DOCSLIB.ORG

SYMBOLIC ANTHROPOLOGY ANTH 4135/6135 Tuesday, Thursday 2:00

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SYMBOLIC ANTHROPOLOGY ANTH 4135/6135 Tuesday, Thursday 2:00 SYMBOLIC ANTHROPOLOGY ANTH 4135/6135 Tuesday, Thursday 2:00-3:20 GC 2560 Copyright © 2018 by Bojka Milicic This syllabus cannot be reproduced or posted on the Internet without author’s permission. Hung Shing Temple, Kau Sai Chau Island, Hong Kong Territory © B. Milicic Instructor: Bojka Milicic, Ph.D., Associate Professor-Lecturer E-mail: [email protected] Office: Gardner Commons 4558 (Department of Anthropology) Office hours: Tuesday, Thursday 1-2. This course is accessible to all majors. Description: Anthropologists and other social and behavioral scientists often debate the interaction between nature and culture. This course argues that the foundation of human culture is based on our capacity to produce symbols. Culture cannot exist without symbols. We will explore the anthropological approach to various facets of symbolism and meaning by looking at both human biological make up and cultural variation. The course provides the basis for an understanding of the unity of the human mind and describes and explains cross-cultural differences. The basic theoretical assumption is that universal cognitive processes organize our perception of the world, while each culture chooses a particular interpretation through its worldview or cosmology. This hypothesis will be tested on ethnographic examples. We will review classic theories, models, and ethnographies as well as the recent findings, on symbolic communication in anthropology, archaeology, linguistics, and cognitive studies with examples ranging from prehistory to the cotemporary Western culture. We will study the symbolism of colors, food, animals, human body, gender, art, myth, ritual, and politics. We will examine the symbolic meanings in the worldviews of the native Pueblos of the American Southwest, China, India, Mexico, central and South Africa, Iceland, Jewish culture, Polynesia, and mainstream American cultures. General goals: 1) Global Cultural diversity: Students will be able to identify and understand, symbolic behavior in cultural areas vastly different from the United States. 2) Applying knowledge to Contemporary Global Context: Students will learn how to analyze and interpret culturally constructed systems of meaning. Students will be able to cross-reference and apply knowledge acquired in this class to the wide range of fields such as linguistics, psychology, human biology, history, philosophy, marketing, literature, and art. 3) Intercultural Knowledge – Cultural Self – Awareness: Students will develop a sense of cultural self-awareness through selected ethnographic examples from a number of different cultures. Students will search for patterns that on the one hand reveal human universal, while on the other hand they will examine cultural variations in terms of environmental, historical, economic, and social contexts. 4) Knowledge of Cultural Worldview Framework: The basic theoretical assumption for this course is that universal cognitive processes organize our perception of the world, while each culture chooses a particular interpretation through its worldview. For their research projects students will explore how people in other cultures shape their worldview. 5) Global Perspective Taking: Students will acquire knowledge about basic cognitive tools and processes that humans use in communication. They will explore how these cognitive tools enabled the human species to inhabit the world. Specific Course objectives: At the end of this course students • will acquire knowledge about basic cognitive tools and processes that humans use in communication. • will acquire knowledge about models, theories, and ethnographies in cultural anthropology as well as important work in the area of physical anthropology and human cognition. • will learn how to integrate knowledge about human universals as outcomes of natural selection with culturally constructed meanings • will be able to analyze and interpret systems of meaning across a wide range of cultures • will learn how to do independent research, construct an argument, analyze data and apply the knowledge acquired in this class in the term research paper. • will be able to cross-reference and apply knowledge acquired in this class across the wide range of fields such as linguistics, psychology, human biology, history, philosophy, marketing and business, literature, and art. Texts: Barber, E. W. & Barber, P.T. 2006. When They Severed Earth from Sky: How the Human Mind Shapes Myth. Princeton University Press ! !Ortiz, Alfonso. 1969. The Tewa World. University of Chicago Press. Additional Readings on Canvas Teaching philosophy and methods: Teaching is a process of exchanging and engaging thoughts. It is giving and receiving. This class consists of lectures, several films shown in class and strongly encouraged discussions. How to get a good grade in this class: Read this syllabus carefully! Attend class! Try to read the assigned chapters ahead of class! Download presentations in Canvas before exams! Take additional notes in class! Plan your term paper well in advance! Use the class material in your paper! Ask questions and participate in discussions! Talk to me if you have any problems. You can earn extra credit points for regular attendance, interest, and class participation. It is students’ responsibility to ask about notes, exams and other information about missed classes! Students are strongly encouraged to communicate with the instructor and pick up their exams. Exams and grades Three exams (two in-class midterms and final in-class exam 100 points each). • Research paper (5-6 pages, 1.5 space, Times 12, 100 points, Word doc). Term paper is a project based on students’ individual interests. You may team up with a group of up to 4 students. All team members get the same grade; one paper/team, upload in Canvas. • The paper is graded on: 1. Content: well-formulated argument, good examples, application of knowledge gained in this class (70 points.) 2. Style: organization, spelling, concise writing, proper use of references (30 points). The instructor will provide detailed guidelines for writing the paper on our Canvas page. Papers obtained/copied on the Internet and references to non-scholarly sources from the Internet are not acceptable. Papers written for another class are not acceptable. Plagiarism will result in failing the class. • Presentation: Students will present their research in class, 20 points. • Outline: One page paper term paper outline and bibliography (at least 2 scholarly sources) is worth additional 20 points. • Participation in class brings additional points. Late exams/paper/presentation: If your exam, term paper or presentation is turned in late, 5 points will be subtracted for each day. Exam deadlines can be changed and make-up exams allowed only under special circumstances or granted with a doctor’s note. • The semester grade is calculated as percentage of 440 possible points or the highest score in class. Graduate students: • Three exams, 100 points each (see above!) • In-class presentation of one class readings, 40 points. • In-class presentation of the research paper, 20 • Research paper outline 20 points. • Research paper (6-7 pages, Times 12, 1.5 space, word doc.)100 points. • Graduate students are expected and strongly encouraged to participate in class! The grade is calculated as a percentage of 460 points Plagiarism Software Policy: Your professor may elect to use a plagiarism detection service in this course, in which case you will be required to submit your paper to such a service as part of your assignment. GRADE DISTRIBUTION A 100-95% A- 94-90% B+ 89-85% B 84-80% B- 76-80 C+ 71-75, C 70-67% , C- 66-63 D+ 62-59% D 58-54 %! D- 53-50! E 49% and below IMPORTANT DATES: EXAM 1. Tuesday, February 12 EXAM 2. Tuesday, March 26 PAPER OUTLINE DUE: Friday, March 29 (upload on canvas) TERM PAPER DUE: Saturday, April 27 FINAL EXAM: to be announced according to the U of U final exam schedule Non-Contract Note.!“Note: The syllabus is not a binding legal contract. It may be modified by the instructor when the! student is given reasonable notice of the modification. “ Common courtesy: Out of courtesy to students and the instructor please do not walk out and in of the class to make phone calls, etc., unless urgent. Please use your laptops during class only for this class needs. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CELL PHONES IN CLASS!!Please do not use your laptops in class for the purpose other than this class. LECTURE TOPICS AND READINGS: WEEK 1. 1/8, 10. Introduction: What makes us human? Human and animal communication. Definitions: signs, icons, indices, and symbols Reading: Pagel, M. 2017. Q&A: What is human language, when did it evolve and why should we care? BMC Biology 15:64, WEEK 2. 1/15, 17. Your brain on metaphors. Readings: Pinker, S. 2007. The Stuff of Thought. The metaphor metaphor. Ch.9. In: Pinker, S., The stuff of thought. Penguin. Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson 1980. Metaphors we live by. U of Chicago Press: Chpts. 1-4. Marriott Library course reserve web page. Film: All in the mind WEEK 3. 1/22, 24 The human mind and the first symbolic representations in prehistory. The rock art of the San of South Africa. The logic of symbolic classification and social organization. Readings: Read, D. and M. Leaf, 2012. The organizational Rubicon of the Upper Paleolithic. (From: Human Thought and Social Organization: Anthropology on a new plane. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books) Lewis-Williams, D. 2002. The Mind in the Cave: Southern African rock art. (From: The mind in the cave. London: Thames&Hudson.) Marriott Library course reserve web page. Durkheim, E. and Mauss, M. 1963. Primitive classification. London: Cohen and West. Pp. 67-88. WEEK 4. 1/29, 31. Practicing religion in Hong Kong. The colored world: biology and culture.! Readings:! Liu, Tik-Sang, 2003. Nameless religion in Hong Kong. (From: China Quarterly). Marriott Library course reserve web page.!Film: Temples of Hong Kong (Instructor’s video) Lakoff, G. 1987. Radial categories Ch.6. (From: Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press) Marriott Library course reserve web page.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Symbols and Rituals: an Interpretive Approach to Faith- Based Behavior
    SYMBOLS AND RITUALS: AN INTERPRETIVE APPROACH TO FAITH- BASED BEHAVIOR By: James A. Forte Presented at: NACSW Convention 2014 November, 2014 Annapolis, Maryland | www.nacsw.org | [email protected] | 888-426-4712 | Symbols and Rituals: An Interpretive Approach to Faith-Based Behavior Presentation at National Association of Christian Social Workers, Annual Conference Annapolis, Maryland November 8, 2014 James A. Forte Professor, Salisbury University Symbols and Rituals (Geertz and Faith Behavior) Memorable Words “The phrase ‘nothing is a practical as good theory’ is a twist of an older truth: Nothing improves theory more than its confrontation with practice” (Hans Zetterberg, 1962, page 189). Symbols and Rituals (Geertz and Faith Behavior) Overview: Framework for Making Sense of Geertz’s Theory Models – Exemplary root theorists Metaphors – Theory’s root metaphors Mapping – Theoretical elements and relations, Translation to eco-map Method - Directives for further inquiry & theory use Middle-range Theory-based applications (Inquiry theorizing and planned change) Marks of Critical thinking about theory Excellence Symbols and Rituals (Geertz and Faith Behavior) Clifford Geertz and The Symbolic Anthropology Approach This approach to religion and spirituality provides an analysis of the system of meanings embodied in the symbols and expressed in rituals which make up the religion or spiritual system (for a focal social group), and the relating of these systems to social-structural and psychological processes (Geertz, 1973, page 125). Symbols
    [Show full text]
  • Symbolic Anthropology Symbolic Anthropology Victor Turner (1920
    Symbolic Anthropology • Examines symbols & processes by which humans assign meaning. • Addresses fundamental Symbolic anthropology questions about human social life, especially through myth & ritual. ANTH 348/Ideas of Culture • Culture does not exist apart from individuals. • It is found in interpretations of events & things around them. Symbolic Anthropology Victor Turner (1920-1983) • Studied with Max Gluckman @ Manchester University. • Culture is a system of meaning deciphered by • Taught at: interpreting key symbols & rituals. • Stanford University • Anthropology is an interpretive not scientific • Cornell University • University of Chicago endeavor . • University of Virginia. • 2 dominant trends in symbolic anthropology • Publications include: • Schism & Continuity in an African Society (1957) represented by work of British anthropologist • The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual (1967) Victor Turner & American anthropologist • The Drums of Affliction: A Study of Religious Processes Among the Ndembu of Zambia Clifford Geertz. (1968) • The Ritual Process: Structure & Anti-Structure (1969). • Dramas, Fields, & Metaphors (1974) • Revelation & Divination in Ndembu Ritual (1975) Social Drama Social drama • • Early work on village-level social processes among the For Turner, social dramas have four main phases: Ndembu people of Zambia 1. Breach –rupture in social relations. examination of demographics & economics. 2. Crisis – cannot be handled by normal strategies. • Later shift to analysis of ritual & symbolism. 3. Redressive action – seeks to remedy the initial problem, • Turner introduced idea of social drama redress and re-establish • "public episodes of tensional irruption*” 4. Reintegration or schism – return to status quo or an • “units of aharmonic or disharmonic process, arising in conflict situations.” alteration in social arrangements. • They represent windows into social organization & values .
    [Show full text]
  • What's in a Meme?
    What’s in a Meme? The Development of the Meme as a Unit of Culture Garry Chick The Pennsylvania State University University Park, Pennsylvania, USA Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association as part of the session, “Perceiving Culture: Unit Definition in Cultural Anthropology,” November 21, 1999. Please do not quote without permission. An earlier version of this paper is in press in Social Science Today (in Russian). Abstract Over the past 150 years numerous labels have been applied to the “parts” of culture. Some of these, including “themes,” “configurations,” “complexes,” and “patterns” are macro level. Micro level terms include “ideas,” “beliefs,” “values,” “rules,” “principles,” “symbols,” “concepts,” and a few others. The macro level labels often appear to be particular arrangements of micro level units. But which of these, if any, is the (or, an) operational unit of cultural transmission, diffusion, and evolution? Recently proposed units of cultural transmission typically derive from analogies made between cultural and biological evolution. Even though the unit of selection in biological evolution (i.e., the gene, the individual, or the group) is still under debate, the “meme,” originally suggested by Dawkins (1976) as a cultural analog of the gene, has been “selected” by many as a viable unit of culture. A “science of memes” (“memetics”) has been proposed (Lynch 1996) and numerous web sites devoted to the meme exist on the internet. This paper will trace the development of the meme and, in the process, critically address its utility as a unit of culture. 2 The whole history of science shows that advance depends upon going beyond “common sense” to abstractions that reveal unobvious relations and common properties of isolatable aspects of phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systems Model of Behaving Organisms and Persons: Implications to Behavior Change in Counseling. INSTITUTION Minnesota Univ., Minneapolis
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 087 953 CG 008 432 AUTHOR Strong, Stanley R. TITLE A Systems Model Of Behaving Organisms and Persons: Implications to Behavior Change in Counseling. INSTITUTION Minnesota Univ., Minneapolis. Office for Student Affairs. PUB DATE 31 Aug 73 NOTE 29p.; Research Bulletin, v14 n1 EDRS PRICE MF-$0.75 HC-$1.85 DESCRIPTORS *Behavior Change; *Behavior Development; Bulletins; Motivation; Social Behavior; *Social Environment; Socialization; Symbolic Learning; *Systems Approach ABSTRACT The behaving organism is described as a system with internal motivational and memory components which guide the actions of external input and output components. The organism actively shapes its environment by using its output to control its input from the environment. Output is a function of the psychological forces, topographic memory, and input contemporaneous with output. Behavior is the relationship between output and input. Behavior change is seen as a function of changes in the internal state of the organism. The phenomena of random, trial and error, and direct effectance behavior, centrality, learning performance, attention, chaining and symbolism are explored from this framework. The behavior of persons is described in terms of social behavior shaping through chaining and symbolism. Means of changing the behavior of persons are suggested. (Author) f ice for student affairs RESEARCH BULLETIN A SYSTEMS MODEL OF BEHAVING ORGANISMS AND PERSONS: 1 Implications to Behavior Change in Counseling Stanley R. Strong Student Life Studies University of Minnesota ABSTRACT The behaving organism is described as a system with internal motivational and memory components which guide the actions of external input and output components. The organism actively shapes its environment by using its output to control its input from the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Claude Lévi-Strauss at His Centennial: Toward a Future Anthropology Albert Doja
    Claude Lévi-Strauss at his Centennial: toward a future anthropology Albert Doja To cite this version: Albert Doja. Claude Lévi-Strauss at his Centennial: toward a future anthropology. Theory, Culture and Society, SAGE Publications, 2008, 25 (7-8), pp.321-340. 10.1177/0263276408097810. halshs- 00405936 HAL Id: halshs-00405936 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00405936 Submitted on 5 Oct 2009 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 321-340 097810 Doja (D) 1/12/08 11:52 Page 321 Published in: "Theory, Culture & Society", vol. 25 (7-8), 2008, pp. 321–340 Claude Lévi-Strauss at His Centennial Toward a Future Anthropology Albert Doja Abstract Lévi-Strauss’s centennial is an opportunity to show his inextricable connec- tions with the evolution of 20th-century thought and what these promise for 21st-century anthropology. He has mapped the philosophical parameters for a renewed ethnography which opens innovative approaches to history, agency, culture and society. The anthropological understanding of history, for instance, is enriched by methodical application of his mytho-logical analysis, in particular his claim that myths are ‘machines for the suppression of time’.
    [Show full text]
  • Frameworks of Analysis
    PART I Frameworks of Analysis INTRODUCTION Tony Bennett then examine the forms of cultural analysis that have been associated It is clear from our discussion in the general with the development of psychological and introduction that it is impossible to tie the sociological thought. Peter Burke’s discussion term ‘culture’ to a single concept or to a of cultural history provides a bridge into simple history of usage. It is better understood the next group of chapters focused mainly as referencing a network of loosely related on text-based disciplines. James English’s concepts that has been shaped by the relations account of the role that the analysis of form between the different histories and fields of has played in the development of literary usage with which the term has came to be studies is followed here by Tia DeNora’s entangled. A significant factor here has been consideration of music as both text and the different meanings deriving from the ways performance. Mieke Bal then examines the in which the concept has been used and relations between art history and the more interpreted in the social science disciplines recent development of visual culture studies. one the one hand and in the humanities The next two chapters – Tom Gunning’s on the other. These different disciplinary discussion of film studies and Toby Miller’s articulations of the concept are the focus account of broadcasting – are concerned with of the contributions composing this first the forms of cultural analysis that have been part of the book, which also assesses how developed in relation to the two main media the ‘cultural turn’ has affected developments systems of the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • SYMBOLIC ANTHROPOLOGY ANTH 4135/6135 Tuesday, Thursday 2-3
    SYMBOLIC ANTHROPOLOGY ANTH 4135/6135 Tuesday, Thursday 2-3:20 GC 2575 Copyright © 2018 by Bojka Milicic This syllabus cannot be reproduced or posted on the Internet without author’s permission. Hung Shing Temple, Kau Sai Chau Island, Hong Kong Territory © B. Milicic Instructor: Bojka Milicic, Ph.D., Associate Professor-Lecturer E-mail: [email protected] Office: Gardner Commons 4558 (Department of Anthropology) Office hours: Thursday 1-2. This course is accessible to all majors. Non-Contract Note.!“ The syllabus is not a binding legal contract. It may be modified by the instructor when student is given reasonable notice of the modification. “ Description: Anthropologists and other social and behavioral scientists often debate the interaction between nature and culture. This course argues that the foundation of human culture is based on our capacity to produce symbols. Culture cannot exist without symbols. We will explore the anthropological approach to various facets of symbolism and meaning by looking at both human biological make up and cultural variation. The course provides the basis for an understanding of the unity of the human mind and describes and explains cross-cultural differences. The basic theoretical assumption is that universal cognitive processes organize our perception of the world, while each culture chooses a particular interpretation through its worldview or cosmology. This hypothesis will be tested on ethnographic examples. We will review classic theories, models, and ethnographies as well as the recent findings, on symbolic communication in anthropology, archaeology, linguistics, and cognitive studies with examples ranging from prehistory to the cotemporary Western culture. We will study the symbolism of colors, food, animals, human body, gender, art, myth, ritual, and politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Organizational Culture| a Perspective That Yields Dividends
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1998 Organizational culture| A perspective that yields dividends M. Jane Redeau-Ogle The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Redeau-Ogle, M. Jane, "Organizational culture| A perspective that yields dividends" (1998). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 3143. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/3143 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LBRARY The University of MONTANA Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and reports. ** Please check "Yes" or "No" and provide signature Yes, I grant permission No, I do not grant permission Author's Signature Date ^//O Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's explicit consent. Organizational Culture; A Perspective That Yields Dividends by M. Jane Redeau Ogle Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts The University of Montana 1998 Approved by ;h®man, Bo^ of Examiners Dean, Graduate School Date UMI Number: EP36236 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • “Marketing Communication As Organizational Communication: Exploration and Synthesis of the Underlying Theoretical Perspectives”
    “Marketing Communication as Organizational Communication: Exploration and Synthesis of the underlying Theoretical Perspectives” AUTHORS Birud Sindhav Phani Tej Adidam Birud Sindhav and Phani Tej Adidam (2005). Marketing Communication as ARTICLE INFO Organizational Communication: Exploration and Synthesis of the underlying Theoretical Perspectives. Innovative Marketing , 1(2) RELEASED ON Tuesday, 01 November 2005 JOURNAL "Innovative Marketing " FOUNDER LLC “Consulting Publishing Company “Business Perspectives” NUMBER OF REFERENCES NUMBER OF FIGURES NUMBER OF TABLES 0 0 0 © The author(s) 2021. This publication is an open access article. businessperspectives.org Innovative Marketing, Volume 1, Issue 2, 2005 77 Marketing Communication as Organizational Communication: Exploration and Synthesis of the Underlying Theoretical Perspectives Birud Sindhav, Phani Tej Adidam Abstract Scholars in the marketing communication area often use a particular theoretical perspec- tive without explicitly recognizing it or fully grasping the implications thereof. Unless one is rea- sonably aware of the heritage of the underlying theoretical perspective, full justice to his or her research question is not rendered. A framework is highlighted to identify the various perspectives in marketing communication, namely mechanistic, psychological, systems-interactions, and inter- pretive-symbolic and the opportunities and limitations associated with them. In the mechanistic perspective, communication becomes a transmission process. This per- spective is suitable to capture
    [Show full text]
  • Rituals in Organizations: a Review and Expansion of Current Theory
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Papers in Economics Rituals in Organizations: A Review and Expansion of Current Theory Gazi Islamro Insper Working Paper WPE: 144/2008 Copyright Insper. Todos os direitos reservados. É proibida a reprodução parcial ou integral do conteúdo deste documento por qualquer meio de distribuição, digital ou im- presso, sem a expressa autorização do Insper ou de seu autor. A reprodução para fins didáticos é permitida observando-sea citação completa do documento Rites, Rituals, and Ceremonies 1 Running Head: RITUALS IN ORGANIZATIONS Rituals in Organizations: A Review and Expansion of Current Theory Gazi Islam Ibmec São Paulo Michael J. Zyphur University of Washington, Bothell Rites, Rituals, and Ceremonies 2 Abstract This paper integrates material from the study of rites, rituals and ceremonies in order to apply these constructs to the study of organizations. A brief history of the study of the constructs is offered. Theories concerning the components, types, and functions of rites, rituals, and ceremonies are described, followed by a survey of field research in organizations that applies these theories. Conclusions about the current state of knowledge in the field are followed by implications for future study. Key Words: Organizational Culture, Symbolic Management, Organizational Change, Ritual Rites, Rituals, and Ceremonies 3 Rituals in Organizations: A Review and Expansion of Current Theory Actions in organizations have been characterized as displaying a dual significance (Pfeffer, 1981). The tangible character of actions can be seen in the way they are used instrumentally to attain profits, promotions, and calculated goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnomusicology Or Transcultural Musicology?
    EDITED BY FRANCESCO GIANNATTASIO GIOVANNI GIURIATI Perspectives on a 21st Century Comparative Musicology: Ethnomusicology or Transcultural Musicology? stems from the ‘International Seminars in Ethnomusicology’ that F. Giannattasio conceived within the activities of the Intercultural Institute for Comparative Music Studies of the Fondazione Giorgio Cini, devoted st to a wide reflection on aims, methods and objects of study of PERSPECTIVES ON A 21 CENTURY ethnomusicology in the light of the profound changes occurring in COMPARATIVE MUSICOLOGY: this field at the beginning of the 21st Century. It concerns a radical rethinking - at a theoretical and epistemological level - of the history of the discipline, due to the contemporary profound transformation ETHNOMUSICOLOGY OR of the object of study. The volume has the ambition of offering new (EDS) GIURIATI GIOVANNI FRANCESCO GIANNATTASIO views on what a comparative musicology could do in its enquiry into TRANSCULTURAL MUSICOLOGY? contemporary music making processes. Scholars coming from different parts of the world, and from different fields of study such as W. Welsch, L.-Ch. Koch, T. Rice, S. Feld, J. Guilbault, J-L. Amselle, contributed to the volume presenting theoretical approaches as an implicit or explicit reaction to the CENTURY theoretical issues presented by Giannattasio. Together with them, st some Italian scholars (G. Giuriati, C. Rizzoni, G. Vacca, R. Di Mauro, M. Agamennone, F. Gervasi) present their thoughts drawn from research in two contexts identified as case studies: the area of BOOK IM05 Naples and its surroundings, and the Salento. MUSICOLOGY: COMPARATIVE ETHNOMUSICOLOGY OR PERSPECTIVES ON A 21 PERSPECTIVES MUSICALI ioni ez TRANSCULTURAL MUSICOLOGY? rs inte 30,00 € BOOK IM 05 Intersezioni Musicali BOOK IM05 Series editor: Giovanni Giuriati Editorial board: Francesco Giannattasio, Maurizio Agamennone, Vito Di Bernardi, Serena Facci Editing: Claudio Rizzoni Translation: Ruggero Bianchin (chapter 10), David Kerr (chapters 12-15), David J.
    [Show full text]
  • ED166111.Pdf
    DOCUMENT RESUME lip166 f1i SO 011 492 AUTHOR Hanna, Judith Lynne TITLE The Anthropology of Dance. A Selected Bipliography. PUB DATE 78 NOTE 19p.; Revised edition DRS PRICE MF-$0.83, HC-$1.67 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Anthropology; *Bibliographies; Body Language; Communication. (Thought Transfer); Creativity; *Dance; Fine Arts; Motion; Music; Symbolism ABSTRACT ll Overt 250 monographs, journal articles, and papers are cited in this selected bibliography of resources on the anthropology of dance. Most of the entries were published during the 1960s and 1970s. 'Entries are arranged alphabetically by author and give information on title, publisher or journal, date, and page numbers. The bibliography is presented in ten major sections. Section one, 'General Theory relevant to the Study of Dance, contains subcategories of communication and semiotics, symbolism and ritual, aesthetics, creativity and cognition,- perception, and emotion. Section two on methods contains subcategories of movement notation-and analytic units, and structural analyses of dance. Sections three through nine present citations on the following topics: conceptualizations of dance, reviews of dance study, aesthetics in dance, dance--group dynamics and change, politics and dance, transcendance and dance, and symbolism. Section ten on interrelationships of the arts explores music, 'art, costume, and body decoration. The bikliography is not seant to be comprehensive or to include items of uniform gdality. The material presented reflects the author's view of what dance researchers should be familiar with and what the field of the- anthropology of dance should encompass. (AV) *************************************Ii**********pc**4;*****************. * Reproductions supplied by EDES are the best that can be made from the original document.
    [Show full text]