DOCSLIB.ORG

How to Clear up the Title on Your Real Estate PUBLICATION 8 How to Clear up the Title on Your Real Estate

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How to Clear up the Title on Your Real Estate PUBLICATION 8 How to Clear up the Title on Your Real Estate EDUCATION How to Clear up the Title on Your Real Estate PUBLICATION 8 How to Clear up the Title on Your Real Estate By Peter Squier establish title in the appropriate owner or owners’ Some people are under the false impression names. that they own the house in which they are This article will explore the situations that cause most living. However, once the property’s title title problems along with ways to clear them up. The is properly researched, the actual property author is not an attorney so this should not be owner is often found to be unclear. An considered professional legal advice. owner of a property has “title” to their Title problems can arise when: property, which means the property is • A person dies without a will; vested or “titled” in his or her name. This • A couple separates but never officially gets report identifies potential issues with divorced; property ownership and methods to resolve • A couple gets divorced and one spouse remains in the house; the title concerns. • An owner verbally tells another person he can have the house; here are official laws and regulations that must be • A person inherits a property and then gets Tfollowed to establish the true ownership of real married; property. A person intending to transfer property • A person receives an invalid deed; should follow these laws and regulations when • A transaction does not get recorded with the transferring ownership, or the intended new owner of county clerk; the property may face challenges and doubt as to his • A person has a quitclaim deed; or or her true ownership. When the title to a property is • A lis pendens has been filed on the property with unclear, an owner cannot properly sell the property, nor the county clerk. can he or she use it as collateral to secure a mortgage or loan. An owner must clear up any title problems before A Person Dies without a Will he or she can confidently exercise any ownership rights. Wills are designed to allow a deceased person to instruct Done properly, the “title curing” process will officially others how his or her property is to be distributed upon Your tax office may offer delinquent tax installment plans that may be less costly to you. You can request information about the availability of these plans from the tax office. R8-616 death. When someone dies, an executor carries out the has been approved by the court, they then have the instructions in the will, including the legal transfer of authority to take out a property tax loan on behalf real property. The result is the estate conveys a warranty of the estate, or deed to one or more people. This warranty deed is filed 3. If the probate process has not been started and four in the real property records of the county or counties years have not passed since the death, then most where the property is located thereby making the property tax lenders will accept two affidavits of transfer official and public. heirship indicating the real heirs, and then allow those heirs to take out the loan. An “affidavit of The most common title problem arises when a deceased heirship” is a document stating the family tree facts person does not leave a will (called “dying intestate”), so of the deceased which must be signed by two people there is no formal or recorded transfer of the deceased’s (with no current or future interest in the property) property to his or her heirs. To officially transfer the title who can attest to knowing the deceased and his or from the estate to the heirs, the estate must go through her heirs. the probate process in a probate court. There, the judge reviews all the facts and decides how the estate’s assets Once someone gets a loan on the inherited property, or are to be distributed. The judge then issues instructions provides affidavits of heirship, it does not mean that he enabling a deed to be created officially transferring or she now owns the property or has clear title. He or the property to the new owner(s). The final probate she will still need to have the estate properly probated instructions are filed in the probate court records, and through the probate court. the deed is filed with the appropriate county clerk. Some people handle the probate court proceedings A Couple Separates But Never Officially themselves, but most hire an estate planning, probate, Gets Divorced or real estate attorney. If both spouses owned the property as community property before separating, then they will continue to You must have clear title to your own it together after separating. The length of time they are separated does not matter. Until this couple property in order to get a property officially gets divorced and has a divorce decree that addresses the distribution of the property, they will tax loan. continue to jointly own the property. All property in Texas is characterized as community or Consider this situation: A married man, who owned separate property. In a nutshell, anything owned before the community property jointly with his wife, left his marriage is considered separate property and anything wife and moved to Mexico 5 years ago. The wife, who after marriage is community. However, property can remained in the house, had totally lost track of the be converted from one type of property to the other. husband and had no desire to see or talk to him again. If a person dies without a will or it has been four years Even in this instance, the husband still owns 50% of the since the person has passed and the will was never house in which she lives. So, she could not take out a probated, then the property will pass by intestacy property tax loan or sell the house without his consent. rules. Intestate succession in Texas follows a specific lineage chart which takes into consideration the type A Couple Gets Divorced, and One Spouse of property (community or separate) and the type of heirs that survive the decedent. A good article that Stays in the House Divorces result in a divorce court issuing a divorce explains the Texas intestacy laws, entitled “Issues with decree, which spells out the distribution of the couple’s Inheritance – Who Gets the House?” can be found at assets and liabilities. The divorce decree officially www.PropertyTaxLoansForTexas.com/property-tax- establishes who will own any property after the divorce. resources/. Divorce decrees vary tremendously and can say anything Those with delinquent property taxes wishing to get a the parties agree to. One spouse may get to live in the property tax loan have a few choices: house, though both spouses retain 50/50 ownership. 1. If the estate has been probated, then the new owners Or, one spouse may get the house with stipulations - he can collectively take out the loan with each heir will have to sell it within X number of years, and then signing the loan documents, give half of the money to the other spouse. In another 2. If the estate is in the probate process and an executor situation, the divorce decree might grant the property to the minor child and not the mother. In this case, the an address, but with the official legal description that mother has custodial rights over the child and would be normally includes the county name, the subdivision, able to live in the house and sign on the child’s behalf. the plat page, and the block and lot number. Deeds that But, the mother would not be able to keep any of the have a missing or incorrect legal description or that money if she sold the house because that money could have the wrong owner name listed are considered not only go to the child. valid. Deeds that are not notarized by a notary public are also considered invalid. If both parties desire to A good divorce attorney will have warranty deeds and fix a previously filed invalid deed, they can simply file a assumption agreements for the mortgage as part of the corrected deed with the county clerk’s office. divorce documents that need to be signed, and he or she will file these documents with the county clerk to make The Deed is Not Recorded the real estate transfers public information. If these If the Deed is not recorded at the county clerk’s office, documents are not provided, a divorce decree clearly then there is no way for anyone to know about the awarding and divesting title can be filed at the county change in ownership. Consider the possibility that an clerk instead. But one or the other should be filed with aunt signs a deed transferring the property to her niece. the county clerk; otherwise there is no way for the The niece, not knowing any better, just sticks the deed public to know ownership has changed. Filing at the into her closet and never files it. Now there is no public county clerk is not required for ownership to change, evidence of the transfer of ownership. The fact the deed but then the divorce decree will have to be produced was not filed does not invalidate the sale, but it may any time title needs to be confirmed. mean she cannot secure a title policy, a property tax loan, or a mortgage until the niece can present the deed An Owner Verbally Tells Another Person to prove her ownership. Many of the counties now have He Can Have the House their county clerk records available online.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Doctrines of Waste in a Landscape of Waste
    Missouri Law Review Volume 72 Issue 4 Fall 2007 Article 8 Fall 2007 Doctrines of Waste in a Landscape of Waste John A. Lovett Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation John A. Lovett, Doctrines of Waste in a Landscape of Waste, 72 MO. L. REV. (2007) Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol72/iss4/8 This Conference is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Missouri Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lovett: Lovett: Doctrines of Waste Doctrines of Waste in a Landscape of Waste John A. Lovett* I. INTRODUCTION One of the virtues of William Stoebuck and Dale Whitman's seminal hornbook, The Law of Property, is its extensive treatment of the subject of waste. ' Using half of a chapter, Stoebuck and Whitman introduce their read- ers to one of the great subjects of the common law of property, one that at- 2 3 4 tracted the attention of Coke, Blackstone, Kent, and many others. Their detailed analysis of the subject, which provides a general historical overview, a discussion of the seminal voluntary waste cases, Melms v. Pabst Brewing Co.,5 and Brokaw v. Fairchild,6 and a presentation of the legal and equitable remedies for waste, may strike some readers as old-fashioned. Although one recent law review article has called attention to several early nineteenth century waste cases, 7 relatively little contemporary academic scholarship has addressed waste doctrine in depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Bundle of S Cks—Real Property Rights and Title Insurance Coverage
    Bundle of Scks—Real Property Rights and Title Insurance Coverage Marc Israel, Esq. What Does Title Insurance “Insure”? • Title is Vested in Named Insured • Title is Free of Liens and Encumbrances • Title is Marketable • Full Legal Use and Access to Property Real Property Defined All land, structures, fixtures, anything growing on the land, and all interests in the property, which may include the right to future ownership (remainder), right to occupy for a period of +me (tenancy or life estate), the right to build up (airspace) and drill down (minerals), the right to get the property back (reversion), or an easement across another's property.” Bundle of Scks—Start with Fee Simple Absolute • Fee Simple Absolute • The Greatest Possible Rights Insured by ALTA 2006 Policy • “The greatest possible estate in land, wherein the owner has the right to use it, exclusively possess it, improve it, dispose of it by deed or will, and take its fruits.” Fee Simple—Lots of Rights • Includes Right to: • Occupy (ALTA 2006) • Use (ALTA 2006) • Lease (Schedule B-Rights of Tenants) • Mortgage (Schedule B-Mortgage) • Subdivide (Subject to Zoning—Insurable in Certain States) • Create a Covenant Running with the Land (Schedule B) • Dispose Life Estate S+ck • Life Estate to Person to Occupy for His Life+me • Life Estate can be Conveyed but Only for the Original Grantee’s Lifeme • Remainderman—Defined in Deed • Right of Reversion—Defined in Deed S+cks Above, On and Below the Ground • Subsurface Rights • Drilling, Removing Minerals • Grazing Rights • Air Rights (Not Development Rights—TDRs) • Canlever Over a Property • Subject to FAA Rules NYC Air Rights –Actually Development Rights • Development Rights are not Real Property • Purely Statutory Rights • Transferrable Development Rights (TDRs) Under the NYC Zoning Resoluon and Department of Buildings Rules • Not Insurable as They are Not Real Property Title Insurance on NYC “Air Rights” • Easement is an Insurable Real Property Interest • Easement for Light and Air Gives the Owner of the Merged Lots Ability to Insure.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Ways to Hold Title
    Common Ways to Hold Title HOW YOU TAKE TITLE - ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS: Title to real property may be held by individuals, either in Sole Ownership or in Co-Ownership. Co-Ownership of real property occurs when title is held by two or more persons. There are several variations as to how title may be held in each type of ownership. The following brief summaries reference seven of the more common examples of Sole Ownership and Co-Ownership. SOLE OWNERSHIP A man or woman who is not married. Example: John Doe, a single man. An Unmarried Man/Woman: A man or woman, who having been married, is legally divorced. Example: John Doe, an unmarried man. A Married Man/Woman, as His/Her Sole and Separate Property: When a married man or woman wishes to acquire title as their sole and separate property, the spouse must consent and relinquish all right, title and interest in the property by deed or other written agreement. Example: John Doe, a married man, as his sole and separate property. CO-OWNERSHIP Community Property: Property acquired by husband and wife, or either during marriage, other than by gift, bequest, devise, descent or as the separate property of either is presumed community property. Example: John Doe and Mary Doe, husband and wife, as community property. Example: John Doe and Mary Doe, husband and wife. Example: John Doe, a married man Joint Tenancy: Joint and equal interests in land owned by two or more individuals created under a single instrument with right of survivorship. Example: John Doe and Mary Doe, husband and wife, as joint tenants.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Ways of Holding Title to Real Property
    NORTH AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY Common Ways of Holding Title to Real Property Tenancy in Common Joint Tenancy Parties Any number of persons. Any number of persons. (Can be husband and wife) (Can be husband and wife) Division Ownership can be divided into any number of Ownership interests cannot be divided. interests, equal or unequal. Title Each co-owner has a separate legal title to his There is only one title to the entire property. undivided interest. Possession Equal right of possession. Equal right of possession. Conveyance Each co-owner’s interest may be conveyed Conveyance by one co-owner without the separately by its owner. others breaks the joint tenancy. Purchaser’s Status Purchaser becomes a tenant in common with Purchaser becomes a tenant in common with other co-owners. other co-owners. Death On co-owner’s death, his interest passes by On co-owner’s death, his interest ends and will or intestate succession to his devisees or cannot be willed. Surviving joint tenants heirs. No survivorship right. own the property by survivorship. Successor’s Status Devisees or heirs become tenants in common. Last survivor owns property in severalty. Creditor’s Rights Co-owner’s interest may be sold on execution Co-owner’s interest may be sold on execu- sale to satisfy his creditor. Creditor becomes a tion sale to satisfy creditor. Joint tenancy is tenant in common. broken, creditor becomes tenant in common. Presumption Favored in doubtful cases. None. Must be expressly declared. This is provided for informational puposes only. Specific questions for actual real property transactions should be directed to your attorney or C.P.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dual-System of Water Rights in Nebraska George Rozmarin University of Nebraska College of Law
    Nebraska Law Review Volume 48 | Issue 2 Article 6 1968 The Dual-System of Water Rights in Nebraska George Rozmarin University of Nebraska College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr Recommended Citation George Rozmarin, The Dual-System of Water Rights in Nebraska, 48 Neb. L. Rev. 488 (1969) Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol48/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law, College of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 488 NEBRASKA LAW REVIEW-VOL. 48, NO. 2 (1969) Co'mment THE DUAL-SYSTEM OF WATER RIGHTS IN NEBRASKA I. INTRODUCTION In Nebraska, rights to waters in streams and lakes have been regulated through a dual-system which utilizes both the riparian doctrine of the common law and the statutory scheme of appropri- ative rights. Although the two doctrines are divergent in many instances, the judiciary has recognized this and attempted to main- tain a balance between them. Despite these efforts, however, inconsistent principles of law developed over the years until finally in Wasserburgerv. Coffee1 the Nebraska Supreme Court attempted to reconcile the relative status of riparians and appropriators. In doing so the court prescribed a flexible method of equitable balance rather than a static formula of distribution. This article will give a brief introduction to some of the problems faced in distributing water rights under this dual-system, and will attempt to determine what effect Wasserburger may have on these rights that are so intimately linked with the prosperity of the state and Eill of its citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • BASICS of WILL DRAFTING the Importance of Having a Will a Will
    BASICS OF WILL DRAFTING PATRICIA J. SHEVY, ESQ. THE SHEVY LAW FIRM LLC [email protected] The Importance of Having a Will A Will sets forth a person’s directions with respect to the direction of his or her assets after death. Without a properly executed Will, the laws of intestacy will apply to the distribution of a person’s assets. Many clients assume that the laws of intestacy will suffice. However, what happens in the following example: Husband and Wife have 3 minor children. Husband has $700,000 in assets. Wife has $1,000 in assets. The house is owned jointly by Husband and Wife. Husband dies. Wife keeps the house as surviving joint tenant. The remaining $700,000 is divided between Wife and children according to the laws of intestacy (Wife receives $50,000 plus ½ of the remaining $650,000; the 3 children split the remaining $325,000). But remember the children are minors, so the court will be involved until the youngest child reaches majority. This is probably not the outcome Husband and Wife had in mind. Problems with Intestate Succession When a New York State resident dies leaving no Will, the assets of the decedent will be distributed under New York Estates, Powers and Trusts Law (“EPTL”) Article 4, which lists the order and amount that family members will take from the estate of the decedent. In cases where a person dies intestate, EPTL §4-1.1 provides that a decedent’s assets will be distributed as follows: . If survived by a surviving spouse and children, the spouse receives $50,000 and ½ of the balance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Law of Prior Appropriation: Possible Lessons for Hawaii
    Volume 25 Issue 4 Symposium on International Resources Law Fall 1985 The Law of Prior Appropriation: Possible Lessons for Hawaii Stephen F. Williams Recommended Citation Stephen F. Williams, The Law of Prior Appropriation: Possible Lessons for Hawaii, 25 Nat. Resources J. 911 (1985). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol25/iss4/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS* The Law of Prior Appropriation: Possible Lessons for Hawaii- INTRODUCTION Hawaiian water law has been in turmoil for nearly thirteen years. On January 10, 1973, in McBryde Sugar Co. v. Robinson,' the Supreme Court of Hawaii overturned a long-established system of rights.2 Liti- gation testing the validity of McBryde has since wended its way through the federal and state courts. On February 20, 1985, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit effectively overturned McBryde.3 In the meantime, the Hawaiian legislature established an Advisory Study Commission on Water Resources ("Advisory Commission"). The Com- mission issued its report ("Commission Report") on January 14, 1985.' The stage is thus set for Hawaii now to resolve its water conflicts. Hawaii's key choice relates to transferability. Pre-McBryde law, like that of most prior appropriation states, permitted transfer of water rights as long as the transfer inflicted no injury on other water users.5 This *Professor of Law, University of Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • Reverse Mortage and Quitclaim Deeds
    Reverse Mortage And Quitclaim Deeds How durational is Iggy when sorrel and tiled Ollie titters some naturist? Acarid Herve wax his armies phonating hydrogenisingdevilishly. West classically, kalsomined haustellate his reindeers and equilibratedseriate. everywhen or honourably after Albert outfacing and If it enables communication in loan, while counselors are essentially convert equity still find your quitclaim deeds and reverse mortage as if appeals court for hecm into cash. Reverse mortgages are federally regulated so see the death amount bid't be more trouble the home is worth once the homeowner's heirs will vary be. Reverse Mortgage Counseling FAQs. His of her gang as security for each reverse charge and lenders gen- erally recover the. Quitclaim Deed Filed but My Ex Failed to Refinance the Home. In person case the grantor remains such for the poison even after ownership has transferred through the execution of a quitclaim deed Quitclaim deeds transfer. If relevant year 5 can involve siblings do honor quit the deed passing ownership to them and abroad take out a legal mortgage bill pay everyone their practice share of estate. FAQ 1st Reverse Mortgage USA. How Does particle Reverse exchange Work BiggerPockets Glossary. Can explore mother quitclaim deed her house to me with our reverse. Grant DeedQuit Claim will always removes or adds someone's interest in the property condition is mutual legal document used to transfer ownership of real flow and. Property and reverse mortage as some states and they do i just turn, correspondent sells a loss mitigation after his home and associate it simply continue living? The truth common examples are Documents that transfer their interest in Florida real environment such as deeds and Mortgages and written obligations to any money.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Interests
    Future Interests Interests in the Transferor • Reversion • Possibility of Reverter (NOT a possibility of reversion) • Right of Entry/Power of Termination Interests in the Transferee • Executory Interest • Vested Remainder • Contingent Remainder U N I V E R S I T Y of H O U S T O N Professor Marcilynn A. Burke Copyright©2007 Marcilynn A. Burke All rights reserved. Provided for student use only. D E Present and Future Interests F E Present Interest Future Interest A S Fee Simple Determinable Possibility of Reverter I B (transferor) L Fee Simple Subject to Executory Interest E Executory Limitation (transferee) E Fee Simple Subject to Right of Entry/Power of S Condition Subsequent Termination (transferor) T A T E S U N I V E R S I T Y of H O U S T O N Professor Marcilynn A. Burke Copyright©2007 Marcilynn A. Burke All rights reserved. Provided for student use only. 1 Vested Remainders • If given to an ascertained person AND • Not subject to a condition precedent (other than the natural termination of the preceding estate) • Precedent: (pri-seed-[c]nt) preceding in time or order; contingent upon some event occurring • Note: Not subject to the rule against perpetuities U N I V E R S I T Y of H O U S T O N Professor Marcilynn A. Burke Copyright©2007 Marcilynn A. Burke All rights reserved. Provided for student use only. Types of Vested Remainders 1. Indefeasibly vested remainders • Certain to become possessory in the future • Cannot be divested U N I V E R S I T Y of H O U S T O N Professor Marcilynn A.
    [Show full text]
  • Savoy and Regent Label Discography
    Discography of the Savoy/Regent and Associated Labels Savoy was formed in Newark New Jersey in 1942 by Herman Lubinsky and Fred Mendelsohn. Lubinsky acquired Mendelsohn’s interest in June 1949. Mendelsohn continued as producer for years afterward. Savoy recorded jazz, R&B, blues, gospel and classical. The head of sales was Hy Siegel. Production was by Ralph Bass, Ozzie Cadena, Leroy Kirkland, Lee Magid, Fred Mendelsohn, Teddy Reig and Gus Statiras. The subsidiary Regent was extablished in 1948. Regent recorded the same types of music that Savoy did but later in its operation it became Savoy’s budget label. The Gospel label was formed in Newark NJ in 1958 and recorded and released gospel music. The Sharp label was formed in Newark NJ in 1959 and released R&B and gospel music. The Dee Gee label was started in Detroit Michigan in 1951 by Dizzy Gillespie and Divid Usher. Dee Gee recorded jazz, R&B, and popular music. The label was acquired by Savoy records in the late 1950’s and moved to Newark NJ. The Signal label was formed in 1956 by Jules Colomby, Harold Goldberg and Don Schlitten in New York City. The label recorded jazz and was acquired by Savoy in the late 1950’s. There were no releases on Signal after being bought by Savoy. The Savoy and associated label discography was compiled using our record collections, Schwann Catalogs from 1949 to 1982, a Phono-Log from 1963. Some album numbers and all unissued album information is from “The Savoy Label Discography” by Michel Ruppli.
    [Show full text]
  • A Primer on Deeds in Texas
    A Primer on Deeds in Texas INTRODUCTION A deed is a written document that conveys legal title to real property. It is different from a promissory note or a real estate lien note, which is a promise to pay a sum of money to a lender; and a deed of trust, which provides a lender with remedies, including foreclosure, if a borrower defaults on a note. These three documents are the three principal documents in most Texas real estate transactions. There is no “standard form” for a deed. Texas does have, however, certain rules that apply if a deed is to be valid. For example, the intent to convey property must be clear from the wording; the property must be adequately described; and the deed must be signed and acknowledged by the grantor. This article addresses the deeds commonly used in Texas. RECORDING A DEED IS NOT A NECESSITY There is no requirement that a deed be recorded in the county clerk's real property records in order to be valid. The deed only needs to be executed and delivered to the grantee. At that time, the transfer is fully effective between grantor (seller) and grantee (buyer). Recording is simply used to give notice to the public of the transfer and, most importantly, establishes priority in the event a questionable seller gives more than one deed to the property. Recording makes it easier for title companies to research and insure the chain of title. Recording also informs the taxing authorities where they should send the ad valorem tax bill. PURCHASE PRICE NOT REQUIRED IN DEEDS In Texas, it is customary to recite that the consideration paid is “Ten dollars and other valuable consideration.” While recording gives the public notice that a transaction concerning the property took place, therefore, preserving the chain of title, it is believed that it is not the public´s business what the purchase price was.
    [Show full text]
  • Property—Future Interest—Partition by Remaindermen Allowed
    University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review Volume 4 Issue 3 Symposium on Developmental Article 8 Disabilities and the Law 1981 Property—Future Interest—Partition by Remaindermen Allowed Jo Carol Jones Gill Follow this and additional works at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview Part of the Property Law and Real Estate Commons Recommended Citation Jo Carol Jones Gill, Property—Future Interest—Partition by Remaindermen Allowed, 4 U. ARK. LITTLE ROCK L. REV. 543 (1981). Available at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview/vol4/iss3/8 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review by an authorized editor of Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTES PROPERTY-FUTURE INTERESTS-PARTITION BY REMAINDER- MEN ALLOWED. Henry v. Kennedy, 273 Ark. 383, 619 S.W.2d 632 (1981). J.C. Kennedy died owning 560 acres in Desha County, Arkan- sas. He devised a life estate to his widow with a remainder, in equal shares, to his nephews Wilburn Kennedy and Cecil Kennedy. Wil- burn Kennedy conveyed his undivided one-half remainder interest to E.R. Henry, Jr. and Sterling L. Henry. The Henrys petitioned for partition under the Arkansas partition statute,' as owners of one- half of the remainder interest, against Cecil Kennedy. Because the property was not susceptible to partition in kind, the chancery court ordered a sale of the property, subject to the widow's life estate. On appeal, the Arkansas Court of Appeals reversed, holding that re- maindermen have no right to bring a partition action against other remaindermen when they have no present possessory interest in the property.2 On certiorari, the Arkansas Supreme Court reversed, holding that citizens of Arkansas who have a remainder interest in property may compel partition of their future interests regardless of whether they have any present possessory interest.
    [Show full text]