REL 223 Module 3 Lecture Notes Buddhism As a Reform Movement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

REL 223 Module 3 Lecture Notes Buddhism As a Reform Movement REL 223 Module 3 Lecture Notes Buddhism as a Reform Movement of Hinduism Reform Movements within Hinduism What is the Axial Age? The period from the 600s – 400s BC in which, according to scholars, many major world religions were taking shape During the mid-first millennium BC, India moved from a small tribal rule to cities ruled by local kings, developed a money-based economy, and saw the rise of the warrior caste to challenge the Brahmins. The Vedic religion of the Brahmins became suspected of being a power tool to control the masses. Upanishadic Hinduism accepted the Vedas but claimed to complete them. Non-orthodox movements like Buddhism and Jainism rejected the Vedas outright, but remain similar to Hinduism in key ways. The Buddha and Indra Buddhism’s myths and symbols originated from Vedic religion. Legends of the Buddha directly parallel legends of the Hindu god Indra. Both were born from the side of their mother, amid earthquakes and supernatural signs. At birth Buddha is called the greatest among men and at birth Indra is called superior to all other gods. Both are declared to be great teachers of gods and men. Indra sets in motion the “wheel of the sun” and Buddha sets in motion the “Wheel of Dharma.” Indra slays the evil spirit Vritra, who causes droughts and is sometimes depicted as the serpent or dragon. Vritra is also called “Namuci.” In Buddhist legend, Siddhartha contends with the evil spirit Mara, who tries to hinder him from attaining liberation. Buddha defeats Mara under the Bodhi Tree. Various Buddhist scriptures call Mara “Namuci.” The Buddha and Vishnu Buddhist legends also parallel legends of the Hindu god Vishnu (or Krishna). In the Bhagavad Gita, Arjuna’s charioteer reveals truth to Arjuna. In Buddhist legend, Siddhartha’s charioteer explained the “Four Signs” to him, setting Siddhartha on the path to liberation. Krishna exhorts Arjuna to take courage, not be a coward, and to do his duty to fight, and avoid shame and disgrace. In struggling with the evil demon, Mara, Buddha states that cowards do not overcome Mara, but suffer shame and disgrace. When Buddha emerged from his mother’s side, he took seven steps, stopped, and said: “I am the best in the world.” In the Rigveda Vishnu takes his famous “three steps” across the earth, and is lauded as the greatest among the gods when he completes his final step. Buddhist and Hindu Mythology The mythologies of Hinduism and Buddhism are similar. Both have multiple heavens and hells, both affirm the existence of gods and spirits on multiple planes of existence, and for both, these gods and spirits are also beings in need of liberation. Many Hindu myths and legends come from the first parts of the Vedas, which pre-date Buddhism. This means Buddhism borrowed these myths and legends. The Human Problem: Pain and Suffering Similarity: The main human problem is pain and suffering Difference: Hinduism affirms life in this world as good and valuable more so than Buddhism With Vedantic Hinduism, early Buddhism saw the human problem as pain and suffering. Hinduism affirms goodness in the world. This is seen in three of its four valid aims of life: (1) pleasure; (2) wealth, power or fame; and (3) performing one’s caste duties. Only the fourth aim, liberation (or moksha), views the world negatively. Buddhism, however, sees the world as completely full of sorrow: “How can there be laughter, how can there be pleasure, when the whole world is on burning and on fire?” (Dhammapada 146) Rebirth in Buddhism and Hinduism Both Hinduism and Buddhism believe in a cycle of rebirth (or samsara). For both, this cycle is due to a chain of causes and effects (or karma) fueled by human actions. For both, thoughts and deeds born of ignorance perpetuate the cycle, while thoughts and deeds born of knowledge break the cycle. Hinduism affirms the rebirth of self (or atman). Buddhism denies that a “true self” undergoes reincarnation. The “self” for Buddhism is an empty illusion. Desire is a cause that at death results in the birth of another substantially “empty” being. This is likened to a candle lighting another candle. Buddhists also reject the caste system, which is bound up with reincarnation in Hinduism. Ignorance and Knowledge Similarity: Ignorance is the problem and knowledge is the solution Difference: What liberating knowledge consists of (True self in Hinduism or no self in Buddhism) For both Hinduism and Buddhism, a wrong view of the self and the world is the human problem. For both, the problem is ignorance, not a moral problem (as in many western religions), and the solution is liberating knowledge. For both, everything in our experience, including ourselves, is impermanent, and therefore not ultimate reality. For both, mistaking the impermanent for the permanent is a wrong view that leads to attachment and hence to suffering. They differ, though, in their view of what constitutes right knowledge. For Hinduism, the limited, changing world of our experience is illusion (or Maya), but underlying this is the timeless, unchanging, infinite, ultimate reality (or Atman-Brahman). For Buddhism, there is nothing permanent, infinite and unchanging. Everything is emptiness and impermanence. Buddhists call this ultimate fact the “unconditioned,” and it becomes a sort of ultimate reality, analogous to Brahman’s role in Hinduism: “There is, monks, an unborn, not become, unmade, uncompounded, and were it not, monks, for this unborn, not become, not made, uncompounded, no escape could be shown here for what is born, has become, is made, and is compounded” (Buddha, Udāna 81). The Human Person Buddhism’s analysis of the Person as “Five Aggregates” (or “Heaps” or Skandhas) is similar to Vedantic Hinduism. Early Buddhists argued the “self” is merely a composite of five things: mind, body, feelings, consciousness, and karmic influences. Vedantic Hinduism speaks of “Five Sheaths” covering the true self (or the atman). Hinduism affirms an unchanging, unborn, infinite “true self” identical with Brahman behind the Five Sheaths, while for Buddhism there is no self beneath the Five Aggregates. Liberating Knowledge The solutions to the human problem in Hinduism and Buddhism are also similar. For both, a wrong view of self leads to thoughts and actions that perpetuate the karmic chain. For both, the solution is knowledge leading to the right thoughts and right actions. This breaks the karmic chain. The difference lies in the nature of liberating knowledge. For Vedantic Hinduism, it is the realization that one’s true self is ultimate reality (or that Atman is Brahman). For Buddhism, enlightenment is the realization that there is no self (anatman). The Ultimate Goal Similarity: Stop the cycle of rebirth into the world (samsara) Difference: Whether the self continues to exist after the cycle of rebirth has ceased The ultimate goals of Hinduism and Buddhism are likewise similar and different. For both, the immediate goal is to stop the cycle of rebirth (samsara). They differ on what this entails. In Hinduism, when rebirth stops, the self continues to exist as Brahman. Brahman cannot really be described except through negative terms. Brahman is not limited by time and space, it does not change, it does not increase or decrease, it is not born, it never perishes, and it does not suffer. Liberating knowledge has been likened to a drop of water already in the ocean (not added to the ocean), realizing that it is the entire ocean. For Buddhism, the Self never really existed. Realizing this is Nirvana, which is described negatively as the “blowing out” of a candle. Removing the false concept of the ego extinguishes selfish desires (tanha). Thus karma is snuffed out and cannot light another candle (cause another birth into the world). In Mahayana Buddhism, a bodhisattva voluntarily forgoes Nirvana, not for selfish reasons, but to help other suffering beings attain liberation. Ways to Liberation Hinduism and Buddhism both prescribe certain thoughts and actions to attain liberation. For Hinduism there are many ways to liberation, seen in the four yogas. For Buddhism, only the Buddha, His teaching (Dharma) and the Buddhist community (Sangha) bring liberation. Buddhism’s Eightfold Path self-consciously differs from the asceticism of Hinduism, and its self-discipline elements primarily involve mental meditation. Yet, part of the Eightfold Path falls under Hinduism’s four yogas. Traditionally, for Hindus, there are four stages of life (ashramas). Only in the fourth stage can one dedicate themselves fully to attaining liberation. Buddhism self-consciously made the pursuit of liberation open to anyone in any stage of life. Incipient Buddhism also rejected the Hindu caste system. In Hinduism, one performs karma yoga by performing the duties of one’s caste, and these differ for each caste. In Buddhism, anyone can attain Nirvana by following the Eightfold Path. Attachment and Detachment Similarity: Attachment to Impermanent things is the problem and Detachment from them is the solution Difference: Ultimate Permanence underlies impermanence (Hinduism) vs. Nothing is Permanent (Buddhism) Attachment and Detachment are central to both Buddhism and Hinduism. For both, attachment leads to bondage and suffering, and detachment leads to freedom and stops suffering. For Buddhism, suffering comes from attachment to and desire (or tanha) for impermanent things. Realizing the true impermanent nature of things leads to detachment, which stops desire and suffering. We know how the Upanishads teach that actions born of desire and attachment lead to bondage, while actions detached from the fruit of work (or karma yoga) lead to liberation. Krishna says in the Bhagavad Gita: “When one renounces all desires and acts without craving, possessiveness, or individuality, he finds peace” (Gita 2.71) and “Always perform with detachment, any action you must do; performing action with detachment, one achieves supreme good” (Gita 3.19).
Recommended publications
  • Atman/Anatman in Buddhism
    Åtman/Anåtman in Buddhism and Its Implication for the Wisdom Tradition by Nancy Reigle Does Christianity believe in reincarnation? Of course it does not. Yet, students of the Wisdom Tradition may seek to find evidence that early Christians did accept reincarnation. Similarly in Buddhism. Does Buddhism believe in the åtman, the permanent self? Certainly the Buddhist religion does not. Yet, there is evidence that the Buddha when teaching his basic doctrine of anåtman, no-self, only denied the abiding reality of the personal or empirical åtman, but not the universal or authentic åtman. The Wisdom Tradition known as Theosophy teaches the existence of “An Omnipresent, Eternal, Boundless, and Immu- table PRINCIPLE,” 1 often compared to the Hindu åtman, the universal “self,” while Buddhism with its doctrine of anåtman, “no-self,” is normally understood to deny any such universal principle. In regard to Buddhism, however, there have been several attempts to show that the Buddha did not deny the exist- ence of the authentic åtman, the self.2 Only one of these attempts seems to have been taken seriously by scholars3; namely, the work of Kamaleswar Bhattacharya. His book on this subject, written in French, L’Åtman-Brahman dans le Bouddhisme ancien, was published in Paris in 1973; and an English translation of this work, The Åtman-Brahman in Ancient Buddhism, was published in 2015.4 It is here that he set forth his arguments for the existence of the Upanißadic åtman in early Buddhism. This is the work that we will discuss. How must we understand
    [Show full text]
  • South-Indian Images of Gods and Goddesses
    ASIA II MB- • ! 00/ CORNELL UNIVERSITY* LIBRARY Date Due >Sf{JviVre > -&h—2 RftPP )9 -Af v^r- tjy J A j£ **'lr *7 i !! in ^_ fc-£r Pg&diJBii'* Cornell University Library NB 1001.K92 South-indian images of gods and goddesse 3 1924 022 943 447 AGENTS FOR THE SALE OF MADRAS GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS. IN INDIA. A. G. Barraud & Co. (Late A. J. Combridge & Co.)> Madras. R. Cambrav & Co., Calcutta. E. M. Gopalakrishna Kone, Pudumantapam, Madura. Higginbothams (Ltd.), Mount Road, Madras. V. Kalyanarama Iyer & Co., Esplanade, Madras. G. C. Loganatham Brothers, Madras. S. Murthv & Co., Madras. G. A. Natesan & Co., Madras. The Superintendent, Nazair Kanun Hind Press, Allahabad. P. R. Rama Iyer & Co., Madras. D. B. Taraporevala Sons & Co., Bombay. Thacker & Co. (Ltd.), Bombay. Thacker, Spink & Co., Calcutta. S. Vas & Co., Madras. S.P.C.K. Press, Madras. IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. B. H. Blackwell, 50 and 51, Broad Street, Oxford. Constable & Co., 10, Orange Street, Leicester Square, London, W.C. Deighton, Bell & Co. (Ltd.), Cambridge. \ T. Fisher Unwin (Ltd.), j, Adelphi Terrace, London, W.C. Grindlay & Co., 54, Parliament Street, London, S.W. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. (Ltd.), 68—74, iCarter Lane, London, E.C. and 25, Museum Street, London, W.C. Henry S. King & Co., 65, Cornhill, London, E.C. X P. S. King & Son, 2 and 4, Great Smith Street, Westminster, London, S.W.- Luzac & Co., 46, Great Russell Street, London, W.C. B. Quaritch, 11, Grafton Street, New Bond Street, London, W. W. Thacker & Co.^f*Cre<d Lane, London, E.O? *' Oliver and Boyd, Tweeddale Court, Edinburgh.
    [Show full text]
  • Yoga and Psychology and Psychotherapy
    Yoga and Psychology and Psychotherapy Compiled by: Trisha Lamb Last Revised: April 27, 2006 © 2004 by International Association of Yoga Therapists (IAYT) International Association of Yoga Therapists P.O. Box 2513 • Prescott • AZ 86302 • Phone: 928-541-0004 E-mail: [email protected] • URL: www.iayt.org The contents of this bibliography do not provide medical advice and should not be so interpreted. Before beginning any exercise program, see your physician for clearance. “How is the field of psychotherapy to become progressively more informed by the infinite wisdom of spirit? It will happen through individuals who allow their own lives to be transformed—their own inner source of knowing to be awakened and expressed.” —Yogi Amrit Desai NOTE: See also the “Counseling” bibliography. For eating disorders, please see the “Eating Disorders” bibliography, and for PTSD, please see the “PTSD” bibliography. Books and Dissertations Abegg, Emil. Indishche Psychologie. Zürich: Rascher, 1945. [In German.] Abhedananda, Swami. The Yoga Psychology. Calcutta: Ramakrishna Vedanta Math, 1960, 1983. “This volume comprises lectures delivered by Swami Abhedananda before a[n] . audience in America on the subject of [the] Yoga-Sutras of Rishi Patanjali in a systematic and scientific manner. “The Yoga Psychology discloses the secret of bringing under control the disturbing modifications of mind, and thus helps one to concentrate and meditate upon the transcendental Atman, which is the fountainhead of knowledge, intelligence, and bliss. “These lectures constitute the contents of this memorial volume, with copious references and glossaries of Vyasa and Vachaspati Misra.” ___________. True Psychology. Calcutta: Ramakrishna Vedanta Math, 1982. “Modern Psychology does not [address] ‘a science of the soul.’ True Psychology, on the other hand, is that science which consists of the systematization and classification of truths relating to the soul or that self-conscious entity which thinks, feels and knows.” Agnello, Nicolò.
    [Show full text]
  • Masterpieces Transcript
    Masterpieces Audio Descriptions The Buddha triumphing over Mara, 900-1000 The Hindu deity Shiva, approx. 1300-1500 Cup with calligraphic inscriptions, 1440-1460 The Hindu deity Vishnu, 940-965 Crowned and bejeweled buddha image and throne, approx. 1860-1880 The Buddhist deity Simhavaktra, a dakini, 1736-1795 Ritual vessel in the shape of a rhinoceros, approx. 1100-1050 Buddha dated 338 The Bodhisattva Avalokiteshvara (Guanyin), 1100-1200 Lidded jar with design of a lotus pond, 1368-1644 Ewer with lotus-shaped lid, 1050-1150 Moon jar, 1650-1750 Standing Brahma (Bonten) and standing Indra (Taishakuten), 730-750 The Buddha triumphing over Mara, 900-1000 NARRATOR: The Buddha triumphing over Mara, created about 900 to 1000. Our audio begins with an overview, followed by an audio description. NARRATOR: This 10th Century stone sculpture features an image of the Buddha rendered in exquisite detail. The array of heart-shaped leaves and branches at the top of the object represent the Bodhi Tree, under which the Buddha-to-be sits in meditation on the threshold of enlightenment. The sculptor imbued this Buddha-image with both humanity—using details like the softly rounded belly—and spirituality. There are many signs pointing to the Buddha-to-be’s special qualities. Curator Forrest McGill. FORREST MCGILL: He has a lump on the top of his head and that symbolizes his extra insight. And then on the palms of his hands and the soles of his feet, he has special symbols and both are marks of a special kind of a being who’s more advanced, more powerful, than a regular human being.
    [Show full text]
  • Srimad Bhagavad-Gita, the Hidden Treasure Of
    A 02 Invocation 7/6/06 3:37 AM Page 1 < a6 h·[evtgh < É ne6eTu Moybmo3ye ƒ 5jrye feteugkf >uƒ Ruesfk jøo6yeƒ npteghoffep h£uk hxe5etyk , aÒXyeh'yrÅqg˘ 5jrylh=ed\e£ueoufl- hHb Yrehfsp ƒd3eoh 5jrÍlyk 5rÒkoqglh <!< fhmESypy k Ruesor\e[bp∂k _π“etorFdeuynÁfkÁ , ukf Yrue 5etyyX[ng; TA MIreo[ym ©efhuA MdlnA <@< Mn´neotieyeu ymÁrkÁXwneguk , ©efhp¬eu w"Qgeu jlyeh'ydpxk fhA <#< sre‰nofqdm jerm dmJ3e jmne[fFdfA , ne6e ‰ rÑsA sp3l5e‰∑e dpJ3ƒ jlyeh'yƒ hxy <$< rspdkrspyƒ dkrƒ wÏsveg;t-hdTfh , dkrwlnthefFdƒ w"Qgƒ rFdk ij͇/h <%< 5lQh¬mgy1e iu¬6i[e jeF3etfl[mYn[e \{ujøexryl w"nkg rxfl wg‰f r[ewk π[e , aÆÑ6ehorwgT-7mthwte dpue‰3ferÅyfl sm¥lgeT 2ù neG`rX tgfdl w≈ryTwA wK\rA <^< nete\uTrvA stmihh[ƒ jlye6TjF3mÑw1ƒ fefe™uefwwKstƒ xotw6esƒbm3febmo3yh , [mwK sˆfq1nd˜ XtxtxA nknluhef ƒ hpde 5;ueÔetyn•iƒ wo[h[M£rƒos fA «ekus k <&< uƒ bø≤e r/gkF¬/¬h/ySypFroFy odRuXA SyrX- r‰§dXA se·nd±hmnofqdXjeTuoFy uƒ sehjeA , £ueferoS6yyÍyfk hfse n|uoFy uƒ umojfm uSueFyƒ f ordAp sptesptjge dreuk ySh X fhA <*< feteugƒ fhSw"Ñu ftƒ vXr ftm¥hh , dkr˘ st>y˘ Ruesƒ yym iuhpdltuyk <(< [1] A 02 Invocation 7/6/06 3:37 AM Page 2 Ma&galåchara@am o^ pårthåya pratibodhitå^ bhagavatå nåråya@ena svaya^ vyåsena grathitå^ purå@a-muninå madhye mahå-bhårate advaitåm~ta-var!i@(^ bhagavat(m a!$ådaßådhyåyi@(m amba tvåm anusandadhåmi bhagavad-g(te bhavad-ve!i@(m [1] namo ’stu te vyåsa-vißåla-buddhe phullåravindåyata-patra-netra yena tvayå bhårata-taila-p)r@a% prajvålito jåna-maya% prad(pa% [2] prapanna-pårijåtåya, totra-vetraika-på@aye jåna-mudråya k~!@åya, g(tåm~ta-duhe nama% [3] sarvopani!ado gåvo,
    [Show full text]
  • Atman/Anatman in Buddhism and Its Implication for the Wisdom Tradition for the Wisdom Tradition
    Åtman/Anåtman in Buddhism and Its Implication for the Wisdom Tradition by Nancy Reigle Does Christianity believe in reincarnation? Of course it does not. Yet, students of the Wisdom Tradition may seek to find evidence that early Christians did accept reincarnation. Similarly in Buddhism. Does Buddhism believe in the åtman, the permanent self? Certainly the Buddhist religion does not. Yet, there is evidence that the Buddha when teaching his basic doctrine of anåtman, no-self, only denied the abiding reality of the personal or empirical åtman, but not the universal or authentic åtman. The Wisdom Tradition known as Theosophy teaches the existence of “An Omnipresent, Eternal, Boundless, and Immu- table PRINCIPLE,” 1 often compared to the Hindu åtman, the universal “self,” while Buddhism with its doctrine of anåtman, “no-self,” is normally understood to deny any such universal principle. In regard to Buddhism, however, there have been several attempts to show that the Buddha did not deny the exist- ence of the authentic åtman, the self.2 Only one of these attempts seems to have been taken seriously by scholars3; namely, the work of Kamaleswar Bhattacharya. His book on this subject, written in French, L’Åtman-Brahman dans le Bouddhisme ancien, was published in Paris in 1973; and an English translation of this work, The Åtman-Brahman in Ancient Buddhism, was published in 2015.4 It is here that he set forth his arguments for the existence of the Upanißadic åtman in early Buddhism. This is the work that we will discuss. How must we understand
    [Show full text]
  • Durga Kills the Buffalo Demon the God Brahma Granted a Boon To
    Marsha K. Russell Introduction to Indian Art St. Andrew’s Episcopal School, Austin, TX Durga Kills the Buffalo Demon The god Brahma granted a boon to Mahishasura, the buffalo demon, that no male could kill him. Thinking he was invincible, Mahisha led his demon army in a great battle with the gods and defeated them. Indra and the other gods ran to Brahma, Shiva, and Vishnu and told them about the tumultuous battle and their defeat by the demons. From the anger of the gods a great energy emerged and took shape as the beautiful Goddess, Durga. All the gods gave her their weapons; the mountain god gave her a lion for her vehicle. Durga is therefore more powerful than all the gods together. The gods reminded her that they are male and cannot defeat the terrible Mahisha, and asked her to conquer the buffalo demon. She agreed, and the gods shout and cheer in anticipation of victory. Mahisha heard the clamoring of the gods and sent his troops to investigate. They returned to tell the king of the demons about the magnificently beautiful and alluring Goddess they saw riding a lion. Enticed by their description, Mahisha asked Durga to marry him, but she refused him. The angry Mahisha then sent his troops to battle Durga’s army. The Goddess’s army defeated the demon troops, so Mahisha and Durga were left alone on the battlefield. Mahisha ran to kill the Goddess’s lion. Enraged, Durga threw her noose over the demon, but Mahisha had the ability to change his shape at will.
    [Show full text]
  • RV 1.43 Rudra
    1 RV 1.43 ṛṣi: kaṇva ghaura; devatā: rudra, 3 rudra, mitrāvaruṇā, 7-9 soma; chanda: gāyatrī, 9 anuṣṭup kd! é/Ôay/ àce?tse mI/¦!÷ò?may/ tVy?se , vae/cem/ z<t?m< ù/de . 1 -043 -01 ywa? nae/ Aid?it>/ kr/t! pñe/ n&_yae/ ywa/ gve? , ywa? tae/kay? é/iÔy?m! . 1 -043 -02 ywa? nae im/Çae vé?[ae/ ywa? é/Ôz! icke?tit , ywa/ ivñe? s/jae;?s> . 1 -043 -03 ga/wp?itm! me/xp?it< é/Ô< jla?;-e;jm! , tc! D</yae> su/çm! $?mhe . 1 -043 -04 y> zu/³ #?v/ sUyaˆR/ ihr?{ym! #v/ raec?te , ïeóae? de/vana</ vsu>? . 1 -043 -05 z< n>? kr/Ty! AvR?te su/gm! me/;ay? me/:ye , n&_yae/ nair?_yae/ gve? . 1 -043 -06 A/Sme sae?m/ iïy/m! Aix/ in xe?ih z/tSy? n&/[am! , mih/ ïv?s! tuivn&/M[m! . 1 -043 -07 ma n>? saempir/baxae/ mara?tyae ju÷rNt , Aa n? #Ndae/ vaje? -j . 1 -043 -08 yas! te? à/ja A/m&t?Sy/ pr?iSm/n! xam?Ú! \/tSy? , mU/xaR na-a? saem ven Aa/-U;?NtI> saem ved> . 1 -043 -09 2 Analysis of the RV 1.43 kd! é/Ôay/ àce?tse mI/¦!÷ò?may/ tVy?se , vae/cem/ z<t?m< ù/de . 1 -043 -01 kád rudrāya prácetase mīḷhúṣṭamāya távyase vocéma śáṃtamaṃ hṛdé 1.043.01 1 WHAT shall we sing to Rudra, strong, most bounteous, excellently wise, That shall be dearest to his heart? Interpretation: “What shall we speak to Rudra, kad vocema, whose consciousness is turned forward, pracetase, who is the most bountiful, mīḻhuṣṭamāya, most powerful, tavyase ? What will be the most wholesome for his heart, śaṃtamaṃ hṛde ?” What shall we speak (express in ourselves) for Rudra(’s sake and his manifestation here), for the Heart to have the deepest Peace in us! His consciousness is always moving forward, he is the Lord of all the Heavenly Waters, mīḻhuṣṭama, the Strongest among all, tavīyaḥ! Since Rudra is the power ascending to the highest Domains of Consciousness, what Word one must find to express Him here? It must be expressed in such a way that it bring the deepest satisfaction in the Heart.
    [Show full text]
  • Mythologies of the Indian Goddess in Sex
    Vol-6 Issue-5 2020 IJARIIE-ISSN(O)-2395-4396 Matrix—Copulating and Childless: Mythologies of the Indian Goddess in Sex Suwanee Goswami* and Dr. Eric Soreng** *Research Scholar Department of Psychology University of Delhi Delhi **Assistant Professor Department of Psychology University of Delhi Delhi ABSTRACT The paper on Matrix is a Jungian oriented mythological research on the Indian Goddess. ‘Goddess in sex’ means that She is fertile and in copulation but Her womb—Matrix—never bears fruits. Her copulation does not consummate in conception because the gods prevent it. She is married and as wife copulates to conceive, but only becomes Kumari-Mata, the Virgin Mother, in Her various manifestations and beget offspring parthenogenetically. She embodies not only maternal love but also encompass intense sexual passion as well as profound spiritual devotion; Her fertility fructifying into ascetical and spiritual wisdom. Such is the mythological series of Goddess Parvati. Her mythologies are recollected and rearranged to form a structural whole for reflection and interpretation wherever possible. The paper consummates with the mythic images of the primacy of the Sacred Feminine in India. Key Words: Matrix, Goddess Parvati, Goddess Kali Carl Jung (1981) defines the Matrix as “the form into which all experience is poured”. He conceptualized the Collective Unconscious as the mother, the source of psychic life and all the manifestations of the psyche. In the lifespan development overcoming the impediments in the world outside that obstructs man’s ascent liberates him from the mother and that leaves in him an eternal thirst which makes him return back to drink renewal from the source of psychic energy and life.
    [Show full text]
  • Ramayan Ki Kathayen, Pandemic and the Hindu Way of Life and the Contribution of Hindu Women, Amongst Others
    Hindu Sevika Samiti (UK) Mahila Shibir 2020 East and South Midlands Vibhag FOREWORD INSPIRING AND UNPRECEDENTED INITIATIVE In an era of mass consumerism - not only of material goods - but of information, where society continues to be led by dominant and parochial ideas, the struggle to make our stories heard, has been limited. But the tides are slowly turning and is being led by the collaborative strength of empowered Hindu women from within our community. The Covid-19 pandemic has at once forced us to cancel our core programs - which for decades had brought us together to pursue our mission to develop value-based leaders - but also allowed us the opportunity to collaborate in other, more innovative ways. It gives me immense pride that Hindu Sevika Samiti (UK) have set a new precedent for the trajectory of our work. As a follow up to the successful Mahila Shibirs in seven vibhags attended by over 500 participants, 342 Mahila sevikas came together to write 411 articles on seven different topics which will be presented in the form of seven e-books. I am very delighted to launch this collection which explores topics such as: The uniqueness of Bharat, Ramayan ki Kathayen, Pandemic and the Hindu way of life and The contribution of Hindu women, amongst others. From writing to editing, content checking to proofreading, the entire project was conducted by our Sevikas. This project has revealed hidden talents of many mahilas in writing essays and articles. We hope that these skills are further encouraged and nurtured to become good writers which our community badly lacks.
    [Show full text]
  • Shankara's Advaita Vedanta
    Shankara’s Advaita Vedanta David Paul Boaz The Purusha, the inner Self, dwells always at the Heart. That One is the Bright, the luminous immortal Self. Katha Upanishad Shankara’s teaching on the Upanishads, Vedanta (Brahma) Sutra and Bhagavad Gita is the very nondual essence of Vedanta, and a sublime contribution to the world’s spiritual literature, and to our nondual Great Wisdom Tradition teaching. Shankara (788-820) was the supreme adept-realizer of the Hindu Upanishadic tradition. In his thirty two years this great master and scholar re-established the authority of the Vedas against the prevailing Buddhist ideology of the time. For Shankara’s Advaita Vedanta the supreme truth of the three Hindu canons (the Upanishads, Vedanta Sutra and Bhagvad Gita) is the nondual nature of Brahman, Absolute Spirit that is Reality Itself. For the Advaita Vedanta of Shankara, Brahman is the nondual primordial awareness that is Absolute or Ultimate Consciousness Being Itself, “One, without a second,” without limit, empty of all predicates, attributes and qualities, beyond concept and belief, or any subject-object dualism whatsoever. As we have seen, Shankara refers to this prior unity as Nirguna Brahman, the Absolute. Satchitananda however, is usually understood as Saguna Brahman, Brahman with relative qualities, the Great Love that is being (sat), consciousness (chit) and bliss (ananda). Ishvara (usually as the Trimurti) the primordial creator-God or creative principle of Brahman is also Saguna Brahman, the spacetime limited creator God, the cause of the conditional state of ananda/bliss and the object of the spiritual devotion of the devotee. Nirguna Brahman is pure nondual Being Itself; Saguna Brahman is pure Being in the various states and stages of becoming in spacetime reality.
    [Show full text]
  • Concept of Redemption in the World Religions: a Comparative Analysis of the Account of Redemption in Semitic Religions and Indian Religions
    IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 21, Issue 3, Ver. I (Mar. 2016) PP 53-64 e-ISSN: 2279-0837, p-ISSN: 2279-0845. www.iosrjournals.org Concept of Redemption in the World Religions: A Comparative Analysis of the Account of Redemption in Semitic Religions and Indian Religions Binoj Mathew, Research Scholar, Bharatiyar University, Coimbatore. I. Introduction The ultimate aim of any religion is salvation / redemption of those who believe in it. They embark various paths to experience redemption according to their beliefs and the life of the founders and prominent figures of these religions. Redemption is a common word in the world religions including the Semitic Religions and the Indian Religions. The Semitic Religions are Judaism, Christianity and Islam and the Indian Religions includes Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism and Sikhism. Semitic Religions are monotheistic for they believe in one God. They hold fast to the belief of the creation of the world out of nothing and God alone is eternal and all the other things like soul, matter, and scripture are created. Whereas the Indian Religions like Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism have their origin from Hinduism. According to Hinduism, God, Soul, Matter and Scripture are eternal. They believe not in one God but many. In Semitic Religion, salvation is the saving of the soul from sin and its consequences. It may also be called „deliverance‟ or „redemption‟ from sin and its effects. Salvation is considered to be caused either by the free will and grace of a deity or by personal efforts through prayer, asceticism, or some combination of the two.
    [Show full text]