Sephardim in Israel: Zionism from the Standpoint of Its Jewish Victims Author(S): Ella Shohat Source: Social Text, No
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Sephardim in Israel: Zionism from the Standpoint of Its Jewish Victims Author(s): Ella Shohat Source: Social Text, No. 19/20 (Autumn, 1988), pp. 1-35 Published by: Duke University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/466176 . Accessed: 02/06/2013 12:04 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Duke University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Social Text. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 141.213.236.110 on Sun, 2 Jun 2013 12:04:41 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Sephardimin Israel: Zionismfrom the Standpointof its JewishVictims ELLA SHOHAT Alternativecritical discourse concerning Israel and Zionismhas untilnow largely focussedon theJewish/Arab conflict, viewing Israel as a constitutedState, allied with the West againstthe East, whose veryfoundation was premisedon the denial of the Orientand of the legitimaterights of the Palestinianpeople. I would like to extendthe termsof the debatebeyond earlier dichotomies (East versusWest, Arab versusJew, Palestinian versus Israeli) to incorporatean issue elidedby previousformulations, to wit,the presence of a mediatingentity, that of theArab or OrientalJews, those Sephardi Jews coming largely from the Arab and Moslemcountries. A morecomplete analysis, I willargue, must consider the negativeconsequences of Zionismnot onlyfor the Palestinianpeople but also forthe SephardiJews who now formthe majorityof the Jewishpopulation in Israel. For Zionism does not only undertaketo speak for Palestineand the Palestinians,thus "blocking" all Palestinianself-representation, it also presumes to speak for Oriental Jews. The Zionist denial of the Arab-Moslemand PalestinianEast, then,has as its corollarythe denialof the Jewish"Mizrahim" (the "EasternOnes") who, like the Palestinians,but by more subtleand less obviouslybrutal mechanisms, have also been strippedof the rightof self- representation.Within Israel, and on thestage of worldopinion, the hegemonic voiceof Israelhas almostinvariably been that of European Jews, the Ashkenazim, whilethe Sephardi voice has beenlargely muffled or silenced. Zionism claimsto be a liberationmovement for all Jews,and Zionist ideologistshave spared no effortin theirattempt to makethe two terms "Jewish" and"Zionist" virtually synonymous. In fact,however, Zionism has beenprimarily a liberationmovement for European Jews (and that,as we know,problemati- cally)and moreprecisely for that tiny minority of EuropeanJews actually settled in Israel. AlthoughZionism claims to providea homelandfor all Jews,that homelandwas not offeredto all withthe samelargess. Sephardi Jews were first broughtto Israel for specificEuropean-Zionist reasons, and once therethey were systematicallydiscriminated against by a Zionism which deployed its energies and material resources differentially,to the consistent advantage of European Jews and to the consistentdetriment of OrientalJews. In this essay,I 1 This content downloaded from 141.213.236.110 on Sun, 2 Jun 2013 12:04:41 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 2 Ella Shohat would like to delineate the situation of structuraloppression experienced by Sephardi Jews in Israel, to brieflytrace the historicalorigins of that oppression, and to propose a symptomaticanalysis of the discourses-historiographic, sociological, political and journalistic-which sublimate,mask and perpetuate that oppression. Superimposed on the East/Westproblematic will be anotherissue, related but hardly identical, namely that of the relation between the "First" and the "Third" Worlds. Although Israel is not a Third World countryby any simple or conventional definition,it does have affinitiesand structuralanalogies to the Third World, analogies which often go unrecognizedeven, and perhaps espe- cially,within Israel itself.In what sense, then,can Israel, despite the views of its officialspokesmen, be seen as partakingin "Third Worldness?"First, in purely demographic terms, a majorityof the Israeli population can be seen as Third World or at least as originatingin the Third World. The Palestiniansmake up about twentypercent of the population while the Sephardim,the majorityof whom come, within very recent memory,from countries such as Morocco, Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Iran and India, countries generallyregarded as forming part of the Third World, constituteanother fifty percent of the population, thus giving us a total of about seventypercent of the population as Third World or Third World-derived(and almost ninetypercent if one includes the West Bank and Gaza.) European hegemonyin Israel, in thissense, is the productof a distinct numerical minority,a minorityin whose interest it is to downplay Israel's "Easterness"as well as its "Third Worldness." Within Israel, European Jewsconstitute a First-Worldelite dominatingnot only the Palestinians but also the Oriental Jews. The Sephardim,as a Jewish Third World people, forma semi-colonizednation-within-a-nation. My analysis here is indebted to anti-colonialistdiscourse generally (Frantz Fanon, Aime Cesaire) and specificallyto Edward Said's indispensable contributionto that discourse, his genealogical critique of Orientalismas the discursiveformation by which European culturewas able to manage-and even produce-the Orient duringthe post-Enlightenmentperiod.1 The Orientalistattitude posits the Orient as a constellation of traits, assigning generalized values to real or imaginary differences,largely to the advantage of the West and the disadvantageof the East, so as to justifythe former'sprivileges and aggressions.Orientalism tends to maintain what Said calls a "flexiblepositional superiority,"which puts the Westernerin a whole series of possible relationswith the Oriental,but without the Westernerever losing the relativeupper hand. My essay concerns,then, the process by which one pole of the East/Westdichotomy is produced and reproduced as rational, developed, superior and human, and the other as aberrant,underdeveloped and inferior,but in thiscase as it affectsOriental Jews. This content downloaded from 141.213.236.110 on Sun, 2 Jun 2013 12:04:41 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Zionismfrom the Perspective ofits Jewish Victims 3 The ZionistMaster Narrative The view of the Sephardim as oppressed Third-Worldpeople goes directly against the grain of the dominant discourse within Israel and disseminatedby the Western media outside of Israel. According to that discourse, European Zionism "saved" Sephardi Jews fromthe harsh rule of theirArab "captors." It took them out of "primitiveconditions" of povertyand superstitionand ushered them gentlyinto a modern Westernsociety characterizedby tolerance,democ- racy, and "humane values," values with which they were but vaguely and erraticallyfamiliar due to the "levantineenvironments" from which they came. Within Israel, of course, theyhave sufferedfrom the problem of "the gap," not simplythat between theirstandard of livingand that of European Jews,but also from the problem of their "incomplete integration"into Israeli liberalismand prosperity,handicapped as they have been by theirOriental, illiterate,despotic, sexistand generallypre-modern formation in theirlands of origin,as well as by theirpropensity for generatinglarge families.Fortunately, however, the political establishment,the welfareinstitutions and the educational systemhave done all in theirpower to "reduce this gap" by initiatingthe OrientalJews into the ways of a civilized, modern society. Fortunatelyas well, inter-marriageis proceeding apace and the Sephardimhave won new appreciationfor their "traditional cultural values," for their folkloricmusic, their rich cuisine and warm hospitality.A serious problem persists,however. Due to theirinadequate education and "lack of experiencewith democracy,"the Jewsof Asia and Africatend to be extremely conservative,even reactionary,and religiouslyfanatic, in contrastto the liberal, secular, and educated European Jews. Anti-Socialist,they form the base of support for the right-wingparties. Given their"cruel experiencein Arab lands," furthermore,they tend to be "Arab-haters,"and in this sense theyhave been an "obstacle to peace," preventingthe effortsof the "Peace Camp" to make a "reasonable settlement"with the Arabs. I will speak in a momentof the fundamentalfalsity of this discourse,but I would like firstto speak of its wide dissemination,for this discourse is shared by rightand "left,"and it has its earlyand late versionsas well as its religiousand secular variants. An ideology which blames the Sephardim (and their Third World countriesof origin) has been elaborated by the Israeli elite, expressedby politicians,social scientists,educators, writers, and the mass-media.This ideol- ogy orchestratesan interlockingseries of prejudicialdiscourses possessing clear colonialistovertones. It is not surprising,in this context,to findthe Sephardim compared, by the elite, to other "lower" colonized peoples. Reporting on the Sephardim in a 1949 article, during the mass-immigrationfrom Arab and Moslem countries,thejournalist Arye Gelblum wrote: This content