Annual Report Fiscal Year 2020 RED, BLUE, and BRADY
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Action. Power. Freedom. FY 2018 Annual Report Action
Action. Power. Freedom. FY 2018 Annual Report Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. This is our moment— “and I truly believe in us. Because we–NARAL, our members, our extended community–have all of the ingredients necessary to win this fight. This is the fight that NARAL, and all of you, were made for.” —Ilyse G. Hogue, President 2 FY 2018 Annual Report Contents A Message From Our President .............................................................................. 5 Action. Power. Freedom. .................................................................................................6 Financial Overview ...........................................................................................................14 A Message From Our Board Chairs...................................................................19 Boards of Directors & Executive Staff .........................................................20 -
February 26, 2020 Chairman David Skaggs Co-Chairwoman Allison
February 26, 2020 Chairman David Skaggs Co-Chairwoman Allison Hayward Office of Congressional Ethics 425 3rd Street, SW Suite 1110 Washington, DC 20024 Dear Chairman Skaggs and Co-Chairwoman Hayward: We write to request that the Office of Congressional Ethics (“OCE”) investigate whether Representative Devin Nunes is receiving free legal services in violation of the Rules of the House of Representatives (“House rules”). Specifically, Representative Nunes retained an attorney who represents him in several defamation lawsuits in various courts where he seeks a total of nearly $1 billion in damages. House rules prohibit a Member from receiving free legal services, unless the Member establishes a Legal Expense Fund (“LEF”). According to the House Legislative Resource Center, Representative Nunes has not filed any of the required reports to establish an LEF. The relevant facts detailed below establish that the OCE Board should authorize an investigation of Representative Nunes. Representative Nunes’s overt involvement with the highly-publicized lawsuits threatens to establish a precedent that the Legal Expense Fund (“LEF”) regulations no longer apply to Members. Although Representative Nunes is entitled to legal representation and he may pursue any legal action to protect and defend his interests, he must comply with House rules. An OCE investigation will preserve Representative Nunes’s legal right to counsel while upholding well-established House rules and precedent. House Rules Prohibit Members from Receiving Discounted or Free Legal Services A Member of the House of Representatives “may not knowingly accept a gift” with limited exceptions.1 A “gift” is defined to include “a gratuity, favor, discount, entertainment, hospitality, loan, forbearance, or other item having monetary value. -
The Cross Chronicle It Counts" Spring 2018 50Th Anniversary Edition Volume 3, Issue 3 in Loving Memory of Mrs
"Different where The Cross Chronicle it counts" Spring 2018 50th Anniversary Edition Volume 3, Issue 3 In loving memory of Mrs. Margaret Leger 2018: The Golden Milestone By Madeline Leo '18 and Joe Genua '18 In the fall of 2018, Holy Cross will celebrate its 50th anniversary. To pay tribute to the anniversary, the school will be hosting several events throughout the year. On Wednesday, May 16, Holy Cross held its 2018 Connecticut Alumni Reception at Tthe Country Club of Waterbury from 6 to 8 pm to Pictures of the event are posted to www.holycrosshs-ct.com. The alumni celebrations will continue next school year: the graduating classes of ‘78, ‘88, ‘98, and ‘08 will reconnect with peers, as well as commemorate the legacy of the school. Our 50th Anniversary Homecoming Weekend will be October 5-7th. In November, Holy Cross will hold a Thanksgiving Eve Liturgy, the Thanksgiving Day home football game and more activities. The most awaited event will be The Golden Gala on March 30th at the Aqua Turf in Southington as a fundraiser, auction, and dinner dance. The event is organized by the Parents Clubs, Alumni, and the Advancement Office. Holy Cross’ very own Vice President for Advancement, Mrs. Cary Fappiano, and Director of Alumni and Special Events, Mr. Michael Phelan, are alumni themselves. Many alumni events will celebrate the Holy Cross of yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Mr. Phelan describes why he is excited about the upcoming events: “It’s exciting reconnecting with the alumni, hearing their memories and the positive impact the Holy Cross experience had on their lives. -
Protect Children, Not Guns 2019 1 Introduction
PROTECT CHILDREN NOT GUNS 2019 Mission Statement he Children’s Defense Fund Leave No Child Behind® mission is to ensure every child a T Healthy Start, a Head Start, a Fair Start, a Safe Start and a Moral Start in life and successful passage to adulthood with the help of caring families and communities. For over 40 years, CDF has provided a strong, effective and independent voice for all the children of America who cannot vote, lobby or speak for themselves. We pay particular attention to the needs of poor and minority children and those with disabilities. CDF educates the nation about the needs of children and encourages preventive investments before they get sick, drop out of school, get into trouble or suffer family breakdown. © 2019 Children’s Defense Fund. All rights reserved. Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................... 2 Overview .............................................................. 5 Select Shootings Involving Children in the Past 12 Months. 7 Child and Teen Gun Deaths ..........................................11 Child and Teen Gun Injuries .........................................19 International Gun Death Comparisons ..............................23 Progress Since Parkland .............................................29 We Can Do Better: We Must Strengthen Laws to Save Lives. .33 Stand Up and Take Action ...........................................39 Appendices .......................................................... 41 Endnotes ............................................................50 Protect Children, Not Guns 2019 1 Introduction On April 20, 1999, Americans witnessed a once unthinkable and now unforgettable tragedy at Columbine High School. We watched in horror as frightened children fled with their hands up, frantic parents tried to reunite with their children, and traumatized survivors told reporters about the violence they witnessed. It was the first time many of us saw these terrifying scenes. But it was far from the last. -
Rethinking Gun Violence
UCLA UCLA Public Law & Legal Theory Series Title Rethinking Gun Violence Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3mh6v370 Authors Greenberg, Mark Litman, Harry Publication Date 2010 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Rethinking Gun Violence Mark Greenberg* and Harry Litman** This working paper develops the argument of "Gun Violence and Gun Control" (also posted on SSRN), a short piece commissioned by the London Review of Books. We decided not to publish either paper, in part because we felt there were empirical issues that we were not in a position to assess. We welcome comments on either paper. The gun policy debate in the United States is in sorry shape. To exaggerate only slightly, the debate proceeds as if there were only two possible positions: for guns or against them. Both sides wave the banner of crime prevention. Fundamentally, however, their fight is not a considered argument over how best to reduce crime, but a clash between those who hate guns and those who love them. Guns for the anti-gun camp represent lawlessness, gangs, drug wars, vigilantes, and survivalist, federal government-hating fanatics. For the pro-gun side, guns are a symbol of self-reliance, the frontier spirit, individualism, resistance to tyranny. The passion of this symbolic fight over guns has greatly infected, if not overwhelmed, serious empirical analysis of how to reduce crime. Instead of a careful discussion of the efficacy and costs of possible gun-violence reduction measures, much of the debate in the United States takes the form of a partisan shouting match over whether we should have more guns or fewer guns. -
Official List of Members
OFFICIAL LIST OF MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES of the UNITED STATES AND THEIR PLACES OF RESIDENCE ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS • DECEMBER 15, 2020 Compiled by CHERYL L. JOHNSON, Clerk of the House of Representatives http://clerk.house.gov Democrats in roman (233); Republicans in italic (195); Independents and Libertarians underlined (2); vacancies (5) CA08, CA50, GA14, NC11, TX04; total 435. The number preceding the name is the Member's district. ALABAMA 1 Bradley Byrne .............................................. Fairhope 2 Martha Roby ................................................ Montgomery 3 Mike Rogers ................................................. Anniston 4 Robert B. Aderholt ....................................... Haleyville 5 Mo Brooks .................................................... Huntsville 6 Gary J. Palmer ............................................ Hoover 7 Terri A. Sewell ............................................. Birmingham ALASKA AT LARGE Don Young .................................................... Fort Yukon ARIZONA 1 Tom O'Halleran ........................................... Sedona 2 Ann Kirkpatrick .......................................... Tucson 3 Raúl M. Grijalva .......................................... Tucson 4 Paul A. Gosar ............................................... Prescott 5 Andy Biggs ................................................... Gilbert 6 David Schweikert ........................................ Fountain Hills 7 Ruben Gallego ............................................ -
The Importance of Politics to CAALA and the Importance of CAALA to Politicians THIS ELECTION IS ABOUT YOUR PRACTICE
CAALA President Mike Arias ARIAS SANGUINETTI WANG & TORRIJOS, LLP October 2018 Issue The importance of politics to CAALA and the importance of CAALA to politicians THIS ELECTION IS ABOUT YOUR PRACTICE In a few short weeks, the mid-term Republicans, we will take back the House. efforts to pare down, strip down and take elections will take place, and I hope I don’t What does this mean to you as a Trial away access to justice.” Swalwell added that have to tell you how important this election Lawyer? It means that the wrath of legislta- “23 seats are between where we are and cut- is for consumer attorneys and the people tion that has emanated out of the ting in half our time in hell. We can prove we represent. Like so many CAALA mem- Republican-controlled House – that is that we are better than that in America.” bers, politics means a lot to me; not just designed to limit consumer rights, deny Katie Hill and Gil Cisneros both said they because I’m CAALA’s President and I’m trial by jury and eliminate our practices – have lived a life of service. Katie as a nurse and about to be installed as President of our will stop. Cisneros in the Navy. They say they are both state trial lawyer association, CAOC. And As is usually the case, California is at the fighting to keep President Trump from taking not because I’m a political junkie who center of the national political landscape, away what trial lawyers work to do. -
Eleni Kounalakis (Lt. Governor) Josh Harder (U.S
California Gavin Newsom (Governor) Eleni Kounalakis (Lt. Governor) Josh Harder (U.S. House, CA-10) TJ Cox (U.S. House, CA-21) Katie Hill (U.S. House, CA-25) Katie Porter (U.S. House, CA-45) Harley Rouda (U.S. House, CA-48) Mike Levin (U.S. House, CA-49) Ammar Campa-Najjar (U.S. House, CA-50) Buffy Wicks (State Assembly, District 15) Colorado Jared Polis (Governor) Dianne Primavera (Lt. Governor) Phil Weiser (Attorney General) Jena Griswold (Secretary of State) Tammy Story (State Senate, District 16) Jessie Danielson (State Senate, District 20) Brittany Pettersen (State Senate, District 22) Faith Winter (State Senate, District 24) Dylan Roberts (State House, District 26) Dafna Michaelson Jenet (State House, District 30) Shannon Bird (State House, District 35) Rochelle Galindo (State House, District 50) Julie McCluskie (State House, District 61) Georgia Stacey Abrams (Governor) Sarah Riggs Amico (Lt. Governor) Matthew Wilson (State House, District 80) Shelly Hutchinson (State House, District 107) Illinois J.B. Pritzker (Governor) Juliana Stratton (Lt. Governor) Kwame Raoul (Attorney General) Sean Casten (U.S. House, IL-6) Brendan Kelly (U.S. House, IL-12) Lauren Underwood (U.S. House, IL-14) Iowa Deidre DeJear (Secretary of State) Tim Gannon (Secretary of Agriculture) Kristin Sunde (State House, District 42) Jennifer Konfrst (State House, District 43) Eric Gjerde (State House, District 67) Laura Liegois (State House, District 91) Maine Louis Luchini (State Senate, District 7) Laura Fortman (State Senate, District 13) Linda Sanborn (State Senate, District 30) Nevada Jacky Rosen (U.S. Senate) Susie Lee (U.S. House, NV-3) Steven Horsford (U.S. -
Pgpost Template
The Pri nce Ge orge’s Pos t OMMUNITY EWSPAPER FOR RINCE EORGE S OUNTY SINCE A C N P G ’ C 1932 Vol. 87, No. 8 February 21 — February 27, 2019 Prince George’s County, Maryland Newspaper of Record Phone: 301-627-0900 25 cents Council Holds FY 2020 Budget Town Hall Meeting County Residents Encouraged to Participate By anGeLa rOUSOn Prince George’s County Council UPPer MarLBOrO, M d. (February 13, 2019)—The Prince George’s County Council will hold its FY 2020 Budget Town Hall Meeting, on Tuesday, February 26, 2019, from 7 –9 p.m., at Prince George’s Com - munity College, Largo Student Center, 301 Largo road in Largo, Maryland, in Community rooms a, B, and C. Council Chair Todd Turner (D)—District 4, encourages residents PHOTOGraPH COUrTeSY BOWIe STaTe SPOrTS InFOrMaTIOn to engage in this important budget conversation, learn more about the budget process, and share their spending priorities. “each year the Council holds a budget town hall meeting to update Football Signees Celebration citizens on the County’s finances, and present residents with an important opportunity to participate in the budget process. The Council remains By GreGOrY C. GOInGS quarterback amir Hall offense creating roster thus far. at the end of the evening, Student- committed to an open, inclusive, and participatory budget process, and Bowie State Sports Information spots, the staff knew recruiting would be key athlete Development Coordinator M. Burton and decided to “mine in their own backyard” Cornish, Jr. further welcomed the parents and look forward to questions and input from County residents.” BOWIe, Md. -
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020
1 116TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 1st Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 116–120 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020 R E P O R T OF THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ON H.R. 2500 together with ADDITIONAL AND DISSENTING VIEWS [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] JUNE 19, 2019.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed VerDate Sep 11 2014 13:22 Jun 20, 2019 Jkt 036763 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6012 Sfmt 6012 E:\HR\OC\HR120.XXX HR120 rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with HEARING E:\Seals\Congress.#13 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020 VerDate Sep 11 2014 13:22 Jun 20, 2019 Jkt 036763 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 E:\HR\OC\HR120.XXX HR120 rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with HEARING with DSKBCBPHB2PROD on rfrederick 1 116TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 1st Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 116–120 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020 R E P O R T OF THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ON H.R. 2500 together with ADDITIONAL AND DISSENTING VIEWS [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] JUNE 19, 2019.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 36–763 WASHINGTON : 2019 VerDate Sep 11 2014 13:22 Jun 20, 2019 Jkt 036763 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR120.XXX HR120 rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with HEARING E:\Seals\Congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS ADAM SMITH, Washington, Chairman SUSAN A. -
Complaint for Damages
1 Ashley Parris, Esq. (SBN 239537) MCELROY PARRIS TRIAL LAWYERS 2 407 Bryant Circle, Suite F Ojai, CA 93023 3 Tel: (805) 272-4001 Fax: (805) 719-6858 4 Email: [email protected] 5 Carrie Goldberg, Esq. (NYS Bar No. 4542411) 6 C.A. GOLDBERG PLLC 16 Court Street 33rd Floor 7 Brooklyn, NY 11241 Tel: 646-666-8908 8 Email: [email protected] (Pro Hac Vice Application To Be Filed) 9 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff, KATHERINE HILL 11 12 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CLAIFORNIA 13 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 14 KATHERINE HILL, CASE NO.: 15 Plaintiff, 16 1. ACTION BASED ON CIVIL CODE v. SECTION 1708.85 17 KENNETH HESLEP, JENNIFER VAN 2. CIVIL CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE 18 LAAR, JOSEPH MESSINA, MAIL CIVIL CODE SECTION 1708.85 MEDIA, INC., SALEM MEDIA GROUP, 19 INC., and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 3. INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS 20 Defendants. 4. ACTION BASED ON BUS. PROF. CODE 21 SECTION 17200 22 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 23 24 25 Plaintiff KATHERINE HILL initiates this suit, by her attorneys, McElroy|Parris Trial 26 Lawyers by Ashley Parris, Esq. and C.A. Goldberg PLLC, by Carrie Goldberg, Esq. against 27 Defendants KENNETH HESLEP, JENNIFER VAN LAAR, JOSEPH MESSINA, MAIL MEDIA, 28 INC., SALEM MEDIA GROUP, INC., and DOES 1 through 50 as follows: 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 1 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 2 1. This case is about a man, Defendant Kenneth Heslep, stopping at nothing to destroy 3 the life of his ex-wife, Plaintiff Katherine Hill (“Hill”), a US Congress newcomer, when she dared 4 end their relationship after more than fifteen years of physical, sexual, verbal, emotional and 5 psychological abuse that began when she was only sixteen and he was twenty. -
Narrowly Tailoring the COVID-19 Response
University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Articles Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship 2020 Narrowly Tailoring the COVID-19 Response Craig Konnoth University of Colorado Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, Legislation Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Citation Information Craig Konnoth, Narrowly Tailoring the COVID-19 Response, 11 Calif. L. Rev. Online 193 (2020), https://www.californialawreview.org/narrowly-tailoring-covid-19-response/, available at https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles/1310/. Copyright Statement Copyright protected. Use of materials from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce is required. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship at Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Narrowly Tailoring the COVID-19 Response Craig Konnoth* Introduction ............................................................................................ 193 I. Overview of the Coronavirus Response .............................................