DOCSLIB.ORG

09-530 NASA V. Nelson (01/19/2011)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The University of Mississippi School of Law The National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law Informational resources on the legal aspects of human activities using aerospace technologies Space Law: Selected Documents 2011 Volume 2: International Space Law Documents Compiled by P.J. Blount P.J. Blount, editor Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz, editor A supplement to the Journal of Space Law This page intentionally left blank. ii Disclaimer The information contained in this compilation represents information as April 23, 2012. It does not constitute legal representation by the National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law (Center), its faculty or staff. Before using any information in this publication, it is recommended that an attorney be consulted for specific legal advice. This publication is offered as a service to the Center's readership. The documents contained in this publication do not purport to be official copies. Some pages have sections blocked out. These blocked sections do not appear in the original documents. Blocked out sections contain information wholly unrelated to the space law materials intended to be compiled. The sections were blocked out by the Center's faculty and staff to facilitate focus on the relevant materials. iii National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law Founded in 1999, the National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law is a reliable source for creating, gathering, and disseminating objective and timely remote sensing, space, and aviation legal research and materials. The Center serves the public good and the aerospace industry by addressing and conducting education and outreach activities related to the legal aspects of aerospace technologies to human activities. Faculty and Staff Prof. Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz, Director Prof. Jacqueline Etil Serrao, Associate Director P.J. Blount, Research Counsel and Instructor of Law Sara M. Langston, Research Counsel Michelle Aten, Assistant Director Melissa Wilson, Senior Staff Assistant Audrey Uffner, Archivist Matthew Elias, Student Research Assistant Ryan Noble, Student Research Assistant Ian Burke Perry, Student Research Assistant For More Information http://spacelaw.olemiss.edu http://rescommunis.olemiss.edu P.O. Box 1848 University, MS 38677 USA Phone: +662.915.6857 Fax: +662.915.6921 [email protected] iv Space Law: Selected Documents: 2011 Volume 2: International Space Law Documents Compiled by P.J. Blount P.J. Blount, editor Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz, editor Copyright 2012 The National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law at University of Mississippi School of Law, University of Mississippi v Copyright © 2012 The National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law at the University of Mississippi School of Law University of Mississippi All Rights Reserved ISBN 978-0-9720432-9-2 Published by The National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law At the University of Mississippi School of Law University of Mississippi P.O. Box 1848 University, MS 38677 www.spacelaw.olemiss.edu Cover design by Michelle L. Aten. This publication was made possible by a NASA grant. vi Dedicated to To all the men and women who served in the U.S. Space Shuttle program. 1976-2011 "Law must precede man into space." - Andrew G. Haley, Space Age Presents Immediate Legal Problems, 1 PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST COLLOQUIUM ON THE LAW OF OUTER SPACE 5 (1959) vii This page intentionally left blank. viii Space Law: Selected Documents 2011 Volume 2: International Space Law Documents Table of Contents Foreword by Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz xiii International Agreements C.N.101.2011.TREATIES-1: Convention Relating to the Distribution of Programme Carrying Signals Transmitted by Satellite, Brussels, 21 May 1974 - Chile: Accession (Mar. 8, 2011) 1 C.N.267.2011.TREATIES-1: Tampere Convention on the Provision of Telecommunication Resources for Disaster Mitigation and Relief Operations, Tampere, 18 June 1998 - Iceland: Ratification (May 13, 2011) 2 C.N.687.2011.TREATIES-2: Constitution of the Asia-Pacific Telecommunity, Bangkok, 27 March 1976 - Kiribati: Accession (Oct. 11, 2011) 3 C.N.801.2011.TREATIES-2: Convention Relating to the Distribution of Programme Carrying Signals Transmitted by Satellite, Brussels, 21 May 1974 - Republic of Korea: Accession (Dec. 19, 2011) 4 Australia – ESA: Agreement between the Government of Australia and the European Space Agency for a Co-Operative Space Vehicle Tracking Program (Oct. 5, 2011) 5 United States – Japan: Exchange of Diplomatic Notes on Space Cooperation (Apr. 22, 2011) 15 United States – Norway: Implementing Arrangement between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration of the United States of America and the Norwegian Space Centre of the Kingdom of Norway on the Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph (IRIS) Mission (Jan. 10, 2011) 19 United States – Romania: Agreement between the United States of America and Romania on the Deployment of the United States Ballistic Missile Defense System in Romania (Sept. 13, 2011) 29 United States – Sweden: Implementing Arrangement between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration of the United States of America and the Swedish National Space Board of the Kingdom of Sweden for Cooperation in Aeronautic and Space Research Using Nanosatell1te Technologies (May 19, 2011) 43 ix Declarations & Statements The Mombasa Declaration on Space and Africa's Development (Sept. 28, 2011) 53 Joint Announcement on United States–Japan GPS Cooperation (Jan. 13, 2011) 57 Conference on Disarmament CD/1912: Letter dated 21 June 2011 from the Permanent Representative of Canada to the Conference on Disarmament addressed to the Secretary-General of the Conference transmitting the summary report on the tenth annual space security conference entitled Space Security 2011: Building on the Past, Stepping toward the Future, organized by the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) in April 2011 (Aug. 23, 2011) 59 CD/1925: Nigeria on behalf of member States of G-21 - Working Paper - Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space (Sept. 13, 2011) 73 Permanent Court of Arbitration Optional Rules for Arbitration of Disputes Relating to Outer Space Activities (Dec. 6, 2011) 75 United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space A/AC.105/C.2/L.281: Information on the activities of international intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations relating to space law (Jan. 25, 2011) 99 A/AC.105/C.2/L.281/Add.1: Information on the activities of international intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations relating to space law (Jan. 25, 2011) 113 A/AC.105/989: Report on the United Nations/Thailand Workshop on Space Law on the theme “Activities of States in outer space in the light of new developments: meeting international responsibilities and establishing national legal and policy frameworks” (Bangkok, 16-19 November 2010) (Jan. 31, 2011) 133 A/AC.105/L.283: Declaration on the Fiftieth Anniversary of Human Space Flight and the Fiftieth Anniversary of the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space - Working paper submitted by the Chair of the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (Mar. 3, 2011) 141 A/AC.105/C.2/2011/DEF/L.1: Draft report of the Chair of the Working Group on the Definition and Delimitation of Outer Space (Apr. 1, 2011) 145 A/AC.105/C.2/2011/TRE/L.1: Draft report of the Chair of the Working Group on the Status and Application of the Five United Nations Treaties on Outer Space (Apr. 4, 2011) 149 A/AC.105/977/Add.2: International cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space: activities of Member States (Apr. 15, 2011) 151 x A/AC.105/990: Report of the Legal Subcommittee on its fiftieth session, held in Vienna from 28 March to 8 April 2011 (Apr. 20, 2011) 163 United Nations General Assembly A/RES/66/27: Prevention of an arms race in outer space (Dec. 2, 2011) 199 A/RES/66/71: International cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space (Dec. 9, 2011) 203 xi This page intentionally left blank. xii Space Law: Selected Documents 2011 Volume 1: National Space Law Documents Volume 2: International Space Law Documents Foreword by Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz This compilation of space law documents for the year 2011 was gathered primarily from postings placed on the aerospace law blog, Res Communis from 1 January through 31 December 2011. Res Communis is hosted by the National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law (Center) at the University of Mississippi School of Law. The postings are supplemented with materials from other sources that were published during 2011, but which were not published on Res Communis. The blog’s name, Res Communis, is taken from the Latin legal term or art that means, in part, “things common to all; that is, those things that are used and enjoyed by everyone.” Res Communis is also a fundamental principle that provides a major part of the foundation of the international space law regime. The name was chosen because of its specific relevance to space law and to express the Center’s intent that the blog provide the aerospace law community with a reliable, timely source of legal materials. The annual compilation is a special supplement to the Journal of Space Law, the world’s oldest law review dedicated to space law. The Journal of Space Law, beginning with the first volume published in 1973, is available on line at the Center’s website, http://spacelaw.olemiss.edu/, and through HeinOnline, http://heinonline.org/. This year’s compilation is again in two volumes: national space law documents and international documents. The body of space law continues to grow in size and complexity. During 2011, the U.S. space law corpus was integrated into the United States Code as Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs. This was the first time in 83 years that a new Title was added to the Code.1 It can be expected that space law will continue to change for the practitioner, academic, and government lawyer.
Recommended publications
  • Russia's Posture in Space

    Russia's Posture in Space

    Russia’s Posture in Space: Prospects for Europe Executive Summary Prepared by the European Space Policy Institute Marco ALIBERTI Ksenia LISITSYNA May 2018 Table of Contents Background and Research Objectives ........................................................................................ 1 Domestic Developments in Russia’s Space Programme ............................................................ 2 Russia’s International Space Posture ......................................................................................... 4 Prospects for Europe .................................................................................................................. 5 Background and Research Objectives For the 50th anniversary of the launch of Sputnik-1, in 2007, the rebirth of Russian space activities appeared well on its way. After the decade-long crisis of the 1990s, the country’s political leadership guided by President Putin gave new impetus to the development of national space activities and put the sector back among the top priorities of Moscow’s domestic and foreign policy agenda. Supported by the progressive recovery of Russia’s economy, renewed political stability, and an improving external environment, Russia re-asserted strong ambitions and the resolve to regain its original position on the international scene. Towards this, several major space programmes were adopted, including the Federal Space Programme 2006-2015, the Federal Target Programme on the development of Russian cosmodromes, and the Federal Target Programme on the redeployment of GLONASS. This renewed commitment to the development of space activities was duly reflected in a sharp increase in the country’s launch rate and space budget throughout the decade. Thanks to the funds made available by flourishing energy exports, Russia’s space expenditure continued to grow even in the midst of the global financial crisis. Besides new programmes and increased funding, the spectrum of activities was also widened to encompass a new focus on space applications and commercial products.
  • Intelsat Satellites Supporting Approximately 50 Channels, Our Intelsatonesm Terrestrial Infrastructure and Other Production Capabilities; And

    Intelsat Satellites Supporting Approximately 50 Channels, Our Intelsatonesm Terrestrial Infrastructure and Other Production Capabilities; And

    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 000-50262 INTELSAT S.A. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Luxembourg 98-0346003 (State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.) 4, rue Albert Borschette Luxembourg L-1246 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) +352 27-84-1600 (Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☐ No ☒* Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
  • Of Mice and Materials: Payoffs of UNSGC Research Infrastructure Awards

    Of Mice and Materials: Payoffs of UNSGC Research Infrastructure Awards

    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Presentations Materials Physics 5-8-2017 Of Mice and Materials: Payoffs of UNSGC Research Infrastructure Awards JR Dennison Utah State Univesity Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mp_presentations Part of the Condensed Matter Physics Commons Recommended Citation Dennison, JR, "Of Mice and Materials: Payoffs of UNSGC Research Infrastructure Awards" (2017). Utah NASA Space Grant Consortium Annual Meeting. Presentations. Paper 168. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mp_presentations/168 This Presentation is brought to you for free and open access by the Materials Physics at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Presentations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Of Mice and Materials: Payoffs of UNSGC Research Infrastructure Awards J.R. Dennison Materials Physics Group Physics Department, Utah State University Utah NASA Space Grant Consortium Annual Meeting Weber State University May 8, 2017 To paraphrase Douglas Adams, “Space is [harsh]. You just won’t believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly [harsh] it is.” Interactions with this harsh space environment can modify materials and cause unforeseen and detrimental effects to spacecraft. The Poster Child for Space Environment Effects Ag coated Mylar with micrometeoroid impact USU MISSIE SUSpECS Logan, UT II Sample Tray Before After Complex dynamic interplay between space environment, satellite motion, and materials properties Facilities & Capabilities • Four ultrahigh vacuum chambers for electron emission tests equipped with electron, ion, and photon sources, detectors, and surface analysis capabilities. Sample Characterization & Preparation • Two high vacuum chambers for resistivity tests. • Bulk composition (AA, IPC). • High vacuum chamber for electrostatic breakdown tests.
  • 2010 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts

    2010 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts

    2010 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts May 2010 FAA Commercial Space Transportation (AST) and the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) HQ-101151.INDD 2010 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts About the Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA/AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 49 United States Code, Subtitle IX, Chapter 701 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA/AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA/AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA/AST’s web site at http://ast.faa.gov. Cover: Art by John Sloan (2010) NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. • i • Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation Table of Contents Executive Summary . 1 Introduction . 4 About the CoMStAC GSo Forecast . .4 About the FAA NGSo Forecast . .4 ChAracteriStics oF the CommerCiAl Space transportAtioN MArket . .5 Demand ForecastS . .5 COMSTAC 2010 Commercial Geosynchronous Orbit (GSO) Launch Demand Forecast . 7 exeCutive Summary . .7 BackGround . .9 Forecast MethoDoloGy . .9 CoMStAC CommerCiAl GSo Launch Demand Forecast reSultS .
  • Space Biology Research and Biosensor Technologies: Past, Present, and Future †

    Space Biology Research and Biosensor Technologies: Past, Present, and Future †

    biosensors Perspective Space Biology Research and Biosensor Technologies: Past, Present, and Future † Ada Kanapskyte 1,2, Elizabeth M. Hawkins 1,3,4, Lauren C. Liddell 5,6, Shilpa R. Bhardwaj 5,7, Diana Gentry 5 and Sergio R. Santa Maria 5,8,* 1 Space Life Sciences Training Program, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA; [email protected] (A.K.); [email protected] (E.M.H.) 2 Biomedical Engineering Department, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA 3 KBR Wyle, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA 4 Mammoth Biosciences, Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA 5 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA; [email protected] (L.C.L.); [email protected] (S.R.B.); [email protected] (D.G.) 6 Logyx, LLC, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA 7 The Bionetics Corporation, Yorktown, VA 23693, USA 8 COSMIAC Research Institute, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-650-604-1411 † Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Biosensors, 2–17 November 2020; Available online: https://iecb2020.sciforum.net/. Abstract: In light of future missions beyond low Earth orbit (LEO) and the potential establishment of bases on the Moon and Mars, the effects of the deep space environment on biology need to be examined in order to develop protective countermeasures. Although many biological experiments have been performed in space since the 1960s, most have occurred in LEO and for only short periods of time. These LEO missions have studied many biological phenomena in a variety of model organisms, and have utilized a broad range of technologies.
  • NASA Ames to Establish Nationwide Lunar Science Institute

    NASA Ames to Establish Nationwide Lunar Science Institute

    November 2007 Worden gives upbeat message about future work for Ames BY JOHN BLUCK "We have switched material to In an upbeat talk to a crowd that phenolic impregnated carbon abla- filled the Ames main auditorium, tor (PICA), a (heat shield) material Ames Center Director S. Pete Worden developed here," Worden noted. His outlined an exciting future at Ames projected slide also listed Ames as that includes new work in exploration, leading PICA development and test- science and aeronautics -- each about a ing both for the Crew Exploration Ve- third of the center's efforts, he said. "I hicle, now called Orion, and the Mars have a gazillion charts to go through," Science Laboratory (MSL), which has photo by Eric James NASA he said. a planned launch date in fall 2009. His wide-ranging presentation Worden said that Ames' arc jets about Ames touched on moon explo- facility "a unique facility in the world." ration, a lunar institute, moon dust re- He added, "We want to upgrade search, heat shield work for spacecraft them." destined for the moon and Mars, a Mars sample "cache box" assignment, Life Sciences rising supercomputer capability, small "We are getting additional life Ames Center Director S. Pete Worden responds satellite work with a potential for support tasks assigned by Johnson to a question during the recent upbeat talk he many missions, increased astrobiology (and Marshall)," Worden said. "This is gave to the center about the future of Ames. work, growing cooperation among significant." continued on page 5 academia, and commercial partners and Ames and much more.
  • 6 FOTON RETRIEVABLE CAPSULES This Section Is Aimed at Providing New and Experienced Users with Basic Utilisation Information Regarding Foton Retrievable Capsules

    6 FOTON RETRIEVABLE CAPSULES This Section Is Aimed at Providing New and Experienced Users with Basic Utilisation Information Regarding Foton Retrievable Capsules

    6 FOTON RETRIEVABLE CAPSULES This section is aimed at providing new and experienced users with basic utilisation information regarding Foton retrievable capsules. It begins with an introduction to the Foton capsule. 6.1 Introduction to Foton Capsules 6.1.1 What Are Foton Capsules? Foton capsules (Figure 6-1 and Figure 6-2) are unmanned, retrievable capsules, derived from the design of the 1960’s Soviet Vostok manned spacecraft and the Zenit military reconnaissance satellite. These capsules are very similar to the Bion and Resurs-F satellites introduced by the Soviets in the 1970’s, for biological research and Earth natural resources investigation, respectively. The first Foton capsule was launched in 1985 as Cosmos 1645 and only with the fourth launch in 1988 was the spacecraft officially designated Foton (Foton-4). These capsules are launched into near-circular, low-earth orbits by a Soyuz-U rocket, providing researchers with gravity levels less than 10 -5 g, for missions lasting approximately 2 weeks. The earlier Foton missions were conceived primarily for materials science research, but later missions also began to include experiments in the fields of fluid physics, biology and radiation dosimetry. ESA’s participation in the Foton programme began in 1991 with a protein crystallisation experiment on-board Foton-7, followed by a further 35 experiments up to and including the Foton- 12 mission in 1999. In 2002, ESA provided a large number of experiments for the Foton-M1 mission (the first flight of an upgraded version of the Foton spacecraft). This mission ended in disaster when the Soyuz launcher rocket exploded shortly after lift-off due to a malfunction in one of its engines.
  • Britain Back in Space

    Britain Back in Space

    Spaceflight A British Interplanetary Society Publication Britain back in Space Vol 58 No 1 January 2016 £4.50 www.bis-space.com 1.indd 1 11/26/2015 8:30:59 AM 2.indd 2 11/26/2015 8:31:14 AM CONTENTS Editor: Published by the British Interplanetary Society David Baker, PhD, BSc, FBIS, FRHS Sub-editor: Volume 58 No. 1 January 2016 Ann Page 4-5 Peake on countdown – to the ISS and beyond Production Assistant: As British astronaut Tim Peake gets ready for his ride into space, Ben Jones Spaceflight reviews the build-up to this mission and examines the Spaceflight Promotion: possibilities that may unfold as a result of European contributions to Suszann Parry NASA’s Orion programme. Spaceflight Arthur C. Clarke House, 6-9 Ready to go! 27/29 South Lambeth Road, London, SW8 1SZ, England. What happens when Tim Peake arrives at the International Space Tel: +44 (0)20 7735 3160 Station, where can I watch it, listen to it, follow it, and what are the Fax: +44 (0)20 7582 7167 broadcasters doing about special programming? We provide the Email: [email protected] directory to a media frenzy! www.bis-space.com 16-17 BIS Technical Projects ADVERTISING Tel: +44 (0)1424 883401 Robin Brand has been busy gathering the latest information about Email: [email protected] studies, research projects and practical experiments now underway at DISTRIBUTION the BIS, the first in a periodic series of roundups. Spaceflight may be received worldwide by mail through membership of the British 18 Icarus Progress Report Interplanetary Society.
  • System Analysis and Design of the Geostationary Earth Orbit All-Electric Communication Satellites

    System Analysis and Design of the Geostationary Earth Orbit All-Electric Communication Satellites

    https://doi.org/10.1590/jatm.v13.1205 REVIEW ARTICLE System Analysis and Design of the Geostationary Earth Orbit All-Electric Communication Satellites Parsa Abbasrezaee1,* , Ali Saraaeb2 1.Sapienza University of Rome – Aerospace Engineering School – Rome – Italy. 2.Khaje Nasir Toosi University of Technology – Aerospace department – Tehran – Iran. *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT With the help of gathered data and formulas extracted from a previous conference paper, the all-electric geostationary Earth orbit (GEO) communication satellite statistical design was conducted and further studied with analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) methods. Moreover, with the help of previously determined system parameters, the orbital ascension, orbital maintenance and deorbiting specifications, calculations and simulations were persuaded. Furthermore, a parametric subsystem design was conducted to test the methods reliability and prove the feasibility of such approach. The parametric subsystem design was used for electrical power subsystem (EPS), attitude determination and control system (ADCS), electric propulsion, telemetry, tracking and control (TT&C) in conceptual subsystem design level, which highly relies on the satellite type and other specifications, were concluded in this paper; other subsystem designs were not of a significant difference to hybrid and chemical satellites. Eventually, the verification of the mentioned subsystems has been evaluated by contrasting the results with the Space mission engineering: the new SMAD, and subsystem design book reference. Keywords: All-electric; GEO; AHP and TOPSIS Method; Maintenance; Deorbiting; Parametric. INTRODUCTION From the previous conference paper, the contrast between all-electric geostationary Earth orbit (GEO) communication and other hybrid and chemical satellite design has shown that using all-electric satellite design has many advantages.
  • Failures in Spacecraft Systems: an Analysis from The

    Failures in Spacecraft Systems: an Analysis from The

    FAILURES IN SPACECRAFT SYSTEMS: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF DECISION MAKING A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Purdue University by Vikranth R. Kattakuri In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering August 2019 Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana ii THE PURDUE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL STATEMENT OF THESIS APPROVAL Dr. Jitesh H. Panchal, Chair School of Mechanical Engineering Dr. Ilias Bilionis School of Mechanical Engineering Dr. William Crossley School of Aeronautics and Astronautics Approved by: Dr. Jay P. Gore Associate Head of Graduate Studies iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am extremely grateful to my advisor Prof. Jitesh Panchal for his patient guidance throughout the two years of my studies. I am indebted to him for considering me to be a part of his research group and for providing this opportunity to work in the fields of systems engineering and mechanical design for a period of 2 years. Being a research and teaching assistant under him had been a rewarding experience. Without his valuable insights, this work would not only have been possible, but also inconceivable. I would like to thank my co-advisor Prof. Ilias Bilionis for his valuable inputs, timely guidance and extremely engaging research meetings. I thank my committee member, Prof. William Crossley for his interest in my work. I had a great opportunity to attend all three courses taught by my committee members and they are the best among all the courses I had at Purdue. I would like to thank my mentors Dr. Jagannath Raju of Systemantics India Pri- vate Limited and Prof.
  • Space Security Index 2013

    Space Security Index 2013

    SPACE SECURITY INDEX 2013 www.spacesecurity.org 10th Edition SPACE SECURITY INDEX 2013 SPACESECURITY.ORG iii Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publications Data Space Security Index 2013 ISBN: 978-1-927802-05-2 FOR PDF version use this © 2013 SPACESECURITY.ORG ISBN: 978-1-927802-05-2 Edited by Cesar Jaramillo Design and layout by Creative Services, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada Cover image: Soyuz TMA-07M Spacecraft ISS034-E-010181 (21 Dec. 2012) As the International Space Station and Soyuz TMA-07M spacecraft were making their relative approaches on Dec. 21, one of the Expedition 34 crew members on the orbital outpost captured this photo of the Soyuz. Credit: NASA. Printed in Canada Printer: Pandora Print Shop, Kitchener, Ontario First published October 2013 Please direct enquiries to: Cesar Jaramillo Project Ploughshares 57 Erb Street West Waterloo, Ontario N2L 6C2 Canada Telephone: 519-888-6541, ext. 7708 Fax: 519-888-0018 Email: [email protected] Governance Group Julie Crôteau Foreign Aairs and International Trade Canada Peter Hays Eisenhower Center for Space and Defense Studies Ram Jakhu Institute of Air and Space Law, McGill University Ajey Lele Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses Paul Meyer The Simons Foundation John Siebert Project Ploughshares Ray Williamson Secure World Foundation Advisory Board Richard DalBello Intelsat General Corporation Theresa Hitchens United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research John Logsdon The George Washington University Lucy Stojak HEC Montréal Project Manager Cesar Jaramillo Project Ploughshares Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE PAGE 1 Acronyms and Abbreviations PAGE 5 Introduction PAGE 9 Acknowledgements PAGE 10 Executive Summary PAGE 23 Theme 1: Condition of the space environment: This theme examines the security and sustainability of the space environment, with an emphasis on space debris; the potential threats posed by near-Earth objects; the allocation of scarce space resources; and the ability to detect, track, identify, and catalog objects in outer space.
  • Commercial Spacecraft Mission Model Update

    Commercial Spacecraft Mission Model Update

    Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) Report of the COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group Commercial Spacecraft Mission Model Update May 1998 Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation Federal Aviation Administration U.S. Department of Transportation M5528/98ml Printed for DOT/FAA/AST by Rocketdyne Propulsion & Power, Boeing North American, Inc. Report of the COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group COMMERCIAL SPACECRAFT MISSION MODEL UPDATE May 1998 Paul Fuller, Chairman Technology & Innovation Working Group Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) Associative Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation Federal Aviation Administration U.S. Department of Transportation TABLE OF CONTENTS COMMERCIAL MISSION MODEL UPDATE........................................................................ 1 1. Introduction................................................................................................................ 1 2. 1998 Mission Model Update Methodology.................................................................. 1 3. Conclusions ................................................................................................................ 2 4. Recommendations....................................................................................................... 3 5. References .................................................................................................................. 3 APPENDIX A – 1998 DISCUSSION AND RESULTS........................................................