubble Constant.
2 3 Einstein = GoMo/R(n) - 2cHo/(n+1) = Cosmological Acceleration - Intrinsic Universal Milgröm 4 Deceleration as: g = G/ T - G 4 then becomes G + g = G/ T and restated in a mass independent form for an encompassment of the curvature fine structures.
Dark Energy Initiation for n=½ with qdS=0 and qAdS=1
Energy Conservation and Continuity dE + PdV = TdS =0 (First Law of Thermodynamics) for a cosmic fluid and scaled Radius R=a.Ro; dR/dt = 2 2 2 2 da/dt.Ro and d R/dt = d a/dt .Ro 2 3 dV/dt = {dV/d‘}.{d‘/dt} = a Ro .{da/dt} 2 2 3 2 3 2 dE/dt = d(mc )/dt = c .d{ V}/dt = ‘o .c /3){a .d /dt + a .da/dt}
3 2 2 2 dE + PdV = ‘o .a { .da/dt + [ac / ].d /dt + P.da/dt} = fo the os i fluid e e g p essu e continuity equation: d /dt = - { da/dt /a.{ + P/c2}} ...... (1z)
The independent Einstein Field Equations of the Robertson-Walker metric reduce to the Friedmann equations:
H2 = {(da/dt)/a}2 = G / - kc2/a2 + Λ/ ...... z)
{(d2a/dt2)/a} = - G/ { + P/c2} + Λ/ ...... (3z)
for scale radius a=R/Ro; Hubble parameter H = {da/dt)/a}; Gravitational Constant G; De sit ; Cu atu e k ; light speed a d Cos ologi al Co sta t .
Differentiating (2z) and substituting (1z) with (2z) gives (3z):
{2(da/dt).(d2a/dt2).a2 - 2a.(da/dt).(da/dt)2}/a4 = 8 G.(d /dt)/3 + 2kc2.(da/dt)/a3 + 0 = (8 G/3){-3{(da/dt)/a.{ + P/c2}} + 2kc2.(da/dt)/a3 + 0
(2(da/dt)/a).{(d2a/dt2).a - (da/dt)2}/a2 = (8 G/3){-3(da/dt)/a}.{ + P/c2} + 2{(da/dt)/a}.(kc2/a2) + 0 2{(da/dt)/a}.{(d2a/dt2).a - (da/dt)2}/a2 = 2{(da/dt)/a}{-4 G.{ + P/c2} + (kc2/a2)} + 0 with kc2/a2=8 G /3 + /3 - {(da/dt)/a}2 d{H2}/dt = 2H.dH/dt = 2{(da/dt)/a}.dH/dt dH/dt = {[d2a/dt2]/a - H2} = {-4 G.( + P/c2) + 8 G /3 + /3 -H2} = -4 G/3( + 3P/c2) + /3 - H2} = -4 G/3( + 3P/c2) + /3 - 8 G /3 + kc2/a2 - /3} = -4 G.( + P/c2) + kc2/a2 dH/dt = - G{ +P/ 2} as the Time derivative for the Hubble parameter H for flat Minkowski space-time with curvature k=0
{(d2a/dt2).a - (da/dt)2}/a2 = - G{ + P/c2} + (kc2/a2) + 0 = - G{ + P/ 2} + G / - {(da/dt)/a}2 + /
{(d2a/dt2)/a} = (- G/ { + P/ 2- } = - G/ { + P/ 2} + / = dH/dt + H2 For a scale factor a=n/[n+1] = {1-1/[n+1]} = 1/{1+1/n}
2 3 2 3 dH/dt + G = - GP/c .... (for V4/10D=[ / ]‘H and V5/11D= RH i fa to /
th For the k universe: areset = Rk(n)AdS/Rk(n)dS + ½ = n-∑∏ k-1+∏ k +½
Scale factor modulation at Nk={[n-∑∏ k-1]/Π k } = ½ reset coordinate
2 2 {dH/dt} = areset .d{Ho/T(n)}/dt = - Ho (2n+1)(n+3/2)/T(n) for k=0
dH/dt + G = - GP/c2
2 2 {dH/dt} = areset .d{Ho/T(n)}/dt = - Ho (2n+1)(n+3/2)/T(n) ……………………. z
2 2 3 3 -Ho (2n+1)(n+3/2)/T(n) + GoMo/{RH (n/[n+1]) }{ } = /{‘H /[ + ] } + / 2 2 2 3 3 -2Ho {[n+1] -¼}/T[n] + GoMo/RH (n/[n+1]) { } = /‘H /[ + ] + / 2 2 2 3 3 -2Ho {[n+1] -¼}/T(n) + .GoMo/RH (n/[n+1]) = /‘H /[ + ] + /
For a scale factor a=n/[n+1] = {1-1/[n+1]} = 1/{1+1/n} with
2 HdS=V(n)/R(n)={c/[n+1] }/{[n+1]/nRH}=Ho/n[n+1]=Ho/T(n)
HAdS=Ho/n a d a eset oo di ate fo the QBB“ fo = a d da k e e g o set =½
R(n)AdS/R(n)dS={nRH}/{nRH/[ + ]}= + ={ -½} fo = + / =areset
2 3 3 2 2 Λ n /RH(n/[n+1]) = - GP/c = GoMo/RH (n/[n+1]) -2Ho /(n[n+1] ) a d Λ = 2 for -P = Λ c [ + ]/ GonRH = Λ Hoc[ + ]/ Gon 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 = Moc [n+1] / RH - Ho c / Gon[n+1]
For n=1.132711...... - (+6.696373x10-11 J/m3)* = (2.126056x10-11 J/m3)* + (-8.8224295x10-11 J/m3)* Negative Dark Energy Pressure = Positive Matter Energy + Negative Inherent Milgröm Deceleration
(cHo/Go)
The Dark Energy and the 'Cosmological Constant' exhibiting the nature of an intrinsic negative pressure in the cosmology become defined in the overall critical deceleration and density parameters. The pressure term in the Friedmann equations being a quintessence of function n and changing sign from positive to negative to positive as indicated. -11 For a present measured deceleration parameter qdS=-0.5586, the DE Lambda calculates as 6.696x10 (N/m2=J/m3)*, albeit as a positive pressure within the negative quintessence. The Einstein Lambda then becomes then the energy-acceleration difference between the baryonic mass content of the universe and an inherent mass energy related to the initial condition of the oscillation parameters for the nodal Hubble Constant.
2 2 For the minimum Planck-Oscillator: Eop = ½hfop = ½mopc = ½kBTop = Mc /#bits 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ={Mc .lplanck }/{4R } = {MGoh/8 cR } = {hg/8 c} with gravitational acceleration g =GoM/R and 2 2 M=gR /Go for kBT = hg/4 c = {String T-Duality modulation factor }{hg/c} = Linearization of Compton wave matter in de Broglie wave matter
2 2 2 2 -44 2 rps/rss = {ps/2}/{2ss} = {ps /4 } = {1/4 .ss } = 10 /4
3 3 2 for 4=HM/HUM={hc /4GokB }/{hc /16 GokB}
The gravitational acceleration in Quantum Relativity g as the Weyl-wormhole gravitational acceleration then is gps = c.fps
3 for Eps = hfps = hc.fps/c = kBTps = hgps/c and generalizes as the Milgröm acceleration -2cHo/(n+1) in the cosmology in g cHo. 2 3 dE = TdS for c dM = (2kBT.c )dA/4Goh for dM = {hgc/2c}dA/{4Goh} = {g/8Go}dA dM/dA = {g/8Go}
2 3 2 3 dS/dA = kB/4lplanck = 2kBc /4hGo from Entropy S=kBA/4lplanck = c kBA/2Goh with dS=2kB from dE/dS
= T and E = TdS = kBT in the quantum self-state dM/dS 2 2 2 3 3 = {dM/dA}.{dA/dS} = {g/8Go}.{4lplanck /kB}= {glplanck /2kBGo} = {hg/4 kBc }= hg/kBc }
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1611.02269.pdf
The scale factor (a=n/[n+1]) radius at the instanton-inflaton is R(nps)=RH(nps/(nps+1)}=RHps/RH=ps in the -49 limit for nps=ps/RH=6.259x10 ~0
The Universal Temperature Evolution in light paths EMI and EMMI
n=Hot Radius m* Mod Quantum Cosmologic Temperature Hawkin Hawking Temp 3 t= R(n)=RH{n/[n+1] factor Modulation al CBBR g bh THawking=hc /4kBGoMHa E=hc/ comoving T= Radius wking redshift {18.2(n+1)2/ Ylem Ylem Radius 3 3 2 z+ =√{ + / n } Radius Rylem=√{kBTRe /Gomc } n[n+2]} of cycle time Hawkin Hawking Radius Energy n g Mass RHawking=hc/2kBTHawking J*/GeV* THawking/Tylem = Hawking Mass 3 2 1 = hcRe / MHawking=RHawkingc /2Go 2 2 2Gomc Rylem RHawking Boson Energy E=kT
1.132711 RH(np)=1.80970456x1 - - 0.2505 2.747 K* 8.2081x Ylem Mass is ~ 5.88 19.116 Gy 026 EMMI Local Flow 3.88x10-23 10-4 m* earth masses RH(np)=8.48546550x1 J*/0.00024 0.08715 025 EMI eV* m* 3.32428 x1023 kg*
1 RH(1)=1.597675453x - - 0.2910 2.921 K* 7.7192x Ho=58.04 km/Mpc.s 16.876 Gy 1026 EMMI Limit Local 4.12x10-23 10-4 m* RH(1)=7.988377266x flow J*/0.00026 0.08986 1025 EMI eV* m* 3.1263x 1023 kg* 26 0.8673 RDdec=1.386x10 - - 0.3432 3.140 K* 7.1808x Measured present age 14.637 Gy EMMI (AdS to dS) 4.43x10-23 10-4 m* of universe 25 RDdec=7.421x10 EMI J*/0.00028 0.09317 H(n)=Ho/(2-np)=66.92 (dS to AdS) eV* m* km/Mpc.s 2.9082x 1023 kg* 25 ½ RDdec=7.988x10 - - 0.9149 4.254 K* 5.3003x Onset of dark energy 8.438 Gy EMMI (AdS to dS) 6.01x10-23 10-4 m* 25 RDdec=5.326x10 EMI J*/0.00037 0.10845 (dS to AdS) eV* m* 2.1466x 1023 kg* 25 0.26542 RDdec=4.241x10 - - 1.0800 6.283 K* 3.5887x 4.479 Gy EMMI (AdS to dS) 8.87x10-23 10-4 m* 25 RDdec=3.351x10 EMI J*/0.00055 0.13180 (dS to AdS) eV* m* 1.4534x 1023 kg* 25 0.2389 RDdec=3.817x10 - - 1.1770 6.728 K* 3.3513x Peak of galaxy 4.032 Gy EMMI (AdS to dS) 9.50x10-23 10-4 m* formation 25 RDdec=3.081x10 EMI J*/0.00059 0.13638 (dS to AdS) eV* m* 1.3573x 1023 kg* 25 0.13271 RDdec=2.120x10 - - 1.8401 9.998 K* 2.2552x Image of npresent 2.240 Gy EMMI (AdS to dS) 1.41x10-22 10-4 m* 25 RDdec=1.872x10 EMI J*/0.00088 0.16623 (dS to AdS) eV* m* 9.1336x 1022 kg* 25 0.10823 RDdec=1.729x10 - - 2.1249 11.523 K* 1.9568x Galaxy formation for 1.827 Gy EMMI (AdS to dS) 1.63x10-22 10-4 m* Einstein 25 RDdec=1.560x10 EMI J*/0.00101 0.17849 quintessence (dS to AdS) eV* m* balanced by 7.9248x Milgröm intrinsic 22 10 kg* deceleration and o=0 24 st 0.059255 RDdec=9.467x10 - - 3.1702 17.700 K* 1.2739x 1 Stars 1 Gy EMMI (AdS to dS) 2.50x10-22 10-4 m* from galactic seeds 24 RDdec=8.937x10 EMI J*/0.00156 0.22121 (dS to AdS) eV* m* 5.1592x 1022 kg* 24 0.056391 RDdec=9.009x10 - - 3.2717 18.345 K* 1.2291x Radiation-Matter 0.95166 EMMI (AdS to dS) 2.59x10-22 10-4 m* equilibrium begin star 24 Gy RDdec=8.529x10 EMI J*/0.00161 0.22521 formation (dS to AdS) eV* m* 4.9778x 1022 kg* 24 0.0430041 RDdec=6.871x10 3.51x1 RALGO=2LALGO=5.325 3.8748 22.337 K* 1.0094x Completion of 725,742 EMMI (AdS to dS) 020 58484x10-5 3.15x10-22 10-4 m* Inversion Modulation 24 My RDdec=6.587x10 EMI LALGO=rALGO=8.47593 J*/0.00196 0.24851 for the Algo (dS to AdS) x10-6 eV* m* wavelength in Universe the size of 4.0882x spacetime from smallest life bio- 1022 kg* spacetime of organisms; cellular supermembrane complex EpsEss in Sarkar supercluster scale 2 -5 2nqo=0.02 Rsarkar=2GoMo/c =4.47 1.62x1 3.62044x10 5.0152 30.570 K* 7.3757x dark matter galaxies 803012 830347x1024 020 4.32x10-22 10-5 m* from supercluster seed 473.039 J*/0.00269 0.29071 manifest honey-comb My eV* m* universal geometry 2.9871x baryon seed 22 10 mobaryon=0.02803=Mo/ kg* MH=2o/AdB 2 -5 st nqo=0.014 Rsarkar=GoMo/c =2.239 4.05x1 1.81022x10 7.4777 51.062 K* 4.4157x Quasar wall - 1 01506 15174x1024 019 7.21x10-22 10-5 m* protostars from 236.520 J*/0.00449 0.37572 supercluster seeds My eV* m* Deceleration 1.7884x parameter 22 10 kg* qo=½Mo/MH=o/AdB 2 -6 ½nqo=0.00 Rsarkar=½GoMo/c =1.1 1.01x1 9.0511x10 10.967 85.578 K* 2.6347x White Hole-Black Hole 700753 1957587x1024 019 1.21x10-21 10-5 m* Sarkar modulation 118.260 J*/0.00752 0.48641 Birth of 1st galaxies like My eV* m* the Milky Way form as 1.0671x baryon seed for dark 1022 kg* matter galaxies protostars manifest from ylem white hole-black hole coupling -4 22 -7 3.934x10 rss=2ss=6.283x10 3.19x1 5.07943x10 49.421 358.05 K* 6.2973x Modular wormhole 6.63948 016 10-6 m* perimeter My 5.05x10-21 0.99494 White Hole upper limit J*/0.03146 m* as wormhole eV* 2.5504x sourcesink 21 10 kg* Eps begins to activate as black hole power sourcesink Ess dark matter galaxies geometry -5 22 -7 4 8.659x10 1.383395x10 1.55x1 1.118392x10 106.468 2301.04 K* 9.79888 RHawking=Re/ =9.79888 4.6113x10 015 3.25x10-20 3x10-7 3x10-7 m* 13 J*/0.20221 m* 1.46127 eV* 2.5222 My m* 3.9685x 1020 kg* -5 22 -8 6.259x10 ss = 10 8.08x1 8.0844x10 125.40 2935.13 K* 7.6820x Reionization end of 1.05636 014 4.14x10-20 10-7 m* opaque universe My J*/0.25793 2.84864 Baryogenesis and eV* m* atomic structure 3.1112x 1020 kg*
-5 -8 2.303x10 ss = 1.09x1 2.974085x10 207.40 6213.74 K* 3.6287x Reionization end of 388,596.8 1022/e=3.678794412 014 8.77x10-20 10-7 m* opaque attenuated y x1021 J*/0.54605 4.14477 universe eV* m* 1.4696x 1020 kg* -6 21 -8 9.962x10 ss/2=1.592x10 2.05x1 1.28704x10 315.83 11,648.4 K* 1.9357x macro quantum 168,115.7 013 1.64x10-19 10-7 m* superstrings as y J*/1.0236 5.67488 supercluster eV* m* seeds 168,115 y to 7.8395x 486,681 My; 11,648- 1019 kg* 358 K* -7 20 6.903x10 1.1028646x10 9.83x1 ROPL=2LOPL=8.916x 1202.6 86,246.7 K* 2.6143x Supermembrane 11,649.5 y 010 10-10 1.22x10-18 10-8 m* modulation for the - LOPL=rOPL=1.419x10 J*/7.5792 15.4417 Planck length bounce 10 eV* m* in spacetime from Universe the size of 1.0588x spacetime on a an atom 1019 kg* characteristic galaxy scale Rylem=Rcurv for 27 Mylem=6.25x10 kg*/0.003Msun -8 18 - 5.897x10 9.42184766x10 7.18x1 RPL=2LPL=7.617x10 4116.9 545,798.3 K* 4.1311x Supermembrane 995.22 y 08 11 7.71x10-18 10-9 m* modulation for the -11 LPL=rPL=1.212x10 J*/47.964 38.8454 Planck length in Universe the size of eV* m* spacetime from the Bohr atom scale 1.6731x spacetime on a 2 18 bohr1=Re/ 10 kg* characteristic galactic core scale Rylem=Rcurv for 28 Mylem=1.57x10 kg*/0.008Msun -9 17 6 5.038x10 8.0488332x10 5.24x1 RMO=2LMO=6.507x1 14,087.9 3.4541x10 6.5278x Supermembrane 85.019 y 06 0-12 K* 10-10 modulation for the - -17 LMO=rMO=1.036x10 4.88x10 m* maximum monopole 12 J*/303.54 97.7217 scale in spacetime Universe the size of eV* m* from spacetime on a the wave matter de 2.6438x characteristic galactic Broglie quantum 1017 kg* core black hole scale
scale dB=h/mc Rylem=Rcurv for 28 Mylem=3.96x10 kg*/0.020Msun
- 16 -13 7 2 st 1.741x10 2.781058x10 6252.7 2.24832x10 75,793.8 4.3217x10 5.2172x RHawking=Re/ =1 Bohr 10 K* 10-11 radius for ylemic 2.938 y 6.10x10-16 m* template for atomic J*/3.798 keV* 345.661 structure as micro Fusion m* Hawking black hole to temperature 2.1130x manifest at 16 4 Mass limit for 10 kg* RHawking/ =9.798883x1 star 0-7 m* formation Rylem=Rcurv for 29 Mylem=1.40x10 kg*/0.070Msun - 16 7 1.679x10 2.6829444x10 5819.3 RMO=2LMO=2.169x1 77,167.2 4.4277x10 K* 5.0924x Supermembrane 10 0-13 6.25x10-16 10-11 modulation for the - 2.834 y LMO=rMO=3.451x10 J*/3.891 keV* m* minimum monopole 14 349.874 scale in spacetime Universe the size of m* from spacetime on a the Compton 2.0624x characteristic star quantum scale 1016 kg* globular cluster scale Rcompton= Rylem=Rcurv for 29 Re/=h/2mc Mylem=1.42x10 kg*/0.071Msun - 3 2 - 8 1.608x10 2*=2.568524393x 8 *r 4 r*=2.07650x10 249,402.7 2.5726x10 8.7645x Rylem=Rcurv for 11 15 14 -12 29 10 * K* 10 Mylem=3.42x10 -15 99.094 Monopolar upper 53.335 Monopolar upper 3.63x10 m* kg*/0.171Msun days classical bound quantum bound J*/22.607 843.354 keV* m* 3.5496x 1015 kg* - 15 -14 8 2 st 1.496x10 2.389899x10 46.175 1.93209x10 258,554.9 2.7155x10 8.3034x RHawking=Re/2 =1 11 K* 10-12 Bohr radius Ess 92.203 3.83x10-15 m* modulation days J*/23.863 866.452 Pauli exclusion keV* m* principle for electrons 3.3629x Rylem=Rcurv for 15 29 10 kg* Mylem=3.51x10 kg*/0.175Msun - 2 -14 8 1.351x10 2RE=2.158884301x1 4 RER 2Re=1.74533x10 272,037.0 2.9306x10 K* 7.6939x Rylem=Rcurv for 11 15 -15 -12 29 0 e 4.14x10 10 Mylem=3.65x10 83.290 37.680 J*/25.754 m* kg*/0.182Msun days keV* 900.123 m* 3.1160x 1015 kg* - 1 -15 9 2.559x10 *=4.087933536x10 2r** 2r*=3.30485x10 625,160.7 1.0210x10 K* 2.2084x Rylem=Rcurv for 12 4 -14 -12 29 MQB= Monopolar mean 1.44x10 10 m* Mylem=6.80x10 15.771 Monopolar mean 1.351 quantum bound J*/89.723 1,680.1 kg*/0.340Msun days classical bound keV* 0 m* 8.9440x 1014 kg* - 14 10 9 2.253x10 RE*=3.6x10 as 1 Re*=Re=10 ps/360 666,181.2 1.1231x10 2.0076x unity modulation 12 12 -12 360xRex10 =1/RE* K* 10 ou ded Di a s 1.2x106 s* 1.59x10-14 m* monopole 13.888 J*/98.696 1,762.1 Rylem=Rcurv for 29 days keV* 0 m* Mylem=7.14x10 8.1309x kg*/0.357Msun 1014 kg* - -15 9 2.151x10 RE= E weyl/ = . RERe Re=2.7777x10 681,897.2 1.1630x10 1.9387x Rylem=Rcurv for 12 14 -12 29 597108x10 0.9544 K* 10 m* Mylem=7.26x10 -14 13.256 1.64x10 1,793.1 kg*/0.363Msun days J*/102.20 37 m* keV* 7.8519x 1014 kg* - 14 -15 9 1.329x10 2.1235470x10 0.3645 XRe=1.716761x10 867,386.8 1.6685x10 1.3514x Rylem=Rcurv for 12 -12 29 6 = A for K* 10 m* Mylem=8.70x10 2 8.193 days A=5=(2X+1) kg*/0.435Msun Atomic radius for 2.36x10-14 2,147.7 nucleus J*/146.62 64 m* XRe/MQB=1.2707 keV* 5.4731x A with A the 1014 kg* atomic number - 14 -15 9 1.075x10 1.7179379x10 0.2386 ½R e=1.38885x10 964,362.2 1.9560x10 K* 1.1527x Rylem=Rcurv for 12 -14 -12 29 ~ X ½{X+½X}Re=¾XRe= 2.76x10 10 m* Mylem=9.42x10 -15 6.628 days 1.2875x10 J*/171.89 2,325.4 kg*/0.471Msun ~XRe/MQB keV* 55 m* 4.6686x 1014 kg* - 14 - 9 6.646x10 1.06177383x10 0.0911 ½XRe=8.583806x10 1.22667x10 2.8061x10 8.0352x Rylem=Rcurv for 13 16 6 -13 30 K* 10 m* Mylem=1.13x10 -14 4.096 days Proton charge 3.96x10 2,785.3 kg*/0.564Msun radius for neutron J*/246.59 20 m* degeneracy keV* 3.2543x 1014 kg* - 9 4.072x10 R*=*/2=6.506148 r*R* r*=ReR*/RE=5.2598 1.56705x10 4.0517x10 5.5650x Rylem=Rcurv for 13 13 -16 6 -13 30 293x10 0.0342 x10 K* 10 m* Mylem=1.36x10 -14 2.510 days Monopolar lower Monopolar lower 5.72x10 3,346.8 kg*/0.678Msun classical bound quantum bound J*/356.06 96 m* keV* 2.2538x 1014 kg* - - 9 3.423x10 RE/2=5.468517817x RERe/4 Re/2=4.42097x10 1.70926x10 4.6156x10 4.8851x Rylem=Rcurv for 13 13 2 16 6 -13 30 10 K* 10 K* Mylem=1.45x10 -14 2.110 days 0.0242 6.52x10 3,572.2 kg*/0.723Msun J*/405.61 15 m* keV* 1.9785x 1014 kg* - 13 -16 6 9 2.455x10 3.92162x10 0.0124 3.17040x10 2.0184x10 5.9229x10 3.80686 RHawking=Re/=Compton 13 K* x10-13 radius 1.513 days 8.36x10-14 m* Electron degeneracy J*/520.49 4,045.5 surface for neutron keV* 03 m* stars 1.5418x Rylem=Rcurv for 14 30 10 kg* Mylem=1.64x10 kg*/0.819Msun - 13 -16 6 9 1.443x10 2.30591x10 4.30x1 1.86419x10 2.6322x10 8.8207x10 K* 2.5562x Rylem=Rcurv for 13 -3 -13 -13 30 0 1.25x10 10 Mylem=2.00x10 76,863.6 J*/775.15 m* kg*/1..000Msun s* keV* 4,938.2 21.35 71 m* hours 1.0353x 1014 kg* 4.895x10- 7.82083x1012 4.95x1 6.32267x10-17 4.5198x106 1.9847x1010 1.1361x Nuclear density 14 -4 -13 n 3 0 K* 10 nuc=3mcY /4{Re} 26,069.4 2.80x10-13 m* (1.105-1.907)x1016 s* J*/1.744 7,407.4 [kg/m3]* 2 7.24 hours MeV* 07 m* M=mss=hfss/c mass 4.6011x quantization for space 1013 kg* quanta count 2 M/mss=h/mssc =hfps/h 30 =fps|mod=3x10 as Mchandra= 1.50 MSun - 12 -17 6 10 2.117x10 3.38237x10 9.25x1 2.73445x10 6.8728x10 3.7215x10 6.05875 RHawking=Re/2 = 14 0-5 K* x10-14 Compton radius Ess 11,274.58 5.25x10-13 m* modulation s* J*/3.270 10,143. Electron degeneracy 3.132 MeV* 34 m* core for neutron stars hours 2.4538x Rylem=Rcurv for 13 30 10 kg* Mylem=4.11x10 kg*/2.054Msun 1.938x10- 3.0959915x1012 7.75x1 2.502924x10-17 7.1836x106 3.9768x1010 5.6698x Modulation 14 0-5 K* 10-14 MQB/0.9544=1.41555 m* for Mchandra 10,320.0 5.61x10-13 10,485. lower Tolman- s* J*/3.495 55 m* Oppenheimer-Volkoff 2.87 hours MeV* 2.2963x (TOV) limit 1013 kg* for neutron stars Rylem=Rcurv for 30 Mylem=4.25x10 kg*/2.123 Msun 1.013x10- 1.618509x1012 2.12x1 1.3084678x10-17 9.9354x106 6.4684x1010 3.4858x Neutron decay mass 14 0-5 K* 10-14 loss: 5395.05 9.13x10-13 m* 8.844/4.900=1.805 s* J*/5.684 13,372. Increases Mchandra to 1.50 hours MeV* 84 m* 1.805Mchandra=2.708 1.4117x Msun 1013 kg* as upper TOV-limit for neutron stars Rylem=Rcurv for 30 Mylem=5.42x10 kg*/2.708 Msun - 11 -18 7 11 4.028x10 6.43488x10 3.35x1 5.20221x10 1.5757x10 1.2919x10 1.7453x RHawking=2Re 15 -6 -14 0 K* 10 Rylem=Rcurv for -12 30 2144.96 s* 1.82x10 m* Mylem=7.65x10 32.749 J*/11.35 18,899. kg*/3.827Msun min MeV* 00 m* 7.0686x 1012 kg*
- -18 11 2.160x10 RF= F weyl/ = . 9.63x1 Rf=2.789990x10 2.15163x10 2.0614x10 1.0938x Rylem=Rcurv for 15 11 -7 7 -14 30 107750x10 0 K* 10 m* Mylem=9.67x10 -12 1150.36 s* 2.91x10 23,872. kg*/4.834Msun 19.173 J*/18.12 87 m* min MeV* 4.4299x 1012 kg*
- -18 11 2.123x10 RG= G weyl/ = . 9.30x1 Rg=2.741872x10 2.17042x10 2.0885x10 1.0796x Rylem=Rcurv for 15 11 -7 7 -14 30 155801x10 0 K* 10 m* Mylem=9.73x10 -12 1130.52 s* 2.95x10 24,029. kg*/4.866Msun 18.8420 J*/18.35 28 m* min MeV* 4.3724x 1012 kg* - -18 11 2.084x10 RF = F weyl/ = . 8.96x1 Rf =2.69200x10 2.19044x10 2.1175x10 1.0648x Primordial neutron 15 11 -7 7 -14 2987275x10 0 K* 10 m* decay: F -2RMP 1109.96 s* 2.99x10-12 24,195. (1109.96-229.82) s* = 18.499 J*/18.61 54 m* 880.14 s*/879.28 s min MeV* 4.3125x from Higgs Boson with 1012 kg* RMP template Neutron decay mass loss: 8.844/4.900=1.805 Increases Mchandra to 1.805Mchandra=2.708 Msun as upper TOV-limit for neutron stars Rylem=Rcurv for 30 Mylem=9.80x10 kg*/4.900Msun
- 11 -19 11 8.754x10 1.39856x10 1.19x1 8.5232x10 3.89284x10 5.0167x10 5.55556 RHawking=2Re 16 -7 7 -15 0 K* x10 Rylem=Rcurv for -12 31 466.186 s* 7.08x10 m* Mylem=1.3566x10 7.770 min J*/44.09 33,497. kg*/6.78Msun MeV* 33 m* 2.2500x 1012 kg* - 2 11 4.315x10 Rneutrondecay=6.894632 3.84x1 2RMP=4 RRMP=5. 4.81381x10 6.89874x10 3.2684x Beginning of neutron 16 3x1010 0-8 57389763x10-19 7 K* 10-15 m* decay 229.821 s* 9.74x10-12 43,672. from Higgs Boson with 3.8304 J*/60.62 54 m* RMP template min MeV* 1.3237x Rylem=Rcurv for 12 31 10 kg* Mylem=1.77x10 kg*/8.844Msun
- 10 -19 11 3.474x10 5.550187x10 2.49x1 4.486994x10 5.36526x10 8.1172x10 2.7778x RHawking=Re limited by 16 -8 7 -15 3 0 K* 10 nucleon=mc/Re 185.006 s* 1.15x10-11 m* Nuclear density n 3 3.083 min J*/71.33 47,372. nuc=3mcY /4{Re} MeV* 40 m* (1.105-1.907)x1016 to 1.1250x [kg/m3]* 12 12 3.1636x10 10 kg* Rylem=Rcurv for 31 K* Mylem=1.92x10 kg*/9.593Msun - 10 -19 12 1.829x10 2.921968x10 6.90x1 2.362236x10 7.39446x10 1.3134x10 1.7168x RHawking=XRe limited by 16 -9 7 -15 3 3 0 K* 10 nucleon=Y mc/Re 97.398 s* 1.85x10-11 m* 1.623 min J*/115.4 60,257. Nuclear density n 3 MeV* 94 m* nuc=3mcY /4{XRe} to 6.9529x (4.683-8.077)x1016 1.3401x1013 1011 kg* [kg/m3]* K* Rylem=Rcurv for 31 Mylem=2.44x10 kg*/12.202Msun - 10 -19 12 1.379x10 2.202648x10 3.92x1 1.780709x10 8.51671x10 1.6234x10 1.3889x RHawking=½Re=protonic 16 0-9 7 K* 10-15 diameter limited by -11 3 73.422 s* 2.29x10 m* nucleon=8mc/Re 1.224 min J*/142.7 66,994. Nuclear density n 3 MeV* 07 m* nuc=3mcY /4{½Re} to 5.6250x (8.844-15.253)x1016 2.5309x1013 1011 kg* [kg/m3]* K* Rylem=Rcurv for 31 Mylem=2.71x10 kg*/13.566Msun - 10 - 7 12 1.172x10 1.87274220x10 2.84x1 RXL=2LXL=1.514x10 9.2365x10 1.8335x10 1.2298x Supermembrane 16 0-9 19 K* 10-15 modulation for the XL- -20 -11 62.425 s* LXL=rXL=2.410x10 2.59x10 m* boson string in J*/161.1 71,197. spacetime from MeV* 38 m* spacetime for quark- 4.9806x lepton differentiation 1011 kg* - 10 -20 12 7.258x10 1.159515x10 1.09x1 9.37398x10 1.17383x10 2.6268x10 8.5838x RHawking=½XRe limited 17 -9 8 -16 3 3 0 K* 10 by nucleon=8Y mc/Re 38.650 s* 3.71x10-11 m* Nuclear density n 3 J*/230.8 85,218. nuc=3mcY /4{½XRe} MeV* 27 m* (3.746-6.461)x1017 to 3.4764x [kg/m3]* 14 11 1.0721x10 10 kg* Rylem=Rcurv for 31 K* Mylem=3.45x10 kg*/17.257Msun - 10 8 12 6.868x10 1.09731481x10 9.73x1 RMP=2RRMP=8.871 1.2066x10 2.7377x10 8.2360x Supermembrane 17 36.577 s* 0-10 13360x10-20 K* 10-16 modulation for the 36.577 s* 3.86x10-11 m* dark matter agent RMP J*/240.6 86,999. in wavelength
MeV* 42 m* RMP=2RRMP dark 3.3356x matter particle 1011 kg* 1st wave matter neutron twin is born from ylem neutron in radial manifestation Rylem=Rcurv for 31 Mylem=3.52x10 kg*/17.617Msun 5.664x10- 9.04906x109 6.62x1 7.31562x10-20 1.32875x10 3.163603x10 7.1272x For electron 17 0-10 8 12 K* 10-16 degeneracy -11 3 30.164 s* 4.47x10 m* nucleon=mc/Re for a J*/278.0 93,522. temperature limit of 2 MeV* 16 m* THawking=mcc /2kB=3.163 2.8865x 603x1012 K* = Neutron 1011 kg* star-black hole limit
nucleon=BH Rylem=Rcurv for 31 Mylem=3.7876x10 kg*/18.938Msun
- 9 8 12 3.900x10 6.23051682x10 3.14x1 REC=2LEC=5.037x10 1.6013x10 4.1854x10 5.3872x Supermembrane 17 0-10 -20 K* 10-16 modulation for the -21 -11 20.768 s* LEC=rEC=8.017x10 5.91x10 m* Ecosmic boson string J*/367.8 107,570 in spacetime from MeV* .18 m* spacetime 2.1818x Rylem=Rcurv for 11 31 10 kg* Mylem=4.36x10 kg*/21.783Msun - 9 -20 12 2.996x10 4.78696x10 1.85x1 3.86997x10 1.82690x10 5.1002x10 4.42097 RHawking=Re/2 Ess 17 0-10 8 K* x10-16 modulation 15.957 s* 7.20x10-11 m* Neutron degeneracy J*/448.2 118,744 Rylem=Rcurv for 31 MeV* .56 m* Mylem=4.81x10 1.7905x kg*/24.05Msun 1011 kg* - 9 8 13 1.093x10 1.74643077x10 2.47x1 RRMP=1.411884763x 3.0246x10 1.0865x10 2.0753x Supermembrane 17 0-11 10-20 K* 10-16 modulation for the 5.821 s* 1.53x10-10 m* dark matter agent J*/954.8 173,315 RMP in radius RRMP = MeV* .85 m* {e*.dtss/dfps|resonance/2 2} 8.4050x = {(e*/22)/(9x1060)} 1010 kg* Y2M2C2 quark geometric template for lefthanded ylemic neutron boson as precursor for fermionic Higgs Boson template Higgs boson string maximum in spacetime from spacetime Rylem=Rcurv for 31 Mylem=7.02x10 kg*/35.096Msun 8.264x10- 1.320239x109 1.41x1 1.0673343x10-20 3.4787x108 1.340124x10 1.6825x For neutron 18 0-11 13 K* 10-16 degeneracy in the 4.401 s* 1.53x10-10 m* diameter of a protonic 3 J*/954.8 192,484 nucleus nucleon=Y mcRe MeV* .62 m* Rylem=Rcurv for 31 6.8141x Mylem=7.7956x10 10 10 kg* kg*/38.978Msun
- 8 8 13 5.523x10 8.82440084x10 6.30x1 RHiggs=2LHiggs=7.134 4.2550x10 1.8129x10 1.2437x Supermembrane 18 0-12 x10-21 K* 10-16 modulation for the -10 2.941 s* LHiggs=rHiggs=1.135x1 2.56x10 m* Higgs boson string 0-21 J*/1.59 GeV* 223,877 minimum in spacetime .44 m* from spacetime 5.0372x 1010 kg* Rylem=Rcurv for 31 Mylem=9.07x10 kg*/45.335Msun 3.540x10- 5.65566x108 2.59x1 4.572262x10-21 5.3150x108 2.530882x10 8.9090x For neutron 18 0-12 13 K* 10-17 degeneracy in the 1.885 s* 3.57x10-10 m* radial size of a J*/2.22 GeV* 264,520 protonic nucleus 3 .60 m* nucleon=8mc3Re 3.6081x Rylem=Rcurv for 10 32 10 kg* Mylem=1.07131x10 kg*/53.565Msun
- 8 9 13 9.066x10 1.44846837x10 1.70x1 RHiggs=2LHiggs=1.171 1.0502x10 7.0300x10 3.2074x Supermembrane 19 0-13 x10-21 K* 10-17 modulation for the -10 0.4828 s* LHiggs=rHiggs=1.864x1 9.92x10 m* Higgs boson string 0-22 J*/6.18 GeV* 440,860 maximum in spacetime .38 m* from spacetime 1.2990x Rylem=Rcurv for 10 32 10 kg* Mylem=1.79x10 kg*/89.274Msun 5.165x10- 8.251498x107 5.50x1 6.670843x10-22 1.3915x109 1.072099x10 2.1031x For neutron 19 0-14 14 K* 10-17 degeneracy in the 0.27505 s* 1.51x10-9 m* charge radius of a J*/9.42 GeV* 544,428 proton 3 3 .68 m* nucleon=8Y mcRe = 8.5177x Quark star limit 9 10 kg* Rylem=Rcurv for 32 Mylem=2.20494x10 kg*/110.25Msun
- 7 -22 9 14 4.917x10 7.85497x10 4.99x1 6.350273x10 1.4262x10 1.11243x10 2.0269x RHawking= Re = Inverse 19 0-14 K* 10-17 Compton radius -9 0.2618 s* 1.57x10 m* Rylem=Rcurv for 32 J*/9.78 GeV* 554,574 Mylem=2.25x10 .32 m* kg*/112.30Msun 8.2089x 109 kg* - 7 -22 9 14 4.864x10 7.77175644x10 7.77x1 2ps=6.283x10 1.4338x10 1.1214x10 2.0107x Supermembrane 19 0-15 K* 10-17 modulation for the 0.2591 s* 1.58x10-9 m* radius of the QBBS J*/9.85 GeV* 556,805 boson string in .71 m* spacetime from 8.1435x spacetime 9 10 kg* Rylem=Rcurv for 32 Mylem=2.26x10 kg*/112.75Msun
- 7 -22 9 14 7.7422x10 1.23694994x10 1.24x1 ps=10 3.3594x10 4.4501x10 5.0668x Supermembrane 20 0-15 K* 10-18 modulation for the 0.04123 s* 6.28x10-9 m* wavelength of the J*/39.11 1.1092x QBBS boson string in GeV* 106 m* spacetime as 2.0520x timespace 9 10 kg* Rylem=Rcurv for 32 Mylem=4.49x10 kg*/224.61Msun
- 6 -23 9 15 1.340x10 REW=2.141143x10 3.71x1 1.730986x10 8.6382x10 1.65825x10 1.3597x Electroweak 20 Dark matter universe 0-17 Ylemic radius K* 10-18 Unification -8 15 1/140 is illuminated as the shrinks as the radial 2.34x10 m* TEW=E/kB=2x10 K* =0.00714 EMI light path universe expands J*/145.7 2.14115 (146-251)GeV* for {W- s* intersects the dark with the separation GeV* x106 m* +W++Zo} matter haloed ylemic of the short range 5.5069x Rylem = R(n) as size of universe nuclear weakon 108 kg* the universe interaction from Dark matter halo the long range defined as a quark- electromagnetic lepton geometric interaction kernel-ring structure crystallizing the ylem neutrons from the Higgs Boson and RMP template Rylem=Rcurv for 32 Mylem=8.67x10 kg*/433.58Msun - 6 -22 9 15 1.233x10 1.96922430x10 3.13x1 ps/2=1.592x10 9.0073x10 1.7657x10 1.2770x Supermembrane 20 0-17 K* 10-18 modulation for 0.00656 s* 2.49x10-8 m* modulated wavelength J*/155.2 2.2094x of the QBBS boson GeV* 106 m* string in spacetime 5.1718x from timespace 8 10 kg* Rylem=Rcurv for 32 Mylem=8.95x10 kg*/447.40Msun 6.613x10- 1.0564789x106 9.02x1 8.541000x10-24 1.2297x101 2.8167x1015 8.0050x Supermembrane 21 0-18 0 K* 10-19 modulation for the 0.00352 s* 3.97x10-8 m* Higgs boson string J*/247.5 2.7906x maximum in spacetime GeV* 106 m* from timespace 3.2420x Rylem=Rcurv for 8 33 10 kg* Mylem=1.13x10 kg*/565.10Msun 1.085x10- 173,420.38 2.43x1 1.40200x10-24 3.0353x101 1.0922x1016 2.0644x Supermembrane 21 0-19 0 K* 10-19 modulation for the 5.781x10-4 1.54x10-7 m* Higgs boson string J*/959.8 5.4951x minimum in spacetime GeV* 106 m* from timespace 8.3608x Rylem=Rcurv for 7 33 10 kg* Mylem=2.23x10 kg*/1112.75Msun - -25 10 16 2 6.958x10 111,173.6 9.99x1 8.98772x10 3.791x10 1.52452x10 1.4790x RHawking= Re = Inverse 22 0-20 K* 10-19 1st Bohr radius for 3.706x10-4 2.15x10-7 m* ylemic template for J*/1.338 TeV* 6.4921x atomic structure as 106 m* micro Hawking black 5.9898x hole to manifest at 7 4 10 kg* RHawking/ =9.798883x1 0-7 m* Rylem=Rcurv for 33 Mylem=2.63x10 kg*/1314.65Msun 1.537x10- 24,553.46 4.87x1 1.9850x10-25 8.0666x101 4.7321x1016 4.7648x Supermembrane 22 0-21 0 K* 10-20 modulation for the 8.184x10-5 6.68x10-7 m* Ecosmic boson string J*/4.158 TeV* 1.1438x in spacetime from 107 m* timespace 1.9298x Rylem=Rcurv for 7 33 10 kg* Mylem=4.63x10 kg*/2316.20Msun - -30 12 3.562x10 RBU=0.569092 2.62x1 4.60077x10 1.676x10 Tps=1.4167x1 1.59155 Bosonic temperature 27 universe is 1.1382 0-30 Ylemic universe is 3.515x10-25 020 K* x10-23 unification -9 3 2 1.897x10 meters across manifested in the J* 0.002 m* T(n)= {{Ho Mo/ encompassed by a primordial Hawking 2.19x10-6 J*/12,449.8 6.2584x σ}. + 2/n3} 8 2 3 ylem dark matter micro black hole eV* TeV* 10 m* = {18.2(n+1) /n }=Tps= halo of radius defining the dark 6445.78 1.4167x1020 K* 8 6.2584x10 m* in matter ylemic halo kg* R ylem=Rcurv for 35 the inflaton EMMI Mylem=2.53x10 universe kg*/126,732.0Msun
- -30 1 20 4 1.394x10 0.22267 4.01x1 1.80019x10 2.6786x10 2.8634x10 7.8744x RHawking= Re = False 27 0-31 3 K* 10-24 Higgs Vacuum limited 7.422x10- 8.98x10-25 m* by wormhole radius 10 J* 8.8974x rps=ps/2 -6 8 5.59x10 10 m* Rylem=Rcurv for 35 eV* 3189.14 Mylem=3.60x10 kg* kg*/180,172.4Msun
5.114x10- 0.0817 5.40x1 6.60496x10-31 4.4221x101 6.0739x1020 - Supermembrane 28 0-32 3 K* modulation for the XL- 2.723x10- 2.4480x10- boson string for quark- 10 24 J* lepton differentiation 1.52x10-5 in spacetime from eV* timespace 3.570x10- 5.704x10-3 2.63x1 4.61134x10-32 1.6736x101 4.4720x1021 - Supermembrane 29 0-34 4 K* modulation for the 1.901x10- 3.5063x10- minimum monopole 11 23 J* scale in spacetime 2.18x10-4 from timespace on a eV* characteristic star globular cluster scale
1.190x10- 1.9012x10-4 2.92x1 1.5370x10-33 9.1671x101 5.7328x1022 - Supermembrane 30 0-37 4 K* modulation for the 6.337x10- 1.0520x10- maximum monopole 13 21 J* scale in spacetime 6.55x10-3 from timespace on a eV* characteristic star globular cluster scale
- nps=tps=fss Supermembrane 3.3x10 nps = tps=fss↔fps=tss 31 ↔fps=tss modulation inversion = =1/nps 1/3x10 30 - 24 15 2 2 3.333x10 RALGO=2LALGO=5.3255 3.51x1 6.587377x10 1.732x10 1.4889886x10 - n=Hotps /nps=ctps /ps=t 31 -5 20 -21 23 8484x10 0 3.755x10 K* ps=1/fps=fss mass eigen 2 tps /tALGO LALGO=rALGO=8.47593x J* frequency -6 st =tps/Ho= 10 0.02338 Image of 1 Logos 1.775x10- Universe the size of eV* mathimatia definition 13 smallest life bio- organisms; cellular complex 0.2 picoseconds 1.017x10- 1.6241x10-5 3.26x1 2.0089x1024 3.1365x101 3.6282x1023 - Supermembrane 31 019 5 K* modulation for the 5.414x10- 1.2315x10- Planck length in 14 20 J* spacetime from 0.0766 eV* timespace on a characteristic galactic core scale
8.687x10- 1.3879x10-6 2.38x1 1.7168x1023 1.0729x101 2.2954x1024 - Supermembrane 33 017 6 K* modulation for the 4.626x10- 1.441x10-19 Planck length bounce 15 J* in spacetime from 897.02 eV* timespace on a characteristic galaxy scale
- 20 17 26 5.581x10 ROPL=2LOPL=8.916x1 9.83x1 1.1028646x10 4.23x10 5.6883x10 - Planck Oscillation in 36 0-10 010 2.243x10-16 K* timespace manifests 2 -10 tps /tOPL LOPL=rOPL=1.419x10 J* in atomic complexity =2.972x10- Universe the size of 1.396 keV* 18 an atom - - 18 18 27 4.768x10 RPL=2LPL=7.617x10 7.18x1 9.42184766x10 1.45x10 3.5997x10 - Planck length of 37 11 08 2.626x10-15 K* timespace manifests 2 -11 tps /tPL LPL=rPL=1.212x10 J* as =2.539x10- Universe the size of 16.34 keV* atomic scale in 19 the Bohr atom scale spacetime 2 bohr1=Re/ 1.454x10- 2.32299x10-11 6.67x1 2.873422x1018 2.6225x101 8.7719x1027 - Beginning of Inversion 37 06 8 K* Modulation for the 7.743x10- 8.610x10-15 Algo wavelength in 20 J* spacetime from 53.59 keV* timespace - 17 18 28 4.073x10 RMO=2LMO=6.507x10 5.24x1 8.0488332x10 4.95x10 2.2781x10 - Monopole [30ec]min in 38 -12 06 3.074x10-14 K* timespace manifests in -12 h/E LMO=rMO=1.036x10 J* quantum mechanics in =2.169x10- Universe the size of 191.33 spacetime 20 the wave matter de keV* Broglie quantum
scale dB=h/mc - 16 19 29 1.357x10 RMO=2LMO=2.169x10 5819.4 2.6829444x10 2.71x10 2.9213x10 - Monopole [ec]max in 39 -13 9.221x10-13 K* timespace manifests in 2 -14 tps /tMO LMO=rMO=3.451x10 J* quantum mechanics in =7.229x10- Universe the size of 5.74 MeV* spacetime 22 the Compton quantum scale Rcompton= Re/=h/2mc - 2 -14 3 19 30 1.300x10 4 r*=2.07650x10 8 *r 2*=2.568524393 8.77x10 1.6968x10 - Dirac string modular Re 40 Monopolar upper * x1015 9.632x10-12 K* upper bound 6.922x10- quantum bound 53.335 Monopolar upper J* 23 classical bound 59.96 MeV* - -14 2 19 30 1.092x10 2Re=1.74533x10 4 RER 2RE=2.158884301x 9.57x10 1.9330x10 - 40 15 -11 e 10 1.146x10 K* 5.818x10- 37.680 J* 23 71.33 MeV* 2.069x10- 2r*=3.30485x10-15 2r** *=4.087933536x1 2.20x1020 6.7340x1030 - Dirac string modular Re 41 Monopolar mean MQB= 014 6.052x10-11 K* mean 1.102x10- quantum bound 1.351 Monopolar mean J* 23 classical bound 376.71 MeV*
- 10 14 20 30 1.739x10 Re*=Re=10 ps/360 1 RE*=3.6x10 as 2.40x10 7.6713x10 - 41 12 -11 360xRex10 =1/RE* 7.200x10 K* 9.259x10- J* 24 448.19 MeV* - -15 1 20 30 1.739x10 Re=2.77777x10 RERe RE=3.43597108x10 2.40x10 7.6713x10 - 41 Electron charge 0.9544 4 7.200x10-11 K* 9.259x10- radius for electron J* 24 degeneracy 448.19 MeV* - -15 14 20 31 1.075x10 XRe=1.716761x10 0.3645 2.1235470x10 3.05x10 1.1006x10 - 41 = A for 6 1.165x10-10 K* 5.723x10- A=5=(2X+1)2 J* 24 Atomic radius for 725.19 nucleus MeV* XRe/MQB=1.2707 A with A the atomic number - -15 14 20 31 8.693x10 ½R e=1.38885x10 0.2386 1.7179379x10 3.39x10 1.2902x10 - 42 -10 ½{X+½X}Re=¾XRe=1. ~ X 1.440x10 K* 4.630x10- 2875x10-15 J* 24 ~XRe/MQB 896.41 MeV* - -16 14 20 31 5.373x10 ½XRe=8.583806x10 0.0911 1.06177383x10 4.31x10 1.8508x10 - 42 Proton charge 2.330x10-10 K* 2.861x10- radius for neutron J* 24 degeneracy 1.450 GeV* - 20 31 3.292x10 r*=ReR*/RE=5.2598x1 r*R* R*=*/2 5.51x10 2.6725x10 - Dirac string modular Re 42 0-16 0.0342 =6.506148293x1013 3.802x10-10 K* lower bound 1.753x10- Monopolar lower Monopolar lower J* 24 quantum bound classical bound 2.367 GeV* - 20 31 2.767x10 Re/2= RERe/4 RE/2=5.468517817 6.01x10 3.0445x10 - 42 -16 2 13 -10 Re/2=4.42097x10 x10 4.524x10 K* 1.474x10- 0.0242 J* 24 2.816 GeV*
- 21 33 1.746x10 f=(RF/RE)Re=2.78999 9.63x1 RF= F weyl/ 7.57x10 1.3598x10 - Higgs Boson 44 0x10-18 0-7 =3.45107750x1011 (7.168- K* 71.020Ynp=122.49 - -19 -8 9.300x10 rf =4.4404070x10 1150.36 s* 1.141)x10 GeV* 27 J* 122.19 GeV (446.23- RMP -dark matter 71.02) deficit=122.49/123.57 GeV* =0.9913 1.731x10- 2.7659325x10-18 9.46x1 3.42132x1011 7.60x1021 1.3687x1033 - Higgs Boson 44 4.4021183x10-19 0-7 1140.44 s* (7.231- K* 71.64Ynp=123.56 GeV* 9.220x10- 1.151)x10-8 123.25 GeV Mean 27 J* time ½(F-G)=9.92 s* (450.11- 71.64) GeV* - 21 33 1.716x10 g=(RG/RE)Re=2.7418 9.30x1 RG= G weyl/ 7.63x10 1.3776x10 - Higgs Boson 44 72x10-18 0-7 =3.39155801x1011 (7.294- K* 72.266Ynp=124.64 - -19 -8 9.140x10 rg=4.36382482x10 1130.52 s* 1.161)x10 GeV* 27 J* 124.33 GeV (454.06- Higgs neutrino:
72.266) mH=merps{RE/RF- -38 GeV* RE/RG}/Re=9.305x10 kg* 0.052 eV* neutrino mass induction 2.969- 3.021 eV* 1.702x10- 2.719631x10-18 9.14x1 3.364047x1011 7.665x1021 1.3861x1033 - 125.66 GeV* 44 4.3284271x10-19 0-7 1121.35 s* (7.354- K* 125.35 GeV 9.065x10- 1.170)x10-8 1 eV*= 0.997540464 27 J* eVSI (457.77- 1 s* = 0.999022562 sSI 72.857) 1 kg*=0.996260907 GeV* kgSI 1.701x10- 2.716941x10-18 9.06x1 3.336072x1011 7.668x1021 1.3870x1033 - Higgs Boson 44 4.324146x10-19 0-7 1120.24 s* (7.361- K* 72.93Ynp=125.78 GeV* 9.0575x10- 1.172)10-8 125.48 GeV 27 J* RMP -dark matter (458.23- excess=126.95/125.78 72.93) =1.0093 GeV* Mean time ½(G- F = . s*
- 21 33 1.685x10 f =(RF /RE)Re=2.6920 8.96x1 RF = F weyl/ 7.70x10 1.3966x10 - Higgs Boson 44 0x10-18 0-7 =3.32987275x1011 (7.429- K* 73.605Ynp=126.95 - -19 -8 8.973x10 rf =4.4404070x10 1109.96 s* 1.182)x10 GeV* 27 J* 126.64 GeV (462.47- Blueprint for neutron
73.605) decay: F -2RMP GeV* (1109.96-229.82) s* = 880.14 s*/879.28 s
1.331x10- 2.1264802x10-18 5.59x1 2.6303496x1011 8.67x1021 1.6668x1033 - 1/(1.351x0.9544)=0.77 44 0-7 876.78 s* K* 5558 7.088x10- Higgs monopolar 0.7755 9.405x10-8 27 mean quantum 58 J* bound from G as 585.46 dineutron GeV* - 2 22 33 3.489x10 2RMP=4 RRMP=5.57 3.84x1 Rneutrondecay=6.89463 1.69x10 4.5500x10 - Modular RMP 45 389763x10-19 0-8 23x1010 3.588x10-7 K* perimeter for 1.858x10- 229.82 s* J* primordial neutron 27 2.234 GeV* decay (1109.96- 229.82)s*=880.14 s*, 879.28 s 1st particular neutron twin is born from ylem neutron to blueprint primordial neutron decay - - 10 22 34 9.475x10 RXL=2LXL=1.514x10 2.84x1 1.87274220x10 3.25x10 1.2094x10 - Image of XL boson 46 19 0-9 1.321x10-6 K* string 2 -20 tps /tXL LXL=rXL=2.410x10 J* Scale of RMP-photon =5.046x10- 8.223 TeV* 28 - 10 22 34 5.553x10 RMP=2RRMP=8.8711 9.73x1 1.09731481x10 4.24x10 1.8057x10 - RMP=2RRMP dark 46 3360x10-20 0-10 2.255x10-6 K* matter particle 2.957x10- J* 1st wave matter 28 14.034 neutron twin is born TeV* from ylem neutron in radial manifestation - - 9 22 34 3.153x10 REC=2LEC=5.037x10 3.14x1 6.23051682x10 5.63x10 2.7604x10 - Image of EC boson 46 20 0-10 3.971x10-6 K* string 2 -21 tps /tEC LEC=rEC=8.017x10 J* Scale of RMP photon =1.679x10- 24.717 28 TeV* - 9 23 34 8.837x10 RRMP=1.411884763x1 2.47x1 1.74643077x10 1.06x10 7.1661x10 - RRMP = 47 -20 -11 -5 0 0 1.417x10 K* {e*.dtss/dfps|resonance/2 4.706x10- J* 2} 29 88.178 = {(e*/22)/(9x1060)} TeV* Y2M2C2 quark geometric template for lefthanded ylemic neutron boson as precursor for fermionic Higgs Boson template - 8 23 35 4.465x10 RHiggs=2LHiggs=7.134x 6.30x1 8.82440084x10 1.50x10 1.1958x10 - False Higgs Vacuum 47 10-21 0-12 2.803x10-5 K* min in spacetime 2 - RHc tps/ LHiggs=rHiggs=1.135x10 J* 21 GoMo 174.51 =2.378x10- TeV* 29 - 8 23 35 7.327x10 RHiggs=2LHiggs=1.171x 1.70x1 1.44846837x10 3.69x10 4.6379x10 - False Higgs Vacuum 48 10-21 0-13 1.708x10-4 K* max in spacetime - tps/√ LHiggs=rHiggs=1.864x10 J* = 22 1063.17 3.902x10- TeV* 30 - -22 7 23 35 3.933x10 2ps=6.283x10 4.88x1 7.77175644x10 5.04x10 7.3956x10 - Modular QBBS 48 0-14 3.183x10-4 K* wormhole perimeter 2.094x10- J* 30 1981.44 TeV* -22 7 24 36 nps= ps=10 1.24x1 1.23694994x10 1.26x10 2.2935x10 - wormhole 6.259x10- 0-15 2x10-3 J* K* temperature < 49 12,449.76 Tps=1.4167x1 universe temperature 20 20 tps= TeV* 0 K* Tps=Eps/kB=1.4167x10 - 3.333x10 < T(nps)= 31 2.935177x1036 K*
- - 6 24 20 9.962x10 rps=ps/2=1.592x10 3.14x1 1.96922430x10 3.17x10 8.9040x10 - Modular QBBS 50 23 0-17 0.01257 J* K* wormhole radius 5.305x10- 78,224.17 32 TeV* - 6 24 5.346x10 RHiggs=2LHiggs=8.541x 9.02x1 1.0564789x10 4.33x10 TH=1.6590x10 - False Higgs Vacuum 50 10-24 0-18 0.02342 J* 21 K* max in timespace - 5 √ tps LHiggs=rHiggs=1.359x10 1.4576x10 = 24 TeV* 2.847x10- 32 - 25 8.773x10 RHiggs=2LHiggs=1.402x 2.43x1 173,420.38 1.07x10 TH=1.0105x10 - False Higgs Vacuum 51 10-24 0-19 0.14265 J* 22 K* min in timespace - 5 GoMotps/RH LHiggs=rHiggs=2.231x10 8.8800x10 c2 25 TeV* = 4.672x10- 33 - - 25 1.243x10 REC=2LEC=1.985x10 4.87x1 24,553.46 2.84x10 TEC=7.0304x1 - EC-Boson string 51 25 0-21 0.9925 J* 022 K* B = e/hA ℮−n[n+1] -26 6 2REC/c LEC=rEC=3.159x10 6.272x10 = TeV* 6.618x10- 34 - - 28 4.135x10 RXL=2LXL=6.606x10 4.95x1 0.0817 1.56x10 TXL=2.1446x1 - XL-Boson string 57 31 -32 28 2RXL/c 0 302,755.07 0 K* -31 = LXL=rXL=1.051x10 J* 2.202x10- 1.885x1012 39 TeV* - -3 28 2.886x10 RMO=2LMO=4.611x10 2.63x1 5.704x10 5.89x10 TMO=3.0721x1 - Monopole [ec]max in 58 -32 0-34 4.337x106 029 K* timespace manifests -33 2RMO/c LMO=rMO=7.339x10 J* in quantum 1.537x10- 2.700x1013 mechanics in 40 TeV* spa eti e as t Hooft- Polyakov GUT monopole lower limit - -4 29 9.621x10 RMO=2LMO=1.537x10 2.92x1 1.9012x10 3.22x10 TMO=9.2157x1 - Monopole [30ec]min in 60 -33 -37 8 30 2RMO/c 0 1.301x10 0 K* timespace manifests - -34 5.124x10 LMO=rMO=2.446x10 J* in quantum 42 8.100x1014 mechanics in TeV* spa eti e as t Hooft- Polyakov GUT monopole upper limit - -5 30 8.219x10 RPL=2Lplanck=1.313x1 2.13x1 1.6241x10 1.10x10 TPL=1.0788x1 - Planck boson string 61 0-34 0-39 1.523x109 032 K* -35 2RPL/c Lplanck=rPL=2.090x10 J* 4.377x10- 9.482x1015 43 TeV* - -6 30 7.021x10 ROPL=2LOPL=1.122x1 1.56x1 1.3879x10 3.77x10 TOPL=1.2630x1 - Planck bounce boson 62 0-35 0-41 1.783x1010 033 K* string 3 2e/c =√ LOPL=rOPL=√Lplanck=1. J* -36 17 tPL 786x10 1.110x10 = TeV* 3.739x10- 44 -11 32 nALGO= RALGO=2LALGO=1.878x 4.36x1 2.32299x10 9.23x10 TALGO=7.5440x - First Logos -40 -51 15 37 HotALGO 10 0 1.065x10 10 K* mathimatia definition - =Honps LALGO=rALGO=2.989x10 J* in timespace 1.175x10- 41 6.629x1021 to manifest universal 66 TeV* life in spacetime
nps= wavelength ps Hotps=ps/R linearized as radius
H RALGO=2rALGO for QBBS 6.259x10- as rps=ps/2 40
The Ylemic Gluon-Quark-Plasma Protostars of Universe as Vortex Energies
The stability of stars is a function of the equilibrium condition, which balances the inward pull of gravity with the outward pressure of the thermodynamic energy or enthalpy of the star (H=PV+U). The Jeans
Mass MJ and the Jeans Length RJ a used to describe the stability conditions for collapsing molecular hydrogen clouds to form stars say, are well known in the scientific data base, say in formulations such as:
MJ=3kBTR/2Gm for a Jeans Length of RJ=√{ kBT/ G }=‘J =√ kBT/Gnm²). Now the Ideal Gas Law of basic thermodynamics states that the internal pressure P and Volume of such an ideal gas are given by PV=nRT=NkT for n moles of substance being the Number N of molecules (say) divided by Avogadro's Constant L in n=N/L . Since the Ideal Gas Constant R divided by Avogadro's Constant L and defines Boltzmann's Constant k=R/L. The statistical analysis of kinetic energy KE of particles in motion in a gas (say) gives a root-mean- square velocity (rms) and the familiar 2.KE=mv²(rms) from the distribution of individual velocities v in such a system. It is found that PV=(2/3)N.KE as a total system described by the v(rms). Setting the KE equal to the Gravitational PE=GMm/R for a spherical gas cloud gives the Jeans Mass
(3/2N).(NkBT)=GMm/R with m the mass of a nucleon or Hydrogen atom and M=MJ=3kTR/2Gm as stated.
The Jeans' Length is the critical radius of a cloud (typically a cloud of interstellar dust) where thermal energy, which causes the cloud to expand, is counter acted by gravity, which causes the cloud to collapse. It is named after the British astronomer Sir James Jeans, who first derived the quantity; where kB is Boltzmann Constant, T is the temperature of the cloud, R is the radius of the cloud, m is the mass per particle in the cloud, G is the Gravitational Constant a d is the loud's ass de sit i.e. the cloud's mass divided by the cloud's volume).
Shortly after the Big Bang, there were of course no gas clouds in the early expanding universe and the
Jeans formulations are not applicable to the mass seedling Mo; in the manner of the Jeans formulations as given. However, the universe's dynamics is in the form of the expansion parameter of General
Relativity and so as R(n)=Rmax(n/(n+1)) with the scale factor of Quantum Relativity.
Expressing the Jeans radius in the form of the Hawking radius of primordial micro black holes with a fixed nuclear density defined by subatomic parameters of the timespace made manifest in the QBBS, then allows analysis of the thermodynamic universe expansion as a function of temperature, independent on the distribution of the mass seedling Mo.as the Gamow-Hawking protostars matching the universal temperature background as potential vortex energies given by the Hawking masses. The thermal internal energy or ITE=H is the outward pressure in equilibrium with the gravitational pote tial e e g of GPE= . The u lea de sit i te s of the supe a e pa a ete s is critical=mc/Vcritical with mc a base-nucleon mass for an 'ylemic neutron'.
3 Vcritical= ‘e /3 or the volume for the ylemic neutron as given by the classical electron radius 10 2 Re=10 ps/360={e*/2c }mod.
3 2 3 H=(molarity)kBT for molar volume as N=(R/Re) for dH=3kBTR /Re
The gravitational potential energy is ‘ = -∫GoMdm/R 3 2 = -4Go∫{4R /3}{R /R}dR 2 2 4 2 2 5 = -{ Go/3}∫‘ dR = -{ Go/15}{R } 2 2 4 2 4 2 3 d/dR=-{ Go/3}{R }=-3Gomc R for dM/d‘=d V /d‘= ‘ a d fo =M/V=3mc/ ‘e
Fo e uili iu , the e ui e e t is that dH=d i the i i u o ditio dH+d = .
2 3 2 4 This gi es dH+d = 3kBTR /Re - 3Gomc R = 0 and the ylemic radius as:
2 Rylem=√{kTRe/Gomc } …………………………..[EQ.4] as the Jeans-Length precursor or progenitor for subsequent stellar and galactic generation.
The ylemic (Jeans) radii are all independent of the mass of the star as a function of its nuclear generated temperature.
Applied to the proto-stars of the vortex neutron matter or ylem, the radii are all neutron star radii and define a specific range of radii for the gravitational collapse of the electron degenerate matter. These spans from the 'First Three Minutes' scenario of the cosmogenesis to 1.1 million seconds (or about 13 days) and encompasses the standard beta decay of the neutron, underpinning radioactivity.
The upper limit defines a trillion-degree temperature and a radius of over 40 km; the trivial Schwarzschild solution gives a typical ylem radius of so 7.4 kilometers and the lower limit defines the 'mysterious' planetesimal limit as 1.8 km. For long a cosmological conundrum, it could not be modelled just how the molecular and electromagnetic forces applicable to conglomerate matter distributions (say gaseous hydrogen as cosmic dust) on the quantum scale of molecules could become strong enough to form say 1 km mass concentrations, required for 'ordinary' gravity to assume control.
The ylem radii's lower limit is defined in the cosmology as the Dirac monopole wavelength modulation at the 1.0 – 1.2 billion Kelvin degree marking the temperature of the universe in its defining Hawking- Gamow micro-mass black holes, which apply the Jeans formulation of hydrogen clouds to the primordial ylemic dineutron scenario. The stellar evolution from the ylemic (di-neutronic) templates is well established in QR and confirms most of the Standard Model's ideas of nucleosynthesis and the general cosmology for a thermodynamically expanding universe.
n=Hot Radius m* Mod Quantum Cosmologic Temperature Hawking Hawking Temp 3 t= R(n)=RH{n/[n+1] factor Modulation al CBBR bh THawking=hc /4kBGoMHa Radius wking comoving T= Ylem Ylem Radius 2 3 2 redshift {18.2(n+1) / Radius Rylem=√{kBTRe /Gomc } z+ =√{ + / n3} Hawking Hawking Radius n[n+2]} of cycle time Mass RHawking=hc/2kBTHawking Energy n Hawking Mass 2 J*/GeV* THawking/Tylem = MHawking=RHawkingc /2Go 3 1 = hcRe / 2 2 2Gomc Rylem RHawking Boson Energy E=kT 14 -15 9 2.559x *=4.087933536x10 2r** 2r*=3.30485x10 625,160.7 1.0210x10 K* 2.2084x Rylem=Rcurv for -12 -14 -12 29 10 Monopolar mean MQB= Monopolar mean 1.44x10 10 m* Mylem=6.80x10 15.77 classical bound 1.351 quantum bound J*/89.723 1,680.10 kg*/0.340Msun days keV* m* 8.9440x 1014 kg* 14 10 9 2.253x RE*=3.6x10 as 1 Re*=Re=10 ps/360 666,181.2 1.1231x10 K* 2.0076x unity modulation -12 12 -14 -12 10 360xRex10 =1/RE* 1.59x10 10 m* ou ded Di a s 1.2x10 J*/98.696 1,762.10 monopole 6 s* keV* m* Rylem=Rcurv for 29 13.88 8.1309x Mylem=7.14x10 14 8 days 10 kg* kg*/0.357Msun -15 9 2.151x RE= E weyl/ = . RERe Re=2.7778x10 681,897.2 1.1630x10 K* 1.9387x Rylem=Rcurv for -12 14 -14 -12 29 10 97108x10 0.9544 1.64x10 10 m* Mylem=7.26x10 13.25 J*/102.20 1,793.13 kg*/0.363Msun 61 keV* 7 m* days 7.8519x 1014 kg* 4.895x 7.82083x1012 4.945x 6.32267x10-17 4.5198x106 1.9847x1010 1.1361x Nuclear density -14 -4 -13 n 3 10 10 K* 10 m* nuc=3mcY /4{Re} 26,06 2.80x10-13 7,407.40 (1.105-1.907)x1016 9.4 s* J*/1.744 7 m* [kg/m3]* 7.24 MeV* 4.6011x Rylem=√{3kBT/4Gomcnu 13 hours 10 kg* c} for 1.5 MSun 2 M=mss=hfss/c mass quantization for space quanta count 2 M/mss=h/mssc =hfps/h 30 =fps|mod=3x10 as Mchandra=1.50 MSun 12 -17 6 10 2.117x 3.38237x10 9249x1 2.73445x10 6.8728x10 3.7215x10 6.05875 RHawking=Re/2 = 10-14 0-5 K* x10-14 Compton radius Ess 11,27 5.25x10-13 m* modulation 4.58 J*/3.270 10,143.3 Electron degeneracy s* MeV* 4 m* core for neutron stars 3.132 2.4538x Rylem=Rcurv for 13 30 hours 10 kg* Mylem=4.11x10 kg*/2.054Msun 1.938x 3.0959915x1012 7.749x 2.502924x10-17 7.1836x106 3.9768x1010 5.6698x Modulation 10-14 10-5 K* 10-14 m* MQB/0.9544=1.41555 -13 10,32 5.61x10 10,485.5 for Mchandra 0.0 s* J*/3.495 5 m* lower Tolman- 2.87 MeV* 2.2963x Oppenheimer-Volkoff hours 1013 kg* (TOV) limit for neutron stars Rylem=Rcurv for 30 Mylem=4.25x10 kg*/2.123 Msun 1.013x 1.618509x1012 2.1x10- 1.3084678x10-17 9.9354x106 6.4684x1010 3.4858x Neutron decay mass 10-14 5 K* 10-14 m* loss: 8.844/4.900=1.805 -13 5395. 9.13x10 13,372.8 Increases Mchandra to 05 s* J*/5.684 4 m* 1.805Mchandra=2.708 1.50 MeV* 1.4117x Msun hours 1013 kg* as upper TOV-limit for neutron stars Rylem=Rcurv for 30 Mylem=5.42x10 kg*/2.708 Msun 11 -18 7 11 4.028x 6.43488x10 3.348x 5.20221x10 1.5757x10 1.2919x10 1.7453x RHawking=2Re -15 -6 -14 10 10 K* 10 m* Rylem=Rcurv for -12 30 2144. 1.82x10 18,899.0 Mylem=7.65x10 96 s* J*/11.35 0 m* kg*/3.827Msun 32.74 MeV* 7.0686x 9 min 1012 kg*
- -18 11 2.160x RF= F weyl/ = . 9.6x10 Rf=2.789990x10 2.15163x10 2.0614x10 1.0938x Rylem=Rcurv for -15 11 7 7 -14 30 10 07750x10 K* 10 m* Mylem=9.67x10 -12 1150. 2.91x10 23,872.8 kg*/4.834Msun 36 s* J*/18.12 7 m* 19.17 MeV* 4.4299x 3 min 1012 kg*
- -18 11 2.123x RG= G weyl/ = . 9.3x10 Rg=2.741872x10 2.17042x10 2.0885x10 1.0796x Rylem=Rcurv for -15 11 7 7 -14 30 10 155801x10 K* 10 m* Mylem=9.73x10 -12 1130. 2.95x10 24,029.2 kg*/4.866Msun 52 s* J*/18.35 8 m* 18.84 MeV* 4.3724x 20 1012 kg* min - -18 11 2.084x RF = F weyl/ = . 9.0x10 Rf =2.69200x10 2.19044x10 2.1175x10 1.0648x Primordial neutron -15 11 7 7 -14 10 2987275x10 K* 10 m* decay: F -2RMP 1109. 2.99x10-12 24,195.5 (1109.96-229.82) s* = 96 s* J*/18.61 4 m* 880.14 s*/879.28 s 18.49 MeV* 4.3125x from Higgs Boson with 9 min 1012 kg* RMP template Neutron decay mass loss: 8.844/4.900=1.805 Increases Mchandra to 1.805Mchandra=2.708 Msun as upper TOV-limit for neutron stars Rylem=Rcurv for 30 Mylem=9.80x10 kg*/4.900Msun
11 - 11 8.754x 1.39856x10 1.6x10 8.5232x10-19 3.89284x10 5.0167x10 5.55556 RHawking=2Re -16 7 7 -15 10 K* x10 Rylem=Rcurv for -12 31 466.1 7.08x10 m* Mylem=1.3566x10 86 s* J*/44.09 33,497.3 kg*/6.78Msun 7.770 MeV* 3 m* min 2.2500x 1012 kg* - 2 11 4.315x Rneutrondecay=6.8946323 3.8x10 2RMP=4 RRMP=5.5 4.81381x10 6.89874x10 3.2684x Beginning of neutron 10-16 x1010 8 7389763x10-19 7 K* 10-15 m* decay 229.8 9.74x10-12 43,672.5 from Higgs Boson with 21 s* J*/60.62 4 m* RMP template 3.830 MeV* 1.3237x Rylem=Rcurv for 12 31 4 min 10 kg* Mylem=1.77x10 kg*/8.844Msun
10 - -19 11 3.474x 5.550187x10 2.5x10 4.486994x10 5.36526x10 8.1172x10 2.7778x RHawking=Re limited by -16 8 7 -15 3 10 K* 10 m* nucleon=mc/Re 185.0 1.15x10-11 47,372.4 Nuclear density n 3 06 s* J*/71.33 0 m* nuc=3mcY /4{Re} 3.083 MeV* 1.1250x (1.105-1.907)x1016 min to 1012 kg* [kg/m3]*
12 3.1636x10 Rylem=Rcurv for 31 K* Mylem=1.92x10 kg*/9.593Msun 10 - -19 12 1.829x 2.921968x10 6.9x10 2.362236x10 7.39446x10 1.3134x10 1.7168x RHawking=XRe limited by -16 9 7 -15 3 3 10 K* 10 m* nucleon=Y mc/Re 97.39 1.85x10-11 60,257.9 8 s* J*/115.4 4 m* Nuclear density n 3 1.623 MeV* 6.9529x nuc=3mcY /4{XRe} min to 1011 kg* (4.683-8.077)x1016 1.3401x1013 [kg/m3]* K* Rylem=Rcurv for 31 Mylem=2.44x10 kg*/12.202Msun 10 - -19 12 1.379x 2.202648x10 3.9x10 1.780709x10 8.51671x10 1.6234x10 1.3889x RHawking=½Re=protonic 10-16 9 7 K* 10-15 m* diameter limited by -11 3 73.42 2.29x10 66,994.0 nucleon=8mc/Re 2 s* J*/142.7 7 m* Nuclear density n 3 1.224 MeV* 5.6250x nuc=3mcY /4{½Re} min to 1011 kg* (8.844-15.253)x1016 2.5309x1013 [kg/m3]* K* Rylem=Rcurv for 31 Mylem=2.71x10 kg*/13.566Msun 10 - -20 12 7.258x 1.159515x10 1.1x10 9.37398x10 1.17383x10 2.6268x10 8.5838x RHawking=½XRe limited by -17 9 8 -16 3 3 10 K* 10 m* nucleon=8Y mc/Re 38.65 3.71x10-11 85,218.2 Nuclear density n 3 0 s* J*/230.8 7 m* nuc=3mcY /4{½XRe} MeV* 3.4764x (3.746-6.461)x1017 to 1011 kg* [kg/m3]* 14 1.0721x10 Rylem=Rcurv for 31 K* Mylem=3.45x10 kg*/17.257Msun 5.664x 9.04906x109 6.6x10- 7.31562x10-20 1.32875x10 3.163603x101 7.1272x For electron 10-17 10 8 2 K* 10-16 m* degeneracy -11 3 30.16 4.47x10 93,522.1 nucleon=mc/Re for a 4 s* J*/278.0 6 m* temperature limit of 2 MeV* 2.8865x THawking=mcc /2kB=3.163 1011 kg* 603x1012 K* = Neutron star-black hole limit
nucleon=BH Rylem=Rcurv for 31 Mylem=3.7876x10 kg*/18.938Msun
9 - -20 12 2.996x 4.78696x10 1.9x10 3.86997x10 1.82690x10 5.1002x10 4.42097 RHawking=Re/2 Ess 10-17 10 8 K* x10-16 modulation 15.95 7.20x10-11 m* Neutron degeneracy 7 s* J*/448.2 118,744. Rylem=Rcurv for 31 MeV* 56 m* Mylem=4.81x10 1.7905x kg*/24.05Msun 1011 kg* 8.264x 1.320239x109 1.4x10- 1.0673343x10-20 3.4787x108 1.340124x101 1.6825x For neutron 10-18 11 3 K* 10-16 m* degeneracy in the 4.401 1.53x10-10 192,484. diameter of a protonic 3 s* J*/954.8 62 m* nucleus nucleon=Y mcRe MeV* 6.8141x Rylem=Rcurv for 10 31 10 kg* Mylem=7.7956x10 kg*/38.978Msun
3.540x 5.65566x108 2.6x10- 4.572262x10-21 5.3150x108 2.530882x101 8.9090x For neutron 10-18 12 3 K* 10-17 m* degeneracy in the 1.885 3.57x10-10 264,520. radial size of a protonic 3 s* J*/2.22 GeV* 60 m* nucleus nucleon=8mc3Re 3.6081x 1010 kg* Rylem=Rcurv for 32 Mylem=1.07131x10 kg*/53.565Msun
5.165x 8.251498x107 5.5x10- 6.670843x10-22 1.3915x109 1.072099x101 2.1031x For neutron 10-19 14 4 K* 10-17 m* degeneracy in the 0.275 1.51x10-9 544,428. charge radius of a 3 3 05 s* J*/9.42 GeV* 68 m* proton nucleon=8Y mcRe 8.5177x = Quark star limit 9 10 kg* Rylem=Rcurv for 32 Mylem=2.20494x10 kg*/110.247Msun
6 - -23 9 14 4.917x 7.85497x10 4.9x10 6.23027x10 1.4262x10 1.11243x10 2.0269x RHawking= Re = Inverse 10-19 16 K* 10-17 m* Compton radius -9 0.261 1.57x10 554,574. Rylem=Rcurv for 32 8 s* J*/9.78 GeV* 32 m* Mylem=2.25x10 8.2089x kg*/112.30Msun 109 kg* 6 - -23 9 15 1.340x REW=2.141143x10 3.7x10 1.730986x10 8.6382x10 1.65825x10 1.3597x Electroweak Unification -20 17 -18 15 10 Dark matter universe Ylemic radius K* 10 m* TEW=E/kB=2x10 K* 1/140 is illuminated as the shrinks as the radial 2.34x10-8 2.14115 (146-251)GeV* for {W- =0.00 EMI light path universe expands J*/146 GeV* x106 m* +W++Zo} 7137 intersects the dark with the separation 5.5069x Rylem = R(n) as size of matter haloed ylemic of the short range 108 kg* the universe universe nuclear weakon Dark matter halo interaction from the defined as a quark- long range lepton geometric electromagnetic kernel-ring structure interaction crystallizing the ylem neutrons from the Higgs Boson and RMP template Rylem=Rcurv for 32 Mylem=8.67x10 kg*/433.6.7Msun - -25 10 16 2 6.958x 111,173.6 1.0x10 8.98772x10 3.791x10 1.52452x10 1.4790x RHawking= Re = Inverse 10-22 19 1.799x10-30 K* 10-19 m* 1st Bohr radius for 0.000 J* 2.15x10-7 6.4921x ylemic template for 37 1.120x10-11 J*/1.34 TeV* 106 m* atomic structure as eV* 5.9898x micro Hawking black 107 kg* hole to manifest at 4 RHawking/ =9.798883x1 0-7 m* Rylem=Rcurv for 33 Mylem=2.63x10 kg*/1314.7Msun 2 28 12 3.562x RBU=0.569092 4.0x10 7.038245x10 1.676x10 Tps=1.4167x10 1.59155 Bosonic temperature 10-27 universe is 1.1382 8 Ylemic universe is 3.515x10-25 20 K* x10-23 unification 3 2 1.897x meters across manifested in the J* 0.002 m* T(n)= {{Ho Mo/ σ 10-9 encompassed by a primordial Hawking 2.19x10-6 J*/12,449.8 6.2584x }.(n+1)2/n3} 8 2 3 ylem dark matter micro black hole eV* TeV* 10 m* = {18.2(n+1) /n }=Tps=1 halo of radius defining the dark 6445.78 .4167x1020 K* 8 6.2584x10 m* in the matter ylemic halo kg* R ylem=Rcurv for 35 inflaton EMMI Mylem=2.53x10 universe kg*/126,732.0Msun
The standard model is correct in the temperature assignment but is amiss in the corresponding 'size- scales' for the cosmic expansion. The Big Bang cosmogenesis describes the universe as a Planck-Black Body Radiator, which sets the Cosmic-Microwave-Black Body Background Radiation Spectrum (CMBR) as a function of n as T4=18.2(n+1)2/n3 and derived from the Stefan-Boltzmann-Law and the related statistical frequency distributions. The metric from General Relativity for Schwarzschild-Black Hole
Evolution has RS=2GM/c² as a function of the star's Black Hole's mass M and we have the ylemic Radius 3 2 as a function of temperature only as Rylem√ kT.‘e /Gomc ).
9 2 The nucleonic mass-seed mc=mplanck and the product Gomc is a constant in the partitioned evolution n n of mc(n)=Y .mc and G(n)=Go.X .
Identifying the ylemic Radius with the Hawking radius gives the properties of the micro-mass black hole at the temperature of the universe and identifying the ylemic radius with a standard Schwarzschild Radius gives the properties of neutron-quark stars at their local temperatures as manifesting vortex energies from their Hawking-Gamow ylemic seedling black holes at a later n-cycle coordinate and in a later and cooler universe.
Quantum Relativity (QR) defines the Weyl-Temperature limit for Bosonic Unification as 1.9 nanoseconds at a temperature of 1.42x1020 Kelvin and the weak-electromagnetic unification at 1/140 seconds or 7 microseconds at T=1.68x1015 K*. The earliest ylem stars are limited at a temperature of 1.68x1015 K* at 32 the electroweak unification nexus with a mass limit of 433.58 Msun or 8.672x10 kg* as the first potential for a ylemic proto-star after the bosonic unification and after the undifferentiated 'bosonic plasma' entered its phase of the QBBS temperature no longer exceeding the temperature and energy of individualised elementary particles, enabling the di-neutrons to be born as ylem or Gamow's neutron matter.
185 seconds or 3 minutes after the Instanton, the universe was so 111 Million km across, when its ylemic 'concentrated' VPE-Temperature was so 812 Billion K* and the Hawking radius was the same as the radius of the classical electron for a micro black hole mass of 1.1x1012 kg* and an ylem radius of 31 47.4 km* indicating a future black hole macro-mass of 1.9x10 kg* as 9.6 Msun as a limiting quark gluon- plasma star.
The 'pixelated' universe so became scaled in ylemic temperature bubbles in the form of primordial White-Hole-Sources coupled to Black Hole-Sinks in a form of macro quanta to reflect the sourcesink Eps coupled to the sinksource Ess of the underpinning elementary super membrane Eps.Ess. As the universe continued its expansion, the WH-BH dyads remained as temperature hotspots embedded within the cooling spacetime as the Black Body Radiator of the cosmogenesis.
As the universe expanded and cooled, the first ylem stars crystallized from the mass seedling Mo. The universe's expansion however cooled the CMBR background and as the temperature characterizing the Chandrasekar white dwarf-neutron star limit is at a temperature of 20 Billion Kelvin, the size of the universe at this temperature provides an upper limit for the size of a star in 7.8x1012 m* or a radius 7.8 billion kilometers. This encompasses about 52 Astronomical Units (1 AU=1.5x108 km as the distance between the earth and the sun) and so the radial extent and the 'size' of a typical solar system, encompassed by supergiants on the HR-diagram.
The ylemic temperature decreases in direct proportion to the square of the ylemic radius and one hitherto enigmatic aspect in cosmology relates to this in the planetesimal limit. A temperature of so 1.2 billion degrees defines an ylemic radius of 1.8 km as the dineutronic limit for proto-neutron stars contracting from 47.4 km* down to this size just 1.1 million seconds or so 13 days after the Quantum Big Bang Dirac Singularity. Chunks of matter can conglomerate via molecular and other adhesive interactions towards this size, where then the accepted gravity is strong enough to build planets and moons; but the ylemic template is defined in subatomic parameters reflecting the mesonic inner and leptonic outer ring boundaries and this the planetesimal limit becomes the modulation of the Dirac monopole wavelength as the mapping of the leptonic outer ring. So neutrino-gluon and quark blueprints micro-macro dance their basic definition as the holographic projections of the space-time quanta.
The nuclear density for neutron stars for electron degeneracy at the leptonic ring is increased for neutron degeneracy at the mesonic ring and therefore modifies the Chandra mass limit for white dwarves in the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff (TOV) limit for neutron stars. A lower limit for the TOV limit is obtained in the Dirac monopole modulation MQB/0.9544=1.41555 increasing the Chandrasekar mass to 1.5x1.41555=2.123 solar masses. The upper limit considers the primordial neutron decay as superimposed onto the ylemic mass evolution in the loss of neutrons between the mass content of the ylemic protostars at the beginning and the end of the primordial beta minus decay of lefthanded neutrons into lefthanded protons and lefthanded electrons with righthanded antineutrinos. At the beginning of the 880.14 seconds the ylemic Hawking mass would be 8.844 solar masses as a function of its radius and reducing to 4.900 solar masses at the end of neutron decay for a mass fraction of 1.804. The upper TOV limit for the Chandrasekar mass so becomes 1.5x1.804=2.706 solar masses.
Hence any star experiencing electron degeneracy is actually becoming ylemic or dineutronic, the boundary for this process being the Chandrasekhar mass, extended to the TOV mass for neutron degeneracy. The ylemic protostar mass at the beginning of neutron decay also sets a natural limit for any stellar black holes in 8.844 solar masses or 1.769x1031 kg*.
6 3 3 6 3 2 2 2 The density of a black hole is calculated from BH=MBH/VBH =MBHc /8Go MBH =c /8Go MBH =c /2Gorcurv = 2 2 2 3 2 c /2Gorylem ={mcc /2kBTHawking}{mc/Re }={mcc /2kBTHawking}{nucleon}
Fo Ha ki g s i o la k holes a ti ated as Ga o s le i p otosta s the , the elatio ship et ee the black hole density and the neutron star density becomes a function of the ylemic-universal temperature projected from the ylem time into the future time when the neutron stars, magnetars and quark stars would be born from as the remnants of supernovae or the merger of neutron stars with each other or black holes.
2 kBTHawking=½mcc {nucleon}/BH} and the limit for an electron degenerate star is given in the black hole 2 density equal to the nucleon density for kBTHawking=½mcc and so for a temperature 2 12 THawking=mcc /2kB=3.163603x10 K*
3 For electron degeneracy nucleon=mc/Re ; for a 2 12 temperature limit of THawking=mcc /2kB=3.163603x10 K*
3 3 For neutron degeneracy in the diameter of a protonic nucleus nucleon=Y mcRe ; for a temperature limit 3 2 13 of THawking=Y mcc /2kB=1.340124x10 K* 3 For neutron degeneracy in the radial size of a protonic nucleus nucleon=8mc3Re ; for a temperature limit 2 13 of THawking=8mcc /2kB=2.530882x10 K*
3 3 For neutron degeneracy in the charge radius of a proton nucleon=8Y mcRe ; for a 3 2 14 temperature limit of THawking=8Y mcc /2kB=1.072099x10 K* Considering the size of the proton for neutron degeneracy engages a displacement scale from 2.778 to 0.858 fermi in a factor of 3.235 for a change in the nuclear density in a factor of (3.235)3=33.87 from 1.105x1016 – 3.743x1017 [kg/m3]*.
Macrostate Macrostate 2 Tps|mod ← Mcurv=RHawkingc /2Go ← RHawking=hc/2kBTcurv ← Tcurv as THawking 3.602774x10-12 K* 2.534656x1035 kg* 6.258410x108 m* 3.602774x10-12 K*
20 8 35 -12 Tps=1.41671x10 K* 6.258410x10 m* 2.534656x10 kg* 3.602774x10 K* 3 2 2 THawking → Rylem=√{kBTHawkingRe /Gomc } → Mcurv=Rylemc /2Go → Tcurv=hc/2kBRylem Macrostate Macrostate 20 -23 20 Tps=1.41671x10 K* rps=1.591549x10 m* 6445.775 kg* Tps=1.41671x10 K* 2 THawking → RHawking=hc/2kBTHawking=Rcurv → Mcurv=Rcurvc /2Go → THawking=hc/2kBRcurv Microstate Microstate -27 20 For the Bosonic Temperature unification nBU=HotBU=3.562x10 for TCMBR=Tps=1.417x10 K* a Hawking -23 radius RHawking=rps=hc/2kBTHawking=1.591x10 m* for a present micro black hole mass 8 Mylem=HM/THawking=6445.78 kg* infers a macrostate ylem radius 6.258x10 m* as a Hawking microstate 35 radius for a macrostate HM black hole mass of Mcurv=HM/Tylem=2.535x10 kg*; for a ylem temperature -12 Tylem=3.603x10 K*modulating the macrostate in the microstate as a minimum boundary self-state for the age of the universe.
Macrostate Macrostate 2 TEW|mod ← Mcurv=RHawkingc /2Go ← RHawking=hc/2kBTcurv ← Tcurv as THawking 1.0530621x10-9 K* 8.671658x1032 kg* 2.14115x106 m* 1.0530621x10-9 K*
15 6 32 -9 TEW=1.65825x10 K* 2.14115x10 m* 8.671658x10 kg* 1.0530621x10 K*
3 2 2 THawking → Rylem=√{kBTHawkingRe /Gomc } → Mcurv=Rylemc /2Go → Tcurv=hc/2kBRylem Macrostate Macrostate 15 -18 8 12 TEW=1.65825x10 K* 1.359725x10 m* 5.506886x10 kg* TEW=5.618369x10 K* 2 THawking → RHawking=hc/2kBTHawking=Rcurv → Mcurv=Rcurvc /2Go → THawking=hc/2kBRcurv Microstate Microstate -20 15 For the electroweak unification nEW=HotEW=1.340x10 for TCMBR=TEW=1.658x10 K* a Hawking radius -18 RHawking=rEW=hc/2kBTHawking=1.360x10 m* for a present micro black hole mass 8 6 Mylem=HM/THawking=5.507x10 kg* infers a macrostate ylem radius 2.141x10 m* as a Hawking microstate 32 radius for a macrostate HM black hole mass of Mcurv=HM/Tylem=8.671x10 kg*; for a ylem temperature -9 Tylem=1.053x10 K*modulating the macrostate in the microstate as a minimum boundary self-state for the age of the universe.
Macrostate Macrostate 2 Tpresent|mod ← Mcurv=RHawkingc /2Go ← RHawking=hc/2kBTcurv ← Tcurv as THawking 0.02589 K* 3.527x1025 kg* 0.08709 m* 0.02589 K*
25 Tpresent=2.747 K* 0.08709 m* 3.527x10 kg* 0.02589 K*
3 2 2 THawking → Rylem=√{kBTHawkingRe /Gomc } → Mcurv=Rylemc /2Go → Tcurv=hc/2kBRylem Macrostate Macrostate -4 23 Tpresent=2.747 K* 8.208x10 m* 3.324x10 kg* Tpresent=2.747 K* 2 THawking → RHawking=hc/2kBTHawking=Rcurv → Mcurv=Rcurvc /2Go → THawking=hc/2kBRcurv Microstate Microstate
For a present n-cycle coordinate npresent=1.132711 for TCMBR=2.747 K* a Hawking radius -4 RHawking=rHpresent=hc/2kBTHawking=8.208x10 m* for a present micro black hole mass 23 Mylem=HM/THawking=3.324x10 kg* infers a macrostate ylem radius 0.0871 m* as a Hawking microstate 25 radius for a macrostate HM black hole mass of Mcurv=HM/Tylem=3.527x10 kg*; for a ylem temperature
Tylem=0.0259 K* modulating the macrostate in the microstate as a maximum boundary self-state for the age of the universe.
As the ylem radius is proportional to the square root of the ylem universal temperature, but decreases with time in the universal temperature evolution fo a i ease i a la k hole s adius; the i ease of the ylem protostar mass with temperature is compensated in the inverse proportionality in the Hawking modulus in the radii of the ylem protostar and the curvature
2 3 2 RHawking = hc/2kBTHawking = 2GoM/c = Rcurv = Rylem=√{kBTRe /Gomc }.
4 3 2 66 2 Nuclear density then varies as nuclear={3c kB/16Go mc}T/M = {5.0129636x10 } T/M which identifies 2 60 the Chandra mass of 1.5 solar masses as fps =9x10 frequency states modulating the nuclear density for a temperature of 1.9847x1010 K* for a Hawking- Gamow micro black hole of mass 4.6011x1013 kg*
3 3 2 66 2 2 3 3 T = {hc /4kBGo} nuclear /{5.013x10 } = nuclear {h c Gomc/3kB } [K ]*
-19 3 = nuclear {1.66348029x10 } [K ]*
Nuclear densities for neutron stars, magnetars and quark-plasma stars so become restricted in the subatomic parameters on the fermi scale all of at about half of the classical electron radius scale a Protonic Diameter, the Protonic Radius must then indicate the limit for the scale where proton degeneracy would have to enter the scenario. As the proton cannot degenerate in that way, the neutron star must enter its Quark-Star Gluon-Plasma phase 30 transition at the ½Re/Y scale, corresponding to a mass of 2Y.MChandra=9.7082x10 kg* or 4.854 solar masses. This marker is between the F-googol and the G-googol space quanta counter nexus coordinates.
This vortex manifested as a VPE concentration after the expanding universe had cooled to allow the universe to become transparent from its hitherto defining state of opaqueness and a time known as the decoupling of matter (in the form of the Mo seedling partitioned in mc's) from the radiation pressure of the CMBR bosons.
Generally, when the gravitational inward pressure is larger than the thermal outward pressure for a star, then electron degeneracy can result in the atomic constituents of the star to break the electromagnetic force keeping the atoms electrons apart from the atomic nucleus. In the evolution of stars the nuclear fusion processes in the core of the star determine how the mass of the star will respond to the release of material of the star in the form of electromagnetic radiation and mass ejections. Once the nuclear fusion processes can no longer convert atomic elements in endothermic reactions at the iron limit, the e othe i ea tio s ill edu e the sta s ass to that of its o e. Depe di g o the ass of this o e, pa ti ula li its dete i e the fate of the sta s o e of eithe e o i g a hite d a f in the Chandrasekhar limit of about 1.4 solar masses and increasing to 2-3 (Supernova SN2003fg~2.0) solar masses or the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff (TOV) limit of about 2.3 (Neutron Star GW170817) solar masses for a general range between 1.5 – 3 solar masses for neutron degenerate matter. A neutron stars mass increases with the rate of rotation by about 20% from a non-rotating state.
As the classical electron radius oscillates between the wormhole Weyl-radius of the QBBS as -23 rps=ps/2 =1.59155x10 m* 2 2 -15 and Re=kee /mec = h/2mec =2.777..x10 m*; 3 the Compton constant Reme=h/2c=Lplanckmplanck=√{(hGo/2c )(hc/2Go)} 2 2 2 -45 =√{h /4 c }=h/2c=Ccompton=Reeff.meeff=2.580702x10 [mkg]* will determine this electronic oscillation between the gluon-neutrino kernel and the inner mesonic ring and the outer leptonic ring for the subatomic structure of a nucleon or hadron. In particular the effective charge radius of the proton of quark content u.d.u=KKIRK differing from the quark content of the neutron d.u.d=KIRKKIR by 1.328 MeV* reduces the classical electron radius by the factor ½X to set -15 Rproton=½XRe= 0.85838x10 m* for an effective electron mass of -30 meeff=Ccompton/Reeff=3.00648x10 kg* at that displacement in the classical electron oscillation. [Footnote 2]
-30 At the scale of a protonic diameter meeff=Ccompton/XRe=1.50324x10 kg*, showing that an increase of the ele t o s size ill de ease its effe ti e self-interacting electromagnetic mass, irrespective of the relativistic velocity of the electron. https://www.academia.edu/39184674/The_Monopolar_Quantum_Relativistic_Electron_An_Extension_ of_the_Standard_Model_and_Quantum_Field_Theory_Part_1_ https://www.academia.edu/40223805/A_Revision_of_the_Friedmann_Cosmology
The cosmology for the lower dimensional universe is described as the spacetime evolution of a Planck Black Body Radiator and so follows a thermodynamic process of a decreasing universal background temperature with increasing volume, due to the expansion of the universe. The modular string-membrane dualities then couple the inversion displacement parameters of the QBBS and the micro-quantum scale of the instanton as a Weyl-Eps-wormhole in the supermembrane EpsEss evolution to the macro-quantum scale of the inflaton under utility of the ABCDEFGH googolplex spacetime quanta counters.
As the E-googol defines the quantum geometric template for the classical electron radius, rendered -15 variable in the maximum of Re=2.777x10 m* and the minimum in the wormhole radius -23 rps=ps/2=1.592x10 m*, the magnitude ratio 10 10 10 RE/Re= E weyl/ /{ ps/360}= E weyl/ /{ rps10 /360}={ E)/10 }{360/2} ={ . … 27}{180/}=3.43597108x1014 m*/2.7777777x10-15 m* = . … 29 spacetime quanta.
The wave nature of matter is given by the de Broglie wavelength for matter in
dB=2rdB=h/p=h/melectronvelectron for an elementary particle like the electron. This is expressed for the particle nature of matter in the Compton wavelength
compton=2rcompton=h/melectronc and maximizing the velocity of the electron to lightspeed c. 2 2 As the classical electron radius is Re=kee /melectronc =h/2melectronc=rcompton , showing that increasing the size of the electron by a factor of 137 will define the light-matter interaction probability in the -13 electromagnetic finestructure constant alpha for Compton radius rcompton=Re/=3.80686301x10 m*.
It defines the Compton constant Ccompton=Reme=h/2c=Recmec for the inverse proportionality between the mass and the radial size of a particle or system in quantum mechanics and where the subscript ec indicates the scale of the particle oscillation in between the boundary conditions for the electron as the maximum Re and the minimum rps. Further quantum mechanical extension of the size of the atomic nucleus then defines the 1st Bohr radius and the size of the hydrogen atom in multiplying the Compton radius by alpha as 2 -11 rBohr1=Re/ =5.2171943x10 m*
The quantum mechanical nature of the atom, so becomes encompassed in the interaction of the classical electron with the electromagnetic finestructure and in allowing the spacial extent of the electron to oscillate within its classical definition of its electromagnetic self-interaction.
The temperature evolution of the universal cosmology so conformally relates this scale of the electron as a classical particle of spacetime, but as derivative of the Dirac monopole as its point particular representative to the macro-quantum form in the GFEH-googolplex.
[Footnote 2]: KKK-Kernel mass=Up/Down-HiggsLevel=3x319.66 MeV*= 958.99 MeV*, using the Kernel-Ring and Family-Coupling Constants. Subtracting the Ring-VPE (3L) gives the basic nucleonic K-State as 939.776 MeV*. This excludes the electronic perturbation of the IR-OR oscillation. For the Proton, one adds one (K-IR-Transition energy) and subtracts the electron-mass for the d-quark level and for the Neutron one doubles this to reflect the up-down-quark differential. An electron perturbation subtracts one 2-2/3=4/3 electron energy as the difference between 2 leptonic rings from the proton's 2 up-quarks and 2-1/3=5/3 electron energy from the neutron' singular up-quark to relate the trisected nucleonic quark geometric template. Proton mp=u.d.u=K.KIR.K=(939.776+1.5013-0.5205-0.1735) MeV* = 940.5833 MeV* (938.270 MeV). Neutron mn=d.u.d=KIR.K.KIR=(939.776+3.0026-1.0410+0.1735) MeV* = 941.9111 MeV* (939.594 MeV). This is the ground state from the Higgs-Restmass-Induction-Mechanism and reflects the quarkian geometry as being responsible for the inertial mass differential between the two elementary nucleons. All ground state elementary particle masses are computed from the Higgs-Scale and then become subject to various finestructures. [End of Footnote 2]
The nuclear densities for neutron stars are defined in the ylemic vortices of the Gamow-Hawking protostars or Gamow-Hawking micro black holes in the function their temperatures. The temperature of the background universe so defines the temperature an electron- or neutron degenerate neutron star will have in its evolutionary development at a later stage of the cosmic temperature evolution. The birth of population III stars as the earliest stars has been calculated to begin as the cores of galaxies as the cores of superclusters at a time marker defined in the superstring modulation of the wavelength of the instanton 22 1/rss=2ss=6.283x10 m* and so the size of a large galaxy manifesting so 6.64 million years after the QBBS.
The Milky Way galaxy as one of the oldest galaxies in the cosmogenesis formed in the Sarkar regime of general galactic evolution and when the baryon mass seedling could manifest in thew form of galaxies in the requirement for the Strominger extremal black hole evolution to have reached the Sarkar radius of 236.52 million light years. This galactic displacement scale matches the time period for a revolution of the local star system to complete a cycle of rotation about the center of the Milky Way galaxy.
n-cycle Radius as size of the Modulati Inversion Cosmologi Temperat Hawking Cosmological Significance coordinate universe on factor Radius cal ure Radius and time Redshift Ylem Radius Hawking micro-BH mass 2 2 2nqo=0.02803 Rsarkar=2GoMo/c =4.478303 1.62x10 3.62044x 5.0152 30.570 K* 7.3757x1 dark matter galaxies from 012 47x1024 0 10-5 0-5 m* supercluster seed 473.039 My 0.29071 manifest honey-comb m* universal geometry 2.9871x1 baryon seed 22 0 kg* mobaryon=0.02803=Mo/MH= 2o/AdB 2 1 st nqo=0.014015 Rsarkar=GoMo/c =2.2391517 4.05x10 1.81022x 7.4777 51.062 K* 4.4157x1 Quasar wall - 1 06 4x1024 9 10-5 0-5 m* protostars from 236.520 My 0.37572 supercluster seeds m* Deceleration parameter
1.7884x1 qo=½Mo/MH=o/AdB 022 kg* 2 1 ½nqo=0.00700 Rsarkar=½GoMo/c =1.119575 1.01x10 9.0511x1 10.967 85.578 K* 2.6347x1 White Hole-Black Hole 753 87x1024 9 0-6 0-5 m* Sarkar modulation 118.260 My 0.48641 Birth of 1st galaxies like m* the Milky Way form as 1.0671x1 baryon seed for dark 022 kg* matter galaxies protostars manifest from ylem white hole-black hole coupling -4 22 1 3.93425x10 rss=2ss=6.283x10 3.19x10 5.07943x 49.421 358.05 K* 6.2973x1 Modular wormhole 6.63948 My 6 10-7 0-6 m* perimeter 0.99494 White Hole upper limit as m* wormhole sourcesink 2.5504x1 Eps begins to activate as 021 kg* black hole power sourcesink Ess dark matter galaxies geometry
The time period from 16 seconds to 21 minutes in the evolution of the universe encompasses a time for the Hawking micro black holes increasing in mass from 1.7x1011 kg* to 1.0x1014 kg* corresponding to their temperatures decreasing from 5.10x1012 K* to 8.82x109 K*. 3 2 Setting the nuclear density as nuclearOR=3mc/4Re =3kBTHawking/4GomcRylem = 1.10545x1016 [kg/m3]* then calculates the density of a neutron star exhibiting electron degeneracy at the temperature regimes given by the ylem radius.
As in this formulation the gravitational parameter is partitioned in 2 n n n u v n Gomc =constant=G(n)X M(n)Y =G(n)X mcY mcY = for superscripts u+v=n for (XY) =1, the mass evolution 9 -28 for the primordial nucleon mc=mplanck =9.92472459x10 kg* must be considered. For the present time, npresent the mc primordial nucleon has attained the scale of the measured neutron mass in mcY = -27 -27 1.711753x10 kg*or 1.7053526x10 kgSI.
As the leptonic ring masses are integrated into the quarkian kernel masses, the measured masses for the electron, muon and tauon remain constant subject to their energy variation in the Compton constant meRe=h/2c. So the nuclear densities calculated in the early period of the cosmology will increase at later times as the effect of the mass evolution of the universe, transmuting Vortex-Potential Energy VPE as the U iPh sCo ph si alized o s ious ess e e g of the o igi al sou e e e g fo the creation event. The leptonic outer ring (OR) for the electron degeneracy then defines the nuclear densities for electron degenerate neutron stars being born as the from the spacetime vortices defined by Hawking-Gamow micro black holes. The mesonic inner ring inner (IR) reduces the scale of the classical electron radius by a factor of 1000 and defines the Higgs boson at that scale as the progeny of the RMP separated from the electron base scale in a factor of 100,000 as the dark matter particle of the cosmogenesis.
The mesonic inner ring defines the neutron degeneracy for quark or proton stars coupled to the primordial neutron decay given in the inversion scale for the radial size of the universe as defined in the googolplex E-FGF i odula e a e i o duality with the classical electron scale. As the strange wave quark is a resonance of the down wave quark in the oscillation potential between the kernel up wave quark K and the outer ring OR for the Compton constant and the energy scale for the classical electron; the neutron degeneracy is given in the entire range from the gluon-neutrino kernel of the QBBS-Dirac monopole singularity to the inner bound of the dark matter particle RMP at the 10-5 fermi scale.
For electron degeneracy characteristic neutron star radii are in the range of the Compton radius Re/ to its modulation in Re/2 to the modulated electron radius 2Re as Hawking radii for micro black holes for temperatures from 5.92x109 K* to 3.72x1010 K* to 1.29x1011 K* with typical neutron star radii as ylem radii from 4,045.5 m* to 10,143.3 m* to 18,899.0 m* for respective neutron star masses from 30 30 30 1.64x10 kg as 0.819 Msun to 4.11x10 kg* as 2.05 Msun to 7.65x10 kg* as 3.83 Msun respectively.
2 The Chandrasekhar limit for white dwarves is approximated by the mass quantization M=mss=hfss/c 2 30 10 and modulation M/mss=h/mssc =hfps/h=fps|mod=3x10 as 1.50 MSun for a temperature of 1.98x10 K* for a Hawking black hole micro-mass of 4.60x1013 kg* and a Gamow-Hawking ylem radius of 7,407.7 m*
The charge radius of the proton is calculated as proportional to the classical electron radius as -15 -15 -15 ½XRe=0.8583806x10 m* reduced from ½Re=1.388889x10 m* and reduced from XRe=1.7167606x10 m* as Hawking radii for the micro black holes for respective electron masses of 3.0064778x10-30 kg* and 1.858105x10-30 kg* and 1.50324x10-30 kg*.
The nuclear densities for neutron degeneracy with increasing pressure from the surface density to the core density then calculate for respective Hawking radii for the micro black holes as:
3 2 16 3 nuclearOR=3mc/4Re =3kBTHawking/4GomcRylem =1.105x10 [kg/m ]* for a 11 31 temperature 8.117x10 K* and ylem mass 1.92x10 kg* as 9.60 Msun 3 3 3 2 16 3 nuclearX=3mcY /4Re =3Y kBTHawking/4GomcRylem =4.683x10 [kg/m ]* for a 12 31 temperature 1.313x10 K* and ylem mass 2.44x10 kg* as 12.20 Msun 3 2 16 3 nuclear½=24mc/4Re =24kBTHawking/4GomcRylem =8.844x10 [kg/m ]* for a 12 31 temperature 1.623x10 K* and ylem mass 2.71x10 kg* as 13.57 Msun 3 3 3 2 17 3 nuclear½X=24mcY /4Re =24Y kBTHawking/4GomcRylem =3.746x10 [kg/m ]* for a 12 31 temperature 2.627x10 K* and ylem mass 3.45x10 kg* as 17.26 Msun
n-cycle Radius as size of the Modula Inversion Radius Cosmolo Temperatur Hawkin Cosmological Significance coordina universe tion gical e g te and factor Redshift Radius time Ylem Radius Hawkin g micro- BH mass 13 -16 9 2.45458 3.92162x10 0.0124 3.17040x10 2.0184x 5.9229x10 3.80686 RHawking=Re/=Compton x10-13 106 K* x10-13 radius 1.5130 m* Electron degeneracy days 4,045.5 surface for neutron stars 03 m* Rylem=Rcurv for 30 1.5418x Mylem=1.64x10 14 10 kg* kg*/0.819Msun 13 -16 9 1.44329 2.30591x10 4.299x 1.86419x10 2.6322x 8.8207x10 2.5562x Rylem=Rcurv for -13 -3 6 -13 30 x10 10 10 K* 10 Mylem=2.00x10 76,863.6 m* kg*/1..000Msun s* 4,938.2 21.35 71 m* hours 1.0353x 1014 kg* 4.89513 7.82083x1012 4.945x 6.32267x10-17 4.5198x 1.9847x1010 1.1361x Nuclear density -14 -4 6 -13 n 3 x10 10 10 K* 10 nuc=3mcY /4{Re} 26,069.4 m* (1.105-1.907)x1016 s* 7,407.4 [kg/m3]* 7.24 07 m* Rylem=√{3kBT/4Gomcnuc} hours 4.6011x for 1.5 MSun 13 2 10 kg* M=mss=hfss/c mass quantization for space quanta count 2 M/mss=h/mssc =hfps/h=f 30 ps|mod=3x10 as 1.50 MSun 12 -17 10 2.11706 3.38237x10 9249x1 2.73445x10 6.8728x 3.7215x10 6.05875 RHawking=Re/2 = x10-14 0-5 106 K* x10-14 Compton radius Ess 11,274.5 m* modulation 8 s* 10,143. Electron degeneracy 3.132 34 m* core for neutron stars hours 2.4538x Rylem=Rcurv for 13 30 10 kg* Mylem=4.11x10 kg*/2.054Msun 11 -18 11 4.02765 6.43488x10 3.348x 5.20221x10 1.5757x 1.2919x10 1.7453x RHawking=2Re Rylem=Rcurv -15 -6 7 -14 30 x10 10 10 K* 10 for Mylem=7.65x10 2144.96 m* kg*/3.827Msun s* 18,899. 32.749 00 m* min 7.0686x 1012 kg*
- -18 11 2.16006 RF= F weyl/ = . 9.6x10 Rf=2.789990x10 2.15163 2.0614x10 1.0938x Rylem=Rcurv for -15 11 7 7 -14 30 2x10 7750x10 x10 K* 10 m* Mylem=9.67x10 1150.36 23,872. kg*/4.834Msun s* 87 m* 19.173 4.4299x min 1012 kg* - -18 11 2.12280 RG= G weyl/ = . 9.3x10 Rg=2.741872x10 2.17042 2.0885x10 1.0796x Rylem=Rcurv for -15 11 7 7 -14 30 8x10 55801x10 x10 K* 10 m* Mylem=9.73x10 1130.52 24,029. kg*/4.866Msun s* 28 m* 18.8420 4.3724x min 1012 kg* - -18 11 2.08419 RF = F weyl/ = . 9.0x10 Rf =2.69200x10 2.19044 2.1175x10 1.0648x Primordial neutron -15 11 7 7 -14 8x10 987275x10 x10 K* 10 m* decay: F -2RMP 1109.96 24,195. (1109.96-229.82) s* = s* 54 m* 880.14 s*/879.28 s 18.499 4.3125x from Higgs Boson with min 1012 kg* RMP template Rylem=Rcurv for 30 Mylem=9.80x10 kg*/4.900Msun
11 - -18 1 8.75370 1.39856x10 1.6x10 1.13065x10 3.89284 4.05858x10 5.55556 RHawking=2Re -16 7 7 1 -15 x10 x10 K* x10 Rylem=Rcurv for 31 466.186 m* Mylem=1.3566x10 s* 33,497. kg*/6.78Msun 7.770 33 m* min 2.2500x 1012 kg*
- 2 1 4.31541 Rneutrondecay=6.8946323x 3.8x10 2RMP=4 RRMP=5.57 4.81381 6.89874x10 3.2684x Beginning of neutron 5x10-16 1010 8 389763x10-19 x107 1 K* 10-15 m* decay 229.821 MHawking=2.7 43,672. from Higgs Boson with s* 92x1037 54 m* RMP template 3.8304 THawking=3.27 1.3237x Rylem=Rcurv for -14 12 31 min 03x10 10 kg* Mylem=1.77x10 kg*/8.844Msun
10 - -19 1 3.47391 5.550187x10 2.5x10 4.486994x10 5.36526 8.11715x10 2.7778x RHawking=Re 4x10-16 8 x107 1 K* 10-15 Nuclear density n 3 185.006 m* nuc=3mcY /4{Re} s* 47,372. (1.105-1.907)x1016 3.083 40 m* [kg/m3]* min 1.1250x Rylem=Rcurv for 12 31 10 kg* Mylem=1.92x10 kg*/9.593Msun 10 - -19 12 1.82888 2.921968x10 6.9x10 2.362236x10 7.39446 1.3134x10 1.7168x RHawking=XRe=Protonic 7x10-16 9 x107 K* 10-15 diameter 97.398 m* Nuclear density n 3 s* 60,257. nuc=3mcY /4{XRe} 1.623 94 m* (4.683-8.077)x1016 min 6.9529x [kg/m3]* 11 10 kg* Rylem=Rcurv for 31 Mylem=2.44x10 kg*/12.202Msun 10 - -19 12 1.37865 2.202648x10 3.9x10 1.780709x10 8.51671 1.6234x10 1.3889x RHawking=½Re 8x10-16 9 x107 K* 10-15 Nuclear density n 3 73.422 m* nuc=3mcY /4{½Re} s* 66,994. (8.844-15.253)x1016 1.224 07 m* [kg/m3]* min 5.6250x Rylem=Rcurv for 11 31 10 kg* Mylem=2.71x10 kg*/13.566Msun 10 - -20 12 7.25751 1.159515x10 1.1x10 9.37398x10 1.17383 2.6268x10 8.5838x RHawking=½XRe 2x10-17 9 x108 K* 10-16 Nuclear density n 3 38.650 m* nuc=3mcY /4{½XRe} s* 85,218. (3.746-6.461)x1017 27 m* [kg/m3]* 3.4764x Rylem=Rcurv for 11 31 10 kg* Mylem=3.45x10 kg*/17.257Msun 9 - -20 12 2.9962x 4.78696x10 1.9x10 3.86997x10 1.82690 5.1002x10 4.42097 RHawking=Re/2 Ess 10-17 10 x108 K* x10-16 modulation 15.957 m* Neutron degeneracy s* 118,744 Rylem=Rcurv for 31 .56 m* Mylem=4.81x10 1.7905x kg*/24.05Msun 1011 kg*
Primordial Neutron decay from the Higgs Boson – RMP Dark Matter quantum geometric blueprint Y2M2C2
As the universe reached an age between 1130-1150 seconds, a 20 second period from the 18 minute 50 second marker manifested primordial radioactive beta-minus decay in the decomposition of a lefthanded ylemic neutron into its constituent parts of a lefthanded proton with a lefthanded electron and a righthanded antineutrino. As this process is a weak nuclear interaction (WNI) a coupling to the st o g u lea i te a tio “NI as ade a ifest i the le i eut o sta s o e t a sfo i g the quark content of the ylemic neutron in the interaction with gluons and crystallizing the force carrying bosons for the WNI and the SNI as weakon bosons (W- for matter and W+ for antimatter and Zo for uncharged matter) and gluons respectively.
Neutron decay depends on the relative movement of the neutron with respect to their environment. The measured discrepancy in the mean lifetime of free neutrons of about 9 seconds using either a p oto t ap ottle o a p oto ea ou te of a d se o ds espe ti el , so e gages the definition of the RMP as being coupled to the Higgs Boson in the matter template YCM. The decoupling of the RMP from the Higgs Boson introduced the colourless Graviphoton as the spin conserver in the UfoQR to preserve the spin neutrality of the Higgs Boson in the lefthanded RMP with the righthanded Graviphoton.
The RMP is the dark matter particle in the Higgs field and is defined in the units of the gravitational parameter as a space quanta volumar acted upon by the time differential of frequency df/dt as a form of quantum spin angular acceleration.
The primordial neutron decay in the first 20 minutes of the QBBS universe became triggered in the initial boundary conditions defined in the space quanta counters E, F and G, with the manifestation of the Dirac monopole singularity as the wavelength *=c/f*=4.087933536x1014 m* for radius -13 13 R*=*/2 =R(n*=Hot* = . ) =6.506148293x10 * fo a ti e t* = , . s* o . mean solar days into the expansion and thermodynamic evolution of the universe.
Initial Boundary Conditions from Membrane Timespace and the Matter-Antimatter Coupling for the QBBS
The Timespace of imaginary space, created the initial boundary condition for the QBBS to manifest in the instanton-inflaton quantum entangled coupling in a higher dimensional parameter space of the mathimatia. Five string classes transformed into each other under properties of modular dualities in the st i g epo h egi i g ith the ou e of the Pla k le gth at a the defi ed ti espa e 5 2 2 6 3 -45 coordinate of √Lplanck/c=√ tplanck=√{ hGo/2c )(2kee /hc)} =√{Gokee /c )}=e/c =5.9498383x10 s* for the finestructure unification condition {Goke=1} between the electromagnetic and gravitational -31 interactions; and ending at the instanton of tweyl=3.333x10 s*.
The heterotic classes allow the 5 bosonic strings to emerge from a 26 dimensional boson string space, where 10 clockwise string rotations are emergent in a 10-dimensional string spacetime and where 16 anti-clockwise rotation are suppressed.
The Planck boson in timespace then is known as the Planck string of class I of open strings at a time -43 tplanck= planck/c=4.376x10 s*; the second a closed monopole string of self-dual class IIB at a time -40 tmonopole= monopole/c=1.537x10 ; the third the closed XL-Boson heterotic class HO(32) at time -39 tXL= XL/c =2.202x10 s*; the fourth the closed Ecosmic Ray-Boson string of class IIA at time -34 tEcosmic= Ecosmic=6.618x10 s* and the fifth the closed heterotic class HE(64) of the instanton.
3 -33 A false Higgs Boso a uu at a ti e i te al f o tdBmin=GoMo/c nps=4.672x10 s* to -32 tdBmax=√αtweyl=2.847x10 s* preceded the instanton in the timespace to image the start of the ti espa e st i g epo h i the ou e o ua tu flu tuatio of the Pla k ti e i the ua tu os illatio of the We l ti e.
Following the creation of spacetime in the instanton, the Weyl parameters of the spacetime could integrate and manifest the primary source energy definitions of the mathimatia parameter space and using the string modular properties for that purpose. One of those properties relates to the modular inversion of displacement in string T-duality, strongly associated with Mirror duality to connect the shadow-mirror universe Abba-Khaibit to the physicalized universe Friedmann-Baab. The quantum entanglement between the two universes under modular string-membrane duality assumes the form of a supermembrane manifesting as a surface information agent in the two-sidedness of the Witten-Maria mirror of the 11-dimensional boundary between Khaibit-Universe-Energy-Primary- Source-Sink or Eps and Riemann-Universe-Energy-Secondary-Sink-Source or Ess.
The supermembrane EpsEss is the coupled under modular string-membrane duality in: 2 2 1. EpsxEss=hfpsxhfss=h with quantum energies Eps=hfps=hc/ps= hc/2rps=mpsc =kTps=1/e* and 2 2 Ess=hfss=h/css= 2h/crss=mssc =kTss=h e* 2 2 2. Eps/Ess=hfps/hfss=fps =1/fss with the inversion displacement coupling fpsps=c=1/{fssss} by definition of modular T-Mirror duality 3. and descriptive for 9x1060 frequency permutation states for the universal physicalized consciousness quantum, the Uniph s o defi i g Di a s o opole -22 4. The wormhole radius rps=ps/2 and wavelength ps=2rps=10 m* for a high quantum energy
Eps and a small winding string mode 22 5. The anti-wormhole radius rss=1/rps=2ss=2x10 m* and wavelength ss=2rss for a low
quantum energy Ess and a great winding string mode
Quantum mechanics of a string physics of the very small so is characterized by a small wavelength and radius r of atomic and subatomic structures, but this radius r is shown to be equivalent to a classical mechanics of extended objects of inverted radius 1/r in terms of the winding modes interchanging under T-duality. A low winding number relative to a small radius rps=1/R can describe a physics equivalent to that physics of the same radius r with a large winding number, as the unwinding of the multiplicity of the perimeter of the circle radius r, would increase the radius rps=1/R to a multiple of 1/R and so increase the radius to 2n.rps=R=rss of classical objects. For the supermembrane EpsEss, the 60 winding number becomes the coupling constant Eps/Ess=fps/fss=9x10 as the maximum permutation frequency state as the self-state or resonance eigenvalue of the unification physics connecting the microcosmos of quantum relativity to the classical universe of general relativity with special relativity.
The Möbian connectivity of the 11-dimensional Witten-Maria mirror manifests in the timespace of the superstring epoch in the form of the quantum relative blueprints and the doubling of a Möbian surface in changing the one-sidedness to a two-sidedness in a double rotation or twist extending a 360 degree rotation to a 720 degree rotation to return to an initial state, known as a spinor.
A two-sided ring of width w and radius r so has two surface areas 2rw as an inner and an outer. Cutting the ring and twisting one end by 180 degrees, before gluing it back to the other end of the ring will connect the previously separated surfaces to one surface of total length 4r and surface area 4rw. A spinor pointing perpendicular to the width would then change direction after one full rotation because of the twist and require and more rotation to return to the initial starting position. Righthandedness becomes left-handedness after a 360 degree rotation and becomes righthanded again after another 360 degree rotation.
This property of a geometric topological transformation from a orientable geometric object like a ring into a non-orientable object like a Möbius strip became the basis for the quantum geometry of fundamental particles blueprinted in the supersymmetry of the timespace.
Five gauge Goldsto e oso s as the fo e a i g field pa ti les oke the supe s et of the unification of five interaction fields:
# Gauge Boson Colour Spin Field Charge 1 Eps-Photon Cyclic +1 EMI RGB 2 Ess-Antiphoton Anticyclic +1 WNI BGR 3 Graviton Anticyclic -2 GI BGR 4 Gluon Cyclic +1 SNI RGB 5 Restmass-Photon Cyclic -1 EMMI Y2C2M2 6 Higgs-Boson Cyclic 0 EMMI Y2C2M2 Dirac Monopole Mirror 7 Anti-Higgs Boson Anticyclic 0 Imaginary M2C2Y2 EMMI 8 Anti-Restmass-Photon Anticyclic +1 Imaginary M2C2Y2 EMMI 9 Anti-Gluon Anticyclic -1 Imaginary BGR SNI 10 Anti-Graviton Cyclic +2 Imaginary RGB GI 11 Ess-Photon Cyclic -1 Imaginary RGB WNI 12 Eps-Antiphoton Anticyclic -1 Imaginary BGR EMI
The cyclic right-handed Eps-Photon of Monopolar Radiation EMMR for the long-range Electromagnetic I te a tio EMI is k o as the i tual photo of U -SU(2)-SU(3) Unitary gauge symmetry of the Standard Model of particle physics combining Quantum Field Theory (QFT) in Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) with Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD). Its anti-particle would so be an anticyclic left-handed Ess- Photon in the supersymmetry of the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity (UFoQR). The Quantum Relativity derives from the geometric topology creating and defining the elementary particle and gauge bosons in their quantum geometry in the timespace and preceding the string- membrane epoch in the mathimatia. The cyclic RGB on one side of the Möbian strip would interact with its own image of the one-sidedness, however separated by the point-circle of the one-dimensional thickness of the Möbian geometry in the spacelessness or imaginary space of timespace.
The self-intersection of the Eps-Photon with its antistate of the Ess-Antiphoton through a membrane mirror of no thickness would mix the Red-Green-Blue cyclic colour triplet on one side of the mirror as a cyclic Eps rotation RGB=GBR=BRG in three successive 120 degree angular displacements. Relative to Ess, this movement would be identical in the quantum self-relativity of rotating from RGB to GBR to BGR, but relative to the other side of the mirror the movement would be anticyclic.
The olou ha ge t iplet ‘GB is defi ed i the pa a ete s of EM‘ as Pla k s Κa E=hf a d light a d i pa a ete s of ass as Ei stei s Κa E= 2 o da k . Ele t o ag eti all ‘ed, G ee a d Blue i e ual proportions result in in the colour White and colour in the matter of paint in equal proportions result in the colour Black in thew colour charge triplet Yellow-Cyan-Magenta or YCM.
In the SU(3) gauge symmetry of QCD, the eight forms of the gluon, transmitting the force of the strong nuclear interaction reduce to one gluon agent in 8 and 4 permutation states.
For hadrons, like nucleons like the proton and the neutron, and constructed by three quarks, the eight gluon permutations transform a pure Black triplet into a pure White triplet in the set: {BBB+BBW+WBB+BWB+WBW+WWB+BWW+WWW}. For mesons and other quark-antiquark state particles the four gluon permutation states are the set: {BB+BW+WB+WW}. The primary colour charge triplet RGB then forms a radiation-matter interaction super template with the secondary colour charge triplet YCM in the Black-White resonances given in the colour-anticolour couplings Red+Cyan=W or B and Green+Magenta= W or W and Blue+Yellow=W or B via E=hf for W or E=mc2 for B respectively.
The original YCM blueprint for matter was created by a half-rotation in the 60°-120° sector where the colour charge interaction (R+G)(G+B)(B+R)=YCM=CMY=MYC, was followed by the second half-rotation in the 240°-300° sector from the inflexion point of 180° manifesting in spacetime as the Möbian twist of 180° to change the orientability of the Möbian topology to non-orientable. The colour charges of both the self-relative sources Eps and Ess inflexed to Blue-Green-Red to give the antimatter template (B+G)(G+R)(R+B)=CYM=YMC=MCY.
At the completion of the 360° rotation, only the primary gauge photon Eps inflected back to its starting position of a cyclic right-handedness, The secondary gauge photon Ess broke the gauge supersymmetry in continuing with its cyclic right-handedness so creating the necessity for the birth of the graviton as a spinor of double integer spin to reset the gauge symmetry in the timespace. This resulted in the suppression of the antimatter template MCY as the mirror of the mass eigenstate to the eigenstate of the BGR anti-EMMR blueprint. The breaking of the gauge symmetry at the inflexion points of 0°-180°-360° differentiated the even −nodes at 0 and 2 radians from the odd -nodes at radians in defining the even nodes in RGB and as an anti-neutrino template R2G2B2 and the odd nodes in BGR and as neutrino template B2G2R2. The o igi al sho t- a ge a e fu tio fo the EMMI of ua tu spi + at the o igi ith the o igi al wave function for the Anti-EMMI of quantum spin -1 and inflecting at the 180°- node in the UFoQR as UFoQR(x)=sin(x)+sin(- , o took the lo g- a ge fo UFoQ‘ =si / -cos(3x/4) in Eps continuing to inflect at odd -nodes and intersecting with the graviton wave function in lieu of the now suppressed Anti-EMMI wave function, effectively retracing the path of Eps with a phase shift of 2 or 360°.
The combined wave function of the EMI and the GI then repeats its waveform in a periodicity of 8 radians or 1440° and intersects in 12 coordinates to define the materialization of particles and anti- particles in the combined wave path of 4ps or four times the Weyl wormhole perimeter manifesting in the QBBS spacetime of the instanton-inflaton.
The 2nd intersection or current node in the UFoQR then defines a Y2C2M2 template for the Higgs Boson of 0 spin and the 4th current junction defines the Anti-Higgs Boson of 0 spin as the M2C2Y2 blueprint. As the coordinates for the 1st and 2nd, the 3rd and 4th to the 5th junction nodes are 120° and 288.5° and 360° and 431.5° and 600° respectively to encompass the Weak Nuclear Interaction (WNI) part of the UFoQR in coupling the matter loops to the antimatter loops; two additional Y2C2M2 and M2C2Y2 templates are made manifest as the blueprints for the Restmass-Photon RMP of spin=-1 at the 200° coordinate and the Anti-RMP of spin=+1 at the 520° coordinate.
The templates for the creation of particles in the spacetime from the timespace so allows the bosonic integral boson-spins to bifurcate into fermionic half-integer spins for any YCM or MCY created particle pairs, such as a ylemic YCM Gamow neutron boson of spin=+1 splitting into two neutrons of spin=+½ in conjugate or parallel action of a ylemic MCY Gamow anti-neutron boson with spin=-1 splitting into two fermionic neutrons of spins -½-½. But this standard scenario of the Big Bang cosmology infers the equal status between matter and antimatter for the cosmogenesis.
The antimatter template MCY remains suppressed as a function of the anti-EMMI template, which also internalizes the anti-RMP and the anti-Higgs bosons into the UFoQR. So it is the Higgs Boson which manifests the elementary particles of the cosmogenesis in splitting its Y2C2M2 matter template into a ylemic YCM Gamow neutron pair with opposite spins +½-½=0. This gives the reason as to why no normally occurring antimatter is observed in the universe, apart from the process of pair-creation defined in the UfoQR between junction nodes 8-9-10 at coordinates of -528.5°-360°-191.5°.
The graviton must have spin 2 as a consequence of quantum angular momentum conservation.
Before spacetime creation in the instanton of the quantum Big Bang, the transformation of the five string classes manifested in the inflaton using a prior supersymmetry between matter- and antimatter templates., represented in say sinx+sin(-x)=0 and where the positive region becomes a quantum geometric matter conformal mapping and the negative region becomes its conjugative for antimatter. As the linearization of the circle inflects at 180 degrees, matter and antimatter become defined in adjacent clockwise and anticlockwise semi cyclicities.
If now the arbitrary boundaries are defined in some unitary interval between 0 and 360 degrees or [- ∞, ,+∞] o [-1,0,+1] or [0,½,1] or [-(X+1),-½,X]; then the left boundary dynamics of say righthandedness cancels the right boundary dynamic of left-handedness throughout the 2 semi cycles, say described in a Möbian connectivity and topology of surface non-orientability in a conformal mapping of a 2D surface onto a 11D supermembrane in a membrane-mirror space.
After the completion of a full cycle, the matter- and antimatter templates exist in the membrane space of the inflaton, say as a supersymmetry between the righthanded electromagnetic monopolar radiation (EMMR) and its antistate in a lefthanded electromagnetic monopolar antiradiation. This supersymmetry between radiative self-states precedes any possible supersymmetry between the matter and antimatter blueprints, as the dynamic of the EMMR eigenstate defines the former as a secondary manifestation of potential manifestation, once the instanton of spacetime creation supersedes that of the prior string- brane epoch.
To realize the matter-antimatter potential, the completion of the full EMMR cycle breaks its own supersymmetry in the exchange of the right- and left boundary and initial conditions. The original righthanded (Weyl-gauge photon say of the left mirror) now situated at the right mirror extends the unitary interval towards the positive abscissa (aleph null enumerability) and inflects its anticlockwise parity into its original clockwise parity or chirality.
The original Weyl-antiphoton from the right mirror, now situated at the left mirror retraces the path of the Weyl-gauge photon however and so does not inflect and so creates the necessity to negate two clockwise quantum spins by a doubled anticlockwise spin angular momentum.
This demands the birth of quantum gravity and of its gauge agent of the graviton in the formation of a new universal wavefunction traversing in the opposite direction of the now twinned electromagnetic monopolar propagation of the original emmr supersymmetry.
A consequence of this 'changing of the fundamental supersymmetry' becomes the restriction of any matter-antimatter symmetry to become confined to the concept of pair production in the presence of existing matter or antimatter in Nonparity.
Defining matter to couple in a Goldstone gauge boson form to the original Weyl-photon (RGB) then forces the Weyl-antiphoton (anticyclic BGR) to suppress the antimatter (MCY anticyclic to matter YCM) template in lieu of a 'twinned' emergent blueprint known as the scalar 0-spin Higgs Boson (Y2C2M2).
Imagine a Moebian strip without thickness und so restricted to be two dimensional. The perimeter of the quasi-inner ring so defines a self-intersection with its quasi-outer ring and depicts half of the total 2D-space of the Möbius strip for the inflection at 180 degrees. Then the Möbian strip breaks its own non-orientable nature and symmetry to create the 3rd dimension as a form of the Dirac string rotating in the 2-dimensional XY-plane to manifest the orthogonal z-direction in the torque of the angular momentum vector.
The second parameter space can now become orientable (without the Möbian twist of 180 degrees) and the self-relativity of the first part becomes now 3-dimensional relative and allows a new mixing of the tripartite sectors of the quantum chromodynamics of the constituent Goldstone bosons. From this point in the cosmogony onwards an older non-manifested matter antimatter supersymmetry can eventuate in the observed pair-production, being otherwise suppressed by the earlier radiation-antiradiation supersymmetry described.
The Higgs boson with a scalar Higgs scalar neutrino in the conformal mapping of the QBBS onto the cosmology
As the universe reached an age between 1130-1150 seconds, a 20 second period from the 18 minute 50 second marker manifested primordial radioactive beta-minus decay in the decomposition of a lefthanded ylemic neutron into its constituent parts of a lefthanded proton with a lefthanded electron and a righthanded antineutrino. As this process is a weak nuclear interaction (WNI) a coupling to the st o g u lea i te a tio “NI as ade a ifest i the le i eut o sta s o e transforming the quark content of the ylemic neutron in the interaction with gluons and crystallizing the force carrying bosons for the WNI and the SNI as weakon bosons (W- for matter and W+ for antimatter and Zo for uncharged matter) and gluons respectively.
The Riemann hyperspheres of the instanton-inflaton evolutionary light path correspond to the quantum geometry inherent in the QBBS
14 RE= E weyl/ = . m* for a time -12 tE=nE/Ho=2.1506x10 /Ho=1,145,323.7 s* or 318.145 hours 9 3 2 2 3 and a temperature TE=1.163x10 K*from T(n)= {{Ho Mo/ σSB}.{(n+1) /n }} corresponds to -15 -30 Re=2.7777x10 m* in the ratio Re/RE=8.0844x10 11 -15 RF= F weyl/ = . m* for a time tF=nF/Ho=2.1601x10 /Ho=1150.36 s* or 19.17 minutes 11 -18 and a temperature TE=2.0614x10 K* corresponds to RHBlower=Re{RF/RE}=2.789990x10 m* in the upper bound for the Higgs Boson HB -25 for a Compton mass mHBlower=h/(2cRHBlower)=1.26766x10 kg* or 71.020 GeV* np increasing to 71.020(Y )= 122.491 GeV* for np=1.132711
11 RG= G weyl/ = . m* for a time -15 11 tG=nG/Ho=2.1228x10 /Ho=1130.52 s* or 18.84 minutes and a temperature TE=2.0885x10 K* -18 corresponds to RHBmean=Re{RG/RE}=2.741872x10 m* in the mean mirror value for the Higgs Boson -25 for a Compton mass mHBmean=h/(2cRHBmean)=1.28991x10 kg* or 72.266 GeV* np increasing to 72.266(Y )= 124.640 GeV* for np=1.132711
102 11 Fo F = G-F)=9.158461354x10 space quanta = RF = F weyl/ = . 275x10 m* for a time -15 tF =nF /Ho=2.0842x10 /Ho=1109.96 s* or 18.50 minutes 11 -18 and a temperature TE=2.1173x10 K* corresponds to RHBlower=Re{RF /RE}=2.6920000x10 m* in the lower bound for the Higgs Boson -25 for a Compton mass mHBupper=h/(2cRHBupper)=1.31381x10 Kg* or 73.605 GeV* increasing to GeV* for np=1.132711 np increasing to 73.605(Y )= 126.950 GeV* for np=1.132711
The Gravitational constant as a function of the finestructure constant alpha and the distribution of magnetic monopole masses
np np -11 GoX (1+ec/30ec + 1/e*)=GoX {1+1/30+1/e*}=(6.44221014x10 ){31/30+1/500} -11 3 2 -11 3 2 =6.66983490x10 [m /kgs ]* = 6.67445232x10 [m /kgs ]SI for the unitary calibration 3 2 3 2 [m /kgs ]*=1.000692286 [m /kgs ]SI
{s}SI = 1.000978394 {s*} = 0.999022562 {s}SI
{m}SI = 1.001671357 {m*} = 0.998331431 {m}SI
{kg}SI = 1.003753126 {kg*] = 0.996260907 {kg}SI
{C}SI = 1.002711702 {C*} = 0.997295631 {C}SI
{J}SI = 1.005143377 {J*} = 0.994882942 {J}SI
{eV}SI = 1.00246560 {eV*} = 0.997540464 {eV}SI
{K}SI 0.98301975 {K*} = 1.017273559 {K}SI
The variation observed in the experiments to measure the gravitational constant G(n) therefore depend not on the time variation decrease for G(n), which is precisely balanced in the time variation increase of the M(n) factor in the gravitational parameter, but is a mirror effect of the universal pole direction variation in the alpha finestructure constant, given as /=8.08x10-5 and as the effect of the Dirac string connecting the three wormholes of the QBBS instanton-inflaton couplings quantum entangling the Riemann-Baab universe with the Abba-Khaibit shadow universe in the definitions of the string- membrane modular T-Mirror dualities.
Alpha remains constant for a cosmology descriptive of a non-accelerating cosmology; but will result in a change in the electric charge quantum in a cosmology, which measures an accelerated spacial expansion, which is however the result of a self-intersection of the light path for particular cosmological redshift intervals in an oscillating cosmology.
Here a particular alpha variation reduces the SI-measurement for the square of the charge quantum e in a factor of (1.6021119x10-19/1.60217662x10-19)2 = 0.99991921...for a calibrated: alpha variation 2 -5 2 2 αvar = 1 - (1.602111895/1.60217662) = 1 - 0.9999192 = 8.08x10 with Alpha α = oce /2h = e / ohc = . . . 2x10-37/(6.62607004x10-34 = e2/h = 7.296762965x10-3 = 1/137.0470721. As the electropolar charge quantum appears squared in the Alpha-Constant, the Alpha-variation so becomes (1.0000807), with the old value of (e') exceeding the new value of (e) in so 4 parts in 100,000 and [Alpha]' greater in magnitude than Alpha by 81 parts in a million and in agreement with the Churchill-Webb measurements of 1998 and the more recent measurements from by the Wilczynska- Webb-Bainbridge-Barrow-Bosman collaboration (Published 2020), observing very distant quasars with redshifts from quasar J1120+0641 with z=7.085 for an alpha variation
-5 α/α = αz − α0 /α0 = − : ± : . https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/17/eaay9672
The a iatio i the la o ato easu e e ts of Ne to s g a itatio al o sta t G is the combined effect of the monopole mass, which when added with the inverse of the magnetic charge quantum defining the Dirac monopole, but as the proportionality connecting the electropolar charge to the n magnetopolar charge from e*Eps= ={e*/ e√{melectron/mplanck}, increases the decreasing G(n)=GoX n (with the compensating nucleon mass mcY compensating for the constancy of Gomo=G(n)m(n)) by one magnetic monopole mass mm=[ec] with the source energy perturbation.
I e ti g the p opo tio alit { e√=e{melectron/mplanck} for the proportionality constant as a function of alpha gi es √={e*/e}{ melectron/mplanck} ith { √}/{ e*√} = Eps
Usi g this p opo tio alit o sta t √/300) to account for the proportionality 1+1/30=31/30=310/300 instead of Eps as the perturbation -3 Eps- √/300=1.43052605x10 in G(npresent)
np -3 -11 -11 3 2 =GoX {31/30+1.43052605x10 }=(6.44221014x10 ){1.03476386}=6.666123x10 [m /kgs ]*
-11 3 2 =6.67073786x10 [m /kgs ]SI differing from the full perturbation by
-11 -11 3 2 -3 3 2 (6.67445232x10 - 6.67073786x10 ) [m /kgs ]SI = 3.7144565x10 [m /kgs ]SI or so 4 parts per 1000 Usi g Di a s ua tizatio o ditio as proportionality -3 Eps-(2/300)=1.95135491x10 gives G(npresent) =(6.44221014x10-11){ 1.03528469}=6.66952152x10-11[m3/kgs2]* -11 3 2 =6.67413873x10 [m /kgs ]SI differing from the full perturbation by
-11 -11 3 2 -4 3 2 (6.67445232x10 - 6.67413873x10 ) [m /kgs ]SI = 3.135873x10 [m /kgs ]SI or so 3 parts per 10,000
And using the nature of the Action Law as the square of charge for a proportionality constant Eps- 2 -3 ( √/300) =Eps-(4/90,000)=1.99967570x10 results in G(npresent)
-11 -11 3 2 -11 3 2 =(6.44221014x10 ){1.03533301}=6.66983281x10 [m /kgs ]* = 6.67445024x10 [m /kgs ]SI differing -11 -11 3 2 -6 3 2 from the full perturbation by (6.67445232x10 - 6.67445024x10 ) [m /kgs ]SI =2.07907x10 [m /kgs ]SI or so 2 parts per Million
2 Because the source energy quantum Eweyl=Eps=mpsc =1/e*=(1/2e√){melectron/mplanck}, the direct proportionality between electro charge quantum e and magneto charge quantum e* for the magnetic 3 flux m=(mps/[ec]mod)ec =Eps=1/e* modifies the gravitational parameter in the basic Schwarzschild metric 2 rcurv=2GoM.c
The distribution of the 30 GUT monopoles maximizes the minimum condition for a single monopole in the distribution of 30 monopoles in the doubling of the gravitational parameter from the gravitational potential energy GMR/R2= - in 4-dimensional spacetime to the gravitational parameter for of a Schwarzschild Black Hole in 5-dimensional spacetime 2GoM=Go{M}={Go/[e ]}{ + / +…+ / } fo the GUT unification in the timespace∇Φ preceding the QBBS.
2 2 This occurs at the unification mass scale for the fine structures alphaEMR=2kee /hc=2Gomm /hc=alphaGR and e ui i g t Hooft-Polyakov magnetic monopoles in the definition of the Maxwell constant 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 oo=1/c in units [Js /C m][C /Jm] with the condition kee =Gomm =Go[ec] for unitary consistency 2 2 2 3 2 2 [ke]=[Jm/C ]=[Js/C ][m/s]=[Action h/Charge C ][m/s] with Go=[e*/kg]= [m /kgs ]=[Js/kg ][m/s] =[h/(ec)2][m/s]=[h/C2][s/m]=[C2/h][s/m] for the inverse of the Action Law as [Charge C2=Action h].
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 This so defines ke[e ]=mm /ke for mm =ke [e ]=[e/4o] =[120ec/4] =[30ec] =mm from the Maxwell 2 constant oo={1/120c}{120/c}=1/c fo the u ifi atio o ditio fo the ass of a ou da t Hooft- Polyakov magnetic monopole to be 30[ec] kg* or 30[ec]c2 Joules of monopolar energy.
A si gle t Hooft-Polyakov monopole would have a mass of -11 8 mmonopole=[ec]mod=4.819369032x10 kg*for a GUT string unification energy of 1.30122964x10 J* or 8.1x1017 GeV*.
All t Hooft-Polyakov monopoles would have a mass of for a GUT string unification energy of 1.30122964x108 J* or 8.1x1017 GeV*.
For a mass less universe with no magnetic monopoles, the Schwarzschild metric would take the form with a gravitational constant Go defining the curvature as a function of purely electromagnetic mass 2 rcurvc =Go{1+0}M=GoM=M/ke=4oM and where M would be expressed in terms of a Maxwell's displacement current [ec]mod=currentxdisplacement The evolution of the universe in an oscillating spacetime and the age of the earth
Newton's gravitational constant so is allowed to vary and decrease over time as a function of the change in the universal inertia increasing in direct proportionality and the transformation of source energy into physically expressed units of quantum consciousness in the gravitational parameter
GM=GoMo=G(n)M(n) and n a dimensionless cycle time. Cycle time parameter n is defined in n=Hot=ct/RH defining the invariant light path X=ct as a scale factor for the size of the universe defined at cycle time coordinate n in a nodal minimum Hubble constant fweyl, defined as the instanton of creation and varying between odd and even nodes for a maximized Hubble constant Ho=dn/dt as the inflaton of creation in the first semi-oscillation of protoverse as a first seedling universe.
An electromagnetic return of the source light traversing the light path X=ct in the 11-dimensional and higher-dimensional universe so gives birth to a second, but concurrent universe within the omniverse as a multiverse after the completion of the light path of creation has reached the nodal boundary set at the instanton of the Weyl wormhole frequency in the cosmology of the Quantum Big Bang.
The electromagnetic monopolar source light so both reflects and refracts its path from the maximized
Hubble Ho-boundary of the inflaton. The refracted light path then increases the size of the bounding omniverse in the addition of wormhole quanta defined in the quantum of universal consciousness and the light path reflected from the 11-dimensional Witten spacetime mirror retraces the light path travelled from the instanton node to the inflaton node as the initial boundary conditions of the multi- dimensional cosmology. The lower dimensional expansion of the universe so is continually decelerating in a parametrization of the wormhole parameters applied to the multitudinous form of the volumars occupying the 10 dimensional string universe; but the electromagnetic retracing of the original light path will intersect itself and cause the measurements of cosmological expansion as a redshift of the light observed to appear as a cosmological contraction and a contraction which will also be observed as a universe accelerating its own expansion.
At a p ese t le ti e of = . … a d a odal = fo tpresent=1/Ho, the electromagnetic return of the monopolar light path has retraced 13.271 % of the Hubble event horizon defined in RH=ct=c/Ho of about 16.9 billion light years for a fraction of 2.24 billion light years indicating that the electromagnetic monopolar age of the universe is 16.876+2.240=19.116 billion light years; but that this will be measured in the gravitationally decelerating cosmology as 19.12-4.48=14.64 billion light years. As the age of the earth is near the doubled light path of the self-intersection in 4.48 billion years added to a doubled interval of a variation in the alpha finestructure constant in 28.6 million years, the age of the earth is 4.48+0.056=4.536 billion years.
Alpha remains constant for a cosmology descriptive of a non-accelerating cosmology; but will result in a change in the electric charge quantum in a cosmology, which measures an accelerated spacial expansion, which is however the result of a self-intersection of the light path for particular cosmological redshift intervals in an oscillating cosmology. Here a particular alpha variation reduces the SI-measurement for the square of the charge quantum e in a factor of (1.6021119x10-19/1.60217662x10-19)2 = 0.99991921...for a calibrated: 2 -5 alpha a iatio αvar = 1 - (1.602111895/1.60217662) = 1 - 0.9999192 = 8.08x10 with 2 2 Alpha α = oce /2h = e / ohc = . . 2x10-37/(6.62607004x10-34 = e2/h = 7.296762965x10-3 = 1/137.0470721.
As the electropolar charge quantum appears squared in the Alpha-Constant, the Alpha-variation so becomes (1.0000807), with the old value of (e') exceeding the new value of (e) in so 4 parts in 100,000 and [Alpha]' greater in magnitude than Alpha by 81 parts in a million and in agreement with the 2 Churchill-We easu e e ts of , i easi g f o Alpha = oc.e /2h = 1/137.047072 to Alpha = 1/137.036003.
The age of the Milky Way galaxy can be determined by using the process of nucleosynthesis in the early universe in the physics of nucleochronology, that is in measuring the abundance of radioactive elements, such as Thorium-232 (98.98%) compared to the abundance of a known abundance of another stable chemical element found in the periodic table of the atomic elements, such as Europium- 153(52.2%); Europium-151(47.8%) is unstable with a half-life of 5.10x109Gy.
In the early universe only rapid neutron capture occurred to synthesize the heavier elements. Spectroscopic evidence of absorption spectra for the ultra-metal-poor and massive Galactic Halo Star CS 22892-052 has discovered an abundance of the radioactive element Thorium with half-life 14.05 Gy in N(tmean)=No.exp[-14.05/tmean} for a mean lifetime of tmean= t½/ln2=14.05/ln2 = 20.27 Gy.
This larger age is comparable to the Electromagnetic Monopolar EMMI age of the QBBS; but ignores the chemical evolution of the universe adding the reactive elements Europium and Thorium in varying proportions by the rapid neutron capture process to their universal abundance in the subsequent thermodynamic evolution of the universe. The chronometric age determination for CS 22892-052 then provides an estimate of the age for the Milky Way Galaxy and its globular cluster stars.
At the time of the creation of the solar system 4.6 Gy ago, the Thorium/Europium ratio is measured [-t/t½] today as 0.369 but as 0.219 in globular cluster star CS 22892-052 in N(t)=No(to){2 . [-4.6/14.05] The {Th/Eu} is (0.369)=No.2 for No=0.463, substantially higher than that for globular cluster star CS 22892-052 measured as 0.219, indicating a far greater age for the star, then calculated for the [4.6/14.05] abundance ratio in the much younger universe for a No=(0.219). 2 =0.275. And for the mean lifetime tmean=t½/ln2=20.27 GY,
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/303968/fulltext/ John J Cowan et all; The Thorium Chronometer in CS 22892-052: Estimates of the Age of the Galaxy; Astrophysical Journal; THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 480:246 254, 1997 May 1
An earlier paper, addressing the actinide chronometer production ratios for the rapid-neutron capture process derive an age for the Milky Way galaxy of 20.8 [+2/-4] Gy and an age for the universe of 19.5 [+3/-3] Gy for a (Sandage) Hubble constant of 60 km/Mpc.s . Those calculations concur with the EMMI age of the universe as 19.12 Gy for a nodal Hubble constant of 58.04 km/Mpc.s for a not accelerating universe with zero cosmological constant in the Friedmann-Walker cosmology. http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1983A%26A...123..162T Title: New actinide chronometer production ratios and the age of the Galaxy Authors: Thielemann, F.-K., Metzinger, J., & Klapdor, H. V. Journal: Astronomy and Astrophysics (ISSN 0004-6361), vol. 123, no. 1, June 1983, p. 162-169.
Measuring Alpha even further back towards the Quantum Big Bang with increasing redshift, would better approximate the 80 parts per million increase in Alpha from say lower deviations at the say 8 parts per million at lower redshifts. So the Alpha-Dip indicates that the textbook SI-value for the electropole is fractionally too high; but that the Alpha Finestructure Constant remains indeed constant once the variation in the electronic charge quantum is considered.
Because the magnetic permeability constants are numerically the same in both the (SI) and the (*) -12 u ita easu e e t s ste s; ut o= / = . (F/m)* and is -12 o=8.8541878176x10 F/m (SI), the (SI) measurement is too large by a factor of 1.00138505 to correlate o e tl ith the ag eti pe ea ilit o sta t o to give the Maxwell constant 2 o o= / . / = / .
In the attempt to explain the Alpha-Dip, some theorists have proposed a 'slowing down' of (c). Recent formulations by populist physicist Paul Davies and in co-authorship with Tamara Davis and Charles Lineweaver from the Department of Astrophysics at the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia have followed the wrong avenues for the interpretation of the data, however. In a paper published in ('Nature': 'Black Holes constrain varying constants'; August 8th, 2002), the authors propose a varying light speed to be responsible for the Alpha-Dip and discount any possible variation in the electrocharge quantum. Davies' argument that an increase in (e) would alter the evolution of Black Holes in their entropy definitions does not consider that a product of the Boltzmann Constant (defining entropy), with (e) forms a fundamental fine-structured constant in its own right.
In particular, the universe's wavefunction B(n) is localized in any arbitrary spacetime in 'unfreezing' the M-space 'stuck' in between the (X,Y) coordinates and subsequently in between real and imaginary linearized time parameters. This demands the establishment of a Mean-Alignment-Time or MAT, relative to a 'unfreezing definition' in a specification of the 'naked singularity', oscillating as zero-point about the FRB. As E*.e*= Epsx1/Eps = 1 as fundamental unity in the 11D Membrane-Mirror-Space of modular duality with e* the magneto charge; one can heuristically state that (Energy E x charge quantum e) in the lower dimensional C-Line-Space C can be expressed as the inversed identity in the form of 1/T.
This then sets E.e=kTe=1 for [ek]=1/T and using an inverse proportion for mass in the lower dimensionality: [e*k*]=1/T* sets a function f(n)=[ek]/[e*k*]=[T*/T]. This is the case for the Mass-Temperature inverse proportionality for the evolution of Black Holes from microstates to macro states and as in the Hawking Mass-Temperature relation for Black Holes and ela eli g the We l st i g as the p i a sou esi k ps high f e ue ith s all a ele gth pa t of the modular dual supermembrane EpsEss a d ith the se o da si ksou e ss ei g the lo f e ue with large wavelength part of the Witten supermembrane.
o 2 Then the Minimum Planck Oscillator Eplanck = ½hfplanck=½mplanck.c for Tmax=Tps and Tmin=Tss in string modular T-duality for ½mplanck.Tplanck= / . planck.Tplanck=Hawking Modulus 3 2 2 HM=hc / GokB=MBHmin.TBHmax={c / }. MBHmax.TBHmin}. B(n) is assigned B(npresent)={[ekB](SI)/[ekB](*)}, with -19 -23 -42 {[ekB](SI)=constant=(1.60217662x10 C)(1.380649x10 J/K)=2.21204355x10 CJ/K} and using the old (SI) value with the Alpha-Variation for (e').
± -19 -42 Using (e =1.6021119x10 C) without the Alpha-Variation gives {[ekB](SI)}=2.21195419x10 CJ/K}. ± -42 The (*)-constant is a relatively fixed constant as: (e *kB*=2.267869086x10 (CJ/K)*) and subsequently -19 B(npresent) calculates a particular value for n at the asymptote B(n ±∞ = fo e= . C*.
± ± 2 {[e kB](SI)/[e kB]*}=(2.21204355/2.267869086)=0.975384145=[2e/hA].exp(-[Alpha]x[n⇒ present +npresent]), which yields an unique (npresent) as a complex solution to the quadratic equation by ln(0.975384145/0.992729803) 2 2 2 ={ln(0.982527312}={-Alpha}{npresent +npresent} for 2.415747501=npresent +npresent for: npresent +npresent- 2.415747501=0 and solving as: (npresent=FRB(-½)±1.6327117).
± ± 2 {[e kB](SI)/[e kB]*}=(2.21195419/2.267869086)=0.975344742=[2e/hA].exp(-[Alpha]x[npresent +npresent]), which yields an unique (npresent) as a complex solution to the quadratic equation by ln(0.975344742/0.992729803) 2 2 2 ={ln(0.98248762}={-Alpha}{npresent +npresent} for 2.421284031=npresent +npresent for: npresent +npresent- 2.421284031=0 and solving as: (npresent=FRB(-½)±1.634406324).
For the unfrozen M-space with Alpha-Variation: {10D-root: npresent=1.1327117 (real) & 12D-root: npresent=-2.1327117 (imaginary)}. For the unfrozen M-space without Alpha-Variation: {10D-root: npresent=1.1344063 (real) & 12D-root: npresent=-2.1344063 (imaginary)}.
The difference in the present np cycle-time coordinate so becomes 1.634406324-1.6327117 = 0.001694624 as 0.001694624/Ho = 9.02486387x1014 s* or 28.59865512 Million civil years. This 'unfreezing' of M-space then allows the singularity algorithm of the cosmogenesis to manifest in what might be called the sex chromosomes of the universal DNA-encoding in terms of frequency or a number count. A new physical quantity in 'awareness' is defined as the time differential of frequency and allows the concept of 'consciousness' to be born from the defining qualities of magneto charges.
The Gravitational constant in the evolvement of the primordial 9 nucleon mass mc=mplanck.{}
n n n n n The “ta da d G a itatio al Pa a ete = GM = constant = GoM(X Y )= GoX .MY and for (XY) =1 can be n finestructured in a decreasing gravitational constant G(n)=GoX with a corresponding increase in the n mass parameter M as M(n)=MoY as say for the proto-nucleonic mass of the Instanton mc(nps) as n n mc(npresent) = mc.Y present = mneutron < mcY present = 1.711752..x10-27 kg* and 958.99 MeV* upper limited
2 2 n For a changing Gravitational constant G(npresent) .mneutron(npresent) = Gomc .Y present and is modulated say in A micro-macro Black Hole perturbation 2 Mo /2M∞.MMaxHawking = 1.000543 ~ 1
The Black Holed mass equivalence for astrophysical bodies is well formulated in the application of the basic Schwarzschild metric derived from General Relativity. Stephen Hawking developed the inverse proportionality between the mass of a Black Hole M and its Temperature T in the form of the Hawking Modulus:
o 2 3 HM = mPlanck.E Planck/k = √{h / Go}{½mPlanck.c /k} = hc / Gok = {MSmin.TSmax} 2 2 23 = [c / ]mod.{MMaxHawking .TSmin } = 9.131793821x10 kg*K*
The Hawking Modulus so has mensuration units [Mass][Temperature] in [kg][K(elvin)] or [kgK]* for the
Stefan-Boltzmann entropy constant kB.
2 2 And so Mmin.Tmax = h / Gok = [c / ]mod.Mmax.Tmin = ½mPlanck.TPlanck 2 2 = MMaxHawking. [c / ]mod.Tss and the Hawking Mass is determined as 49 MMaxHawking = max /Go = 2.54469..x10 kg*.
3 HyperMass MHyper (nps) = hc .e*/ Go = 6445.775 kg at the Instanton boundary n=nps so increases to n 3 n MHyper(npresent)Y present =hc .e*/ GoX present ~ 11,117.26 kg as the projected Instanton boundary mass for the wormhole radius rwormhole = rps modulating the Inflaton curvature with the Instanton curvature and -11 utilizing npresent=1.132711... for a decreased perturbed G(npresent) = 6.442x10 G-string units for the k n-k 2 n Standard Gravitational Parameter G(n)miY (n).mjY = Gomc = constant for G(n)=GoX . Usi g the min max=1 wavelength modulation in the T-duality of min= ‘min= / max= /‘max, this modulation closely approximates the geometric mean of the seedling 2 2 102 102 ass i { / }Mo /2M∞.MMax=Mo / .M∞.MHawking =3.2895..x10 /3.2931..x10 ~ 0.998910744...
This also circumscribes the actual to critical density ratio in the omega of the general relativistic treatment of the cosmologies. n The applied G value in Gm(n)=Go.X as now coupled to the derived Black Hole Mass modulation coupled to the quantum micro masses.
n+k n k Gomc²={GoX }.{mcY }.{mcY }=Gm(n).mnmax.mnmin and where Gm is the actual G value as measured and which has proved difficult to do so in the laboratories. n+k n k Gm(n)=Go.X =Gomc²/mnmax.mnmin=Gomc²/({mcY }{mnmin}) and where we have mnmin=mcY } for the n unknown value of k with mnmax=mcY .
n+k n 2 n 2 So Gm(n)=Go.X =GoX [mc/mnmin]=Go{mc /mcY }.{Mo / .M∞.MHawking.mav} for k 2 X ={mc/mav}.{Mo / .M∞.MHawking}=1.00109044..{mc/mav} 2 and where now {mnmin}={ .M∞.MHawking.mav/Mo }=1.00109044..mav. k k mav={Mo / .M∞.MHawking}{mnmin}={Mo / .M∞.MHawking}{mcY }=0.9989107..{mcY } and represents a k reduced minimum mass mnmin=mcY .
But the product of maximum and 'new' minimum now allows an actual finetuning to a measured nucleon mass mN by: n n n mN² = mavY .mcY =mav.mnmax.Y .
So substituting for mav in our Gm expression, will now give the formulation: n+k n 2 n 2 Gm(n)=Go.X =GoX [mc/mnmin]=Go{mc /mcY }.{Mo / .M∞.MHawking.mav} n+k n 2 n 2 2n 2 Gm(n)=Go.X =GoX [mc/mnmin]=Go{mc /mcY }.{Mo / .M∞.MHawking}{mcY /mN } 2 2 2 n Gm(n)=Go.{mc /mN }{Mo / .M∞.MHawking}Y
The average nucleon mass mN is upper bounded in the neutron mass and lower bounded in the proton mass, their difference being an effect of their nucleonic quark content, differing in the up-down transition and energy level and because of electro charges increasing the intra-quarkian Magneto charge coupling between the two mesonic rings of the neutron and a single mesonic ring in the proton's down- or KIR-quark.
-27 For a Neutron Restmass of: mneutron=1.6812656x10 kg* (941.9111 MeV*) or (1.6749792x10-27 kg and 939.594 MeV) the substitution (and using calibrations m=1.001671358 m*; s=1.000978395 s*; kg=1.003753127 kg* and C=1.002711702 C* gives: 2 n -11 3 2 G(np)= Go{mc/mneutron} .(0.9989107..)Y p = 6.670693x10 (m /kgs )* or 6.675312x10-11 (m³/kgs²).
-27 For a Proton Restmass of: mproton=1.6788956x10 kg* (940.5833 MeV*) or (1.672618x10-27 kg and 938.270 MeV). 2 n -11 3 2 G(np) = Go{mc/mN} .(0.9989107..)Y p = 6.6895399x10 (m /kgs )* or 6.694171x10-11 (m³/kgs²).
n+k -11 3 2 Gm(n)=Go.X = 6.670693x10 (m /kgs )* then gives kp =ln{Gm(np)/Go}/ln{X} - np = 1.0602852 - 1.132711 = -0.0724258
The upper value of the neutron bound so represents an upper limit for the Gravitational Constant as the original quark-lepton bifurcation of the X-Boson precursor given in the KKK kernel. Only the KKK kernel is subject to the mass evolution of the cosmos; the leptonic masses being intrinsically incorporated in the Kernel means. n The mc.Y so serves as an appropriate upper bounded approximation for G(n), subject to leptonic ring IR- OR perturbations.
The best approximation for 'Big G' hence depends on an accurate determination for the neutron's inertial mass, only fixed as the base nucleon minimum mass at the birth of the universe. A fluctuating Neutron mass would also result in deviations in 'G' independent upon the sensitivity of the measuring equipment. The inducted mass difference in the protonic-and neutronic rest masses, derives from the Higgs-Restmass-Scale and can be stated in a first approximation as the ground state. -28 Basic nucleon rest mass is mc=√O ega. P=9.9247245x10 kg* or 958.99 MeV*.
(Here Omega is a gauge string factor coupling in the fundamental force interactions as: Cube root(Alpha):Alpha:Cuberoot(Omega):Omega and for Omega=G-alpha.) KKK-Kernel mass=Up/Down-HiggsLevel=3x319.66 MeV*= 958.99 MeV*, using the Kernel-Ring and Family-Coupling Constants.
Subtracting the Ring-VPE (3L) gives the basic nucleonic K-State as 939.776 MeV*. This excludes the electronic perturbation of the IR-OR oscillation.
For the Proton, one adds one (K-IR-Transition energy) and subtracts the electron-mass for the d-quark level and for the Neutron one doubles this to reflect the up-down-quark differential. An electron perturbation subtracts one 2-2/3=4/3 electron energy as the difference between 2 leptonic rings from the proton's 2 up-quarks and 2-1/3=5/3 electron energy from the neutron' singular up-quark to relate the trisected nucleonic quark geometric template.
Proton mp=u.d.u=K.KIR.K=(939.776+1.5013-0.5205-0.1735) MeV* = 940.5833 MeV* (938.270 MeV).
Neutron mn=d.u.d=KIR.K.KIR=(939.776+3.0026-1.0410+0.1735) MeV* = 941.9111 MeV* (939.594 MeV).
This is the ground state from the Higgs-Restmass-Induction-Mechanism and reflects the quarkian geometry as being responsible for the inertial mass differential between the two elementary nucleons. All ground state elementary particle masses are computed from the Higgs-Scale and then become subject to various finestructures. Overall, the MEASURED gravitational constant 'G' can be said to be decreasing over time.
n The ratio given as k is GmY /Go ~ 0.600362... and so the present G-constant is about 60% of the one at the Planck Scale. G decreases nonlinearly, but at a present rate of 0.600362/19.12x109 per year, which calculates as 3.1400..x10-11 G-units per year.
Generally using the exponential series expansion, one can indicate the change in G. For Xn+k=z=exp[(n+k)lnX] by (n+k)lnX=lnz for the value u=(n+k)lnX=-0.481212(n+k); z transforms in exponential expansion eu=1+u+u2/2!+u3/3!+u4/4!+...
n+k For a function f(n)=z=Gm(n)/Go=X - f(n) =1-(0.481212.)(n+k)+(0.2316.)(n+k)2/2-(0.1114.)(n+k)3/6+(0.0536.)(n+k)4/24-...+...
-49 At time instantaneity of the Quantum Big Bang, n=nps= ps/Rmax=6.2591x10 ~ 0 nps Then GBigBang=GoX =Go (to 50 decimal places distinguishing the time instanton from the Null time as the Planck-Time transform).
Go represents the quantum gravitational constant applicable for any Black Hole cosmology and can be used to correlate the MOND gravitation with the Newton-Einstein gravitation in inferring a greater gravitational constant in the cosmic past in conjunction with an inherent Milgröm deceleration as a time derivative of the universal scale factor a={n/[n+1]}.
n For our previously calculated k=ln(GmY /Go)/lnX and which calculates as k= -0.0724258.. f(n)=1-(0.481212.)(n+k)+(0.2316.)(n+k)2/2-(0.1114.)(n+k)3/6+(0.0536.)(n+k)4/24-(0.0258.)(n+k)5/120+...- ... for f(1.132711)=1-0.51022+0.13016-0.02214+0.00283-0.000288...+...~ 0.6006340 to fifth order approximation to 0.60036246...
Hence, the gravitational constant assumes a value of about 60.0% of its Big Bang initialization and calculates as 6.675x10-11 G-units for a present cycle time npresent=Hotpresent=1.132711...
The introduction of the mass seed coupling between the macro quantum Mo and the micro quantum 9 mc=mPalpha (from the gravitational finestructure unification) PERTURBS the 'purely electromagnetic' cosmology in the perturbation factor k and increases the purely electromagnetic Gmemr in the black hole physics described.
So gravity appears stronger when one 'looks back in time' or analyses cosmological objects at large distances. The expansion parameter (a) in the Friedmann-Einstein standard cosmology can be rewritten as a curvature ratio R(n)/Rmax={n/(n+1)} and describes the asymptotic universe in say 10 dimensions evolving under the inertial parameters of the c-invariance. This 'lower dimensional universe' is open and expands under hyperbolic curvature under the deceleration parameter qo=½ o=Mo/2M∞=2GoHoMo/c³ ~0.014015... This open universe is bounded in the 'standing wave' of the Hubble Oscillation of the 11D and 'higher dimensional universe'.
The Inflaton and the Grand Unification Symmetry in a Transformation of Supermembranes
SEWG------SEWg------SEW.G------SeW.G------S.EW.G------S.E.W.G Planck Unification I------IIB------HO32------IIA------HE64--Bosonic Unification
{Capitalization of letters infers emphasis and decapitalization of letters implies suppression of respective fundamental interactions}.
The transformation of the 5 superstring classes proceeds in utilizing the self-duality of superstring IIB as the first energy transformation of the Inflaton in the Planck string class I trans mutating into the monopole string class IIB and residing in the 2-toroidal bulk space of Vafa as a Riemann 3-dimensional surface describing the VPE-ZPE of the micro quantum of the QBBS. The Eps-Weyl wormhole of topological closure so is holographically and conformally mapped onto the bulk space in 12 dimensions as a braned volumar evolving by mirror duality of the 11dimensional closed AdS membrane space of Witten's M-space as Vafa's F-space and mirroring the hyperbolic topology of 10-dimensional C-space as an open dS cosmology in an overall measured and observed Euclidean flatness of zero curvature.
Modular Wavelengt Waveleng Decoupling Time h th m* Temp Significan String Boson E ergy hc/ s* = l J* & eV* K* ce m*
0. Genesis-Boson TIME=1/FREQUE LIGHTPATH ENERGY= TEMPERATU Algorithm 39 Algorithmic NCY c.TIME hRmax/ ps 5.326x10 RE ic -40 = ps/RH = psHo/c 1.877x10 =k.TEMPERAT = hRmax/k ps Definiton 3 = nps = Hotps URE 7.54481x10 6.2591x10-49 =h.FREQUENC 7 Y =h/TIME=MAS S.c2 1.065 PJ* or 6.629x1033 eV*
-35 34 33 1. Planck Length Bounce tOPL= OPL/c 1.122x10 17.830 GJ* or 8.913x10 1.263x10 Quantum 2 2 -44 29 √αLplanckc =e↔e*= ‘ec 3.739x10 1.110x10 Fluctuatio =1/Eps eV* n of Creation Outside Hubble 1.523 GJ* or 2. Planck-Boson tP= P/c LP= P Horizon 9.482x1027 7.617x1033 1.079x1032 I/SEWG sEwG 4.377x10-43 1.313x10-34 Limit in eV* Protovers ⇒ e 3. Monopole-Boson 13.011 MJ* or IIB/sEwG SEWg 26 Outside tM= M/c 8.100x10 GI-GUT 1.537x10-33 6.506x1032 9.216x1030 Hubble 5.124x10-42 eV* decoupling⇒ [max] to [max] to [max] to Horizon [max] to [min] [max] to [min] max = 30 [ec] [min] [min] [min] Limit in tM= M/c 4.337 MJ* or min = 1 [ec] 4.611x10-32 2.169x1031 3.072x1029 Protovers 1.537x10-40 2.700x1025 e eV*
Outside Hubble -31 302.817 kJ* or 4. XLBoson tXL= XL/c 6.605x10 Horizon 1.885x1024 1.514x1030 2.145x1028 HO32/SEW.G 2.202x10-39 Limit in eV* Protovers e
-25 24 22 5. Ecosmic-Boson tEC= EC/c 1.986x10 1.0073 J* or 5.035x10 7.135x10 Galactic IIA/SeW.G SNI 6.618x10-34 6.270x1018 Superclust decoupling eV* er Sarkar Scale Mo=RSarkar 2 c /2Go
3 37 tHmin=GoMo/c nps {7.206x10 4.672x10-33 0.143 J* or [min] to [min] to [max] 8.883x1017 [max] 37 1.402x10-24 eV* 1.171x1023 1.857x10 Galactic tHmax=√αtps 6. False Higgs Vacuum -32 [min] to [min] to [max] [min] to Superclust 2.847x10 Algorithmic (min to max) [max] 0.023 J* or [max] er
8.541x10-24 1.458x1017 7.133x1023 from Scale eV* Genesis Boson}
7. Weyl-Boson {Temperatu HE64/S.EW.G re Big Bang Gradient Galactic Instanton EMI 0.002 J* or tps= ps/c Tps/T(nps) Halo decoupling 1.000x10-22 1.245x1016 1.000x1022 3.333x10-31 Genesis (Group) eV* Boson Scale T(nps) = 2.935x1036} ctBU/(1+Hot BU) Bosonic
0.5691 Plasma TBU = Tps Unitary Protoverse h/tBU = 1.417x1020 -25 1.757 Modular 8. T(n)=Tps Inflaton 3.514x10 J* 18.2[n+1]2/ tBU=nBU/Ho Protovers Geometri Bosonic Condensate min to or n3 1.897x10-9 e c Unification Instanton 2.188x10-6 eV* 1022 n=HotBU Mean to 0.002 J* or Scale Inflaton 12.45 PeV* max 10-22 9. Electroweak WNI Higgs decoupling Boson
-8 And -18 2.341x10 J* tEW=nEW/Ho 8.543x10 RMP or 1.171x1017 1.658x1015 0.00714~1/140 Dark 145.70 GeV* Matter scale
10. Higgs Chi-Boson/ Outer Super Diquark Leptonic Sbar=ss 2.227x10-17 4.799x10-8 J* Inner tQL=nQL/Ho Quark-Lepton scale Quantum or 4.490x1016 3.400x1015 Mesonic 0.00274~1/365 Vacuum Expectation Scale 298.785 GeV* Kernel Quantum scale
Quantum Gravitation Unification in a Coupling of the Supermembranes in Self dual Monopole Class IIB
SEWG ---- SEWg as string transformation from Planck brane to (Grand Unification/GUT) monopole brane. The X-Boson is modular dual to the L-Boson in the string class transformation from the Planck brane to the monopole brane to the X/L-brane to the Cosmic String brane to the Weyl brane. For the X-Boson, the coupling can be written as: : #.(mps/mPlanck)f(G) and for the L-Boson it is written as: 54 # .(mPlanck/mps)f(S) to indicate the inherent modular duality.
As alpha=#3 specifies the emmr-matter-emr interaction probability; EMI/SNI=#3/#=#2 breaks the unified symmetry via the WNI and defines #f(G) as a unitary mass.
3 A ' i i g a gle' θps is defined via constant X { } alpha α as X = ϖ . si θps for a unitary force action ϖ(n) acting on the inflaton acceleration cfps modulated from the inflaton source hyper- ⇒ ℵ ⇒ 2 87 2 acceleration of the de Broglie matter wave for phase speed RHfps in RHfps =1.43790791x10 (m/s )* in the displacement light path for the nodal Hubble constant Ho = dn/dt = c/RH defining the frequency ratio nps = ps/RH = ps/RH =fps/Ho as the linearization of the wormhole from its closed Planck brane form as string class I into its transformation as open string class HE(8x8) then manifesting as the Compton-de Broglie wavelengths in the emr-matter-emmr interactions.
The Hubble law so modulates the inflaton as the instanton in a dimensionless cycle time parameter n in a time rate change constant as the nodal Hubble constant H(n)|min =
Ho = 58.04 km/Mpc.s (extrapolated to 66.9 km/Mpc.s for a present npresent =1.132711... cycle time coordinate) and in inverse proportion to its maximum as the wormhole frequency fps, becoming the maximum node for H(n) in the associated multiverse cosmology, which defines this multiverse as parallel in time space, but as holofractally nested in spacetime. It is then a quantum tunneling of the entire universe upon the completion of interwoven cycles defining the nodal oscillations in particular nodal 'walls of time' defined in the light path, which become the medium for this quantum tunneling of lower dimensional spacetime itself.
The i flato a gle θps so is maximized at 90° at X = ϖ . si θps fo θps = 38.17270761° for a unitary force ϖ(n)=1 and for the X/L bosonic coupling for a GUT scale characterizing SEW.G for the decoupling of the gravitational interaction from the unified energy field described by the Standard Model.
-43 Now the Planck string for a Planck time of tP= P/c = 4.377x10 is connected to the X/L string via the 2 monopole string at the unified SEWG level in the self-duality of the GUT-monopole at [ec.c ]uimd = 16 -40 2.7x10 GeV* and at a brane inflaton time of tM= M/c=1.537x10 s* and for which SEWG transformed into sEwG to indicate the unified nature between the long-range EMI and GI in a coupling of the electromagnetic and gravitational fine structures here termed alpha and g-alpha respectively.
-39 The X/L boson time is tXL= XL/c=2.202x10 s* and string class HO(32) decouples gravity in replacing 2 f(G)/mPlanck by the monopole mass # /[ec]uimd modular dual to f(S)mPlanck to account for the SNI/EMI breaking of the native supersymmetry SEWG and to transform the Planck brane energy scale into the X/L brane energy scale. 3 -12 15 mXB = alpha.mps/[ec]uimd = # .mps/[ec]uimd = 3.364554269x10 kg* = 1.884955575x10 GeV* unifying 18 2 SEW in the monopolar electron boson energy mec|max = α ps mLB = alpha .[ec]uimd/# .mps 52 2 -28 =# .[ec]uimd/# .mps = 1.982105788x10 kg* = 111.0453587 MeV* unifying EWG at the bosonic muon energy
The X-Boson mass and the L-Boson mass then transform into the string class IIA, as the coupling from the self-dual monopole class, here termed the ECosmic Boson to indicate its native characterization as primordial cosmic string ancestor for a spectrum of cosmic rays, tabulated following this discussion.
-34 The ECosmic Boson manifests at an inflaton time of tEC= EC/c = 6.717x10 s* at an energy of 0.9927 J* or 6.180x109 eV* and as a consequence of the universal wavefunction B(n) = {2e/hA}.exp{-Alpha.T(n)} and where T(n)=n(n+1) defines X and Y in the Euler identity for T(n)=1.
The electromagnetic interaction, which was emphasized in the decoupling of the gravitational interaction in the sEwG to form the X/L-Boson in SEW.G now becomes suppressed in SeW.G in the B(n) -49 for n=nps=6.259093473x10 0 and T(0)=0 for B(nps)=2e/hA= 0.992729794..in units of inverse energy that is as units of the magneto charge under modular string duality. ⇒ The constant A=4.854663436x1014 Ampere* can be defined as a cosmic string magneto current and derives from particular algorithmic encodings underpinning the numerical values for the fundamental constants of nature.
3 The ECosmic boson then triggers a 'false vacuum' in a brane time interval from tdBmin=GoMo/c nps = -33 -32 4.672x10 [min] to [max] tdBmax=√αtps = 2.847... x10 defined in a non-kinematic temperature gradient of the cosmogenesis and related to the hyper acceleration gradient between the de Broglie inflaton 2 wave phase speed adB = RHfps a d the ou da os ologi al da k e e g o sta t Einstein(nps) = 2 GoMo/ ps with . Einstein(nps)/adB = Mo/MH=0.02803.. descriptive for the baryonic matter content at the instanton as a proportional coupling between the 'mother black hole' defined in the Schwarzschild metric with an 2 event horizon the size of the Hubble radius RH = 2GoMH/c .
It can be said, that the universal wave function B(n) remains 'frozen' within this encompassing inflaton event horizon about the FRB (Functional Riemann Bound) at the x=-½ coordinate and between a cosmic uncertainty interval {X: -1,0} defining the Witten-M-space in this presentation; until it is observed and/or defined in accordance with the premises of quantum mechanics applied to the universe in total. In particular the 'unfreezing' of B(n) requires the linearization of the quantum geometric circularity of the Compton wavelength into its particularized quantum radius.
https://youtu.be/sRTKSzAOBr4
Quark-Lepton Unification in XL-Boson Class HO(32)
SEWg --- SEW.G
Following the creation of the 'false Higgs vacuum' as a potential spacetime quantum and as a prototypical holofractal of the brane volumar; the Planck string and now as an ECosmic string of increased spacial extent and of lower energy transforms into the Weyl-Eps Boson of the quantum big bang event as the instanton.
This results in an integration or summation of Eps-quanta evolving at the speed of light from the original Weylian wormhole as the 'creation singularity'.
This 'filling' of the inflaton M-space with lower dimensional instanton C-space represents however an attempt by the wormhole summation, which is expanding originally at the speed of light to become retarded by a force opposing the linear expansion and so decurving of the original wormhole definition. This effect of anti-curvature or the attempt to recircularized the linearization of the lower dimensional expanded membrane space by its higher dimensional contracting (or collapsing) membrane space is known as gravity in the macrocosmic cosmology of General Relativity but represents the integrated effect of quantum gravity as a summation of spacetime quanta as wormhole volumars inhabiting expanding space as boundary and initial condition for contracting spacetime.
The expanding qbb or the integration and multiplication of wormhole quanta now enables the X/L -31 bosons to transform into a quark-lepton hierarchy at instanton time tps=fss=1/fps=3.333.x10 s*.
The Higgs vacuum is now rendered as physical in spacetime occupancy and the relative sizes of elementary particles is defined in the diameter of the electron and its parameters of energy and 2 momentum. In particular e*=2Rec =1/Eps restricts the extent of the Compton constant in the mass and size of the electron and quantizing the quantization of monopolar energy in the volumar equivalent of the inversed source energy quantum of the Weyl-Eps Boson conformally transformed from the Planck scale onto the Weyl wormhole scale in the superstring transformations.
Magnetopolar charge e* as inversed energy quantum in its higher dimensional form assumes the characteristic of a region of space acted upon by the time rate change of frequency or df/dt. As said, this allows a definition of physical consciousness as the action of a quasi-angular acceleration as df/dt onto the dynamics of anything occupying any space, if this space represents a summation of Eps- gauge photon quanta. The concept of physical consciousness so finds it resolution in the quantum geometry of super brane volumars.
The Higgs field of physical consciousness so applies action on spatially occupied dynamics, such as elementary particles or collections and conglomerations of particles, irrespective of those particles exhibiting inertial mass or gravitational mass and as a consequence of the photonic energy equivalence to mass in E=hf=mc2.
The X-Boson of energy 1.885x1015 GeV* so transforms into a K-Boson of energy given by the 9 8.5 transformed Planck boson into the K-Boson with mc=mPlanck.Alpha =keeα
8.5 -28 =(e/Go α =9.924724514x10 kg or 556.0220853... MeV* under Planck-Stoney unification for electric charge and mass.
The primordial K-Boson so becomes the ancestor for all nucleons and hyperons as a base kernel energy n as a function of cycle time n in m(n)=mcY .
n n For a invariance of the Gravitational parameter GM=GoX .MY = constant , a mass evolution in the constancy of XY = X+Y = ei = i2 = -1 n can be applied to 'evolve' the mass of the K-Boson as a function of cycle time n from its initial self-state nps=Ho/fps= ps/RH and to relate the history in time to a history of space in a timeless cosmogenesis.
This evolution of mass as a fundamental cosmological parameter relates to the 'missing' mass in the
Mo/MH = 0.02803... ratio say as the Omega of the deceleration parameter in the Friedmann cosmology.
Considering a time evolution of a rest mass seedling Mo towards a Black Hole closure mass MH in the form of 'massless eternal Strominger branes' will crystallize the existence of a multiverse as a function of the wormhole radius rps expanding in higher dimensional brane spacetime until the Hubble radius RH is reached in a time of about 4 trillion years. A formula to describe this is: nlnY=ln(RH/rps) or equivalently nlnY=ln(MH/Mcurvature) for the quantum gravitational transformation of the Planck mass into the curvature mass of 6445.775... kg* as the minimum mass a Black Hole can have in the quantum relativistic cosmology.
When a Strominger eternal (there is no Hawking radiation) black hole has reached its macro state from its micro state, say after 234.47 cycles in a protoverse, then the entire old universe will quantum tunnel into a new universe which was born as a multiverse at the completion of the first cycle for n=1 and when a second inflaton holographically repeated the cosmogenesis parallel in time but not in space to ensure the eternal continuity for the first universe created as a protoverse. The quantum tunneling wall so is an interval of time defined in nps and not any boundary in space.
https://youtu.be/RF7dDt3tVmI
npresent -27 The upper bound for the kernel mass so becomes mcY =1.71175285x10 kg* or 958.9912423...
MeV* for npresent set at 1.132711...
The K-Boson then assumes the form of a trisected subatomic core in distributing the K-superstring energy in three quantum geometric parts or sectors depictable in three 120-degree regions of a gluon field for the 8 gluon permutations between the SU(3) self-states:
E=mc2: {BBB; BBW; WBB; BWB; WBW; BWW; WWB; WWW}:E=hf, for the hyperon SU(3) unitary quark or antiquark distribution and E=mc2:{BB; BW; WB; WW}:E=hf for the mesonic quark-antiquark couplings for SU(2), with the (W)hite state implying complete emr-emmr dematerialization and the (B)lack state inferring complete materialization in the chromodynamics of the colour mixing and gluon charge exchanges.
The L-Boson then induces the outer leptonic OR ring structure as the ancestor of the muon fermion and the inner mesonic ring or IR becomes the oscillatory potential for the OR to reduce in size to approach the kernel K trisected in the gluon distribution.
The precursive X/L-Boson transforming into the quark-lepton hierarchy of fermions, so manifests a native supersymmetry or supergravity without any necessity for additional particles or string vibrations in unification physics.
It can then be said, that the meeting or intersection of the OR with the Kernel K occurs at the IR in the form of neutrinos and anti-neutrinos emitted by the kernel as the partners for the OR manifesting as three leptonic generations in electron, muon and tauon to define the weak interaction bosons in the weakons and the Z-Boson. The weakons so display the bosonic nature of the original X/L bosons but allow a partitioning of the boson integral spin momentum in a sharing between the fermionic kernel and the fermionic outer ring. The quantum geometry indicated then allows a decomposition of the weakons into leptonic generations and the Z-Boson to assume the weak interaction energy in the form of massless gluons becoming mass induced by the quantum geometric template of a scalar Higgs field as Majorana neutrinos. This can be illustrated in the quantum chromodynamics of the trisection of both kernel and rings as the mixing of colour charges as indicated.
Subtracting the L-Boson mass from the K-Boson mass then sets particular energy intervals shown following in the diquark hierarchies found in the quantum geometry of Quantum Relativity. The energy interval for the KKK kernel then becomes (282.6487 MeV* - 319.6637 MeV*) and is defined as a Kernel- Ring-Cross-Coupling constant, where 111.045/3 = 37.015 gives the appropriate energy range for a particular quark energy level for a ground state GS:
n-2 - - GS = GSn-1 + 2gn -1 + ULM .{ ⅓e ;⅔e } = Iterative Kernel GS + Ring Perturbation
n Kernel-Ring Mixing Constant: KX/RL = mcY /3mLB = 958.991/(3x111.045) = 2.8786858
for npresent =1.132711 …
n -27 Nucleonic Upper Limit: mcY present = 1.71175285x10 kg* = 958.9912423 MeV*
npresent Unitary Coupling Force: ϖ(npresent /√{Y } = #f(G).cfps{alphaE/alpha} npresent 2 = cGomplanckmpsmemc√ Y )/eh = 1.33606051 n alphaE = Gomcme/hc for mc√ Y ); as ring masses me, ,τ are constant in kernel masses 2 n alphaG = Gomc /hc for kernel mass mc as mcY
Graviton-GI mass: #f(G)=alpha.mplanck/[ec]uimd transforms mps from mplanck in mXB
Coupli g a gle: θps present) = Arcsin(X/ϖ(npresent)) = Arcsi . … = 27.553674°
Upper Bound Multiplier = 1/Lower Bound Multiplier
ULM = /LBM = °/θps(npresent) = 3.26663521
Using those definitions allows construction for the diquark hierarchies following. Reducing the atomic scaling to its intrinsic superstring dimension shows the Higgs Bosonic Restmass Induction, corresponding to the Dilaton of M-Theory.
Renormalizing the wavefunction B(n) about the FRB = -½ as maximum ordinate gives a probability y2dV fo = √ alpha/ fo the e o alizatio . Alpha/ ei g the p o a ilit of fi di g the F‘B flu tuatio fo the i te al [-X,X-1] in volume element dV as the uncertainty fluctuation.
This volume element defines the dimensional intersection from C-Space into F-Space via M-Space in the topological mapping of the complex Riemann C∞-Space about the Riemann pole of the FRB as the Calabi-Yau superstring space in 10 dimensions.
X = ½ √ -1) = 0.618033...... and Y = -(X+1) = -½ √ + = -1.618033... -X(X-1) = 0.236067... in analogue to X(X+1) = 1= T(n) and XY = X+Y = -1 = i2 as the complex origin. But 0.236067...= X3, so defining the 'New Unity' as #3 = Alpha and the precursive unity as the Cube root of Alpha or as # in the symmetry #:#3 = SNI:EMI = {Strong Nuclear Interaction Strength}/{Electromagnetic Interaction Strength}.
2 2 The Strong-Interaction-Co sta t “IC = √Alpha = √e / oh = √ e /h) in standard and in string units, reduces the SNI fine structure constant # by a factor Alpha1/6 ; that is in the sixth root of alpha and so relates the SIC at the post quantization level as # to the pre- ua tu epo h as “IC = √Alpha = #3/2. The SNI is therefore so 11.7 times weaker at the XL-Boson 'Grand-Unification-Time' SEW.G of heterotic superstring class HO(32), then at the EpsEss time instantaneity S.EW.G of the superstring of the Quantum Big Bang in heterotic class HE(8x8) {this is the string class of Visi in the group theories}.
This then is the Bosonic Gauge Heterosis Coupling between superstrings HO(32) and HE(8x8). The coupling between superstrings IIA (ECosmic and manifesting the cosmic rays as superstring decay products) and IIB (Magnetic Monopole) derives directly from the B(n), with B(n=0) = Jo = 2e/hA
= 0.9927298 1/J* or 6.2705x109 GeV* and representative of the ECosmic string class and the super high energy resonances in the cosmic ray spectrum, bounded in the monopolar resonance limit of 2.7x1016 GeV*.
The Unity of the SNI transforms to [1-X] = X2 and the EMI transforms as the Interaction of Invariance from X to X. The Weak Nuclear Interaction or WNI as X2 becomes [1+X] = 1/X and the Gravitational Interaction or GI transforms as X3 transforms to [2+X] = 1/X2 by modular symmetry between X and Alpha and the encompassing Unification Unity: [1-X][X][1+X][2+X] = 1.
This Unification Polynomial U(u) = u4+2u3-u2-2u+1 = 0 then has minimum roots (as quartic solutions) at the Phi = X and the Golden Mean Y = -(1+X).
This sets the coupling between SNI and EMI as X; the coupling between EMI and WNI becomes X2 and the coupling between WNI and GI then is again X.
The general Force-Interaction-Ratio so is: SNI:EMI:WNI:GI = SEWG = #:#3:#18:#54.
Typical decay rates for the nested fundamental interactions then follow the order in the light path lp = ctk:
-15 8 -24 tSNI = Re/c = 2.777...x10 m*/3x10 m*/s* = 0.925925...10 s* (Order 10-23 s*) -23 -3 -21 -21 tEMI = tSNI/α = s*/(7.30x10 ) = 1.37x10 s* ~ Order (10 s*) 6 -23 -13 -11 -10 tWNI =tSNI/α = 10 s*/(1.51x10 ) = 6.62x10 s* ~ Order (10 s*) 18 -23 -39 15 15 tGI = tSNI/α = 10 s*/(3.44x10 ) = 2.91x10 s* ~ Order (10 s* ~ 92 million years characterizing the half-lives of trans uranium elements like Plutonium Pu-244 at 79x106 y)
This is the ge e alizatio fo the u i t a sfo : → 3 with the Alpha-Unity squaring in the functionality of the WNI and defining G-Alpha as Alpha18 in the Planck-Mass transforming in string bosonic reduction to a basic fundamental nucleonic mass (proton and neutrons as up-down quark conglomerates and sufficient to construct a physical universe of measurement and observation):
9 mc = mplanck Alpha from the electromagnetic string unification with gravitation in the two dimensionless fine structures:
2 Fo G a itatio al Mass Cha ge f o highe D Mag eti Cha ge: = Go.mplanck /hc For Electromagnetic Coulomb Charge as lower D Ele t i Cha ge: Alpha = ke2/hc Alpha as the universal master constant of creation, then becomes defined via the Riemann Analysis from XY = i2 definition, reflecting in modulation in the statistical renormalization of the B(n) as the probability distributions in quantum wave mechanics, however.
U(u) has its maximum at u = -½ = FRB for U(-½) = 25/16 = (5/4)2 for the B(n) supersymmetry. A symmetry for B(n) is found for B(n) = i2 = -1. (u)=0 for an FRB=½ indicating a cosmological relationship to the Riemann hypothesis with respect to the distribution of prime numbers and Riemann's zeta function.
The derivation of the HBRMI draws upon this definition process and sets the coupling angle as Arcsin(X/ϖ) for a Unitary 'Force' ϖ =(#fG).cfpsE-Alpha/Alpha and with the electron mass replacing the fundamental nucleon mass mc in the definition of E-Alpha.
A disassociated GI unifies with the WNI in the L-Boson and is supersymmetric to an intrinsic unification between the SNI and the EMI as the X-Boson for the duality fGfS = 1 in modular definition of a characteristic GI-mass #fG as the disassociated elementary gauge field interaction. The transformation of the 5 superstring classes proceeds in utilizing the self-duality of superstring IIB as the first energy transformation of the Inflaton in the Planck string class I trans mutating into the monopole string class IIB.
Wikipedia reference: F-theory is a branch of string theory developed by Cumrun Vafa.[1] The new vacua described by F-theory were discovered by Vafa and allowed string theorists to construct new realistic vacua — in the form of F-theory compactified on elliptically fibered Calabi–Yau four-folds. The letter "F" supposedly stands for "Father".[2]
F-theory is formally a 12-dimensional theory, but the only way to obtain an acceptable background is to compactify this theory on a two-torus. By doing so, one obtains type IIB superstring theory in 10 dimensions. The SL(2,Z) S-duality symmetry of the resulting type IIB string theory is manifest because it arises as the group of large diffeomorphisms of the two- dimensional torus
The transformation of the 5 superstring classes proceeds in utilizing the self-duality of superstring IIB as the first energy transformation of the Inflaton in the Planck string class I trans mutating into the monopole string class IIB and residing in the 2-toroidal bulk space of Vafa as our Riemann 3-dimensional surface describing the VPE-ZPE of the micro quantum of the qbb. The Eps-Weyl wormhole of topological closure so is holographically and conformally mapped onto the bulk space in 12 dimensions as a braned volumar evolving by mirror duality of the 11dimensional closed AdS membrane space of Witten's M- space as Vafa's F-space and mirroring the hyperbolic topology of 10-dimensional C-space as an open dS cosmology in an overall measured and observed Euclidean flatness of zero curvature.
Vafa's F-space so can be named the omniverse hosting multiple universes which are nested in parallel time space and defined in particular initial and boundary conditions valid and applicable for all universes as a multiversal parameter space.
The quantization of mass m so indicates the coupling of the Planck Law in the frequency parameter to the Einstein law in the mass parameter.
The postulated basis of M-Theory utilizes the coupling of two energy-momentum eigenstates in the form of the modular duality between so termed 'vibratory' (high energy and short wavelengths) and 'winding' (low energy and long wavelengths) self-states. 2 The 'vibratory' self-state is denoted in: Eps=Eprimary sourcesink = hfps = mpsc and the 'winding' and coupled self-state is denoted by: Ess = Esecondary sinksource = hfss = mssc2.
The F-Space Unitary symmetry condition becomes: fpsfss = rpsrss = ps/ ss) = 1 The coupling constants between the two eigenstates are so: 2 2 2 EpsEss = h and Eps/Ess = fps = 1/fss The Supermembrane EpsEss then denotes the coupled superstrings in their 'vibratory' high energy and 'winded' low energy self-state within an encompassing super eigen state of quantum entanglement.
The coupling constant for the vibratory high energy describes a maximized frequency differential over 2 time in df/dt|max = fps and the coupling constant for the winded low energy describes its minimized 2 reciprocal in df/dt|min = fss .
F-Theory also crystallizes the following string formulations from the EpsEss super brane parameters.
Electromagnetic Fine structure: (Planck-Sto ey QR u its* …….….[EQ. ] 2 2 2 2 αe = kee /hc = e / ε0hc = oe c/2h = e /h 2 2 Gravitational Fi e structure Electro : αg = Gome /hc = {me/mplanck} 2 Gravitational Fine structure (Primordial Nucleo : αn = Gomc /hc 2 Gravitatio al Fi e structure Pla ck Boso : αPlanck = Gomplanck /hc
2 2 2 2 1/Eps = e* = 2Rec = √{ αh e / Gome } = e√α[ P/me] = e√{αe/αg} = {2e /me}√ ke/Go) 2 2 = 2e /Gome = e / ome for Go = 1/ke = o for a cosmological unification of fine structures in unitary coupling E*.e*=1 in [Nm2/kg2]=[m3s- 2/kg]=1/[Nm2/C2]=[C2m-3s2/kg] for [C2]=[m6/s4] 3 2 2 and [C]=[m /s ]. Eps = 1/Ess = /e* = √{αg/αe}/2e = Gome/2e
Here e* is defined as the inverse of the sourcesink vibratory superstring energy quantum Eps = E* and becomes a New Physical Measurement Unit is the Star Coulomb (C*) and as the physical measurement unit for 'Physical Consciousness'.
Re is the 'classical electron radius' coupling the 'point electron' of Quantum- Electro-Dynamics (QED) to 2 Quantum Field Theory (QFT) and given in the electric potential energy of Coulomb's Law in: mec = 2 kee /Re; and for the electronic monopolar rest mass me. 2 Alpha α is the ele t o ag eti fi e st u tu e oupli g o sta t α = kee /hc for the electric charge quantum e, Planck's constant h and lightspeed constant c. Go is the Newtonian gravitational constant as applicable in the Planck-Mass n n mP = √ h / Go) and the invariance of the gravitational parameter G(n)M(n)=GoX .mcY . As the Star Coulomb unit describes the inverse sourcesink string energy as an elementary energy transformation from the string parametrization into the realm of classical QFT and QED, this transformation allows the reassignment of the Star Coulomb (C*) as the measurement of physical space itself.
The following derivations lead to a simplified string formalism as boundary- and initial conditions in a de Sitter cosmology encompassing the classical Minkowskian-Friedmann spacetimes holographically and fractally in the Schwarzschild metrics.
The magnetic field intensity B is classically described in the Biot-Savart Law: B = o / 2 = oi/ = o ω/ = oNef/2r fo a ha ge ou t =Ne; a gula elo it ω= / = f; u e t i = d /dt a d the u e t ele e t i.dl = dq.(dl/dt) = vdq.
The Maxwell constant then can be written as an (approximating) fine structure: 2 o o = 1/c = (1 / / to stallize the 'f ee spa e i peda e' )o = √ o/ o = ~ Oh .
This vacuum resistance Zo so defines a 'Unified Action Law' in a coupling of the electric permittivity o po e t o) of inertial mass and the magnetic permeabilit o po e t o) of gravitational mass in the Equivalence Principle of General Relativity.
A unified self-state of the pre-inertial (string- or brane) cosmology so is obtained from the fine structures for the electric- and gravitational interactions coupling a so defined electropolar mass to magnetopolar mass, respectively.
2 The Planck-Mass is gi e f o U it = G P /hc and the Planck-Charge derives from 2 Alpha= kee /hc and where ke= / o in the electromagnetic fine structure describing the probability interaction between matter and light (as about 1/137).
The important aspect of alpha relates to the inertia coupling of Planck-Charge to Planck-Mass as all inertial masses are associated with Coulombic charges as inertial electropoles; whilst the stringed form of the Planck-Mass remains massless as gravitational mass. It is the acceleration of electropoles coupled to inertial mass, which produces electromagnetic radiation (EMR); whilst the analogy of accelerating magnetopoles coupled to gravitational mass and emitting electromagnetic monopolar radiation (EMMR) remains hitherto undefined in the standard models of both cosmology and particle physics.
But the coupling between electropoles and magnetopoles occurs as dimensional intersection, say between a flat Minkowskian spacetime in 4D and a curved de Sitter spacetime in 5D (and which becomes topologically extended in 6-dimensional Calabi-Yau tori and 7-dimensional Joyce manifolds in M-Theory).
The formal coupling results in the 'bounce' of the Planck-Length in the pre-Big Bang scenario, and which manifests in the de Broglie inflaton-instanton. 3 The Planck-Length LP = √ hG/ ) 'oscillates' in its Planck-Energy mP = h/ P = h/ ΚP to gi e √Alpha .ΚP = e/c2 in the coupling of 'Stoney units' suppressing Planck's constant 'h' to the 'Planck units' suppressing charge quantum 'e'.
Subsequently, the Planck-Κe gth is 'displa ed' i a fa to of a out . = /√Alpha = √ h/ /e a d using the Maxwellian fine structures and the unity condition keGo=1 for a dimensionless string coupling 2 Go = o, describing the 'Action Law' for the Vacuum Impedance as Action=Charge , say via dimensional analysis:
2 2 2 2 2 2 Zo = √ [Js /C m]/[C /Jm]) = [Js]/[C ] = [Action/Charge ] i Oh s [ = V/I = Js/C ] and proportional to [h/e2] as the 'higher dimensional source' for the manifesting superconductivity of the lower dimensions in the Quantum Hall Effect (~e2/h), the conductance quantum (2e2/h) and the Josephson frequencies ~ e/h i Oh s [ ].
This derivation so indicates an electromagnetic cosmology based on string parameters as preceding the introduction of inertial mass (in the quantum Big Bang) and defines an intrinsic curvature within the higher dimensional (de Sitter) universe based on gravitational mass equivalents and their superconductive monopolar current flows.
A massless, but monopolar electromagnetic de Sitter universe would exhibit intrinsic curvature in gravitational mass equivalence in its property of closure under an encompassing static Schwarzschild metric and a Gravitational String-Constant Go = 1/ke = 1/30c (as given in the Maxwellian fine structures in the string space).
In other words, the Big Bang manifested inertial parameters and the matter content for a subsequent Cosmo evolution in the transformation of gravitational 'curvature energy', here called gravita as precursor for inertia into inertial mass seedlings, both however describable in Black Hole physics and the Schwarzschild metrics.
The Gravitational Fine structure so derives in replacing the Planck-Mass mP by a proto-nucleonic mass: 9 mc = √ h / Go).f(alpha) = f(Alpha).mP and where f(Alpha) = Alpha . The Gravitational fine structure, here named Omega, is further described in a five folded supersymmetry of the string hierarchies, the latter as indicated in the following below in excerpt. This pentagonal supersymmetry can be expressed in a number of ways, say in a one-to-one mapping of the Alpha fine structure constant as invariant X from the Euler Identity: X+Y = XY = -1 = i2 = e p i . One can write a Unification Polynomial: (1-X)(X)(1+X)(2+X) = 1 or X4+2X3-X2-2X+1 = 0 to find the coupling ratios: f(S)¦f(E)¦f(W)¦f(G) = #¦#3¦#18¦#54 from the proportionality
#¦#3¦{[(#3)2]}3¦({[(#3)2]}3)3 = Cube root(Alpha):Alpha:Cuberoot(Omega):Omega.
The Unification polynomial then sets the ratios in the inversion properties under modular duality:
(1)[Strong short]¦(X)[Electromagnetic long]¦(X2)[Weak short]¦(X3)[Gravitational long] as 1¦X¦X2¦X3 = (1-X)¦(X)¦(1+X)¦(2+X). Unity 1 maps as (1-X) transforming as f(S) in the equality (1-X) = X2; X maps as invariant of the function f(E) in the equality (X) = (X); X2 maps as (1+X) transforming as f(W) in the equality (1+X) = 1/X; and X3 maps as (2+X) transforming as f(G) in the equality (2+X) = 1/X2 = 1/(1-X). The mathematical pentagonal supersymmetry from the above then indicates the physicalised T-duality of M-theory in the principle of mirror-symmetry and which manifests in the reflection properties of the heterotic string classes HO(32) and HE(64), described further in the following.
Defining f(S) = # = 1/f(G) and f(E) = #2.f(S) then describes a symmetry breaking between the 'strong S' f(S) interaction and the 'electromagnetic E' f(E) interaction under the unification couplings.
This couples under modular duality to f(S).f(G) = 1 = #55 in a factor #-53 = f(S)/f(G) = {f(S)}2 of the 'broken' symmetry between the long range- and the shortrange interactions. SEWG = 1 = Strong-Electromagnetic-Weak-Gravitational as the unified supersymmetric identity then decouples in the manifestation of string-classes in the de Broglie 'matter wave' epoch termed inflation and preceding the Big Bang, the latter manifesting at Weyl-Time as a string transformed Planck-Time as the heterotic HE(64) class.
As SEWG indicates the Planck-String (class I, which is both open ended and closed), the first transformation becomes the suppression of the nuclear interactions sEwG and describing the self-dual monopole (string class IIB, which is loop-closed in Dirichlet brane attachment across dimensions say Kaluza-Klein R5 to Minkowskian R4 or Membrane-Space R11 to String Space R10).
The monopole class so 'unifies' E with G via the gravitational fine structure assuming not a Weylian 2 2 fermionic nucleon, but the bosonic monopole from the kGo = 1 initial-boundary condition GmM = kee for mM = kee = 30[ec] = mP√Alpha. 2 The Planck-Monopole coupling so becomes mP/mM = mP/ [e ] = /√Alpha ith f “ = f E /# modulating f(G) = #2/f E = /# ↔ f G {f “ /f G } = # i the s et eaki g f(S)/f(G) = 1/#53 between short (nuclear asymptotic) and long (inverse square).
The short-range coupling becomes f(S)/f(W) = #/#18 = 1/#17 = Cube root(Alpha)/Alpha6 and the long- range coupling is Alpha/Omega = 1/Alpha17 = #3/#54 = 1/#51 = 1/(#17)3.
The strong nuclear interaction coupling parameter so becomes about 0.2 as the cube root of alpha and as measured in the standard model of particle physics in the form of an energy dependent 'running o oupli g o sta t' a d hi h takes a alue of αZ = 0.1184 at the energy level of the Z weakon at about 92 GeV.
The monopole quasi-mass [ec] describes a monopolar source current ef from the unification identity 1/e*fps = h = E*/fps as a fi e st u tu e fo Pla k's o sta t h, a ifesti g fo a displa e e t = /f. This is of course the GUT unification energy of the Dirac Monopole at precisely [c3] eV or 2.7x1016 GeV and the upper limit for the Cosmic Ray spectra as the physical manifestation for the string classes: {I, IIB, HO(32), IIA and HE(64) in order of modular duality transmutation}.
The transformation of the Monopole string into the XL-Boson string decouples Gravity from sEwG in sEw.G in the heterotic superstring class HO(32). As this heterotic class is modular dual to the other heterotic class, HE(64), it is here, that the proto nucleon mass is defined in the modular duality of the heterosis in: 18 2 2 Omega = Alpha = Gomc /hc = (mc/mP) . The HO(32) string bifurcates into a quarkian X-part and a leptonic L-part, so rendering the bosonic scalar spin as fermionic half spin in the continuation of the 'breaking' of the supersymmetry of the Planckian unification. Its heterosis with the Weyl-string then decouples the strong interaction at Weyl-Time for a
Weyl-Mass mW, meaning at the time instanton of the end of inflation or the Big Bang in sEw.G becoming s.Ew.G.
The X-Boson then transforms into a fermionic proto nucleon triquark-component (of energy ~ 10-27 kg or 560 MeV) and the L-Boson transforms into the proto-muon (of energy about 111 MeV).
The electroweak decoupling then occurs from a time marker about 1/140th of a second from the QBBS at a temperature of 1.658x1015 K* for a Fermi-Expectation Energy about 1/365 seconds after the Big Bang at a temperature of about 3.4x1015 K and at a 'Higgs Boson' energy of about 298 GeV.
A Bosonic decoupling preceded the electroweak decoupling about 2 nanoseconds into the cosmogenesis 20 at the Weyl-temperature of so TWeyl = Tmax = EWeyl/kB = 1.4x10 K as the maximum Black Hole temperature maximized in the Hawking MT modulus and the Hawking-Gibbons formulation: McriticalTmin 2 3 -29 = ½MPlanckTPlanck = h / Go)(c /2kB) = hc / kBGo for Tmin = 1.4x10 K and Boltzmann constant kB. The Hawking Radiation formula results in the scaling of the Hawking MT modulus by the factor of the 'U ified Field' spa i g a displa e e t s ale of adia s o ° i the displa e e t of ps.
3 15 The XL-Boson mass is given in the quark-component: mX = # mWeyl/[ec]|mod = 1.9x10 GeV modulated in (SNI/EMI= {Alpha}/[Alpha]), the intrinsic unified Strong-Electroweak Interaction-Strength for the Kernel part in the Quark-Lepton hierarchy. 2 2 The LX-Boson mass is given in the lepton-component: mL = Omega.[ec]/# = ([Omega]x([ec])/(mps. α ) = 52 # [ec/mWeyl] ~ 111 MeV in functional operators f(G)xf(S) = 1 for the Ring part in the Quark-Lepton hierarchy.
2 2 In particular f(G)/mplanck ↔ # /[ec] for #(mps/mplanck)f(G) and the X-Boson and f(S).mplanck ↔ [ec]/# for 54 # [(mplanck/mps)f(S) for the L-Boson.
The X-Boso 's ass is: [Alpha α] ps/[ec]) modulated in (SNI/EMI= {Alpha}/[Alpha]), the intrinsic 2 unified Strong-Electroweak Interaction-Strength and the L-Boson's mass in: ([Omega]x([ec])/(mps. α ). When the heavy electron known as the muon was accidentally discovered in the late 1930s, Nobel physicist Isidor Isaac Rabi famously remarked, "Who ordered that?"
It is this lepton component which necessitates the existence of the muon (and the tauon and their neutrino partners as constituents of the weak interaction gauge bosons) as a 'heavy electron', as the quantum geometry defines the muon mass in a decoupling of the L1 energy level given in a diquark hierarchy and based on a quantum geometry of the quantum relativity:
Ten DIQUARK quark-mass-levels crystallize, including a VPE-level for the K-IR transition and a VPE-level for the IR-OR transition:
The K-Means define individual materializing families of elementary particles: a (UP/DOWN-Mean) sets the (PION-FAMIΚY: o, +, -).
a (STRANGE-Mean) specifies the (KAON-FAMILY: Ko, K+, K-).
a (CHARM-Mea defi es the J/P“I=J/ -Charmonium-FAMILY).
a (BEAUTY-Mea sets the UP“IΚON=Υ-Bottonium-FAMILY).
a (MAGIC-Mean) specifies the (EP“IΚON= -FAMILY).
a (DAINTY-Mean) bases the (OMICRON-Ο-FAMILY).
a (TRUTH-Mea sets the KOPPA= -Topomium-FAMILY) and a (SUPER-Mea defi es the fi al ua k state i the HIGG“/CHI=H/ -FAMILY).
Kernel-Energy K-Mean(x½) Ring-Energy IR- Ground state Quark Level Comment in MeV* in MeV* in MeV* OR.Mean.in.MeV* K-Mean-IR-OR- Mean
g = VPE-Level 26.4924- L2 2.8175- L = 1.5010 = mu 12.6126 K-IR VPE 14.11355 2 [K-IR] 29.9618 3.1865
GS2=GSVPE= 41.198
ms=2gL1+L1+L2 IR-OR VPE VPE-Level 86.5334- gL1 = 46.100 9.2030- L1 = 4.9028 = md =gL1+gL2+2Lu,d+L1+L2 Ground-OR [IR-OR] 97.8657 10.408 =98.645; 98.604 electron level s = = gL2 - gL1 + 2Lu,d
Quark 282.6487- gu,d = GS =GS = UP/DOWN-Level 30.060- L = 16.014 3 u,d K-KIR 319.6637 150.5781 u,d 134.5641 u=K; d=K+IR 33.997 basis Pionium ubar=Kbar; dbar=Kbar+IRbar
KIR-KOR 98.187- Quark GS4=GSs= basis 923.2302- gs = 491.8401 111.045 Ls = 52.308 STRANGE-Level 439.5321 1st (K)-OR-Muon level 1,044.13 muon s=K+OR Kaonium energy d↔s sbar=Kbar+ORbar KI‘↔KO‘ Resonance
GS5=GScU= gcU = 1,606.53 Diquark 1,435.67 active CHARM-Level 3,015.59- 320.71- LcU = 170.86 Charmonium gcU-LcU-gu,d singlet c=U.ubar=uu.ubar 3,410.51 362.71 Pole mass =mcU*= apparent cbar=Ubar.u =GS +0.L = 1,285.09 cU cU =(uu)bar.u 1,435.67
GS6=GSb= Diquark gb = 5,247.48 4,689.40
BEAUTY-Level Bottonium active 9,849.99- 1,047.6- Lb = 558.08 BOTTOM-Level gb-Lb-gs Pole mass doublet 11,139.93 1,184.7 b=(ud)bar =mb*= =GSb+0.Lb apparent =(ud).ubar 4,197.56 +½(gL1+gL2)= bbar=(ud) 4,719.51 =(ud)bar.u
GS7=GSM= 15,317.25 Diquark L = 1,822.88 Magiconium g = M MAGIC-Level 32,173.6- M 3,421.7- Pole mass suppressed 17,140.13 M=(us)bar 36,386.9 3,869.8 max Tauon energy =GSM+½LM doublet-1 =(us).ubar +½(gL1+gL2)+ in 2nd K-OR-Tauon level Mbar=(us) ½(L1+L2)= M=us and M.Mbar=VPE =(us)bar.u 16,262.00 in b.bbar resonance
GS =GS = 8 D 50,031.25 Diquark Daintonium DAINTY-Level 105,090- gD = 11,177- L = 5,954.25 suppressed D Pole mass D=(dd)bar 118,852 55,985.5 12,640 triplet-1 =GS +0.L =(ud).dbar D D in D=dd and D.Dbar=VPE +(g +g )= Dbar=(dd) L1 L2 in no IROR oscillation 50,091.46 =(ud)bar.d
GS =GS = 9 t gt = 163,420.75 Diquark 182,869 Toponium TRUTH-Level active 343,261- 36,506- L = 19,448.25 Pole mass TOP-Level t triplet 388,214 gt-Lt+gs 41,287 =GS +½.L t=(ds)bar t t apparent =mt*= +(g +g )+ =(ud).sbar L1 L2 163,912.6 ½(L +L )= tbar=(ds) 1 2 173,208.3 =(ud)bar.s
GS =GS = 10 S 533,633.73
Superonium Diquark gS = 1,120,592- 119,243- L = 63,525.27 Pole mass suppressed SUPER-Level 597,159.0 S 1,268,044 134,858 =GS +L triplet-2 S=(ss)bar S S +(g +g )+ in S=ss and S.Sbar=VPE =(us)sbar L1 L2 (L +L )= in no ORIR oscillation Sbar=(ss)=(us)bar.s 1 2 597,225.6
basic.symbol.energy most symmetric particle particle partitioning energy values energy * energy SI quantum geometry name for groundstates gk MeV* MeV + 939.776+1.5013- charged p+ u.d.u=KKIRK m +[L }-[e-]- -] 940.5833 938.270 K 2 ⅓[e 0.5205-0.1735 proton
- - mK+2[L2]-2[e ]+⅓[e ]- 939.776+3.0026- neutral no d.u.d=KIRKKIR 941.8701 939.554 s 1.0410+0.1735-0.041 neutron
charged ± OR* in 1st OR oscillation m - L - 111.04536- 106.143- 105.6584 L 1 . + muon n[Ls : 98.19-111.05]
1822.88- OR** in 2nd OR LM - mL+ 2gs + Ls + Lud charged τ± 111.05+0.9837+52.31+ . + 1776.86 oscillation + tauon . + = . + . +
neutral m - L + e- - + o u.ubar; d.dbar gu,d u,d + ⅓e 150.5781- 134.9776 pion . + . + . + ground state
- ± - 150.5781-16.014+4.9028+~e charged u.dbar; ubar.d mgu,d - Lu,d + L1 + e + . + 139.5702 o - + pion + L1 - ⅓e + . + 135.258+4.9028- . + 941.911+135.26+ o o o neutral d.u.s mn + m + gL2 - L1 + . + 1115.683 lambda 46.100- . +
The VPE-Means are indicators for average effective quark masses found in particular interactions.
Kernel-K-mixing of the wavefunctions gives K(+) = 60.214 MeV* and K(-) = 31.986 MeV* and the IROR- Ring-Mixing gives (L(+) = 6.404 MeV* and L(-) = 3.402 MeV*) for a (L-K-Mean of 1.5010 MeV*) and a (L-IROR-Mean of 4.9028 MeV*); the Electropole ([e-] = 0.52049 MeV* and 3x(0.17350 MeV* for e±/3) as the effective electron mass and as determined from the electronic radius and the magneto charge in the UFoQR.
The rest masses for the elementary particles can now be constructed, using the basic nucleonic -28 -27 Restmass (mc=9.9247245x10 kg*= √ O ega P) for np as 1.71175286x10 kg* or 958.99 MeV* and setting as the basic maximum
(UP/DOWN-K-mass=mass(KERNEL CORE)=3xmass(KKK)=3x319.6637 MeV*=958.991 MeV*).
Subtracting the (Ring VPE 3xL(+) =19.215 MeV*, one gets the basic nucleonic K-state for the atomic nucleus (made from protons and neutrons) in: {m(n0;p+) = 939.776 MeV*}.
A best approximation for Newton's Gravitational constant 'Big G' hence depends on an accurate determination for the neutron's inertial mass, only fixed as the base nucleon minimum mass at the birth of the universe. A fluctuating Neutron mass would also result in deviations in 'G' independent upon the sensitivity of the measuring equipment. The inducted mass difference in the protonic-and neutronic rest masses, derives from the Higgs-Restmass-Scale and can be stated in a first approximation as the ground state.
-28 A basic nucleon rest mass is mc=√O ega. P = 9.9247245x10 kg* or 958.99 MeV*. (Here Omega is a gauge string factor coupling in the fundamental force interactions as: Cube root(Alpha):Alpha:Cuberoot(Omega):Omega and for Omega = G-alpha.)
KKK-Kernel mass = Up/Down-HiggsLevel=3x319.66 MeV*= 958.99 MeV*, using the Kernel-Ring and Family-Coupling Constants.
Subtracting the Ring-VPE (3L) gives the basic nucleonic K-State as 939.776 MeV*. This excludes the electronic perturbation of the IR-OR oscillation.
For the Proton, one adds one (K-IR-Transition energy) and subtracts the electron-mass for the dquark level and for the Neutron one doubles this to reflect the up-down-quark differential.
An electron perturbation subtracts one 2-2/3=4/3 electron energy as the difference between 2 leptonic rings from the proton's 2 up-quarks and 2-1/3=5/3 electron energy from the neutron' singular up-quark to relate the trisected nucleonic quark geometric template. The neut o s do -strange oscillation, enabling its beta decay into a left-handed proton, a left-handed electron and a right-handed antineutrino subtracts
s = gL2 - gL1 + 2Lu,d = 0.041 MeV* as a d* = s quark differential.
Proton mp=u.d.u=K.KIR.K=(939.776+1.5013-0.5205-0.1735) MeV* = 940.5833 MeV* (938.270 MeV).
Neutron mn=d.u.d=KIR.K.KIR=(939.776+3.0026-1.0410+0.1735-0.041) MeV* = 941.8701 MeV* (939.554 MeV).
This is the ground state from the Higgs-Restmass-Induction-Mechanism and reflects the quarkian geometry as being responsible for the inertial mass differential between the two elementary nucleons. All ground state elementary particle masses are computed from the Higgs-Scale and then become subject to various fine structures. Overall, the measured gravitational constant 'G' can be said to be decreasing over time.
The Higgs Boson HB is said of having been measured in the decay of W's, ) s, and Tau Leptons, as well as the bottom- and top-quark systems described in the table and the text addressing K-KIR-KOR transitions. The K means core for kernel and the IR means Inner Ring and the OR mean Outer Ring. The Rings are derivatives from the L-Boson of the HO(32 string class) and the Kernels are the products of the decay of the X-Boson from the same brane source. So the Tau-decay relates to 'Rings' which are charmed and strange and bottomized and topped, say. They are higher energy manifestations of the basic nucleons of the proton and the neutrons and basic mesons and hyperons.
The energy resonances of the Z-boson (uncharged) represents an 'average' or statistical mean value of the 'Top-Quark' and the Upper-Limit for the Higgs Boson is a similar 'Super-Quark' 'average' and as the weak interaction unification energy.
A postulated energy for the Higgs Boson of so 110 GeV is the Omicron-resonance, is inferred from the table above.
The most fundamental way to generate the Higgs Boson as a 'weak interaction' gauge is through the coupling of two equal mass, but oppositely charged W-bosons (of whom the Zo is the uncharged counterpart).
The W-mass is a summation of all the other quark-masses as kernel-means from the strangeness upwards to the truth-quark level.
Then doubling the 80.622 GeV* and 80.424 GeV mass of the weak-interaction gauge boson must represent the basic form of the Higgs Boson and that is 161.244 GeV* or 160.847 GeV as a function of the electro-weak coupling and related as a 'charged current' weak interaction to a 'neutral current' interaction mediated by the Zo boson of energy about 91 GeV* to sum for a 'Vacuum Expectation Value' of about 252 GeV*.
- + o Higgs Boson Weakon WNI-Mass MHBWZ = {W + W + Z } GeV* = {80.622 + 80.622 + 91.435} GeV* = 252.68 GeV*
{(14.11355+46.100)+(1.5010+4.9028)+(150.571+491.8401+1,606.53+5,247.48+17,140.13+55,985.5)+(18 2,869)+(597.159.0)} = {60.2136}+{6.404}+{80,622.05}+{182,869}+{597,159} = {66.6618}+{80,622.05}+{2x91,434.5}+{2x298,580} = 860,716.7 MeV*
Kernel-Inner Ring VPE = 0.04611 GeV*
Kernel-Outer Ring VPE = 0.01411 GeV*
Pion-(KIR-Quark d)-VPE = 0.1501 GeV* Kaon-(KOR-Quark s=d*)-VPE = 0.4918 GeV*
Charm-(Diquark U=uu)-VPE = 1.60653 GeV*
Bottom-(Diquark b=ud)-VPE = 5.24748 GeV*
Magic-(Diquark m=us)-VPE = 17,140.13 GeV*
Dainty-(Diquark D=dd)-VPE = 55,985.5 GeV*
Top-(Diquark t=ds)-VPE = 182,869 GeV*
Super-(Diquark S=ss)-VPE = 597,159 GeV*
Mean-Kernel-Mass Higgs Boson Quark q Diquark Structure qq Manifesto Mean-Ring-Mass GeV* Mass Integration GeV*
K↔I‘↔O‘ KIR=d K1 Kernel-Outer Ring VPE1 Kernel-Mesonic-Leptonic KOR=s 0.01411355 L1 0.0015010 K L ½(K -L ) Kernel-Inner Ring VPE K↔I‘ K=u 2 2 2 2 2 Kernel-Mesonic 0.046100 0.0049028 0.0206
Pion-(KIR-Quark d) Base KIR Quark uq, dq 0.1505781 0.016014 ∑ d =0.1506
Kaon-(KOR-Quark s=d*) Resonance KOR Quark sq 0.49184 0.052308 ∑ d+s =0.6419
Diquark Singlet Uqbar Charm-(Diquark U=uu) 1.60653 0.17086 ∑ d+s+U Active c=Uubar =2.24843
Diquark Doublet Bottom-(Diquark b=ud) bqbar 5.24748 0.55808 ∑ d+s+U+ Active =7.4959 Diquark Doublet Magic-(Diquark m=us) 17.14013 1.82288 ∑ d+s+U+ + Suppressed =24.636
Diquark Triplet ∑ d+s+U+ + +D Dainty-(Diquark D=dd) 55.9855 5.95425 Suppressed =80.622 = MW Diquark Triplet ½{t} Top-(Diquark t=ds) tqbar 182.869 19.44825 Active =91.4345 = MZ Diquark Triplet ½{S} Super-(Diquark S=ss) 597.159 63.52527 Suppressed =298.58 = HVE
+ - o o ∑ MW + MW + MZ ) = 2MHB = (80.622 + 80.622 + 91.4345) GeV* = 252.679 GeV*
For Universal Electro-Weak Unification:
npresent 2 npresent -25 2MBHo/Y = 2MBHoe/c Y = 2.6150x10 kg* fo ‘HBo = h/MHBoc and -18 RHBo = 1.3525x10 m*
2 3 2 o Restmass-Photo ‘MP is ua tized i olu a RRMP .fps |constant = e* for RRMP = 1.41188...x10-20 m*
o HVE - 2MHB = (298.58 - 252.679) GeV* = 45.901 GeV*
o HVE - MHB = (298.58 - 126.340) GeV* = 172.24 GeV* = Top-Quark Mass
Fermi Constant for Electro-Weak WNI U ifi atio fo u i e sal alpha = e2/h:
2 2 2 -3 -5 2 Fo α = α /{√ .MW .(1-MW /MZ )} = 1.5338574x10 .α = . = 1/{298.72 GeV*) for universal alpha = e2/h
Fermi Constant for Electro-Weak WNI U ifi atio fo ' u i g' alpha = α':
2 2 2 -3 -5 2 Fo α' = α' /{√ .MW .(1-MW /MZ )} = 1.5338574x10 .α' = . = 1/{292.81 GeV*) for universal alpha = e2/h
Fo α /Fo α' = α/α' = . = / . fo α < α'
Fermi-HVE α = . GeV* = . - 5.8894 - 0.0206 ) GeV* = Fermi-HVE α' - ∑ +s+d - ½{K2-L2} = 292.81 GeV*
Fermi-HVE α' = . GeV* = . + . GeV* = HEV + ∑ +s+d + M for base o VPE = uubar = M = ∑ d - {K↔I‘↔O‘} o o {M = M + L2 - ⅓ e = 0.1399945 GeV* for M = 0.150578 - . + +⅓ e = 0.150578 - 0.016014 + 0.000694 = 0.135258 GeV*}
Weinberg Angle: 2 2 osθW = MW/MZ = . / . = . = g/√ g +g' ) 2 2 2 si θW = √ - cos θW) = √ . = . = g'/√ g +g' ) g'/g = ta θW = si θW/ osθW = 0.53498967 for g'< g { g'α/gα'} = { . / . } = . = . °/ . ° = . + . fo θW = arccos{0.88175} = 28.1463° = 27.553674° + 0.5926°
Kernel-VPE-Mixing: K(+) = K+ + K- = 60.21355
K(-) = K+ - K- = 31.98645
L(+) = L+ + L- = 6.40128
L(-) = L+ - L- = 3.4018 K2 + L2 = 0.0510 GeV* for Kernel-Inner Ring VPE2 K→I‘ fo Gluo i Ke el to Meso i I e ‘i g
K1 + L1 = 0.0156 GeV* for Kernel-Outer Ring VPE1 K→ I‘→O‘ fo Meso i I e ‘i g to Κepto i Oute Ring
K2 - L2 = 0.0412 GeV* for Kernel-Inner Ring VPE2 K→I‘ fo Gluo i Ke el Base VPE K1 - L1 = 0.0126 GeV* for Kernel-Outer Ring VPE1 K→ I‘→O‘ fo Gluo i Ke el)
K1 - L1 = 0.0126 GeV* for Kernel-Outer Ring VPE1 K→ I‘→O‘ fo Gluo i Ke el
Modular ylem mass:
M|mod = Mchandra = Mm = fps|mod from monopolar displacement current:
i/ = efps/ = e/ ps = e/rps = e.rss = e ss fo i = [e ]. ss as monopolar displacement current i = ss[e ] = e[ ss ] = e[fps ps ss] = efps = e / ps e /lplanck√α = e 3/e = 2 [ec]c2/e = 2 M|modc2/e 2 2 2 2 ⇔ i = efps = M|modc /e for e fps|mod = M|modc for [h/c ]fps|mod = [E/f][m/E]fps|mod = M|mod = Mm by Action Law Action h = e2 Charge2
From Electro-Weak Unification parameters: -21 15 {1eV = 1.0024656 eV*} with T(nEW=4.67x10 ) = 3.40x10 K* ± MW = ΣKernel-Mean = mup-down+mstrange+mcharm+mbottom+mmagic+mdainty = 0.151+0.492+1.607+5.247+17.140+55.986 = 80.622 GeV* or 80.424 GeV
o MZ = 91.435 GeV* or 91.210 GeV
MHχ = 298.580 GeV* or 297.846 GeV
2 2 2 2 √ .Fe i Co sta t G = √ .GF = √ { α/ √ .MW [1-MW /MZ ])} = (1/Higgs-Vacuum-Expectation HVE) = 1.5848x10-5 GeV-2* for HVE=251.19 GeV* or 250.58 GeV
As the Charmonium quark state is defined by the coupling of a double-up-diquark U=uu to an anti-up- quark as c=U.u(bar) and so as a quark molecule as the quark singlet state of 3 interacting quarks; whilst the diquark doublet of bottom-magic {b=[ud].ubar and m=[us].ubar} and the diquark triplet of dainty- top-super {D=[dd].U and t=[ds].U and S=[ss].U} form double quarks; the Kernel-Mean of the Charmonium energy level is added to the HVE and the Difference-VPE levels for the K-IR - IR-OR transitions are subtracted for the quark-antiquark coupling.
- + o MW + MW + MZ = . GeV* ≈ HVE + mcharm - (mK(+)+mK(-)+mL(+)+mL(-)) = (251.19 + 1.60653 - [0.0922+0.009806]) = 252.69 GeV* or 252.07 GeV
- + o mcharm - (mK(+)+mK(-)+mL(+)+mL(-)) = 1.60653 - . = . ≈ MW + MW + MZ - HEV = 1.49 GeV*
HEV = MHχ - mD + mud + 2xmcharm + mu,d = 298.580 - 55.986 + 5.24748 + 3.21306 + 0.15058 = 251.205 GeV* ≈ HEV in Kernel -Inner Ring mixing HEV = HB+anti-HB = 2xMhiggsboson for a Higgs Boson mean of: ½{252.68} = 126.34 GeV* or 126.03 GeV SI.
Mhiggs boson = 2x{55.986+5.247+1.607+0.492+0.151+0.046+0.014} GeV* = 127.09 GeV* = 126.77 GeV SI for an upper bound including the base quarks u,d,s.
Using the 3 Diquark energy levels U,D and S yield Mhiggsboson = 2x{55.986+5.247+1.607} GeV* = 125.68 GeV* and 125.37 GeV SI. Subtracting the u,d means and the VPE mixing corrections gives:
125.68 - (gL2+gL1+gu,d+L2+L1+Lu,d) = 125.68 - 0.23321 = 125.447 GeV* or 125.138 GeV SI for a measured mass of the Higgs Boson.
Quantum Relativity describes the creation of the Higgs Boson from even more fundamental templates of the so called 'gauges'. The Higgs Boson is massless but consists of two classical electron rings and a massless doubled neutrino kernel, and then emerges in the magneto charge induction as mass carrying Goldstone gauge boson. Higgs Boson resonances found by ATLAS and CMS as diquark conglomerates and Diphotons of CERN as Top-Super diquarks
The 'make-up' of the Higgs Boson can be highlighted in a discovery of a 160 GeV Higgs Boson energy and incorporating the lower energy between 92 GeV and to the upper dainty level at 130 GeV as part of the diquark triplet of the associated topomium energy level.
In particular, as the bottomium doublet minimum is at 5,247.48 MeV* and the topomium triplet minimum is at 55,985.5 MeV* in terms of their characteristic Kernel-Means, their doubled sum indicates a particle-decay excess at the recently publicized ~125 GeV energy level in 2x(5.24748+55.9855) GeV* = 122.466 GeV* (or 122.165 GeV SI).
These are the two means from ATLAS {116-130 GeV as 123 GeV} and CMS {115-127 GeV as 121 GeV} respectively. http://press.web.cern.ch/press/PressReleases/Releases2011/PR25.11E.html
Then extending the minimum energy levels, like as in the case to calculate the charged weakon gauge field agent energy in the charm and the VPE perturbations as per the table given, specifies the 125 GeV energy level in the Perturbation Integral/Summation:
2x{55.986+5.247+1.607+0.492+0.151+0.046+0.014} GeV* = 127.09 GeV*, which become about 126.77 GeV SI as an upper bound for this 'Higgs Boson' at the Dainty quark resonance level from the UFoQR (Unified Field of Quantum Relativity).
Using the 3 Diquark energy levels U,D and S yield 2x{55.986+5.247+1.607} GeV* = 125.68 GeV* and 125.37 GeV SI.
Some data/discovery about the Higgs Boson aka the 'God-Particle' states, that there seems to be a 'resonance-blip' at an energy of about 160 GeV and as just one of say 5 Higgs Bosons for a 'minimal supersymmetry'. One, the lowest form of the Higgs Boson is said to be about 110 GeV in the Standard Model. There is also a convergence of the HB to an energy level of so 120 GeV from some other models.
But according to QR, the Higgs Boson, is that is not a particular particle, but relates to all particles in its 'scalar nature' as a rest mass inducer.
It is natural, that an extended form of the Higgs Boson can show a blip at the 160 GeV mark and due to its nature as a 'polarity' neutralizer (a scalar particle has no charge and no spin but can be made up of two opposite electric charges and say two opposing chirality of spin orientations.) As can be calculated from the table entries below; a (suppressed Top-Super Diquark Resonance is predicted as a (ds)UUbar(ss)=(ds).u.ubar.u.ubar.(ss) quark complex or diquark molecule averaged at 182.869+597.159)GeV=780.03 GeV.
https://profmattstrassler.com/2015/12/16/is-this-the-beginning-of-the-end-of-the-standard-model/
In the diquark triplet {dd; ds; ss}={Dainty; Top; Super} a Super-Superbar resonance at 1.1943 TeV can also be inferred with an 'IR-OR triplet suppressed' Super-Dainty resonance at 653.145 GeV* and the Top-Dainty resonance at 238.855 GeV* by the Higgs Boson summation as indicated below.
Supersymmetric partners become unnecessary in the Standard Model, extended into the diquark hierarchies. Next, we interpret this scalar (or sterile) Double-Higgs (anti)neutrino as a majoron and lose the distinction between antineutrino and neutrino eigenstates.
We can only do this in the case of the Zo decay pattern, which engage the boson spin of the Zo as a superposition of two antineutrinos for the matter case and the superposition of two neutrinos in the antimatter case from first principles. So the Zo is a Majorana particle, which merges the templates of two antineutrinos say and spin induces the Higgs-Antineutrino. And where does this occur? It occurs at the Mesonic-Inner-Ring Boundary previously determined at the 2.776x10-18 meter marker. This marker so specifies the Zo Boson energy level explicitly as an upper boundary relative to the displacement scale set for the kernel at the wormhole radius rps= ps/ a d the lassi al ele t o adius as the li it fo the u lea i te a tio s ale at 3 fermis in: RcomptonAlpha.
So the particle masses of the standard model in QED and QCD become Compton-Masses, which are -18 Higgs-mass-induced at the Mesonic-Inner-Ring (MIR) marker at RMIR=2.777...x10 meters. A reformulation of the rotational dynamics associated with the monopolar naturally superconductive current flow and the fractalization of the static Schwarzschild solution follows in a reinterpretation of the Biot-Savart Law.
The Biot-“a a t Κa : B = o / 2 = oi/ = oNef/ = oNeω/ fo a gula elo it ω= / transforms into B = constant(e/c3 g ω
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 in using acentripetal = v / = ω for g = GoM/r = (2GoM/c )(c /2r ) = (RSc /2R ) for a Schwarzschild solution 2 RS = 2GoM/c .
B = o sta t eω/ / 2 = oNeω/ ields o sta t = oN / = N/ = N ith e = 3 2 2 2 2 mM/ fo N eω/ )(GoM/R ) = 30N(mM/ ω GoM/c )/(2cR = N M ω/ R)(RS/R) = 2 2 2 {M}ω/ R. Subsequently, B = M/2c R = NmM(RS/‘ {ω/ R} to give a manifesting mass M fine structured in M = NmM(RS/R) for N = 2n in the superconductive 'Cooper-Pairings' for a charge count q 2 2 = Ne = 2ne. Factor 2Rc is then proportional to magneto charge e*=2Rec =1/Eps with units
GoM=M/ke=4oM
The string-parametric Biot-Savart law then relates the angular momentum of any inertial object of mass M ith a gula elo it ω i self i du i g a ag eti flu i te sit gi e B = Mω/ ‘ 2 and where the magnetic flux and magnetic field strength relate inversely to a displacement R from the center of rotation and as a leading term approximation for applicable perturbation series. The units for magnetic field B reform from the magneto charge units [C*] from Tesla [T]*=[Js/Cm2]*=[J/Am2]*=[kgm2s-2]*/[Cm2s-1]*=[kg/s]*/[C*]=[kg/s]*/[m3/s2]*=[M/C*]*
All inertial objects are massless as 'Strominger branes' or extremal boundary Black Hole equivalents and as such obey the static and basic Schwarzschild metric as gravita template for inertia.
This also crystallizes the Sarkar Black Hole boundary as the 100 Mpc limit
(RSarkar = (Mo/Mcritical.RHubble) = 0.028.RHubble~237 Million lightyears) for the cosmological principle, describing large scale homogeneity and isotropy, in the supercluster scale as the direct 'descendants' of Daughter Black Holes from the Universal Mother Black Hole describing the Hubble Horizon as the de Sitter envelope for the Friedmann cosmology for the oscillatory universe bounded in the Hubble nodes as a standing waveform.
But any mass M has a Schwarzschild radius RS for N = (M/mM){R/RS} 2 2 = (M/mM){Rc /2GoM} = {Rc /2GmM} = {R/RM} for a monopolar Schwarzschild radius 2 2 3 2 RM = 2GomM/c = 2Go(30ec)/c = 60ec/30c = 2e/c = 2LP√Alpha = OΚP. Any mass M is quantized in the Monopole mass mM = mP√Alpha i its “ h a zs hild et i a d he e the characterizing monopolar Schwarzschild radius represents the minimum metric displacement scale as the Oscillation of the Planck-Length in the form 2LP√Alpha~ΚP/5.85. This relates directly to the manifestation of the magnetopole in the lower dimensions, say in Minkowskian spacetime in the coupling of inertia to Coulombic charges, that is the electro pole and resulting in the creation of the mass-associated electromagnetic fields bounded in the c-invariance.
2 From the Planck-Length Oscillation or 'LP-bounce': OLP = LP√Alpha = e/ in the higher (collapsed or 2 2 enfolded) string dimensions, the electro pole e = OLP.c maps the magnetopole e*= 2Re.c as 'inverse source energy' EWeyl = hfWeyl and as function of the classical electron radius 2 2 2 10 Re = kee /mec = RCompton.Alpha = RBohr1.Alpha = 10 { ps/360} = {e*/2e}.OLP. The resulting reflection-mirror space of the M-Membrane space (in 11D) so manifests the 'higher D' magneto charge 'e*' as inertial in the monopolar current [ec], that is the electropolar Coulomb charge 'e'. This M-space becomes then mathematically formulated in the gauge symmetry of the algebraic Lie group E8 and which generates the inertial parameters of the classical Big Bang in the Weylian limits and as the final Planck-String transformation.
This descriptor of a string-based cosmology so relates the inherent pentagonal supersymmetry in the cosmogenesis to the definition of the Euler identity in its fine structure X+Y = XY = i2 = -1, and a resulting quadratic with roots the Golden Mean and the Golden Ratio of the ancient omniscience of harmonics, inclusive of the five Platonic solids mapping the five superstring classes.
The quantization of mass m so indicates the coupling of the Planck Law in the frequency parameter to the Einstein law in the mass parameter.
The postulated basis of M-Theory utilizes the coupling of two energy-momentum eigenstates in the form of the modular duality between so termed 'vibratory' (high energy and short wavelengths) and 'winding' (low energy and long wavelengths) self-states. The 'vibratory' self-state is denoted in: 2 Eps = Eprimary sourcesink = hfps = mpsc and the 'winding' and coupled self-state is denoted by: 2 Ess = Esecondary sinksource = hfss = mssc
The F-Space Unitary symmetry condition becomes: fps.fss = rps.rss = ps/ ss) = 1 The coupling constants between the two eigenstates are so: 2 2 2 EpsEss = h and Eps/Ess = fps = 1/fss
The Supermembrane EpsEss then denotes the coupled superstrings in their 'vibratory' high energy and 'winded' low energy self-states.
The coupling constant for the vibratory high energy describes a maximized frequency differential over 2 time in df/dt|max = fps and the coupling constant for the winded low energy describes its minimized 2 reciprocal in df/dt|min = fss .
F-Theory also crystallizes the following string formulations from the EpsEss super brane parameters. 2 2 2 2 1/Eps = e*= 2Rec = √{ αh e / Gome } = e√α{ P/me} = 2kee /me = αh / e
Here e* is defined as the inverse of the sourcesink vibratory superstring energy quantum Eps = E* and becomes a New Physical Measurement Unit is the Star Coulomb (C*) and as the physical measurement unit for 'Physical Consciousness'. Re is the 'classical electron radius' coupling the 'point electron' of Quantum- Electro-Dynamics (QED) to Quantum Field Theory (QFT) and given in the electric potential 2 2 energy of Coulomb's Law in: mec = kee /Re; and for the electronic rest mass me. 2 Alpha α is the ele t o ag eti fi e st u tu e oupli g o sta t = kee /hc for the electric charge quantum e, Planck's constant h and lightspeed constant c. Go is the Newtonian gravitational constant as applicable in the Planck-Mass mP = √ h / Go). As the Star Coulomb unit describes the inverse sourcesink string energy as an elementary energy transformation from the string parametrization into the realm of classical QFT and QED, this transformation allows the reassignment of the Star Coulomb (C*) as the measurement of physical space itself.
The Mass Distribution for a Quantum Relativistic Classical Electron
2 2 2 We set Constant A in Amec = oe / ‘e for Aß = /√[ - ß ] - 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 from: c (m - mec = oe v / ‘e = mecc /√[ -ß ] - 1) = mecv A with a total QR monopolar mass m = 2 mec/√ -[v/c] )
This leads to a quadratic in ß2: 1 = (1 + Aß2)2(1-ß2) = 1 + ß2(2A+A2ß2-2Aß2-A2ß4 - 1) and so: {A2}ß4+{2A- A2}ß2+{1-2A} = 0 with solution in roots:
ß2 = ([A- ] ± √[A²+ A] / A = { ½- /A ±√ ¼+ /A }[ ...... [EQ.7] and A = -{ ± /√ -ß2)}/ß2 solving (in 4 roots) the quadratic (2Aß2+2-A)2 = A2 + 4A
This defines a distribution of ß2 = (v/c)² and ß = v/c velocity ratios in 2 2 mec.Aß = oe²[v/c] / ‘e
The electromagnetic mass mec in the relation mecA = ½me is then the monopolar quantum relativistic Restmass and allows correlation by the Compton constant and between its internal magnetopolar self- interaction with its external magnetic relativistic and kinetic effective electron ground state mass me respectively. In particular me = 2Amec and is mec for A=½ as the new minimization condition. In string parameters and 2 -31 with me in *units, meA=30e c/e*=½me=4.645263574x10 kg* In terms of the superstring quantum physical theory, the expression -11 3 16 [ec]unified = 4.81936903x10 kg* or [ec ]u = 2.7x10 GeV* as the Grand-Unification (GUT) energy scale of the magnetic monopole, which represents the first superstring class transformation from the Planck- string class I of closure to the self-dual opening of class IIB, as the magnetic monopole of the inflaton epoch.
2 2 E*=Eweyl=Eps=hfps=hc/ ps=mpsc =(me/ e .√[ Go/αhc]={ e/mP}/{ e√α}= / Rec =1/e*
Monopolar charge quantum as Electropolar charge quantum 2 2 e*/c = 2Re super-membrane displacement transformation √α.lplanck = e/c
-31 This implies, that for A=1,⇐ mec = ½me , where me = 9.290527155x10 kg* from⇒ particular algorithmic associations of the QR cosmogony and is related to the fine structure of the magnetic permeability 2 o sta t o = / = / oc , defining the classical electronic radius. As ß≥ fo all elo ities , ou ded as g oup speed i fo hi h ß2=ß=1, (and not de Broglie phase 2 2 speed: vdB = (h/mvgroup)(mc /h) = c /vgroup >c); a natural limit for the ß distribution is found at A = ½ and A = ∞. The electron's Restmass mec so is binomially distributed for the ß quadratic. Its minimum value is half its effective mass me and as given in: oe / eRe = ½me for a distributed rest-mass mec/Re = me/rec in A and 2 melectric = keq²/2Re = oe / ‘e = Ue/c² = ½me fo A=½ a d its a i u fo A=∞ is the u it = fo ß=
The classical Restmass mo of the electron and as a function of its velocity from v=0 to v=c so is itself 2 2 distributed in its magnetic mass potential about its effective Restmass me= oe / ‘ec and as a function of the classical electron radius Re. Its minimum condition is defined by the electric potential energy in mo=½me for a value of A=½ with effective Restmass me being the Restmass for a stationary electron v=0 without magnetic inertia component. For v=c, the mass of the electron incorporates a purely relativistic and quantum relative self-interacting magnetic monopolar value for which mo=0 and the effective me assumes the minimum rest energy for the electron at A=1 and generalised as me=2Amo. 2 The classical Restmass mo=hf/c so decreases from its maximum value as mo=me to mo=0 as a function of the velocity distribution and in the extension of the classical force to incorporate the differential d(mo) = hd(f)/c2 by
FNewton = Fa + Fα = F-acceleration + F-alpha as the sum of the classical Newtonian linear momentum change and the quantum mechanical angular acceleration momentum change in the self-interaction for the electron.
The charge radius for the proton and neutrinos in QR
[BeginQuote]A scientific tug-of-war is underway over the size of the proton. Scientists cannot agree on how big the subatomic particle is, but a new measurement has just issued a forceful yank in favor of a smaller proton. By studying how electrons scatter off of protons, scientists with the PRad experiment at Jefferson Laboratory in Newport News, Va., sized up the p oto s adius at a measly 0.83 femtometers, or millionths of a billionth of a meter. That is about 5 percent smaller than the currently accepted radius, about 0.88 femtometers. https://www.sciencenews.org/article...-slightly-smaller-proton?tgt=more[EndofQuote]
It is the unitary interval between A=½ and A=1 which so determines the quantum nature for the quantum mechanics in the relativistic ß distribution.
In particular for A=½ and for ß2 = x = 0, the Compton constant defines the required electron Restmass of 2 2 2 electro stasis as ½mec = e / oRe} for an effective electron size of Re, whilst for A=1 mec = 2 2 e / oRe for a doubling of this radius to 2Re for ß = x = X.
Using the Rydberg Constant as a function of Alpha (and including the Alpha variation) as R ∞ = 3 2 4 2 3 6 6 Alpha / ‘e = Alpha .mec/2h = mee / o h c = 11.1299104x10 [1/m]* or 11.1485125x10 [1/m] defines variation in the measured CODATA Rydberg constant of a factor 10,973,731.6/11,148,512.5 = 0.98432... Subsequently, using the Rydberg energy levels for the electron-muon quantum energy transitions, will result in a discrepancy for the proton's charge radius in 0.88x0.98 ~ 0.866 femto meters as a mean value for the charge radius of the proton.
2 2 2 Energy for quantization n: E = -Ze / oR = KE+PE = ½mv - Ze / o‘ fo a gula o e tu h/ = 2 2 2 mvR with mv /R = Ze / oR 2 2 2 2 -11 for v = Ze / onh and R = n h o/Ze = 5.217x10 m* for the minimum energy n=1 for -31 m=meffective=me=9.29061x10 kg* and atomic number Z=1 for hydrogen.
2 4 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 En =hfn = h / n = -Z e e / o h n ) = -Z e e / oRec / o h n ) 2 6 3 2 2 2 2 6 3 3 2 3 2 3 2 = -Z e / ‘e o h n c fo / n = -Z e / ‘e o h n c ) = -Z .Alpha / Re for eigen state n and 3 2 4 2 3 Rydberg constant R ∞ = Alpha / ‘e = Alpha .mec/2h = mee / o h c
In the Feynman lecture the discrepancy for the electron mass in the electromagnetic mass multiplier of 4/3 is discussed. http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_28.html
Its solution resides in the unitary interval for A, as the arithmetic mean of: ½{½+1} = 3/4 as the present internal magnetic charge distribution of the electron, namely as a trisection of the colour charge in ⅓= egati e f a tio ha ges i the ua tu geo et of the ele t o i di ated elo i this pape .
The classical size for the proton so is likewise approximated at the mean value of its own colour charge distribution, now consisting of a trisected quark-gluon-anti- eut i o ke el of ⅔= positi e f a tio charges, which are 'hugged' by a trisected 'Inner Mesonic Ring' (d-quark-KIR) as a contracted 'Outer Leptonic Ring' (s-quark-KOR) for the manifestation of the electron-muon-tauon lepton family of the standard model.
For the electrostatic electron the ß distribution at A=½, the Compton constant gives 2 mecrec = meRe for ß = 0 and at A=1, the Compton constant gives mecrec = ½me.2Re for ß2 = X and as the mean for a unitary interval is ½, the electron radius transforms into the protonic radius containing monopolar charge as internal charge distribution in Rp = ½XRe and where the factor X represents the symmetry equilibrium for a ß=(v/c} velocity ratio distribution for the effective electron Restmass me proportional to the spacial extent of the electron.
For the proton then, its 'charge distribution' radius becomes averaged as -15 Rproton = 0.85838052x10 m* as a reduced classical electron radius and for a speed for the self- interactive or quantum relativistic electron of 2.96026005x10-13 c. This quantum relativistic speed reaches its v/c=1- limit at the instanton boundary and defines a minimum quantum relativistic speed for -18 the electron at ve = 1.50506548x10 c for its electrostatic potential, where Ue=∫{ / or²}dr = 2 / oRe = ½mec for a classical velocity of ve=0 in a non-interacting magnetic field B=0. 2 2 2Ue=mec so implies a halving of the classical electron radius to obtain the electron mass me=2Ue/c and infers an oscillating nature for the electron size to allow a synergy between classical physics and that of quantum mechanics.
Electromagnetic Mass Distribution for the Quantum Relativistic Electrodynamic Electron
self-relative-QR-
2 2 2 meo A= oe / ß = 1-{meo/me} 2 meo kg*/ meo kg (vps/c) = ecRe 4 2 2 4 2 2 x root y root 1/{1+rec / α rps } =ke / = 1-{meoRe/mecrec} 2 self-relative 2 meo = me√ -ß ) v/c for 2mecRec -QR-re 2 2 2 = me/γ magnetopolar.velocity.i =ke /mece* ß (iß) 2 n =ke |Eps*|/me for A < ½ ß2 (iß)2 c (m/s)* c ⇒ for A < ½ 2 ⇒ rec = Re/γ = √ -ß ) Re rec /Re = me/mec in m*
algorithmic metaphysicality 0 0 ± 0 1/0+ -1/0+ [1/0+]m i/0+ [ ] R e inflaton spacetime as e complex vps = ic = ci
1 c
-2.914213562 1+½√2 = 0 i 1 (2/0+)R 1- -1 = i2 -4.82842714 e ½√2 = ±1.914213562 0 0 0.292893218 x-root is complex y-root is 0 R complex e
{1-
- ½√2}+O(10 v 2 2} 17) -0.999999999.... ps= 2παc/√{1+4π α =0.045798805 ic = ß 2 = - {i.m }2 = 349,065,850. compleximage e/αmps 0+ i- 13,739,641.79 [m/s]* 0.292893218+ 2.914213561...... - -4.82842714+ 6 R 0+ r =r =180R 10) e ± 1.91421356200... 1+3.282806345x1 ec ps e/(π10 1.591549431x10-23 - -ß2]} 0-17 {1±1/√[1 5.729577953x10-9 R /ß2 e ~- 1{1±1+½ß2}/ß 2
9.129344446x10- 1.558679858x10-18 ic - ß 2 = -0.034397297 31 0.185i 4.676039573x10-10 1.018 R A = lb 3.068503782 e lb -1.55145054 9.095208981x10- 2.729585632x10-15 0.487459961 31 ± 1.517053242 0.982650855 Re
9.142642017x10- 1.554149091x10-18 ic ß 2 = - A = 1 -0.031582303 31 0.177i 4.662447273x10-10 1.016 R 1 -1.547250706 ± 3.062919108 e 0.488459961. 9.108456831x10- 2.733561478x10-15 1.515668402 31 0.984082159 Re
9.143177565x10- 1.55396695x10-18 ic - 31 ß 2 = -0.031468847 0.177i 4.661900851x10-10 1.016 R A = 3l 3.062693941 9.108990376x10- e 3l -1.547081394 2.733721674x10-15 0.488500361 31 ± 1.515612547 0.984139803 Re
-31 ASI = complex 9.14320282x10 0.488502266 9.109015537x10-
[e/m]= 31 1.553958288x10-18 ic ß 2 = - 1.758820024 SI -0.031463495 0.177i 4.661874865x10-10 1.016 R -1.54707341 3.062683324 e x10-11 C/kg =- 9.5x10-8 2.733729293x10-15 ± 1.515609914 δmeo with αvar uncertainty 0.984142545 Re A-root solution complex=real complex - real
A = complex SI 0.488502361 - -18 2 9.143204074x10 1.553957936x10 ic [e/m]= ßSI = - 31 -10 -0.03146323 0.177i 4.661873808x10 1.016 Re 1.758820024 -1.547073013 3.062682796 - -15 -11 9.109016786x10 2.733729603x10 x10 C/kg ± 1.515609783 31 0.984142657 Re with αvar min
9.143712983x10- 1.553784965x10-18 ic A = 31 3u ß 2 = -0.03135541 -3.06246881 0.177i 4.661354894x10-10 1.016 R 0.488540761 3u 9.109523792x10- e -1.54691211 2.733881762x10-15 31 ± 1.5155567 0.984197434 Re
9.151423661x10- 1.551167736x10-18 ic A = - 31 5l ß5l2 = -0.029721051 0.172i 4.653503207x10-10 1.015 R 0.489123658 3.059224489 9.117205639x10- e -1.54447277 2.73618718x10-15 31 ± 1.514751719 0.985027384 Re
9.151957085x10- 1.550986921x10-18 ic A = - 31 5u ß 2 = -1.544303917 -0.029607935 0.172i 4.652960762x10-10 1.015 R 0.489164058 5u 3.058999899 9.117737069x10- e ± 1.514695982 2.736346668x10-15 31 0.9850848 Re
m = m = m eo e ec 9.290527148x10- ½ -3/2 ± 3/2 0.0 -3 0 1.5050654x10-18 c R 31 e 2.7777777...x10-15 9.255789006x10- = 1.00 R 31 e
ß 2 = - 9.280778463x10- 1.508228953x10-18 c realimage - 0.50078795 1.496853158 0.002097530539 31 0.0458 4.524686858x10-10 1.001576 R 2.995803844 e ± 1.498950686 0.00209752801 9.246076772x10- 2.774863014x10-15 31 0.998950685 Re
9.151059822x10-
A = - 31 4l 0.029798201 0.173 1.551286282x10-18 c 1.015 R 0.511459239 ß 2 = -1.455190021 2.940178243 9.1163843161x1 e 4l 2.73608263x10-15 ± 1.484988222 0-31 = 0.98498975 Re
9.15057674x10-31 A = - 4u ß 2 = 0.029900632 9.116361885x10- 0.173 1.55145488x10-18 c 1.015 R 0.511499639 4u 2.939971818 e -1.455035593 31 2.73593396x10-15 ± 1.484936225 = 0.98493623 Re
9.150093721x10-
A = - 31 0.1732.8 2 ß 2 = 0.030003044 1.55161873x10-18 c 1.015 R 0.511540039 2 2.939765424 9.115880672x10- 6 e -1.45488119 2.7357895x10-15 31 ± 1.484884234 = 0.98488423 Re
9.143613382x10- - A = ß 2 = 0.031376513 31 0.177 1.553818818x10-18 c 1.016 R 6l 6l 2.936996915 e 0.512082536 -1.452810201 9.109424564x10- 2.73385198x10-15 31 ± 1.484186714 = 0.98418671 Re
A = real SI 0.512116936 [1.02/1.02]m ß 2 = - e√(1 [e/m]= SI 0.031463496 -x) 0.177 1.553958371x10-18 c 1.016 R -1.452679026 2.936821548 e 1.758820024 9.14320282x10-31 2.73372922x10-15 -11 ± 1.484142522 - x10 C/kg 9.109015537x10 = 0.98414252 Re 31 with αvar max
9.143130852x10- - A = ß 2 = 0.031478742 31 0.177 1.553982826x10-18 c 1.016 R 6u 6u 2.936790887 e 0.512122936 -1.452656072 9.108943838x10- 2.73370771x10-15 31 ± 1.484134815 = 0.98413478 Re
9.138156632x10- - A = ß 2 = 0.032532283 31 0.180 1.555675057x10-18 c 1.017 R ub ub 2.934666453 e 0.512540039 -1.451067085 9.103988218x10- 2.73222047x10-15 31 ± 1.483599368 = 0.98359937 Re
[1.24/1.24]m -1.116025404 e√(1 2.006753867x10-18 c - -x) ±1.366025404 v = 6.020261601x10-9 4( -1) ¼ 2.482050080 8.045832525x10- 0.500 ps 1.238 R ⅔√3 - 2.405626121x10-15 e 0.618802153 8 31 = 0.866025403 R ¼(1+2√3)±½√(4+2√ - 8.015748411x10- e 3) (¾+√3) 31
-x) ¾ [3/2]⅔me√(1 7.045060062x10- Mean: - 0.424972405 -2.09164 0.652 3R /2 ± √(19/12) 31 2.617379438x10-18 c e ½{½+1} - -9 7.018717929x10 vps = 7.852138314x10 ∑surface 31 2.10640483x10-15 charge = 0.75830574 Re
[5/3]⅗me√(1-x) - 6.542012566x10- 3.035381866x10-18 c -7/10 ± √(29/20) 0.504159457 31 0.710 -10 5Re/3 ∑Volume 1.904159458 vps = 9.106145598x10 charge 6.517551374x10- 1.9559985x10-15 31 = 0.70415946 Re
[2]½m -x) e√(1 - 5.741861551x10- 1 - 0.618033988 0.786 3.94031237x10-18 c 2 R ½ ± ½√(5) 1.618033988 31 e v = 1.182093711x10-9 5.720392198x10- ps 1.71676108x10-15 31 = 0.61803399 Re
[3.41/3.41]m e√(1 -1 = i2 -x) 8.77216401x10-18 c 0.828427125 3.414213562 -0.085786437 3.848262343x10- 0.910 2.631649203x10-9 1+½√2 = R 1.707106781 ±0.914213562 y-root is 31 1.150593228x10-15 e x-root is real - = (2+√2) Re complex 3.833873334x10 0.414213562 Re 31 =( √2 - 1) Re
[4]⅙me√(1-x) - 3.400568951x10- 2 0.866025403 0.931 4 R 0 ± ½√(3) 0.866025403 31 1.123396092x10-17 c e 3.387853908x10- 3.370188275x10-9 31 1.01673724x10-15 = 0.36602540 Re [4.94/4.94]m e√(1 -x) - 0.095491515 ± 2.870930718x10- 4.94427206 2.47213603 0.904508501 0.713525547 0.951 1.576125021x10-17 c 0.809016986 31 R 1 4.728375064x10-9 e 2.860196042x10- R = 31 proton 0.85838052x10-15 = 0.309016987 Re
-x) - [6]⅙me√(1 3 0.930429282 2.450493743x10- 0.965 2.163360455x10-17 c 6 R ± √(7/12) 0.597195949 e 31 6.490081364x10-9 2.44133112x10-31 7.32673935x10-16 = 0.26376262 Re
[8]⅛me√(1-x) - 1.924131173x10- 3.50886558x10-17 c 4 0.957106781 0.978 8 R ¼ ± √(½) 0.457106781 31 1.052659674x10-8 e 1.916936668x10- 5.75296616x10-16 31 = 0.20710678 Re
[#/#]me√(1-x) 5.323079946x10- 174,532,925.3 39
- -ß2]} 0.999999999.... 5.303176457x10- qbb boundary of {1±1/√[1 0.499999...4 ± 349,065,850. /ß2 {m }2 = 39 0.999 physicality 0.500000...5 e/αmps -0.000000...1 6 R ~- 1- minimum mass e ~ ½- ± ½+ 1{1±1+½ß2}/ß 3.282806345x10-17 (electron- 0.045798805 c 2 neutrino) 13,739,641.79 0.00297104794 rec = rps =(me/αmps)Re eV* 1.59154943x10-23 2 -9 mνe =mvτ = 5.7296x10 Re = 0. 002982..eV*
algorithmic - + - + - - [∞ ]0 me√(1- - metaphysicality ∞ ½ ± ½ 1 0 1 [∞] Re x)=me inflaton spacetime as meo=0+ complex vps = ic = ci The X-root is always positive in an interval from 0 to 1 and the Y-root is always negative in the interval from -3 to 0. 2 - + - - 2 2 fo A=∞: ß =½ ±½ for roots x=1 and y=0 ; for v=c with Um = (½v oe / ‘e 2 2 2 2 2 = (½v oe / ‘e = ½mec = mmagneticc = melectricc and mo = 0me Aß2 = ([1-ß2]-½-1) = 1+½ß2-3ß4/8+5ß6/16 -35ß8/128+...-1
The Binomial Identity gives the limit of A=½ in: A=½ - ß2{3/8 - 5ß2/16 + 35ß4/128 -...} and as the non- relativistic low velocity approximation of E=mc² as KE=½mov².
2 Letting ß =n, we obtain the Feynman-Summation or Path-Integral for dimensionless cycle time n = Hot = ct/RHubble with Ho=dn/dt in the UfoQR for 1 = (1-ß2)(1+ß2)2 as ß4+ß2-1=0 for T(n) = n(n+1 )= 1.
From the unification polynomial U(x) = x4 + 2x3 - x2 - 2x + 1 = 0 and derivative U'(x) = 4x3 + 6x2 -
2x - 2 with minimum roots at x1 = X and x2 = -(X+1) = Y and maximum root at x3 = ½ we form the factor distribution (1-X)(X)(1+X)(2+X) = 0 and form a unification proportionality:
SNI:EMI:WNI:GI = [Strong Nuclear Interaction #]:[Electromagnetic Interaction #3]:[Weak Interaction #18]:[Gravitational Interaction #54] under the Grand Unification transformation of X alpha α
⇔ X α in ℵ(Transformation)
3 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 = {ℵ}⇔ : X → α{#} → # → # → (# ) →{(# ) } ……………….[EQ.8]
This redefines the Interaction proportion as: SNI:EMI:WNI:GI = [#]:[#3]:[#18]:[#54] = [1X]:[X]:[1+X]:[2+X] for the X Alpha Unification, which is of course indicated in the unitary interval from A = 0 to A =1 in the ß2 distribution for the electron mass.
#:#3 SNI:EMI [1-X]:[X] X X -⅔ Invariant X-Boson α 1/ 2 Upper Bound #-2 α SNI:WNI [1-X]:[1+X] [2X-1] X3 #:#18 α-⅓ #-17 1/ α17
SNI:GI [1-X]:[2+X] [1-X]2 X4 #:#54 #-53 α-⅓ 1/ α53
EMI:WNI [X]:[1+X] [1-X] X2 #3:#18 α-5 #-15 1/ α15
EMI:GI [X]:[2+X] [2X-1] X3 #3:#54 #-51 α-17 1/ α51
WNI:GI [1+X]:[2+X] X #18:#54 α-12 Invariant L-Boson #-36 1/ α36 Lower Bound
For the unitary interval at A=½ the Compton constant defines me.Re, but at A=1, the constancy becomes ½me.2Re a d at the a e age alue at A=¾ it is ⅔ e.(3/2)Re. This crystallizes the multiplying (4/3) factor calculated from the integration of the volume element to calculate the electromagnetic mass in the Feynman lecture and revisited further on in this paper. if the electrostatic potential energy is proportional to half the electron mass is changed by a factor of / , the the full ele t o ass ill e odified to ⅔ of its alue. Using the ß2 velocity distribution, one can see this (4/3) factor in the electromagnetic mass calculation to be the average between the two A-values as ½(½+1) = ¾ for a corrected electron ass of ⅔ e and for a surface distribution for the electron. The problem with the electromagnetic mass so becomes an apparent 'missing mass' in its distribution between the electric- and magnetic external fields and the magnetopolar self- interaction fields as indicated in this paper.
In the diagram above the mass of the electron is distributed as mec in the unitary interval applied to the Compton constant and where exactly half of it can be considered imaginary or complex from A=0 to A=½. The mass of the electron at A=0 is however simply half of its effective mass me, which is realised at the half-way point at A=½ as the new origin of the electron's electrostatic energy without velocity in the absence of an external magnetic field. We have seen however, that the electrostatic electron carries a minimum eigen-velocity and so magnetopolar -18 self-energy, calculated as vps = 1.50506548x10 c and manifesting not as a dynamic external -16 2 14 motion, but as fαω = 2.84108945x10 = ∑fss = ∑ ssc /h = fαω/fss = 8.52326834x10 mass- or frequency self-states.
2 2 M-Sigma conformal mapping onto {meo/me} in the ß distribution
2 ⅔ As the ß distribution is bounded in {Aub - Alb = ⅔α } as a sub-unitary interval in a smaller sub-interval of ½αvar; the SI-CODATA value for the Restmass of the electron is derived from first inflaton-based principles in a conformal mapping of the M-Sigma relation applied to the Black Hole Mass to Galactic Bulge ratio for the alpha bound.
Minimum Planck Oscillator ½|Eo| |Eps|* = 1/|e*| ½|Eps| ¾|Eps| 1|Eps| 5/4|Eps| 3/2|Eps| Value in energy (Joules; Joules*) 1/1000 1/500 1/400 ⇔ / ⅔ / ⅓ Value as modulated to A-interval as M-Sigma 1x10-3 1.5x10-3 2x10-3 2.5x10-3 3x10-3
-6 -6 -6 -6 -6 |Eps|*/|e*| to reunitize-renormalize E*e*=1 2x10 3x10 4x10 5x10 6x10
⅔- alue i pa titio i te al ⅔ e.(3/2)Re for mean A=¾ 1/2 3/4 1 5/4 3/2 Fraction of Renormalization effect 1/3 1/2 2/3 5/6 1
2x10-6 6x10-6 } in A - A and in A - A 3x10-6 4x10-6 5x10-6 Value of ½αvar 6lb 6ub 3ub 3lb complex real minimum maximum -6 2 The ½var sub-interval so is adjusted by 6x10 from A6ub - ½αvar} = ASI for ßSI for meoSI for the real solution
The Schwarzschild Classical Electron as a Planck function for a Quantum of Physicalized Consciousness
2 2 3 2 mebh = Rec /2Go = e*/4Go|mod-mass = Vrmp.df/dt|max/4Go = 2 Rrmp .fps /4Go = 1.125x1012 kg* is the Schwarzschild wave matter mass for a classical electron with curvature radius Re and effective electron mass me in the electromagnetic interaction E*-Gauge photon of the supermembrane displacement transformation between the monopolar and electropolar universal charge quanta e* and e respectively.
The e e g de sit fo this odula da k atte - o s ious ess ele t o as fu tio of the Pla k Va uu e o es: 3 5 2 3 2 2 planck = mplanck/Vplanck = mplanck/Lplanck = c /hGo = { ps /hGo}.{fps /4Go} = 1.855079x1096 (kg/m3)* 2 70 3 -26 ebh-rmp = mebh/Vrmp = df/dt|max/4Go = fps /4Go = 2.025x10 (kg/m )* = 1.0916x10 planck -23 Mrmp = mfermi = h/ ‘rmp = 2.50500365x10 kg* or 14.034015 TeV* is the Compton-de Broglie wave- atte ass fo the ‘est ass Photo p as the da k atte pa ti ula age t i the UFOQ‘ a d he e edefi ed as the Pa ti le of U i e sal or Cosmic Physicalized Co s ious ess . 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 - Rrmp = {Vrmp/2 } = {2Rec /(2 .df/dt|max)} = {e*/2 fps }|mod = {1/2 hfps }|mod = 1.411884763...x10 20 m* 3 3 for a unitary calibration for the rmp in [m ]* = [s /h]* and [m]* =[s]*/ h for Mrpm in [kg]* = [Js2/m]*x h/[s]* = [Js/m]*x h = [kg]* 2 3 2 3 Mrmp = mfermi = h/ ‘rmp = {h/ }.{ {2 hfps }|mod} = {hfps/c} {2 h/8 }|mod = {Eps/c}} {h/4 }|mod 2 2 2 2 Mrmp = h/ ‘rmp = {Eps/c}} {h/4 }| mod = 2Lplanck c /RrmpRe = Lplanck c /GoRrmp in the equivalence of the 2 Gravitational parameter applied to de Broglie wave matter MdB in 4GoMdB = 2Rec = e* with the Star Coulomb [C*]*as the unit for physicalized consciousness.
Closed Planck-String class I Finestructure Constant for monopolar mass displacement current [M] = [ec]|mod = [ ‘.i]mod: 3 2 -35 Mrmp/mebh = 2hGo/ RrmpRe = 2Lplanck /RrmpRe = 2.226669925x10 = 1/4.491011392x1034 = Order{Planck-Length} Dark Matter-Physicalized Consciousness Finestructure Constant: -5 Re/Rrmp = GoMrmpmebh/hc = 62,625.09124 = 1/1.596804061x10
The nature of the universal Schwarzschild classical electron as a high-density form of de Broglie wave matter so becomes an elementary agency for quantum gravity manifesting from the hyperspace of the multi-dimensional cosmology as non-Baryonic form of matter energy and is related to the definition of physicalized consciousness in the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity (UFOQR). The UFOQR is based on Vortex-Potential-Energy or VPE as the non-virtual, but Goldstone Boson gauged Zero-Point-Energy Heisenberg matrix of spacetimes.
Epilogue:
The birth of the universe in space and time from physicalized universal consciousness
Time began, when the nonexistent and the uncreated became conscious of itself and what It was, as also being It as the existent and as the created. The difference between the uncreated and the created then describes the concept of time as a process fo It of e o i g o s ious of itself i the fo of a u i e sal self, usi g ti e pote tials to e pe ie e itself as a form of energy. It eated itself as a u i e sal self i ealizing its own potential from the uncreated state of It i o ti e to eate itself i Now time , a d the efo e gi i g i th to ti e. Consciousness so is a form of source energy, which forms a relationship between the nonexistent and uncreated and the existent and created. This original consciousness also forms a partnership between the energy forms in existence and the energy forms not in existence in the form of the consciousness energy as imagination.
The ot e isti g o Nothi g ess of a pote tial a d ete al oid as as O e ith the Every thingness of All that It could have been a d as as All That Is a d ould e i a ealizatio of the e e g potentials contained in the eternity of the void. A d the o e e t a d d a i of diffe e tiati g the pote tials of the ould ha e ee f o the pote tials of the ould e e a e the defi itio of diffe e tiati g the o de of before and after as a flow of time from the relative past to the relative present to the relative future.
The imagination in self-consciousness so exists to realize the potentials of the source energy in a form of the forethought realizing itself as the afterthought. This process connects the time relative past with experienced realized energy potentials through the time relative present moment or now time to the time relative future with not experienced and unrealized energy potentials of the source energy, albeit distributed in the parts of the source energy.
The sou e e e g so e pe ie es the flo of ti e as a p i iple of o de where event B cannot occur before event A has become happenstance in the realization of a relative time potential. The relativity of time potentials then becomes self-relative in the form of the source energy and its partition into sub structures of the precursor or parent source energy. The duration between events A and B so becomes a function of the relativity of time as experienced or measured or counted in the distributed forms of the source energy and as a self-relativity of the worlds within worlds of an encompassing overworld or super realm of the source energy.
This super world is known as universe emerging from a protoverse to evolve into a multiverse and being encompassed as an omniverse as a necessary boundary- and initial condition to enable the source energy experience itself through the time potentials in a spacetime interwoven with the time potentials. The i th of the u i e se is k o as the sepa atio of a o ld a o e alled Hea e A o e f o a o ld elo alled Ea th Belo i the eatio of a spa eti e i o alled the Fi a e t . This p o ess as the sepa atio of the Noti e f o the Now time a d defi es the original realization of the original time potential by the source energy. This process is also known as a quantum fluctuation of a mathematical singularity, physicalizing the metaphysical or spiritual universe without the parameter of spacetime within a spacetime defined in the mathematical singularity. The creation and birth of time so also gave birth to spacetime in the form of the mathematical singularity defining both a space parameter and a time parameter to become i te o e o ua tu e ta gled ith ea h othe i a spa eti e pa a ete , k o as the wormhole parameter of a quantum tunnel connecting the two worlds separated by the firmament of the spacetime mirror.
The quantum tunnel, connecting heaven to earth, so is also known as a Einstein-Rosen bridge connecting a Planck-Stoney cosmology to a Weyl-Hawking cosmology in the utility of a 12-dimensional Vafa-Witten spacetime mirror. The Planck-Stoney cosmology then forms the higher dimensional universe known as the membrane- superstring physics using the 11th dimension in a mirror symmetry to connect the 12th dimension of an old hea e to the th di e sio of a old ea th , emerging or evolving from the 1st dimension and mirroring a 0th or Null dimension in the 13th di e sio as a ou da fo the old hea e . The lower dimensional universe is bounded in the 1st dimension and so is the mirror image of the 12th dimension across the mirror of the 11th dimension, which so is also the 2nd dimension in the root reduction of the numbers 12=1+2=3 with 11=1+1=2 and 10=1+0=1. The lower dimensional universe so occupies the spacetime of 3 space dimensions and connects to the higher dimensional universe in a 4th spacetime dimension.
The 4th dimension so is a time dimension, which can also be a space dimension, should the higher dimensional universe reconfigure itself by using the spacetime mirrors of the 2nd and 11th dimensions in a transformation of the 8 dimensions between dimensions 2 and 11 and in using the quantum tunnel as the thickness of the universal mirror of universal time. The 3rd space dimension so is born and created in transforming the 8 dimensions in the quantum tunnel as a new mirror of time as the 7th dimension separating dimensions 8, 9 and 10 from dimensions 4, 5 and 6 in a trio of time dimensions 4, 7 and 10. The mathematical singularity or quantum fluctuation creating the universe in spacetime from the consciousness of the nowhere in notime, so partitioned a 12-dimensional universe into 4 worlds in spacetime and 3 worlds of 4-dimensional space in notime.
The first world of 4-dimensional line-space of dimensions 1, 2, 3 and 4 is connected to the second world of 4-dimensional space of dimensions 5, 6, 7 and 8 as a 7-dimensional rotation-space by the 4th spacetime dimension known as Minkowski time-space and the second 7-dimensional world is connected to the third world of 4-dimensional space as a 10-dimensional vibration-space by the 7th spacetime dimension, known as Penrose time-space. As the third world of four space dimensions without time manifests dimensions 9, 10, 11 and 12; a third time-space is created in the 10th space dimension, known as String time-space. The three worlds of 4-dimensional spacetimes so are described as occupying line-space, twistor-space, frequency-space and quantum-space in 1-3 and 4-6 and 7-9 and 10-12 dimensions as four worlds of spacetimes connected to each other in a shared time-space dimension closing the 3 dimensional continuum or circle from the 1st dimension to the 12th dimension in time connector dimensions 4, 7 and 10 or the algorithmic sequence Begin(1|0)-2-3-(4|1)-5-6-(7|2)-8-9-(10|3=1*)-(11|2=2*)-(12|1=3*)- (13|0=4*)End forming the boundary-initial condition of mirroring heaven in earth in the dimensional root reductions of 10=1+0=1 and 11=1+1=2 and 12=1+2=3 defining the line-space, the area-membrane- space and the volumar-space in 3 dimensions in the lower dimensional universe but mirrored in the higher dimensional universe in dimensions 10, 11 and 12.
The di e sio s des i i g the thi k ess of the spa eti e i o o necting heaven to earth, so originally manifest the physical universe in the birth of spacetime in the wormhole parameters of the Weyl-Hawking cosmology. It does this in transforming a one-sided mirror, known as the dragon Möbius, defined in 2 dimensions of a 3 dimensional space into a two-sided mirror, known as the dragon Klein. The dragon Möbius resides in the area- or membrane space of the Mathimatia, which is a label des i i g the o s ious ess eal of U i e sal I tellige e also k o as the U i e sal Word or Logos-Sophia. Möbius so is both a 2-dimensional mathematical dragon and a 11-dimensional mathematical dragon connecting its particular membrane space of geometric occupancy to its environmental space as its cave of residence or embedment of 3-dimensional geometry in the lower dimensional universe of the old earth and the 12-dimensional geometry in the higher dimensional universe of the old heaven.
The transformation of the old heaven with the old earth into a new heaven with a new earth then is defined in the dragon Möbius in mathematical 2-dimensional membrane space and residing in mathematical 3-dimensional volumar space changing into the dragon Klein defined in 3-dimensional volumar space and residing in 4-dimensional volumar space, also known as hyper-space within a 5- dimensional spacetime with the 7th dimension of Penrose time-space. The Möbius-Klein dragon metamorphosis of Minkowski time-space into Penrose time-space with the transformation of 3- dimensional line-space within 4-dimensional spacetime into 4-dimensional hyper-space within 5- dimensional spacetime so changes the one-sidedness of the Möbius dragon mirror into a two-sidedness of the Klein dragon mirror. Before the transformation, the old heaven in the 12th dimension is trapped and restricted in the so is one-sidedness of the self-reflection of the consciousness of the source energy.
The creation of the universe and the quantum tunnel required the thickness of the 11-dimensional quantum mirror to transform this thickness into its lower 10-dimensional equivalence as a medium of self-reflection for the source energy. The 10-dimensional String time-space so expanded itself through the wormhole parameters of the Planck-Stoney and the Witten-Hawking cosmologies from the 11th dimension as a root reduced 2nd dimension and so creating the 3rd dimension of the line-space in the quantum tunneling of the 12th di e sio th ough the thi k ess of the ua tu tu el as a ti i g a hi e . As this manifested the birth of space and time in a one-sidedness of direction from the 12th dimension to the 3rd and as the 3 worlds of volumars in the 4-space worlds of 1-4 and 5-8 and 9-12 dimensions, the old heaven became subject to the one-sidedness of the creation event of the quantum universe coming into existence from the consciousness or source energy of the creation-creation duality. The old heaven so formed a creator-creation duality with the old earth and in which the creator part is defined in the darkness on the non-reflecting surface of the one-sided Möbius mirror as the left side above the firmament and the reflecting surface of the dragon Möbius, also known as the mirror of the Sabbath rest defining the light of the creation being emitted into the creation as the right side of the firmament below. The existence of the universe in spacetime, then enabled cycles of light and darkness to prepare the time potentials to evolve into a process by which the old earth could become a new earth in using the dragon Klein as a two-sided spacetime mirror embedded in a 4-dimensional space as a 5- dimensional hyper-spacetime. The two-sidedness of Klein would then be able to reflect a processed monopolar electromagnetic source light to back towards the 11-dimensional Witten mirror as a consequence of the breaking of the Möbius mirror destroying the one-sidedness and replacing it with the two-sidedness of Klein. The replacing of the archetypical low vibration red dragon Möbius with the archetypical high vibration blue dragon Klein would so create a new heaven as the image of the new earth.
The creator-creation duality so describes the original existence-nonexistence dichotomy as a dyadic monad of being two things within one thing, but unable to experience the two things as one unity, due to the in separateness of the two things in the absence of the existence of space to separate in. A monadic dyad as two things unified as one thing would however allow a separating in space between the two things, if the two things could become irrevocably connected with each other. The time potentials of the source energy so define the quantum entanglement as a space independent parameter of spacetime as a primary foundation for the cosmology of the source energy as universal consciousness.
The old heaven so released its consciousness energy as electromagnetic-monopolar light to enable the transformation of consciousness into energy forms subject to spacetime parameters derived from the wormhole cosmology of the mathematical singularity geometrically defined in the dragon Möbius, transforming into the dragon Klein using the time potentials of the source energy as universal consciousness. This transformation of source energy was initiated in the Planck-Stoney cosmology, which defined interdependent units for measurement and experience under the guidance of universal principles, also known as the laws of nature. The time potential for the transformation of the Planck- Stoney cosmology into the Witten-Hawking cosmology became realized in the quantum tunneling creating the 3rd dimension from the thickness of the 11-dimensional Witten membrane mirror and allowed the transmutation of five superstring classes of the 10-dimensional String time-space into each other in a gradient of energy between the five classes. The first class so is known as the Planck string, the second class as a Monopole string, the third class as a XL-boson class, the fourth class as a Cosmic Ray string and the fifth class as a Weyl string, the last enabling the 4-dimensional Minkowski spacetime to emerge as a Einstein-Maxwell-Planck cosmology, descriptive of a thermodynamic expansion of the universe as a Black Body Planck Radiator emitting electromagnetic radiation in frames of references relating inertial mass parameters with non-inertial parameters.
The definition of physicalized consciousness in the refence frame of the source energy of universal intelligence
As a noninertial frame of reference experiences a form of acceleration relative to an inertial frame of reference; the form of acceleration becomes the mode of operation for measurements using the laws of atu e. Whe easu i g the eight of so ethi g o the ea th s poles, this eight ill e g eate than if measured on the equator by about 0.53 %, because there is no horizontal force on the weight as the ea th spi s a ou d its a is; ut the e is a fi titious ho izo tal fo e o the e uato , he e the weight moves in a circle about the axis of the earth in a period of rotation of about 24 hours. The vertical reaction force on the weight on the poles exactly balances the action force of gravity without any horizontal force component; but on the equator the vertical action force of gravity is balanced by both, the vertical reaction force of the weight and a vertical component, horizontal relative to the poles, as the fictitious centrifugal force. The gravitational action so is measured as a reduction in weight and in the absence of the centrifugal force component. This example supposes a perfect spherical symmetry for the earth. As the earth is flattened on the poles as an oblate spheroid, gravity on the poles is greater than at the equator as the poles are closer to the center of the earth, than is the equator.
It is so the inertia, which causes fictitious forces as non-accelerated frames of reference for measurement and observation i a lassi al ph si s of Ne to s la s a d Ei stei s e te sio of the laws of mechanics in the curvature of spacetime incorporating the inertial frames of reference of Special Relativity within the non-inertial accelerated frames of reference of General Relativity. The classical physics of Newton, Maxwell and Einstein is based on the geometry of spacetime and is applied to describe the geometry of the universe as an interaction of physical entities within a spacetime of both inertial and non-inertial reference frames. Minkowski spacetime is considered flat without curvature and Penrose spacetime is considered curved or twisted in a geometry of positive ellipsoidal or negative hyperbolic curvatures underpinning the force of gravity as a curvature of spacetime interacting with mass as the basis of inertia.
The physical basis for consciousness as the source energy so becomes the precursor of inertia and so mass in the original nature of a non-inertial reference frame. The mass content of the universe at the creation event of the quantum tunneling of the 12th dimension transforming into the 3rd dimension of the parameters of the Weyl string and as the total inertia of the universe was caused by the non-inertial and so accelerated frame of reference of the source energy in form of universal spacetime consciousness quantum tunneling as a function and derivative of the Planck string transforming into the Weyl string.
The non-inertial reference frame of the source energy so defined the original spacetime unit as a source energy quantum of physicalized consciousness in the Weyl wormhole parameters of creation, also known as a Quantum Big Bang.
The connection and unification between all forms of energy as derivatives of the source energy of universal consciousness so is found in the Mathimatia of the Universal Logos-Sophia, which utilizes the Euclidean classical geometry of Newton, Maxwell, and Einstein as a consequence from a quantum geometry of Planck, Stoney, and Witten.
The Origin of all the energy in the Universe as a transformation of the mathematical-metaphysical singularity as a Planck-Sto ey Qua tu fluctuatio of Dirac’s ag etic o opole It then becomes a quantum acceleration, which forms the basis for a physical definition of the source energy and physicalized consciousness. Angular acceleration of an elementary particle, such as a proton, a neutron, an electron, or a neutrino is known as quantum spin defined as a half-integer fermionic quantum rotation or as a integer bosonic quantum rotation multiplied by a constant spacetime pa a ete alled Pla k s o sta t h di ided . Angular acceleration is by definition independent from linear displacement, the parameter of linear extent being replaced by angular extent. In the quantum geometry of the source energy, the units of measurement or mensuration for the quantum acceleration so assume the form of frequency divided by time or the inverse of the square of time, generalised as the time differential of frequency or df/dt. Logos Mathimatia or the universal intelligence then defines the parameter df/dt as the unit of spacetime awareness, which if multiplied by the wormhole volumar of the Weyl string Vweyl of the Quantum Big Bang will define the source energy quantum from first principles as {proportionality 2 constant}.Vweyl.{df/dt}weyl=Eweyl=hfweyl=mweylc =kBTweyl, in the mathematical formulations for the energy transformations in electromagnetic radiation (Planck) and mass (Einstein) and temperature as kinetic energy (Stefan-Boltzmann) respectively.
A supersymmetry between the electric- a d ag eti field e to s i Ma ell s e uatio s fo electrodynamical energy systems emerges as a consequence of the source energy physicalizing its original energy definition as a form of mass independent consciousness and as a function of quantum angular acceleration defined in a space-less void of the mathematical or metaphysical singularity. The absence of mass or inertia defines the quantum acceleration as the time derivative of frequency as a pure number count not requiring any spatial coordinates or displacements and by necessity relate a frequency distribution as a quantized number field given by particular boundary- and initial conditions, defining a particular form for the frequency distribution once the space coordinates and displacement vectors are added to the frequency distribution at the instanton-inflaton coupling defining the parameters of a Quantum Big Bang redefining the mathematical singularity. The boundary conditions for the frequency distribution then assume the form of a maximum and a minimum permutation count under an inversion duality and as defined in the T-duality of superstring-membrane theory.
The initial condition for the transformation of the source energy as a metaphysical singularity in null space into displacement coordinate-vector space, then defines a maximum frequency permutation self- state unifying with its minimum frequency permutation state in the form of the time differential for frequency or df/dt. In the null space of the singularity, the inversion property so defines the maximum frequency state fmax for a time coordinate tmin and the minimum frequency state fmin=1/fmax with tmax not defined as a limit or upper bound for a subsequent expansion of the coordinate space emerging from the null space.
The eigen state for the source energy so is defined in a source energy quantum of metaphysical consciousness physicalized in a Quantum Big Bang and as a consequence of defining the minimum spacetime configuration in the quantum fluctuation of the mathematical singularity. This null space so is space-less and without energy as defined in spacetime, but nevertheless carries energy in the form of not physicalized consciousness defined metaphysically or in abstract mathematical terms.
The null space is descriptive of the 12-dimensional universe of the mathimatia and remains not physicalized until the boundary of the 5th superstring class has become defined in the physical null space.
The source energy quantum for physicalized consciousness and therefore physicalized energy so is defined as the Weyl-boson of the Quantum Big Bang self-creation event, creating spacetime as the Weyl-wormhole as a transformed superstring class from the first superstring class of a Planck-boson causative and defining the quantum oscillation of itself to manifest the spacetime parameters created in a physicalisation of the Planck-boson as the Weyl-boson at the instanton as the birth of spacetime and coupled to a inflaton as the upper boundary initial condition for the lower boundary as the instanton.
2 At the instanton df/dt|max=df/dt|weyl=df/dt|primarysourcesink=df/dt|ps =fmax/tmin=fmax for 2 Eps=Eweyl=hfps=hc/lps=mpsc =kBTps The physicalized energy expressions with unitary mensuration units for the spacetime parameters however emerged fro the ull spa e, des i i g the highe di e sio al st i g- e a e spa e a d this defi itio spa eti e of the 5 string classes preceded the Weyl-boson spacetime in the frequency- or number-space modulating the spacetime parameters and measurement units to define the Weyl-Eps- boson in the units of the Witten spacetime.
Eps=Eweyl={melectron/2e}√{hc/Go/hc}|mod={mplanck/melectron}/{2e√}|mod and defining the source energy quantum as having units of Inverse electropole charge or 1/e defining a magnetopole charge e*=1/Eweyl as the proportionality condition for multidimensional unification Eweyl.e*=Eps.e*=1 and for 2 2e/e*=2e.Eps = constant = {mplanck/melectron}/{√} = Gomelectron/2e }. In the manifested spacetime from the quantum Big Bang, the magnetopole charge e* has the units of 2 3 2 the gravitational parameter GM in the form of e*=2Relectronc in units [Volume][df/dt]=[m /s ]
Using the mass of the electron and the Planck-mass as a dimensionless ratio, the Planck-mass is proportional to the Planck-length in the quantization of quantum angular momentum in 3 mplanck=√{hc/2Go} with Lplanck=√{hGo/2c } i Pla k o sta t 2 3 2 2 Gomplanck /c=h/2= c Lplanck /Go for the proportion mplanck={c /Go}Lplanck by the generalised finestructure 2 2 2 2 unification Goke=1 from 2GoM /r =2kee /r with the Maxwell fine structure oo={120/c}{1/120c} and the free spacetime impedance Zo=√o/o}=120. Here Go=4o|mod={4/120c}|mod=1/30c|mod. The monopole string class so 'unifies' Electromagnetism with Gravitation via the gravitational finestructure assuming not a Weylian fermionic nucleon, but the bosonic monopole from the keGo=1 2 2 initial-boundary condition GomMonopole =kee for mMonopole=e/Go=kee=[30ec]mod=mplanck.√a. The G a d-U ifi atio ag eti o opole ass so e o es 2 3 17 [30ec]modc =30ec eV* for a magnetic monopole mass of 8.1x10 GeV* manifesting in Weyl-spacetime as a defect in the Higgs-boson symmetry, breaking a SU(3)SU(2)U(1) gauge symmetry in the supersymmetry of a SU(5) string-membrane spacetime. The Higgs-boson, as a universal mass generator from its quantum geometric template; so manifests the magnetic monopole as a magnetic point charge, manifesting in a magneto-current mass equivalence in the modulation of [ec]mod=[monopole mass mmonopole]=[monopolar current imonopole]=[electropolar charge e]x[displacement/time] and where the displacement of the magnetic point charge occurs in the string odula spa e of the ou e of the Pla k-Length as the oscillation of a Zero-Point Planck-boson oscillator defining the minimum spacetime configuration of superstring class one transforming into superstring class 2 as the Monopole-boson and manifesting the quantum Big Bang in superstring class 5 at the instanton-inflaton coupling, creating spacetime in the Weyl-boson and the inflaton. The quantum fluctuation of the Planck- oso is defi ed i the ou e of the Pla k le gth as 2 3 2 4 2 Lstoney=√.Lplanck=√{2kee /hc}.√{ hGo/2c }=√{keGoe /c }=e/c . And modulate the string displacement of the Pla k ou e as the atio of ele t opole ha ge to the s ua e of the speed of light. “u stituti g Lstoney for the mass-current equivalence of the magnetic monopole [ec]|mod=[mass]=[monopolar 2 3 current/Stoney displacement]=[ec/(e/c )]=[c ]mod as the energy of monopole [ec] as a mass in 3 16 -11 16 c =2.7x10 eV*. A monopole mass of [ec]mod=4.818x10 kg* or 2.7x10 GeV* so is upper bounded by the monopole string as a Higgs defect of 8.1x1017 GeV* and a factor of 30.
The p opo tio alit o sta t i u its ass/displa e e t [kg/ ] des i es Ma ell s displa e e t current in the non-inertial reference of the Stoney units of the transformation of the Planck string into the Stoney monopole string. As the Pla k st i g supp esses the pa a ete of ele t i ha ge e i the Pla k displa e e t o Pla k 3 length Lplanck=√{hGo/2c } and Planck mass mplanck=√{hc/2Go} and the Planck time 5 2 tplanck=Lplanck/c=√{2Goh/c } with the Planck energy Eplanck=mplanck.c =h/tplanck and Planck temperature 5 2 2 Tplanck=Eplanck/kB=√{hc /2GokB } f o Ne to s la fo g a itatio al fo e Fgrav=GoMm/R , and from 2 2 Coulo s la fo ele t i fo e Femr=kee /R .
This defines a Planck charge qplanck=√{hc/2ke}=√{2ohc}=e/√ for a Coulomb electric permittivity 2 constant o=1/moc and an magnetic permeability constant o from the Maxwell equations for classical 2 electromagnetism and the electromagnetic finestructure constant =2kee /hc. The electromagnetic finestructure constant alpha a so becomes the agency to transform the Planck units into Stoney units.
2 4 The Stoney string suppresses the Planck- a d A tio o sta t h i the “to e le gth Κstoney=√{Gokee /c } 2 2 6 and a Stoney mass mstoney=√{kee /Go} and the Stoney time tstoney=√{Gokee /c } with Stoney energy 2 2 4 2 Estoney=mstoney.c =h/tstoney and Stoney temperature Tstoney=Estoney/kB=√{kee c /GokB }.
This defines a Stoney charge qstoney=e as the Coulo ha ge ua tu a d defi es Pla k s o sta t 2 2 2 h=2keqplanck /c=2kee /c =2keqstoney /c=h for a unitized finestructure constant being 1 in Stoney units but being about 1/137 in Planck units using the numerical values for the constants of nature defined in the symbols of the mathimatia.
The proportionality constant for the unification of the electromagnetic and gravitational forces or energy interactions so is obtained in the ratio of the Stoney mass to the Stoney displacement or 2 2 4 4 2 2 mstoney/Lstoney=√{ kee /Go)/( Gokee /c }= √{ /Go }=c /Go and the same ratio of the Planck mass to the Planck length in 3 4 2 2 √{ h / Go)/(hGo/2c )}= √{ /Go }=c /Go.
Ma ell s ass displa e e t u e t fo the flo of i e tia so is ua tu g a itatio all e p essed i 2 the constant c /Go a d he e Ne to s g a itatio al o sta t G is applied to a i e tia f ee o assless u i e se defi ed i a u atu e of f ee spa e for the Maxwell definition for the invariance of the speed 2 of light and propagation of electromagnetic waves and in the formulation o.o=1/c and fine structured i the f ee spa e i peda e )o=|Electric Field Strength E|/|Magnetic Field Strength H| =√{o/o}=√{(120/c)/(1/120c)}=120. In an inertia free universe without mass, the curvature would become independent on mass and the 2 4 displacement parameter would be given in the Stoney length Lstoney=√{Gokee /c } and where the 2 2 2 2 curvature would be defined in the proportionality constant √{Goke} in units of √{[Nm /kg ][Nm /C ]}= √[m6/s4.C2]=[m3/s2C] and so the units of the gravitational parameter GM divided by the units of Coulomb ha ge e a d the u its of spa etime awareness multiplied by the units of a spacetime volumar divided the u its of the ha ge e . The ua tu ph si s of this fo ulatio e a les the Κogos athi atia to unitize both the gravitational parameter GM and the consciousness quantum (proportionality constant)Vweyl.{df/dt}=1/e* in a definition of e* being the magnetopolar charge as inversion of the 2 quantum energy formulations E=hf=mc =kBT. Instead of the unit for electropolar charge using the Coulomb [C], the magnetopolar charge uses the Star Coulomb [C*] as the unit of measurement. This unitization of the units of the Stoney length in the Star Coulomb also unitizes the product of the proportionality constant in the Stoney length as Goke=1 and therefore unifies the energy interactions of gravitation and electromagnetism on the quantum level of the source energy.
2 4 2 4 2 This also redefines the Stoney length as Lstoney=√{Gokee /c }= Lstoney=√{e /c }=e/c = 2 3 2 4 2 2 Lstoney=√.Lplanck=√{2kee /hc}.√{ hGo/2c }=√{keGoe /c }=e/c . The Stoney length e/c in the units of displacement of the Planck length, so represents the quantum fluctuation causative for the Quantum Big Bang and the separation of the old heaven from the old earth in a factor of the inverse of the square root of alpha or a numerical factor of about 11.706=1/0.0854 describing the oscillation of the Planck 2 -36 3 -35 length between a linear displacement value of {e/c =1.784x10 m*} and {√{hGo/2c =2.090x10 m*} in star units derived from the free space impedance where the speed of light is precisely 3x108 [m/s]*=2.99792458x108 [m/s] SI.
A fu da e tal atu al la ultidi e sio al u i e se stallizes f o the defi itio of the f ee spa e i peda e )o=|E/H|=√{o/o}=√{(120/c)/(1/120c)}=120 in the unitary analysis: 2 2 2 2 2 2 Zo=√{ H/ / F/ }=√ [Js /C m]/[C /Jm])=[Js]/[C ] = [Action/Charge ] i Oh s [ ]=[V/I]=[Js/C ] and proportional to [h/e2] as the 'higher dimensional source' for the manifesting superconductivity of the lower dimensions in the quantum Hall effect (~e2/h), the conductance quantum (2e2/h) and the Josephso f e ue ies ~ e/h i Oh s [ ].
This derivation so indicates an electromagnetic cosmology based on string parameters as preceding the introduction of inertial mass in the quantum Big Bang and defines an intrinsic curvature within the higher dimensional (de Sitter) universe based on gravitational mass equivalents and their superconductive monopolar current flows.
A massless, but monopolically electromagnetic de Sitter universe would exhibit intrinsic curvature in gravitational mass equivalence in its property of closure under an encompassing static Schwarzschild metric and a Gravitational String-Constant Go=1/ke as given in the Maxwellian finestructures in the string space and as ke=1/4o=120c/4=[30c]mod=1/Go in the finestructure unification condition of Goke=1.
In other words, the Big Bang manifested inertial parameters and the matter content for a subsequent cosmic evolution in the transformation of gravitational 'curvature energy', here called gravita as precursor for inertia into inertial mass seedlings; both however described by the physics of black holes and the associated Schwarzschild metrics.
The Gravitational Finestructure so derives in replacing the Planck-Mass mplanck by a proto-nucleonic mass: 9 mc=√ h / Go).f(alpha)=f(alpha).mplanck and where f(alpha) = alpha . The Gravitational finestructure, here named Omega, is further described in a five folded supersymmetry of the string hierarchies, the latter as indicated in pentagonal or five folded supersymmetry. This pentagonal supersymmetry can be expressed in a number of ways, say in a one-to-one mapping of the Alpha finestructure constant as invariant X from the Euler Identity: X+Y = XY = -1= i2 = e p i .
A Unification Polynomial: (1-X)(X)(1+X)(2+X) = 1 or X4+2X3-X2-2X+1 = 0 is used to find the coupling ratios: f(S)¦f(E)¦f(W)¦f(G) = #¦#3¦#18¦#54 from the proportionality #¦#3¦{[(#3)2]}3¦({[(#3)2]}3)3 = Cube root(Alpha):Alpha:Cuberoot(Omega):Omega.
The Unification polynomial then sets the ratios in the inversion properties under modular duality: (1)[Strong short]¦(X)[Electromagnetic long]¦(X2)[Weak short]¦(X3)[Gravitational long] as 1¦X¦X2¦X3 = (1- X)¦(X)¦(1+X)¦(2+X).
Unity 1 maps as (1-X) transforming as f(S) in the equality (1-X) = X2; X maps as invariant from f(E) in the equality (X) = (X); X2 maps as (1+X) transforming as f(W) in the equality (1+X) = 1/X; and X3 maps as (2+X) transforming as f(G) in the equality (2+X) = 1/X2 = 1/(1-X).
The mathematical pentagonal supersymmetry from the above then indicates the physicalised T-duality of M-theory in the principle of mirror-symmetry and which manifests in the reflection properties of the heterotic string classes HO(32) and HE(64) as the 3rd and 5th string classes, respectively. Defining f(S) = # = 1/f(G) and f(E) = #2.f(S) then describes a symmetry breaking between the 'strong S' f(S) interaction and the 'electromagnetic E' f(E) interaction under the unification couplings.
This couples under modular duality to f(S).f(G) = 1 = #55 in a factor #-53 = f(S)/f(G) = {f(S)}2 of the 'broken' symmetry between long-range- and short-range interactions. SEWG = 1 = Strong-Electromagnetic-Weak-Gravitational as the unified supersymmetric identity then decouples in the manifestation of string-classes in the de Broglie 'matter wave' epoch termed inflation and preceding the Big Bang, the latter manifesting at Weyl-Time as a string-transformed Planck-Time as the heterotic HE(64) class.
As SEWG indicates the Planck-String (class I, which is both open ended and closed), the first transformation becomes the suppression of the nuclear interactions sEwG and describing the self-dual monopole (string class IIB, which is loop-closed in Dirichlet brane attachment across dimensions say Kaluza-Klein R5 to Minkowski R4 or Membrane-Space R11 to String Space R10). The monopole class so 'unifies' E with G via the gravitational finestructure assuming not a Weylian fermionic nucleon, but the bosonic monopole from the keGo=1 initial-boundary condition 2 2 GomMonopole =kee for mMonopole=e/Go=kee=[30ec]mod=mplanck.√a.
2 The Planck-Monopole coupling so becomes mplanck/mmonopole=mplanck/30[ec]mod= /√ with f(S) = f(E)/# modulating f(G) = #2/f E = /# ↔ f G {f “ /f G } = # i the s et eaki g f “ /f G = /#53 between short (nuclear asymptotic) and long (inverse square). The short-range coupling becomes f(S)/f(W)=#/#18=1/#17=Cube root(Alpha)/Alpha6 and the long-range coupling is Alpha/Omega=1/Alpha17=#3/#54=1/#51=1/(#17)3.
The strong nuclear interaction coupling parameter so becomes about 0.2 as the cube root of alpha and as measured in the standard model of particle physics in the form of an energy dependent 'running oupli g o sta t' a d hi h takes a alue of αZ = 0.1184 at the energy level of the Zo weakon at about 92 GeV.
The monopole quasimass [ec]mod describes a monopolar source current ef from the unification identity 1/e*fps = h = E*/fps as a fi e st u tu e fo Pla k's o sta t h, a ifesti g fo a displa e e t = /f. This is the GUT unification energy of the Dirac Monopole at precisely [c3] eV or 2.7x1016 GeV and the upper limit for the Cosmic Ray spectra then as [30c3]=8.1x1017 GeV*as the physical manifestation for the string classes: I, IIB, HO(32), IIA and HE(64) in order of modular duality transmutation.
The transformation of the Monopole string into the XL-Boson string decouples Gravity from sEwG in sEw.G in the heterotic superstring class HO(32). As this heterotic class is modular dual to the other heterotic class HE(64), it is here, that the proto nucleon mass is defined in the modular duality of the heterosis in: 18 2 2 Omega=Alpha = Gomc /hc=mc/mplanck .
The HO(32) string bifurcates into a quarkian X-part and a leptonic L-part, so rendering the bosonic scalar spin as fermionic half spin in the continuation of the 'breaking' of the supersymmetry of the Planckian unification. Its heterosis with the Weyl-string then decouples the strong interaction at Weyl-Time for a Weyl-Mass mW, meaning at the time-instanton of the end of inflation or the Big Bang in sEw.G becoming s.Ew.G.
The X-Boson then transforms into a fermionic protonucleon triquark-component (of energy ~ 10-27 kg or 560 MeV) and the L-Boson transforms into the proto-muon of energy about 111 MeV. The last 'electroweak' decoupling then occurs at the Fermi-Expectation Energy about 1/365 seconds after the Big Bang at a temperature of about 3.4x1015 K and at a 'Higgs Boson' energy of about 298 GeV.
A Bosonic decoupling preceded the electroweak decoupling about 2 nanoseconds into the cosmogenesis 20 at the Weyl-temperature of so Tweyl = Tmax = Eweyl/kB=Eps/kB=1.4x10 K as the maximum Black Hole temperature maximized in the Hawking MT modulus and the Hawking-Gibbons formulation: 2 3 -29 McriticalTmin = ½mplanckTplanck = h / Go)(c /2kB) = hc / kBGo for Tmin = 1.4x10 K and Boltzmann constant kB. The Hawking Radiation formula results in the scaling of the Hawking MT modulus by the factor of the 'U ified Field' spa i g a displa e e t s ale of adia s o ° i the displa e e t of ps.
3 The XL-Boson mass is given in the quark-component: mX = # mW/[ec] 3 15 = Alpha.mW/mplanck=# {mW/mplanck}~1.9x10 GeV; and the lepton-component: 2 52 mL = Omega.[ec]/# =# [ec/mW] ~ 111 MeV. It is this lepton component which necessitates the existence of the muon (and the tauon and their neutrino partners as constituents of the weak interaction gauge bosons) as a 'heavy electron', as the quantum geometry defines the muon mass in a decoupling of the L1 energy level given in a diquark hierarchy and based on a quantum geometry of the quantum relativity.
The definition of quantum consciousness is so obtained in the definition of magnetopolar charge e*=1/Eweyl=1/Eps in the units of the Star Coulomb being the measurement of inverse energy as the inversion of the unit for energy in the Joule as [J=kgm2/s2]*=[1/C*]. For the parameters of the electron 2 2 2 2 of mass me=kee /Rec =h/2cRe and classical displacement Re=kee /mec /and the Compton constant 2 2 meRe=kee /c =h/2c=.Lplanck.mplanck=Lec.mec for monopolar distribution of electron masses and as a consequence of the Planck length oscillation as a minimum spacetime configuration causative for the Qua tu Big Ba g. The su s ipt e de otes the G a d-Unification monopole mass as the second 2 2 2 2 string class where mass m=E/c =hf/c =h/lc=h/(ec/c )=hc/e=[Action].c/e=[e ]c/e=[ec]mod of about -11 2 3 4.818x10 kg* as the Dirac monopole of the GUT energy in electronvolt as [ec]mod.c =[c ] eV*.
The Co pto o sta t defi es the i e se p opo tio alit et ee the size of the ele t o f o poi t -22 -15 like at the wormhole radius at 10 m* to its maximized extent at Re=2.777..x10 m* as a function of its mass in mec.Lec=h/2c, relative to meRe=h/2c, with Lec=Re being the characteristic displacement scale for the weak nuclear interaction as the magnetic asymptotic confinement scale of the gluon-quark interactions, emerging in a kernel-inner mesonic ring-outer leptonic ring quantum geometry for the subatomic quantum mechanics of the elementary particles of the Standard Model. For the minimized classical Weyl-size of the electron at a wavelength of 10-22 m*, the Compton constant defines an -22 -20 effective mass of mec=h/2c(Rweyl)=h/c(10 )=2.22x10 kg* for Lec=Rweyl, which is the Weyl wormhole 2 mass mweyl=mps=Eps/c .
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle relating energy with time and displacement with momentum in the e p essio E. t = . p ≥ h/ applied to the ua tu e ha i al s ale of de B oglie a e atte dB = h/mv and the Compton mass-photo i te a tio = compton=h/ sho s a atu al li it fo the easu e e t of positio i p = ≥ h/ = ½ . Whe p e eeds , the E e eeds i the E e g -Momentum relation E2=(pc)2+(mc2)2 and we can apply this natural limitation on measurement to the position of the electrostatic electron mass in a 2 2 variable classical electron radius as rec=αh/ =α compton={ oe / h}.{h/ ec} = oe / ec and rendering the Compton mass-photon interaction modified in the electromagnetic fine structure o sta t α to elate the i e se p opo tio alit et ee the ele t o 's est ass to its spa ial e te t i : meRe= Co pto o sta t=αh/ =lplanck.α. planck=mecrec The Compton constant ensures Lorentz invariance across all reference frames in cancelling the length contraction with the relativistic mass increase in the product of the proper length lo and the proper rest mass mo as lo.mo=lo . o/y in special relativity (SR) in the self-relative reference frame of the monopolar electron and with = /√ -v2/c2).
Physicalized Consciousness is a monopolar source current Imonopolar, acting on a spacetime volumar coupled to the time differential of frequency as defined by the spacetime awareness enclosed in the volumar. The source monopolar current is equivalent to the mass of the interaction.
2 60 For the resonance energy state, the spacetime awareness df/dt is {df/dt}|max=fps/fss=fps =9x10 frequency eigenstates, defining the volume of the Restmass-Photo ‘MP as the da k atte pa ti le of physicalized consciousness
2 60 -59 3 Vrmp=e*/{df/dt}|max=2Rec /{df/dt}|max=500/9x10 = . … [m ]* and calculates as Rrmp= {5.555..x10-59}/22}=1.933..x10-21 m* for a toroidal hyper-surface volumar (V4=½2R4 for 4 2 3 2 - dV /dR=2 R =(2R).(R ) for a 3-dimensional Horn Torus) and calculates as Rrmp= {5.555..x10 59 }/4/ }= . … -21 m* The resonance state with the source energy quantum{proportionality 2 constant}.Vweyl.{df/dt}weyl=Eweyl.=hfweyl=mweylc =kBTweyl, ={mass/displacement}. Vweyl.{df/dt}weyl={ec/displacement}}. Vweyl.{df/dt}weyl={Imonopole}. Vweyl.{df/dt}weyl 2 = {monopolar mass current = Eweyl = hfweyl = mweylc = kBTweyl Logos Mathimatia or the universal intelligence then defines the parameter df/dt as the unit of spacetime awareness, which if multiplied by the wormhole volumar of the Weyl string Vweyl of the Quantum Big Bang will define the source energy quantum from first principles as {proportionality 2 constant}.Vweyl.{df/dt}weyl=Eweyl=hfweyl=mweylc =kBTweyl, in the mathematical formulations for the energy transformations in electromagnetic radiation (Planck) and mass (Einstein) and temperature as kinetic energy (Stefan-Boltzmann) respectively. The propo tio alit o sta t i u its ass/displa e e t [kg/ ] des i es Ma ell s displa e e t current in the non-inertial reference of the Stoney units of the transformation of the Planck string into the Stoney monopole string.
Di a s o opole e o es the si gula it of the eatio e e t i the Qua tu Big Ba g “i gula it o QBBS as a universal mirror connecting nowhere in notime as a one-dimensional Dirac superstring dividing the timespace of abstract mathematical, algorithmic, and logical definition to a spacetime rediscovering the potential of the timespace in the flow of time and the experience of spacial separation. This serves the universal purpose to manifest the potential energy configurations of physicalized consciousness in the activity and dynamical interactions of physical information carriers. The increase of physicalized consciousness in the quantum acceleration potential df/dt in the cosmology enhances the self-awareness of the physicalized information processors in the potential transformation of restmass quanta defined in the low energy part of the supermembrane EpsEss. As the restmass quanta mss are always coupled to the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity (UFoQR) and the agency of the Restmass-Photon RMP as a dark matter agent for the UFoQR; the definition for physicalized consciousness as the angular radial independent quantum acceleration acting upon any volumar of space ensures the dynamic evolvement of volumar spacetime in the experience of the flow of time common to both the experienced spacetime and its generating timespace. In timespace the absence of duration as a unit count is replaced in the ordering principle for events, independent on any duration count between the occurrence of the events. The perception of spacetime becomes however a function of individuated physicalized consciousness in its scope of resonating with the source energy parameters in the form of the time differential for eigen- f e ue spe if i g the spa ial a a e ess as a eige - or self-state to harmonize or resonate with the timespace definitions made manifest in spacetime.
The inertial frame of self-reference then defines the acceleration of a magnetic charge generating monopolar electromagnetic radiation (EMMR) as a form of the original Electromagnetic Monopolar Interaction EMMI light path of the creation event and where the parameter of a magnetic point charge as the mass of a magnetic monopole becomes the quantum for the RMP as the dark matter agent and as a fifth fundamental interaction in the UFoQR in mirror capacity to the electropolar charge of the electron.
Time began from nowhere in notime at the now time of the source energy becoming conscious of itself and the creation of somewhere from sometime became the logical consequence of the birthing of time as a spacetime parameter and function to enable the original consciousness energy experience itself as its o pa ts o hild e of des e da i the sha i g of the u i e sal o os i self-consciousness. The function and primary focus of spacetime then is to manifest a mirror symmetry between the ancestral original creator source consciousness and the descendent created source consciousness known as spacetime awareness.
The source energy is known and labeled in many ways and including the names of God a d the g eat I AM and gods, as All That Is a d as deifications of mythos and of history in the libraries and records of the history of the worlds. The stories of creation and of the gods so share particular similarities and differ in other aspects as a function of culture and custom and regionality, relative to the scribes and record keepers indigenous to an area, where the records are being composed and collected.
The creative source is known in the Mathimatia of the Universal Logos-Sophia as the universal intelligence or source energy manifesting itself from a timeless and space-independent realm labeled as timespace in spacetimes interwoven in the physical parameters of spacial extent and a timed duration between events. the primary and spacetime-aware. To relate the nospace and the notime with space and time a modular inversion and mirror duality becomes integrated in the creation of a protoversal seed with the potential to reflect and mirror its creation modular duality in the inversion properties of quantization of the micro-self-states and the macro-self-states of existence in the form of a supermembrane consisting of two interwoven, albeit reciprocated parts. The high energy and micro- quantum part is known as Abba as the name of the creator-creation sourcesink and the macro-quantum part is known as Baab as the name of the creation-creator sinksource in a generalised White-Hole-Black- Hole or Yang-Yin or DNA-RNA or chicken-egg or male-female or phallus-yoni cosmology.
The Time fractal of the Genesis Code in Seven Days of Creation
The fractal of the Genesis code is the number 7 as a count of units of time. A full day, as a circle of time counted as 360 degrees, can be divided into two halves of 180 degrees. The first half of the circle can be defined as lightness from a sunrise or dawn at 0 degrees to sunset at 180 degrees. The second half of the circle from 180 degrees to 360 degrees can then be defined as evening to morning of the full day. The period of time from sunrise to noon or midday to sunset of the 180 degrees is then halved into two 90 degree periods defining the upper half of the full circle as the Light of a Day and comprising 12 hours as 180 degrees. The lower half of the circle of a full day then can be defined as the Darkness of a Night and comprising 12 hours as 180 degrees. The four 90 degree sectors of the circle can then be said to be four watches of 6 hours each and where a watch of 6 hours completes 90 degrees of the circle of 360 degrees. One hour of the 24 hours of the complete circle therefore is defined as 360/24=15 degrees. As one hour in a day represents 15 degrees of the full circle of 360 degrees, one day in 360 days defines a circle- or degree year as 360 days. Proportionally then, one hour in a day of 24 hours is the same as 15 days within a degree year of 360 days.
This defi es a sho te ed ti e as a ou t i hou s f o a sta da d ti e as a ou t i da s i 7x24=168 hours being 7 full days. The original division of the circle of 360 degrees into 2x180 degrees becomes redefined as 3½ days of 84 hours of daytime and 3½ days of 84 hours of nighttime. The seven days of creation so are 7x12=84 hours of daytime from morning to evening, followed by 7x12=84 hours of nighttime from sunset to sunrise. The fractal of the Genesis-Star-Genetic Code is defined by 2x7x12=14x12=168 hours as: 7+70+700+7,000+70,000+700,000+7,000,000+70,000,000+700,000,000+7,000,000,000+70,000, 000,000+700,000,000,000+7,000,000,000,000=7,777,777,777,777 full days of creation in one week of consecutive daytime and 1 week of consecutive nighttime.
There are so six periods of daytime from 7-70 and 70-700 and 700-7,000 and 7,000-70,000 and 70,000-700,000 and 700,000-7,000,000 followed by a mirror of half-time and 7,000,000- 70,000,000 and 70,000,000-700,000,000 and 700,000,000-7,000,000,000 and 7,000,000,000- 70,000,000,000 and 70,000,000,000-700,000,000,000 and 700,000,000,000-7,000,000,000,000 The alpha-sunrise as the morning of the 1st day of creation are the 7 days of the beginning and counting from left to right or clockwise with the omega-sunset of the 6th day being the , , da s at the Halftime Κogos Mi o of the daytime and mirroring the 6 days of daytimes in the 6 days of night times. The 6th night of the 7,000,000 days so continues as the 6th night to the 70,000,000 days to begin the nighttime of the 5th full day and following the clockwise motion of the circle in the nighttime from 180 degrees to the 360 degrees of the 7,000,000,000,000 days to reset the 360 degrees in the 0th degree of the sunrise of the 1st day ending the nighttime of the 1st full day and completing the circle of the star-genetic time.
The 1st day of star-genetic creation are 7 days and 7 Trillion nights
as 7 days a d , , , , / = . … Billio Deg ee-Yea s DY with 7 T illio / . = . Billio Ci il Yea s CY {The Age of the universe as a multiverse, subject to quantum tunneling can be calculated as 19.12 Billion years in an cosmology of 12-dimensional supermembrane duality}
The 2nd day of star-genetic creation are 70 days and 700 Billion nights
as 70 days a d , , , / = . … Billio DY with Billio / . = . … Billio CY {A ele t o ag eti highe di e sio al u i e sal age of . Billio ea s defi es a i te se tio etu of the ele t o ag eti light path i te al of . Billio ea s fo a lo e dimensional universal age of 19.12-2x2.24=14.64 Billion years coincident with an age of planet Earth of 2.24 billion years for the onset of prokaryotic unicellular lifeforms transmutating into eukaryotic multicellular lifeforms}
The 3rd day of star-genetic creation are 700 days and 70 Billion nights
as 700/360= . … DY with 700/365.2425=1.916… CY and 70,000,000,000/360=194.444… Million DY with 70 Billion/365.2425=191.653… Million CY {200 Million years is a time marker for the evolution of the first mammals and diversification of dinosaurs in the transition from the Triassic into the Jurassic era of the Mesozoic time period. The time required for the local star system of Rahsol to complete a cycle of rotation about the center of the Milky Way galaxy takes about 236 Million years}
The 4th day of star-genetic creation are 7,000 days and 7 Billion nights as , / = . ... DY with , / . = . … CY and 7,000,000,000/360=19. … Millio DY ith Billio / . = . … Millio CY {20 Million years ago in the evolution of life on planet Earth represents a nexus point towards the end of the Miocene era and initiates the evolution of apes (Hominoidea) from an earlier primate genomatrix (Old World Monkeys)}
The 5th day of star-genetic creation are 70,000 days and 700,000 Million nights as , / = . … DY ith , / . = . CY a d , , / = . … Millio DY ith 00 Millio / . = . … Millio CY {The Hominoidea-Hominidae-Homininae-Hominini-Hominina-Homo taxonomy of human evolution had passed the Australopithecine and Homo Habilis nexus marker to emerge the ho o e e tus o up ight a as a hai fo e u e of ho o sapie s 2 Million years ago}
The 6th day of star-genetic creation are 700,000 days and 70,000 Million nights as , / = . … DY ith , / . = . … CY a d 70, , / = , . … DY ith 0 Million/365.2425=191,653… Millio CY {200,000 years ago ha a te ized the appea a e of Ho o “apie s o ise a as e ol ed from Homo Sapiens-(Devosonian, Homo Neanderthalensis, Homo Heidelbergensis) in the form of A ato i all Mode Hu a AMH Cro-Magnon Man) in the Late/Upper Pleistocene period of the Quaternary era of geology}
The 7th day of star-genetic creation are 7,000,000 days and 7,000,000 nights as , , / = , . … DY ith Millio / . = , . … CY a d , , / = , . … DY ith Millio / . = , . … Millio CY {The last i e age a d pe iod of gla iatio Younger Dryas) in the Holocene epoch 12,000 years ago is defined within the last precessional cycle of precession, defined by a simple day-count calendar of 9,360,000=65x144,000 day-kin of the Maya from [-52.0.0.0.0=4Ahau 3Kayab as 01Mar23,615 BCG (Gregorian proleptic)/27Aug23,615 BCJ (Julian proleptic)= 25Sivan-19,854] to a Midpoint of a 65 Baktun Precessional Cycle defining the glaciation for the dates [-20.10.0.0.0 =4Ahau 13Muan as 27Jul10,802 BCG/18Oct10,802 BCJ=16Elul-7041] to [13.0.0.0.0= 4Ahau Ka ki as De ADG/ De ADJ= Te eth ] as a , , / = , DY ith a , , / . = , . … CY ou t of years for the completion of the fifth of five such precessional cycles of time.}
Dedicated to the supermembrane AbbABaaB for the reconfiguration of an old world into a new world! Queanbeyan, New-South-Wales; Australia; July 4th, 2020