South Korea Country Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Yeni Oluşan Türkistan Bölgesinde Yatirim Konusu: Yapilan Değişiklikler Ve Perspektifler
HABER / YORUM DERGİSİ Yıl: 4, Sayı: 41, Haziran 2019 АХМЕТ ЯСАУИ УНИВЕРСИТЕТІ ISSN 2415-8437 AHMET YESEVİ ÜNİİ VERS TESİ Ақпараттық сараптама журналы Басылымның 4-ші жылы, №41, Маусым 2019 AVRASYA ARAŞTIRMA ENSTİTÜSÜNÜN AYLIK YAYINIDIR ЕУРАЗИЯ ҒЫЛЫМИ-ЗЕРТТЕУ ИНСТИТУТЫНЫҢ АЙ САЙЫН ШЫҒАТЫН БАСЫЛЫМЫ YENİ OLUŞAN TÜRKİSTAN BÖLGESİNDE YATIRIM KONUSU: YAPILAN DEĞİŞİKLİKLER VE PERSPEKTİFLER ЖАҢА ҚАЛЫПТАСҚАН ТҮРКІСТАН АЙМАҒЫНДАҒЫ ИНВЕСТИЦИЯЛАР: ЖҮЗЕГЕ АСЫРЫЛҒАН ӨЗГЕРІСТЕР МЕН ПЕРСПЕКТИВАЛАР RÖPORTAJ СҰХБАТ TÜRK KAZAK İŞ ADAMLARI BİRLİĞİ (TÜKİB) FIRM STATISTICS OF ТҮРКІСТАН ОБЛЫСЫНДА «ЦИФРЛЫ YÖNETİM KURULU BAŞKANI MANUFACTURING SECTOR ҚАЗАҚСТАН» МЕМЛЕКЕТТІК FIRAT DEVELİOĞLU IN KAZAKHSTAN БАҒДАРЛАМАСЫНЫҢ ЖҮЗЕГЕ АСУЫ ҚАЗАҚ-ТҮРІК КӘСІПКЕРЛЕР ОДАҒЫ (TÜKİB) СТАТИСТИКА ПРЕДПРИЯТИЙ TÜRKİSTAN BÖLGESİNDE «DİJİTAL ДИРЕКТОРЛАР КЕҢЕСІНІҢ ТӨРАҒАСЫ ОБРАБАТЫВАЮЩЕГО KAZAKİSTAN» DEVLET ФЫРАТ ДЕВЕЛИОГЛУ СЕКТОРА КАЗАХСТАНА PROGRAMI’NIN UYGULAMAYA GEÇMESİ KANAT MAKHANOV DAULET ZHAILYBAYEV 4 23 40 Asya Avrupa / Азия Еуропа (Haber – Yorum) / (Ақпараттық сараптама) Avrasya Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınıdır Еуразия ғылыми-зерттеу институты басылымы Sahibi / Меншік иесі Ahmet Yesevi Üniversitesi Avrasya Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürü / Ахмет Ясауи университеті Еуразия ғылыми-зерттеу институты директоры Doç. Dr. Vakur Sümer Genel Yayın Yönetmeni / Бас редактор Zhengizkhan Zhanaltay Sorumlu Yazı İşleri Müdürü / Жауапты редактор Dr. Zhandos Ranov Haber Müdürü / Жаңалықтарға жауапты редактор Zhengizkhan Zhanaltay Tercüme Ekibi / Аудармашылар тобы Omirbek Hanayi Aigerim Manatkızı Kanat -
K-Pop in Latin America: Transcultural Fandom and Digital Mediation
International Journal of Communication 11(2017), 2250–2269 1932–8036/20170005 K-Pop in Latin America: Transcultural Fandom and Digital Mediation BENJAMIN HAN Concordia University Wisconsin, USA This article examines the transnational popularity of K-pop in Latin America. It argues K- pop as a subculture that transforms into transcultural fandom via digital mediation, further resulting in its accommodation into Latin American mass culture. The article further engages in a critical analysis of K-pop fan activism in Latin America to explore the transcultural dynamics of K-pop fandom. In doing so, the article provides a more holistic approach to the study of the Korean Wave in Latin America within the different “scapes” of globalization. Keywords: K-pop, fandom, Latin America, digital culture, Korean Wave The popularity of K-pop around the globe has garnered mass media publicity as Psy’s “Gangnam Style” reached number two on the Billboard Charts and became the most watched video on YouTube in 2012. Although newspapers, trade journals, and scholars have examined the growing transnational popularity of K-pop in East Asia, the reception and consumption of K-pop in Latin America have begun to receive serious scholarly consideration only in the last few years. Numerous reasons have been explicated for the international appeal and success of K-pop, but it also is important to understand that the transnational and transcultural fandom of K-pop cannot be confined solely to its metavisual aesthetics that creatively syncretize various genres of global popular music such as Black soul and J-pop. K-pop as hybrid music accentuated with powerful choreography is a form of visual spectacle but also promotes a particular kind of lifestyle represented by everyday modernity in which social mobility in the form of stardom becomes an important facet of the modernization process in Latin America. -
New Directions in Cultural Diplomacy
This is an advance copy of an essay to be published in 2010 by Real Instituto Elcano, Madrid, in a collection entitled “Cultura y Proyección Exterior: Nuevos Valores y Estrategias de Acción”. It is not to be reproduced or circulated without the approval of the author. New Directions Steve Green1 William Gibson’s frequently quoted statement “the future is already here; it’s just not evenly distributed”, applies to cultural diplomacy. The new directions promise to usher in a transformation of cultural diplomacy. They will add new strands of activity, lead to a re-assessment of existing ways of operating and introduce new items to the cultural diplomacy toolkit. This essay surveys the new directions in global cultural diplomacy. A standard difficulty in surveys is the lack of an agreed terminology. Is the field to be referred to as “cultural diplomacy”, “cultural PR”, “public diplomacy”, “nation branding”? Different countries, different organizations, different authors use the terms almost interchangeably. This essay uses “cultural diplomacy” and returns to the terminology issue in its final section. It will be useful to start with a set of opening parameters in mind. Rod Fisher has a seven point list of the principal objectives of a country’s foreign cultural policy. They are: • to promote cultural diplomacy • to develop cultural relations • to support the export of a nation’s cultural products and creative industries • to underpin the development of beneficial new trading arrangements • to attract tourism and perhaps inward investment • to enhance programme aid in developing countries and • To create an informed and primarily favourable picture of a country to the “outside world”.2 1 Steve Green is Team Leader for the EUNIC presidency. -
Korejas Studiju Centrs
LATVIJAS UNIVERSITYERSITĀTE HUMANITĀRO ZINĀTŅU FAKULTĀTE ĀZIJAS STUDIJU NODAĻA KOREJAS STUDIJU CENTRS Visvalža iela 4a, Rīga, Latvija, LV-1050; tālrunis + 371 67034825; e-pasts [email protected] 16th Central and Eastern European Society of Koreanology (CEESOK) Conference “The comparative approach and prospects on education of local and Korean culture (& literature) in Central and East Europe” Venue: Faculty of Humanities, University of Latvia (Visvalza 4a, Riga, Latvia) Date: 29 – 30. September, 2017 28. September 16:00 – 18:00 Registration Center for Korean Studies. Faculty of Humanities (room 105) (We recommend to register on 28. September, if possible. Our centre is just 10 minutes’ walk away from the hotel). 29. September 09:00 – 10:00 Registration Center for Korean Studies. Faculty of Humanities (room 105) 10:00 – 11:30 Opening Ceremony (auditorium 401. Faculty of Humanities) Welcome Speeches Rector of University of Latvia - Prof. Indriķis Muižnieks Head of mission, Embassy of the Republic of Korea in Riga - H.E. Mr. Min Kyong-Ho Ambassador of the Republic of Latvia to Republic of Korea - H.E. Mr. Peteris Vaivars Dean of Faculty of Humanities – Prof. Ilze Rumniece President of CEESOK – Assoc. Prof. Ekaterina Pokholkova Director of the Department of Asian Studies – Prof. Janis Priede Head of International Affairs, Academy of Korean Studies – Assis. Prof. Shin Jeongsoo. Presentation of self-learning Korean text book for Latvian Head of Center for Korean Studies – Assoc. Prof. Seo Jinseok LATVIJAS UNIVERSITYERSITĀTE HUMANITĀRO ZINĀTŅU FAKULTĀTE ĀZIJAS STUDIJU NODAĻA KOREJAS STUDIJU CENTRS Visvalža iela 4a, Rīga, Latvija, LV-1050; tālrunis + 371 67034825; e-pasts [email protected] 11:30 – 13:00 Lunch break Auditoriums 422, FAculty oF Auditorium 431. -
Diplomasi Publik Korea Selatan Di Indonesia Melalui King Sejong Institute Center Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.26593/jihi.v15i2.3415.131-145 Diplomasi Publik Korea Selatan di Indonesia Melalui King Sejong Institute Center Indonesia Naomi Karina Hutagalung1, Junita Budi Rachman2, Akim3 1Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Padjajaran, Indonesia, [email protected] 2Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Padjajaran, Indonesia, [email protected] 3Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Padjajaran, Indonesia, [email protected] ABSTRAK Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi dan mengidentifikasi diplomasi publik Korea Selatan melalui King Sejong Institute Center Indonesia (KSIC). KSIC adalah institusi yang bergerak dibidang pendidikan bahasa dan budaya. Kehadirannya di Indonesia sebagai respon atas minat publik Indonesia yang gemar akan budaya Korea Selatan, khususnya budaya populer (Hallyu) yang mendorong keingintahuan mereka untuk lebih mengenal Korea Selatan. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dan eksploratif dalam mengidentifikasi data pelaksanaan diplomasi publik di lapangan dengan menggunakan kerangka konseptual dimensi strategis diplomasi publik, untuk mengidentifikasi keberadaan elemen-elemennya, yaitu: listening, advocacy, cultural diplomacy, exchange diplomacy dan international broadcasting. Validasi penelitian ini dengan metoda triangulasi: studi literatur dan wawancara terhadap narasumber signifikan dan khalayak peserta. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa KSIC Indonesia telah melaksanakan diplomasi publik dan menerapkan beberapa elemen- elemennya dalam kegiatan di setiap dimensi strategis. Walaupun demikian tidak semua elemen dapat dicakup dalam setiap dimensi pelaksanaannya. Melalui diplomasi publik yang dilaksanakan, KSIC Indonesia dalam waktu singkat telah dapat menarik perhatian masyarakat Indonesia terutama masyarakat Jakarta di mana tempat KSIC Indonesia berada. Hasil identifikasi terhadap hierarki penerimaan publik Indonesia yang merupakan hasil dari diplomasi publik KSIC Indonesia menandai bahwa KSIC Indonesia telah melaksanakan tugasnya sebagai perwakilan resmi Negara Korea Selatan. -
UC Berkeley Nineteen Sixty Nine: an Ethnic Studies Journal
UC Berkeley nineteen sixty nine: an ethnic studies journal Title Stories of Identity, Race, and Transnational Experience in the Lives of Asian Latinos in the United States Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4dm1566t Journal nineteen sixty nine: an ethnic studies journal, 1(1) Author Shu, Julia Publication Date 2012 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California 56 nineteen sixty nine 1:1 2012 Stories of Identity, Race, and Transnational Experience in the Lives of Asian Latinos in the United States Julia Shu Abstract: This article examines the lives of Asians and Asian Latinos who came to the United States after living in Latin America. It focuses on the questions of experi- ence and identity for these individuals and their families, at an intersection of places and cultures. In particular, this essay attempts to compare the relative experiences of Asian Latinos as an ethnic minority in two different social situations: the Latin American country to which their family emigrated from Asia and the United States. Introduction he field of Ethnic Studies is one of inherent change and evolution. After all, no matter the topic, the work of our scholars revolves around the lives of working, moving, grow- Ting human beings. Diaspora studies – the study of the spread and movement of a group of people through time and space – and its related topics of transnationalism and mixed race studies – are often neglected and overlooked, yet recent academic trends show that they are increasingly becoming prominent in university classrooms.1 I first became interested in Asian diaspora studies while studying abroad in Mexico and Spain. -
The Politics of Diaspora Management in the Republic of Korea
The Politics of Diaspora Management in the Republic of Korea Harris Mylonas Assistant Professor George Washington University The Republic of Korea has an elaborate diaspora management policy since the 1990s. But what accounts for the variation in policies toward Koreans in China, Japan, North America, and the former Soviet Union? In this issue brief I explore various explanations for this variation: ethnic hierarchy, with some of these communities considered as more purely Korean than others; the timing and reasons behind the emigration of each group; the skills that each community has; the degree of organization abroad; and, finally, the nature of interstate relations and balance of power between South Korea and the respective host states. Diaspora management is a term I have re-conceptualized to describe both the policies that states follow in order to build links with their diaspora abroad and the policies designed to help with the incorporation and integration of diasporic communities when they “return” home.1 In particular, I focus on the conditions under which a government treats some of its diasporic communities more favorably—e.g. providing them with incentives to “return” back to the homeland—than others. South Korea fits the characteristics of a country with developed diaspora management policies: it has a clear definition of a “national type”; a population outside of its borders that can fit the criteria of this 1 definition; and, since the late 1980s, the capacity to design and implement such a policy. These characteristics together with the national security threats that it is facing and its position in global economic competition render it a good case to test my argument outside of the European continent. -
Chapter 4: the Impact of Korean Immigration on the US Economy
4 The Impact of Korean Immigration on the US Economy MARCUS NOLAND Korean migration to the United States has occurred in three distinct phases. The first phase involved a relatively small number of migrants at the beginning of the 20th century; the second consisted mainly of stu- dents motivated by educational opportunity in the first decade or so fol- lowing the Korean War; and the third started in 1965 with the liberalization of the US national quota system. This chapter examines the economic impact of Korean immigration on the US economy, focusing on the third wave of immigration that began in 1965. This group of Korean immigrants appears to be distinct both from most other national immigrant groups and previous Korean immigrants. They have high levels of educational attainment, with rates of college edu- cation nearly twice the US national average. They form businesses at a rate 70 percent higher than the US public at large, and have savings rates of roughly twice the national average. Their children have achieved even higher rates of educational attainment and earn per capita incomes well above the national average. There is a correlation between the presence of Korean immigrants and state economic performance, and if this were in- terpreted as a causal relation, it would suggest that a doubling of the Korean immigrant population would increase national per capita income growth by 0.1-0.2 percentage points. Marcus Noland is a senior fellow at the Institute for International Economics. He would like to thank Scott Holladay for excellent research assistance. 61 Institute for International Economics | http://www.iie.com Korean Immigration to the United States The first treaty on immigration between the United States and Korea was signed in 1882, and within a few years a small number of merchants, stu- dents, and political dissidents began arriving in America. -
Korean-Chinese) Migrants in Japan: 7KH,QÀXHQFHRI0XOWLOLQJXDOLVPDQG 7UDQVQDWLRQDOLVPRQ6HOI,GHQWL¿FDWLRQ
*UDGXDWH6FKRRORI$VLD3DFL¿F6WXGLHV:DVHGD8QLYHUVLW\ -RXUQDORIWKH*UDGXDWH6FKRRORI$VLD3DFL¿F6WXGLHV No.36 (2018.9) pp.57-71 The Identity of Joseonjok (Korean-Chinese) Migrants in Japan: 7KH,QÀXHQFHRI0XOWLOLQJXDOLVPDQG 7UDQVQDWLRQDOLVPRQ6HOI,GHQWL¿FDWLRQ You Gene Kim* 在日朝鮮族のアイデンティティ ―マルチリンガリズムとトランスナショナリズムが自己認識に及ぼす影響― * キム ユージン Abstract Joseonjok are the descendants of Koreans who migrated from the Korean Peninsula to Northeast China in the late 1800s and the early 1900s (Seol and Skrentny 2004). Since the 1980s under the auspices of Japanese government’s“ 100,000 International Students Plan” Joseonjok as a sub-group of Chinese migrants have moved to Japan to seek out better life chances. During the course of their settlement in Japan, their identity has become multilayered because of their Chinese nationality and Korean ethnicity as well as their Japanese cultural competencies. Furthermore, their identity has been shaped by their multilingual and transnational experiences. To implement this research, I have reviewed Joseonjok researches performed in China, Japan, and South Korea. I have used qualitative methods combining in-depth interviews and participant observation which have been performed in the Tokyo area since 2016. I have also performed on-line surveys through the media sites of Joseonjok communities. The main purpose of this research is to examine how multilingualism and transnationalism affect the construction of Joseonjok identity in Japan. Joseonjok’s trilingual ability and their transnational activities among the three countries have affected the formation of the distinctive identity as an ethnic minority in Japan. The multilingual and transnational identity of Joseonjok in Japan keeps evolving through the process of formation, construction, and negotiation. Key Words : Migration, Identity, Joseonjok, Diaspora, Ethnicity, Transnationalism, Multilingualism *Ph.D. -
Korean Diaspora in Kazakhstan: Question of Topical Problems for Minorities in Post-Soviet Space
Korean Diaspora in Kazakhstan: Question of Topical Problems for Minorities in Post-Soviet Space German Kim Introduction Kazakhstan is a multinational state. Dozens of nations and ethnic groups living there generate a lot of problems that are both immanently national and part of the system of international relations. Before moving to the presentation and causal-consequential analysis of the actual problems of the Korean Diaspora in Kazakhstan, it is necessary to make a brief historical inquiry into the pre-history and history of the appearance of Koreans in Kazakhstan and neighboring Central Asian states. By the beginning of the 20th century, situations of hunger, cruel exploitation by the ruling classes, and the Japanese colonial yoke forced tens of thousands of pauperized Koreans to migrate to Manchuria, the Russian Far East and America. At present the number of Koreans outside Korea constitutes more than 5 million, and the most numerous groups live in China (2 million); the USA (about 1 5 million); Japan (0.7 million) and the former USSR (0.450 million). On the Korean peninsula, which is divided at the 38th parallel, in the two opposing Korean states, there is one common social phenomenon—the absence of a national question. In both North and South Korea, the number of permanently living foreigners is minimal.1 In total, the number of Koreans who lived in the USSR according to the 1989 Census was 439 thousand, and a great bulk lived in Uzbekistan, Russia and Kazakhstan. The modern demography of the Korean population is characterized by dispersion. This demography is a legacy of the policy of forced migration during the Stalin era, and also by processes of migration and infiltration among the Korean population. -
Download Download
July-December 2018 Volume: 8, No: 2, pp. 297 – 310 ISSN: 2046-4436 e-ISSN: 2046-4444 tplondon.com/bordercrossing Submitted: 26 August 2017; Accepted: 12 May 2018 Citizenship and the Indonesian Susi Dwi Harijanti§ Bilal Dewansyah¥ Diaspora: Lessons from the South Ali Abdurahmanα Korean and Indian Experiences Wicaksana Dramanda± Abstract The existence and movement of diasporas across the world significantly challenge the existing legal norms on citizenship and migration. The responses from law-makers from the origin countries vary. Most European, Latin America and African countries adopt dual citizenship laws. However, most countries in Asia-Pacific region, including Indonesia, do not favour dual citizenship. This is mostly because of the ideological perception of citizenship. In this sense, many countries grant special status or schemes to their diaspora (neither citizens nor residents of the country) in the form of an external quasi-citizenship based on ethnic descent, called “ethnizenship” by Bauböck.This article, drawing on on-going research, compares the Indonesian experience with that of two other countries that have adopted quasi- citizenship schemes. India and South Korea have been chosen for comparison since both countries have particular statutes that recognise and regulate diaspora status. India created the Person of Indian Origin (PIO) card scheme in 1998 and Overseas Citizens of India (OCI) card scheme in 2003. These two schemes merged in 2015 into the Overseas Citizens of India Card Holder (OCC) scheme through the Citizenship (Amendment) Act 2015. While India adopts a regulatory model of diaspora through a citizenship law regime, the South Korean experience showsa different attitude towards their diaspora. -
Social Change and Marriage Patterns Among Koryo Saram in Kazakhstan, 1937–1965*
Social Change and Marriage Patterns among Koryo Saram in Kazakhstan, 1937–1965* Natalya Yem and Stephen J. Epstein This article considers social forces set in motion when ethnic Koreans of the former Soviet Union (Koryo saram) were deported from the Soviet Far East to Central Asia under Stalin, treating these emerging phenomena as a context for understanding the community’s marriage patterns. Drawing on archival records from 1937 to1965 in Kazakhstan, we show how choice of marriage partner reflects changes in socioeconomic status, places of residence, gender roles and language use. Demographic data about interethnic marriages in Kazakhstan, we argue, serves as a useful tool for exploring relations between Koryo saram and the larger host society; these evolving trends in marriage patterns offer a window into the Korean diaspora experience locally and more broadly. Keywords: Korean diaspora, Koryo saram, interethnic marriage, census, Kazakhstan In recent years, scholars have turned increasing attention to the history of Koreans in the diaspora, outlining distinctive histories and patterns of settlement among Korean-Americans, Korean-Chinese (Joseonjok), Korean- Japanese (Zainichi), and Koreans of the former Soviet Union (Koryo saram) among others.1 With the collapse of the Soviet Union and the establishment of * This work was supported in part by the Korea Foundation for Advanced Studies International Scholar Exchange Fellowship for the 2011–2012 academic year. 1. Important book-length studies in English on different segments of the Korean diaspora include, for example: Wayne Patterson, The Korean Frontier in America: Immigration to Hawaii 1896– 1910 (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 1988); Nancy Abelmann and John Lie, Blue Natalya Yem ([email protected]) is Head of the Department of Korean and Japanese Studies, Faculty of Oriental Studies at al-Farabi Kazakh National University; Stephen J.