Fn Partial Fulfill¡Enè
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
TI{E REÐISCOVERY OF JOTIN DOMIÈ¡ A SÎUDT OF HIS PO},=IRY AND REPInATION IN TI{E LIGHT 0F ¡rOÐFnN S0HoLARSHIP, TIITH EMPHASIS ON TI{E CRITICAL APFAOACHES OF S]R ED¡flJND COSSE AND SIR HERBIIRT J.C. GRÍT,BSON A Thesis Prege¡rt ed to the FacuLty of the Departnent of Engllsh UnLversity of Manitoba fn Partial Fulfill¡enÈ of the Requlrementg for the Degree Master of Arts by CLenent Horatlo Wyke Oeùober L96À ?IIE REÐISCOIIERT OF JOHN DONNES A STUDT OF HTS POETRY AND REPUTATION IN THE I,IGI{T OF MODERN SCHoLARSHIP, 1IITH IiTtpHASIS 0N THE CRTTICAL APPROACHES OF SM EDMUND GOSSE AND SIR HERBTN,T J.C. GRIIRSON An .{bstract of a ThesLs PreseuL ed to the Faculty of the Department of Engli-sh University of Ì,fanLtoba In Part,Íal FulfiLl-¡nent of the Requiremenùs for the Degree Master of Arts by Cle¡oent Horatío lfyke October 196À ås a wit and as the Dean of St. Paults, John Dorne tvas conetanùIy recognized throughout the centuries ¡ but as a poet he was accl-aímed. in his own centu.ry, oonde:¡ned jrr the eighteenth century, partly neglected ln the nineteenth century and. ¡ediscovered in the early tvrentíeth century. It is the purpose of thls thosis to account for this modern revivaL of i¡terest Ln Donne. Accordingþ¡ his rediscovery nust be prJncipalþ concerned with his reputatlon as a poet. After arüIess j:nita.tors of Donners w"it had made rnetaphysical poetr5r wrdesi¡able and unpopu].ar durjng the Restoration period, Dryden contínued the reaction :lgainsl Ðonne, but not r+lthout adrniring his wit. For Ðryden Donne was nthe gre¿rtest t^/Lt, though not the best poet of our nation.tt lle fUrther cfajfled that rtif we are rot so great w-its as Donne, yet certainly lúe a.re better poets.tt This cluestíoning of Donners position as a poet narked the begiruoíng of neocl-assical reaction against his poetry. Eighteenth-century jnterest in satirica,l- n'riting lnevitably focussed on D,or:net s satíres. they were fomd to be metrically rough though fuLl of quêlity e¡d substance, and cÕnsequenily Pope applied his own versificatlon to some of then. It was not long before Donners satires were compared with Popets version ê.nd clfticiøed for fa3-ll¡g short of the nark. But to this eriticLsnì of Donne t s satires Dryden added the accusa- tj.on: trHe fDonne-l affects the neteplrysics, not onþ ín his satires, but in his amorous vel.ses r.Jhere natu¡e erhoul-d relgn . .ll This brought the term ttnetaphyslcal-rr Lnio contenporary use in connection with ¿he nêare of Donne. tf Between bhe years I?7? and 1?8I, Johnson, in discusslng 0owley in his Lileq_gl _thq:lqet e, not only applied the term to Donners poetry¡ but conveit,ed J.t ínto a lfterary öitle r.rhich had peJoratlve co nnotatíons. He stated bhat, the Metaphyslcals used poetry as a medlum for dlspla¡ring their Learníng. But this was not all; Donne and hls school were to be brought into greater disrepute because of wltty conceits. rWítrr went through a series of meanlngs as e llterary te¡n and Donnels reputation lras affected accordlngly. Johnson disnissed Donnerg vit as a kind of d-LsrA$tre g!æ, and hls ve¡dict r+,as th e cuLrrination of a century of adverse criticism of Donnc and the other Metaphysicals which continued in the nineteenth century. Nlneteenth-cent ury crítlcs uere influencod by Johnsonts erltLclsrn in the !i:le _olltqq¡Iel and were consequently prejudiced ln theír asseasment of Donre as poet. Theír dlsfavour and negLect left Donners reputatlon under ê cloud. However¡ Wordsworth, Coleridge, Larnb, De Quíncey and Brovning r.rere enong ùhe few crítics rvho spoke in Donners favour but theír slgníficant comneRts on Donne were insufficlent to roverse the tide of Johnsonian criticism. Tn the Vlctorian period r¡hen critical taste was cÒloured more than usual by moråL consideratlons, Donnets elegÍes and satirea ettracted further adverse co¡nment fron critles. However, an increasing interest in Donne ae a subJect of biography was shoh'tì by ndrrund Gosse, who pubì.lshed his lilp_eld _!g!!qq .çLf_ {qbn Donæ in 1899r Gossers book rias based on lJaltonlg Ll:Le of lonng, whlch, slnce lts f lrst publi,cetlon in 1ó40 wLth Donne' s !AXI_ gegryIrs, bad portrayed Donne as a gracious divlne who.¡ though his llfe uas filled v¡ith unforbunate lii circunstances, had died a saintly death. Wal-tonrs !!þr by drawing f,avourable connent fro¡n critics who had l-ittle ad¡niration for Donne a.e a poet, had served to preserve so¡ne interest in hi:n. ,Àlthough Ít was admired for its styte and chann as a classío, rfalton I s biography of Donno r+as crlticized in the nlneteehùh and twentieth centuríes for its in_ accuracy of detail. Gosse, ironfcall_y enough, was one of those who warned agai¡st r^fal-ton t s errors, but drew sinilar ad.vers e criticis¡¡ for his :ovrn 'ÌrtsùakËs rr¡hen he published his Life of Donne. The literary and critical inte¡est rr'hich r,¡as stÍr¡ed by Gossers ttuo-volune biography of Donne was indÍrectly a boost to Donners position as poet. By presenthg Donne to a scholarly and exbensive f-iterary audlence, Gosse had accomplished in the fierd of, biography what earller critics of the nineteenth century had noü done i^n the field of literary criùicism. However, it was in the early twentieth eeâtur.y that Donnels reputation was rehabilltated when fu 191.2 Gríerson provided hLs contertr- poraries and thelr successors wüh a subsüantial edition of Donners poetry: the oxford hrglish Text edition with appendixes and comnentary. îhus i-p12 may be suggested as the date of ùhe Do¡¡ne revival. Previous editions of Ðonnets poetry proved u¡rsubstantial and erroneous/ and even when critical i¡terest began, there vras no truly rell-able edJ.tion to provide the fou¡rdation for it,s contjnuance. The results of Griersonts valuabl-e editlon are gtill- seen tod.ay, and are highly appreciated by Donne scholars. GrLerson succeeded not only ln suppþing a basÍs fot, future iv texLual- study of Donnets poetq¡¡ but aLso in restoring recognition of Donne as a poet. He accornplished this by redefining the ter¡n theta- physica}r to allov¡ for more fruiùful and favou¡abLe treatment of Donnets poetry and by allowi-ng Donne the freedom of díctíon hrhich previous critics had denled hirtr. In brief, he nade a fulL re-eval-uati,on of Dor¡ne. Grierson I s re-assessment of Donne waa ctj¡axed by hÍs emphasis on passi.on j¡ Dorne I s poetry, and on the successful combinatto¡r of this passion Ï¡'lth wit. These areas of eraphasis escaped. the eyes of critics lrho were either hlndered by ¿heir oun tools of critíciôTn or by a pre- occupation with biographical fact-findiag. ;å, representative selection of poems fron each of the naJor sections of Donnets poetry is analJsed to il-lustrate the ínadequacy or error of the judgments of his earller detractors and thc sotÐ.d.ness of Gríersonts eritical reaesessment of his work. TÁBI,E O¡'CONTts{TS cHAPîm PJ,GE I. 1 ü. DONNE RSVEAI,TD Ï{NOUGH BIOGRAFHY 23 The lIaltoà Lmege of Donn€ 23 Gosse and Hla -Audlcncè:  Study of Factors InfLuenclng Opinfon of, (þEscls Life of Do¡¡re 36 The Gosse ¡nage of Donne a¡rd Contemporar,¡r Opinton 44 Cosselg Tmag€ of Donne as Poet . 5l+ IIr. DONI{E REDISCOV!]ìH) 64 rv. DONI\TE RE-EVIII¡,ATED IN TI{E soNcs AND soIìINETs 90 MetapÌ¡reLcal Poemo nèconoid€red 9] Blographlcal Poeø¡ ReconEidored 102 Poems of Fortraordinary lìIlt . 106 Poøs wlth l{lt and Passlon 115 v. DoNNÊ RÞEVÂLUATLÐ IN Îl{E ELEOIES A¡tD SATTRES 128 the Elegfes Roeonsidered ae Rhetorloal poetry J29 The Rcle of, Pasgl.qn in the E"tqELgg 134 The Âdve!ðe Eff€cts,of Wtt tn the Sg!9g )43 The QuestLon of Indecency in the Sgþ 146 The Ver6lflcstloa of the ËeþEqs a¡d Oritical Optnion 151 The !.fetnfcal Hsrshness of thô ggþEeq . t55 CHAFT¡R PAGE Obscurl-ty of Meaning in the gelyrgs_ 156 Indecency ln the Setytgg 158 Overwittlness 1n the Þa.!yl_çg ]'59 The Third SaU¡re exe¡npL ed from Overt¡iLtlness 161 The Ártl-ess I¡nitatlon of Donners tr¡tt and the Effect on hla Reputation r63 pI!"t_N¡ vï. Dot'rNE RB-I;VAT,UATED tN THE !QEÌ{S t?0 CrltfcaÌ Oplníon of Donners Type of Religlous poetry t7r The Source of Passion Ln the Divine poe¡¡s . 175 Exceesive I,/lt ln the Dív{ne PoenE r78 ItPerillous The Balancetr Between t¡J1t and passion . 184 The Effectlve Combl.natfon of Wlt and passion in ùhe Hol¿éenne,Lq and }lvnqg 1É8 CONOIUSTON 198a BIBLTOGRAP}IY 200 CI{ìIPTER I DONI{Ê D¡ æIIPSE Donnel¡ gl-orious reLgn ae the ûMonsrch of Witn íes brought to a¡r end ln the eighteenth century by the abueea of hl.6 oim subJectE. Hig poetry y¡eB then e:rpoged to seyere crltlcfan basêd on ruLes wlth vrhtch nelthar Donne uo¡r hle age had been greatly conÇetîed. Dryden, pàpc and Johnaon, the greatest flgurea of the neoclassÍca1 age, dlsquallflcd Donne as a grêat post e¡rd lcft to ct'Ltfc3 of thê ninetèenth centurJr a nast, unfavourable inpresaLon of hin. !'ortunately, however, this lnpreoel,on ¡vae coFected ln the eerþ tr*entleth cantuIy r,rhen Donne rs poêtry nês gl.ven e falrër asseasËeÍtt.