Thesis Sci 1989 Du Plessis M A.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgementTown of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Cape Published by the University ofof Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University BEHAVIOURAL ECOLOGY OF THE RED BILLED WOODHOOPOE PHOENICULUS PURPUREUS IN SOUTH AFRICA by Morne Andre du PlessisTown Cape of Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University Department of Zoology Faculty of Science University of Cape Town August 1989 Dedicated to my parents, A.S. and Mienkie, for a stable natal territory And the 'ffiekabafazi' for sharing the best times of my life Town Cape of University ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vi GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 SECTION 1: ECOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS ON SOCIALITY 10 Chapter 1. The influence of roost-cavity availability on flock size 11 Chapter 2. Resource patchiness as a dispersal constraint: consequences for philopatry and inbreeding 37 SECTION 2: SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR 73 Chapter 3. Reciprocity and reinforcement of socialTown status: multiple functions of allopreening 74 Chapter 4. Dominance and sociality: balancing conflict and cooperation Cape 97 Chapter 5. Behavioural maintenance of group territoriality 122 of SECTION 3. EVOLUTIONARY IMPLICATIONS OF SOCIALITY 143 Chapter 6. The role of helpers in feeding chicks 144 Chapter 7. Consequences of sociality for individual fitness 159 Chapter 8. UniversityHelping at the nest: a test of hypotheses 206 SECTION 4. SYNTHESIS 229 Chapter 9. Towards an understanding of the evolution of sociality 232 APPENDIX 1. The development of kleptoparasitic behaviour 252 APPENDIX 2. Behavioural and physiological influences on roosting behaviour 257 III ABSTRACT du Plessis, Morne A. 1989. Behavioural ecology of the Redbilled Woodhoopoe I Phoeniculus purpureus in South Africa. PhD. Thesis, Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa, (vii) + 265pp. A study was made of two Redbilled (Green) Woodhoopoe Phoeniculus purpureus populations spanning an eight year period (1981-1988) and 258 'flock-years', in the eastern Cape Province of South Mrica. The main objectives of the study were to investigate (1) why woodhoopoes live in groups; (2) why nonbreeders do not breed; and, (3) why nonbreeders provision young that are notTown their own? Ecological and demographic data were gathered in addition to detailed behavioural observations of 54 woodhoopoe flocks. TheCape following experimental manipulations were performed: (1) breeders were ofremoved from flocks to (a) monitor dispersal patterns and restructuring of flocks; and, (b) observe behavioural reactions by remaining birds; (2) cavity availability was (a) decreased, to enable quantification of availability; and, (b) increased, by addition of nest/roost boxes to an area which supported no permanent woodhoopoe territories; and, (3) stimuli, associated with University the food provisioning response of adult birds, were manipulated to investigate the evolutionary basis of allofeeding behaviour Variability in social and reproductive behaviour reflects environmental selection pressures, in the form of roost-cavity availability, with a reduction in cavity availability leading to increased group size. The group-territorial social system and high level of inbreeding of Redbilled Woodhoopoes have evolved primarily in iv response to environmental constraints on dispersal, rather than by particular benefits that arise from group living. Therefore, the habitat-saturation hypothesis best explains group living of woodhoopoes. Behavioural dominance hierarchies ensure that dominance relationships are well-defined among potential competitors (for breeding status), and thereby minimize disruption to flock cohesion upon the death (or removal) of a breeder. If competition for a breeding vacancy arose at the time of the breeder's death, the resultant delay in occupancy of the breeding vacancy would increase the likelihood of competition from unrelated birds. The establishment of such hierarchies is therefore adaptive in the context of the direct component of kin selection. The presence of nonbreeding helpers do not increase fledgling success, breeding frequency, survivorship (of any age, sex or social class), or number of breeder-offspring produced. Because noTown unambiguous indirect fitness benefits could be shown to result from helping behaviour (specifically allofeeding), I propose that the unselected (misdirectedCape parental care) hypothesis is a viable alternative to the 'functional hypotheses.'of This hypothesis is supported by observations/manipulations of misdirected food provisioning by both breeders and helpers. University v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I gratefully acknowledge fmancial support for this study from the following sources: The Council for Scientific and Industrial Research's Foundation for Research Development, the trustees of the Bob Blundell Memorial Scholarship Fund, the University of Cape Town, and my father, AS. du Plessis. I thank Dr Philip Hockey for being the model supervisor, allowing me total freedom in my approach to the study, yet providing valuable criticisms of unrefmed ideas and manuscripts, and efficiently handling less pleasant administrative matters. The countless encounters we had on the squash-racquets court over lunch hours, during the writing-up stage of the dissertation, greatly contributed to my physical well-being, as well as making 'city-life' somewhat more bearable. I thank Prof. Roy Siegfried for his confidence in me, and his support of the study. Town Deon du Plessis and Dirk Verwoerd were constant sources of inspiration, especially during the early phases of the study and we spent many memorable nights around the the camp ftre 'talking kakelaars'. Carl Vernon was an endless source of fteld knowledgeCape and we spent some pleasurable times together in the fteld. David Allan was always willing to engageof in long discussions about the study. Many people provided comments on drafts of chapters: Dr Phil Hockey (all chapters), Dr Alan Kemp (Ch. 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, App. 2), David Allan (Ch. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, App. 2), Prof. W. Roy Siegfried (Ch. 2, 4, 5, 7, App. 1), Deon du Plessis (Ch. 1,2, 3, 6), Prof. J. David Ligon (Ch. 3, 4, 5), Prof. Anne Rasa (Ch. 4, 5, App. 2), Peter RyanUniversity (Ch. 2, 3,8), Will Steele (Ch. 2, 6, 7), Sue Jackson (Ch. 6, App. 2), Dr Joe Williams (Ch. 2, App. 2), Dr Nigel Bennett (Ch. 4), Richard Brooke (App. 1) Dr Willem Ferguson (App. 1), Dr Robert Prys-Jones (App. 1), and Dr Peter Woodall (App. 1). Additionally, this dissertation benefttted from discussions with Dr William Bond, Dr Adrian Craig, Dr Francois Odendaal, Terry Oatley, Dr Scott Turner and Carl Vernon. Dirk Verwoerd drew the sketches of woodhoopoe displays (Ch. 3, 5), painted the woodhoopoe clay models (Ch. 8) and assisted with some of the fteld work (Ch. 6, and other). Deon, Ryna and Francois du Plessis assisted with some of the fteld work (Ch. 6, and other), Carl Vernon assisted with the identification of trees, and Martie Kossatz made the clay models of begging woodhoopoes (Ch. 8). Dr Coleen Moloney was always willing to push her own work aside to assist me VI with statistical problems; Dr Richard Knight also provided statistical help. Helen Davies and Mark Boobyer kindly assisted me whenever I needed advice on 'the mysteries of the computer world'. Willem and Dottie Fourie not only generously provided accommodation throughout the study, but they were also a continuous source of meat and supplies (i.e. red wine), and helped in many other ways. I shall always cherish the fantastic times we had together, especially those at Double Mouth. Cecil Whale never once complained about the organic black ring which I left around his bath after the occasional 'Kubusi dean-up'. The following landowners allowed me unlimited access to their properties, warm hospitality and assisted in various ways: Patrick Bailey, Hannes Botha, Harold Brent, Ethel Brown, Lionel Brill, Peter Brill, Reg Cawthorne, Frank Codon, Shaun Cockin, Vernon Codon, Brummer de Kock, Zander de Kock, Pierre de Villiers, Cape Department of Environment Affairs (Forestry Branch: Paul Gobetz), Willem Fourie, Kei Mouth Municipality, Kei Mouth Pineries (ErrolTown Schenk), Eugene Miles, John Miles, David Osterloh, D.D. Osterloh, Philip Osterloh, Alan Robb, Michael Robb, Norton Thompson, George Warren, and Ronald Warren. Cape Many people regularly invited me over for deliciousof meals and assisted me in other ways, particularly Shaun and Tam Cockin, Jeff and Sue Warren-Smith, Frank and Mandy Cockin, Bennie and Lundi Botha, Phil and Pat Cripps, Anthony and Marilyn Nelson, Allan and Glynnis Ranger, John and Santa Deere, Reg and Alet White, and Barnie Barnard. Finally I thank my Universityparents, A.S. and Mienkie du Plessis, for support throughout my life, and for never asking when I was going to start earning a decent wage! Something which this dissertation obviously cannot capture is the evocative atmosphere of the study sites (Double Mouth and the Kubusi River valley) and I shall cherish countless memories ...... Crowned Crane-elegance, as they spiral in to roost at dusk; Crowned Eagle-power, as a monkey drapes limply from talons; Blue Duiker-innocence, as a mother nuzzles her lamb; Trumpeter Hornbill cacophony, as forty playful birds prepare to roost; Africa-nostalgia, as songs